67
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MARKETING STRATEGIES USED IN DESTINATION BRANDING IN THE PROMOTION OF DOMESTIC TOURISM BY ELIZABETH NJERI NDUNG’U A MANAGEMENT RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTERS IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (MBA) OF SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI. September 2010

The Effectiveness Of Marketing Strategies Used In

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MARKETING STRATEGIES USED IN DESTINATION BRANDING IN THE PROMOTION OF DOMESTIC TOURISM

BY

ELIZABETH NJERI NDUNG’U

A MANAGEMENT RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTERS IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (MBA) OF SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI.

September 2010

DECLARATION

I declare that this is my original work and has not been submitted for a degree or diploma

in any other university.

ELIZABETH NJERI NDUNG’U

This project has been submitted for examination with my approval as the university

supervisor.

TOM MUTUGU

Senior Lecturer

Department of Business Administration

Faculty of Commerce

University of Nairobi

Signature Date

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

In a project covering more than two months, there have been many people that have

contributed generously in a variety of ways. Without them, this research papers would

never have taken off the ground.

First, I would also like to thank my supervisor Mr. Tom Mutugu for his invaluable and

insightful support and guidance. Without his support and vast knowledge, this project

would have been skeletal.

I am eternally grateful to my family for their constant encouragement and patience with

my hectic schedule. God bless them all.

Special thanks go to my cousin, Sylvia Njeru for her help in collecting data for this study.

She devoted her time to ensure that all the data was collected within the short time I had

to carry out the study.

Above all, I am incredibly grateful to Almighty God for giving me strength, good health

and sound mind throughout my study period. With HIM, all things are possible.

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study 1

1.1.1 Definition of destination branding 2

1. 1.2 The tourism industry in Kenya 4

1.. 1.3 Tourism agents in Kenya 5

1.2 Statement of the Problem 6

1.3 Objectives of the Study 8

1.4 Significance of the Study 8

2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Destination Branding Concept 9

2.2 Key Destination Branding Components 10

2.3 Conceptual Framework for Destination Branding 14

2.4 Marketing Strategies in Destination Branding 19

2.5 Destination Positioning 20

3.0 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Research Design 23

3.2 Target Population 23

3.3 Sampling Design 23

3.4 Data Collection 24

3.5 Data Analysis 24

4.0 DATA ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

4.1 Introduction 25

4.2 General Information 25

4.3 Destination Brand Image 31

4.4 Destination Brand Personality ̂AJ J

iv

4.5 Destination Brand Attributes 34

4.6 Correlation Analysis 34

5.0 DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION 35

5.1 Introduction 35

5.2 Summary of findings 36

5.3 Discussion 37

5.4 Conclusion 37

5.5 Recommendations 38

REFERENCES 39

APPENDICES 43Appendix 1: List of Tour Operators by Categories

Appendix 2: KATO Members Category

Appendix 3: Introduction Letter

Appendix 4 Questionnaire

v

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

DMO - Destination Marketing Organisations

SME - Small and Medium Enterprises

KATO - Kenya Association of Tour Operators

KATA - Kenya Association of Tour Agents

EASTA - East African Society Of Travel Agents

IATA - International Association of Travel Agents

DTCK - Domestic Tourism Council of Kenya

KTB - Kenya Tourism Board

KTF - Kenya Tourism Federation

KEPSA - Kenya Private Sector Alliance

vi

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted with an objective of finding out the effectiveness of marketing

strategies used in destination branding in the promotion of domestic tourism. The main

objective was to find out if destination branding is often used in promoting domestic

tourism and if so, the effectiveness of the marketing strategies employed.

To achieve the above objective, primary data was collected trom a sample ot 50 tour

operators, out of whom 45 responded successfully leading to a response rate of 90%.

This was considered sufficient enough to achieve the intended objective. The tour

operators were selected using stratified systematic sampling.

The collected data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Ihese included tables, pie

charts, percentages and frequency tables.

The study found that advertising, direct marketing, website and on-line marketing are

highly effective marketing strategies used in the promotion of domestic tourism. The

joint initiative between the media and the tourism industry was considered highly

effective in improving information flow between the industry and the consumers, in this

case being the domestic tourists. However despite this, domestic tourism is still

considered expensive by the Kenyan consumers therefore allecting demand for domestic

tourism packages.

The government tourism agencies and the media were found to be important instruments

in improving domestic tourism as a leading revenue earner for the country. Similarly, the

study found that tour operators should be encouraged to use less traditional marketing

strategies like the three aspects of destination branding to entice the domestic tourists to

discover their beautiful country, thus increasing the number of domestic tourists and

increasing revenue earned for the government.

The conclusion from the study therefore is the tour operators do not use all the three

aspects of destination branding, that is destination image, personality and attributes. It

was found that in the promotion of domestic tourism, tour operators tend to use

destination brand image and destination brand attributes more olten than destination

brand personality. By employing the three aspects of destination branding, tour operators

would be able to market the different regions of Kenya to domestic tourists and prove the

effectiveness of destination branding.

viii

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the studyTravel and tourism is best understood as a market. It is a market that reflects the

demands of consumers for a very wide range of travel related products and the supply of

services by a wide array of community and public sector organizations. In the 21st

century, increasing interest is being shown in many countries in the potential of global

travel and tourism as an important contributor to economic development. This is

measured in terms of investment, employment and balance of payment. When managed

effectively, tourism can play an important role in more sustainable development at the

visited destinations. It sustains not only international organizations like airlines, tour

operators and hotels, but also thousands of small and medium enterprises (SME’s) that

are vital elements in most economic systems.

Tourism is best understood in terms of demand and supply. It is the vital linking

mechanism between supply and demand focused on exchange transactions in which

consumers exercise preferences and choices, and exchange their time and money in

return for the supply of particular travel experience or products. It is also a vital role for

tourism organizations and other area organizations identified as destination management

organizations (DMOs), most of which are not directly engaged in the sale of products

(Middleton, 2003). Marketing is a subject of vital concern in tourism because in practical

terms, it harnesses the power of massive community forces as well as government and

regulatory influences. It is the principal management influence that can be used to shape

the size and behavior of a major growing global market.

The most recent trend of marketing a tourist destination is called Destination Marketing

or Destination Branding. According to Nigel, Annette and Roger (2002) work on

destination branding started in 2002 and has since gathered momentum. It has become

one of the hottest topics amongst marketing professionals, academia and politicians. Due

to the rapid development of this area of expertise, numerous books, journals and articles

have been written with the aim of stating the case for destination branding, raising its

profile amongst a range of audiences, including practitioners, destination stakeholders,

academia, politicians and students.

1.1.1 Destination BrandingA destination can be anything from a nation to a region, a resort to a city, an attraction to

an event, or even the tour operators that help them to sell. Branding defines a unique set

of beliefs about a destination and the sort of holidays or breaks it offers- beliefs that are

equally emotional and rational, make it stand out from the competition and make it feel

just right for each of its many target audiences. Many factors will go into the creation of

these beliefs. Getting it right requires strategic thinking - weighing up what you can

offer against what your competitors are doing, what your potential visitors are looking

for, and most importantly how to adapt to change, (www.destinationbranding.co.uk)

Piggott (2001) states that branding is perhaps the most powerful marketing weapon

available to contemporary destination marketers confronted by tourists who are

increasingly seeking lifestyle fulfillment and experience rather than recognizing

differentiation in the more tangible elements of the destination product such as

accommodation and attractions. Most destinations have superb five-star resorts and

attractions, every country claims a unique culture, landscape and heritage, each place

describes itself having the friendliest people, high standards of customer service and

facilities. As a result, the need for destinations to create a unique identity to

differentiate themselves from their competitors - is more critical and the basis for

survival within a globally competitive marketplace

A destination brand can be developed using various strategies. Most common are

advertising, direct marketing, personal selling, public and media relations and through the

co-operation of destination marketing organizations (DMOs). Gold and Ward (1994)

define place promotion as the conscious use of publicity and marketing to communicate

selective images of specific geographic localities or areas to a target audience. Ward

(1998) contends that it not only involves advertising and publicity, but also encompasses

“flagship” developments and “spotlight” events in the arts, media, leisure, heritage,

retailing or sports industries. For example, Egypt is famous for its pyramids (flagship

developments) and Kenya is known for its athletes (spotlight events in sports).

2

Clarke (2000) argues that places currently offer the greatest untapped branding

opportunities. He contends that the choice of a holiday destination is now a significant

lifestyle indicator for today’s aspirational consumers and the places where they choose to

spend their hard earned income increasingly have to have emotional appeal, high

conversational capital and even celebrity' value. Travel for leisure is increasingly

permeating the discourse of everyday life but remains a highly involving experience,

extensively planned, excitedly anticipated and fondly remembered. With this realization,

countries around the world have begun engaging in marketing themselves as destinations

of choice in an attempt to communicate their uniqueness and hence gain competitive

advantage over other countries with similar products.

Nigel, Annete, and Roger (2002) expound on the use of destination branding to market

countries and places within countries such as cities as tourism destinations. They take the

view that brand winners should base their destination branding on a vision that is founded

on intensive stakeholder, competitor and consumer research, and expressed with care and

discipline in everything that communicates the brand personality. While identifying the

dynamics within destination branding, they note the complexity and political dimension

that branding a country involves. This view is supported by Ryan and Zahra (2003) who

document the political role in New Zealand’s tourism sector.

While most of the literature on place and destination branding has concentrated on

nations and the use of Destination Marketing Organizations (DMOs) to undertake place

branding, individual players within the sector have been largely ignored. This is in spite

of the fact that in order to achieve competitive advantage, any tourist firm or organization

must ensure that its destinations overall appeal and the tourist experience offered must be

superior to that of alternative destinations. One way of ensuring this happens is by

engaging the services of tour operators to build up the image of the destination and in the

process attract potential consumers.

Traditionally, owners of consumer brands had a choice of reviewing the effectiveness of

their brand every few years. They would then, if found necessary, re-launch or replace it

with a new one allowing the outdated brand to slowly die, therefore completing its

lifecycle. Countries and destinations did not have that luxury, until the internet

happened. With it came, new media, cheap transport, increased choice, increased

prosperity, dynamic expectations, interests and concerns that brought about a revolution.

Palmer (2001) while expounding on the internet challenge for destination marketing

organizations, alludes to the crucial role of individual players in destination marketing.

He states that destination branding must involve the focused attention ot all tourism

related organizations in a destination and that this can create a major challenge in getting

all the stakeholders to create a coherent theme for the destination brand. This is a basis

for this study.

1.1.2 The Tourism Industry in KenyaKenya lies along the east coast of Africa covering an area of 586,350 sq. km with an

estimated population of 38 million (2010 Kenya Census). Tourism is currently the

second largest contributor to the economy after agriculture. Tourism in Kenya dates back

to pre-independence days and history has it recorded that as early as the 1930’s overseas

visitors and explorers started coming to Kenya mainly for big game hunting expeditions

while others came in search of solitude. These expeditions were locally referred to by the

Swahili word “Safari”. At that time, there was limited tourism infrastructure and the

accommodation was spartan but ideal for both the visitors as well as the settler

community in Kenya. Soon after independence, the government realized the enormous

potential of the nascent tourism industry and undertook to upgrade the existing

infrastructure as well as invest in additional facilities. Towards achieving this goal, the

government encouraged local and foreign entrepreneurs to invest in the tourism and

hospitality industries to pave way for the future development of the sector.

www.ktdc.co.ke

According to the Ministry of Tourism, despite increased competition from other

destinations, Kenya is still one of the most preferred tourist destinations in Africa after

South Africa, Morocco and Egypt. Tourism in Kenya is mainly based on natural

attractions which include wildlife in its natural habitat as well as idyllic beaches.

Approximately 10% of the country has been set aside for conservation of wildlife and

biodiversity. Game viewing is a very popular pursuit since most visitors to Kenya are

predominantly interested in seeing the “big five” animals (that is, the elephant, rhino,

4

lion, buffalo and leopard) not to mention other lesser and unique game the country has to

offer.

Tourism in Kenya has recorded remarkable growth in both revenue earnings and volume

of visitors. In 2007, the tourism sector maintained an upward growth momentum by

recording approximately 2 million visitor arrivals, up from 1.6 million arrivals in 2006.

Consolidated tourism earnings expanded from Kshs 56.2 billion in 2006 to about Ksh.

65.4 billion in 2007, reflecting an 11.6% growth. Tourism accounts for over 9% of total

wage employment and it is also a major source of government revenue in the form of

taxes, duties, license fees, entry fees etc. In addition, tourism through its multiplier effect

has the capacity to promote regional development, create new' commercial and industrial

enterprises, stimulate demand for locally produced goods and services and provide a

market for agricultural produce, w w w,tourism.no.ke

In Kenya, domestic tourism gained prominence at the height of travel advisories given by

foreign governments to their citizens. These advisories witnessed a sharp decline in the

number of international tourists to Kenya and a decline in foreign and general earnings.

In a bid to ensure that the tourism industry remained afloat, domestic tourism was touted

as a possible approach as it was not subject to travel advisories.

1.1.3 Tourism Agents in KenyaThe key players responsible for promotion of domestic tourism in Kenya include the

Ministry of Tourism, the national tourist organizations, like Domestic Tourism Council

of Kenya (DTCK), Kenya Tourist Board (KTB), the media and the tour operators and

agents. The media and the tourism industry in Kenya have formed a joined initiative

aimed at improving tourism information flow thus promoting positive coverage of the

country as a prime tourists’ destination.

Tour operators and agents play an important role in promoting the tourism industry in

Kenya. They are the first source of information for the tourists and as a result of dealing

directly with them, they are able to cater for the different needs of the visitors.

The two major bodies of tour operators and agents in Kenya are Kenya Association of

Tour Operators (KATO) and Kenya Association of Travel Agents (KATA). The Kenya

5

Association of Tour Operators (KATO) is Kenya's leading tourism trade association

representing the interests of over 250 leading and experienced professional tour operators

in Kenya. The members of KATO offer a wide range of services to the tourists. These

can be broadly divided into categories namely: Special Interest safaris, Air safaris,

incentive travel group safaris, custom safaris for individual travelers, camping safaris,

Indian Ocean and Coast holidays. Golf safaris and Agro safaris. (www.katokenya.or g).

Among the objectives of KATO are to uphold the good reputation of Kenya as a tourist

destination by ensuring the operators maintain the highest standards of service and value,

give tourists the confidence of knowing that Kenya offers exciting tourist destinations

that are world renown and spectacular and maintain the recommended standards by the

Ministry of Tourism and Wildlife needed to grant or renew the license of an operator.

The Kenya Association of Travel Agents (KATA) is an organization that has represented

the interests of Kenyan travel agents since 1979 when its forerunner East African Society

of Travel Agents (EASTA) was disbanded due to the collapse of the East African

Community. It works to enhance and improve the travel industry business climate in

Kenya by promoting the services of its members to the general public, protecting their

rights and assisting them to optimize their business. There are over eighty (80)

International Association of Travel Agents (IATA) accredited travel agencies and four

(4) IATA approved training colleges in Kenya. KATA works closely with the Ministry

of Transport, Ministry of Tourism and related government parastatals. It also plays an

important role in the private sector bodies such as Kenya Tourism Federation (KTF) and

the Kenya Private Sector Alliance (KEPSA) in advancing and promoting the tourism

industry, (www.katakenva.org).

1.2 Statement of the ProblemThere is a growing body of literature on destination branding from authors like P. Kotler.

S. Baloglu, V. Middleton. N. Morgan. A. Pritchard and R. Pride. However much of this

literature has largely focused on countries and destination marketing organizations

(DMOs). Little has been done to examine the role of individual players in destination

branding. Besides this, the main focus has been on international tourists. Besides studies

that have been done in the domestic tourism sector (for example, by Isaac Nkari and

6

Makawiti), little else haS been done on the use of destination branding to increase

domestic tourism. This is despite the fact that domestic tourism has been identified as a

key alternative to foreign tourists. In fact, the Ministry of Tourism, in its Strategic Plan

(2008 - 2012) seeks to increase the number of domestic bed nights from 1,8M to 3.6M by

the year 2012.

When it comes to promoting tourism in Kenya, the Ministry of Tourism, the media and

related national organizations are always at the forefront of promoting the tourism

industry and ensuring that the number of visitors increase, bed occupancy increases and

domestic tourism is on the rise. The government has particularly been on the forefront in

marketing Kenya as a tourism destination. Among its key efforts is the creation of Brand

Kenya Board as a state corporation that has been tasked with the responsibility of

identifying and refining the key attributes about Kenya, that contribute positively to the

image and reputation of the nation.

While many researches have been conducted on destination branding in various countries

by authors like J. Day, G. Caprara, Y. Ekinci and S. Hosany over a period of time, little

has been done in the Kenyan context especially in the domestic tourism sector.

Additionally, little is known about the challenges pertaining to the use of destination

branding as a marketing tool by local companies to woo local tourists.

This study therefore seeks to fill the knowledge gaps identified by examining the

effectiveness of marketing strategies in destination branding by local tour operators and

its impact on domestic tourism revenue.

The study will answer the following questions:-

“How effective are the marketing strategies used in destination branding of domestic

tourism in Kenya?”

“What impact would destination branding have on revenue earned from domestic

tourism?”

7

1.3 Research ObjectivesThis study aims to:

i) Determine the effectiveness of the marketing strategies used in destination branding of

domestic tourism by Kenyan tourism operators.

ii) Determine the impact of the marketing strategies used in destination branding on

revenue earned from domestic tourism.

iii) Identify and rank the marketing strategies according to level of importance.

1.4 Significance of the study

The beneficiaries of the study include: the government and policy makers who will utilize

the results of the study when coming up with policies for expansion of the domestic

tourism sector; the Kenyan tourism organizations will be better informed on the potential

benefits of the use of destination branding in gaining and sustaining competitive

advantage among peers; and for the academicians and researchers, the study will advance

existing knowledge on destination branding and open up areas for further research.

Specifically, it will provide data on the use.of destination branding in Kenya and show

how its use is linked with competitive advantage.

8

CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Destination Branding ConceptDestination branding is defined as “ selecting a consistent element mix to identify and

distinguish a destination through positive image-building” and has been considered

synonymous with (re)positioning, image-building and image-reconstruction (Gilmore,

Hall et al, 2002). According to Abimbola (2001), branding means “ identifying and/or

creating, then exploiting certain sustainable competitive advantages”. Branding conveys

information about what a product is and can be, it can render value to a product, it is the

set of methods by means of which a destination or product communicates, symbolizes

and differentiates itself towards its audience. Critical to the creation of a desirable

destination brand is the identification of brand’s value, and the translation of these into a

suitably, emotionally, appealing brand personality, the target and the efficient delivery of

that message (Morgan, Pritchard & Piggot, 2002). A tourist destination needs a strong

tourist brand created in compliance with the genuine, authentic strengths of advertising

on national and foreign channels according to its tourist potential that should be able to

persuade visitors that it is a unique, customized, competitive destination.

Destination branding is a critical issue in tourism destination strategy and planning

(Prideaux & Cooper, 2002). It has been considered a potent marketing tool for tourism

promotion (Morgan et ah, 2004). Destinations with clear competitive positions and strong

supportive branding have been noted to perform better in gaining the attention of

potential tourists and have experienced more favourable tourist visits (Uysal et al, 2000).

For example, brand development campaign executed in New Zealand resulted in the

‘100% Pure New Zealand’ marketing campaign. This branding strategy was driven by

Tourism New Zealand (TNZ) but involved all recognized stakeholders across the

country’s tourism industry. The main objective was to double the number of tourist visits

by 2005 (Morgan, Pritchard & Piggot, 2002) .The other case is the Western Australia

destination brand Personality Campaign which reinstated the country as a premier nature-

based tourism destination resulting in increased tourism demand (Crockett and Wood.

2002).

9

The key in branding a tourism destination is to develop an emotional link to tourists and

to define the unique identity of a destination (Park & Petrick, 2006). Kotler and Gertner

(2002) questioned if countries can be brands and can have brand equity, and concluded in

favour by mentioning the possible effect of strong country brands in attracting not only

tourists, but also businesses and investment. They defined the steps and tools of

successful country branding as; the projection of a simple, appealing , believable and

distinctive image; defining the attributes that form a basis for strong branding (for

instance, natural resources); developing an umbrella concept to cover all of the country's

separate branding activities (for instance, pleasure); a catchy slogan (for instance,

‘Spain - Everything Under the Sun' ); visual images or symbols (for instance, Bin Ben

for London/England); and special events or deeds (for instance, Wimbledon Tennis

Tournament for England).

Hankinson (2004) proposed a framework that was built around the concept of brand

networks in which place branding performs four main functions. These are: brands as

communicators, where brands represent a mark of ownership and a means of product

differentiation manifested in legally protected names, logos, and trademarks; brands as

perceptual entities, which appeal to the consumer senses, reasons and emotions; brands

as value enhancers, which has led to the concept of brand equity; and brands as

relationships, where the brand is construed as having a personality which enables it to

form a relationship with the consumer. Hankinson (2004) also postulated place as

“ relational brand networks" in which the place brand is represented by a core brand and

four categories of brand relationships (consumer relationships, primary service

relationships, brand infrastructure relationships and media relationships) that enhance the

brand reality and brand experience.

2.2 Key Destination Branding ComponentsThe destination branding process revolves around the following five components. Each of

the components is discussed with respect to their relevance and importance to strategic

destination branding:

10

2.2.1 Vision and Stakeholder ManagementAccording to Balmer, 2001 and de Chernatony and Riley, 1998, vision is the starting

point of any great strategy. By having clarity in long-term objectives that can range from

tourism quality, business generation, societal welfare and to political self preservation

agendas, vision can lead to performance results by delivering stakeholder expectations. It

also drives brand positioning hence is considered the beginning of a brand strategy

(Polonsky and Jevons 2006).

Dana 2005 and Balmer 2001 argue that successful policies not only increase economic

benefits but also harmonize culture (who we are), the process (how we know), the content

(what we know), infrastructure requirements (who. how and where), the brand (promise

to be communicated), image (what is current perception) and reputation (distinctive

attributes). For these decisions, the government needs to formulate, communicate and

assimilate vision to all relevant stakeholders, to create a service-oriented culture that will

give it a competitive advantage (Pike. 2005; de Chernatony and Riley. 1998).

Branding complexity increases with the diversity of stakeholders and target customers

needs and their conflicting objectives (Pike, 2005). Dana 2005 contends that an important

part of vision is to know who we are looking at both internal stakeholder needs and

external stakeholders perceptions of the destination. Starting with an inward focus,

governments must ensure that their aspirations are in harmony with local community

needs and expectations (Trueman et ah, 2004; Pike, 2005).

2.2.2 Target Customer and Product Portfolio MatchingA destination’s product and service portfolio must be integrated with the overall branding

strategy based on existing assets and the assets they are capable of developing

(Hankinson, 2004). Products require strategic location, investments in infrastructure

(airlines, ports, roads, technology)? exploitation of natural resources (like safe port, access

to oil) and adaptation of ideas like open skies policies and other economic policies (tax

free, economic free zones and credit facilities) (Balakrishnan, 2008).

Destinations that diversify their portfolio reduce their risk; increase their target base and

encourage loyalty. More destinations are looking at combinations of business based or

11 i

vacation based portfolios (Hankinson, 2005, 2004). Places are re-inventing themselves by

moving away from historical branding. Some successful re-branding strategies for

destinations are recreational, sports, culture and eco-tourism (Ibrahim and Gill. 2005).

Destinations are perceived differently by different segments. Positioning improves when

the destination image is matched with the customer psychographic profile. It can also be

matched with lifestyle variables; activities and experiences and usage occasions. There

must be consistency of brand image and attitude with the customer perception of

themselves and the other users. Focused marketing for specific segments increases the

chances of success in a crowded marketplace; for example the “Nawart Masr You Light

Up Egypt” campaign focused on Arabs (Deloitte HB, 2006). By matching product

portfolios to a few dominant target segments, reach, effective spending and loyalty can be

increased (Woodside and Dubelaar, 2002).

2.2.3 Positioning and Differentiation: Using Brand ComponentsBrand identity is an image that creates a sustainable advantage by differentiating the

brand from other competitors through the positioning statement. A good positioning helps

rationalize the decision making process by letting the customer link key attributes to that

place (Ries and Trout, 1981). It is also a simple and truthful message with limited

association and preferably is based on visitor’s experiences.

Positioning is achieved through brand components, which can be tangible or intangible

attributes; and functional or symbolic (de Chernatony and Riley, 1998). Effective

positioning moves customers up the brand value pyramid from attributes and functional

benefits to emotional and self-expressive benefits (Davis, 2002). According to Hosany et

al. (2007), the emotional component of the destination image is responsible for the

majority of the variance of the personality of the destination. Images associated with

history, heritage and culture are most important when differentiating between

destinations though they may be the second most salient category after attributes

associated with activities and facilities which are functional in nature (Hankinson, 2004).

Consumers prefer brands on the basis of their symbolic properties rather than functional

qualities (Jamal and Goode, 2001). Symbolic values give a more sustainable competitive

advantage (Mowle and Merrilees, 2005). Destinations should focus on a unique

12

constellation of few (three to seven) tangible and functional destination attributes rather

than a “having it all” strategy (Woodside and Dubelaar, 2002; Woodside and frappey,

2001).

2.2.4 Communication StrategyAccording to Nielsen Media, newspapers, televisions, magazines and radios are

considered more trustworthy than on-line forms of advertising. 1 he Internet is growing in

usefulness as it attracts new users and if used to satisfaction, increases destination

enjoyment (Castan'eda et ah, 2007). Tourists prefer word-of-mouth to choose

destinations, but once chosen, web-based resources are used to narrow itinerary (Future

Brands, 2006). Virtual sites must allow easy interactivity between all other destination

product offer sites to allow the customer to get a holistic view of the destination (Palmer

and McCole, 2000).

2.2.5 Managing the ResponseWhen managing the destination brand, the gap between communicated, conceived ideal

and desired identities must be reduced using market research (Rangan et ah, 2006;

Javalgi et ah, 2006; Balmer, 2001). Destinations must be sold with correct information

and not hype as this increases loyalty and word of mouth. Brand netnography helps

understand a tourist’s interpretation of the,place. Another important strategy to build

brand image is harnessing the power of word of mouth. Traveling for social reasons is

impacted by word of mouth because normative inlluences/peers have a greater perceived

reliability and this is also the case for business travel where customers are looking for

expert sources with similarities to them (Wangenheim and Bayo'n, 2004). A survey by

Neilson Media in 2007 on internet users from 47 markets found 78 percent of consumers

felt recommendations from other consumers were most trustworthy. Another response

management strategy is using souvenirs, which are conversations starters. Destinations

must manage their licensing strategy to maintain standardization and correct

representation of the brand (Rangan et ah, 2006).

Vision is the starting point of designing a branding strategy. Governing bodies must take

into consideration the relationships they want to develop with both internal and external

customers, the networks they have alliances with or can develop to help reinlorce

branding strategies, and the basket of products they want and can offer. Governing bodies

must identify key target customers in terms of where they come from, their potential to

spend and mindset. Vision must embrace existing culture and work to balance any

negative effects associated with the country of origin.

The differentiation strategy must be designed to leave a clear and unique image in the

target customer’s mind with consistency in all media choices. Destinations must choose

combinations of brand components for attracting customers, helping customers make a

decision to visit and to create loyalty. It begins in the tourist’s country of origin, is

reinforced on arrival, and duration of stay, and managed during exit and post-visit.

2.3 Conceptual Framework

2.3.1 Destination Brand ImageDestination image is a critical component in the destination selection process (Baloglu

1997). Appropriate images can establish a meaningful position for the destination in the

minds of selected segments of the public as being a place that is different from other

destinations offering similar primary attractions (Chon, 1990; Ahmed. 1997). According

to Pender (1999) destination image comprises all the associations, images and

evaluations, favourable and unfavourable, which a person holds about a place, and it is

thought to be a major influence on destination choice. A destination is not just something

that actually exists; it is also what is thought to exist, a mental concept in the minds of its

tourists and potential tourists (Seaton, 1996).

14

According to Laws (1995), successful destination marketing entails projecting a clear

image to chosen target markets, and offering clients satisfying product experiences which

meet their expectations. Destination marketing is successful when both tourists and

marketers image of the destination matches together. These images should always be

positive and attractive in the minds of the tourists. Thus destination marketers have to

know how tourists see the destination, especially what are the most attractive qualities of

the destination before they start promoting it. According to Laws (1995), for a destination

to be successful in the eyes of potential tourists it is important to know the key things that

attract tourists to a destination.

Engel et al. (1986) stated that image refers to the consumer subjective perceptions of how

an alternative performs on important evaluation criteria. The promotional activities

undertaken by the tourism industry can play an important role in providing competitive

advantages to one tourist destination over another. Tourists perceive many images of

their destinations and these images in turn influence their behavior, attitude, and

predispositions as consumers (Ahmed, 1996). Ahmed also points out that merely

possessing outstanding tourism resources is not sufficient to attract the optimal number of

tourists to a tourist destination rather tourists image of a destination and the attitude of

tourists toward that destination seem to be two of the most important factors responsible

for this variation.

The image of a destination represents the essence of its value that management has used♦

for the creation of a favourable market position. In order to be a source of competitive

advantage, the image must be unique for the creation of a stable and strong impact on

consumers in the process of decision making about buying.

The whole image is the result of the combination of tangible and non-tangible elements

used for the creation of a wanted image on the market: attractive, functional, tangible and

organizational (Chon, 1990). Attractive elements are the objects and space parts that have

utility value since they satisfy the needs of tourists. These motives can be natural

(climate, flora, and fauna) and anthropogenic (cultural and historic heritage, fares,

manifestations, festivities). Functional elements are development forms of tourist circulation (recreation, cultural and mountain tourism, excursions) that reflect socio­

15

economic and space' characteristics of tourism. Tangible elements comprise different

types of services in tourist circulation, which form the material basis (Baloglu, 1997).

Day (2001) discussed two kinds of levels of destination image: Organic and Induced.

Organic image is collected information about a destination from non-commercial sources

like radio, TV, film, books, poetry, education. It can also include a destination’s history,

politics, natural and human catastrophes. Induced image is formed of deliberately-

promoted commercial information sponsored by an organization to attract visitors.

Organic image is seen as more influential on destination choice than induced image, but

both of them influence people’s images on a destination (Pizam & Mansfield, 2000;

Pender, 1999).

2.3.2 Destination Brand PersonalityAs places seek to become distinctive, destination personality is viewed as a viable

metaphor for understanding tourists’ perceptions of places and for crafting a unique

destination identity (Caprara et ah, 2001; Triplett, 1994). Brand personality is simply

defined as the set of human characteristics associated with a brand that are projected from

the self-images of the consumers in an attempt to reinforce their own personalities

(Aaker, 1997). These characteristics or dimensions and their facets as defined by Aaker’s

brand personality framework are sincerity (down-to-earth, honest, wholesome, cheerful);

excitement (daring, spirited, imaginative, up-to-date); competence (reliable, intelligent,

successful); sophistication (upper class, charming); and ruggedness (outdoorsy, tough). A

strong destination brand personality representing either of these dimensions may lead to

increased preference and usage and higher emotional ties translating to loyalty and repeat

visitors. Tourism can be restored through aggressive government campaigns that seek to

redefine the image of the countries (Kanso, 2005).

According to Ekinci and Hosany (2006), a distinctive brand personality can help to create

a set of unique and favourable associations in consumer memory and thus build and

enhance destination. In order to analyse the destination establishment of brand

personalities, an alternative of Aaker’s (1997) study on the brand personality scale has

been used. This substitute scale has been developed by Ekinci and Idosany (2005) who

argued that brand personalities of destinations may be explained by using only a few

16

dimensions, in this case three. These dimensions are sincerity, excitement, and

conviviality. The sincerity dimension values the importance of a good relationship

between visitors/tourists and hosts in evaluating holiday experiences. This may be

explained by the fact that tourists portrayed destinations as trustworthy and dependable.

This in turn reduces their feelings of vulnerability, and the risks associated with the new

environment.

The second dimension, ‘Excitement’. includes traits such as* exciting, daring, spirited and

original. In general, destinations that are perceived to have exciting personalities are

considered attractive, and are thus highly capable of generating interest (Altschiller,

2000).Tourists travel to destinations mostly for relaxation/ leisure purposes, which may

explained why tourists attach a sense of excitement to places/ destinations.

The third dimension, ‘Conviviality’, has been specifically developed for destinations. It

consisted of traits such as friendly, family-oriented, and charming. These are the most

common themes that destination marketers use to characterize destinations in today’s

travel media.

Murphy et al., (2007) argued that brand personality may create a basis for differentiation

as a strong brand personality lead to relatively higher product evaluations. They argued

that brand personality provides a link between the brand’s emotional and self-expressive

benefits. A distinctive brand personality can. help to create a set of unique and favorable

associations in consumer memory and thus build and enhance brand equity (Johnson,

Soutar and Sweeney, 2000; Phau and Lau, 2000). A well- established brand personality

influences consumer preferences and patronage, develops stronger emotional ties and

trust and loyalty with the brand (Fournier, 1998). Similarly, a distinctive and emotionally

attractive destination personality is shown to leverage perceived image of a place and

influence tourist choice behaviouf. For example. Western Australia destination brand

Personality Campaign reinstated the country as a premier nature-based tourism

destination and resulted in increased tourism demand (Crockett and Wood, 2002). Santos

(2004) in his studies revealed that Portugal was represented with personality attributes

such as contemporary, modern, sophisticated and traditional in the U.S.A travel media.

Morgan and Pritchard (2002) posited that

17

England was portrayed as being conservative, pleasant, refined, civilized, eccentric, and

down-to-earth in the U.K tourism media. Furthermore, Henderson (2000) revealed that

the New Asia-Singapore brand comprised of five personality characteristics:

cosmopolitan, youthful, vibrant, modern, reliable and comfortable.

2.3.3 Destination Brand AttributesHankinson (2005) states that brands can be decomposed into various smaller components

in order to help destination managers to manage them. According to him, one of these

components is brand associations that can be classified into individual attribute

categories: functional, emotional and symbolic, experiential and brand attributes.

Hankinson (2004) concluded that destination personality can be characterized by using

these attributes. An efficient co-ordination of brand attributes generates the desired

synergies and advantages for the brand community. The synergies arise because the

tourist encounters the same and similar qualities throughout the destination in a number

of different situations and combinations (Park et al., 1986). Since these are all directly

related to the attraction, the tourist is motivated to associate what is encountered and

encode it within a contiguous neural network.

McEnally and de Chernatony (1999) believe that the functional level needs to be

established at least as a product class, before symbolic levels can be constructed. While

the functional level is the easiest to copy by competitors, the experiential and symbolic

levels offer opportunities for diversification and uniqueness. It is therefore of importance

when branding a tourism destination with the country as brand in mind that the

consistency of attributes is developed within and across three dimensions: First, the

tourism industry has to ascertain that tourism operators build and manage agreed upon

brand attributes horizontally across individual industry sectors. Secondly, there needs to

be vertical consistency between different industry sectors, and thirdly, each operation

must manage these attributes at the functional, experiential and symbolic levels

combined, so that the experience and its meaning become inextricably intertwined

(Gnoth, 2002; Kotler, 1988).

18

2.4 Marketing Strategies in Destination Branding

The main marketing strategies used in developing a destination brand are:-

2.4.1 AdvertisingEgan (2007) defines advertising as a form of communication intended to persuade an

audience (viewers, readers or listeners) to purchase or take some action upon products,

ideals, or services. It includes the name of a product or service and how that product or

service could benefit the consumer, to persuade a target market to purchase or to

consume that particular brand. These brands are usually paid for or identified through

sponsors and viewed via various media. The media commonly used for advertising is

print and electronic media. Advertising can also serve to communicate an idea to a large

number of people in an attempt to convince them to take a certain action, lire

effectiveness of advertising is measured by recall. So if a destination is advertised very

well, then the recall of the target gropu will be high. For example, the wildebeest

migration is one attraction that has been advertised so well that it attracts thousands of

local and international tourists.

2.4.2 Direct Marketing

Direct marketing is a form of advertising that reaches its audience without using

traditional formal channels of advertising, such as TV, newspapers or radio. These are

direct connections with carefully targeted individual consumers to both obtain an

immediate response and cultivate lasting customer relationships. It involves the use of

direct mail, telephone, direct-response television, email, the internet and other tools of

communication to communicate directly with specific customers. Businesses

communicate straight to the consumer with advertising techniques such as fliers,

catalogue distribution, promotional letters, and street advertising (Kotler et.al 2008)•TP

Direct Advertising is a sub-discipline and type of marketing. There are two main

definitional characteristics which distinguish it from other types of marketing. The first is

that it sends its message directly to consumers, without the use of intervening commercial

communication media. The second characteristic is the core principle of successful

advertising driving a specific "call to action." This aspect of direct marketing involves an

19

emphasis on trackable, measurable, positive responses from consumers (known simply as

"response" in the industry) regardless of medium, (www.wikipedia.org)

2.4.3 Personal SellingPersonal selling is as old as bartering, and much older than any organized monetary

system. It can be defined as persuasive communication between a representative of the

company and one or more prospective customers, designed to influence the person's or

group's purchase decision. It is normally face-to-face communication between the seller

and the buyer or direct contact between a salesperson and a customer Egan (2007).

According to Kotler et.al, they define personal selling as the personal presentation by the

firm’s sales force for the purpose of making sales and building customer relationships.

2.4.4 Public and Media relationsThe Chartered Institute of Public Relations (CIPR) has defined public relations as the

discipline which looks after reputation, with the aim of earning understanding and

support and influencing opinion and behaviour. It is the planned and sustained effort to

establish and maintain goodwill and mutual understanding between and organization and

its publics (Egan 2007). Kotler. Bowen and Makens (.2008) have also defined public

relations as building good relations with the company’s various publics by obtaining

favourable publicity, building up a good corporate image and handling or heading off

unfavourable rumors, stories and events.

Similar to effective advertising and promotions, effective public relations often depends

on designing and implementing a well-designed public relations plan. Often, public

relations are conducted through print and electronic media. Publicity is mention in the

media. Organizations usually have little control over the message in the media, at least,

not as much as they do in advertising as the reporters and writers decide what will be

said. *

2.5 Destination PositioningGill and Ibrahim (2005) state that the positioning of a destination "is the process of

establishing a distinctive place of that destination in the minds of potential visitors” .

According to Hankinson (2004), both similar and unique attributes in relation to the

20

competitors needs to be identified. Jobber (2004) added that a clear differential advantage

can be achieved through a brand name, image, service, design, guarantees, packaging,

and delivery. According to Lovelock (1984), positioning is more than just advertising and

promotion. Market position can be affected by pricing, distribution and, of course the

product itself, which is the core around which all positioning strategies revolve.

Haahti (1986) identified the positioning of Finland as a summer holiday destination vis-a-

vis ten competing European countries. According to his findings, Dutch respondents

perceived Norway and Finland similarly on attributes of ‘Friendliness’, and ‘Hospitality’;

and ‘Wilderness’ and ‘Camping’ compared to those of other countries. Kim et al., (2005)

explored the preference and positioning of seven overseas destinations by mainland

Chinese tourists. They found that respondents preferred Australia as an overseas

destination and showed a relatively high level of preference to Singapore and Egypt in

comparison to Japan and South Korea that were least preferred.

Baloglu & McCleary (1999) and Mackay & Fesenmaier (1997), in their studies looked at

both cognition and affect toward environments and destinations. Cognitive components

are tourist prior product knowledge while the affective reflects related feelings (Chen &

Uysal, 2002). Both components have been used to delineate market positioning. Pike and

Ryan (2004) added a conative component, which is analogous to behaviour, as having an

impact on desired positioning. Thus, positioning framework for destinations suggested

that a combination of affective components of image (Push attributes), cognitive

components (Pull attributes) and an individual’s intent (likelihood for purchase) influence

overall positioning in the minds of visitors.

Heath and Wall (1992) propose different approaches towards developing a positioning

strategy for tourism destinations. The first is to assess the current position with respect to

its major competitors by surveying relevant tourism groups who are in a position to make

such a comparison. The second is to select the desired position with regard to a particular

market segment or in general, by interpreting the requirements of existing and potential

markets and the resource strengths of the destination. The options arising from this

analysis may be to keep the current position based on its strength and reliability, develop

a new or clarified position for the destination and communicating it; or where

21

appropriate, position the destination offering on a new dimension, one that tourists may

value but that they do not routinely use in evaluating the region's tourism offering.

Gilbert (1991) argued that destinations should differentiate their tourism products in

order to be able to achieve a unique ‘tourist product benefit" which would enable them to

establish their position in the international tourism market, as well as to attract high

spenders and loyal tourists. Tourism destinations, therefore, should attempt to achieve a

‘status area' image, rather than a ‘commodity area' (Gilbert, 1991). In ‘commodity area’,

the destination is heavily substitutable, very sensitive to price and economic changes,

while consumers have a low awareness of any unique benefits or attributes of the region

(Poon’s, 1993). Thus, holidaymakers base their decision to visit the area merely on price,

while the demand for the destination is incidental and destinations are unable to attract

high spenders. In contrast ‘status areas’ achieve intentional demand as a result of the

unique product attributes perceived by the tourism market. These unique attributes may

be genuine or imagined and thus, a destination is regarded as irreplaceable increasing

consumers’ loyalty and willingness to pay. Gilbert (1991) asserts that destinations should

attempt to become ‘status areas’ in order to improve their image, loyalty and economic

benefits.

Poon’s (1993) ‘flexible specialization' concept examined the industry processes and

proposed a strategy to enable tourism organizations to improve their competitiveness. He

argued that ‘flexible specialization' is a strategy o f ‘permanent innovation' and ‘ceaseless

change’ which provides for the ‘new tourism’. This new tourism is flexible, segmented,

customized to the tourist’s needs and diagonally integrated. In contrast, the old tourism

can be characterized as ‘mass, standardized and rigidly packaged'. The main sources oi

flexibility for service firms lie in the organization, management, marketing, distribution

and other forms of interaction and interrelationships among guests, hotels, suppliers and

distributors. What is important however is not each of these stand-alone aspects but how

they are coupled to create competitive advantages and hence capabilities to move with

the market (Poon, 1993).

22

CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Research Design

This study will adopt a descriptive research design. According to Donald and Pamela

(2006), a descriptive study deals with the what, how and who of a phenomenon which is

the concern for this study. The study specifically will try to establish the extent of usage

of various features of destination branding among tourist operators in Kenya. A semi-

structured questionnaire with will be used to collect primary data. A five-point likert type

scale will be used to measure extent to which the various aspects of destination branding

have been applied and the corresponding effect of performance of the firm. According to

Orodho (2003), a descriptive research design is a method of collecting information by

interviewing or administering a questionnaire to a sample of individuals. This research

design is particularly appropriate since it enables the researcher to identify relations

between the extent of usage of destination branding and firm performance.

3.2 Target populationThe target population is made up of all the three hundred and ten (310) tour operators

registered by the Kenya Association of Tourist Operators (KATO). This information is

publicly available in the KATO website as shown in appendix (II). The unit of study will

be the tour operator.

3.3 Sample designThe target population will be divided into different stratum according to their categories.

The tour operators are divided into categories by KATO based on their annual gross

turnover. To ensure that the strata are proportionate in size, the researcher will divide the

number of tour operators in each stratum by the total number of tour operators in Kenya

and multiply by the sample size. The sample size is derived from systematic random

sampling where the researcher picks one (1) tour operator out of every six (6) tour

operators therefore constituting a sample of approximately fifty (50) tour operators.

Interval sampling will then be done on each stratum depending on the number of tour

operators in each category. This will ensure that each stratum is adequately represented

23

and help reduce the possibility of too few responses while at the same time ensuring that

the data collected is representative of the entire population.

3.4 Data Collection

Primary data is obtained through the use of semi-structured questionnaires which contain

both closed and open-ended questions. Secondary data is obtained from publications such

as journals, books and magazines and the internet.

The questionnaire (appendix 3) will be designed so as to capture the four research

objectives. The questionnaire is divided into four sections. Section 1 contains questions

on demographic information of the person answering the questionnaire. Section 2 is

probing for effectiveness of the media, national tourism organizations and marketing

strategies in promoting domestic tourism. Section 3 addresses the three aspects of

destination branding and section 4 probes for the impact of the destination branding

marketing strategies on the revenue earned from domestic tourism. The researcher

intends to email the questionnaire to those tour operators outside Nairobi and personally

administer the questionnaire to those in Nairobi. This is considered appropriate since the

respondents are spread across the country and time is limited.

3.5 Data analysis and presentation

Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize and analyze the data with the help ol the

SPSS package. This will be presented Tn form of tables, frequencies and percentage

scores. Therefore, data will be presented using tables, charts, graphs and percentages.

24

CHAPTER FOUR: DATA ANALYSIS, FINDINGS AND

DISCUSSION

*

4.1 Introduction

This chapter contains the results of data analysis, findings and discussion. The first

section presents the demographic characteristics of the respondents.

4.2 General information

4.2.1 Level of education

Majority of the respondents (54%) were university graduates. This was followed by those

who had tertiary college education (43%). Only 3% had university post graduate

education.

Frequency

Tertiary college 15 43%

University graduate 19 54%

University postgraduate 1 3%

Total 35 100%

4.2.2 Years of experience in the firm

Majority of the respondents (24%) had been working in their firms for 2 years. A

cumulative percentage of 59% had been had between 2 and 5 years experience in their

respective firms.

Frequency----------------------------------- —---*0.5 2 6%

1 2 6%

1.5 2 6%

2 8 24%o 4 12%

25

I4 1%..... n 21%

5 4 12%

5.5 1 3%

6 2 6%

7 1 3%

30 1 3%

4.2.3 Business age

All the tourist firms who responded had been in operation for over 4 years. Majority of

them (21%) had been in operation for 10 years.

Frequency

4 1 3%

5 2 6%

6 2 6%

7 5 15%

8 2 6%

10 4 7 21%

15 6 18%

17 1 3%

20 oJ 9%

22 *____________________ di_________________

1 3%

25 1 3%

30 1 3%

32 1 3%

53 1 3%

Total 34 100%........ .... .... .

26

4.2.4 Challenges facing exploitation of local tourist industry

The respondents were asked to give the major challenges that they experienced in

exploiting the local tourist industry. Majority (51%) stated that most local tourists find

products very expensive. This was followed by lack of awareness among potential

tourists (34%) and negativity among local tourists about some destinations (9%). Though

not cited by many respondents, un-harmonized hotel pricing, police harassment and high

KWS park fees also emerged as some of the challenges.

Frequency

Increase in KWS park fees, police harassment 1 3%

Un-harmonized hotel pricing, undercutting 1 3%

Negativity from potential local tourists about some

destinations

3

9%

Lack of awareness among potential local tourists 12 34%

Most products prove costly to local tourists , 18 51%

Total 35 100%

4.2.5 Role of various bodies in enhancing domestic tourism

The mass media and KWS were rated highest (mean 4.4) in assisting tour operators

promote tourism in Kenya. These were followed by the ministry of tourism (mean 4.3)

then Kenya Tourist Board (mean 4.0). The DTCK was rated lowest (mean 2.8). This

means that but for DTCK, local tourist operators deem all other government agencies

efficient in carrying out their key mandate of promoting tourism in the local arena.

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Mean

Std.

Deviation

Ministry of tourism 35 1.00 5.00 4.2857 .89349

Domestic Tourism Council of Kenya

(DTCK)

35 1.00 5.00 2.8000 1.41005

Kenya Tourist Board (KTB) 35 2.00 5.00 4.0857 .70174

27

Media 35 2.00 5.00 4.4000 .65079

Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) 35 3.00 5.00 4.3714 .59832

Valid N (listwise) 35

4.2.6 Successfulness of KATOThe respondents find KATO to have been successful (mean ~ 4) in the following

respects: Upholding good reputation of Kenya; Ensuring operators maintain highest std

of services and value; Giving domestic tourist confidence of knowing Kenya offers

different exciting destinations; and Ensuring synergy by facilitating joint focus among all

operators and government agencies.

Descriptive Statistics

N Min Max Mean Std. Deviation

Upholding good reputation of Kenya 35 1.00 5.00 4.3429 .76477

Ensuring operators maintain highest std of

services and value

35 1.00 5.00 4.2857 .78857

Giving domestic tourist confidence of

knowing Kenya offers different exciting

destinations

35 1.00 5.00 3.8286 1.01419

Ensuring synergy by facilitating joint focus

among all operators and government agencies

35 3.00 5.00 4.1714 .70651

Valid N (listwise) 35

4.2.7 The joint initiative between the media and the tourism industry in Kenya

The respondents were asked whether they thought the joint imitative between the media

and the tourism industry has been successful. An overwhelming majority (97%)

concurred while only 3% did not think it had been successful.

28

4.2.8 Favorability of legal framework

The respondents were asked whether the legal framework in place was favorable for their

business. An overwhelming majority of 94% said that it was favorable while only 6% felt

that it was not citing too many licenses and licensing under PSV as the main issues.

■Hi4.2.9 Marketing strategies used

The survey also sought to determine the main advertising channels used by the tour

operators. The results indicate that direct marketing is the most often used strategy (91%)

followed by advertising (82%). Personal selling and online advertising were next (77%).

The least used strategy is public and media relations (44%).

29

Not used

Used often often

Row N % Row N %

Advertising 81.8% 18.2%

Direct marketing 91.2% 8.8%

Personal selling 76.5% 23.5%

Public and media relations 43.8% 56.3%

On-line advertising and website 76.5% 23.5%

4.2.9 Effectiveness of marketing strategies

The most effective strategy was found to be advertising (cumulative percentage 97%)

while the least effective was public and media relations (66%). This could explain why

public and media relations are the least used marketing strategy.

'Not

effective

Slightly

effective Effective

Above 1

average

effective

Highly

effective

Row N Row N Row N Row N Row N

% % % % %

Advertising .0% 2.9% .0% 54.3% 42.9%

Direct marketing .0% .0% 8.6% 40.0% 51.4%

Personal selling .0% 2.9% 25.7% 25.7% 45.7%

Public and media relations .0% 11.4% 22.9% 45.7% 20.0%

On-line advertising and website 3.1% 15.6% 6.3% 12.5% 62.5%

4.2.10 Prohibiting factors affecting range of packages offered to local tourists

The respondents were asked to state the factors that prohibit them from not offering

certain products to local tourists. A majority (82%) cited lack of demand due to high

costs while others cited lack of awareness and interest among local tourists (1 2 % ).

30

PercentFrequency

Lack of awareness and interest 6 18%

Lack of demand due to high costs 28 82%

Total 34 100%

4.3 Destination Branding as a marketing tool

4.3.1 Destination Brand Image

The respondents agreed (mean > 4) to all the positive questions posed which were used to

measure the extent to which local tourists sought to build a destination brand image as an ♦

element of destination branding. This means that the tour operators have embraced this

element of destination branding to a great extent.

Descriptive Statistics

N Min Max Mean

Std.

Deviation

Our advertising seeks to project a clear image to

chosen target markets

35 3.00 5.00 4.4857 .56211

Our marketed destination image and that of

tourists always match hence no disappointments

35 1.00 5.00 4.1714 .85700

We offer clients satisfying product experiences

which meet their expectation

35 2.00 5.00 4.4000 .77460

Our marketing campaigns usually bring out

historical as well as socio- cultural aspects of a

destination

35 2.00 5.00 4.2000 .83314

We emphasize on bringing our emotional

association with various experiences in the

destination

35 2.00 5.00 4.5714 .73907

Valid N (listwise) 35

31

4.3.2 Destination Brand Personality

Destination brand personality is the second element of destination branding. The toui-

operators have embraced some aspects while other aspects are still lacking behind.

Sincerity, excitement, competence and sophistication was portrayed in destination brands

to a great extent (mean > 4). Ruggedness was portrayed in destination brands to a small

extent (mean 3).

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Mean

Std.

Deviation

Sincerity [down-to-earth, honest,

wholesome, cheerful]

35 4.00 5.00 4.5714 .50210

Excitement [daring, spirited,

imaginative, up-to-date]

35 3.00 5.00 4.6000 .60391

Competence[reliable, intelligent,

successful]

35 4.00 5.00 4.5714 .50210

Sophisticationfupper class, charming} 34 ■ 1.00 5.00 3.7647 1.12973

Ruggednessfoutdoorsy, tough} 35 1.00 5.00 3.0571 1.23533

Valid N (listwise) 34

4.3.4 Destination Brand Attributes

The third category of destination branding is destination brand attributes. The

respondents agreed to all positive questions used to estimate this element (mean 4). This

means that destination brand attributes are brought out well in marketing campaigns by

the tour operators.

32

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Mean

Std.

Deviation

We segment marketing campaigns

according to destination attributes

35 3.00 5.00 4.4000 .65079

We develop product categories and

market them differently to different

markets segments

35 2.00 5.00 4.1714 .89066

There coordinated effort in industry to

ensure consistent marketing using

common market attributes among tour

operators

35 2.00 5.00 4.2000 .83314

Marketing campaigns sufficiently convey

functional benefits of destination

35 2.00 5.00 4.2857 .66737

Emotional attributes of destination are

emphasized in our campaigns

35 2.00 5.00 4.3143 .67612

Valid N (listwise) 35

4.4 Correlation analysis

Correlation analysis was used to estimate the relationship between use of destination

branding and four performance indicators. Strong and significant positive correlations

were found between destination brand image on the one hand and higher emotional ties (r

=0.63, p-value - 0.000) and loyal repeat customers (r = 0.31, p-value = 0.000) on the

other; Destination brand personality had high significant correlation with increased

preference and usage (r 0.65, p-value 0.000). Finally, destination brand attributes had

fairly strong significant positive correlations with higher emotional ties (r 0.59, p-value

0.000) and loyal repeat customers (r = 0.57, p-value = 0.000). The results indicate that;

Increased

preference

and usage

Higher

emotional

ties

Loyal

and

repeat

visitors Differentiation

Destination brand image Pearson

Correlation

.213 .631" .610" .258

Sig. (2-tailed) .219 .000 .000 .141

Destination brand

personality

Pearson

Correlation

.646" .391 .082 .240

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .020 .638 .172

Destination brand

attributes

Pearson

Correlation

.192 .585" .570"~~ .180

Sig. (2-tailed) .268 .000 .000 .309

34

CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, DISCUSSION,

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Introduction

This chapter presents a complete overview of the entire study. It contains a summary of

the research findings, discussion of the findings in accordance with the objectives, the

conclusions and the recommendations.

5.2 Summary of findings

The study sought to determine stumbling blocks to using destination branding by local

tour firms to market Kenyan destinations to local tourists; to examine the use of brand

image as a marketing tool to increase domestic tourism; to determine how brand

personality has been used as a marketing tool by local tour operators; to evaluate the

usage of destination attributes in local marketing campaigns by tour operators; and to

evaluate the impact of destination branding on revenue and increase in domestic tourists.

It was established that the major challenges that local tour operators experience in

exploiting the local tourist industry include: the local tourists find the product to be too

expensive, lack of awareness among potential tourists and negativity among local tourists

about some destinations. The media and Government agencies concerned with promotion

of tourism were found to be effective. These include the media. Ministry of Tourism,

KWS and KTB. DTCK was found to be less effective than the other government

agencies. KATO which is the key association of the tourist operators was found to have

35 UNIVERSITY OF NAIRC'4'lower karate u^tr *

been have been successful in all its key mandates. The legal framework in place was

found to be favorable for business of local tourist operators.

Local tourist operators utilize the concept of destination brand image to a great extent in

their marketing campaigns directed towards local tourists. They sought to build a

destination brand image as an element of destination branding by focusing on and

fostering the key elements that constitute brand image in their campaigns. This means

that the tour operators have embraced this element of destination branding to a great

extent.

Destination brand personality which is the second element of destination branding was

also used to a great extent. Sincerity, excitement, competence and sophistication is

portrayed in destination brands to a great extent. However one aspect examined was not

fully utilized. This was portrayal of ruggedness.

The third category. of destination branding is destination brand attributes. The

respondents agreed to all positive questions used to estimate this element. This means

that destination brand attributes are brought out well in marketing campaigns by the tour

operators.

Destination branding was found to have strong positive correlations with performance

indicators. Strong and significant positive correlations were found between destination

brand image on one hand and higher emotional ties and loyal repeat customers on the

other. Destination brand personality had high significant correlation with increased

preference and usage. Finally, destination brand attributes had fairly strong significant

positive correlations with higher emotional ties and loyal repeat customers.

36

5 .3 D is c u s s io n

Domestic tourism is seen as the savior of the tourism industry as it is not subject to travel

advisories. The government efforts to assure the growth of the industry through various

agencies like KWS. KTB and MOT is bearing fruit. This is because the tour operators

feel that they are getting sufficient support from these agencies. The role of the media is

also being felt by the tour operators. Tour operators and agents play an important role in

promoting the tourism industry in Kenya. They are the first source of information for the

tourists and as a result of dealing directly with them, they are able to cater for the

different needs of the visitors. As such their marketing strategies need to be enriched with

informative content. This can be achieved with the aid of destination branding.

This is in line with Prideaux & Cooper’s (2002) suggestion that destination branding is a

critical issue in tourism destination strategy and planning. The findings suggest that

destination branding is strongly correlated with performance. This supports Morgan et al.,

(2004) assertion that destination branding is a potent marketing tool for tourism

promotion. This finding s*so supports Uysgl et al, (2000) finding that destinations with

clear competitive positions and strong supportive branding perform better in gaining the

attention of potential tourists experience more favorable tourist visits.

5.4 Conclusion

The concerted effort by the media, tourism government agencies and tourism operator

associations is effective in enhancing local tourism industry. Apart from high costs

involved, all other key factors support growth prospects of the local tourism industry. The

local tourist operators stand to gain a lot from use of destination branding in marketing

37

campaigns directed towards local tourists. The study has provided empirical evidence that

links destination brand image, destination brand personality and destination brand

attributes to greater customer loyalty, building of higher emotional ties and increased

usage of packages. Increased and more focused usage of these strategies can therefore

lead to higher sales and growth of the industry in general.

5.5 Recommendations

The media and the tourism government agencies should keep up their efforts at

promoting tourism to Kenyans as it has a high growth potential.

KATO should encourage its members to explore other less traditional marketing

strategies like destination branding in their effort to attract local tourists.

It is suggested that further studies be conducted to determine the effect of firm size on the

effectiveness of use of destination branding as a marketing tool for local tourists.

Additionally, a comparative study should be undertaken to determine the relative

effectiveness of destination branding for different regions in Kenya.

38

REFERENCES

Aaker, D. A. (1996) Measuring brand equity across products and markets California Management Review, Vol. 38: 347-56

Aaker, D. A. (2004 ) Brand Portfolio Strategy, Reprint 2004, Simon and Schuster Inc., New York

Ahmed, Z. U. and Krohn, K. B. (1990) Reversing the United States declining competitiveness in the marketing of international Tourism: A perspective on Future Policy, Journal of Travel Research Vol. 2: 23-29

Anderson, J. (1983) The Equity of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge*

Bagozzi, R. P. (1991) Principles of Marketing Management. 1st Edition, Macmillan

Balmer, J. M. T. (2001) Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing: Seeing through the fog, European Journal of Marketing Vol. 35: 248-291

Baloglu, S. & Brinberg, D. (1997) Affective images of tourism destinations. Journal of Travel Research, Vol.35:11-15

Blain, C., Levy, S. E. and Brent Ritchie, J. R. (2005) Destination Branding Insights and Practice from Destination Management Organization, Journal of Travel Research. Vol. 43: 328-338

Buhalis, D. (2000) Marketing the Competitive Destination of the future. Tourism Management, Vol. 21: 97-116

Cai, L. (2002) Cooperative Branding for Rural Destinations, Annals of Tourism Research Vbl. 2: 720-742

Calantone, R. J. and Mazanec , J. A (1991) Marketing Management and Tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol.18: 25-32

Caprara G.V. and Guido G. (2001) Brand Personality: How to make the Metaphor Fit? Journal of Economics Psychology, Vol. 22: 377-395

Clarke, J. (2000) Tourism Brands: An exploratory study of the brands box model. Journal of Vacation Marketing Vol. 6: 329-345

Cooper, C. (1990) Resorts in Decline - The Management__Response. TourismManagement Vol. 11(1 ):63-67

Day, J. S.K., Drnore S. & Kotler, P. (2001) Image selection in destination positioning: A new approach. Journal of Vacation Marketing , Vol. 18(2): 177-186

39

Echtner, C. M. and Ritchie, J. R. B. (1993) The Measurement of Destination Image : An Empirical Assessment. Journal of Travel Research Vol. 31(3): 13

Egan, J. (2007) Marketing Communications, 1st edition, Thompson

Ekinci, Y. G & Hosany, S. (2006) Destination Personality: An Application of Brand Personality of Tourism Destinations. Journal of Travel Research Vol.45(2): 127 -139

Gartner, W. C (1993), Image Formation Process, Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, Vol. 5: 2-9

Gill, J. and Ibrahim, E. E. (2005) A positioning Strategy for a Tourism destination, based on analysis of customer1 s perceptions and satisfactions. Marketing Intelligence & planning Vol. 23(2), 172-188

Go, F. and Govers, R. (2000) Integrated Quality Management for Tourist Destinations: A European Perspectives on Achieving Competitiveness, Tourism Management Vol. 21(1): 79-88

Gold, R. and Ward, S. V. (1994) Place Promotion: The Use of Publicity and Marketing to Sell Towns and Regions, 2nd edition, Chichester Wiley

Govers, R and Go, F. M. (2003) Deconstructing Destination Image in the Information Age, Information Technology & Tourism, Vol. 6(1): 13-29

Gunn, C. (1989) Vacationscape: Designing Tourist Regions, 2nd Edition , Van Nostrand Reinhold

Haahti, A. J. (1986) Finland's competitive position as a destination. Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 13:11-35

Hankison, G. (2004) Relational Network Brands: Towards a conceptual model of place brands. Journal of Vacation Marketing, Vol. 10(2): 109-21.

Hankison, G. (2005) Destination brand image: A business tourism perspective. Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 19(1): 24-23

Health, E. T and Wall, G. (1992) Marketing Tourism Destination: A Strategic Planning Approach, John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Johar. J. and Siry, M (1995) Using segment congruence analysis to determine action ability of travel / tourism segments. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, Vol. 4(3): 1-18

Kapferer, J. N. (2004) The Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity , 3rd Edition, Kogan Page Publishers

40

Keller, K. (1998) Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring and Managing, Brand Equity 3rd edition, Prentice - Hall

Kenya Association of Tour Operators (2010) KA TO Objectives, www.katokenya.org

Kenya Association of Travel Agents (2010) History and Background. Mandate, Vision and Objectives, www.katakenva.org

Kenya Tourism and Development Corporation (2010) Tourism in Kenya, www.ktdc.co.ke

Kotler, P. and Armstrong G. (2001) Principles of Marketing, 9th edition, Prentice-Hall

Kotler, P. and Gertner, D. (2002) Country as Brand product and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective Journal of Brand Management Vol. 9 (4): 249 -261

Kotler, P., Bowen, J. T. and Makens, J. C (????) Marketing for Hospitality and Tourism, 5th Edition, Pearson

Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Saunders, J. and Wong, V. (1999) Principles of Marketing, 2nd Edition, Prentice-Hall Europe

Laws, E. (1995) Tourist Destination Management: Issues Analysis & Polices: London Routledge

Lee, C., Lee, Y. and Lee., B. (2005) Korea’s destination image formed by the 2002 World Cup, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 32(4): 839-858

McCabe, S. (2009) Marketing Communications in tourism and hospitality: concepts, strategies and cases, 3,d edition, Butterworth-Heinnemann

Middleton, V., Fyall, A. and Morgan, M. (2009) Marketing in Travel and Tourism. 4th Edition, Butterworth-Heinnemann

Ministry of Tourism (2010) Tourism Performance 2009, www.tourism.go.ke

Morgan, N., Pritchard, A. and Pride, R. (2004) Destination Branding, 2nd edition, Butterworth-Heinnemann

Murphy, L., Moscardo, G. and Benckendorff, P. (2007) Using Brand Personality to Differentiate Regional Tourism Destinations, Journal of Travel Research Vol.46(l):5-l 4

Palmer, A. and McCole, P. (2000) Tourism destination marketing alliances. Annals of Tourism Research Vol. 22: 616-629

41

Piggot, R. (2001) Building a brand for a country: Can commercial marketing practices achieve this in a government funded environment? Unpublished MBA dissertation. University of Hull

Pike, S. (2004) Destination brand positioning slogans - towards the development of a set of accountability criteria. Acta Turistica, Vol. 16(2): 102 -124

Pike, S. (2005) Tourism destination branding complexity. Journal of product & brand management, Vol. 14(4):258-259

Pike, S. and Ryan, C. (2004 ) Destination positioning , analysis through a comparison of Cognitive , Affective and Cognitive perceptions Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 42(2): 333-334

Poon, A. (1993) Tourism, Technology and Competitive Strategies, Reprint, CAB International

Prideaux, B. and Cooper, C. (2002) Marketing and destination growth: A symbiotic relationship or simple coincidence? Journal of Vacation Marketing, Vol. 9(1): 35-48

Ritchie, .1. R.B and Crouch, G. I. (2003) The Competitive Destination: A Sustainability Perspective, Tourism Management, Vol. 21: 1-71

Ryan, C. and Simmons, D. (1999) Towards a tourism research strategy for New Zealand. Tourism Management Vol. 20: 305-312

Selby, M and Morgan, N. J. (1996) Reconstructing Place Image: A Case Study on its Role of Destination Market Research Tourism Management, Vol. 17(4): 287-294

Ward, S. V. (1998) Selling Places: Thg Marketing and Promotion of Towns and Cities 1850-2000, 1st edition, Routledge

42

A p p e n d ix 1

L I S T O F T O I J R O P E R A T O R S BY C A T E G O R I E S

A b e rc ro m b ie & K e n t L td C a te g o ry A

A fric a n H o riz o n s T ra v e l & S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry A

A fric a n Q u e s t S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry A

A fr ic a n S e c re ts L td -M sa C a te g o ry A

B a llo o n S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry A

B u sh a n d B e y o n d L td C a te g o ry A

C h e li & P e a c o c k L td C a te g o ry A

D o d o w o rld (K ) L td C a te g o ry A

E x p re ss T ra v e l G ro u p C a te g o ry A

G a m e w a tc h e rs S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry A

G u e rb a (K ) L td C a te g o ry A

Ja d e S ea Jo u rn e y s L td C a te g o ry A

K o b o S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry A

L ib e rty A fr ic a S a fa r is C a te g o ry A

M a n ia g o S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry A

M in i C a b s T o u rs & S a fa r is C a te g o ry A

O rig in s S a fa r is C a te g o ry A

P o llm a n 's T o u rs & S a fa r is L td -M sa C a te g o ry A

P riv a te S a fa r is (E A ) L td C a te g o ry A

R h in o S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry A

S o m a k T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry A

S o u th e rn C ro s s S a fa r is (M o m b a sa )L td C a te g o ry A

S o u th e rn C ro s s S a fa r is (N B I) L td C a te g o ry A

T ra n sw o rld S a fa r is (K ) L td . C a te g o ry A

T w ig a C a r H ire & T o u rs L td C a te g o ry A

V in ta g e A fr ic a L td C a te g o ry A

W ild T re k S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry A

W ild life S a fa r i (K ) L td C a te g o ry A

A c ro ss A fr ic a S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry B

B ig F iv e T o u rs & S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry B

C h a rle s to n T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry B

D isc o v e r K e n y a S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry B

In tra S a fa r is L td -M sa C a te g o ry B

43

K e n y a W ild life T ra ils L td C a te g o ry B

L u c a S a fa r i L td. C a te g o ry B

M u th a ig a T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry B

R o b in H u rt S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry B

S o u th e rn S k y S a fa r is C a te g o ry B

Sun w o r ld S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry B

A fr ic a E x p e d it io n s L td C a te g o ry C

A fric a n L a titu d e (K e n y a ) L td C a te g o ry C

A fric a n R o a d S a fa r is C a te g o ry C

B e s t C a m p in g T o u rs C a te g o ry C

D a lla g o T o u rs & S a fa r is C a te g o ry C

E a s te rn a n d S o u th e rn S a fa r is C a te g o ry C

G a m e tra c k e rs (K ) L td C a te g o ry C

K e r & D o w n e y S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry C

K e tty T o u rs T ra v e l & S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry C

K im b la M a n ta n a (K ) L td C a te g o ry C

N a tu re E x p e d it io n s A fr ic a C a te g o ry C

R eal A fr ic a L T D C a te g o ry C

S h o o r T ra v e ls & T o u rs C a te g o ry C

S u n tre k T o u rs & T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry C

T ra v e l A ffa irs L td C a te g o ry C

T u sk e r S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry C

A ir T ra v e l & R e la te d S e rv ic e s L td C a te g o ry D

A lla m a n d a S a fa r is C a te g o ry D

A p o llo T o u rs & T ra v e l C a te g o ry D

A rc h e rs T o u rs & T ra v e l L td . C a te g o ry D

B a te le u r S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry D

B C D T ra v e l C a te g o ry D

B ill W in te r S a fa r is C a te g o ry D

B o ttg e r P ro d u c tio n s & T o u rs L td C a te g o ry D

C h a m e le o n T o u rs C a te g o ry D

C h ro n ic le T o u rs & T ra v e l C a te g o ry D

C o n c o rd e C a r H ire & S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry D

C ro w n T o u rs & C a r H ire L td . C a te g o ry D

D e s tin a tio n (K ) L td C a te g o ry D

44

E a s t A fr ic a S a fa r i V e n tu re s L td C a te g o ry D

F re d lin k C o m p a n y L td -M sa C a te g o ry D

G e o S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry D

G lo b a l H o lid a y s & In c e n tiv e s L td C a te g o ry D

G ra n t & C a m e ro n S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry D

H o lid a y B a z a a r L td C a te g o ry D

In to A fr ic a E c o -T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry D

J a m b o T ra v e l H o u se L im ite d C a te g o ry D

K e n ia T o u rs & S a fa r is C a te g o ry D

K ib o S lo p e s & S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry D

K u ld ip s T o u r in g C o m p a n y -M s a C a te g o ry D

L e t's G o T ra v e l C a te g o ry D

M a rk e t S e rv ic e S ta tio n L td C a te g o ry D

M o tto T o u rs & T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry D

O ffb e a t S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry D

O n S a fa r i (K ) L td C a te g o ry D

R a ja ir T ra v e l & T o u rs C a te g o ry D

R ic k sh a w T ra v e ls (K e n y a ) L td C a te g o ry D

S a fa r is In S ty le C a te g o ry D

S a fa r is U n lim ite d (A fr ic a ) L td C a te g o ry D

S p e c ia l L o fty S a fa r is -M sa C a te g o ry D

S ta r T ra v e l & T o u rs L td C a te g o ry D

T e x c a l H o u se S e rv ic e S ta tio n C a te g o ry D

T o b s K e n y a G o l f S a fa r is C a te g o ry D

T o u r A fr ic a S a fa r is C a te g o ry D

T ra v e l C re a tio n s L td C a te g o ry D

T ra v e l 'n S ty le L td C a te g o ry D

T ra v e l S c e n e S e rv ic e s C a te g o ry D

T ro p ic a l B reak s C a te g o ry D

T ro p ic a l Ice L td C a te g o ry DIS3

U n ig lo b e N o r th l in e T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry D

V e n tu re A fr ic a S a fa r is & T ra v e l C a te g o ry D

W e s tm in s te r S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry D

A b so lu te A d v e n tu re A fr ic a S a fa r is L im ite d C a te g o ry E

A c a c ia H o lid a y s L td C a te g o ry E

A c c a c ia S a fa r is ( K e n y a ) L im ite d C a te g o ry E

45

■y

A d v e n tu re C e n tre L td -M sa C a te g o ry E

A fr ic a V iz a T ra v e l S e rv ic e s L td C a te g o ry E

A fric a n E c o -S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

A fric a n R o u te S a fa r is -M sa C a te g o ry E

A fric a n S a fa ri D ian i A d v e n tu re s - M sa C a te g o ry E

A fric a n S e rm o n S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

A fric a n S p ic e S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

A fric a n T ro p ic a l S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry E

A fr iq u e e n A d v e n tu re L td . C a te g o ry E

A ll S e a so n s S a fa r is a n d T o u rs C a te g o ry E

A lo h a T o u rs & S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

A n s te T o u rs & T ra v e l L im ite d C a te g o ry E

A rc h e r C la rk E n te rp r is e s L td C a te g o ry E

A s Y o u L ik e It (S a fa r is ) L td C a te g o ry E

A s ili A d v e n tu re S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

A u s tra lk e n T o u rs & T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry E

A V T o u rs a n d S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry E

A v e n u e M o to rs L td C a te g o ry E

A v e n u e S e rv ic e S ta tio n C a te g o ry E

B a se c a m p T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry E

B u sh b u c k A d v e n tu re s L td C a te g o ry E

C a ll o f A fr ic a S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

C a ta ly s t T ra v e ls L td C a te g o ry E

C e n tra l R e n t a C a r C a te g o ry E

C K C T o u rs & T ra v e l C a te g o ry E

C o tts T ra v e l & T o u rs L td C a te g o ry E

C ru z e iro S a fa r is L td . C a te g o ry E

C u s to m S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

D av id & E v a n so n T o u rs ( IN T )-M sa C a te g o ry E

D ay m u T ra v e l a n d S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry E

D e s ig n e r T o u rs & T ra v e l «■ C a te g o ry E

D e s tin a tio n C o n n e c t C o . L td C a te g o ry E

D e s tin a tio n L in k S e rv ic e s C a te g o ry E

D iw a k a T o u rs & T ra v e l Ltd C a te g o ry E

E a rth T o u rs & T ra v e l L td . C a te g o ry E

E as t A fr ic a n E a g le (K ) ltd C a te g o ry E

E as t A fr ic a n S h u tt le s & S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

46

E as t A fr ic a n W ild life S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

E co A d v e n tu re s L im ite d C a te g o ry E

El M o lo T o u rs & T ra v e l C a te g o ry E

E n c h a n tin g A fr ic a L T D C a te g o ry E

E x o tic D e s tin a tio n s L td -M sa C a te g o ry E

F e rra ri T o u rs C a te g o ry E

F in ch T ra v e ls L td . C a te g o ry E

F la w le s s L in k s C a te g o ry E

F o u r B y F o u r S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry E

F ra n z L a n g S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

F u rs te n b e rg S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry E

G a m e V ie w e rs A d v e n tu re s L im ited C a te g o ry E

G A T S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

G e n e t T o u rs & S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

G lo ry C a r H ire T o u rs & S a fa r is L td. C a te g o ry E

G o A fric a S a fa r is an d T ra v e l C a te g o ry E

G o A fr ic a T ra v e l L td. C a te g o ry E

G o 4 F i/n S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry E

G o in g P la c e s L td C a te g o ry E

G ra n d E d itio n T o u rs C a te g o ry E

H a m e rk o p S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

H a y a S a fa r is (A ) & T ra v e l L td -M sa C a te g o ry E

H o lid a y S e e k e rs L td C a te g o ry E

H o te l A d v e n tu re T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry E

Ib is T o u rs an d T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry E

Im p e ria l A ir S e rv ic e s C a te g o ry E

In c e n tiv e T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry E

Je t T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry E

JM A R S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry E

K a ris ia L im ite d C a te g o ry E

K e n ta n S a fa r is L td . C a te g o ry E

K e n y a B each T ra v e l L td -M sa C a te g o ry E

K is im a T o u rs & S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

K u ja S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

L e a d in g E x p e d it io n s S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

L e b o o S a fa r i T o u rs L td C a te g o ry E

L in d e rb e rg H o lid a y s & S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

L o n g R en T o u rs & T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry E

M a d u k h a T o u rs & S a fa r is Ltd C a te g o ry E

M a rid a d i S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry E

M a th e w s S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

M e n e n g a i H o lid a y s L td C a te g o ry E

M o m b a sa A ir S a fa r i L td -M sa C a te g o ry E

M o n a c o T o u rs a n d S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

N a h d y T ra v e l & T o u rs C a te g o ry E

N a k e d W ild e rn e s s A fr ic a C a te g o ry E

N a p p e t T o u rs & T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry E

N a tu re 's E d g e C a te g o ry E

N e w K e n y a T ra v e l & T o u rs S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry E

N u tty S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

O s tr ic h H o lid a y s A d v e n tu re s C a te g o ry E

P a lb in a T ra v e l & T o u rs C a te g o ry E

P a p a M u sili S a fa r is L T D C a te g o ry E

P h o e n ix S a fa r is (K ) L td C a te g o ry E

P io n e e rT ra v e ls L td C a te g o ry E

P re p s S a fa r is In te rn a tio n a l L td . C a te g o ry E

P rim a V e ra T o u rs & S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

P rim e tim e S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

R a y d o ll T o u rs & T ra v e l C a te g o ry E

R a y le n n e T o u rs & S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

R e k e ro C a m p L td C a te g o ry E

S a fa r i L in e A fr ic a C a te g o ry E

S a fa ri P a r tn e rs K e n y a L td . C a te g o ry E

S a fa ri T ra ils L im ite d C a te g o ry E

S a fa r i T ra v e l K e n y a L td C a te g o ry E

S a fe R id e T o u rs a n d S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

S a le v a A fr ic a T o u rs L td . C a te g o ry E

S a rd iu s T o u rs & S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

S a tg u ru T ra v e l & T o u rs S e rv ic e s L td. C a te g o ry E

S a y a ri A fr ik a L td C a te g o ry E

S c e n ic W ild life S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry E

S e le c tiv e S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

S e n a to r T ra v e l S e rv ic e s C a te g o ry E

S h a d e s o f A fr ic a T o u rs & S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

48

S ig h ts o f A fr ic a (E .A .) T o u rs & T ra v e l

S ilv e r A fr ic a T o u rs & T ra v e l

C a te g o ry E

C a te g o ry E

S ilv e rb ird A d v e n tu re T o u rs & T ra v e l C a te g o ry E

S ilv e rb ird T ra v e l P lu s L td C a te g o ry E

S k y v ie w O f A fr ic a ltd C a te g o ry E

S m ile T o u rs & G e n e ra l A g e n c ie s C a te g o ry E

S o lly S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry E

S p e c ia l C a m p in g S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

S p e e d b ird T ra v e l & S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

S p o r tsm e n 's S a fa r is & T o u rs C a te g o ry E

S p u rw in g T ra v e l & T o u rs L td C a te g o ry E

S te e n b o k S a fa r is & C a r H ire C a te g o ry E

T a ip a n V a c a tio n s & T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry E

T a m a sh a A fr ic a L td C a te g o ry E

T e e O f f K e n y a L im ite d

T e k k o T o u rs & T ravelK fc

C a te g o ry E

C a te g o ry E

T h e S p e c ia l iz e d S a fa r is C o .L td C a te g o ry E

T o p D e c k T ra v e l & T o u rs C a te g o ry E

T ra v e l A fr ic a S a fa r is L td . C a te g o ry E

T ra v e l C a re L td C a te g o ry E

T ra v e l C o n n e c tio n s L td C a te g o ry E

T ra v e l S h o p p e L td . C a te g o ry E

T ra v e l W ild E .A L T D C a te g o ry E

T ra v e lm a r t L td C a te g o ry E

T ro p ic a l W in d s L td . C a te g o ry E

T u lip T ra v e l L td C a te g o ry E

U If A sc h a n S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry E

U n ik C a r H ire & S a fa r is -M sa C a te g o ry E

V ic to r ia S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

V is i t A f r ic a L td

W ay m a rk S a fa r is L td .

C a te g o ry E

C a te g o ry E

W ild D e s tin a tio n s L td C a te g o ry E

W ild T im e s L td C a te g o ry E

W o n i S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry E

X c e lle n t W ild life P a ra d is e - H o lid a y s an d S a fa r is C a te g o ry E

Y a re S a fa r is L td C a te g o ry E

Z irk u li E x p e d it io n s L td C a te g o ry E

49

Zoar Tours and Safaris Category E

A c c e ss A fr ic a S a fa r is L T D A sso c ia te

A ffa b le T o u rs & S a fa r is (E .A ) A sso c ia te

A fric a B o u n d S a fa r is (K ) L td A sso c ia te

A fric a C la s s ic E sc a p e s L td A sso c ia te

A fr ic a P a r tn e rs In S a fa r i L td A sso c ia te

B a isy O ry x T o u rs T ra v e l & S afa ris A sso c ia te

B e lla fr ic E x p e d it io n s L td . A sso c ia te

B ra v o N o rr is L td . A sso c ia te

B u e n a V is ta T o u rs & S a fa r is A sso c ia te

B u sh tro o p T o u rs & S a fa r is A sso c ia te

C e n tu r io n T ra v e l & T o u rs L td A sso c ia te

C h e e ta h T o u rs L td A sso c ia te

D e a n s T ra v e l C e n tre L td A sso c ia te

D K G ra n d S a fa r is & T o u rs L td A sso c ia te

E a s te rn V a c a tio n s T o u rs L td A sso c ia te

E lite T ra v e l S e rv ic e s L td A sso c ia te

E x o tic G o lf S a fa r is L td . A sso c ia te

E y es on A fr ic a A d v e n tu re S a fa r is L td A sso c ia te

G o fa n S a fa r is A sso c ia te

H iro la T o u rs & S a fa r is A sso c ia te

Id ea l T o u rs & T ra v e l A sso c ia te

JK S a fa ri A d v e n tu re s L td A sso c ia te

Jo c k y T o u rs & S a fa r is A sso c ia te

K e n o r S a fa r is L td A sso c ia te

M a rb le T ra v e l A sso c ia te

N a p e n d a A fr ic a S a fa r is A sso c ia te

N a tu ra l T ra c k S a fa r is A sso c ia te

N a tu ra l W o rld M sa S a fa r is•

P la tin u m C a r H ire & T o u rs

A sso c ia te

A sso c ia te

S a fa ri Icon A sso c ia te

S a m e c o T o u rs A sso c ia te

S c e n ic T re a su re s L td A sso c ia te

S p o t K e n y a S a fa r is A sso c ia te

S u n p e a k S a fa r is A sso c ia te

T a m im i K e n y a L td A sso c ia te

50

r

T h e E rik se n A d v e n tu re A sso c ia te

T ra v e l W a v e s S a fa r is A sso c ia te

W o rld E x p lo re r S a fa r is L td A sso c ia te

A S T A S o c ie ty O f T ra v e l A g e n ts A ff ilia te

B lu e W a v e L td A ffilia te

E a s t A fr ic a n M a g a z in e s A ff i l ia te

E x c lu s iv e A fr ic a n T re a su re s A ffilia te

K .P .S .G .A A ffilia te

K A T O S e c re ta r ia t A ff ilia te

K e n y a U ta lii C o lle g e A ffilia te

K in a z in i F u n z i D h o w S a fa r is -M sa A ffilia te

N e w A fr ic a n T e rr i to r ie s A ff ilia te

O u t o f A fr ic a C o lle c tio n L td A ffilia te

P A W S A fric a S a fa r is L td A ffilia te

R iu k i C u ltu ra l C e n tre A ffilia te

S h e r S a fa r i S e rv ic e s L td .

S h im o n i A q u a V e n tu re s

A ffilia te

A ff ilia te

T a m a r in d M a n a g e m e n t L td A ffilia te

T h e A ir T ra v e l & R e la te d S tu d ie s A ffilia te

T o u r is t M a p s K e n y a L T D A ffilia te

W ild W a te rs L T D A ffilia te

W o rld o f T u i A ff ilia te

51

A p p e n d ix 2

KATO MEMBERS CATEGORY

KATO Members are all categorised depending on their gross annual turnover in the Association. The following are the categories currently in use: -

Category “A” - All members with a gross annual turnover exceeding US$ 1,7Million

Category “B” - All members with a gross annual turnover exceeding US$ 1.1 Million but below US$1,7Million

Category “C” - All members with a gross annual turnover exceeding US$570,000 but below US$l.lMillion

Category “D” - All members with a gross annual turnover exceeding US$140,000 but below US$570,000

Category “E” - All members with a gross annual turnover of not exceeding US$ 140,000

Associate - All new members who are yet to complete one full year in membership.

Affiliate - All members whose activities are affiliated to tourism but they do not have a Tour Operator's licence i.e. they will not be able to offer any tours or safaris but have operations that KATO can benefit from.

Please note that the membership category does NOT in any way relate to the Member's quality of service or ability to meet your safari requirements. It may, in some cases, have a bearing on the size of the company.

52

Elizabeth Njeri Ndung’u

F. O. Box 79594 - 00200

NAIROBI.

A p p e n d ix ?

Cell: 0722 701339

Email: njerindunmiO 1 @,yahoo.com

[email protected]

19 October 2010

Dear Sir/Madam

RE: COLLECTION OF SURVEY DATA

I am a post graduate student at the University of Nairobi, School of Business, pursuing

my Masters in Business Administration (MBA) in Marketing. In partial fulfillment of the

requirements for the award of MBA degree, I am conducting a research entitled “THE

EFFECTIVENESS OF MARKETING STRATEGIES USED IN DESTINATION

BRANDING IN THE PROMOTION OF DOMESTIC TOURISM”.

I have identified your organization as one of the respondents and hereby request that you

spare time out of your busy schedule to complete the attached questionnaire to the best of

your ability.

The information provided will be treated in strict confidence and used solely for

academic purposes. A copy of the report will be availed to you on request.

Yours faithfully, «•

ELIZABETH N. NDUNG’U

53

A p p e n d ix 4

QUESTIONNAIRE

This questionnaire is meant to collect information on the effectiveness of marketing

strategies used in the destination branding of domestic tourism in Kenya. This

information is being sought solely for academic purposes and will be treated with strict

confidence. Kindly answer the questions by writing a brief statement or ticking the boxes

provided.

SECTION 1: PERSONAL INFORMATION

1. What is your highest level of education?

a. Secondary

b. Tertiary college [ ]

c. University graduate [ ]

d. University postgraduate | ]

e. Other (please specify ) ____________________________ ______

2. In which town is your firm's head office located?____________________________

3. What position do you hold in the f i r m ? __________________________

4. How long have you been working with the firm ?_____________________________

5. For how long has the firm been in operation? _ _________________

SECTION 2: GENERAL INFORMATION

6. Do you offer services to domestic tourists?Yes [ ] No [ ]

7. Do you believe that domestic tourism is a high potential area in terms of profitability to tourism operators?Yes [ ] No [ ]

8. What are some of the major challenges facing tourism operators in exploiting domestic tourism to its full potential?

54

9. To what extent have the following assisted tour operators in promoting domestic tourism? G iv e y o u r r a tin g s o n a s c a le o f 1 - 5 (W h e re l = V ery s m a ll ex ten t, 2 S m a ll ex ten t, 3 = M o d e r a te ex ten t, 4 = G re a t ex te n t, 5 = V ery la rg e ex te n t)

No. Respondent’s rating

1 2 -> 4 5

1 Ministry of Tourism

2 Domestic Tourism Council of Kenya (DTCK),

->J Kenya Tourist Board (KTB),

4 The media

5 Kenya Wildlife Services (KWS)

6 Specify any other body

10. How successful has KATO been at the following?G ive y o u r r a tin g s o n a s c a le o f 1 5 (W h e re l ^ N o su c ce ss , 2 = L itt le su ccess ,

3 = A v e r a g e su c c e ss , 4 = A b o v e a v e ra g e s u c c e s s , 5 ^ E x t r e m e ly s u c c e s s fu l)

Respondent’s rating

1 2 J) 4 5

1 Upholding the good reputation of Kenya as a tourist destination

2 Ensuring the operators maintain the highest standards of service and value

oJ Giving domestic tourists the confidence of knowing that Kenya offers different exciting destinations

4 Ensuring synergy by facilitating joint focus among all operators and government agencies

11. Would you say that the joint initiative between the media and the tourism industry to improve tourism information How has been successful?Yes II No | |

55

14. How effective are the following strategies in destination branding?G iv e y o u r r a tin g s o n a s c a le o f 1 - 5 (W h e re 1 =Not e ffe c t iv e a t a l l 2 S l ig h tly e ffe c tive , 3 = E ffe c tiv e , 4 = A b o v e a v e ra g e e ffe c tive , 5 - H ig h ly e ffe c tiv e )

Respondent’s rating

1 2 J 4 5

1 Advertising

2 Direct marketing

3 Personal selling

4 Public and media relations

On-line advertising and websites

15. In your opinion, which other marketing strategy or strategies should be used in branding destinations so as to promote domestic tourism?

16. Do you offer the following packages to domestic tourists on a regular basis?

Yes No

1 Special Interest safaris e.g. honeymoon

2 Air safaris

o Incentive travel group safaris (like for organizations)

4 Custom safaris for individual travelers

5 Camping safaris ♦

6 Indian Ocean and Coast holidays

7 Golf safaris

8 Agro safaris

57

For the packages that are not offered on a regular basis, what is/are the prohibiting factor/s?

SECTION 3: ASPECTS OF DESTINATION BRANDING

Destination Brand Image

17. Do you agree with the following statements which describe aspects of your marketing strategies in relation to projecting brand image to domestic tourists?G iv e y o u r r a tin g s in th e sc a le o f 1 -5 (W h ere 1 = S tr o n g ly d isa g re e , 2 D isa g ree , 3 -^U n d ec id ed , 4= A g r e e a n d 5 S tr o n g ly a g re e )

No. Respondent’s rating

1 2 "33 4 5

1 Our advertising seeks to project a clear image to chosen target markets

2 Our marketed destination image and that of the tourists always match hence no disappointments

-> We offer clients satisfying product experiences which meet their expectation

4 Our marketing campaigns usually bring out historical as well as socio-cultural aspects of a destination

5 We emphasize on bringing our the emotional association with the various experiences in the destination

Destination Brand Personality

18. To what extent do you project the following brand personality qualities in your marketing strategies towards domestic tourists?

G iv e y o u r r a tin g s in the sc a le o f 1-5 ( W h ere 1 = N o ex ten t, 2 = V ery s m a ll ex ten t, 3 = A v e r a g e ex ten t, 4 = G re a t ex ten t, 5 = V ery g r e a t ex te n t)

58

No. Respondent’s rating

1 2 3 4 5

1 Sincerity (down-to-earth, honest, wholesome, cheerful)

2 Excitement (daring, spirited , imaginative, up-to- date)

3 Competence (reliable, intelligent, successful)

4 Sophistication (upper class, charming)

5 Ruggedness (outdoorsy, tough)

Destination Brand Attributes

19. Do you agree with the following statements in relation to destination brand attributes as expressed in your marketing strategies? (Brand attributes include brand personality, brand image, logo, slogans, metaphors) G iv e y o u r r a tin g s in th e sc a le o f 1-5 (W h e re 1 = S tro n g ly d isa g re e , 2 D isa g ree . 3 = U n d ec id ed , 4 - A g r e e a n d 5 = S tro n g ly a g re e )

No. Respondent’s rating

1 2 3 4 5

1 We segment the marketing campaigns according to destination attributes

2 We develop product categories and market them differently to different market segments

QJ There is coordinated effort in the industry to ensure consistent marketing using common market attributes among tour operators

4 Marketing campaigns sufficiently convey the functional benefits of a destination

5 Emotional attributes of destinations are emphasized in our campaigns

59

SECTION 4: PERFORMANCE

20. To what extent have you achieved the following from your marketing campaigns? G iv e y o u r r a tin g s in th e s c a le o f 1-5 (W h ere 1 = V ery s m a ll e x te n t, 2 = S m a ll ex ten t, 3 = M o d e ra te e x ten t, 4 G re a t ex ten t, 5 = V e r y g r e a t ex ten t) ___________

No. Respondent’s rating

1 2 3 4 5

1 Increased preference and usage

2 Higher emotional ties

oJ Loyalty and repeat visitors

4 Differentiation

21. With respect to destination branding, how successful has your firm been in achieving the following? G iv e y o u r ra tin g s in th e s c a le o f 1 - 4 (W h e re 1= N o t s u c c e s s fu l a t a ll, 2 = L itt le su c ce ss , 3= S u c c e s s fu l, 4 = M o d e r a te ly su c ce ss fu l, 5 = E x tre m e ly s u c c e s s fu l) __ _ ___No. Respondent’s rating

1 2 3 4 5

1 Using destination branding as a marketing strategy for domestic tourism

2 Increasing overall number of domestic tourists

Increasing loyal and repeat customers due to domestic marketing campaigns

4 Increasing revenue earned from domestic tourism

60