57
With support from e East African Sustainability Watch Network A Citizen’s Guide to the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance, Monitoring and Control Strategy (2012 - 2030) A Citizen’s Guide to the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance, Monitoring and Control Strategy (2012 - 2030) The East African Community Lake Victoria Basin Commission Secretariat July 2014

The East African Community Lake Victoria Basin … WHSCMS August...The East African Sustainability Watch Network A Citizen’s Guide to the Lake Victoria Basin ... Secretariat for

  • Upload
    vongoc

  • View
    218

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

With support from

The East African Sustainability Watch Network

A Citizen’s Guide to the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance, Monitoring

and Control Strategy (2012 - 2030)

A Citizen’s Guide to the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance, Monitoring

and Control Strategy (2012 - 2030)

The East African Community Lake Victoria Basin Commission Secretariat

July 2014

This Citizen’s Guide to the East African Community’s Regional Plan to Observe, Monitor and Control the Water Hyacinth in the Lake Victoria Basin (2012-2030) was produced by the Lake Victoria Basin Commission (LVBC) secretariat in cooperation with the East African Sustainability Watch Network for the purpose of mobilising long-term stakeholder interest and actions including resource allocation that can secure that the water hyacinth management is at ecologically acceptable levels.

The Guide is a result of the work of a variety of individuals and institutions. Specifically, we would like to thank the Lake Victoria Basin Commission Secretariat for the input provided to enable realisation of this product.

We would also like to thank all the East African SusWatch Network Staff at Uganda Coalition for Sustainable Development: Sustainable Environmental Development Watch Network: and Tanzania Coalition for Sustainable Development: for their contribution to the process of developing this Citizen Guide.Last but not least, special thanks go to the Government of Sweden for supporting the production of this document as part of the support to EA SusWatch Network’s LVEMPII Civil Society Watch Project (November 2011 – October 2014)

Acknowledgement

Cover Picture: Removing water hyacinth from Bariki Sisters’ Dam in Musoma Photo: Bariki Sisters

Lake Victoria is the world’s second largest freshwater body found in East Africa. Lake Victoria Basin is shared by all East Africa Community (EAC) partner States of Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda. Water hyacinth is considered most serious aquatic weed in the Lake Victoria basin. It was officially recognized as an invasive weed in Lake Victoria in the late 1980’s. Although the harmful effects of the water hyacinth are generally known, it has been very difficult to stop its spread.

Since the recognition of water hyacinth as a serious problem in the lake, various methods of water hyacinth control have been employed by the governments of Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda with support from International Partners. These control methods include biological, mechanical and manual/physical. By 2005; 80% of water hyacinth was removed by the Lake Victoria Environment Management Project Phase I (LVEMP I) project; but then just after one or two years, the resurgence of water hyacinth was witnessed at high rates.

The resurgence of water hyacinth has been attributed to a number of factors including: the inability of countries to provide funds to continue with water hyacinth monitoring and control, most of Countries didn’t have well equipped special units to deal with this weed, no regional coordination was in place to coordinate Partner States initiative.

It is from this background that LVBC through the Lake Victoria Environment Management Project Phase II (LVEMP II), developed the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy aimed at aligning organizational resources in order to remove and maintain water hyacinth levels at ecologically acceptable levels within the short-, medium- and long-term.

The implementation of this strategy has started and the following are key registered actions:

Preface

1

a) Private sectors have been sensitised to support water hyacinth removal by mechanical means. Now we have three interested private sectors; and some have tested their harvesters;

b) Establishment of water hyacinth community based groups in many water hyacinth hotpots. We have more than 30 community based water hyacinth groups that are supported to monitor and remove water hyacinth manually and suppressing water hyacinth by using biological means; and

c) LVEMP II regional office and some LVEMP II offices have started using GPS and available satellite images provided by USGS Landsat to monitor water hyacinth. The analysis done is showing reduction of water hyacinth in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda from 2010 to January 2014. Therefore, this Citizen Guide to the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy is another step aimed at sharing the efforts made towards monitoring water hyacinth; and mobilising long-term stakeholder interest and actions including resource allocation that can secure that the water hyacinth is managed at ecologically acceptable levels (remove water hyacinth up to 80% and maintain if possible above this level).

On behalf of Lake Victoria Basin Commission; I take this opportunity to thank LVEMP II regional and National staff, EA SusWatch Network and our Development partners including the World Bank, GEF and the Government of Sweden for all the support made available towards controlling the water hyacinth.

Dr. Canisius KanangireExecutive Secretary - Lake Victoria Basin Commission (LVBC) Secretariat

2

Acknowledgement Preface 1Abbreviations and definition of key terms 5

1.0 Overview of the Citizen’s Guide 7

2.0 How does the water hyacinth affect Lake Victoria and its peoples? 9

3.0 What are the current steps by the EAC Partner States to Control the Water Hyacinth on Lake Victoria? 15

4.0 What is the status to control the water hyacinth in each of the 5 EAC Partner States? 21

5.0 Why do we need the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy? 24

6.0 What is the Purpose of the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy? 26

7.0 What are the performances Indicators for implementation of the Strategy? 31

8.0 What are the Planned Strategic Interventions (actions) for Implementation of the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy? 40

9.0 What other Supportive Mechanisms are Planned to Implement the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy? 41

Table of contents

3

10.0 What are the Institutional Set-up to Implement the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy? 43

11.0 How will the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy be financed? 46

12.0 What are the Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Plans for the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy? 47

13.0 Key reference for further reading 48

Annex 1: Strategic interventions (Activities and associated tasks for each Strategic objective) 49

Annex 2: Stakeholder’s roles and responsibilities in Strategy Implementation 52

4

CBO Community Based OrganizationEAC East African CommunityEACJ East African Court of JudicatureGIS Geographical Information SystemGPS Global Positioning SystemKARI Kenya Agricultural Research InstituteLVB Lake Victoria BasinLVBC Lake Victoria Basin CommissionLVBCS Lake Victoria Basin Commission SecretariatLVEMP Lake Victoria Environment Management ProjectLVFO Lake Victoria Fisheries OrganizationMINERA Ministry of the Environment and Lands (Rwanda)MINAGRI Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources (Rwanda)NARO National Agricultural Research Organisation- UgandaNaFIRRI National Fisheries Resources Research InstituteNEMA National Environment Management AuthorityNEMC National Environment Management CouncilNGO Non-Governmental OrganizationREMA Rwanda Environment Management AuthorityUSGS U.S. Geological Survey WHSMCS Water Hyacinth Surveillance, Monitoring and Control Strategy

Some key terms used

Control: to exercise restraining or directing influence over the water hyacinth challenge through the sanctioned methods (manual, mechanical and biological). Long term watershed management actions can also be taken as control measures

Hotspots: a place of more than usual interest, activity with regard to water hyacinth infestation. These include bays that are sometimes heavily polluted to favour high rate of growth of water hyacinth growth.

Abbreviations and definition of key terms

5

6

Disclaimer The content in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the funders or institutions involved in its preparation

Monitoring: to watch, keep track of, or check the changes in water hyacinth coverage, behaviour etc. over time

Strategy: a careful plan or method for achieving a particular goal (in this case bringing water hyacinth control) usually over a long period of time (in this case (2012 to 2030)

Surveillance: The act of carefully watching over / observe the water hyacinth coverage, behaviour, etc. in order to prevent its spread beyond ecologically acceptable levels, that have previously caused environmental and economic costs to Partner States and dependent communities.

1.0 Overview of the Citizen’s Guide

#Did You Know That:

• Water hyacinth is one of the most noxious aquatic weeds found in water bodies of all the five EAC Partner States

• Tanzania was the first country in East Africa where water hyacinth was seen in Tanga region along River Sigi in 1955. Additional sightings later followed in River Pangani in 1964. All these sightings were outside Lake Victoria Basin. However, water hyacinth invaded the Tanzanian portion of Lake Victoria in the late 1980s via River Kagera

• The costs of invasive weeds infestation on the environment, social and economic systems though recognised are difficult to calculate but estimated impacts may be in the range of millions of dollars.

• Water hyacinth coverage in LVB increased to peak levels between 1995 and 1998 and then receded. It again peaked in some areas of Lake Victoria between 2006 and 2007

Water hyacinth is considered to be the most serious aquatic weed in the Lake Victoria basin. It was officially recognized as an invasive weed in Lake Victoria in the late 1980’s. Although the harmful effects of the water hyacinth are generally known, it has been very difficult tostop the spread.

In response to this challenge, the Lake Victoria Basin Commission through the Lake Victoria Environment Management Project Phase II (LVEMP II), decided to develop the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy. This Citizens guide is a summary of the 150-page strategy document, prepared with a purpose of raising awareness and understanding of and encouraging citizens, CSOs, leaders at national and local levels in the Lake Victoria Basin to join action to address the challenges raised by the water hyacinth that range from effects on local to national economies as well as livelihoods.

7

This Citizen Guide to the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy has twelve sections in form of questions. These reflect the key content of the Strategy and are arranged in a form that will enable a (busy) reader to quickly look out for a particular aspect of interest. Hence, while an overview of the Citizens Guide is provided, a background to the water hyacinth challenge comes in before introducing the strategy (purpose, strategic objectives, and strategic interventions) and the role of the different stakeholders from local, national and regional levels, which are also elaborated in the Annexes 1 to 2.

It is important to note that the Strategy is a long-term undertaking (2012 to 2030) to keep the water hyacinth under control so as to avoid the harm that has been witnessed in the last few years due to lack of coordinated action

8

Water hyacinth cover. Photo: UCSD

2.0 How does the water hyacinth affect Lake Victoria Basin and its peoples?

#Did You Know That:• At one point, the water hyacinth mats present in the Winam Gulf in

Kisumu covered an estimated area of about 17,200 ha, making it the largest coverage of the weed recorded for an observed area on Lake Victoria for the period 1989 – 2001

• The River Kagera that enjoins to Lake Victoria from the Rivers Nyabarongo and Akanyaru is probably the most prolific water hyacinth production zone of the entire river system

• Lake Rweru that is shared by Rwanda and Burundi receives water hyacinth from River Kagera but does not seem to support luxurious mats of the weed. Substantial quantities of water hyacinth however cover the lake only after the transfer from the River Kagera during the rainy season

• Rivers Mara, Kagera, Katonga, and Nzoia) catchments are infested by water hyacinth; and River Kagera system remains a major source of the water hyacinth input into Lake Victoria;

• Water hyacinth is mobile, moves in relation to wind and nutrients distributions;

• Involvement of local communities/ institutions at hotspots to control water hyacinth is sustainable; a good examples in Uganda and Tanzania;

• Use of the biological, physical/ manual removal are more preferable than machines to remove in terms of cost and sustainability

Lake Victoria, the second world largest freshwater body, has a surface area of 68,870 sq km, a mean depth of 40m and maximum depth of 80m (Crul, 1995). The Lake Victoria Basin covers an area of 193,000 sq. km, shared by Tanzania (44%), Kenya (22%), Uganda (16%), Rwanda (11%) and Burundi (7%) (Hutchinson 1957,LVBC 2011). The catchment encompasses the Rwanda, Burundi, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda who are the member states of the East African Community (EAC).

9

Figure 1. Water hyacinth hotspots identified by 2011

Commercial fishery with fish export is a main source of revenue in the Lake Victoria Basin (LVB). In recent years, the Lake Victoria and its river systems has been greatly affected by the water hyacinth and other noxious weeds proliferation (Figure 1, above) and this has resulted in several social, economic and environmental challenges to the countries as well as the dependent riparian communities.

The rapid urbanization and industrialization in the Lake Victoria basin has increased uncontrolled pollution discharges into the Lake that cause shallower parts of the lake to become rich in nutrients and promote weed infestation. The pollution is largely caused by nutrient rich discharges from wastewater treatment plants, industrial effluents, urban storm water and poor agricultural and land degradation practices.

10

Water hyacinth infestation in Winam Gulf – Kisumu (Kenya). Photo: LVBC

Most of the rivers in the catchment (e.g. Mara, Kagera, Katonga and Nzoia) remain infested with water hyacinth. River Kagera system remains a major source of the water hyacinth input into Lake Victoria. When it reaches Lake Victoria, the water hyacinth is spread rapidly within the lake by the south easterly winds and water currents influenced by the River Nile current system that cause the spread of water hyacinth into sheltered bays and inlets along the lake shores.

However, efforts at national and regional level to control the menace of water hyacinth in the waters of the Lake Victoria Basin is a function of the policy, legal and institutional frameworks in place at both country and regional levels. A review carried out in the five EAC Partner States (Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda) identified relevant policies and laws in place that could be used to effectively control Water hyacinth and associated invasive aquatic weeds.

Water hyacinth in Burundi

Water hyacinth occurs mostly in Lakes Rweru and Kanzigiri and River Kagera regions of the LVB of Burundi. Both Lake Rweru and River Kagera are shared between Burundi and Rwanda. Water hyacinth invades the Rwanda portion of Lake Rweru during the rainy season.

11

However, it is known that the water hyacinth trans-located by the lake waters has so far not established extensive resident mats. Water hyacinth mats on Lake Rweru, in Burundi, result from the flooding of River Kagera.

Areas prone to infestation by water hyacinth have been mapped. A total of 36 areas that are considered hotspot areas for Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda have been mapped. Of the 36 hotspots, 13 were mapped in Uganda, 7 in Kenya and 16 in Tanzania. River Kagera is a major hotspot shared between Tanzania and Uganda. For Burundi and Rwanda, the actual hotspot areas shall be mapped in the course of implementing this strategy.

Water hyacinth in Kenya

In Kenya water hyacinth was first reported in 1988 in Lake Naivasha and the weed appeared in Lake Victoria in 1992. Water hyacinth subsequently gained access to many other surface water bodies in the Lake Victoria basin of Kenya including rivers, dams, and ponds. However, explosive proliferation of water hyacinth got established in the nutrient-rich bays of Kisumu, Kendu-Bay, Nyakach and Homa-Bay in the mid-1990s. Water Hyacinth proliferation peaked to 6,000 ha in Kenyan waters of Lake Victoria (EAC 1999) and dropped to lowest coverage in February 2000 at approximately 500 ha following biomass collapse largely attributed to the effects of biological control weevils and strong wave action. There was however a significant resurgence of water hyacinth in Winam Gulf between 2002 and 2004 (LVBC 2011). The resurgence peaked in July 2007 with a weed cover of approximately 9,300 ha.

Water hyacinth in Rwanda

The highest altitude location of water hyacinth within the Lake Victoria Basin is perhaps Lake Ruhondo and the tributaries of River Nyabarongo in Ruhengeri Prefecture, Kagera River System in north-western Rwanda. The presence of water hyacinth in the upstream lower reaches of River Akanyaru was reported as early as the mid 1980’s. The Nyabarongo and Akanyaru join to form River Kagera of Rwanda which is probably the main water hyacinth production zone of the entire river system.

12

Water hyacinth in Tanzania

Tanzania was the first country in East Africa where water hyacinth was seen in Tanga region along River Sigi in 1955. Additional sightings later followed in River Pangani in 1964. All these sightings were outside Lake Victoria Basin. However, water hyacinth invaded the Tanzanian portion of Lake Victoria in the late 1980s via River Kagera. The spread of water hyacinth to the eastern sheltered shores of Lake Victoria was rapid and it was from here that extensive distribution and proliferation occurred to other parts of the country and beyond. In Tanzania, the infestations were mostly located in Mara Bay, Bauman Gulf, Speke Gulf, Mwanza Gulf and Emin Pasha Gulf; and Rubafu Bay all in Mara, Mwanza, and Kagera regions respectively. Peak infestation was estimated at 2,000 ha by 1998 (LVEMP 1999). By 2001 water hyacinth had dramatically reduced as a result of intensive control. Data from the most recent ground surveys (December 2010) indicates presence of water hyacinth to be about 519 ha.

Water hyacinth in Uganda

Water hyacinth was first reported in Uganda in Lake Kyoga (outside the Lake Victoria Basin) in 1988. By 1990, the water hyacinth had spread down the River Nile to Lake Albert and the Albert Nile. Water hyacinth entered Lake Victoria via River Kagera around the end of 1987 (Mallya et al., 2001).

The numerous sheltered bays and inlets typical of the western and northern shoreline of Lake Victoria were the initial suitable habitats and acted as breeding grounds and proliferation of water hyacinth in the Lake Victoria of Uganda (Twongo et al., 1995).

Formation of mobile water hyacinth mats started during the early 1990s when stationary water hyacinth along the shores expanded beyond the maximum shelter threshold provided by shoreline topography.

13

The weed diminished in some of the bays such as Macdonald and Pringle. This decline was attributed to the decline in reserves of essential nutrients especially phosphorus. The drastic decline in water hyacinth cover/biomass especially in the sheltered bays that’s occurred starting in the second half of 1998 was mainly attributed to biological control (Ogwang and Molo, 1999) enhanced by complex environmental dynamics in the vast Lake Victoria (Kayanja ,2000). In 2011 it was found out that only limited re-occurrence of water hyacinth had taken place in the previous hot spot bays of Murchison, Hannington and Thruston.

14

Water hyacinth infestation at one point in Winam Gulf, Kisumu. Photo Ken Oluoch

Environment policy in the EAC Partner states has been evolving from the post-independence methods that emphasized protectionist utilisation to the current conservation and management methods.

Analysis of regional policy, legal and institutional arrangements has revealed that each of the five EAC Partner States and more so Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania have applied the relevant policies and laws defining the methods used for the observation and monitoring of water hyacinth but at different levels of effectiveness and efficiency. The existence of policies and legislative instruments however is a strong point from which opportunities for harmonisation, reviews and synchronised implementation of the water hyacinth monitoring, observation and control strategy can be achieved.

3.0 What are the current steps by the EAC Partner States to Control the Water Hyacinth on Lake Victoria?

3.1 What are the available water hyacinth observation and control methods?

# Did You Know That: • ‘Ecological succession- the process by which the structure of a biological

community evolves over time) in the control of water hyacinth in Lake Victoria is often not recognised yet it actually takes place in Lake Victoria. This natural process often ends in having mixture of water hyacinth and hippo grass and this is most spectacular in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. Uganda reported total mixture of about 70% of the estimated 2,200ha of stationary water hyacinth mats along the shore of lake Victoria by hippo grass.

• Water hyacinth from River Kagera continuously enters Lake Victoria. Within 1kmofLakeVictoria,thedailyrateofwaterhyacinthflowingdowntheKageraRiver is estimated to range between 0.2 and more than 1.5 ha per day

• The aquatic water hyacinth (Eichhoria crassipes), air-filled foliage of theperennialplantfloatsacrossthewater’ssurface,whilethethickfibrousrootsystemanchorsitfirmlytothemuddybottom

• Water hyacinths have the ability to tolerate high levels of toxins and pollution • The roots of these plants absorb pollutants and toxic substances such as

Mercury and Lead• Water hyacinth produces seeds; one plant can produce as many as 5,000

seeds. • The seeds can remain dormant and viable for as long as twenty to thirty years• Therapidrateofreproductionsometimesresultsinadoublingoftheplant’s

presence in just a week

15

3.1.1 Water hyacinth observation methods

Three methods were tried by the technical persons for observation of water hyacinth in Lake Victoria that can help in planning and decision making regarding the choice of control methods and the expected costs. However, only two were successfully operated. The three are as follows:

1) In Uganda, a canoe with outboard engines was used to estimate the area of stationary mats in bays as well as mobile mats after they settled along the shore at dusk.

2) The second method involved aerial surveys using photographic cameras to record, obliquely, areas infested with water hyacinth mats.It was tried unsuccessfully in Uganda due to administrative challenges. Use of Aerial Digital Photographic System (ADPS) for the vertical observation and monitoring of water hyacinth is a recommended method.

3) The third method uses satellite images for water hyacinth observation

Since the recognition of water hyacinth as a serious problem in the lake, various management activities have been implemented by the governments of Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda with support from International Partners. Various methods of water hyacinth control have implemented mainly in Lake Victoria.

3.1.2 Water hyacinth control methods

These control methods include:• Biological• Mechanical• Manual• Chemical.Concurrent application of any two or more of the above methods to control water hyacinth acquired the label “integrated control option” to signify use of more than one method.

16

Several factors influence the choice of the combination of the options integrated. For example, in the 1990s, the physical barrier restrained the weed from swamping the Nalubaale hydropower plant for months until the effects of biological control stopped fresh inputs and also reduced the vigour of the accumulated water hyacinth above the physical barrier. Eventually mechanical harvesters successfully hauled up the rest of the frail weed biomass.

Among other factors, ecological and social-economic importance of the surface water body infested with water hyacinth and the cost effectiveness and applicability of the control options to be included in the package determine the choice of methods

Biological Control

This method involves rearing and release of weevils that can feed on the water hyacinth. The weevils are entirely specific to water hyacinth for their reproductive cycle and in nature depend entirely on water hyacinth for food. Biological control using two weevil species: Neochetina bruchi and Neochetina eichhorniae was selected by Uganda, Tanzania and Kenya as the sustainable option mainly because it was deemed the most cost effective. Biological method that was tried in River Kagera (Agaba et al., 2009, Moorhouse et al., 2001), though not very effective.

Biological control weevils were introduced on infestations of water hyacinth in the Uganda waters Lake Victoria in 1995 and in the Kenya and Tanzania waters in 1996 and 1997.

A spectacular collapse of water hyacinth mats in Uganda waters was credited to the effects of the weevils that occurred between late September and early October of 1998. A similar collapse in 2000 was reported in Kenya and Tanzanian waters of the lake.

Kenya also reared and released mites (Orthogalumna terebrantis) into the lake which are reported to have established and spread (Twongo et al., 2005); the release of the moth, Sameodes albiguttalis that did not succeed.

17

Biological control station using two weevil species: Neochetina bruchi and Neochetina eichhorniae managed by trained communities. Photo: LVBC

Mechanical removal

Mechanized removal involves use of a variety of appropriately designed mechanical weed harvesters. Mechanical removal clears larger areas of weed in a shorter time than manual removal because the harvesters remove larger quantities of weed biomass each time and clear more hectares (6-8ha, depending on size of the harvester) per day than manual labour.

The advantage of mechanical harvesting is that within limits of the size of the infestation, the weed burden may be alleviated within a matter of hours or days. Re-infestation may be prevented or delayed by use of physical barriers, depending on the size and momentum of the incoming weed mats. Suitably designed barriers are used to keep or divert water hyacinth away from economic installations or recreational facilities.

18

It was used at the Kisumu Pier as well as at the mouth of River Kagera with Lake Victoria. It was also used in the 1990s when barriers were installed above the Nalubaale hydropower generation facility near Jinja town to hold hectares of water hyacinth. Unfortunately this mechanical removal exercise was not able to clear the weed partly due to periodic re-infestation from nearby bays of Lake Victoria.

Manual removal

Manual removal involves physical removal of the water hyacinth using hand tools and protective gear mostly gumboots and hand gloves. It has the benefit of offering employment to people, is suitable for clearing small infestations or delimited areas like landing sites but is also a very labour-intensive method.

It does not require any skills and has no perceived environmental risks beyond the risks posed to the people clearing the weed by snakes, crocodiles and disease vectors. Over larger areas or for heavier infestations, the operating costs become prohibitive and the cost effectiveness of the method becomes low because the overall rate of weed removal is low. Where water hyacinth mats are periodically imported by wind, the removal rate may not match that of weed importation leading to continuous pile up.

However, a recent survey in Kenya revealed that communities were mostly in support of manual removal than other methods although this could be linked to their stated motivation to be engaged through cash payments (LVBC, 2011).

In Rwanda, manual removal is favoured because it provides employment to vulnerable groups and the removed weed raw material for craft-making (verbal report from NEYP). In other areas, the preference is linked to making communities more responsible for the integrity of their environment and the observation that local communities do a better job of removing the weed than contractors using mechanical harvesters (verbal report from PAIGELAC).

19

Chemical application

The use of herbicides to control water hyacinth was not adopted by the riparian countries around Lake Victoria. Its use beyond experimental trials was not adopted by member countries of the LVB due to perceived fears of the likely impacts of the chemicals on waterand aquatic life in general.

In addition to the above, one of the key long term options for control of water hyacinths is watershed management that aims at reducing the influx of excess nutrients into surface waters.

What if NO action is taken?

If no action is taken to control water hyacinth, the subsequent costs will be unprecedented and include, but not be limited to, loss of income, adverse environmental impacts and social strife as the livelihoods of fishing and lake/river-dependent communities become compromised.

For example, during peak infestations of water hyacinth on Lake Victoria in the mid-1990s, electricity generation and lake navigation were compromised, volumes of capture fisheries reduced considerably rendering redundant several hundreds of people involved with the fishing industry, and the costs of availing potable water increased. The estimated economic loss in the LVB catchment exceeds USD 3-4billion per year, while the majority of activities that generate this money would cease if water hyacinth was left to proliferate.

20

4.0 What is the status to control the water hyacinth in each of the 5 EAC Partner States?

# Did You Know That:• Water hyacinth control efforts in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania registered

significant results whereby weeds cover in Lake Victoria, in hectares dropped between 1999 and 2001

• Despite the various control methods employed by the Partner States to control the water hyacinth, the weed has not been eradicated and has demonstrated high capacity of resurgence

Burundi and Rwanda

Manual weed removal is the only option so far used to manage water hyacinth on the minor lakes in Rwanda and Burundi.

Kenya

In Kenya the mechanical and biological control methods are the two main options employed to manage water hyacinth. Mites were also used in Kenya for water hyacinth control and the mites have now spread throughout Lake Victoria. The effectiveness of the mites is not well documented.

The mechanical option, unlike as applied in Uganda, involved removal, shredding and dumping of the shredded weeds back into the waters. This aspect was particularly applied at Kisumu bay but with disastrous effects on water quality in the long run when the weed rot and sank. The communities were involved in the biological control programme by rearing the weevils.

Tanzania

Tanzania at the onset basing on the lessons from Uganda adopted the most efficient approach: the Integrated Weed Management (IWM) approach involving using the biological control agents (weevils) and manual removal of water hyacinth at strategic locations (Mallya et al., 2001).

21

The control programme coordinated by the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security put in place efficient mechanism for collaboration with communities while at the same time implementing quarantine regulations and nutrient influx management towards attaining sustainable management of the weed.

Communities and NGOs were involved in manual removal of water hyacinth and government provided hand tools to the communities. Water Hyacinth Control Regulations were also prepared in 1999 based on the National Plant Protection Act (No. 13 of 1997) to guide the

Manual water hyacinth control in Mwanza - Tanzania. Photo: UCSD

Uganda

In Uganda efforts to control water hyacinth started slowly because many decision makers were not convinced of the serious nature of the weed given that this was the first time for such massive infestation to occur.

22

It was the fisher-folks who were being directly impacted who started to voluntarily physically clear the weeds. Having recognised the community efforts, the government created the Water Hyacinth Unit at the Ministry of Agriculture Animal Industry and Fisheries to coordinate all initiatives. Hand tools were distributed to help in removing the weeds in various fish landing sites.

The shortcomings of physical removal caused nutrient rich and sheltered bays to be completely covered with water hyacinth and cut off, while the water intakes for water works and the Owen falls dam were clogged with the weed that caused serious operational interruption.

At this stage the mechanical removal option was introduced to remove weeds at the Owen Fall dam and the piers at Jinja and Port Bell. The mechanical harvesters however proved unaffordable because of frequent break down, repair costs and loss of time.

The application of biological control agents (Neochetina bruchi and Neochetina eichorniae) was introduced thereafter. This control option was to become the most predominant and largely acceptable method for the control of water hyacinth not only in the waters of Lake Victoria. Trials of chemical control using a pesticide namely: Diquat, 2, 4-D amine and Glyphosate were undertaken in Uganda but because of inconclusive results combined with public pressure mainly driven by the fear of loss of market for Nile perch, it was never adopted or used in the control of the weeds (LVBC 2011

23

5.0 Why do we need the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy?

#Did You Know That:• Tanzania’s Plant Protection Act (No. 13) 1997 is the main document for

invasive weed control in the country. From this Act the Plant Protection (Control of Water Hyacinth) Rules was produced in 1999, which is the most detailed document that provides for the monitoring, control and management of water hyacinth in Tanzania

• Much as the water hyacinth can be managed as a resource (asset) especially in the production of commercial goods (e.g. furniture, crafts, animal feeds, bio-energy) and the provision of breeding grounds for some fish species. But in Tanzania, it goes against this law.

Despite the various control methods employed by the Partner States to control the water hyacinth, the weed has not been eradicated and has demonstrated high capacity of resurgence. Moreover, water hyacinth has various impacts on the socio-economic and bio-physical functioning of the water bodies (and associated ecosystems) within the LVB.

These negative economic impacts include interference with water transportation, blocking of fish landing sites, increase in transportation costs, reduced fish catches, difficulties in electricity generation and water extraction, fewer tourists, and blockage of irrigation canals.

Social impacts include lack of clean water, increase in vector-borne diseases, migration of communities, social conflict and difficulty in accessing water points, increase in the population of dangerous snakes. Environmental impacts include decline in water quality, water loss through evapo-transpiration, siltation, increased potential for flooding, spread of other aquatic weeds and a decline in the diversity of aquatic life.

On the positive side, some enterprising members of the riparian communities are deriving livelihoods by harvesting water hyacinth for various economic uses such as livestock feed and production of furniture and handicrafts ( LVBC a, 2011).

24

Hence, some stakeholders feel that water hyacinth can be managed as a resource (asset) especially in the production of commercial goods (e.g. furniture, crafts, animal feeds, bio-energy) and the provision of breeding grounds for some fish species. On the other hand, it goes against the law of some Partner States. This strategy considers water hyacinth as a noxious weed that must be eliminated in Partner States using all the available control measures.

However, it is also envisaged that this stand may change in respect of accepting that some level of water hyacinth infestation is both ecologically and economically desirable.

25

Manual removal of the water hyacinth in Mwanza, Tanzania. Photo Emily Arayo

6.0 What is the Purpose of the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy?

#Did You Know That:• There are high risk areas for introduction and invasion by aquatic weeds

because of interaction with activities in the surrounding areas of the water body. Examples of high risk areas are: Bays especially those directly receiving high nutrient loads from the surrounding: (e.g. sewage works, industry, municipality, agriculture); (ii )Ponded or slow flowing water bodies; (iii) Water bodies near residential areas; (iv)Areas of high human activities (e.g. fish landing sites, camp sites, boat piers, bridges)

• Availability of water nutrients (mostly due to point and non-point source pollutants), waterfalls (that enhance water hyacinth ‘seed’ in Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda), wind velocity, heavy rains, floods, and bays shaded from strong winds and waves all contribute to the proliferation of water hyacinth in the Lake Victoria Basin

The LVBC Secretariat under the LVEMP II project has prepared this strategy guided by the overall aim to improve the environment, safeguard human health, ensure effective use of water resources and facilitate the development of the populations living within the Lake Victoria Basin (LVB) for the benefit of all the Partner States.

This strategy was developed to assist the Partner States to use a fairly common mechanism to conduct observation, monitoring, and control of the water hyacinth (and other aquatic weeds) in the Lake Victoria Basin in order to ensure the attainment of a higher goal of an environment free of invasive weeds as a way of enabling the uninterrupted use of water resources for various economic processes and operations that in turn improve the wellbeing of the communities within the Riparian Partner States.

The strategy was developed through consultations with the key stakeholders in the Partner States that included government lead agencies, local authorities, community and the Lake Victoria Basin Commission (LVBC) Secretariat.

The LVBC Secretariat together with the Regional Technical Committee Working Group (RTWG) provided guidance in developing the strategy.

26

One of the strengths of the Partner States in the implementation of this strategy is that each Partner State already has national arrangements for controlling water hyacinth.

These arrangements range from on-going projects to institutionalised arrangements in all the five Partner States. Hence, creation of synergies will be critical for deploying scarce resources effectively in implementing the strategy. Above all, the success in implementation of this strategy depends on emphasis doing the ‘right things’ (effectiveness) and doing ‘things right’ (efficiency) with the available financial, human and time resources.Another critical issue is the enactment of regional laws (which take precedence over national laws), for the control, observation and monitoring of water hyacinth and other aquatic weeds. The anticipated future process of enacting new laws, or reviewing exiting ones, is another opportunity that should be taken advantage of during the implementation of the proposed strategy.

6.1 What is the strategic goal of the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Observation, Monitoring and Control Strategy?

The strategic goal of the Lake Victoria Basin Strategy for water hyacinth surveillance and control is “to run a well-coordinated system” in each of the Partner states of Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda for the surveillance, monitoring, and control of water hyacinth coverage/infestations to acceptable ecological and economic levels.

6.2 What are the strategic objectives of the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Observation, Monitoring and Control Strategy?

The strategic objectives for this strategy are aimed at aligning organizational resources in order to maintain water hyacinth levels at ecologically acceptable levels within the short-, medium- and long-terms. Six (6) strategic objectives have been selected to achieve this goal and these include:

27

Strategic objective 1:

Management of water hyacinth infestations in hotspots and other areas to the acceptable ecological and economical levels as and when infestation occurs.

Strategic interventions under Objective 1i. To build capacity of key stakeholders in each hotspot to understand the water hyacinth dynamics and control methods.ii. To support, involve and mobilise key stakeholders (fishermen/lady (BMUs); water suppliers, villagers; district authorities, and other main users of the hotspots) in each hotspot to use the recommended methods to remove water hyacinth at the acceptable level in each hotspot.iii. To create incentives to the key stakeholders to value and see the need of removing water hyacinth and other associated aquatic weeds in the hotspots as and when infestation occurs.iv. To hire machines in the areas where machines can be economically used, to remove water hyacinth easily and quickly.v. To use biological methods as means to ensure sustainability of intercepting the water hyacinth cycle/ life.

Strategic Objective 2:

Establishment of a cost-effective water hyacinth observation, control and monitoring system.

Strategic interventions under Objective 2i. Capacity building of the technical staff of mandated agencies for the observation and monitoring of water hyacinth and other aquatic weeds.ii. Development of standardised field data collection tools. iii. Capacity building of community members in the observation and monitoring of water hyacinth and other aquatic weeds in each Partner State.iv. Establishment of a regional and national baseline databases for the water hyacinth observation and monitoring system.

28

v. Execution of routine or/and project-based periodic activities for the observation and monitoring of water hyacinth and other aquatic weeds in each partner state.

Strategic Objective 3: Prevention and control of the water hyacinth as rapidly as it is identified by the established water observation and monitoring system.

Strategic interventions under Objective 3i. Using data generated to establish periodic infestations of water hyacinth in terms of coverage (ha) and using categories such as (‘insignificant’, ‘light’, ‘significant’ or ‘very heavy’).ii. Establish (or enhance if existing) a manual control system for critical economic areas (water abstraction points/sources, power generation plants, fish landing beaches, ports and piers, irrigation canals) that will have low to moderate weed infestation. iii. Implement a biological control scheme (with Neochetina spp) in lake environments and dams that get heavily infested with water hyacinth.

Strategic Objective 4:

Establishment of a mechanism for sustainable financial resources/ mobilization for the implementation of this strategy.

Strategic interventions under Objective 4i. Identify all the possible different sources of funding for implementing the strategyii. Secure funds for implementing the strategyiii. Mainstream the strategy implementation in the financial plans of the partner statesiv. Establish effective and efficient financial administration for strategy implementation

29

Strategic Objective 5:

Establishment of effective and efficient water hyacinth communication framework

Strategic interventions under Objective 5i. Build capacity of journalists from Partner States to effectively communicate water hyacinth and other aquatic weeds issues to a varied audience within Partner States and beyond.ii. Carry out awareness and sensitisation programmes among riparian communities in the LVB. iii. Promote the integration of invasive weeds information and management issues in school curriculum.iv. Procure communication and information gathering equipment.

Strategic Objective 6:

Establishment and operationalization of regional and national coordination mechanisms ensuring synchronization of water hyacinth surveillance, monitoring and control system.

Strategic interventions under Objective 6i. Strengthen the LVBC Regional unit for effective coordination of the activities of the control and observation of water hyacinth and other aquatic weeds.ii. Improve the effectiveness of key national institutions for control and observation of water hyacinth and other aquatic weeds.iii. Strengthen existing Institutions’ capacity to improve the cooperative management of water hyacinth.iv. Develop improved policy and regulatory framework for the control and observation of water hyacinth and other aquatic weeds in LVB.v. Assist research institutional development for establishment of database and database management. vi. Develop and implement quality assurance mechanism to track implementation of the strategy.

30

7.0 What are the performance Indicators for implementation of the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy?

#Did You Know That:• Riparian communities of water hyacinth infested bodies should

be involved in control initiatives, with emphasis on community mobilization, coordination of community-based activities and access to information

In order to measure progress, each of the six strategic objectives of this strategy has a corresponding expected outcome and performance indicators as explained below:

Strategic objective 1: Management of water hyacinth infestations in hotspots and other areas to the acceptable ecological and economical levels as and when infestation occurs.

The water hyacinth mapped in 36 (13 in Uganda, 7 in Kenya and 16 in Tanzania) hotspots need to be removed by using above recommended control methods. But the involvement of key stakeholders in the hotspots is very important and sustainable.

Outcome:

80% Reduction in area covered by water hyacinth in identified hotspots

Key Performance Indicators

• % reduction in area covered by water hyacinth in identified hotspot

• Capacity built on the key stakeholders (fishermen/lady (BMUs);water suppliers, villagers; district authorities, and other main users of the hotspots); and

• Key stakeholders willingly manage water hyacinth at ecological and economical levels.

31

Status of implementation (January 2014)The following is the regional implementation status by January 2014:a) Private sectors have been sensitised to support water hyacinth removal by mechanical means. Now we have three interested private sectors; and some have tested their harvesters;b) Establishment of water hyacinth community based groups in many water hyacinth hotpots. We have more than 30 community based water hyacinth groups that are supported to monitor and remove water hyacinth manually and suppressing water hyacinth by using biological means; andc) LVEMP II regional office and some LVEMP II offices have started using GSP and available satellite images provided by USGS Landsat to monitor water hyacinth. The analysis done is showing reduction of water hyacinth in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda from 2010 to January 2014 by more than 30%.

Strategic Objective 2:

Establishment of a cost-effective water hyacinth observation, control and monitoring system.

Cost-effective National and Regional water hyacinth surveillance control and monitoring system will enable national and regional water hyacinth units to be able to understand the position and movement of water hyacinth; and hence communicate with responsible key stakeholders to control it. The strategy is proposing to establish a special national water hyacinth surveillance, control and monitoring system unit. The Unit will be responsible for coordinating, mobilising and ensure effective water hyacinth monitoring and control at national level.

32

Outcome:

Key stakeholders routinely contributing to the rapid generation of accurate spatial information on the occurrence of water hyacinth/other aquatic weeds; and removal within Partner States

Key Performance Indicators:

• National water hyacinth surveillance, control and monitoring system unit established and operationalised;

• a coordinated cost-effective water hyacinth surveillance, control and monitoring system established in each country; and

• Collected data is informing hyacinth surveillance and control.

Status of implementation (January 2014)a) Tanzania, Kenya and Uganda have established water hyacinth surveillance, control and monitoring system unit;b) Mechanical, manual and biological methods are used in all EAC Partner States; i. in Tanzania manual removal and biological has shown very high effects on water hyacinth control; the monitoring data shows the reduction of above 60% and in some areas more than 80% ii. In Kenya Biological methods has shown very high effects on water hyacinth control; the monitoring data shows the reduction of more than 20% and in some areas more than 30%. Most of the affected water hyacinth died and sank in Homa bay and other areas iii. In Uganda; mechanical and manual removal is dominate and have shown effects on water hyacinth removal in area around Jinja hydropower station removal is morethan 70%. However data from other places not yet collected; iv. Rwanda and Burundi efforts are going on but no data has been received by Regional LVEMP II office (LVBC).

33

Water hyacinth affected by Weevils as biological control. Photo: LVBC

Strategic Objective 3:

Prevention and control of the water hyacinth as rapidly as it is Identified by the established water observation and monitoring System.

The effective and efficient regional and national units will have responsibility to maintain water hyacinth at acceptable economic and ecological levels. These units are given responsibility therefore to ensure key stakeholders and responsible institutions develop a culture of preventing and controlling water hyacinth as rapidly as possible. For this to happen it needs well established water surveillance and monitoring system in place.

Outcome:

Water hyacinth (and other aquatic weeds) maintained at an economic and ecological levels considered by the Partner States to be insignificant in disrupting economic processes within the Lake Victoria Basin

34

Key Performance Indicators:

• Regional Water surveillance and monitoring system established and operational at all levels; and

• LVBC and Partner States able to effectively and efficiently coordinate at the regional and national levels respectively the surveillance, monitoring and control of water hyacinth in LVB.

Status of implementation (January 2014)Very little has been done under this specific objective. In Tanzania the regional office witnessed systematic monitoring schedule and reports. It is the only LVEMP II office with such established system. Other LVEMP II offices data collection is not systematic. The Regional LVEMP II office (LVBC) has started training of LVEMP II national officers to collect data systematically using GPS.

A Specialised team monitoring the water hyacinth. Photo: LVBC

35

Strategic Objective 4:

Establishment of a mechanism for sustainable financial resources/ mobilization for the implementation of this strategy.

In order to ensure water hyacinth is controlled at economic and ecological levels; countries and LVBC Secretariat need to monitor and control continu-ously. This is only possible if sustainable financing mechanism is put in place to support not only the incoming water hyacinth surveillance, control units or offices, but also key stakeholders who will be used to monitor and remove water hyacinth.

Outcome:

LVBC and Partner States have sustainable, stable and secure mechanisms in place for funding the implementation of the strategy for surveillance, monitor-ing and control of water hyacinth in LVB.

Key Performance Indicators:

• National water hyacinth monitoring and control sustainable financing sources established and operationalised; and

• Increased annual financial support to government institutions and key stakeholders to monitor and control water hyacinth.

Status of implementation (January 2014)Most of water hyacinth monitoring and removal to date depends on LVEMP II funds. All Partner States have not established sustainable National water hyacinth monitoring and control sustainable financing sources.

36

Water hyacinth impact: Reduced fish catch that threatens livelihoods

Strategic Objective 5:

Establishment of effective and efficient water hyacinth communication framework

Water hyacinth monitoring and control requires effective and efficient communication at all levels. National Water hyacinth monitoring and control institutions and key stakeholders must communicate on the location, amount, Direction and any other information that is required to control water hyacinth. This strategy is proposing to establish effective and efficient communication at all levels.

Outcome: An effective and efficient Water hyacinth monitoring and control communication framework at all levels established and operational in each country and at LVBC Secretariat.

37

Key Performance Indicators:

• Effective and efficient National Water hyacinth monitoring and control communication framework established and operationalised; and

• Water hyacinth monitoring and control information flows and access of information (documentations, media and sharing of experiences) at all levels.

Status of implementation (January 2014)The implementation of this specific objective is as in specific objective 3. Very little has been done under this specific objective. In Tanzania the regional office witnessed systematic monitoring schedule, and reports communicated to key stakeholders.

Strategic Objective 6:

Establishment and operationalization of regional and national coordination mechanisms ensuring synchronization of water hyacinth surveillance, monitoring and control system.

The role of LVBC Secretariat is to coordinate and promote the National Water hyacinth monitoring and control initiatives. In order to effectively implement this, the strategy is proposing to establish a special water hyacinth monitoring and control unit. The role of this unit is to regionally mobilise resources, coordinate national units and ensure effective monitoring and control of water hyacinth.

The water Hyacinth research need to be supported and encouraged to ensure the water hyacinth surveillance, monitoring and control system is informed by research findings.

Outcome:

An effective and efficient regional coordination of Water hyacinth monitoring and control in Lake Victoria Basin.

38

Key Performance Indicators

• Effective and efficient regional Water hyacinth monitoring and control unit established and operationalised;

• Regional water hyacinth monitoring and control financial resources mobilised and efficiently utilised according to plan; and

• Capacity building of Research stations in the Lake Victoria Basin enhanced and research findings shared and adopted.

Status of implementation (January 2014)LVEMPII has established regional monitoring indicators; all National LVEMP II offices use water hyacinth or called aquatic weeds specialists to monitor and report water hyacinth removal. Need to enhance these one man offices to full operational units.

39

8.0 What are the Planned Strategic Interventions (actions) for Implementation of the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy?

#Did You Know That:Nutrient rich water supports water hyacinth proliferations. These can occur from sources such as: Wastewater treatment plant effluents; Industrial effluents; Industrial wastes; Urban storm water drains; Urban wastes; Runoff from degraded land, soil erosion; Effluents from intensive livestock handling areas and feed lots ; Cropping and agriculture and Abattoir effluents

For each strategic objectives (above) the required strategic interventions have been identified and are depicted in Annex 1. However, the detailed activities, responsibilities, timeframes and resources will be worked out by the implementers of this strategy in each of the five Partner States. By implication, this means that the strategy has only identified strategic interventions which will be translated into various projects and/or routine organizational workflows needed to implement the proposed strategy for the surveillance, monitoring and control of water hyacinth in each of the five Partner States.

40

9.0 What other Supportive Mechanisms are Planned to Implement the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy?

#Did You Know That:• At one point, the water hyacinth mats present in the Winam Gulf

covered an estimated area of about 17,200 ha, making it the largest coverage of the weed recorded for an observed area on Lake Victoria for the period 1989 – 2001

9.1 Coordination

Sustainable aquatic weed management plan requires carefully constituted national and regional institutional frameworks with appropriately mandated institutions and adequate enabling policy and legal arrangements. To ensure effectiveness, there should be in place national and regional coordination arrangements given the multiplicity of stakeholders at different levels.

9.2 Early warning detection and timely action

During the implementation of aquatic weed control programmes, it is important to promptly identify the sources of infestation. It is also important to identify activities that are potential transfer routes (vectors) of the weeds and promptly address them.

9.3 Prioritization of weed control areas

For best results in aquatic weed control, it is important to assess the highest priority areas. The prioritized areas should then be closely observed and Observation and mapping undertaken to record changes.

9.4 Catchment management

Nutrients originating from water catchment exhibits significant influence on water quality that may lead to eutrophication. Nutrient rich water supports water hyacinth proliferations. It is therefore important that the nutrient sources are identified for appropriate mitigation measures to be implemented.

41

9.5 Research and development

Control of aquatic weeds must be informed by research and more so because the ecology of the weeds is governed by physico-chemical status, physical status (morphology, open vs. sheltered, wave movements), climate/weather conditions (rainfall, wind, temperature), that significantly influence resurgence, proliferation and succession characteristics. Research to understand the weed ecology, weed impacts and the impacts of the management process should be done.

9.6 Aquatic weed control options and approach

An integrated approach is vital to achieve successful aquatic weeds management, because it puts the most stress on the weeds. Integrated approach is a combination of different weed control methods that are carefully selected to form a mix with the most effective outcome

9.7 Education and awareness

Raising awareness among the riparian communities is one of the most effective actions that can be undertaken to control and prevent the spread of water weeds.

9.8 Effective communication

Communication plays an important role and that the absence of well-organized information flow can easily deal a fatal blow to even the most noble of intentions. For the fight against the water hyacinth to be successful, it is necessary to enhance awareness among stakeholders of the social, economic and environmental consequences of water hyacinth infestation.

42

Effective implementation of the water Hyacinth observation, Monitoring and control strategy will depend on how best the planned activities in the Partner States are coordinated and harmonised. Lake Victoria basin Commission Secretariat (LVBC) is the primary coordinating agency that will ensure that the national activities are well coordinated and synchronised to avoid unnecessary duplications and conflicts that may arise. The National Focal Point Ministries will coordinate the activities of the water hyacinth units with those of other technical agencies within the Partner States. The implementation mechanisms of the WHSMCS at the regional and national levels are outlined in the following sections and in Annex 2.

10.1 Regional Institutions

Under the EAC Treaty, the EAC Partner States have agreed to cooperate in the management and sustainable development of shared natural resources (the Protocol for Sustainable Development of Lake Victoria Basin and the Protocol on Environment and Natural Resources Management). The Lake Victoria Basin Commission was established to implement the Protocol for Sustainable Development of the LVB, and is responsible for coordinating the actions of national and local organizations and stakeholders. LVBC is therefore the primary regional body responsible for guiding the implementation of the Water Hyacinth Observation, Monitoring and Control Strategy.

10.2 National Institutions

In Burundi, the Focal Point Ministry for the EAC, the Ministry of the Water, Environment, Land Management and Town planning is proposed to be in charge of coordinating the implementation of this strategy with technically relevant sector ministries.

In Kenya, Ministry of Agriculture is proposed to be in charge of coordinating the implementation of the WHSMCS with technically relevant sector ministries and agencies.

10.0 What are the Institutional Set-up to Implement the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy?

43

In Rwanda, Institut de Sciences Agronomique du Rwanda is proposed to be in charge of coordinating the implementation of the WHSMCS with technically relevant sector ministries.

In Tanzania, Ministry of Agriculture, Food Security and Cooperatives is proposed to be in charge of coordinating the implementation of the WHSMCS with technically relevant sector ministries.

In Uganda, Ministry of Agriculture Animal Industry and Fisheries is proposed to be for the implementation of the WHSMCS with technically relevant sector ministries.

10.3 Local Institutions

The Ministries responsible for Local Government in the Partner States will be in charge of implementation of the WHSMCS based on their mandates. The Ministries will work with Lower Local government structures that will be the primary implementing agents and will be the focal points on the ground for incorporating activities into their District work plans, for guiding implementation activities (such as site selection, community involvement and monitoring and evaluation), and for ensuring follow-up on data collecting and reporting.

At the grassroots level, Beach Management Units and Water Users Associations/Committees have a mandate to participate in management of water resources in the basin. They will work closely with the District Environment and Water Offices to ensure WHSMCS implementation according to recommended activities. They will also be responsible for monitoring and reporting on the status of water hyacinth monitoring and control including weed incidences and coverage in their locality. Other important partners will be the Research Institutions both within the region and from other countries that will be needed to conduct the necessary research for effective implementation of the strategy.

44

10.4 Regional and International Conservation Agencies

LVEMP, NBI-NELSAP and other regional or international conservation partners on the ground and those not on the ground but with interest in conservation in the LVB, will be critical to the success of the strategy implementation.

10.5 NGOs and CBOs

International organizations including NGOs and CBOs will be involved primarily as sources of funding and technical expertise for implementation of the strategy.

45

Nyabisarye CDD group water hyacinth weevil breeding centre in Musoma, Tanzania.

Photo Emily Arayo.

The water hyacinth Weevil.

The acquisition of adequate resources is a prerequisite for the successful implementation of this strategy. LVBC who is the primary coordinating institution responsible for the implementation of the WHSMCS is the vehicle for the mobilization of the necessary resources. LVBC is mobilising funds from different Development Partners; but efforts have not yet born fruit. LVBC is in the process of establishing Lake Victoria Environment Trust Funds to provide funds to support transboundary environmental initiatives. At this point eac Partner Sates is requested to provide funds to enable established unit to operate.

11.0 How will the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance (Observation), Monitoring and Control Strategy be financed?

46

12.0 What are the Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Plans for the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Observation, Monitoring and Control Strategy?

Implementation of the strategy will require regular monitoring and evaluation of the progress of the different planned activities, which will be based on appropriate performance indicators for the Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) system building on those in Section 6.0 above.

47

A pile of water hyacinth in Kisumu. Photo Ken Oluoch.

13.0 Key reference for further reading

East African Community / Lake Victoria Basin Commission (2013). Lake Victoria Water Hyacinth Surveillance, Monitoring and Control Strategy – 2012 to 2030:http://tinyurl.com/olm9fxh accessed January 31, 2014

48

49

Anne

x 1:

St

rate

gic

inte

rven

tions

(Act

iviti

es a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d ta

sks

for e

ach

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive)

Stra

tegi

c Ob

ject

ive

Expe

cted

Out

com

eSt

rate

gic

Inte

rven

tions

Stra

tegi

c Ob

ject

ive

1M

anag

emen

t of w

ater

hya

cint

h in

fest

atio

ns in

hot

spot

s an

d ot

her a

reas

to th

e ac

cept

able

ec

olog

ical

and

eco

nom

ical

le

vels

as

and

whe

n in

fest

atio

n oc

curs

.

Stra

tegi

c Ob

ject

ive

2

Esta

blis

hmen

t of a

cos

t ef

fect

ive

wat

er h

yaci

nth

surv

eilla

nce

and

mon

itorin

g sy

stem

•80

% re

duct

ion

in a

rea

cove

red

by

wat

er h

yaci

nth

in id

entif

ied

hots

pots

•Ca

paci

ty b

uilt

on th

e ke

y st

akeh

olde

rs (f

ishe

rmen

/ lad

y (B

MUs

; wat

er s

uppl

iers

, villa

gers

, di

stric

t aut

horit

ies,

and

oth

er m

ain

user

s of

hot

spot

s; a

nd

•Ke

y st

akeh

olde

rs w

illing

ly m

anag

e w

ater

hya

cint

h at

eco

logi

cal a

nd

econ

omic

leve

ls; n

eed

of re

mov

ing

wat

er h

yaci

nth

and

othe

r ass

ocia

ted

aqua

tic w

eeds

in th

e ho

tspo

ts a

s an

d w

hen

infe

stat

ion

occu

rs

•o

Key

stak

ehol

ders

rout

inel

y co

ntrib

utin

g to

the

rapi

d ge

nera

tion

of a

ccur

ate

spat

ial i

nfor

mat

ion

on th

e oc

curre

nce

of w

ater

hya

cint

h / o

ther

aq

uatic

wee

ds; a

nd re

mov

al w

ithin

Pa

rtner

sta

tes

•To

bui

ld th

e ca

paci

ty o

f key

sta

keho

lder

s in

eac

h ho

tspo

t to

und

erst

and

the

wat

er h

yaci

nth

dyna

mic

s an

d co

ntro

l m

etho

ds•

To s

uppo

rt, in

volv

e an

d m

obili

se k

ey s

take

hold

ers

(fish

erm

en/ l

ady

(BM

Us; w

ater

sup

plie

rs, v

illage

rs,

dist

rict a

utho

ritie

s, a

nd o

ther

mai

n us

ers

of h

otsp

ots)

in

eac

h ho

tspo

t to

use

the

reco

mm

ende

d m

etho

ds to

re

mov

e w

ater

hya

cint

h at

the

acce

ptab

le le

vel i

n ea

ch

hots

pot.

•To

cre

ate

ince

ntiv

es to

the

key

stak

ehol

ders

to v

alue

an

d se

e th

e ne

ed o

f rem

ovin

g w

ater

hya

cint

h an

d ot

her

asso

ciat

ed a

quat

ic w

eeds

in th

e ho

tspo

ts a

s an

d w

hen

infe

stat

ion

occu

rs;

•To

hire

mac

hine

s in

the

area

s w

here

mac

hine

s ca

n be

ec

onom

ical

ly u

sed,

to re

mov

e w

ater

hya

cint

h ea

sily

and

qu

ickl

y; a

nd•

To u

se b

iolo

gica

l met

hods

as

mea

ns to

ens

ure

sust

aina

bilit

y of

inte

rcep

ting

the

wat

er h

yaci

nth

cycl

e /

life.

•Ca

paci

ty b

uild

ing

of th

e te

chni

cal s

taff

of m

anda

ted

agen

cies

for t

he s

urve

illanc

e an

d m

onito

ring

of w

ater

hy

acin

th a

nd o

ther

aqu

atic

wee

ds•

Deve

lopm

ent o

f sta

ndar

dise

d fie

ld d

ata

colle

ctio

n to

ols

•Ca

paci

ty b

uild

ing

of c

omm

unity

mem

bers

in th

e su

rvei

llanc

e an

d m

onito

ring

of w

ater

hya

cint

h an

d ot

her

aqua

tic w

eeds

in e

ach

Partn

er S

tate

.•

Esta

blis

hmen

t of a

regi

onal

and

nat

iona

l bas

elin

e da

taba

ses

for t

he w

ater

hya

cint

h su

rvei

llanc

e an

d m

onito

ring

syst

em•

Exec

utio

n of

rout

ine

or /

and

proj

ect –

base

d pe

riodi

c ac

tiviti

es fo

r the

sur

veilla

nce

and

mon

itorin

g of

wat

er

hyac

inth

and

aqu

atic

wee

ds in

eac

h P

artn

er S

tate

50

Anne

x 1:

St

rate

gic

inte

rven

tions

(Act

iviti

es a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d ta

sks

for e

ach

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive)

Stra

tegi

c Ob

ject

ive

Expe

cted

Out

com

eSt

rate

gic

Inte

rven

tions

Stra

tegi

c Ob

ject

ive

3

Prev

entio

n an

d co

ntro

l of t

he

wat

er h

yaci

nth

as ra

pidl

y as

it

is id

entif

ied

by th

e es

tabl

ishe

d w

ater

obs

erva

tion

and

mon

itorin

g sy

stem

.

Stra

tegi

c Ob

ject

ive

4

Esta

blis

hmen

t of a

mec

hani

sm

for s

usta

inab

le fi

nanc

ial

reso

urce

s/ m

obili

zatio

n fo

r the

im

plem

enta

tion

of th

is s

trate

gy.

Stra

tegi

c Ob

ject

ive

5

Esta

blis

hmen

t of e

ffect

ive

and

effic

ient

wat

er h

yaci

nth

com

mun

icat

ion

fram

ewor

k

•W

ater

hya

cint

h (a

nd o

ther

aqu

atic

w

eeds

) mai

ntai

ned

at a

n ec

onom

ic

and

ecol

ogic

al le

vels

con

side

red

by

the

Partn

er S

tate

s to

be

insi

gnifi

cant

in

dis

rupt

ing

econ

omic

pro

cess

es

with

in th

e La

ke V

icto

ria B

asin

•LV

BC a

nd P

artn

er S

tate

s ha

ve

sust

aina

ble,

sta

ble

and

secu

re

mec

hani

sms

in p

lace

for f

undi

ng th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e st

rate

gy fo

r su

rvei

llanc

e, m

onito

ring

and

cont

rol

of w

ater

hya

cint

h in

LVB

•An

effe

ctiv

e an

d ef

ficie

nt W

ater

hy

acin

th m

onito

ring

and

cont

rol

com

mun

icat

ion

fram

ewor

k at

all

leve

ls e

stab

lishe

d an

d op

erat

iona

l in

eac

h co

untry

and

at L

VBC

Secr

etar

iat.

•Us

ing

data

gen

erat

ed fr

om (S

trate

gic

Obje

ctiv

e 2)

ab

ove,

est

ablis

h pe

riodi

c in

fest

atio

ns o

f wat

er h

yaci

nth

in te

rms

of c

over

age

(ha)

and

usi

ng c

ateg

orie

s (s

uch

as

‘insi

gnifi

cant

’, ‘li

ght’,

‘sig

nific

ant’,

or ‘

very

hea

vy’)

•Es

tabl

ish

(or e

nhan

ce if

exi

stin

g) a

man

ual c

ontro

l sy

stem

for c

ritic

al e

cono

mic

are

as (w

ater

abs

tract

ion

poin

ts /

sour

ces,

pow

er g

ener

atio

n pl

ants

, fis

h la

ndin

g si

tes,

bea

ches

, por

ts a

nd p

iers

, irri

gatio

n ca

nals

) tha

t w

ill ha

ve lo

w to

mod

erat

e w

eed

infe

stat

ion

•Im

plem

ent a

bio

logi

cal c

ontro

l sch

eme

(with

Neo

chet

ina

spp)

in la

ke e

nviro

nmen

ts a

nd d

ams

that

get

hea

vily

in

fest

ed w

ith w

ater

hya

cint

h

•Id

entif

y al

l pos

sibl

e di

ffere

nt s

ourc

es o

f fun

ding

for

impl

emen

ting

the

stra

tegy

•Se

cure

fund

s fo

r im

plem

entin

g th

e st

rate

gy•

Mai

nstre

am th

e st

rate

gy im

plem

enta

tion

in th

e fin

anci

al

plan

s of

the

Partn

er S

tate

s•

Esta

blis

h ef

fect

ive

and

effic

ient

fina

ncia

l adm

inis

tratio

n fo

r stra

tegy

impl

emen

tatio

n

•Bu

ild c

apac

ity o

f jou

rnal

ists

form

Par

tner

Sta

tes

to

effe

ctiv

ely

com

mun

icat

e w

ater

hya

cint

h an

d ot

her

aqua

tic w

eeds

issu

es to

a v

arie

d au

dien

ce w

ithin

Pa

rtner

Sta

tes

and

beyo

nd•

Carry

out

aw

aren

ess

and

sens

itiza

tion

prog

ram

mes

am

ong

ripar

ian

com

mun

ities

in th

e LV

B•

Prom

ote

the

inte

grat

ion

of in

vasi

ve w

eeds

info

rmat

ion

and

man

agem

ent i

ssue

s in

sch

ool c

urric

ulum

•Pr

ocur

e co

mm

unic

atio

n an

d in

form

atio

n ga

ther

ing

equi

pmen

t

51

Anne

x 1:

St

rate

gic

inte

rven

tions

(Act

iviti

es a

nd a

ssoc

iate

d ta

sks

for e

ach

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive)

Stra

tegi

c Ob

ject

ive

Expe

cted

Out

com

eSt

rate

gic

Inte

rven

tions

Stra

tegi

c Ob

ject

ive

6

Esta

blis

hmen

t and

op

erat

iona

lizat

ion

of re

gion

al

and

natio

nal c

oord

inat

ion

mec

hani

sms

ensu

ring

sync

hron

izatio

n of

wat

er

hyac

inth

sur

veilla

nce,

m

onito

ring

and

cont

rol s

yste

m.

•LV

BC a

nd P

artn

er S

tate

s ab

le to

ef

fect

ivel

y co

ordi

nate

at t

he re

gion

al

and

natio

nal l

evel

s re

spec

tivel

y th

e su

rvei

llanc

e, m

onito

ring

and

cont

rol

of w

ater

hya

cint

h in

LVB

•Ca

paci

ty b

uild

ing

of re

sear

ch

stat

ions

in th

e LV

B en

hanc

ed

and

rese

arch

find

ings

sha

red

and

adop

ted.

•St

reng

then

the

LVBC

Reg

iona

l uni

t for

effe

ctiv

e co

ordi

natio

n of

the

activ

ities

of t

he c

ontro

l and

su

rvei

llanc

e of

wat

er h

yaci

nth

and

othe

r aqu

atic

wee

ds•

Impr

ove

the

effe

ctiv

enes

s of

key

nat

iona

l ins

titut

ions

fo

r con

trol a

nd s

urve

illanc

e of

wat

er h

yaci

nth

and

othe

r aq

uatic

wee

ds•

Stre

ngth

en e

xist

ing

inst

itutio

ns’ c

apac

ity to

impr

ove

the

coop

erat

ive

man

agem

ent o

f wat

er h

yaci

nth

•De

velo

p im

prov

ed p

olic

y an

d re

gula

tory

fram

ewor

k fo

r the

con

trol a

nd s

urve

illanc

e of

wat

er h

yaci

nth

and

othe

r aqu

atic

wee

ds in

LVB

•As

sist

rese

arch

inst

itutio

nal d

evel

opm

ent f

or

esta

blis

hmen

t of d

atab

ase

and

data

base

man

agem

ent

•De

velo

p an

d im

plem

ent q

ualit

y as

sura

nce

mec

hani

sm

to tr

ack

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

stra

tegy

52

Anne

x 2:

St

akeh

olde

r’s ro

les

and

resp

onsi

bilit

ies

in S

trate

gy Im

plem

enta

tion

Stra

tegi

c Ob

ject

ive

Expe

cted

Out

com

eSt

rate

gic

Inte

rven

tions

East

Afr

ican

Com

mun

ity

(EA

C) S

ecre

taria

t•

To p

rom

ote

the

wid

enin

g an

d de

epen

ing

of e

cono

mic

, pol

itica

l, so

cial

and

cul

tura

l int

egra

tion

in

orde

r to

impr

ove

the

qual

ity o

f lif

e of

the

peop

le o

f Eas

t Afri

ca

thro

ugh

incr

ease

d co

mpe

titiv

enes

s,

valu

ed a

dded

pro

duct

ion,

trad

e an

d in

vest

men

t; th

roug

h co

ntro

l/rem

oval

of

wat

er h

yaci

nth

and

othe

r inv

asiv

e w

eeds

from

all

the

fresh

wat

ers

of

the

regi

on

•Gu

idin

g th

e EA

C Po

licy

fram

ewor

k on

Env

ironm

ent a

nd

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es w

ith s

peci

fic re

fere

nce

to a

quat

ic

wee

ds o

bser

vatio

n& c

ontro

l in

Lake

Vic

toria

Bas

in

(LVB

)•

Perio

dic

Brie

fing

of th

e EA

C Co

unci

l of M

inis

ters

and

Su

mm

it on

pro

gres

s m

ade

in a

quat

ic w

eed

cont

rol

•Re

sour

ce m

obili

zatio

n fro

m p

artn

ers

for u

se in

the

cont

rol p

rogr

ams

East

Afr

ican

Leg

isla

tive

Ass

embl

y (E

ALA

)•

Legi

slat

ion,

ove

rsig

ht a

nd

repr

esen

tatio

n•

Legi

slat

e &

enac

t law

s on

con

trol o

f wat

er w

eeds

•Ap

prov

e fu

ndin

g•

Audi

t rev

iew

•Fo

rmat

ion

of a

spe

cial

ized

com

mitt

ee to

follo

w u

p on

th

e ac

tiviti

es re

late

d to

con

trol o

f aqu

atic

wee

ds

Lake

Vic

toria

Bas

in

Com

mis

sion

(LVB

C)•

To h

ave

with

in th

e La

ke V

icto

ria B

asin

an

d Ea

st A

frica

n•

Com

mun

ity a

t lar

ge a

pro

sper

ous

popu

latio

n liv

ing

in a

hea

lthy

and

sust

aina

bly

man

aged

env

ironm

ent

prov

idin

g eq

uita

ble

oppo

rtuni

ties

and

bene

fits

thro

ugh

the

prom

otio

n,

faci

litat

ion

and

coor

dina

tion

of

activ

ities

of

•di

ffere

nt a

ctor

s to

war

ds s

usta

inab

le

deve

lopm

ent a

nd p

over

ty e

radi

catio

n.

•Co

ordi

nate

and

ove

rsee

Wat

er h

yaci

nth

obse

rvat

ion&

co

ntro

l pro

gram

mes

•Qu

ality

con

trol o

f dat

a ac

quis

ition

, tre

atm

ent,

stor

age

and

man

agem

ent

•M

obili

ze a

nd c

oord

inat

e al

l sta

keho

lder

s w

ith in

tere

st in

pa

rtici

patin

g in

the

cont

rol p

rogr

ams

•Bu

ild c

apac

ity o

f the

regi

on to

con

trol t

he a

quat

ic

wee

ds•

Mob

ilize

reso

urce

s

53

Anne

x 2:

St

akeh

olde

r’s ro

les

and

resp

onsi

bilit

ies

in S

trate

gy Im

plem

enta

tion

Stra

tegi

c Ob

ject

ive

Expe

cted

Out

com

eSt

rate

gic

Inte

rven

tions

East

Afr

ican

Cou

rt o

f Jus

tice

(EA

CJ)

•En

surin

g ad

here

nce

to th

e La

w,

Inte

rpre

tatio

n an

d ap

plic

atio

n of

the

Trea

ty fo

r the

Est

ablis

hmen

t of t

he

East

Afri

ca C

omm

unity

the

Trea

ty

•To

hea

r and

det

erm

ine

disp

utes

on

the

inte

rpre

tatio

n of

the

Trea

ty a

nd in

this

cas

e w

ith re

gard

to s

ectio

ns

rela

ted

to th

e w

ater

wee

d co

ntro

l and

arb

itrat

ion

Lake

Vic

toria

Fis

herie

s Or

gani

satio

n (L

VFO)

•Fi

sher

ies

man

agem

ent i

n th

e re

gion

•M

aint

enan

ce o

f vib

rant

fish

erie

s in

dust

ry in

the

regi

on

•Re

sear

ch•

Trai

ning

Nat

iona

l Leg

isla

tive

Ass

embl

yN

atio

nal i

nter

est i

n en

viro

nmen

tal

man

agem

ent a

nd th

e co

ntro

l of w

ater

w

eeds

•N

atio

nal i

nter

est i

n en

viro

nmen

tal

•m

anag

emen

t and

the

cont

rol o

f wat

er w

eeds

Line

Min

istr

ies

e.g.

Wat

er

and

Envi

ronm

ent

Nat

iona

l Env

ironm

enta

l M

anag

emen

t Aut

horit

ies:

NEM

A, N

EMC,

REM

A

Loca

l Aut

horit

ies

Nat

iona

l int

eres

t in

the

follo

win

g ar

eas:

•En

viro

nmen

tal m

anag

emen

t•

Wat

er re

sour

ces

man

agem

ent

•Fi

sher

ies

and

fishe

r fol

ks w

elfa

re•

Man

agem

ent o

f wee

ds•

Food

sec

urity

•He

alth

•N

atio

nal E

nviro

nmen

tal M

anag

emen

t Au

thor

ities

:•

NEM

A, N

EMC,

REM

A

•W

elfa

re o

f the

loca

l com

mun

ity

•In

itiat

e &

Impl

emen

t pol

icie

s•

Mai

nstre

am a

quat

ic w

eeds

obs

erva

tion&

con

trol i

n po

licie

s, la

ws

and

stra

tegi

es•

Supe

rvis

e go

vern

men

t pro

gram

mes

for w

ater

wee

ds•

Deve

lop

capa

city

for o

bser

vatio

n& c

ontro

l

•Co

ordi

natio

n•

Enfo

rcem

ent

•M

obili

satio

n•

Ordi

nanc

es/b

yela

ws

•Se

nsiti

zatio

n•

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

obs

erva

tion&

con

trol a

ctiv

ities

54

Anne

x 2:

St

akeh

olde

r’s ro

les

and

resp

onsi

bilit

ies

in S

trate

gy Im

plem

enta

tion

Stra

tegi

c Ob

ject

ive

Expe

cted

Out

com

eSt

rate

gic

Inte

rven

tions

Com

mun

ity•

Wel

fare

of t

he c

omm

unity

•Im

plem

enta

tion

of o

bser

vatio

n& c

ontro

l act

iviti

es•

Gath

erin

g an

d tra

nsm

ittin

g•

info

rmat

ion

on w

ater

hya

cint

h &

asso

ciat

ed w

ater

w

eeds

NGO

s &C

BOs

•Co

mm

unity

focu

sed

proj

ects

•Li

nk n

atio

nal a

nd re

gion

al in

stitu

tions

to th

e co

mm

unity

•Fu

ndra

isin

g &

fund

ing

•Tr

aini

ng o

f com

mun

ity•

Help

mon

itor a

nd d

eman

d ac

coun

tabi

lity

The

Med

ia

Dev

elop

men

t par

tner

s

•In

form

atio

n di

ssem

inat

ion

•As

sist

ance

to re

gion

al a

nd n

atio

nal

inst

itutio

ns

•Re

porti

ng is

sues

of p

ublic

inte

rest

•As

sist

ance

in th

e de

velo

pmen

t and

impl

emen

tatio

n

o

f the

obs

erva

tion&

con

trol p

roce

ss

55

About the East African Sustainability Watch Network

The East African Sustainability Watch (EA SusWatch) is a network of CSOs from Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania constituted by the Uganda Coalition for Sustainable Development (UCSD), Sustainable Environmental Development Watch Network (SusWatch Kenya), and Tanzania Coalition for Sustainable Development (TCSD)

EA SusWatch Network is currently implementing the LVEMP II Civil Society Watch Project that seeks to lobby and advocate for realization of results-based performance from the Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project (LVEMP II) and implementation of the East African Climate Change Policy (EACCCP).

This Citizen’s Guide to the Lake Victoria Basin Water Hyacinth Surveillance, Monitoring and Control Strategy (2012 – 2030) is jointly developed by the Lake Victoria Basin Commission of the East African Community and EA SusWatch Network. It is aimed at sharing the efforts made towards monitoring water hyacinth; and mobilising long-term stakeholder interest and actions including resource allocation that can secure that the water hyacinth is managed at ecologically acceptable levels (remove water hyacinth up to 80% and maintain if possible above this level).

CONTACT INFORMATION:Uganda National Focal Point and Regional Lead AgencyThe Regional Coordinator - LVEMP II Civil Society Watch Project of the East African Sustainability Watch Network (C/o UCSD) Nsambya – Kabalagala (Gaba Road) P. O. Box 27551 Kampala (Uganda) Tel: +256 414 269461, Email: [email protected], Website: www.easuswatch.org