The Deceptive God of Technology

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 The Deceptive God of Technology

    1/4

    Derek Parker

    ENG 110-998

    Dr. Baumlin

    16 September 2010

    The Deceptive God of Technology

    There are several gods that Postman believes fail. Postman describes the god of technology as

    being something that we as humans cannot pull away from. We worship it in a sense. It works both for

    us and against us. But, often times it can do as much harm as good. He gives some examples like the

    combustion engine and the television. He believes that people should be aware of the consequences of

    choosing these devices and this god of technology before we decide to let ourselves be completely

    swallowed up by it.

    It can be seen fairly easily that technology affects us both positively and negatively. A research

    project was conducted a few years ago at the University of Missouri Columbia which tested how

    violent video games altered the brains response to real life violence. The subjects with the most

    experience playing violent games had a smaller and more delayed brain response to images of real life

    violence. This isnt all that hard to believe because the U.S. Military has even used video games to try

    and help prepare soldiers for war. In fact, the game Doom, which was first licensed by the U.S. Military,

    was a game that the shooters of the Columbine Massacre played and prepared themselves with. Eric

    Harris had actually customized his own version of the game to where there were two shooters and they

    could shoot anybody, but could not be shot back at.

    But how was the U.S. Military to know that some crazy psychopaths would use this game to do

    evil? Their original intent was to use this game to help soldiers be prepared for war and to put them in

    real life situations within a virtual world. My point is, technology is usuallycreated with good intentions

  • 8/8/2019 The Deceptive God of Technology

    2/4

    in mind, but like most things, can be used for evil. These are just a few examples of how technology that

    has to do with television can be detrimental, but its not all bad.

    Television helps keep the American experiment alive today, which is something that Postman

    would applaud rather than frown upon. If it werent for the television, American citizens would not be

    able to stay informed about todays political issues. Critics such as Postman, however, can and probably

    would argue that certain news channels are biased to a particular political party. This is very true I have

    to agree. Fox News has been accused of being biased towards the Republican Party while CNN has been

    accused of being biased to the Democratic Party. However, the majority of the news they present is still

    very truthful. People can stay informed about who is running for what office, what political party they

    belong to, the kind of experience they have, etc. These are all the things an American citizen should be

    informed of in order to vote correctly. When we get out and vote, this helps keep the American

    experiment alive. I bring this up because Postman criticizes the god of technology, but in reality it helps

    keep alive some of his own personal beliefs and ideals. Technology is supposed to aid us in our daily

    lives.

    I agree with Postman when he says any problems the schools cannot solve without

    computers, they cannot solve with them. The computer is definitely not an answer to our problems in

    society. The computer should only be used to help us make things easier. For example, it is faster to type

    a paper than it is to hand write one. It is also sometimes more convenient to email a teacher than it is to

    call them. For one, it may be a security issue if teachers go around giving out their phone numbers.

    Secondly, if a teacher is emailed a question he/she can respond to it whenever he/she has time to do so.

    I dont believe computers were ever invented to try and fix problems within our society (Postman gives

    the example of group interaction). I believe they were merely invented to provide us with an aid in our

  • 8/8/2019 The Deceptive God of Technology

    3/4

    work and our research. It is true, however, that people have taken this to an extreme. This is not the

    only technological advancement that has provided us with an even number of pros and cons.

    Postman gives the combustion engine as another example. The combustion engine has given us

    the gift of transportation, but at what costs? Is the deterioration of the ozone layer worth the

    convenience of having a car? Are the deaths of thousands of soldiers and innocent citizens (both

    American and Middle Eastern) worth the fuel it takes to maintain this convenient form of travel? As the

    shortage of oil gets worse, the fight to control it will get worse as well. Even though we know how bad

    automobile emissions are for the ozone layer and how these emissions are causing environmental

    problems such as global warming, we cannot even imagine our lives without some sort of transportation

    other than by foot. We have become so accustomed to hopping in our cars, on the bus, or in a plane,

    that we dont know how to function without such things.

    I believe this is where Postman says that the god of technology becomes dangerous. When we

    begin to base our life around these things and we dont know what to do without them is when we truly

    bow to this new god of technology. Theres no way to decide if this god of technology is more harmful

    than good because at this time this god has not actually failed. Postman believes it will fail because he

    believes the cons outweigh the pros, but I believe that there isnt enough evidence for either side to

    decide whether or not the god of technology fails or rules.

  • 8/8/2019 The Deceptive God of Technology

    4/4

    Works Cited

    Postman, Neil. The End of Education: Redefining the Value of School. New York: Vintage, 1996.

    Phillips, H. (2005, December 12).New Scientist. Retrieved September 14, 2010, from Violent video

    games alter brain's response to violence : http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8449-violent-

    video-games-alter-brains-response-to-violence.html

    Shin, G. (2008, January 4). Video Games: A Cause of Violence and Aggression. Retrieved September 14,

    2010, from Serendip: http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1723