53
The Development of Orthodox Christianity and the New Testament By Ed Hensley

The Development of Orthodox Christianity and the New Testament

  • Upload
    yoland

  • View
    50

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Development of Orthodox Christianity and the New Testament. By Ed Hensley. Outline of this Study. Early Versions of Christianity – This Study Development of Orthodox Christianity – This Study Development of Christian Canons Selecting Books for the Canons - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

The Development of Orthodox Christianity

and the New TestamentBy Ed Hensley

Page 2: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Outline of this Study• Early Versions of Christianity – This Study• Development of Orthodox Christianity – This Study• Development of Christian Canons• Selecting Books for the Canons• Editing the Books of the Canons• Books No Longer in the Canon(s)

• Development of Anti-Judaism in Christianity• Non-Canonical Books and Myths referenced in the NT• Important Contradictions in the NT

Page 3: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

My Background• Southern Baptist• Texas• Fundamentalist Churches• Moderate Family• Not fluent in Hebrew, Greek, or Latin• Not a scholar• Send corrections to [email protected]

Page 4: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

From Christ to ConstantineFrom multiple early Christianities to an almost unified

Christianity under Constantine

Page 5: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Historical Background

Page 6: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Historical Background• Ancient Hebrews evolved from the ancient Canaanite

Religion. El Elyon was the most high god of many gods.• Ancient Hebrews became monolithic. They believed in

many gods, but Hebrews should only worship their god named Yahweh.• Ancient Hebrews evolved into monotheism around the 6th

century BCE while in Babylonian capticity, believing Yahweh was the only god.

Page 7: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Historical Background• In 587 BCE, the southern Kingdom of Judah with its capital

Jerusalem had been conquered by the Babylonians who destroyed the First Temple and forced the Jewish population into exile, known as the Babylonian exile. Fifty years later, Cyrus of Persia permitted the Jews to return and build yet a new temple, the Second Temple, only to have it destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE. Thus, the span of Jewish history from 515 BCE to 70 CE is often referred to as the Second Temple period. Within it are four subdivisions:

(Wikipedia)

Page 8: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Historical Background• The Persian Period (ca. 537-332 BCE). • Jewish nation ruled by high priests• Minimal interference from the Persian kings• Synagogues became significant sites for teaching and worship• The Torah became the focal point of their religion

• The Hellenistic Period (ca. 332-167 BCE) • The Holy Land came under Greek control during conquests by

Alexander the Great• 198-167 BCE was a reign of terror during which Jews suffered

horrible atrocities from Antiochus IV Epiphanes, King of Syria, who sought to exterminate Judaism by force

Page 9: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Historical Background• The Hasmonean Period (167-63 BCE) • Jewish rebels nicknamed "Maccabees" ("hammers") led revolt

against Antiochus and won independence. Rededication of the Second Temple (defiled by Antiochus) is the origin of Hanukkah. Two important Jewish sects, Pharisees and Sadducees, emerged.

• The Roman Period (63 BCE – 70CE) • Roman general Pompey conquered Jerusalem in 63 BCE• Herod the Great appointed King of the Jews by the Roman

Senate (37 - 4 BCE)• Census of Quirinius (CE 6)• Judea was a Roman Province (6 – 135 CE)

Page 10: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Judean Coin 68 CE

A coin issued by the rebels in 68, note Paleo-Hebrew alphabet. Obverse: "Shekel, Israel. Year 3." Reverse: "Jerusalem the Holy“ – Wikipedia.com

Page 11: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Roman Coin Celebrating Judean Captivity

An ancient Roman coin. The inscription reads IVDEA CAPTA. The coins inscribed Ivdaea Capta (Judea Captured) were issued throughout the Empire to demonstrate the futility of possible future rebellions. Judea was represented by a crying woman. – Wikipedia.com

Page 12: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Roman Coin Celebrating Jewish Captivity

Roman denarius depicting Titus, circa 79. The reverse commemorates his triumph in the Judaean wars, representing a Jewish captive kneeling in front of a trophy of arms. – Wikipedia.com

Page 13: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Romans Looting Jewish Treasure

The treasures of Jerusalem taken by the Romans (detail from the Arch of Titus). Wikipedia.com

Page 14: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament
Page 15: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Who Was Jesus (really)• Jesus was not important historically, as he was not

mentioned by any contemporary historians, Jewish, Roman, Greek, or otherwise.• The general scholarly consensus is that Jesus was a Gallilean

Jew born between 7 and 2 BCE. who condemned other Jews in particular of not following the laws or the spirit of the laws. • Jesus is believed to have been crucified by the Romans for

rebellion against their authority around 30-36 CE.• There is a small minority of scholars who claim Jesus never

existed. Some also claim Nazareth did not exist in the 1st Century.

Page 16: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Pauline Epistles

Page 17: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Paul Establishes Christian Theology• Born as Hebrew Saul, he legally prosecuted Christians• Had a conversion on the road to Damascus while hunting

Jewish Christians. Changes name to Roman name Paul• Pauline Epistles (letters of Paul) written first (authentic ones)

• 7 Considered Authentic: Romans, 1 & 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, Philemon• 6 Considered Pseudepigraphic: Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians

and the pastoral letters 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus• Romans is most important book for establishing Christian theology

• Jesus was crucified, rose from the dead, and faith in the resurrection is necessary for salvation. Return of Jesus is imminent. Bodily resurrection.

• Galatians – Confronts Peter - Christians do not follow Jewish laws/rules other than rules regarding sex.• Paul’s letters did not contain many facts referenced in Gospels.

Page 18: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

The Gospels

Page 19: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Gospels Written Long After Jesus’ Death

Luke 1 - Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled[a] among us, 2 just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the word. 3 With this in mind, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, I too decided to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, 4 so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.

a. Luke 1:1 Or been surely believed • Many gospels• Not an eyewitness• Theophilus – “Friend of God” – Not necessarily a real name.

Page 20: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Wikipedia

Page 21: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Gospel of Mark• Written first (of the 4 in NT) around 66 – 70 CE.• All gospels are anonymous.• Papias (around 100-140 CE) quoting “John the Elder” claimed

Mark was Peter’s assistant. Not all believe Papias referred to the book we now call Mark.• [John] The Elder used to say: Mark, in his capacity as Peter’s

interpreter, wrote down accurately as many things as he recalled from memory—though not in an ordered form—of the things either said or done by the Lord. For he neither heard the Lord nor accompanied him, but later, as I said, Peter, who used to give his teachings in the form of chreiai [short anecdotes], but had no intention of providing an ordered arrangement of the logia [oracles or sayings] of the Lord.

Page 22: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Jesus According to Mark• No birth story or genealogy.• Appears to be adopted by god at baptism.• Mark 1 to 8:26 – Many Miracles• Mark 8:27 – 8:30 Peter confesses Jesus is Messiah• 8:31 – Jesus predicts his death. Rest of gospel is about his

last days and death.

Page 23: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Jesus According to Mark• Jesus asks disciples to keep his identity a secret.• Never calls Jesus God or claim a divine being prior to birth

(as in John).• Never mentions Jesus was born of a virgin (Matthew and

Luke).• Does not trace ancestry to David (Matthew and Luke).• Jesus promises to return in disciples’ lifetime (9:1, 13:30).• 3 Endings to Mark 16: abrupt, short, and long. Long ending

is used to support Christian snake handling.

Page 24: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Gospel of Matthew• 70 – 10 CE (most believe 80-90 CE)• Papias claims Matthew was written in Hebrew. However,

most scholars believe it was written in Greek.• Genealogy, birth, & post resurrection stories not in Mark.• Five Discourses of Matthew• Sermon on the Mount – Christian discipleship, love, humility• Mission – 12 apostles to spread gospel• Parables – Stories to describe the Kingdom of Heaven• Church – Governing the community of followers• End Times – Judgment is coming (both destruction of temple and

his return?)

Page 25: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Gospel of Matthew• Shows more Jewish knowledge than Mark• Mark 1:2 attributes Malachi 3:1 to Isaiah. Corrected in Matt 3:3.• Mark 2:7 (men can not forgive another’s sins, only god can)

corrected in Matthew 9:3• Jesus ridicules food laws in Mark 7:18-19, dropped in Matthew

15:18-20.• Jesus misquotes commandments in Mark 10:19, corrected Matt

19:18-19.• Mark refers to David as “our father” (11:10) but not all Jews are

descended from David, corrected in Matthew 21:9.• Mark errs on Passover date (14:12) corrected in Matt 26:17.• Mark 2:26 “In the days of Abiathar the high priest” should be

Ahimelech. Matthew 12:1-8 drops this mistake.

Page 26: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Gospel of Matthew• Jesus is more divine than in Matthew in Mark• “Young man” at tomb in Mark becomes a radiant angel• Miracles in Mark demonstrate he is emissary of god• Miracles in Matthew show he is divine

• Peter calls Jesus “the Messiah, the son of the living God” in Matt 16:16. Mark 8:29 omits son of god. • “Fulfillment” of OT prophecy 5 times. None in Mark.• Matt 27:25 All the people answered, “His blood is on us and

on our children!” – Used to blame and kill Jews for centuries.

Page 27: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Gospel of Luke• Luke 1: Stories were “handed down to us”. Admits many gospels. • Written around 80 – 100 CE.• Luke was either a gentile Christian or Hellenized Jew. • Luke is known as the gospel for the gentiles.• Believed to have been a woman by some modern scholars.• Luke was highly educated and well traveled.• Author of Luke probably wrote Acts. Both address Theophilus.• Claimed to be a companion or assistant of Paul by conservatives.• Acts contradicts letters of Paul, causing many scholars to doubt

Luke was a companion of Paul.

Page 28: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Gospel of Luke• Birth story contradicts Matthew extremely.• Only gospel with Annunciation of birth to Mary.• Places blame of crucifixion on Jews, which would please

Rome.• Evidence of editing to counter heretics (which is evidence

heretics existed).• (3:22) God says to Jesus at baptism "This day I have begotten you”

in early manuscripts. Changed to “with you I am well pleased” from Mark in later manuscripts, probably to counter adoptionists.• (22:43-44) An angel helps Jesus sweat drops of blood in

Gethsemane. Not present in early manuscripts, possibly inserted to counter doceticism (the belief Jesus did not suffer).

Page 29: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Gospel of John• Jesus is an incarnation of the divine Logos.• (1:1) In the beginning was the logos, and the logos was god,

and the logos was with god. • Logos was inserted into Jewish philosophy by Philo of

Alexandria (20 BCE – 50 CE), a Hellenistic Jew. • Logos meant divine intelligent design from which all things

arise.• John 1:1 today translates logos as “word”, which means

“bible” to many Christians.• Important example of how a modern word does not mean

the same thing as it did in the 1st century.

Page 30: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament
Page 31: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Gospel of John• Author is “the disciple whom Jesus loved.”• Some propose it was written in layers.• Most date the final form to 90 – 100 CE.• Many signs and miracles showing divinity.• Raising Lazarus from the dead is the reason

Jesus is arrested, not for claiming he could destroy and rebuild the temple.• Most spiritual gospel.• Favorite gospel of the Gnostics.• Independent of the Synoptic Gospels.

The Rylands Papyrus is perhaps the earliest New Testament fragment; dated from its handwriting to about 125.

Page 32: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Gospel Word UsageSon of David

Son of Man

Son of God Rabbi

King Of The Jews

just "the jews"

Matthew 10 30 8 4 4 1

Mark 3 14 3 4 5 1

Luke 4 25 6 0 3 1

John 0 12 5 7 5 25

Some manuscripts do not have “Son of God” in Mark 1.

Page 33: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Early Christian Sects

Some manuscripts do not have “Son of God” in Mark 1.

Page 34: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Early Christian Sects• There were multiple versions of early

Christianity with a variety of beliefs about the nature of Jesus and the relationship with Judaism and the OT. • I will focus primarily on Ebionites, Marcionites, Gnostics and

the Proto-Orthodox. I will briefly mention Montanism and Arianism.

Page 35: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Ebionites• Ebionites were very Jewish Christians. • They believed in 1 god.• They considered themselves Jews and obeyed the OT laws. • Only Christian sect recorded by Eusebius as keeping the

Sabbath.• They believed Jesus was completely human and not divine.• They believed Paul was an arch heretic. • http://ebionite.org/ - Claim to be modern Ebionites.• Ebionites or similar groups such as Nazareans, were possibly

the groups chastised by Paul for keeping the OT laws.

Page 36: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Ebionites• Matthew 5 was used by Ebionites to show that followers of Jesus

should not abandon OT laws.• 17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the

Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. 19 Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.

Page 37: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Marcionites• Marcionites were Gentiles who claimed Jewish practice was

harmful for a relationship with god. • They were followers or Marcion, a real person in the 2nd

century.• They believed in two gods, one Jewish and one Christian. • They believed Jesus was completely divine and not human. • They rejected the OT as a book inspired by the inferior god of

the Jews. • They believed Paul was the one true apostle of Christ. • Jesus revealed himself to Paul because the other apostles failed

to comprehend true Christianity because they were too Jewish.

Page 38: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Marcionites•Marcion (a heretic to Proto-Orthodox

Christianity) created the 1st Christian NT Canon around 144 CE. • It contained a version of the gospel of Luke and 10 of the 13

letters of Paul, namely Romans, 1st & 2nd Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1st & 2nd Thessalonians, and Philemon. • It rejected the OT, Matthew, and John. • Proto-orthodox canons were a response to the canon

created by Marcion.

Page 39: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Gnostics• Very spiritual and many widely varying subsets.• Believed Jesus was a spirit and did not suffer, but only

appeared to suffer.• They believed in salvation through mysterious knowledge.• This world is full of ignorance and suffering; salvation comes

not by making it better but by escaping it.• They had little church structure and taught equality of all

members.

Page 40: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Gnostics• Coptic texts discovered in Nag Hamadi,

Egypt, in 1945.• The Coptic Apocalypse of Peter: • "He whom you saw on the tree, glad and

laughing, this is the living Jesus. But this one into whose hands and feet they drive the nails is his fleshly part, which is the substitute being put to shame, the one who came into being in his likeness. But look at him and me."• Warns against those who “will cleave to

the name of a dead man, thinking that they will become pure”.

Page 41: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Iranaeus v. Gnostics in Against Heresies

• Around 180 CE, proto-orthodox Christian Bishop Iranaeus wrote Against Heresies to show the errors of gnostics.

• The first time that 4 and only 4 gospels are listed as divinely inspired occurrs in an argument against Gnostics.• "It is not possible that the Gospels can be either more or fewer in number

than they are. For, since there are four zones of the world in which we live, and four principal winds, while the Church is scattered throughout all the world, and the pillar and ground of the Church is the Gospel and the spirit of life; it is fitting that she should have four pillars, breathing out immortality on every side, and vivifying men afresh. From which fact, it is evident that the Word, the Artificer of all, He that sits upon the cherubim, and contains all things, He who was manifested to men, has given us the Gospel under four aspects, but bound together by one Spirit." (Against Heresies, 3:11:8)

Page 42: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Montanism• 2nd Century Christian sect founded by Montanus.• Known as New Prophecy by followers, Montanism by critics.• Led to Cataphrygian and Phrygian groups that lasted until the 6th

Century.• Prophetic movement that called on reliance of the Holy Spirit

and a conservative personal ethic.• Parallels have been drawn to Pentecostals today.• Montanus, Prisca and Maximilla spoke via ecstatic visions.• Opponents claimed they were possessed by evil spirits.

Page 43: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Arianism• 3rd Century sect founded by Arius• Arius asserted that the Son of God was a subordinate entity

to God the Father.• The Son of God did not always exist, but was created by—

and is therefore distinct from—God the Father. • Based on John 14:28 - …If you loved me, you would be glad

that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I. • Deemed a heretic at Nicea in 325 CE• Much of the Nicene Creed was written as a response to

Arianism.

Page 44: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Proto-Orthodox• All of the Above Christians.• Jesus was a) Human b)Divine c) All of the Above• Jesus is a) God the Father b) God the Son c) God the Holy Spirit

d) All of the Above• Christians scripture includes a) the OT b) the NT c) All of the

Above (but do not have to follow all OT laws)• Claimed ancient roots for their religion.• Rejected unappealing Jewish practices such as circumcision.• Had strong church leadership and hierarchy.• Communicated with one another.

Page 45: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Arsenal of the Proto-Orthodox• Stressed that they were unified and all the other sects were

not unified (similar to Church of Christ , Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and other claims today).• Had their own versions of sense & nonsense, truth & error.• Claimed apostolic succession, as opposed to Marcion,

Montanus, Arius. • Started developing creeds in response.• Wrote forgeries and falsifications of their opponents views.• Charged non-orthodox with reprobate activity.

Page 46: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Proto-Orthodox & Simon Magus• Simon Magus (a magician and new

convert) in Acts 8 is chastised for seeking the power to give Holy Spirit to new converts.• Little more is said about Simon in

the bible, but he is considered the source of heretical views in later writings.• Many claims of reprobate activity of

non-orthodox Christians, including several involving Simon Magus. Peter's conflict with Simon Magus by

Avanzino Nucci, 1620. Simon is on the right, dressed in black.

Page 47: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Orthodox Christianity• Orthodox Christianity was forged over 3 centuries,

culminating in the Council of Nicea in 325 CE. • The Proto-Orthodox Christians increased in power and started

discussing their own canons and doctrines (partly due to influence of Marcion and the Gnostics).• The Roman Emperor Constantine converted to Christianity in

312 CE.• Edict of Milan in 313 made Christianity legal.• Constantine Ordered the Council of Nicea (present day Iznik,

Turkey) in 325 to settle disagreements on Christian doctrine.• The Nicene Creed and Constantinople Creed in 381 formalized

Christian doctrine.

Page 49: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

The Council of Nicea

Map from the University of California showing influence of non-orthodox Christian sects at the time of the Council of Nicea, 325 CE. The black line is the boundary of the Roman Empire.

Page 50: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

The Nicene Creed Is A Response to Heresy

We believe in one God,the Father, the Almighty,maker of heaven and earth,of all that is, seen and unseen.We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ,the only Son of God,eternally begotten of the Father,God from God, Light from Light,true God from true God,begotten, not made,of one Being with the Father.Through him all things were made.For us and for our salvationhe came down from heaven:by the power of the Holy Spirithe became incarnate from the Virgin Mary,and was made man.

Page 51: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

The Nicene Creed A Response To Heresy

For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate;he suffered death and was buried.On the third day he rose againin accordance with the Scriptures;he ascended into heavenand is seated at the right hand of the Father.He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead,and his kingdom will have no end.

Page 52: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

The Nicene Creed A Response To Heresy

We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,who proceeds from the Father and the Son.With the Father and the Son he is worshiped and glorified.He has spoken through the Prophets.We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.We look for the resurrection of the dead,and the life of the world to come. Amen.

Page 53: The Development of  Orthodox Christianity  and the New Testament

Books Used In This Study• Lost Christianities, Bart Ehrman• Misquoting Jesus, Bart Ehrman• Jesus Interrupted, Bart Ehrman• http://www.ntcanon.org/table.shtml• http://www.ntcanon.org/authorities.shtml, Richard Carrier• Black and White pictures from Ehrman with permission• Other images from Wikipedia and other public websites• Best image of tree of Christian sects from Concordia University

website.• Map of early Christian sects from University of California.