Upload
scot-brent-walton
View
221
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The DØ Experiment
Don Lincoln
Fermilab
‘Physics for Everyone’
Approved
Don’s Mom
Feb 2000
Legal Disclaimer
This product is meant for educational purposes only. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead is purely coincidental. Void where prohibited. Some assembly required. List each check separately by bank number. Batteries not included. Contents may settle during
shipment. Use only as directed. No other warranty expressed or implied. Do not use while operating a motor vehicle or heavy equipment. Postage will be paid by
addressee. Subject to CAB approval. This is not an offer to sell securities. Apply only to affected area. May be too intense for some viewers. Do not stamp. Use other side for additional listings.
For recreational use only. Do not disturb. All models over 18 years of age. If condition persists, consult your physician. No user-serviceable parts inside. Freshest if eaten before date on carton. Subject to change without notice.
Times approximate. Simulated picture. No postage necessary if mailed in the United States. Please remain seated until the ride has come to a complete stop. Breaking seal constitutes acceptance of agreement. For off-road use only. As seen on TV. One size fits all. Many suitcases look alike. Contains a substantial amount of non-tobacco ingredients. Colors may, in time, fade. We have sent the forms which seem right for you. Slippery when wet. For office use only. Not affiliated with the American Red Cross. Drop in any mailbox. Edited for television. Keep cool; process promptly. Post office will not deliver without postage. List was current at time of printing. Return to sender, no forwarding order on file, unable to forward. Not responsible for direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages resulting from any defect, error or failure to perform. At participating locations only. Not the Beatles. Penalty for private use. See label for sequence. Substantial penalty for early withdrawal. Do not write below this line. Falling rock. Lost ticket pays maximum rate. Nap was here. Your canceled check is your receipt. Add toner. Place stamp here. Avoid contact with skin. Sanitized for your protection.
What’s the Point?High Energy Particle Physics is a study of the smallest pieces of matter.
It investigates (among other things) the nature of the universe immediately after the Big Bang.
It also explores physics at temperatures not common for the past 15 billion years (or so).
It’s a lot of fun.
Periodic Table
All atoms are madeof protons, neutronsand electrons
Helium Neon
u
du u
d d
Proton NeutronElectron
Gluons hold quarks togetherPhotons hold atoms together
Consider an Ice Cube• Heat it and it
– Melts– Boils– Turns to steam
– H2O breaks up into hydrogen and oxygen atoms
– The electrons get ripped off the atoms and electrons and atomic nuclei scurry around
– Atomic nuclei get broken up into protons and neutrons– Protons and neutrons get ripped apart into particles called
quarks.
• So lots of energy means very hot temperatures, which in turn means you can look at very small objects.
Now (15 billion years)
Stars form (1 billion years)
Atoms form (300,000 years)
Nuclei form (180 seconds)
Protons and neutrons form (10-10 seconds)
Quarks differentiate (10-34 seconds?)
??? (Before that)
Fermilab4×10-12 seconds
LHC10-13 Seconds
What is DØ?• One of two large multi-purpose particle detectors
here at Fermilab.
• Designed to record collisions of protons colliding with antiprotons at nearly the speed of light.
• It’s basically a camera.
• It lets us look back in time.
Rogue’s Gallery
1983-1996
1996-
1993-1999
1999-
Currently DØ has two co-spokesmen who standfor re-election every three years
January 2001
550 scientists involved 17 countries63 institutions400 authors
DØ History1985 1990 1995 2000
First MeetingStony Brook
July 1983
Baseline Approval from
DOENovember
1984Design CollisionHall, Do Detector
R&D (First Calorimeter Using
Liquid Argon)1985-1987
Peak Construction 1988-1991
Roll In
February 1992
Good Beam
September 1992
Fall 1993, First DØ Paper (Leptoquarks)
March 1995, Discovery of Top
Fall 2000, 100th DØ Paper (W Boson)
130th Ph.D.
Data Taking 1992-1996
Upgrade Detector
to Utilize Main
Injector Upgrade
1996-2000
Roll In January 2001
Why DØ? Initial name
Coolest
Detector
at
Fermilab
Rejected due to copyright infringement
Why DØ? Second name
Best
Fermilab
Detector
Rejected by directorate.
Why DØ? Third name: Ask famous Hollywood Star
And it stuck.......
Why DØ? The Real Reason
AØ: The High Rise
BØ: The Competition
CØ: Future BTeV
FØ: The RF
EØ: This Space For Rent
DØ: Fermilab’s Best Detector
DØ Detector: Run II
• Weighs 5000 tons• Can inspect 3,000,000
collisions/second• Will record 50
collisions/second• Records
approximately 10,000,000 bytes/second
• Will record 1015 (1,000,000,000,000,000) bytes in the next run (1 PetaByte).
30’
30’
50’
DØ vs. Borg
Coincidence? Or just another cool thing about DØ?
f
Highlights from 1992-1996 Run
• Limits set on the maximum size of quarks (it’s gotta be smaller than 1/1000 the size of a proton)
• Supported evidence that Standard Model works rather well (didn’t see anything too weird)
• Studied quark scattering, b quarks, W bosons
• Top quark discovery 1995
The Needle in the Haystack: Run I• There are 2,000,000,000,000,000 possible
collisions per second.
• There are 300,000 actual collisions per second, each of them scanned.
• We write 4 per second to tape.
• For each top quark making collision, there are 10,000,000,000 other types of collisions.
• Even though we are very picky about the collisions we record, we have 65,000,000 on tape.
• Only 500 are top quark events.
• We’ve identified 50 top quark events and expect 50 more which look like top, but aren’t.
Run II
×10
Top Facts• Discovery
announced March 1995
• Produced in pairs
• Decays very rapidly ~10-24 seconds
• You can’t see top quarks!!!
• Six objects after collision
• In each event, a top and anti-top quark is created.
• ~100% of the time, a top quark decays into a bottom quark and a W boson.
• A W boson can decay into two quarks or into a charged lepton and a neutrino.
• So, an event in which top quarks are produced should have:– 6 quarks
– 4 quarks, a charged lepton and a neutrino
– 2 quarks, 2 charged leptons and 2 neutrinos
Top Facts
6 quarks
2 quarks2 leptons
2 neutrinos
Taustuff
(hard)
4 quarks1 lepton
1 neutrino
The types ofcollisions one gets
in top-creating collisions are not
unique to top.
In fact, there are many otherways that one can make top-like
collisions.
You have to figure out how to pick the ones you want.
1,000,000 to 1
20 to 1
3 to 1
Top Facts
Top Facts• Very messy
collisions
• Hundreds of objects after collision
• Need to simplify the measurement
We’re in luck!
Quarks can’t exist, except when they are confined
MiracleqAs quarks leave a collision, they change into a ‘shotgun blast’ of particles called a
‘jet’
q
Where Did the Energy Go?
Combining Viewpoints
“God”
t
t
b W
e
b W
q q q q b b e
j j j j e
j j j j e
j j j j e
“Us”
Top Quark Run I: The Summary• The top quark was discovered in 1995• Mass known to 3% (the most accurately known
quark mass) • The mass of one top quark is 175 times as heavy
as a proton (which contains three quarks)
Why??
?
In 1964, Peter Higgs postulated a physics mechanism which gives all particles their mass.
This mechanism is a field which permeates the universe.
If this postulate is correct, then one of the signatures is a particle (called the Higgs Particle). Fermilab’s Leon Lederman co-authored a book on the subject called The God Particle.
top
bottom
Undiscovered!
“LEP observes significant Higgscandidates for a mass of 115 GeVwith a statistical significance of 2.7 and compatible with theexpected rate and distribution ofsearch channels.”
Chris Tully, Fermilab Colloquium13-Dec-2000
PFE Translation:
Maybe we see something, maybe we don’t.
What we see is consistent with being a Higgs Particle. But it could end up being nothing.
It’s Fermilab’s turn.
Is a Fermilab Higgs Search Credible?
• LEP incorrect Rule out with 95% certainty by ~2003
• LEP correct Similar quality evidence ~2004-2005 “Discovery” quality evidence ~2007
• Higgs exists but is heavier than LEP suggests Depends on how heavy DØ has a good shot on seeing ‘maybe’ and
possibly ‘absolutely’ quality evidence
Is a Fermilab Higgs Search Credible?: Good News/Bad News
• Good News ×10 more data than Run I
• Bad News ×1/10 less likely to be created than top quark
• So it’s a wash...similar problem to Run I top search
• Except... Events which look like Higgs but aren’t are much
more numerous. An irony...top quarks are a big piece of the ‘noise’
obscuring Higgs searches.
Increasing ‘Violence’ of Collision
ExpectedNumber
ofEvents
Run II
Run I
Increased reach for discovery physicsat highest masses
Huge statistics for precision physicsat low mass scales
Formerly rare processesbecome high statisticsprocesses
1
10
100
1000
The Main Ring upgrade was completed in 1999.
The new accelerator increases the number of possible collisions per second by 10-20.
DØ and CDF have undertaken massive upgrades to utilize the increased collision rate.
Run II begins March 2001
Calorimeters Tracker
Muon System
Beamline Shielding
Electronics
protons antiprotons
66 feet
In Run II (March 1, 2001), the FermilabTevatron will deliver 10-20 times asmany collisions per second as Run I.
The DØ detector required an overhaulin order to cope.
Eight cylinders covered withscintillating fiberare read out with a novel light detector (VLPCs).
VLPCs
DØ Fiber Tracker
See the Display!
1.25 mp
p
DØ Silicon Tracker
• 800,000 distinct detector elements
• Very complex (fragile)• Absolutely crucial for viewing
the details of how particles behave near the collision.
• Particles that don’t come from the collision point serve as ‘flags’ of interesting physics.
DØ Muon System
• Muons provide a signature of many interesting physics events.
• Muons penetrate dense material for long distances.
• Thus muon detectors are outside the large amount of metal that makes the rest of the detector.
• The muon system consists of many different detector technologies, and is the physically largest system.
Data-Model Comparison
Run II: What are we going to find?
I don’t know!
Improve top mass and measure decay modes.
Do Run I more accurately
Supersymmetry, Higgs, Technicolor, particles smaller than quarks, something unexpected?
Thanks!
Backup Slides
E = m c2
Energy is MatterMatter is Energy
Lots of energy makes lots of matter
and vice versa!!!!!!
Particle AccelerationAccelerationVocabulary
1 eV (electron volt) is the amount of energy carried by aparticle with the same charge as an electron, when accelerated by a 1 volt battery.
electron
1 keV (kilo electron volt) 1,000 x-rays, TV1 MeV (mega electron volt) 1,000,000 Gamma rays1 GeV (giga electron volt) 1,000,000,000 Big gamma rays1 TeV (tera electron volt) 1,000,000,000,000 Fermilab!
Particle AccelerationAcceleration
Linear Accelerator (LINAC)
ParticleAcceleration
Electric Field
Synchrotron (Fermilab)
Electric Field
Measuring Momentum
)/(qBpr
qVBF
r×
×
××
××
r = radius of curvaturep = momentum (~energy)q = electrical chargeB = magnetic field
The use of a magnet makesthe path of the particle bend.Thus we can measure themomentum (related to the velocity in HS physics)
Magnetic Fieldpoints into screen
Wires orScintillatingFibers
Equations!
High Momentum
Low Momentum
× ×× ×
Calorimetry: Measuring Energy
E 2×E/2 4×E/4 8×E/8 16×E/16
Dense Stuff Undense Stuff
A particle hits some dense stuff (like metal) and creates more particles, each of which have less energy. In the undense material you count particles. The number of particles is proportional to the energy.