25
Published quarterly by the Association of Environmental Professionals NAEP Affiliation the Environmental the Environmental monitor Summer 2012 Yosemite, CA monitor 2012 AEP Awards Program Birds of a Feather Flock Together: The Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison The Planning, Sustainability, Health Connection: A Glimpse at Emerging Trends CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications: A Gold Mine of Gray Literature?

the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

  • Upload
    ngonga

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

Published quarterly by theAssociation of

Environmental Professionals

NAEP Affiliation

the Environmentalthe EnvironmentalmonitorSummer 2012

Yosemite CA

monitor2012 AEP Awards Program

Birds of a Feather Flock Together The Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection A Glimpse at Emerging Trends

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

D I R E C T O R S - A T - L A R G EMichael Hendrix9098905951 ext 2509michaelhendrixatkinsglobalcom

Steve Noack AICP5108483815 ext306stevedceplanningcom

Kent Norton AICP REA9517819310kentnortonlsa-assoccom

Alliance Acoustical Consulting IncAlthouse amp Meade Inc

Anchor QEA LLCASM Affiliates Inc

Aspen Environmental GroupBaker Manock amp Jensen PC

Brezack amp Associates PlanningBriscoe Ivester amp Bazel LLP

BonTerra ConsultingBurns amp McDonnell

California Open LandsCity of HesperiaCity of La QuintaCity of Murrieta

City of Ontario Planning DepartmentCity of San Diego

Cogstone Resource Management IncCondor Country Consulting IncCondor Earth Technologies IncCounty of San DiegoDPWESU

County of Santa Cruz Planning DepartmentDavid J Powers amp Associates Inc

Denise Duffy amp Associates IncDMI-EMK Environmental Services Inc

Double Barrel Environmental IncDowney Brand LLP

EcoLayers Inc

Ecology amp Environment IncECORP Consulting Inc

El Dorado Irrigation DistrictEMC Planning Group Inc

Environmental Compliance SolutionsEnvironmental Science AssociatesFresno Metro Flood Control District

GHDGlobal Environmental PermittingGresham Savage Nolan amp Tilden

Helix Water DistrictHiggins AssociatesHNTB CorporationICF International

James P Allen amp AssociatesJRP Historical Consulting

Katz and AssociatesKrieger amp Stewart

Lilburn CorporationLive Oak Associates Inc

LSA Associates IncMcCormick Biological Inc

Michael Brandman AssociatesMoore Iacofano Goltsman Inc

NicholsBermanOdell Planning amp Research IncOrange County Public Works

Pacific Watershed Associates IncPangea Biological

PAR Environmental Services IncPCR Services CorporationPebble Beach Company

Perkins Coie LLPPlanning Associates IncPoint Impact Analysis LLC

Rosen Goldberg Der amp Lewitz IncSan Joaquin Hills TCA

Santa Barbara County APCDSLO Office of SWCA Environmental Consultants

Stockton Port DistrictStoel Rives LLP

Swaim Biological IncTerra Nova Planning amp Research

Tetra Tech IncThe Ervin Consulting GroupTRA Environmental Sciences

Urban Futures IncUrban Planning Partners

VCS EnvironmentalWildlife Heritage Foundation

WRA Inc

AEP websitewwwCalifAEPorgIncludes Chapter Links

A E P S T A T E B O A R D O F D I R E C T O R S

C H A P T E R D I R E C T O R S

O F F I C E R S

S P O N S O R I N G O R G A N I Z A T I O N S

CentralJohn P Kinsey Esq5592334800jkinseywjhattorneyscom

Channel CountiesJohn Karamitsos8059346255Johnkcosanta-barbaracaus

Inland EmpireOpen--

Los Angeles CountyDev Vrat AICP6268401580devvratcsunedu

C H A P T E R P R E S I D E N T SMonterey Bay AreaBill Wiseman8318838187presidentmontereybayaeporg

Orange CountyAlisha Winterswyk9518268303Alishawinterswykbbklawcom

San DiegoJulie Wang6196870110juliewangch2mcom

San Francisco BayTerri McCrackentmccrackenplanningcentercom

PresidentGene Talmadge8054274123jngtalmadgemsncom

Executive Vice PresidentWilliam Halligan7149669220whalliganplanningcentercom

Administrative Vice PresidentDevon Muto8586943016devonmutosdcountycagov

Financial Vice PresidentLynn Calvert-Hayes9517819310lynnhayeslsa-assoccom

NAEP LiaisonRoger Turner9517075020rwturnerhotmailcom

CentralGeorge Finney5596247125gfinneycotularecaus

Channel CountiesDavid Wolff8182928033dwolffsageiicom

Inland EmpireJoan Valle9515224005joan_valleurscorpcom

Los Angeles CountyLaura R Kaufman AICP6266833547lkaufmansapphosenvironmentalcom

Monterey Bay AreaChristine Bradley8316491799directormontereybayaeporg

Orange CountyKonnie Dobreva7149669220kdobrevaplanningcentercom

San DiegoMarilyn Ponseggi6199444294marilyn_pcoxnet

San Francisco Bay AreaJoan Douglas-Fryjdouglas-fryesassoccom

Send all graphics to

Publication DesignDorina BlytheGranDesigns9516953646FAX 9516953646dorinagrandesignsus31807 Green Oak WayTemecula CA 92592

S T A F FAdvertising inquiries should be addressed to

AEP ManagementLynne Bynder CMPMeetings Xceptional7603404499FAX 7606742479lbyndercalifaeporg40747 Baranda CourtPalm Desert CA 92260

For questions comments suggestions and all textualsubmittals please contact the EnvironmentalMonitor Editor

Environmental Monitor EditorMarc P Bierdzinski AICP8057144512mbplanmarcverizonnet

WebmasterKenneth J Carey7147577750admincalifaeporg

Environmental Assessor EditorTerry Rivasplata9167373000FAX 9167373030trivasplatajsanetcom

P U B L I C A T I O N B O A R D

Superior CaliforniaJanet Dallas9164145877janetdallasaecomcom

Superior CaliforniaChristina Ryan9164447301christyryanascentenvinccom

the Environmentalmonitor

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 2

Submittal deadline for theFALL 2012 Issue

of the Environmental Monitor isOctober 1 2012

(posted by October 15 2012)dates subject to change without notice

contents

Statements of fact and opinion are theresponsibility of the authors alone and do notimply an endorsement on the part of theofficers directors or members of AEPMaterials may not be reproduced withoutwritten permission Articles and graphicssubmitted are the property of AEP but authorsretain the right to reprint their own articles

SUBMITTAL SPECIFICATIONSArticles Professionals on the Move andCalendar items should be sent to the editorMarc Bierdzinski in Word format For fileverification sendfax a hard copyAll article photos calling card and display adswill be accepted in DIGITAL FORMAT ONLYNO EXCEPTIONS Digital specifications are

bull JPEG or PDF formatbull Grayscale or black and whitebull 300 - 600 resolution at 100 sizebull Email your ad to dorinagrandesignsus

All addressesphone numbers may be foundon the inside front cover of the EnvironmentalMonitor

Greetings to you all It isindeed a pleasure andhonor to introduce you tothe next issue of theEnvironmental Monitor We

have interesting feature articles as well asa recap from the recent 2012 AEPConference in Sacramento The AEPwebsite (wwwcalifaeporg) continues itsimprovement following the AEP ChapterSummit discussions and you will findmore notices of events and otherimportant information being posted foryour reading pleasure Our member use(and many ldquohitsrdquo from outside sourcesincluding overseas viewers) hasincreased Truly a great service to you ourmembers Check it out

Our AEP Conference was a bigsuccess and thanks to all on thecommittee under the capable leadershipof Trevor Macenski and John Kinsey theConference achieved its financial andattendance goals set forth in the budgetWe had two inspiring talks from ourfeatured speakers Julia Burrows fromGreenwise Joint Venture in the City ofSacramento spoke to us about manystrategies being implemented in the cityto promote lsquogreenrsquo practices Our featuredspeaker was John Laird CaliforniaSecretary for Natural Resources whospoke about the many challenges facingthe state including the Bay Delta Accord(critical to water supplies in the state)renewable energy programs and otherprojects of significance to our statersquosresources CEQA plays a vital role inthem all and he is firm supporter of thelaw

Inside this edition of theEnvironmental Monitor are twointeresting articles that came from theconference proceedings One deals withthe California State University MontereyBay Watershed Institute while the otherdeals with an interesting twist in habitatpreservation This article details theprotection of a bird colony in a prison ndashshowing not all things found in prisons arepredictably bad Very interesting

Just before the Conference we had anAEP Board meeting and the ChapterSummit The Summit is an important

the Environmentalmonitor

S U M M E R 2 0 1 2

Gene Talmadge AEP President

3 Presidentrsquos Message

4 2012 AEP Awards Program

9 From the NAEP Liaisonrsquos Desk

10 Birds of a Feather Flock TogetherThe Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

12 The Planning Sustainability HealthConnection A Glimpse at EmergingTrends

16 CSU Monterey Bay WatershedInstitute Publications A Gold Mineof Gray Literature

18 2013 AEP Awards ProgramNominations

22 2013 NAEPAEP Joint ConferenceSponsorExhibitor Opportunities

25 AEP Membership Application

PRESIDENTrsquoS MESSAGE

opportunity for the AEP Chapters todiscuss matters of interest and importanceto the chapters and provide guidance tothe state Board At this yearrsquos Summit wehad representatives from all the chapterspresent and had a great discussion onnumerous topics Our number onepriority remains Membership ndash retainingexisting members recruiting new onesand finding ones that may have driftedaway The Membership Committee willbe leading the ldquoDriverdquo a very ambitiousprogram We have re-designed themembership form to include a summary ofmember benefits and defining new classesof membership (regular new professionalsstudent etc) as well as a new promotionalmaterial package distributed to allchapters The Committee has scheduledregular conference calls to coordinatetheir activities The real key to theirefforts is underscored by the commitmentof each chapterrsquos actions to reach out andkeep their current members recruit newmembers and draw others back into thefold Each chapter member and thechapter board needs to focus attention onthis important effort The larger AEPbecomes the more services and programswe can offer to our members for theirpersonal professional development andsocialbusiness networking Corporate

continued on page 24

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 3

Cover photo credit Dorina Blythe April 2012Taken while vacationing in Yosemite

FEATURE ARTICLE

By Roger Turner and Dev Vrat Awards Program Co-Chairs

2012 AEP Awards Program

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Charles S BullldquoCharly is a mentor I am always amazed by the depth and diversity of his knowledge from his recognized expertise in noise modeling andanalysis cultural resources and air quality to his seemingly unlimited understanding of CEQA and NEPA regulations and implementationMoreover he has managed and successfully completed environmental documents for large controversial projects Charly freely shares hisknowledge and has had a hand in educating many of the environmental professionals working today in the San Diego region If you have aquestion he knows the answer Above all Charly will drop everything he is working on to take a moment or an afternoon to teachrdquo mdash RobertMacAller President RECON

ldquoCharly has been an active member of AEP for over 25 years and served as an AEP State Boardmember In this capacity he activelyparticipated in several rounds of AEP Strategic Plans He was anorganizer of the first CEQA Basics Workshop for the San Diego Chapter ofAEP as well as anorganizer and co-presenter of the first CEQA Basics Workshop for the San Diego Chapter of AEP aswell as an organizer andco-presenter with Margaret Sohagi for an Advanced CEQA Workshop Hewas also the Director of the 2000 AEP Conference in San Diegowhere the conference focused onconflict resolution in the environmental process The conference included presentations by CEQAjudges fromthroughout California and involved a comparative mock trial versus mediation of aCEQA challenge Charly has also served on the San DiegoChapterlegislative review committee andparticipated as a member of the chapter awards juryrdquo - Julie Wang AEP San Diego ChapterPresident

ldquoMost recently he is serving as a Co-Chair to the San Diego Chapterrsquos newly formedEmeritusCommittee The Emeritus Committeersquos goal is to re-involve long-time AEP memberswho are approaching retirement and havenrsquot been active in AEP recently It will give the Chaptermembership one more chance to learn from these individuals before they retire from theprofession The Emeritus Committee under Charlyrsquos leadership will be establishing mentorprograms for our Student Chapters as well as for professionals at all levelsrdquo mdash Marilyn RFPonseggi San Diego AEP Chapter DirectorContact Nicole Turner RECON Environmental 1927 5th Avenue San Diego CA 92101 619-308-9333 nturnerreconenvironmentalcom

and to URS for sponsoring this yearrsquos production of theAwards Presentation Video highlighting the recipients It wasanother great program You can learn more about thesewinning projects and programs on AEPrsquos website atwwwcalifaeporg You can also look in this and future editionsof the Environmental Monitor for articles on these greatdocuments If you are curious contact the authors and discussyour thoughts

Also now is the time to prepare a nomination for nextyearrsquos program The 2013 awards announcement is on theAEP website and in this issue of the Environmental Monitorwith listed criteria for submittals The 2013 Awardscriteria and submission materials are to be submitted byAugust 15 2012 Do not miss this opportunity to haveyour outstanding work and contributions to the professionrecognized by your peers next year

The Association of Environmental Professionalscongratulates the following winners of the 2012 AwardsProgram

The Association of Environmental Professionals(AEP) has been recognizing the best work ofpublic agencies and environmental professionalsfor over 36 years Award-winners have advancedthe state-of-the-art in environmental analysis

and presenting this analysis to the public and decision makersin an attractive understandable and easily accessible formatClimate Change and preparation of Climate Action Plans toreduce greenhouse gas emissions have become State prioritiesYear after year the best of the best environmentalprofessionals and their documents achievementrsquos and serviceto the profession have contributed to the enhancementmaintenance and protection of the quality of the natural andhuman environment

AEPrsquos award winners were recognized at the AEP AwardsProgram ceremony held on May 7 2012 in SacramentoAEP congratulates each winning recipient of the prestigiousmountain trophies award plaques and certificates

AEP extends sincere thanks to the volunteer Awards Jury

continued on page 5

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 4

Accepting this award Charlie Bull

AEP is looking for volunteers for the 2013 AEP Awards Jury If you would like to serve on the jury please contact Dev Vrat AICPdevvratcsunedu

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 5

Environmental Analysis Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDSan Diego County General Plan Update EIRPrepared for the County of San DiegoPrepared by Atkins County of San Diego Department of Planning amp Land Use

The Awards Jury found the EIR to be well organized and user-friendly with manysupportive tables and high quality graphics to illustrate key resource areas The impactsummary tables at the beginning of each resource section are also a nice touch The EIR teamwas able to develop a concise project description that allowed for a comprehensiveprogrammatic evaluation of land use and transportation policies and a holistic considerationof impacts Outstanding

Contact Devon Muto Chief Advanced Planning Department of Planning and Land Use Countyof San Diego 5201 Ruffin Road Suite B San Diego CA 92123-1666 Office 8586943016DevonMutosdcountycagov

OUTSTANDING AWARDPlan Santa Barbara General Plan Update Program EIRPrepared for the City of Santa BarbaraPrepared by AMEC Earth amp EnvironmentalFehr amp Peers NelsonNygaard Applied Earthworks Santa Barbara CommunityDevelopment Department Planning Division

The Awards Jury noted that this EIR employs a number of unique and innovativeapproaches These include a unique level of analysis of the integrated effects of land use TDMand alternative transportation on congestion energy consumption emissions and climatechange The EIR transforms broad planning policies into a detailed project description for the EIR analysis necessary to support adoption of theGeneral Plan Update The jury appreciated the approach and organization of the executive summary In addition the project website demonstratesgreat public involvement It is clear a lot of thought was put into the organization and preparation of this Program EIR Outstanding

Contact Ben Botkin AMEC 805962-0992 benjaminbotkinameccom

MERIT AWARD2050 Regional Transportation Plan Sustainable Communities Strategy EIRPrepared for San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)Prepared by AECOM and SANDAG

This EIR uses a unique methodology - breaking the environmental analysis down by timeperiod to help disclose the impacts of the 2050 RTPSCS in meeting targets for GHGemission reductions under SB 375 The EIR team at SANDAG and AECOM workeddiligently through extensive use of a geographic information system (GIS) data inputmapping and modeling to determine the environmental impacts associated with theproposed project Collection review and distillation of statewide regional and localjurisdiction plans regulations and EIRs fed into the analysis for each issue area This is a wellthought out document and is practical to use Excellent

Contact Yara Fisher 6192331454 yarafisheraecomcom

Planning Document

OUTSTANDING AWARDSan Diego County General Plan UpdatePrepared for the County of San DiegoPrepared by the San Diego County Department of Planning and Land Use

San Diego County has successfully performed a challenging land use balancing actin this general plan update The plan is well organized clearly presented and uses acommon sense approach in its analysis Itrsquos an impressive example of rethinking land useplans to minimize impacts and encourage more efficient use of lands Kudos to San DiegoCounty for reducing the need for roads in constrained areas Outstanding

Contact Bob Citrano 8586943016 or Devon Muto DevonMutosdcountycagov

continued on page 6

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 4

Accepting this award Dianne Sandman Senior ProjectManager Mindy Fogg Atkins

Accepting this award Jeff Henderson AICP ProjectManager AECOM

Accepting this award Ben Botkin AMEC BarbaraShelton City of Santa Barbara Community DevelopmentDepartment

Accepting this award Eric Gibson Devon Muto Chief ofAdvance Planning County of San Diego

Climate Change Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDCity of West Hollywood Climate Action PlanPrepared for the City of West Hollywood and AECOM

The Awards Jury found the document to be user friendly including excellentgraphics and publicly accessible The climate action plan presents measurable outcomesfor two target years 2020 and 2035 The organization of information is intuitivethroughout the document and the one page pullouts for each measure make thedocument easy to read The comprehensive matrix at the end is an excellent referencefor implementation of the plan and for individuals interested in reading about howdecisions were made regarding each measure Adjustments to the plan are called for on5-yr cycle An Outstanding Climate Action Plan Contact Jeff Henderson 9164837999 jeffhendersonaecomcom

MERIT AWARDUnion City Climate Action PlanPrepared for Union CityPrepared by Climate Protection Task Force City Council and Planning Commission ofUnion City AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury found the tool kit included in this climate action plan may be used asa decision support tool for Greenhouse Gas emission reduction measures thereby providing acommon sense approach to choosing various reduction measures in an interactive settingThe CAP includes supporting measures even when they are not quantifiable whichultimately improves the ability to implement the plan The jury also noted that there wastransparency in the technical appendix documents The toolkit enables real-time resultswhich increases buy-in by staff and stakeholders Everyone can see immediately what theresults will be using various scenarios The reduction keys are a good way to provide at-a-glance monitoring of impacts An excellent documentContact Claire Bonham AECOM 4159552800 clairbonham-carteraecomcom

MERIT AWARDCity of Escondido Draft Climate Action PlanPrepared for the City of EscondidoPrepared by ATKINS and the City of Escondido

The Awards Jury noted that this climate action plan presents information simply andclearly so the layperson can understand the implications of specific measures and programs -the one page pullouts are key The jury agreed itrsquos encouraging that partnerships werehighlighted in a CAP as a priority for implementation - this will help reduce the impacts toboth staff resources and the Cityrsquos budget It was also great to see the linkage to regionalplanning via the RTPSCS Periodic updates are called for with three initial definite yearsidentified The plan also includes definable metrics with screening table minimum valuesAn excellent document

Contact Joanne Dramko 8585141023 joannedramkoatkinsglobalcom

MERIT AWARDSan Luis Obispo County Energy Wise PlanPrepared for the County of San Luis ObispoPrepared by PMC and the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning amp Building

The Energy Wise Plan was developed in coordination with a number of otherplanning efforts occurring throughout the County so that it can serve as a centralclearing house for energy and climate policy Of particular note the plan includes athree tiered approach to performance monitoring and includes an innovative approachof providing yearly progress assessments Well doneContactTammy Seale PMC 8052507974 tsealepmcworldcom

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 5

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 6

continued on page 7

Accepting this award Jeff Henderson AICP ProjectManager AECOM

Accepting this award Culley Thomas Union City

Accepting this award Joanne Dramko and MichaelHendrix Program Managers Atkins

Accepting this award Jason H Giffen Director County ofSan Luis Obispo Leanne Singleton Tammy Seale PMC

Environmental Resource Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDRobert Louis Stevenson State Park and Wildlake-Duff RanchesPrepared for the Land Trust of Napa CountyPrepared by AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury observed that the management plan uses a comprehensive approachwith supporting mapping making it easy to evaluate the various management scenarios Theconcept of this document can be replicated at other parks or in other situations involvingmultiple ownerships The technical information presented in a graphic format enables a layperson to understand project opportunities and constraints at-a-glance An outstandingdocumentContact Sarah Heard AECOM 4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

MERIT AWARDAdapting to Rising Tides -Transportation Vulnerability and Risk Assessment ProjectPrepared for Conservation and Development Commission Metropolitan TransportationCommission California Department of Transportation District 4 AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury commented that this project is an excellent example of how to usecreative partnerships to provide regional value and statewide applicability The risk profileswith zoom-in maps are helpful to understand impacts and compare different facilities Anexcellent documentContact Sarah Heard AECOM 4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

OUTSTANDING AWARDNew Irvington Tunnel Project Groundwater Management ProgramPrepared for the Public Utilities CommissionPrepared by Public Utilities Commission ndash New Irvington Tunnel Project Team

The Awards Jury noted that the program uses multiple platforms to reach the public Theproject includes clear fact sheets which are visually appealing A hotline was established andis displayed prominently in all the program materials Congratulations to the San FranciscoPublic Utilities Commission for their 5 years of effort to recognize the value of the landowners as stake holders and to engage them as part of the long-term groundwatermanagement solution An outstanding outcome

Contact David Tszoo Project Manager SFPUC 9252334354 dtsztoosfwaterorg

MERIT AWARDEffective Mitigation - Development through ImplementationPrepared for Sempra EnergyPrepared by Insignia Environmental San Diego Gas amp Electric Company and GasCompany

Sempra Energy Utilities and Insignia Environmental have crafted a training session thatprovides a primer on the A to Zrsquos of mitigation measures They detail the permitting processdiscuss the semantics of mitigation measures and review tracking procedures The Awards Juryfound the regulatory triggers table to be very helpful This program can be easily transferredto other public utility agencies and local municipalities An excellent documentContact Anne Marie McGraw Insignia 6503216787 AMcgrawinsigniaenvcom

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 7

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 6

continued on page 8

Accepting this award Sarah Heard AECOM4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Accepting this award Sarah Heard AECOM4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Accepting this award David Tsztoo PE SFPUC BetsyRhodes SFPUC Holly Their The Their Group BruceAbellimanKim Stern SFPUC

Accepting this award Name to come Erin KeochekiconAnne Marie McGraw Insignia

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

MERIT AWARDSan Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter ProgramPrepared for San Diego Gas and ElectricPrepared by San Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter Program ndash Customer Experience

The SDGampE Smart Meter Programrsquos detailed messaging plan may be used as a model foreffective outreach Itrsquos 90-60-30-day notification plan is transferable to other publiceducation efforts The informational door hangers were an innovative approach to reachinga segment of the public that might otherwise have been missed Excellent work

Contact Risa Baron Sempra Utilities Office 8586541857 rbaronsemprautilitiescom

Humor Award

AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line -General Outreach and Educational MaterialsPrepared for AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line members Prepared by AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line

The Awards Jury found this project to be creative and hilarious ndash especially to nerds Thetricksters at AECOM presented a real tongue-in-cheek treat for the reader Halloween willnever be the same and neither will the employee who portrayed the patient zombie It takesthe notion of ldquoother duties as assignedrdquo to a whole other realm Thanks to the knowledgeableand respected AECOM technical staff for sharing your internal office humor and providingthe Awards Jury an enjoyable respite from the serious environmental analysis and climatereduction plansContact John Hute AECOM 9164145876

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 8

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 7

AcknowledgementsOne of the most important AEP volunteer groups is the AEP Awards Jury These are AEP peer professionals chosen for

their years of experience and expertise in the profession AEP recognized the following individuals who gave graciously manydays of their time to review and judge all the submittals and hours spent on AEP conference calls to reach consensus decisionsusing the AEP rating criteria Thank you all

AEP 2012 AWARDS VIDEO PRODUCTIONWe thank Megan Giglini Vivian Gaddie and Joan Valle of URS for the great video for the awards program We thank URS

for sponsoring the Awards Program The video was enjoyed by all

AEP 2012 CONFERENCE COMMITTEEFinally we thank the Co-Chairs for this conference Trevor Macenski Michael Brandman Associates and John Kinsey

Wanger Jones Helsley PC for leadership and hard work and their little army of conference volunteers Thank you all for awonderful successful conference

AEP 2012 AWARDS JURYDev Vrat AICP Jury ChairUrban Studies and Planning DepartmentCalifornia State University Northridge

Patti Nahil AICPPGN

Jeffry S Rice AICPURS

Crystahl TaylorPadre Associates Inc

Honey L WaltersAscent Environmental Inc

Ray WeissESA

Accepting this award Carolyn Winn VP Customer ServiceSan Diego Gas and Electric

Accepting this award John Hute AECOM

Summer is here and it has warmed up It is the timefor vacations and exploring the outdoors I hope youget out there and refresh your fun time hiking or justhaving a good time doing your favorite activity Theenvironmental field continues to take more

importance in all aspects of our lives We hear more newscoverage of disasters and their environmental effectsEnvironmental professionals are sought out for professionaladvice in every aspect of our community issues We have astronger voice in developing environmental policy inCalifornia and in every state in this nation So I ask what roledo you play and how can you stay sharp with your skills

AEP and NAEP offer many opportunities includingCEQANEPA Workshops special training in air qualitytransportation planning greenhouse gas emission impactsurban pollution in our nations water and the list goes on AEPis planning for the Fall Basic CEQA Workshop Look to theAEP Website and to upcoming newsletters for the Fall BasicCEQA Workshops

AEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop this summerDates are July 25th in Clovis CA July 30 in Oakland CA July31 in San Diego CA and August 1 in Carson CA Go to thecalifaeporg website for more information This is the first timeAEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop training program

NAEP is continuing to offer Webinars I will be sendinginformation to you as it is published Take advantage of these90 minute online training programs They are valuable andgreat to stay current on the regulatory policy and court cases foryour work Look for more information in the near futureNAEP is working hard to increase real value opportunities toenvironmental professionals Recent webinars on FrackingEndangered Species and Green Energy Development Impactsto Natural Resources were presented by NAEP

NAEP posts bimonthly E-Newsletters A recentedition included in some excellent articles on

various environmental topics The E-Newlettersare posted on the AEP Website and e-mailed

to AEP members when published These aregreat resources to read current events in

the environmental profession and staycurrent on the happening scene

Look for the most recent edition onour website

NAEP will be conducting aChapter Retreat July 21 and

22 2012 in Kansas CityThis is a time when the

From the NAEP Liaisonrsquos DeskNAEPAFFILIATION

By Roger W Turner

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 9

Chapter representatives will go over the strategic goals andreview the programs provided by NAEP The Chapter Retreatwill help set the new course for NAEP in providing its Chapterservices and programs to its members Note all AEP members areaffiliated with NAEP and will benefit from programs trainingand conferences NAEP produces I will publish the results of theChapter Retreat in a future edition of this report

The 2013 NAEPAEP Joint Conference is planned for April1 to 5 2013 The theme is ldquoWalk the Talkrdquo The conferencecommittee is hard at work planning what will sure to be aninformative and engaging event for environmental professionalsOur conference will be held in an outstanding state-of-the-artconference facility at the JW Marriott Hotel located in thevibrant LA Live complex in downtown Los Angeles

The hotel and conference facility sport a front-row seat tosome of Los Angelesrsquo top attractions include the Staples Centerthe Nokia Theatre Regal Cinemas and a wide variety of shopsand restaurants In addition despite the car-centered nature ofgreater Los Angeles many world-class attractions can be reachedvia public transit which is easily accessible from the complex

The conference program will feature dynamic regional andnational keynote speakers and an all-day pre-conferencesymposium on climate change adaptation Conference sessionswill cover topics including NEPA and CEQA Climate ChangeWater Supply and Delivery Air Quality Energy and AlternativeEnergy Development Marine and Coastal Issues HabitatMitigation Transportation Land Use and Cultural ResourcesThere will also be numerous other conference and social eventsthat will take advantage of the conference location including anumber of mobile workshops and a 5K run through some ofdowntown Los Angelesrsquo top attractions

Look for more information in future editions of my columnand on the AEP Website

Please mark your calendar-

The presentation abstracts submittal deadline-August 15 2012

The sponsor exhibitor submittal deadline-March 1 2013

The 2013 awards nomination submittal deadline-August 15 2012

As always I look forward to your comments and thoughts Ialso invite you to write me at rwturnerhotmailcom or call

(951) 707-5020 if you have a question about NAEP or needassistance in obtaining service from NAEP

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 11

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 10

By Bill Goggin Senior Biologist EMC Planning Group

Birds of a Feather Flock TogetherThe Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

solve an on-going maintenance problem that had become ahealth liability the prison staff proposed to construct a pavedpath between security fences so that the facilityrsquos guards couldbetter patrol this area (several of the guards had suffered turnedankles and knees because of the uneven and pot-holed groundsurface) Because the project had a potential to impact sensitivebiological resources Santa Clara County staff contracted withEMC Planning Group to assist the County with complying withthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and otherstate and federal environmental laws established to protectsensitive animals and their habitats including what is the subjectof this short article an established egret and heron rookery

During the performance of an earlier biological pre-construction survey performed by EMC Planning Group in July2010 an active rookery (a colonial breeding bird site) wasobserved within the south-central portion of the prison facilityrsquosmain courtyard The rookery is located within a cluster of denselyfoliated trees and contained approximately 50-60 nests fromthree species of birds great egret (Ardea alba) snowy egret(Egretta thula) and black-crowned night heron (Nycticorax

You can hear the sound as you approach thecourtyard of the Elmwood Correctional Facilityalthough itrsquos not exactly clear whatrsquos causing allthe commotion It starts as a low backgroundchattering and builds to a near cacophony close to

the mess hall Beyond these seemingly discordant soundseverything in the scene appears to be in order the prisonrsquosinmates going about their daily routine dressed in white- andblack-striped jumpsuits sweeping lifting weights or casuallytalking in groups while the watchful guards keep a dutiful eyeout for anything out of the ordinary All in all itrsquos just anotherordinary day at the Elmwood Correctional Facility But what iscausing all this noise you may ask yourself Finally out of ideasyou glance heavenward and thatrsquos when it hits you (no notthat) there are birds in the trees above your head manybirdshellipand they are large birds Are you puzzled Donrsquot bebecause this is the story of the jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

The Elmwood Correctional Facility is a low-security SantaClara County prison located west of Interstate 880 and north ofGreat American Parkway in Milpitas California In order to

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 11

Birds of a Feather Flock Together continued from page 10

nycticorax) The ground surface beneath these trees showedevidence of long-term site use by rookeryrsquos birds as wasdemonstrated by an accumulation of whitewash feathers andegg shell fragments

Especially unique in an urban area the Elmwood rookerysite is believed to be the only egret and heron rookery in thesouthern San Francisco Bay located within an entirely fencedanthropogenic setting and may be the only one of its kind innorthern California Colonial breeding sites are especiallyimportant when located within urbanized environments asdevelopment and land conversion often degrades orremoves available rookery habitat and asa result opportunities for colonialnesting species in urban areasare limited These sites arealso significant becausethey often support asizeable segment ofthe local populationand because theirproximity to foragingareas can reducetravel distances theymay potentially reducepredator-prey (iemortality) interactions

Because construction wasplanned during the most sensitive periodof the birds natural life history cycle the projectrsquosconstruction activities had a potential to cause detrimentalimpacts (ie elevated levels of noise dust and fumes) possiblyaffecting the birds nesting and juvenile rearing which couldhave led to fines and negative press for the County Thereforein order to protect this important resource in spring 2011 theCounty retained EMC Planning Group to monitor the rookeryduring the projectrsquos construction whenever heavy equipmentoperation would be occurring within 500 feet of the rookery

It is important to note that none of bird species living at theElmwood rookery (great egret snowy egret and night heron) arespecifically listed as threatened or endangered by the state orfederal Endangered Species Acts however the CaliforniaDepartment of Fish and Game (CDFG) considers colonialbreeding sites to be sensitive resource areas that are affordedprotection under CDFG Code during the breeding bird seasonas they can be sensitive to human intrusion and disturbance Inaddition to state regulations the protection of egrets and heronsare covered under the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act Oncenests have been constructed and eggs are present the rookerysite becomes a protected resource area and cannot be disturbedReproduction for the rookeries species generally occurs from

early April through July with the juvenile rearing periodextending into mid-September

Behavioral monitoring of the egret and heron rookeryconsisted of a qualified EMC Planning Group biologist stationedinside the facilityrsquos perimeter fence in a direct line of siteapproximately 275 feet from the rookery during constructionactivities or during operation of heavy equipment within 500feet of the rookery During construction the monitoringbiologist observed egret and heron behavior using hand heldbinoculars and a high magnification field spotting scope for signs

of stress andor agitation Notes on behavioralinteractions (ie preeninggrooming

feeding sibling competition etc)and daily counts on numbers of

individuals and juvenilespresent were recorded

C o n s t r u c t i o ncommenced on April27 and an EMCPlanning Groupbiologist conductedworker environmental

awareness trainingconcerning the presence

of the rookery and theimportance of protecting the

rookery During the projectrsquosimplementation no disturbance of the

rookery was noted and the rookeries behavior wasessentially unchanged by project activities Approximately 38adult and 23 juvenile egrets and herons were observedthroughout the construction period

By incorporating these pro-active impact minimization andspecial-status species protection measures into the projectrsquosimplementation the County as the lead agency demonstratedproper compliance with CDFG Code and CEQA law and thisimportant and sensitive resource was safeguarded frominadvertent disturbance This model of good stewardshipdemonstrates leadership on the part of the County and theyshould be commended for stepping up All land managers canlearn from this experience and should take note itrsquos alwaysbetter to err on the side of caution

EMC Planning Group wishes to thank the County of SantaClara the projectrsquos manager Ms Alicia Flynn for her support on theproject the projectrsquos contractors Granite and BCI and the entireElmwood prison facilities staff for their cooperation and supportduring the monitoring activities

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 13

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 12

By Morty Prisament MSMP AICP Strategenesis-GPC

The Planning Sustainability Health ConnectionA Glimpse at Emerging Trends

some predictions and prognostications about how we can makethe transition

Harmonic Convergence Health + SustainabilitySustainable Development is a logical contextual frame for

considering health in planning The classic definition from theBrundtland Commission is development that ldquomeets the needsof the present without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needsrdquo CEQArsquos requirement toaddress long-term versus short-term needs appears to echo theCommissionrsquos definition of sustainable development MichaelThomas Needham referred similarly to lsquoSustainableDevelopmentrsquo ldquoas the ability to meet the needs of the presentwhile contributing to the future generationsrsquo needsrdquo

Sustainable development happens at many levels fromindividual buildings and neighborhoods-green building andsustainable communities to the city and regional scale greencities sustainable bioregions etc Sustainable development alsohas multiple dimensions from design and green planning togreen infrastructure Most relevant from a planninghealthperspective is sustainable developmentrsquos focus on enhancingldquomobilityrdquo This includes community design incorporatingmixed use development in combination with transit optionsstreetscape design that enhances pedestrianbike safety(ldquocomplete streetsrdquo) and access to services and amenities Inessence an urban form characterized by mixed use andpedestrian and transit-oriented development is what makeswalking and biking more attractive as well as practical andfeasible On a regional level it embodies the ldquosmart growthrdquoprinciples of interconnected ldquowalkablerdquo and ldquobikeablerdquocommunities served by local businesses and linked to a largertransit and alternative modes network Think ldquoMillenniumParkrdquo in downtown Chicago or ldquoBell Street Parkrdquo in Seattle

The past decade has seen resurgence in not only theeconomic vitality of American cities but cityplanning And this has come about as a result ofthe sustainability movement Sustainability isproviding a framework for planners to move

beyond the traditional confines of Euclidian zoning adopting amore holistic and integrated approach to building communitiesat the human scale Sustainability initiatives have attractedbroad support because of the benefits conveyed on a number oflevels from reduction in greenhouse gases to economicdevelopment and quality-of-life However one of the mostprofound findings is the connection between ldquocommunityplanningrdquo and health In fact recent findings suggest that yourldquozip coderdquo is the single-most important determinant of an

individualrsquos health In other words how communities aredesigned can influence onersquos level of physical activity andhence health Given the prominence of the obesity epidemicand rise in chronic diseases planners will increasingly be calledupon to play a role in promoting healthy communities This willexpand the mission of planning organizations to consider thehealth implications of land-use decisions The ldquoconvergencerdquo ofplanning and health and wellness represents a significant trendand one which will set a dominant tone This article is intendedto help planners understand this emerging trend

We begin with deciphering the connection betweenplanning and health specifically the ldquofitrdquo between health andsustainability Next we look at upstream health factors Wethen discuss the ldquoculturalrdquo transition in the planning healthand social services arenas that will be necessary in order to fullyrealize the potential of health sustainability planning Wehighlight the importance of power sharing between agencies andgrassroots organizations and highlight the evolution in policyplanning and environmental analysis along with the use ofhealth impact assessments (HIAs) Finally we conclude with

ldquoSocially ldquoGreen Healthrdquo occurs at a nexus of morally-laden decisions about living inthe world as patients workers consumers and citizensrdquo

(Institute for the Future Health Horizons Program)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 13

continued on page 14

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 12

Health FactorsIncreasingly health researchers are finding that health

problems are influenced by societal policies and environmentsthat either support behaviors or fail to foster healthier choicesDr Kawachi stressed that where you live affects how you liveThere is growing consensus that major health problems will notbe solved solely by individual actions and choices By movingldquoupstreamrdquo to address causes and improving environments wherewe work learn and play we can reduce chronic illnesses DrKawachi specifically cites changes in ldquotransportation policiesand urban zoningrdquo (Physical Activity and the BuiltEnvironment What Worksrdquo Statewide Conference Sponsoredby Health by Design September 10 2007 Indianapolis IN)

Health care genetics and lifestyle changes only take us so far Ifyou want to prevent obesity you need to cure the environmentnot the individualrdquo

Dr Ichiro Kawachi delivering Keynote address at StatewidePolicy Forum on Social Determinants of Health 111306(httpbcbsmnfoundationcom objectsTier_3forum_proceedingspdf )

ldquoWe must understand that education housing transportationand community development and income policies are healthpolicies- Jan Malcolm (httpmngov health-reformimagesTask-Force-and-Work-Groups-Summary-2012-01-31pdf )

In essence it appears that health professionals areabandoning their long-held belief in the efficacy of healtheducation programs They have learned that such programsrarely lead to sustained behavioral change unless scaled up andinstituted through formal and informal PSE changes Anupstream approach might also involve measures designed toinfluence diet and nutrition such as agricultural food subsidiesand national nutrition standards If this seems out-of-bounds toyou planners out there think about the growing trend topromote local and sustainable foods through urban agricultureand farmerrsquos markets or the efforts by schools and universities tosource more sustainable food options

Cultural Transition Sustainable Development by its very nature is

interdisciplinary and in the case of health and land-use willrequire the ldquotriadrdquo of planners health and social servicesprofessionals to collaborate in developing plans and forgingstrategies This would hardly be the first time that planners haveworked with health professionals Solid waste and water qualityfacility siting as well as development review call for planners towork routinely with local health departments as well as Stateand federal agencies like Environmental Protection AgencyDepartment of Toxic Substances Control and CaliforniaDepartment of Health Services What has changed is that until

recently health issues have not been a consideration in land-usetransportation and mobility planning such as has engineeringand public service issues for example The marriage betweenplanning and public works professionals may not be perfect butthey have grown accustomed to one anotherrsquos particularproclivities Merging of health social service and planning willrequire a similar cultural transition However in this latter casethe transition may be eased given a shared vision if not missionof promoting healthy communities Human resources managersmust also be included in this conversation Recruiting trainingand retaining staff with appropriate interdisciplinary experienceis essential for capacity building and effecting organizationalchange

APArsquos Sustainable Planning Interest Group is emblematic ofthe critical mass of planning professionals that are supportingsustainability initiatives many of whom are focused on healthand mobility together with local and sustainable foods Healthmobility local foods and nutrition were recurring sustainabilitythemes dominating recent APA conferences in Boston and LosAngeles APA has also adopted policies on supportingldquoCommunity and Regional Food Systemsrdquo[httpwwwurbantilthorgwpcontentuploads200810american-planning-association-policy-guide-on-community-and-regional-food-planningpdf] While training and conferenceprograms focusing on the intersection of planning health andsustainability is available advanced or graduate-level curriculahas yet to be developed The Sustainable Urban DevelopmentReader (2ndEd 2008) (wwwroutledgegeographycom) intendedfor advanced studies in sustainable development contains onlyone paragraph on the subject of the health-sustainability link inan otherwise comprehensive text Similarly contemporary textson health policy lack any substantive discussion of thesignificance of environmental determinants as a factor inchronic disease or the connection between health andcommunity planning

Community Collaboration and Power-Sharing Concerns about sustainability have been driven to a large

degree by the public and consequently power relationshipsneed to change in order to promote community partnershipsMoreover health and social service professionals will need todevelop competencies that enable them to address issues thatoccur at the intersection of health planning and sustainabledevelopment This would require planners to understand therole of health determinants approaches to health promotionhealth policy and tools like logic mapping and health impactassessments

Because of the grassroots nature of sustainability initiativesplanners health professionals and social workers will need toplace increasing emphasis upon consensus building anddeveloping community partnerships This will also require

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 13

continued on page 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 14

planning health and social service agencies to adopt a proactiveapproach to organizational change and one that relies more on aprocess of shared learning increased openness and accessibilityand a shift in how information is acquired and communicatedThis not only involves power-sharing but further portends afundamental change in the notion of local government from onethat mandates change to one that empowers change Plannersalready have some models that embody a cooperative grassrootsapproach wherein agencies derive their power consensuallyversus coercively (wwwmpoworgelisheva_sadan_empowerment_spreads_chapter1pdf) Californiarsquos ldquocoordinated resourcemanagement and planningrdquo model is a good example of bottom-up watershed planning which emphasizes decentralized decision-making power sharing and collaboration Other examplesinclude the many successful open space and trails planning andacquisition programs spearheaded by land conservancies andconservationdeveloper partnerships local food coops and untilmore recently the many community-run recycling programs

This requires planning organizations coupled with incentivesand inducements

Policy Planning and Impact AssessmentPlanning-related health issues can be addressed through

general plan or other local policy plans or via Health ImpactAssessments (HIAs) The City of Richmond California was oneof the first cities in the country to develop a comprehensivegeneral plan element addressing the link between public healthand the built environment A number of other Cities andcounties in California have since developed health planelements Richmond a former shipbuilding hub during WorldWar II has a number of historic industrial uses and a legacy ofenvironmental contamination It is home to Chevron-RichmondRefinery General Chemical as well as a proliferation of otherport-industrial activities Naturally then RichmondrsquosCommunity Health and Wellness Element addressesenvironmental justice issues related to air pollution and waterand soil contamination The Health Element further discussespedestrian and bicyclist injuries chronic diseases and crime andviolence Richmond residents are at a higher risk than residentsin the rest of the county on many health indicators including thehighest proportion of deaths from diabetes a much higher thanaverage rate of children requiring hospitalization due to asthmaand the second highest number of hospitalizations for mentalhealth disorders and substance abuse Richmond residents arealso disproportionately affected by heart disease cancer andstroke (httpwwwhealthycommunitiesby designorg) Healthplanning elements and HIAs can also be prepared in associationwith Housing Elements and Economic Development PlansSustainability and Carbon Action Plans Alternative ModesPlans Trails and Bicycle Plans as well as Safety and EmergencyPreparedness Plans HIAs are particularly suited to addressinghealth implications of plans programs and policies(programmatic HIAs)

Health Impact Assessment is ldquoa multidisciplinary processwithin which a range of evidence about the health effects of aproposal is considered in a structured framework hellipbased on abroad model of health which proposes that economic politicalsocial psychological and environmental factors determinepopulation healthrdquo (wwwhiacollaborativeorgfaq )

HIA have also been defined as ldquohellip a systematic process thatevaluates the health impacts of a proposed policy planprogram or project The assessment helps the public anddecision-makers understand the health consequences of theproposal and make informed choices that protect and promotehealthrdquo (httpwwwhumanimpactorgcomponentjdownloadsfinish81180)

HIAs have been used as a policy analysis tool to highlighthealth impacts and can either be in the form of a highlystructured report a policy brief or issue paper or can even takethe shape of a community forum Compared to EnvironmentalImpact Assessments (EIA) there is a greater emphasis onldquointer-sectoralrdquo or interdisciplinary coordination and publicparticipation HIAs examine causal factors and pathways infour main areas including social determinants environmentalimpacts (ie air and water quality) built environment andhealth behaviors The ldquobuilt environmentrdquo has been receivingmost attention lately along with the need to promotesustainable development Consequently there is increasinginterest to using HIAs in conjunction with land-use policyplanning and EIAs Pathways could include for examplehousing land-use mix food access and security transportationinfrastructure traffic safety noise community walkability andrecreational amenities Examples of causal factors such as inthe case of a farmerrsquos market might include consumption offruits and vegetables income for vendorsrsquo and farmerspreservation of agricultural land community economicconditions and pedestrian access (ie physical activity)

Planners and environmental scientists would as before beconcerned with biophysical health effects which havecommonly been addressed through human health riskassessments (HRAs) and ecological health risk assessments(ERAs) EPA establishes a specific methodology for assessingHRAs and ERAs risks to human health from exposure tohazardous substances and are thus narrower than HIAs Forexample laws addressing hazardous substances like motorvehicle fuel additives and pesticides or emissions of mercury ordioxin from a power plant generally require HRAs or ERAsrather than HIAs In contrast HIAs would focus increasinglyupon the more indirect health outcomes in order to determinethe health effects of a policy or activity

HIAs are just beginning to be used in connection withNEPA and NEPACEQA reviews and incorporation into

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 2: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

D I R E C T O R S - A T - L A R G EMichael Hendrix9098905951 ext 2509michaelhendrixatkinsglobalcom

Steve Noack AICP5108483815 ext306stevedceplanningcom

Kent Norton AICP REA9517819310kentnortonlsa-assoccom

Alliance Acoustical Consulting IncAlthouse amp Meade Inc

Anchor QEA LLCASM Affiliates Inc

Aspen Environmental GroupBaker Manock amp Jensen PC

Brezack amp Associates PlanningBriscoe Ivester amp Bazel LLP

BonTerra ConsultingBurns amp McDonnell

California Open LandsCity of HesperiaCity of La QuintaCity of Murrieta

City of Ontario Planning DepartmentCity of San Diego

Cogstone Resource Management IncCondor Country Consulting IncCondor Earth Technologies IncCounty of San DiegoDPWESU

County of Santa Cruz Planning DepartmentDavid J Powers amp Associates Inc

Denise Duffy amp Associates IncDMI-EMK Environmental Services Inc

Double Barrel Environmental IncDowney Brand LLP

EcoLayers Inc

Ecology amp Environment IncECORP Consulting Inc

El Dorado Irrigation DistrictEMC Planning Group Inc

Environmental Compliance SolutionsEnvironmental Science AssociatesFresno Metro Flood Control District

GHDGlobal Environmental PermittingGresham Savage Nolan amp Tilden

Helix Water DistrictHiggins AssociatesHNTB CorporationICF International

James P Allen amp AssociatesJRP Historical Consulting

Katz and AssociatesKrieger amp Stewart

Lilburn CorporationLive Oak Associates Inc

LSA Associates IncMcCormick Biological Inc

Michael Brandman AssociatesMoore Iacofano Goltsman Inc

NicholsBermanOdell Planning amp Research IncOrange County Public Works

Pacific Watershed Associates IncPangea Biological

PAR Environmental Services IncPCR Services CorporationPebble Beach Company

Perkins Coie LLPPlanning Associates IncPoint Impact Analysis LLC

Rosen Goldberg Der amp Lewitz IncSan Joaquin Hills TCA

Santa Barbara County APCDSLO Office of SWCA Environmental Consultants

Stockton Port DistrictStoel Rives LLP

Swaim Biological IncTerra Nova Planning amp Research

Tetra Tech IncThe Ervin Consulting GroupTRA Environmental Sciences

Urban Futures IncUrban Planning Partners

VCS EnvironmentalWildlife Heritage Foundation

WRA Inc

AEP websitewwwCalifAEPorgIncludes Chapter Links

A E P S T A T E B O A R D O F D I R E C T O R S

C H A P T E R D I R E C T O R S

O F F I C E R S

S P O N S O R I N G O R G A N I Z A T I O N S

CentralJohn P Kinsey Esq5592334800jkinseywjhattorneyscom

Channel CountiesJohn Karamitsos8059346255Johnkcosanta-barbaracaus

Inland EmpireOpen--

Los Angeles CountyDev Vrat AICP6268401580devvratcsunedu

C H A P T E R P R E S I D E N T SMonterey Bay AreaBill Wiseman8318838187presidentmontereybayaeporg

Orange CountyAlisha Winterswyk9518268303Alishawinterswykbbklawcom

San DiegoJulie Wang6196870110juliewangch2mcom

San Francisco BayTerri McCrackentmccrackenplanningcentercom

PresidentGene Talmadge8054274123jngtalmadgemsncom

Executive Vice PresidentWilliam Halligan7149669220whalliganplanningcentercom

Administrative Vice PresidentDevon Muto8586943016devonmutosdcountycagov

Financial Vice PresidentLynn Calvert-Hayes9517819310lynnhayeslsa-assoccom

NAEP LiaisonRoger Turner9517075020rwturnerhotmailcom

CentralGeorge Finney5596247125gfinneycotularecaus

Channel CountiesDavid Wolff8182928033dwolffsageiicom

Inland EmpireJoan Valle9515224005joan_valleurscorpcom

Los Angeles CountyLaura R Kaufman AICP6266833547lkaufmansapphosenvironmentalcom

Monterey Bay AreaChristine Bradley8316491799directormontereybayaeporg

Orange CountyKonnie Dobreva7149669220kdobrevaplanningcentercom

San DiegoMarilyn Ponseggi6199444294marilyn_pcoxnet

San Francisco Bay AreaJoan Douglas-Fryjdouglas-fryesassoccom

Send all graphics to

Publication DesignDorina BlytheGranDesigns9516953646FAX 9516953646dorinagrandesignsus31807 Green Oak WayTemecula CA 92592

S T A F FAdvertising inquiries should be addressed to

AEP ManagementLynne Bynder CMPMeetings Xceptional7603404499FAX 7606742479lbyndercalifaeporg40747 Baranda CourtPalm Desert CA 92260

For questions comments suggestions and all textualsubmittals please contact the EnvironmentalMonitor Editor

Environmental Monitor EditorMarc P Bierdzinski AICP8057144512mbplanmarcverizonnet

WebmasterKenneth J Carey7147577750admincalifaeporg

Environmental Assessor EditorTerry Rivasplata9167373000FAX 9167373030trivasplatajsanetcom

P U B L I C A T I O N B O A R D

Superior CaliforniaJanet Dallas9164145877janetdallasaecomcom

Superior CaliforniaChristina Ryan9164447301christyryanascentenvinccom

the Environmentalmonitor

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 2

Submittal deadline for theFALL 2012 Issue

of the Environmental Monitor isOctober 1 2012

(posted by October 15 2012)dates subject to change without notice

contents

Statements of fact and opinion are theresponsibility of the authors alone and do notimply an endorsement on the part of theofficers directors or members of AEPMaterials may not be reproduced withoutwritten permission Articles and graphicssubmitted are the property of AEP but authorsretain the right to reprint their own articles

SUBMITTAL SPECIFICATIONSArticles Professionals on the Move andCalendar items should be sent to the editorMarc Bierdzinski in Word format For fileverification sendfax a hard copyAll article photos calling card and display adswill be accepted in DIGITAL FORMAT ONLYNO EXCEPTIONS Digital specifications are

bull JPEG or PDF formatbull Grayscale or black and whitebull 300 - 600 resolution at 100 sizebull Email your ad to dorinagrandesignsus

All addressesphone numbers may be foundon the inside front cover of the EnvironmentalMonitor

Greetings to you all It isindeed a pleasure andhonor to introduce you tothe next issue of theEnvironmental Monitor We

have interesting feature articles as well asa recap from the recent 2012 AEPConference in Sacramento The AEPwebsite (wwwcalifaeporg) continues itsimprovement following the AEP ChapterSummit discussions and you will findmore notices of events and otherimportant information being posted foryour reading pleasure Our member use(and many ldquohitsrdquo from outside sourcesincluding overseas viewers) hasincreased Truly a great service to you ourmembers Check it out

Our AEP Conference was a bigsuccess and thanks to all on thecommittee under the capable leadershipof Trevor Macenski and John Kinsey theConference achieved its financial andattendance goals set forth in the budgetWe had two inspiring talks from ourfeatured speakers Julia Burrows fromGreenwise Joint Venture in the City ofSacramento spoke to us about manystrategies being implemented in the cityto promote lsquogreenrsquo practices Our featuredspeaker was John Laird CaliforniaSecretary for Natural Resources whospoke about the many challenges facingthe state including the Bay Delta Accord(critical to water supplies in the state)renewable energy programs and otherprojects of significance to our statersquosresources CEQA plays a vital role inthem all and he is firm supporter of thelaw

Inside this edition of theEnvironmental Monitor are twointeresting articles that came from theconference proceedings One deals withthe California State University MontereyBay Watershed Institute while the otherdeals with an interesting twist in habitatpreservation This article details theprotection of a bird colony in a prison ndashshowing not all things found in prisons arepredictably bad Very interesting

Just before the Conference we had anAEP Board meeting and the ChapterSummit The Summit is an important

the Environmentalmonitor

S U M M E R 2 0 1 2

Gene Talmadge AEP President

3 Presidentrsquos Message

4 2012 AEP Awards Program

9 From the NAEP Liaisonrsquos Desk

10 Birds of a Feather Flock TogetherThe Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

12 The Planning Sustainability HealthConnection A Glimpse at EmergingTrends

16 CSU Monterey Bay WatershedInstitute Publications A Gold Mineof Gray Literature

18 2013 AEP Awards ProgramNominations

22 2013 NAEPAEP Joint ConferenceSponsorExhibitor Opportunities

25 AEP Membership Application

PRESIDENTrsquoS MESSAGE

opportunity for the AEP Chapters todiscuss matters of interest and importanceto the chapters and provide guidance tothe state Board At this yearrsquos Summit wehad representatives from all the chapterspresent and had a great discussion onnumerous topics Our number onepriority remains Membership ndash retainingexisting members recruiting new onesand finding ones that may have driftedaway The Membership Committee willbe leading the ldquoDriverdquo a very ambitiousprogram We have re-designed themembership form to include a summary ofmember benefits and defining new classesof membership (regular new professionalsstudent etc) as well as a new promotionalmaterial package distributed to allchapters The Committee has scheduledregular conference calls to coordinatetheir activities The real key to theirefforts is underscored by the commitmentof each chapterrsquos actions to reach out andkeep their current members recruit newmembers and draw others back into thefold Each chapter member and thechapter board needs to focus attention onthis important effort The larger AEPbecomes the more services and programswe can offer to our members for theirpersonal professional development andsocialbusiness networking Corporate

continued on page 24

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 3

Cover photo credit Dorina Blythe April 2012Taken while vacationing in Yosemite

FEATURE ARTICLE

By Roger Turner and Dev Vrat Awards Program Co-Chairs

2012 AEP Awards Program

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Charles S BullldquoCharly is a mentor I am always amazed by the depth and diversity of his knowledge from his recognized expertise in noise modeling andanalysis cultural resources and air quality to his seemingly unlimited understanding of CEQA and NEPA regulations and implementationMoreover he has managed and successfully completed environmental documents for large controversial projects Charly freely shares hisknowledge and has had a hand in educating many of the environmental professionals working today in the San Diego region If you have aquestion he knows the answer Above all Charly will drop everything he is working on to take a moment or an afternoon to teachrdquo mdash RobertMacAller President RECON

ldquoCharly has been an active member of AEP for over 25 years and served as an AEP State Boardmember In this capacity he activelyparticipated in several rounds of AEP Strategic Plans He was anorganizer of the first CEQA Basics Workshop for the San Diego Chapter ofAEP as well as anorganizer and co-presenter of the first CEQA Basics Workshop for the San Diego Chapter of AEP aswell as an organizer andco-presenter with Margaret Sohagi for an Advanced CEQA Workshop Hewas also the Director of the 2000 AEP Conference in San Diegowhere the conference focused onconflict resolution in the environmental process The conference included presentations by CEQAjudges fromthroughout California and involved a comparative mock trial versus mediation of aCEQA challenge Charly has also served on the San DiegoChapterlegislative review committee andparticipated as a member of the chapter awards juryrdquo - Julie Wang AEP San Diego ChapterPresident

ldquoMost recently he is serving as a Co-Chair to the San Diego Chapterrsquos newly formedEmeritusCommittee The Emeritus Committeersquos goal is to re-involve long-time AEP memberswho are approaching retirement and havenrsquot been active in AEP recently It will give the Chaptermembership one more chance to learn from these individuals before they retire from theprofession The Emeritus Committee under Charlyrsquos leadership will be establishing mentorprograms for our Student Chapters as well as for professionals at all levelsrdquo mdash Marilyn RFPonseggi San Diego AEP Chapter DirectorContact Nicole Turner RECON Environmental 1927 5th Avenue San Diego CA 92101 619-308-9333 nturnerreconenvironmentalcom

and to URS for sponsoring this yearrsquos production of theAwards Presentation Video highlighting the recipients It wasanother great program You can learn more about thesewinning projects and programs on AEPrsquos website atwwwcalifaeporg You can also look in this and future editionsof the Environmental Monitor for articles on these greatdocuments If you are curious contact the authors and discussyour thoughts

Also now is the time to prepare a nomination for nextyearrsquos program The 2013 awards announcement is on theAEP website and in this issue of the Environmental Monitorwith listed criteria for submittals The 2013 Awardscriteria and submission materials are to be submitted byAugust 15 2012 Do not miss this opportunity to haveyour outstanding work and contributions to the professionrecognized by your peers next year

The Association of Environmental Professionalscongratulates the following winners of the 2012 AwardsProgram

The Association of Environmental Professionals(AEP) has been recognizing the best work ofpublic agencies and environmental professionalsfor over 36 years Award-winners have advancedthe state-of-the-art in environmental analysis

and presenting this analysis to the public and decision makersin an attractive understandable and easily accessible formatClimate Change and preparation of Climate Action Plans toreduce greenhouse gas emissions have become State prioritiesYear after year the best of the best environmentalprofessionals and their documents achievementrsquos and serviceto the profession have contributed to the enhancementmaintenance and protection of the quality of the natural andhuman environment

AEPrsquos award winners were recognized at the AEP AwardsProgram ceremony held on May 7 2012 in SacramentoAEP congratulates each winning recipient of the prestigiousmountain trophies award plaques and certificates

AEP extends sincere thanks to the volunteer Awards Jury

continued on page 5

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 4

Accepting this award Charlie Bull

AEP is looking for volunteers for the 2013 AEP Awards Jury If you would like to serve on the jury please contact Dev Vrat AICPdevvratcsunedu

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 5

Environmental Analysis Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDSan Diego County General Plan Update EIRPrepared for the County of San DiegoPrepared by Atkins County of San Diego Department of Planning amp Land Use

The Awards Jury found the EIR to be well organized and user-friendly with manysupportive tables and high quality graphics to illustrate key resource areas The impactsummary tables at the beginning of each resource section are also a nice touch The EIR teamwas able to develop a concise project description that allowed for a comprehensiveprogrammatic evaluation of land use and transportation policies and a holistic considerationof impacts Outstanding

Contact Devon Muto Chief Advanced Planning Department of Planning and Land Use Countyof San Diego 5201 Ruffin Road Suite B San Diego CA 92123-1666 Office 8586943016DevonMutosdcountycagov

OUTSTANDING AWARDPlan Santa Barbara General Plan Update Program EIRPrepared for the City of Santa BarbaraPrepared by AMEC Earth amp EnvironmentalFehr amp Peers NelsonNygaard Applied Earthworks Santa Barbara CommunityDevelopment Department Planning Division

The Awards Jury noted that this EIR employs a number of unique and innovativeapproaches These include a unique level of analysis of the integrated effects of land use TDMand alternative transportation on congestion energy consumption emissions and climatechange The EIR transforms broad planning policies into a detailed project description for the EIR analysis necessary to support adoption of theGeneral Plan Update The jury appreciated the approach and organization of the executive summary In addition the project website demonstratesgreat public involvement It is clear a lot of thought was put into the organization and preparation of this Program EIR Outstanding

Contact Ben Botkin AMEC 805962-0992 benjaminbotkinameccom

MERIT AWARD2050 Regional Transportation Plan Sustainable Communities Strategy EIRPrepared for San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)Prepared by AECOM and SANDAG

This EIR uses a unique methodology - breaking the environmental analysis down by timeperiod to help disclose the impacts of the 2050 RTPSCS in meeting targets for GHGemission reductions under SB 375 The EIR team at SANDAG and AECOM workeddiligently through extensive use of a geographic information system (GIS) data inputmapping and modeling to determine the environmental impacts associated with theproposed project Collection review and distillation of statewide regional and localjurisdiction plans regulations and EIRs fed into the analysis for each issue area This is a wellthought out document and is practical to use Excellent

Contact Yara Fisher 6192331454 yarafisheraecomcom

Planning Document

OUTSTANDING AWARDSan Diego County General Plan UpdatePrepared for the County of San DiegoPrepared by the San Diego County Department of Planning and Land Use

San Diego County has successfully performed a challenging land use balancing actin this general plan update The plan is well organized clearly presented and uses acommon sense approach in its analysis Itrsquos an impressive example of rethinking land useplans to minimize impacts and encourage more efficient use of lands Kudos to San DiegoCounty for reducing the need for roads in constrained areas Outstanding

Contact Bob Citrano 8586943016 or Devon Muto DevonMutosdcountycagov

continued on page 6

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 4

Accepting this award Dianne Sandman Senior ProjectManager Mindy Fogg Atkins

Accepting this award Jeff Henderson AICP ProjectManager AECOM

Accepting this award Ben Botkin AMEC BarbaraShelton City of Santa Barbara Community DevelopmentDepartment

Accepting this award Eric Gibson Devon Muto Chief ofAdvance Planning County of San Diego

Climate Change Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDCity of West Hollywood Climate Action PlanPrepared for the City of West Hollywood and AECOM

The Awards Jury found the document to be user friendly including excellentgraphics and publicly accessible The climate action plan presents measurable outcomesfor two target years 2020 and 2035 The organization of information is intuitivethroughout the document and the one page pullouts for each measure make thedocument easy to read The comprehensive matrix at the end is an excellent referencefor implementation of the plan and for individuals interested in reading about howdecisions were made regarding each measure Adjustments to the plan are called for on5-yr cycle An Outstanding Climate Action Plan Contact Jeff Henderson 9164837999 jeffhendersonaecomcom

MERIT AWARDUnion City Climate Action PlanPrepared for Union CityPrepared by Climate Protection Task Force City Council and Planning Commission ofUnion City AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury found the tool kit included in this climate action plan may be used asa decision support tool for Greenhouse Gas emission reduction measures thereby providing acommon sense approach to choosing various reduction measures in an interactive settingThe CAP includes supporting measures even when they are not quantifiable whichultimately improves the ability to implement the plan The jury also noted that there wastransparency in the technical appendix documents The toolkit enables real-time resultswhich increases buy-in by staff and stakeholders Everyone can see immediately what theresults will be using various scenarios The reduction keys are a good way to provide at-a-glance monitoring of impacts An excellent documentContact Claire Bonham AECOM 4159552800 clairbonham-carteraecomcom

MERIT AWARDCity of Escondido Draft Climate Action PlanPrepared for the City of EscondidoPrepared by ATKINS and the City of Escondido

The Awards Jury noted that this climate action plan presents information simply andclearly so the layperson can understand the implications of specific measures and programs -the one page pullouts are key The jury agreed itrsquos encouraging that partnerships werehighlighted in a CAP as a priority for implementation - this will help reduce the impacts toboth staff resources and the Cityrsquos budget It was also great to see the linkage to regionalplanning via the RTPSCS Periodic updates are called for with three initial definite yearsidentified The plan also includes definable metrics with screening table minimum valuesAn excellent document

Contact Joanne Dramko 8585141023 joannedramkoatkinsglobalcom

MERIT AWARDSan Luis Obispo County Energy Wise PlanPrepared for the County of San Luis ObispoPrepared by PMC and the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning amp Building

The Energy Wise Plan was developed in coordination with a number of otherplanning efforts occurring throughout the County so that it can serve as a centralclearing house for energy and climate policy Of particular note the plan includes athree tiered approach to performance monitoring and includes an innovative approachof providing yearly progress assessments Well doneContactTammy Seale PMC 8052507974 tsealepmcworldcom

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 5

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 6

continued on page 7

Accepting this award Jeff Henderson AICP ProjectManager AECOM

Accepting this award Culley Thomas Union City

Accepting this award Joanne Dramko and MichaelHendrix Program Managers Atkins

Accepting this award Jason H Giffen Director County ofSan Luis Obispo Leanne Singleton Tammy Seale PMC

Environmental Resource Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDRobert Louis Stevenson State Park and Wildlake-Duff RanchesPrepared for the Land Trust of Napa CountyPrepared by AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury observed that the management plan uses a comprehensive approachwith supporting mapping making it easy to evaluate the various management scenarios Theconcept of this document can be replicated at other parks or in other situations involvingmultiple ownerships The technical information presented in a graphic format enables a layperson to understand project opportunities and constraints at-a-glance An outstandingdocumentContact Sarah Heard AECOM 4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

MERIT AWARDAdapting to Rising Tides -Transportation Vulnerability and Risk Assessment ProjectPrepared for Conservation and Development Commission Metropolitan TransportationCommission California Department of Transportation District 4 AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury commented that this project is an excellent example of how to usecreative partnerships to provide regional value and statewide applicability The risk profileswith zoom-in maps are helpful to understand impacts and compare different facilities Anexcellent documentContact Sarah Heard AECOM 4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

OUTSTANDING AWARDNew Irvington Tunnel Project Groundwater Management ProgramPrepared for the Public Utilities CommissionPrepared by Public Utilities Commission ndash New Irvington Tunnel Project Team

The Awards Jury noted that the program uses multiple platforms to reach the public Theproject includes clear fact sheets which are visually appealing A hotline was established andis displayed prominently in all the program materials Congratulations to the San FranciscoPublic Utilities Commission for their 5 years of effort to recognize the value of the landowners as stake holders and to engage them as part of the long-term groundwatermanagement solution An outstanding outcome

Contact David Tszoo Project Manager SFPUC 9252334354 dtsztoosfwaterorg

MERIT AWARDEffective Mitigation - Development through ImplementationPrepared for Sempra EnergyPrepared by Insignia Environmental San Diego Gas amp Electric Company and GasCompany

Sempra Energy Utilities and Insignia Environmental have crafted a training session thatprovides a primer on the A to Zrsquos of mitigation measures They detail the permitting processdiscuss the semantics of mitigation measures and review tracking procedures The Awards Juryfound the regulatory triggers table to be very helpful This program can be easily transferredto other public utility agencies and local municipalities An excellent documentContact Anne Marie McGraw Insignia 6503216787 AMcgrawinsigniaenvcom

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 7

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 6

continued on page 8

Accepting this award Sarah Heard AECOM4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Accepting this award Sarah Heard AECOM4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Accepting this award David Tsztoo PE SFPUC BetsyRhodes SFPUC Holly Their The Their Group BruceAbellimanKim Stern SFPUC

Accepting this award Name to come Erin KeochekiconAnne Marie McGraw Insignia

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

MERIT AWARDSan Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter ProgramPrepared for San Diego Gas and ElectricPrepared by San Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter Program ndash Customer Experience

The SDGampE Smart Meter Programrsquos detailed messaging plan may be used as a model foreffective outreach Itrsquos 90-60-30-day notification plan is transferable to other publiceducation efforts The informational door hangers were an innovative approach to reachinga segment of the public that might otherwise have been missed Excellent work

Contact Risa Baron Sempra Utilities Office 8586541857 rbaronsemprautilitiescom

Humor Award

AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line -General Outreach and Educational MaterialsPrepared for AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line members Prepared by AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line

The Awards Jury found this project to be creative and hilarious ndash especially to nerds Thetricksters at AECOM presented a real tongue-in-cheek treat for the reader Halloween willnever be the same and neither will the employee who portrayed the patient zombie It takesthe notion of ldquoother duties as assignedrdquo to a whole other realm Thanks to the knowledgeableand respected AECOM technical staff for sharing your internal office humor and providingthe Awards Jury an enjoyable respite from the serious environmental analysis and climatereduction plansContact John Hute AECOM 9164145876

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 8

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 7

AcknowledgementsOne of the most important AEP volunteer groups is the AEP Awards Jury These are AEP peer professionals chosen for

their years of experience and expertise in the profession AEP recognized the following individuals who gave graciously manydays of their time to review and judge all the submittals and hours spent on AEP conference calls to reach consensus decisionsusing the AEP rating criteria Thank you all

AEP 2012 AWARDS VIDEO PRODUCTIONWe thank Megan Giglini Vivian Gaddie and Joan Valle of URS for the great video for the awards program We thank URS

for sponsoring the Awards Program The video was enjoyed by all

AEP 2012 CONFERENCE COMMITTEEFinally we thank the Co-Chairs for this conference Trevor Macenski Michael Brandman Associates and John Kinsey

Wanger Jones Helsley PC for leadership and hard work and their little army of conference volunteers Thank you all for awonderful successful conference

AEP 2012 AWARDS JURYDev Vrat AICP Jury ChairUrban Studies and Planning DepartmentCalifornia State University Northridge

Patti Nahil AICPPGN

Jeffry S Rice AICPURS

Crystahl TaylorPadre Associates Inc

Honey L WaltersAscent Environmental Inc

Ray WeissESA

Accepting this award Carolyn Winn VP Customer ServiceSan Diego Gas and Electric

Accepting this award John Hute AECOM

Summer is here and it has warmed up It is the timefor vacations and exploring the outdoors I hope youget out there and refresh your fun time hiking or justhaving a good time doing your favorite activity Theenvironmental field continues to take more

importance in all aspects of our lives We hear more newscoverage of disasters and their environmental effectsEnvironmental professionals are sought out for professionaladvice in every aspect of our community issues We have astronger voice in developing environmental policy inCalifornia and in every state in this nation So I ask what roledo you play and how can you stay sharp with your skills

AEP and NAEP offer many opportunities includingCEQANEPA Workshops special training in air qualitytransportation planning greenhouse gas emission impactsurban pollution in our nations water and the list goes on AEPis planning for the Fall Basic CEQA Workshop Look to theAEP Website and to upcoming newsletters for the Fall BasicCEQA Workshops

AEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop this summerDates are July 25th in Clovis CA July 30 in Oakland CA July31 in San Diego CA and August 1 in Carson CA Go to thecalifaeporg website for more information This is the first timeAEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop training program

NAEP is continuing to offer Webinars I will be sendinginformation to you as it is published Take advantage of these90 minute online training programs They are valuable andgreat to stay current on the regulatory policy and court cases foryour work Look for more information in the near futureNAEP is working hard to increase real value opportunities toenvironmental professionals Recent webinars on FrackingEndangered Species and Green Energy Development Impactsto Natural Resources were presented by NAEP

NAEP posts bimonthly E-Newsletters A recentedition included in some excellent articles on

various environmental topics The E-Newlettersare posted on the AEP Website and e-mailed

to AEP members when published These aregreat resources to read current events in

the environmental profession and staycurrent on the happening scene

Look for the most recent edition onour website

NAEP will be conducting aChapter Retreat July 21 and

22 2012 in Kansas CityThis is a time when the

From the NAEP Liaisonrsquos DeskNAEPAFFILIATION

By Roger W Turner

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 9

Chapter representatives will go over the strategic goals andreview the programs provided by NAEP The Chapter Retreatwill help set the new course for NAEP in providing its Chapterservices and programs to its members Note all AEP members areaffiliated with NAEP and will benefit from programs trainingand conferences NAEP produces I will publish the results of theChapter Retreat in a future edition of this report

The 2013 NAEPAEP Joint Conference is planned for April1 to 5 2013 The theme is ldquoWalk the Talkrdquo The conferencecommittee is hard at work planning what will sure to be aninformative and engaging event for environmental professionalsOur conference will be held in an outstanding state-of-the-artconference facility at the JW Marriott Hotel located in thevibrant LA Live complex in downtown Los Angeles

The hotel and conference facility sport a front-row seat tosome of Los Angelesrsquo top attractions include the Staples Centerthe Nokia Theatre Regal Cinemas and a wide variety of shopsand restaurants In addition despite the car-centered nature ofgreater Los Angeles many world-class attractions can be reachedvia public transit which is easily accessible from the complex

The conference program will feature dynamic regional andnational keynote speakers and an all-day pre-conferencesymposium on climate change adaptation Conference sessionswill cover topics including NEPA and CEQA Climate ChangeWater Supply and Delivery Air Quality Energy and AlternativeEnergy Development Marine and Coastal Issues HabitatMitigation Transportation Land Use and Cultural ResourcesThere will also be numerous other conference and social eventsthat will take advantage of the conference location including anumber of mobile workshops and a 5K run through some ofdowntown Los Angelesrsquo top attractions

Look for more information in future editions of my columnand on the AEP Website

Please mark your calendar-

The presentation abstracts submittal deadline-August 15 2012

The sponsor exhibitor submittal deadline-March 1 2013

The 2013 awards nomination submittal deadline-August 15 2012

As always I look forward to your comments and thoughts Ialso invite you to write me at rwturnerhotmailcom or call

(951) 707-5020 if you have a question about NAEP or needassistance in obtaining service from NAEP

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 11

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 10

By Bill Goggin Senior Biologist EMC Planning Group

Birds of a Feather Flock TogetherThe Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

solve an on-going maintenance problem that had become ahealth liability the prison staff proposed to construct a pavedpath between security fences so that the facilityrsquos guards couldbetter patrol this area (several of the guards had suffered turnedankles and knees because of the uneven and pot-holed groundsurface) Because the project had a potential to impact sensitivebiological resources Santa Clara County staff contracted withEMC Planning Group to assist the County with complying withthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and otherstate and federal environmental laws established to protectsensitive animals and their habitats including what is the subjectof this short article an established egret and heron rookery

During the performance of an earlier biological pre-construction survey performed by EMC Planning Group in July2010 an active rookery (a colonial breeding bird site) wasobserved within the south-central portion of the prison facilityrsquosmain courtyard The rookery is located within a cluster of denselyfoliated trees and contained approximately 50-60 nests fromthree species of birds great egret (Ardea alba) snowy egret(Egretta thula) and black-crowned night heron (Nycticorax

You can hear the sound as you approach thecourtyard of the Elmwood Correctional Facilityalthough itrsquos not exactly clear whatrsquos causing allthe commotion It starts as a low backgroundchattering and builds to a near cacophony close to

the mess hall Beyond these seemingly discordant soundseverything in the scene appears to be in order the prisonrsquosinmates going about their daily routine dressed in white- andblack-striped jumpsuits sweeping lifting weights or casuallytalking in groups while the watchful guards keep a dutiful eyeout for anything out of the ordinary All in all itrsquos just anotherordinary day at the Elmwood Correctional Facility But what iscausing all this noise you may ask yourself Finally out of ideasyou glance heavenward and thatrsquos when it hits you (no notthat) there are birds in the trees above your head manybirdshellipand they are large birds Are you puzzled Donrsquot bebecause this is the story of the jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

The Elmwood Correctional Facility is a low-security SantaClara County prison located west of Interstate 880 and north ofGreat American Parkway in Milpitas California In order to

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 11

Birds of a Feather Flock Together continued from page 10

nycticorax) The ground surface beneath these trees showedevidence of long-term site use by rookeryrsquos birds as wasdemonstrated by an accumulation of whitewash feathers andegg shell fragments

Especially unique in an urban area the Elmwood rookerysite is believed to be the only egret and heron rookery in thesouthern San Francisco Bay located within an entirely fencedanthropogenic setting and may be the only one of its kind innorthern California Colonial breeding sites are especiallyimportant when located within urbanized environments asdevelopment and land conversion often degrades orremoves available rookery habitat and asa result opportunities for colonialnesting species in urban areasare limited These sites arealso significant becausethey often support asizeable segment ofthe local populationand because theirproximity to foragingareas can reducetravel distances theymay potentially reducepredator-prey (iemortality) interactions

Because construction wasplanned during the most sensitive periodof the birds natural life history cycle the projectrsquosconstruction activities had a potential to cause detrimentalimpacts (ie elevated levels of noise dust and fumes) possiblyaffecting the birds nesting and juvenile rearing which couldhave led to fines and negative press for the County Thereforein order to protect this important resource in spring 2011 theCounty retained EMC Planning Group to monitor the rookeryduring the projectrsquos construction whenever heavy equipmentoperation would be occurring within 500 feet of the rookery

It is important to note that none of bird species living at theElmwood rookery (great egret snowy egret and night heron) arespecifically listed as threatened or endangered by the state orfederal Endangered Species Acts however the CaliforniaDepartment of Fish and Game (CDFG) considers colonialbreeding sites to be sensitive resource areas that are affordedprotection under CDFG Code during the breeding bird seasonas they can be sensitive to human intrusion and disturbance Inaddition to state regulations the protection of egrets and heronsare covered under the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act Oncenests have been constructed and eggs are present the rookerysite becomes a protected resource area and cannot be disturbedReproduction for the rookeries species generally occurs from

early April through July with the juvenile rearing periodextending into mid-September

Behavioral monitoring of the egret and heron rookeryconsisted of a qualified EMC Planning Group biologist stationedinside the facilityrsquos perimeter fence in a direct line of siteapproximately 275 feet from the rookery during constructionactivities or during operation of heavy equipment within 500feet of the rookery During construction the monitoringbiologist observed egret and heron behavior using hand heldbinoculars and a high magnification field spotting scope for signs

of stress andor agitation Notes on behavioralinteractions (ie preeninggrooming

feeding sibling competition etc)and daily counts on numbers of

individuals and juvenilespresent were recorded

C o n s t r u c t i o ncommenced on April27 and an EMCPlanning Groupbiologist conductedworker environmental

awareness trainingconcerning the presence

of the rookery and theimportance of protecting the

rookery During the projectrsquosimplementation no disturbance of the

rookery was noted and the rookeries behavior wasessentially unchanged by project activities Approximately 38adult and 23 juvenile egrets and herons were observedthroughout the construction period

By incorporating these pro-active impact minimization andspecial-status species protection measures into the projectrsquosimplementation the County as the lead agency demonstratedproper compliance with CDFG Code and CEQA law and thisimportant and sensitive resource was safeguarded frominadvertent disturbance This model of good stewardshipdemonstrates leadership on the part of the County and theyshould be commended for stepping up All land managers canlearn from this experience and should take note itrsquos alwaysbetter to err on the side of caution

EMC Planning Group wishes to thank the County of SantaClara the projectrsquos manager Ms Alicia Flynn for her support on theproject the projectrsquos contractors Granite and BCI and the entireElmwood prison facilities staff for their cooperation and supportduring the monitoring activities

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 13

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 12

By Morty Prisament MSMP AICP Strategenesis-GPC

The Planning Sustainability Health ConnectionA Glimpse at Emerging Trends

some predictions and prognostications about how we can makethe transition

Harmonic Convergence Health + SustainabilitySustainable Development is a logical contextual frame for

considering health in planning The classic definition from theBrundtland Commission is development that ldquomeets the needsof the present without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needsrdquo CEQArsquos requirement toaddress long-term versus short-term needs appears to echo theCommissionrsquos definition of sustainable development MichaelThomas Needham referred similarly to lsquoSustainableDevelopmentrsquo ldquoas the ability to meet the needs of the presentwhile contributing to the future generationsrsquo needsrdquo

Sustainable development happens at many levels fromindividual buildings and neighborhoods-green building andsustainable communities to the city and regional scale greencities sustainable bioregions etc Sustainable development alsohas multiple dimensions from design and green planning togreen infrastructure Most relevant from a planninghealthperspective is sustainable developmentrsquos focus on enhancingldquomobilityrdquo This includes community design incorporatingmixed use development in combination with transit optionsstreetscape design that enhances pedestrianbike safety(ldquocomplete streetsrdquo) and access to services and amenities Inessence an urban form characterized by mixed use andpedestrian and transit-oriented development is what makeswalking and biking more attractive as well as practical andfeasible On a regional level it embodies the ldquosmart growthrdquoprinciples of interconnected ldquowalkablerdquo and ldquobikeablerdquocommunities served by local businesses and linked to a largertransit and alternative modes network Think ldquoMillenniumParkrdquo in downtown Chicago or ldquoBell Street Parkrdquo in Seattle

The past decade has seen resurgence in not only theeconomic vitality of American cities but cityplanning And this has come about as a result ofthe sustainability movement Sustainability isproviding a framework for planners to move

beyond the traditional confines of Euclidian zoning adopting amore holistic and integrated approach to building communitiesat the human scale Sustainability initiatives have attractedbroad support because of the benefits conveyed on a number oflevels from reduction in greenhouse gases to economicdevelopment and quality-of-life However one of the mostprofound findings is the connection between ldquocommunityplanningrdquo and health In fact recent findings suggest that yourldquozip coderdquo is the single-most important determinant of an

individualrsquos health In other words how communities aredesigned can influence onersquos level of physical activity andhence health Given the prominence of the obesity epidemicand rise in chronic diseases planners will increasingly be calledupon to play a role in promoting healthy communities This willexpand the mission of planning organizations to consider thehealth implications of land-use decisions The ldquoconvergencerdquo ofplanning and health and wellness represents a significant trendand one which will set a dominant tone This article is intendedto help planners understand this emerging trend

We begin with deciphering the connection betweenplanning and health specifically the ldquofitrdquo between health andsustainability Next we look at upstream health factors Wethen discuss the ldquoculturalrdquo transition in the planning healthand social services arenas that will be necessary in order to fullyrealize the potential of health sustainability planning Wehighlight the importance of power sharing between agencies andgrassroots organizations and highlight the evolution in policyplanning and environmental analysis along with the use ofhealth impact assessments (HIAs) Finally we conclude with

ldquoSocially ldquoGreen Healthrdquo occurs at a nexus of morally-laden decisions about living inthe world as patients workers consumers and citizensrdquo

(Institute for the Future Health Horizons Program)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 13

continued on page 14

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 12

Health FactorsIncreasingly health researchers are finding that health

problems are influenced by societal policies and environmentsthat either support behaviors or fail to foster healthier choicesDr Kawachi stressed that where you live affects how you liveThere is growing consensus that major health problems will notbe solved solely by individual actions and choices By movingldquoupstreamrdquo to address causes and improving environments wherewe work learn and play we can reduce chronic illnesses DrKawachi specifically cites changes in ldquotransportation policiesand urban zoningrdquo (Physical Activity and the BuiltEnvironment What Worksrdquo Statewide Conference Sponsoredby Health by Design September 10 2007 Indianapolis IN)

Health care genetics and lifestyle changes only take us so far Ifyou want to prevent obesity you need to cure the environmentnot the individualrdquo

Dr Ichiro Kawachi delivering Keynote address at StatewidePolicy Forum on Social Determinants of Health 111306(httpbcbsmnfoundationcom objectsTier_3forum_proceedingspdf )

ldquoWe must understand that education housing transportationand community development and income policies are healthpolicies- Jan Malcolm (httpmngov health-reformimagesTask-Force-and-Work-Groups-Summary-2012-01-31pdf )

In essence it appears that health professionals areabandoning their long-held belief in the efficacy of healtheducation programs They have learned that such programsrarely lead to sustained behavioral change unless scaled up andinstituted through formal and informal PSE changes Anupstream approach might also involve measures designed toinfluence diet and nutrition such as agricultural food subsidiesand national nutrition standards If this seems out-of-bounds toyou planners out there think about the growing trend topromote local and sustainable foods through urban agricultureand farmerrsquos markets or the efforts by schools and universities tosource more sustainable food options

Cultural Transition Sustainable Development by its very nature is

interdisciplinary and in the case of health and land-use willrequire the ldquotriadrdquo of planners health and social servicesprofessionals to collaborate in developing plans and forgingstrategies This would hardly be the first time that planners haveworked with health professionals Solid waste and water qualityfacility siting as well as development review call for planners towork routinely with local health departments as well as Stateand federal agencies like Environmental Protection AgencyDepartment of Toxic Substances Control and CaliforniaDepartment of Health Services What has changed is that until

recently health issues have not been a consideration in land-usetransportation and mobility planning such as has engineeringand public service issues for example The marriage betweenplanning and public works professionals may not be perfect butthey have grown accustomed to one anotherrsquos particularproclivities Merging of health social service and planning willrequire a similar cultural transition However in this latter casethe transition may be eased given a shared vision if not missionof promoting healthy communities Human resources managersmust also be included in this conversation Recruiting trainingand retaining staff with appropriate interdisciplinary experienceis essential for capacity building and effecting organizationalchange

APArsquos Sustainable Planning Interest Group is emblematic ofthe critical mass of planning professionals that are supportingsustainability initiatives many of whom are focused on healthand mobility together with local and sustainable foods Healthmobility local foods and nutrition were recurring sustainabilitythemes dominating recent APA conferences in Boston and LosAngeles APA has also adopted policies on supportingldquoCommunity and Regional Food Systemsrdquo[httpwwwurbantilthorgwpcontentuploads200810american-planning-association-policy-guide-on-community-and-regional-food-planningpdf] While training and conferenceprograms focusing on the intersection of planning health andsustainability is available advanced or graduate-level curriculahas yet to be developed The Sustainable Urban DevelopmentReader (2ndEd 2008) (wwwroutledgegeographycom) intendedfor advanced studies in sustainable development contains onlyone paragraph on the subject of the health-sustainability link inan otherwise comprehensive text Similarly contemporary textson health policy lack any substantive discussion of thesignificance of environmental determinants as a factor inchronic disease or the connection between health andcommunity planning

Community Collaboration and Power-Sharing Concerns about sustainability have been driven to a large

degree by the public and consequently power relationshipsneed to change in order to promote community partnershipsMoreover health and social service professionals will need todevelop competencies that enable them to address issues thatoccur at the intersection of health planning and sustainabledevelopment This would require planners to understand therole of health determinants approaches to health promotionhealth policy and tools like logic mapping and health impactassessments

Because of the grassroots nature of sustainability initiativesplanners health professionals and social workers will need toplace increasing emphasis upon consensus building anddeveloping community partnerships This will also require

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 13

continued on page 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 14

planning health and social service agencies to adopt a proactiveapproach to organizational change and one that relies more on aprocess of shared learning increased openness and accessibilityand a shift in how information is acquired and communicatedThis not only involves power-sharing but further portends afundamental change in the notion of local government from onethat mandates change to one that empowers change Plannersalready have some models that embody a cooperative grassrootsapproach wherein agencies derive their power consensuallyversus coercively (wwwmpoworgelisheva_sadan_empowerment_spreads_chapter1pdf) Californiarsquos ldquocoordinated resourcemanagement and planningrdquo model is a good example of bottom-up watershed planning which emphasizes decentralized decision-making power sharing and collaboration Other examplesinclude the many successful open space and trails planning andacquisition programs spearheaded by land conservancies andconservationdeveloper partnerships local food coops and untilmore recently the many community-run recycling programs

This requires planning organizations coupled with incentivesand inducements

Policy Planning and Impact AssessmentPlanning-related health issues can be addressed through

general plan or other local policy plans or via Health ImpactAssessments (HIAs) The City of Richmond California was oneof the first cities in the country to develop a comprehensivegeneral plan element addressing the link between public healthand the built environment A number of other Cities andcounties in California have since developed health planelements Richmond a former shipbuilding hub during WorldWar II has a number of historic industrial uses and a legacy ofenvironmental contamination It is home to Chevron-RichmondRefinery General Chemical as well as a proliferation of otherport-industrial activities Naturally then RichmondrsquosCommunity Health and Wellness Element addressesenvironmental justice issues related to air pollution and waterand soil contamination The Health Element further discussespedestrian and bicyclist injuries chronic diseases and crime andviolence Richmond residents are at a higher risk than residentsin the rest of the county on many health indicators including thehighest proportion of deaths from diabetes a much higher thanaverage rate of children requiring hospitalization due to asthmaand the second highest number of hospitalizations for mentalhealth disorders and substance abuse Richmond residents arealso disproportionately affected by heart disease cancer andstroke (httpwwwhealthycommunitiesby designorg) Healthplanning elements and HIAs can also be prepared in associationwith Housing Elements and Economic Development PlansSustainability and Carbon Action Plans Alternative ModesPlans Trails and Bicycle Plans as well as Safety and EmergencyPreparedness Plans HIAs are particularly suited to addressinghealth implications of plans programs and policies(programmatic HIAs)

Health Impact Assessment is ldquoa multidisciplinary processwithin which a range of evidence about the health effects of aproposal is considered in a structured framework hellipbased on abroad model of health which proposes that economic politicalsocial psychological and environmental factors determinepopulation healthrdquo (wwwhiacollaborativeorgfaq )

HIA have also been defined as ldquohellip a systematic process thatevaluates the health impacts of a proposed policy planprogram or project The assessment helps the public anddecision-makers understand the health consequences of theproposal and make informed choices that protect and promotehealthrdquo (httpwwwhumanimpactorgcomponentjdownloadsfinish81180)

HIAs have been used as a policy analysis tool to highlighthealth impacts and can either be in the form of a highlystructured report a policy brief or issue paper or can even takethe shape of a community forum Compared to EnvironmentalImpact Assessments (EIA) there is a greater emphasis onldquointer-sectoralrdquo or interdisciplinary coordination and publicparticipation HIAs examine causal factors and pathways infour main areas including social determinants environmentalimpacts (ie air and water quality) built environment andhealth behaviors The ldquobuilt environmentrdquo has been receivingmost attention lately along with the need to promotesustainable development Consequently there is increasinginterest to using HIAs in conjunction with land-use policyplanning and EIAs Pathways could include for examplehousing land-use mix food access and security transportationinfrastructure traffic safety noise community walkability andrecreational amenities Examples of causal factors such as inthe case of a farmerrsquos market might include consumption offruits and vegetables income for vendorsrsquo and farmerspreservation of agricultural land community economicconditions and pedestrian access (ie physical activity)

Planners and environmental scientists would as before beconcerned with biophysical health effects which havecommonly been addressed through human health riskassessments (HRAs) and ecological health risk assessments(ERAs) EPA establishes a specific methodology for assessingHRAs and ERAs risks to human health from exposure tohazardous substances and are thus narrower than HIAs Forexample laws addressing hazardous substances like motorvehicle fuel additives and pesticides or emissions of mercury ordioxin from a power plant generally require HRAs or ERAsrather than HIAs In contrast HIAs would focus increasinglyupon the more indirect health outcomes in order to determinethe health effects of a policy or activity

HIAs are just beginning to be used in connection withNEPA and NEPACEQA reviews and incorporation into

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 3: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

Submittal deadline for theFALL 2012 Issue

of the Environmental Monitor isOctober 1 2012

(posted by October 15 2012)dates subject to change without notice

contents

Statements of fact and opinion are theresponsibility of the authors alone and do notimply an endorsement on the part of theofficers directors or members of AEPMaterials may not be reproduced withoutwritten permission Articles and graphicssubmitted are the property of AEP but authorsretain the right to reprint their own articles

SUBMITTAL SPECIFICATIONSArticles Professionals on the Move andCalendar items should be sent to the editorMarc Bierdzinski in Word format For fileverification sendfax a hard copyAll article photos calling card and display adswill be accepted in DIGITAL FORMAT ONLYNO EXCEPTIONS Digital specifications are

bull JPEG or PDF formatbull Grayscale or black and whitebull 300 - 600 resolution at 100 sizebull Email your ad to dorinagrandesignsus

All addressesphone numbers may be foundon the inside front cover of the EnvironmentalMonitor

Greetings to you all It isindeed a pleasure andhonor to introduce you tothe next issue of theEnvironmental Monitor We

have interesting feature articles as well asa recap from the recent 2012 AEPConference in Sacramento The AEPwebsite (wwwcalifaeporg) continues itsimprovement following the AEP ChapterSummit discussions and you will findmore notices of events and otherimportant information being posted foryour reading pleasure Our member use(and many ldquohitsrdquo from outside sourcesincluding overseas viewers) hasincreased Truly a great service to you ourmembers Check it out

Our AEP Conference was a bigsuccess and thanks to all on thecommittee under the capable leadershipof Trevor Macenski and John Kinsey theConference achieved its financial andattendance goals set forth in the budgetWe had two inspiring talks from ourfeatured speakers Julia Burrows fromGreenwise Joint Venture in the City ofSacramento spoke to us about manystrategies being implemented in the cityto promote lsquogreenrsquo practices Our featuredspeaker was John Laird CaliforniaSecretary for Natural Resources whospoke about the many challenges facingthe state including the Bay Delta Accord(critical to water supplies in the state)renewable energy programs and otherprojects of significance to our statersquosresources CEQA plays a vital role inthem all and he is firm supporter of thelaw

Inside this edition of theEnvironmental Monitor are twointeresting articles that came from theconference proceedings One deals withthe California State University MontereyBay Watershed Institute while the otherdeals with an interesting twist in habitatpreservation This article details theprotection of a bird colony in a prison ndashshowing not all things found in prisons arepredictably bad Very interesting

Just before the Conference we had anAEP Board meeting and the ChapterSummit The Summit is an important

the Environmentalmonitor

S U M M E R 2 0 1 2

Gene Talmadge AEP President

3 Presidentrsquos Message

4 2012 AEP Awards Program

9 From the NAEP Liaisonrsquos Desk

10 Birds of a Feather Flock TogetherThe Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

12 The Planning Sustainability HealthConnection A Glimpse at EmergingTrends

16 CSU Monterey Bay WatershedInstitute Publications A Gold Mineof Gray Literature

18 2013 AEP Awards ProgramNominations

22 2013 NAEPAEP Joint ConferenceSponsorExhibitor Opportunities

25 AEP Membership Application

PRESIDENTrsquoS MESSAGE

opportunity for the AEP Chapters todiscuss matters of interest and importanceto the chapters and provide guidance tothe state Board At this yearrsquos Summit wehad representatives from all the chapterspresent and had a great discussion onnumerous topics Our number onepriority remains Membership ndash retainingexisting members recruiting new onesand finding ones that may have driftedaway The Membership Committee willbe leading the ldquoDriverdquo a very ambitiousprogram We have re-designed themembership form to include a summary ofmember benefits and defining new classesof membership (regular new professionalsstudent etc) as well as a new promotionalmaterial package distributed to allchapters The Committee has scheduledregular conference calls to coordinatetheir activities The real key to theirefforts is underscored by the commitmentof each chapterrsquos actions to reach out andkeep their current members recruit newmembers and draw others back into thefold Each chapter member and thechapter board needs to focus attention onthis important effort The larger AEPbecomes the more services and programswe can offer to our members for theirpersonal professional development andsocialbusiness networking Corporate

continued on page 24

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 3

Cover photo credit Dorina Blythe April 2012Taken while vacationing in Yosemite

FEATURE ARTICLE

By Roger Turner and Dev Vrat Awards Program Co-Chairs

2012 AEP Awards Program

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Charles S BullldquoCharly is a mentor I am always amazed by the depth and diversity of his knowledge from his recognized expertise in noise modeling andanalysis cultural resources and air quality to his seemingly unlimited understanding of CEQA and NEPA regulations and implementationMoreover he has managed and successfully completed environmental documents for large controversial projects Charly freely shares hisknowledge and has had a hand in educating many of the environmental professionals working today in the San Diego region If you have aquestion he knows the answer Above all Charly will drop everything he is working on to take a moment or an afternoon to teachrdquo mdash RobertMacAller President RECON

ldquoCharly has been an active member of AEP for over 25 years and served as an AEP State Boardmember In this capacity he activelyparticipated in several rounds of AEP Strategic Plans He was anorganizer of the first CEQA Basics Workshop for the San Diego Chapter ofAEP as well as anorganizer and co-presenter of the first CEQA Basics Workshop for the San Diego Chapter of AEP aswell as an organizer andco-presenter with Margaret Sohagi for an Advanced CEQA Workshop Hewas also the Director of the 2000 AEP Conference in San Diegowhere the conference focused onconflict resolution in the environmental process The conference included presentations by CEQAjudges fromthroughout California and involved a comparative mock trial versus mediation of aCEQA challenge Charly has also served on the San DiegoChapterlegislative review committee andparticipated as a member of the chapter awards juryrdquo - Julie Wang AEP San Diego ChapterPresident

ldquoMost recently he is serving as a Co-Chair to the San Diego Chapterrsquos newly formedEmeritusCommittee The Emeritus Committeersquos goal is to re-involve long-time AEP memberswho are approaching retirement and havenrsquot been active in AEP recently It will give the Chaptermembership one more chance to learn from these individuals before they retire from theprofession The Emeritus Committee under Charlyrsquos leadership will be establishing mentorprograms for our Student Chapters as well as for professionals at all levelsrdquo mdash Marilyn RFPonseggi San Diego AEP Chapter DirectorContact Nicole Turner RECON Environmental 1927 5th Avenue San Diego CA 92101 619-308-9333 nturnerreconenvironmentalcom

and to URS for sponsoring this yearrsquos production of theAwards Presentation Video highlighting the recipients It wasanother great program You can learn more about thesewinning projects and programs on AEPrsquos website atwwwcalifaeporg You can also look in this and future editionsof the Environmental Monitor for articles on these greatdocuments If you are curious contact the authors and discussyour thoughts

Also now is the time to prepare a nomination for nextyearrsquos program The 2013 awards announcement is on theAEP website and in this issue of the Environmental Monitorwith listed criteria for submittals The 2013 Awardscriteria and submission materials are to be submitted byAugust 15 2012 Do not miss this opportunity to haveyour outstanding work and contributions to the professionrecognized by your peers next year

The Association of Environmental Professionalscongratulates the following winners of the 2012 AwardsProgram

The Association of Environmental Professionals(AEP) has been recognizing the best work ofpublic agencies and environmental professionalsfor over 36 years Award-winners have advancedthe state-of-the-art in environmental analysis

and presenting this analysis to the public and decision makersin an attractive understandable and easily accessible formatClimate Change and preparation of Climate Action Plans toreduce greenhouse gas emissions have become State prioritiesYear after year the best of the best environmentalprofessionals and their documents achievementrsquos and serviceto the profession have contributed to the enhancementmaintenance and protection of the quality of the natural andhuman environment

AEPrsquos award winners were recognized at the AEP AwardsProgram ceremony held on May 7 2012 in SacramentoAEP congratulates each winning recipient of the prestigiousmountain trophies award plaques and certificates

AEP extends sincere thanks to the volunteer Awards Jury

continued on page 5

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 4

Accepting this award Charlie Bull

AEP is looking for volunteers for the 2013 AEP Awards Jury If you would like to serve on the jury please contact Dev Vrat AICPdevvratcsunedu

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 5

Environmental Analysis Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDSan Diego County General Plan Update EIRPrepared for the County of San DiegoPrepared by Atkins County of San Diego Department of Planning amp Land Use

The Awards Jury found the EIR to be well organized and user-friendly with manysupportive tables and high quality graphics to illustrate key resource areas The impactsummary tables at the beginning of each resource section are also a nice touch The EIR teamwas able to develop a concise project description that allowed for a comprehensiveprogrammatic evaluation of land use and transportation policies and a holistic considerationof impacts Outstanding

Contact Devon Muto Chief Advanced Planning Department of Planning and Land Use Countyof San Diego 5201 Ruffin Road Suite B San Diego CA 92123-1666 Office 8586943016DevonMutosdcountycagov

OUTSTANDING AWARDPlan Santa Barbara General Plan Update Program EIRPrepared for the City of Santa BarbaraPrepared by AMEC Earth amp EnvironmentalFehr amp Peers NelsonNygaard Applied Earthworks Santa Barbara CommunityDevelopment Department Planning Division

The Awards Jury noted that this EIR employs a number of unique and innovativeapproaches These include a unique level of analysis of the integrated effects of land use TDMand alternative transportation on congestion energy consumption emissions and climatechange The EIR transforms broad planning policies into a detailed project description for the EIR analysis necessary to support adoption of theGeneral Plan Update The jury appreciated the approach and organization of the executive summary In addition the project website demonstratesgreat public involvement It is clear a lot of thought was put into the organization and preparation of this Program EIR Outstanding

Contact Ben Botkin AMEC 805962-0992 benjaminbotkinameccom

MERIT AWARD2050 Regional Transportation Plan Sustainable Communities Strategy EIRPrepared for San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)Prepared by AECOM and SANDAG

This EIR uses a unique methodology - breaking the environmental analysis down by timeperiod to help disclose the impacts of the 2050 RTPSCS in meeting targets for GHGemission reductions under SB 375 The EIR team at SANDAG and AECOM workeddiligently through extensive use of a geographic information system (GIS) data inputmapping and modeling to determine the environmental impacts associated with theproposed project Collection review and distillation of statewide regional and localjurisdiction plans regulations and EIRs fed into the analysis for each issue area This is a wellthought out document and is practical to use Excellent

Contact Yara Fisher 6192331454 yarafisheraecomcom

Planning Document

OUTSTANDING AWARDSan Diego County General Plan UpdatePrepared for the County of San DiegoPrepared by the San Diego County Department of Planning and Land Use

San Diego County has successfully performed a challenging land use balancing actin this general plan update The plan is well organized clearly presented and uses acommon sense approach in its analysis Itrsquos an impressive example of rethinking land useplans to minimize impacts and encourage more efficient use of lands Kudos to San DiegoCounty for reducing the need for roads in constrained areas Outstanding

Contact Bob Citrano 8586943016 or Devon Muto DevonMutosdcountycagov

continued on page 6

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 4

Accepting this award Dianne Sandman Senior ProjectManager Mindy Fogg Atkins

Accepting this award Jeff Henderson AICP ProjectManager AECOM

Accepting this award Ben Botkin AMEC BarbaraShelton City of Santa Barbara Community DevelopmentDepartment

Accepting this award Eric Gibson Devon Muto Chief ofAdvance Planning County of San Diego

Climate Change Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDCity of West Hollywood Climate Action PlanPrepared for the City of West Hollywood and AECOM

The Awards Jury found the document to be user friendly including excellentgraphics and publicly accessible The climate action plan presents measurable outcomesfor two target years 2020 and 2035 The organization of information is intuitivethroughout the document and the one page pullouts for each measure make thedocument easy to read The comprehensive matrix at the end is an excellent referencefor implementation of the plan and for individuals interested in reading about howdecisions were made regarding each measure Adjustments to the plan are called for on5-yr cycle An Outstanding Climate Action Plan Contact Jeff Henderson 9164837999 jeffhendersonaecomcom

MERIT AWARDUnion City Climate Action PlanPrepared for Union CityPrepared by Climate Protection Task Force City Council and Planning Commission ofUnion City AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury found the tool kit included in this climate action plan may be used asa decision support tool for Greenhouse Gas emission reduction measures thereby providing acommon sense approach to choosing various reduction measures in an interactive settingThe CAP includes supporting measures even when they are not quantifiable whichultimately improves the ability to implement the plan The jury also noted that there wastransparency in the technical appendix documents The toolkit enables real-time resultswhich increases buy-in by staff and stakeholders Everyone can see immediately what theresults will be using various scenarios The reduction keys are a good way to provide at-a-glance monitoring of impacts An excellent documentContact Claire Bonham AECOM 4159552800 clairbonham-carteraecomcom

MERIT AWARDCity of Escondido Draft Climate Action PlanPrepared for the City of EscondidoPrepared by ATKINS and the City of Escondido

The Awards Jury noted that this climate action plan presents information simply andclearly so the layperson can understand the implications of specific measures and programs -the one page pullouts are key The jury agreed itrsquos encouraging that partnerships werehighlighted in a CAP as a priority for implementation - this will help reduce the impacts toboth staff resources and the Cityrsquos budget It was also great to see the linkage to regionalplanning via the RTPSCS Periodic updates are called for with three initial definite yearsidentified The plan also includes definable metrics with screening table minimum valuesAn excellent document

Contact Joanne Dramko 8585141023 joannedramkoatkinsglobalcom

MERIT AWARDSan Luis Obispo County Energy Wise PlanPrepared for the County of San Luis ObispoPrepared by PMC and the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning amp Building

The Energy Wise Plan was developed in coordination with a number of otherplanning efforts occurring throughout the County so that it can serve as a centralclearing house for energy and climate policy Of particular note the plan includes athree tiered approach to performance monitoring and includes an innovative approachof providing yearly progress assessments Well doneContactTammy Seale PMC 8052507974 tsealepmcworldcom

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 5

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 6

continued on page 7

Accepting this award Jeff Henderson AICP ProjectManager AECOM

Accepting this award Culley Thomas Union City

Accepting this award Joanne Dramko and MichaelHendrix Program Managers Atkins

Accepting this award Jason H Giffen Director County ofSan Luis Obispo Leanne Singleton Tammy Seale PMC

Environmental Resource Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDRobert Louis Stevenson State Park and Wildlake-Duff RanchesPrepared for the Land Trust of Napa CountyPrepared by AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury observed that the management plan uses a comprehensive approachwith supporting mapping making it easy to evaluate the various management scenarios Theconcept of this document can be replicated at other parks or in other situations involvingmultiple ownerships The technical information presented in a graphic format enables a layperson to understand project opportunities and constraints at-a-glance An outstandingdocumentContact Sarah Heard AECOM 4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

MERIT AWARDAdapting to Rising Tides -Transportation Vulnerability and Risk Assessment ProjectPrepared for Conservation and Development Commission Metropolitan TransportationCommission California Department of Transportation District 4 AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury commented that this project is an excellent example of how to usecreative partnerships to provide regional value and statewide applicability The risk profileswith zoom-in maps are helpful to understand impacts and compare different facilities Anexcellent documentContact Sarah Heard AECOM 4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

OUTSTANDING AWARDNew Irvington Tunnel Project Groundwater Management ProgramPrepared for the Public Utilities CommissionPrepared by Public Utilities Commission ndash New Irvington Tunnel Project Team

The Awards Jury noted that the program uses multiple platforms to reach the public Theproject includes clear fact sheets which are visually appealing A hotline was established andis displayed prominently in all the program materials Congratulations to the San FranciscoPublic Utilities Commission for their 5 years of effort to recognize the value of the landowners as stake holders and to engage them as part of the long-term groundwatermanagement solution An outstanding outcome

Contact David Tszoo Project Manager SFPUC 9252334354 dtsztoosfwaterorg

MERIT AWARDEffective Mitigation - Development through ImplementationPrepared for Sempra EnergyPrepared by Insignia Environmental San Diego Gas amp Electric Company and GasCompany

Sempra Energy Utilities and Insignia Environmental have crafted a training session thatprovides a primer on the A to Zrsquos of mitigation measures They detail the permitting processdiscuss the semantics of mitigation measures and review tracking procedures The Awards Juryfound the regulatory triggers table to be very helpful This program can be easily transferredto other public utility agencies and local municipalities An excellent documentContact Anne Marie McGraw Insignia 6503216787 AMcgrawinsigniaenvcom

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 7

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 6

continued on page 8

Accepting this award Sarah Heard AECOM4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Accepting this award Sarah Heard AECOM4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Accepting this award David Tsztoo PE SFPUC BetsyRhodes SFPUC Holly Their The Their Group BruceAbellimanKim Stern SFPUC

Accepting this award Name to come Erin KeochekiconAnne Marie McGraw Insignia

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

MERIT AWARDSan Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter ProgramPrepared for San Diego Gas and ElectricPrepared by San Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter Program ndash Customer Experience

The SDGampE Smart Meter Programrsquos detailed messaging plan may be used as a model foreffective outreach Itrsquos 90-60-30-day notification plan is transferable to other publiceducation efforts The informational door hangers were an innovative approach to reachinga segment of the public that might otherwise have been missed Excellent work

Contact Risa Baron Sempra Utilities Office 8586541857 rbaronsemprautilitiescom

Humor Award

AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line -General Outreach and Educational MaterialsPrepared for AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line members Prepared by AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line

The Awards Jury found this project to be creative and hilarious ndash especially to nerds Thetricksters at AECOM presented a real tongue-in-cheek treat for the reader Halloween willnever be the same and neither will the employee who portrayed the patient zombie It takesthe notion of ldquoother duties as assignedrdquo to a whole other realm Thanks to the knowledgeableand respected AECOM technical staff for sharing your internal office humor and providingthe Awards Jury an enjoyable respite from the serious environmental analysis and climatereduction plansContact John Hute AECOM 9164145876

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 8

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 7

AcknowledgementsOne of the most important AEP volunteer groups is the AEP Awards Jury These are AEP peer professionals chosen for

their years of experience and expertise in the profession AEP recognized the following individuals who gave graciously manydays of their time to review and judge all the submittals and hours spent on AEP conference calls to reach consensus decisionsusing the AEP rating criteria Thank you all

AEP 2012 AWARDS VIDEO PRODUCTIONWe thank Megan Giglini Vivian Gaddie and Joan Valle of URS for the great video for the awards program We thank URS

for sponsoring the Awards Program The video was enjoyed by all

AEP 2012 CONFERENCE COMMITTEEFinally we thank the Co-Chairs for this conference Trevor Macenski Michael Brandman Associates and John Kinsey

Wanger Jones Helsley PC for leadership and hard work and their little army of conference volunteers Thank you all for awonderful successful conference

AEP 2012 AWARDS JURYDev Vrat AICP Jury ChairUrban Studies and Planning DepartmentCalifornia State University Northridge

Patti Nahil AICPPGN

Jeffry S Rice AICPURS

Crystahl TaylorPadre Associates Inc

Honey L WaltersAscent Environmental Inc

Ray WeissESA

Accepting this award Carolyn Winn VP Customer ServiceSan Diego Gas and Electric

Accepting this award John Hute AECOM

Summer is here and it has warmed up It is the timefor vacations and exploring the outdoors I hope youget out there and refresh your fun time hiking or justhaving a good time doing your favorite activity Theenvironmental field continues to take more

importance in all aspects of our lives We hear more newscoverage of disasters and their environmental effectsEnvironmental professionals are sought out for professionaladvice in every aspect of our community issues We have astronger voice in developing environmental policy inCalifornia and in every state in this nation So I ask what roledo you play and how can you stay sharp with your skills

AEP and NAEP offer many opportunities includingCEQANEPA Workshops special training in air qualitytransportation planning greenhouse gas emission impactsurban pollution in our nations water and the list goes on AEPis planning for the Fall Basic CEQA Workshop Look to theAEP Website and to upcoming newsletters for the Fall BasicCEQA Workshops

AEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop this summerDates are July 25th in Clovis CA July 30 in Oakland CA July31 in San Diego CA and August 1 in Carson CA Go to thecalifaeporg website for more information This is the first timeAEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop training program

NAEP is continuing to offer Webinars I will be sendinginformation to you as it is published Take advantage of these90 minute online training programs They are valuable andgreat to stay current on the regulatory policy and court cases foryour work Look for more information in the near futureNAEP is working hard to increase real value opportunities toenvironmental professionals Recent webinars on FrackingEndangered Species and Green Energy Development Impactsto Natural Resources were presented by NAEP

NAEP posts bimonthly E-Newsletters A recentedition included in some excellent articles on

various environmental topics The E-Newlettersare posted on the AEP Website and e-mailed

to AEP members when published These aregreat resources to read current events in

the environmental profession and staycurrent on the happening scene

Look for the most recent edition onour website

NAEP will be conducting aChapter Retreat July 21 and

22 2012 in Kansas CityThis is a time when the

From the NAEP Liaisonrsquos DeskNAEPAFFILIATION

By Roger W Turner

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 9

Chapter representatives will go over the strategic goals andreview the programs provided by NAEP The Chapter Retreatwill help set the new course for NAEP in providing its Chapterservices and programs to its members Note all AEP members areaffiliated with NAEP and will benefit from programs trainingand conferences NAEP produces I will publish the results of theChapter Retreat in a future edition of this report

The 2013 NAEPAEP Joint Conference is planned for April1 to 5 2013 The theme is ldquoWalk the Talkrdquo The conferencecommittee is hard at work planning what will sure to be aninformative and engaging event for environmental professionalsOur conference will be held in an outstanding state-of-the-artconference facility at the JW Marriott Hotel located in thevibrant LA Live complex in downtown Los Angeles

The hotel and conference facility sport a front-row seat tosome of Los Angelesrsquo top attractions include the Staples Centerthe Nokia Theatre Regal Cinemas and a wide variety of shopsand restaurants In addition despite the car-centered nature ofgreater Los Angeles many world-class attractions can be reachedvia public transit which is easily accessible from the complex

The conference program will feature dynamic regional andnational keynote speakers and an all-day pre-conferencesymposium on climate change adaptation Conference sessionswill cover topics including NEPA and CEQA Climate ChangeWater Supply and Delivery Air Quality Energy and AlternativeEnergy Development Marine and Coastal Issues HabitatMitigation Transportation Land Use and Cultural ResourcesThere will also be numerous other conference and social eventsthat will take advantage of the conference location including anumber of mobile workshops and a 5K run through some ofdowntown Los Angelesrsquo top attractions

Look for more information in future editions of my columnand on the AEP Website

Please mark your calendar-

The presentation abstracts submittal deadline-August 15 2012

The sponsor exhibitor submittal deadline-March 1 2013

The 2013 awards nomination submittal deadline-August 15 2012

As always I look forward to your comments and thoughts Ialso invite you to write me at rwturnerhotmailcom or call

(951) 707-5020 if you have a question about NAEP or needassistance in obtaining service from NAEP

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 11

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 10

By Bill Goggin Senior Biologist EMC Planning Group

Birds of a Feather Flock TogetherThe Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

solve an on-going maintenance problem that had become ahealth liability the prison staff proposed to construct a pavedpath between security fences so that the facilityrsquos guards couldbetter patrol this area (several of the guards had suffered turnedankles and knees because of the uneven and pot-holed groundsurface) Because the project had a potential to impact sensitivebiological resources Santa Clara County staff contracted withEMC Planning Group to assist the County with complying withthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and otherstate and federal environmental laws established to protectsensitive animals and their habitats including what is the subjectof this short article an established egret and heron rookery

During the performance of an earlier biological pre-construction survey performed by EMC Planning Group in July2010 an active rookery (a colonial breeding bird site) wasobserved within the south-central portion of the prison facilityrsquosmain courtyard The rookery is located within a cluster of denselyfoliated trees and contained approximately 50-60 nests fromthree species of birds great egret (Ardea alba) snowy egret(Egretta thula) and black-crowned night heron (Nycticorax

You can hear the sound as you approach thecourtyard of the Elmwood Correctional Facilityalthough itrsquos not exactly clear whatrsquos causing allthe commotion It starts as a low backgroundchattering and builds to a near cacophony close to

the mess hall Beyond these seemingly discordant soundseverything in the scene appears to be in order the prisonrsquosinmates going about their daily routine dressed in white- andblack-striped jumpsuits sweeping lifting weights or casuallytalking in groups while the watchful guards keep a dutiful eyeout for anything out of the ordinary All in all itrsquos just anotherordinary day at the Elmwood Correctional Facility But what iscausing all this noise you may ask yourself Finally out of ideasyou glance heavenward and thatrsquos when it hits you (no notthat) there are birds in the trees above your head manybirdshellipand they are large birds Are you puzzled Donrsquot bebecause this is the story of the jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

The Elmwood Correctional Facility is a low-security SantaClara County prison located west of Interstate 880 and north ofGreat American Parkway in Milpitas California In order to

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 11

Birds of a Feather Flock Together continued from page 10

nycticorax) The ground surface beneath these trees showedevidence of long-term site use by rookeryrsquos birds as wasdemonstrated by an accumulation of whitewash feathers andegg shell fragments

Especially unique in an urban area the Elmwood rookerysite is believed to be the only egret and heron rookery in thesouthern San Francisco Bay located within an entirely fencedanthropogenic setting and may be the only one of its kind innorthern California Colonial breeding sites are especiallyimportant when located within urbanized environments asdevelopment and land conversion often degrades orremoves available rookery habitat and asa result opportunities for colonialnesting species in urban areasare limited These sites arealso significant becausethey often support asizeable segment ofthe local populationand because theirproximity to foragingareas can reducetravel distances theymay potentially reducepredator-prey (iemortality) interactions

Because construction wasplanned during the most sensitive periodof the birds natural life history cycle the projectrsquosconstruction activities had a potential to cause detrimentalimpacts (ie elevated levels of noise dust and fumes) possiblyaffecting the birds nesting and juvenile rearing which couldhave led to fines and negative press for the County Thereforein order to protect this important resource in spring 2011 theCounty retained EMC Planning Group to monitor the rookeryduring the projectrsquos construction whenever heavy equipmentoperation would be occurring within 500 feet of the rookery

It is important to note that none of bird species living at theElmwood rookery (great egret snowy egret and night heron) arespecifically listed as threatened or endangered by the state orfederal Endangered Species Acts however the CaliforniaDepartment of Fish and Game (CDFG) considers colonialbreeding sites to be sensitive resource areas that are affordedprotection under CDFG Code during the breeding bird seasonas they can be sensitive to human intrusion and disturbance Inaddition to state regulations the protection of egrets and heronsare covered under the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act Oncenests have been constructed and eggs are present the rookerysite becomes a protected resource area and cannot be disturbedReproduction for the rookeries species generally occurs from

early April through July with the juvenile rearing periodextending into mid-September

Behavioral monitoring of the egret and heron rookeryconsisted of a qualified EMC Planning Group biologist stationedinside the facilityrsquos perimeter fence in a direct line of siteapproximately 275 feet from the rookery during constructionactivities or during operation of heavy equipment within 500feet of the rookery During construction the monitoringbiologist observed egret and heron behavior using hand heldbinoculars and a high magnification field spotting scope for signs

of stress andor agitation Notes on behavioralinteractions (ie preeninggrooming

feeding sibling competition etc)and daily counts on numbers of

individuals and juvenilespresent were recorded

C o n s t r u c t i o ncommenced on April27 and an EMCPlanning Groupbiologist conductedworker environmental

awareness trainingconcerning the presence

of the rookery and theimportance of protecting the

rookery During the projectrsquosimplementation no disturbance of the

rookery was noted and the rookeries behavior wasessentially unchanged by project activities Approximately 38adult and 23 juvenile egrets and herons were observedthroughout the construction period

By incorporating these pro-active impact minimization andspecial-status species protection measures into the projectrsquosimplementation the County as the lead agency demonstratedproper compliance with CDFG Code and CEQA law and thisimportant and sensitive resource was safeguarded frominadvertent disturbance This model of good stewardshipdemonstrates leadership on the part of the County and theyshould be commended for stepping up All land managers canlearn from this experience and should take note itrsquos alwaysbetter to err on the side of caution

EMC Planning Group wishes to thank the County of SantaClara the projectrsquos manager Ms Alicia Flynn for her support on theproject the projectrsquos contractors Granite and BCI and the entireElmwood prison facilities staff for their cooperation and supportduring the monitoring activities

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 13

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 12

By Morty Prisament MSMP AICP Strategenesis-GPC

The Planning Sustainability Health ConnectionA Glimpse at Emerging Trends

some predictions and prognostications about how we can makethe transition

Harmonic Convergence Health + SustainabilitySustainable Development is a logical contextual frame for

considering health in planning The classic definition from theBrundtland Commission is development that ldquomeets the needsof the present without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needsrdquo CEQArsquos requirement toaddress long-term versus short-term needs appears to echo theCommissionrsquos definition of sustainable development MichaelThomas Needham referred similarly to lsquoSustainableDevelopmentrsquo ldquoas the ability to meet the needs of the presentwhile contributing to the future generationsrsquo needsrdquo

Sustainable development happens at many levels fromindividual buildings and neighborhoods-green building andsustainable communities to the city and regional scale greencities sustainable bioregions etc Sustainable development alsohas multiple dimensions from design and green planning togreen infrastructure Most relevant from a planninghealthperspective is sustainable developmentrsquos focus on enhancingldquomobilityrdquo This includes community design incorporatingmixed use development in combination with transit optionsstreetscape design that enhances pedestrianbike safety(ldquocomplete streetsrdquo) and access to services and amenities Inessence an urban form characterized by mixed use andpedestrian and transit-oriented development is what makeswalking and biking more attractive as well as practical andfeasible On a regional level it embodies the ldquosmart growthrdquoprinciples of interconnected ldquowalkablerdquo and ldquobikeablerdquocommunities served by local businesses and linked to a largertransit and alternative modes network Think ldquoMillenniumParkrdquo in downtown Chicago or ldquoBell Street Parkrdquo in Seattle

The past decade has seen resurgence in not only theeconomic vitality of American cities but cityplanning And this has come about as a result ofthe sustainability movement Sustainability isproviding a framework for planners to move

beyond the traditional confines of Euclidian zoning adopting amore holistic and integrated approach to building communitiesat the human scale Sustainability initiatives have attractedbroad support because of the benefits conveyed on a number oflevels from reduction in greenhouse gases to economicdevelopment and quality-of-life However one of the mostprofound findings is the connection between ldquocommunityplanningrdquo and health In fact recent findings suggest that yourldquozip coderdquo is the single-most important determinant of an

individualrsquos health In other words how communities aredesigned can influence onersquos level of physical activity andhence health Given the prominence of the obesity epidemicand rise in chronic diseases planners will increasingly be calledupon to play a role in promoting healthy communities This willexpand the mission of planning organizations to consider thehealth implications of land-use decisions The ldquoconvergencerdquo ofplanning and health and wellness represents a significant trendand one which will set a dominant tone This article is intendedto help planners understand this emerging trend

We begin with deciphering the connection betweenplanning and health specifically the ldquofitrdquo between health andsustainability Next we look at upstream health factors Wethen discuss the ldquoculturalrdquo transition in the planning healthand social services arenas that will be necessary in order to fullyrealize the potential of health sustainability planning Wehighlight the importance of power sharing between agencies andgrassroots organizations and highlight the evolution in policyplanning and environmental analysis along with the use ofhealth impact assessments (HIAs) Finally we conclude with

ldquoSocially ldquoGreen Healthrdquo occurs at a nexus of morally-laden decisions about living inthe world as patients workers consumers and citizensrdquo

(Institute for the Future Health Horizons Program)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 13

continued on page 14

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 12

Health FactorsIncreasingly health researchers are finding that health

problems are influenced by societal policies and environmentsthat either support behaviors or fail to foster healthier choicesDr Kawachi stressed that where you live affects how you liveThere is growing consensus that major health problems will notbe solved solely by individual actions and choices By movingldquoupstreamrdquo to address causes and improving environments wherewe work learn and play we can reduce chronic illnesses DrKawachi specifically cites changes in ldquotransportation policiesand urban zoningrdquo (Physical Activity and the BuiltEnvironment What Worksrdquo Statewide Conference Sponsoredby Health by Design September 10 2007 Indianapolis IN)

Health care genetics and lifestyle changes only take us so far Ifyou want to prevent obesity you need to cure the environmentnot the individualrdquo

Dr Ichiro Kawachi delivering Keynote address at StatewidePolicy Forum on Social Determinants of Health 111306(httpbcbsmnfoundationcom objectsTier_3forum_proceedingspdf )

ldquoWe must understand that education housing transportationand community development and income policies are healthpolicies- Jan Malcolm (httpmngov health-reformimagesTask-Force-and-Work-Groups-Summary-2012-01-31pdf )

In essence it appears that health professionals areabandoning their long-held belief in the efficacy of healtheducation programs They have learned that such programsrarely lead to sustained behavioral change unless scaled up andinstituted through formal and informal PSE changes Anupstream approach might also involve measures designed toinfluence diet and nutrition such as agricultural food subsidiesand national nutrition standards If this seems out-of-bounds toyou planners out there think about the growing trend topromote local and sustainable foods through urban agricultureand farmerrsquos markets or the efforts by schools and universities tosource more sustainable food options

Cultural Transition Sustainable Development by its very nature is

interdisciplinary and in the case of health and land-use willrequire the ldquotriadrdquo of planners health and social servicesprofessionals to collaborate in developing plans and forgingstrategies This would hardly be the first time that planners haveworked with health professionals Solid waste and water qualityfacility siting as well as development review call for planners towork routinely with local health departments as well as Stateand federal agencies like Environmental Protection AgencyDepartment of Toxic Substances Control and CaliforniaDepartment of Health Services What has changed is that until

recently health issues have not been a consideration in land-usetransportation and mobility planning such as has engineeringand public service issues for example The marriage betweenplanning and public works professionals may not be perfect butthey have grown accustomed to one anotherrsquos particularproclivities Merging of health social service and planning willrequire a similar cultural transition However in this latter casethe transition may be eased given a shared vision if not missionof promoting healthy communities Human resources managersmust also be included in this conversation Recruiting trainingand retaining staff with appropriate interdisciplinary experienceis essential for capacity building and effecting organizationalchange

APArsquos Sustainable Planning Interest Group is emblematic ofthe critical mass of planning professionals that are supportingsustainability initiatives many of whom are focused on healthand mobility together with local and sustainable foods Healthmobility local foods and nutrition were recurring sustainabilitythemes dominating recent APA conferences in Boston and LosAngeles APA has also adopted policies on supportingldquoCommunity and Regional Food Systemsrdquo[httpwwwurbantilthorgwpcontentuploads200810american-planning-association-policy-guide-on-community-and-regional-food-planningpdf] While training and conferenceprograms focusing on the intersection of planning health andsustainability is available advanced or graduate-level curriculahas yet to be developed The Sustainable Urban DevelopmentReader (2ndEd 2008) (wwwroutledgegeographycom) intendedfor advanced studies in sustainable development contains onlyone paragraph on the subject of the health-sustainability link inan otherwise comprehensive text Similarly contemporary textson health policy lack any substantive discussion of thesignificance of environmental determinants as a factor inchronic disease or the connection between health andcommunity planning

Community Collaboration and Power-Sharing Concerns about sustainability have been driven to a large

degree by the public and consequently power relationshipsneed to change in order to promote community partnershipsMoreover health and social service professionals will need todevelop competencies that enable them to address issues thatoccur at the intersection of health planning and sustainabledevelopment This would require planners to understand therole of health determinants approaches to health promotionhealth policy and tools like logic mapping and health impactassessments

Because of the grassroots nature of sustainability initiativesplanners health professionals and social workers will need toplace increasing emphasis upon consensus building anddeveloping community partnerships This will also require

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 13

continued on page 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 14

planning health and social service agencies to adopt a proactiveapproach to organizational change and one that relies more on aprocess of shared learning increased openness and accessibilityand a shift in how information is acquired and communicatedThis not only involves power-sharing but further portends afundamental change in the notion of local government from onethat mandates change to one that empowers change Plannersalready have some models that embody a cooperative grassrootsapproach wherein agencies derive their power consensuallyversus coercively (wwwmpoworgelisheva_sadan_empowerment_spreads_chapter1pdf) Californiarsquos ldquocoordinated resourcemanagement and planningrdquo model is a good example of bottom-up watershed planning which emphasizes decentralized decision-making power sharing and collaboration Other examplesinclude the many successful open space and trails planning andacquisition programs spearheaded by land conservancies andconservationdeveloper partnerships local food coops and untilmore recently the many community-run recycling programs

This requires planning organizations coupled with incentivesand inducements

Policy Planning and Impact AssessmentPlanning-related health issues can be addressed through

general plan or other local policy plans or via Health ImpactAssessments (HIAs) The City of Richmond California was oneof the first cities in the country to develop a comprehensivegeneral plan element addressing the link between public healthand the built environment A number of other Cities andcounties in California have since developed health planelements Richmond a former shipbuilding hub during WorldWar II has a number of historic industrial uses and a legacy ofenvironmental contamination It is home to Chevron-RichmondRefinery General Chemical as well as a proliferation of otherport-industrial activities Naturally then RichmondrsquosCommunity Health and Wellness Element addressesenvironmental justice issues related to air pollution and waterand soil contamination The Health Element further discussespedestrian and bicyclist injuries chronic diseases and crime andviolence Richmond residents are at a higher risk than residentsin the rest of the county on many health indicators including thehighest proportion of deaths from diabetes a much higher thanaverage rate of children requiring hospitalization due to asthmaand the second highest number of hospitalizations for mentalhealth disorders and substance abuse Richmond residents arealso disproportionately affected by heart disease cancer andstroke (httpwwwhealthycommunitiesby designorg) Healthplanning elements and HIAs can also be prepared in associationwith Housing Elements and Economic Development PlansSustainability and Carbon Action Plans Alternative ModesPlans Trails and Bicycle Plans as well as Safety and EmergencyPreparedness Plans HIAs are particularly suited to addressinghealth implications of plans programs and policies(programmatic HIAs)

Health Impact Assessment is ldquoa multidisciplinary processwithin which a range of evidence about the health effects of aproposal is considered in a structured framework hellipbased on abroad model of health which proposes that economic politicalsocial psychological and environmental factors determinepopulation healthrdquo (wwwhiacollaborativeorgfaq )

HIA have also been defined as ldquohellip a systematic process thatevaluates the health impacts of a proposed policy planprogram or project The assessment helps the public anddecision-makers understand the health consequences of theproposal and make informed choices that protect and promotehealthrdquo (httpwwwhumanimpactorgcomponentjdownloadsfinish81180)

HIAs have been used as a policy analysis tool to highlighthealth impacts and can either be in the form of a highlystructured report a policy brief or issue paper or can even takethe shape of a community forum Compared to EnvironmentalImpact Assessments (EIA) there is a greater emphasis onldquointer-sectoralrdquo or interdisciplinary coordination and publicparticipation HIAs examine causal factors and pathways infour main areas including social determinants environmentalimpacts (ie air and water quality) built environment andhealth behaviors The ldquobuilt environmentrdquo has been receivingmost attention lately along with the need to promotesustainable development Consequently there is increasinginterest to using HIAs in conjunction with land-use policyplanning and EIAs Pathways could include for examplehousing land-use mix food access and security transportationinfrastructure traffic safety noise community walkability andrecreational amenities Examples of causal factors such as inthe case of a farmerrsquos market might include consumption offruits and vegetables income for vendorsrsquo and farmerspreservation of agricultural land community economicconditions and pedestrian access (ie physical activity)

Planners and environmental scientists would as before beconcerned with biophysical health effects which havecommonly been addressed through human health riskassessments (HRAs) and ecological health risk assessments(ERAs) EPA establishes a specific methodology for assessingHRAs and ERAs risks to human health from exposure tohazardous substances and are thus narrower than HIAs Forexample laws addressing hazardous substances like motorvehicle fuel additives and pesticides or emissions of mercury ordioxin from a power plant generally require HRAs or ERAsrather than HIAs In contrast HIAs would focus increasinglyupon the more indirect health outcomes in order to determinethe health effects of a policy or activity

HIAs are just beginning to be used in connection withNEPA and NEPACEQA reviews and incorporation into

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 4: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

FEATURE ARTICLE

By Roger Turner and Dev Vrat Awards Program Co-Chairs

2012 AEP Awards Program

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Charles S BullldquoCharly is a mentor I am always amazed by the depth and diversity of his knowledge from his recognized expertise in noise modeling andanalysis cultural resources and air quality to his seemingly unlimited understanding of CEQA and NEPA regulations and implementationMoreover he has managed and successfully completed environmental documents for large controversial projects Charly freely shares hisknowledge and has had a hand in educating many of the environmental professionals working today in the San Diego region If you have aquestion he knows the answer Above all Charly will drop everything he is working on to take a moment or an afternoon to teachrdquo mdash RobertMacAller President RECON

ldquoCharly has been an active member of AEP for over 25 years and served as an AEP State Boardmember In this capacity he activelyparticipated in several rounds of AEP Strategic Plans He was anorganizer of the first CEQA Basics Workshop for the San Diego Chapter ofAEP as well as anorganizer and co-presenter of the first CEQA Basics Workshop for the San Diego Chapter of AEP aswell as an organizer andco-presenter with Margaret Sohagi for an Advanced CEQA Workshop Hewas also the Director of the 2000 AEP Conference in San Diegowhere the conference focused onconflict resolution in the environmental process The conference included presentations by CEQAjudges fromthroughout California and involved a comparative mock trial versus mediation of aCEQA challenge Charly has also served on the San DiegoChapterlegislative review committee andparticipated as a member of the chapter awards juryrdquo - Julie Wang AEP San Diego ChapterPresident

ldquoMost recently he is serving as a Co-Chair to the San Diego Chapterrsquos newly formedEmeritusCommittee The Emeritus Committeersquos goal is to re-involve long-time AEP memberswho are approaching retirement and havenrsquot been active in AEP recently It will give the Chaptermembership one more chance to learn from these individuals before they retire from theprofession The Emeritus Committee under Charlyrsquos leadership will be establishing mentorprograms for our Student Chapters as well as for professionals at all levelsrdquo mdash Marilyn RFPonseggi San Diego AEP Chapter DirectorContact Nicole Turner RECON Environmental 1927 5th Avenue San Diego CA 92101 619-308-9333 nturnerreconenvironmentalcom

and to URS for sponsoring this yearrsquos production of theAwards Presentation Video highlighting the recipients It wasanother great program You can learn more about thesewinning projects and programs on AEPrsquos website atwwwcalifaeporg You can also look in this and future editionsof the Environmental Monitor for articles on these greatdocuments If you are curious contact the authors and discussyour thoughts

Also now is the time to prepare a nomination for nextyearrsquos program The 2013 awards announcement is on theAEP website and in this issue of the Environmental Monitorwith listed criteria for submittals The 2013 Awardscriteria and submission materials are to be submitted byAugust 15 2012 Do not miss this opportunity to haveyour outstanding work and contributions to the professionrecognized by your peers next year

The Association of Environmental Professionalscongratulates the following winners of the 2012 AwardsProgram

The Association of Environmental Professionals(AEP) has been recognizing the best work ofpublic agencies and environmental professionalsfor over 36 years Award-winners have advancedthe state-of-the-art in environmental analysis

and presenting this analysis to the public and decision makersin an attractive understandable and easily accessible formatClimate Change and preparation of Climate Action Plans toreduce greenhouse gas emissions have become State prioritiesYear after year the best of the best environmentalprofessionals and their documents achievementrsquos and serviceto the profession have contributed to the enhancementmaintenance and protection of the quality of the natural andhuman environment

AEPrsquos award winners were recognized at the AEP AwardsProgram ceremony held on May 7 2012 in SacramentoAEP congratulates each winning recipient of the prestigiousmountain trophies award plaques and certificates

AEP extends sincere thanks to the volunteer Awards Jury

continued on page 5

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 4

Accepting this award Charlie Bull

AEP is looking for volunteers for the 2013 AEP Awards Jury If you would like to serve on the jury please contact Dev Vrat AICPdevvratcsunedu

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 5

Environmental Analysis Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDSan Diego County General Plan Update EIRPrepared for the County of San DiegoPrepared by Atkins County of San Diego Department of Planning amp Land Use

The Awards Jury found the EIR to be well organized and user-friendly with manysupportive tables and high quality graphics to illustrate key resource areas The impactsummary tables at the beginning of each resource section are also a nice touch The EIR teamwas able to develop a concise project description that allowed for a comprehensiveprogrammatic evaluation of land use and transportation policies and a holistic considerationof impacts Outstanding

Contact Devon Muto Chief Advanced Planning Department of Planning and Land Use Countyof San Diego 5201 Ruffin Road Suite B San Diego CA 92123-1666 Office 8586943016DevonMutosdcountycagov

OUTSTANDING AWARDPlan Santa Barbara General Plan Update Program EIRPrepared for the City of Santa BarbaraPrepared by AMEC Earth amp EnvironmentalFehr amp Peers NelsonNygaard Applied Earthworks Santa Barbara CommunityDevelopment Department Planning Division

The Awards Jury noted that this EIR employs a number of unique and innovativeapproaches These include a unique level of analysis of the integrated effects of land use TDMand alternative transportation on congestion energy consumption emissions and climatechange The EIR transforms broad planning policies into a detailed project description for the EIR analysis necessary to support adoption of theGeneral Plan Update The jury appreciated the approach and organization of the executive summary In addition the project website demonstratesgreat public involvement It is clear a lot of thought was put into the organization and preparation of this Program EIR Outstanding

Contact Ben Botkin AMEC 805962-0992 benjaminbotkinameccom

MERIT AWARD2050 Regional Transportation Plan Sustainable Communities Strategy EIRPrepared for San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)Prepared by AECOM and SANDAG

This EIR uses a unique methodology - breaking the environmental analysis down by timeperiod to help disclose the impacts of the 2050 RTPSCS in meeting targets for GHGemission reductions under SB 375 The EIR team at SANDAG and AECOM workeddiligently through extensive use of a geographic information system (GIS) data inputmapping and modeling to determine the environmental impacts associated with theproposed project Collection review and distillation of statewide regional and localjurisdiction plans regulations and EIRs fed into the analysis for each issue area This is a wellthought out document and is practical to use Excellent

Contact Yara Fisher 6192331454 yarafisheraecomcom

Planning Document

OUTSTANDING AWARDSan Diego County General Plan UpdatePrepared for the County of San DiegoPrepared by the San Diego County Department of Planning and Land Use

San Diego County has successfully performed a challenging land use balancing actin this general plan update The plan is well organized clearly presented and uses acommon sense approach in its analysis Itrsquos an impressive example of rethinking land useplans to minimize impacts and encourage more efficient use of lands Kudos to San DiegoCounty for reducing the need for roads in constrained areas Outstanding

Contact Bob Citrano 8586943016 or Devon Muto DevonMutosdcountycagov

continued on page 6

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 4

Accepting this award Dianne Sandman Senior ProjectManager Mindy Fogg Atkins

Accepting this award Jeff Henderson AICP ProjectManager AECOM

Accepting this award Ben Botkin AMEC BarbaraShelton City of Santa Barbara Community DevelopmentDepartment

Accepting this award Eric Gibson Devon Muto Chief ofAdvance Planning County of San Diego

Climate Change Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDCity of West Hollywood Climate Action PlanPrepared for the City of West Hollywood and AECOM

The Awards Jury found the document to be user friendly including excellentgraphics and publicly accessible The climate action plan presents measurable outcomesfor two target years 2020 and 2035 The organization of information is intuitivethroughout the document and the one page pullouts for each measure make thedocument easy to read The comprehensive matrix at the end is an excellent referencefor implementation of the plan and for individuals interested in reading about howdecisions were made regarding each measure Adjustments to the plan are called for on5-yr cycle An Outstanding Climate Action Plan Contact Jeff Henderson 9164837999 jeffhendersonaecomcom

MERIT AWARDUnion City Climate Action PlanPrepared for Union CityPrepared by Climate Protection Task Force City Council and Planning Commission ofUnion City AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury found the tool kit included in this climate action plan may be used asa decision support tool for Greenhouse Gas emission reduction measures thereby providing acommon sense approach to choosing various reduction measures in an interactive settingThe CAP includes supporting measures even when they are not quantifiable whichultimately improves the ability to implement the plan The jury also noted that there wastransparency in the technical appendix documents The toolkit enables real-time resultswhich increases buy-in by staff and stakeholders Everyone can see immediately what theresults will be using various scenarios The reduction keys are a good way to provide at-a-glance monitoring of impacts An excellent documentContact Claire Bonham AECOM 4159552800 clairbonham-carteraecomcom

MERIT AWARDCity of Escondido Draft Climate Action PlanPrepared for the City of EscondidoPrepared by ATKINS and the City of Escondido

The Awards Jury noted that this climate action plan presents information simply andclearly so the layperson can understand the implications of specific measures and programs -the one page pullouts are key The jury agreed itrsquos encouraging that partnerships werehighlighted in a CAP as a priority for implementation - this will help reduce the impacts toboth staff resources and the Cityrsquos budget It was also great to see the linkage to regionalplanning via the RTPSCS Periodic updates are called for with three initial definite yearsidentified The plan also includes definable metrics with screening table minimum valuesAn excellent document

Contact Joanne Dramko 8585141023 joannedramkoatkinsglobalcom

MERIT AWARDSan Luis Obispo County Energy Wise PlanPrepared for the County of San Luis ObispoPrepared by PMC and the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning amp Building

The Energy Wise Plan was developed in coordination with a number of otherplanning efforts occurring throughout the County so that it can serve as a centralclearing house for energy and climate policy Of particular note the plan includes athree tiered approach to performance monitoring and includes an innovative approachof providing yearly progress assessments Well doneContactTammy Seale PMC 8052507974 tsealepmcworldcom

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 5

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 6

continued on page 7

Accepting this award Jeff Henderson AICP ProjectManager AECOM

Accepting this award Culley Thomas Union City

Accepting this award Joanne Dramko and MichaelHendrix Program Managers Atkins

Accepting this award Jason H Giffen Director County ofSan Luis Obispo Leanne Singleton Tammy Seale PMC

Environmental Resource Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDRobert Louis Stevenson State Park and Wildlake-Duff RanchesPrepared for the Land Trust of Napa CountyPrepared by AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury observed that the management plan uses a comprehensive approachwith supporting mapping making it easy to evaluate the various management scenarios Theconcept of this document can be replicated at other parks or in other situations involvingmultiple ownerships The technical information presented in a graphic format enables a layperson to understand project opportunities and constraints at-a-glance An outstandingdocumentContact Sarah Heard AECOM 4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

MERIT AWARDAdapting to Rising Tides -Transportation Vulnerability and Risk Assessment ProjectPrepared for Conservation and Development Commission Metropolitan TransportationCommission California Department of Transportation District 4 AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury commented that this project is an excellent example of how to usecreative partnerships to provide regional value and statewide applicability The risk profileswith zoom-in maps are helpful to understand impacts and compare different facilities Anexcellent documentContact Sarah Heard AECOM 4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

OUTSTANDING AWARDNew Irvington Tunnel Project Groundwater Management ProgramPrepared for the Public Utilities CommissionPrepared by Public Utilities Commission ndash New Irvington Tunnel Project Team

The Awards Jury noted that the program uses multiple platforms to reach the public Theproject includes clear fact sheets which are visually appealing A hotline was established andis displayed prominently in all the program materials Congratulations to the San FranciscoPublic Utilities Commission for their 5 years of effort to recognize the value of the landowners as stake holders and to engage them as part of the long-term groundwatermanagement solution An outstanding outcome

Contact David Tszoo Project Manager SFPUC 9252334354 dtsztoosfwaterorg

MERIT AWARDEffective Mitigation - Development through ImplementationPrepared for Sempra EnergyPrepared by Insignia Environmental San Diego Gas amp Electric Company and GasCompany

Sempra Energy Utilities and Insignia Environmental have crafted a training session thatprovides a primer on the A to Zrsquos of mitigation measures They detail the permitting processdiscuss the semantics of mitigation measures and review tracking procedures The Awards Juryfound the regulatory triggers table to be very helpful This program can be easily transferredto other public utility agencies and local municipalities An excellent documentContact Anne Marie McGraw Insignia 6503216787 AMcgrawinsigniaenvcom

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 7

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 6

continued on page 8

Accepting this award Sarah Heard AECOM4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Accepting this award Sarah Heard AECOM4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Accepting this award David Tsztoo PE SFPUC BetsyRhodes SFPUC Holly Their The Their Group BruceAbellimanKim Stern SFPUC

Accepting this award Name to come Erin KeochekiconAnne Marie McGraw Insignia

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

MERIT AWARDSan Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter ProgramPrepared for San Diego Gas and ElectricPrepared by San Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter Program ndash Customer Experience

The SDGampE Smart Meter Programrsquos detailed messaging plan may be used as a model foreffective outreach Itrsquos 90-60-30-day notification plan is transferable to other publiceducation efforts The informational door hangers were an innovative approach to reachinga segment of the public that might otherwise have been missed Excellent work

Contact Risa Baron Sempra Utilities Office 8586541857 rbaronsemprautilitiescom

Humor Award

AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line -General Outreach and Educational MaterialsPrepared for AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line members Prepared by AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line

The Awards Jury found this project to be creative and hilarious ndash especially to nerds Thetricksters at AECOM presented a real tongue-in-cheek treat for the reader Halloween willnever be the same and neither will the employee who portrayed the patient zombie It takesthe notion of ldquoother duties as assignedrdquo to a whole other realm Thanks to the knowledgeableand respected AECOM technical staff for sharing your internal office humor and providingthe Awards Jury an enjoyable respite from the serious environmental analysis and climatereduction plansContact John Hute AECOM 9164145876

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 8

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 7

AcknowledgementsOne of the most important AEP volunteer groups is the AEP Awards Jury These are AEP peer professionals chosen for

their years of experience and expertise in the profession AEP recognized the following individuals who gave graciously manydays of their time to review and judge all the submittals and hours spent on AEP conference calls to reach consensus decisionsusing the AEP rating criteria Thank you all

AEP 2012 AWARDS VIDEO PRODUCTIONWe thank Megan Giglini Vivian Gaddie and Joan Valle of URS for the great video for the awards program We thank URS

for sponsoring the Awards Program The video was enjoyed by all

AEP 2012 CONFERENCE COMMITTEEFinally we thank the Co-Chairs for this conference Trevor Macenski Michael Brandman Associates and John Kinsey

Wanger Jones Helsley PC for leadership and hard work and their little army of conference volunteers Thank you all for awonderful successful conference

AEP 2012 AWARDS JURYDev Vrat AICP Jury ChairUrban Studies and Planning DepartmentCalifornia State University Northridge

Patti Nahil AICPPGN

Jeffry S Rice AICPURS

Crystahl TaylorPadre Associates Inc

Honey L WaltersAscent Environmental Inc

Ray WeissESA

Accepting this award Carolyn Winn VP Customer ServiceSan Diego Gas and Electric

Accepting this award John Hute AECOM

Summer is here and it has warmed up It is the timefor vacations and exploring the outdoors I hope youget out there and refresh your fun time hiking or justhaving a good time doing your favorite activity Theenvironmental field continues to take more

importance in all aspects of our lives We hear more newscoverage of disasters and their environmental effectsEnvironmental professionals are sought out for professionaladvice in every aspect of our community issues We have astronger voice in developing environmental policy inCalifornia and in every state in this nation So I ask what roledo you play and how can you stay sharp with your skills

AEP and NAEP offer many opportunities includingCEQANEPA Workshops special training in air qualitytransportation planning greenhouse gas emission impactsurban pollution in our nations water and the list goes on AEPis planning for the Fall Basic CEQA Workshop Look to theAEP Website and to upcoming newsletters for the Fall BasicCEQA Workshops

AEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop this summerDates are July 25th in Clovis CA July 30 in Oakland CA July31 in San Diego CA and August 1 in Carson CA Go to thecalifaeporg website for more information This is the first timeAEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop training program

NAEP is continuing to offer Webinars I will be sendinginformation to you as it is published Take advantage of these90 minute online training programs They are valuable andgreat to stay current on the regulatory policy and court cases foryour work Look for more information in the near futureNAEP is working hard to increase real value opportunities toenvironmental professionals Recent webinars on FrackingEndangered Species and Green Energy Development Impactsto Natural Resources were presented by NAEP

NAEP posts bimonthly E-Newsletters A recentedition included in some excellent articles on

various environmental topics The E-Newlettersare posted on the AEP Website and e-mailed

to AEP members when published These aregreat resources to read current events in

the environmental profession and staycurrent on the happening scene

Look for the most recent edition onour website

NAEP will be conducting aChapter Retreat July 21 and

22 2012 in Kansas CityThis is a time when the

From the NAEP Liaisonrsquos DeskNAEPAFFILIATION

By Roger W Turner

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 9

Chapter representatives will go over the strategic goals andreview the programs provided by NAEP The Chapter Retreatwill help set the new course for NAEP in providing its Chapterservices and programs to its members Note all AEP members areaffiliated with NAEP and will benefit from programs trainingand conferences NAEP produces I will publish the results of theChapter Retreat in a future edition of this report

The 2013 NAEPAEP Joint Conference is planned for April1 to 5 2013 The theme is ldquoWalk the Talkrdquo The conferencecommittee is hard at work planning what will sure to be aninformative and engaging event for environmental professionalsOur conference will be held in an outstanding state-of-the-artconference facility at the JW Marriott Hotel located in thevibrant LA Live complex in downtown Los Angeles

The hotel and conference facility sport a front-row seat tosome of Los Angelesrsquo top attractions include the Staples Centerthe Nokia Theatre Regal Cinemas and a wide variety of shopsand restaurants In addition despite the car-centered nature ofgreater Los Angeles many world-class attractions can be reachedvia public transit which is easily accessible from the complex

The conference program will feature dynamic regional andnational keynote speakers and an all-day pre-conferencesymposium on climate change adaptation Conference sessionswill cover topics including NEPA and CEQA Climate ChangeWater Supply and Delivery Air Quality Energy and AlternativeEnergy Development Marine and Coastal Issues HabitatMitigation Transportation Land Use and Cultural ResourcesThere will also be numerous other conference and social eventsthat will take advantage of the conference location including anumber of mobile workshops and a 5K run through some ofdowntown Los Angelesrsquo top attractions

Look for more information in future editions of my columnand on the AEP Website

Please mark your calendar-

The presentation abstracts submittal deadline-August 15 2012

The sponsor exhibitor submittal deadline-March 1 2013

The 2013 awards nomination submittal deadline-August 15 2012

As always I look forward to your comments and thoughts Ialso invite you to write me at rwturnerhotmailcom or call

(951) 707-5020 if you have a question about NAEP or needassistance in obtaining service from NAEP

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 11

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 10

By Bill Goggin Senior Biologist EMC Planning Group

Birds of a Feather Flock TogetherThe Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

solve an on-going maintenance problem that had become ahealth liability the prison staff proposed to construct a pavedpath between security fences so that the facilityrsquos guards couldbetter patrol this area (several of the guards had suffered turnedankles and knees because of the uneven and pot-holed groundsurface) Because the project had a potential to impact sensitivebiological resources Santa Clara County staff contracted withEMC Planning Group to assist the County with complying withthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and otherstate and federal environmental laws established to protectsensitive animals and their habitats including what is the subjectof this short article an established egret and heron rookery

During the performance of an earlier biological pre-construction survey performed by EMC Planning Group in July2010 an active rookery (a colonial breeding bird site) wasobserved within the south-central portion of the prison facilityrsquosmain courtyard The rookery is located within a cluster of denselyfoliated trees and contained approximately 50-60 nests fromthree species of birds great egret (Ardea alba) snowy egret(Egretta thula) and black-crowned night heron (Nycticorax

You can hear the sound as you approach thecourtyard of the Elmwood Correctional Facilityalthough itrsquos not exactly clear whatrsquos causing allthe commotion It starts as a low backgroundchattering and builds to a near cacophony close to

the mess hall Beyond these seemingly discordant soundseverything in the scene appears to be in order the prisonrsquosinmates going about their daily routine dressed in white- andblack-striped jumpsuits sweeping lifting weights or casuallytalking in groups while the watchful guards keep a dutiful eyeout for anything out of the ordinary All in all itrsquos just anotherordinary day at the Elmwood Correctional Facility But what iscausing all this noise you may ask yourself Finally out of ideasyou glance heavenward and thatrsquos when it hits you (no notthat) there are birds in the trees above your head manybirdshellipand they are large birds Are you puzzled Donrsquot bebecause this is the story of the jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

The Elmwood Correctional Facility is a low-security SantaClara County prison located west of Interstate 880 and north ofGreat American Parkway in Milpitas California In order to

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 11

Birds of a Feather Flock Together continued from page 10

nycticorax) The ground surface beneath these trees showedevidence of long-term site use by rookeryrsquos birds as wasdemonstrated by an accumulation of whitewash feathers andegg shell fragments

Especially unique in an urban area the Elmwood rookerysite is believed to be the only egret and heron rookery in thesouthern San Francisco Bay located within an entirely fencedanthropogenic setting and may be the only one of its kind innorthern California Colonial breeding sites are especiallyimportant when located within urbanized environments asdevelopment and land conversion often degrades orremoves available rookery habitat and asa result opportunities for colonialnesting species in urban areasare limited These sites arealso significant becausethey often support asizeable segment ofthe local populationand because theirproximity to foragingareas can reducetravel distances theymay potentially reducepredator-prey (iemortality) interactions

Because construction wasplanned during the most sensitive periodof the birds natural life history cycle the projectrsquosconstruction activities had a potential to cause detrimentalimpacts (ie elevated levels of noise dust and fumes) possiblyaffecting the birds nesting and juvenile rearing which couldhave led to fines and negative press for the County Thereforein order to protect this important resource in spring 2011 theCounty retained EMC Planning Group to monitor the rookeryduring the projectrsquos construction whenever heavy equipmentoperation would be occurring within 500 feet of the rookery

It is important to note that none of bird species living at theElmwood rookery (great egret snowy egret and night heron) arespecifically listed as threatened or endangered by the state orfederal Endangered Species Acts however the CaliforniaDepartment of Fish and Game (CDFG) considers colonialbreeding sites to be sensitive resource areas that are affordedprotection under CDFG Code during the breeding bird seasonas they can be sensitive to human intrusion and disturbance Inaddition to state regulations the protection of egrets and heronsare covered under the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act Oncenests have been constructed and eggs are present the rookerysite becomes a protected resource area and cannot be disturbedReproduction for the rookeries species generally occurs from

early April through July with the juvenile rearing periodextending into mid-September

Behavioral monitoring of the egret and heron rookeryconsisted of a qualified EMC Planning Group biologist stationedinside the facilityrsquos perimeter fence in a direct line of siteapproximately 275 feet from the rookery during constructionactivities or during operation of heavy equipment within 500feet of the rookery During construction the monitoringbiologist observed egret and heron behavior using hand heldbinoculars and a high magnification field spotting scope for signs

of stress andor agitation Notes on behavioralinteractions (ie preeninggrooming

feeding sibling competition etc)and daily counts on numbers of

individuals and juvenilespresent were recorded

C o n s t r u c t i o ncommenced on April27 and an EMCPlanning Groupbiologist conductedworker environmental

awareness trainingconcerning the presence

of the rookery and theimportance of protecting the

rookery During the projectrsquosimplementation no disturbance of the

rookery was noted and the rookeries behavior wasessentially unchanged by project activities Approximately 38adult and 23 juvenile egrets and herons were observedthroughout the construction period

By incorporating these pro-active impact minimization andspecial-status species protection measures into the projectrsquosimplementation the County as the lead agency demonstratedproper compliance with CDFG Code and CEQA law and thisimportant and sensitive resource was safeguarded frominadvertent disturbance This model of good stewardshipdemonstrates leadership on the part of the County and theyshould be commended for stepping up All land managers canlearn from this experience and should take note itrsquos alwaysbetter to err on the side of caution

EMC Planning Group wishes to thank the County of SantaClara the projectrsquos manager Ms Alicia Flynn for her support on theproject the projectrsquos contractors Granite and BCI and the entireElmwood prison facilities staff for their cooperation and supportduring the monitoring activities

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 13

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 12

By Morty Prisament MSMP AICP Strategenesis-GPC

The Planning Sustainability Health ConnectionA Glimpse at Emerging Trends

some predictions and prognostications about how we can makethe transition

Harmonic Convergence Health + SustainabilitySustainable Development is a logical contextual frame for

considering health in planning The classic definition from theBrundtland Commission is development that ldquomeets the needsof the present without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needsrdquo CEQArsquos requirement toaddress long-term versus short-term needs appears to echo theCommissionrsquos definition of sustainable development MichaelThomas Needham referred similarly to lsquoSustainableDevelopmentrsquo ldquoas the ability to meet the needs of the presentwhile contributing to the future generationsrsquo needsrdquo

Sustainable development happens at many levels fromindividual buildings and neighborhoods-green building andsustainable communities to the city and regional scale greencities sustainable bioregions etc Sustainable development alsohas multiple dimensions from design and green planning togreen infrastructure Most relevant from a planninghealthperspective is sustainable developmentrsquos focus on enhancingldquomobilityrdquo This includes community design incorporatingmixed use development in combination with transit optionsstreetscape design that enhances pedestrianbike safety(ldquocomplete streetsrdquo) and access to services and amenities Inessence an urban form characterized by mixed use andpedestrian and transit-oriented development is what makeswalking and biking more attractive as well as practical andfeasible On a regional level it embodies the ldquosmart growthrdquoprinciples of interconnected ldquowalkablerdquo and ldquobikeablerdquocommunities served by local businesses and linked to a largertransit and alternative modes network Think ldquoMillenniumParkrdquo in downtown Chicago or ldquoBell Street Parkrdquo in Seattle

The past decade has seen resurgence in not only theeconomic vitality of American cities but cityplanning And this has come about as a result ofthe sustainability movement Sustainability isproviding a framework for planners to move

beyond the traditional confines of Euclidian zoning adopting amore holistic and integrated approach to building communitiesat the human scale Sustainability initiatives have attractedbroad support because of the benefits conveyed on a number oflevels from reduction in greenhouse gases to economicdevelopment and quality-of-life However one of the mostprofound findings is the connection between ldquocommunityplanningrdquo and health In fact recent findings suggest that yourldquozip coderdquo is the single-most important determinant of an

individualrsquos health In other words how communities aredesigned can influence onersquos level of physical activity andhence health Given the prominence of the obesity epidemicand rise in chronic diseases planners will increasingly be calledupon to play a role in promoting healthy communities This willexpand the mission of planning organizations to consider thehealth implications of land-use decisions The ldquoconvergencerdquo ofplanning and health and wellness represents a significant trendand one which will set a dominant tone This article is intendedto help planners understand this emerging trend

We begin with deciphering the connection betweenplanning and health specifically the ldquofitrdquo between health andsustainability Next we look at upstream health factors Wethen discuss the ldquoculturalrdquo transition in the planning healthand social services arenas that will be necessary in order to fullyrealize the potential of health sustainability planning Wehighlight the importance of power sharing between agencies andgrassroots organizations and highlight the evolution in policyplanning and environmental analysis along with the use ofhealth impact assessments (HIAs) Finally we conclude with

ldquoSocially ldquoGreen Healthrdquo occurs at a nexus of morally-laden decisions about living inthe world as patients workers consumers and citizensrdquo

(Institute for the Future Health Horizons Program)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 13

continued on page 14

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 12

Health FactorsIncreasingly health researchers are finding that health

problems are influenced by societal policies and environmentsthat either support behaviors or fail to foster healthier choicesDr Kawachi stressed that where you live affects how you liveThere is growing consensus that major health problems will notbe solved solely by individual actions and choices By movingldquoupstreamrdquo to address causes and improving environments wherewe work learn and play we can reduce chronic illnesses DrKawachi specifically cites changes in ldquotransportation policiesand urban zoningrdquo (Physical Activity and the BuiltEnvironment What Worksrdquo Statewide Conference Sponsoredby Health by Design September 10 2007 Indianapolis IN)

Health care genetics and lifestyle changes only take us so far Ifyou want to prevent obesity you need to cure the environmentnot the individualrdquo

Dr Ichiro Kawachi delivering Keynote address at StatewidePolicy Forum on Social Determinants of Health 111306(httpbcbsmnfoundationcom objectsTier_3forum_proceedingspdf )

ldquoWe must understand that education housing transportationand community development and income policies are healthpolicies- Jan Malcolm (httpmngov health-reformimagesTask-Force-and-Work-Groups-Summary-2012-01-31pdf )

In essence it appears that health professionals areabandoning their long-held belief in the efficacy of healtheducation programs They have learned that such programsrarely lead to sustained behavioral change unless scaled up andinstituted through formal and informal PSE changes Anupstream approach might also involve measures designed toinfluence diet and nutrition such as agricultural food subsidiesand national nutrition standards If this seems out-of-bounds toyou planners out there think about the growing trend topromote local and sustainable foods through urban agricultureand farmerrsquos markets or the efforts by schools and universities tosource more sustainable food options

Cultural Transition Sustainable Development by its very nature is

interdisciplinary and in the case of health and land-use willrequire the ldquotriadrdquo of planners health and social servicesprofessionals to collaborate in developing plans and forgingstrategies This would hardly be the first time that planners haveworked with health professionals Solid waste and water qualityfacility siting as well as development review call for planners towork routinely with local health departments as well as Stateand federal agencies like Environmental Protection AgencyDepartment of Toxic Substances Control and CaliforniaDepartment of Health Services What has changed is that until

recently health issues have not been a consideration in land-usetransportation and mobility planning such as has engineeringand public service issues for example The marriage betweenplanning and public works professionals may not be perfect butthey have grown accustomed to one anotherrsquos particularproclivities Merging of health social service and planning willrequire a similar cultural transition However in this latter casethe transition may be eased given a shared vision if not missionof promoting healthy communities Human resources managersmust also be included in this conversation Recruiting trainingand retaining staff with appropriate interdisciplinary experienceis essential for capacity building and effecting organizationalchange

APArsquos Sustainable Planning Interest Group is emblematic ofthe critical mass of planning professionals that are supportingsustainability initiatives many of whom are focused on healthand mobility together with local and sustainable foods Healthmobility local foods and nutrition were recurring sustainabilitythemes dominating recent APA conferences in Boston and LosAngeles APA has also adopted policies on supportingldquoCommunity and Regional Food Systemsrdquo[httpwwwurbantilthorgwpcontentuploads200810american-planning-association-policy-guide-on-community-and-regional-food-planningpdf] While training and conferenceprograms focusing on the intersection of planning health andsustainability is available advanced or graduate-level curriculahas yet to be developed The Sustainable Urban DevelopmentReader (2ndEd 2008) (wwwroutledgegeographycom) intendedfor advanced studies in sustainable development contains onlyone paragraph on the subject of the health-sustainability link inan otherwise comprehensive text Similarly contemporary textson health policy lack any substantive discussion of thesignificance of environmental determinants as a factor inchronic disease or the connection between health andcommunity planning

Community Collaboration and Power-Sharing Concerns about sustainability have been driven to a large

degree by the public and consequently power relationshipsneed to change in order to promote community partnershipsMoreover health and social service professionals will need todevelop competencies that enable them to address issues thatoccur at the intersection of health planning and sustainabledevelopment This would require planners to understand therole of health determinants approaches to health promotionhealth policy and tools like logic mapping and health impactassessments

Because of the grassroots nature of sustainability initiativesplanners health professionals and social workers will need toplace increasing emphasis upon consensus building anddeveloping community partnerships This will also require

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 13

continued on page 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 14

planning health and social service agencies to adopt a proactiveapproach to organizational change and one that relies more on aprocess of shared learning increased openness and accessibilityand a shift in how information is acquired and communicatedThis not only involves power-sharing but further portends afundamental change in the notion of local government from onethat mandates change to one that empowers change Plannersalready have some models that embody a cooperative grassrootsapproach wherein agencies derive their power consensuallyversus coercively (wwwmpoworgelisheva_sadan_empowerment_spreads_chapter1pdf) Californiarsquos ldquocoordinated resourcemanagement and planningrdquo model is a good example of bottom-up watershed planning which emphasizes decentralized decision-making power sharing and collaboration Other examplesinclude the many successful open space and trails planning andacquisition programs spearheaded by land conservancies andconservationdeveloper partnerships local food coops and untilmore recently the many community-run recycling programs

This requires planning organizations coupled with incentivesand inducements

Policy Planning and Impact AssessmentPlanning-related health issues can be addressed through

general plan or other local policy plans or via Health ImpactAssessments (HIAs) The City of Richmond California was oneof the first cities in the country to develop a comprehensivegeneral plan element addressing the link between public healthand the built environment A number of other Cities andcounties in California have since developed health planelements Richmond a former shipbuilding hub during WorldWar II has a number of historic industrial uses and a legacy ofenvironmental contamination It is home to Chevron-RichmondRefinery General Chemical as well as a proliferation of otherport-industrial activities Naturally then RichmondrsquosCommunity Health and Wellness Element addressesenvironmental justice issues related to air pollution and waterand soil contamination The Health Element further discussespedestrian and bicyclist injuries chronic diseases and crime andviolence Richmond residents are at a higher risk than residentsin the rest of the county on many health indicators including thehighest proportion of deaths from diabetes a much higher thanaverage rate of children requiring hospitalization due to asthmaand the second highest number of hospitalizations for mentalhealth disorders and substance abuse Richmond residents arealso disproportionately affected by heart disease cancer andstroke (httpwwwhealthycommunitiesby designorg) Healthplanning elements and HIAs can also be prepared in associationwith Housing Elements and Economic Development PlansSustainability and Carbon Action Plans Alternative ModesPlans Trails and Bicycle Plans as well as Safety and EmergencyPreparedness Plans HIAs are particularly suited to addressinghealth implications of plans programs and policies(programmatic HIAs)

Health Impact Assessment is ldquoa multidisciplinary processwithin which a range of evidence about the health effects of aproposal is considered in a structured framework hellipbased on abroad model of health which proposes that economic politicalsocial psychological and environmental factors determinepopulation healthrdquo (wwwhiacollaborativeorgfaq )

HIA have also been defined as ldquohellip a systematic process thatevaluates the health impacts of a proposed policy planprogram or project The assessment helps the public anddecision-makers understand the health consequences of theproposal and make informed choices that protect and promotehealthrdquo (httpwwwhumanimpactorgcomponentjdownloadsfinish81180)

HIAs have been used as a policy analysis tool to highlighthealth impacts and can either be in the form of a highlystructured report a policy brief or issue paper or can even takethe shape of a community forum Compared to EnvironmentalImpact Assessments (EIA) there is a greater emphasis onldquointer-sectoralrdquo or interdisciplinary coordination and publicparticipation HIAs examine causal factors and pathways infour main areas including social determinants environmentalimpacts (ie air and water quality) built environment andhealth behaviors The ldquobuilt environmentrdquo has been receivingmost attention lately along with the need to promotesustainable development Consequently there is increasinginterest to using HIAs in conjunction with land-use policyplanning and EIAs Pathways could include for examplehousing land-use mix food access and security transportationinfrastructure traffic safety noise community walkability andrecreational amenities Examples of causal factors such as inthe case of a farmerrsquos market might include consumption offruits and vegetables income for vendorsrsquo and farmerspreservation of agricultural land community economicconditions and pedestrian access (ie physical activity)

Planners and environmental scientists would as before beconcerned with biophysical health effects which havecommonly been addressed through human health riskassessments (HRAs) and ecological health risk assessments(ERAs) EPA establishes a specific methodology for assessingHRAs and ERAs risks to human health from exposure tohazardous substances and are thus narrower than HIAs Forexample laws addressing hazardous substances like motorvehicle fuel additives and pesticides or emissions of mercury ordioxin from a power plant generally require HRAs or ERAsrather than HIAs In contrast HIAs would focus increasinglyupon the more indirect health outcomes in order to determinethe health effects of a policy or activity

HIAs are just beginning to be used in connection withNEPA and NEPACEQA reviews and incorporation into

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 5: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 5

Environmental Analysis Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDSan Diego County General Plan Update EIRPrepared for the County of San DiegoPrepared by Atkins County of San Diego Department of Planning amp Land Use

The Awards Jury found the EIR to be well organized and user-friendly with manysupportive tables and high quality graphics to illustrate key resource areas The impactsummary tables at the beginning of each resource section are also a nice touch The EIR teamwas able to develop a concise project description that allowed for a comprehensiveprogrammatic evaluation of land use and transportation policies and a holistic considerationof impacts Outstanding

Contact Devon Muto Chief Advanced Planning Department of Planning and Land Use Countyof San Diego 5201 Ruffin Road Suite B San Diego CA 92123-1666 Office 8586943016DevonMutosdcountycagov

OUTSTANDING AWARDPlan Santa Barbara General Plan Update Program EIRPrepared for the City of Santa BarbaraPrepared by AMEC Earth amp EnvironmentalFehr amp Peers NelsonNygaard Applied Earthworks Santa Barbara CommunityDevelopment Department Planning Division

The Awards Jury noted that this EIR employs a number of unique and innovativeapproaches These include a unique level of analysis of the integrated effects of land use TDMand alternative transportation on congestion energy consumption emissions and climatechange The EIR transforms broad planning policies into a detailed project description for the EIR analysis necessary to support adoption of theGeneral Plan Update The jury appreciated the approach and organization of the executive summary In addition the project website demonstratesgreat public involvement It is clear a lot of thought was put into the organization and preparation of this Program EIR Outstanding

Contact Ben Botkin AMEC 805962-0992 benjaminbotkinameccom

MERIT AWARD2050 Regional Transportation Plan Sustainable Communities Strategy EIRPrepared for San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)Prepared by AECOM and SANDAG

This EIR uses a unique methodology - breaking the environmental analysis down by timeperiod to help disclose the impacts of the 2050 RTPSCS in meeting targets for GHGemission reductions under SB 375 The EIR team at SANDAG and AECOM workeddiligently through extensive use of a geographic information system (GIS) data inputmapping and modeling to determine the environmental impacts associated with theproposed project Collection review and distillation of statewide regional and localjurisdiction plans regulations and EIRs fed into the analysis for each issue area This is a wellthought out document and is practical to use Excellent

Contact Yara Fisher 6192331454 yarafisheraecomcom

Planning Document

OUTSTANDING AWARDSan Diego County General Plan UpdatePrepared for the County of San DiegoPrepared by the San Diego County Department of Planning and Land Use

San Diego County has successfully performed a challenging land use balancing actin this general plan update The plan is well organized clearly presented and uses acommon sense approach in its analysis Itrsquos an impressive example of rethinking land useplans to minimize impacts and encourage more efficient use of lands Kudos to San DiegoCounty for reducing the need for roads in constrained areas Outstanding

Contact Bob Citrano 8586943016 or Devon Muto DevonMutosdcountycagov

continued on page 6

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 4

Accepting this award Dianne Sandman Senior ProjectManager Mindy Fogg Atkins

Accepting this award Jeff Henderson AICP ProjectManager AECOM

Accepting this award Ben Botkin AMEC BarbaraShelton City of Santa Barbara Community DevelopmentDepartment

Accepting this award Eric Gibson Devon Muto Chief ofAdvance Planning County of San Diego

Climate Change Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDCity of West Hollywood Climate Action PlanPrepared for the City of West Hollywood and AECOM

The Awards Jury found the document to be user friendly including excellentgraphics and publicly accessible The climate action plan presents measurable outcomesfor two target years 2020 and 2035 The organization of information is intuitivethroughout the document and the one page pullouts for each measure make thedocument easy to read The comprehensive matrix at the end is an excellent referencefor implementation of the plan and for individuals interested in reading about howdecisions were made regarding each measure Adjustments to the plan are called for on5-yr cycle An Outstanding Climate Action Plan Contact Jeff Henderson 9164837999 jeffhendersonaecomcom

MERIT AWARDUnion City Climate Action PlanPrepared for Union CityPrepared by Climate Protection Task Force City Council and Planning Commission ofUnion City AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury found the tool kit included in this climate action plan may be used asa decision support tool for Greenhouse Gas emission reduction measures thereby providing acommon sense approach to choosing various reduction measures in an interactive settingThe CAP includes supporting measures even when they are not quantifiable whichultimately improves the ability to implement the plan The jury also noted that there wastransparency in the technical appendix documents The toolkit enables real-time resultswhich increases buy-in by staff and stakeholders Everyone can see immediately what theresults will be using various scenarios The reduction keys are a good way to provide at-a-glance monitoring of impacts An excellent documentContact Claire Bonham AECOM 4159552800 clairbonham-carteraecomcom

MERIT AWARDCity of Escondido Draft Climate Action PlanPrepared for the City of EscondidoPrepared by ATKINS and the City of Escondido

The Awards Jury noted that this climate action plan presents information simply andclearly so the layperson can understand the implications of specific measures and programs -the one page pullouts are key The jury agreed itrsquos encouraging that partnerships werehighlighted in a CAP as a priority for implementation - this will help reduce the impacts toboth staff resources and the Cityrsquos budget It was also great to see the linkage to regionalplanning via the RTPSCS Periodic updates are called for with three initial definite yearsidentified The plan also includes definable metrics with screening table minimum valuesAn excellent document

Contact Joanne Dramko 8585141023 joannedramkoatkinsglobalcom

MERIT AWARDSan Luis Obispo County Energy Wise PlanPrepared for the County of San Luis ObispoPrepared by PMC and the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning amp Building

The Energy Wise Plan was developed in coordination with a number of otherplanning efforts occurring throughout the County so that it can serve as a centralclearing house for energy and climate policy Of particular note the plan includes athree tiered approach to performance monitoring and includes an innovative approachof providing yearly progress assessments Well doneContactTammy Seale PMC 8052507974 tsealepmcworldcom

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 5

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 6

continued on page 7

Accepting this award Jeff Henderson AICP ProjectManager AECOM

Accepting this award Culley Thomas Union City

Accepting this award Joanne Dramko and MichaelHendrix Program Managers Atkins

Accepting this award Jason H Giffen Director County ofSan Luis Obispo Leanne Singleton Tammy Seale PMC

Environmental Resource Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDRobert Louis Stevenson State Park and Wildlake-Duff RanchesPrepared for the Land Trust of Napa CountyPrepared by AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury observed that the management plan uses a comprehensive approachwith supporting mapping making it easy to evaluate the various management scenarios Theconcept of this document can be replicated at other parks or in other situations involvingmultiple ownerships The technical information presented in a graphic format enables a layperson to understand project opportunities and constraints at-a-glance An outstandingdocumentContact Sarah Heard AECOM 4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

MERIT AWARDAdapting to Rising Tides -Transportation Vulnerability and Risk Assessment ProjectPrepared for Conservation and Development Commission Metropolitan TransportationCommission California Department of Transportation District 4 AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury commented that this project is an excellent example of how to usecreative partnerships to provide regional value and statewide applicability The risk profileswith zoom-in maps are helpful to understand impacts and compare different facilities Anexcellent documentContact Sarah Heard AECOM 4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

OUTSTANDING AWARDNew Irvington Tunnel Project Groundwater Management ProgramPrepared for the Public Utilities CommissionPrepared by Public Utilities Commission ndash New Irvington Tunnel Project Team

The Awards Jury noted that the program uses multiple platforms to reach the public Theproject includes clear fact sheets which are visually appealing A hotline was established andis displayed prominently in all the program materials Congratulations to the San FranciscoPublic Utilities Commission for their 5 years of effort to recognize the value of the landowners as stake holders and to engage them as part of the long-term groundwatermanagement solution An outstanding outcome

Contact David Tszoo Project Manager SFPUC 9252334354 dtsztoosfwaterorg

MERIT AWARDEffective Mitigation - Development through ImplementationPrepared for Sempra EnergyPrepared by Insignia Environmental San Diego Gas amp Electric Company and GasCompany

Sempra Energy Utilities and Insignia Environmental have crafted a training session thatprovides a primer on the A to Zrsquos of mitigation measures They detail the permitting processdiscuss the semantics of mitigation measures and review tracking procedures The Awards Juryfound the regulatory triggers table to be very helpful This program can be easily transferredto other public utility agencies and local municipalities An excellent documentContact Anne Marie McGraw Insignia 6503216787 AMcgrawinsigniaenvcom

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 7

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 6

continued on page 8

Accepting this award Sarah Heard AECOM4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Accepting this award Sarah Heard AECOM4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Accepting this award David Tsztoo PE SFPUC BetsyRhodes SFPUC Holly Their The Their Group BruceAbellimanKim Stern SFPUC

Accepting this award Name to come Erin KeochekiconAnne Marie McGraw Insignia

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

MERIT AWARDSan Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter ProgramPrepared for San Diego Gas and ElectricPrepared by San Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter Program ndash Customer Experience

The SDGampE Smart Meter Programrsquos detailed messaging plan may be used as a model foreffective outreach Itrsquos 90-60-30-day notification plan is transferable to other publiceducation efforts The informational door hangers were an innovative approach to reachinga segment of the public that might otherwise have been missed Excellent work

Contact Risa Baron Sempra Utilities Office 8586541857 rbaronsemprautilitiescom

Humor Award

AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line -General Outreach and Educational MaterialsPrepared for AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line members Prepared by AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line

The Awards Jury found this project to be creative and hilarious ndash especially to nerds Thetricksters at AECOM presented a real tongue-in-cheek treat for the reader Halloween willnever be the same and neither will the employee who portrayed the patient zombie It takesthe notion of ldquoother duties as assignedrdquo to a whole other realm Thanks to the knowledgeableand respected AECOM technical staff for sharing your internal office humor and providingthe Awards Jury an enjoyable respite from the serious environmental analysis and climatereduction plansContact John Hute AECOM 9164145876

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 8

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 7

AcknowledgementsOne of the most important AEP volunteer groups is the AEP Awards Jury These are AEP peer professionals chosen for

their years of experience and expertise in the profession AEP recognized the following individuals who gave graciously manydays of their time to review and judge all the submittals and hours spent on AEP conference calls to reach consensus decisionsusing the AEP rating criteria Thank you all

AEP 2012 AWARDS VIDEO PRODUCTIONWe thank Megan Giglini Vivian Gaddie and Joan Valle of URS for the great video for the awards program We thank URS

for sponsoring the Awards Program The video was enjoyed by all

AEP 2012 CONFERENCE COMMITTEEFinally we thank the Co-Chairs for this conference Trevor Macenski Michael Brandman Associates and John Kinsey

Wanger Jones Helsley PC for leadership and hard work and their little army of conference volunteers Thank you all for awonderful successful conference

AEP 2012 AWARDS JURYDev Vrat AICP Jury ChairUrban Studies and Planning DepartmentCalifornia State University Northridge

Patti Nahil AICPPGN

Jeffry S Rice AICPURS

Crystahl TaylorPadre Associates Inc

Honey L WaltersAscent Environmental Inc

Ray WeissESA

Accepting this award Carolyn Winn VP Customer ServiceSan Diego Gas and Electric

Accepting this award John Hute AECOM

Summer is here and it has warmed up It is the timefor vacations and exploring the outdoors I hope youget out there and refresh your fun time hiking or justhaving a good time doing your favorite activity Theenvironmental field continues to take more

importance in all aspects of our lives We hear more newscoverage of disasters and their environmental effectsEnvironmental professionals are sought out for professionaladvice in every aspect of our community issues We have astronger voice in developing environmental policy inCalifornia and in every state in this nation So I ask what roledo you play and how can you stay sharp with your skills

AEP and NAEP offer many opportunities includingCEQANEPA Workshops special training in air qualitytransportation planning greenhouse gas emission impactsurban pollution in our nations water and the list goes on AEPis planning for the Fall Basic CEQA Workshop Look to theAEP Website and to upcoming newsletters for the Fall BasicCEQA Workshops

AEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop this summerDates are July 25th in Clovis CA July 30 in Oakland CA July31 in San Diego CA and August 1 in Carson CA Go to thecalifaeporg website for more information This is the first timeAEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop training program

NAEP is continuing to offer Webinars I will be sendinginformation to you as it is published Take advantage of these90 minute online training programs They are valuable andgreat to stay current on the regulatory policy and court cases foryour work Look for more information in the near futureNAEP is working hard to increase real value opportunities toenvironmental professionals Recent webinars on FrackingEndangered Species and Green Energy Development Impactsto Natural Resources were presented by NAEP

NAEP posts bimonthly E-Newsletters A recentedition included in some excellent articles on

various environmental topics The E-Newlettersare posted on the AEP Website and e-mailed

to AEP members when published These aregreat resources to read current events in

the environmental profession and staycurrent on the happening scene

Look for the most recent edition onour website

NAEP will be conducting aChapter Retreat July 21 and

22 2012 in Kansas CityThis is a time when the

From the NAEP Liaisonrsquos DeskNAEPAFFILIATION

By Roger W Turner

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 9

Chapter representatives will go over the strategic goals andreview the programs provided by NAEP The Chapter Retreatwill help set the new course for NAEP in providing its Chapterservices and programs to its members Note all AEP members areaffiliated with NAEP and will benefit from programs trainingand conferences NAEP produces I will publish the results of theChapter Retreat in a future edition of this report

The 2013 NAEPAEP Joint Conference is planned for April1 to 5 2013 The theme is ldquoWalk the Talkrdquo The conferencecommittee is hard at work planning what will sure to be aninformative and engaging event for environmental professionalsOur conference will be held in an outstanding state-of-the-artconference facility at the JW Marriott Hotel located in thevibrant LA Live complex in downtown Los Angeles

The hotel and conference facility sport a front-row seat tosome of Los Angelesrsquo top attractions include the Staples Centerthe Nokia Theatre Regal Cinemas and a wide variety of shopsand restaurants In addition despite the car-centered nature ofgreater Los Angeles many world-class attractions can be reachedvia public transit which is easily accessible from the complex

The conference program will feature dynamic regional andnational keynote speakers and an all-day pre-conferencesymposium on climate change adaptation Conference sessionswill cover topics including NEPA and CEQA Climate ChangeWater Supply and Delivery Air Quality Energy and AlternativeEnergy Development Marine and Coastal Issues HabitatMitigation Transportation Land Use and Cultural ResourcesThere will also be numerous other conference and social eventsthat will take advantage of the conference location including anumber of mobile workshops and a 5K run through some ofdowntown Los Angelesrsquo top attractions

Look for more information in future editions of my columnand on the AEP Website

Please mark your calendar-

The presentation abstracts submittal deadline-August 15 2012

The sponsor exhibitor submittal deadline-March 1 2013

The 2013 awards nomination submittal deadline-August 15 2012

As always I look forward to your comments and thoughts Ialso invite you to write me at rwturnerhotmailcom or call

(951) 707-5020 if you have a question about NAEP or needassistance in obtaining service from NAEP

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 11

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 10

By Bill Goggin Senior Biologist EMC Planning Group

Birds of a Feather Flock TogetherThe Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

solve an on-going maintenance problem that had become ahealth liability the prison staff proposed to construct a pavedpath between security fences so that the facilityrsquos guards couldbetter patrol this area (several of the guards had suffered turnedankles and knees because of the uneven and pot-holed groundsurface) Because the project had a potential to impact sensitivebiological resources Santa Clara County staff contracted withEMC Planning Group to assist the County with complying withthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and otherstate and federal environmental laws established to protectsensitive animals and their habitats including what is the subjectof this short article an established egret and heron rookery

During the performance of an earlier biological pre-construction survey performed by EMC Planning Group in July2010 an active rookery (a colonial breeding bird site) wasobserved within the south-central portion of the prison facilityrsquosmain courtyard The rookery is located within a cluster of denselyfoliated trees and contained approximately 50-60 nests fromthree species of birds great egret (Ardea alba) snowy egret(Egretta thula) and black-crowned night heron (Nycticorax

You can hear the sound as you approach thecourtyard of the Elmwood Correctional Facilityalthough itrsquos not exactly clear whatrsquos causing allthe commotion It starts as a low backgroundchattering and builds to a near cacophony close to

the mess hall Beyond these seemingly discordant soundseverything in the scene appears to be in order the prisonrsquosinmates going about their daily routine dressed in white- andblack-striped jumpsuits sweeping lifting weights or casuallytalking in groups while the watchful guards keep a dutiful eyeout for anything out of the ordinary All in all itrsquos just anotherordinary day at the Elmwood Correctional Facility But what iscausing all this noise you may ask yourself Finally out of ideasyou glance heavenward and thatrsquos when it hits you (no notthat) there are birds in the trees above your head manybirdshellipand they are large birds Are you puzzled Donrsquot bebecause this is the story of the jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

The Elmwood Correctional Facility is a low-security SantaClara County prison located west of Interstate 880 and north ofGreat American Parkway in Milpitas California In order to

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 11

Birds of a Feather Flock Together continued from page 10

nycticorax) The ground surface beneath these trees showedevidence of long-term site use by rookeryrsquos birds as wasdemonstrated by an accumulation of whitewash feathers andegg shell fragments

Especially unique in an urban area the Elmwood rookerysite is believed to be the only egret and heron rookery in thesouthern San Francisco Bay located within an entirely fencedanthropogenic setting and may be the only one of its kind innorthern California Colonial breeding sites are especiallyimportant when located within urbanized environments asdevelopment and land conversion often degrades orremoves available rookery habitat and asa result opportunities for colonialnesting species in urban areasare limited These sites arealso significant becausethey often support asizeable segment ofthe local populationand because theirproximity to foragingareas can reducetravel distances theymay potentially reducepredator-prey (iemortality) interactions

Because construction wasplanned during the most sensitive periodof the birds natural life history cycle the projectrsquosconstruction activities had a potential to cause detrimentalimpacts (ie elevated levels of noise dust and fumes) possiblyaffecting the birds nesting and juvenile rearing which couldhave led to fines and negative press for the County Thereforein order to protect this important resource in spring 2011 theCounty retained EMC Planning Group to monitor the rookeryduring the projectrsquos construction whenever heavy equipmentoperation would be occurring within 500 feet of the rookery

It is important to note that none of bird species living at theElmwood rookery (great egret snowy egret and night heron) arespecifically listed as threatened or endangered by the state orfederal Endangered Species Acts however the CaliforniaDepartment of Fish and Game (CDFG) considers colonialbreeding sites to be sensitive resource areas that are affordedprotection under CDFG Code during the breeding bird seasonas they can be sensitive to human intrusion and disturbance Inaddition to state regulations the protection of egrets and heronsare covered under the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act Oncenests have been constructed and eggs are present the rookerysite becomes a protected resource area and cannot be disturbedReproduction for the rookeries species generally occurs from

early April through July with the juvenile rearing periodextending into mid-September

Behavioral monitoring of the egret and heron rookeryconsisted of a qualified EMC Planning Group biologist stationedinside the facilityrsquos perimeter fence in a direct line of siteapproximately 275 feet from the rookery during constructionactivities or during operation of heavy equipment within 500feet of the rookery During construction the monitoringbiologist observed egret and heron behavior using hand heldbinoculars and a high magnification field spotting scope for signs

of stress andor agitation Notes on behavioralinteractions (ie preeninggrooming

feeding sibling competition etc)and daily counts on numbers of

individuals and juvenilespresent were recorded

C o n s t r u c t i o ncommenced on April27 and an EMCPlanning Groupbiologist conductedworker environmental

awareness trainingconcerning the presence

of the rookery and theimportance of protecting the

rookery During the projectrsquosimplementation no disturbance of the

rookery was noted and the rookeries behavior wasessentially unchanged by project activities Approximately 38adult and 23 juvenile egrets and herons were observedthroughout the construction period

By incorporating these pro-active impact minimization andspecial-status species protection measures into the projectrsquosimplementation the County as the lead agency demonstratedproper compliance with CDFG Code and CEQA law and thisimportant and sensitive resource was safeguarded frominadvertent disturbance This model of good stewardshipdemonstrates leadership on the part of the County and theyshould be commended for stepping up All land managers canlearn from this experience and should take note itrsquos alwaysbetter to err on the side of caution

EMC Planning Group wishes to thank the County of SantaClara the projectrsquos manager Ms Alicia Flynn for her support on theproject the projectrsquos contractors Granite and BCI and the entireElmwood prison facilities staff for their cooperation and supportduring the monitoring activities

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 13

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 12

By Morty Prisament MSMP AICP Strategenesis-GPC

The Planning Sustainability Health ConnectionA Glimpse at Emerging Trends

some predictions and prognostications about how we can makethe transition

Harmonic Convergence Health + SustainabilitySustainable Development is a logical contextual frame for

considering health in planning The classic definition from theBrundtland Commission is development that ldquomeets the needsof the present without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needsrdquo CEQArsquos requirement toaddress long-term versus short-term needs appears to echo theCommissionrsquos definition of sustainable development MichaelThomas Needham referred similarly to lsquoSustainableDevelopmentrsquo ldquoas the ability to meet the needs of the presentwhile contributing to the future generationsrsquo needsrdquo

Sustainable development happens at many levels fromindividual buildings and neighborhoods-green building andsustainable communities to the city and regional scale greencities sustainable bioregions etc Sustainable development alsohas multiple dimensions from design and green planning togreen infrastructure Most relevant from a planninghealthperspective is sustainable developmentrsquos focus on enhancingldquomobilityrdquo This includes community design incorporatingmixed use development in combination with transit optionsstreetscape design that enhances pedestrianbike safety(ldquocomplete streetsrdquo) and access to services and amenities Inessence an urban form characterized by mixed use andpedestrian and transit-oriented development is what makeswalking and biking more attractive as well as practical andfeasible On a regional level it embodies the ldquosmart growthrdquoprinciples of interconnected ldquowalkablerdquo and ldquobikeablerdquocommunities served by local businesses and linked to a largertransit and alternative modes network Think ldquoMillenniumParkrdquo in downtown Chicago or ldquoBell Street Parkrdquo in Seattle

The past decade has seen resurgence in not only theeconomic vitality of American cities but cityplanning And this has come about as a result ofthe sustainability movement Sustainability isproviding a framework for planners to move

beyond the traditional confines of Euclidian zoning adopting amore holistic and integrated approach to building communitiesat the human scale Sustainability initiatives have attractedbroad support because of the benefits conveyed on a number oflevels from reduction in greenhouse gases to economicdevelopment and quality-of-life However one of the mostprofound findings is the connection between ldquocommunityplanningrdquo and health In fact recent findings suggest that yourldquozip coderdquo is the single-most important determinant of an

individualrsquos health In other words how communities aredesigned can influence onersquos level of physical activity andhence health Given the prominence of the obesity epidemicand rise in chronic diseases planners will increasingly be calledupon to play a role in promoting healthy communities This willexpand the mission of planning organizations to consider thehealth implications of land-use decisions The ldquoconvergencerdquo ofplanning and health and wellness represents a significant trendand one which will set a dominant tone This article is intendedto help planners understand this emerging trend

We begin with deciphering the connection betweenplanning and health specifically the ldquofitrdquo between health andsustainability Next we look at upstream health factors Wethen discuss the ldquoculturalrdquo transition in the planning healthand social services arenas that will be necessary in order to fullyrealize the potential of health sustainability planning Wehighlight the importance of power sharing between agencies andgrassroots organizations and highlight the evolution in policyplanning and environmental analysis along with the use ofhealth impact assessments (HIAs) Finally we conclude with

ldquoSocially ldquoGreen Healthrdquo occurs at a nexus of morally-laden decisions about living inthe world as patients workers consumers and citizensrdquo

(Institute for the Future Health Horizons Program)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 13

continued on page 14

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 12

Health FactorsIncreasingly health researchers are finding that health

problems are influenced by societal policies and environmentsthat either support behaviors or fail to foster healthier choicesDr Kawachi stressed that where you live affects how you liveThere is growing consensus that major health problems will notbe solved solely by individual actions and choices By movingldquoupstreamrdquo to address causes and improving environments wherewe work learn and play we can reduce chronic illnesses DrKawachi specifically cites changes in ldquotransportation policiesand urban zoningrdquo (Physical Activity and the BuiltEnvironment What Worksrdquo Statewide Conference Sponsoredby Health by Design September 10 2007 Indianapolis IN)

Health care genetics and lifestyle changes only take us so far Ifyou want to prevent obesity you need to cure the environmentnot the individualrdquo

Dr Ichiro Kawachi delivering Keynote address at StatewidePolicy Forum on Social Determinants of Health 111306(httpbcbsmnfoundationcom objectsTier_3forum_proceedingspdf )

ldquoWe must understand that education housing transportationand community development and income policies are healthpolicies- Jan Malcolm (httpmngov health-reformimagesTask-Force-and-Work-Groups-Summary-2012-01-31pdf )

In essence it appears that health professionals areabandoning their long-held belief in the efficacy of healtheducation programs They have learned that such programsrarely lead to sustained behavioral change unless scaled up andinstituted through formal and informal PSE changes Anupstream approach might also involve measures designed toinfluence diet and nutrition such as agricultural food subsidiesand national nutrition standards If this seems out-of-bounds toyou planners out there think about the growing trend topromote local and sustainable foods through urban agricultureand farmerrsquos markets or the efforts by schools and universities tosource more sustainable food options

Cultural Transition Sustainable Development by its very nature is

interdisciplinary and in the case of health and land-use willrequire the ldquotriadrdquo of planners health and social servicesprofessionals to collaborate in developing plans and forgingstrategies This would hardly be the first time that planners haveworked with health professionals Solid waste and water qualityfacility siting as well as development review call for planners towork routinely with local health departments as well as Stateand federal agencies like Environmental Protection AgencyDepartment of Toxic Substances Control and CaliforniaDepartment of Health Services What has changed is that until

recently health issues have not been a consideration in land-usetransportation and mobility planning such as has engineeringand public service issues for example The marriage betweenplanning and public works professionals may not be perfect butthey have grown accustomed to one anotherrsquos particularproclivities Merging of health social service and planning willrequire a similar cultural transition However in this latter casethe transition may be eased given a shared vision if not missionof promoting healthy communities Human resources managersmust also be included in this conversation Recruiting trainingand retaining staff with appropriate interdisciplinary experienceis essential for capacity building and effecting organizationalchange

APArsquos Sustainable Planning Interest Group is emblematic ofthe critical mass of planning professionals that are supportingsustainability initiatives many of whom are focused on healthand mobility together with local and sustainable foods Healthmobility local foods and nutrition were recurring sustainabilitythemes dominating recent APA conferences in Boston and LosAngeles APA has also adopted policies on supportingldquoCommunity and Regional Food Systemsrdquo[httpwwwurbantilthorgwpcontentuploads200810american-planning-association-policy-guide-on-community-and-regional-food-planningpdf] While training and conferenceprograms focusing on the intersection of planning health andsustainability is available advanced or graduate-level curriculahas yet to be developed The Sustainable Urban DevelopmentReader (2ndEd 2008) (wwwroutledgegeographycom) intendedfor advanced studies in sustainable development contains onlyone paragraph on the subject of the health-sustainability link inan otherwise comprehensive text Similarly contemporary textson health policy lack any substantive discussion of thesignificance of environmental determinants as a factor inchronic disease or the connection between health andcommunity planning

Community Collaboration and Power-Sharing Concerns about sustainability have been driven to a large

degree by the public and consequently power relationshipsneed to change in order to promote community partnershipsMoreover health and social service professionals will need todevelop competencies that enable them to address issues thatoccur at the intersection of health planning and sustainabledevelopment This would require planners to understand therole of health determinants approaches to health promotionhealth policy and tools like logic mapping and health impactassessments

Because of the grassroots nature of sustainability initiativesplanners health professionals and social workers will need toplace increasing emphasis upon consensus building anddeveloping community partnerships This will also require

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 13

continued on page 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 14

planning health and social service agencies to adopt a proactiveapproach to organizational change and one that relies more on aprocess of shared learning increased openness and accessibilityand a shift in how information is acquired and communicatedThis not only involves power-sharing but further portends afundamental change in the notion of local government from onethat mandates change to one that empowers change Plannersalready have some models that embody a cooperative grassrootsapproach wherein agencies derive their power consensuallyversus coercively (wwwmpoworgelisheva_sadan_empowerment_spreads_chapter1pdf) Californiarsquos ldquocoordinated resourcemanagement and planningrdquo model is a good example of bottom-up watershed planning which emphasizes decentralized decision-making power sharing and collaboration Other examplesinclude the many successful open space and trails planning andacquisition programs spearheaded by land conservancies andconservationdeveloper partnerships local food coops and untilmore recently the many community-run recycling programs

This requires planning organizations coupled with incentivesand inducements

Policy Planning and Impact AssessmentPlanning-related health issues can be addressed through

general plan or other local policy plans or via Health ImpactAssessments (HIAs) The City of Richmond California was oneof the first cities in the country to develop a comprehensivegeneral plan element addressing the link between public healthand the built environment A number of other Cities andcounties in California have since developed health planelements Richmond a former shipbuilding hub during WorldWar II has a number of historic industrial uses and a legacy ofenvironmental contamination It is home to Chevron-RichmondRefinery General Chemical as well as a proliferation of otherport-industrial activities Naturally then RichmondrsquosCommunity Health and Wellness Element addressesenvironmental justice issues related to air pollution and waterand soil contamination The Health Element further discussespedestrian and bicyclist injuries chronic diseases and crime andviolence Richmond residents are at a higher risk than residentsin the rest of the county on many health indicators including thehighest proportion of deaths from diabetes a much higher thanaverage rate of children requiring hospitalization due to asthmaand the second highest number of hospitalizations for mentalhealth disorders and substance abuse Richmond residents arealso disproportionately affected by heart disease cancer andstroke (httpwwwhealthycommunitiesby designorg) Healthplanning elements and HIAs can also be prepared in associationwith Housing Elements and Economic Development PlansSustainability and Carbon Action Plans Alternative ModesPlans Trails and Bicycle Plans as well as Safety and EmergencyPreparedness Plans HIAs are particularly suited to addressinghealth implications of plans programs and policies(programmatic HIAs)

Health Impact Assessment is ldquoa multidisciplinary processwithin which a range of evidence about the health effects of aproposal is considered in a structured framework hellipbased on abroad model of health which proposes that economic politicalsocial psychological and environmental factors determinepopulation healthrdquo (wwwhiacollaborativeorgfaq )

HIA have also been defined as ldquohellip a systematic process thatevaluates the health impacts of a proposed policy planprogram or project The assessment helps the public anddecision-makers understand the health consequences of theproposal and make informed choices that protect and promotehealthrdquo (httpwwwhumanimpactorgcomponentjdownloadsfinish81180)

HIAs have been used as a policy analysis tool to highlighthealth impacts and can either be in the form of a highlystructured report a policy brief or issue paper or can even takethe shape of a community forum Compared to EnvironmentalImpact Assessments (EIA) there is a greater emphasis onldquointer-sectoralrdquo or interdisciplinary coordination and publicparticipation HIAs examine causal factors and pathways infour main areas including social determinants environmentalimpacts (ie air and water quality) built environment andhealth behaviors The ldquobuilt environmentrdquo has been receivingmost attention lately along with the need to promotesustainable development Consequently there is increasinginterest to using HIAs in conjunction with land-use policyplanning and EIAs Pathways could include for examplehousing land-use mix food access and security transportationinfrastructure traffic safety noise community walkability andrecreational amenities Examples of causal factors such as inthe case of a farmerrsquos market might include consumption offruits and vegetables income for vendorsrsquo and farmerspreservation of agricultural land community economicconditions and pedestrian access (ie physical activity)

Planners and environmental scientists would as before beconcerned with biophysical health effects which havecommonly been addressed through human health riskassessments (HRAs) and ecological health risk assessments(ERAs) EPA establishes a specific methodology for assessingHRAs and ERAs risks to human health from exposure tohazardous substances and are thus narrower than HIAs Forexample laws addressing hazardous substances like motorvehicle fuel additives and pesticides or emissions of mercury ordioxin from a power plant generally require HRAs or ERAsrather than HIAs In contrast HIAs would focus increasinglyupon the more indirect health outcomes in order to determinethe health effects of a policy or activity

HIAs are just beginning to be used in connection withNEPA and NEPACEQA reviews and incorporation into

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 6: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

Climate Change Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDCity of West Hollywood Climate Action PlanPrepared for the City of West Hollywood and AECOM

The Awards Jury found the document to be user friendly including excellentgraphics and publicly accessible The climate action plan presents measurable outcomesfor two target years 2020 and 2035 The organization of information is intuitivethroughout the document and the one page pullouts for each measure make thedocument easy to read The comprehensive matrix at the end is an excellent referencefor implementation of the plan and for individuals interested in reading about howdecisions were made regarding each measure Adjustments to the plan are called for on5-yr cycle An Outstanding Climate Action Plan Contact Jeff Henderson 9164837999 jeffhendersonaecomcom

MERIT AWARDUnion City Climate Action PlanPrepared for Union CityPrepared by Climate Protection Task Force City Council and Planning Commission ofUnion City AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury found the tool kit included in this climate action plan may be used asa decision support tool for Greenhouse Gas emission reduction measures thereby providing acommon sense approach to choosing various reduction measures in an interactive settingThe CAP includes supporting measures even when they are not quantifiable whichultimately improves the ability to implement the plan The jury also noted that there wastransparency in the technical appendix documents The toolkit enables real-time resultswhich increases buy-in by staff and stakeholders Everyone can see immediately what theresults will be using various scenarios The reduction keys are a good way to provide at-a-glance monitoring of impacts An excellent documentContact Claire Bonham AECOM 4159552800 clairbonham-carteraecomcom

MERIT AWARDCity of Escondido Draft Climate Action PlanPrepared for the City of EscondidoPrepared by ATKINS and the City of Escondido

The Awards Jury noted that this climate action plan presents information simply andclearly so the layperson can understand the implications of specific measures and programs -the one page pullouts are key The jury agreed itrsquos encouraging that partnerships werehighlighted in a CAP as a priority for implementation - this will help reduce the impacts toboth staff resources and the Cityrsquos budget It was also great to see the linkage to regionalplanning via the RTPSCS Periodic updates are called for with three initial definite yearsidentified The plan also includes definable metrics with screening table minimum valuesAn excellent document

Contact Joanne Dramko 8585141023 joannedramkoatkinsglobalcom

MERIT AWARDSan Luis Obispo County Energy Wise PlanPrepared for the County of San Luis ObispoPrepared by PMC and the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning amp Building

The Energy Wise Plan was developed in coordination with a number of otherplanning efforts occurring throughout the County so that it can serve as a centralclearing house for energy and climate policy Of particular note the plan includes athree tiered approach to performance monitoring and includes an innovative approachof providing yearly progress assessments Well doneContactTammy Seale PMC 8052507974 tsealepmcworldcom

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 5

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 6

continued on page 7

Accepting this award Jeff Henderson AICP ProjectManager AECOM

Accepting this award Culley Thomas Union City

Accepting this award Joanne Dramko and MichaelHendrix Program Managers Atkins

Accepting this award Jason H Giffen Director County ofSan Luis Obispo Leanne Singleton Tammy Seale PMC

Environmental Resource Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDRobert Louis Stevenson State Park and Wildlake-Duff RanchesPrepared for the Land Trust of Napa CountyPrepared by AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury observed that the management plan uses a comprehensive approachwith supporting mapping making it easy to evaluate the various management scenarios Theconcept of this document can be replicated at other parks or in other situations involvingmultiple ownerships The technical information presented in a graphic format enables a layperson to understand project opportunities and constraints at-a-glance An outstandingdocumentContact Sarah Heard AECOM 4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

MERIT AWARDAdapting to Rising Tides -Transportation Vulnerability and Risk Assessment ProjectPrepared for Conservation and Development Commission Metropolitan TransportationCommission California Department of Transportation District 4 AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury commented that this project is an excellent example of how to usecreative partnerships to provide regional value and statewide applicability The risk profileswith zoom-in maps are helpful to understand impacts and compare different facilities Anexcellent documentContact Sarah Heard AECOM 4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

OUTSTANDING AWARDNew Irvington Tunnel Project Groundwater Management ProgramPrepared for the Public Utilities CommissionPrepared by Public Utilities Commission ndash New Irvington Tunnel Project Team

The Awards Jury noted that the program uses multiple platforms to reach the public Theproject includes clear fact sheets which are visually appealing A hotline was established andis displayed prominently in all the program materials Congratulations to the San FranciscoPublic Utilities Commission for their 5 years of effort to recognize the value of the landowners as stake holders and to engage them as part of the long-term groundwatermanagement solution An outstanding outcome

Contact David Tszoo Project Manager SFPUC 9252334354 dtsztoosfwaterorg

MERIT AWARDEffective Mitigation - Development through ImplementationPrepared for Sempra EnergyPrepared by Insignia Environmental San Diego Gas amp Electric Company and GasCompany

Sempra Energy Utilities and Insignia Environmental have crafted a training session thatprovides a primer on the A to Zrsquos of mitigation measures They detail the permitting processdiscuss the semantics of mitigation measures and review tracking procedures The Awards Juryfound the regulatory triggers table to be very helpful This program can be easily transferredto other public utility agencies and local municipalities An excellent documentContact Anne Marie McGraw Insignia 6503216787 AMcgrawinsigniaenvcom

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 7

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 6

continued on page 8

Accepting this award Sarah Heard AECOM4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Accepting this award Sarah Heard AECOM4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Accepting this award David Tsztoo PE SFPUC BetsyRhodes SFPUC Holly Their The Their Group BruceAbellimanKim Stern SFPUC

Accepting this award Name to come Erin KeochekiconAnne Marie McGraw Insignia

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

MERIT AWARDSan Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter ProgramPrepared for San Diego Gas and ElectricPrepared by San Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter Program ndash Customer Experience

The SDGampE Smart Meter Programrsquos detailed messaging plan may be used as a model foreffective outreach Itrsquos 90-60-30-day notification plan is transferable to other publiceducation efforts The informational door hangers were an innovative approach to reachinga segment of the public that might otherwise have been missed Excellent work

Contact Risa Baron Sempra Utilities Office 8586541857 rbaronsemprautilitiescom

Humor Award

AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line -General Outreach and Educational MaterialsPrepared for AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line members Prepared by AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line

The Awards Jury found this project to be creative and hilarious ndash especially to nerds Thetricksters at AECOM presented a real tongue-in-cheek treat for the reader Halloween willnever be the same and neither will the employee who portrayed the patient zombie It takesthe notion of ldquoother duties as assignedrdquo to a whole other realm Thanks to the knowledgeableand respected AECOM technical staff for sharing your internal office humor and providingthe Awards Jury an enjoyable respite from the serious environmental analysis and climatereduction plansContact John Hute AECOM 9164145876

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 8

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 7

AcknowledgementsOne of the most important AEP volunteer groups is the AEP Awards Jury These are AEP peer professionals chosen for

their years of experience and expertise in the profession AEP recognized the following individuals who gave graciously manydays of their time to review and judge all the submittals and hours spent on AEP conference calls to reach consensus decisionsusing the AEP rating criteria Thank you all

AEP 2012 AWARDS VIDEO PRODUCTIONWe thank Megan Giglini Vivian Gaddie and Joan Valle of URS for the great video for the awards program We thank URS

for sponsoring the Awards Program The video was enjoyed by all

AEP 2012 CONFERENCE COMMITTEEFinally we thank the Co-Chairs for this conference Trevor Macenski Michael Brandman Associates and John Kinsey

Wanger Jones Helsley PC for leadership and hard work and their little army of conference volunteers Thank you all for awonderful successful conference

AEP 2012 AWARDS JURYDev Vrat AICP Jury ChairUrban Studies and Planning DepartmentCalifornia State University Northridge

Patti Nahil AICPPGN

Jeffry S Rice AICPURS

Crystahl TaylorPadre Associates Inc

Honey L WaltersAscent Environmental Inc

Ray WeissESA

Accepting this award Carolyn Winn VP Customer ServiceSan Diego Gas and Electric

Accepting this award John Hute AECOM

Summer is here and it has warmed up It is the timefor vacations and exploring the outdoors I hope youget out there and refresh your fun time hiking or justhaving a good time doing your favorite activity Theenvironmental field continues to take more

importance in all aspects of our lives We hear more newscoverage of disasters and their environmental effectsEnvironmental professionals are sought out for professionaladvice in every aspect of our community issues We have astronger voice in developing environmental policy inCalifornia and in every state in this nation So I ask what roledo you play and how can you stay sharp with your skills

AEP and NAEP offer many opportunities includingCEQANEPA Workshops special training in air qualitytransportation planning greenhouse gas emission impactsurban pollution in our nations water and the list goes on AEPis planning for the Fall Basic CEQA Workshop Look to theAEP Website and to upcoming newsletters for the Fall BasicCEQA Workshops

AEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop this summerDates are July 25th in Clovis CA July 30 in Oakland CA July31 in San Diego CA and August 1 in Carson CA Go to thecalifaeporg website for more information This is the first timeAEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop training program

NAEP is continuing to offer Webinars I will be sendinginformation to you as it is published Take advantage of these90 minute online training programs They are valuable andgreat to stay current on the regulatory policy and court cases foryour work Look for more information in the near futureNAEP is working hard to increase real value opportunities toenvironmental professionals Recent webinars on FrackingEndangered Species and Green Energy Development Impactsto Natural Resources were presented by NAEP

NAEP posts bimonthly E-Newsletters A recentedition included in some excellent articles on

various environmental topics The E-Newlettersare posted on the AEP Website and e-mailed

to AEP members when published These aregreat resources to read current events in

the environmental profession and staycurrent on the happening scene

Look for the most recent edition onour website

NAEP will be conducting aChapter Retreat July 21 and

22 2012 in Kansas CityThis is a time when the

From the NAEP Liaisonrsquos DeskNAEPAFFILIATION

By Roger W Turner

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 9

Chapter representatives will go over the strategic goals andreview the programs provided by NAEP The Chapter Retreatwill help set the new course for NAEP in providing its Chapterservices and programs to its members Note all AEP members areaffiliated with NAEP and will benefit from programs trainingand conferences NAEP produces I will publish the results of theChapter Retreat in a future edition of this report

The 2013 NAEPAEP Joint Conference is planned for April1 to 5 2013 The theme is ldquoWalk the Talkrdquo The conferencecommittee is hard at work planning what will sure to be aninformative and engaging event for environmental professionalsOur conference will be held in an outstanding state-of-the-artconference facility at the JW Marriott Hotel located in thevibrant LA Live complex in downtown Los Angeles

The hotel and conference facility sport a front-row seat tosome of Los Angelesrsquo top attractions include the Staples Centerthe Nokia Theatre Regal Cinemas and a wide variety of shopsand restaurants In addition despite the car-centered nature ofgreater Los Angeles many world-class attractions can be reachedvia public transit which is easily accessible from the complex

The conference program will feature dynamic regional andnational keynote speakers and an all-day pre-conferencesymposium on climate change adaptation Conference sessionswill cover topics including NEPA and CEQA Climate ChangeWater Supply and Delivery Air Quality Energy and AlternativeEnergy Development Marine and Coastal Issues HabitatMitigation Transportation Land Use and Cultural ResourcesThere will also be numerous other conference and social eventsthat will take advantage of the conference location including anumber of mobile workshops and a 5K run through some ofdowntown Los Angelesrsquo top attractions

Look for more information in future editions of my columnand on the AEP Website

Please mark your calendar-

The presentation abstracts submittal deadline-August 15 2012

The sponsor exhibitor submittal deadline-March 1 2013

The 2013 awards nomination submittal deadline-August 15 2012

As always I look forward to your comments and thoughts Ialso invite you to write me at rwturnerhotmailcom or call

(951) 707-5020 if you have a question about NAEP or needassistance in obtaining service from NAEP

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 11

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 10

By Bill Goggin Senior Biologist EMC Planning Group

Birds of a Feather Flock TogetherThe Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

solve an on-going maintenance problem that had become ahealth liability the prison staff proposed to construct a pavedpath between security fences so that the facilityrsquos guards couldbetter patrol this area (several of the guards had suffered turnedankles and knees because of the uneven and pot-holed groundsurface) Because the project had a potential to impact sensitivebiological resources Santa Clara County staff contracted withEMC Planning Group to assist the County with complying withthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and otherstate and federal environmental laws established to protectsensitive animals and their habitats including what is the subjectof this short article an established egret and heron rookery

During the performance of an earlier biological pre-construction survey performed by EMC Planning Group in July2010 an active rookery (a colonial breeding bird site) wasobserved within the south-central portion of the prison facilityrsquosmain courtyard The rookery is located within a cluster of denselyfoliated trees and contained approximately 50-60 nests fromthree species of birds great egret (Ardea alba) snowy egret(Egretta thula) and black-crowned night heron (Nycticorax

You can hear the sound as you approach thecourtyard of the Elmwood Correctional Facilityalthough itrsquos not exactly clear whatrsquos causing allthe commotion It starts as a low backgroundchattering and builds to a near cacophony close to

the mess hall Beyond these seemingly discordant soundseverything in the scene appears to be in order the prisonrsquosinmates going about their daily routine dressed in white- andblack-striped jumpsuits sweeping lifting weights or casuallytalking in groups while the watchful guards keep a dutiful eyeout for anything out of the ordinary All in all itrsquos just anotherordinary day at the Elmwood Correctional Facility But what iscausing all this noise you may ask yourself Finally out of ideasyou glance heavenward and thatrsquos when it hits you (no notthat) there are birds in the trees above your head manybirdshellipand they are large birds Are you puzzled Donrsquot bebecause this is the story of the jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

The Elmwood Correctional Facility is a low-security SantaClara County prison located west of Interstate 880 and north ofGreat American Parkway in Milpitas California In order to

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 11

Birds of a Feather Flock Together continued from page 10

nycticorax) The ground surface beneath these trees showedevidence of long-term site use by rookeryrsquos birds as wasdemonstrated by an accumulation of whitewash feathers andegg shell fragments

Especially unique in an urban area the Elmwood rookerysite is believed to be the only egret and heron rookery in thesouthern San Francisco Bay located within an entirely fencedanthropogenic setting and may be the only one of its kind innorthern California Colonial breeding sites are especiallyimportant when located within urbanized environments asdevelopment and land conversion often degrades orremoves available rookery habitat and asa result opportunities for colonialnesting species in urban areasare limited These sites arealso significant becausethey often support asizeable segment ofthe local populationand because theirproximity to foragingareas can reducetravel distances theymay potentially reducepredator-prey (iemortality) interactions

Because construction wasplanned during the most sensitive periodof the birds natural life history cycle the projectrsquosconstruction activities had a potential to cause detrimentalimpacts (ie elevated levels of noise dust and fumes) possiblyaffecting the birds nesting and juvenile rearing which couldhave led to fines and negative press for the County Thereforein order to protect this important resource in spring 2011 theCounty retained EMC Planning Group to monitor the rookeryduring the projectrsquos construction whenever heavy equipmentoperation would be occurring within 500 feet of the rookery

It is important to note that none of bird species living at theElmwood rookery (great egret snowy egret and night heron) arespecifically listed as threatened or endangered by the state orfederal Endangered Species Acts however the CaliforniaDepartment of Fish and Game (CDFG) considers colonialbreeding sites to be sensitive resource areas that are affordedprotection under CDFG Code during the breeding bird seasonas they can be sensitive to human intrusion and disturbance Inaddition to state regulations the protection of egrets and heronsare covered under the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act Oncenests have been constructed and eggs are present the rookerysite becomes a protected resource area and cannot be disturbedReproduction for the rookeries species generally occurs from

early April through July with the juvenile rearing periodextending into mid-September

Behavioral monitoring of the egret and heron rookeryconsisted of a qualified EMC Planning Group biologist stationedinside the facilityrsquos perimeter fence in a direct line of siteapproximately 275 feet from the rookery during constructionactivities or during operation of heavy equipment within 500feet of the rookery During construction the monitoringbiologist observed egret and heron behavior using hand heldbinoculars and a high magnification field spotting scope for signs

of stress andor agitation Notes on behavioralinteractions (ie preeninggrooming

feeding sibling competition etc)and daily counts on numbers of

individuals and juvenilespresent were recorded

C o n s t r u c t i o ncommenced on April27 and an EMCPlanning Groupbiologist conductedworker environmental

awareness trainingconcerning the presence

of the rookery and theimportance of protecting the

rookery During the projectrsquosimplementation no disturbance of the

rookery was noted and the rookeries behavior wasessentially unchanged by project activities Approximately 38adult and 23 juvenile egrets and herons were observedthroughout the construction period

By incorporating these pro-active impact minimization andspecial-status species protection measures into the projectrsquosimplementation the County as the lead agency demonstratedproper compliance with CDFG Code and CEQA law and thisimportant and sensitive resource was safeguarded frominadvertent disturbance This model of good stewardshipdemonstrates leadership on the part of the County and theyshould be commended for stepping up All land managers canlearn from this experience and should take note itrsquos alwaysbetter to err on the side of caution

EMC Planning Group wishes to thank the County of SantaClara the projectrsquos manager Ms Alicia Flynn for her support on theproject the projectrsquos contractors Granite and BCI and the entireElmwood prison facilities staff for their cooperation and supportduring the monitoring activities

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 13

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 12

By Morty Prisament MSMP AICP Strategenesis-GPC

The Planning Sustainability Health ConnectionA Glimpse at Emerging Trends

some predictions and prognostications about how we can makethe transition

Harmonic Convergence Health + SustainabilitySustainable Development is a logical contextual frame for

considering health in planning The classic definition from theBrundtland Commission is development that ldquomeets the needsof the present without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needsrdquo CEQArsquos requirement toaddress long-term versus short-term needs appears to echo theCommissionrsquos definition of sustainable development MichaelThomas Needham referred similarly to lsquoSustainableDevelopmentrsquo ldquoas the ability to meet the needs of the presentwhile contributing to the future generationsrsquo needsrdquo

Sustainable development happens at many levels fromindividual buildings and neighborhoods-green building andsustainable communities to the city and regional scale greencities sustainable bioregions etc Sustainable development alsohas multiple dimensions from design and green planning togreen infrastructure Most relevant from a planninghealthperspective is sustainable developmentrsquos focus on enhancingldquomobilityrdquo This includes community design incorporatingmixed use development in combination with transit optionsstreetscape design that enhances pedestrianbike safety(ldquocomplete streetsrdquo) and access to services and amenities Inessence an urban form characterized by mixed use andpedestrian and transit-oriented development is what makeswalking and biking more attractive as well as practical andfeasible On a regional level it embodies the ldquosmart growthrdquoprinciples of interconnected ldquowalkablerdquo and ldquobikeablerdquocommunities served by local businesses and linked to a largertransit and alternative modes network Think ldquoMillenniumParkrdquo in downtown Chicago or ldquoBell Street Parkrdquo in Seattle

The past decade has seen resurgence in not only theeconomic vitality of American cities but cityplanning And this has come about as a result ofthe sustainability movement Sustainability isproviding a framework for planners to move

beyond the traditional confines of Euclidian zoning adopting amore holistic and integrated approach to building communitiesat the human scale Sustainability initiatives have attractedbroad support because of the benefits conveyed on a number oflevels from reduction in greenhouse gases to economicdevelopment and quality-of-life However one of the mostprofound findings is the connection between ldquocommunityplanningrdquo and health In fact recent findings suggest that yourldquozip coderdquo is the single-most important determinant of an

individualrsquos health In other words how communities aredesigned can influence onersquos level of physical activity andhence health Given the prominence of the obesity epidemicand rise in chronic diseases planners will increasingly be calledupon to play a role in promoting healthy communities This willexpand the mission of planning organizations to consider thehealth implications of land-use decisions The ldquoconvergencerdquo ofplanning and health and wellness represents a significant trendand one which will set a dominant tone This article is intendedto help planners understand this emerging trend

We begin with deciphering the connection betweenplanning and health specifically the ldquofitrdquo between health andsustainability Next we look at upstream health factors Wethen discuss the ldquoculturalrdquo transition in the planning healthand social services arenas that will be necessary in order to fullyrealize the potential of health sustainability planning Wehighlight the importance of power sharing between agencies andgrassroots organizations and highlight the evolution in policyplanning and environmental analysis along with the use ofhealth impact assessments (HIAs) Finally we conclude with

ldquoSocially ldquoGreen Healthrdquo occurs at a nexus of morally-laden decisions about living inthe world as patients workers consumers and citizensrdquo

(Institute for the Future Health Horizons Program)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 13

continued on page 14

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 12

Health FactorsIncreasingly health researchers are finding that health

problems are influenced by societal policies and environmentsthat either support behaviors or fail to foster healthier choicesDr Kawachi stressed that where you live affects how you liveThere is growing consensus that major health problems will notbe solved solely by individual actions and choices By movingldquoupstreamrdquo to address causes and improving environments wherewe work learn and play we can reduce chronic illnesses DrKawachi specifically cites changes in ldquotransportation policiesand urban zoningrdquo (Physical Activity and the BuiltEnvironment What Worksrdquo Statewide Conference Sponsoredby Health by Design September 10 2007 Indianapolis IN)

Health care genetics and lifestyle changes only take us so far Ifyou want to prevent obesity you need to cure the environmentnot the individualrdquo

Dr Ichiro Kawachi delivering Keynote address at StatewidePolicy Forum on Social Determinants of Health 111306(httpbcbsmnfoundationcom objectsTier_3forum_proceedingspdf )

ldquoWe must understand that education housing transportationand community development and income policies are healthpolicies- Jan Malcolm (httpmngov health-reformimagesTask-Force-and-Work-Groups-Summary-2012-01-31pdf )

In essence it appears that health professionals areabandoning their long-held belief in the efficacy of healtheducation programs They have learned that such programsrarely lead to sustained behavioral change unless scaled up andinstituted through formal and informal PSE changes Anupstream approach might also involve measures designed toinfluence diet and nutrition such as agricultural food subsidiesand national nutrition standards If this seems out-of-bounds toyou planners out there think about the growing trend topromote local and sustainable foods through urban agricultureand farmerrsquos markets or the efforts by schools and universities tosource more sustainable food options

Cultural Transition Sustainable Development by its very nature is

interdisciplinary and in the case of health and land-use willrequire the ldquotriadrdquo of planners health and social servicesprofessionals to collaborate in developing plans and forgingstrategies This would hardly be the first time that planners haveworked with health professionals Solid waste and water qualityfacility siting as well as development review call for planners towork routinely with local health departments as well as Stateand federal agencies like Environmental Protection AgencyDepartment of Toxic Substances Control and CaliforniaDepartment of Health Services What has changed is that until

recently health issues have not been a consideration in land-usetransportation and mobility planning such as has engineeringand public service issues for example The marriage betweenplanning and public works professionals may not be perfect butthey have grown accustomed to one anotherrsquos particularproclivities Merging of health social service and planning willrequire a similar cultural transition However in this latter casethe transition may be eased given a shared vision if not missionof promoting healthy communities Human resources managersmust also be included in this conversation Recruiting trainingand retaining staff with appropriate interdisciplinary experienceis essential for capacity building and effecting organizationalchange

APArsquos Sustainable Planning Interest Group is emblematic ofthe critical mass of planning professionals that are supportingsustainability initiatives many of whom are focused on healthand mobility together with local and sustainable foods Healthmobility local foods and nutrition were recurring sustainabilitythemes dominating recent APA conferences in Boston and LosAngeles APA has also adopted policies on supportingldquoCommunity and Regional Food Systemsrdquo[httpwwwurbantilthorgwpcontentuploads200810american-planning-association-policy-guide-on-community-and-regional-food-planningpdf] While training and conferenceprograms focusing on the intersection of planning health andsustainability is available advanced or graduate-level curriculahas yet to be developed The Sustainable Urban DevelopmentReader (2ndEd 2008) (wwwroutledgegeographycom) intendedfor advanced studies in sustainable development contains onlyone paragraph on the subject of the health-sustainability link inan otherwise comprehensive text Similarly contemporary textson health policy lack any substantive discussion of thesignificance of environmental determinants as a factor inchronic disease or the connection between health andcommunity planning

Community Collaboration and Power-Sharing Concerns about sustainability have been driven to a large

degree by the public and consequently power relationshipsneed to change in order to promote community partnershipsMoreover health and social service professionals will need todevelop competencies that enable them to address issues thatoccur at the intersection of health planning and sustainabledevelopment This would require planners to understand therole of health determinants approaches to health promotionhealth policy and tools like logic mapping and health impactassessments

Because of the grassroots nature of sustainability initiativesplanners health professionals and social workers will need toplace increasing emphasis upon consensus building anddeveloping community partnerships This will also require

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 13

continued on page 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 14

planning health and social service agencies to adopt a proactiveapproach to organizational change and one that relies more on aprocess of shared learning increased openness and accessibilityand a shift in how information is acquired and communicatedThis not only involves power-sharing but further portends afundamental change in the notion of local government from onethat mandates change to one that empowers change Plannersalready have some models that embody a cooperative grassrootsapproach wherein agencies derive their power consensuallyversus coercively (wwwmpoworgelisheva_sadan_empowerment_spreads_chapter1pdf) Californiarsquos ldquocoordinated resourcemanagement and planningrdquo model is a good example of bottom-up watershed planning which emphasizes decentralized decision-making power sharing and collaboration Other examplesinclude the many successful open space and trails planning andacquisition programs spearheaded by land conservancies andconservationdeveloper partnerships local food coops and untilmore recently the many community-run recycling programs

This requires planning organizations coupled with incentivesand inducements

Policy Planning and Impact AssessmentPlanning-related health issues can be addressed through

general plan or other local policy plans or via Health ImpactAssessments (HIAs) The City of Richmond California was oneof the first cities in the country to develop a comprehensivegeneral plan element addressing the link between public healthand the built environment A number of other Cities andcounties in California have since developed health planelements Richmond a former shipbuilding hub during WorldWar II has a number of historic industrial uses and a legacy ofenvironmental contamination It is home to Chevron-RichmondRefinery General Chemical as well as a proliferation of otherport-industrial activities Naturally then RichmondrsquosCommunity Health and Wellness Element addressesenvironmental justice issues related to air pollution and waterand soil contamination The Health Element further discussespedestrian and bicyclist injuries chronic diseases and crime andviolence Richmond residents are at a higher risk than residentsin the rest of the county on many health indicators including thehighest proportion of deaths from diabetes a much higher thanaverage rate of children requiring hospitalization due to asthmaand the second highest number of hospitalizations for mentalhealth disorders and substance abuse Richmond residents arealso disproportionately affected by heart disease cancer andstroke (httpwwwhealthycommunitiesby designorg) Healthplanning elements and HIAs can also be prepared in associationwith Housing Elements and Economic Development PlansSustainability and Carbon Action Plans Alternative ModesPlans Trails and Bicycle Plans as well as Safety and EmergencyPreparedness Plans HIAs are particularly suited to addressinghealth implications of plans programs and policies(programmatic HIAs)

Health Impact Assessment is ldquoa multidisciplinary processwithin which a range of evidence about the health effects of aproposal is considered in a structured framework hellipbased on abroad model of health which proposes that economic politicalsocial psychological and environmental factors determinepopulation healthrdquo (wwwhiacollaborativeorgfaq )

HIA have also been defined as ldquohellip a systematic process thatevaluates the health impacts of a proposed policy planprogram or project The assessment helps the public anddecision-makers understand the health consequences of theproposal and make informed choices that protect and promotehealthrdquo (httpwwwhumanimpactorgcomponentjdownloadsfinish81180)

HIAs have been used as a policy analysis tool to highlighthealth impacts and can either be in the form of a highlystructured report a policy brief or issue paper or can even takethe shape of a community forum Compared to EnvironmentalImpact Assessments (EIA) there is a greater emphasis onldquointer-sectoralrdquo or interdisciplinary coordination and publicparticipation HIAs examine causal factors and pathways infour main areas including social determinants environmentalimpacts (ie air and water quality) built environment andhealth behaviors The ldquobuilt environmentrdquo has been receivingmost attention lately along with the need to promotesustainable development Consequently there is increasinginterest to using HIAs in conjunction with land-use policyplanning and EIAs Pathways could include for examplehousing land-use mix food access and security transportationinfrastructure traffic safety noise community walkability andrecreational amenities Examples of causal factors such as inthe case of a farmerrsquos market might include consumption offruits and vegetables income for vendorsrsquo and farmerspreservation of agricultural land community economicconditions and pedestrian access (ie physical activity)

Planners and environmental scientists would as before beconcerned with biophysical health effects which havecommonly been addressed through human health riskassessments (HRAs) and ecological health risk assessments(ERAs) EPA establishes a specific methodology for assessingHRAs and ERAs risks to human health from exposure tohazardous substances and are thus narrower than HIAs Forexample laws addressing hazardous substances like motorvehicle fuel additives and pesticides or emissions of mercury ordioxin from a power plant generally require HRAs or ERAsrather than HIAs In contrast HIAs would focus increasinglyupon the more indirect health outcomes in order to determinethe health effects of a policy or activity

HIAs are just beginning to be used in connection withNEPA and NEPACEQA reviews and incorporation into

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 7: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

Environmental Resource Documents

OUTSTANDING AWARDRobert Louis Stevenson State Park and Wildlake-Duff RanchesPrepared for the Land Trust of Napa CountyPrepared by AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury observed that the management plan uses a comprehensive approachwith supporting mapping making it easy to evaluate the various management scenarios Theconcept of this document can be replicated at other parks or in other situations involvingmultiple ownerships The technical information presented in a graphic format enables a layperson to understand project opportunities and constraints at-a-glance An outstandingdocumentContact Sarah Heard AECOM 4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

MERIT AWARDAdapting to Rising Tides -Transportation Vulnerability and Risk Assessment ProjectPrepared for Conservation and Development Commission Metropolitan TransportationCommission California Department of Transportation District 4 AECOM Technical Services Inc

The Awards Jury commented that this project is an excellent example of how to usecreative partnerships to provide regional value and statewide applicability The risk profileswith zoom-in maps are helpful to understand impacts and compare different facilities Anexcellent documentContact Sarah Heard AECOM 4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

OUTSTANDING AWARDNew Irvington Tunnel Project Groundwater Management ProgramPrepared for the Public Utilities CommissionPrepared by Public Utilities Commission ndash New Irvington Tunnel Project Team

The Awards Jury noted that the program uses multiple platforms to reach the public Theproject includes clear fact sheets which are visually appealing A hotline was established andis displayed prominently in all the program materials Congratulations to the San FranciscoPublic Utilities Commission for their 5 years of effort to recognize the value of the landowners as stake holders and to engage them as part of the long-term groundwatermanagement solution An outstanding outcome

Contact David Tszoo Project Manager SFPUC 9252334354 dtsztoosfwaterorg

MERIT AWARDEffective Mitigation - Development through ImplementationPrepared for Sempra EnergyPrepared by Insignia Environmental San Diego Gas amp Electric Company and GasCompany

Sempra Energy Utilities and Insignia Environmental have crafted a training session thatprovides a primer on the A to Zrsquos of mitigation measures They detail the permitting processdiscuss the semantics of mitigation measures and review tracking procedures The Awards Juryfound the regulatory triggers table to be very helpful This program can be easily transferredto other public utility agencies and local municipalities An excellent documentContact Anne Marie McGraw Insignia 6503216787 AMcgrawinsigniaenvcom

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 7

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 6

continued on page 8

Accepting this award Sarah Heard AECOM4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Accepting this award Sarah Heard AECOM4159552800 sarahheardaecomcom

Accepting this award David Tsztoo PE SFPUC BetsyRhodes SFPUC Holly Their The Their Group BruceAbellimanKim Stern SFPUC

Accepting this award Name to come Erin KeochekiconAnne Marie McGraw Insignia

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

MERIT AWARDSan Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter ProgramPrepared for San Diego Gas and ElectricPrepared by San Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter Program ndash Customer Experience

The SDGampE Smart Meter Programrsquos detailed messaging plan may be used as a model foreffective outreach Itrsquos 90-60-30-day notification plan is transferable to other publiceducation efforts The informational door hangers were an innovative approach to reachinga segment of the public that might otherwise have been missed Excellent work

Contact Risa Baron Sempra Utilities Office 8586541857 rbaronsemprautilitiescom

Humor Award

AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line -General Outreach and Educational MaterialsPrepared for AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line members Prepared by AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line

The Awards Jury found this project to be creative and hilarious ndash especially to nerds Thetricksters at AECOM presented a real tongue-in-cheek treat for the reader Halloween willnever be the same and neither will the employee who portrayed the patient zombie It takesthe notion of ldquoother duties as assignedrdquo to a whole other realm Thanks to the knowledgeableand respected AECOM technical staff for sharing your internal office humor and providingthe Awards Jury an enjoyable respite from the serious environmental analysis and climatereduction plansContact John Hute AECOM 9164145876

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 8

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 7

AcknowledgementsOne of the most important AEP volunteer groups is the AEP Awards Jury These are AEP peer professionals chosen for

their years of experience and expertise in the profession AEP recognized the following individuals who gave graciously manydays of their time to review and judge all the submittals and hours spent on AEP conference calls to reach consensus decisionsusing the AEP rating criteria Thank you all

AEP 2012 AWARDS VIDEO PRODUCTIONWe thank Megan Giglini Vivian Gaddie and Joan Valle of URS for the great video for the awards program We thank URS

for sponsoring the Awards Program The video was enjoyed by all

AEP 2012 CONFERENCE COMMITTEEFinally we thank the Co-Chairs for this conference Trevor Macenski Michael Brandman Associates and John Kinsey

Wanger Jones Helsley PC for leadership and hard work and their little army of conference volunteers Thank you all for awonderful successful conference

AEP 2012 AWARDS JURYDev Vrat AICP Jury ChairUrban Studies and Planning DepartmentCalifornia State University Northridge

Patti Nahil AICPPGN

Jeffry S Rice AICPURS

Crystahl TaylorPadre Associates Inc

Honey L WaltersAscent Environmental Inc

Ray WeissESA

Accepting this award Carolyn Winn VP Customer ServiceSan Diego Gas and Electric

Accepting this award John Hute AECOM

Summer is here and it has warmed up It is the timefor vacations and exploring the outdoors I hope youget out there and refresh your fun time hiking or justhaving a good time doing your favorite activity Theenvironmental field continues to take more

importance in all aspects of our lives We hear more newscoverage of disasters and their environmental effectsEnvironmental professionals are sought out for professionaladvice in every aspect of our community issues We have astronger voice in developing environmental policy inCalifornia and in every state in this nation So I ask what roledo you play and how can you stay sharp with your skills

AEP and NAEP offer many opportunities includingCEQANEPA Workshops special training in air qualitytransportation planning greenhouse gas emission impactsurban pollution in our nations water and the list goes on AEPis planning for the Fall Basic CEQA Workshop Look to theAEP Website and to upcoming newsletters for the Fall BasicCEQA Workshops

AEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop this summerDates are July 25th in Clovis CA July 30 in Oakland CA July31 in San Diego CA and August 1 in Carson CA Go to thecalifaeporg website for more information This is the first timeAEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop training program

NAEP is continuing to offer Webinars I will be sendinginformation to you as it is published Take advantage of these90 minute online training programs They are valuable andgreat to stay current on the regulatory policy and court cases foryour work Look for more information in the near futureNAEP is working hard to increase real value opportunities toenvironmental professionals Recent webinars on FrackingEndangered Species and Green Energy Development Impactsto Natural Resources were presented by NAEP

NAEP posts bimonthly E-Newsletters A recentedition included in some excellent articles on

various environmental topics The E-Newlettersare posted on the AEP Website and e-mailed

to AEP members when published These aregreat resources to read current events in

the environmental profession and staycurrent on the happening scene

Look for the most recent edition onour website

NAEP will be conducting aChapter Retreat July 21 and

22 2012 in Kansas CityThis is a time when the

From the NAEP Liaisonrsquos DeskNAEPAFFILIATION

By Roger W Turner

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 9

Chapter representatives will go over the strategic goals andreview the programs provided by NAEP The Chapter Retreatwill help set the new course for NAEP in providing its Chapterservices and programs to its members Note all AEP members areaffiliated with NAEP and will benefit from programs trainingand conferences NAEP produces I will publish the results of theChapter Retreat in a future edition of this report

The 2013 NAEPAEP Joint Conference is planned for April1 to 5 2013 The theme is ldquoWalk the Talkrdquo The conferencecommittee is hard at work planning what will sure to be aninformative and engaging event for environmental professionalsOur conference will be held in an outstanding state-of-the-artconference facility at the JW Marriott Hotel located in thevibrant LA Live complex in downtown Los Angeles

The hotel and conference facility sport a front-row seat tosome of Los Angelesrsquo top attractions include the Staples Centerthe Nokia Theatre Regal Cinemas and a wide variety of shopsand restaurants In addition despite the car-centered nature ofgreater Los Angeles many world-class attractions can be reachedvia public transit which is easily accessible from the complex

The conference program will feature dynamic regional andnational keynote speakers and an all-day pre-conferencesymposium on climate change adaptation Conference sessionswill cover topics including NEPA and CEQA Climate ChangeWater Supply and Delivery Air Quality Energy and AlternativeEnergy Development Marine and Coastal Issues HabitatMitigation Transportation Land Use and Cultural ResourcesThere will also be numerous other conference and social eventsthat will take advantage of the conference location including anumber of mobile workshops and a 5K run through some ofdowntown Los Angelesrsquo top attractions

Look for more information in future editions of my columnand on the AEP Website

Please mark your calendar-

The presentation abstracts submittal deadline-August 15 2012

The sponsor exhibitor submittal deadline-March 1 2013

The 2013 awards nomination submittal deadline-August 15 2012

As always I look forward to your comments and thoughts Ialso invite you to write me at rwturnerhotmailcom or call

(951) 707-5020 if you have a question about NAEP or needassistance in obtaining service from NAEP

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 11

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 10

By Bill Goggin Senior Biologist EMC Planning Group

Birds of a Feather Flock TogetherThe Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

solve an on-going maintenance problem that had become ahealth liability the prison staff proposed to construct a pavedpath between security fences so that the facilityrsquos guards couldbetter patrol this area (several of the guards had suffered turnedankles and knees because of the uneven and pot-holed groundsurface) Because the project had a potential to impact sensitivebiological resources Santa Clara County staff contracted withEMC Planning Group to assist the County with complying withthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and otherstate and federal environmental laws established to protectsensitive animals and their habitats including what is the subjectof this short article an established egret and heron rookery

During the performance of an earlier biological pre-construction survey performed by EMC Planning Group in July2010 an active rookery (a colonial breeding bird site) wasobserved within the south-central portion of the prison facilityrsquosmain courtyard The rookery is located within a cluster of denselyfoliated trees and contained approximately 50-60 nests fromthree species of birds great egret (Ardea alba) snowy egret(Egretta thula) and black-crowned night heron (Nycticorax

You can hear the sound as you approach thecourtyard of the Elmwood Correctional Facilityalthough itrsquos not exactly clear whatrsquos causing allthe commotion It starts as a low backgroundchattering and builds to a near cacophony close to

the mess hall Beyond these seemingly discordant soundseverything in the scene appears to be in order the prisonrsquosinmates going about their daily routine dressed in white- andblack-striped jumpsuits sweeping lifting weights or casuallytalking in groups while the watchful guards keep a dutiful eyeout for anything out of the ordinary All in all itrsquos just anotherordinary day at the Elmwood Correctional Facility But what iscausing all this noise you may ask yourself Finally out of ideasyou glance heavenward and thatrsquos when it hits you (no notthat) there are birds in the trees above your head manybirdshellipand they are large birds Are you puzzled Donrsquot bebecause this is the story of the jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

The Elmwood Correctional Facility is a low-security SantaClara County prison located west of Interstate 880 and north ofGreat American Parkway in Milpitas California In order to

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 11

Birds of a Feather Flock Together continued from page 10

nycticorax) The ground surface beneath these trees showedevidence of long-term site use by rookeryrsquos birds as wasdemonstrated by an accumulation of whitewash feathers andegg shell fragments

Especially unique in an urban area the Elmwood rookerysite is believed to be the only egret and heron rookery in thesouthern San Francisco Bay located within an entirely fencedanthropogenic setting and may be the only one of its kind innorthern California Colonial breeding sites are especiallyimportant when located within urbanized environments asdevelopment and land conversion often degrades orremoves available rookery habitat and asa result opportunities for colonialnesting species in urban areasare limited These sites arealso significant becausethey often support asizeable segment ofthe local populationand because theirproximity to foragingareas can reducetravel distances theymay potentially reducepredator-prey (iemortality) interactions

Because construction wasplanned during the most sensitive periodof the birds natural life history cycle the projectrsquosconstruction activities had a potential to cause detrimentalimpacts (ie elevated levels of noise dust and fumes) possiblyaffecting the birds nesting and juvenile rearing which couldhave led to fines and negative press for the County Thereforein order to protect this important resource in spring 2011 theCounty retained EMC Planning Group to monitor the rookeryduring the projectrsquos construction whenever heavy equipmentoperation would be occurring within 500 feet of the rookery

It is important to note that none of bird species living at theElmwood rookery (great egret snowy egret and night heron) arespecifically listed as threatened or endangered by the state orfederal Endangered Species Acts however the CaliforniaDepartment of Fish and Game (CDFG) considers colonialbreeding sites to be sensitive resource areas that are affordedprotection under CDFG Code during the breeding bird seasonas they can be sensitive to human intrusion and disturbance Inaddition to state regulations the protection of egrets and heronsare covered under the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act Oncenests have been constructed and eggs are present the rookerysite becomes a protected resource area and cannot be disturbedReproduction for the rookeries species generally occurs from

early April through July with the juvenile rearing periodextending into mid-September

Behavioral monitoring of the egret and heron rookeryconsisted of a qualified EMC Planning Group biologist stationedinside the facilityrsquos perimeter fence in a direct line of siteapproximately 275 feet from the rookery during constructionactivities or during operation of heavy equipment within 500feet of the rookery During construction the monitoringbiologist observed egret and heron behavior using hand heldbinoculars and a high magnification field spotting scope for signs

of stress andor agitation Notes on behavioralinteractions (ie preeninggrooming

feeding sibling competition etc)and daily counts on numbers of

individuals and juvenilespresent were recorded

C o n s t r u c t i o ncommenced on April27 and an EMCPlanning Groupbiologist conductedworker environmental

awareness trainingconcerning the presence

of the rookery and theimportance of protecting the

rookery During the projectrsquosimplementation no disturbance of the

rookery was noted and the rookeries behavior wasessentially unchanged by project activities Approximately 38adult and 23 juvenile egrets and herons were observedthroughout the construction period

By incorporating these pro-active impact minimization andspecial-status species protection measures into the projectrsquosimplementation the County as the lead agency demonstratedproper compliance with CDFG Code and CEQA law and thisimportant and sensitive resource was safeguarded frominadvertent disturbance This model of good stewardshipdemonstrates leadership on the part of the County and theyshould be commended for stepping up All land managers canlearn from this experience and should take note itrsquos alwaysbetter to err on the side of caution

EMC Planning Group wishes to thank the County of SantaClara the projectrsquos manager Ms Alicia Flynn for her support on theproject the projectrsquos contractors Granite and BCI and the entireElmwood prison facilities staff for their cooperation and supportduring the monitoring activities

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 13

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 12

By Morty Prisament MSMP AICP Strategenesis-GPC

The Planning Sustainability Health ConnectionA Glimpse at Emerging Trends

some predictions and prognostications about how we can makethe transition

Harmonic Convergence Health + SustainabilitySustainable Development is a logical contextual frame for

considering health in planning The classic definition from theBrundtland Commission is development that ldquomeets the needsof the present without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needsrdquo CEQArsquos requirement toaddress long-term versus short-term needs appears to echo theCommissionrsquos definition of sustainable development MichaelThomas Needham referred similarly to lsquoSustainableDevelopmentrsquo ldquoas the ability to meet the needs of the presentwhile contributing to the future generationsrsquo needsrdquo

Sustainable development happens at many levels fromindividual buildings and neighborhoods-green building andsustainable communities to the city and regional scale greencities sustainable bioregions etc Sustainable development alsohas multiple dimensions from design and green planning togreen infrastructure Most relevant from a planninghealthperspective is sustainable developmentrsquos focus on enhancingldquomobilityrdquo This includes community design incorporatingmixed use development in combination with transit optionsstreetscape design that enhances pedestrianbike safety(ldquocomplete streetsrdquo) and access to services and amenities Inessence an urban form characterized by mixed use andpedestrian and transit-oriented development is what makeswalking and biking more attractive as well as practical andfeasible On a regional level it embodies the ldquosmart growthrdquoprinciples of interconnected ldquowalkablerdquo and ldquobikeablerdquocommunities served by local businesses and linked to a largertransit and alternative modes network Think ldquoMillenniumParkrdquo in downtown Chicago or ldquoBell Street Parkrdquo in Seattle

The past decade has seen resurgence in not only theeconomic vitality of American cities but cityplanning And this has come about as a result ofthe sustainability movement Sustainability isproviding a framework for planners to move

beyond the traditional confines of Euclidian zoning adopting amore holistic and integrated approach to building communitiesat the human scale Sustainability initiatives have attractedbroad support because of the benefits conveyed on a number oflevels from reduction in greenhouse gases to economicdevelopment and quality-of-life However one of the mostprofound findings is the connection between ldquocommunityplanningrdquo and health In fact recent findings suggest that yourldquozip coderdquo is the single-most important determinant of an

individualrsquos health In other words how communities aredesigned can influence onersquos level of physical activity andhence health Given the prominence of the obesity epidemicand rise in chronic diseases planners will increasingly be calledupon to play a role in promoting healthy communities This willexpand the mission of planning organizations to consider thehealth implications of land-use decisions The ldquoconvergencerdquo ofplanning and health and wellness represents a significant trendand one which will set a dominant tone This article is intendedto help planners understand this emerging trend

We begin with deciphering the connection betweenplanning and health specifically the ldquofitrdquo between health andsustainability Next we look at upstream health factors Wethen discuss the ldquoculturalrdquo transition in the planning healthand social services arenas that will be necessary in order to fullyrealize the potential of health sustainability planning Wehighlight the importance of power sharing between agencies andgrassroots organizations and highlight the evolution in policyplanning and environmental analysis along with the use ofhealth impact assessments (HIAs) Finally we conclude with

ldquoSocially ldquoGreen Healthrdquo occurs at a nexus of morally-laden decisions about living inthe world as patients workers consumers and citizensrdquo

(Institute for the Future Health Horizons Program)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 13

continued on page 14

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 12

Health FactorsIncreasingly health researchers are finding that health

problems are influenced by societal policies and environmentsthat either support behaviors or fail to foster healthier choicesDr Kawachi stressed that where you live affects how you liveThere is growing consensus that major health problems will notbe solved solely by individual actions and choices By movingldquoupstreamrdquo to address causes and improving environments wherewe work learn and play we can reduce chronic illnesses DrKawachi specifically cites changes in ldquotransportation policiesand urban zoningrdquo (Physical Activity and the BuiltEnvironment What Worksrdquo Statewide Conference Sponsoredby Health by Design September 10 2007 Indianapolis IN)

Health care genetics and lifestyle changes only take us so far Ifyou want to prevent obesity you need to cure the environmentnot the individualrdquo

Dr Ichiro Kawachi delivering Keynote address at StatewidePolicy Forum on Social Determinants of Health 111306(httpbcbsmnfoundationcom objectsTier_3forum_proceedingspdf )

ldquoWe must understand that education housing transportationand community development and income policies are healthpolicies- Jan Malcolm (httpmngov health-reformimagesTask-Force-and-Work-Groups-Summary-2012-01-31pdf )

In essence it appears that health professionals areabandoning their long-held belief in the efficacy of healtheducation programs They have learned that such programsrarely lead to sustained behavioral change unless scaled up andinstituted through formal and informal PSE changes Anupstream approach might also involve measures designed toinfluence diet and nutrition such as agricultural food subsidiesand national nutrition standards If this seems out-of-bounds toyou planners out there think about the growing trend topromote local and sustainable foods through urban agricultureand farmerrsquos markets or the efforts by schools and universities tosource more sustainable food options

Cultural Transition Sustainable Development by its very nature is

interdisciplinary and in the case of health and land-use willrequire the ldquotriadrdquo of planners health and social servicesprofessionals to collaborate in developing plans and forgingstrategies This would hardly be the first time that planners haveworked with health professionals Solid waste and water qualityfacility siting as well as development review call for planners towork routinely with local health departments as well as Stateand federal agencies like Environmental Protection AgencyDepartment of Toxic Substances Control and CaliforniaDepartment of Health Services What has changed is that until

recently health issues have not been a consideration in land-usetransportation and mobility planning such as has engineeringand public service issues for example The marriage betweenplanning and public works professionals may not be perfect butthey have grown accustomed to one anotherrsquos particularproclivities Merging of health social service and planning willrequire a similar cultural transition However in this latter casethe transition may be eased given a shared vision if not missionof promoting healthy communities Human resources managersmust also be included in this conversation Recruiting trainingand retaining staff with appropriate interdisciplinary experienceis essential for capacity building and effecting organizationalchange

APArsquos Sustainable Planning Interest Group is emblematic ofthe critical mass of planning professionals that are supportingsustainability initiatives many of whom are focused on healthand mobility together with local and sustainable foods Healthmobility local foods and nutrition were recurring sustainabilitythemes dominating recent APA conferences in Boston and LosAngeles APA has also adopted policies on supportingldquoCommunity and Regional Food Systemsrdquo[httpwwwurbantilthorgwpcontentuploads200810american-planning-association-policy-guide-on-community-and-regional-food-planningpdf] While training and conferenceprograms focusing on the intersection of planning health andsustainability is available advanced or graduate-level curriculahas yet to be developed The Sustainable Urban DevelopmentReader (2ndEd 2008) (wwwroutledgegeographycom) intendedfor advanced studies in sustainable development contains onlyone paragraph on the subject of the health-sustainability link inan otherwise comprehensive text Similarly contemporary textson health policy lack any substantive discussion of thesignificance of environmental determinants as a factor inchronic disease or the connection between health andcommunity planning

Community Collaboration and Power-Sharing Concerns about sustainability have been driven to a large

degree by the public and consequently power relationshipsneed to change in order to promote community partnershipsMoreover health and social service professionals will need todevelop competencies that enable them to address issues thatoccur at the intersection of health planning and sustainabledevelopment This would require planners to understand therole of health determinants approaches to health promotionhealth policy and tools like logic mapping and health impactassessments

Because of the grassroots nature of sustainability initiativesplanners health professionals and social workers will need toplace increasing emphasis upon consensus building anddeveloping community partnerships This will also require

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 13

continued on page 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 14

planning health and social service agencies to adopt a proactiveapproach to organizational change and one that relies more on aprocess of shared learning increased openness and accessibilityand a shift in how information is acquired and communicatedThis not only involves power-sharing but further portends afundamental change in the notion of local government from onethat mandates change to one that empowers change Plannersalready have some models that embody a cooperative grassrootsapproach wherein agencies derive their power consensuallyversus coercively (wwwmpoworgelisheva_sadan_empowerment_spreads_chapter1pdf) Californiarsquos ldquocoordinated resourcemanagement and planningrdquo model is a good example of bottom-up watershed planning which emphasizes decentralized decision-making power sharing and collaboration Other examplesinclude the many successful open space and trails planning andacquisition programs spearheaded by land conservancies andconservationdeveloper partnerships local food coops and untilmore recently the many community-run recycling programs

This requires planning organizations coupled with incentivesand inducements

Policy Planning and Impact AssessmentPlanning-related health issues can be addressed through

general plan or other local policy plans or via Health ImpactAssessments (HIAs) The City of Richmond California was oneof the first cities in the country to develop a comprehensivegeneral plan element addressing the link between public healthand the built environment A number of other Cities andcounties in California have since developed health planelements Richmond a former shipbuilding hub during WorldWar II has a number of historic industrial uses and a legacy ofenvironmental contamination It is home to Chevron-RichmondRefinery General Chemical as well as a proliferation of otherport-industrial activities Naturally then RichmondrsquosCommunity Health and Wellness Element addressesenvironmental justice issues related to air pollution and waterand soil contamination The Health Element further discussespedestrian and bicyclist injuries chronic diseases and crime andviolence Richmond residents are at a higher risk than residentsin the rest of the county on many health indicators including thehighest proportion of deaths from diabetes a much higher thanaverage rate of children requiring hospitalization due to asthmaand the second highest number of hospitalizations for mentalhealth disorders and substance abuse Richmond residents arealso disproportionately affected by heart disease cancer andstroke (httpwwwhealthycommunitiesby designorg) Healthplanning elements and HIAs can also be prepared in associationwith Housing Elements and Economic Development PlansSustainability and Carbon Action Plans Alternative ModesPlans Trails and Bicycle Plans as well as Safety and EmergencyPreparedness Plans HIAs are particularly suited to addressinghealth implications of plans programs and policies(programmatic HIAs)

Health Impact Assessment is ldquoa multidisciplinary processwithin which a range of evidence about the health effects of aproposal is considered in a structured framework hellipbased on abroad model of health which proposes that economic politicalsocial psychological and environmental factors determinepopulation healthrdquo (wwwhiacollaborativeorgfaq )

HIA have also been defined as ldquohellip a systematic process thatevaluates the health impacts of a proposed policy planprogram or project The assessment helps the public anddecision-makers understand the health consequences of theproposal and make informed choices that protect and promotehealthrdquo (httpwwwhumanimpactorgcomponentjdownloadsfinish81180)

HIAs have been used as a policy analysis tool to highlighthealth impacts and can either be in the form of a highlystructured report a policy brief or issue paper or can even takethe shape of a community forum Compared to EnvironmentalImpact Assessments (EIA) there is a greater emphasis onldquointer-sectoralrdquo or interdisciplinary coordination and publicparticipation HIAs examine causal factors and pathways infour main areas including social determinants environmentalimpacts (ie air and water quality) built environment andhealth behaviors The ldquobuilt environmentrdquo has been receivingmost attention lately along with the need to promotesustainable development Consequently there is increasinginterest to using HIAs in conjunction with land-use policyplanning and EIAs Pathways could include for examplehousing land-use mix food access and security transportationinfrastructure traffic safety noise community walkability andrecreational amenities Examples of causal factors such as inthe case of a farmerrsquos market might include consumption offruits and vegetables income for vendorsrsquo and farmerspreservation of agricultural land community economicconditions and pedestrian access (ie physical activity)

Planners and environmental scientists would as before beconcerned with biophysical health effects which havecommonly been addressed through human health riskassessments (HRAs) and ecological health risk assessments(ERAs) EPA establishes a specific methodology for assessingHRAs and ERAs risks to human health from exposure tohazardous substances and are thus narrower than HIAs Forexample laws addressing hazardous substances like motorvehicle fuel additives and pesticides or emissions of mercury ordioxin from a power plant generally require HRAs or ERAsrather than HIAs In contrast HIAs would focus increasinglyupon the more indirect health outcomes in order to determinethe health effects of a policy or activity

HIAs are just beginning to be used in connection withNEPA and NEPACEQA reviews and incorporation into

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 8: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

Public InvolvementEducation Programs

MERIT AWARDSan Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter ProgramPrepared for San Diego Gas and ElectricPrepared by San Diego Gas and Electric Smart Meter Program ndash Customer Experience

The SDGampE Smart Meter Programrsquos detailed messaging plan may be used as a model foreffective outreach Itrsquos 90-60-30-day notification plan is transferable to other publiceducation efforts The informational door hangers were an innovative approach to reachinga segment of the public that might otherwise have been missed Excellent work

Contact Risa Baron Sempra Utilities Office 8586541857 rbaronsemprautilitiescom

Humor Award

AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line -General Outreach and Educational MaterialsPrepared for AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line members Prepared by AECOM Unnatural Resources Practice Line

The Awards Jury found this project to be creative and hilarious ndash especially to nerds Thetricksters at AECOM presented a real tongue-in-cheek treat for the reader Halloween willnever be the same and neither will the employee who portrayed the patient zombie It takesthe notion of ldquoother duties as assignedrdquo to a whole other realm Thanks to the knowledgeableand respected AECOM technical staff for sharing your internal office humor and providingthe Awards Jury an enjoyable respite from the serious environmental analysis and climatereduction plansContact John Hute AECOM 9164145876

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 8

2012 AEP Awards Program continued from page 7

AcknowledgementsOne of the most important AEP volunteer groups is the AEP Awards Jury These are AEP peer professionals chosen for

their years of experience and expertise in the profession AEP recognized the following individuals who gave graciously manydays of their time to review and judge all the submittals and hours spent on AEP conference calls to reach consensus decisionsusing the AEP rating criteria Thank you all

AEP 2012 AWARDS VIDEO PRODUCTIONWe thank Megan Giglini Vivian Gaddie and Joan Valle of URS for the great video for the awards program We thank URS

for sponsoring the Awards Program The video was enjoyed by all

AEP 2012 CONFERENCE COMMITTEEFinally we thank the Co-Chairs for this conference Trevor Macenski Michael Brandman Associates and John Kinsey

Wanger Jones Helsley PC for leadership and hard work and their little army of conference volunteers Thank you all for awonderful successful conference

AEP 2012 AWARDS JURYDev Vrat AICP Jury ChairUrban Studies and Planning DepartmentCalifornia State University Northridge

Patti Nahil AICPPGN

Jeffry S Rice AICPURS

Crystahl TaylorPadre Associates Inc

Honey L WaltersAscent Environmental Inc

Ray WeissESA

Accepting this award Carolyn Winn VP Customer ServiceSan Diego Gas and Electric

Accepting this award John Hute AECOM

Summer is here and it has warmed up It is the timefor vacations and exploring the outdoors I hope youget out there and refresh your fun time hiking or justhaving a good time doing your favorite activity Theenvironmental field continues to take more

importance in all aspects of our lives We hear more newscoverage of disasters and their environmental effectsEnvironmental professionals are sought out for professionaladvice in every aspect of our community issues We have astronger voice in developing environmental policy inCalifornia and in every state in this nation So I ask what roledo you play and how can you stay sharp with your skills

AEP and NAEP offer many opportunities includingCEQANEPA Workshops special training in air qualitytransportation planning greenhouse gas emission impactsurban pollution in our nations water and the list goes on AEPis planning for the Fall Basic CEQA Workshop Look to theAEP Website and to upcoming newsletters for the Fall BasicCEQA Workshops

AEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop this summerDates are July 25th in Clovis CA July 30 in Oakland CA July31 in San Diego CA and August 1 in Carson CA Go to thecalifaeporg website for more information This is the first timeAEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop training program

NAEP is continuing to offer Webinars I will be sendinginformation to you as it is published Take advantage of these90 minute online training programs They are valuable andgreat to stay current on the regulatory policy and court cases foryour work Look for more information in the near futureNAEP is working hard to increase real value opportunities toenvironmental professionals Recent webinars on FrackingEndangered Species and Green Energy Development Impactsto Natural Resources were presented by NAEP

NAEP posts bimonthly E-Newsletters A recentedition included in some excellent articles on

various environmental topics The E-Newlettersare posted on the AEP Website and e-mailed

to AEP members when published These aregreat resources to read current events in

the environmental profession and staycurrent on the happening scene

Look for the most recent edition onour website

NAEP will be conducting aChapter Retreat July 21 and

22 2012 in Kansas CityThis is a time when the

From the NAEP Liaisonrsquos DeskNAEPAFFILIATION

By Roger W Turner

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 9

Chapter representatives will go over the strategic goals andreview the programs provided by NAEP The Chapter Retreatwill help set the new course for NAEP in providing its Chapterservices and programs to its members Note all AEP members areaffiliated with NAEP and will benefit from programs trainingand conferences NAEP produces I will publish the results of theChapter Retreat in a future edition of this report

The 2013 NAEPAEP Joint Conference is planned for April1 to 5 2013 The theme is ldquoWalk the Talkrdquo The conferencecommittee is hard at work planning what will sure to be aninformative and engaging event for environmental professionalsOur conference will be held in an outstanding state-of-the-artconference facility at the JW Marriott Hotel located in thevibrant LA Live complex in downtown Los Angeles

The hotel and conference facility sport a front-row seat tosome of Los Angelesrsquo top attractions include the Staples Centerthe Nokia Theatre Regal Cinemas and a wide variety of shopsand restaurants In addition despite the car-centered nature ofgreater Los Angeles many world-class attractions can be reachedvia public transit which is easily accessible from the complex

The conference program will feature dynamic regional andnational keynote speakers and an all-day pre-conferencesymposium on climate change adaptation Conference sessionswill cover topics including NEPA and CEQA Climate ChangeWater Supply and Delivery Air Quality Energy and AlternativeEnergy Development Marine and Coastal Issues HabitatMitigation Transportation Land Use and Cultural ResourcesThere will also be numerous other conference and social eventsthat will take advantage of the conference location including anumber of mobile workshops and a 5K run through some ofdowntown Los Angelesrsquo top attractions

Look for more information in future editions of my columnand on the AEP Website

Please mark your calendar-

The presentation abstracts submittal deadline-August 15 2012

The sponsor exhibitor submittal deadline-March 1 2013

The 2013 awards nomination submittal deadline-August 15 2012

As always I look forward to your comments and thoughts Ialso invite you to write me at rwturnerhotmailcom or call

(951) 707-5020 if you have a question about NAEP or needassistance in obtaining service from NAEP

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 11

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 10

By Bill Goggin Senior Biologist EMC Planning Group

Birds of a Feather Flock TogetherThe Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

solve an on-going maintenance problem that had become ahealth liability the prison staff proposed to construct a pavedpath between security fences so that the facilityrsquos guards couldbetter patrol this area (several of the guards had suffered turnedankles and knees because of the uneven and pot-holed groundsurface) Because the project had a potential to impact sensitivebiological resources Santa Clara County staff contracted withEMC Planning Group to assist the County with complying withthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and otherstate and federal environmental laws established to protectsensitive animals and their habitats including what is the subjectof this short article an established egret and heron rookery

During the performance of an earlier biological pre-construction survey performed by EMC Planning Group in July2010 an active rookery (a colonial breeding bird site) wasobserved within the south-central portion of the prison facilityrsquosmain courtyard The rookery is located within a cluster of denselyfoliated trees and contained approximately 50-60 nests fromthree species of birds great egret (Ardea alba) snowy egret(Egretta thula) and black-crowned night heron (Nycticorax

You can hear the sound as you approach thecourtyard of the Elmwood Correctional Facilityalthough itrsquos not exactly clear whatrsquos causing allthe commotion It starts as a low backgroundchattering and builds to a near cacophony close to

the mess hall Beyond these seemingly discordant soundseverything in the scene appears to be in order the prisonrsquosinmates going about their daily routine dressed in white- andblack-striped jumpsuits sweeping lifting weights or casuallytalking in groups while the watchful guards keep a dutiful eyeout for anything out of the ordinary All in all itrsquos just anotherordinary day at the Elmwood Correctional Facility But what iscausing all this noise you may ask yourself Finally out of ideasyou glance heavenward and thatrsquos when it hits you (no notthat) there are birds in the trees above your head manybirdshellipand they are large birds Are you puzzled Donrsquot bebecause this is the story of the jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

The Elmwood Correctional Facility is a low-security SantaClara County prison located west of Interstate 880 and north ofGreat American Parkway in Milpitas California In order to

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 11

Birds of a Feather Flock Together continued from page 10

nycticorax) The ground surface beneath these trees showedevidence of long-term site use by rookeryrsquos birds as wasdemonstrated by an accumulation of whitewash feathers andegg shell fragments

Especially unique in an urban area the Elmwood rookerysite is believed to be the only egret and heron rookery in thesouthern San Francisco Bay located within an entirely fencedanthropogenic setting and may be the only one of its kind innorthern California Colonial breeding sites are especiallyimportant when located within urbanized environments asdevelopment and land conversion often degrades orremoves available rookery habitat and asa result opportunities for colonialnesting species in urban areasare limited These sites arealso significant becausethey often support asizeable segment ofthe local populationand because theirproximity to foragingareas can reducetravel distances theymay potentially reducepredator-prey (iemortality) interactions

Because construction wasplanned during the most sensitive periodof the birds natural life history cycle the projectrsquosconstruction activities had a potential to cause detrimentalimpacts (ie elevated levels of noise dust and fumes) possiblyaffecting the birds nesting and juvenile rearing which couldhave led to fines and negative press for the County Thereforein order to protect this important resource in spring 2011 theCounty retained EMC Planning Group to monitor the rookeryduring the projectrsquos construction whenever heavy equipmentoperation would be occurring within 500 feet of the rookery

It is important to note that none of bird species living at theElmwood rookery (great egret snowy egret and night heron) arespecifically listed as threatened or endangered by the state orfederal Endangered Species Acts however the CaliforniaDepartment of Fish and Game (CDFG) considers colonialbreeding sites to be sensitive resource areas that are affordedprotection under CDFG Code during the breeding bird seasonas they can be sensitive to human intrusion and disturbance Inaddition to state regulations the protection of egrets and heronsare covered under the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act Oncenests have been constructed and eggs are present the rookerysite becomes a protected resource area and cannot be disturbedReproduction for the rookeries species generally occurs from

early April through July with the juvenile rearing periodextending into mid-September

Behavioral monitoring of the egret and heron rookeryconsisted of a qualified EMC Planning Group biologist stationedinside the facilityrsquos perimeter fence in a direct line of siteapproximately 275 feet from the rookery during constructionactivities or during operation of heavy equipment within 500feet of the rookery During construction the monitoringbiologist observed egret and heron behavior using hand heldbinoculars and a high magnification field spotting scope for signs

of stress andor agitation Notes on behavioralinteractions (ie preeninggrooming

feeding sibling competition etc)and daily counts on numbers of

individuals and juvenilespresent were recorded

C o n s t r u c t i o ncommenced on April27 and an EMCPlanning Groupbiologist conductedworker environmental

awareness trainingconcerning the presence

of the rookery and theimportance of protecting the

rookery During the projectrsquosimplementation no disturbance of the

rookery was noted and the rookeries behavior wasessentially unchanged by project activities Approximately 38adult and 23 juvenile egrets and herons were observedthroughout the construction period

By incorporating these pro-active impact minimization andspecial-status species protection measures into the projectrsquosimplementation the County as the lead agency demonstratedproper compliance with CDFG Code and CEQA law and thisimportant and sensitive resource was safeguarded frominadvertent disturbance This model of good stewardshipdemonstrates leadership on the part of the County and theyshould be commended for stepping up All land managers canlearn from this experience and should take note itrsquos alwaysbetter to err on the side of caution

EMC Planning Group wishes to thank the County of SantaClara the projectrsquos manager Ms Alicia Flynn for her support on theproject the projectrsquos contractors Granite and BCI and the entireElmwood prison facilities staff for their cooperation and supportduring the monitoring activities

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 13

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 12

By Morty Prisament MSMP AICP Strategenesis-GPC

The Planning Sustainability Health ConnectionA Glimpse at Emerging Trends

some predictions and prognostications about how we can makethe transition

Harmonic Convergence Health + SustainabilitySustainable Development is a logical contextual frame for

considering health in planning The classic definition from theBrundtland Commission is development that ldquomeets the needsof the present without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needsrdquo CEQArsquos requirement toaddress long-term versus short-term needs appears to echo theCommissionrsquos definition of sustainable development MichaelThomas Needham referred similarly to lsquoSustainableDevelopmentrsquo ldquoas the ability to meet the needs of the presentwhile contributing to the future generationsrsquo needsrdquo

Sustainable development happens at many levels fromindividual buildings and neighborhoods-green building andsustainable communities to the city and regional scale greencities sustainable bioregions etc Sustainable development alsohas multiple dimensions from design and green planning togreen infrastructure Most relevant from a planninghealthperspective is sustainable developmentrsquos focus on enhancingldquomobilityrdquo This includes community design incorporatingmixed use development in combination with transit optionsstreetscape design that enhances pedestrianbike safety(ldquocomplete streetsrdquo) and access to services and amenities Inessence an urban form characterized by mixed use andpedestrian and transit-oriented development is what makeswalking and biking more attractive as well as practical andfeasible On a regional level it embodies the ldquosmart growthrdquoprinciples of interconnected ldquowalkablerdquo and ldquobikeablerdquocommunities served by local businesses and linked to a largertransit and alternative modes network Think ldquoMillenniumParkrdquo in downtown Chicago or ldquoBell Street Parkrdquo in Seattle

The past decade has seen resurgence in not only theeconomic vitality of American cities but cityplanning And this has come about as a result ofthe sustainability movement Sustainability isproviding a framework for planners to move

beyond the traditional confines of Euclidian zoning adopting amore holistic and integrated approach to building communitiesat the human scale Sustainability initiatives have attractedbroad support because of the benefits conveyed on a number oflevels from reduction in greenhouse gases to economicdevelopment and quality-of-life However one of the mostprofound findings is the connection between ldquocommunityplanningrdquo and health In fact recent findings suggest that yourldquozip coderdquo is the single-most important determinant of an

individualrsquos health In other words how communities aredesigned can influence onersquos level of physical activity andhence health Given the prominence of the obesity epidemicand rise in chronic diseases planners will increasingly be calledupon to play a role in promoting healthy communities This willexpand the mission of planning organizations to consider thehealth implications of land-use decisions The ldquoconvergencerdquo ofplanning and health and wellness represents a significant trendand one which will set a dominant tone This article is intendedto help planners understand this emerging trend

We begin with deciphering the connection betweenplanning and health specifically the ldquofitrdquo between health andsustainability Next we look at upstream health factors Wethen discuss the ldquoculturalrdquo transition in the planning healthand social services arenas that will be necessary in order to fullyrealize the potential of health sustainability planning Wehighlight the importance of power sharing between agencies andgrassroots organizations and highlight the evolution in policyplanning and environmental analysis along with the use ofhealth impact assessments (HIAs) Finally we conclude with

ldquoSocially ldquoGreen Healthrdquo occurs at a nexus of morally-laden decisions about living inthe world as patients workers consumers and citizensrdquo

(Institute for the Future Health Horizons Program)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 13

continued on page 14

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 12

Health FactorsIncreasingly health researchers are finding that health

problems are influenced by societal policies and environmentsthat either support behaviors or fail to foster healthier choicesDr Kawachi stressed that where you live affects how you liveThere is growing consensus that major health problems will notbe solved solely by individual actions and choices By movingldquoupstreamrdquo to address causes and improving environments wherewe work learn and play we can reduce chronic illnesses DrKawachi specifically cites changes in ldquotransportation policiesand urban zoningrdquo (Physical Activity and the BuiltEnvironment What Worksrdquo Statewide Conference Sponsoredby Health by Design September 10 2007 Indianapolis IN)

Health care genetics and lifestyle changes only take us so far Ifyou want to prevent obesity you need to cure the environmentnot the individualrdquo

Dr Ichiro Kawachi delivering Keynote address at StatewidePolicy Forum on Social Determinants of Health 111306(httpbcbsmnfoundationcom objectsTier_3forum_proceedingspdf )

ldquoWe must understand that education housing transportationand community development and income policies are healthpolicies- Jan Malcolm (httpmngov health-reformimagesTask-Force-and-Work-Groups-Summary-2012-01-31pdf )

In essence it appears that health professionals areabandoning their long-held belief in the efficacy of healtheducation programs They have learned that such programsrarely lead to sustained behavioral change unless scaled up andinstituted through formal and informal PSE changes Anupstream approach might also involve measures designed toinfluence diet and nutrition such as agricultural food subsidiesand national nutrition standards If this seems out-of-bounds toyou planners out there think about the growing trend topromote local and sustainable foods through urban agricultureand farmerrsquos markets or the efforts by schools and universities tosource more sustainable food options

Cultural Transition Sustainable Development by its very nature is

interdisciplinary and in the case of health and land-use willrequire the ldquotriadrdquo of planners health and social servicesprofessionals to collaborate in developing plans and forgingstrategies This would hardly be the first time that planners haveworked with health professionals Solid waste and water qualityfacility siting as well as development review call for planners towork routinely with local health departments as well as Stateand federal agencies like Environmental Protection AgencyDepartment of Toxic Substances Control and CaliforniaDepartment of Health Services What has changed is that until

recently health issues have not been a consideration in land-usetransportation and mobility planning such as has engineeringand public service issues for example The marriage betweenplanning and public works professionals may not be perfect butthey have grown accustomed to one anotherrsquos particularproclivities Merging of health social service and planning willrequire a similar cultural transition However in this latter casethe transition may be eased given a shared vision if not missionof promoting healthy communities Human resources managersmust also be included in this conversation Recruiting trainingand retaining staff with appropriate interdisciplinary experienceis essential for capacity building and effecting organizationalchange

APArsquos Sustainable Planning Interest Group is emblematic ofthe critical mass of planning professionals that are supportingsustainability initiatives many of whom are focused on healthand mobility together with local and sustainable foods Healthmobility local foods and nutrition were recurring sustainabilitythemes dominating recent APA conferences in Boston and LosAngeles APA has also adopted policies on supportingldquoCommunity and Regional Food Systemsrdquo[httpwwwurbantilthorgwpcontentuploads200810american-planning-association-policy-guide-on-community-and-regional-food-planningpdf] While training and conferenceprograms focusing on the intersection of planning health andsustainability is available advanced or graduate-level curriculahas yet to be developed The Sustainable Urban DevelopmentReader (2ndEd 2008) (wwwroutledgegeographycom) intendedfor advanced studies in sustainable development contains onlyone paragraph on the subject of the health-sustainability link inan otherwise comprehensive text Similarly contemporary textson health policy lack any substantive discussion of thesignificance of environmental determinants as a factor inchronic disease or the connection between health andcommunity planning

Community Collaboration and Power-Sharing Concerns about sustainability have been driven to a large

degree by the public and consequently power relationshipsneed to change in order to promote community partnershipsMoreover health and social service professionals will need todevelop competencies that enable them to address issues thatoccur at the intersection of health planning and sustainabledevelopment This would require planners to understand therole of health determinants approaches to health promotionhealth policy and tools like logic mapping and health impactassessments

Because of the grassroots nature of sustainability initiativesplanners health professionals and social workers will need toplace increasing emphasis upon consensus building anddeveloping community partnerships This will also require

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 13

continued on page 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 14

planning health and social service agencies to adopt a proactiveapproach to organizational change and one that relies more on aprocess of shared learning increased openness and accessibilityand a shift in how information is acquired and communicatedThis not only involves power-sharing but further portends afundamental change in the notion of local government from onethat mandates change to one that empowers change Plannersalready have some models that embody a cooperative grassrootsapproach wherein agencies derive their power consensuallyversus coercively (wwwmpoworgelisheva_sadan_empowerment_spreads_chapter1pdf) Californiarsquos ldquocoordinated resourcemanagement and planningrdquo model is a good example of bottom-up watershed planning which emphasizes decentralized decision-making power sharing and collaboration Other examplesinclude the many successful open space and trails planning andacquisition programs spearheaded by land conservancies andconservationdeveloper partnerships local food coops and untilmore recently the many community-run recycling programs

This requires planning organizations coupled with incentivesand inducements

Policy Planning and Impact AssessmentPlanning-related health issues can be addressed through

general plan or other local policy plans or via Health ImpactAssessments (HIAs) The City of Richmond California was oneof the first cities in the country to develop a comprehensivegeneral plan element addressing the link between public healthand the built environment A number of other Cities andcounties in California have since developed health planelements Richmond a former shipbuilding hub during WorldWar II has a number of historic industrial uses and a legacy ofenvironmental contamination It is home to Chevron-RichmondRefinery General Chemical as well as a proliferation of otherport-industrial activities Naturally then RichmondrsquosCommunity Health and Wellness Element addressesenvironmental justice issues related to air pollution and waterand soil contamination The Health Element further discussespedestrian and bicyclist injuries chronic diseases and crime andviolence Richmond residents are at a higher risk than residentsin the rest of the county on many health indicators including thehighest proportion of deaths from diabetes a much higher thanaverage rate of children requiring hospitalization due to asthmaand the second highest number of hospitalizations for mentalhealth disorders and substance abuse Richmond residents arealso disproportionately affected by heart disease cancer andstroke (httpwwwhealthycommunitiesby designorg) Healthplanning elements and HIAs can also be prepared in associationwith Housing Elements and Economic Development PlansSustainability and Carbon Action Plans Alternative ModesPlans Trails and Bicycle Plans as well as Safety and EmergencyPreparedness Plans HIAs are particularly suited to addressinghealth implications of plans programs and policies(programmatic HIAs)

Health Impact Assessment is ldquoa multidisciplinary processwithin which a range of evidence about the health effects of aproposal is considered in a structured framework hellipbased on abroad model of health which proposes that economic politicalsocial psychological and environmental factors determinepopulation healthrdquo (wwwhiacollaborativeorgfaq )

HIA have also been defined as ldquohellip a systematic process thatevaluates the health impacts of a proposed policy planprogram or project The assessment helps the public anddecision-makers understand the health consequences of theproposal and make informed choices that protect and promotehealthrdquo (httpwwwhumanimpactorgcomponentjdownloadsfinish81180)

HIAs have been used as a policy analysis tool to highlighthealth impacts and can either be in the form of a highlystructured report a policy brief or issue paper or can even takethe shape of a community forum Compared to EnvironmentalImpact Assessments (EIA) there is a greater emphasis onldquointer-sectoralrdquo or interdisciplinary coordination and publicparticipation HIAs examine causal factors and pathways infour main areas including social determinants environmentalimpacts (ie air and water quality) built environment andhealth behaviors The ldquobuilt environmentrdquo has been receivingmost attention lately along with the need to promotesustainable development Consequently there is increasinginterest to using HIAs in conjunction with land-use policyplanning and EIAs Pathways could include for examplehousing land-use mix food access and security transportationinfrastructure traffic safety noise community walkability andrecreational amenities Examples of causal factors such as inthe case of a farmerrsquos market might include consumption offruits and vegetables income for vendorsrsquo and farmerspreservation of agricultural land community economicconditions and pedestrian access (ie physical activity)

Planners and environmental scientists would as before beconcerned with biophysical health effects which havecommonly been addressed through human health riskassessments (HRAs) and ecological health risk assessments(ERAs) EPA establishes a specific methodology for assessingHRAs and ERAs risks to human health from exposure tohazardous substances and are thus narrower than HIAs Forexample laws addressing hazardous substances like motorvehicle fuel additives and pesticides or emissions of mercury ordioxin from a power plant generally require HRAs or ERAsrather than HIAs In contrast HIAs would focus increasinglyupon the more indirect health outcomes in order to determinethe health effects of a policy or activity

HIAs are just beginning to be used in connection withNEPA and NEPACEQA reviews and incorporation into

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 9: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

Summer is here and it has warmed up It is the timefor vacations and exploring the outdoors I hope youget out there and refresh your fun time hiking or justhaving a good time doing your favorite activity Theenvironmental field continues to take more

importance in all aspects of our lives We hear more newscoverage of disasters and their environmental effectsEnvironmental professionals are sought out for professionaladvice in every aspect of our community issues We have astronger voice in developing environmental policy inCalifornia and in every state in this nation So I ask what roledo you play and how can you stay sharp with your skills

AEP and NAEP offer many opportunities includingCEQANEPA Workshops special training in air qualitytransportation planning greenhouse gas emission impactsurban pollution in our nations water and the list goes on AEPis planning for the Fall Basic CEQA Workshop Look to theAEP Website and to upcoming newsletters for the Fall BasicCEQA Workshops

AEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop this summerDates are July 25th in Clovis CA July 30 in Oakland CA July31 in San Diego CA and August 1 in Carson CA Go to thecalifaeporg website for more information This is the first timeAEP is offering a Basic NEPA Workshop training program

NAEP is continuing to offer Webinars I will be sendinginformation to you as it is published Take advantage of these90 minute online training programs They are valuable andgreat to stay current on the regulatory policy and court cases foryour work Look for more information in the near futureNAEP is working hard to increase real value opportunities toenvironmental professionals Recent webinars on FrackingEndangered Species and Green Energy Development Impactsto Natural Resources were presented by NAEP

NAEP posts bimonthly E-Newsletters A recentedition included in some excellent articles on

various environmental topics The E-Newlettersare posted on the AEP Website and e-mailed

to AEP members when published These aregreat resources to read current events in

the environmental profession and staycurrent on the happening scene

Look for the most recent edition onour website

NAEP will be conducting aChapter Retreat July 21 and

22 2012 in Kansas CityThis is a time when the

From the NAEP Liaisonrsquos DeskNAEPAFFILIATION

By Roger W Turner

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 9

Chapter representatives will go over the strategic goals andreview the programs provided by NAEP The Chapter Retreatwill help set the new course for NAEP in providing its Chapterservices and programs to its members Note all AEP members areaffiliated with NAEP and will benefit from programs trainingand conferences NAEP produces I will publish the results of theChapter Retreat in a future edition of this report

The 2013 NAEPAEP Joint Conference is planned for April1 to 5 2013 The theme is ldquoWalk the Talkrdquo The conferencecommittee is hard at work planning what will sure to be aninformative and engaging event for environmental professionalsOur conference will be held in an outstanding state-of-the-artconference facility at the JW Marriott Hotel located in thevibrant LA Live complex in downtown Los Angeles

The hotel and conference facility sport a front-row seat tosome of Los Angelesrsquo top attractions include the Staples Centerthe Nokia Theatre Regal Cinemas and a wide variety of shopsand restaurants In addition despite the car-centered nature ofgreater Los Angeles many world-class attractions can be reachedvia public transit which is easily accessible from the complex

The conference program will feature dynamic regional andnational keynote speakers and an all-day pre-conferencesymposium on climate change adaptation Conference sessionswill cover topics including NEPA and CEQA Climate ChangeWater Supply and Delivery Air Quality Energy and AlternativeEnergy Development Marine and Coastal Issues HabitatMitigation Transportation Land Use and Cultural ResourcesThere will also be numerous other conference and social eventsthat will take advantage of the conference location including anumber of mobile workshops and a 5K run through some ofdowntown Los Angelesrsquo top attractions

Look for more information in future editions of my columnand on the AEP Website

Please mark your calendar-

The presentation abstracts submittal deadline-August 15 2012

The sponsor exhibitor submittal deadline-March 1 2013

The 2013 awards nomination submittal deadline-August 15 2012

As always I look forward to your comments and thoughts Ialso invite you to write me at rwturnerhotmailcom or call

(951) 707-5020 if you have a question about NAEP or needassistance in obtaining service from NAEP

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 11

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 10

By Bill Goggin Senior Biologist EMC Planning Group

Birds of a Feather Flock TogetherThe Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

solve an on-going maintenance problem that had become ahealth liability the prison staff proposed to construct a pavedpath between security fences so that the facilityrsquos guards couldbetter patrol this area (several of the guards had suffered turnedankles and knees because of the uneven and pot-holed groundsurface) Because the project had a potential to impact sensitivebiological resources Santa Clara County staff contracted withEMC Planning Group to assist the County with complying withthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and otherstate and federal environmental laws established to protectsensitive animals and their habitats including what is the subjectof this short article an established egret and heron rookery

During the performance of an earlier biological pre-construction survey performed by EMC Planning Group in July2010 an active rookery (a colonial breeding bird site) wasobserved within the south-central portion of the prison facilityrsquosmain courtyard The rookery is located within a cluster of denselyfoliated trees and contained approximately 50-60 nests fromthree species of birds great egret (Ardea alba) snowy egret(Egretta thula) and black-crowned night heron (Nycticorax

You can hear the sound as you approach thecourtyard of the Elmwood Correctional Facilityalthough itrsquos not exactly clear whatrsquos causing allthe commotion It starts as a low backgroundchattering and builds to a near cacophony close to

the mess hall Beyond these seemingly discordant soundseverything in the scene appears to be in order the prisonrsquosinmates going about their daily routine dressed in white- andblack-striped jumpsuits sweeping lifting weights or casuallytalking in groups while the watchful guards keep a dutiful eyeout for anything out of the ordinary All in all itrsquos just anotherordinary day at the Elmwood Correctional Facility But what iscausing all this noise you may ask yourself Finally out of ideasyou glance heavenward and thatrsquos when it hits you (no notthat) there are birds in the trees above your head manybirdshellipand they are large birds Are you puzzled Donrsquot bebecause this is the story of the jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

The Elmwood Correctional Facility is a low-security SantaClara County prison located west of Interstate 880 and north ofGreat American Parkway in Milpitas California In order to

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 11

Birds of a Feather Flock Together continued from page 10

nycticorax) The ground surface beneath these trees showedevidence of long-term site use by rookeryrsquos birds as wasdemonstrated by an accumulation of whitewash feathers andegg shell fragments

Especially unique in an urban area the Elmwood rookerysite is believed to be the only egret and heron rookery in thesouthern San Francisco Bay located within an entirely fencedanthropogenic setting and may be the only one of its kind innorthern California Colonial breeding sites are especiallyimportant when located within urbanized environments asdevelopment and land conversion often degrades orremoves available rookery habitat and asa result opportunities for colonialnesting species in urban areasare limited These sites arealso significant becausethey often support asizeable segment ofthe local populationand because theirproximity to foragingareas can reducetravel distances theymay potentially reducepredator-prey (iemortality) interactions

Because construction wasplanned during the most sensitive periodof the birds natural life history cycle the projectrsquosconstruction activities had a potential to cause detrimentalimpacts (ie elevated levels of noise dust and fumes) possiblyaffecting the birds nesting and juvenile rearing which couldhave led to fines and negative press for the County Thereforein order to protect this important resource in spring 2011 theCounty retained EMC Planning Group to monitor the rookeryduring the projectrsquos construction whenever heavy equipmentoperation would be occurring within 500 feet of the rookery

It is important to note that none of bird species living at theElmwood rookery (great egret snowy egret and night heron) arespecifically listed as threatened or endangered by the state orfederal Endangered Species Acts however the CaliforniaDepartment of Fish and Game (CDFG) considers colonialbreeding sites to be sensitive resource areas that are affordedprotection under CDFG Code during the breeding bird seasonas they can be sensitive to human intrusion and disturbance Inaddition to state regulations the protection of egrets and heronsare covered under the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act Oncenests have been constructed and eggs are present the rookerysite becomes a protected resource area and cannot be disturbedReproduction for the rookeries species generally occurs from

early April through July with the juvenile rearing periodextending into mid-September

Behavioral monitoring of the egret and heron rookeryconsisted of a qualified EMC Planning Group biologist stationedinside the facilityrsquos perimeter fence in a direct line of siteapproximately 275 feet from the rookery during constructionactivities or during operation of heavy equipment within 500feet of the rookery During construction the monitoringbiologist observed egret and heron behavior using hand heldbinoculars and a high magnification field spotting scope for signs

of stress andor agitation Notes on behavioralinteractions (ie preeninggrooming

feeding sibling competition etc)and daily counts on numbers of

individuals and juvenilespresent were recorded

C o n s t r u c t i o ncommenced on April27 and an EMCPlanning Groupbiologist conductedworker environmental

awareness trainingconcerning the presence

of the rookery and theimportance of protecting the

rookery During the projectrsquosimplementation no disturbance of the

rookery was noted and the rookeries behavior wasessentially unchanged by project activities Approximately 38adult and 23 juvenile egrets and herons were observedthroughout the construction period

By incorporating these pro-active impact minimization andspecial-status species protection measures into the projectrsquosimplementation the County as the lead agency demonstratedproper compliance with CDFG Code and CEQA law and thisimportant and sensitive resource was safeguarded frominadvertent disturbance This model of good stewardshipdemonstrates leadership on the part of the County and theyshould be commended for stepping up All land managers canlearn from this experience and should take note itrsquos alwaysbetter to err on the side of caution

EMC Planning Group wishes to thank the County of SantaClara the projectrsquos manager Ms Alicia Flynn for her support on theproject the projectrsquos contractors Granite and BCI and the entireElmwood prison facilities staff for their cooperation and supportduring the monitoring activities

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 13

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 12

By Morty Prisament MSMP AICP Strategenesis-GPC

The Planning Sustainability Health ConnectionA Glimpse at Emerging Trends

some predictions and prognostications about how we can makethe transition

Harmonic Convergence Health + SustainabilitySustainable Development is a logical contextual frame for

considering health in planning The classic definition from theBrundtland Commission is development that ldquomeets the needsof the present without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needsrdquo CEQArsquos requirement toaddress long-term versus short-term needs appears to echo theCommissionrsquos definition of sustainable development MichaelThomas Needham referred similarly to lsquoSustainableDevelopmentrsquo ldquoas the ability to meet the needs of the presentwhile contributing to the future generationsrsquo needsrdquo

Sustainable development happens at many levels fromindividual buildings and neighborhoods-green building andsustainable communities to the city and regional scale greencities sustainable bioregions etc Sustainable development alsohas multiple dimensions from design and green planning togreen infrastructure Most relevant from a planninghealthperspective is sustainable developmentrsquos focus on enhancingldquomobilityrdquo This includes community design incorporatingmixed use development in combination with transit optionsstreetscape design that enhances pedestrianbike safety(ldquocomplete streetsrdquo) and access to services and amenities Inessence an urban form characterized by mixed use andpedestrian and transit-oriented development is what makeswalking and biking more attractive as well as practical andfeasible On a regional level it embodies the ldquosmart growthrdquoprinciples of interconnected ldquowalkablerdquo and ldquobikeablerdquocommunities served by local businesses and linked to a largertransit and alternative modes network Think ldquoMillenniumParkrdquo in downtown Chicago or ldquoBell Street Parkrdquo in Seattle

The past decade has seen resurgence in not only theeconomic vitality of American cities but cityplanning And this has come about as a result ofthe sustainability movement Sustainability isproviding a framework for planners to move

beyond the traditional confines of Euclidian zoning adopting amore holistic and integrated approach to building communitiesat the human scale Sustainability initiatives have attractedbroad support because of the benefits conveyed on a number oflevels from reduction in greenhouse gases to economicdevelopment and quality-of-life However one of the mostprofound findings is the connection between ldquocommunityplanningrdquo and health In fact recent findings suggest that yourldquozip coderdquo is the single-most important determinant of an

individualrsquos health In other words how communities aredesigned can influence onersquos level of physical activity andhence health Given the prominence of the obesity epidemicand rise in chronic diseases planners will increasingly be calledupon to play a role in promoting healthy communities This willexpand the mission of planning organizations to consider thehealth implications of land-use decisions The ldquoconvergencerdquo ofplanning and health and wellness represents a significant trendand one which will set a dominant tone This article is intendedto help planners understand this emerging trend

We begin with deciphering the connection betweenplanning and health specifically the ldquofitrdquo between health andsustainability Next we look at upstream health factors Wethen discuss the ldquoculturalrdquo transition in the planning healthand social services arenas that will be necessary in order to fullyrealize the potential of health sustainability planning Wehighlight the importance of power sharing between agencies andgrassroots organizations and highlight the evolution in policyplanning and environmental analysis along with the use ofhealth impact assessments (HIAs) Finally we conclude with

ldquoSocially ldquoGreen Healthrdquo occurs at a nexus of morally-laden decisions about living inthe world as patients workers consumers and citizensrdquo

(Institute for the Future Health Horizons Program)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 13

continued on page 14

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 12

Health FactorsIncreasingly health researchers are finding that health

problems are influenced by societal policies and environmentsthat either support behaviors or fail to foster healthier choicesDr Kawachi stressed that where you live affects how you liveThere is growing consensus that major health problems will notbe solved solely by individual actions and choices By movingldquoupstreamrdquo to address causes and improving environments wherewe work learn and play we can reduce chronic illnesses DrKawachi specifically cites changes in ldquotransportation policiesand urban zoningrdquo (Physical Activity and the BuiltEnvironment What Worksrdquo Statewide Conference Sponsoredby Health by Design September 10 2007 Indianapolis IN)

Health care genetics and lifestyle changes only take us so far Ifyou want to prevent obesity you need to cure the environmentnot the individualrdquo

Dr Ichiro Kawachi delivering Keynote address at StatewidePolicy Forum on Social Determinants of Health 111306(httpbcbsmnfoundationcom objectsTier_3forum_proceedingspdf )

ldquoWe must understand that education housing transportationand community development and income policies are healthpolicies- Jan Malcolm (httpmngov health-reformimagesTask-Force-and-Work-Groups-Summary-2012-01-31pdf )

In essence it appears that health professionals areabandoning their long-held belief in the efficacy of healtheducation programs They have learned that such programsrarely lead to sustained behavioral change unless scaled up andinstituted through formal and informal PSE changes Anupstream approach might also involve measures designed toinfluence diet and nutrition such as agricultural food subsidiesand national nutrition standards If this seems out-of-bounds toyou planners out there think about the growing trend topromote local and sustainable foods through urban agricultureand farmerrsquos markets or the efforts by schools and universities tosource more sustainable food options

Cultural Transition Sustainable Development by its very nature is

interdisciplinary and in the case of health and land-use willrequire the ldquotriadrdquo of planners health and social servicesprofessionals to collaborate in developing plans and forgingstrategies This would hardly be the first time that planners haveworked with health professionals Solid waste and water qualityfacility siting as well as development review call for planners towork routinely with local health departments as well as Stateand federal agencies like Environmental Protection AgencyDepartment of Toxic Substances Control and CaliforniaDepartment of Health Services What has changed is that until

recently health issues have not been a consideration in land-usetransportation and mobility planning such as has engineeringand public service issues for example The marriage betweenplanning and public works professionals may not be perfect butthey have grown accustomed to one anotherrsquos particularproclivities Merging of health social service and planning willrequire a similar cultural transition However in this latter casethe transition may be eased given a shared vision if not missionof promoting healthy communities Human resources managersmust also be included in this conversation Recruiting trainingand retaining staff with appropriate interdisciplinary experienceis essential for capacity building and effecting organizationalchange

APArsquos Sustainable Planning Interest Group is emblematic ofthe critical mass of planning professionals that are supportingsustainability initiatives many of whom are focused on healthand mobility together with local and sustainable foods Healthmobility local foods and nutrition were recurring sustainabilitythemes dominating recent APA conferences in Boston and LosAngeles APA has also adopted policies on supportingldquoCommunity and Regional Food Systemsrdquo[httpwwwurbantilthorgwpcontentuploads200810american-planning-association-policy-guide-on-community-and-regional-food-planningpdf] While training and conferenceprograms focusing on the intersection of planning health andsustainability is available advanced or graduate-level curriculahas yet to be developed The Sustainable Urban DevelopmentReader (2ndEd 2008) (wwwroutledgegeographycom) intendedfor advanced studies in sustainable development contains onlyone paragraph on the subject of the health-sustainability link inan otherwise comprehensive text Similarly contemporary textson health policy lack any substantive discussion of thesignificance of environmental determinants as a factor inchronic disease or the connection between health andcommunity planning

Community Collaboration and Power-Sharing Concerns about sustainability have been driven to a large

degree by the public and consequently power relationshipsneed to change in order to promote community partnershipsMoreover health and social service professionals will need todevelop competencies that enable them to address issues thatoccur at the intersection of health planning and sustainabledevelopment This would require planners to understand therole of health determinants approaches to health promotionhealth policy and tools like logic mapping and health impactassessments

Because of the grassroots nature of sustainability initiativesplanners health professionals and social workers will need toplace increasing emphasis upon consensus building anddeveloping community partnerships This will also require

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 13

continued on page 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 14

planning health and social service agencies to adopt a proactiveapproach to organizational change and one that relies more on aprocess of shared learning increased openness and accessibilityand a shift in how information is acquired and communicatedThis not only involves power-sharing but further portends afundamental change in the notion of local government from onethat mandates change to one that empowers change Plannersalready have some models that embody a cooperative grassrootsapproach wherein agencies derive their power consensuallyversus coercively (wwwmpoworgelisheva_sadan_empowerment_spreads_chapter1pdf) Californiarsquos ldquocoordinated resourcemanagement and planningrdquo model is a good example of bottom-up watershed planning which emphasizes decentralized decision-making power sharing and collaboration Other examplesinclude the many successful open space and trails planning andacquisition programs spearheaded by land conservancies andconservationdeveloper partnerships local food coops and untilmore recently the many community-run recycling programs

This requires planning organizations coupled with incentivesand inducements

Policy Planning and Impact AssessmentPlanning-related health issues can be addressed through

general plan or other local policy plans or via Health ImpactAssessments (HIAs) The City of Richmond California was oneof the first cities in the country to develop a comprehensivegeneral plan element addressing the link between public healthand the built environment A number of other Cities andcounties in California have since developed health planelements Richmond a former shipbuilding hub during WorldWar II has a number of historic industrial uses and a legacy ofenvironmental contamination It is home to Chevron-RichmondRefinery General Chemical as well as a proliferation of otherport-industrial activities Naturally then RichmondrsquosCommunity Health and Wellness Element addressesenvironmental justice issues related to air pollution and waterand soil contamination The Health Element further discussespedestrian and bicyclist injuries chronic diseases and crime andviolence Richmond residents are at a higher risk than residentsin the rest of the county on many health indicators including thehighest proportion of deaths from diabetes a much higher thanaverage rate of children requiring hospitalization due to asthmaand the second highest number of hospitalizations for mentalhealth disorders and substance abuse Richmond residents arealso disproportionately affected by heart disease cancer andstroke (httpwwwhealthycommunitiesby designorg) Healthplanning elements and HIAs can also be prepared in associationwith Housing Elements and Economic Development PlansSustainability and Carbon Action Plans Alternative ModesPlans Trails and Bicycle Plans as well as Safety and EmergencyPreparedness Plans HIAs are particularly suited to addressinghealth implications of plans programs and policies(programmatic HIAs)

Health Impact Assessment is ldquoa multidisciplinary processwithin which a range of evidence about the health effects of aproposal is considered in a structured framework hellipbased on abroad model of health which proposes that economic politicalsocial psychological and environmental factors determinepopulation healthrdquo (wwwhiacollaborativeorgfaq )

HIA have also been defined as ldquohellip a systematic process thatevaluates the health impacts of a proposed policy planprogram or project The assessment helps the public anddecision-makers understand the health consequences of theproposal and make informed choices that protect and promotehealthrdquo (httpwwwhumanimpactorgcomponentjdownloadsfinish81180)

HIAs have been used as a policy analysis tool to highlighthealth impacts and can either be in the form of a highlystructured report a policy brief or issue paper or can even takethe shape of a community forum Compared to EnvironmentalImpact Assessments (EIA) there is a greater emphasis onldquointer-sectoralrdquo or interdisciplinary coordination and publicparticipation HIAs examine causal factors and pathways infour main areas including social determinants environmentalimpacts (ie air and water quality) built environment andhealth behaviors The ldquobuilt environmentrdquo has been receivingmost attention lately along with the need to promotesustainable development Consequently there is increasinginterest to using HIAs in conjunction with land-use policyplanning and EIAs Pathways could include for examplehousing land-use mix food access and security transportationinfrastructure traffic safety noise community walkability andrecreational amenities Examples of causal factors such as inthe case of a farmerrsquos market might include consumption offruits and vegetables income for vendorsrsquo and farmerspreservation of agricultural land community economicconditions and pedestrian access (ie physical activity)

Planners and environmental scientists would as before beconcerned with biophysical health effects which havecommonly been addressed through human health riskassessments (HRAs) and ecological health risk assessments(ERAs) EPA establishes a specific methodology for assessingHRAs and ERAs risks to human health from exposure tohazardous substances and are thus narrower than HIAs Forexample laws addressing hazardous substances like motorvehicle fuel additives and pesticides or emissions of mercury ordioxin from a power plant generally require HRAs or ERAsrather than HIAs In contrast HIAs would focus increasinglyupon the more indirect health outcomes in order to determinethe health effects of a policy or activity

HIAs are just beginning to be used in connection withNEPA and NEPACEQA reviews and incorporation into

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 10: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 11

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 10

By Bill Goggin Senior Biologist EMC Planning Group

Birds of a Feather Flock TogetherThe Jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

solve an on-going maintenance problem that had become ahealth liability the prison staff proposed to construct a pavedpath between security fences so that the facilityrsquos guards couldbetter patrol this area (several of the guards had suffered turnedankles and knees because of the uneven and pot-holed groundsurface) Because the project had a potential to impact sensitivebiological resources Santa Clara County staff contracted withEMC Planning Group to assist the County with complying withthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and otherstate and federal environmental laws established to protectsensitive animals and their habitats including what is the subjectof this short article an established egret and heron rookery

During the performance of an earlier biological pre-construction survey performed by EMC Planning Group in July2010 an active rookery (a colonial breeding bird site) wasobserved within the south-central portion of the prison facilityrsquosmain courtyard The rookery is located within a cluster of denselyfoliated trees and contained approximately 50-60 nests fromthree species of birds great egret (Ardea alba) snowy egret(Egretta thula) and black-crowned night heron (Nycticorax

You can hear the sound as you approach thecourtyard of the Elmwood Correctional Facilityalthough itrsquos not exactly clear whatrsquos causing allthe commotion It starts as a low backgroundchattering and builds to a near cacophony close to

the mess hall Beyond these seemingly discordant soundseverything in the scene appears to be in order the prisonrsquosinmates going about their daily routine dressed in white- andblack-striped jumpsuits sweeping lifting weights or casuallytalking in groups while the watchful guards keep a dutiful eyeout for anything out of the ordinary All in all itrsquos just anotherordinary day at the Elmwood Correctional Facility But what iscausing all this noise you may ask yourself Finally out of ideasyou glance heavenward and thatrsquos when it hits you (no notthat) there are birds in the trees above your head manybirdshellipand they are large birds Are you puzzled Donrsquot bebecause this is the story of the jailbirds of Elmwood Prison

The Elmwood Correctional Facility is a low-security SantaClara County prison located west of Interstate 880 and north ofGreat American Parkway in Milpitas California In order to

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 11

Birds of a Feather Flock Together continued from page 10

nycticorax) The ground surface beneath these trees showedevidence of long-term site use by rookeryrsquos birds as wasdemonstrated by an accumulation of whitewash feathers andegg shell fragments

Especially unique in an urban area the Elmwood rookerysite is believed to be the only egret and heron rookery in thesouthern San Francisco Bay located within an entirely fencedanthropogenic setting and may be the only one of its kind innorthern California Colonial breeding sites are especiallyimportant when located within urbanized environments asdevelopment and land conversion often degrades orremoves available rookery habitat and asa result opportunities for colonialnesting species in urban areasare limited These sites arealso significant becausethey often support asizeable segment ofthe local populationand because theirproximity to foragingareas can reducetravel distances theymay potentially reducepredator-prey (iemortality) interactions

Because construction wasplanned during the most sensitive periodof the birds natural life history cycle the projectrsquosconstruction activities had a potential to cause detrimentalimpacts (ie elevated levels of noise dust and fumes) possiblyaffecting the birds nesting and juvenile rearing which couldhave led to fines and negative press for the County Thereforein order to protect this important resource in spring 2011 theCounty retained EMC Planning Group to monitor the rookeryduring the projectrsquos construction whenever heavy equipmentoperation would be occurring within 500 feet of the rookery

It is important to note that none of bird species living at theElmwood rookery (great egret snowy egret and night heron) arespecifically listed as threatened or endangered by the state orfederal Endangered Species Acts however the CaliforniaDepartment of Fish and Game (CDFG) considers colonialbreeding sites to be sensitive resource areas that are affordedprotection under CDFG Code during the breeding bird seasonas they can be sensitive to human intrusion and disturbance Inaddition to state regulations the protection of egrets and heronsare covered under the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act Oncenests have been constructed and eggs are present the rookerysite becomes a protected resource area and cannot be disturbedReproduction for the rookeries species generally occurs from

early April through July with the juvenile rearing periodextending into mid-September

Behavioral monitoring of the egret and heron rookeryconsisted of a qualified EMC Planning Group biologist stationedinside the facilityrsquos perimeter fence in a direct line of siteapproximately 275 feet from the rookery during constructionactivities or during operation of heavy equipment within 500feet of the rookery During construction the monitoringbiologist observed egret and heron behavior using hand heldbinoculars and a high magnification field spotting scope for signs

of stress andor agitation Notes on behavioralinteractions (ie preeninggrooming

feeding sibling competition etc)and daily counts on numbers of

individuals and juvenilespresent were recorded

C o n s t r u c t i o ncommenced on April27 and an EMCPlanning Groupbiologist conductedworker environmental

awareness trainingconcerning the presence

of the rookery and theimportance of protecting the

rookery During the projectrsquosimplementation no disturbance of the

rookery was noted and the rookeries behavior wasessentially unchanged by project activities Approximately 38adult and 23 juvenile egrets and herons were observedthroughout the construction period

By incorporating these pro-active impact minimization andspecial-status species protection measures into the projectrsquosimplementation the County as the lead agency demonstratedproper compliance with CDFG Code and CEQA law and thisimportant and sensitive resource was safeguarded frominadvertent disturbance This model of good stewardshipdemonstrates leadership on the part of the County and theyshould be commended for stepping up All land managers canlearn from this experience and should take note itrsquos alwaysbetter to err on the side of caution

EMC Planning Group wishes to thank the County of SantaClara the projectrsquos manager Ms Alicia Flynn for her support on theproject the projectrsquos contractors Granite and BCI and the entireElmwood prison facilities staff for their cooperation and supportduring the monitoring activities

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 13

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 12

By Morty Prisament MSMP AICP Strategenesis-GPC

The Planning Sustainability Health ConnectionA Glimpse at Emerging Trends

some predictions and prognostications about how we can makethe transition

Harmonic Convergence Health + SustainabilitySustainable Development is a logical contextual frame for

considering health in planning The classic definition from theBrundtland Commission is development that ldquomeets the needsof the present without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needsrdquo CEQArsquos requirement toaddress long-term versus short-term needs appears to echo theCommissionrsquos definition of sustainable development MichaelThomas Needham referred similarly to lsquoSustainableDevelopmentrsquo ldquoas the ability to meet the needs of the presentwhile contributing to the future generationsrsquo needsrdquo

Sustainable development happens at many levels fromindividual buildings and neighborhoods-green building andsustainable communities to the city and regional scale greencities sustainable bioregions etc Sustainable development alsohas multiple dimensions from design and green planning togreen infrastructure Most relevant from a planninghealthperspective is sustainable developmentrsquos focus on enhancingldquomobilityrdquo This includes community design incorporatingmixed use development in combination with transit optionsstreetscape design that enhances pedestrianbike safety(ldquocomplete streetsrdquo) and access to services and amenities Inessence an urban form characterized by mixed use andpedestrian and transit-oriented development is what makeswalking and biking more attractive as well as practical andfeasible On a regional level it embodies the ldquosmart growthrdquoprinciples of interconnected ldquowalkablerdquo and ldquobikeablerdquocommunities served by local businesses and linked to a largertransit and alternative modes network Think ldquoMillenniumParkrdquo in downtown Chicago or ldquoBell Street Parkrdquo in Seattle

The past decade has seen resurgence in not only theeconomic vitality of American cities but cityplanning And this has come about as a result ofthe sustainability movement Sustainability isproviding a framework for planners to move

beyond the traditional confines of Euclidian zoning adopting amore holistic and integrated approach to building communitiesat the human scale Sustainability initiatives have attractedbroad support because of the benefits conveyed on a number oflevels from reduction in greenhouse gases to economicdevelopment and quality-of-life However one of the mostprofound findings is the connection between ldquocommunityplanningrdquo and health In fact recent findings suggest that yourldquozip coderdquo is the single-most important determinant of an

individualrsquos health In other words how communities aredesigned can influence onersquos level of physical activity andhence health Given the prominence of the obesity epidemicand rise in chronic diseases planners will increasingly be calledupon to play a role in promoting healthy communities This willexpand the mission of planning organizations to consider thehealth implications of land-use decisions The ldquoconvergencerdquo ofplanning and health and wellness represents a significant trendand one which will set a dominant tone This article is intendedto help planners understand this emerging trend

We begin with deciphering the connection betweenplanning and health specifically the ldquofitrdquo between health andsustainability Next we look at upstream health factors Wethen discuss the ldquoculturalrdquo transition in the planning healthand social services arenas that will be necessary in order to fullyrealize the potential of health sustainability planning Wehighlight the importance of power sharing between agencies andgrassroots organizations and highlight the evolution in policyplanning and environmental analysis along with the use ofhealth impact assessments (HIAs) Finally we conclude with

ldquoSocially ldquoGreen Healthrdquo occurs at a nexus of morally-laden decisions about living inthe world as patients workers consumers and citizensrdquo

(Institute for the Future Health Horizons Program)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 13

continued on page 14

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 12

Health FactorsIncreasingly health researchers are finding that health

problems are influenced by societal policies and environmentsthat either support behaviors or fail to foster healthier choicesDr Kawachi stressed that where you live affects how you liveThere is growing consensus that major health problems will notbe solved solely by individual actions and choices By movingldquoupstreamrdquo to address causes and improving environments wherewe work learn and play we can reduce chronic illnesses DrKawachi specifically cites changes in ldquotransportation policiesand urban zoningrdquo (Physical Activity and the BuiltEnvironment What Worksrdquo Statewide Conference Sponsoredby Health by Design September 10 2007 Indianapolis IN)

Health care genetics and lifestyle changes only take us so far Ifyou want to prevent obesity you need to cure the environmentnot the individualrdquo

Dr Ichiro Kawachi delivering Keynote address at StatewidePolicy Forum on Social Determinants of Health 111306(httpbcbsmnfoundationcom objectsTier_3forum_proceedingspdf )

ldquoWe must understand that education housing transportationand community development and income policies are healthpolicies- Jan Malcolm (httpmngov health-reformimagesTask-Force-and-Work-Groups-Summary-2012-01-31pdf )

In essence it appears that health professionals areabandoning their long-held belief in the efficacy of healtheducation programs They have learned that such programsrarely lead to sustained behavioral change unless scaled up andinstituted through formal and informal PSE changes Anupstream approach might also involve measures designed toinfluence diet and nutrition such as agricultural food subsidiesand national nutrition standards If this seems out-of-bounds toyou planners out there think about the growing trend topromote local and sustainable foods through urban agricultureand farmerrsquos markets or the efforts by schools and universities tosource more sustainable food options

Cultural Transition Sustainable Development by its very nature is

interdisciplinary and in the case of health and land-use willrequire the ldquotriadrdquo of planners health and social servicesprofessionals to collaborate in developing plans and forgingstrategies This would hardly be the first time that planners haveworked with health professionals Solid waste and water qualityfacility siting as well as development review call for planners towork routinely with local health departments as well as Stateand federal agencies like Environmental Protection AgencyDepartment of Toxic Substances Control and CaliforniaDepartment of Health Services What has changed is that until

recently health issues have not been a consideration in land-usetransportation and mobility planning such as has engineeringand public service issues for example The marriage betweenplanning and public works professionals may not be perfect butthey have grown accustomed to one anotherrsquos particularproclivities Merging of health social service and planning willrequire a similar cultural transition However in this latter casethe transition may be eased given a shared vision if not missionof promoting healthy communities Human resources managersmust also be included in this conversation Recruiting trainingand retaining staff with appropriate interdisciplinary experienceis essential for capacity building and effecting organizationalchange

APArsquos Sustainable Planning Interest Group is emblematic ofthe critical mass of planning professionals that are supportingsustainability initiatives many of whom are focused on healthand mobility together with local and sustainable foods Healthmobility local foods and nutrition were recurring sustainabilitythemes dominating recent APA conferences in Boston and LosAngeles APA has also adopted policies on supportingldquoCommunity and Regional Food Systemsrdquo[httpwwwurbantilthorgwpcontentuploads200810american-planning-association-policy-guide-on-community-and-regional-food-planningpdf] While training and conferenceprograms focusing on the intersection of planning health andsustainability is available advanced or graduate-level curriculahas yet to be developed The Sustainable Urban DevelopmentReader (2ndEd 2008) (wwwroutledgegeographycom) intendedfor advanced studies in sustainable development contains onlyone paragraph on the subject of the health-sustainability link inan otherwise comprehensive text Similarly contemporary textson health policy lack any substantive discussion of thesignificance of environmental determinants as a factor inchronic disease or the connection between health andcommunity planning

Community Collaboration and Power-Sharing Concerns about sustainability have been driven to a large

degree by the public and consequently power relationshipsneed to change in order to promote community partnershipsMoreover health and social service professionals will need todevelop competencies that enable them to address issues thatoccur at the intersection of health planning and sustainabledevelopment This would require planners to understand therole of health determinants approaches to health promotionhealth policy and tools like logic mapping and health impactassessments

Because of the grassroots nature of sustainability initiativesplanners health professionals and social workers will need toplace increasing emphasis upon consensus building anddeveloping community partnerships This will also require

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 13

continued on page 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 14

planning health and social service agencies to adopt a proactiveapproach to organizational change and one that relies more on aprocess of shared learning increased openness and accessibilityand a shift in how information is acquired and communicatedThis not only involves power-sharing but further portends afundamental change in the notion of local government from onethat mandates change to one that empowers change Plannersalready have some models that embody a cooperative grassrootsapproach wherein agencies derive their power consensuallyversus coercively (wwwmpoworgelisheva_sadan_empowerment_spreads_chapter1pdf) Californiarsquos ldquocoordinated resourcemanagement and planningrdquo model is a good example of bottom-up watershed planning which emphasizes decentralized decision-making power sharing and collaboration Other examplesinclude the many successful open space and trails planning andacquisition programs spearheaded by land conservancies andconservationdeveloper partnerships local food coops and untilmore recently the many community-run recycling programs

This requires planning organizations coupled with incentivesand inducements

Policy Planning and Impact AssessmentPlanning-related health issues can be addressed through

general plan or other local policy plans or via Health ImpactAssessments (HIAs) The City of Richmond California was oneof the first cities in the country to develop a comprehensivegeneral plan element addressing the link between public healthand the built environment A number of other Cities andcounties in California have since developed health planelements Richmond a former shipbuilding hub during WorldWar II has a number of historic industrial uses and a legacy ofenvironmental contamination It is home to Chevron-RichmondRefinery General Chemical as well as a proliferation of otherport-industrial activities Naturally then RichmondrsquosCommunity Health and Wellness Element addressesenvironmental justice issues related to air pollution and waterand soil contamination The Health Element further discussespedestrian and bicyclist injuries chronic diseases and crime andviolence Richmond residents are at a higher risk than residentsin the rest of the county on many health indicators including thehighest proportion of deaths from diabetes a much higher thanaverage rate of children requiring hospitalization due to asthmaand the second highest number of hospitalizations for mentalhealth disorders and substance abuse Richmond residents arealso disproportionately affected by heart disease cancer andstroke (httpwwwhealthycommunitiesby designorg) Healthplanning elements and HIAs can also be prepared in associationwith Housing Elements and Economic Development PlansSustainability and Carbon Action Plans Alternative ModesPlans Trails and Bicycle Plans as well as Safety and EmergencyPreparedness Plans HIAs are particularly suited to addressinghealth implications of plans programs and policies(programmatic HIAs)

Health Impact Assessment is ldquoa multidisciplinary processwithin which a range of evidence about the health effects of aproposal is considered in a structured framework hellipbased on abroad model of health which proposes that economic politicalsocial psychological and environmental factors determinepopulation healthrdquo (wwwhiacollaborativeorgfaq )

HIA have also been defined as ldquohellip a systematic process thatevaluates the health impacts of a proposed policy planprogram or project The assessment helps the public anddecision-makers understand the health consequences of theproposal and make informed choices that protect and promotehealthrdquo (httpwwwhumanimpactorgcomponentjdownloadsfinish81180)

HIAs have been used as a policy analysis tool to highlighthealth impacts and can either be in the form of a highlystructured report a policy brief or issue paper or can even takethe shape of a community forum Compared to EnvironmentalImpact Assessments (EIA) there is a greater emphasis onldquointer-sectoralrdquo or interdisciplinary coordination and publicparticipation HIAs examine causal factors and pathways infour main areas including social determinants environmentalimpacts (ie air and water quality) built environment andhealth behaviors The ldquobuilt environmentrdquo has been receivingmost attention lately along with the need to promotesustainable development Consequently there is increasinginterest to using HIAs in conjunction with land-use policyplanning and EIAs Pathways could include for examplehousing land-use mix food access and security transportationinfrastructure traffic safety noise community walkability andrecreational amenities Examples of causal factors such as inthe case of a farmerrsquos market might include consumption offruits and vegetables income for vendorsrsquo and farmerspreservation of agricultural land community economicconditions and pedestrian access (ie physical activity)

Planners and environmental scientists would as before beconcerned with biophysical health effects which havecommonly been addressed through human health riskassessments (HRAs) and ecological health risk assessments(ERAs) EPA establishes a specific methodology for assessingHRAs and ERAs risks to human health from exposure tohazardous substances and are thus narrower than HIAs Forexample laws addressing hazardous substances like motorvehicle fuel additives and pesticides or emissions of mercury ordioxin from a power plant generally require HRAs or ERAsrather than HIAs In contrast HIAs would focus increasinglyupon the more indirect health outcomes in order to determinethe health effects of a policy or activity

HIAs are just beginning to be used in connection withNEPA and NEPACEQA reviews and incorporation into

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 11: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 11

Birds of a Feather Flock Together continued from page 10

nycticorax) The ground surface beneath these trees showedevidence of long-term site use by rookeryrsquos birds as wasdemonstrated by an accumulation of whitewash feathers andegg shell fragments

Especially unique in an urban area the Elmwood rookerysite is believed to be the only egret and heron rookery in thesouthern San Francisco Bay located within an entirely fencedanthropogenic setting and may be the only one of its kind innorthern California Colonial breeding sites are especiallyimportant when located within urbanized environments asdevelopment and land conversion often degrades orremoves available rookery habitat and asa result opportunities for colonialnesting species in urban areasare limited These sites arealso significant becausethey often support asizeable segment ofthe local populationand because theirproximity to foragingareas can reducetravel distances theymay potentially reducepredator-prey (iemortality) interactions

Because construction wasplanned during the most sensitive periodof the birds natural life history cycle the projectrsquosconstruction activities had a potential to cause detrimentalimpacts (ie elevated levels of noise dust and fumes) possiblyaffecting the birds nesting and juvenile rearing which couldhave led to fines and negative press for the County Thereforein order to protect this important resource in spring 2011 theCounty retained EMC Planning Group to monitor the rookeryduring the projectrsquos construction whenever heavy equipmentoperation would be occurring within 500 feet of the rookery

It is important to note that none of bird species living at theElmwood rookery (great egret snowy egret and night heron) arespecifically listed as threatened or endangered by the state orfederal Endangered Species Acts however the CaliforniaDepartment of Fish and Game (CDFG) considers colonialbreeding sites to be sensitive resource areas that are affordedprotection under CDFG Code during the breeding bird seasonas they can be sensitive to human intrusion and disturbance Inaddition to state regulations the protection of egrets and heronsare covered under the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act Oncenests have been constructed and eggs are present the rookerysite becomes a protected resource area and cannot be disturbedReproduction for the rookeries species generally occurs from

early April through July with the juvenile rearing periodextending into mid-September

Behavioral monitoring of the egret and heron rookeryconsisted of a qualified EMC Planning Group biologist stationedinside the facilityrsquos perimeter fence in a direct line of siteapproximately 275 feet from the rookery during constructionactivities or during operation of heavy equipment within 500feet of the rookery During construction the monitoringbiologist observed egret and heron behavior using hand heldbinoculars and a high magnification field spotting scope for signs

of stress andor agitation Notes on behavioralinteractions (ie preeninggrooming

feeding sibling competition etc)and daily counts on numbers of

individuals and juvenilespresent were recorded

C o n s t r u c t i o ncommenced on April27 and an EMCPlanning Groupbiologist conductedworker environmental

awareness trainingconcerning the presence

of the rookery and theimportance of protecting the

rookery During the projectrsquosimplementation no disturbance of the

rookery was noted and the rookeries behavior wasessentially unchanged by project activities Approximately 38adult and 23 juvenile egrets and herons were observedthroughout the construction period

By incorporating these pro-active impact minimization andspecial-status species protection measures into the projectrsquosimplementation the County as the lead agency demonstratedproper compliance with CDFG Code and CEQA law and thisimportant and sensitive resource was safeguarded frominadvertent disturbance This model of good stewardshipdemonstrates leadership on the part of the County and theyshould be commended for stepping up All land managers canlearn from this experience and should take note itrsquos alwaysbetter to err on the side of caution

EMC Planning Group wishes to thank the County of SantaClara the projectrsquos manager Ms Alicia Flynn for her support on theproject the projectrsquos contractors Granite and BCI and the entireElmwood prison facilities staff for their cooperation and supportduring the monitoring activities

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 13

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 12

By Morty Prisament MSMP AICP Strategenesis-GPC

The Planning Sustainability Health ConnectionA Glimpse at Emerging Trends

some predictions and prognostications about how we can makethe transition

Harmonic Convergence Health + SustainabilitySustainable Development is a logical contextual frame for

considering health in planning The classic definition from theBrundtland Commission is development that ldquomeets the needsof the present without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needsrdquo CEQArsquos requirement toaddress long-term versus short-term needs appears to echo theCommissionrsquos definition of sustainable development MichaelThomas Needham referred similarly to lsquoSustainableDevelopmentrsquo ldquoas the ability to meet the needs of the presentwhile contributing to the future generationsrsquo needsrdquo

Sustainable development happens at many levels fromindividual buildings and neighborhoods-green building andsustainable communities to the city and regional scale greencities sustainable bioregions etc Sustainable development alsohas multiple dimensions from design and green planning togreen infrastructure Most relevant from a planninghealthperspective is sustainable developmentrsquos focus on enhancingldquomobilityrdquo This includes community design incorporatingmixed use development in combination with transit optionsstreetscape design that enhances pedestrianbike safety(ldquocomplete streetsrdquo) and access to services and amenities Inessence an urban form characterized by mixed use andpedestrian and transit-oriented development is what makeswalking and biking more attractive as well as practical andfeasible On a regional level it embodies the ldquosmart growthrdquoprinciples of interconnected ldquowalkablerdquo and ldquobikeablerdquocommunities served by local businesses and linked to a largertransit and alternative modes network Think ldquoMillenniumParkrdquo in downtown Chicago or ldquoBell Street Parkrdquo in Seattle

The past decade has seen resurgence in not only theeconomic vitality of American cities but cityplanning And this has come about as a result ofthe sustainability movement Sustainability isproviding a framework for planners to move

beyond the traditional confines of Euclidian zoning adopting amore holistic and integrated approach to building communitiesat the human scale Sustainability initiatives have attractedbroad support because of the benefits conveyed on a number oflevels from reduction in greenhouse gases to economicdevelopment and quality-of-life However one of the mostprofound findings is the connection between ldquocommunityplanningrdquo and health In fact recent findings suggest that yourldquozip coderdquo is the single-most important determinant of an

individualrsquos health In other words how communities aredesigned can influence onersquos level of physical activity andhence health Given the prominence of the obesity epidemicand rise in chronic diseases planners will increasingly be calledupon to play a role in promoting healthy communities This willexpand the mission of planning organizations to consider thehealth implications of land-use decisions The ldquoconvergencerdquo ofplanning and health and wellness represents a significant trendand one which will set a dominant tone This article is intendedto help planners understand this emerging trend

We begin with deciphering the connection betweenplanning and health specifically the ldquofitrdquo between health andsustainability Next we look at upstream health factors Wethen discuss the ldquoculturalrdquo transition in the planning healthand social services arenas that will be necessary in order to fullyrealize the potential of health sustainability planning Wehighlight the importance of power sharing between agencies andgrassroots organizations and highlight the evolution in policyplanning and environmental analysis along with the use ofhealth impact assessments (HIAs) Finally we conclude with

ldquoSocially ldquoGreen Healthrdquo occurs at a nexus of morally-laden decisions about living inthe world as patients workers consumers and citizensrdquo

(Institute for the Future Health Horizons Program)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 13

continued on page 14

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 12

Health FactorsIncreasingly health researchers are finding that health

problems are influenced by societal policies and environmentsthat either support behaviors or fail to foster healthier choicesDr Kawachi stressed that where you live affects how you liveThere is growing consensus that major health problems will notbe solved solely by individual actions and choices By movingldquoupstreamrdquo to address causes and improving environments wherewe work learn and play we can reduce chronic illnesses DrKawachi specifically cites changes in ldquotransportation policiesand urban zoningrdquo (Physical Activity and the BuiltEnvironment What Worksrdquo Statewide Conference Sponsoredby Health by Design September 10 2007 Indianapolis IN)

Health care genetics and lifestyle changes only take us so far Ifyou want to prevent obesity you need to cure the environmentnot the individualrdquo

Dr Ichiro Kawachi delivering Keynote address at StatewidePolicy Forum on Social Determinants of Health 111306(httpbcbsmnfoundationcom objectsTier_3forum_proceedingspdf )

ldquoWe must understand that education housing transportationand community development and income policies are healthpolicies- Jan Malcolm (httpmngov health-reformimagesTask-Force-and-Work-Groups-Summary-2012-01-31pdf )

In essence it appears that health professionals areabandoning their long-held belief in the efficacy of healtheducation programs They have learned that such programsrarely lead to sustained behavioral change unless scaled up andinstituted through formal and informal PSE changes Anupstream approach might also involve measures designed toinfluence diet and nutrition such as agricultural food subsidiesand national nutrition standards If this seems out-of-bounds toyou planners out there think about the growing trend topromote local and sustainable foods through urban agricultureand farmerrsquos markets or the efforts by schools and universities tosource more sustainable food options

Cultural Transition Sustainable Development by its very nature is

interdisciplinary and in the case of health and land-use willrequire the ldquotriadrdquo of planners health and social servicesprofessionals to collaborate in developing plans and forgingstrategies This would hardly be the first time that planners haveworked with health professionals Solid waste and water qualityfacility siting as well as development review call for planners towork routinely with local health departments as well as Stateand federal agencies like Environmental Protection AgencyDepartment of Toxic Substances Control and CaliforniaDepartment of Health Services What has changed is that until

recently health issues have not been a consideration in land-usetransportation and mobility planning such as has engineeringand public service issues for example The marriage betweenplanning and public works professionals may not be perfect butthey have grown accustomed to one anotherrsquos particularproclivities Merging of health social service and planning willrequire a similar cultural transition However in this latter casethe transition may be eased given a shared vision if not missionof promoting healthy communities Human resources managersmust also be included in this conversation Recruiting trainingand retaining staff with appropriate interdisciplinary experienceis essential for capacity building and effecting organizationalchange

APArsquos Sustainable Planning Interest Group is emblematic ofthe critical mass of planning professionals that are supportingsustainability initiatives many of whom are focused on healthand mobility together with local and sustainable foods Healthmobility local foods and nutrition were recurring sustainabilitythemes dominating recent APA conferences in Boston and LosAngeles APA has also adopted policies on supportingldquoCommunity and Regional Food Systemsrdquo[httpwwwurbantilthorgwpcontentuploads200810american-planning-association-policy-guide-on-community-and-regional-food-planningpdf] While training and conferenceprograms focusing on the intersection of planning health andsustainability is available advanced or graduate-level curriculahas yet to be developed The Sustainable Urban DevelopmentReader (2ndEd 2008) (wwwroutledgegeographycom) intendedfor advanced studies in sustainable development contains onlyone paragraph on the subject of the health-sustainability link inan otherwise comprehensive text Similarly contemporary textson health policy lack any substantive discussion of thesignificance of environmental determinants as a factor inchronic disease or the connection between health andcommunity planning

Community Collaboration and Power-Sharing Concerns about sustainability have been driven to a large

degree by the public and consequently power relationshipsneed to change in order to promote community partnershipsMoreover health and social service professionals will need todevelop competencies that enable them to address issues thatoccur at the intersection of health planning and sustainabledevelopment This would require planners to understand therole of health determinants approaches to health promotionhealth policy and tools like logic mapping and health impactassessments

Because of the grassroots nature of sustainability initiativesplanners health professionals and social workers will need toplace increasing emphasis upon consensus building anddeveloping community partnerships This will also require

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 13

continued on page 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 14

planning health and social service agencies to adopt a proactiveapproach to organizational change and one that relies more on aprocess of shared learning increased openness and accessibilityand a shift in how information is acquired and communicatedThis not only involves power-sharing but further portends afundamental change in the notion of local government from onethat mandates change to one that empowers change Plannersalready have some models that embody a cooperative grassrootsapproach wherein agencies derive their power consensuallyversus coercively (wwwmpoworgelisheva_sadan_empowerment_spreads_chapter1pdf) Californiarsquos ldquocoordinated resourcemanagement and planningrdquo model is a good example of bottom-up watershed planning which emphasizes decentralized decision-making power sharing and collaboration Other examplesinclude the many successful open space and trails planning andacquisition programs spearheaded by land conservancies andconservationdeveloper partnerships local food coops and untilmore recently the many community-run recycling programs

This requires planning organizations coupled with incentivesand inducements

Policy Planning and Impact AssessmentPlanning-related health issues can be addressed through

general plan or other local policy plans or via Health ImpactAssessments (HIAs) The City of Richmond California was oneof the first cities in the country to develop a comprehensivegeneral plan element addressing the link between public healthand the built environment A number of other Cities andcounties in California have since developed health planelements Richmond a former shipbuilding hub during WorldWar II has a number of historic industrial uses and a legacy ofenvironmental contamination It is home to Chevron-RichmondRefinery General Chemical as well as a proliferation of otherport-industrial activities Naturally then RichmondrsquosCommunity Health and Wellness Element addressesenvironmental justice issues related to air pollution and waterand soil contamination The Health Element further discussespedestrian and bicyclist injuries chronic diseases and crime andviolence Richmond residents are at a higher risk than residentsin the rest of the county on many health indicators including thehighest proportion of deaths from diabetes a much higher thanaverage rate of children requiring hospitalization due to asthmaand the second highest number of hospitalizations for mentalhealth disorders and substance abuse Richmond residents arealso disproportionately affected by heart disease cancer andstroke (httpwwwhealthycommunitiesby designorg) Healthplanning elements and HIAs can also be prepared in associationwith Housing Elements and Economic Development PlansSustainability and Carbon Action Plans Alternative ModesPlans Trails and Bicycle Plans as well as Safety and EmergencyPreparedness Plans HIAs are particularly suited to addressinghealth implications of plans programs and policies(programmatic HIAs)

Health Impact Assessment is ldquoa multidisciplinary processwithin which a range of evidence about the health effects of aproposal is considered in a structured framework hellipbased on abroad model of health which proposes that economic politicalsocial psychological and environmental factors determinepopulation healthrdquo (wwwhiacollaborativeorgfaq )

HIA have also been defined as ldquohellip a systematic process thatevaluates the health impacts of a proposed policy planprogram or project The assessment helps the public anddecision-makers understand the health consequences of theproposal and make informed choices that protect and promotehealthrdquo (httpwwwhumanimpactorgcomponentjdownloadsfinish81180)

HIAs have been used as a policy analysis tool to highlighthealth impacts and can either be in the form of a highlystructured report a policy brief or issue paper or can even takethe shape of a community forum Compared to EnvironmentalImpact Assessments (EIA) there is a greater emphasis onldquointer-sectoralrdquo or interdisciplinary coordination and publicparticipation HIAs examine causal factors and pathways infour main areas including social determinants environmentalimpacts (ie air and water quality) built environment andhealth behaviors The ldquobuilt environmentrdquo has been receivingmost attention lately along with the need to promotesustainable development Consequently there is increasinginterest to using HIAs in conjunction with land-use policyplanning and EIAs Pathways could include for examplehousing land-use mix food access and security transportationinfrastructure traffic safety noise community walkability andrecreational amenities Examples of causal factors such as inthe case of a farmerrsquos market might include consumption offruits and vegetables income for vendorsrsquo and farmerspreservation of agricultural land community economicconditions and pedestrian access (ie physical activity)

Planners and environmental scientists would as before beconcerned with biophysical health effects which havecommonly been addressed through human health riskassessments (HRAs) and ecological health risk assessments(ERAs) EPA establishes a specific methodology for assessingHRAs and ERAs risks to human health from exposure tohazardous substances and are thus narrower than HIAs Forexample laws addressing hazardous substances like motorvehicle fuel additives and pesticides or emissions of mercury ordioxin from a power plant generally require HRAs or ERAsrather than HIAs In contrast HIAs would focus increasinglyupon the more indirect health outcomes in order to determinethe health effects of a policy or activity

HIAs are just beginning to be used in connection withNEPA and NEPACEQA reviews and incorporation into

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 12: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 13

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 12

By Morty Prisament MSMP AICP Strategenesis-GPC

The Planning Sustainability Health ConnectionA Glimpse at Emerging Trends

some predictions and prognostications about how we can makethe transition

Harmonic Convergence Health + SustainabilitySustainable Development is a logical contextual frame for

considering health in planning The classic definition from theBrundtland Commission is development that ldquomeets the needsof the present without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needsrdquo CEQArsquos requirement toaddress long-term versus short-term needs appears to echo theCommissionrsquos definition of sustainable development MichaelThomas Needham referred similarly to lsquoSustainableDevelopmentrsquo ldquoas the ability to meet the needs of the presentwhile contributing to the future generationsrsquo needsrdquo

Sustainable development happens at many levels fromindividual buildings and neighborhoods-green building andsustainable communities to the city and regional scale greencities sustainable bioregions etc Sustainable development alsohas multiple dimensions from design and green planning togreen infrastructure Most relevant from a planninghealthperspective is sustainable developmentrsquos focus on enhancingldquomobilityrdquo This includes community design incorporatingmixed use development in combination with transit optionsstreetscape design that enhances pedestrianbike safety(ldquocomplete streetsrdquo) and access to services and amenities Inessence an urban form characterized by mixed use andpedestrian and transit-oriented development is what makeswalking and biking more attractive as well as practical andfeasible On a regional level it embodies the ldquosmart growthrdquoprinciples of interconnected ldquowalkablerdquo and ldquobikeablerdquocommunities served by local businesses and linked to a largertransit and alternative modes network Think ldquoMillenniumParkrdquo in downtown Chicago or ldquoBell Street Parkrdquo in Seattle

The past decade has seen resurgence in not only theeconomic vitality of American cities but cityplanning And this has come about as a result ofthe sustainability movement Sustainability isproviding a framework for planners to move

beyond the traditional confines of Euclidian zoning adopting amore holistic and integrated approach to building communitiesat the human scale Sustainability initiatives have attractedbroad support because of the benefits conveyed on a number oflevels from reduction in greenhouse gases to economicdevelopment and quality-of-life However one of the mostprofound findings is the connection between ldquocommunityplanningrdquo and health In fact recent findings suggest that yourldquozip coderdquo is the single-most important determinant of an

individualrsquos health In other words how communities aredesigned can influence onersquos level of physical activity andhence health Given the prominence of the obesity epidemicand rise in chronic diseases planners will increasingly be calledupon to play a role in promoting healthy communities This willexpand the mission of planning organizations to consider thehealth implications of land-use decisions The ldquoconvergencerdquo ofplanning and health and wellness represents a significant trendand one which will set a dominant tone This article is intendedto help planners understand this emerging trend

We begin with deciphering the connection betweenplanning and health specifically the ldquofitrdquo between health andsustainability Next we look at upstream health factors Wethen discuss the ldquoculturalrdquo transition in the planning healthand social services arenas that will be necessary in order to fullyrealize the potential of health sustainability planning Wehighlight the importance of power sharing between agencies andgrassroots organizations and highlight the evolution in policyplanning and environmental analysis along with the use ofhealth impact assessments (HIAs) Finally we conclude with

ldquoSocially ldquoGreen Healthrdquo occurs at a nexus of morally-laden decisions about living inthe world as patients workers consumers and citizensrdquo

(Institute for the Future Health Horizons Program)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 13

continued on page 14

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 12

Health FactorsIncreasingly health researchers are finding that health

problems are influenced by societal policies and environmentsthat either support behaviors or fail to foster healthier choicesDr Kawachi stressed that where you live affects how you liveThere is growing consensus that major health problems will notbe solved solely by individual actions and choices By movingldquoupstreamrdquo to address causes and improving environments wherewe work learn and play we can reduce chronic illnesses DrKawachi specifically cites changes in ldquotransportation policiesand urban zoningrdquo (Physical Activity and the BuiltEnvironment What Worksrdquo Statewide Conference Sponsoredby Health by Design September 10 2007 Indianapolis IN)

Health care genetics and lifestyle changes only take us so far Ifyou want to prevent obesity you need to cure the environmentnot the individualrdquo

Dr Ichiro Kawachi delivering Keynote address at StatewidePolicy Forum on Social Determinants of Health 111306(httpbcbsmnfoundationcom objectsTier_3forum_proceedingspdf )

ldquoWe must understand that education housing transportationand community development and income policies are healthpolicies- Jan Malcolm (httpmngov health-reformimagesTask-Force-and-Work-Groups-Summary-2012-01-31pdf )

In essence it appears that health professionals areabandoning their long-held belief in the efficacy of healtheducation programs They have learned that such programsrarely lead to sustained behavioral change unless scaled up andinstituted through formal and informal PSE changes Anupstream approach might also involve measures designed toinfluence diet and nutrition such as agricultural food subsidiesand national nutrition standards If this seems out-of-bounds toyou planners out there think about the growing trend topromote local and sustainable foods through urban agricultureand farmerrsquos markets or the efforts by schools and universities tosource more sustainable food options

Cultural Transition Sustainable Development by its very nature is

interdisciplinary and in the case of health and land-use willrequire the ldquotriadrdquo of planners health and social servicesprofessionals to collaborate in developing plans and forgingstrategies This would hardly be the first time that planners haveworked with health professionals Solid waste and water qualityfacility siting as well as development review call for planners towork routinely with local health departments as well as Stateand federal agencies like Environmental Protection AgencyDepartment of Toxic Substances Control and CaliforniaDepartment of Health Services What has changed is that until

recently health issues have not been a consideration in land-usetransportation and mobility planning such as has engineeringand public service issues for example The marriage betweenplanning and public works professionals may not be perfect butthey have grown accustomed to one anotherrsquos particularproclivities Merging of health social service and planning willrequire a similar cultural transition However in this latter casethe transition may be eased given a shared vision if not missionof promoting healthy communities Human resources managersmust also be included in this conversation Recruiting trainingand retaining staff with appropriate interdisciplinary experienceis essential for capacity building and effecting organizationalchange

APArsquos Sustainable Planning Interest Group is emblematic ofthe critical mass of planning professionals that are supportingsustainability initiatives many of whom are focused on healthand mobility together with local and sustainable foods Healthmobility local foods and nutrition were recurring sustainabilitythemes dominating recent APA conferences in Boston and LosAngeles APA has also adopted policies on supportingldquoCommunity and Regional Food Systemsrdquo[httpwwwurbantilthorgwpcontentuploads200810american-planning-association-policy-guide-on-community-and-regional-food-planningpdf] While training and conferenceprograms focusing on the intersection of planning health andsustainability is available advanced or graduate-level curriculahas yet to be developed The Sustainable Urban DevelopmentReader (2ndEd 2008) (wwwroutledgegeographycom) intendedfor advanced studies in sustainable development contains onlyone paragraph on the subject of the health-sustainability link inan otherwise comprehensive text Similarly contemporary textson health policy lack any substantive discussion of thesignificance of environmental determinants as a factor inchronic disease or the connection between health andcommunity planning

Community Collaboration and Power-Sharing Concerns about sustainability have been driven to a large

degree by the public and consequently power relationshipsneed to change in order to promote community partnershipsMoreover health and social service professionals will need todevelop competencies that enable them to address issues thatoccur at the intersection of health planning and sustainabledevelopment This would require planners to understand therole of health determinants approaches to health promotionhealth policy and tools like logic mapping and health impactassessments

Because of the grassroots nature of sustainability initiativesplanners health professionals and social workers will need toplace increasing emphasis upon consensus building anddeveloping community partnerships This will also require

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 13

continued on page 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 14

planning health and social service agencies to adopt a proactiveapproach to organizational change and one that relies more on aprocess of shared learning increased openness and accessibilityand a shift in how information is acquired and communicatedThis not only involves power-sharing but further portends afundamental change in the notion of local government from onethat mandates change to one that empowers change Plannersalready have some models that embody a cooperative grassrootsapproach wherein agencies derive their power consensuallyversus coercively (wwwmpoworgelisheva_sadan_empowerment_spreads_chapter1pdf) Californiarsquos ldquocoordinated resourcemanagement and planningrdquo model is a good example of bottom-up watershed planning which emphasizes decentralized decision-making power sharing and collaboration Other examplesinclude the many successful open space and trails planning andacquisition programs spearheaded by land conservancies andconservationdeveloper partnerships local food coops and untilmore recently the many community-run recycling programs

This requires planning organizations coupled with incentivesand inducements

Policy Planning and Impact AssessmentPlanning-related health issues can be addressed through

general plan or other local policy plans or via Health ImpactAssessments (HIAs) The City of Richmond California was oneof the first cities in the country to develop a comprehensivegeneral plan element addressing the link between public healthand the built environment A number of other Cities andcounties in California have since developed health planelements Richmond a former shipbuilding hub during WorldWar II has a number of historic industrial uses and a legacy ofenvironmental contamination It is home to Chevron-RichmondRefinery General Chemical as well as a proliferation of otherport-industrial activities Naturally then RichmondrsquosCommunity Health and Wellness Element addressesenvironmental justice issues related to air pollution and waterand soil contamination The Health Element further discussespedestrian and bicyclist injuries chronic diseases and crime andviolence Richmond residents are at a higher risk than residentsin the rest of the county on many health indicators including thehighest proportion of deaths from diabetes a much higher thanaverage rate of children requiring hospitalization due to asthmaand the second highest number of hospitalizations for mentalhealth disorders and substance abuse Richmond residents arealso disproportionately affected by heart disease cancer andstroke (httpwwwhealthycommunitiesby designorg) Healthplanning elements and HIAs can also be prepared in associationwith Housing Elements and Economic Development PlansSustainability and Carbon Action Plans Alternative ModesPlans Trails and Bicycle Plans as well as Safety and EmergencyPreparedness Plans HIAs are particularly suited to addressinghealth implications of plans programs and policies(programmatic HIAs)

Health Impact Assessment is ldquoa multidisciplinary processwithin which a range of evidence about the health effects of aproposal is considered in a structured framework hellipbased on abroad model of health which proposes that economic politicalsocial psychological and environmental factors determinepopulation healthrdquo (wwwhiacollaborativeorgfaq )

HIA have also been defined as ldquohellip a systematic process thatevaluates the health impacts of a proposed policy planprogram or project The assessment helps the public anddecision-makers understand the health consequences of theproposal and make informed choices that protect and promotehealthrdquo (httpwwwhumanimpactorgcomponentjdownloadsfinish81180)

HIAs have been used as a policy analysis tool to highlighthealth impacts and can either be in the form of a highlystructured report a policy brief or issue paper or can even takethe shape of a community forum Compared to EnvironmentalImpact Assessments (EIA) there is a greater emphasis onldquointer-sectoralrdquo or interdisciplinary coordination and publicparticipation HIAs examine causal factors and pathways infour main areas including social determinants environmentalimpacts (ie air and water quality) built environment andhealth behaviors The ldquobuilt environmentrdquo has been receivingmost attention lately along with the need to promotesustainable development Consequently there is increasinginterest to using HIAs in conjunction with land-use policyplanning and EIAs Pathways could include for examplehousing land-use mix food access and security transportationinfrastructure traffic safety noise community walkability andrecreational amenities Examples of causal factors such as inthe case of a farmerrsquos market might include consumption offruits and vegetables income for vendorsrsquo and farmerspreservation of agricultural land community economicconditions and pedestrian access (ie physical activity)

Planners and environmental scientists would as before beconcerned with biophysical health effects which havecommonly been addressed through human health riskassessments (HRAs) and ecological health risk assessments(ERAs) EPA establishes a specific methodology for assessingHRAs and ERAs risks to human health from exposure tohazardous substances and are thus narrower than HIAs Forexample laws addressing hazardous substances like motorvehicle fuel additives and pesticides or emissions of mercury ordioxin from a power plant generally require HRAs or ERAsrather than HIAs In contrast HIAs would focus increasinglyupon the more indirect health outcomes in order to determinethe health effects of a policy or activity

HIAs are just beginning to be used in connection withNEPA and NEPACEQA reviews and incorporation into

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 13: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 13

continued on page 14

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 12

Health FactorsIncreasingly health researchers are finding that health

problems are influenced by societal policies and environmentsthat either support behaviors or fail to foster healthier choicesDr Kawachi stressed that where you live affects how you liveThere is growing consensus that major health problems will notbe solved solely by individual actions and choices By movingldquoupstreamrdquo to address causes and improving environments wherewe work learn and play we can reduce chronic illnesses DrKawachi specifically cites changes in ldquotransportation policiesand urban zoningrdquo (Physical Activity and the BuiltEnvironment What Worksrdquo Statewide Conference Sponsoredby Health by Design September 10 2007 Indianapolis IN)

Health care genetics and lifestyle changes only take us so far Ifyou want to prevent obesity you need to cure the environmentnot the individualrdquo

Dr Ichiro Kawachi delivering Keynote address at StatewidePolicy Forum on Social Determinants of Health 111306(httpbcbsmnfoundationcom objectsTier_3forum_proceedingspdf )

ldquoWe must understand that education housing transportationand community development and income policies are healthpolicies- Jan Malcolm (httpmngov health-reformimagesTask-Force-and-Work-Groups-Summary-2012-01-31pdf )

In essence it appears that health professionals areabandoning their long-held belief in the efficacy of healtheducation programs They have learned that such programsrarely lead to sustained behavioral change unless scaled up andinstituted through formal and informal PSE changes Anupstream approach might also involve measures designed toinfluence diet and nutrition such as agricultural food subsidiesand national nutrition standards If this seems out-of-bounds toyou planners out there think about the growing trend topromote local and sustainable foods through urban agricultureand farmerrsquos markets or the efforts by schools and universities tosource more sustainable food options

Cultural Transition Sustainable Development by its very nature is

interdisciplinary and in the case of health and land-use willrequire the ldquotriadrdquo of planners health and social servicesprofessionals to collaborate in developing plans and forgingstrategies This would hardly be the first time that planners haveworked with health professionals Solid waste and water qualityfacility siting as well as development review call for planners towork routinely with local health departments as well as Stateand federal agencies like Environmental Protection AgencyDepartment of Toxic Substances Control and CaliforniaDepartment of Health Services What has changed is that until

recently health issues have not been a consideration in land-usetransportation and mobility planning such as has engineeringand public service issues for example The marriage betweenplanning and public works professionals may not be perfect butthey have grown accustomed to one anotherrsquos particularproclivities Merging of health social service and planning willrequire a similar cultural transition However in this latter casethe transition may be eased given a shared vision if not missionof promoting healthy communities Human resources managersmust also be included in this conversation Recruiting trainingand retaining staff with appropriate interdisciplinary experienceis essential for capacity building and effecting organizationalchange

APArsquos Sustainable Planning Interest Group is emblematic ofthe critical mass of planning professionals that are supportingsustainability initiatives many of whom are focused on healthand mobility together with local and sustainable foods Healthmobility local foods and nutrition were recurring sustainabilitythemes dominating recent APA conferences in Boston and LosAngeles APA has also adopted policies on supportingldquoCommunity and Regional Food Systemsrdquo[httpwwwurbantilthorgwpcontentuploads200810american-planning-association-policy-guide-on-community-and-regional-food-planningpdf] While training and conferenceprograms focusing on the intersection of planning health andsustainability is available advanced or graduate-level curriculahas yet to be developed The Sustainable Urban DevelopmentReader (2ndEd 2008) (wwwroutledgegeographycom) intendedfor advanced studies in sustainable development contains onlyone paragraph on the subject of the health-sustainability link inan otherwise comprehensive text Similarly contemporary textson health policy lack any substantive discussion of thesignificance of environmental determinants as a factor inchronic disease or the connection between health andcommunity planning

Community Collaboration and Power-Sharing Concerns about sustainability have been driven to a large

degree by the public and consequently power relationshipsneed to change in order to promote community partnershipsMoreover health and social service professionals will need todevelop competencies that enable them to address issues thatoccur at the intersection of health planning and sustainabledevelopment This would require planners to understand therole of health determinants approaches to health promotionhealth policy and tools like logic mapping and health impactassessments

Because of the grassroots nature of sustainability initiativesplanners health professionals and social workers will need toplace increasing emphasis upon consensus building anddeveloping community partnerships This will also require

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 13

continued on page 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 14

planning health and social service agencies to adopt a proactiveapproach to organizational change and one that relies more on aprocess of shared learning increased openness and accessibilityand a shift in how information is acquired and communicatedThis not only involves power-sharing but further portends afundamental change in the notion of local government from onethat mandates change to one that empowers change Plannersalready have some models that embody a cooperative grassrootsapproach wherein agencies derive their power consensuallyversus coercively (wwwmpoworgelisheva_sadan_empowerment_spreads_chapter1pdf) Californiarsquos ldquocoordinated resourcemanagement and planningrdquo model is a good example of bottom-up watershed planning which emphasizes decentralized decision-making power sharing and collaboration Other examplesinclude the many successful open space and trails planning andacquisition programs spearheaded by land conservancies andconservationdeveloper partnerships local food coops and untilmore recently the many community-run recycling programs

This requires planning organizations coupled with incentivesand inducements

Policy Planning and Impact AssessmentPlanning-related health issues can be addressed through

general plan or other local policy plans or via Health ImpactAssessments (HIAs) The City of Richmond California was oneof the first cities in the country to develop a comprehensivegeneral plan element addressing the link between public healthand the built environment A number of other Cities andcounties in California have since developed health planelements Richmond a former shipbuilding hub during WorldWar II has a number of historic industrial uses and a legacy ofenvironmental contamination It is home to Chevron-RichmondRefinery General Chemical as well as a proliferation of otherport-industrial activities Naturally then RichmondrsquosCommunity Health and Wellness Element addressesenvironmental justice issues related to air pollution and waterand soil contamination The Health Element further discussespedestrian and bicyclist injuries chronic diseases and crime andviolence Richmond residents are at a higher risk than residentsin the rest of the county on many health indicators including thehighest proportion of deaths from diabetes a much higher thanaverage rate of children requiring hospitalization due to asthmaand the second highest number of hospitalizations for mentalhealth disorders and substance abuse Richmond residents arealso disproportionately affected by heart disease cancer andstroke (httpwwwhealthycommunitiesby designorg) Healthplanning elements and HIAs can also be prepared in associationwith Housing Elements and Economic Development PlansSustainability and Carbon Action Plans Alternative ModesPlans Trails and Bicycle Plans as well as Safety and EmergencyPreparedness Plans HIAs are particularly suited to addressinghealth implications of plans programs and policies(programmatic HIAs)

Health Impact Assessment is ldquoa multidisciplinary processwithin which a range of evidence about the health effects of aproposal is considered in a structured framework hellipbased on abroad model of health which proposes that economic politicalsocial psychological and environmental factors determinepopulation healthrdquo (wwwhiacollaborativeorgfaq )

HIA have also been defined as ldquohellip a systematic process thatevaluates the health impacts of a proposed policy planprogram or project The assessment helps the public anddecision-makers understand the health consequences of theproposal and make informed choices that protect and promotehealthrdquo (httpwwwhumanimpactorgcomponentjdownloadsfinish81180)

HIAs have been used as a policy analysis tool to highlighthealth impacts and can either be in the form of a highlystructured report a policy brief or issue paper or can even takethe shape of a community forum Compared to EnvironmentalImpact Assessments (EIA) there is a greater emphasis onldquointer-sectoralrdquo or interdisciplinary coordination and publicparticipation HIAs examine causal factors and pathways infour main areas including social determinants environmentalimpacts (ie air and water quality) built environment andhealth behaviors The ldquobuilt environmentrdquo has been receivingmost attention lately along with the need to promotesustainable development Consequently there is increasinginterest to using HIAs in conjunction with land-use policyplanning and EIAs Pathways could include for examplehousing land-use mix food access and security transportationinfrastructure traffic safety noise community walkability andrecreational amenities Examples of causal factors such as inthe case of a farmerrsquos market might include consumption offruits and vegetables income for vendorsrsquo and farmerspreservation of agricultural land community economicconditions and pedestrian access (ie physical activity)

Planners and environmental scientists would as before beconcerned with biophysical health effects which havecommonly been addressed through human health riskassessments (HRAs) and ecological health risk assessments(ERAs) EPA establishes a specific methodology for assessingHRAs and ERAs risks to human health from exposure tohazardous substances and are thus narrower than HIAs Forexample laws addressing hazardous substances like motorvehicle fuel additives and pesticides or emissions of mercury ordioxin from a power plant generally require HRAs or ERAsrather than HIAs In contrast HIAs would focus increasinglyupon the more indirect health outcomes in order to determinethe health effects of a policy or activity

HIAs are just beginning to be used in connection withNEPA and NEPACEQA reviews and incorporation into

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 14: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 13

continued on page 15

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 14

planning health and social service agencies to adopt a proactiveapproach to organizational change and one that relies more on aprocess of shared learning increased openness and accessibilityand a shift in how information is acquired and communicatedThis not only involves power-sharing but further portends afundamental change in the notion of local government from onethat mandates change to one that empowers change Plannersalready have some models that embody a cooperative grassrootsapproach wherein agencies derive their power consensuallyversus coercively (wwwmpoworgelisheva_sadan_empowerment_spreads_chapter1pdf) Californiarsquos ldquocoordinated resourcemanagement and planningrdquo model is a good example of bottom-up watershed planning which emphasizes decentralized decision-making power sharing and collaboration Other examplesinclude the many successful open space and trails planning andacquisition programs spearheaded by land conservancies andconservationdeveloper partnerships local food coops and untilmore recently the many community-run recycling programs

This requires planning organizations coupled with incentivesand inducements

Policy Planning and Impact AssessmentPlanning-related health issues can be addressed through

general plan or other local policy plans or via Health ImpactAssessments (HIAs) The City of Richmond California was oneof the first cities in the country to develop a comprehensivegeneral plan element addressing the link between public healthand the built environment A number of other Cities andcounties in California have since developed health planelements Richmond a former shipbuilding hub during WorldWar II has a number of historic industrial uses and a legacy ofenvironmental contamination It is home to Chevron-RichmondRefinery General Chemical as well as a proliferation of otherport-industrial activities Naturally then RichmondrsquosCommunity Health and Wellness Element addressesenvironmental justice issues related to air pollution and waterand soil contamination The Health Element further discussespedestrian and bicyclist injuries chronic diseases and crime andviolence Richmond residents are at a higher risk than residentsin the rest of the county on many health indicators including thehighest proportion of deaths from diabetes a much higher thanaverage rate of children requiring hospitalization due to asthmaand the second highest number of hospitalizations for mentalhealth disorders and substance abuse Richmond residents arealso disproportionately affected by heart disease cancer andstroke (httpwwwhealthycommunitiesby designorg) Healthplanning elements and HIAs can also be prepared in associationwith Housing Elements and Economic Development PlansSustainability and Carbon Action Plans Alternative ModesPlans Trails and Bicycle Plans as well as Safety and EmergencyPreparedness Plans HIAs are particularly suited to addressinghealth implications of plans programs and policies(programmatic HIAs)

Health Impact Assessment is ldquoa multidisciplinary processwithin which a range of evidence about the health effects of aproposal is considered in a structured framework hellipbased on abroad model of health which proposes that economic politicalsocial psychological and environmental factors determinepopulation healthrdquo (wwwhiacollaborativeorgfaq )

HIA have also been defined as ldquohellip a systematic process thatevaluates the health impacts of a proposed policy planprogram or project The assessment helps the public anddecision-makers understand the health consequences of theproposal and make informed choices that protect and promotehealthrdquo (httpwwwhumanimpactorgcomponentjdownloadsfinish81180)

HIAs have been used as a policy analysis tool to highlighthealth impacts and can either be in the form of a highlystructured report a policy brief or issue paper or can even takethe shape of a community forum Compared to EnvironmentalImpact Assessments (EIA) there is a greater emphasis onldquointer-sectoralrdquo or interdisciplinary coordination and publicparticipation HIAs examine causal factors and pathways infour main areas including social determinants environmentalimpacts (ie air and water quality) built environment andhealth behaviors The ldquobuilt environmentrdquo has been receivingmost attention lately along with the need to promotesustainable development Consequently there is increasinginterest to using HIAs in conjunction with land-use policyplanning and EIAs Pathways could include for examplehousing land-use mix food access and security transportationinfrastructure traffic safety noise community walkability andrecreational amenities Examples of causal factors such as inthe case of a farmerrsquos market might include consumption offruits and vegetables income for vendorsrsquo and farmerspreservation of agricultural land community economicconditions and pedestrian access (ie physical activity)

Planners and environmental scientists would as before beconcerned with biophysical health effects which havecommonly been addressed through human health riskassessments (HRAs) and ecological health risk assessments(ERAs) EPA establishes a specific methodology for assessingHRAs and ERAs risks to human health from exposure tohazardous substances and are thus narrower than HIAs Forexample laws addressing hazardous substances like motorvehicle fuel additives and pesticides or emissions of mercury ordioxin from a power plant generally require HRAs or ERAsrather than HIAs In contrast HIAs would focus increasinglyupon the more indirect health outcomes in order to determinethe health effects of a policy or activity

HIAs are just beginning to be used in connection withNEPA and NEPACEQA reviews and incorporation into

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 15: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 15

The Planning Sustainability Health Connection continued from page 14

CEQA is easily foreseeable The Bureau of Land Management(BLM) conducted the first federal joint HIAEIS to addresscommunity health concerns for proposed oil and gas leasing inthe National Petroleum Reserve Northeast (NPR-A EIS) HIAsare being planned in conjunction with major projects at thePorts of Oakland Los Angeles and Long Beach in additionexpansion of the I-710 in Southern California NEPA does notspecifically require HIAs however it does contain language inits stated purpose requiring consideration of health impacts(Sections 150827(b)(2) In addition Council onEnvironmental Quality (CEQ) regulations stipulate thatagencies respond to public comments on health concerns(Section 2 42 USC 4321)

HIAs through examining impact pathways offer a usefulplanning and analysis tool They provide a far more rigorousanalysis of physical health outcomes like changes in Body MassIndicators (BMI) than the analysis that would commonly beundertaken in an EIA In California UCLA has been leadingthe way establishing an ldquoHIA Training Manual(wwwphuclaeduhshealth-impact)rdquo San FranciscoDepartment of Public Health has prepared ldquoA Guide to HealthImpact Assessmentrdquo for the State Department of Health andleading national efforts Centers for Disease Control(wwwcdcgovhealthyplaceshia) has authored reports on avariety of HIA topics Non-profits including PEW HealthGroup (wwwhealthimpactprojectorg) have also contributed toresearch in this area

ConclusionsPlanners have been preaching about the virtues of

sustainable development for a long time However as aprofession we have been largely ineffective until recently inpromoting these ideas and bringing about change Indeed theldquonew urbanistrdquo and ldquosmart growthrdquo ideas born in the 1980s arebeginning to gain momentum The concepts of density mixeduse and transit and pedestrian-oriented development are beingimplemented in cities across the country The sustainabilitymovement has given shape to and propelled these initiativesNow recognition of the healthsustainability link is adding anadditional impetus to these initiatives Concerns about theprecipitous rise in chronic health conditions such as heartdisease and diabetes associated with physical inactivity and poornutrition have brought the obesity epidemic to center stageHowever this has not yet resulted in policy changes at thenational level The majority of health care expenditures still goto medical treatment of chronic diseases rather than towardprevention And this results in repercussions throughout thehealth care system particularly with regard to rising costs anddisparities in treatment The costs of treating chronic conditionsaccount for the great majority of health care expenditures

Clearly promoting sustainable and healthy communitydevelopment will pay dividends in public health benefits andeconomic savings However progressive planning measureshaving the most effect such as reducing parking requirementsestablishing car-free zones and bike-only corridors are morelikely to meet political opposition compared to the palliativemeasures that are usually advocated Likewise economicincentives and disincentives like raising gas taxes and chargingmore for or limiting parking might be though relativelyefficient but are also likely to meet resistance Wellnessstrategies in school on campus and in the workplace can alsobe effective when combined with incentives However doesthis imply that individuals accustomed to unhealthy andsedentary lifestyles are suddenly going to adopt changes inbehavior There are often deep psychological factors thatinhibit change such as ingrained habits peer pressure stressdepression and substance abuse Perhaps the greatest changeswill come from children and those adults who are alreadymotivated to adopt a healthier lifestyle given the rightcircumstances And that in turn might result in significantsocietal change

Morty Prisament MSMPAICP is Founder ofStrategenesis-GPC an inter-disciplinary team developingsustainability strategies andtraining programs He hascollaborated with Boise StateUniversityrsquos Energy PolicyInstitute (EPI) on sustainabilityinitiatives as an Adjunct Facultymember UC-San DiegorsquosInstitute of the Americas as wellas Southern California Associa-tion of Governments Morty wasformerly Planning Manager withTetra Tech and has managed NEPACEQA coastal energy andwastewater programs in the Bay Area Central Coast and SanDiego He also previously directed the California CoordinatedResources Program in Sacramento As Bay Area AEP VicePresident he initiated the Green Planning Workshop Seriescoordinating programs throughout California Contact 510-484-6811mortygreenplanningcollaaborativeorg

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 16: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

FEATURE ARTICLE

continued on page 17

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 16

By Dr Doug Smith Professor in the CSUMB Division of Science amp Environmental Policy and Co-Director of the CSUMB Watershed Institute

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed InstitutePublications A Gold Mine of Gray Literature

Watershed Institute PublicationsIn about 2000 Fred Watson (CSUMB faculty and CCoWS

researcher) created the Watershed Institute Publication series tobe an on-line archive of our collective technical reports Thereports have been publically available since that time TheWatershed Institute Publications series can be found organizedby year under the headings of ldquoReportsrdquo and ldquoClass Reportsrdquowithin our general publications list at the following web addresshttpccowscsumbedupubs As of May 2012 there were over100 reports listed Most of the reports are web-accessible andvirtually all have at least one student co-author Thepublications listed under ldquoReportsrdquo are typically funded projectreports that represent many months of careful data collectionand analysis These reports have undergone rigorous internalreview (and sometimes ldquopeerrdquo or ldquoclientrdquo review outside theInstitute) In contrast the ldquoClass Reportsrdquo are gratis studiesdone by graduate students in our Advanced Watershed Scienceand Policy course Usually three Class Reports are generatedeach fall semester each supervised by a different faculty memberWhile the Class Reports are commonly high-quality studies thatthe client appreciates the reports are typically not as deeplyreviewed and vetted before posting Nonetheless each reporthas a fine data set or result that is archived for future referenceby environmental professionals

A Data-Hungry CommunityThe large number of reports on the web is testament to a

community that needs environmental data for resource-management decisions CCoWS serves abroad spectrum of community partnersranging from grass-roots organizations tothe federal government Communitymembers contact us with potentialprojects on a fairly regular basis We mustfilter the requests in various ways giventhat we are a finite team with a generallyheavy teaching load Beyond serving aspecific client our reports live on to becited in EIRs EAs watershed assessmentsgrant proposals biological opinions andjournal articles Our one goal is to deliverthe cleanest science possible independentof our personal perspectives Ethics andimpartial data collection are at the heartof science and these are key lessons for thestudents who join us in our research

When is the best time to plant a fruit treeConventional wisdom says fifteen years agoCoincidentally that is also a great time tohave started baseline monitoring for thatEIR you are now contracted to write If

there is a university near your project there is a reasonablechance that someone has made a few unpublished butcriticallyndashimportant historical baseline observations about yourarea of interest Unfortunately most of those unpublished datasets are sitting in a file somewhere or at best they are collectingdust shelved on a clientrsquos book case as a gray literatureconsulting report However if you are working in MontereyCounty California you may have run into the CaliforniaCoastal Watershed Studies technical reports produced byresearchers affiliated with the CSU Monterey Bay (CSUMB)Watershed Institute This article to describes how theWatershed Institute publication series has played a pivotal rolein serving our data-hungry community has given students real-world experience in the art of technical report writing and hashelped to inform environmental decision-makers

CSUMB Watershed InstituteThe Watershed Institute has been continuously engaged in

environmental research projects and technical advisory servicesince 1995 when CSUMB first opened its doors as part of the re-use of the former Fort Ord army base The research group ispopularly known as the CCoWS (pronounced ldquoseacowsrdquo) whichstands for California Coastal Watershed Studies(httpccowscsumbeduhome) In generalwe work in hydrology erosion sedimenttransport aquatic and terrestrial ecologywater quality geospatial technology dataanalysis and environmental modeling Andyes we are the same professors who teachthose research skills in the undergraduateand graduate environmental scienceprograms within the CSUMB Division ofScience and Environmental Policy(httpsepcsumbedusep) These programsinclude a BS in Environmental ScienceTechnology and Policy (httpsepcsumbeduestp) and an MS in Coastal andWatershed Science amp Policy (httpsepcsumbeducwsp) Our graduate programoffers the traditional thesis option and aProfessional Master of Science (PSM)option

Graduate Student Kathy Pugh installs a web-hostedtelemetered stream gage at a research site near HollisterCA Photo by Carrie Williams

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 17: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 17

CSU Monterey Bay Watershed Institute Publications continued from page 16

Real-World Training for StudentsWe include undergraduate and graduate students in nearly

every project We have student interns who do lab and fieldwork student collaborators who take on a greaterresponsibilities and occasionally students who act as leadscientists managing other students on the team Students gainco-authorship on a technical report by materially contributingto a project and its write-up

The real-world projects leading to Watershed Institutetechnical reports offer students a chance to get involved with allaspects of applied science Students are commonly involved inbackground research project design data collection statisticalanalysis budgeting and report writing As we all know projectsnever go exactly according to plan so students get the addedexperience of troubleshooting and adapting to newcircumstances The benefits to these students include a deeperknowledge of a particular topic and related policies someprofessional experience a paycheck and they appreciate addingsome ldquobeefrdquo to their resumes as they look to the next step intheir careers

Through the years we have sent out several surveys to ourregional employers to gauge the current and future employeeskill sets Without fail the top requirements have nothing to dowith emerging technologies According to our surveysemployers need students who have great writing skills So wehave a challenge Freshmen come to us with an enormous rangeof writing skills In response we have tried a variety of strategiesto build those skills For example we shoot for the ldquotechnicalreportrdquo as the target genre for our students in several of ourproject-based watershed-science courses Some of those studentseventually rise to the challenge of coauthoring a WatershedInstitute Publication an event that carries significant honorwithin the student body Employers have been pleased with ourgraduatersquos writing skills

Sample ProjectsThe range of projects in the publication series is broad I

provide three examples here Smith et al (2008) collected

multibeam bathymetry and vessel-based LiDAR data to producea high precision digital model of Los Padres Reservoir for theMonterey Peninsula Management District The projectincluded four graduate student co-authors including KrystalGomez shown running a LiDAR scanner Krystal is now happilyemployed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

Perry et al (2007) is a report to the California Departmentof Parks and Recreation describing three years of water qualityand aquatic invertebrate monitoring after the construction ofthe Carmel River Lagoon Enhancement Project The 90-pagereport presents the data required to assess whether or not theenhancement project improved steelhead habitat in the lagoonThe report was written by three students (or recent graduates)and Fred Watson Over the course of the three-year project atleast 10 students were involved One of the coauthors JoelCasagrande is now with National Marine Fisheries Service

Pugh et al (2011) is an example of a graduate class projectwith 12 student coauthors The project delineated thewatershed areas for stormwater outfalls in the City of PacificGrove CA The project brought students up-to-speed on thenew urban stormwater regulations and Low ImpactDevelopment (LID) technologies while providing a valuableproduct for the City The work involved DEM analysis land-cover analysis and field verification The report was the basisfor another student project in 2012 focusing on HEC HMSmodeling of storm runoff in a specific Pacific Grove watershedthat is being evaluated for wetland creation and other LIDapplications The cumulative body of data has now been used bythe city to generate a Request for Proposals for consultantsbidding for the LID work The report has been used at a localschool as part of the watershed curriculum and as the focus ofpublic debate on stormwater and urban forestry issues Leadauthor Kathy Pugh is now employed with WaterwaysConsulting

ReferencesPerry W Watson F Casagrande J and Hanely C 2007 Carmellagoon enhancement project Water quality and wildlife monitoring2006-7 The Watershed Institute California State Monterey BayPublication No WI-2007-02 90 pages httpccowscsumbeducrlepreportsCRLEP_Final_070815pdf (last downloaded June 24 2012)

Pugh K Arenas R Cubanski P Lanctot M Purdy A Bassett R SmithJ Hession S Stoner K Ashbach R Alberola G Jacuzzi N Watson F2011 Stormwater outfall watershed delineation land covercharacteristics and recommended priorities for monitoring andmitigation in the City of Pacific Grove California The WatershedInstitute California State Monterey Bay Publication No WI-2011-0274 pages httpccowscsumbedupubsreportsCSUMB_ENVS660_ClassReport_PGStormwater_120306pdf (last downloaded June 252012)

Smith DP Kvitek R Aiello I Iampietro P Quan S Paddock EEndris C and Gomez K 2009 Fall 2008 Stage-Volume Relationshipfor Los Padres Reservoir Carmel Valley California Prepared for theMonterey Peninsula Water Management District The WatershedInstitute California State University Monterey Bay Publication noWI-2009-2 30 pp httpccows csumbedupubsreportsCCoWS_MPWMD_LosPadres_StageVol_2008_090508pdf (last downloadedJune 20 2012)

Graduate student Krystal Gomez operates a vessel-based terrestrial LiDAR unit as shecreates a precise DEM of the Los Padres Reservoir in the Carmel River watershedPhoto by Rikk Kvitek

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 18: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 18

2013 AEP Awards Program

AEP issues thefollowing awards

bull Outstanding Environmental

Analysis Document

bull Outstanding Environmental

Resource Document

bull Outstanding Planning

Document

bull Outstanding Climate

Change Document

bull Outstanding Public

InvolvementEducation

Program

bull Outstanding Media

Coverage of an

Environmental Topic

bull Outstanding Chapter

Activity

bull Environmental Humor

bull Al Reynolds Memorial

Lifetime Achievement Award

bull Certificate of Achievement

bull Certificate of Appreciation

I N T E R E S T E D I N

S E R V I N G O N T H E 2 0 1 3

A E P A W A R D S J U RY

Please contact

Dev Vrat

2013 AEP

Awards Program Co-Chair

devvrataolcom

MANDATORY SUBMITTALREQUIREMENTSAll of the following documentation must be provided in full Dueto time and cost factors incomplete nominations cannot beconsidered The Nominator will be considered the primarycontact for the nomination Each nomination shall consist ofthe following

1 Printed copy of the completed AEP Award Nomination

Submittal Form or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org

(six hard copies)

2 CDs or DVDs (six) containing the following (paper materials

are not accepted by the AEP Awards Program)

bull Completed AEP Award Nomination Submittal Form

(see attached or visit httpwwwn-aep2013org)

bull Two-page (maximum) Summary Description of the

Submittal explaining (1) its best features (2) unique or

innovative approaches or benefits and (3) how the

nominated document has achieved the specific award

criteria

bull Supplemental supporting materials such as audio video

or electronic presentations are encouraged These

materials should be succinct given the limited time

available for Jury deliberations

3 Copy of the entire document on CD-ROM as appropriate

for which the Nomination is submitted (6 CDs)

Nomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

Nominations are being accepted until August 15 2012 for the 2013 AEP Awards Program which

will occur between April 1 - 5 2013 at the NAEPAEP Joint Conference in Los Angeles Award

recipients will be invited to present their work in a special program session at the conference

All documents will be evaluated based on their merits using the rating criteria established for each

respective category

All nominations must be submitted in CD or DVD

format The AEP Awards Committee may also solicit

nominations and suggest additional or special awards

from AEP Chapters and the State Board The Awards

Committee Co-chairs shall make all final decisions

regarding the AEP Awards Program in consultation

with the Awards Jury

AWARDS PRESENTATIONThe Awards Ceremony will include a video presentation of theachievements of Outstanding and Merit Award winnersCertificate winners will also be recognized If your nominationis selected to receive an Outstanding or Merit Award you willbe invited to submit concise video footage describing yourwork achievement The AEP Awards Program videographerwill contact award recipients concerning the format and lengthof your video submittal Award recipients will be required tosign a release allowing AEP to publicize andor publish thenomination package to promote the outstanding work ofCalifornia environmental professionals

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ANDINFORMATIONNominations may only be made by AEP membersDocuments must have been published or presented during theprevious five years Nominations and appropriate supportingmaterials must be received by the AEP Awards Chair at theaddress provided by August 15 2012 An entry fee of $50must be included with all nominations except those forCertificates of Achievement or Appreciation and OutstandingChapter Activity If an award nomination involves a publicagency the public agency must also sign the nomination formor include a separate letter authorizing the nomination beforesubmittal to the Awards Committee If the general submittalrequirements are not met the nomination will be rejectedAwards will be issued unless nominations for a given categorydo not meet the criteria of an ldquooutstandingrdquo or ldquoexceptionalrdquoexample of its type In this case no award will be issued forthat category

AEP Mountain plaques will be given for Outstanding and Meritawards for each winning document program or person If acombination of agencies andor firms was involved in thepreparation of the document please specify the one agency orfirm who will be accepting the award AEP will provide theopportunity for award winners to order additional awardplaques at cost

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 19: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 19

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSISDOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental analysis or assessment document including but not limited

to

bull Environmental Impact Reports

bull Environmental Impact Statements

bull Environmental Assessments and

bull Initial Studies

Draft Final Supplemental Subsequent Addendum and Program versions

of such documents may be considered appropriate for this award category

The Awards Jury will consider other types of documents suitable for this

award if judged to be appropriate The documents will be judged on the

basis of the following criteria

bull Completeness mdash adequate reliable and thorough presentation of

documentation and data

bull Clarity of Organization mdash clear structure tracks State CEQA or NEPA

format

bull Clarity of Writing and Presentation mdash readable by laypersons decision-

makers and professionals alike minimal use of acronyms

bull Economy of Language mdash concise direct and to the point technical

information technical information is provided in appendicies

bull Adequacy of Summary mdash concise and salient tells the full story

bull Unique Methodology original approach to analysis and data

presentation and

bull Public Involvement mdash extent of public outreach and involvement in

document preparation

OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCEDOCUMENTThis award is given to an individual agency or firm publishing an outstanding

environmental resource document The award is for environmental

documents which have a broader application or can serve as a resource for

a wide range of environmental professionals as distinguished from an

impact analysis or assessment document which addresses specific projects

or programs Appropriate documents for consideration in this award

category may include but are not limited to

bull Manuals for preparing Environment Impact Reports

bull Significance Threshold Guidelines

bull Mitigation Monitoring Programs and

bull Other Non-Impact AnalysisAssessment Studies and Reports

At a minimum such documents should have usefulness to other

environmental professionals and have applications for a wide range of

geographical areas or conditions The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate

these types of documents on the basis of the following criteria

bull Creativity and Innovation mdashoriginality of methodology format or

approach to an issue

bull Transferability mdash ability to adapt methodology or apply information to

different situations

bull Methodology mdash sound and well-substantiated approach andor analysis

to presentation of data and conclusions and

bull Clarity mdash ldquouser friendlyrdquo presentation of technical information with

direct and concise language andor graphics appropriate for audience

OUTSTANDING PLANNING DOCUMENTThis award is given to the agency or firm publishing a land use transportation

or other plan that best accommodates projected population growth in a

compact form to protect Californiarsquos environmental resources minimize

greenhouse gas emissions and provide urban recreation and natural open

space These include but are not limited to

bull General Plan Elements

bull Specific Plans

bull Housing Elements

bull Transportation Plans and

bull Neo-Traditional or New Urbanist Plans

The plans will be judged on the basis of the following criteria

bull Protection of sensitive environmental resources and agriculture

bull Accommodation of HCD and COG population growth projections

bull Regional jobshousing balance to reduce commuting

bull Provision of housing affordable to a range of household incomes and

bull Provision of public transit bikeways and pedestrian paths

OUTSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE DOCUMENTThis category includes Climate Action Plans CEQA Documents significance

thresholds implementation guidelines technical assistance documents AB32

scoping plans public information documents and research documents For

plans or projects that are intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions the

criteria includes

bull Methodology ndash How to determine targets and assess progress (ref SB

375 models vs BMPs)

bull Performance Monitoring - Does the plan identify a defensible and

replicable means for measuring actual GHG emission reductions

bull Backstop - Does the plan include backstop measures in case the primary

strategies fall short of expectations

bull Metrics - Does the planproject rely on metrics that result in a fair

measurement of GHG reductions (ref SB 375 GHG reduction per

capita vs GHG reduction compared to base year vs GHG reduction

per service population etc)

OUTSTANDING PUBLICINVOLVEMENTEDUCATION PROGRAMThis award is given to individual agencies firms or organizations who have

conducted an outstanding public involvement or educational program This

category serves the AEP awards program criteria of promoting the diversity of

entrants and achievements among environmental professionals To be

considered for this award the nominated public involvement or education

program should meet and exceed the following criteria

bull Increase the publicrsquos awareness of environmental issues and facilitate their

role in the environmental planning analysis and review process

bull Provide a clear message consistent with AEPrsquos objectives enhance protect

and maintain the natural and human environments

bull Emphasize creative use of media (eg Social Media)

bull Use methodology or paradigm which has broad applicability and is

replicable by other agencies firms or organizations and

bull Includes measures to demonstrate its effectiveness mdash eg level of

participation adoption of model ordinances or descriptions of other

changes in behavior or benefits resulting from the program

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 20: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 20

OUTSTANDING MEDIA COVERAGE OF ANENVIRONMENTAL TOPICThis award is given to an individual writer editor or publication for an

outstanding article or series of articles or for the demonstration of unbiased

factual coverage of environmental issues Similarly writers producers or

individual radio or television shows or web sites responsible for outstanding

coverage of an environmental topic are also eligible for this award

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Relevance to the public at large

bull Demonstrated depth of research of the topic at hand

bull Clarity and quality of the presentation and

bull Usefulness of the coverage in empowering the reader listener or viewer

toward positive environmental action (eg article includes references to

volunteer organizations use of social media provides practical tips for use

at home or work provides maps and directions to areas of interest etc)

OUTSTANDING CHAPTER ACTIVITYThe Chapter Activity Award is given to a Chapter or Chapters for an activity

program or workshop of unusually high merit

The AEP Awards Jury will evaluate nominations under this category using the

following criteria

bull Accessibility and relevance for AEP members

bull Outreach to others outside of the AEP

bull Provision of tools and information that can be used in practice by

participants and

bull Transferability to other AEP chapters

ENVIRONMENTAL HUMOR AWARDA good sense of humor can provide a welcome respite during our current

economic challenges in the environmental profession This award is given to

the person who submits the most humorous anecdotal story news article

publication or other item relating to the environmental profession in California

or in the enhancement protection or maintenance of the California

environment itself Stories may include but are not limited to field experiences

document preparation public meetings and hearings This is intended to be a

fun category so let yourself go The Awards Jury will read all the nominations

and then decide which nomination makes them laugh the hardest

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENTThis award is given to an individual firm agency or organization for unique

achievements in an environmental field or activity Nominees need not be

members of AEP AEP has recognized lifetime achievements of excellence in

the environmental profession and individual accomplishments in a specific

environmental field or on an issue or topic The award is also appropriate for

any significant environment-related activity that has been highly successful

and noteworthy including newspaper or magazine reporting development of

key legislation implementation of progressive program etc

In addition to the form nominations must include

bull Resume of nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and statements of endorsement from

knowledgeable persons and

bull Sufficient supporting material to allow the awards committee to make an

evaluation without seeking further information or research

CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATIONThis award is given to AEP members who have made outstanding

contributions (excluding monetary) to either the state AEP organization or

a local chapter The AEP Awards Committee encourages each chapter

board to nominate at least one person within their chapter In addition to

the form the nomination must include

bull Name address and phone number of the nominee

bull Reasons for recognition and

bull Statements of endorsement from knowledgeable persons

AL REYNOLDS MEMORIAL LIFETIMEACHIEVEMENT (ARMLA) AWARDEstablished in 2005 the ARMLA Award is the most prestigious of all

awards presented by AEP It acknowledges superior achievement

throughout the recipientrsquos entire career

The Awards Jury will use the following criteria in considering this

prestigious award

bull Nominees body of work over entire career must have significantly

contributed to the goals of AEP Enhance maintain and protect the

natural and human environment

bull Nominee must be at least sixty years old in the year of the award

Posthumous awards will also be given and

bull Nomination must be supported with letters from least two AEP

members

Nomination Submittal DeadlineAugust 15 2012

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 21: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

Name of document person or group nominated for award

Prepared for (public agency)

Agency Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Prepared by (firmagency names only) who contributed to the success of the project in the opinion of theNominator Specify which names if any should be included on the award plaque

Firm Contact Name

Phone

E-mail

Date of publicationpresentation

Nominator Name (must be AEP member)

Firm or jurisdiction

Address

CityStateZip

Phone

Fax

E-mail

2013 AEP Awards Nomination SubmittalNomination Submittal Deadline August 15 2012

ENTRY FEE

$50 Entry Fee except for

Certificates of Appreciation or

Achievement and Outstanding

Chapter Activity Please make

check payable to Association of

Environmental Professionals

MANDATORYSHIPPINGREQUIREMENT

You must ship nominations

through any vendor that

documents and guarantees

receipt such as UPS Federal

Express personal delivery etc

Submit Nomination Package

1 envelope nomination form (6

copies) CD-ROM(s) or DVD(s) (6

copies) and $50 entry fee to

Roger Turner and Dev Vrat

AEP Awards Program Co-Chairs

Association of

Environmental Professionals

(httpwwwn-aep2013org)

co Lynne C Bynder

Meetings Xceptional

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

email lbyndercalifaeporgPhone 7607992740

AEP will confirm receipt of your

submittal through e-mail or fax If you

have not heard from AEP by August

30 2012 and your shipper has

confirmed delivery of your package

please contact Lynne Bynder at

lbyndercalifaeporg In your

message please indicate who signed

for your package according to your

shipper

Environmental Analysis Document

Environmental Resource Document

Planning Document

Climate Change Document

Public InvolvementEducation Program

Media Coverage of an Environmental Topic

PLEASE CHECK ONEChapter Activity

Environmental Humor

Al Reynolds Memorial Lifetime Achievement Award

Certificate of Achievement

Certificate of Appreciation

Check here if you would like to present your project in conference session Please completesession proposal separately

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 22: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

SponsorExhibitor Opportunities

Exhibitor Booth$2500

bull One full conference registration (not

including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference

program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

ExhibitorTable Top $1500

bull One Day conference registration

(not including special workshops

courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted

on the conference Website

httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic

advertising for conference

bull Business card ad in conference

program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons

to identify your attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Bronze $1000bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Business card advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Recognition on all printed and electronic advertising forconference

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Copper $500bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

Conference Bag Sponsor $2500bull One full conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Quarter page ad in conference program

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Lanyard Sponsor $1500bull One Day conference registration (not including special

workshops courses amp tours)

bull Your companyagency name posted on the conference

Website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising for

conference

bull Business card ad in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify your

attendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Public Agency SponsorsContact AEP 2013 Conference for more information

Platinum $10000bull Exhibit booth (choice of premier location)

bull Two full conference registrations (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at all sponsored functions

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Full-page advertisement in the conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Gold $5000bull Recognition as a Gold sponsor for a major conference

event

bull Exhibit booth (choice of location)

bull One full conference registration (not including specialworkshops courses amp tours)

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Posteroral recognition at sponsored function

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Half-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list

Silver $2000bull Recognition as a Silver sponsor for a conference

event or mobile workshops

bull Recognition on all printedelectronic advertising forconference

bull Two meal tickets (breakfast or lunch)

bull Your companyagency name posted on theconference website httpwwwn-aep2013org

bull Quarter-page advertisement in conference program

bull Exhibitor and sponsorship ribbons to identify yourattendees

bull Pre-conference attendee list SPONSORSH IP EXH IB I TOR QUEST IONS

2013 CONFERENCE PLANNERLynne Bynder Meetings Xceptional lbyndercalifaeporg

For more information visithttpwwwn-aep2013org

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 22

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 23: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

Note Payment is appreciated at the time this form is submitted but must be received no later than March 1 2013All fields below are required

1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice

Check Visa Mastercard Discovercard BoothTabletop Space No

Credit Card Number

Name on Credit Card Expiration Date Verification Code

Billing Address for Credit Card

Billing City State ZIP

SponsorExhibitor Registration

Return this formwith your check orcredit cardinformation toAEP 2013 Conference

40747 Baranda Court

Palm Desert CA 92260

7603404499

Fax 7606742479

lbyndercalifaeporg

httpwwwn-aep2013org

CancellationPolicyIf written cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

by January 15 2013 an 80

refund will be made less $100

administrative fee If written

cancellation of the

sponsorexhibitor is received

after February 17 2013 but

before March 1 2013

a 50 refund less $100

administrative fee will be

given On or after March 1

2013 no refunds will be made

See Exhibitor Area Map Space will be allocated basedon sponsorship level and date application is received

Exhibitor Submission Deadline March 1 2013Sponsor Submission Deadline March 14 2013

Company Name

Address

City State ZIP

Contact Name

Phone Fax

Email Web Site

Platinum - $100001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Gold - $50001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Silver - $20001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

Bronze - $10001st sponsoring event choice

2nd sponsoring event choice

SponsorsPlease sign us up for the following

Booth - $2500Table Top - $1500Pop Up Floor Display -$1500

Exhibitors

We would like to donate an item forthe conference bags

(subject to committee approval)

Other

Full PageHalf PageQuarter PageBusiness Card

Program Ads

Conference Bag Sponsor- $2500

Lanyard Sponsor - $1500

Copper - $500

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 24: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 24

Presidentrsquos Message continued from page 3

sponsorship falls in the same category ndash greater participation by our corporatesponsors provides AEP funds for their contributions but also tremendousexposure for their employees (and potential future employees) in networkingwith the professional environmental community

Heads up - The 2013 Conference will be offered in Los Angeles April 1-5 so mark your calendars now (The actual conference will be April 3-5 withApril 1 and 2 for Board Meetings Symposia etc) The venue is ldquoLA Liverdquo atthe J W Marriott adjacent to the Staples Center and other downtownattractions Marie Campbell is the chair for the Conference and she hasplanned a very full and rewarding group of sessions One important date towatch is the due date for AEP Awards ndash it is August 15 2012 Much earlierthan normal and information regarding the Awards program is located on theAEP website Also sponsorship and exhibitor opportunities are posted foryour information You can also upload abstracts for conference papers So getready ndash things are moving FAST

AEP is an association of environmental professionals dedicated to theprofessional development of its members and the relationships we build withothers in the environmental industry Our strength is you the members ofAEP Together we can move the organization to directions we need to ensurethe viability and relevance of AEP With this we can stay on the right path ofadvancement for the environmental professional and AEP

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25

Page 25: the Envirmonmeontanl itor - Central Coast Watershed …ccows.csumb.edu/pubs/magazine_articles/EM-Summer-2012.pdf · Environmental Compliance Solutions ... Pebble Beach Company Perkins

1 CEQANEPA Compliance

2 Environmental Impact Analysis

3 Resource Management

4 SolidHazardous Waste

5 Air Quality

G E N E R A L I N F O R M AT I O N

A R E A S O F I N T E R E S T ( S E L E C T 3 )

S t a t u s P l e a s e C h e c k

New Member ApplicationRenewal Membership

Change of Address Etc

M e m b e r s h i p C a t e g o r y A n n u a l D u e s P l e a s e C h e c k

Full AEP Member $ 15000

AEP Sponsor Member $ 25000GovernmentCorporate Sponsors are provided one Full Membershipwhich can ldquofloatrdquo within the sponsor company

Young Professionals Member $7000Must have graduated in 2011 or 2012

Emeritus Member $7000Must have been a full member within the last 5 years

AEP Full Time Student Member $3500Please include current student schedule showing 12 units or more with application

N o t e S e e f u l l c a t e g o r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o n l i n e a t C a l i f A E P o rg

1 Channel Counties

2 Inland Empire

3 Los Angeles

4 Monterey Bay

5 Superior California

6 Orange County

7 San Diego

8 San Francisco Bay Area

9 Central

A E P C h a p t e r A r e a s ( c h e c k o n e c h a p t e r o n l y )

First Last Certification FirmAgency

Address

City State Zip Email

Daytime Phone No Ext Fax

Check to be OMITTED from the AEP Web Site Directory Employment type Non-Profit Private Public Other

Please send me a National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) membership application

T O PAY B Y C R E D I T C A R D ( P L E A S E F I L L O U T B E L O W )

Card Holder Name Signature

Billing Address City State Zip

Card type Visa Mastercard Discover Card No CVC Exp Date

Please mail this portion along with your check made payable to AEP co Lynne C Bynder CMP Meetings Xceptional 40747 Baranda Court Palm Desert CA 92260AEP can not invoice for new memberships Questions 7603404499 fax 7606742479

Online application available at httpwwwcalifaeporgindexphpoption=com_osemscampview=register

11 Cultural Resources

12 Growth Management Regional Planning

13 Environmental LawPolicy

14 Land UseSite Planning

15 Geographic Information Systems

16 Environmental Justice

17 Environmental Engineering

18 Other

w w w C a l i f A E P o rg

6 Noise

7 Transportation

8 HydrologyWater

9 Endangered SpeciesBiology

10 GeologySeismic

C H A P T E R R E G I O N S A N D M E M B E R S H I P

N E W R E N E W A L M E M B E R S H I P A P P L I C AT I O N

A E P C O D E O F E T H I C S1 I will conduct myself and my work in a manner that will uphold the values integrity and

respect of the profession

2 I will uphold the stated intent as well as the letter of environmental policies laws andregulations which are adopted by governmental bodies or agencies

3 I will not engage in encourage or condone dishonesty fraud deceit discrimination ormisrepresentation in the solicitation preparation or use of work prepared by me orunder my direction

4 I will fully disclose to my employers and my prospective clients any economic or ethicalinterests which could reasonably be interpreted as a conflict of interest by them or byother affected parties with regard to my professional work

5 I will ensure a good faith effort at full disclosure technical accuracy soundmethodology clarity and objectivity in the collection analysis interpretation andpresentation of environmental information by me or under my direction

6 I will achieve and maintain the highest level of professional competency for myself andrequire the same for those I supervise

Signature acknowledges full understanding amp acceptance of the AEP Code of Ethics amp Professional Conduct Guidelines

Contributions or gifts to AEP are not tax deductible as charitable contributions for income taxpurposes However they may be tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expensessubject to restrictions imposed as a result of association lobbying activities AEP estimates that thenondeductible portion of your dues allocable to lobbying is 5

OFFICE USE ONLY Co P Date Amount Check

rev 112

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR SUMMER 2012 25