Upload
hathuy
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
http://tde.sagepub.com
The Diabetes Educator
DOI: 10.1177/0145721708326774 2009; 35; 72 The Diabetes Educator
Suzanne A. Boren, Karen A. Fitzner, Pallavi S. Panhalkar and James E. Specker Costs and Benefits Associated With Diabetes Education: A Review of the Literature
http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/1/72 The online version of this article can be found at:
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
American Association of Diabetes Educators
can be found at:The Diabetes Educator Additional services and information for
http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Email Alerts:
http://tde.sagepub.com/subscriptions Subscriptions:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navReprints:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navPermissions:
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
The Diabetes EDUCATOR
72
Volume 35, Number 1, January/February 2009
Costs and BenefitsAssociated WithDiabetes EducationA Review of the Literature
Purpose
The purpose of this article was to review the publishedliterature and evaluate the economic benefits and costsassociated with diabetes education.
Methods
The Medline database (1991-2006) and Google weresearched. Articles that addressed the economic and/orfinancial outcomes of a diabetes-related self-care or edu-cational intervention were included. The study aim, pop-ulation, design, intervention, financial and economicoutcomes, results, and conclusions were extracted fromeligible articles.
Results
Twenty-six papers were identified that addressed dia-betes self-management training and education. Studydesigns included meta-analysis (1); randomized con-trolled trials (8); prospective, quasi-experimental, andpre-post studies (8); and retrospective database analyses(9). The studies conducted cost analyses (6), cost-effec-tiveness analyses (13), cost-utilization analyses (7), andnumber needed to treat analyses (2). More than half (18)of the 26 papers identified by the literature reviewreported findings that associated diabetes education (anddisease management) with decreased cost, cost saving,cost-effectiveness, or positive return on investment. Fourstudies reported neutral results, 1 study found that costsincreased, and 3 studies did not fit into these categories.
Suzanne A. Boren, PhD
Karen A. Fitzner, PhD
Pallavi S. Panhalkar
James E. Specker
From Health Services Research and Development,Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans’ Hospital,
Columbia, Missouri (Dr Boren); Department of HealthManagement and Informatics, University of Missouri,
Columbia, Missouri (Dr Boren, Ms Panhalkar); andAmerican Association of Diabetes Educators,
Chicago, Illinois (Dr Fitzner, Mr Specker).
Correspondence to Karen Fitzner, PhD, Chief Scienceand Practice Officer, American Association of
Diabetes Educators, 200 W. Madison St, Suite 800,Chicago, IL 60606 ([email protected]).
Acknowledgments: No funds were provided for thisstudy.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article arethose of the authors and do not necessarily represent
the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
DOI: 10.1177/0145721708326774
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 72
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Costs and Benefits Associated With Diabetes Education
73
Boren et al
Conclusions
The findings indicate that the benefits associated witheducation on self-management and lifestyle modificationfor people with diabetes are positive and outweigh thecosts associated with the intervention. More research isneeded to validate that diabetes education provided bydiabetes educators is cost-effective.
In 2006, the United States spent 16% of its grossdomestic product (GDP) or $2 trillion on healthcare,1 and people with chronic conditionsaccounted for 85% of the expenditure.2 Diabetesaffects 7% of Americans and represents more than
$116 billion of these expenditures.3 The overall eco-nomic cost of diabetes in 2007 was $174 billion, withreduced national productivity accounting for $58 to $105billion.3,4 Moreover, the prevalence of the disease is ris-ing, and total health care is expected to reach 20% ofGDP by 2016.1 Interestingly, even with these consider-able expenditures, in 2005, the Centers for Medicare andMedicaid Services (CMS) reimbursed only $4.8 millionon diabetes self-management training codes G108 andG109.
Diabetes education, also known as diabetes self-man-agement training (DSMT) or diabetes self-managementeducation (DSME), is defined as a collaborative processthrough which people with or at risk for diabetes gain theknowledge and skills needed to modify behavior and suc-cessfully self-manage the disease and its related condi-tions. DSMT/DSME is an interactive, ongoing processinvolving the person with diabetes (or the caregiver orfamily) and a diabetes educator(s).5 Diabetes educatorsare health care professionals who focus on helping peo-ple with and at risk for diabetes and related conditionsachieve behavior change goals that, in turn, lead to betterclinical outcomes and improved health status.
Diabetes education is effective in helping people withdiabetes control their illness and maximize their health6-9
and is generally accepted as a cost-effective strategy.There is, however, a lack of available published informa-tion regarding economic evaluations of the benefits andcosts of diabetes education and the value that may beadded by a diabetes educator. Even among those provid-ing diabetes self-management education and training, thestudies that demonstrate this fact are not well-known.
In late 2007, the authors undertook an analysis of theliterature to better understand the economic benefits andcosts associated with diabetes education. This articlereports on the review of published literature and evalu-ates the economic benefits and costs associated with dia-betes education.
Methods
Data Sources
The authors searched MEDLINE (1991-2006) andGoogle in the fourth quarter of 2007 using combinationsand variations of the following search terms: (1) diabetescomplications, diabetes mellitus, type 1 diabetes melli-tus, or type 2 diabetes mellitus; (2) disease management,health promotion, patient education as topic, or self care;and (3) cost control, cost of illness, cost savings, cost-benefit analysis, costs and cost analysis, direct servicecosts, health care costs, health expenditures, health serv-ices, outcome assessment (health care), program evalua-tion, or quality-adjusted life years.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Diabetes self-management training and education pro-grams were defined broadly. By defining the topicbroadly, this study was able to identify a wider variety ofeconomic studies on diabetes education to support thisanalysis. Inclusion criteria were any article reporting theeconomic and/or financial outcomes of a diabetes-relatedself-care or educational intervention. This studyexcluded articles published prior to 1991, not publishedin English, or not reporting the results in a quantifiablemanner.
Study Selection and Data Extraction
Two of the investigators (KAF, JES) reviewed thetitles and abstracts of the identified citations and applieda screening algorithm based on the inclusion and exclu-sion criteria described above. The “potentially eligible”studies were then reviewed in full. Data abstraction wasperformed by one investigator independently (KAF)using a structured abstraction process, and the abstrac-tions were independently reviewed by another investiga-tor (PP). Any discrepancies between the 2 investigatorswere resolved through discussion and consensus. Theinformation extracted from the articles into the tables
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 73
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
included (1) study aim, (2) study population (eg, samplesize, age, type 1 or type 2 diabetes, gender, race/ethnicity,and recruitment location), (3) study design, (4) interven-tion, (5) financial and economic outcomes, (6) results,and (7) conclusions.
Results
Literature searches identified 609 articles. The titlesand abstracts were screened, and 26 articles were identi-fied that addressed the costs and benefits of diabetes edu-cation, using this study’s broad definition, and wereincluded in this review (Table 1).10-35 Most studies wereconducted in the United States, and 2 studies were con-ducted in the Netherlands.16,25 Data from 40 588 patientsare represented in the studies. Most of the studiesincluded adults, and 1 study focused on adolescents.13
Studies involved patients with impaired glucose tolerance(IGT),18,22,23,27 type 1 diabetes,13 type 2 diabetes,30,32,34 orboth type 1 and type 2 diabetes.10,12,14,24-26,28,29,31,35 Severalstudies did not specify the type of diabetes.11,15-17,19-21,33
Study designs included meta-analysis,26 randomizedcontrolled trials (RCTs),13,16,18,22-24,27,34 prospective quasi-experimental pre-post studies,10-12,14,15,20,25,29 and retro-spective database analyses.17,19,21,28,30,31-33,35 The studiesconducted cost analyses,13,19,22,28,29,32 cost-effectivenessanalyses,10-12,14-16,18,21,23,24,26,34,35 cost-utilization analy-ses,10,11,17,20,30,31,33 or number needed to treat (NNT) analy-ses.25,27 The types interventions that were studiedincluded comprehensive diabetes education or diseasemanagement programs,10-12,14-17,19,20,25,29,31,33 diabetes pre-vention programs,18,22,23,27 education for depression,24
transmission of glucose values,13 initiation of insulintherapy,30 diet education,34 and retrospective analysisbased on A1C level.21,28,32,35 The outcome measures gen-erally addressed cost savings and included the following:total health care costs,11,12,14-17,19-21,30,31,33,35 total diabetes-related costs,10,16,25,30,32 outpatient costs,13,24 inpatientcosts,28 medication costs,16 cost per quality-adjusted lifeyear,18,23,24 cost of primary prevention of diabetes,22,22,29
number needed to treat to reduce 1 case of diabetes,27
cost per depression-free day,24 and cost of restrictedactivity.34
Based on the results and conclusions presented inTable 1, each of the articles was assigned to 1 of 3 costimpact categories: (1) cost reduction/cost-effectivenessassociated with the intervention (18 studies),10,11,
13-15,17,19,20,25,26,28-35 (2) neutral impact associated with the
intervention (4 studies),16,18,23,24 or (3) increased costassociated with the intervention (1 study).22 Three stud-ies did not fit into these categories.12,21,27 More than half(18) of the 26 articles identified by the literature reviewreported findings that associated diabetes education (anddisease management) with decreased cost, cost saving,cost-effectiveness, or positive return on investment(ROI). One study demonstrated increased productivity atthe workplace.34 Three studies did not report on diabeteseducation per se but imply that a well-designed diabeteseducation program could be effective in reducing costs.These are Gilmer et al’s work on costs associated withrising A1C,21 Rubin et al’s findings that inpatient utiliza-tion declines with better management,31 and Rosenblumet al’s report of a 40% decrease in health care costs fol-lowing initiation of insulin.30 One study found theDiabetes Prevention Program (DPP) to be too costly forbroad implementation and called for more affordableapproaches for achieving weight loss outcomes that areassociated with better health for people with or at risk ofdiabetes.18 The DPP group suggests that self-manage-ment interventions are likely to be affordable in routineclinical practice when education is conducted in a groupand generic drugs are prescribed.27 The oldest of thestudies reported on a randomized control study thatfound no effect from education.16
Discussion
Health care policy makers and payers, faced with con-siderable resource constraints, are increasingly focusedon interventions that work well and do so for reasonablecost. Glycemic control among those with diabetes is acost-effective strategy,36 and health management pro-grams that empower people with chronic illnesses to self-manage their conditions are of interest in theworkplace.37,38 Behavior change is crucial to effectiveself-management. Diabetes educators are experts at fos-tering positive behavior change in people with diabetes,and the interventions they use are effective.10 The CMSand many other payers reimburse for diabetes self-man-agement education/training, implicitly recognizing theimportance and value of the intervention.39 Diabetes edu-cation aims to achieve optimal health status and betterquality of life, as well as reduce the need for costly healthcare. The primary purpose of this analysis is to increaseunderstanding of the economic value of diabetes educa-tion for people with diabetes.
The Diabetes EDUCATOR
74
Volume 35, Number 1, January/February 2009
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 74
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Costs and Benefits Associated With Diabetes Education
75
Boren et al
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Bala
mur
ugan
et a
l
(200
6)10
Berg
and
Wad
hwa
(200
2)11
Stud
y Ai
m
Impl
emen
t a
diab
etes
sel
f-
man
agem
ent
educ
atio
n
(DSM
E) p
rogr
am
for M
edic
aid
reci
pien
ts u
sing
a co
ntin
uous
qual
ity
impr
ovem
ent
(CQI
) pro
cess
and
eval
uate
resu
lts o
f the
parti
cipa
nts'
clin
ical
outc
omes
and
heal
th c
are
cost
s
Asse
ss d
iffer
ence
s
in b
ehav
ior a
nd
med
ical
ser
vice
use
com
parin
g
base
line,
6-
mon
th,a
nd 1
year
resu
lts
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
212
Arka
nsas
Med
icai
d
reci
pien
ts w
ith
diab
etes
for a
t
leas
t 1 y
ear a
nd
enro
lled
in
Med
icai
d fo
r 11
cont
inuo
us
mon
ths.
Child
ren
(<19
yea
rs),
end-
stag
e re
nal
dise
ase
patie
nts,
and
preg
nant
wom
en w
ere
excl
uded
.
127
pers
ons
with
diab
etes
in a
heal
th
mai
nten
ance
orga
niza
tion
(HM
O) a
nd
pref
erre
d pr
ovid
e
orga
niza
tion
(PPO
).
Stud
y De
sign
Parti
cipa
nts
rece
ived
12
hour
s of
gro
up
educ
atio
n (o
ver
3 vi
sits
-initi
al
visi
t,6
mon
ths,
and
1 ye
ar) o
n
nutri
tion
and
self-
man
agem
ent
from
a
regi
ster
ed n
urse
and
a re
gist
ered
diet
icia
n.
Hist
oric
al c
ontro
l
com
paris
on o
f
diab
etes
dis
ease
man
agem
ent
parti
cipa
nts
in
com
mun
ity-
base
d se
tting
Inte
rven
tion
Diab
etes
sel
f-
man
agem
ent
educ
atio
n
prog
ram
Diab
etes
dis
ease
man
agem
ent
prog
ram
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Expe
nditu
res;
over
all a
nd th
ose
rela
ted
to
diab
etes
Retu
rn o
n
inve
stm
ent (
ROI)
Resu
lts
Over
1 y
ear,
DSM
E
parti
cipa
nts
had
a
0.45
% d
eclin
e in
mea
n
A1C,
few
er h
ospi
tal
adm
issi
ons,
emer
genc
y
room
vis
its,a
nd
outp
atie
nt v
isits
.Ove
r 3
year
s,th
e es
timat
ed
savi
ngs
in d
iabe
tes-
rela
ted
cost
was
$41
5
per p
rogr
am c
ompl
eter
.
Over
10
year
s,
com
plet
ers
wer
e
estim
ated
to e
xper
ienc
e
a de
crea
se in
cor
onar
y
hear
t dis
ease
eve
nt a
nd
mic
rova
scul
ar d
isea
se
even
ts b
y 12
% a
nd
15%
,res
pect
ivel
y.
The
num
ber o
f par
ticip
ants
getti
ng a
n A1
C te
st
incr
ease
d by
44.
9%
(P<
.001
),an
d
hype
rgly
cem
ia
sym
ptom
s de
crea
sed
by
53.2
% (P
= .0
02).
Inpa
tient
adm
issi
ons
decr
ease
d by
391
per
Conc
lusi
ons
This
DSM
E pr
ogra
m
redu
ced
heal
th c
are
use
amon
g M
edic
aid
reci
pien
ts w
ith d
iabe
tes
with
in 1
yea
r and
is li
kely
to re
duce
cos
ts a
ssoc
iate
d
with
dec
reas
ed u
tiliz
atio
n
over
a lo
nger
per
iod
of
time.
The
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
diab
etes
pro
gram
that
prov
ides
com
preh
ensi
ve
info
rmat
ion
and
coun
selin
g fo
r sel
f-
man
agem
ent o
f dia
bete
s
is a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith p
ositi
ve
beha
vior
al c
hang
e an
d
subs
tant
ial r
educ
tion
in
Tab
le 1
Diab
etes
Edu
catio
n
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 75
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
The Diabetes EDUCATOR
76
Volume 35, Number 1, January/February 2009
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Burto
n an
d
Conn
erty
(199
8)12
Chas
e et
al
(200
3)13
Stud
y Ai
m
Asse
ss a
wor
ksite
diab
etes
educ
atio
n
prog
ram
Com
paris
on o
f a
mod
em
trans
mis
sion
inte
rven
tion
to
usua
l clin
ic v
isit
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
53 e
mpl
oyed
indi
vidu
als
70 a
dole
scen
ts
with
type
1
diab
etes
for a
t
leas
t 1 y
ear,
ages
15-
20
Stud
y De
sign
Mea
n A1
C va
lues
at b
asel
ine
and
3 m
onth
s w
ere
calc
ulat
ed
Rand
omiz
ed
cont
rol t
rial
(RCT
)
Inte
rven
tion
3-m
onth
wor
ksite
diab
etes
educ
atio
n
prog
ram
Cont
rol g
roup
(qua
rterly
clin
ic
visi
ts) v
s m
odem
grou
p
(tran
smitt
ed
gluc
ose
read
ings
ever
y 2
wee
ks
for 6
mon
ths
inst
ead
of c
linic
visi
ts)
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Dire
ct a
nd in
dire
ct
heal
th c
are
cost
,
prod
uctiv
ity
Savi
ngs/
patie
nt fo
r
the
mod
em g
roup
as c
ompa
red
with
the
cont
rol
grou
p
Resu
lts
1000
for e
ach
grou
p (P
<
.001
),w
hile
con
trolli
ng
for a
ge,l
engt
h of
mem
bers
hip,
and
the
num
ber o
f com
orbi
d
clai
ms
for c
onge
stiv
e
hear
t fai
lure
.
The
mea
n fa
stin
g bl
ood
gluc
ose
leve
ls fe
ll fro
m
197.
8 to
179
.6 m
g%
(P=
.12)
,mea
n
glyc
ohem
oglo
bin
decl
ined
from
11.
5% to
10.1
% (P
< .0
01),
and
mea
n A1
C de
clin
ed
from
9.0
% to
8.3
%
(P<
.001
).
The
aver
age
cost
for 6
mon
ths
was
$30
5 fo
r
the
visi
t gro
up a
nd $
163
for t
he m
odem
gro
up
(sav
ings
of $
142
per
patie
nt p
er 6
mon
ths)
.
Conc
lusi
ons
med
ical
ser
vice
util
izat
ion.
Cost
ana
lysi
s of
dis
ease
man
agem
ent p
rogr
am
cost
s fo
und
a $4
.34:
1 RO
I.
Alth
ough
the
valu
es in
this
stud
y w
ere
still
hig
her
than
the
idea
l,an
y
impr
ovem
ent i
n gl
ycem
ic
cont
rol h
as b
een
show
n to
redu
ce th
e ris
k fo
r
diab
etes
-rel
ated
com
plic
atio
ns a
nd
subs
eque
nt d
irect
and
indi
rect
hea
lth c
are
cost
s.
Whi
le th
e A1
C va
lues
did
not d
iffer
sig
nific
antly
betw
een
the
cont
rol a
nd
mod
em g
roup
s,th
e
aver
age
occu
rren
ce o
f
mild
to m
oder
ate
hypo
glyc
emic
epi
sode
s
was
sim
ilar b
etw
een
grou
ps w
ith n
o se
vere
hypo
glyc
emic
epi
sode
s fo
r
eith
er.
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 76
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Costs and Benefits Associated With Diabetes Education
77
Boren et al
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Chris
tens
en
et a
l
(200
4)14
Cran
or e
t al
(200
3)15
Stud
y Ai
m
Eval
uate
the
cost
savi
ngs
and
clin
ical
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
a di
abet
es
educ
atio
n
prog
ram
for
impr
ovin
g
nutri
tion
know
ledg
e,fo
od
porti
onin
g sk
ills,
hem
oglo
bin
A1C,
and
anth
ropo
met
ric
indi
ces
Asse
ss th
e
cont
inui
ty o
f
outc
omes
for 5
year
s,en
suin
g
afte
r the
initi
atio
n of
com
mun
ity-
base
d
phar
mac
eutic
al
care
ser
vice
s
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
155
parti
cipa
nts;
ages
54.
54
(11.
87) y
ears
;
fem
ales
,71.
4%;
type
1,5
.8%
;
type
2,6
7.7%
; no
diab
etes
,26.
5%;
63.2
%,≥
col
lege
grad
uate
136
patie
nts
with
diab
etes
cov
ered
by s
elf-
insu
red
empl
oyer
s’
heal
th p
lans
Stud
y De
sign
Quas
i-
expe
rimen
tal,
pre-
and
post
cour
se
anth
ropo
met
ric
mea
sure
men
ts;
a w
ritte
n fo
od
porti
on te
st; a
n
obse
rvat
iona
l
food
-por
tioni
ng
skill
test
; and
A1C
test
wer
e
adm
inis
tere
d
and
scor
ed fo
r
all p
artic
ipan
ts.
Quas
i-
expe
rimen
tal,
long
itudi
nal p
re-
post
coh
ort
stud
y
Inte
rven
tion
3-m
onth
dia
bete
s
educ
atio
n co
urse
focu
sing
on
food
-por
tioni
ng
skill
s
Educ
atio
n by
certi
fied
diab
etes
educ
ator
s
(CDE
s),l
ong-
term
com
mun
ity
phar
mac
ist
follo
w-u
p us
ing
sche
dule
d
cons
ulta
tions
,
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Med
ical
cos
t
savi
ngs
(inpa
tient
)
Mea
n to
tal d
irect
med
ical
cos
t;
prod
uctiv
ity
estim
ates
in
dolla
rs a
nd d
ays
of s
ick
time
Resu
lts
Impr
oved
food
por
tion
know
ledg
e (4
9.67
% p
re
vs 5
9.56
% p
ost,
P=
.004
),im
prov
ed fo
od-
porti
onin
g sk
ills
out o
f 5
(2.4
3 pr
e vs
4.2
9 po
st,
P=
.023
),A1
C de
crea
sed
0.73
% (P
= .0
00),
body
mas
s in
dex
(BM
I)
decr
ease
d 0.
82 k
g/m
2
(P=
.000
),w
aist
circ
umfe
renc
e
decr
ease
d 1.
27 in
(P=
.000
),hi
p ci
rcum
fere
nce
decr
ease
d 0.
6 in
(P=
.000
),an
d w
aist
-to-
hip
ratio
dec
reas
ed 0
.01
(P=
.000
).
Mea
n A1
C de
crea
sed
at a
ll
follo
w-u
ps.T
he n
umbe
r
of p
atie
nts
with
opt
imal
A1C
valu
es (<
7%) a
lso
incr
ease
d at
eac
h
follo
w-u
p.M
ore
than
50%
of p
atie
nts
dem
onst
rate
d
impr
ovem
ent i
n A1
C
valu
es a
nd in
lipi
d le
vels
at e
very
mea
sure
men
t.
Conc
lusi
ons
Impr
oved
nut
ritio
n
know
ledg
e,
anth
ropo
met
ric m
easu
res,
and
gluc
ose
cont
rol a
re
estim
ated
to re
duce
med
ical
cos
ts
(hos
pita
lizat
ions
)
by $
94 0
10.
Patie
nts
mai
ntai
ned
impr
ovem
ent i
n A1
C ov
er
time,
and
empl
oyer
s
expe
rienc
ed a
dec
line
in
mea
n to
tal d
irect
med
ical
cost
s.
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 77
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
The Diabetes EDUCATOR
78
Volume 35, Number 1, January/February 2009
Auth
or(Y
ear)
De W
eerd
t
et a
l
(199
1)16
Stud
y Ai
m
(PCS
) for
dia
betic
patie
nts
Eval
uate
if a
n
outp
atie
nt
educ
atio
n
prog
ram
for
insu
lin-t
reat
ed
diab
etic
pat
ient
s
impr
oved
the
leve
l of s
elf-
care
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
558
patie
nts
from
15 h
ospi
tals
Stud
y De
sign
Rand
omiz
ed
cont
rol s
tudy
; 2
expe
rimen
tal
grou
ps (g
uide
d
by a
hea
lth c
are
prof
essi
onal
or a
fello
w p
atie
nt)
and
a co
ntro
l
grou
p
Inte
rven
tion
clin
ical
asse
ssm
ent,
goal
set
ting,
mon
itorin
g,an
d
colla
bora
tive
drug
ther
apy
man
agem
ent
with
phy
sici
ans
Educ
atio
n pr
ogra
m
desi
gned
to
assi
st in
sulin
-
treat
ed d
iabe
tic
patie
nts
in s
elf-
care
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Cost
of t
hera
py
Resu
lts
Patie
nts
with
hig
her
base
line
A1C
valu
es
wer
e m
ore
likel
y to
impr
ove;
thos
e w
ith
high
er b
asel
ine
cost
s
wer
e lik
ely
to h
ave
low
er
cost
s fo
llow
ing
educ
atio
n.To
tal m
ean
dire
ct m
edic
al c
osts
decr
ease
d by
$12
00 to
$187
2 pe
r pat
ient
per
year
com
pare
d w
ith
base
line.
Days
of s
ick
time
decr
ease
d ev
ery
year
(199
7-20
01) f
or
one
empl
oyer
gro
up,
with
est
imat
ed in
crea
ses
in p
rodu
ctiv
ity e
stim
ated
at $
18 0
00 a
nnua
lly.
The
effe
ct o
f the
pro
gram
on m
etab
olic
con
trol,
qual
ity o
f life
,and
cos
ts
of th
erap
y w
as
asse
ssed
,but
no
sign
ifica
nt c
hang
es w
ere
note
d.
Conc
lusi
ons
No s
igni
fican
t effe
ct o
f
educ
atio
n on
any
one
of
thes
e va
riabl
es c
ould
be
iden
tifie
d.
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 78
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Costs and Benefits Associated With Diabetes Education
79
Boren et al
Auth
or(Y
ear)
“Dia
bete
s
Cost
Savi
ngs
Legi
slat
ion
Wou
ld S
ave
Mill
ions
for
Ohio
Insu
ranc
e
Indu
stry
,
Busi
ness
,
and
Taxp
ayer
s in
Prod
uctiv
ity,
Emer
genc
y
Room
Vis
its,
and
Hosp
ital
Stay
s”
(200
5)17
Eddy
et a
l
(200
5)18
Stud
y Ai
m
Ratio
naliz
e th
e
impl
emen
tatio
n
of th
e Di
abet
es
Cost
Red
uctio
n
Act (
DCRA
) in
Ohio
by
prov
idin
g
evid
ence
of c
ost
savi
ngs
in s
tate
s
with
DCR
A an
d
high
light
ing
incr
ease
d co
sts
for O
hio
in
abse
nce
of th
e
act
Estim
ate
the
effe
cts
of th
e
lifes
tyle
mod
ifica
tion
prog
ram
use
d in
the
Diab
etes
Prev
entio
n
Prog
ram
(DPP
)
on h
ealth
and
econ
omic
outc
omes
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
Pers
ons
with
diab
etes
3234
adu
lts a
t
high
risk
for
diab
etes
(BM
I
>24
kg/
m2,
fast
ing
plas
ma
gluc
ose
leve
l of
5.27
25-6
.937
5
mm
ol/L
[95-
125
mg/
dL],
2-ho
ur
gluc
ose
tole
ranc
e te
st
Stud
y De
sign
Com
parin
g co
st in
med
ical
cla
ims
for p
atie
nts
who
took
the
diab
etes
educ
atio
n co
urse
to p
atie
nts
with
sim
ilar
sym
ptom
s an
d
prob
lem
s w
ho
did
not a
ttend
diab
etes
chr
onic
dise
ase
wor
ksho
ps
Cost
-effe
ctiv
enes
s
anal
ysis
usi
ng
the
Arch
imed
es
mod
el
Inte
rven
tion
Diab
etes
chr
onic
dise
ase
wor
ksho
ps
No p
reve
ntio
n,
DPP’
s lif
esty
le
mod
ifica
tion
prog
ram
,
lifes
tyle
mod
ifica
tion
initi
atin
g af
ter a
pers
on d
evel
ops
diab
etes
,and
met
form
in
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Med
ical
cla
ims
cost
Cost
-effe
ctiv
enes
s
of D
PP li
fest
yle
prog
ram
in te
rms
of q
ualit
y-
adju
sted
life
year
s (Q
ALYs
)
gain
ed a
nd
cost
/per
son
Resu
lts
Patie
nts
who
com
plet
ed a
diab
etes
edu
catio
n
cour
se h
ad $
2324
less
in m
edic
al c
laim
s pe
r
year
than
pat
ient
s w
ith
sim
ilar s
ympt
oms
and
prob
lem
s w
ho d
id n
ot g
o
to a
dia
bete
s ed
ucat
ion
wor
ksho
p.
The
DPP
com
pare
d w
ith n
o
prev
entio
n w
ould
redu
ce
a hi
gh-r
isk
pers
on’s
30-
year
cha
nces
of g
ettin
g
diab
etes
by
abou
t 11%
,
the
chan
ces
of g
ettin
g a
serio
us c
ompl
icat
ion
by
8%,a
nd th
e ch
ance
s of
dyin
g of
a c
ompl
icat
ion
of d
iabe
tes
by 2
.3%
.
Com
pare
d w
ith th
e
Conc
lusi
ons
The
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
DCRA
in O
hio
will
ena
ble
Ohio
ans
with
dia
bete
s to
obta
in a
bet
ter c
ontro
l of
thei
r blo
od g
luco
se,
ther
eby
min
imiz
ing
the
occu
rren
ce o
f cos
tly
diab
etes
-rel
ated
com
plic
atio
ns,p
rom
otin
g
cost
sav
ings
for t
he
insu
ranc
e in
dust
ry in
term
s of
dec
reas
ed
med
ical
cla
ims,
emer
genc
y ro
om v
isits
,
hosp
ital s
tays
,and
surg
erie
s.
Life
styl
e m
odifi
catio
n
shou
ld b
e re
com
men
ded
to a
ll hi
gh-r
isk
peop
le
beca
use
it is
like
ly to
hav
e
impo
rtant
effe
cts
on th
e
mor
bidi
ty a
nd m
orta
lity
of
diab
etes
.The
pro
gram
used
in th
e DP
P st
udy,
how
ever
,may
be
too
expe
nsiv
e fo
r hea
lth p
lans
or a
nat
iona
l pro
gram
to
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 79
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
The Diabetes EDUCATOR
80
Volume 35, Number 1, January/February 2009
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Stud
y Ai
mSt
udy
Popu
latio
n
resu
lt of
7.7
7-
11.0
445
mm
ol/L
[140
-199
mg/
dL])
Stud
y De
sign
Inte
rven
tion
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Resu
lts
no-p
reve
ntio
n pr
ogra
m,
the
expe
cted
30-
year
cost
/QAL
Y of
the
DPP
lifes
tyle
inte
rven
tion
from
the
heal
th p
lan'
s
pers
pect
ive
wou
ld b
e
abou
t $14
3 00
0.Fr
om a
soci
etal
per
spec
tive,
the
cost
/QAL
Y of
the
lifes
tyle
inte
rven
tion
com
pare
d
with
doi
ng n
othi
ng w
ould
be a
bout
$62
600
.Eith
er
usin
g m
etfo
rmin
or
dela
ying
the
lifes
tyle
inte
rven
tion
until
afte
r a
pers
on d
evel
ops
diab
etes
wou
ld b
e m
ore
cost
-
effe
ctiv
e,co
stin
g ab
out
$35
400
or $
24 5
00 p
er
QALY
gai
ned,
resp
ectiv
ely,
com
pare
d w
ith n
o
prog
ram
.Com
pare
d w
ith
dela
ying
the
lifes
tyle
prog
ram
unt
il af
ter
diab
etes
is d
iagn
osed
,the
mar
gina
l cos
t-
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
beg
inni
ng
the
DPP
lifes
tyle
pro
gram
imm
edia
tely
wou
ld b
e
abou
t $20
1 80
0.
Conc
lusi
ons
impl
emen
t.Le
ss
expe
nsiv
e al
tern
ativ
es
are
need
ed.
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 80
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Costs and Benefits Associated With Diabetes Education
81
Boren et al
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Frie
s an
d
McS
hane
(199
8)19
Garr
ett a
nd
Blum
l
(200
5)20
Stud
y Ai
m
Com
pare
effe
ctiv
enes
s
and
cost
sav
ings
of h
ealth
educ
atio
n
prog
ram
s in
high
-ris
k
pers
ons
to th
ose
pers
ons
with
all
risk
leve
ls
Asse
ss c
linic
al
bene
fits,
satis
fact
ion,
and
econ
omic
mea
sure
s fro
m a
colla
bora
tive
heal
th
man
agem
ent
prog
ram
invo
lvin
g
com
mun
ity
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
2586
par
ticip
ants
of th
e hi
gh-r
isk
grou
p w
ere
mos
tly m
embe
rs
of e
mpl
oyee
grou
ps,w
ere
whi
te-c
olla
r
wor
kers
,had
priv
ate
heal
th
insu
ranc
e,an
d
had
a m
ean
age
of 4
9.7
year
s.
Empl
oyee
gro
up
had
a m
ean
age
of 4
1.2
year
s.
Seni
or g
roup
had
a m
ean
age
of
73.3
yea
rs.
256
diab
etic
patie
nts
unde
r
self-
insu
red
empl
oyer
s’
heal
th p
lans
; 80
com
mun
ity
phar
mac
y
prov
ider
s w
ith
train
ing
who
wer
e re
imbu
rsed
by e
mpl
oyer
s
Stud
y De
sign
Hist
oric
al c
ontro
l
com
paris
on o
f
man
agem
ent o
f
parti
cipa
nts
Quas
i-
expe
rimen
tal,
pre-
post
coh
ort
stud
y
Inte
rven
tion
Rand
omly
sel
ecte
d
parti
cipa
nts
rece
ived
hea
lth
asse
ssm
ent
ques
tionn
aire
,
lette
r,a
repo
rt,
and
heal
th
educ
atio
n
mat
eria
l bas
ed
on h
igh-
risk
prog
ram
are
as
(arth
ritis
,
diab
etes
,hig
h
bloo
d pr
essu
re,
smok
ing,
etc)
.
Com
mun
ity
phar
mac
ist
patie
nt c
are
serv
ices
usi
ng
sche
dule
d
cons
ulta
tions
,
clin
ical
goa
l
setti
ng,
mon
itorin
g,an
d
colla
bora
tive
drug
ther
apy
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Dire
ct a
nd to
tal
cost
s; R
OI
Mea
n pr
ojec
ted
tota
l dire
ct
med
ical
cos
ts
Resu
lts
Prev
ious
yea
r cos
ts w
ere
$113
8 in
dire
ct c
osts
for
high
-ris
k gr
oups
(HR)
com
pare
d w
ith $
352
in
empl
oyee
(E) a
nd $
995
in s
enio
r gro
up (S
).At
6
mon
ths,
dire
ct c
osts
wer
e re
duce
d by
$30
4
(HR)
com
pare
d w
ith $
57
(E) a
nd $
70 (S
).To
tal
cost
s w
ere
redu
ced
by
$484
(HR)
vs
$87
(E) a
nd
$120
(S).
The
ROI w
as
6:1
in th
e hi
gh-r
isk
grou
p vs
4:1
in th
e
com
paris
on g
roup
s.
95.7
% re
porte
d be
ing
very
satis
fied/
satis
fied
with
care
from
pha
rmac
ist.
Influ
enza
vac
cina
tion
rate
s in
crea
sed
from
52%
to 7
7%,e
ye e
xam
rate
s in
crea
sed
from
46%
to 8
2%,f
oot e
xam
rate
s in
crea
sed
from
38%
to 8
0%,a
nd p
atie
nt
satis
fact
ion
with
ove
rall
Conc
lusi
ons
Inte
nsiv
e ed
ucat
iona
l
inte
rven
tions
may
be
just
ified
in h
igh-
risk
grou
ps w
hen
they
resu
lt in
larg
er c
hang
es in
hig
h-
risk
pers
ons
than
in
unsc
reen
ed p
erso
ns fo
r
use
and
cost
s.
Patie
nts
who
par
ticip
ated
in
the
prog
ram
had
incr
ease
d sa
tisfa
ctio
n w
ith
diab
etes
car
e,hi
gher
rate
s
of s
elf-
man
agem
ent g
oal
setti
ng a
nd a
chie
vem
ent,
and
sign
ifica
nt
impr
ovem
ent i
n cl
inic
al
indi
cato
rs o
f dia
bete
s
man
agem
ent.
Empl
oyer
s
expe
rienc
ed a
dec
line
in
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 81
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
The Diabetes EDUCATOR
82
Volume 35, Number 1, January/February 2009
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Gilm
er e
t al
(199
7)21
Stud
y Ai
m
phar
mac
ists
and
heal
th c
are
prov
ider
s ai
med
to a
ssis
t dia
betic
patie
nts
with
treat
men
t,
educ
atio
n,an
d
self-
man
agem
ent
stra
tegi
es
Asse
ss c
hang
es in
econ
omic
and
clin
ical
indi
cato
rs
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
3017
adu
lts w
ith
diab
etes
who
wer
e
cont
inuo
usly
enro
lled
in a
larg
e HM
O ov
er
a 4-
year
per
iod
Stud
y De
sign
Regr
essi
on
anal
ysis
use
d to
estim
ate
rela
tions
hip
betw
een
glyc
emic
con
trol
and
med
ical
care
cha
rges
Inte
rven
tion
man
agem
ent
with
phy
sici
ans
and
refe
rral
s to
diab
etes
educ
ator
s
Diag
nosi
s of
diab
etes
was
asce
rtain
ed fr
om
diag
nost
ic a
nd
phar
mac
eutic
al
data
base
s w
ith
sens
itivi
ty o
f
0.91
and
spec
ifici
ty o
f
0.99
.
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Stan
dard
ized
cos
t
diffe
rent
ials
for
1% c
hang
es in
A1C
for p
atie
nts
with
dia
bete
s an
d
othe
r chr
onic
dise
ases
and
for
thos
e w
ith
diab
etes
onl
y
Resu
lts
diab
etes
car
e im
prov
ed
57%
to 8
7% in
hig
hest
rang
e.M
ean
A1C
decr
ease
d fro
m 7
.9%
to
7.1%
,mea
n lo
w-d
ensi
ty
lipop
rote
in c
hole
ster
ol
(LDL
-C) d
ecre
ased
from
113.
4 to
104
.5 m
g/dL
,
and
mea
n sy
stol
ic b
lood
pres
sure
dec
reas
ed fr
om
136.
2 to
131
.4 m
m H
g.
Tota
l mea
n co
sts/
patie
nt
wer
e $9
18 lo
wer
than
proj
ectio
n fro
m in
itial
year
of e
nrol
lmen
t.
Stan
dard
ized
3-y
ear
estim
ates
of c
harg
es
rang
ed fr
om $
10 4
39
(pat
ient
s w
ithou
t
com
orbi
ditie
s) to
$44
417
(pat
ient
s w
ith h
eart
dise
ase
and
hype
rtens
ion)
.Med
ical
care
cha
rges
incr
ease
d
sign
ifica
ntly
for e
very
Conc
lusi
ons
mea
n pr
ojec
ted
tota
l
dire
ct m
edic
al c
osts
.
A1C
prov
ides
use
ful
info
rmat
ion
to p
rovi
ders
and
patie
nts
rega
rdin
g
both
hea
lth s
tatu
s an
d
futu
re m
edic
al c
are
char
ges.
Econ
omic
dat
a
sugg
est t
hat c
linic
ians
shou
ld a
ssig
n hi
gh
impo
rtanc
e to
low
A1C
resu
lts a
nd a
ggre
ssiv
ely
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 82
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Costs and Benefits Associated With Diabetes Education
83
Boren et al
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Herm
an e
t al
(200
3)22
Stud
y Ai
m
Repo
rt th
e co
sts
of
the
DPP
inte
rven
tions
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
3234
par
ticip
ants
with
impa
ired
gluc
ose
tole
ranc
e (IG
T)
enro
lled
in th
e
DPP
inte
rven
tions
Stud
y De
sign
Cost
ana
lysi
s
Inte
rven
tion
Life
styl
e
inte
rven
tion
or
met
form
in u
se
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Dire
ct m
edic
al
cost
s,di
rect
nonm
edic
al
cost
s,an
d
indi
rect
cos
ts o
f
the
plac
ebo,
met
form
in,a
nd
Resu
lts
1% in
crea
se o
f A1C
abov
e 7%
.For
exa
mpl
e,
for a
per
son
with
an
A1C
valu
e of
6%
,suc
cess
ive
1% in
crea
ses
in A
1C
resu
lted
in c
umul
ativ
e
incr
ease
s in
cha
rges
of
appr
oxim
atel
y 4%
,10%
,
20%
,and
30%
.The
incr
ease
in c
harg
es
acce
lera
ted
as th
e A1
C
valu
e in
crea
sed.
The
rate
of in
crea
se in
cha
rges
with
A1C
was
con
sist
ent
for p
atie
nts
with
diab
etes
onl
y as
wel
l as
diab
etes
plu
s ot
her
chro
nic
cond
ition
s.
Over
3 y
ears
,the
dire
ct
med
ical
cos
ts o
f the
grou
ps a
ssig
ned
to th
e
inte
rven
tions
wer
e
$79/
parti
cipa
nt fo
r the
plac
ebo,
$254
2 fo
r
met
form
in,a
nd $
2780
Conc
lusi
ons
mai
ntai
n th
e A1
C st
atus
of
patie
nts
who
hav
e lo
w
A1C
valu
es.T
he m
edic
al
char
ge d
ata
sugg
est t
hat
inve
stm
ent i
n cl
inic
al
syst
ems
to im
prov
e
diab
etes
car
e m
ay b
enef
it
both
pay
ers
and
patie
nts.
Mod
est i
ncre
men
tal c
osts
are
asso
ciat
ed w
ith
met
form
in u
se a
nd
lifes
tyle
inte
rven
tions
whe
n co
mpa
rison
s ar
e
mad
e to
a p
lace
bo
inte
rven
tion.
Futu
re
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 83
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
The Diabetes EDUCATOR
84
Volume 35, Number 1, January/February 2009
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Herm
an e
t al
(200
3)23
Stud
y Ai
m
Asse
ss th
e co
st-
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
the
DPP
lifes
tyle
and
met
form
in
inte
rven
tions
rela
tive
to th
e
plac
ebo
inte
rven
tion
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
3234
par
ticip
ants
with
IGT
enro
lled
in th
e DP
P
inte
rven
tions
Stud
y De
sign
Cost
-effe
ctiv
enes
s
anal
ysis
of t
he
DPP
inte
rven
tions
from
bot
h he
alth
syst
em a
nd
soci
etal
pers
pect
ive
Inte
rven
tion
Inte
nsiv
e lif
esty
le
and
met
form
in
inte
rven
tions
Fina
ncia
l/Eco
nom
ic
Outc
ome
inte
nsiv
e lif
esty
le
inte
rven
tions
ove
r
the
3-ye
ar s
tudy
perio
d of
the
DPP
from
the
pers
pect
ive
of th
e
heal
th s
yste
m
and
soci
ety
Dire
ct m
edic
al
cost
s,di
rect
nonm
edic
al
cost
s,an
d
indi
rect
cos
ts;
QALY
from
a
soci
etal
and
heal
th s
yste
m
pers
pect
ive
Resu
lts
for l
ifest
yle.
Dire
ct
med
ical
cos
ts (d
irect
nonm
edic
al c
osts
) of
care
wer
e $2
72 ($
9) le
ss
per p
artic
ipan
t for
the
met
form
in g
roup
and
$432
less
($14
45
grea
ter)
for t
he li
fest
yle
grou
p as
com
pare
d w
ith
the
plac
ebo
grou
p.
Indi
rect
cos
ts b
y
inte
rven
tion
wer
e $2
30
mor
e/pa
rtici
pant
for
met
form
in a
nd $
174
less
for l
ifest
yle
as c
ompa
red
with
the
plac
ebo
grou
p.
Over
3 y
ears
,the
life
styl
e
and
met
form
in
inte
rven
tions
cos
t
appr
oxim
atel
y $2
250
mor
e pe
r par
ticip
ant
than
did
the
plac
ebo
in
the
DPP
stud
y.If
impl
emen
ted
in c
linic
al
prac
tice
(and
from
a
soci
etal
per
spec
tive)
,the
lifes
tyle
inte
rven
tion
cost
$13
200
and
met
form
in
Conc
lusi
ons
eval
uatio
n of
cos
ts re
lativ
e
to h
ealth
ben
efits
can
be
used
to e
stab
lish
the
valu
e of
thes
e
inte
rven
tions
to h
ealth
syst
ems.
Over
3 y
ears
,the
life
styl
e
and
met
form
in
inte
rven
tions
wer
e fo
und
to b
e bo
th e
ffect
ive
and
cost
-effe
ctiv
e fro
m a
heal
th s
yste
m a
nd s
ocie
tal
pers
pect
ive.
Mor
eove
r,
thes
e in
terv
entio
ns a
re
likel
y to
be
affo
rdab
le in
rout
ine
clin
ical
pra
ctic
e
whe
n ed
ucat
ion
is
cond
ucte
d in
a g
roup
and
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 84
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Costs and Benefits Associated With Diabetes Education
85
Boren et al
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Kato
n et
al
(200
6)24
Stud
y Ai
m
Dete
rmin
e th
e
incr
emen
tal
cost
-
effe
ctiv
enes
s
and
net b
enef
it
of a
dep
ress
ion
colla
bora
tive
care
pro
gram
com
pare
d w
ith
usua
l car
e fo
r
patie
nts
with
diab
etes
and
depr
essi
on
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
A to
tal o
f 418
of
1801
pat
ient
s
rand
omiz
ed to
the
Impr
ovin
g
Moo
d-Pr
omot
ing
Acce
ss to
Colla
bora
tive
(IMPA
CT)
inte
rven
tion
(n =
204
) vs
usua
l car
e
(n =
214
) had
coex
istin
g
diab
etes
Stud
y De
sign
Prep
lann
ed
subg
roup
anal
ysis
of
patie
nts
with
diab
etes
from
the
IMPA
CT R
CT
Inte
rven
tion
IMPA
CT,t
hrou
gh a
depr
essi
on c
are
man
ager
(DCM
),
who
offe
red
educ
atio
n,
beha
vior
al
activ
atio
n,an
d a
choi
ce o
f
prob
lem
-sol
ving
treat
men
t or
supp
ort o
f
antid
epre
ssan
t
man
agem
ent
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Incr
emen
tal c
ost-
effe
ctiv
enes
s an
d
net b
enef
it
Resu
lts
cost
$14
300
per
cas
e
of d
iabe
tes
dela
yed
or
prev
ente
d.Li
fest
yle
inte
rven
tions
cos
t $27
100/
QALY
; met
form
in
cost
$35
000
/QAL
Y
gain
ed.T
he li
fest
yle
inte
rven
tion
was
mor
e
cost
-effe
ctiv
e th
an th
e
met
form
in in
terv
entio
n
from
bot
h th
e he
alth
syst
em a
nd s
ocie
tal
pers
pect
ives
.
Rela
tive
to u
sual
car
e,
inte
rven
tion
patie
nts
expe
rienc
ed 1
15 m
ore
depr
essi
on-f
ree
days
ove
r
24 m
onth
s.To
tal
outp
atie
nt c
osts
wer
e $2
5
high
er d
urin
g th
is s
ame
perio
d.Th
e in
crem
enta
l
cost
per
dep
ress
ion-
free
day
was
25
cent
s,an
d
the
incr
emen
tal c
ost p
er
QALY
rang
ed fr
om $
198
to $
397.
An in
crem
enta
l
net b
enef
it of
$11
29
was
foun
d.
Conc
lusi
ons
gene
ric d
rugs
are
pres
crib
ed.H
ealth
pla
ns
are
likel
y to
acq
uire
impo
rtant
per
sona
l and
mem
ber b
enef
its a
t a
reas
onab
le c
ost a
nd in
a
shor
t ter
m b
y ad
optio
n of
the
diab
etes
pre
vent
ion
prog
ram
s.
The
IMPA
CT in
terv
entio
n is
asso
ciat
ed w
ith h
igh
clin
ical
ben
efits
at n
o
grea
ter c
ost t
han
usua
l
care
.
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 85
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
The Diabetes EDUCATOR
86
Volume 35, Number 1, January/February 2009
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Keer
s et
al
(200
5)25
Klon
off a
nd
Schw
artz
(200
0)26
Stud
y Ai
m
Dete
rmin
e th
e co
st
and
bene
fits
of
an in
tens
ive
diab
etes
educ
atio
n
prog
ram
for
patie
nts
with
prol
onge
d se
lf-
man
agem
ent
prob
lem
s an
d to
dete
rmin
e th
e
incl
usio
n cr
iteria
for o
ptim
al
outc
omes
Stra
tify
inte
rven
tions
for
diab
etes
acco
rdin
g to
thei
r eco
nom
ic
impa
ct
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
61 p
artic
ipan
ts o
f
a di
abet
es
educ
atio
n
prog
ram
Artic
les
docu
men
ting
or
mod
elin
g th
e
achi
evem
ent o
f
a de
sire
d
outc
ome
or
bene
fit a
long
with
an
econ
omic
Stud
y De
sign
Pre-
and
post
inte
rven
tion
data
on
glyc
emic
cont
rol (
A1C)
,
diab
etes
-rel
ated
dist
ress
,and
cost
s w
ere
com
pare
d w
ith a
refe
renc
e gr
oup
of 2
30
nonr
efer
red
cons
ecut
ive
outp
atie
nts.
Met
a-an
alys
is/
liter
atur
e re
view
Inte
rven
tion
Mul
tidis
cipl
inar
y
inte
nsiv
e
diab
etes
educ
atio
n
prog
ram
(MID
EP)
Diab
etes
dis
ease
man
agem
ent
prog
ram
s
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Diab
etes
-rel
ated
cost
s; im
med
iate
and
futu
re c
osts
of d
iabe
tes
com
plic
atio
ns;
num
ber n
eede
d
to tr
eat
Cost
sav
ing
and
cost
-
effe
ctiv
enes
s
Resu
lts
The
effe
ct o
f MID
EP o
n
A1C
and
diab
etes
-
rela
ted
dist
ress
was
satis
fact
ory,
with
1 in
less
than
3 p
atie
nts
havi
ng a
0.5
%
redu
ctio
n in
A1C
and
1
in s
light
ly m
ore
than
2
patie
nts
repo
rting
a
decr
ease
of >
1 SD
at
the
diab
etes
-rel
ated
dist
ress
.Sel
ectio
n of
patie
nts
with
A1C
8.0
%
and
diab
etes
-rel
ated
dist
ress
sco
res
≥ 4
0
furth
er in
crea
sed
MID
EP's
effi
cien
cy
with
out e
xclu
ding
man
y
patie
nts.
(1) C
lear
ly c
ost-
savi
ng
inte
rven
tions
incl
uded
eye
care
and
prec
once
ptio
n ca
re.
(2) C
lear
ly c
ost-
effe
ctiv
e
inte
rven
tions
incl
uded
neph
ropa
thy
prev
entio
n
in ty
pe 1
dia
bete
s an
d
impr
oved
gly
cem
ic
Conc
lusi
ons
The
inte
rven
tion
is e
ffect
ive
and
cost
-effe
ctiv
e in
impr
ovin
g gl
ycem
ic
cont
rol a
nd d
iabe
tes-
rela
ted
dist
ress
for
patie
nts
with
pro
long
ed
self-
man
agem
ent
diffi
culti
es.S
trict
er
incl
usio
n cr
iteria
rela
ted
to
A1C
and
diab
etes
-rel
ated
dist
ress
sco
res
may
enha
nce
the
prog
ram
’s
effic
ienc
y.
Wid
ely
prac
ticed
inte
rven
tions
for p
atie
nts
with
dia
bete
s ca
n be
cos
t
savi
ng a
nd c
ost-
effe
ctiv
e
from
bot
h a
med
ical
and
an e
cono
mic
per
spec
tive.
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 86
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Costs and Benefits Associated With Diabetes Education
87
Boren et al
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Know
ler e
t al
(200
2)27
Stud
y Ai
m
Asse
ss a
life
styl
e
inte
rven
tion
for
cont
rolli
ng a
nd
prev
entin
g
diab
etes
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
anal
ysis
for 1
7
wid
ely
prac
ticed
inte
rven
tions
for
diab
etes
3234
par
ticip
ants
with
IGT
enro
lled
in th
e DP
P
inte
rven
tions
Stud
y De
sign
RCT
Inte
rven
tion
Com
paris
on o
f a
plac
ebo
grou
p
with
gro
ups
assi
gned
to a
n
inte
nsiv
e lif
esty
le
chan
ge o
r
met
form
in u
se
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Effic
acy
at
decr
easi
ng th
e
inci
denc
e of
diab
etes
Resu
lts
cont
rol.
(3) P
ossi
bly
cost
-
effe
ctiv
e in
terv
entio
ns
incl
uded
nep
hrop
athy
inte
rven
tions
in ty
pe
2 di
abet
es a
nd s
elf-
man
agem
ent t
rain
ing.
Uncl
ear e
cono
mic
impa
ct
inte
rven
tions
incl
ude
case
man
agem
ent,
MNT
,
self-
mon
itorin
g of
blo
od
gluc
ose,
foot
car
e,bl
ood
pres
sure
(BP)
con
trol,
bloo
d lip
id c
ontro
l,
smok
ing
cess
atio
n,
exer
cise
,wei
ght l
oss,
A1C
mea
sure
men
t,an
d
influ
enza
and
pneu
moc
occu
s
vacc
inat
ions
.
The
lifes
tyle
inte
rven
tion
was
mor
e ef
fect
ive
than
met
form
in.F
ifty
perc
ent
of th
e pa
rtici
pant
s in
lifes
tyle
inte
rven
tion
expe
rienc
ed >
7% lo
ss o
f
body
wei
ght.
The
inci
denc
e of
dia
bete
s
redu
ced
by 5
8% in
the
Conc
lusi
ons
Whi
le n
ot e
xplic
itly
stat
ed,
the
read
er c
ould
ass
ume
that
by
redu
cing
the
inci
denc
e of
dia
bete
s,
cost
s re
latin
g to
the
treat
men
t of t
he d
isea
se
and
com
orbi
d co
nditi
ons
are
redu
ced.
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 87
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
The Diabetes EDUCATOR
88
Volume 35, Number 1, January/February 2009
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Men
zin
et a
l
(200
1)28
Ragu
cci e
t al
(200
5)29
Stud
y Ai
m
Exam
ine
impa
ct o
f
impr
oved
glyc
emic
con
trol
on s
hort-
term
com
plic
atio
ns o
f
diab
etes
and
asso
ciat
ed c
osts
Eval
uate
the
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
phar
mac
ist-
adm
inis
tere
d
diab
etes
mel
litus
educ
atio
n an
d
man
agem
ent
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
3294
adu
lts w
ith
diab
etes
in a
man
aged
car
e
setti
ng
191
patie
nts
with
diab
etes
at 3
univ
ersi
ty-b
ased
prim
ary
care
clin
ics
Stud
y De
sign
Retro
spec
tive
coho
rt de
sign
One-
year
obse
rvat
iona
l
stud
y
Inte
rven
tion
No in
terv
entio
n;
patie
nts
divi
ded
into
3 g
roup
s on
basi
s of
mea
n
A1C
leve
l:go
od
cont
rol
(≤8%
),fa
ir
cont
rol
(8%
-10%
),an
d
poor
con
trol
(>10
%)
Phar
mac
ist-
adm
inis
tere
d
diab
etes
educ
atio
n an
d
man
agem
ent
serv
ices
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Savi
ngs
Savi
ngs
and
cost
avoi
danc
e fo
r
thos
e pa
tient
s
with
impr
oved
patie
nt c
are
outc
omes
-
redu
ctio
ns in
A1C
Resu
lts
lifes
tyle
inte
rven
tion
grou
p an
d by
31%
in th
e
met
form
in g
roup
as
com
pare
d w
ith th
e
plac
ebo
grou
p.
Abou
t 10%
of 2
394
patie
nts
with
dia
bete
s
had
at le
ast 1
inpa
tient
stay
for a
sho
rt-te
rm
com
plic
atio
n.Ov
er 3
year
s,th
e ad
just
ed ra
te
of in
patie
nt tr
eatm
ent f
or
3 gr
oups
rang
ed fr
om
13:1
6:31
per
100
patie
nts
for
good
:fair:
poor
A1C
cont
rol (
P=
.05)
.The
corr
espo
ndin
g m
ean
adju
sted
cha
rges
wer
e
$970
,$13
80,a
nd
$304
0,re
spec
tivel
y.
Aver
age
A1C
at 1
yea
r was
7.8%
(ran
ge,4
.5%
-
13.9
%) v
s 9.
5% (r
ange
,
5.4%
-19%
) at b
asel
ine
(cha
nge
-1.7
%,P
< .0
5).
Of th
e pa
tient
s,38
% h
ad
a 1%
or g
reat
er
Conc
lusi
ons
Patie
nts
with
goo
d gl
ycem
ic
cont
rol o
n av
erag
e sa
ved
$410
to $
2070
ove
r the
span
of 3
yea
rs w
hen
com
pare
d w
ith fa
ir an
d
poor
con
trol g
roup
cos
ts.
Clin
ical
pha
rmac
ist
prov
isio
n of
dia
bete
s
man
agem
ent s
ervi
ces
achi
eved
sig
nific
ant
impr
ovem
ents
in A
1C
valu
es,b
lood
pre
ssur
e,
and
aspi
rin u
se.C
ontin
ued
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 88
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Costs and Benefits Associated With Diabetes Education
89
Boren et al
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Stud
y Ai
m
serv
ices
on
sele
cted
diab
etes
perfo
rman
ce
mea
sure
s
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
Stud
y De
sign
Inte
rven
tion
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
of a
t lea
st 1
%,
bloo
d pr
essu
re
cont
rol,
and
docu
men
ted
aspi
rin u
se
Resu
lts
redu
ctio
n in
A1C
.
Aver
age
bloo
d pr
essu
re
decr
ease
d ov
er th
e st
udy
perio
d fro
m 1
41/7
9 to
135/
75 m
m H
g (P
=
.007
),bu
t ave
rage
LDL
leve
ls d
id n
ot c
hang
e to
a st
atis
tical
ly s
igni
fican
t
exte
nt (1
14-1
12 m
g/dL
,
P>
.05)
.The
re w
as a
n
incr
ease
from
34%
at
base
line
to 7
3% a
t 1
year
(P<
.000
1) in
aspi
rin u
se.T
he p
rogr
am
achi
eved
the
A1C
and
LDL
valu
es th
at w
ould
qual
ify fo
r Nat
iona
l
Com
mitt
ee fo
r Qua
lity
Assu
ranc
e (N
CQA)
diab
etes
reco
gniti
on.
Cost
avo
idan
ce w
as
calc
ulat
ed a
s $5
9 04
0,
base
d on
an
estim
ated
savi
ngs
of $
820
for e
ach
1% d
ecre
ase
in A
1C.
Conc
lusi
ons
effo
rts in
dia
bete
s
educ
atio
n an
d
man
agem
ent a
re n
eede
d
to fu
rther
impr
ove
clin
ical
,
econ
omic
,and
hum
anis
tic
outc
omes
.
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 89
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
The Diabetes EDUCATOR
90
Volume 35, Number 1, January/February 2009
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Rose
nblu
m
and
Kane
(200
3)30
Stud
y Ai
m
Anal
ysis
of t
he
cost
and
utili
zatio
n of
heal
th c
are
serv
ices
bef
ore
and
afte
r the
initi
atio
n of
insu
lin th
erap
y
in p
atie
nts
with
type
2 d
iabe
tes
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
1177
pat
ient
s w
ith
type
2 d
iabe
tes
betw
een
the
ages
of 1
8 an
d
65 y
ears
and
cont
inuo
usly
enro
lled
in a
man
aged
car
e
orga
niza
tion
for
9 m
onth
s be
fore
and
afte
r the
ir
insu
lin s
tart
date
Stud
y De
sign
Med
ical
,fac
ility
,
and
phar
mac
eutic
al
serv
ices
in th
e
prei
nsul
in a
nd
post
insu
lin ti
me
perio
d w
ere
exam
ined
alo
ng
with
a
suba
naly
sis
of
all t
ypes
of
med
ical
ser
vice
cost
cat
egor
ies
Inte
rven
tion
Initi
atio
n of
insu
lin
ther
apy
for
patie
nts
with
type
2 d
iabe
tes
to d
eter
min
e
decr
ease
in
dise
ase-
rela
ted
and
tota
l hea
lth
care
cos
ts
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Tota
l cos
ts,
dise
ase-
rela
ted
cost
s,an
d co
sts
asso
ciat
ed w
ith
vario
us a
spec
ts
of d
irect
car
e
Resu
lts
Aver
age
tota
l and
dis
ease
-
rela
ted
cost
s in
crea
sed
afte
r ins
ulin
was
sta
rted,
with
a m
ean
diffe
renc
e
of $
2220
(P<
.001
) for
aver
age
tota
l cos
ts a
nd
$430
(P<
.001
) for
dise
ase-
rela
ted
cost
s.
Muc
h of
the
cost
incr
ease
afte
r the
sta
rt
of in
sulin
occ
urre
d in
the
initi
al 2
-mon
th
post
insu
lin p
erio
d,af
ter
whi
ch b
oth
tota
l cos
ts
and
dise
ase-
rela
ted
cost
s de
crea
sed
by 5
7%
(P<
.001
) and
49%
(P<
.001
),re
spec
tivel
y,
thro
ugho
ut th
e
rem
aind
er o
f the
post
insu
lin ti
me
perio
d.
Faci
lity
cost
s de
crea
sed
at a
ll po
stin
sulin
mea
sure
men
t int
erva
ls.
Phar
mac
y co
sts
wer
e
the
only
trea
tmen
t
com
pone
nt to
rem
ain
abov
e th
e pr
eins
ulin
perio
d.
Conc
lusi
ons
Initi
atio
n of
insu
lin th
erap
y
in th
e m
anag
emen
t of
type
2 d
iabe
tes
invo
lves
an a
ppro
xim
ate
10%
incr
ease
in to
tal h
ealth
care
exp
endi
ture
s.Th
is is
offs
et b
y a
40%
dec
reas
e
in s
ubse
quen
t tot
al h
ealth
care
exp
endi
ture
s 9
mon
ths
follo
win
g in
sulin
initi
atio
n.
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 90
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Costs and Benefits Associated With Diabetes Education
91
Boren et al
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Rubi
n et
al
(199
8)31
Shet
ty e
t al
(200
5)32
Stud
y Ai
m
Iden
tify
the
pote
ntia
l to
redu
ce d
iabe
tes
com
plic
atio
ns
and
cost
s
thro
ugh
inte
nsiv
e
man
agem
ent
Asse
ss d
iffer
ence
in c
osts
asso
ciat
ed w
ith
diffe
rent
A1C
leve
ls
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
7000
peo
ple
with
diab
etes
bei
ng
treat
ed th
roug
h
7 m
anag
ed c
are
plan
s
3121
pat
ient
s
(46%
) at t
arge
t
A1C
leve
l
(≤ 7
%) a
nd 3
659
patie
nts
(54%
)
abov
e ta
rget
A1C
leve
l
(≤ 7
%)
Stud
y De
sign
Retro
spec
tive
anal
ysis
of
shor
t-te
rm
base
line
and
follo
w-u
p
clin
ical
,
econ
omic
,
mem
ber,
and
prov
ider
satis
fact
ion
Retro
spec
tive
data
base
anal
ysis
usi
ng
elig
ibili
ty d
ata,
med
ical
and
phar
mac
y
adm
inis
trativ
e
clai
ms
data
,and
labo
rato
ry d
ata
from
a la
rge
US
man
aged
car
e
orga
niza
tion
Inte
rven
tion
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
a co
mpr
ehen
sive
heal
th c
are
man
agem
ent
prog
ram
for
peop
le w
ith
diab
etes
No in
terv
entio
n;
type
2 d
iabe
tes
patie
nts
<7%
vs
>7%
A1C
leve
ls
wer
e fo
llow
ed
for 1
yea
r to
dete
rmin
e
diffe
renc
e in
cost
s
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Gros
s ec
onom
ic
savi
ngs
Diab
etes
-rel
ated
cost
s
Resu
lts
Gros
s-ad
just
ed s
avin
gs o
f
$50/
mem
ber w
ith
diab
etes
/mon
th (1
2.3%
)
was
ach
ieve
d,w
ith
gros
s un
adju
sted
savi
ngs
of $
44/d
iabe
tic
mem
ber/
mon
th (1
0.9%
).
Hosp
ital a
dmis
sion
s pe
r
1000
dia
betic
mem
ber
year
s de
crea
sed
by
18%
,and
bed
day
s fe
ll
by 2
1%.P
atie
nts
with
diab
etes
wer
e m
ore
likel
y to
get
A1C
test
s,
foot
exa
ms,
eye
exam
s,
and
chol
este
rol
scre
enin
gs w
hile
enro
lled
in th
e pr
ogra
m.
Afte
r adj
ustin
g fo
r
conf
ound
ers,
the
pred
icte
d to
tal d
iabe
tes-
rela
ted
cost
for t
he
abov
e-ta
rget
gro
up
durin
g th
e 1-
year
follo
w-
up p
erio
d w
as
$154
0/pa
tient
,32%
high
er th
an th
e to
tal
diab
etes
-rel
ated
cos
t
($11
71) f
or th
e at
-tar
get
grou
p (P
< .0
01).
Conc
lusi
ons
lmpl
emen
tatio
n of
a
com
preh
ensi
ve h
ealth
care
man
agem
ent
prog
ram
for p
eopl
e w
ith
diab
etes
can
not o
nly
lead
to s
ubst
antia
l
impr
ovem
ents
in c
osts
and
clin
ical
out
com
es in
the
shor
t ter
m b
ut a
lso
resu
lt in
con
tinui
ng
impr
ovem
ents
in h
ealth
stat
us a
nd a
redu
ctio
n in
the
num
ber o
f fut
ure
diab
etic
com
plic
atio
ns
over
tim
e.
Man
aged
car
e m
embe
rs
with
type
2 d
iabe
tes
who
stay
ed c
ontin
uous
ly a
t the
targ
et A
1C o
f 7%
or l
ess
over
a 1
-yea
r per
iod
incu
rred
low
er d
iabe
tes-
rela
ted
cost
s vs
thos
e w
ho
wer
e co
ntin
uous
ly o
ver t
he
targ
et o
f ≤7%
A1C
.
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 91
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
The Diabetes EDUCATOR
92
Volume 35, Number 1, January/February 2009
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Sido
rov
et a
l
(200
2)33
Test
a an
d
Sim
onso
n
(199
8)34
Stud
y Ai
m
Asse
ss th
e im
pact
of d
iabe
tes
dise
ase
man
agem
ent
(DDM
) pro
gram
on m
edic
al c
osts
for p
atie
nts
with
diab
etes
Exam
ine
shor
t-
term
out
com
es
of g
lyce
mic
cont
rol i
n ty
pe
2 di
abet
es
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
6799
pat
ient
s
fulfi
lling
Hea
lth
Plan
Em
ploy
er
Data
and
Info
rmat
ion
Set
(HED
IS) c
riter
ia
for d
iabe
tes,
of
who
m 3
118
patie
nts
(45.
9%)
enro
lled
in D
DM
and
3681
patie
nts
(54.
1%)
not e
nrol
led
in D
DM
569
empl
oyed
indi
vidu
als
with
type
2 d
iabe
tes
Stud
y De
sign
Retro
spec
tive
exam
inat
ion
of
paid
hea
lth c
are
clai
ms
and
othe
r
mea
sure
s of
heal
th c
are
use
by th
e co
hort
over
2 y
ears
12-w
eek
rand
omiz
ed,
cont
rolle
d,
doub
le-b
lind
stud
y
Inte
rven
tion
DDM
pro
gram
Diet
and
titra
tion
with
eith
er 5
to
20 m
g of
glip
izid
e
gast
roin
test
inal
ther
apeu
tic
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Aver
age
gros
s
savi
ngs;
ROI
Chan
ge in
glu
cose
and
A1C
leve
ls,
sym
ptom
dist
ress
,qua
lity
of li
fe (Q
OL),
and
heal
th e
cono
mic
Resu
lts
Low
er in
patie
nt u
se
amon
g DD
M p
atie
nts
(0.1
2 ad
mis
sion
s an
d
0.56
inpa
tient
days
/pat
ient
/yea
r vs
0.16
adm
issi
ons
and
0.98
inpa
tient
days
/pat
ient
/yea
r for
non-
DDM
).M
ean
num
ber
of e
mer
genc
y ro
om
visi
ts w
as 0
.49
(DDM
) vs
0.56
(non
-DDM
).DD
M
patie
nts
had
mor
e
prim
ary
care
offi
ce v
isits
8.4
vs 7
.8/p
atie
nt/y
ear
but l
ower
mea
n pa
id
clai
ms
amon
g
com
mer
cial
insu
ranc
e
($30
2.19
DDM
vs
$527
.96
non-
DDM
) and
Med
icar
e ($
424.
00 D
DM
vs $
500.
37 n
on-D
DM).
At 1
2 w
eeks
,mea
n A1
C
and
fast
ing
bloo
d
gluc
ose
leve
ls d
ecre
ased
with
act
ive
ther
apy
(glip
izid
e GI
TS) v
s
plac
ebo
(7.5
% ±
0.1%
vs
Conc
lusi
ons
Patie
nts
enro
lled
in th
e
DDM
ave
rage
d
$394
.62/
mem
ber/
mon
th
in p
aid
clai
ms
vs $
502.
48
for t
hose
not
in D
DM
(21%
sta
tistic
ally
sign
ifica
nt re
duct
ion
in
cost
s fo
r bot
h co
mm
erci
al
and
Med
icar
e ris
k
insu
ranc
e).A
vera
ge g
ross
savi
ngs:
$129
4.32
per
pers
on/y
ear.
Patie
nts
in
DDM
not
onl
y ex
perie
nced
low
er c
harg
es b
ut a
lso
had
sign
ifica
ntly
hig
her
mea
sure
s in
the
key
diab
etes
HED
IS m
easu
res.
Lost
ear
ning
s as
soci
ated
with
abs
ente
eism
wer
e
$24/
mal
e w
orke
r/m
onth
with
impr
oved
gly
cem
ic
cont
rol b
ut w
ere
$115
for
thos
e w
ithou
t unc
ontro
lled
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 92
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Costs and Benefits Associated With Diabetes Education
93
Boren et al
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Stud
y Ai
mSt
udy
Popu
latio
nSt
udy
Desi
gnIn
terv
entio
n
syst
em (G
ITS)
or
plac
ebo
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
indi
cato
rs
(pro
duct
ivity
)
from
ques
tionn
aire
s
and
diar
ies
Resu
lts
9.3%
±0.
1% a
nd 7
.0 ±
0.1
mm
ol/L
[126
±2
mg/
dL] v
s 9.
3 ±
0.2
mm
ol/L
[168
±4
mg/
dL]
,res
pect
ivel
y;
P<
.001
).Qu
ality
-of-
life
treat
men
t diff
eren
ces
for
sym
ptom
dis
tress
gene
ral p
erce
ived
hea
lth
and
cogn
itive
func
tioni
ng
wer
e si
gnifi
cant
ly b
ette
r
for t
hose
in a
ctiv
e
ther
apy.
Econ
omic
outc
omes
for g
lipiz
ide
GITS
incl
uded
hig
her
reta
ined
em
ploy
men
t
(97%
vs
85%
; P<
.001
)
and
prod
uctiv
e ca
paci
ty
(99%
vs
87%
; P<
.001
),
less
abs
ente
eism
(loss
es =
$24
vs
$115
/wor
ker p
er m
onth
;
P<
.001
),fe
wer
bed
days
(los
ses
= $
1539
vs
$184
3 pe
r 100
0 pe
rson
days
; P=
.05)
,and
few
er
rest
ricte
d-ac
tivity
day
s
(loss
es =
$26
60 v
s
Conc
lusi
ons
bloo
d su
gar.
Lost
ear
ning
due
to re
stric
ted
activ
ity
wer
e $2
660/
1000
per
son
days
for m
ale
empl
oyee
s
with
goo
d gl
ycem
ic
cont
rol v
s $4
275
for t
hose
with
out.
Lost
wag
es fo
r
thos
e re
stric
ted
to b
ed
rest
wer
e $1
539/
1000
pers
on d
ays
com
pare
d
with
$18
43 fo
r poo
r
glyc
emic
con
trol.
Impr
oved
gly
cem
ic c
ontro
l
for p
atie
nts
with
type
2
diab
etes
is a
ssoc
iate
d
with
sub
stan
tial s
hort-
term
sym
ptom
atic
,QOL
,
and
heal
th e
cono
mic
bene
fits.
Empl
oyee
s w
ho
impr
oved
thei
r gly
cem
ic
cont
rol w
ere
mor
e
prod
uctiv
e on
the
job
(99%
vs
87%
) and
abl
e to
rem
ain
empl
oyed
long
er
(97%
vs
85%
) tha
n
empl
oyee
s w
ho d
id n
ot
cont
rol a
nd lo
wer
thei
r
bloo
d su
gar l
evel
s.
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
(con
tinue
d)
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 93
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
The Diabetes EDUCATOR
94
Volume 35, Number 1, January/February 2009
Auth
or(Y
ear)
Wag
ner e
t al
(200
1)35
Stud
y Ai
m
Dete
rmin
e im
pact
on c
ost o
f
patie
nts
with
impr
oved
A1C
Stud
y Po
pula
tion
4744
dia
bete
s
patie
nts
≥18
year
s,
cont
inuo
usly
enro
lled,
and
had
A1C
mea
sure
d at
leas
t onc
e a
year
Stud
y De
sign
Hist
oric
al c
ohor
t
stud
y be
twee
n
1992
and
199
7
in a
sta
ff-m
odel
HMO;
732
patie
nts
who
se
A1C
decr
ease
d
≥1%
bet
wee
n
1992
and
199
3
and
was
mai
ntai
ned
thro
ugh
1994
form
ed th
e
impr
oved
gro
up.
4012
pat
ient
s
who
se le
vels
decr
ease
d 0
.9%
com
pris
ed th
e
unim
prov
ed
grou
p.
Inte
rven
tion
Com
pare
pat
ient
s
with
dia
bete
s
who
se A
1C
impr
oved
to
thos
e w
hose
did
not
Fina
ncia
l/Ec
onom
ic O
utco
me
Mea
n to
tal c
osts
;
cost
sav
ings
Resu
lts
$427
5 pe
r 100
0 pe
rson
days
; P=
.01)
.
Patie
nts
with
dia
bete
s
who
se A
1C im
prov
ed
had
sim
ilar
dem
ogra
phic
s to
thos
e
who
se d
id n
ot b
ut h
ad
high
er b
asel
ine
mea
sure
men
ts (1
0.0%
vs 7
.7%
).Co
st s
avin
gs
in im
prov
ed c
ohor
t wer
e
stat
istic
ally
sig
nific
ant
only
am
ong
thos
e w
ith
the
high
est b
asel
ine
leve
ls (>
10%
) and
wer
e
unaf
fect
ed b
y
com
plic
atio
ns a
t
base
line.
Utili
zatio
n w
as
cons
iste
ntly
low
er in
the
impr
oved
coh
ort f
or
prim
ary
care
and
spec
ialty
vis
its.
Conc
lusi
ons
Abse
ntee
ism
rate
dro
pped
by 1
% c
ompa
red
with
an
8% in
crea
se in
em
ploy
ees
with
poo
r gly
cem
ic
cont
rol.
A su
stai
ned
redu
ctio
n in
A1C
leve
l am
ong
adul
t
patie
nts
with
dia
bete
s is
asso
ciat
ed w
ith s
igni
fican
t
cost
sav
ings
(mea
n to
tal
heal
th c
are
cost
s w
ere
$685
to $
950
less
eac
h
year
in th
e co
hort
with
impr
oved
A1C
mea
sure
men
ts) w
ithin
1
to 2
yea
rs o
f
impr
ovem
ent.
Tab
le 1
(c
on
tinu
ed
)
MNT
:med
ical
nut
ritio
n th
erap
y.
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 94
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Costs and Benefits Associated With Diabetes Education
95
Boren et al
Most professional diabetes educators are members ofthe American Association of Diabetes Educators. Somediabetes educators are certified diabetes educators (CDEs)or Board Certified Advanced Diabetes Managers, havingmet certain eligibility and exam requirements. TheAmerican Association of Diabetes Educators advocatesdiabetes education that is provided by a diabetes educatorand focuses on 7 self-care behaviors (ie, healthy eating,being active, monitoring, taking medication, problem solv-ing, healthy coping, and reducing risks) that are essentialfor improved health status and greater quality of life. Noeconomic studies were available that met this morerestricted definition of diabetes education. Hence, thisstudy adopted a very broad definition of diabetes educationfor its literature review. The strength of this decision is thatmore than 25 studies were identified as being relevant. Theweakness is that the studies varied considerably in design,outcome metric, population studied, and their aims.
In summary, the review of the literature addresses eco-nomic and financial outcomes relating to diabetes educa-tion interventions that are supportive of diabeteseducation as a cost-effective intervention. One couldposit that diabetes education reduces cost because it isguided by the best available science-based evidence;incorporates the needs, goals, and life experiences of theperson with or at risk of diabetes; and supports the workof health care providers who treat these patients.
Most but not all published papers on the topic appearin Medline. Some of the studies are more robust than oth-ers. The inclusion criteria were broad, and hence it is notpossible to grade the rigor of the studies and the impor-tance of the findings of each. This study did, however,include findings from RCTs and a recent systematicreview. Finally, it is not possible to identify the impor-tance of the diabetes educator in the provision and out-comes of the programs in the study because of the broaddefinition of diabetes education that was used.
The findings indicate that the benefits associated witheducation on self-management and lifestyle modificationfor people with diabetes are positive and outweigh thecosts associated with the intervention. More research isneeded to validate that diabetes education provided bydiabetes educators is cost-effective.
Implications/Relevance
• Behavior change, lifestyle modification, and self-manage-ment are crucial elements to the cost-effective managementof chronic illnesses such as diabetes.
• For optimal comparisons, a standardized definition of diabeteseducation should be adopted for future economic studies.
• The benefits associated with diabetes education are positiveand, based on the literature, outweigh the costs associatedwith the intervention.
References
1. Schoen C, Guterman S, Shih A, et al. Bending the curve: optionsfor achieving savings and improving value in U.S. health spend-ing, The Commonwealth Fund, December 2007. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/publications_show.htm?doc_id=620087. Accessed January 29, 2008.
2. Anderson G. Chronic conditions: making the case for ongoingcare. Johns Hopkins University. November 2007. http://www.fightchronicdisease.com/news/pfcd/documents/ChronicCareChartbook_FINAL.pdf. Accessed January 29, 2008.
3. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes inthe U.S. in 2007. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:1-20.
4. DeVol R, Bedroussian A, Charuworn A, et al. An unhealthyAmerica: the economic burden of chronic disease—charting anew course to save lives and increase productivity and economicgrowth. Milken Institute. October 2007. http://www.milkeninstitute.org/pdf/chronic_disease_report.pdf. Accessed January 29, 2008.
5. American Association of Diabetes Educators. About diabeteseducation. http://www.diabeteseducator.org/DiabetesEducation.Accessed February 5, 2008.
6. Norris SL, Nichols PL, Caspersen CJ, et al. The effectiveness ofdisease and case management for people with diabetes: a system-atic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22(suppl):15-38.
7. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmidt CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care.2002;25:1159-1171.
8. Salber PR. How managed care organizations contribute toimproved diabetes outcomes. Am J Managed Care. 2008;14:9-12.
9. Gary TL, Genkinger JM, Guallar E, Peyrot M, Brancati FL. Meta-analysis of randomized educational and behavioral interventionsin type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2003;29:488-501.
10. Balamurugan A, Ohsfeldt R, Hughes T, Phillips M. Diabetes self-management education program for Medicaid recipients: a con-tinuous quality improvement process. Diabetes Educ. 2006;32:893-900.
11. Berg GD, Wadhwa S. Diabetes disease management in a commu-nity-based setting. Manag Care. 2002;11:45-50.
12. Burton WN, Connerty CM. Evaluation of a worksite-basedpatient education intervention targeted at employees with diabetesmellitus. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;40:702-706.
13. Chase HP, Pearson JA, Wightman C, Roberts MD, Oderberg AD,Garg SK. Modem transmission of glucose values reduces the costsand need for clinic visits. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1475-1479.
14. Christensen NK, Williams P, Pfister R. Cost savings and clinicaleffectiveness of an extension service diabetes program. DiabetesSpectrum. 2004;17:171-175.
15. Cranor CW, Bunting BA, Christensen DB. The Asheville project:long-term clinical and economic outcomes of a community phar-macy diabetes care program. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2003;43:173-184.
16. De Weerdt, Visser AP, Kok GJ, van der Veen EA. Randomizedcontrolled multicentre evaluation of an education programme for
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 95
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from
The Diabetes EDUCATOR
96
Volume 35, Number 1, January/February 2009
insulin-treated diabetic patients: effects on metabolic control,quality of life and cost of therapy. Diabetes Med. 1991;8:338-345.
17. Diabetes cost savings legislation would save millions for Ohio insur-ance industry, business, and taxpayers in productivity, emergencyroom visits, and hospital stays. October 4, 2005 [cited January 7,2008]. http://www.diabetes.org/uedocuments/10.4.05DCRA.pdf.
18. Eddy DM, Schlessinger L, Kahn R. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of strategies for managing people at high risk fordiabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:251-264.
19. Fries JF, McShane D. Reducing need and demand for medicalservices in high-risk persons: a health education approach. West JMed. 1998;169:201-207.
20. Garrett DG, Bluml BM. Patient self-management program fordiabetes: first-year clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes.J Am Pharm Assoc. 2005;45:130-137.
21. Gilmer TP, O’Connor PJ, Manning WG, Rush WA. The cost tohealth plans of poor glycemic control. Diabetes Care.1997;20:1847-1853.
22. Herman WH, Brandle M, Zhang P, et al. Diabetes PreventionProgram Research Group: costs associated with the primary pre-vention of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the diabetes prevention pro-gram. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:36-47.
23. Herman WH, Brandle M, Zhang P, et al. Diabetes PreventionProgram Research Group: within-trial cost-effectiveness oflifestyle intervention or metformin for the primary prevention oftype 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2518-2523.
24. Katon W, Unutzer J, Fan M, et al. Cost effectiveness and net ben-efit of enhanced treatment of depression for older adults with dia-betes and depression. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:265-270.
25. Keers JC, Groen H, Sluiter WJ, Bouma J, Links TP. Costs andbenefits of a multidisciplinary intensive diabetes education pro-gram. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11:293-303.
26. Klonoff DC, Schwartz DM. An economic analysis of interven-tions for diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:390-404.
27. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, et al. Reduction inthe incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or met-formin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393-403.
28. Menzin J, Langley-Hawthorne C, Friedman M, Boulanger L,Cavanaugh R. Potential short-term economic benefits ofimproved glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:51-55.
29. Ragucci KR, Fermo JD, Wessell AM, Chumney ECG.Effectiveness of pharmacist-administered diabetes mellitus edu-cation and management services. Pharmacotherapy. 2005;25:1809-1816.
30. Rosenblum MS, Kane MP. Analysis of cost and utilization ofhealth care services before and after initiation of insulin therapyin patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Manag Care Pharm.2003;9:309-316.
31. Rubin RJ, Dietrich KA, Hawk AD. Clinical and economicimpact of implementing a comprehensive diabetes managementprogram in managed care. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:2635-2642.
32. Shetty S, Secnik K, Oglesby AK. Relationship of glycemic con-trol to total diabetes-related costs for managed care health planmembers with type 2 diabetes. J Manag Care Pharm.2005;11:559-564.
33. Sidorov J, Shull R, Tomcavage J, Girolami S, Lawton N, HarrisR. Does diabetes disease management save money and improveoutcomes? Diabetes Care. 2002;25:684-689.
34. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Health economic benefits and qualityof life during improved glycemic control in patients with type 2diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.JAMA. 1998;280:1490-1496.
35. Wagner EH, Sandhu N, Newton KM, McCulloch DK, RamseySD, Grothaus LC. Effect of improved glycemic control on healthcare costs and utilization. JAMA. 2001;285:182-189.
36. CDC Diabetes Cost-Effectiveness Group. Cost-effectiveness ofintensive glycemic control, intensified hypertension control andserum cholesterol level reduction for type 2 diabetes. JAMA.2002;287:2542-2551.
37. Ozminkowski RJ, Goetzel RZ, Smith MW, Cantor RI,Shaughnessy A, Harrison M. The impact of the Citibank, NA,health management program on changes in employee health risksover time. J Occup Environ Med. 2000;42:502-511.
38. Aldana SG. Financial impact of health promotion programs: acomprehensive review of the literature. Am J Health Promotion.2001;15:296-320.
39. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Care FinancingAdministration. Federal Register, Part II; 42 CFR Parts 410, 414,424, 480 and 498. Friday, December 29, 2000.
TDE326774.qxd 1/16/2009 6:38 PM Page 96
at American Association of Diabetes Educators on June 8, 2009 http://tde.sagepub.comDownloaded from