The Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 The Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages

    1/13

  • 8/11/2019 The Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages

    2/13

    Though in the early days this commerce was run from various bases (like Walcheren/Domburg, theHandelsterpen and so on), it tended to become concentrated on Dorestad(which reached its maximum growth in the period 770 to 830), with Frisian merchantsacting as the main exporters of Rhenish agricultural and craft products towards easternEngland and Jutland. Beyond this area rather strictly limited, in fact, to the southern partof the North Sea, they had a more episodic presence in the English Channel (particularlyat Hamwih and in the Seine valley up to the Saint-Denis fairs), and in the Baltic, notablyalong the seaway between Haithabu and Lake Mlaren.

    What strikes me most is the permanence of the network of searoutes leaving Frisia, andthe correlative importance of certain trading colonies in foreign lands. One can hardly failto be impressed by the number of exchanges linking Rhenish Frisia and Northumberland,for example, exchanges echoed in the hagiographical literature - especially in the Vita

    Liudgeri8- as well as in the poems and letters of Alcuin. It is symptomatic that the latter,writing around 800, can think of no other natural trading link between the region ofAachen, where he was then living, and the distant city of York, where he came from, than

    the naves Fresonum.9Archaeology and numismatics have recently brought forward newevidence of these links: Peter Addyman claims to have identified a Frisian quarter in theNorthumbrian town,10and Michael Dolley has been able to reconstruct a hoard of coinsfrom Dorestad discovered along the Ouse River during the eighteenth century,11Nor is apossible confirmation from the study of runes to be excluded, for there appear to havebeen simultaneous and identical modifications in the Northumbrian and the Frisianalphabets at the end of the eighth century,12changes which one is inclined to attributemore to the influence of the trading milieu than to 'the milieu of missionaries.

    As far as the longer-range trading activities of the Frisians are concerned, I note that thepresence ofthe Frisian traders at Saint-Denis is cited only once (in 753), in company withthe Anglo-Saxons who are cited more often, and since well before that date.13This leads

    me to wonder whether Hamwih did not serve as the stepping-stone which led them,thanks to a well-known shipping route hitherto much used by the Anglo-Saxons,14 toextend their activities to the lower Seine valley. On the other hand, I maintain that onemust not underestimate, let alone deny, as did Aksel Christensen, the Frisian presence inthe Baltic. First ofall, it is now practically certain, thanks to the excavations ofHerbertJankuhn and Heiko Steuer,15 that the Frisians took part in founding the southernsettlement at Haithabu - that is to say the first permanent trading settlement on the Balticshore of the isthmus of Jutland; and that they were thus among the first (mid-eighthcentury) to grasp the economic value ofthe portage which, linking the upper valley of theTreene to the Schlei Fjord, eliminated the long circumnavigation ofthe Danish peninsula.Would the Frisians have taken an interest in opening this window on the Baltic if theywere not motivated by a desire to send their ships farther out among the lands washed by

    this sea? I think not. And one cannot avoid associating with the founding of this firsttrading link the importation first at Helg (in the second half ofthe eighth century) then atBirka (in the first half ofthe ninth) ofan impressive number ofproducts which originatedfromthe Rhineland or frommore distant parts ofthe West.16

    8. Lebecq 1983b, p. 109; Lebecq 1990b.9. Lebecq 1983b, p. 23.10. Addyman 1976, p. 29.11. Dolley 1965-1966.12. Elliott 1980, p. 37-38.13. Lebecq 1983b, p. 400-405.14. Lebecq 1983b, p. 90; Hodges 1981.

    15. Jankuhn 1986; Steuer 1974.16. Holmqvist 1961- 1972; Lundstrom 1968; Arbman 1937; Ellmers 1985; Mller-Wille 1985.

  • 8/11/2019 The Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages

    3/13

    It is also quite symptomatic that if Christensen quotes from the Vita Anskarii thecomplaint ofthe old man fromBirka, evidently a Swede, who toward the middle of theninth century deplores that his people can no longer reach Dorestad,17he omits mentio-ning the story of the old Christian woman of Birka, whose name, Frideburg, has nothingSwedish about it, and who requested her daughter Catla to make the journey to Dorestadafter her death in order to distribute her fortune among the churches and the poor.18I amconvinced that an act of redemptive charity of this sort could only have come from aFrisian woman living in Birka, - and that there must have been a Frisian colony on thedistant shores of Lake Mlaren.So I think that the scope of Frisian trading ventures should not be underestimated, andthat the concept of 'trader-farmers', which has been invoked by authors as scrupulous asEdith Ennen, Jan Dhondt or, more recently, Richard Hodges,19is too ambiguous.

    17. For the Vita Anskarii, see Lebecq 1983b, p. 134-135. Christensen 1966 and 1969.

    18. Lebecq 1983b p. 131-133; Lebecq I 990a.19. Ennen 1975, p. 47; Dhondt 1968, p. 165; Hodges 1982, p. 88.

    Fig. 1. Great Frisia during the Dark ages

  • 8/11/2019 The Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages

    4/13

  • 8/11/2019 The Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages

    5/13

    Frisians, indicate that the Lek and Waal valleys were Frisian as far as and includingTeisterbant (or, if one prefers, the Tiel region) since theAnnales Fuldenses still refer in885 to these 'Frisiones qui vocantur Destarbenzon' - of these 'Frisians said to be ofTeisterbant'.27

    This is as much as saying that Dorestad, situated at the point where the Lek and the Rhine

    diverge and the undoubted largescale trading centre at the heyday of Frisian commerce,was in Frisia (the Cosmographer of Ravenna clearly makes it at the end of the seventhcentury the 'patria Frisonum'),28and that its inhabitants were unanimously considered tobe 'Frisians' (in theAnnales Fuldenses in 837 as well as in the so-calledAnnales ofSaint-Bertin in 863).29 Nonetheless the famous emporium is presented by these sameauthors as a specific place in regard to the rest of Frisia. The so-called Annalist of Saint-Bertin describes, for example, how in 836 the Normans devastated both Dorestad andFrisia; more especially, when relating the proposed partition of 839, he clearly distin-guishes within Lothair's part the' ducatum Fresiae usque Mosam' and the 'comitatumTestrabenti cum Dorestado'.30It appears from this that, if Dorestad at its height unquestio-

    27. Lebecq 1983b, p. 324.28. Lebecq 1983b, p. 206-208.

    29. Lebecq 1983b, p. 318-319 and 313-314.30. Lebecq 1983b, p. 310.

    Fig. 2 Frisian trade routes during the 7th-9th centuries.1. Great routes. 2. Secondary routes. 3. Places where the presence of Frisian traders is eithertestified or can safely be presumed.

  • 8/11/2019 The Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages

    6/13

    nably belonged to Frisia, it was perceived as relatively marginal, or in any case asspecific, since it was expressly named in the proposed partition alongside much vasterterritorial holdings.

    Dorestad's specificity can be attributed to two kinds of reasons. In the first place - and it isin this regard that the special dispositions concerning it in the proposed division of theEmpire and consequently of its wealth appear particularly significant -, the town had anenormous importance in the eyes of contemporaries, which made it a real stake in thepower struggles. Around 790/ 800 Luidgar, recounting the life of Gregory of Utrecht,presents it as the' vicus famosus',31and in 834 the so-called Annalist of Xanten refers tothe' vicus nominatissimus'. 32This emphasis was soon to reach its highest point whenRimbert came to speak of the town's 'many churches',33and when a tradition took shapewhich would carry their number as high as fifty-five!34

    From all appearances, contemporaries were struck by the topographic and economicimportance of the site. This ought not to surprise us because, since 779 at the latest,Dorestad harboured one of the principal customs stations of the Carolingian empire, the

    northernmost at any rate,35where merchants from the North had to pay to theprocura-tores or ministeriales a 10% levy on all of their cargo.36Dorestad was likewise the homeof the most prolific Carolingian mint after that of the Palace; issues struck there havebeen found from York to Haithabu,37and these types were imitated often enough, as theywere at Haithabu from 825 on, thus furnishing Scandinavia with its first monetary instru-ments.38

    This evocation of the Carolingian presence at Dorestad leads me to speak of the secondfact which could explain why the settlement appeared to be special in the eyes ofcontemporaries: I mean its ethnic character. If the whole southwest of Frisia, fromZeeland up to Teisterbant - what Bede calls 'Fresia Citerior'39had been for centuries azone of contact between Franks and Frisians, and even if the former had launched amilitary colonization since the end of the seventh century the better to control the latter, 40

    it is certainly at Dorestad that we perceive most clearly the rapprochement of the twopeoples. This is particularly true of our central concern here, the merchant population ofthe town. If it was in fact the merchants globally considered as 'Frisians' who fleddefinitively from the town in 863, according to the Annalist of Saint-Bertin,41it seemsthat these merchants might individually come from a Frankish or from an authenticallyFrisian background.I shall quote two pieces of evidence: first, the only merchant from Dorestad whose namehas been preserved, the 'black Hrotberet' with whom Alcuin may have voyaged fromYork, and who in any case refused to welcome him under his roof in 780, bears anindisputably Frankish name.42Secondly, even if it seems sure that the terpen area was thestartpoint of the first merchant expansion of the Frisians towards Scandinavia, at the sametime as the ethnic migration towards 'Northern Frisia' Dorestad had just as certainly

    become by the time of Ansgar (first half of the ninth century) the main point of departureto Haithabu and Birka.43How can one avoid concluding from these two facts that thetrading population to whom the vicus owed its fame derived just as much from the

    31. Lebecq 1983b, p. 99.32. Lebecq 1983b, p. 335.33. Lebecq 1983b, p. 132; and Lebecq 1990a.34. In the Passio Friderici written by Odbert in the beginning of the eleventh century: see Lebecq 1983b, p. 117.35. Lebecq 1983b, pA19: or Atsma and Vezin 1986, p. 38-41. See Verkerk 1988, p. 166.36. Lebecq 1983b, p. 411-413; Verkerk 1988, p. 167.37. Enno van Gelder 1961; Morrison and Grunthal 1967, p. 90-91,126-128,160-162; Lebecq 1983a, p. 60-66.38. Malmer 1966, p. 60-63 and 204-209.39. Lebecq 1983b, p. 234.40. Blok 1979.41. Lebecq 1983b, p. 313-314.

    42. Lebecq 1983b, p. 21.43. Lebecq 1983b, p. 132-135; Lebecq 1989; Lebecq 1990a.

  • 8/11/2019 The Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages

    7/13

    Frankish countries south and southwest (one thinks naturally of the lower Rhine andMeuse valleys) as from the distant Frisia of the terpen to the North?

    Before we ask whether the Pippinids had set about deliberately - and successfully -attracting to Dorestad the commercial dynamism of the North and settle it there byassociating with it the force of Austrasia, we must acknowledge that the Carolingian Statewas the main beneficiary of the success of Frisian commerce - at least during the periodof its greatest activity. The most obvious gain was certainly economic. The State was thefirst to benefit, which is as much as to say the Carolingian family. The revenues resultingfrom coinage, and especially those, which are much easier to perceive, deriving fromcustoms duties must have been considerable. To be sure, out of concern for the salvationof their souls, the Pippinids had abandoned (at the latest from the time of Pippin Ill, moreplausibly since the day of Pippin II, in 695) one tenth of their revenues to the church ofUtrecht, which thus acquired the ripaticum along the bank of the Lek;44to be sure, for thesame reasons, this or that ecclesiastical establishment might be dispensed from payingcustoms fees - as was the case with the monks of Saint-Germain-des-Pres in 779.45

    But it is significant that one of the rare tolls that Louis the Pious continued to collect from

    the merchants supplying his palace in 828 was precisely the one perceived at Dorestad.46

    Beside the State, the whole of Carolingian society drew profit from the commercialdynamism of the Frisians. The success of the latter in obtaining and then in defending forso long their positions in the distant marketplaces of Northern Europe, stimulated theeconomic growth of their own hinterland. This was particularly true of the Rhineland: theFrisians guaranteed the distribution of the products of the many glassware-, pottery- andmetallurgy-workshops of the Cologne basin and the Eifel country. The Austrasianaristocracy, the principal social basis of Carolingian power, must have derived enormousbenefits from Frisian trading. It was without doubt the principal consumer of the luxurygoods imported from the British Islands, from Scandinavia and from the far-distantOriental hinterland; more particularly, it also supplied the Frisians with their return

    freight: the considerable surpluses of their estates in grains and wine.47Nor is it to beexcluded that the existence of these distant markets prospected and then serviced by theFrisians was directly connected with the undeniable growth of agriculture, and perhapsmore precisely viticulture, experienced in the Rhenish regions during the 'CarolingianPeace', between 750 and 830.48

    But this peace, as we know, was only relative, and the Carolingians had several chancesto feel the threats that were brewing to the East and especially to the North before thestorm really broke. This enables us to devine the political advantages that the Frisiancontrol of the Northern seaways and of certain river-systems in central Europe put in thehands of the Frankish rulers. Nor did they fail to use them: in the first place in the field ofmilitary techniques, by requisitioning Frisian boats and men. Charlemagne did so twice:once in 789, on the Elbe and the Havel, against the Wilzes; and later in 791 on the Rhine,

    the Main and the Danube, against the Avars.49

    Furthermore, they used Frisian traders asambassadors to distant lands reputed to be hostile: this was probably the case in 809during a period of tension between Charlemagne and the Danish King Godfred.50At theleast, they carried useful information.51From this point of view we can hardly imaginethat Charlemagne, and even more Louis the Pious did not grasp the opportunity that the

    44. According to the diplomas given in 777 and 815 to the church of Utrecht. Lebecq 1983b, p. 409-412.45. See above, n. 35.46. ccording to the Praeceptum Negotiatorum. Lebecq 1983b, p. 437.47. Cf. a famous poem by Ermoldus Nigellus: Lebecq 1983 b, p. 26-30. See Devroey 1985.48. Lebecq 1983a; Devroey 1985.49. According to the Annales Regni Francorum and the Annales Laureshamenses: Lebecq 1983b, p. 295 et

    301-302.50. According to an interpretation of the Annales Mettenses Lebecq 1983b, p. 330-331.

    51. Just as, at the end of the IXth century, Alfred was to use the information given to him by the merchantsOhthere and Wulfstan: Lebecq 1987.

  • 8/11/2019 The Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages

    8/13

  • 8/11/2019 The Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages

    9/13

    which does not seem to have played an important role during the Roman and earlyMerovingian period. The site was Dorestad, whose name appears for the first time oncoins struck by Frankish minters who came from Maastricht 58According to a well-established tradition, 630 was the time when Dagobert established positions in the lowerRhine valley, created a church in Utrecht, and as numismatists have recently discovered -enabled the minters Rimoaldus and Madelinus to transfer their mints from Maastricht toDorestad.

    The Frankish seizure of the lower Rhine valley in the second quarter of the seventhcentury had a number of different implications: no doubt the ambitious desire to recoverthe old Roman frontier along the Rhine, with its numerous forts (notably that one ofLevefanum, close by Dorestad)59was part of it; maybe the spirit of religious proselytismplayed a role; in any case it meant a desire, from the part of the Franks, to attract aprofitable commerce into their orbit, by making of Dorestad the necessary 'relaismonetaire' - to adopt Jean Lafaurie's phrase - between Gaul and the northern lands.60

    But, lacking the means and the perspectives, the Merovingians failed to capture that

    commerce: it was a Frisia which had entirely reconquered its independence that gaveunmistakable signs of mercantile expansion during the second half of the seventh century.These range from the first explicit mention, by Venerable Bede, of a Frisian merchant in aforeign marketplace (London, 679)61to the prodigious production in Frisian workshops ofthose small silver coins which one should rather call 'proto-deniers' or 'proto-pennies'than' sceattas', which were struck, circulated, imitated and discovered everywhere aroundthe North Sea.62But the most telling sign is without a doubt the renewed vigour ofDorestad itself. For, the evidence leaves no room for doubt, the new port and the newsettlement created to the east of the earlier dwelling area, built up along the Rhine whichhad itself shifted notably to the east, preceded by two decades the victorious return of theFranks, under Pippin II, to Dorestad. The combined testimony of archaeology and ofdendrochronology agree that the renewal of the port of Dorestad dates to around 675,

    particularly the first phase of construction of the remarkable river front reconstructed byW.A. van Es and W.J.H. Verwers consisting of a continuous wharf backed by buildingswith quarters for the traders.63These installations were in use fifteen years before strugglebegan again in the vicinity of Dorestad, twenty years before Pippin's definitive victoryover the Frisian King Radbod, and forty years before the Franks gained firm anddefinitive control over 'Citerior Fresia' thanks to the decisive victory of Charles Martel.64

    It seems then that if the Franks under Dagobert were the first to develop Dorestad, hopingto use it to draw some part of Frisian commerce closer to their own power-centers, it wasthe Frisians themselves, having regained independence, who most fully exploited thenatural advantages of this site strategically located in the delta, making it the focal pointof their trading ventures. It may have been from here that Bede's Frisian set out for

    London; no doubt Wilfrid disembarked here from the merchant vessel before spendingthe winter of 678/679 in Frisia;65certainly many of the so-called 'sceattas' were struckhere. At the same time the settlement became the focus of Frisian military power. ThusDorestad, which in the seventh century written sources is called only a castrum 66(surelyreferring to the ancient Levefanum of the Table of Peutinger),67 or as the 'patria

    58. Zadoks-Josephus-Jitta 1961, p. 8-10; Lafaurie 1967.59. Blok 1979; Lebecq 1978.60. Lafaurie 1967, p. 198.61. Lebecq 1983b, p. 232.62. Dolley 1976, p. 352; Zadoks-Josephus-Jitta 1961, p. 10; Hill and Metcalf 1984.63. Van Es and Verwers, in Dorestad 1978; or Van Es and Verwers 1980, vol. I, p. 294-303.64. Blok 1979; Lebecq 1978.65. Though the Eddius Stephanus 'Vita Wilfridi' is not so precise, I agree with Hodges 1982, p. 88 and 90, that

    Wilfrid landed in Dorestad in 678.

    66. [text note 66 missing in original]67. Van Es 1980, p. 181; Verhulst, in Verhulst and DeBock-Doehaerd 1981, p. 204.

  • 8/11/2019 The Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages

    10/13

    Frisonum' (this is the expression, as we have seen, of the distant Ravenna Cosmographer)68became the principal stake in the wars of 690/695.

    Only after the area had fallen definitively under Frankish control was the term castrumreplaced by the use, which became rapidly systematic, of the terms portus (firstappearance in 779),69vicus (from about 790/800),70and emporium (used from 834).71

    It was also under their authority that the major work of building the port complex wasaccomplished: phase 2/A of the Archaeologists, dated between 700/725 and 750/775.72

    Under Frankish power the mercantile dynamism of the Frisians from the North and theFranks from the South were made to converge in this single, favoured site. Similarly, onecentury later (808), the Danish King Godfred would attract to the new settlement ofHaithabu Danish, Slavic and Saxon merchants as well as Frisians.73Under the Frankishdominium, finally, Dorestad became the obligatory point of concentration for trafficcoming from or bound for the Rhineland, eastern England or the Scandinavian market-places, reducing the other ports - whether within greater Frisia or on its frontiers - to mererelay-stations.

    In summary, it seems that the mercantile potential of the area, perceptible and to someextent developed during the days of independence, was expanded and above allconfirmed and made highly profitable by the integration of Frisia into the regnumFrancorum. It thus benefited from a prosperous and soon pacified hinterland, which wasinterested, moreover, in the development of distant markets; a major gain was the morerational organization of the site of Dorestad, where unprecedented structures were built.The 'large-scale long-distance Frisian trading' of the Early Middle Ages, which succeededin turning the North Sea and sometimes some of its annexes (the Rhineland to be sure,but the Baltic and the English Channel as well) into a unified commercial space in theeighth and ninth centuries, seems to have resulted from the encounter of Frisiandynamism and technical skills (principally nautical) on the one hand, and the ambition ofthe early Carolingians, who succeeded in pacifying the Frisian hinterland and stimulating

    its growth, on the other. Furthermore, at the same time, the Frankish power sought, bywhat was to start with a diffuse form of imperialism mixed with a certain concern formissionary work, to penetrate the foreign and threatening Northern realms. In fact, the'great Frisian trade' was in its heyday, but only then, the 'Frankish/Frisian trade ofDorestad'.

    68. Lebecq 1983 b, p. 206-208.69. In a diploma to Saint-Germain-des-Pres: Atsma and Vezin 1986, p.38-41.70. According to Luidgar Vita Gregorii: Lebecq 1983b, p. 99.71. In the so-called Anna1es Bertiniani: Lebecq 1983 b, p. 307.72. Van Es and Verwers 1980, vol. I, p. 303.

    73. According to the Annales Regni Francorum: Lebecq 1983 b, p. 303-304; and the excavations of the mainsettlement: Jankuhn 1986.

  • 8/11/2019 The Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages

    11/13

    Bibliography

    ADDYMAN, P.V., 1976.Excavations in York 1973-1974. Second interim Report. (Edited by theYork Archaeological Trust), York.ARBMAN, H., 1937. Schweden und das Karolingische Reich. Studien zu den Handelverbin-

    dungen des IX. Jahrhunderts, Stockholm.ATSMA, H., & J. VEZIN, 1986. Chartae Latinae Antiquiores, t.XVI, France IV. Dietikon-Zrich.BLOK, D.P., 1979.De Franken in Nederland (third edition). Bussum.BLOK, D.P., & M. GYSSELING, 1959. Studies over de oudste plaatsnamen van Holland enUtrecht. Amsterdam.BLOK, D.P., & A.C.F. KOCH, 1964. De naam Wijk bij Duurstede in verband met de ligging derstad.Mededelingen van de Vereniging voor Naamkunde 40, 34-51.BOELES, P.C.J.A., 1951. Friesland tot de elfde eeuw, 2d ed., 's-Gravenhage.BRANDT, K., 1985. Die Bedeutung der Langwurten fr die frhmittelalterliche Wirtschaft in derNordseemarsch. In: Duwel et aI., 1987, 291-311.CHRISTENS EN, A.E., 1966. Birka uden Frisere.Handels og Sofartsmuseet pa Kronborg Arbog25, 17-38.CHRISTENS EN, A.E., 1969. Vikingetidens Danmark. Paa oldhistorisk baggrund. Copenhagen.

    CLAUDE, D., 1985. Aspekte des Binnenhandels im Merowingerreich auf Grund der Schrift-quellen. In: Dwel et al., 1987,9-99.DESPY, G., 1968. ViIles et campagnes aux IXe et Xe siecles. L'exemple du pays mosan.Revue du

    Nord 50, 145-168.DEVROEY, J.P., 1985. Reflexions sur l'economie des premiers temps carolingiens (768-877):grands domaines et action politique entre Seine et Rhin, Francia 13,475-488.DHONDT, J., 1968.Das fruhe Mittelalter. Frankfurt/Main.DOLLEY, M., 1965-1966. 'New light on the pre-1760 Coney Street (York) find of coins of theDuurstede Mint.Jaarboek voor Munt- en Penningkunde 52-53, 1-7.DOLLEY, M., 1976. The coins. In: Wilson 1976,349-372.

    DORESTAD 1978. (Specia] issue of Spiege1 Historiael 13, No. 4).DWEL, K., H. JANKUHN, H. SIEMS & D. TIMPE, 1985. Untersuchungen zu Handel undVerkehr der vor- und fruhgeschichtlichen Zeit in Mittel- und Nordeuropa. Teil III: Der Handel des

    fruhen Mittelalters. Gottingen.DWEL, K., H. JANKUHN, H. SIEMS, & D. TIMPE, 1987. Untersuchungen zu Handel undVerkehr Der vor- und fruhgeschichtlichen Zeit in Mittel- und Nordeuropa. Teil IV: Der Handel del

    Karolinger und Wikingerzeit. Gottingen.ELLIOT, R.W.V., 1980.Runes (third edition). Cambridge.ELLMERS, D., 1985. Die Bedeutung der Friesen fr die Handelsverbindungen des Ostseeraumesbis zur Wikingerzeit. In: Society and Trade ... 1985,7-54.ELLMERS, D., 1990. The Frisian monopoly of coastal transport in the 6th-8th centuries A.D. In:McGrails (ed.) 1990. 91-92.ENNEN, E., 1975.Die Europische Stadt des Mittelalters. Gottingen.ENNO VAN GELD ER, H., 1961. De Karolingische Muntslag te Duurstede,Jaarboek voor Munt-en Penningkunde 48, 15-42.ES, W.A. V AN, 1980. Gedachten over Dorestads functie, Westerheem 29,174-189.ES, W.A. VAN, & W.J.H. VERWERS, 1980.Excavations at Dorestad I. The harbour: Hoogstraat

    1 (2 vol.). Amersfoort.HALBERTS MA, H., 1963. Terpen tussen Vlie en Eems. Een geografisch-historische Benadering(2 vol.). Groningen.HILL, D. & D.M. METCALF, 1984. Sceattas in England and on the Continent (BritishArchaeological Reports, British Series 128). Oxford.HODGES, R., 1981. The Hamwih Pottery: the local and imported wares from 30 yearsexcavations at Middle Saxon Southampton and their European context. London/Southampton.HODGES, R., 1982.Dark Ages Economics. The origins of towns and trade (AD. 600/1000).London.HODGES, R., 1988. Primitive and Peasant Markets. Oxford.HODGES, R., & D. WHITEHOUSE, 1983.Mohammad, Charlemagne and the origins of Europe.London.HOLMQVIST, W., 1961/1972.Excavations at Helg (4 vo]). Stockholm.

    JANKUHN, H., 1953. Der frankisch-friesische Handel zur Ostzee im frhen Mittelalter.Vierteljahrschrift fr Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte 40, 193-243.

  • 8/11/2019 The Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages

    12/13

    JANKUHN, H., 1958. Die frhmittelalterlichen Seehandelsplatze im Nord- und Ostseeraum.Studien zu den Anfngen des europischen Stadtewesens, Reichenau-Vortriige 1955-1956.Lindau/Konstanz, 451-498.JANKUHN, H., 1986.Haithabu. Ein Handelsplatz Der Wikingerzeit, 8th ed. Neumnster.JELLEMA, D., 1955. 'Frisian trade in the Dark Ages'. Speculum 30,15-36.

    JOHANEK, P., 1985. Der 'Aubenhan Des Frankenreiches der Merowingerzeit nach Norden undOsten im Spiegel der Schriftquellen. In: Dwel et al. 1985,214-254.JOHANEK, P., 1987. Der frankische Handel der Karolingerzeit im Spiegel der Schriftquellen. In:Dwel et al. 1987, 7-68.KUHN, H., 1955. Friesisch und Nordseegermanisch. Us Wurk 4,37-46.LAFAURIE, J., 1967. Dcouvertes nouvelles de tremisses de Dorestad,Bulletin de la Societe

    francaise de Numismatique 22, 197-198.LEBECQ, S., 1978. Francs contre Frisons (VIe/VIIIe siecles),La guerre et la paix au Moyen Age.(Actes du 101e Congres des Societes Savantes). Paris, 53-71.LEBECQ, S., 1980. De la protohistoire au haut Moyen Age: le paysage des terpen le long descotes de la Mer du Nord, specialement dans l'ancienne Frise.Le paysage rural. Realites etrepresentations (special issue of Revue du Nord 62), 125-154.LEBECQ S., 1983a.Marchands et navigateurs frisons du haut Moyen Age, t.1,Essai. Lille.LEBECQ, S., 1983b.Marchands et navigateurs frisons du haut Moyen Age, t.2, Corpus dessources ecrites. Lille.LEBECQ, S., 1986. Dans I'Europe du Nord des VIIe/IXe siecles: commerce frison ou commercefranco-frison?,Annales. Economies. Societes. Civilisations 41,361-377.LEBECQ, S., 1987. Ohthere et Wulfstan: deux marchands-navigateurs dans le Nord-Est europeenit la fin du IXe siec1e.ln:Horizons marins, itineraires spirituels (VeIXV/IIe sicles), Melangesofferts a Michel Mollat, 1.2, Paris, 167-181.LEBECQ, S., 1989. Frisons et Vikings. Remarques sur les relations entre Frisons et Scandinaves(VIIe/IXe siec1es). In:Les mondes normands (VIIlelXlIe siecles). Actes du 2e Congres de laSociete d' Archeologie Medievale, Caen, 45-59.LEBECQ, S., 1990a.Religiosa Femina nomine Frideburg. La communaute chretienne de Birka aumilieu du IXe siecle d'apres le chapitre 20 de la Vita Anskarii, Recueil d' etudes en hommage a

    Lucien Musset, Cahier desAnnales de Normandie 23, 127-137.LEBECQ, S., 1990b. La famille et les apprentissages de Liudger d'apres les premiers chapitres de

    la Vita Liudgeri d' Altfrid. In:Haut Moyen Age. Culture, education et societe. Etudes offeres aPierre Riche, Paris/Nanterre, 283-299.LEBECQ, S., 1990c. On the use of the word 'Frisian' in the 6th/10th centuries written sources:some interpretations. In: McGrail, 1990, 85-90.LUNDSTROM, A., 1968. Helg als frhmittelalterlicher Handelsplatz in Mittelschweden.Fruhmittelalterliche Studien 2, 278-290.MALMER, B., 1966.Nordiska Mynt fore ar 1000. Bonn/Lund.MCGRAIL, S., 1990.Maritime Celts, Frisians and Saxons, (Council for British Archaeology,research Report 71). London.MORRISON, K.F., & H. GRUNTHAL, 1967. Carolingian Coinage. New York.MULLER- WILLE, M., 1985. Westeuropaischer Import der Wikingerzeit in Nordeuropa. In:Society and Trade... 1985, 79-102.PIRENNE, H., 1951.Histoire economique de l'accident medieval. Paris.

    POELMAN, H.A., 1908. Geschiedenis van den Handel van Noord-Nederland gedurende hetmerovingische en karolingische Tijdperk. 's-Gravenhage.ROES, A., 1954/1955. Les trouvailles de Domburg (Zelande).Berichten van de Rijksdienst voorhet Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek 5, 65-69 and 6, 79-85.ROHWER, B., 1937.Der Friesische Handel im fruhen Mittelalter. Kiel.SIEMS, H., 1980. Studien zur Lex Frisionum, Ebelsbach.SOCIETY AND TRADE in the Baltic during the Viking Age 1985, (7th Visby Symposium). Visby.STEUER, H., 1974.Die Sudsiedlung von Haithabu. Studien zur frhmittellterlichen Keramik im

    Nordseekustenbereich und in Schleswig-Holstein. Neumnster.VERHULST, A., 1970. Der Handel im Merowingerreich: Gesamtdarstellung nach schriftlichenQuellen.Early Medieval Studies 2, 2-54.VERHULST, A., 1985. Der frhmittelalterliche Handel der Niederlande und der Friesenhandel. In:Dwel et a!., 1985, 381-391.VERHULST, A., & R. DE BOCK-DOEHAERD, 1981. Nijverheid en Handel. In:Algemenegeschiedenis der Nederlanden (vol. I). Haarlem/Bussum, 183-215.

  • 8/11/2019 The Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages

    13/13

    VERKERK, C.L., Les tonlieux carolingiens et ottoniens aus Pays-Bas septentrionaux, aux bouchesdes grandes rivieres. Tonlieux, Foires et Marches avant 1300 en Lotharingie. (Publications de laSection Historique de l'Institut Grand-Ducal de Luxembourg, vol. 104), Luxembourg, 159-180.VERWERS W.J.H., 1988. Dorestad, a Carolingian town? In: R. Hodges and B. Hobley (ed.) Therebirth of towns in the West (A.D. 7001 1050), (Council for British Archaeology, Research Report

    68), 52-56.WILSON, D., 1976. The Archaeology of Anglo-Saxon England. Cambridge.ZADOKS-JOSEPHUS-JITTA, A.N., 1961. De eerste muntslag te Duurstede.Jaarboek voor Munt-en Penningkunde 48, 1-14.