The Geopolitics of Cybersecurity

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/25/2019 The Geopolitics of Cybersecurity

    1/2

    20/9/2014 The geopolitics of cybersecurity

    http://blog.foreignpol icy.com/posts/2011/01/12/the_geopol itics_of_cybersecur ity?wp_login_redirect=0

    BY

    The geopolitics of cybersecurityIAN BREMMER

    By Ian Bremmer and David Gordon

    Individual hackers and organized crime organizations have targeted businesses

    or years, but cyberattacks have rarely created political risk. They do now. The

    centralization of data networks -- both in energy distribution (the move to the

    smart grid) and information technology more broadly (the shift to cloud

    computing) -- is increasing the vulnerability of states to potentially debilitatingcyberattacks. As governments become more directly and actively involved in

    cyberspace, geopolitics and cybersecurity will collide in three major ways.

    First, new cyber capacity allows governments to project power in a world where

    direct military strikes are much more costly and dangerous. There have been

    lenty of stories about well-funded efforts from inside China to manipulate access

    to the Internet, but it's the almost-certainly state-sponsored Stuxnet attacks on

    Iran's industrial infrastructure that provide the clearest early glimpse of what

    tomorrow's carefully targeted state-sponsored attack might look like. When a

    issile is launched, everyone knows where it came from. Cyberattacks are a very

    different story.

    Second, we'll see more cyber conflicts between state-owned companies and

    ultinational corporations, providing state capitalists with tools that give them a

    competitive commercial advantage. China and Chinese companies are by far the

    biggest concern here. Throw in Beijing's indigenous innovation plans, which are

    http://redtape.msnbc.com/2010/11/china-web-hijacking-shows-net-at-risk.htmlhttp://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/01/12/the_geopolitics_of_cybersecurityhttp://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/01/12/the_geopolitics_of_cybersecurityhttp://redtape.msnbc.com/2010/11/china-web-hijacking-shows-net-at-risk.htmlhttp://www.economist.com/node/17147862?story_id=17147862http://www.foreignpolicy.com/profiles/Ian-Bremmerhttp://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/01/12/the_geopolitics_of_cybersecurity
  • 7/25/2019 The Geopolitics of Cybersecurity

    2/2

    20/9/2014 The geopolitics of cybersecurity

    http://blog.foreignpol icy.com/posts/2011/01/12/the_geopol itics_of_cybersecur ity?wp_login_redirect=0

    designed to ensure that China develops its own advanced technology, and this is

    robably the world's most important source of direct conflict between states and

    corporations.

    hird, there is the increasing fallout from the WikiLeaks problem, as those

    sympathetic to Julian Assange unleash attacks on governments and the

    corporations that support them in targeting WikiLeaks and its founder. In fact, the

    rincipal cybersecurity concern of governments has shifted from potential attacks

    by al Qaeda or Chinese security forces to radicalized info -- anarchists undertaking

    a debilitating attack against critical infrastructure, a key government agency, or a

    illar of the financial system. Whether attacks are waged for power (state versus

    state), profit (particularly among state capitalists), or for 'the people,' (as in the

    ikiLeaks case), this will be a wildcard to watch in 2011.

    On Friday, we'll talk about Top Risk no. 4: China -- and why its policymakers will

    rustrate much of the international community this year.

    Ian Bremmer is president of Eurasia Group. David Gordon is the firm's head of

    esearch.

    IM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images

    http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/its-time-to-get-serious-about-cyber-attack-risk-20101228-1998p.html