."The First Appellate Authority,

R.T.!,

C.!.C,

New Delhi 110066

Sub: Nondisclosure of queried information

Sir,

06.04:2017

,

Information seeking candid rule and reason u/S4 RTI Act corroborating thedecision affecting my interest, detailed in query No CICOM/ R/ 20 I7 /0021 5dated 03.03.2017, not disclosed till date, warrants your indulgence.

Yours Sincerely

(Jamal Ahmed)

c/o Sadiqa Jamal,

Hamdard Public School, Talimabad,

Sangam Vihar , New Delhi 110080

'11. •. C,I'.J.O.R.T.I,('.1.": . New Delhi

• ••

01.03.2017

Sir,

Please arrange disclosures corroborating queries as under:

I. Did CPIO, JNU, New Delhi, eventually comply with the reprimand (vide CIC/SAlAI20IS/00188S/dtd 09.08.16) "to furnish complete information regarding d(\!,!ialof compensation with ruleand reason to the appellant" as I remain dodged till date?

2. Did Miss Yadav ever provide Rules u1S4(1)(b)(v~ testifying bonafides of the contention:2.1 "Reasons are not covered under RTf" despite Sec.4(1 )(d) obligating it?

2.2 non-furnishing of originaJ vouchers for burgled items incurred denial while VC;s Committeeand SAC held precondition a volte.face and based on suppression of truth enforcing claim;'2.3. original SBI, JNU's, 2008 receipt for burgled locker key inadmissible for compensation ;2.4. SAC's 29.08.08 direction seeking "detailed valuation of burgled items"and its 29.09.08compliance with FIR and documents from Police is non enforceable for compensa~on ;2.S.application Of/Compensation Norm 2010' on 2008 case does not infringe principles of rule ofJaw and nat\lral justice;2.6. 'non-acceptance of inspection offer, incurring deniaJ does not infringe Sec.4 RTIAct;2.7. pursuing RTI u1S4(2) against perennially hostile, coercive and deceptive offer incurred denial;

3. Did her 'submissions' aiso comprise Rules overriding vital indictments of IN!J by:3.1. VC's Two Member Independent Committee; mandated to decide compensation)testifyingburglary 'a case of security lapse', objections to compensation' devoid of corroboration' and

~'suppressed truth enforcing ciaim.' before fixing vicarious responsibility of compensation in~~cordance with principles of tortuous liability? .I. ~ .2. full bench of 14.12.12 Security Advisory Committee (SAC) endorsing 12.12.12 VC's.~~ Committee's Recommendations while conclusively holding JNU liable for compensation;••. Rllason u1S4(l led) for not:

4.1. considering original receipt issued by SBI JNU for compensation;4.2. verifying bona fides ofCPIO's allegations in the light ofSec.4 RTI Act, VC's Comm.ittee verdictand its endorsement by SAC enclosed with the appeal;4.3. invoking Sec.20 RTI Act in view of perennial harassment, defiance of direction and misleadingevcn Hon 'ble CIC.

\\'S11~-\ \ 3 \\'l~

Yours Sincerely

~~~J~maJ Ahmed)

C/O Sadiqa Jamal, Hamdard Public School, Talimabad, Sangam Vihar , New Delhi J 10080

•,

" . .. 1!11-

.;.'.

No. SECI24-C/2012Dated: April 18, 2012

To,

Ms. Syeda Bilgrami ImamMemberNational Commission for MinoritiesSill Floor, Lok Nayak BhawanKhan MarketNew Delhi - 110003

Ge;ilrMadam,

. Please refer to your letter No Nil dated 10.04.2012 addressed 10 theViC!'!-Chanceilor for matter related to compensation-claim of Shri Jamal Ahmad (RetiredTechnical Officer, JNU). .

I

2. '. The Sec'urity AdvisorY Committee at.its meeting held on February 27, 2012 hasdecided and taken a resolution as unper, The same has been intimated,to the individualvide our letter No. SEC/24-C(vii)/2012 dated 23.03.20'12 (copy enclosed) .

•• 8, Letter regarding compe,nsation ()f"Shri Jamal Ahmad (RetiredTechnical Officer) dated 21.12,2011

The Cotnmittee suggested that '!I'two member IndependentCommittee may be constituted by the Vice-Chancellor to lookinto the matter,"

. he de,elsion of the case will be taken. by the two member Ind(!pendenCommittee and the same will be communicated arid put on .recor-d as and when theproceedings or resolution is received. - ,

With regards,

\ ez'J." ,,

~ncl : As stated

COPy to:- ,

Shri Jamal Ahmad (Retired Technical Officer)27, Hamdard P SchoolTalimabad, Sangam ViharNew Delhi-110062 .

•

~.(San.deep Chatterjee),.

" .

lNU

Notification No. SEC/24-C(Vii} 201~81

Dated April, 2012

{]l]To,

"• 2' .,'. ). !"-~. . :0<>.P.t-!:.~'jI t'- "~..fiyi~.•::yJ! :':;Lu.'..J.ll1 jS jO~ ..",.="""l:;;;:••••••Centre of Arabic and African Studies

School of Language, Literature and Culture StudiesJawaharlal Nehni University, New.Delhi _ 110C67

G1ql~O«'fI(>J ~ ~, ~ ~.110067The Vice Chancellor, '. . .

New Delhi

Ref.i'

\

.',';.~

'. f

GraIn: JA YENU Tel.: 2670 11253 "a>;; 91.I:i:2~'7;.7525'

Sir,

With the above ref~rence, we 'ar,? submitting our observation/report in'respe<;t of the ttieh case th~tw~s committed in the ho~se 'of Mr. lamal (i.e. 61,D.P,., lNUJ in february 2007: We hepe 'that o'ur r.ep6rt will provide 'help in solvingthe compensation' problems pertaining to the above said theft. Needless' to v/ritehere that We -have -prepared our report after th'oroughly looking into the file

•'containing'related to th.e above'said burglary.

Wi~hwarm reg~rds-'

: ,:: .• ;' I .i'.~

.. -- - -._----

. '. ". "~915].aE,\061c'-(l\~

i1

•

III

!l!••,i .:

'"i, •• iii•.•...'1;' v j'60.',... ,., ~./' T;;"- -....•, ._~-:!' !U~"L, """ .~... ,a __ ',.:!'S1'1-~I~i'

.IU\j-:~

~

',' ~~,~

i ..

~ '

:; "., "

I

Report

A thorough and Careful Study of the fiie's!.!bmitted to us to be looked intothe mattat pertaining to an act, of th!!ft'tom~itted in the house of Mr. JamalAhmad, a retired technical offic~r pf the Uryive[sity, has led us to thefollowing:

1. The House of Mr. Ja~al Ahmad hD.PJ:r~~U~as burgled whilst hewas abroad for hiSHaj pilgrimag~ in the year 2007.12:Soon ~fter comi~g back, helo~ged a formal FIR at the Vasant Vihar

Police Station and afterward, p'repare.d an inventory of items primafacie found missing'along ~jth its eva,luation. ,.It appears that the list. , . ; ,

was, not complete as the entire ftlmily was traumatized a.fter finding 'itsentire life's accumulated: ilnd irlherited .fortune altogether with onesbel;towc;:d 'UP~ii hi~ da.l;«hter by her in~l~vv:sand othe~ well-wishers. , ,burgled .

. 3. Ipso fa eta being a case of se~lI~ity 'IC!'ps~~the aggrieved Mr. lama]applied for compensation ellclosing r:;i;ery ava!/aQle document

I I.retrieved from the at will plundered house 'ils,demanded'by the SAC.

4. It is incomprehensible why the SAC ha,s ;rejected his claim slapping, , . II . .

uncorroborated charges against him wf;lile absolving the security. . .... . '

, , agency of any' lapse on its PClrt. (Vide SAC's resolution .No. 08 dated,.' .. '--' ~-' ..'. '.

May 11, 200Q). The committee, after goi~ through the. documents], [collected by Mr. Jamal under the! RTf feels' ~hat t~e SAC.ver~ct was not

lonly devoid of any corroborati()n but it ~urprisingly suppr.esses theI

'Jrl,!th reinforcing the claim.

5 .. Good' sense however, prev<liled and .th~i Uni~ersity a'd';'inistration' . . .

accepted its fault and in a communication to National CommiSsion for

Ii

; ':•...•.•..\.

"i,

..,II J

"" .I

The committee finally came: to the, conclusion that the SAC'sresolutions pertaining to l::!rnaJ Ahnlad's claim are devoid ofcorroborative reaso~s and hJnce the :comrt!ittee opines that the€ompensation -for all the stolen items be given to Mr. Jamal without. .' . .e'l"l)'CO~dH::\:m'l"~es~a~~ impos'sjbJ~.. ,." -.......... '

" , ':'Jb...,'OI.~,~\.u,~,~S~_

1 .,.1:1 "".C.•"'nCl;j.,J'feC,"1,h~'\." lie ~ I;"e t 61~,,\)0\ c\ \"'p'\\-,i' '\ '\00-:""J NeW \) J'J'" .

" IMinorities acknowledged to compensate to Mr. Jamal. This

" ,acknowledgement in fact, tant~mounts tp admitting the laps'e.

6. SAC's conditional decisIon for compensation is nothing but to denyMr. Jamal's claim for the same. It is because of the following reasons:

~,

a) There is no doubt that cl.tthe time of theft, allvaluables and itsvouchers were at the mercy of burglars. .

. ,. "..!b) Hence the production of vouchers for aHthe valuables is next to,

.impossible.c) Mr. Jamal himself has categorically .de.clar.edthat all the documents

, ,

pertaining to the valuable item have'been stolen.

•

J..~j1

1i,i

IIJii•"1(I,

- ,..

II

I"

/

(•

• •

I, Refer ~oMinutes of the Compensation Committee meeting heldon 20,07.2012 (copy attached).

, ) 2. In view of the above; you are' requested to kindly clarify in ', 'regard to Point 5 of tlie Two Member Committee report as mentioned

below:. . , •

'., '

Dated: 01.08,2012

/ -:J';: J r...,\i1q /6 ffl/ M ~ TCiVCfTCfE.lI M aJAWAHARLALNEIIRV UNIVERSITY

'NEW DELIn-l1 0067 's p, C V tJ? I ry.- (j) 'E P g:rg T'M. 'E.,NT '

SEC/24.C/2012

"5, Good sense. however, ')revailed and the Universityadmi,nistration accepted its (.~Iiand in a communication toNatio~al Commission, for', Minorities' acknowledged tocompen'sate to Mr., Jamal, i.-his acknowledgement in (a~,ta~tamounts to admi(ting the l.apse ".

,"

. ,

" ~~~. x...:.s ~ k. ~<f'" • ~ l.;- t..e.. a.....-....ti"'"-1.0 ~, :..r-t ~ ~ ~J~ /~~.;.~

'... .:.~ ~ ......:f~~ ~ 6;" e ~ I P'."",,''' ....•.L tc .• .., . ..-r-- - r.-'-'-''. tl-c:' ~ •."t"7--/~ ~,k.<::~. ,

", ~

~ 'f;""'; j;" '.tk. ;;"."It. f ';.~ ' ,.,I£f,l--'F ~"~'

=--.-,-??-=. ~(<Jr.(I:

. I

1

I

IIII

"

Ii

I, t,

J

,:

Na, SEC/24,C/2013

, '"

"

January 10.2013

\1ICIT6'X<.frc;f ~ fct~CffclWC'fll'Jaw~hf',rlaINehru U;liversity

, NewDelhi.'llQ067Security Department

1'WJ!

I,I!IY'---===-

J'J~'ji.'.1

" {,,i

I,•

Shr' Jamal Ahmadl'cc,1nical Officer (Retired)F~!o27, Hailldard Public Schooll'a:imabad, Sangam ViharNn'.' Delhi

fl~arSir, -"TI',e Security Advisory Committee at its meeting held ,on December 14, 20) 2. vide,Resol,lty 'l ""'/No. i decided as under:-

1. The ,minutes of the Co"'penslltioIl Committee meeting, held on 03.10,2012regarding burglary casc' of Shrj Jamal Ahm,,:! [Ret.ired Technical Officer). "

. ~..The Committee went,through aU the docul'JentS, e~quiry reports, the two'tiJ,embercommittee"eport, compensation committee reports, initial investigation report as well as the testimony,';!$pecial invitee Mr, Jamal Ahmed and deliberated on every aspect of the case. 'Af~"t'detaileddiscussion, the committee endorsed the two lUembel"s independent committee report and, str~~~~_rec°!1l!n_e!l.dedt~at S!Jri Jamal Ahmed ji":etir<idTechnical O!ficer).'shou,ld:be re'",son~b)y ,ompensated by the UI1lVerslty, The case may be forwarded l"O the comjien~attol1 cc>mrmttee .,vitholll any delay for necessary aclicn .. ',t wa, felt that the case has' ynnecessarily bee,:lragged for so' many yea,'s, th" GroUPr4 shoulti ""ve been held responsible but since thr.matter Wi'S shuttlpo:! between thi~ Security, SAC,!lnd Compensation Comm,lt-tee, and wasted 51'long year 3 liltlt the 04 has also left. In 'SU(") a situation the university, may reasonably;;Ornpe'lSllte the claimant and matter ended for !he good, , .' ,

•The above decisions of committee are being forwarded to you for kind information

please,

Yows faithfully,~

~QP,Y,Jo:~{e.gist,:'lL.JNll~hai.!J'.(:.r...~.Q...'L_Colnpcnsntioh Co.n1Initt~~

---Chief-Security Of

, o-t L.--

cer

~I\ :I_l~_ ..

\"~\'-")\ ':.\ .

}.,.~

.;?

/

/'. .,"' - ...••.,/

.' .

This is to certify that a sum of Rs',3229/- has been charged from Shri Jamal Ahmad,, , SB A/c.,no 10596594828 for break open of his L9cker No, 67 at this branch,

"'-."

\

'-' .....•. .

".. .

.,, .'.,

A ~m'h;., State Bank oHndlaJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew Delhi Pin: 110067Branch code 01624Ph 011-26161929FAX 011- 26196106

16/12//2008

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

,,

\', ", .'.. '.

.~m~ger

; .

,/;.1/ ;-.r ..'

. '"\8. Compensation-Cases:

\i1ql!$i(<1I<1~5 ~JAWAHARLALNEHRUUNIVERSITY

NEWDELHI.110067

I;T~~~_=~=~_=S~E=C=U=R=I=TY~D_E_P~A=R=T_M=E=N=T_._===_~~--.;::!J,. No. SEC/24-C/2008 September ~9, 2008*l0f. . Shri Jamal Ahmad

27 Hamdard P.Sehool,Talimabad, Sangarn Vihar.NewDelhi-62

,'.

Dear Sir,The Se~urjty Advisory Committee at its meeting held on August 29.,2008 vide.Resoluti~l1 No.8 Compensation eases (b) decided as Ulider:

, ..b. Theft at Flat no:61 allotted to Shrl Jamal Ahmed, Technical Officer on

28.12.2007Tti-ecommittee after goingthrough t4e documents provided, concludes that• detailed valuation of all the . ms mentioned are not r v. ,and', therefore cannot discuss the matter till it pas this information.~

. 'The above decision of the. Committee is being comm'unicate<;i to you for kind ,

information.

'.

\. Yours faithfully,

?-" b" \~.(Ra~inder S ngh)

Acting' Chief Security ffieer

, ,

,

HOZIlh

•

~/. 1".1' ,:'. o~ :.:I .01 ~{';~S ~U.)1. .lec.~i!.t~),eld

",.! ,~. ~.,(l.. ~~:lJ1.. ~.cJiPn. Bh ..f~k..1;

P'i'!i';llt1'1 ..::5'.'~ I~r;.l::'.t~.~i;~';J(.;::::,.:588L~. :) CJt3t1d.ra~ckilran~::." ~lla;J'::2r rJhol':";1 I (J. S Cll~hCir

_ (;hairpcrsor:- Member- 1I1emb •.•r_~:'k:mbcr

f~r..: ial !r"\'itcc:~~;,i""1'. 1\. Snng;wan

_ Chief Security Officer

'pp:icablo to' u11~cll1inr. end subsequent c1ii,:n$ : compensation .,','j'.llthe•~~ll:',i','.~.t•.d 11.~:'ms~t:b

She:

'1" 'u;pr'CSOI1. Clu;TT1ofCompr.ll~"ti()., l'-ceeling \V,ek,med nil the mem"crs to t1'" Me,li,,~

C.Jil1'''' for comprl1!Oalion icr t:.dts de, ",ill be processed em.y after Jt.:U',. ' .•: ucityur.pa.: :...,,~"t..cstah!ish('~ l'rin1ft: rat ,'~'a 1arJscO~l the p~rt security service provj(\:r.

2, Th,' AI11.'oUntof ali such c1;"m~ ','fill net .,,,ceed the v(llue of thr stolen/damnged I;O(.osi ",:Iuding ~"shJ sl2.~cd in 11:~odg:i'lll FIR 1..dged ",-;th th,' I'olice.

_I. Ail r,:.,;i,'r:Ms are slrongly ad'ij$:.)6:~..; draw 0;':( cellnprcbclIsive illslIrnnce policies for tr.drmlltonud vehiclcs. Thc security ~CrviCf:pro"iner win hcwever be rcsponr.ible for :11:,1:1":;good the. difference (If any) between the i,,~ul'3nee amount rccciveu. and the insurer; v,'i •.•eof the ",-hide as mcnliemd in the.jnsurance. I\>liey document. .

'.~:

. ..). 1,,\ i'l~Illr. ..:d ;nv~~:.tC:;.;~~"f&:..H::"iS6.tO~lg v..,H~ r~d;b:;!:.:~l:~leproof or pur<.:)~se ho~ ',,=.' be prn'. jded

~!..n'. ":',;f" ~.,~.J'<>~\!,cf\;,~.r.c,,~h;~hc~-;u~.;n.~:,,!le~pl<iP':?"i~~a ~ •.I( statement' a~ F' ,'Of.\,.o}a::i1~',~tl. accompat\u...d 11y ~uch;pto:~rw1l1.~~otb~cnlrl'toln~(i .

.: : .

~) Vcr r'l.'~:-Y t.hr~fl1J or dati.age ',0' '.~~hicl~sin parking ~rea (indu~jirq r~sid::mtiaj at.~;:~~~IH:sc':uri'Y ~crvic\: provider's liabil~t},,\~i!tcxlend to uca.riog: ~,hc cost or :cplacir.bir('j .•~,irii1~t'ht:

~tolcnI'::~"nagedileITIS.

,:"I.j RI',a:'lk:]1" 01i'1T:""."'\) r ""lI1CC (,rrieer

~P'~::~:--=::~'a.-:;~-t-":::.";~~

";'h,:,)!' P. I<. Snngwull.... : :')ccuri ~.yOffic~';

.,.t/,.. , ----<: I' .•••.;.... . .-c.=.,.' ••• • .,.

Dr. S. Ch.lndn.l~'.:k.." .J.':Coordinator (Ev"U

,-./

'.'New Delhi

Sir, . .' .'In compliance once again please t'iifd'enc!osed the revise~ valuation of it •••,. ~ burgied. from my 61 D,P.) J.N, U residence dJriflg my sojourn for Hajj 2(l07 for llJ< "peeay ,and unprejudiced disposal ef-my compensation ciaim .

Would youplease oblige?

Thanking you",

Yours SincerelyJa,fual Afunecf -.,'g.~ "-;\{..w.-u .... (J~7'.Hamdard P. Scho~l. .Ta!Jmapad, Sangarn VlharNew Delhi" 62

•

"""

\\ ..

\,

"

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION2nd Floor, August Kranti BhawanBhikji Cama Place, R K Puram

New Delhi - 110066(phone NO.OII 26105027)

No. CICOMIR/2017/00215/MP

To,Shri Jamal Ahmed.C/o Sadiqa jamal, Hamdard Public School,Tamilabad, SangamVihar,New Delhi- 110080.

Subject: • Application VIS (6) of the Right to Information Act 2005.

Sir,

Date: 06/0312017

Kindly refer to your RTI application dated 01-03-2017 seeking information regarding file no:CIC/SA/A/201 510018851Dated: 09-08-2016. The records of the appeal file no : CIC/SA/A/2015/001885have been received from Dy. Registrar IC(SA) today. It has been examined carefully. This appeal has beendisposed off vide order Dated: 13-10-2016 after hearing the parties. No other information is available onthe records of the file. Copy of the order dated: 13-10-2016 has also been issued to the parties on 27-10-2016.

In case you are not satisfied, you can appeal to the Appellate Authority of CIC. The details of theAppellate Authority are as follows:

Name : Shri R K SinghDesignation: Additional Secretary & First Appellate Authority

Address : 2nd Floor, 'B' WingAugust Kranti BhawanBhikaji Cama Place,New Delhi -110066

(R L Gupta)CPIO I Dy. Registrar

Copy to:- 1 : Nodal CPIO,RTI-Cell CIC, New-Delhi for information.