Upload
nyasia-teed
View
218
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Establishment of Communist Regimes in Eastern Europe
3 dimensions of the problem of communism in Eastern Europe after World War II
1. The widely recognized need for fundamental and progressive social changes
2. Existence of political forces prepared to lead the postwar transformation
3. Role of the USSR
Eastern Europe in 1945
2 groups of countries:
1. Germany and her former allies:
Romania
Hungary
Bulgaria
Finland
2. Victims of Nazi aggression:
Poland
Czechoslovakia
Austria (?)
Yugoslavia
Albania
Churchill-Stalin “percentages” agreement, Moscow, Oct. 1944
“I thought you’d be there waiting for me … What greeted me instead was the lingering stench of ashes and the empty sockets of our ruined home.”
Samuel Puterman on his return to Warsaw, 1945 “We could see the physical destruction but the effect of
vast economic disruption and political, social, and psychological destruction … completely escaped us.”
Dean Acheson, US Secretary of State, 1947
Lowe, Keith (2012-07-03). Savage Continent: Europe in the Aftermath of World War II . St. Martin's Press. Kindle Edition.
Warsaw
Budapest
Berlin
Shattered states and societies Discredited elites Economies destroyed Legacies of ethnic warfare and border conflicts Masses in turmoil – hopes for a fresh start Intensive political struggles in each country In Western Europe, too:
Capitalism in deep crisis Socialist ideas popular
The Right is either eliminated or severely weakened The situation favours the Left The East European Left in 1945, 3 types of left-wing forces:
Agrarian socialists Social Democrats Communists
Together, they dominate the political scene in every country Relations between them depend on both internal and
external factors
Throughout East Europe, left-wing parties were banned since 1920s or 1930s
Only in Czechoslovakia the Left, including CP, was fully legal until the German occupation - and was dominant in politics one of the reasons why Britain and France gave it to Hitler?
Now the Left is free to act and take advantage of the postwar crisis
Its issues are popular: Punishment of collaborators Democratization Socialist-type reforms
Even without the Soviet presence, Eastern European politics would have shifted drastically leftward
Stalin’s support of East European Leftists The only Left Moscow was prepared to tolerate was one
which would follow Stalin’s orders And the orders were not necessarily: take power now! And one did not have to be a Communist This puts East European communists in a situation radically
different from the Russian situation in 1917 Fundamental contradiction between the Left project and
Stalinism
East European Communists welcomed Soviet aid, but did they want to be Soviet puppets?
Some did, others not Those who did not, tried to find other options And the West was more or less willing to treat them as
legitimate forces in the region But Stalin would not tolerate the slightest dissent from the
Kremlin line He was the Red Emperor And dissenters were severely punished Degree of Soviet control was determined by Soviet strategic
considerations Any leeway was possible only if Soviet interests demanded it
The logic of Soviet actions in Eastern Europe Geopolitics and security above all In 1945-47, Stalin considered it pragmatic to allow a degree
of freedom in East European countries “People’s Democracies”, not one-party Communist regimes Then the Cold War confrontation turned Eastern Europe
into a political battleground between USSR and the West
The Cold War started unexpectedly early after the end of WWII – almost without a pause
A unique combination of factors: Geopolitical Ideological Military
Geopolitics: Emergence of a bipolar system: rise of the 2 superpowers
US-Soviet relations became the central axis of world politics
Ideology: The historic defeat of the Global Right in 1945 empowered
the Global Left socialism, in some form or another, began to be seen by many
as “the wave of the future”
Military power: Introduction of atomic weapons as tools of foreign policy
global projection of enormous military power on the cheap
The Global Left: the postwar offensive
EUROPE Yugoslavia and Albania – Communists have come to
power on their own Greece, Italy, France – Communist parties may come to
power on their own Germany, Austria, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria –
defeated states in shambles; Soviet presence a major boost to local Communists
Poland – Soviet presence assures Communist takeover Czechoslovakia – gradual Communist takeover from a
strong domestic base, with Soviet help Moderate, reformist Left makes major political gains in
the West (e.g. Labour Party in Britain)
The West was primarily concerned about survival and rebuilding of capitalism in Western Europe
USSR was primarily concerned about strategic control of Eastern Europe – securing the Western flank
The division of Europe, agreed in 1945, materialized The fate of Germany remained the one major bone of
contention – East vs. West In Asia, it was an open-ended continental struggle
ASIA: Indochina: Vietnamese Communists the main anti-
colonialist force, proclaim Vietnam’s independence in 1945 China, 1945-49: Communists defeat Nationalists Korea, 1945: Communists control the North with Soviet help India, 1947: Independence won by nationalists supported
by communists Indonesia, Burma: nationalist-communist coalitions lead
anticolonialist campaigns Iran: the rise of a Communist-nationalist alliance Turkey: emergence of a strong Communist-led Left The Mideast
The establishment of Israel - with Soviet support The rise of Arab nationalism against Western colonial rule
In 1948-49, Stalin goes for full control and isolation of Eastern Europe from the West
East European Communists were to serve as the tools for the Soviet takeover – at the expense of national independence and freedom to choose their own strategies
It required a massive purge of East European Communist Parties
Installation of Soviet-type regimes Repressions against opposition and civil society Socioeconomic changes of state-socialist type