Upload
ingo
View
45
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
THE DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC DEVELOPMENT OF HOSPİTAL ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA. Turhan Ece, MD Professor of Pulmonary Medicine İstanbul University, İstanbul Medical School, Department of Pulmonary Medicine. HEALTCARE ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA. H ospital A cquired P neumonia ( HAP ) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
THE DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC DEVELOPMENT OF HOSPİTAL
ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA
Turhan Ece, MDProfessor of Pulmonary Medicine
İstanbul University, İstanbul Medical School,Department of Pulmonary Medicine
2
HEALTCARE ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA
• Hospital Acquired Pneumonia
(HAP)
• Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
(VAP)
• HealtCare Associated Pneumonia (HCAP)
3
HEALTCARE ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA
• HAP; occurs ≥ 48 hours after admission
• VAP; occurs ≥ 48 hours after intubation
• HCAP; occurs ≥ 48 hours hospitalized within 90 days, resided in a nursing home, received recent IV antibiotic, chemotherapy, or wound care within the past 30 days, attended a hemodialysis clinic
4
HEALTCARE ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA
• HAP, VAP, HCAP• Multidsiplinary• Epidemiology and Pathogenesis• Modifiable risk factors• The variability of bacteriology• Early onset pneumonia without MDR*
pathogen riskLate onset pneumonia with MDR* pathogen risk
*P.aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp, MRSA
5
HAP- Epidemiology
• The socond most common nosocomial infection
• HAP increases hospital stay 7-9 days and cost 40.000 USD
• HAP occurs 5-10 cases per 1000 hospital admission ( 6-20 fold in MV patients)
• HAP accounts 25 % of all ICU infections
Am Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171: 388-416
6
The Epidemiology of HCAP• An increase in mortolity for HAP and VAP is
associated with MDR pathogens• Bacteria cause most cases of HAP and VAP is
polymicrobial espacially high in patients with ARDS• HAP, VAP, and HCAP are commonly caused
by AGNB ( P.aeruginosa,K.pneumoniae,
Acinetobacter sp. Enterobacter sp.) 55- 85%
by GPC ( S.aureus, MRSA) 20- 30%• Rates of L.pneumophila is high when water supply
colonisation and ongoing construction• Nosocomial virus and fungal infections are
uncommon Am Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171: 388-416
7
VAP- Epidemiology
• VAP occurs in 9-27 % of all ıntubated patients• During the first 5 days 3%
During 5 to 10 days 2%
After 10 days 1%• Half of VAP occur within 4 days of MV
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
The Pathogenesis of HAP
• Sources of pathogenesis for HAP include healthcare devices, the environment and the transfer of microorganism
• Host and treatment related colonization factors; severity of underlying disease, prior surgery, exposure to antibiotics and invasive respiratory devices
16
The Pathogenesis of HAP
• Aspiration of oropharyngeal pathogens, or leakage of secretions
• Inhalation or direct inoculation of pathogens, hematogenous spread from infected IV catheters
bacterial translocation from GI tract
• Infected biofilm in the tracheal tube
• The stomach and sinuses may be potential reservoirs
17
Clasification of HAP and VAP
• Early- onset HAP and VAP
Occurring within the first 4 days
Caused by antibiotic sensitive bacteria
Prior antibiotics or hospitalization within 90 days are at greater risk for MDR
• Late- onset HAP and VAP
Occurring after 4 days
Caused by MDR pathogens
18
HCAP- Risk factors for MDR pathogens
• Antimicrobial therapy in preceiding 90 d• Current hospitalization of 5 d or more• High frequency of antibiotic resistance in the
community or hospital unit• Presence of risk factors for HCAP:
Hospitalization for ≥ 2 d within 90 dResidence nursing home or extended care facilityHome infusion therapy, wound careChronic dialysis within 30 dFamily member with MDR pathogen
• Immunosupressive disease and/ or therapyAJRCCM 2005; 171: 388- 416
19
The Pathogen of HAP and VAP in Turkey (%)
P. aeruginosa
Acinetobacter sp.
Klebsiella spp.
S.aureus
HAP
23-24
23-36
15-17
14-17
ICU
35-36
13-31
17-18
27-28
VIP
4-26
20-66
7-21
12-54
Toraks Dergisi 2002;3 Ek 4: 1-13
20
Mojor Points and Recommendations for Diagnosis
• Medical history and physical examination• CXR ( multilobar? Effusion? Cavitation?)• Purulent tracheobronchitis vs tracheal colonization• Arterial blood gas, CBC and biochemistry• All patients with suspected VAP should have blood
cultures collected.• Diagnostic thorocentesis• Samples of LRT secretions should be obtained• A sterile culture of LRT secretions rules out bacterial
pneumonia• For patients with ARDS should be done more
diagnostic testing
21
The Diagnosis of VAP
PITA* PSB,BAL,PTC**
• Sensitivity (%) 77 75• Specificity (%) 84 88• PPV 4.80 6.25• NPV 0.27 0.28
Conclusion: PITA may be a reliable alternative to PSB,BAL,PTC
* Postintubation tracheal aspiration (PITA)** Plugged telescoping catheter (PTC)
Chest 2006;130: 956- 961
22
Clinical strategy
• New or progressive radiologic infiltrate + fever > 38 C, leukocytosis or leukopenia and prulent secretions
• The results of emiquantitative LRTS cultures and serial clinical evaluations, by Day 3
• High probability of pneumonia or sepsis , prompt therapy is required
• Delays in the initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy can increase the mortality of VAP
• The clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS)< 6 : low risk for early discontinuation of empiric treatment
23
Empiric Antibiotic Therapy for HAP
HAP, VAP or HCAP Suspected
Late Onset (≥ 5 days) or Risk Factors for MDR Pathogens
Limited Spectrum Antibiotic Therapy
Broad Spectrum Antibiotic Therapy
For MDR Pathogens
No Yes
24
HKP- Hasta grupları ve etkenler
Grup 1
Erken başlangıçlı HKP
( 4. gün)
Grup 2
Geç başlangıçlı HKP
( 5. gün)
Grup 3
Yüksek çoğul dirençli bakteri infeksiyonu ve mortalite riskli HKP
Temel Etkenler:
S. Pneumoniae
H. influenzae
M.catarrhalis
S. Aureus (MSSA)
Enterobacter spp.
K. pneumoniae
S. marcescens
E. coli
Diğer Gram negatif çomaklar
S. aureus
Temel etkenler
P.aeruginosa
Acinetobacter spp.
S.aureus (MRSA**)
K.pneumoniae
S. maltophilia
Grup 2 etkenleri
Toraks Dergisi 2002;3 Ek 4: 1-13
25
Empiric Antibiotic Therapy for Early Onset HAP
Potential Pathogen Recommended Antibiotic• S. Pneumoniae Ceftriaxone• H. Influenzae or• S. aureus ( MSSA) R. Fleuroquinolons• Antibiotic sensitive EGNB or
E.coli Ampicillin/ sulbactam
K. Pneumoniae orEnterobacter spp. ErtapenemProteus spp.S. marcescens
Toraks Dergisi 2002;3 Ek 4: 1-13
26
Empiric Antibiotic Therapy for HAP
Erken 4. gün Temel etkenler• S. pneumoniae• H. influenzae• M.catarrhalis
• S. aureus ( MSSA)
Monoterapi• Betalaktam+betalakmaz
inhibitörü *
veya• 2.-3. kuşak
nonpseudomonal sefalosporin
veya• Yeni kinolon**
Toraks Dergisi 2002;3 Ek 4: 1-13
27
Empiric Antib iotic Therapy for Late Onset HAP
Potential Pathogen Recommended Antibiotic• Pathogens of Antipseudomonal SS
Early Onset HAP (Cefepime, Ceftazidime)
• MDR pathogens; orP.aeruginosa Antipseudomonal carbapenK.pneumoniae (ESBL) (imipenem or meropenem)
Acinetobacter spp. orβ- lactam/ β- lactamase
inhibitor (piperacillin- tazobactam)
plus Antipseudomonal FQ or AG
plus• MRSA Vancomycin or Linezolid• Legionella pneumophila
28
HKP- Grup 2
Geç 5 gün• Enterobacter spp.• K. pneumoniae• S. marcescens• E. coli• Diğer Gram negatif
çomaklar• S. aureus• Temel etkenler
Monoterapi** • Betalaktam+betalakmaz
inhibitörü*veya
• 3.kuşak nonpsödomonal sefalosporin
veya• Kinolon (Ofloksasin /Siprofloks)
29
HKP- Grup 3
Yüksek riskli, çokludirençli bakteri inf.• Son 15 günde AB kullanımı• MV> 6 gün • YBÜ> 48 saat • Acil entübasyon
Mortalite artıran faktör• Bilateral, multilober, kaviter
tutulum, apse, ampiyem, hızlı radyolojik progresyon,
• PaO2/FiO2< 250
• Ağır sepsis/ septik şok
Kombine tedavi • Antipseud. Penisilin
veya
Antipseud. sefalosporin
veya
Karbapenem
+
Aminoglikozid veya Kinolon (Ofloks/Siprofl)
30
The prognosis of HCAP
• The crude mortality rate for HAP 30- 70 %• The mortality related to the HAP 33- 50 %• Increased mortality rates;
bacteremia ( P.aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp)
medical illness
ineffective antibitic therapy
31
Mojor Points and Recommendations for Initial Antibiotic Therapy
• Select an empiric therapy based on risk factors and local mycrobiliogic data
• Initial antibiotic therapy should be given promptly
• Inapropriate therapy is a major risk factor for excess mortality
• Select a different antibiotic class for patients who have recently received an antibiotic
32
Mojor Points and Recommendations for Optimal Antibiotic Therapy
• Initial therapy should be administered to all patient intravenously
• Aerosolized antibiotics may be considered as adjunctive therapy
• Combination therapy should be used• The aminoglycoside can be stopped after 5-7 days• Monotherapy can be used after the results of LRTS
culture • If patients receive an appropriate therapy, efforts
should be made to shorten ( 7-8 days)
33
34
VIP’ li erişkinlerde 8- 15 günlük antibiyotik tedavisinin karşılaştırılması
• Amaç- VİP’li hastalarda 8 günlük tedavinin 15 günlük tedavi kadar etkili olabileceğini belirlemek
• Kurgu- Prospektif, randomize, çift kör, 401 VİP’li hasta
• Bulgular- Tedavi: 15 gün- 8 gün
mortolite artışı yok: %18.8- %17.7rekürren infeksiyon:%28.9- %26.0Antibiyotiksiz gün: 13.1- 8.7 p< 0.01
• Sonuç- 8 günlük tedavi 15 günlük tedavi ile karşılaştırılabilir etkinliktedir. Kısa süreli tedavi antimicrobial direnç oluşumunu azaltabilir. JAMA 2003;290:2588-2598
35
Mojor Points and Recommendations for selected MDR pathogens
• If P.aeruginosa pneumonia is documented, combination therapy is recommended
• If Acinetobacter speices are documented, the most active agents are the carbapenems, sulbactam, colistin and polymyxin
• If ESBL Enterobacteriaceae are isolated, then monotherapy should be avoided ( 3.JSS)
• Adjunctive therapy with an inhaled AG or polymyxin for MDR GN pneumonia should be considered
• Linezolid is an alternative to vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA VAP
• Antibiotic restriction and cycling may reduce the frequancy of antibitic resistance
36
VİP- Levofloxacin vs Imipenem/cilistatin
Levo + Imip+ pKlinik başarı(%) 58.6 63.1 NSMortalite (%) 11 13.1 NS
VİP empirik tedavisinde; Levofloxacin,Imipenem/cilistatin kadar etkili
Levo.( 750 mg/ gün) + Vancomycin APABImip.(3-4 x 500-1000mg/ gün) + Vancomycin APAB
Chest 2003; 124(4): 79s- 80s
37
MRSA-HKP: Linezolid vs Vancomycin
• Gram pozitif : 1019
S. Aureus: 339
MRSA : 160
• Linezolid 600 mg 2x1 ve Aztreonam 1-2 gr 3x1
vs• Vancomycin 1 gr 2x1 ve
Aztreonam 1-2 gr 3x1
Lin. Van.
Sağ kalım %: 80 63.5
p= 0.03
Klinik kür %: 59 35.5
p< 0.01
Chest 2003; 124: 1789- 1797
38
VİP- P. aeruginosa/Piperacilin
• Dirençli suşlar: % 25
• Betalactam/AG/ Ciprofloxacin direncide
• Önceden FQ kullanımı direnç olasılığını
• Dirençli suşlarda mortalite: % 59 Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34: 1047
39
VİP- Lokal AB• Travmalı hastalarda: Enterik Gram neg.
bak.VİP’de TOBi yararlıYBÜ(gün) MV(gün) Sürvi(%)
İki IV AB 16 15.4 80IV AB+ TOBI 11 9.9 91• Yüksek dirençli Gram netatif bak. VİP’ de
Colistin yararlı Colistin 50 mg + SF 50 ml trakeal tüp yoluyla 8/ 11 olgu iyileşmiş Chest 2003; 124(4): 79s- 80s
40
VİP- AB değişikliğiGrup 0 1 2 3Olgu (n=56) 19 8 19 10Yetersiz AB (%) 12.7 8.1 6.9 5.9Kültür- değ. (%) 37.5 15.8 14Kanıtsız- değ. (%) 1.25 23.7 37.2Mortalite (%) 21.1 25 57.9 80YBÜ ve MV süresi uzaması ile değişiklik Kanıtsız AB değişimi mortalite artışı ile koreleYetersiz AB bir kez değiş. mortalite artmıyor
Chest 2003; 124(4): 79s
41
Assessment of Nonresponders
Wrong OrganismDrug resistance Pathogen:
(bacteria,mycobacteria,virus,fungus)
Inadequate AB Therapy
Wrong DiagnosisAtelectasis,PE, ARDSPulmoner hemorrhage
Underlying diseaseNeoplasm
ComplicationEmpyema or Lung abscess
C.difficile ColitisOccult Infection
Drug fever
42
HAP, VAP or HCAP Suspected
Obtain LRTS for Microscopy & Culture
Days 2 & 3: Check Cultures & Assess Clinical ResponseClinical Improvement
No Yes
Begin Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy Based on Algorithms and Local Microbiologic Data
Cultures +Adjust Antibiotic
Therapy
Cultures –Search for
other pathogens, Complications
Cultures +De-escelate Antibiotics
Cultures –Consider Stopping Antibiotics
43
HAP- Take Home Messages
• Avoid untreated or inadequate treated HCAP
• Recognize the variability of bacteriology from one hospital to another
• Avoid the overuse of antibiotics by focusing on accurate diagnosis
• Apply prevention strategies aimed at modifiable risk factors
44
45
46
Trakeal aspirasyon kateterleri
• Açık tek kullanımlık
• Kapalı çok kullanımlık*
daha ekonomik
çapraz kontaminasyon için daha güvenli
• Biofilm koruma teknolojisi***CDC. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19: 304
** Jansen B. Journal of Industrial Microbiology 1995;15: 391- 6
47
NP korunma önlemleri
I- Genel: surveyans, eğitim, el yıkama-bariyer, dezenf- steril,izolas,AB kontrolü, aşılamaII-Hastalara yönelik: kısa yatış,oral hijyen, AB profl- tedavi, ortak araçkullanmama, hasta eğitimi,post op analjezi, gereksizs.ülser profilaks. kaçınma
III-YB hastalarına yönelik: NPPV önceliği, beslenmedesteği, enteral beslenme,aspir.önlenme, oral entüb,kuf basıncı, erken ekstüb,subglottik asp, kapalı asp.kateteri, ventilator devreleribakımıIV- Özel: SGID, Ig, IFG
48
Subglottik aspirasyon- Tüp Kafı
• Tüp kafı üstünde kolonize sekresyon;
kaf basıncı azalması
tüp değiştirme- çıkarma• Tüp kafı basıncı yeterli olmalı• Tüp kafı üst kısmının drenajı
VİP insidensi azalmaktaValles J. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 179- 86
Rello J. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154: 111- 5
49
Ventilatör devrelerinin değişimi-VAP
Değişim 2 gün 7 gün p
VAP n= 38 8
VAP /gün 16.7/ 1000 8.2/ 1000 < 0.001
7 günde değişim daha güvenliHan JN. Respir Care 2001; 46(9): 891- 6
50
Surveyans
• En yüksek infeksiyon oranı ve
antibiyotik direnci olan bölümler
• İnfeksiyon endemi oranını belirlemek
• Sonuçlar ilgili bölümlere ulaştırılmalı
Hastane inf. %32 azalmaktaHaley RW.Am J Epidemiol 1985;121: 183-205
51
Trakeal aspirasyon kateterleri
• Açık tek kullanımlık
• Kapalı çok kullanımlık*
daha ekonomik
çapraz kontaminasyon için daha güvenli
• Biofilm koruma teknolojisi***CDC. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19: 304
** Jansen B. Journal of Industrial Microbiology 1995;15: 391- 6
52
Personel kaynaklı risk azaltma
• Inluenza virus aşısı• MRSA taşıyıcılığı
Mupirocin nazal krem 2x1 1 haftaClindamycine 150 mg/gün 1 ayRifampicin 600 mg/gün + TMP-SMX fort tb/ gün 10 gün Vitamin C
JID 1997; 173: 1502
JAC 1987; 19: 1
53
El yıkama
• Çalışanların uyumu < %50*• NP % 25- 50 azalma saptanmış**• Chlorhexidine > isopropyl alcohol
AB dirençli inf. üstün**• Alkol bazlı ajanlar yeterli el dezenfek. sağlar• Görülebilir kirlenme varsa mutlaka yıkanmalı
* Graham M. Am J Infect Control 1990; 18: 77
**Doebbeling BN. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 88- 93
54
El yıkama- dezenfektan
• El yıkama, kurulama 60 sn• Alkollü el dezenfektanı 15 sn
(MRSA kolonizasyon ve inf. azalıyor)
Görülebilir kirlilik ve/veya organik materyal yıkanmalı
Voss A. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997; 18: 205
Pittet D. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 126
APIC. Am J Infect Control 1995; 23: 251
55
HAP- Key points• Use evidence based guidelines
• Early, appropriate antibiotics in adequate doses
• De-escalation of initial antibiotic therapy
• The variability of bacteriology
• Early onset pneumonia without MDR pathogen riskLate onset pneumonia with MDR pathogen risk
Am Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171: 388-416
56
HEALTCARE ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA • Use evidence based guidelines• Collection of culture before antibiotic therapy• Quantitative culture according to the basis of local
expertise• Early, appropriate antibiotics in adequate doses• Empiric therapy should include different class
antibiotics and/ or combination therapy• To stop antibitic therapy according to negative LRT
cultures• Additional diagnostic and therapeutic evaluations
57
HEALTCARE ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA
• Linezolid is an alternative to vancomycin for MRSA
• Colistin should be considered for carbapenem resistance Acinetobacter spp.
• Aerosolized antibiotics may have value as adjunctive therapy
• De-escalation of antibiotics based on clinical and mycrobiological response
• A shorter duration of therapy (7-8 days)
58
The principles of the management of HCAP
• Avoid untreated or inadequate treated HCAP
• Recognize the variability of bacteriology from one hospital to another
• Avoid the overuse of antibiotics by focusing on accurate diagnosis
• Apply prevention strategies aimed at modifiable risk factors
59
60
Modifiable risk factors
• General prophylaxis– Effective infection control measures– Surveillance of ICU infections
• Aspiration, body position, and enteral feeding– Patients should be kept in the semirecumbent
position– Enteral nutrition is preferred
61
Modifiable risk factors
• Intubation and mechanical ventilation– Intubation and reintubation should be avoided– NIMV should be used– Orotracheal intubation and orogastric tubes– Continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions– The endotracheal tube cuff pressure ≥20 cm H2O– Contaminated condensate should be emtied– Passive humidifiers or heat moisture exchangers– Reduced duration of intubation and MV– Maintaining adequate staffing levels in the ICU
62
Modifiable risk factors
• Modulation of colnization– Selective decontamination of digestive tract
( Not for routine use)– Prior or prophylactic administration of systemic antibiotics– Modulation of oropharyngeal colonization (clorhexidine)– Use daily interruption or lightening of sedation
• Stress bleeding prophylaxis– H2 antagonists or sucralfate is acceptable
• Leucocyte depleted red blood cell transfusions• Intensive insulin therapy is recommended
63
HCAP guidelines
• ATS 1996, 2005
• CTS
• Thorax
• STS
• TTS 2002, 2007?
64
Hastane Kökenli Pnömoni
• Her HKP(VIP) atağı 40.000 USD
• SDD koruyucu, ancak seçici davranılmalı
• Erken ekstübasyon
• NIMV
• HKP tedavi rehberleri koruyucu önlemlerden daha fazla dikkate alınmakta
• Etkili empirik tedavi başlanması çok önemli
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80