18
The Evaluation of IMPACT V Jeni Corn, [email protected] Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education www.fi.ncsu.edu

The Evaluation of IMPACT V

  • Upload
    selina

  • View
    36

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Evaluation of IMPACT V. Jeni Corn, [email protected] Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education www.fi.ncsu.edu. The Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. Mission: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

The Evaluation of IMPACT V

Jeni Corn, [email protected] Friday Institute for Educational InnovationNC State University College of Education

www.fi.ncsu.edu

Page 2: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

The Friday Institute for Educational Innovation

Mission:The Friday Institute advances education through innovation in teaching, learning, and leadership. By bringing together students, teachers, researchers, policy-makers, educational professionals, and other community members, the Friday Institute serves as a center for fostering collaboration to improve education.

Page 3: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

The Friday Institute for Educational Innovation

• The research arm of the College of Education at NC State University

• Focused on 5 main areas – 21st Century Teaching and Learning– Professional and Leadership Development– Technology Infrastructure– Evaluation of Educational Innovations– Educational Policy

Page 4: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

FI IMPACT V Evaluation Team

• Jeni Corn, Principal Investigator• Tricia Townsend, Research Associate• Megan Townsend, Research Associate• Jennifer Maxfield, Research Associate• Malinda Faber, Research Associate• Dina DeVose, Graduate Research Assistant

Page 5: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

Evaluation Work

• IMPACT• NC 1:1 Learning Initiative• NC Math and Science Education Network• Maximizing the Impact of STEM Outreach through

Data-driven Decision-Making (MISO)• NC Virtual Public Schools• School Connectivity Initiative• Race to the Top• Capacity Building• Golden LEAF STEM

Page 6: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

Previous IMPACT Cohorts

• IMPACT I (2003-2006): 8 elementary schools• IMPACT II (2007-2011): 5 middle schools• IMPACT III (2007-2011): 17 schools, K-12,

located within 3 school districts• IMPACT IV (2008-2011): 13 schools, gr. 3-12,

located within 4 school districts

Page 7: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

Results from Previous IMPACT Studies

• Professional development was seen as a vital component in the successful implementation of the IMPACT model– Benefits to scheduling prior to the start of the school year

and to having multiple schools within a district participating

• Collaborative planning sessions provided much needed support for technology integration– Improvements over time in the nature of collaboration and

teachers’ receptiveness to its purpose and potential benefits

Page 8: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

Results from Previous IMPACT Studies

• Many schools reported a need for a technician so their TF and MC could be free to function in an instructional capacity

• Some schools provided teacher leaders with support and training to enhance the model’s sustainability

Page 9: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

Results from Previous IMPACT Studies

• Providing flexible access to technology resources was initially a challenge for elementary schools

• The influx of technology and flexible access led to more frequent and varied use of media center resources

• Flexible access to technology resources allowed teachers to plan more effective, authentic lessons supported by technology

Page 10: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

Results from Previous IMPACT Studies

• Teachers reported changes in their instruction:– More project-based, small-group and collaborative

learning• Significant growth in teachers’ confidence in

their ability to implement NETS• Increased comfort level with equipment and

ability to troubleshoot technical problems

Page 11: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

Results from Previous IMPACT Studies

• Some growth in students’ perceptions of their technology skills

• Significant increase among elementary and middle schools in the number of students who felt the use of technology made learning easier and more interesting for them

• Overall, student achievement in IMPACT schools is exhibiting a promising trend toward improvement in Reading and Math over and above what was observed in comparison schools

Page 12: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

IMPACT V Objective

• To build capacity for school and classroom leadership in North Carolina middle and high schools with the highest need

Page 13: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

IMPACT V Components

• Funding for school and classroom technology• High-quality professional development • Additional P.D. (NCDPI and outside contracted) for a

cohort of district and school leaders• School principals earn an EdS degree and classroom

teachers earn a Master’s of Instructional Technology degree– UNC-system provided graduate-level classes

• Core team of teachers fulfill the ITF role

Page 14: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

Evaluation Purpose

• To evaluate the impact of the IMPACT V project:– Teachers’ instructional practices– Teachers’ leadership roles– Principals’ leadership practices– School-level components of the IMPACT model– District-level practices– Supply and equitable distribution of teachers and

leaders

Page 15: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

Evaluation Questions

PD Quality Participant Behavior Changes Broader Impacts1. In what professional

development opportunities did teachers and principals participate?

2. To what extent did teachers and principals think the PD was beneficial?

3. To what extent did teacher participants change their instructional practices?

4. To what extent did teacher participants exhibit leadership roles in their schools?

5. To what extent did principal participants change their leadership practices?

6. What, if any, was the impact on the school around each of the components of the IMPACT model?

7. How did IMPACT V change district level practices?

8. How did IMPACT V impact the supply and equitable distribution of teachers and leaders?

9. How did the overall impact of the core facilitation team model compare to the overall impact of the ITF model?

Page 16: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

Evaluation Data Collection Timeline

Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Fall 2012 Spring 2013

School Application Implementation Plans Teacher Self Survey About Practice (STNA)

Student Survey About Teacher Practice (Tech Skills Checklist and/or STNA*S)

Classroom Observations Focus Groups (Core Teams, Other Teachers)

Principal Interview On Track 360 Participant Survey/Reflection Implementation Checklist District Interview

Page 17: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

Next Steps

• Assign one point person per school to work with the evaluation team:– Help with scheduling classroom observations,

focus groups, and interviews– Help with survey administration

• Administration window for baseline surveys: October 17 – November 18

Page 18: The Evaluation of IMPACT V

Friday Institute for Educational InnovationNC State University College of Education

http://www.fi.ncsu.edu/

Link to presentations/publications: http://www.fi.ncsu.edu/project/evaluation-of-impact-model

FI Web Site Information