50
s

The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

  • Upload
    otis

  • View
    16

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

s. The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”. Sectionalism: Northern Leaders Daniel Webster, Massachusetts J.Q. Adams, Massachusetts Martin Van Buren, New York. Sectionalism: Southern Leaders John C. Calhoun, South Carolina William Crawford, Georgia. Sectionalism: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

s

Page 2: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

The Election of 1816“The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Page 3: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 4: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Sectionalism: Northern Leaders

• Daniel Webster, Massachusetts

• J.Q. Adams, Massachusetts

• Martin Van Buren, New York

Page 5: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Sectionalism: Southern Leaders

• John C. Calhoun, South Carolina

• William Crawford, Georgia

Page 6: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Sectionalism:Western Leaders

• Andrew Jackson, Tennessee

• William Henry Harrison, Indiana

• Henry Clay, Kentucky

• Thomas Hart Benton , Missouri

Page 7: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Henry Clay• Henry Clay (1777 - 1852)• US Senator from Kentucky • Speaker of the US House of Representatives

(Kentucky)• Secretary of State under John Quincy Adams• Perennial Presidential Candidate (lost to President

John Quincy Adams in 1824, to President Andrew Jackson in 1832, and to President James K. Polk in 1844)

Page 8: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

American System, Nationalistic Economic Program

• Henry Clay speaker of the house– Tariff of 1816– Second bank of

the US 1816-1836– Internal

improvements at the federal expense

Page 9: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

p WEST got roads, canals, and federal aide.

p EAST got the backing of protective tariffs from the West.

p SOUTH ??

The American System

Page 10: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

The American System

Henry Clay1777 - 1852

Page 11: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 12: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

E 1817 – 1825.E 363 miles Albany to Buffalo.E Much further than any other American or European

canal.

The Erie Canal

Page 13: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 14: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

The American SystemThe National (Cumberland) Road

Page 15: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 16: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Adams – Onis Treaty 1817-1819

• What was it? Transfer of Florida• Who was it between? Spain and the U.S.• What did it concern? Seminole Indians• What was the outcome? The U.S got

Florida

Page 17: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

The Adams-Onis Treaty 1819“The Transcontinental Treaty”

Page 18: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Rush-Bagot Treaty

Page 19: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

What was it? Disarmament Pact Who was it between? Great Britain and the U.S.What did it concern?The Great Lakes RegionWhat was the outcome? Created the Longest unfortified/peaceful border in the world

Rush-Bagot Treaty 1817

Page 20: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Convention of 1818

Page 21: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Convention of 1818

• What was it? Further improved relations between the U.S. and Great Britain

• Who was it between? U.S. & Great Britain

• What did it concern? 1. Fishing Rights 2. Join occupation of the Oregon Country 3. Set boundary at the 49th Parallel

• What was the outcome? Great Peace between the U.S. and Great Britain

Page 22: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

The Convention of 1818

Page 23: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

The West and N.W. 1816-1824

Page 24: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 25: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 26: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

US Population Density

1810 1820

Page 27: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Where are the Federalists, now?

Page 28: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

The Monroe Doctrine• What was it? A unilateral decree that the

U.S. had the right to REFUSE European expansion into the Western Hemisphere

• Who was it between? The U.S. & Europe• What did it concern? Further European

Imperialism• What was the outcome? European

nations NEVER violated it

Page 29: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 30: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 31: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

3. What would the US do if the warning was not headed?

Monroe Doctrine

2. What warning is given to the European countries?1. What

foreign policy principles are established?

p Referred to as “America’s Self-Defense Doctrine”

The Monroe Doctrine

Page 32: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 33: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 34: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 35: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 36: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 37: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 38: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Missouri Compromise 1820

• What was it? A dilemma over admission of Missouri ( a slave state) when there was no Free-State available.

• Who was it between? Northern and Southern factions in Congress

• What did it concern? Maintaining the balance between Slave and Free States

• What was the outcome? The “balance” is maintained

Page 39: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

"This momentous question, like a fire-bell in the night, awakened and filled me with terror. I considered it at once as the death knell of the

Union ... my only consolation is to be, that I live not to weep over it."

Page 40: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 41: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Mc Culluch v Maryland

• What was it? A challenge of the U.S. Bank by the State of Maryland

• Who was it between? The State of Maryland and the U.S. Government

• What did it concern? The right of the U.S. Bank to “exist”

• What was the outcome? The U.S. Government is Supreme

Page 42: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

McCulloch v Maryland

Constitutionality of the Bank of the United States (BUS) was in question

Bank not SPECIFICALLY mentioned in the Constitution

“The power to tax is the power to destroy”

Page 43: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Dartmouth College v Woodward• What was it? An attempt by the State of

New Hampshire to make “public” Dartmouth

• Who was it between? The State of New Hampshire ( rep. by the Sec’y of the NEW Bd. Of Trustees) and the Board of Trustees of the College Dartmouth

• What did it concern? Contract Law• What was the outcome? Contracts

cannot be overturned by outside parties – Contract Clause

Page 44: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Dartmouth College v Woodward

• New Hampshire wanted to alter Dartmouth Charter – from private to public college

• Ruled that states could not alter contracts, regardless of age or condition of when contract was made

• Created the need to place clauses in contracts for revision or revokation

Page 45: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Gibbons v Ogden• What was it? A contract dispute over

Interstate (between one or more states) Commerce (trade)

• Who was it between? Gibbons, Ogden, N.Y. State and the U.S. Government

• What did it concern? “Who” has the right over Interstate Commerce

• What was the outcome? The Federal (U.S.) Government has the right over Interstate Commerce

Page 46: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Gibbons v. Ogden

Aaron Ogden (had a NY ONLY charter -) Licensed by the Legislature of New York State

Thomas Gibbons (had a - NY to NJ/NJ to NY charter) Licensed by the U.S. Congress

favored Ogden favoredGibbons

>>>>>>

<<<<

Page 47: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”

Political Parties of the early 19th Century

Page 48: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 49: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”
Page 50: The Election of 1816 “The Demise of the Federalist Party”