Upload
melvin-lang
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The essence of strategy lies in creating tomorrow’s competitive
advantages faster than competitors mimic the ones you possess today. Gary Hamel and C.K. Prahalad
Strategies for taking the hill won’t necessarily hold it.
Amar Bhide
“Quote”
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
2
Chapter Outline
Generic Competitive Strategies Low-Cost Leadership Strategy Broad Differentiation Strategies Best-Cost Provider Strategies Focused Low-Cost Strategies Focused Differentiation Strategies
Vertical Integration Strategies Cooperative Strategies Offensive and Defensive Strategies First-Mover Advantages and Disadvantages
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
3
Strategy and Competitive Advantage
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE exists when a firm’s strategy gives it an edge in Defending against competitive forces and Securing customers
Convince customers firm’s product / service offers SUPERIOR VALUE Offer buyers a good product at a lower price Use differentiation to provide a better product
buyers think is worth a premium price
Key to Success
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
4
What Is Competitive Strategy?
Consists of business approaches to Attract customers, fulfilling their expectations Withstand competitive pressures Strengthen market position
Includes offensive and defensive moves to Counter actions of key rivals Shift resources to improve long-term market
position Respond to prevailing market conditions
Narrower in scope than business strategy
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
5
The Five GenericCompetitive Strategies
Ma
rke
t T
arg
et
Type of Advantage Sought
Overall Low-CostLeadership
Strategy
BroadDifferentiation
Strategy
FocusedLow-CostStrategy
FocusedDifferentiation
Strategy
Best-CostProviderStrategy
Lower Cost Differentiation
Broad Range of Buyers
Narrow Buyer
Segmentor Niche
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
6
A Low-Cost Leadership Strategy
Open up a sustainable cost advantage over rivals, using lower-cost edge as a basis either to Under-price rivals and reap market
share gains OR Earn higher profit margin selling at
going price
Objective
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
7
Low-Cost Leadership
Make achievement of low-cost relative to rivals the THEME of firm’s business strategy
Find ways to drive costs out of business year-after-year
Keys to SuccessKeys to Success
Low-cost leadership means lowOVERALL costs, not just lowmanufacturing or production costs!
Low-cost leadership means lowOVERALL costs, not just low
manufacturing or production costs!
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
8
Approaches to Securinga Cost Advantage
Do a better job than rivals of
performing value chain activities
efficiently and cost effectively
Approach 1
Revamp value chain to bypass
some cost-producing activities
Approach 2 Control costs!
By-pass costs!
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
9
Approach 1: Controlling the Cost Drivers
Capture scale economies; avoid scale diseconomies
Capture learning and experience curve effects
Manage costs of key resource inputs
Consider linkages with other activities in value chain
Find sharing opportunities with other business units
Compare vertical integration vs. outsourcing
Assess first-mover advantages vs. disadvantages
Control percentage of capacity utilization
Make prudent strategic choices related to operations
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
10
Approach 2: Revamping the Value Chain
Simplify product design Offer basic, no-frills product/service Shift to a simpler, less capital-intensive, or more
streamlined technological process Find ways to bypass use of high-cost raw materials Use direct-to-end user sales/marketing approaches Relocate facilities closer to suppliers or customers Reengineer core business processes---be creative
in finding ways to eliminate value chain activities Use PC technology to delete works steps, modify
processes, cut out cost-producing activities
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
11
Characteristics of aLow-Cost Provider
Cost conscious corporate culture Employee participation in cost-control efforts Ongoing efforts to benchmark costs Intensive scrutiny of budget requests Programs promoting continuous cost
improvement
Low-cost producers championFRUGALITY while aggressivelyINVESTING in cost-saving improvements!
Successful low-cost producers championfrugality but wisely and aggressively
invest in cost-saving improvements !
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
12
What Company Managers Have to Do to Achieve Low-Cost Leadership
Scrutinize each cost-creating activity, identifying cost drivers
Use knowledge about cost drivers to manage costs of each activity down year after year
Find ways to reengineer how activities are performed and coordinated---eliminate unnecessary work steps
Be creative in cutting some activities out of value chain system---re-invent the industry value chain
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
13
The Competitive Strengths of Low-Cost Leadership
Better positioned than RIVAL COMPETITORS to compete offensively on basis of price
Low-cost provides some protection from bargaining leverage of powerful BUYERS
Low-cost provides some protection from bargaining leverage of powerful SUPPLIERS
Low-cost provider’s pricing power acts as a significant barrier for POTENTIAL ENTRANTS
Low cost puts a company in position to use low price as a defense against SUBSTITUTES
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
14
A Low-Cost Strategy Works Best When:
Price competition is vigorous Product is standardized or readily
available from many suppliers There are few ways to achieve
differentiation that have value Most buyers use product in same ways Buyers incur low switching costs Buyers are large and have significant
bargaining power
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
15
Pitfalls of Low-Cost Strategies
Being overly aggressive in cutting price (revenue erosion of lower price is not offset by gains in sales volume--profits go down,not up)
Low cost methods are easily imitated by rivals Becoming too fixated on reducing costs
and ignoring Buyer interest in additional features Declining buyer sensitivity to price Changes in how the product is used
Technological breakthroughs open up cost reductions for rivals
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
16
Differentiation Strategies
Incorporate differentiating features that cause buyers to prefer firm’s product or service over the brands of rivals
Find ways to differentiate that CREATE VALUE for buyers and that are NOT EASILY MATCHED or CHEAPLY COPIED by rivals
Not spending more to achieve differentiation than the price premium that can be charged
Keys to Success
Objective
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
17
The Appeal of Differentiation Strategies
A powerful competitive approach when uniqueness can be achieved in ways that Buyers perceive as valuable Rivals find hard to match or copy Can be incorporated
at a cost well below the price premium that buyers will pay
Which hat is unique?
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
18
The Benefits of Successful Differentiation
A product / service with unique and
appealing attributes allows a firm to
Command a premium price and/or
Increase unit sales and/or
Build brand loyalty
= Competitive Advantage
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
19
Types of Differentiation Themes
Unique taste -- Dr. Pepper Special features -- America Online Superior service -- FedEx, Ritz-Carlton Spare parts availability -- Caterpillar More for your money -- McDonald’s, Wal-Mart Engineering design and performance -- Mercedes Prestige -- Rolex Quality manufacture -- Honda , Toyota Technological leadership -- 3M Corporation, Intel Top-of-the-line image -- Ralph Lauren, Chanel
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
20
Sustaining Differentiation: The Key to Competitive Advantage
Most appealing approaches to differentiation: Those hardest for rivals to match or imitate Those buyers will find most appealing
Best choices for gaining a longer-lasting, more profitable competitive edge: New product innovation Technical superiority Product quality and reliability Comprehensive customer service
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
21
Where to Find Differentiation Opportunities in the Value Chain
Purchasing and procurement activities Product R&D activities Production R&D; technology-related activities Manufacturing activities Outbound logistics and distribution activities Marketing, sales, and customer service
activities
InternallyPerformedActivities, Costs, &Margins
Activities, Costs, &
Margins ofSuppliers
Buyer/UserValue
Chains
Activities, Costs,& Margins of
Forward ChannelAllies &
Strategic Partners
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
22
How to Achieve aDifferentiation-Based Advantage
Incorporate product features/attributes that lower buyer’s overall costs of using product
Approach 1
Incorporate features/attributes that raise the performance a buyer gets out of the product
Approach 2
Incorporate features/attributes that enhance buyer satisfaction in non-economic or intangible ways
Approach 3
Compete on the basis of superior capabilitiesApproach 4
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
23
Signaling Value as Well as Delivering Value
Buyers seldom pay for value that is not perceived
Signals of value may be as important as actual value when Nature of differentiation is hard to
quantify Buyers are making first-time
purchases Repurchase is infrequent Buyers are unsophisticated
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
24
The Competitive Strengths of a Differentiation Strategy
Buyers develop loyalty to brand they like best--can beat RIVAL COMPETITORS in the marketplace
Mitigates bargaining power of large BUYERS since other products are less attractive
Differentiation puts a seller in better position to withstand efforts of SUPPLIERS to raise prices
Buyer loyalty acts as a barrier to POTENTIAL ENTRANTS
Differentiation puts a seller in better position to fend off threats of SUBSTITUTES not having comparable features
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
25
A Differentiation Strategy Works Best When:
There are many ways to differentiate a product that have value and please customers
Buyer needs and uses are diverse Few rivals are following a similar type
of differentiation approach Technological change is fast-paced
and competition is focused on evolving product features
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
26
What Can Make aDifferentiation Strategy Fail
Trying to differentiate on a feature buyers do not perceive as lowering their cost or enhancing their well-being
Over-differentiating such that product features exceed buyers’ needs
Charging a price premium that buyers perceive is too high
Failing to signal value Not understanding what buyers want or prefer
and differentiating on the “wrong” things
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
27
Competitive Strategy Principle
A low-cost producer strategy can
defeat a differentiation strategy
when buyers are satisfied with a
standard product and do not see
extra attributes as worth paying
additional money to obtain!
A low-cost producer strategy can
defeat a differentiation strategy
when buyers are satisfied with
a standard product and do not
see extra attributes as worth
paying for!
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
28
Best Cost Provider Strategies
Combine a strategic emphasis on low-cost with a strategic emphasis on differentiation Make an upscale product at a lower cost Give customers more value for the money
Create superior value by MEETING OR EXCEEDING buyer expectations on product attributes and BEATING their price expectations
Be the low-cost producer of a product with GOOD-TO-EXCELLENT product attributes, then use cost advantage to UNDERPRICE comparable brands
Objectives
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
29
The Competitive Strength of a Best-Cost Provider Strategy
Competitive advantage comes from matching close rivals on key product attributes and beating them on price
Success depends on having the skills and capabilities to provide attractive performance and features at a lower cost than rivals
A best-cost producer can often out-compete both a low-cost provider and a differentiator when Standardized features/attributes won’t meet the
diverse needs of buyers Many buyers are price and value sensitive
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
30
Focus / Niche Strategies
Involve concentrated attention on a narrow piece of the total market
Serve niche buyers better than rivals
Choose a market niche where buyers have distinctive preferences, special requirements, or unique needs
Develop unique capabilities to serve needs of target buyer segment
Objective
Keys to Success
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
31
Focus / Niche Strategies and Competitive Advantage
Achieve LOWER COSTS than
rivals in serving the segment--
A low-cost strategy
Offer niche buyers SOMETHING DIFFERENT from rivals--A differentiation strategy
Approach 1
Approach 2 Which hat is unique?
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
32
Examples of Focus Strategies
Netscape Software to browse World Wide Web
Porsche Sports cars
Cannondale Mountain bikes
Horizon and Comair - Commuter airlines Link major airports with small cities
Jiffy Lube International Maintenance for motor vehicles
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
33
What Makes a NicheAttractive for Focusing?
Big enough to be profitable Good growth potential Not crucial to success of major competitors
(making it unlikely they will compete hard in niche)
Focuser has resources to effectively serve segment
Focuser can defend against challengers via superior ability to serve buyers in segment and customer goodwill
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
34
The Competitive Strength ofFocus / Niche Strategies
RIVAL COMPETITORS do not have matching capabilities to meet specialized needs of niche members
Focuser’s competencies/capabilities act as a barrier to POTENTIAL ENTRANTS
Focuser’s competencies/capabilities pose obstacle to sellers of SUBSTITUTES
Focuser’s unique ability to meet niche buyers’ needs can blunt bargaining leverage of powerful BUYERS
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
35
When Does a FocusStrategy Work Best?
Costly or difficult for multi-segment rivals to serve specialized needs of target niche
No other rivals are concentrating on same segment
Firm’s resources do not allow it to go after a bigger piece of market
Industry has many different segments, creating more focusing opportunities
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
36
Risks of a Focus Strategy
Competitors find effective ways to match a focuser’s capabilities in serving niche
Niche buyers’ preferences shift towards product attributes desired by majority of buyers--the niche becomes part of the overall market
Segment becomes so attractive it becomes crowded with rivals, causing segment profits to be splintered
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
37
Vertical Integration Strategies
Vertical integration extends a firm’s competitive scope within same industry Backward into sources of supply Forward toward end-users of final
product Can aim at either full or partial integration
InternallyPerformedActivities, Costs, &Margins
Activities, Costs, &
Margins ofSuppliers
Buyer/UserValue
Chains
Activities, Costs,& Margins of
Forward ChannelAllies &
Strategic Partners
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
38
Competitive Strategy Principle
A vertical integration strategy has
appeal ONLY if it significantly
strengthens a firm’s competitive
position!
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
39
Appeal of Backward Integration
Generates cost savings only if volume needed is big enough to capture efficiencies of suppliers
Potential to reduce costs exists when Suppliers have sizable profit margins Item supplied is a major cost component Resource requirements are easily met
Can produce a differentiation-based competitive advantage when it results in a better quality part
Reduces risk of depending on suppliers of crucial raw materials / parts / components
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
40
Appeal of Forward Integration
Advantageous for a firm to establish its own distribution network if Undependable distribution channels
undermine steady production operations Integrating forward into distribution and retailing
May be cheaper than going through independent distributors
May help achieve stronger product differentiation, allowing escape from price competition
May provide better access to users
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
41
Strategic Disadvantages ofVertical Integration
Boosts resource requirements Locks firm deeper into same industry Results in fixed sources of supply and
less flexibility in accommodatingbuyer demands for product variety
Poses problems of balancing capacity at each stage of value chain
May require radically different skills / capabilities Reduces manufacturing flexibility, lengthening
design time and ability to introduce new products
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
42
Unbundling andOutsourcing Strategies
Involves not performing certain value chain activities internally and relying on
outside vendors to perform needed activities and services
Concept
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
43
Advantages ofOutsourcing Strategies
Outside specialists may can perform the activity better or more cheaply
Activity is not crucial to achieving competitive advantage
Reduces risk exposure to changing technology and/or changing buyer preferences
Streamlines operations to Cut cycle time Speed decision-making Reduce coordination costs
Allows firm to concentrate on its core business
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
44
Pros and Cons of Vertical Integration
The appeal of a vertical integration strategy depends on Its ability to enhance performance of
strategy-critical activities by Lowering costs or Increasing differentiation
Its impact on Resource requirements Flexibility and response times Administrative overhead of coordination
Its ability to create a competitive advantage
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
45
Cooperative Strategies
Companies sometimes use strategic alliances or strategic partnerships or collaborative
agreements to complement their own strategic initiatives and strengthen their competitiveness. Such cooperative strategies go beyond normal company-to-company dealings but fall short of
merger or formal joint venture
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
46
Why Are Strategic Alliances Formed?
To collaborate on technology development or new product development
To improve supply chain efficiency To gain economies of scale in production
and/or marketing To fill gaps in technical or manufacturing
expertise To speed new products to market To acquire or improve market access
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
47
Offensive and Defensive Strategies
Are undertaken to build new or stronger market positions and/or
create competitive advantage
Offensive Strategies
Can protect competitive advantage, but rarely are the basis for creating advantage
Defensive Strategies
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
48
The Building and Eroding of Competitive Advantage
Siz
e o
f C
om
pet
itiv
e A
dva
nta
ge
Time
Benefit Period Erosion PeriodBuildup Period
StrategicMovesProduceCompetitiveAdvantage
Moves byRivalsReduceCompetitiveAdvantage
Size ofCompetitiveAdvantageAchieved
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
49
Options for MountingStrategic Offensives
1. Initiatives to match or exceed rivals’ strengths
2. Initiatives to capitalize on rivals’ weaknesses
3. Simultaneous initiatives on many fronts
4. End-run offensives
5. Guerrilla warfare tactics
6. Preemptive strikes
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
50
Attacking Competitor Strengths
Appeal Gain market share by
out-matching strengths of weaker rivals
Whittle away at a rival’s competitive advantage
Challenging strong competitors with a lower price is foolhardy unless the aggressor has a COST
ADVANTAGE or advantage of GREATER FINANCIAL STRENGTH!
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
51
Attacking Competitor Strengths
Possible Offensive Options
Under-price rivals Boost advertising Introduce new features to appeal to rivals’
customers
Best Options Attack with equally good product & lower price Develop low-cost edge, use it to under-price
rivals
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
52
Options for Attackinga Competitor’s Strengths
Offer equally good product at a lower price
Offer a better product at the same price
Leapfrog into next-generation technologies
Add appealing new features
Run comparison ads
Construct new plant capacity
Offer a wider product line
Develop better customer service capabilities
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
53
Attacking Competitor Weaknesses
Basic ApproachConcentrate company strengths and resources
directly against a rival’s weaknesses
Weaknesses to Attack Geographic regions where rival is weak Segments rival is neglecting Go after those customers a rival
is least equipped to serve Rivals with weaker marketing skills Introduce new models exploiting gaps in rivals’
product lines
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
54
Launching Simultaneous Offensiveson Many Fronts
Objective Launch several major initiatives to
Throw rivals off-balance Splinter their attention Force them to use substantial resources
to defend their position
AppealA challenger with superior resources can overpower
weaker rivals by out-competing them across-the-board long enough to become a market leader.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
55
End-Run Offensives
Objectives DODGE head-to-head confrontations that
escalate competitive intensity or risk cutthroat competition
Attempt to MANEUVER around areas of strong competition--concentrate on those areas of market where competition is weakest
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
56
Optional Approaches for End-Run Offensives
Build presence in geographic areas where rivals have little presence or exposure
Introduce products with different attributes and features to better meet buyer needs
Introduce next-generation technologies and leapfrog rivals
Add more support services for customers
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
57
Guerrilla Offenses
Approach
Use principles of surprise and hit-and-run to attack in locations and at times where conditions are most favorable to initiator
Appeal
Well-suited to small challengers with limited resources
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
58
Options for Guerrilla Offenses
Focus on narrow target weakly defended by rivals Challenge rivals where they are overextended and
when they are encountering problems Make random scattered raids on leaders
Occasional low-balling on price Intense bursts of promotional
activity Legal actions charging antitrust
violations, patent infringements, or unfair advertising
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
59
Preemptive Strikes
Approach
Involves moving first to secure an advantageous
position that rivals
are foreclosed or discouraged
from duplicating!
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
60
Preemptive Strike Options
Expand capacity ahead of demand in hopes of discouraging rivals from following suit
Tie up best or cheapest sources of essential raw materials
Move to secure best geographic locations Obtain business of prestigious customers Build an image in buyers’ minds that is unique &
hard to copy Secure exclusive or dominant access to best
distributors Acquire desirable, but struggling, competitor
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
61
Choosing Whom to Attack
Four types of firms can be the target of an offensive: Market leaders Runner-up firms Struggling rivals on verge
of going under Small local or regional
firms not doing a good jobfor their customers
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
62
Offensive Strategy andCompetitive Advantage
STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE options offering strongest basis for COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE Develop lower-cost product design Make changes in production operations that
lower costs or enhance differentiation Develop product features that deliver superior
performance or lower users’ costs Give more responsive customer service Escalate marketing effort Pioneer new distribution channel Sell direct to end-users
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
63
Defensive Strategy
Objectives Fortify firm’s present position Help sustain any competitive advantage
held Lessen risk of being attacked Blunt impact of any attack that occurs Influence challengers to aim attacks at
other rivals
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
64
Defensive Strategies: Approaches
Approach 1
Block avenues challengers can take in mounting offensive attacks
Approach 2
Make it clear any challenge will
be met with strong counterattack
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
65
Blocking Avenues for Rivals’ Offensives
Broaden product line to fill gaps rivals may go after Keep prices low on models that match rivals Sign exclusive agreements with distributors Offer free training to buyers’ personnel Give better credit terms to buyers Reduce delivery times for spare parts Increase warranty coverage Patent alternative technologies Sign exclusive contracts with best suppliers Protect proprietary know-how
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
66
Signaling Defensive Toughness
Publicly announce management’s strong commitment to maintain present market share
Publicly announce plans to construct new production capacity to meet forecasted demand
Give out advance information about new products, technological breakthroughs, and other moves
Publicly commit firm to policy of matching prices and terms offered by rivals
Maintain war chest of cash reserves Make occasional counter-responses to rivals’
moves
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
67
First-Mover Advantages
WHEN to make a strategic move is often as crucial as WHAT move to make
First-mover advantages arise WHEN Pioneering helps build firm’s image and
reputation Early commitments to raw material suppliers,
new technologies, & distribution channels can produce cost advantage
Loyalty of first time buyers is high Moving first can be a preemptive strike
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
68
First-Mover Disadvantages
Moving early can be a disadvantage (or fail to produce an advantage) when Costs of pioneering are sizable and loyalty of
first time buyers is weak Rapid technological change
allows followers to leapfrog pioneers
Achievements of pioneers are easily and quickly imitated by late movers
It is relatively easy for latecomers to crack the market
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
69
Timing and Competitive Advantage
Principle 1Being a first-mover holds potential for
competitive advantage in some cases but not in others
Principle 2Being a fast follower can sometimes yield as
good a result as being a first mover
Principle 3Being a late-mover may or may not be fatal--it
varies with the situation