70

The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that
Page 2: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that
Page 3: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

TheDeathofBiblicalDoctrine

Dr.PeterS.RuckmanPresident,PensacolaBibleInstitute

B.A.,B.D.,M.A.,Th.M.,Ph.D.

COPYRIGHT©2007byPeterS.RuckmanAllRightsReserved

(PRINT)ISBN1-58026-218-x

PUBLISHER’SNOTE

TheScripturequotationsfoundhereinarefromthetextoftheAuthorizedKingJamesVersionoftheBible.Anydeviationstherefromarenotintentional.

BBBOOKSTOREP.O.Box7135Pensacola,FL32534

www.kjv1611.org

OtherworksavailableonKindle

Page 4: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

TableofContents

Introduction1.GettingRidoftheHolyScriptures2.GettingRidofEternalSecurity3.GettingRidoftheRapture4.OldTestamentandNewTestamentSalvation5.DoctrineandTeaching6.TheOldTestamentSaints7.GettingRidoftheBodyofChrist8.TheSonsofGodandChrist’sLordship9.TheSonsofGodandSpiritualCircumcision10.ConfoundingRemissionwithRedemption11.GettingRidoftheKingdoms12.John15andRomans1113.WorldwidePeaceAfterward

Page 5: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Introduction

Thethingthat“mankind”hasagainstoneBookisapparentifyoutaketimeouttoreadthatBook. ItexplainswhythatBookhasbeenrevisedmore than220 timessince1880,justbeforeEnglishbecametheuniversallanguageofthe“NewAge.”YouareforbiddeneventoREADitinaschoolroominAmerica;youareforbiddentoquoteitinacourtoflaw;youareforbiddentoopenCongressortheUNAssemblywithanyreadingsfromit;and you are forbidden to preach or teach what it says about sex perverts, Hindus,Buddhists, Catholics, Jews, Moslems, atheists, evolutionists, humanists, and “GlobalCitizens”(forexample:Matt.11:27,23:9,33,25:41;John8:17,14:6;Rom.1:26–28;Lev.20:13;Jude6–7;1John5:20;Eph.5:22;Zeph.3:8;Isa.63:1–7).

Nowthe“hex”onthisBookhastodowithasimplethingthatnoonewouldsuspectoreventake“timeout”toexamine.ThetruthisitprofessestobeaHISTORYBOOK,notareligiousbookaboutsomeone’s“faith.”ItdoesnotbeginwithonewordaboutanyGodbeing the “one trueGod,” or any belief being the “one true belief,” or anything aboutmoral standards, sacraments, life after death, or even individuals giving account ofthemselvestosomeGod.Nothingwhateverissaidaboutanyone’s“searching”forGodorthe truth, findingGodor the truth,becoming“onewith theuniverse,”or “developingauniversal consciousness” or attaining any degree of spirituality through any system ofthoughtorconduct.TheheartandcoreofeveryreligioussystemonearthistobefoundNOWHEREinGenesis1–3.

Genesis1–3isgivenasasimplehistoricalnarrativethatdealswithman’sbeginning,nature’sbeginning,theearth’sbeginning,andheaven’sbeginning.

Itispurehistory,whichmustberejectedbyallfuturemenunlesstheytakeanegativeviewofmanandhisfuture.HisfutureisdescribedinGenesis3:16–19,6:5–7,and9:25;and then HISTORY confirms those historical accounts right down to the last “tid-bit”throughthenext6,000yearsofwrittenandrecordedhistory.

Note theghastly facts:deterioration (Gen.3:19)anddeath (Gen.5:5,8,11,14,17,etc.).What you are told is that history—nobody’s faith or religion remotely connectedwith it—is operated under a scientific law of physics called “The Law of HumanCollapse.”Godthenrecordsitandthenillustratesitfor6,000yearswhereanymancanreadit.

TheBookspeaksof“thelawofsin”and“thelawofdeath”longbeforeitspeaksof“thelawofthespiritoflife,”or“thelawofGod”(the“Torah”):seeRomans7:25and8:2.

ButonceyoulaythatBookdownandgotoDarwin,Huxley,Socrates,Plato,Einstein,KarlMarx,SigmundFreud,Haeckel,Lyell,NationalGeographic,Life,Time,Newsweek,NASA,theACLU,theNEA,and“DiscoveryChannel”foryourHISTORY,yourundownablindalleyintoadeadend.

No evolutionist can explain DEATH and no evolutionist ever tried it withoutdestroyingthebedrockfoundationofDarwin’stheory.

Page 6: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Youdon’tgetbetter;yougetolderandsickerandthenyoudieorgetkilled.Sodoallofyourrolemodelsandmentors;aswellasallofyourancestorsandyour

greatgrandchildren.TheBookdealswithscientificfacts,notphilosophicalfiction.There is no way to present “evolution” as even an intelligible theory, let alone a

scientific fact. Evolution has always been (and always will be) a “Fairy Tale forGrownups.”ItcannotbefoundintheHISTORYofthesolarsystem,theuniverse,nature,animals,orman.Itisjustaflimsy,religiousmythdesignedtomakeegotistsindependentoftheirCreatorsotheydonothavetogiveaccounttoHimfortheirsins.

According to the detailed history of every phase of evolution (see The EvolutionCruncher,VanceFerrell, 2001) coveringmore than900pagesof documented facts thatcan be demonstrated in a “lab,” evolution is just a pagan religion formerly called“animism” or “pantheism”—if you believed in any kind of invisible powers that “ran”things—orcalled“atheism”or“naturalism”ifyoujudgedeverythingbyyourfivesenses.

Noweveryoneknowsthefirst,basic“fundamental”ofthispagan“religion.”Itmaybeworded as Dr. Shadduck said it: “From Puddle to Paradise: the Modern “Pilgrim’sProgress.”

Inshort,itisadenialofman’shistory.Noman gets better and better till he attains perfection.Everyman (includingALL

humanistsandevolutionists)windsupinaholeintheground,wearingawoodenormetal“kimono.”Theyallwindupplantedina“MarbleOrchard”(Mafialingo).

HowdoesthisillustrateEVOLUTION?IntheBook,“DEATH”comesfromdisobeyingGodviapositivethinking (Gen.3:6)

where“man”hadbeenorderedtothinknegatively(Gen.2:17).Nowwhosehistoryturnedouttobecorrect?Man’sortheBook?Theeducatedscientists,scholars,physicists,priests,andphilosophersorTHEBOOK?

TourtheNationalCemeteryinWashington,D.C.andtellus“allaboutit.”Every period of time in the history of man from 4000 B.C. to A.D. 3000 ends in

entropy, deterioration, degeneracy, apostasy, disintegration, decay, “randomness: andDEATH. Don’t believe it? Tour the battlefields of Flanders Field, Normandy Beach,Moscow,andStalingrad,andthenstudytheDeclineoftheWest(Spengler)orTheFalloftheRomanEmpire(Gibbon).

The dust of the centuries blows across the graveyards of the nations whoDISOBEYED GOD by positive thinking about themselves: Egypt, Syria, Assyria,Mongolia,Babylon,Persia,Greece,France,Italy,andSpain.Howdidyoufailtonotethatlastthree?TheyproducedNapoleonicarmies,theRomanLegions,andtheConquistadors.Whathappened to their power?Spain and Italy andFrance, combined, couldn’t scare apussycatlongenoughtostandhisfuronend.TheywoundupasRussia,China,andtheUSAwillwindup,iftheBookiscorrect.

Evolution has no explanation for why ANYTHING living should ever die. If it is

Page 7: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

continuallyprogressing it shouldneverdie:but theyalldo.According to theBook theyALLwillexceptoneman(Gen.5:24)whostoodforagenerationofpeoplewhotookthenegativeviewofthemselves(Eph.2:1–5;Rom.3:9–18;Gen.5:29)andwillbe“caughtup”(Heb.1:5;2Cor.15:50–56;Rev.4:1–2;Acts1:10)withoutdying.Thelastone(Acts1:10)diddiebutHedidnotSTAYdead.HewouldbeaperfectexampleofhowDarwin’stheoryshouldwork,butDarwin’stheorydoesn’tworkthatway.Inhistheorynobodyiscaughtupwithoutdyingandnobodycanliveagainbeyondthegrave.

ThehistoryBooksayshewasaliarandsowashistheory(Rev.22:15).ThehistoryBookprovedtobecorrectbythedeadbodiesofmorethan4,000,000,000peoplesincethefirstonewasmurderedbyhisbrother(Gen.4).

Nowthe“LawofHumanCollapse”isthethemeofbothTestamentswhere“man”isconcerned.AnditistothisLawwemustsuccumbifwe(oranyoneelse)aregoingtobeabletodiscernbetweentruthanderror(“sounddoctrine”and“falsedoctrine”intheBook)in these “last times” (see 2 Tim. 2:3). We don’t have to disprove evolution; it hasdisproveditselftwenty-fourhoursaday,365daysayear,onfivecontinentsandhasbeendoingitformorethan6,000years.TheproblemliesinwhatthehistoryBooksaysaboutthehistoryofChristiansbetweenA.D.1880andA.D.2007.

They are the oneswho need to discern between “sound doctrine” (2 Tim. 4:3) and“falsedoctrine(see2Tim.2:16–19)forthishistoryBookmakesitclearthateveryperiodof time (called a “dispensation” in places) ends in apostasy: see Genesis 3, 6, 11, 50;Exodus32;Deuteronomy28,etc.

This is not acceptable to any adult unregenerated sinner on five continents: it hasneverbeenacceptable.Itisrejectedbyallpoliticiansrunningforanyoffice.ItisrejectedbyallState-Churches(CatholicandMoslem),allleadersintheUnitedNations,andallthematerialputoutbytheNationalEducationAssociation,and(recently)by85percentoftheprofessingChristiansinAmerica.

Genesis 1–2 ends in a catastrophe (Gen. 3, 4). Genesis 4–6 ends in a catastrophe(Gen.7,8).Genesis8and9endsinacatastrophe(Gen.11).Genesis12to50endsinacatastrophe(Exod.1–15).Exodus20to1Kings12endsinacatastrophe(Jer.52;1Kings25; Lamentations). Luke 2:10, 11, 14, 32 and Ephesians 2:12-22 ends in a catastrophe(Rev.11,12,13).AndRevelation13endsinanothercatastrophe(Rev.19;Isa.63;Joel2;Jer.25;Isa.24).Finallytheperfectkingdomcomes(seePsa.2,110,72;Isa.60:12,8:18;Zech.14;Ezek.48;Psa.148)withworldwidepeacefor1,000years(seeRev.20:1–6;Isa.2,11,61,62,66)andthenitendsintotalapostasy,destruction,anddamnation(seeRev.20:7–11andEzek.38).

There isnopermanentpeace,nopermanentpurity,nopermanent joy,nopermanentLIFEfoundintheBookuntilthepresent“heavensandearth”(Gen.1:3–31)areGONE(2Pet.3;Rev.66).

Sohereyouarein2007.IpresumeyouarearegeneratedchildofGodwhohasbeenbaptizedintotheBodyofChrist(1Cor.12:13)bytheHolySpiritandthensealedbytheHolySpirit(Eph.4:20)toguaranteeyouwillwindupjustlikeGod’sSON(1John3:1–3;Phil. 3:21; Rom. 8:29). According to the history Book, your history has taking place

Page 8: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

between 1901 and the Rapture. The history Book gives a history of church history inRevelation2,3andstates thatyour“ChurchAge”endsasallagesend:withdepravity,apostasy, deterioration, degeneration, devolution, “randomness,” confusion, entropy, anddecay.

Andthatbringsustoour“thesis”:“Forthetimewillcomewhentheywillnotenduresounddoctrine;butaftertheir

ownlustsshalltheyheaptothemselvesteachers,havingitchingears”(2Tim.4:3).Where do false doctrines come from?How do you know if they are not “sound”?

Well,hereisthe“acidtest.”Wegiveyouhereahandfulofcases(13)tostudy.Accordingto2Timothy2:15,inaKingJamesBible,youareto“study” them.Accordingtoeverycorrupt“Bible”printedsince1880(thiswouldincludetheASV,NKJV,andNIV,aswellasthe other 217 “versions”) you areNOT to“study” them.TheNIV and theNASV bothslapped Jesus Christ right in the mouth when He spoke John 5:39 and claimed Hecommandednothingof thekind.“Searchthescriptures;forinthemyethinkyehaveeternallife:andtheyaretheywhichtestifyofme”(John5:39).

Both grossly corrupt “versions” (NIV and NASV) were translated by professingChristianswhobelievedinallofthe“Fundamentals”oftheChristianfaith.Bothofthemhave been used and recommended by every brand and kind of Christian scholar inAmerica. To do it they had to remove the word “corrupt” from 2 Corinthians 2:17becausethatreference,inaKingJamesBible,wastoTHEM.

Here, then, youwill see how saved Evangelical, Conservative, and FundamentalistGreekandHebrewscholarshavetrainedliterallythousandsofyoungministerstoDENYthe“wordsof truth” in“the scriptureof truth” (Dan. 10:21) and exchange them fortraditional,“historicpositions”thatarenomore“truetotheScriptures”thanTheKoran,TheHadith, The Shastas andPuranas, TheKaballa, The Book ofMormon, The SecretDoctrine,TheTripitaka,orAliceinWonderland.

ThispackageofBible-rejectingheresiesshowshowallapostasybegins:itbeginswithhigher Christian education, starting with the first Christian University at Alexandria(Philo,Clement,Plato,Origen,andPantaenus)rightup toBobJonesUniversity,CrownCollege,LibertyUniversity,andfiftyothers.

Asyouread,maytheLordgrantyouthegiftof“discerningofspirits”(1Cor.12:10)whichisnotaJewish“signgift.”Wealwayscorrectallscholars,alltexts,allversions,allBibleswiththeKingJamesHolyBibleiftheyteachanyofthethirteenheresiesexaminedhere.

We accept the only 100 percent accurate HISTORY Book about man ever writtenwhile believing “all things written in the law and the prophets” (Luke 24:25; Acts24:14).Wewrite“ICHABOD”acrossthelast100yearsofAmericanchurchHISTORY.“All dispensations end in apostasy.” Those who take the positive view of modernChristianity are simply deceived liars who want to live in dreamland by ignoring the“lessonsofhistory.”Ithelpstheirimage($$$)andmakesthem“lookgood.”Itcan“winfriendsandinfluencepeople($$$).IthasnothingtodowiththeTRUTH,theBIBLE,orHISTORY.

Page 9: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Chapter1

“SoundDoctrine—FalseDoctrine”

GettingRidoftheHolyScriptures

AstheBodyofChrist(1Cor.12:12–27;Eph.1:22–23;Col.1:24)movesdeeperanddeeperintothestarlessmidnightof totalapostasy (seeLuke13:18–21andcomments inthatCommentaryandMatt.13:33inthatCommentary),itsleadersarerapidlybecomingclonedrobotswho“ape”eachothertothepointofnausea.WespeakhereoftheChristianSeminaries,Colleges,Universities,andBibleInstitutes“manned”bysavedEvangelicals,Conservatives, Fundamentalists, and Interdenominational “possibility thinkers” and“purpose-driven”Biblecorrectors.

This has been going on in America since 1880; it reached its “high point” ofdegenerationand“highpoint”ofcorruption in1901with thepublicationof theEnglishBible revision of 1884, disguised asTheAmerican StandardVersion (1901). From thattime on, as the “times of the Gentiles” ended (1917), the stinking corruption ofPrinceton’sCalvinisticscholarsinfiltratedeveryfacetofevangelicalChristianity.Dr.A.T.RobertsonandB.H.CarrollbothfollowedthisleadalthoughtheywerenotPresbyterians,and so did Kenneth Wuest of Moody Bible Institute, Nowell Smith (Fort Worth“Fundamentalist”),andthenthefacultiesandstaffsofHoward,Furman,Judson,Stetson,FullerSeminary,MoodyBibleInstitute,BobJonesUniversity,TennesseeTempleCollege,Wheaton, Pillsbury, Piedmont, Maranatha, Northwestern, Mid-South, Baptist BibleCollege, and the Seminaries at Forth Worth, St. Louis, Denver, New Orleans, LosAngeles,Louisville,Chicago,Minneapolis,etc.

Althoughnotalloftheseschools“swore”bytheASVof1901,theyallhadonethingin common which they still have today; and you can add these to the list: LibertyUniversity,PensacolaChristianCollege,CrownCollege,andthenexttwodozen“comingup.”

From 1880 to 2007, every one of them taught false doctrine where the word“scripture”itselfappearsinthe“scripture.”Thereisnotoneexceptionin127years.

Thisheresy isnowTHE“HistoricPosition”ofevery recognized, qualified, “godly”BibleteacherinAmerica.SheltonSmithteachesthisheresyexactlyasJohnR.Ricetaughtit, and exactly as Curtis Hutson and Stewart Custer taught it. (See The Last Grenade,published in 1990, pp. 82, 95, 105, 115.)This heresywas taught by J.VernonMcGee,CharlesStanley, andBillyGraham exactly as itwas taught byRosenthal,Osteen, RickWarren, Robert Sumner, “Hot Dog” Hymers, Doug Kutilek, Harold Willmington, EdHindson,Dr.Dobson,ChuckColson,JerryFalwell,DavidJeremiah,andTimLaHaye.

We will not waste your time with any suggestions, slander, opinions, theories,allegations, or suppositions.Wewillname theheresy,describe it,discuss it,analyze it,

Page 10: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

andprovethatitisasgreata“heresy”asanyhereticeverinventedsincePaulpointedhimoutinTitus3:10and1Corinthians11:19.

When you get through examining the evidence, youwill be at liberty to doexactlywhatthemenlistedabovedid;throwthewholecollectionofBibleversesoutthewindow,duetoyourstupidityandFEAROFRIDICULE.

Inthe“HolyBible”—thatiswhatnearlyallEnglishBibleversionsprofesstobe—the“holyscriptures” (Rom. 1:2) are called “theword ofGod…hewords ofGod…thewordoftruth…theoraclesofGod…thewordofChrist…thewordsoflife…thewordoftheLord.”

In theKing James Bible, the “scriptures” are never referred to as “theWord ofGod.”Thatexpression(noticethecapital“W”)isareferencetoaPERSON(John1:1–3;1John 1:1–2)—not any BOOK. Further, the small “w” used throughout the AuthorizedVersionisdefinedas“words”—not“theWordofGod.”The“words”ofGod(small“w”)are a reference toWORDSwritten in the “Holy Scriptures” or spoken by God to anindividualornation.ThereisnosuchthingintheHolyBibleasthe“preservedWordofGod.”“Theholyscriptures”saidthe“WORDS”werepreserved(seePsa.12:6–7).

NotonemanIlistedbelievedthatpassageIjustquoted.“Thewords of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth,

purifiedseventimes.“Thou shaltkeep them,OLord, thou shaltpreserve them from thisgeneration

forever”(Psa.12:6–7).Thisterm“words”(small“w”)willbefoundinPsalm119:103,138:4;Isaiah41:26,

51:16;Deuteronomy5:22;Matthew24:35,etc.There isnoconcernabout the“WordofGod”inoneofthosepassages.Theyareconcernedwith“WORDS” thatGodspokeorwrote.SeeitfurtherinJohn5:47,8:47;Amos8:11;Jeremiah1:9,6:19,13:10;Hosea6:5;Ezekiel2:7;andProverbs30:6,etc.

TorunfromtheseversesandfallbackonPsalm119:89istheSOPatallUniversities,Colleges,Seminaries,andInstitutes,sinceitenablestheapostatehypocritestochangeany(orall)oftheWORDSintheHolyBibleonthegroundsthattheywereonly“preserved”outofsight,beyondhumanreach,sonoonecanevercheckonthemtofindtheabsolutetruthaboutanything.

AccordingtoRomans10:6–7,nomanonearthwouldhavetotakeatriptothethirdheaventofindtheWORDSofGod(Psa.12:6),andifhedid,hecouldn’tspeakallofthemwhenhegotback(see2Cor.12:1–4).

ThepurposebehindrunningtoPsalm119:89istoridthescholar,student,teacher,andreaderofGod’sWORDS.The“runners”diditsotheycouldinsertthemselvesinitsplace,wherenoonecouldcheckonthemtoseeiftheywerelyingornot.ArlinHortondidbetterthanthat.WhenhediscardedtheAlexandrianGreektextfortheGreekTextusReceptus,hejoinedtogetherMatthew24:35withPsalm119:89sothatallofGod’swordscouldpassawaydownhere,buttheywouldstillbeupthere.

Page 11: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Unfortunately for every hereticwe listed—andwe realize they are not heretical onscores of other matters—the “WORDS of God” (not the “Word of God”) are directlyconnectedtoknowingGod(1Sam.3:1,7,19),lovingGod(John14:23),andgettingyourprayersanswered(John15:7).

The“pioneers”inthisapostasywerewhatConservativescalled“Neo-Evangelicals,”whotaught“Neo-Orthodoxy.”AnyMadisonAvenueexecutivecouldfigureoutwhattheywereuptoina“trice.”That“Neo”is“NEW,”asinActs17:21andEcclesiastes1:9–10.Its“buddies”arethe“NEWAge,”“NEWClairol,”“NEWpermissiveness,”“NEWDeal,”“NEW ASV,” “NEW World Translation,” “NEW RSV,” “NEW International Version,“NEWmorality,’and“NEWKJV.”

The apostate corrupters who gave birth to this “new” Christianity were Barth,Brunner, Tillich, Niebuhr, and some others.What they did was simple in the extreme.Theytooktheterm“WORD”ofGodasmeaningjustaMESSAGEfromGod.Howitwas“WORDED” was anyone’s guess, with the smartest (or whoever thought he was thesmartest) being able to give you God’s real WORDS without a copy of them beinganywhere.

If you want to watchWilbur Smith, John Rice, Fred Afman, Stewart Custer, BobJones III, Harold Rawlings, Marshal Neal, and Ed Hindson wobble, twist, jump, turn,gyrate, flip, and flop,watch them (or listen to them) trying to tell you thatYOUhaveaccesstoaninfallibleandinerrantauthorityfromGodHimself,withouttellingyouWHATitisorwhereyoucangetit.

Itisunavailabletoyou,accordingtoallofthem;butasfarasthatgoes,ithasalwaysbeenunavailabletoTHEM!Moral?TheywantYOUtobeasstupidasTHEYarewhenitcomestotheWORDS thatGodspokeorwrote.Thisgodless,stinkingmotiveiscoveredupbysaying,“Ohno,wewanteveryman tounderstandBETTERwhatGodwrote,bygoing to THE GREEK TEXT! That way they can get closer to the (unseen, unread,unrecorded)‘original.’”

P.S.Thereisnosuchthingonthisearthas“THE”Greektext.Every man listed above will look you right straight in the eyeballs and lie like a

Persianrug.Therearemorethanthirty-five“Greektexts,”andnotone“believer”inthembelieves

thatanyofthemareinerrantorinfallible.Ifyouwantsomethingthatistrueandabsolutelytruth—“thetruth,thewholetruth,andnothingbutthetruth”—theyfixitsoyouwillhavetocometoTHEMtogetit,andwhenyoudo,youwillhavewillinglyconsentedtosupportanoutrageouslie.

Youwillfind(indetail)seventeenstandardliesthataretaughtdaily,weekly,monthly,andyearly, ineverymajor theologicalSeminary inEuropeandAmerica,onpages149–178ofTheChristian’sHandbookofBiblicalScholarship(1988).Theyarestandard,“up-to-date,” perennial lies, believed and enforced to insure that you (and your friends,relatives,family,andchurch)willNEVER,everagaintaketheWORDSoftheHolyBible(AuthorizedVersion)tobemoreauthoritativethanthecowardly,lyingAPOSTATEwhoistrying togetyou togobyanunseen,unheard,unmemorized,unknown“WordofGod”

Page 12: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

thathasbeen“preserved”somewhereoverAlphaDraconis(thePolarStar).Now,hereisthetruth,thewholetruth,and“nothin’but!”The word “scripture” in the “holy scriptures” (Rom. 1:2)—any edition of any

version of any translation—is never given, ONE TIME, as a reference to any originalmanuscripts,anyoriginalautographs,or“THEGreektext.”Notonceinmorethanfifty-five references.Check ‘em. (Don’tyoubelieveawordPeterRuckmansays: checkhimout!)

TheScripturesJesusreadinNazareth(Luke4:17–21)werenotIsaiah’s“original”orwithin400yearsofit.TheScripturestheBereans“searched” (Acts17:11)werenottheoriginalsofoneBibleauthorfrom1500B.C.to400B.C.Notoneof‘em.TheScripturesthatPhilipandtheeunuchstudied(seeActs8:32)werenomore“originalautographs”oftheScripturesthantheworksofWilliamShakespeare.TheScripturesthatPaulcited(Gal.4:27, 30;Rom. 9:17;Acts 13:40–41) didn’t containoneoriginal autograph of a singleBiblicalauthor.

The men I listed in pages 2 and 5 all lied like a dog when it came to “the holyscriptures”(Rom.1:2).

Whatever their religious “preferences” were (Presbyterian, Charismatic, non-denominational, Catholic, Lutheran, Church of God, Church of Christ, Reformed,Anglican,Baptist,Methodist,Mennonite, etc.) theyall agreed (joyfully,beautifully, andhappily)onone,great, godly, “historicposition,” i.e., nooneonearth can finda singlecopyofthe“SCRIPTURES”:notevenwithoneverse init.Paulhadcopieshequoted;Timothyhadcopieshewasraisedon(1Tim.9:15);theBereanshadcopiestheyreaddaily(Acts 17:11); and if the Christ-rejecting Pharisees didn’t have copies of the HolyScripturesthenJesusChristunjustlycommandedthemtodosomethingtheycouldnotdoinJohn5:39.Ifthe“originalautographs”aretheonlyScripturesthatcanqualifyasbeing“givenbyinspirationofGod”(2Tim.3:16)nooneintheBiblehadanythingthatwas“profitablefordoctrine,forreproof,forcorrection,forinstructioninrighteousness.”

Thereitis—falsedoctrine;chokeonit.“Ruckman”doesn’tentertheequationanywhereatanytimeforanyreason.“Theholy

scriptures,”intheHolyScriptures,wereall“givenbyinspiration,”andthousandshadaccesstothemDAILY.Doyou?

Whydon’tyou?Didyoueverhaveacopy?Didyouloseit?DidsomeoneSTEALitfromyou?

“ButBrotherRuckman,ifI takethatposition,howcanIexplainsuchandsuch,andsuchandsuch,andsuchandsuch?”Easy:acopyofTheLastGrenade,The“Errors”inaKingJamesBible,TheChristianLiars’Library,Ruckman’sBibleReferences,Riplinger’sNew Age Bible Versions, Hills’Believing Bible Study, Vance’s Archaic Words and theAuthorizedVersion,andO’Reilly’s‘OBiblios;andIwillflatguaranteeyouthatnotoncewillanyscholar,ofanycaliber,standing,intelligence,andexperience,everbeabletodragyoudownagaintoHISignorantlevelofcowardly,Nicolaitanapostasy.

Trymeoutand“prove”me. I’ve triedallof them continually, for fifty-sevenyears,

Page 13: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

afterbeingtrainedbyTHEMatBobJonesUniversity.They all teach false doctrine when dealing with 1 Timothy 3:15–16; and if that

weren’t enough, every one of them, without exception, altered the word “spake” in 2Peter1:21to“wrote”whendefendingtheirghastly,godlessHERESY.Idon’tknowofoneexceptionin400workswrittenbetween1880and2007.

Theycannot“endureSOUNDdoctrine”(2Tim.4:3).WhenitcomestofaithfulnesstowhattheScripturessayabouttheScripturesin“the

holyscriptures,”theycombinetomakethelargestgroupofChristian“gutlesswonders”everfoundintheNineteenthandTwentiethCenturies.

Page 14: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Chapter2

“SoundDoctrine—FalseDoctrine”

GettingRidofEternalSecurity

Whenfacedwiththeobviousfactthatatleast100versesintheNewTestamentteach“conditional salvation,” conditioned on faith andworks—Revelation 12:17, 14:12, andHebrews 3:6, 14, for example—the Christian scholars divide themselves off into twoBible-perverting, Bible-rejecting “private interpreters” (2 Pet. 1:20) and confound theentireBodyofChristwithtwoopposingviewswhereneitheroneisanymoreScripturalthanMadamBlavatsky’s“SecretDoctrine.”

Christian scholars (saved and lost,Liberal andCatholic) havebeendoing this sinceA.D.90,atthecompletionoftheNewTestament.

The first set (comprised of the vast majority) swears that any Christian can losesalvationanytimeafterhe issaved:hecanloseeternal lifeasquicklyashecanlosehisbillfoldorhiscarkeys.ThisgroupiscalledArminians,fromJacobArminius—anenemyofJohnCalvin.ItincludesallRomanCatholics,allEpiscopalians,allGreekOrthodox,allMethodists,allPentecostals,allMormons,allJehovah’sWitnesses,allCampbellites,allSeventh-dayAdventists,allMoslems,andallOrthodoxJews.

The second group is called Calvinists, which includes Reformed theologians andorthodoxBaptists.Thepositionthatalloftheirleadingtheologianshavetakenisthatallsalvation(ofanyone),inbothTestaments,isbygraceonly,apartfromanyworks,andthat,therefore,all100verseswhichclearlyteach“faithandworks”musteitherbealteredbyusing“theoriginalGreek,”etc.,orbyspiritualizingthem,orbytakingthemoutoftheircontexts: for example, Psalm 24:3–5; Matthew 25:40,45; Revelation 14:12; Matthew24:13,etc.

Both of these positions are just as non-scriptural as baptismal regeneration, getting“slain in theSpirit,”praying toMary, thinking thatanyPopeeverexperienced theNewBirth,orteachingthatActs2:38is“thegospelofthegraceofGod”(Acts20:24).

As usual: “There are two sides to every question, and both sides are wrong.”(Murphy’sLaw)

Now, it is perfectly apparent to any readerwho is not intellectually dishonest, thatsuchpassagesasRomans2:13;Hebrews10:26;1John3:7;andJames2:24clearlyteacha“faith-and-works” type of salvation for SOMEONE. Salvation “by grace…throughfaith”inthefinishedatonementofGod’sSoncannotbefoundanywhereinTheSermonon theMount orMatthew24 orMatthew25.Anyone can see that at one reading.ThegospelpreachedinRevelation14:6–7byanangelwouldputthatangelunderacurseifhepreacheditbeforetheChurchAgeendedandtheBodyofChristhadleft(Gal.1:8).

Not one “convert” in the Millennium is saved “by grace…through faith” in

Page 15: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

anything.Heisnotevenwalkingbyfaith,nomatterwhathebelieves.Heiswalkingbysight,justlikeThomas!(SeeZech.14:16;Ezek.48:35;Zeph.3:15–17;2Chron.6:6;Psa.9:11;Joel2:27;Zech.2:10,12).

All of this is evident to anyone, except College and Seminary-educated BibleTeachers,Popes,Bishops,andBibleRevisers.

Herewewillcontentourselveswithshowingyouhowthose100verseshavetoapplytoconvertseitherintheOldTestament(seeEzek.33:11–19;Psa.18:20–24)ortheGreatTribulation(Mark13;Matt.24;Rev.5–19)ortheMillennium(Rev.20;Matt.5–7;Zech.14; Isa. 11;Heb. 8; etc.).Not one verse in that lot can be forced into theChurchAgewithoutmakingaliaroutoftheAuthorofScripturebychangingitswordingorbyaddingorsubtractingfromitswordingorbyremovingitcompletelyfromitscontext.

Now, I am going to pretend for a moment that I am a Catholic, Charismatic,Methodist,Jew,Moslem,Mormon,Anglican,orGreekOrthodox“believer.”Iamgoingtoshowyou from theHolyScriptures—without adding or subtracting oneword fromoneverse,orgoingto“theGreek”tochangeoneverse—whataChristianwouldhavetodotoearnHellandgothereafteracceptingthe“freegift”(Rom.5:15)of“eternallife”(Rom.6:23).

AccordingtowhattheHolySpiritrecordedintheNewTestament—inanyeditionofanytranslationofanyversionoftheBible,inanylanguage—THISiswhatwouldhavetohappentoyouifyouwereaborn-again(John3:3)“sonofGod”(1John3:1–3)“inJesusChrist”(1Thess.4:16;Col.2:6–10;John17:21–23).

1.Youwouldhaveto“returntoyourmother’swomb”andbebornAGAIN,afteryouwere born again (John 3:3–4). Furthermore, you would have to chalk down at least adozen “new births” if you “lost it” twelve times in forty-eight years—once every fouryears.InthecaseofaCampbelliteorCatholicwho“lost it,”youwouldalsohavetoberebaptized inwater to get it back, since both of these apostate groups swear thatMark16:16 isESSENTIALforspiritualsalvation. If you lost your salvationonce every fouryears,youwouldhavetobebaptizedagaininwatertwelvetimesinhalfacentury.

Obviously,IamtalkingNONSENSE.AllCatholicsandCampbellitespreachjustthat:NONSENSE.2.GodwouldhavetocutyououtofthebodyofHisSon,bytearingyouloosefrom

His“flesh” and“bones” (Eph. 5:30). Hewould have to “divide” Christ (1 Cor. 1:13)about thirty times a day (or more) when dealing with over 1,000,000,000 professingChristians.ChristwouldbemutilatedagainafterHissufferingsonCalvary(Isa.53).SinceHis spiritual body,“that filleth all in all” (Eph. 1:23), is likened to a“pearl of greatprice”(Matt.13:46),asonepreciousjewel(Mal.3:17;Prov.31:10;Matt.7:6),itwouldhavetobechippedawayat,say,50,000times,if50,000Christiansinit,“lostit.”Surely,in twentycenturies, 50,000members of that one body (1Cor. 12:13;Col. 2:17)wouldhave“lostit”ifyoucould“loseit.”

Apearl is the only precious stone on earth that comes from aWOUND in a livingorganism.Unlikediamonds, rubies, etc., it cannotbe cut anywhere tomake twopearls.

Page 16: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Youwouldruinitifyoutookonechipoutofit.3.Youwouldhave towindup inHellafter beingpredestinated towindup inNew

Jerusalem(seeRev.21:9)wherethe“BRIDEofChrist”is—HisBODY(Eph.4:12).Youwouldhaveasinlessbody(Phil.3:21;Rom.8:21,23;1John3:1–3),soifyoulostit,theChristianwouldhavetoswearthatPaulandGodAlmightyLIEDwhentheyhadRomans8:29recorded.

Thatversesaysthefinaldestinationofeveryborn-againchildofGod(see“called”inRom.8:30and1Cor.1:26)istowindupjustlikeJesusChristHimself(Phil.3:21;1John3:1–3).

ThatdestinationwasFIXED,inthePASTtense(Rom.8:30).The“messers”whomessedwithittookthepasttenseon“glorified”andmadeitrefer

tospiritualsalvationinthepast.JesusChristdoesn’tcome“inhisglory”(Matt.25:31;2Pet.1:17)tilltheSecondAdvent,andwhenHedoes,theChristiandoesnotgetspiritualsalvationoreternallifeatall:hegetsaglorifiedbody(1John3:1–3;Phil.3:21).Romans8:30wasgivenasGodlookedattheoperationfrometernity.

YouhavetooverthrowadivinedecreeoftheOnewhosavedyou(Rom.8:29)inordertochangeyourdestination;allCatholics,Jews,Moslems,Campbellites,GreekOrthodox,Episcopalians,andCharismaticsCHANGEIT.

4. Inorder foryou towindup in theLakeofFireafterJesusnotonly“knew”you(Gal. 4:9 cf. Matt. 7:23) but accepted you (Eph. 1:6–7), you would have to deny thepetitionHeprayedtoGodtheFatherinJohn17:24.YouwoulddothisafterhearingHimsaythatGodalwaysheardHim(seeJohn11:41–42,5:20).

Who do you think you are, claiming that your private interpretation of verses youdon’tunderstandispowerfulenoughtoannulaprayer thatJesusprayedtoHisFather?!WithHimAND theHolySpirit praying foryou (Rom.8:26–27),you’re going to “beatthemoutofit,”areyou?

NotunlessyouareasconceitedasaPope,asstupidasStanLaurel,aslazyasRipVanWinkle,andascrookedasSlickWillie.

5.ForyoutoloseGod’s“freegift”of“eternallife”(seeRom.5:15–16,6:23),youwouldhavetoapply1John1:9toChrist’sbloodatonement,andthatisnotgoingtowork.First John1:9hasnothing todowithanyonegetting toHeavenorNewJerusalem.ThewholechapterisonFELLOWSHIPandtheversedealswithapplyingtheatonement—notMAKINGit.Itwas“made”1,970yearsago,anditcoveredeverysincommittedbetweenAdamandtheWhiteThroneJudgment(Gen.3–Rev.20).

Youareseekingforgivenessin1John1:9tomaintain“fellowship,”soeveryBible-perverting scamp pretended the word wasn’t in the chapter and made it apply to“salvation.”Itdoesn’t,andJesusChristHimselftoldyouwhyandhowitdoesn’tinJohn13:10–14.Paultoldyouagainin1Corinthians11:31.Noonein1Corinthians11islosingsalvationorcondemnedtoHell.Theyarebeing judgedby theirSaviourfornot judgingthemselves,andtheconsequenceshavenothingtodowithanyofthemgoingtoHell.Theybecomeweakorsick,orGodhastoKILLthem.Theydon’t“loseit”forfiveseconds.

Page 17: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

The educated, apostate corrupters simply read the “damnation” of 1 Corinthians11:29 into the “damned” of Romans 14:23 and pretend the “condemnation” waspermanent,asinMark16:16.Itwasn’t,notinanyofthethreecases.

Theydidthesamethingwhentheyremovedtheword“condemnation”fromRomans8:1(seetheScofieldnotes).That“condemnation”hadnothingtodowiththeoneinJohn5:24.Theyjusttookitcompletelyoutofcontextbecauseitdidn’tfittheirsystem.

6.Finally,ifanymemberofJesusChrist’sBODY(whowasofficiallyadopted)couldloseeternallife,whatwouldbethepointingettingit tostartwith?“IoncewaslostbutnowI’mtemporarilyfound;t’wasblindbutnowIsee,butIcangoblindagain.”Didyouever actually think about what these scoundrels are getting away with?Why, they aredestroyinghalfofthehymnsinyourhymnbook.

Observe:“Thankyou,Lord,forsavingmysoul(temporarily);thankyou,Lord,formakingme

whole(forawhile).Thygreat (temporary) salvationso richand free (althoughyoumaytakeitawayfrommelater).”

That’sthe“GoodNews,”isit?“Blessedtemporaryassurance!Jesusismine,forawhile!Oh,whataforetasteofglory

divine(which Imightmiss).Heirof temporary salvation,purchaseofGod,bornofHisSpirit(butcanbeunbornagain),washed(forthepresent)inHisblood.”

Imaginethehypocrisyofthesecheapskatessinginghymnsaboutassurancewhentheyhavenone,andusingyourhymnbookwhileteachingyouthatyourhymnbookisalie!

“Whatevermylot,thouhasttaughtmetosay:Itistemporarilywellwithmysoul!Itiswell!Itiswell,temporarily,withmysoul!”

“Under his wings I am temporarily safely abiding though the night deepens andtempestsarewild.StillIcantrustHim,IknowHecan’tkeepme,thoughhehasredeemedmeandIam(presently)Hischild.WhofromHislovecansever?ExceptmeandtheDevilandtheworldandtheflesh!UnderHiswings,mysoulshalltemporarilyabide,SAFELYabide,unlessIfallfromgrace,forever.”

That would be an honest hymnbook text for every honest Christian who sincerelybelievesthatGodLIEDtoHimwhenHegavehimthepromiseofRomans8:29.

“ConditionedSecurity” is just like“Christianwhores,”“alternate lifestyles,”“sexualorientation,”and“virtualreality.”It’sthetalkofatwo-facedhypocrite.

Page 18: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Chapter3

“SoundDoctrine—FalseDoctrine”

GettingRidoftheRapture

Thesearticleson“sounddoctrinevs.falsedoctrine”arenotwrittenforthebenefitofanyChristian(ornon-Christian)whotakesthenewsmediaseriouslywhereitdealswithanything.ItiswrittenforBiblebelieverswhoareconcernedaboutteachingorpreachingfalsehood.Thiswouldautomaticallyexclude98percentofallpersonnelconnectedwithallnewsmediaoutlets,includingradio,magazines,books,TV,“websandinternets,”andnewspapers.

“Modernman”isnotslightlyconcernedabout“thetruth.”Heisnotaloverof“THETRUTH”(John14:6,17:17;Psa.119:160),andifeducated,hedoesn’tbelievethatthereisanysuchthingas“THE”truthaboutanything.All“truths,”toahighly-educatedmoron,arerelative.Theinquireristhefinalauthoritywhendealingwithanytruth.Allhumanists(andallChristianscholarsinthe“scholarlycommunity”)arepracticalatheists.

SohereweareabouttodiscussamatterinwhichnotoneleaderintheUnitedStatesortheEuropeanUnionortheUnitedNationsisevenslightlyinterested.Unfortunatelyforthem,theirdestinies(whichincludestheirhealth,theirjobs,theirfamilies,theirrace,theirnation,andtheirLIVES)areboundupwiththedoctrinesweareabouttodiscuss,fortheywere covered in detail, in the Holy Bible,more than 1,845 years before the UN wasformed.

The matter under examination is called “The Rapture” (see a dictionary for themeaning).Theversesdealingwithitcallfortheimmediate“translation”(Heb.11:5;Gen.5:24) of several million human beings upward through outer space at a speed ofsomewherebeyondtentimesthespeedoflight(ifthephysicistshavegaugedthedistancebetweenhereandAlphaDraconis[thepolarstar]correctly.P.S.:Theyprobablyhaven’t).

These transformedbodieswillbe thebodiesof livingpeople (John11:26)anddeadpeople(John11:25),accordingtoJesusChristandtheApostlePaul(1Cor.15:52–54;1Thess.4:14–17).Youarenotexpectedtobelievethatifalltheinformationtowhichyouhave had access in the last 100 years has beenCBS,NBC,Mutual,ABC,CNN,FOX,Time, Life, Look, theNational Geographic, and ten years of post-graduate work in aFederalCollegeorUniversity.Youaretorejectitasafairytale,whileatthesametime(!),you will swear there was a Mesozoic Period, Pogo, a Pre-Cambrian Era, Batman,Diplodocus, Stegosaurus, Tarzan, Mother Goose, spontaneous generation, “acquiredcharacteristics,”andthecreationofDNAandRNAwithanautomatic,built-incodethatcreatedenzymesandproteinsACCIDENTLY.

Youmight aswell believe in SantaClaus or theKoran and do just aswell. If thatdoesn’twork,try“Mary”bruisingtheserpent’s“head”(Gen.3:15)infourdozenstatues

Page 19: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

inEurope.Sameoutfit.“Jes’dependsonhowyalookathit.”Now, this “Rapture” is supposed to take place at three different times according to

three different ways of interpreting the Scriptures. We call the first one the “Post-TribulationRapture”(seeTheTwoRaptures,BibleBaptistBookstore,1996).Thismeansthat after a periodof either forty-twomonths (Rev. 11:2, 12:6, 14, 13:5) or sevenyears(Dan.9:24–27;Jer.30:7),thelivinganddeadsaintsare“caughtuptothethirdheaven”(2Cor.12:1–4)assurelyasEnochwas“caughtup”(Gen.5:24),Elijahwas“caughtup”(2Kings2:11),Paulwas“caughtup”(2Cor.12:1–4),Johnwas“caughtup”(Rev.4:1–2)andJesusChristwas“caughtup”(Acts1:9).

A“POST”Tribulationrapturewouldmeanthe“catchingup”wouldnotoccuruntiltheforty-twomonths(orsevenyears)wasover.

SuchapositionmeansthatChristiansliving, today,willbeexposedtofallingoutoftheBodyofChristandlosingtheirsalvationbytakingthe“markofthebeast.”

“Andthethirdangelfollowedthem,sayingwithaloudvoice,Ifanymanworshipthebeastandhisimage,andreceivehismarkinhisforehead,orinhishand,

“The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured outwithoutmixtureintothecupofhisindignation;andheshallbetormentedwithfireandbrimstoneinthepresenceoftheholyangels,andinthepresenceoftheLamb”(Rev.14:9–10).

“Buthethatshallendureuntotheend,thesameshallbesaved”(Matt.24:13).“Andthefoolishsaiduntothewise,Giveusofyouroil; forourlampsaregone

out”(Matt.25:8).“Thenshallhesayalsountothemonthe lefthand,Departfromme,yecursed,

intoeverlastingfire,preparedforthedevilandhisangels”(Matt.25:41).This places every verse in the New Testament that teaches SOMEONE can “lose

salvation”(forexample:2Pet.2:20–22;John15:6;1Tim.5:15;1Cor.9:13;Heb.3:6,14,6:4–6,10:26–31;Rev.21:8)right“smackdab”oneveryborn-again,regenerated,justified(freely),sanctified(inthepast),andpredestinated(Rom.8:29)memberofChrist’s“flesh”and“bones”(Eph.5:30)anddepositshimintheLakeofFireifhedoesn’tdieasamartyr(Rev.6:9,20:4,13:5,12:11).

Falsedoctrine.AnyBibleteacherwhointerpretsANYpassageineitherTestamentinsuchawayas

to make it contradict any other passage in either Testament is a false prophet who is“privatelyinterpreting”(2Pet.1:20)theHolyScriptures.

YoucannotmakeLeviticus11:1–28contradict1Timothy4:3–4,unlessyouteachthatsalvationintheOldTestamentandNewTestamentareidentical,whichtheyarenot.YoucannotmakeRevelation12:17and14:12refertoanysaintonthisearthbetweenA.D.33andA.D.2007withoutcontradictingRomans4:5,7–8;Ephesians2:8–9;andTitus3:5.

Where verses seem to “collide,” you simply have not placed them in the right“bracket”(2Tim.2:15).FirstJohn1:9doesNOTcontradictColossians1:14,unlessyou

Page 20: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

pretend1John1:9isdealingwithSALVATION,whichitisnot.In the Tribulation, WORKS are a part of spiritual AND physical salvation. You

couldn’t readMatthew24or25withoutbelieving thatunlessyousimplyquitbelievingwhat both chapters said in Greek, Hebrew, English, Spanish, German, Latin, French,Japanese,Russians,Chinese,orPigLatin.

SoifyouadoptthePost-Tribulationtheory,youmusteithermakealiaroutofGodinfiftyversesintheNewTestament,oryoumustteachthataChristiancan“loseit.”Takeyourpick.You’reaBible-rejectinghereticnomatterwhichheresyyouchose.

Falsedoctrine.Thesecondtheoryisthe“Pre-TribulationRapture.”ThisteachesthatEnochgotoutof

“thewrathtocome”(Matt.3:7;Mal.4:1–4;1Thess.5:9)inthe“daysofNoah”beforethefloodhit(1Pet.3:20),andLotgotoutofSodom(“inthedaysofLot”—Luke17:28)beforetheFIREfell(Mal.4:1–4;Matt.3:7–10;2Thess.1:7–8;Matt.13:40–42).

Thatis,thedeadandlivingsaintswillbecaughtupBEFOREtheforty-twomonths(or7years; seeabove)begin.With this system,youcan take1 John3:1–3andPhilippians3:20–21literally,automaticallyexcludinganyChristianwhoislookingfortheforty-two-monthorseven-yearperiodstoshowupwiththe“beast”(Rev.13:5–8,14:9–11).Noticetoo,thatthePost-TribulationRapturemakesaliaroutoftheApostlePaul,forhesaidthatyouwereto“comfortoneanotherwiththeseworlds”(1Thess.4:18).Thewordshejustgave—seethecontext—hadabsolutelyNOTHINGtodowiththeTribulation,NOTHINGtodowithDaniel’sSeventiethWeek,NOTHINGtodowiththe“beast”orhis“mark,”andabsolutelyNOTHINGtodowithanyone“enduringtotheend”(seeDan.12:6,8,9,13;Matt.24:13;andHeb.3:6,14,6:8)ofANYTHING.

Falsedoctrine.The Post-Tribulation Rapture cannot haveANY application to ANYChristian who

wassavedbygracethroughfaithinthefinishedbloodatonementofJesusChrist.Then howdid somanyChristians get “talked into it”?Why, that’s easy: there ISa

post-Tribulation rapture (Matt. 24:31), but it has nothing to do with Christ’s “BODY”(Acts20:28;Eph.5:23–32;1Cor.12:13–27)inthisage.Thepost-Tribulationraptureisasplitrapturewheresomeofthe“candidates”foritLOSEsalvationandhence:

1.Donot“SEE”GodwhenHeappearsattheENDoftheTribulationjustbeforetheADVENT(Matt.5:8;Rev.14:14;Psa.50:2,80:3,19,53:6;Dan.10:5–7; Isa.6:1–11;1Cor.15:8).

2.DonotSEE“theLord” (Heb.12:14)becausetheyceasedtobe“holy”andwerenot “looking for Him” (see the exact words in Heb. 9:28; Luke 21:34–36; and Matt.24:48–50).

But once youmake the deadly, hereticalmistake of identifyingOld Testament andTribulationsalvationwith“thegospelofthegraceofGod”(Acts20:24)inthisage,youhave permanently severed your spiritual jugular vein and simultaneously “lost yourmarbles.”

Page 21: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

All the“foolishvirgins” inMatthew25:8–12“lost it.”All the“wicked servants” inMatthew 25:26–30 “lost it.” And all of the Gentiles who ignored the Jews in theTribulation“lostit”(Matt.25:45–46).[Youropinionortheopinionof10,000savedGreekscholars about these matters is not even worth discussing. You are simply trying toproduceaBiblewheretheversescontradicteachotherandYOU“saveface.”]

Finally (2005), a converted Jew named Rosenthal published a “middle of the roadcompromise.”Hegotthesaintstwenty-twomonthsintotheTribulationsotheywouldgeta chance to take theMark of the Beast. He called this cute little “doo-dad” the “Pre-WRATH Rapture.” Unfortunately, to prove his point, he eradicated 200 verses on theMillennialReignofChrist,forheequated“thedayoftheLord”in2Peter3:10withthe“dayoftheLord”foundinJoel2:1–2;Zephaniah1:14–15;andIsaiah34:8,61:2.

Falsedoctrine.SecondPeter 3:10 takes placeAFTER theMillennialReign ofChrist (Rev. 20:1–6,

11–14).Blew it again.Howdid he do it? Just like all cultists in theAlexandrianCult have

been doing it since the days of Eusebius, Origen, Jerome, Augustine, and the early“Popes.”Theysuperimposetheirownsystemsofprivateinterpretationsovereveryversewithwhichtheydisagreeorareoffendedbyorcannotunderstandorgetsinthewayofthereligioussystemfromwhichtheymaketheirliving.

DoyouknowwhatRosenthaldidinanefforttogetattentionasa“Bibleresearcher”whohaddiscoveredan“advancedrevelation”inthe“originalGreek”?Wellsir!blessyourhereticalbody, soul,andspirit,hedeclared that theChristians in theTribulationwillbegettingconvertswithagospelthatan“angel”preached(seeRev.14:6–7)whichwillnotbetheGospelPaulpreachedallhislife(Gal.1:8–12).

Doyouknowwhat elseBrotherRosenthal did,with a conscience just as clear as ablackout?HedividedJesusChristup into twoparts,afterbeingwarned thatChristwasNOT“divided” (1Cor.1:13).RosenthalsplitHimrightdownthemiddleandgaveyouonesetofsavedsinnerswhowereallJEWS(Rev.7:4–9)andanothersetofsinnersthatwereallGENTILES(Rev.7:9–14),andneitherofthemwerepartofJesusChrist’sBody—Hisbride(Eph.5:23–32;2Cor.11:2;Rev.19:7).

Thus, Rosenthal (with the best intentions) created a monster heresy that destroyednearly400versesintheBible.Yousee,“inChrist,”“thereisneitherJewnorGreek”(Eph.2:13–22,3:1–6;1Cor.12:13;Gal.3:28)and“themiddlewallofpartition” thatwasbrokendown(seeEph.2:14),comesbackintofulleffectthroughouttheTribulation.Ifyoudoubtit,lookatthetwodifferentgroupswho“inheritthekingdom”attheendoftheTribulation—Matthew25:6–10,40.

One of them is a nation of persecuted JEWS who are Christ’s “brethren” (Matt.25:40)inthesenseofMatthew28:10,23:8,and1John3:14.

Theothergroupis“SHEEP”whoareNOT“Christ’sbrethren.”Lookatthepassage(Matt.25:32–40).

Yourmodern,savedscholarscan’thandlethepassage:noneofthem.

Page 22: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Theyarenot interested in the truth.Theywill skipover anything thatwould revealthis SIN in the eyes of the believers. They all skip it and declare that Old Testamentsalvation under the Law andTribulation salvation under theAntichrist are the same asNewTestamentsalvation“bygrace…throughfaith.”

Theyareliars;theyteachFALSEDOCTRINE.Sounddoctrine—falsedoctrine.NotonememberoftheBodyofChristwillparticipateintheraptureofPsalm50:1–5;

Revelation11:11–12;andIsaiah26:19–20.NotonememberoftheBodyofChristwillbeleft on this earth to enter a “salvation-by-works-and-faith” situation: that will be thesituationaccordingtotheHolySpiritasHiswordsarefoundinRevelation14:12,12:17;Matthew25:30;Hebrew6:4–6;andRevelation22:14.

A Post-Tribulation or Pre-Wrath rapture for any regenerated Bible believer in theBody of Christ (Col. 1:27, 2:9–10; Eph. 5:29–32) is as “out of the question,” and asimpossible as President Bush setting up an Islamic democracy in the Middle East.(Through 1,400 years, the Moslems conquered North Africa, the Middle East, andSoutheast Asia by bloody combat in physical warfare [A.D. 600–A.D. 2007] undermilitary,religious,State-Churchdictators;theywillnotchangetheirtacticsnow.)

Page 23: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Chapter4

“SoundDoctrine—FalseDoctrine”

OldTestamentandNewTestamentSalvation

AllmajorChristiansourcesof“highereducation”havebeenpromotingtheheresythatOldTestamentandNewTestamentsalvationareidentical; theyhavebeendoingitsincesomewhere around 1850. Utterly disregarding the facts that there are TWO different“Testaments”(Heb.8:13),andoneisconnectedwiththeLaw(John1:17)withaCURSEonthoseundertheLaw(Gal.3:13),andtheOldTestamentendswithacurse(Mal.4:6)while the New Testament doesn’t (Rev. 22:21), they have completely overlooked thestaggering FACT that if salvation is the SAME under both Testaments, then there iscertainlynoneedforTWOofthem.

This sloppywayofprivately interpreting theScripturecame from the refusalof theNineteenthCenturyChristianleaderstorightlydivide“thewordoftruth.”Iftheyhad,they would have found SEVEN different “covenants.” They certainly should haveobservedthem,fortheyalteredtheword“testament”to“covenant”inMatthew26:28;2Corinthians3:6;Hebrews9:15,18,20;andRevelation11:19.

AnyreaderwithanIQof90couldseethatAdamandEvehadacovenantofWORKSbeforetheyfell,andneitherofthem“walkedbyfaith”adayintheirlives.TheywalkedbySIGHT,asall“converts”willdofor1,000yearsaftertheTribulation(seeEzek.48:35;Zech.14:9,16;andPsa.66:4,72:1–15,96:10,82:8,102:13–22,86:9,and67:4).

Noone in theMillenniumissavedbyfaithor justifiedbyfaith,nordoanyof them“walk” by faith. They walk by SIGHT just like Thomas did (John 20:26–29). That isobvious toanyonewhocouldreadanyBible inany language.Afterbeing told thatOldTestamentsalvationundertheMosaiccovenant(theLaw)hasworks,works,works,andmoreworks (seeExod. 15:26; Isa. 1:15–17;Deut. 30:10–20, 32:46;Lev. 26:3–16; Psa.24:3–5; Ezek. 18:5–28; Jer. 11:4–8), the stupid blunderers insisted on quoting Romans4:22–24 dealing with Abraham to prove that his imputed righteousness was like ours(Rom.4:24,4:2–5).

Abrahamwasn’tundertheMosaiccovenant.Aliarhastohaveagoodmemory;thesehereticsdon’thaveone.SotheyappealedtoDavidinPsalm32:2tolineupwithRomans4:8.David’s“suremercies”(Isa.55:3;Acts13:34)werethe“exceptiontotherule”under

the Mosaic covenant, and that is why they can be applied, spiritually, to the NewTestament.However, if anyBiblical illiteratewere to insist theywere foreveryone,notjustDavid,hewouldcatchhimselfinabeartrap.ItwasDAVIDwhowasworryingaboutlosingtheHolySpirit(Psa.51:11).IsTHATyoursalvationsinceCalvary?DavidhadseenSaullosetheHolySpirit(1Sam.16:14),andhehadreadaboutSamsonlosingtheHoly

Page 24: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Spirit(Judg.16:20),andheknewtheHolySpiritwasINSIDEthosemenattimesbecausetheHoly Spirit was said to be INSIDE (not “ON”) them. See Exodus 31:3 and Isaiah63:10–11.

As a matter of fact, the Holy Spirit in the New Testament was said to have beenINSIDE Isaiah, Jeremiah,Ezekiel,Micah,Haggai,Habakkuk, andZechariah in theOldTestament,accordingto1Peter1:11.

SomeoneinAmericahasbeenteachingTWOheresiestomorethan10,000ministerialstudentssince1901.

Thefamousministerialcliché(whichisnowan“historicposition”withallLaodiceanapostates)is“MenintheOldTestamentweresavedbylookingforwardtothecross;theyaresavednowbylookingbackatit.”Isn’tthatanattractive,lovely,spiritualsummaryofthe“planofsalvation”?Well,itispositive,andtheGospel(1Cor.15:3–4)is75percentnegative. The heresy amalgamates, integrates, synthesizes, mixes, adulterates, andreconcilestwoentirelydifferentthingstomakethemappearequal.IwillshowyouhowEQUALtheywere.

1.Abraham(underGRACEbeforetheLaw)couldnotget“redeemed,”norcouldhissinsbe“takenaway”(Heb.10:4;Exod.34:7;Heb.9:15).AnyonesinceA.D.33can.

2.Abrahamwasnot“justified”tillyearsafterhegothisimputedrighteousness(Gen.15:6;Rom.4:22).YougetyoursthemomentyouacceptGod’sSon(John1:12;Rom.4:5,5:1,9).Abrahamwas“saved” inGenesis15:6butwasnot justified tillGenesis22 (seeJames2:21,24).

3. Abraham (under GRACE before the Law) was not “born again,” nor was hespiritually circumcised (Col. 2:11, 13; Gen. 17:11). No saint in the Old TestamentexperiencedtheNewBirth.TheOldTestament(Psa.22:30–31)toldNicodemusitcouldnottakeplacetillafterJohn3:14.“ArtthouamasterinIsraelandknowethnotPsalm22atverses30and31?”

4.Abrahamdidnotgotothethirdheavenwhenhedied;nordidAbel,Joseph,Judah,Isaac, Jacob, or Daniel. They went to Paradise or “Abraham’s bosom,” where ChristwentaftertheCrucifixion(seeEph.4:8–10;Matt.27:52,12:40).

YougodirectlyintoJesusChrist’spresenceinthethirdheaven(Phil.1:23;1Cor.1:7–8;2Cor.5:1–8;2Tim.4:8;John17:24).

5.AbrahamwasnotadoptedasoneofGod’ssons(Rom.8:15–16),nordidheenterChrist’s body. Jesus Christ had no spiritual body in the sense of Ephesians 5:25–31;Ephesians2:13;andColossians2:9–10untilAFTERActs1.

6.Abrahamdidnot“SEE”anythingthattookplaceatCalvaryorthetomb(Matt.27–28). The statement in John 8:56 was aborted to read “Abraham saw me dying on thecross.”That isnotwhat it said inonecopyof anyBiblemanuscript thathaseverbeenfound.JesusChrist’s“day”waswhatAbrahamwentthroughinGenesis22:3–14,anditturnedout tobeaTYPEofwhatwould takeplace later.AbrahambelievedGodwouldresurrecthissonIsaac(Gen.22:5).THATisthesenseof“hesawmy…day”inJohn8:56.

7.NothinghappenedtoAbrahamwhenhe“believedGod”(Gen.15:1–6),absolutely

Page 25: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

nothing.Hewasnotregenerated,hewasnotspirituallycircumcised,hewasnotputintoChrist’sBody,hissinswerenottakenaway,hissinswerenotpaidfor(redeemed),hewasnotadoptedintoGod’sfamily,andhissoulresidedinParadiseuntilMatthew27:52–53.

AndOldTestamentandNewTestamentsalvationarethesame,arethey?TheyarenoteventhesameunderGRACE(Gen.3:21,6:8)beforeAbraham.“Thejust”wholived“byfaith”intheOldTestamentdonotevenlivebytheFAITH

youhaveunderRomans1:17and5:1.Aliarhastohaveagoodmemory,soalltheliarsforgot that Habakkuk’s quotation was MISQUOTED by Paul in Romans 1:17. Paulomitted“his”from“hisfaith”(Hab.2:4).

The Bible then told you that Old Testament faith was manufactured; thus all thementions of “faith” in Hebrews 11, demonstrating Old Testament faith, are onlyillustrationsof individualactionsbasedonbelievingwhatGodsaid.This is identical toAbraham’sfaithonwhatGodsaid(Gen.15:1–6).

When you turn to the actual passages in the Old Testament and read them, yousuddenlybecomeawareofthefactthat“faith”hadlittleornothingtodowithanyone’seternalsalvation,forthewordonlyoccurstwotimes intheOldTestament(Deut.32:20;Hab.2:4).Whenitdoes,onetimeitisemphasizingsomeone’slackoffaith(Deut.32:20).

Your“faith”wasgiventoyouaccordingtoEphesians2:8–9sothatyoucouldrepenton the spot (Acts 11:18) and believe “on the dot” (Rom. 10:8). The scholars simplypervertedEphesians2:8–9soitwouldnotgiveGodthecreditforgivingyouenoughfaithtobelieve—butHedid(whetherornotyouuseditisyourbusiness).

Allof theapostatescholarsmade the“thatnotofyourselves” refer to salvation ingeneral.Itdidn’t.ItwasareferencetoagiftGodgaveyousoyoucouldreceivea“FREEGIFT” (Rom. 5:16—salvation) “by grace…through FAITH” and “THAT not ofyourselves.”

SotheOldTestament“his”wasdroppedinRomans1:17.Itwasnolonger“his”; itwas God’s. All of the Hebrew and Greek scholars missed both passages. They did itbecause they were trying to equate Old Testament salvation with New Testamentsalvation. They wished to “join together” what God Almighty had “put asunder.” Thesolution could only be found if they had RIGHTLY DIVIDED “the word of truth”instead of trying to mix it up together in one, confused, scholarly, balled-up, hereticalmess.

TheSermonontheMountisworksfromstarttofinish,andits“finish”finisheswithan admonition toWORK (Matt. 7:24–26).Faith andgrace are not evenmentioned inMatthew25.No one inMatthew25:34–40was saved“by grace…through faith.” Noone in the Tribulation “endured to the end” (Matt. 24:13) without keeping “thecommandmentsofGod” (Rev.12:17,14:12,22:14),andgrace, faith, justification,andimputedrighteousness are not even a PART of“the everlastinggospel” (Rev. 14:6–7)preachedintheTribulation.

The saved Christian scholars have been anti-biblical for nearly 200 years. Theirdiseasedmindsarespreadinga“communicable”disease;itisTERMINAL.

Page 26: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

“ThereisnocureforAPOSTASY.”Falsedoctrine:heresy.In2Timothy4:3–4,itistheleadersofChristianityinAmerica,notjusttheirconverts,

students,classmembers,orchurchmembers,whocannot“enduresounddoctrine.”OldTestamentsalvationisnotidenticaltoNewTestamentsalvationbefore,during,or

after the Law. The saved Gentiles, who didn’t have the Law, were saved byWORKSaccording to theirCreator: seeRomans2:7 andExodus20:6 asHecommunicatedwiththemwhentherewerenoScriptures(seeJob23:12).Thereisnowayin“Hell’shalfacre”that any scholar can reconcile Romans 2:7 with Galatians 2:16 and Romans 3:10, orreconcile James 2:21, 24 with Romans 5:1,9, by talking about “looking forward andbackwardtothecross.”Whatallthescholarsdoiscreatetheologicalsystemswhichwillforcethe“wordsoftruth”tocontradictthemselves.Thatway,thescholarswillemergeas“saviors fromerror,” and theycanmakeyoucome to them toget “the real story” from“thehorse’smouth.”(Theymeanfromthejackass’smouth[Job11:12]).

PeterandJohnknewnomoreabouttheresurrectionofJesusChrist,afterministeringtoHimfor42months, thanAbraham,Moses, Isaac, Jacob, Jonah,or Isaiah.ReadJohn12:16andMark9:32.

NordidanyofIsaiah’sbuddies:read1Peter1:10–11.NoonewaslookingforwardtoChrist’sdeathorresurrection(Mark9:10),evenafter

they had been prophesiedmore than two dozen times (in types) betweenMoses (1500B.C.) and Zechariah (500 B.C.), and details about both of them were in print in thePsalms, Isaiah, and Genesis more than 800 years before Christ’s birth. If that seemsstrange toanyreader, lethimponder this: the totaldestructionof191Gentilenations is“ondeck,”andthedetailsofthiscomingslaughterwereallgiven,indetail,morethan100times in theOldTestament; that is2,500yearsago.Less than10percentof theworld’spopulationtodayis“lookingforward”foranyofthose100versestobefulfilled.HumannatureisjustthesameinA.D.2007asitwasin1500B.C.

Sounddoctrine—falsedoctrine.Inanydispensation,everysinnerisSAVEDbydoingwhatGodtellshimtodo.Those

savedinActs2:38wereNOTsavedasthoseinActs16:30–31.ThosesavedinActs8:12,15werenotsavedlikethoseinActs10:47.ThereareFOURdifferentwaystogetsavedinthe bookofActs alone; that iswhy it is one of themost dangerous books in theBible(outsideofHebrewsandMatthew)forgettingmessedupwithFALSEDOCTRINES.

NoonetodaygetstheHolySpiritbywaterbaptism(Acts2)ortongues(Acts2).NoonehastobebaptizedtoreceivetheHolySpirit(Gal.3:14;Acts10:47),andnoonehastohavehandslaidonhimtogettheHolySpirit(Acts8:15–17).Whoeverwouldteachyoudifferentlythanthat,isanapostatehereticwhomakeshislivingteachingfalsedoctrines.

Page 27: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Chapter5

“SoundDoctrine—FalseDoctrine”DoctrineandTeaching

Themost vivid “watermark” of theLaodicean church period—the final apostasy ofthe local Christian churches (Rev. 2–3)—is marked by the refusal of savedFundamentalistsandConservativesandEvangelicalstoputupwith(“endure”)“SOUNDDOCTRINE.”

This gross Christian sin was so predominant in the Twentieth Century that every“new”and“better”Englishtranslationproduceddidawaywiththeveryword“doctrine”inscoresofplaces.TheSatanicsubstitutionused,togetridofanyBiblicaldoctrine,wastheword“teaching.”YouwillfindthatthishasbeendoneintheNIVandtheNASV(inallof their editions) in fourteenplaces in theGospels, four times in thebookofActs, andeleventimesinthePaulineEpistleswherethatwritersaidChristianswouldnot“enduresounddoctrine”(2Tim.4:3).

Thesubtle“sleightofhand”(Eph.4:14)behind thischoiceofwords lies in thefactthat theword teaching has no religious content; to the contrary, theworddoctrine hasalwaysbeenconnectedwithreligiousteachingsofsomekind.Suchusesas“TheMonroeDoctrine”or“indoctrination”byCommunistsisusedoccasionally,butallunderstandthat“teaching” is not always concerned with any “doctrines” of anyone. “Doctrines” arestatementsofbeliefthatcenteronthingsareligiouspersonissupposedtobelieve.

Doctrines are “dogmas” that appear in “creeds.” “Teaching” covers what anyonethinks someone should learn. For example: basket weaving, net mending, sewing andknitting, repairing electrical andgasoline appliances, the alphabet,mathematics, history,mid-Victorian poetry, organic chemistry, marriage relationships, self control, Kung Fu,Karate,boxing,swimming,dieting,“aerobics,”etc.

Thefirstthreeitemsthe“NewAge”Biblesgotridofwere:1.Thecommandmentto“search” Scriptures (John 5:39); 2. The command to “study” the Scriptures (2 Tim.2:15);and3.Theword“doctrine.”(SeetheNuttyIdiot’sVersion,forexample,inMatt.7:28,15:9,16:12,22:33,andMark1:22,27,4:2,7:7,11:18,12:38,etc.)

Millionsof“teachers” (see2Tim.4:3)donot teachany “doctrines.”So the“NewAge” Bibles convert Bible teachers (the first ones are in Antioch, Acts 13:1) into just“teachers.”Youdonothavetobelievethe“DOCTRINES”thattheytaught.Allofthemtaughtdoctrines,notjust“teachings.”Hereisabriefsampleofsounddoctrines.

1.TheIncarnationofDeity(1Tim.3:16,alteredinallnewversions).2.TheVirginBirth(Matt.1;Luke1)andthenamesofMary’sotherchildren(Mark

6:3;Psa.69:8).

Page 28: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

3.Thepre-TribulationRaptureofChristiansintheChurchAge(Rev.7,14:6;2Thess.2 cf. 1 Cor. 15:51–54; 1 Thess. 4:13–18), with Enoch as the Old Testament type of aChristianwhoisaliveand iscaughtupandoutbefore theFlood.Yousee,Enoch is theonlymanineitherTestamentwhoneverdiesandneverwilldie.NeitherMosesnorElijahnorChristHimself“fulfill”thatbill.

4. Salvation under theLaw and in theTribulation is a system of faithANDworks(Rev.12:17,14:12;Heb.3:6,14,10:26,6:1–6;Rev.22:14;John1:17;Rom.10:4–6).

5.Aphysical, literal,political,EARTHLYkingdomwillbesetuponthisearthwithJesusHimselfasamilitarydictator(Rev.2:26–27;Psa.110:2,72:4;Isa.26:10–11).ItwillhaveitscapitalinJerusalem(Rev.20:9;Ezek.40–48;Zech.14:8–21)andwilllast1,000years(Rev.20:1–7).

6.HeavenandHellareliteralplaces,whichterminateinNewJerusalem(Rev.21—22)andtheLakeofFire(Rev.20:14–15);bothofthemareeternal(Rev.14:10–11;Matt.25:46;Luke16:26;Rev.22:14–15,21:8).

7.Inthisage,workshavenopartinsalvation,andeternallifeisa“freegift” (Rom.5:15,18)whichguaranteesthesinnerwhoreceivesJesusChrist(John1:12;1John3:1–3;Phil.3:21)willwindupjustlikeJesusChristHimself.

Thosearesevensamplesof“DOCTRINES.”Theyarenotjust“teachings.”Theyarenotjust“teachings”unlessthereaderwhoreadthemrejectsbothTestaments

asbeingthetruth(John17:17,6:63,18:37).Nowhereareacoupleofcases.Here are apostate Christians all over America teaching that John 5:29 proves

WORKSarenecessaryforNewTestamentsalvationand2Peter2:22isareferencetoaborn-again child of God going to Hell after salvation. To wrap up these two false“teachings,”Galatians5:4 isproduced toshow thatanymansavedbyGRACEthroughFAITH(Eph.2:8–9)can“fall”fromthatgraceintothebottomlesspitortheLakeofFireor“outerdarkness”(2Pet.2:17;Jude6,13).

TheseheresiesaretaughtasChristian“doctrines”bysavedBibleteachersintheBodyofChrist.LaodiceaisthefinalapostasyofChrist’sBRIDEbeforeshehitstheJudgmentSeat andgets the“spots” (1 Pet. 1:19; Jude 23) and “wrinkles” (Eph. 5:27) out of her(Rev.19:7).

This final apostasy has nothing to do with humanists, evolutionists, Liberals,”modernists,orevenecumenicalmovements.ItisthesavedpeoplethemselveswhoKNEW“sounddoctrine”whentheyheardit(2Tim.4:3)andrejecteditbecausetheydidn’tlikeit or couldn’t understand it. The passage (2 Tim. 4:3) could not possibly have anyreferencetoanyunsavedperson,fornoneofthemwouldknowsounddoctrinefromfalsedoctrineiftheyheardit—accordingto1Corinthians2:14.

Nownote in reference to2Peter2:22 that the“they” (and“them”) throughout theentirechapterisareferencetounsavedteacherswhorejectthebloodatonementofJesusChrist (read vs. 1). There is not one Christian referred to as “they,” “them,”“themselves,”or“their” in theentirechapter (vss.1,2,8,10,12,13,18,19,20,21).

Page 29: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

When 2 Peter says“their” or “these” (see vss. 2, 8, 12), it is NEVER a reference toanyonewhoevergotsavedfromA.D.33toA.D.2007.

Verses21and22threweveryapostateLaodiceanclearoffthehighway.Heassumed—and ifhewasunsavedhecertainlywouldhaveassumed it—thatyouhad tobea realChristian if you had “knowledge” about Jesus Christ and knew “the way ofrighteousness.”The reader forgot that allChrist-rejectingPharisees inChrist’s daydidjustTHAT.Theyremained“pigsanddogs.”Notoneofthemwaseverasheep.(LookatJohn10:4,14).

FALSEDOCTRINE:taughtbyChristiansinthiscentury.Laodicea:totalapostasy.NowtryGalatians5:4. Is“fallingFROMgrace” thesameasbeing“thrownout”of

JesusChrist’sBody(1Cor.6:17)?Thenwhyisittaughtthatthishappens?Now,sinceallapostateLaodiceansneverwerecommandedto“search”theScripture

or“study” the Scripture (see theRSV, NRSV, ASV, NASV, NIV, etc.), they didn’t evenbothertoseetowhatthepassagereferred.ItisinterpretedinActs13:43.Therethegracemessageof“thegraceofGod”has justbeenheardthefirst timebyamassofunsavedGentiles, and some Jews (Acts 13:43). It does not say that the ones in verse 43 were“savedbygracethroughfaith.”Itstatesthatiftheywantedsalvation,theyhadbetternotgo back under theLaw (seeActs 13:38–39) and adopt the old faith-and-works system.ThisexplainswhytheJewshada“fit”inActs13:50,Acts14:19,andActs17:5.

PaulwasencouragingthemtoBELIEVEwhathesaidandacceptitasGod’s“planofsalvation.”Somedid and somedidnot: look atActs 13:48–51.Thosewho didnot arelabeledinGalatians5:4.Lookattheverse.Nowcompare(forcontrast)verse4withverse5.Seethe“we”?ThatisareferencetoeveryrealChristianinGalatia.The“ye”andthe“everyman”andthe“he”inverses2and3arenoreferencesatalltoANYmansavedbygracethroughfaith(Eph.2:8–9)apartfromworks(Rom.4:5).

Thefallensinnerinverse4iscountingontheworksoftheLawtojustifyhiminsteadoftheatonementofJesusChrist.

ThatiswhatALLtextsofGalatians5:2–5sayineveryGreekmanuscriptextantonthepassage.Theyall(withtheKingJamestext—anyedition)teach“sounddoctrine.”

Forthefinalshot(orfinalblunder),noteJohn5:29.Surelyhereisa“works”passage.[Bettertakeyourfootoffthepedal.]Lookat5:24onlyfiveversesearlier.Nobelieverinthis age comes“into condemnation,” and no believer in this age “passed from life todeath”afterpassing“fromdeathuntolife”(2Cor.5:17;1John5:10–13).Notefurther,that“everlasting life” (vs. 24) is a present possession, and the future (“SHALLNOTcome into condemnation”) shows hewill not lose“everlasting life” anywhere at anytime.

Atwhom,then,isverse29aimed?Why,theapostateFundamentalists,Conservatives,andEvangelicalsdidn’tevenread

theversebeforeit!TheversewillnotbefulfilledtillRevelation20:13.Hesaid,“allthatareinthegraves”—notjustdeadChristianswhowill“hearhisvoice”(1Cor.15:50;1

Page 30: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Thess.4:13–18)1,000yearsbeforeseveralbilliondeadhearit.Gooddeeds (works) in theTribulation get rewarded at theWhiteThrone Judgment

(seeRev.11:18).AllofthesavedBiblescholarsmissedit:allofthem.GooddeedsintheMillenniumearnanameintheLamb’sBookofLife(seetheSermonontheMount,whichis theConstitution for that kingdom—faith andworks).Check it outwithDaniel 12:3.CheckitoutwithPsalm24:3–5.CheckitoutwithEzekiel18:5–28.

Don’twasteanytimetocheckitoutwithonesingle“militantFundamentalist”Bibleteacher connected with any Christian College or Seminary anywhere in the USA from1880to2007.Theyallwentintoapostasyin1901:notone“Neo-Orthodox”present;theywereallborn-againbelievers“in”Christ’sBODY.

Page 31: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Chapter6

“SoundDoctrine—FalseDoctrine”

TheOldTestamentSaints

FalseBibledoctrinesintheTwentiethandTwenty-firstCenturiesareasnumerousasrabbitsandashurtfulasfireants.Theyaretobefound,mainly,amongthesaved,born-again, Bible-teaching, Bible-preaching “Christians” connected with “higher Christianeducation” (Colleges, Seminaries, and Universities) and ecumenical movements (OpusDei,PromiseKeepers,Purpose-Drivenentrepreneurs,andVaticancouncils).

Thefablethattheapostatesconnectedwith2Thessalonians2:3and2Timothy4:3areunsaved “Liberals” or unsaved “Modernists” or unsaved “Neo-Evangelicals,” wasinvented by savedChristians (1900–1960) who believed in all of the “fundamentals,”whilerejectingtheHolyBibleastheirabsoluteandfinalauthority,eventhoughtheygotallofthe“fundamentals”fromit.

Whytheseapostate,Laodicean“Fundamentalists” found faultwith facultymemberswhoquestionedtheVirginBirthor theDeityofChrist (or the“feedingof the5,000”orSimonPeter“walkingonthewater”)israthermysterious.SouthernBaptistprofessorsinWaco, Stetson, Baylor, Judson, Howard, Furman, Louisville, NewOrleans, Dallas, andFortWorthhavebeendoubtingthosekindofthingssince1910.

Whilelabelingthese“infidels”astheapostatesof2Timothy4:3and2Thessalonians2:3, the facultymembers at Bob Jones University, Tennessee Temple, Crown College,Liberty University, Grace Theological Seminary, Pensacola Christian College, BaptistBible Institute, Dallas Theological Seminary, BIOLA, Northwestern, LouisvilleTheological Seminary, Fuller Seminary, Wheaton College, and Moody Bible Instituteweredenying theVirginBirth inLuke2:33andActs4:27,and theDeityofChrist in1Timothy3:16,Luke24:52,John9:38(marginofASV,1901),andMark1:1–2.

WhiledoingthistheytaughtyouthatyouwereNOT“acceptedinthebeloved”(Eph.1:6:NASV,NIV,NRSV), that no one evercorrupted theBible (2Cor. 2:17:ASV,NASV,RSV,NRSV,NIV), thatJesuscouldnothavebeenonearthandingloryat thesame time(John3:13:ASV,NASV,RSV,NRSV,NIV),that“theloveofmoney”isnot“therootofallevil”(1Tim.6:10),youarenotto“abstainfromallappearanceofevil”(1Thess.5:22),thatnoIsraeliteevercrossed the“Redsea” (hecrossed the“SuphSea,”whichwas themarshygroundnorthoftheRedSea),andthattheLordJesusChristwillnevertakeovertheliteral“kingdomsofthisworld”(Rev.11:15).HewouldjusttakethekingdomoftheworldfromSatan.

Apostasy. Apostasy justified and taught by apostate Christians who were all “INCHRIST”(Col.1:27;Rom.16:7).

Nowhereisanother“ensample.”Oftenapreacherwillinventanimpressivesounding

Page 32: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

statement of his faith and then it becomes—via Christian schools—a sort of “historicposition” which all Christians should observe as a sound Biblical doctrine. Once an“historicposition”isestablishedthenalleducationaloutletsofallChristianschoolsadoptitandprogramyoungministerswithitbeforetheygraduate.

Iwill locate threeof these “historicpositions” that arenomoreScriptural than JoeSmith’spositiononmarriageandbaptismortheJehovah’sWitnessespositiononHellandthe144,000JewsofRevelation7.

1.Thefinal,absoluteauthorityfor“truth”istobefoundintheoriginalautographsofthe Bible inHebrew andGreek.No “final appeal” is any higher ormore reliable thanthese.

That “historic position”—if anyone accepts it as such—is as rotten as the FrenchQuarterinNewOrleanstwenty-fourhoursafterKatrinapassedthrough.

2. A Christian can be “demon-oppressed” and “demon-obsessed” but cannot be“demon-possessed.”

No,butSatancangetsomuchofhisFLESHthatPaulcouldn’tfindone“goodthing”inhisown flesh (Rom.7:18), and turneddisobedientChristiansover to“Satan for thedestructionoftheflesh”(1Cor.5:5).Whatthe“demons”can’tgetfromasavedsinnerishisSOUL.TheDevilcanget(anytimeGodallowshim—2Tim.2:26)yourliver, lungs,arms,legs,hands,feet,brain,head,eyes,imagination,thoughts,andhealth(1Cor.11:30),andthentakeyourjoy,yourassuranceofsalvation,yourproperty(Gen.19:24–25),yourtestimony,yourrewardsattheJudgmentSeatofChrist,yourMillennialinheritance,andyourlife(Heb.12:16–17;1Cor.3:15;Gen.19:36;Heb.2:14).

Thatmaynotbe“demonpossession,”butyoucanbesurethedemonsandtheDevilwillsettleforthatlistinaChristiananydayoftheweek.

3.“MenintheOldTestamentweresavedbylookingforwardtothecross,andsincethenwearesavedbylookingbacktoit,sobothgroupsweresavedTHESAMEWAY.”

That appeared in some nut’s sermon back in the early 1900s, and nuts have beengrowingonthattreeeversince.Nosincerereaderofthird-gradeEnglishwouldfailtoseethatthat“historicposition”wasexactlylikethe“historicposition”(fifteencenturies) theCatholicstookonMaryandexactlylikethe“historicposition”(nineteencenturies)thatallCatholics,Lutherans,Methodists,Anglicans,andPresbyterianstookonJohn3:5andActs2:38:“WaterDogism.”

[AnunsavedCampbelliteisa“dog”(2Pet.2:22),nota“sheep”(John10:27–28).HiswaterbaptismconvertshimintoaWETDOG—notasheep.Hencewesay,“OfthosebornoutofWATER,threearebornoutright:atadpole,amosquito,andaCampbellite.”WaterDogism.]

NowlookatscrewballNo.3—lookingforwardandbackward.Theoneverse used to prove thiswas John 8:56. Into this verse, some lazy, stupid,

Bible-rejecting Christian read “Abraham saw Jesus shedding His atoning blood on theRomancrossandsawHisresurrection.”

Page 33: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Not even Peter and John “saw” the resurrection after it took place (John 20:9).NeitherPeter,James,orJohn“saw”Christ’sresurrectionfromthedeadafterHetoldthemaboutit(Mark9:10).

Christ’s“DAY”didn’tshowAbrahamANYTHINGabouttheGospelasdefinedin1Corinthians15:3–4andGalatians1:8–12.

Youcan’tevenfindthebloodatonementofJesusChristforanysinnerinActs2or3.IfActs2:38isaproperformulathroughtheentirebookofActs,thenGalatians3:14,4:28;1Corinthians12:13;andEphesians4:5arelies.Acts2:38inA.D.2007(A.D.54–2007,etc.)will land you flat on your back in theLake of Fire.There is nomention of Jesusdyingforyoursins“accordingtothescripture”(1Cor.15:4–5)anywhereinActs2–7.

AndAbraham “saw it,” did he?AndDavid,Moses, Samson, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph,Judah,andGideonall“lookedforwardtothecross”togetsaved,didthey?

NotunlessyouaregullibleenoughtobelievethatyoucanwinawarontheAsiaticmainland.[Gen.Wedemeyersaid(1950):“AmericashouldnevergetinvolvedinawarontheAsiaticmainland.”What followed?Korea,Vietnam,Iraq,andIran.Whathappened?Samethinginallfourcases,andthreemoreifyouwantthem.]

Crucifixion was not a major form of capital punishment for any nation until theAssyrians rose to power (900 B.C.).Moses didn’t see the “cross” when he was giveninstructionstoconstruct“Calvary”inpublic(Num.21:8–9cf.John3:14).The“lamb”isin Exodus 12, the “blood” is in Exodus 12, and the three crosses are on the doors inExodus 12, the lack of “water” is in Exodus 12:9, etc., and Moses never got anyconnectionfromthem.

Nowthesesuperstitiousidiotswouldhaveyouthinkthatbecausenow,aftertheNewTestament was written, you can see the typology, that Moses (or in their proof text—Abraham)knewwhathewasdoing:“Lookingforwardtothecross.”

Sonny,whenMoseswrote thosewords (Exod. 12), he had nomore idea about the“sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow” (1 Pet. 1:11–12) than theauthors of 1 and 2 Samuel, 1 and 2 Kings, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Micah,Nahum,Obadiah,etc.Doyouhonestlybelieve thatJonah“SAW”thedeath,burial,andresurrectionofJesusChristwhenhewasbeingdigestedinawhale’sgut(Matt.12:40)?

Mosesbearingthe“reproachofChrist”(Heb.11:26)isapost-resurrectionstatementwhere the author of Hebrews points out Moses as a TYPE of Christ—after theresurrection.Why,JosephisatypeofChristin154particulars,andneitherhenorhisownparentsandbrothers“saw”anythinginit(Gen.37:1–11).

This shows you how Silly-Willie and Simple Simon—remember the pie man?—exegetetheScriptures: likeblindBartameusonaweekenddrunk(Prov.26:9).Whatthepreacherwhoinventedthis“historicposition”did,wastopretendthatnooneintheOldTestamenthadtohaveanyWORKSalongwithhisfaithtogetsaved.HewastryingtodoawaywithTWOTestamentsandsaytheywereboththesame!Whytwodifferentonesiftheywerethesame?

NosaintintheOldTestamenthadhissinstakenaway(Heb.10:4).

Page 34: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

NosaintintheOldTestamenthadhissinsredeemed(Heb.9:15;Exod.34:7).NosaintintheOldTestamentbecameamemberofChrist’sBody (Eph.5:30;1Cor.

12:13).NosaintintheOldTestamentwasbornagain(Psa.22:30–31).Nosaint(includingAbraham)wasspirituallycircumcised(Col.2:11).No saint in theOldTestament, except Enoch,went to the third heaven, andEnoch

didn’tDIEtogetthere.Moseswentthere,buthemustreturntothisearth(Rev.11:3–12)todieAGAIN(likeLazarus,thewidowofNain’sson,Eutychus,Dorcas,etal.).

When a saint died in the Old Testament, he went to “Abraham’s bosom” or“paradise,”andthat“paradise”wascertainlynottheoneinRevelation2:7,becausethemaninHell(Luke16:23–24)couldSEELazarusandtalktoAbraham.That“paradise”was down under your feet until Matthew 27:52. But who didn’t know THAT except10,000 preachers (1880–2006) trained in Christian Colleges, Seminaries, andUniversities?

They adopted an “historic position” that denied Scriptural material in BOTHTestaments in every translation of every version of the Scriptures that has ever beenprinted.Atonof“historicpositions”areexactly likeTHAT.Amongthemarebaptismalregeneration,the“ImmaculateConception,”the“AssumptionofMary,”“onlytheoriginalautographs were inspired,” Postmillennialism, Amillennialism, the post-Tribulation“rapture”oftheBodyofChrist,etc.,etc.

Abraham“saw”Christ’s“day” in that he looked forward to the resurrectionofhisownsonAFTERhewasgoingtoslayhim(Gen.22:5).Abraham,byactsoffaith,showedthat he believed three things, without even guessing that they would be applied tosomeoneelse1,700yearsafterhisdeath.

1.HebelievedinperfectobediencetoGod’sordersevenwhentheyinvolvedthedeathofhisbelovedson(1John4:10).

2. He believed that his own son would allow him to do the killing (see The BibleBeliever’sCommentaryonGenesis,1960,Gen.22:9).

3. He believed that even if he delivered his son up, God would resurrect the boybecauseofthePROMISESconnectedwithhim(Gen.15:4–6,17:19–21).

That is howAbraham“saw”Christ’s day.As far as a televised video of the death,burial,andresurrection,heneversawONEMINUTEofitinanywayshapeorform,anymorethanPeterdid(Matt.16:21–22)oranyoftheotherapostles(Mark9:31–32).

That “historic position” was nothing but Satanic FALSE DOCTRINE so you couldnever understand the theology recorded in Acts 2:38, 8:15–16, 10:47, 15:16–17,29;Hebrews3,4,6,10;andpassagesin1John,2Peter,andRevelation7,12,14,21,and22.

Sounddoctrine—theHolyBible(AV1611).False doctrine—any piece of recommended JUNK since 1880, recommended by

Bibleteacherswhoinvent“historicpositions.”

Page 35: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Chapter7

“SoundDoctrine—FalseDoctrine”

GettingRidoftheBodyofChrist

Theterm“sounddoctrine” isfoundin2Timothy4:3andTitus2:1.It includednotonly the Bible doctrines that deal with belief but with actions (Titus 2:1–10). Thus acorrectconfessionwouldbe,“IbelievetheHolyBibleistheFINALAUTHORITYfortheChristianinALLmattersofFAITHandPRACTISE.”

WhenthisprofessionismadebysomeChristian(say,forexample,DavidHunt,JohnMacArthur,RickWarren,JoelOsteen,BobJonesJr.,BobJonesIII,StewartCuster,JerryFalwell,BillyGraham,ChuckColson,JackVanImpe,CurtisHutson,JohnRice,CharlesStanley,orSheltonSmith),itdoesn’treallymeananythingatall;allfifteenmen(and115more just like them) are professional liars whenever the term“FINAL AUTHORITY”comesup.

(Fordocumentationonthatstatement,obtainDr.Grady’sworkonFinalAuthorityortheworkbytheauthor,TheChristianLiars’Library[1998],orTheChristian’sHandbookofBiblicalScholarship[1998].Betweenthosethreebooksyouwillfindmystatementwasneitherslandernorexaggeration; itwasquiteconservativeandevenmild inviewof theissue.)

Myremarksonlyappear tobe“mean”or“nasty” (“abrasive”or“malicious”) in theeyesofTwenty-firstCenturyPablumPuke“Christians”whoareasignorantoftheFACTSasA.T.Robertson,KennethWuest,Westcott andHort,EugeneNida,EberhardNestle,KurtAland,BruceMetzger,andthe“PromiseKeepers.”

TheapostatesPauldiscusses in2Timothy4:3–4areallsavedpeople, for theyhavebeen exposed to “sound doctrine” so much that they know the difference between“sound” and “unsound” doctrine. Not one sinner in that passage could have been anunsaved man, because no unsavedman (when it came to the texts of the Holy Bible)wouldknowthedifference.“ThenaturalmanreceivethnotthethingsoftheSpiritofGod:fortheyarefoolishnessuntohim:neithercanheknowthem,becausetheyarespirituallydiscerned”(1Cor.2:14).

The apostate Fundamentalists, Evangelicals, and Conservatives in the TwentiethCentury simply excused themselves from discussing 2 Timothy 4:3–4 and eliminatedthemselvesasbeingtheapostatesreferredto.Believeitornot,themost“fundamental”ofthemallprofessedtobeabletocorrecttheKingJamestextwith“THEGreektext”or“theORIGINALGreektext”whileconfessingtheydidn’tknowwhatαπο-‘ιστημιmeant.

It means to fall away from (απο) a standing position (στασια) from ‘ιστημι—αποστασια.

Every saved Fundamentalist (preacher, pastor, teacher, bishop, deacon, missionary,

Page 36: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

founder,or“president”)whoclaimedthathebelievedtheHolyBiblewasthefinalcourtofappealsforallChristians“infaithandconduct,”whileappealingtoanunseen,unread,unheardpileoflostpapers(whichhecalls“theoriginalautographs”),wasnothingbutatwo-facedlyinghypocrite;andthatistheBESTyoucouldsayforhim.

HehadnoHolyBible.Heconfessedhehadneverseenorreadany“HolyBible”orany“holyscriptures”(Rom.1:2).

Hisfinalauthoritywasactuallyanonexistent,invisiblesimilitudeofaBookthatneverexisted. Pretending it was just the “word” that was “settled forever in Heaven” (Psa.119:89)—thatis,itisnowhereavailabledownhere—heforgotthatyouweretoldnoteventothinkaboutgoinguptoHeaventofindawordofit.Iftheonlyinfallible,inerrantHolyBibleisjusta“loosecanon”storedawayinthethirdheaven—afterbeingpurifiedin theearth seven times (Psa. 12:6)—his “final authority”was PIXIEDUST; he couldn’t seewhatitsaidaboutANYTHINGdealingwith“faithorpractise”foranyone—includingthelost.

Proof?Whydon’tyoureadNestle’snotesinallofhisGreekNewTestaments?Theysay that such passages as John 8:1–11 and Mark 16:9–20 were never a part of “theoriginalGreektext.”

Thatistheexactequivalentofsaying“Thoushaltnotsteal”wasnotintheoriginalDecaloguethatMosesgotfromGod.

Bothcriticalobservationsareinaclassificationwith“famousdecreesissuedbydeafanddumbmutesplaying‘HereWeGo‘RoundtheMulberryBush.’”

Nowhere is a falsedoctrine taught by hundreds of apostate, LaodiceanBaptists in2007 as “sound doctrine.” Not one man who teaches this heresy is a “Liberal” or a“Modernist” or a “Neo-Orthodox” who denies the “fundamentals.” They are all born-again,saved,regenerated,ChristianpastorsandevangelistswhoweretrainedinChristianinstitutions.

Their main “role model” was Noel Smith (1930), the editor of The Baptist BibleTribuneforJ.FrankNorris.

Theteachingwasthata localBaptistchurch (singular) isTHEBodyofChrist (Col.1:18; Eph. 1:22–23)—the one TRUE church. This teaching produces a false doctrinewhichwecall“TheBaptistBride.”ItishighlightedbythepeculiarlyinsaneteachingthatJohn theBaptist setup the localBaptistchurch,soyouenter“THEBodyofChrist”bywaterbaptismintoalocalchurch.

DittoallRomanCatholicsandCampbellites,bycoincidence.ThereasoningisthatyouenterChrist’sBODYbyWATER;yougetthisbyreadingthe

locative of theGreekword “εν” in 1 Corinthians 12:13 instead of instrumental (as theKingJamestexthasit:“BYoneSpirit.”)

Thus“born of water” (John 3:5) can now refer to regeneration by immersion inwater (or in the Catholic case, as “sprinkling”). This puts you into Jesus Christ’sSPIRITUALBODY(1Cor.12:13;Eph.1:22–23,5:23–30;Col.1:18,etc.).

Page 37: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

All“waterdogs”(Campbellites)say“AMEN!”NoelSmith’spositionwas,“Thereisnouniversalchurch.Theonlychurchthereis,is

onEARTH.”Rightawayhe“blewit”twice.One:TheChurch“triumphant”isnowinthethirdheaven.TheChurch“militant” isstilldownhere.Two:Ifa localBaptistchurch isthe one true CHURCH, then it is exactly what the Catholic Church claims. They bothclaimtobeauniversalchurch,worldwide.Afterall, therearethousandsoflocalBaptistchurches,“universally.”

Theculminationof thisLaodicean apostasy, amongSAVEDpreachers, is that since“thechurch”(Eph.5:23–30;Col.1:18)isthe“BrideofChrist”(Rev.21:9,19:7)andtheonly true church is a Baptist church, that no saved Methodist (John Wesley), savedCalvinist (JohnKnox),savedLutheran (MartinLuther),savedCatholic (Savonarola),orsaved Presbyterian (Donald Grey Barnhouse) can participate in “the marriage of theLamb” (Rev. 19:7). She is aBaptist Bride. No saved Anglican (like JohnNewton) orsavedNazarene(likeBudRobinson)canbepartof“theBride.”

This confounding of local churches (plural) with the heavenly Body (singular) ofJesus Christ (Eph. 1:22–23) was taught as a “Landmark” for Baptists, back in theNineteenthCentury.A“LandmarkBaptist”acceptedthisheresy,justlikeaCampbelliteorCatholicacceptedthepartofitwhereWATERputsyouintoaspiritualbodythatfilledtheuniverse(Eph.1:22–23).

Toshowyouhowridiculous(aswellasapostate)thisexegesisis,observe:1.Therehasneverbeenone“member”(1Cor.12:27)ofJesusChrist’s“body”who

wasanunsavedsinner;localBaptistchurchesarefilledwiththem.2. Baptist churches did not begin with John the Baptist. He confessed that he was

NOTamemberofChrist’sBODYorHisBride(John3:29).3. The treasurer of the “First Baptist Church of Jerusalem” (Matt. 16:18) was a

“devil”(John6:70–71,13:29).Hewas immersed inwater by John theBaptist andpartookof the “Eucharist” (see

Luke22:17–21).IfJudaseverwasin“THE”church(Christ’sBodyinEph.1:22–23andCol.1:18),he

musthavefallenout,forheisnowin“hisownplace”(Acts1:25).Itis“thebottomlesspit”(Rev.9:11,17:8).

4.Thefinalendof“thebodyofChrist”isaRaptureintoglory(1Thess.4:14–18).5. The final end of all local churches on this earth after the Rapture is TOTAL

APOSTASY(2Tim.3:1–7,4:3–4;Rev.3:14–22,13:8–14).6.Thelocalchurchisanorganization,notanorganism.Itisaninstitution,notapart

of JesusChrist’sBODY.All four of thesewordswere confused by the apostateswhenthey readActs 2, for there the localchurch becomespart ofChrist’sBODY, and at thesametimeeverymemberofChrist’sbodywasinONElocalchurch.

NoticewhatagiganticproblemarisesinLaodiceawhentheSAVEDapostatesfacethePaulineEpistles.“InthechurchoftheLaodiceans,”“untothechurch…atCorinth,”

Page 38: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

“untothechurchoftheThessalonians,”etc.Without any regard for third-grade English or the context of these words, every

apostateBaptistinLaodiceaavoidstheapplicationoftheseverses.Ifapplied,itisobviousthatsomeoneis“bonkers”ifhehasanIQof50.Hereiswhatisgoingon.

“Paul…untoTHECHURCH…atCorinth,”etc.“Paul…untoTHECHURCHofthePensacolians,”etc.“Paul…untoTHECHURCHofGodATPensacola,”etc.WhogetstheEpistle?Isaid,“WHOgetstheEpistle?”Yousay,“ItisaddressedtoTHEchurch.”Yeah?Whichone?Therearemorethan100

oftheminPensacola,and80ofthemareBaptistchurches.WhichBaptistchurch?Didn’the say “THE church”?Well, you just said “THE church” was a local Baptist church.Freewill or Primitive? Hardshell or Two-seed-in-One? American or Southern Baptist?What!? Neither? GARB Baptists? No? North American Baptists? Baptist BibleFellowship?TheFirstBaptistChurch?Oh,the“First”churchesare“apostate,”arethey?Whatdifferencewouldthatmake?EveryCatholicintownwouldswearthat“thechurch”wastheRomanCatholicChurch!“Baptists”wouldnotevenbeanafterthought!

Why,ifJesusChrististheheadof“THECHURCH”andsaiditwasgoingtobe“MYCHURCH” (Matt. 16:18), then obviously Paul would be writing to the Campbellites!—“TheChurchOFCHRIST!”

Okay?Settleforthat?Better hadn’t; the term doesn’t occur in either Testament. The term “churches of

Christ”occurs(Rom.16:16),butsodoes“thechurchesofAsia”(1Cor.16:19).Andwho in the “Church of God” (1 Cor. 10:32) could read such a letter if “THE

church”wasaBaptistchurch?Think about this, stupid!Not one single Christian in Philippiwas addressed in the

EpistleofPaultheApostletothePhilippians,becauseno“CHURCH”wasmentionedinthegreeting:itsaidsimply“saints,”“bishopsanddeacons”(Phil.1:1).

NowpickuptheHolyBible (andIdon’tmean theone“settled inHeaven”orsomewriter’s“originalautograph.”)

Pickup“theholyscriptures”(Rom.1:2)andthen,astheysayintheNavy,“NOWHEARTHIS!”

Godhasafamily(Eph.3:15).InthatfamilyareHisSon,HisSon’sBride(John3:29),HisSon’s“friends”(John3:29),attendant“virgins”foramarriage(Matt.25:1–10;SongofSol.6:8),andevenwedding“guests”(Matt.22:10)suchas“concubines”and“kings’daughters”(SongofSol.6:8;Psa.45:9).

Any cockeyed, catty-cornered flop doodle of a doctrine that makes the BaptistsChrist’s BRIDE and then makes “the…family” (Eph. 3:15)Methodists, Presbyterians,Anglicans,Catholics,etc.,istheworkofadog-eared,sloth-energizedegotistwhothinks

Page 39: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

God didn’t know what He was doing when He divided off SEVEN different kinds ofmembersforHis“family.”

1.AmassofGentilessavedintheOldTestamentoutsideofIsrael.2.AgroupofIsraelitessavedundertheLawofMoses.3.AnothergroupofGentilesandIsraelites“calledout”intheChurchAgetomakeup

theBodyofChrist(Acts15:14;Eph.2:16–22).4.AmassofsavedGentilesmartyredintheTribulation(Rev.7:9–17).5.144,000JewssavedintheTribulation(Rev.7:1–8).6.AnothermassofGentilessavedduringtheMillennium(Acts15:17).7. A mass of millions of Gentiles and Jews who, though not saved, were

“INNOCENT”(Deut.1:39;Rom.4:15,5:13,4:8).Sinwasnot“imputed to them.”Thiswould include severalBILLIONchildrenwho

diedafterbirthanywherefromtheirbirthdayupto8,9,10,andsometimes12,13,14,and15yearsofold(seeDeut.1:39),andmorons,“waterheads,”“imbeciles,”etc.

“THEBRIDEOFCHRIST”isfoundinNo.3,andnot inanyothergroup.JohntheBaptistisinNo.2.The“virgins”ofMatthew25:1–10areinNo.5.

Themodern “Baptist Bride” is theBride of Frankenstein. SavedBaptists producedher.Falsedoctrine. Just as apostate as baptismal regeneration. It comes from failure tostudy,search,andbelievetheHolyBible.

Page 40: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Chapter8

“SoundDoctrine—FalseDoctrine”

TheSonsofGodandChrist’sLordship

“Theholyscriptures”compriseatwo-edgedrazorblade.Therazorisforcuttingintotheheartandmindofasinner(Heb.4:12)andthenoperatingaccordingtohiscondition.Where the“ground”hasbeen thoroughlyplowed, the“incorruptible seed” (1Pet.1:23)canbeplanted(Luke8:15).Wheretheheartishardandbarren,theBibleflipsitspagesandgivesthesinneratasteofIsaiah28:13;Ezekiel14:1–11;and2Thessalonians2:11–12.Thatis,accordingtodivinerevelationasrecordedin1Kings22:22–23.

NinetypercentoftheBibleteachersinAmerica(includingpastors,missionaries,andevangelists)have forgotten that aSWORDis forkillingpeople (see Judg.3:16,22;Psa.149:6–7; Jer.48:10). It isa“sword” thatcomesoutof themouthof JesusChrist (Rev.19:15).Thewordswordissimplyputtingan“s”before“word.”

Tobe“slainintheSpirit”hasnoreferenceatalltoSaulwrithingnakedontheground(1Sam.19:24)asademon-possessedkiller(1Sam.19:9),norisitJudasfallingflatonhisback(John18:5–6)afterrunningintothegreat“IAM”(יהוה).

Tobe“slain in thespirit” is tobe“cuttotheheart” (Acts7:54)so thatyoueitherbecomemadenoughtokillsomeonepreachingthetruthoryoufallonyourknees(Acts9:4)andacceptTHETRUTH(John14:6)inthepersonofJesusChrist(Acts9:5).

This explains howmillions ofAmericanChristians are deceived daily,weekly, andmonthlybyfalseprophets,heretics,“PromiseKeepers,”amateurpsychologists,thenewsmedia,“possibilitythinkers,”andjustplainconartists(Eph.4:14).

Yousee,untilSELF-RIGHTEOUSNESSleavesamanandhegivesuptryingtoearneternal lifeandheavenbyhisownrighteousness (seeRom.10:1–4,3:21–28),hecannot“receive”JesusChrist,forJesusisGod’srighteousness(Rom.10:4,10).NoNewBirthispossibleaslongasold“Adam”hidesbehindthetreeswearingafigleafapron.

Tobeasbluntaboutitaspossible,andassimpleaspossible,asinnersuffersinHellforbelievinginhisownrighteousnessinsteadofGod’s(John16:9–10).It’sthatsimple.Itis thatsimple inRomans10:3. It is thatsimple inEphesians2:8–10. It is thatsimple inGalatians2:21.Anditisthatsimplein2Corinthians5:19–21.

WheneveryouencounteraChristian(layman,minister,bishop,orpriest)whoteachesthat you can loseGod’s “free gift” of“eternal life” (Rom. 5:15, 6:23), you will findyou’redealingwithamanwhoquestionsyoursalvationbythefactthatheobservesthatyoudon’tliveasholyalifeasHE lives.IhaveneverheardanyChristian,whotaughtaChristiancouldlosesalvation,everconfessthathehimselfhadeverlostit,evenasmuchasforonedayinalifetime.Theyareallself-righteous.

Page 41: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

NowinAmerica, since thedaysof thePrimitive,Hardshell,andFreeWillBaptists,you will find two false teachings that are about as “sound” (when it comes to Bibledoctrines)asaspeechbyHillaryClintonbeingadissertationonsoulwinning.

Thefirst teachingis thatyoucanget tornoutofJesusChrist’sBODY(Eph.5:30;1Cor.12:13)afterbeing“sealed”intoitpermanently(Eph.4:30)bytheHolySpiritand,intheprocess,haveGod’s“freegift”of“eternallife”(Rom.5:15,6:23)takenawayfromyou.Byanactof“will”youcanoverruleGod’swillasHewroteitdowninRomans8:29.

“For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to theimageofhisSon,thathemightbethefirstbornamongmanybrethren”(Rom.8:29).

“Whoshallchangeourvilebody,thatitmaybefashionedlikeuntohisgloriousbody, according to theworkingwhereby he is able even to subdue all things untohimself”(Phil.3:21).

YouaresoHOLY,yourwillisgreaterthanGod’swill.ThatisaFreeWillBaptistoraPentecostalor“ChurchofGod”doctrine.

Theotherteachingisgiveninacanonicalform.Itgoeslikethis:“IfJesusisnotLordofall,HeisnotLordatall.”

This hyper-Calvinistic rubbish came fromCalvinistswho began to judge “elect” or“non-elect”amongtheirchurchmembers(andfollowers)bythewaytheyLIVEDinsteadofwhattheyBELIEVED.Ahyper-Calvinismalwaysleadstoahyper-Arminianism.Thatis,onceyoutakethepositionthatthe“Lord”andthe“Saviour”aresoidenticalthatyoucannotgetJesustosaveyouunlessyouliveaperfectlife,youmustliveperfectinordertoprovethatChristis“Lord”ofyourlife,aswellas“Saviour”ofyoursoul.

LikealloftheFreeWillboysbelieve,youwindupjudginga“perfect”lifebythewayyoulive,sinceyouprofessthatJesusisthe“Lord”ofyourlife:yourbrotherorsisterwhodoesn’tmeetyourstandardsobviouslyisLOST,becauseifChristhadsavedhim(orher),heautomaticallywouldbecompletelysurrenderedtoHIM!

Poppycock(English).Basura(Spanish).Quatsch(German).Baloney(American).Theself-righteousfoolshaveconfoundedsalvationwithdiscipleship,salvationwith

service,andsalvationwithsubmission.WhattheyaresayingisthatifyoudefytheLord(likePaul inActs 21:11, 20:22, 22:18), you couldn’t really have been saved, for Jesusdoesn’t“SAVE”anyoneunlessheacceptsChrist’scompleteLordshipovereveryfacetofhislife.WherethisputsPeterwhenhepulledoffhisstuntinGalatians2:11,14,andthenargued with the Lord (while calling Him “Lord”) in Acts 10:14, is rather difficult to“exegete.”

IsupposeMarkwasn’tsavedwhenhedefectedinActs13:13,andIsupposethatallthe“brethren” inCorinth (1Cor. 5:1–2,11:30,11:17–19;2Cor. 12:20–21)wereALLlost sinnersandwereneverconverted for the listof the sins thatPauldiscusses (2Cor.12:20–21; 1Cor. 6:9–10) areNOT theworks of anyonewho recognizes Jesus as theirpersonal“Lord.”Readtheverses.

“IfJesusisnotLordofall…,”meaning“all”inyourlifeasaChristian—thatis,Lordofyourbody,yourmind,yourfamily,yoursoul,yourheart,yourincome,yourspirit,your

Page 42: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

conduct, your thoughts, and your actions—thenHe couldn’t be yourLord andSaviourbecausethetermsareidentical.

Funnybunny:theywereneveridentical.ThewordSaviourisatitlegiventoOnewhoisabletodosomethingtoasinnerand

doesitifHeisgivenachance(John6:37;1Tim.1:15;2Cor.5:21).ThewordmeansthatHeliterallySAVEDthesinnerfromsomething.ThewordLordisnotareferencetoANYactionbyANYSaviour.

“Lord,” in Jesus Christ’s case, is clearly a TITLE given to Him, like “KING OFKINGS”or“Godofgods”(Rev.19:16;Dan.2:47).

To show any blind, stupid fool that it was not a reference to saving anyone, therestands the written record of Philippians 2:10–11, which states that millions who neverconfessed Jesus Christ as “Saviour” (and never will!) will certainly confess Him as“LORD”(Phil.2:11).

“ThatatthenameofJesuseverykneeshouldbow,ofthingsinheaven,andthingsinearth,andthingsundertheearth;

“AndthateverytongueshouldconfessthatJesusChristisLord,tothegloryofGodtheFather”(Phil.2:10–11).

Nowdoyouseehowsimpleamatteritistospotalyinghypocritewhenhepreaches?AllyouhavetodoisreadyourBible.

JesuswasNEVER“theLord”over the life ofANYunsavedman, let alone a savedman.YetallunsavedpeoplewillhavetoconfessHimas“Lord”withoutevertrustingHimas “Saviour.” How do you figure that a saved man, whom Jesus the Saviour SAVED,doesn’thaveHimashis“Lord”(atall!)becausehefailstoobeyHimtwenty-fourhoursaday,365daysayear?

Youaredealingwithproud, self-righteous foolswho are trying to forceyou to liveliketheyliveorelsedenyyoursalvation.Thisisthetruthofthematter.

“Hecouldn’tbesaved!Hehasquittithing.”“Shecouldn’tbesaved.Shedoesn’tcometoSundaynightservice.”“Theycouldn’tbesaved;theydon’tattendprayermeeting.”“IfChristwasLORDoftheirlife,theywouldteachSundaySchool.”Jesuscouldn’thavesavedhimbecausehedeniesChrist’sLordshipwhenhedoesn’t

volunteertodriveaSundaySchoolchurchbus.”“Don’ttellmeanymanknowstheLordifhedrinkswineorsmokes!”“Theyall think they are savedbecause theycame to Jesus andcalledonHisname.

Why,HeistheLORDJesusChrist.Iftheydon’tobeyHim,theycouldn’tbesaved!”That is a self-righteous, bloated, puffed-up, conceitedASSwho thinks he owns the

stable andwholepasture.And I say thatwith apologies to every four-legged jackass inTexasandColorado.

Page 43: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Chapter9

“SoundDoctrine—FalseDoctrine”

TheSonsofGodandSpiritualCircumcision

The“fallingaway”mentionedin2Thessalonians2:3(whichprecedestheRapture)isfrom theGreekword“apostasias.” It is a compoundwordwith the preposition“apo”givenas aprefix to a“mi”verb(‘ιστημι).Literally, itwouldbe to “fall away”or “falldown” FROM a standing or upright position. KennethWuest’s (Moody Bible InstituteGreek scholar) brainless nonsense about it meaning “to catch the Body of ChristUPWARD”—trying to prove a pre-TribulationRapture—is just somuchmore apostategarbageinapilethatnowreachestothemoon.

Noone needs to knowGreek or “the original”Greek or “THEGreek text” or “theORIGINALGreek text” tosee that ifaChristianprofesses tobelieve something thatheoncereallybelieved,butnownolongerbelieves,heisaGENUINE“APOSTATE.”

AnexampleofanapostateChristianwhoteachesfalsedoctrine,whileprofessing tobelieve “sound doctrine” (2 Tim. 4:3), is a born-again, saved, “qualified,” godly,dedicated “defender of the faith” telling you that theAV of the Holy Bible is just the“preservedWord of God” while believing he can change everyWORD in it where hedislikes it or cannot understand it.Another good example of aBible-rejecting, apostateFundamentalististheonewhotellsyouthatthe“finalcourtofappeals”forallChristiansis a mass of lost pieces of paper that no one can see, read, memorize, learn, or hearpreached.

Bothoftheseprofessionalliarsare“apostates”inthetruestsenseofthewordiftheyeverbelievedthattheAVoftheHolyBiblewas“thetruth,theWHOLEtruth,andnothingbut the truth.” They “fell away from a standing position.” All apostasy (including thatwhichendsindenyingtheVirginBirthortheDeityofChristortheResurrection)beginswithGenesis3:1—questioningwhatGodactuallysaid.

Now,herearetwoexamplesoffalsedoctrinestaught(andpromoted)bymanyBibleteachersatLibertyUniversity,CrownCollege,BaptistBibleCollege,DallasTheologicalSeminary, Tennessee Temple University, Pensacola Christian College (and Seminary),Wheaton,Fuller,Moody,etc.

1.“ThesonsofGod”inGenesis6:2werethesonsofSeth.2.TheHolySpiritwasnever“in”anyOldTestamentsaint;only“on”himattimes.These two apostate heresies come from deliberately rejecting the text of the Holy

Bible(AV1611)anddeliberatelypretendingthattheversesthatnullifythemdonotevenexist.

Page 44: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

In essence these apostatesdonotdiffer anymore in intent,method, and result thanthosewhorejectwhatthesametext(AV1611)saysabouttheNewBirth,thetwonaturesofthebeliever,thedifferencesbetweentheKingdomofGodandtheKingdomofHeaven,Premillennialism and Postmillennialism, or the restoration of Israel. “Apostates of afeatherflocktogether.”

Now notice: “the sons ofGod” (literally, exactly as it is spelled here) in the OldTestamentareneverthe“sons”ofanymanwhoeverlived.TheywereCREATEDbeforeAdamevershowedup:seeJob1:6and38:7.

Whoever pervertedGenesis 6:2 reached over into John 1:12 and pretended that thereferencewasto“godly”people,sinceJohn1:12showedwhowas“godly”andwhowasnot.ThissecondheresyproducedtheridiculousnotionthateveryonebornfromSethandhis progenies were “the GODLY line” of the Messiah. The “godly” line of Messiahcontained(accordingtoeveryaccountofit inMatthew):awhore(Rahab),anadulteress(Bathsheba),anidolator(Solomon),an incestuousfather-in-law (Judah),andamurderer(David).

How“godly”cana“godly”lineget?THATisthe“Messianicline.”Obviously theScofieldBoardofEditors—andanyonedumbenoughtobelieve their

notesonGenesis6:2—wastemporarily“offtheirrocker”whentheylocatedthe“sonsofGod.”WhydidSeth’sprogenyproduceGIANTS?“Well,”say thedestructivecriticsoftheHolyBible,“thatjustmeant‘menofstature’—‘bigshots’;notrealgiants.”TherewererealgiantsthissideoftheFlood(Deut.2,3;Josh.15:8),andsomeofthemwereoverninefeettall(1Sam.17:4).

Thesaved,“godly”scholarssimplyrockedofftheirrockersagain.Thistime,toprovethat“thesonsofGod”inGenesis6:2couldNOTbeangels,they

agreedtolietoyououtrightlyanddenyMatthew22:30byomittingtwowordsinit—justliketheapostateNIVandtheapostateNASVomittedone-thirdofLuke4:4.Orjustlikeallnewsmediaoutletsomitone-halfofLuke2:14atChristmastime—everyyearsince1918.

Youwere told thatANGELSwere“sexless,” so theycouldn’tbeproducing“sons.”Thereisn’tonesexlessangelanywhereinsixty-sixbooksintheHolyBible,inanyversionofany translation thatevershowedupon thisearth.Everyangel in thatBook,withnotoneexception,isaMALE(Gen.19:1,10;Judg.13:3–18;Luke24:4,23;Acts1:10;Rev.21:17).

So eight saved, born-again, “godly,” qualified, recognized “Bible believers” lied toyouonpurposetoprovetheirpoint;andnotONEofthemwasBiblicalorScripturalwhilemishandlingtheHolyBible:NOTONEOFTHEM.SecondTimothy4:3isnotaimedatCatholics, Satanists, Liberals, Modernists, Atheists, Evolutionists, Neo-Evangelicals, orinfidels.Itisaimedrightatsaved,born-again,Bible-rejecting“Fundamentalists.”

Byomitting“inheaven”inMatthew22:30,theysidesteppedhundredsofangelswholeftheaven (Jude6;2Pet.2:4),andthoseweretheonesfoundinGenesis6:2.Theyarecalled“gods”inPsalm82andarereferredtobytheDevilinGenesis3:5.

Page 45: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Onehundredpercenterroronthepartofmorethan100,000,000AmericanChristianssince1880.Falsedoctrinefor“itchingears”(2Tim.4:3).

The secondmassacre of theHolyBible took placewhen several hundred thousandBible studentswere taught—in at least fortymajorChristianColleges, Seminaries, andUniversities—thatsinnersweresavedtheSAMEWAYintheOldTestamentasintheNewTestament.ThiswouldmeanthatALLofthemexperiencedtheNewBirth.ThatiswhatallNewTestamentChristiansexperience (John3:3), since it isconnected toCalvary (John3:14)AFTERthecrucifixion(seePsa.22:30–31).PaulconfessedhisownNewBirthin1Corinthians 15:8 and even included himself as a part of the operation in 1Corinthians4:15.Petersays thisNewBirthwasaccomplishedby the“wordofGod” (1Pet.1:23),andthis“word”hadtobeRECEIVED(James1:21).

ThereisnoNewBirthforanysavedsinneranywhereinyourBiblefromGenesis1:1to Acts 1:26. They lied to you again. Who? Born-again, saved, “godly,” dedicated,recognized,qualified,militant“defendersofthefaith”—that’s“who.”

They are the same bunch who altered 1 Thessalonians 5:22; 1 Timothy 6:10; 2Corinthians2:17;John3:13;Luke2:33;Matthew5:22;Luke2:14;Revelation22:14;Acts4:27,30;and1Timothy3:16.Samecrew:THOROUGHBREDAPOSTATES.

OncetheHolySpirithaspointedouttoyouthatHecameINTOOldTestamentsaints(Gen.41:38;Exod.31:3;Neh.9:30;Isa.63:11;1Pet.1:11),thefacultiesandstaffsofallfortymajorChristianColleges,Universities,andSeminariesdeclared thatHeneverdid.Theystick toversessuchas2Kings2:15andJudges14:6 toprovethat theHolySpiritonlycame“ON”menattimes.ThiswasdonetobackathirdMAJORheresy:thatallOldTestamentsaintsweresaved“bygracethroughfaith,withoutworks”;therefore,theHolySpiritwouldnotthinkofcomingINTOthemandthenLEAVINGthem(see1Sam.16:14andJudg.16:20).

AccordingtoeveryapostateFundamentalist inAmerica—themainscholars,pastors,professors,and teachers—all of theOldTestament saintswouldhavebeenpermanentlysealed (Eph. 4:30) by theHolySpirit ifHehad ever entered them.That is, these lyingapostates are trying to make you think Old Testament salvation and New Testamentsalvationare identical.Under theLaw, theyare about as “identical” as IslamandBiblePresbyterianchurches(John1;Rom.10).

SinceDavidandSolomonbothknewagreatdealmoreaboutthesemattersthananyTwentieth or Twenty-first Century “godly” apostate, we should refer to THEM for thetruth.WhydoyouthinkDavidwasprayingforGodnottotakeHisHolySpiritfromhimwhenYOUdon’teverhavetoprayit(Psa.51:11)?Gotta’littleproblemthere,doya?Youmean,GoddidNOT takehisHolySpirit fromSaul (1Sam.16:14) andSamson (Judg.16:20)?

ThenwhatwasDaviddoing“sweatingitout”?WasheoffhisrockerliketheScofieldBoardofEditors?

Read theseOld Testament texts carefully as they are found in every edition of theKingJamesBiblethatevercameout.

Page 46: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

“Thenherememberedthedaysofold,Moses,andhispeople,saying,Whereishethatbroughtthemupoutoftheseawiththeshepherdofhisflock?whereishethatputhisholySpiritwithinhim?”(Isa.63:11).

“Behold, we are servants this day, and for the land that thou gavest unto ourfathers toeat the fruit thereofand thegood thereof,behold,weare servants in it”(Neh.9:36).

“Searchingwhat,orwhatmanneroftimetheSpiritofChristwhichwasinthemdidsignify,when it testifiedbeforehandthesufferingsofChrist,andtheglorythatshouldfollow(1Pet.1:11).

The reason why the Holy Spirit could not ABIDE in the bodies of Old Testamentsaints isbecausewithout theNewBirth and spiritual circumcision (Col.2:11–13), theirSOULS were stuck to their FLESH (see Rom. 7:1–3). When the FLESH sinned (Lev.22:4–6),theSOULsinned;bye-byeHolySpirit!

Ifyouaresavedinthisage,theHolySpiritdoesnotcomeincontactwithyourflesh(Rom.7:17–18;Col.2:11–13),youhavebeencut loose(Col.2:11),and that iswhytheeditoroftheSwordoftheLord(CurtisHutson)spokeof“Ruckman’sRamblings”in(Godhelpus!)the“SWORD.”Hesaid,“spiritualcircumcision,whateverTHATis!”Whywasithedidn’tknow?BecausenotonemanwhobelievedthestuffthatJohnRicewroteeverchecked Rice out with the Book. He just swallowed “Dear Dr. John” hook, line, andsinker.Hedigestedsixtreblehooks:dittoSheltonSmithandBobJonesIII.

TheexplanationIgaveyouaboveunlocksastumblingblockinRevelation21and22thatnotoneevangelicalFundamentalisthasbeenabletoexplainuntiltoday.Itshowsthatanunsavedman,withouttheNewBirth,isaPARTofhissins(Rev.22:15)andthereforeiscalledbythenameofhissin(1Cor.6:9).AChristiancancertainlycommiteverysinlistedinRevelation21:8,atleastaccordingtotheApostleoftheGentileswhowrotehisepistlestotheBodyofChrist(Eph.3:1–12).Hereisthelist:

“Nowtheworksoftheflesharemanifest,whicharethese;Adultery,fornication,uncleanness,lasciviousness,

“Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions,heresies,

“Envyings,murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of thewhich I tellyoubefore,asIhavealsotoldyouintimepast,thattheywhichdosuchthingsshallnotinheritthekingdomofGod”(Gal.5:19–21).

NotethattheChristianisnotaLIARoranADULTERERoraMURDERER,buthisfleshis(seeRom.7:17–18;Gal.6:7–8).

Fortunately,theNewBirthproducesaspiritualcircumcisionwhichcutsoffyoursoulfromyourflesh.Thus,thereal“YOU”isnotresponsibleforfleshysins(Rom.7:15–18),althoughsinceYOU(the fleshyyou)commit themas“worksof the flesh” (Gal. 5:19–21),youwillcertainlyreapthem—INTHEFLESH.

Theycannotaffectthesalvationofyoursoul.

Page 47: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

IntheOldTestamenttheycould(Ezek.18:20).Andtherethewholefalseteachingisexposedlikearottenegg:“Youcan’tbeatitbut

itsurestinks.”NotehowONEOMISSIONoftwowords(Matt.22:30)dealingwithangels,destroyed

tenotherverses thatgave lighton the twonaturesof thebeliever and thematterof theHolySpiritleavingaChristian.ThisshowsyouhowapostasyalwayshasbegunwithintheBody of Christ. It also explains how Luke 13:19 is true as it stands against Matthew13:31–32.

The apostates in 2 Timothy 4:3 are saved, “dedicated,” scholarly Nicolaitans (Rev.2:6)whoaspiretocontroltheBodyofChrist.ThereweredozensoftheminNiceainA.D.325,andtherearehundredsofthemnowineverymajorChristianCollege,Seminary,andUniversityinEuropeandtheAmericas.

[Foracomprehensivelist,seemorethan320listedintheAppendicesofTheChristianLiars’Library,1988.)]

For an exact, individual, specific, well-documented case, see the article in theSeptember2005BibleBelievers’Bulletin,“SheltonSmith,theApostateFundamentalistin‘FullBloom.’”SheltonSmithcan’tevenmentiontheterm“theholyscriptures.”Hehasneverseen,read,orheardoneverseof“theholyscriptures” a day inhis life.Hehaswhat he called “THE Bible”—not “the holy scriptures.” He recommended it so 2Timothy 3:16 could not be applied to what he recommended.He never identifed “theBible”as“theholyscriptures.”Hecouldn’t.Hehadbeenlyingformorethanthirtyyears—just likeCurtisHutson,Bob Jones Jr., and JohnR.Rice.Hehad “fallen away” fromwhatheoncebelieved;thescholars“gottohim.”

Apostatesofafeatherflocktogether.

Page 48: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Chapter10

“SoundDoctrine—FalseDoctrine”

ConfoundingRemissionwithRedemption

The two main sources for the execution of more than 1,000,000 Bible-believingChristiansintheDarkAgeswereJohn6:53–56andMatthew16:18–19.UsingthesetwoScriptures as foundation stones for a worldwide, imperialistic Church-State—foundnowhere inANYScriptures ever printed, read, or spoken—theRomanCatholic Churchproduced“TheMostHolyCouncilofTrent”(1546–1564).Inthisofficialcouncil,whichismentionedinthe“TridentineConfession”towhichALLpriests,nuns,monks,attachés,Archbishops, Cardinals, Papal “nuncios,” and Popes have to swear loyalty, are twostatementsthatguaranteethedamnationofanyonewhodarestorejectthem.ThesupportforthesestatementsareJohn3:5andActs2:38.

WhentheInquisitionwentabout its“holy”workof torturing“heretics”andburningthem alive, it always concerned itselfwith two things: THEMASS andSPRINKLINGBABIES.

The “Reformation” (1500–1700) failed to unplug this sewage that jammed everywater system in Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas. Not even Luther completelyrecovered from “this is my body” and 1 Corinthians 11:24; he offered“consubstantiation”for“transubstantiation.”ZwinglipartedcompanywithLutheronthatpoint and took theBaptist position on the Lord’s Supper as amemorial. However, notevenZwingliorCalvinrecoveredfromJohn3:5andActs2:38.Totheirdyingdaytheyrejectedtheimmersionofadultbelieversonlyandretainedthesprinklingofthekiddies—asdidLuther.This explains the failure of theLutheranChurch andDutch andGermanReformed churches to do much of anything after 1600. The State Church of England(Anglican)alsoretainedthebabysprinkling.

TheInquisitionapproachwas:1.Waterbaptismshouldbesprinklingwateronpeople.2.OnlyRomanCatholicwaterbaptismproducestheNewBirth.3.ThismakestheBabylonianwhoreonsevenmountains(Rev.17)your“MOTHER.”

(TheSanskritfor“CAT”meansmother:asin“CATholic.”)4. Sprinkling babies gets rid of “ORIGINAL SIN” and engrafts them into Christ’s

body.(StilltaughttodayinALLofficialRomanCatholicbooksonCatholicdoctrine.)5.Ofcourse,theycanbecome“unregenerated”andfall“out”ofChrist’sBodylater.

Thus,noRomanCatholicwhoeverlived(includingmorethan200Popes)hadanymoreideaaboutwheretheywouldwindup,forsure,thanSt.Thomas,St.Theresa,St.Joan,St.

Page 49: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Augustine,PopeJohnPaulII,Rasputin,BillytheKid,orKarlMarx.So you see, aswe have said on at least four dozen occasions, theBook is not just

writtentosavepeopleandshowthemhowtoglorifytheirSaviour.ItisalsowrittentobeusedbySatan(seeLuke4:9–10) inorder todamn souls,destroychurches,murderanti-Catholics,justifyanti-Semitism,andprovethatachildofGodcanlosesalvation.

Nowalthough this seems fantastic, it happens tobehistory, andyouwouldhave torevisehistory to disprove it.Allheresiesare based on SCRIPTURE (1Cor. 11:19; Tit.3:10). This is so true that theNASV and theNIVboth omitted the word every time itshowed up in theNewTestament (1Cor. 11:19;Acts 24:14; Tit. 3:10). Thesemodern,sneaky, slick, smooth, treacherous, “Conservative” foxes all “covered up their owntracks.”

Nowinregardstothebloody-bloodlessMass—thatisexactlyhowitisstatedinanyofficialCatholicpublicationbetweenA.D.1700and2000—theprooftextsareJohn6:53–56andMatthew26:26–27.

An examinationof the contexts of all threepassages show that no sanemanwouldattendaCatholicchurchforfiveminutesifhehadspentanytimereadingtheHolyBible.

1.Nowineispresent;itisthe“fruitofthevine”(Matt.26:29;Gen.40:10–13;Isa.65:8;Neh.1:11).

2.ItwasnotgiveninLatin;itwasinthecommonlanguageofthedisciples(Greek,orsomesayAramaic).

3.JesusdidnotturnHisbackonanyonetoofferthe“elements.”4.Hedidn’tcallany“wafer”“myLordandmyGod”(John20:28).6.HebrokethebreadbeforeHesaid“Thisismybody”(1Cor.11:24).TheCatholic

priestdoesitAFTER.7.Hegavethebreadtothembyputtingitintheirhands,nottheirmouths.8.Hedidnot“elevate”ANYTHING.9. He never mentioned “Mary,” although every Baalite cannibal priest (A.D. 400-

1900) inNorth, Central, and SouthAmerica said, “Solemnizing and communicating inTHEFIRSTPLACEtheremembranceoftheGLORIOUSMARY!”

ThedirtyreprobatemadealiaroutoftheLordJesuseverySundaymorningat11a.m.Jesussaid,“THISDOINREMEMBRANCEOFME”—NOT“Mary.”

(There is no liar like a Catholic liar unless it is the Christian scholar who wouldrecommendanASV,NASV,RSV,NIV,NWT,NEV,CEV,orThe“Living”Bible.)

NotoneRomanCatholicinAmericaevernoticedthatJesusliedwhenHesaidifyoutook the “Mass” youwould have ETERNALLIFE as a present possession (John 6:54).WhyisitthenthatnoCatholictowhomyouevertalked,believedineternalsecurity?Youdidn’thearPaulVI, JohnXXIII,PiusXI,PiusXII,orJohnPaul II sayonewordabouthowhappytheywouldbeinNewJerusalemaftertheLordtookthemhome:notapeep.TherearemorethaneightyhymnsinaProtestanthymnalthathaveyouSINGaboutit.

Page 50: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

FALSE DOCTRINE. In the Holy Bible, Rome’s “Mass” is a “Mess.” The RomanCatholicChurchhasalwaystakentheposition(upto1900,wherethepressgottoohotforthem to get away with such stuff) that anyone who said what I just said should beBURNEDATTHESTAKE. To prove their sincerity, they did it—formore than 1,000years.

Nowtheseconddoctrinehadtodowithsprinklingbabiesinsteadofbaptizingadults.Nobabiesarebaptized(orsprinkled)anywhereintheNewTestament.Theoperationwasjust science fiction.Waterbaptism,every time it showsup, followsbelief (Mark16:16;Matt.21:32;Acts2:41,8:12,10:47).

Well, here is the “hangman’s noose” that caused the damnation, probably, ofmoresouls between the completion of theNewTestament toPresidentBush’s administrationthantheworld,theflesh,andtheDevildestroyedinthesametimethroughidolatry,“theloveofmoney,”drugs,liquor,politics,wars,oranti-Christianreligions.

“Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in thenameofJesusChristfortheremissionofsins,andyeshallreceivethegiftoftheHolyGhost”(Acts2:38).

Thefollowingdenominationsused thatverseasa“proof text” thatnoonecanhavehisorhersinsREMITTEDunlesstheygetbaptizedinwater:RomanCatholics,Mormons,Seventh-day Adventists, Campbellites, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, Church of God,Pentecostals, Charismatics, Greek Orthodox, Lutherans, Nazarenes, and Jehovah’sWitnesses.

Dr.A.T.Robertson, theSouthernBaptistGreekprofessoratLouisvilleTheologicalSeminary,says“amen” to thematter.His“originalGreek”says“getbaptized,WITHAVIEWtogettingyoursinsremitted.”

RightoutofHell;freshonthepitchfork.In the four places where “FOR the remission of sins” is given (Mark 1:4; Matt.

26:28;Acts2:38;Rom.3:25),thereisnotasingletimewhereitmeans“SOyoursinscanbe forgiven.” In all four cases itmeans“BECAUSE you have had your sins forgiven.”Thissimple, third-gradeEnglish(orGreekorHebreworGermanorLatinorSpanishorRussianorFrench,etc.)isbornoutbythemainstatementintheNewTestamentonPaul’sGospel(Rom.2:16).Itsaid,“Christdiedforoursins”(1Cor.15:3).

Compare!“ThethiefwasjailedFORstealing.”Washe jailedBECAUSEhestole,orwashe jailed“withaview tostealing”or“in

ordertosteal”?Theartistwasrewarded“FORpainting the landscape.”WasheawardedBECAUSE

hepaintedit,orwasherewardedSOhecouldpaintit?Well, according to the entiremass of deceived “Christians” (given above), the thief

hadtogotojailinordertosteal,andtheartistcouldn’tpaintthepicturetillhehadbeenrewarded.

That is the “SANITY” of thirteen main “Christian” denominations through fifteen

Page 51: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

centuries.The first deceived dupes, who duped their congregations, were Greek Orthodox

“soulwinners” (A.D. 400). The next group wasRomanCatholics (A.D. 300–800), andthentheyledthewholeexpresstrainrightdownthemountainintoaswamp(2007).

InGalatians3:14,youaretoldthatnotONEGentilesavedunderPaul’sministryeverhadtogetbaptizedorsprinkledto“get”theHolyGhost;seealsoEphesians1:13.ThistruthhadalreadybeendemonstratedtoSimonPeterinActs10:47.NoGentileinthebookof Acts, after Acts 8, had to get sprinkled or baptized in water to get saved, to getforgiven, to get justified, to get redeemed, to get eternal life, or to get theHoly Spirit.Everyoneofthem(Acts16:33,18:8)GOTWET.

Nowhowdidsuchathinghappen?Well,1Peter3:21;Ephesians4:5;Hebrews9:15;Isaiah40:1–4;Luke23:34;Exodus

34:7;Acts3:17–19explainwhat20,0000highly-educatedChristianscholarscouldn’tfindineighteencenturies.

1.Nosaint in theOldTestamentwasbornagain,andnonehadtheirssins“TAKENAWAY” (Heb. 10:4; Exod. 34:7). However, they were forgiven (sins “remitted”); seeExodus34:7,32:32and2Chronicles6:21,25,27,30.

2.SinswereforgivenfromGenesis3toMatthew27,butnonewere“REDEEMED”(seeRom. 3:25 andHeb. 9:15).Note the blood ofChristwas shed to redeem sins thatwere“PAST.”Itdidwhatthebloodofbullsandgoatscouldnotdo(Heb.9:13–15,10:4).

3.When John preaches “the baptism of repentance FOR the remission of sins”(Mark1:4),IsaiahtellsyouthatitisbecauseGodHADforgivenIsraelofhersinsatthattime(Isa.40:1–2).Andthattakesyourightbackinto1Peter1:11;Mark1:3;andMatthew17:11–12, where the First and Second comings are spoken of as being together (seecomments on Gen. 49:11, 24; Isa. 61:2). None of the scholars had enough energy orsinceritytolookupthematters.

4.WhenPeterpreaches“thebaptismofrepentanceFORtheremissionofsins,”itis exactly the same case. This is clear from the fact that on the cross Christ asked theFatherto“FORGIVETHEM”(Luke23:34),andHeDID(seeJohn11:42).

Thisexplainsthe“secondchance”giventoIsraelinActs2:32–36andthethirdchanceinActs4andPaul’sremarkin1Corinthians2:8.

5.When Jesus shedsHis blood“FOR the remission of sins” (Matt. 26:28), it haslittletodowithfuturesinners.Hebrews9:22hasbeenusedtoprovethatnoonecouldget“remissionof sins”withoutJesus sheddingHis blood. See howneatlyMatthew 26:28andHebrews 9:22 prepare you to believe in baptismal regeneration (Acts 2:38)? Neat,wouldn’tyousay?Neverfear!Morethan100,000,000suckersfellforitbetweenA.D.200andA.D.1000,andmorethan900,000,000morebetween A.D. 1000 and A.D. 1900. Right now, there are more than 1,000,000,000professingChristianswhobelievethatActs2:38isessentialforsalvationandessentialtoreceiving the Holy Spirit. They are just as screwed up (twenty centuries later!) as the“ChurchFathers”(A.D.200)whopromotedthatFALSEDOCTRINE.

Page 52: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Onceyouaddtheword“baptism”toJohn3:5(whereitdoesnotappearinoneextantGreekmanuscript thathaseverbeen found)and thenadd“water” toEphesians4:5andGalatians3:27 (although theworddoesnot appear in either epistle,anywhere), you arereadyfortheLakeofFire.

JesusChristHADtoshedHisblood,becauseGodhadbeenforgivingsinsfor4,000yearswithnobasisfordoingit(Josh.24:19;Exod.23:21).AlltheChristiansforgotthatGodwasSINLESS:HewasHOLY.Hewouldn’tdoanythingwrong,noteven tosaveasoulfromHell.

TheverseinHebrews9:22hadbeenmisappliedtoMatthew26:28bythe“scholars.”IthadnothingtodowithMatthew26:28.Thewholeverse(Heb.9:22)wastalkingabouttheshedbloodofanimalsfortheremissionofsins.Itcouldn’tREDEEMthem(seeCol.1:14),and itcouldn’t“take” sin“away” fromthesinner (Heb.10:11),and itcouldnot“clear”him(Exod.34:7).

Ninety-fivepercentofall theChristiansbetweenA.D.33andA.D.2007missed theentirerevelationfrombothTestaments.ThatishowtheywoundupthinkingthatActs2:38did something for the sinner. The only thing it did for him was, that at that time, itqualifiedhimtoreceivetheHolySpirit;later,ithadnothingtodoevenwiththat.SeeActs10:47,8:14–16,andGalatians3:14forabsoluteproof.

FALSEDOCTRINE.ItwastaughtasabsolutetruthbyeveryProtestant,Catholic,andGreek Orthodox denomination, which explains why Acts 2:38 shows up in ALL theircreedsandconfessions;noteventheSouthernBaptistGreekscholarDr.A.T.Robertsonwasexemptfromthis“colossalstupidity.”

Acts2:38;John3:5;andTitus3:5aretheshortestandquickestroadstoHellyoucantake.Allthreeare“Scripture.”All threedealwithsalvation, ifyoumistakethe“for” inActs2:38for“inorderto”insteadof“becauseof.”

“FORtheremissionofsins”inMark1:4meansexactlywhatitmeansinActs2:38.“FORtheremissionofsins” inRomans3:25meansexactlywhat itmeant inMatthew26:28.Allfouridenticalexpressionsmeanexactlythesamethinginallfourcases.NOTONCE do any of them refer to anyone getting baptized in order to get “remission ofsins.” That is a Satanic fable taught by Lutherans, Mennonites, Anglicans, Catholics,Amish, Mormons, Greek Orthodox, Pentecostals, Methodists, Presbyterians, Coptics,Armenians,ChurchofGod,ChurchofChrist,Nazarenes,Seventh-dayAdventists,andahandfulofBaptists.

Page 53: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Chapter11

“SoundDoctrine—FalseDoctrine”

GettingRidoftheKingdoms

AstheBodyofChristcollapsesintotalapostasy(1901–2001)—atleast90percentofit in America and 95 percent in Europe—thematter of “sound doctrine” becomes soimportant(see2Tim.4:3)thattheword“doctrine”hasbeenreplacedby“teaching”inallof themodern,apostate translationssuchas theASV,NASV,NIV,andsoforth.Since thereviserswhoproduced thoseperversionscannot“enduresounddoctrine” (2Tim. 4:3)andwanttodonothingbut“tell”or“hearsomeNEWTHING” (seeActs17:21), theycould not even stand the sight of the word. The grossly corruptNIV andNASV haveremoveditthirtytimesfromtheNewTestament.

“Sound doctrine” cannot be taught by any sinner, saved or lost, educated oruneducated, backslidden or consecrated, unless the teacher (or writer) observes fiveironclad“canons”ofinterpretation.Whereanyoftheseareviolated,thealibiforviolatingthemis“nullandvoid”andmarksouttheteacherasjustalyinghypocritewhoisatworktryingtobolsterandbackupaFALSEDOCTRINEwhichheisteaching:noexceptionsinanybranchof“Christianity”inthelast390years.

Protocol1.Neveraddwordstotheversewhenquotingitstext.Protocol2.Neversubtractwordsfromtheversewhenquotingitstext.Protocol 3. Never remove the verse completely from the context unless “right

dividing”(2Tim.2:15)demandsit.Forexample,Genesis49:10–11,49:24;Isaiah40:1–4,61:2;Matthew17:11–12,etc.

Protocol4.NeverattempttointerpretaCLEARpassageinthelightofanUNCLEARpassage.

Protocol5.NevertrustANYscholarorANY“historicposition”togive“light”onanyverseor passagewhere“theholy scriptures” themselves have already given the light.ExampleafterexamplecouldbecitedwhenANYscholar is tryingto“explain”Genesis1:7, 1:16, 6:1–2, 24:22, 49:6; Numbers 22:22; Deuteronomy 33:2; Matthew 26:27–28,16:18;Acts2:38,etc.

Now here we have a major case where we observe the utter failure of all BiblerevisersandallmajorBible teachersandall“Christiancelebrities” inconcocting (sinceA.D.1500)abeliefbuiltonself-righteousnessandthetrustthatIsraelwouldneveragainbeconstitutedasaKINGDOMconnectedwithGOD:i.e.,“thekingdomofGod.”

The whole crew skipped over God’s personal note, written to THEM in Romans11:26–30.Thiscausedthemtoconfound“thekingdomofGod”with“thekingdomof

Page 54: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

heaven,”andtheyhaven’tuntiedthatknotinA.D.2007.Ifyouwanttoseefull-bloomedandfull-blossomedapostasyinitsdeepestform,geta

copyofBobJonesIII’schapeladdresstothestudentsofBJUbeforeheturnedthemessover to “Stephen” Jones (2006). We have already printed it in The Bible Believers’Bulletin.

Inthat“BastionofOrthodoxy”and“FortressofFaith”thePresidentannouncedthateveryyoungmanandwomanintheUniversity(BJU)whobelievedthatANYBiblewasbetterthantheASV,NASV,RSV,NRSV,NIV,etc.,sothatitwastheir“pettranslation,”thatthose students were LOST and on their way to Hell, for they were practicingWITCHCRAFTandADULTERY.

Iknowyoudon’tbelieve that.Get thearticle. If youwantyourowncopy,write toPastorBillReese,LakesideBaptistChurch,Box1728,Clearwater,SouthCarolina29822.Hegotitword-by-wordfromarecordingmadeinthechapel.

Thisistheschool(BJU)thatstilldistributescutelittleradiocassettesof“TheWordofTruth,” by their deceased founder, Bob Jones Sr., trying to drum up an enrollment ofyoung peoplewho think that the school is “orthodox.” It is nomore orthodoxwhen itcomestoexpoundingtheScripturesthanSaltLakeCity,Utah.

BobJonesIIIcondemned4,000savedyoungpeoplebyapplyingGalatians5tothemasproofthatiftheyputanyemphasisontheKingJamesBibletheirsinwasequaltotheunsavedpractitionersofADULTERYandWITCHCRAFT.

Thedirty,lying,God-forsakenreprobatewouldsacrificeyoursonsanddaughtersonthealtarofhisownSTUPIDITYinordertokeepanystudentfrom“rockingtheboat”atBJU.His “god”was the institution fromwhich he drew his salary: typical, absolutelytypical.

When it comes to “sound doctrine,” all teachers of FALSE doctrines make threegrosserrorsatthestartoftheir“historicpositions.”

1.TheyassumethatthePARABLESon“thekingdomofheaven”(Matthew:twelveof them are in the Gospel of “the King of the Jews”) are DOCTRINAL statementsdealingwith“thekingdomofGod.”

2.Theyignorethedefinitionof“thekingdomofGod,”inthisage,giveninRomans14:17.

3. They assume the two kingdoms are identical, or at least “one within another”(ClarenceLarking).

Withthisorientationyouaregearedforacrash-landingeverytimeyourunacrossaversethatspeaksaboutaJew’s“inheritance”(Deut.12:9,18:2;Num.34:18;Psa.78:71;1Pet.1:4).SothatiswhereBobJonesUniversitywoundupin2006;withthemostcrooked,depravedbitoftheologicalFRAUDandEXTORTIONeverleveledonyoungChristiansinthiscentury.

Afterclaimingthat“Ruckman”taughtnobodycouldbesavedexceptthroughaKingJamesBible(whichIhaveneverevensuggestedin120volumesofcomments),thispoor,

Page 55: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

stupidBiblical illiterate—inchargeof theBiblicalwelfareof4,000youngChristians!—cameoutwithrubbish thatwouldgagamaggot. Itwasnosurprise tome(seeTheFullCup,1998);Ihadtheoutfit“figured”before1960.

Nowherewas the problem.There areTWO“inheritances” spoken of in regards toconvertsintheChurchAge.OneofthemisaspiritualoneenteredattheNewBirth.This“kingdomofGod” isnevermanifestedphysicallyat theNewBirth; it isreceived. It isreceived because the receptor becomes an “heir” with the One who originated the“inheritance”(Rom.8:16–17).

Nowcomesthecatch!Thisspiritualkingdom,definedinRomans14:17,isalsosaidtobeakingdomthatJesusChristgoestoHeaventoreceive,andwhenHecomesbackHesets it up as a political kingdom, ruling over cities (Luke 19:12–27; Rev. 20:4; Matt.19:28).

Thiscleansoutthe“Scholars’Union”asneatlyandasthoroughlyasKatrinacleanedouttheRomanCatholicFrenchQuarterin2005.

Yousee,inActs14:22,Paulspeaksof“enteringthekingdom”—nottheNewBirth—asworkingandsufferingasadiscipletoEARNit.HedoesthesamethinginColossians3:24–25.Tofurtherconfuseeveryself-righteousAthenianfromA.D.90toA.D.2007,wefind Jesus Christ speaking about the “kingdom ofGod” as though it were an earthly,physicalkingdomwhichcanbegiventoaNATION(Matt.21:43;Acts1:3).

These verses give every heretic the ammunition he needs to proveTWO lies:NewTestamentsalvationispartlyfaithandpartlyworks,andNewTestamentsalvationcanbeLOSTifyoudothewrongworks(1Cor.6:9–10;Gal.5:19–22).

THATiswhereBobJonesIIIlanded.Rightinarat’snest.ButsinceBJUwasneveraBAPTISTschool,hecouldn’tdenythesecondfalsehood

publicly,andsincehewasalazy,stupidBiblestudent,hethoughtGalatians5:19–22wasalistof thingsnosavedpersoncoulddo if theyweresaved.He immediatelycoupled thiswith 1 Corinthians 6:9–10, where UNSAVED people were doing the things listed inGalatians5:19–22.Thenhavingputthemtogether,hegotawildheresywhichheforcedonhisstudentbody.Itwasaboutas“sound”asaGerman“Mark”in1934.

Now here is THE BOOK, and when we say “THE Book,” we never mean whatSheltonSmithmeans.Hisstatementon“THEBook,”asheappliedittotheKingJamesBible,simplymeansthathethinksitisthebestEnglishtranslationyoucanget.HeisjustascarefulasBobJonesJr.,BobJonesIII,JohnR.Rice,RickWarren,JoelOsteen,BillyGraham, Jack Van Impe, and Curtis Hutson never to say “THE Book is the HolyScriptures”(Rom.1:2).SheltonSmithhasno“holyscriptures.”NeitherdidBobJonesJr.orBobJonesIIIorJohnR.RiceorCurtisHutsonorClarenceSexton.

Nowin“THEBook,”the“kingdomofheaven” isalwaysliteral,for“heaven”and“the heavens” are physical. “The kingdom of God” is always SPIRITUAL (Rom.14:17),for“GodisaSpirit”(John4:24).ThefirstverseinyourBible(Gen.1:1)showsyouthetwokingdomscouldnotpossiblybeIDENTICAL;allhereticsteachtheyare.Thisexplains2,000yearsofreligioushistoryamongthenations.Theywerealways trying to

Page 56: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

bring in a “golden age,” “new age,” “global age,” etc., via armed conflict, politicaltheatrics, “summit conferences,” socialwelfare, “handouts,” and treaties,whilepraying,“thykingdomcome.Thywillbedone,inearthasitisinheaven.”

Goodenough,but“therewasWARinheaven”(Rev.12:7).Nowseewhatamessyouare in?There isnospiritualkingdom tobe found inone

chapterinapropheticBookthatdealswiththeworldkingdomsfromNebuchadnezzartoPopeBenedictXVI (Dan. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). Those literal, physical, visibleKINGDOMS have nothing to do with John 3:5; Romans 14:17; Luke 17:20–21; orColossians1:13.

ButtheydohavetodowithActs1:3,14:22;1Corinthians6:9–10;Galatians5:19–21;Colossians3:24;andRomans15:12.

What the Holy Spirit has done here (as He has done scores of times in bothTestaments)isdeliberatelyCONFUSEthemindofthereadersohewilldestroyhimselfby“theword”(Hos.6:5;Isa.28:13;Ezek.14:1–11)ifheisproudoristryingtojustifyhissins.IfyouwanttoreallyseeHiminaction,watchHimsegregate“having”eternallife(1John 5:13)with “reaping” eternal life (Gal. 6:8) and “layingHOLD” on eternal life (1Tim. 6:19). Every apostate in theBody ofChristwill amalgamate those three differingverses and force them together to prove that if you don’t “hang on” to eternal life byWORKS,youcanloseitafteryougetitasa“freegift”(Rom.5:15).

NowhereiswhattheLorddid.HegavethechildofGodONEinheritanceasa“gift”whenhegotsaved;this inheritance ismentionedin1Peter1:4–6;Ephesians1:18;Acts26:18;Romans8:17;andColossians1:12–13.HethenofferedhimanotherinheritancebyWORKS (Col. 3:24).Both inheritances are called“thekingdomofGod” inActs 1:3,14:22;andLuke19:11,sincebothwillshowupintheMillenniumatChrist’sAdvent.InTHIS age, THAT kingdom (“the kingdom of God,” Rom. 14:17) is NOT a literal,physicalkingdom.IntheMillenniumitisstillthere,butitisconcurrentandsimultaneouswith“the kingdom of heaven” (see Matt. 5:20, 5:3). Both kingdoms are present andneitheroneisidentical.Theyneverwere.

There is no“kingdomofGod,” in the sense ofRomans 14:17, anywhere betweenGenesis4andActs2.Thereisno“kingdomofheaven”anywhere(inthesenseofDan.7:17andRev.11:15)intheChurchAge.AllitspoliticalcounterfeitsareGentileattemptsto set up State-Churches (Catholicism, Anglicanism, Communism, Greek Orthodox,Hinduism,Islam,etc.)to“bringinthekingdom.”

The heartbeat of the Papists is “meat and drink” (Rom. 14:17), for it is wine(“drink”)andawafer(“meat”accordingtoLev.2).Thatisexactlywhat“thekingdomofGod”isNOT.“ForthekingdomofGodisnotmeatanddrink;butrighteousness,andpeace,andjoy intheHolyGhost” (Rom.14:17) in thisage.Theheartbeatof the“Four Freedoms” in a “Democracy” is equal sharing of wealth in a Socialist State orWelfareState:“meatanddrink,andjobstoprocurethem.”

JesusChristwas a humanbeing (“achild isborn,” Isa. 9:6)who is “King” in thesense of King David, which is why King David’s throne is called “THE LORD’STHRONE”(1Chron.29:23;Matt.5:35).

Page 57: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

JesusChrist,asDeity(1John5:20),was“ason…given”(Isa.9:6),begottenbyGod(Heb. 1:5). As such, He is a SPIRITUAL KING (John 18:36) over a SPIRITUALKINGDOM(Rom.14:17).ThusHe isadualKingoverdualkingdoms, and thatmeansthatwhenHeisonearth,bothkingdomsarepresent.Thatwouldbe4B.C.toA.D.33,andfromtheSecondAdventtotheWhiteThroneJudgment.

ThisisprovedbyLuke24:36–43,wherebothnaturalbeingsandsupernaturalbeings(JesusChristHimself)areEATINGandDRINKING(Rom.14:17!)togetheratthesametime.DittointheMillennium.Bothkingdomswerepresent;neitherwereidentical.

And thus it came to pass that every apostate who picked up 1 Corinthians 6:9–10taughtthat“ALLdrunkardsandqueersgotoHell”andthenrantoGalatians5:19–21toprovethatifanyChristiancommittedthosesinsheLOSTGod’ssalvation.Youseewhatthrew them?“SHALLNOT INHERITTHEKINGDOMOFGOD” wasmisread as“SHALLNOTGETTOHEAVEN.”ThereferencewastoEARNINGareignonthisearthasgivenin2Timothy2:12andaswarnedabout,usingESAUasanexample(Heb.12:16–17).

FALSEDOCTRINE.FalsedoctrinetaughtbythePresidentofBJUandadozenmorejust likehim.Total

apostasy.TherewereTWOkingdomsandTWOinheritances,andtheywerenotidentical,and

theyareonlybothpresentwhenthe“KING”ofthemisonthisearth.Atpresent,theonlykingdompresentisnotconnectedwithchurchbuildings,income,

sacraments,politics,attendance,enrollment,property,ororganizations.Thoseitemsproducethekingdomof“DeathandHell”(seeRev.6,13).

Page 58: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Chapter12

“SoundDoctrine—FalseDoctrine”John15andRomans11

More than 1,900years ago a converted Jew—“anHebrewof theHebrews” (Phil.3:5)—warnedtheBodyofChrist“thatinthelastdays”(see2Tim.3:1)oftheChurch,intheChurchAge—notthe“lastdays”ofthe“endtime”ofJacob’sTroubles—theborn-againChristiansintheBodyofChrist(1Cor.12:13–27;Eph.5:29–33)wouldgettotheplacewheretheycould“notenduresounddoctrine”(2Tim.4:2).

Inagracious(bututterlymistaken)gesture,allof theScofieldBiblesbackeduptheTwenty-firstCenturyChristianapostasybyclaimingthatonlyanunsaved“liberal”couldbe anapostate. That is, the material in 2 Timothy 3–4 had no application to a REAL“Christian,”justaprofessingChristian.

Thissafelycoveredthesourceofallapostasywithin theBodyofChristsince1900:the saved Christian Bible teachers and scholars in the Christian schools of “highereducation.” In all thewritings of JohnRice,WilburSmith,BenjaminWarfield, StewartCuster,Robert Sumner,DougKutilek,KennethWuest,A.T.Robertson,DonaldWaite,Harry Ironsides, et al., and all of the sermons byCharles Stanley, Bob Jones Jr., BillyGraham, Bob Jones III, Jerry Falwell, Curtis Hutson, Shelton Smith, Jack Van Impe,HaroldWillmington, et al.,youwillnot findonestatement that “puts its finger”on thesorespot.All apostate liberal institutions (theologians,writers,Bible revisers, etc.) justsuddenlyPOPUPinsomeschoolsomewhereanddenysome“fundamentalofthefaith.”

That is, “modernism” or “liberalism” has always been traced to unsavedmen whopassoffassavedmen.Rightwhilethisisgoingon(1800–2000),youhaveliterallyscoresof born-again, saved Conservatives, who believe in ALL the fundamentals (like allCatholics do when they recite the Apostles’ Creed!), preaching and teaching seventeenoutrageousLIESwhichcouldleadanysavedFundamentalistintorejectinganypartoftheHoly Bible—in ANY version—as his final authority and substituting for it his ownpreference or opinions (see this documented in The Christian’s Handbook of BiblicalScholarship,pp201–257,1998).

What would you call that? You mean you wouldn’t call it “apostasy”? Why youwould if youknewany freshman “Greek”where it dealtwith the “mi”verbs (‘ιστημι).αποστασιαmeansto“fallawayfromastandingposition.”Itmeansyoukeeponprofessingsomethingyoudonot believe sinceyou canmake abetter living thatway.What is thedifferencebetweenthatandanyunsaved,Bible-denying“Liberal”whoprofessestobeaChristian?

“Thereisnodifference:Forallhavesinned.”

Page 59: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Theproblemis,“Whatcamefirst:thechickenortheegg?”WasittheLiberalortheeggthathatchedhim?All unsaved “Liberals” were “hatched” in Christian Colleges, Seminaries, and

Universities(A.D.1500–A.D.2000).Noneof themjust“poppedup”suddenlyovernightbecause theywere“lost.”Ifany

sinner’shighestauthorityishisownpreferencesoropinions,heisapracticalATHEIST,even if he is a soulwinning “saint.” Once you justify yourself (or any other man) inrejecting the Bible as your final authority, you open the way (and justly) for denyinganythingintheBibleyouwanttodeny.IfyouprefertodenytheVirginBirthortheDeityofChrist,youcanhavejustasreasonableandlogicalbackingfordoingsoasyouwouldfordenyingthe“earring”ofGenesis24:22andclaimingitwasactuallya“nosejewel”ora“foreheadjewel,”orfordenyingthatthe“power”giventoaChristianatthetimeofhisNewBirth (seeEph.1:11;Matt.22:30;Phil.3:21)was just an“authority” tobecomea“sonofGod”(seeJohn1:12).

YoudifferfromalostmaninDEGREEonly;notinlogic,motive,desire,choice,andmethod.

Now in2007, the rejectersof“sounddoctrine” are innoway limited toMoslems,Mormons, Catholics, “Modernists,” “Neo-Orthodox,” Satanists, Humanists, or“Scientologists.”

The“earitching”Athenians(2Tim.4:3;Acts17:21)arerepletewithConservatives,Fundamentalists,Evangelicals,andCharismaticswhoallbelieve in theVirginBirthandDeityofChrist.Theseapostatesnownumberintothemillions.Theyall“believeinGod.”“Thedevilsalsobelieve,andtremble”(James2:19).

According to every apostate reprobate in the Body of Christ fromA.D. 325–2007,John15:1–6andRomans11:18–22provethataborn-againchildofGod—whowassealedpermanently by theHoly Spirit (Eph. 4:30)—can lose eternal life and go toHell afterbeingpredestinated,byGodHimself(Rom.8:29),towindupjustlikeJesusChrist(Phil.3:21;1John3:1–3).

Since the“naturalman” (unsaved, according toPaul—1Cor.2:14) cannot receive“the things of the Spirit,” the teaching abovewouldmark a “Christian” out as beingunconverted:hecouldn’tbea“real”Christian.

John 15:1–6 and Romans 11:18–22 would be too hard for any practical atheist totackle.Anymanwhosehighestauthorityishisownopinion,ortheopinionofsomeoneheread,willduckeveryBiblepassagethatheeithercannotunderstandorelseresents.Notethat in this particular, all saved apostates think and act just like all lost sinners. Forexample:everymanontheNASVcommitteeandtheNIVcommitteeprofessedtobelieveinthe“fundamentalsofthefaith.”Notonebelievedintherightwayforevenfindingoutwhatthe“fundamentals”were.

John5:39commandsallsinnersto“search”theHolyScriptures.SecondTimothy2:15commandsallChristiansto“study”theHolyScriptures.

Page 60: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

The apostates who produced the NIV and NASV didn’t believe in either of thosecommands.TheyomittedbothofthemfromtheirEnglishtexts.

Wouldyoucallthatapostasy?Ifnot,whatwouldyoucallit?What is thedifferencebetweenaLiberalwhodoesn’tbelieveinwhat theScriptures

say and a saved Fundamentalistwho doesn’t believe you should study or search them,whentheyarethewitnessestoallofthe“fundamentals”?

“Thereisnodifference:Forallhavesinned.”NowtakeJohn15:1–6.Ifaborn-again,forgiven,sanctified(Heb.10:10,14),justified,

redeemedchildofGoddoesn’tbear“fruit”forChrist,hegoestoHell(John15:6).Right?Whattypeoffruit?The“fruit”inGalatians5:22–23?Why,ifheborethatfruithewouldstilltogoHellifheLIED(seetheverseallapostatesuseforthis—Rev.21:8).

Whatistheproblem?Well, you either have anunsaved sinner trying to teach you the Bible or a carnal,

worldly,man-worshippingChristian heretic (see 1 Cor. 11:19; Tit. 3:10) who gave upsearchingtheScripturestofindwhatJohn15:1–6wastalkingabout.DittoRomans11:18–22.

InRomans11:21–22,ifaregeneratedsonofGod(John1:12),whosedestinyhasbeenfixedpermanently(Rom.8:29),canloseeternallifeby“boasting”(Rom.11:18)orbeing“conceited”or“ignorant”(Rom.11:25),youcancounton20,000,000ChristiansayeargoingtoHell.

Now!Onyourmarks,getset…POW!ThereisnothinginRomans11fromverse11toverse24thathasanythingtodowith

anyonegettingsavedorgetting lost.No individualsare foundanywhere in thepassage,andtheHolySpiritHimselftoldyouthewarningwasnottoborn-againchildrenofGodatall;itwasawarningtoGentilesinGentilenations(Rom.11:12,13,17,21,23).

InChrist“thereisneitherJewnorGentile”(Gal.3:28;Eph.3:6;1Cor.10:32).TheyarebothinRomans11,andtheyarenotsaidtobeChristians.NoneofthemarepartofJesusChrist,andnoneofthemare“inChrist.”Theydonot

evenbecome joinedTOJesusChrist; theybecome joined to Israel’s national privileges(Rom.11:16,17)andareindangeroflosingthem(Rom.11:21–22)ifthey“lorditover”Israel(seeRom.11:11,12,18,25;Psa.83:4;Jer.30:11;Isa.60:12).

If the“olivetree”was JesusChrist,Godwouldhave tomutilateHis Son’sBODY(Col.1:24;Eph.1:22–23,5:30;1Cor.12:13)everytimeHe“broke”(Rom.11:20–22)a“branch”outofit(seeJohn15:6).Anyonewho“searchedtheScriptures”couldfindthatmaterial in tenminutes. God set aside a Gentile Queen (Esther 1) for a Jewish queen(Esther 2) just before the Tribulation (42monthsmatching the 42 chapters of Job; seecommentsinTheBibleBeliever’sCommentaryonJob,chapter19).

PaulisnotwarninganychildofGodinRome(oranywhereelse)aboutfallingoutoftheBody ofChrist; he is plainlywarningallGentiles inRome that they had better be

Page 61: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

carefulhowtheyrespondtotheGospelbecauseIsrael(aNATION)wasnotcareful.Thethemewas “Gospel privileges”—chances to be saved. Israel’s chance will come againwhenMosesandElijahreturn(Rev.11);itwill“end”with100percentconversions(Rom.11:23–27;Heb.8:10–13).

NowJohn15isrougher.ItisrougherbecausetheLordkeepstalkingaboutsomebody“INHim.”NooneinJohn1–19is“in”JesusChristatall.Neitherisanydisciple“IN”HiminJohn20–21orActs1.

Nowanyapostatehas to face thatFACTbeforeattempting toproveanything. IfheoverlooksthatScripturalFACT,hehasnobasisforanyexpositionofanykind.NoteventheCorinthians (afterActs16)knewthatJesusChristwas“IN” them(1Cor.3:16)andtheywere “IN”Him (1Cor. 6:15).You see, theLord answeredChrist’s prayer in John17:21–23withoutthePopebelievingithadtakenplaceyet,andwithoutanysavedsinnersinActs2knowingaboutit.

John 15:1–6 has to be an illustration, not adoctrinal teaching. Notice the“abide”givenasaconditionwhileHehadjusttoldthemthattheHolySpiritwasgoingto“abide”inthemforever(John14:16;dittoEph.4:30).Problem!(AnditistoobigforanapostateLaodiceanBiblecorrectortohandle.)Fora“beaut”justlikeit,readJohn10:1–4andnotethat itwas aparable (John 10:6), not a doctrine. According to Ephesians 5:23–32, theillustrationsaboutChrist’sBODYarenotparables,illustrations,orsimilitudesonly;theyaredoctrinallyoperatinginthespiritworld.

John15:4willnotoperatedoctrinallyunlessyoulineitupwith1John2:6,24,28and1 John 3:6; and when you do that, you land right in the middle of a faith-and-workssituation (1 John 3:15; Heb. 3:6,14, 10:26; Rev. 12:17, 14:12) that plainly is not anyreferencetoanyoneintheChurchAge,doctrinally.

Yousay,“Whynot?”Because,stupid,ifitwas,itwouldcontradictthirtypassagesinthePaulineEpistles thatdealwithsalvationbygraceapart fromanyworks (Rom.4:5).WanttheBooktocontradictitself,doyou?Therevisersdid.Thatiswhytheyleftoutthecommandto“search”itand“study”it.Theywantedyoutofind“contradictions.”SodoallapostateChristians.

The“fire”ofJohn15:6isnotthefireofMatthew13:50,25:41;Malachi4:1–3;or2Thessalonians 1:8. No “angels” throw anyone into any “Hell fire” in John 15:6. Theillustration says “men” burn the branches. In Matthew 13:49–50, it is ANGELS.“Burning” can be different than burning in Hell; for example, 2 Corinthians 11:29; 1Corinthians 7:9; andRomans 1:27. “Cast away” branches are like castawaySALT (seeMatt. 5:13—“men,” not angels). Both illustrations (salt and branches) illustrate a“backsliddenChristian”who refuses to “abide in Christ” in the sense of following andobeyingHim, and both expressionswerepre-crucifixion illustrations to Jewsunder theLaw. Like the “lost son” (Luke 15:32) who died and got lost, as a son, and then got“saved” and alive again (while still a son!), these passages are all aimeddoctrinally ateither professing “Christians” in the Tribulation or Jews before the Blood Atonement.SomeonejustthrewtheirBibleoutthewindowwhentheyreadJohn15:1–6.Theydidn’tstudytheBookanddidnotsearchit.

Page 62: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

ThatiswhatthesavedConservativesencouragedthemtodointheNIVandtheNASV.IfyouthinkforaminutethatGod“tookaway”(John15:2)everyChristianintheChurchAge who didn’t bear “fruit,” you have been spending too much time with the “GlassToilet.”IhaveknownGodtoputupwithnon-fruit-bearingChristiansforhalfacenturyandmorebeforeHe“tookthemaway.”

Sounddoctrine?John15:1–6isawarningtoabelievertogotoworkforChristandbringforthfruit—somethirty,somesixty,someonehundred(Mark4:20).ItistellinghimthattheLordmayhaveto“prune”himprettyclose(John15:2)togetagoodcrop,andifhe is not going tobear the fruits of theSpirit (Gal. 5:22), theworldwill “eat himup.”He’ll“burnout”inunsavedcompany,withtheworldhavingnomorerespectforhimthantheyhadforSamsonaftertheyblindedhim.

Falsedoctrine?Thefalsedoctrinestatesthatthepassageisadoctrinaldissertationonlosingyoursalvation.Ifyoudon’tkeepworkingatit,youwillwindupinHell.

“Study to shew thyself approved untoGod, aworkman that needeth not to beashamed,rightlydividingthewordoftruth”(2Tim.2:15).

Page 63: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Chapter13

“SoundDoctrine—FalseDoctrine”WorldwidePeace

In keeping with the “sure word of prophecy,” the new “Bibles” were careful toremovefromtheirtextstheonlytwocommandmentsin theBibletostudytheBible.Theprophecy said“that in the lastdays” (2 Tim. 3:1–4) of theChurchAge, theBody ofChristwouldreachthepointwheretheycouldn’t“enduresounddoctrine”(2Tim.4:3).Fulfilling the prophecy to the exact degree, the NIV and NASV got rid of the word“doctrine” fromtheKingJames textasquicklyas theycould;seeMatthew7:28,15:9,16:12,22:33;Mark1:22,27,4:2,7:7;Luke4:32;John7:16,17,18:19;Acts2:42,13:12,17:19;Romans6:17;etc.

Thenfearingthatthiswouldnotcompletelyprotectthemastheycontinuedtodefilethe“purewords” (Psa.12:6;Prov.15:26,30:5;Psa.119:140), theyfound theonly twoplaces in the New Testament where the reader was given a command to “search thescriptures” (John 5:39) and “study” the Scriptures (2 Tim. 2:15), and they neatlyremovedbothofthosereadings.ThisiswhathappenedtoEurope,Asia,theMiddleEast,Africa,Mexico, andSouthAmericabetweenA.D.325andA.D.2007.Theirpopulacesquit reading, studying, and “searching” the Scripture. The historical results (as anyhistorianknows)were“theAgeofEnlightenment”(Biblerejection),“TheAgeofReason”(Bible rejection), “Evolution” (Bible rejection), “English Deism” (Bible rejection),“French Atheism” (Bible rejection), “German Rationalism” (Bible rejection),“Polytheism”inIndiaandJapan(Biblerejection),and“CommunisticAtheism”inRussia,China,andKorea(Biblerejection).

TheCatholicChurchwas in totalapostasy longbefore theCouncilofTrent (1546);and that insured the Biblical illiteracy of Spain, Croatia, Poland, Austria, Ireland, thePhilippines,CentralAmerica,Mexico,andPortugal.

So“sounddoctrine” is (andalwayshasbeen) the“deathknell” forcarnal,worldlyChristians in any century. The word “search” in all Greek texts (John 5:39) is animperativecommand.Withnoregardwhatsoevertoany“originalGreek,”includingtheirown“eclectic texts” (Vaticanus,Sinaiticus,Alexandrinus,etc.), thedemoniachypocritesyieldedtothe“spiritthatnowworkethinthechildrenofdisobedience”(Eph.2:2)andgaveyouanIndicative(ερευναω).ThatwordisnotintheIndicativemode inanyoneofmorethan1,600Greekmanuscripts.ItisanImperative,exactlyasitisinJohn7:52.

Itwaschangedtosootheyourconsciencewhenyoulet thedustaccumulateonyourBible.TheNIV andNASV revisers did the same thing by changing 1 Timothy 6:5 andRomans 1:18, 21, 25 to soothe their own consciences. Their conscienceswere“searedwithahotiron”(1Tim.4:2)whentheysatdowntoproducetheNIVandtheNASV.

Page 64: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Yousay,“Now,BrotherRuckman,judgenotlestyebejudged.”I’lltakemychancesonthoselastfiveparagraphswithoutablush,aqualmofconscience,atwitterofpityorfear,andwithnoregardatallforanyone’sanalysisofthematter.Ihavejudgedthemanddiditwith“maliceaforethought,”exactlyasPauldidwhenhewroteTitus1:12andwhenPetersaid2Peter2:12,14andwhenJeremiahjudged(Jer.18:23)andwhenPauljudged(1Cor.5:3),andwhenJamesjudgedthetwelvetribes(James1:1,4:4).

IwillcontinuetojudgesuchmattersaccordingtoGod’sstandardofabsoluteTRUTH(John17:17,8:45–46;1Tim.4:2–4;1Cor.2:12–15)andwillcertainlynotloseanysleepoverit.

Nowherearethree“eschatological”terms—alongwayofsaying“Analyzingcomingevents according to Biblical theology.” They are called “Postmillennialism,”“Amillennialism,” and Premillennialism.” These seemingly innocent terms would noteven be noticed by anyone who was not spending time studying the Scriptures. Theywouldbediscardedbyallpoliticiansandeducatorsasbeingcompletely“irrelevant”and“unmeaningful”toeveryChristianinthelastfourgenerationsofChristiansthathavebeenraisedonnewspapers,magazines,andtelevision.

Who inCongress or the StateDepartment or theUnitedNationswould give a flipabout any of the three terms?Theywould be confined to obscure religious beliefs thatdifferamongvariousChristians.

Joke!Godisagreat“joker.”EverhearHimsay,“BeholdtheLambofGod”(John1:29)and thenshowyouaLION (Rev.5:5)?No?Well,howabout saying,“Here is theLIONofJudah!”(Rev.5:5)andthenshowingyouaLAMB(Rev.5:6)?EverhearHimsay,“Iwillnotjustifythewicked”(Exod.23:7),andthenDOIT(Rom.5:8–10)?EverhearHimsay,“Answerafooloneway”andthensay,“No,don’tdothat”(Prov.26:4–5)!

Youwon’t beat theLord outwhen it comes to craftiness,wisdom, sarcasm, power,insight,authority,understanding,orpurposely“messingyouup”good(seeEzek.14:7–9;Mic.2:11).

Well,therelevancyof“Postmillennialism”isthatALLpoliticiansandleadersinALLcountriesintheTwenty-firstCenturyare“Postmillennial”withoutevenknowingtowhatthetermrefers.

Briefly, “Postmillennialism” was a reference to the Roman Catholic teaching ofOrigen,Augustine,andJeromethatthisChurchAgewouldprogressreligiouslyuntilthewholeworldwouldbeconvertedtoRomanCatholicism—exactlyhowMohammedtaughtitexceptheinserted“Islam”for“Catholicism”—withoutJesusChristcomingback.Thatis, Catholic sinners—“all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God”—weregoing to bring in “peace on earth” by “spreading the kingdom”—that is, the Pope’s“kingdom”—until the“AgeofGold”(see thefourthverseofItCameUponAMidnightClearinyourChristmascarols!)andtheconditionsofSolomon’skingdom(1Kings4:21–24)wouldberestored,worldwide,without“thesonofDavid”(Matt.22:45,Luke1:31–33;Acts3:20–21)comingback.TheCatholicPopes,Priests,Nuns,Nuncios,Cardinals,and“Monks”wouldbring it inbySHEEREFFORT:1.Controlofkingsandpresidentsanddictators.2.Armed forces,arrests, imprisonments,exiles,murders,and torture.3.A

Page 65: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

phonyBiblewithaphonycanon.4.Thecanonizationof“saints”andtheprayerstoHolyMary“MotherofGod,”etc.

The“kingdom”nevercamein.Itisn’tabouttocomein.EveryprayerforworldpeaceprayedbyeveryPopesinceA.D.500wasajoke:oneoftheAlmighty’sjokes;Henevertoldthemtoprayforworldpeace(John17:9,14).

All politicians have to be “Postmillennial.” All evolutionists have to be“Postmillennial,”andallHumanistsandAtheistshavetobe“Postmillennial.”Everyoneofthem,withoutasingleexception,mustswearhe(orshe)willmaketheworlda“betterplacetolivein”WITHOUT“thesonofDavid”comingbacktoreignover“thehouseofJacob”(Luke1:31–33).Allpositivethinkershavetothinkthesameway.

AllofficialcouncilsoftheUnitedNationsare“Postmillennial.”An“Amillennialist”standsinthesamepositionthatanAtheiststandstoa“Theist”—

which is the same position as an “Agnostic” stands to a “Gnostic.” The “A” simplycancelswhatfollows.An“Agnostic”isa“dumbbell”or“ignoramus.”An“Atheist”isamanwhoworshipshimselformankind;allreal“humanists”intheTwentiethandTwenty-firstCenturiesareAtheists.

Several million Postmillennialists converted to Amillennialism between 1914 and1918.Yousee,theyhadbeen“possibilitythinking”and“purposedriven”allthroughtheEighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries by the remarkable POSITIVE strides in science,music,art,communications,medicine,and transportation(between1600and1900).Butsuddenlytheir“Post”(“Post-millennial”)wasshattered;itsplitandthencrackedandthencrumbledintochipsthatbecamesawdust.Thewholeworldwenttowar(1914)andhasn’trecoveredfromitsince.

Sotheyjustdeniedthe1,000-year(Millennium)yearreignof“thesonofDavid”(seeRev.20:1–6)andbecame“Agnostics”about“Eschatology.”Themainteachersofthis“nomillennium”ideasimplypretendthatthe1,000-years(mentionedsixtimesinfiveverses)wasnot1,000atall;itwas“figurative”andshouldberetranslatedas“anindefiniteperiodoftime.”Thus,thetextoftheHolyBiblewouldbedraggeddowntotheignorantlevelofthestupidscholar.

A“Premillennialist”believesin“thepowerofNEGATIVEthinking.”Hehasenoughinsight to know that “the CURE is often worse than the DISEASE,” so “an ounce ofpreventionisworthtentonsofcure.”

Negativefirst,always:asinCainandAbel,AdamandChrist,IshmaelandIsaac,Esauand Jacob, and Old Testament (“CURSE”—Mal. 4:6) first, New Testament(“GRACE”—Rev.22:21)second.

Ijustgaveyouaninfallibleruleforabsolutetruth.“TheexceptionPROVEStherule”;exceptions never overthrow rules unless you are an Agnostic, Communist, terrorist,evolutionist,humanitarian,Atheist,ora“possibilitythinker.”

ThePremillennialteachingissimple.Therewillneverbeanypermanentpeaceonthisearth (under any set of conditions, set up by any group of people with good or badmotives)untilGodgetsthe“glory”(Luke2:14)thatHesaidhadtoaccompany“peaceon

Page 66: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

earth”(Luke2:14).Youarewastingyourtimewith“peaceprocesses,”peacetalks,peaceproposals,peace

keeping“forces,”prayersforpeace,andpeacetreatiesifwhatyouhaveinmindisgettingridofWAR(whichisGod’sjudgmentonSINhere)without“ThePrinceofPeace”(Isa.9:6)returningtoDavid’sthroneonMt.Zion(Psa.2:6–7,76:12,72:8,11,99:9,102:13,16;Isa.18:7;Hag.2:9).

Hewillreturntorunyouandruleyou(andyourfamily,yourchurch,yourbusiness,yourproperty,andyournation).Untilthenyouwillberuledby“thegodofthisworld”(Luke4:6;2Cor.4:4).

“Eschatology”?Onehundredpercentnegativefor191nations(Zeph.3:8).Ifyouwon’tberuledbytheOnewhocameinHis“Father’sname”(John5:43),then

youwillberuledbysomeonewhocomes“inhisownname”(Dan.11:37;2Thess.2:4).ThatistheteachingofbothTestamentsineverytextofeitheronethathasbeenpublishedbyanyonein160differentlanguagesthroughaperiodofeighteencenturies.

Ijustgaveyouanotherinfallible,inerranttruththatisabsolute.Youhavenoideaofthepowerofthatinnocent-looking,littleblack-backed,66-caliber

“Uzi.”Andsinceyouarenotgoingtostudyit(ifyoufollowtheNASV)andarenotgoingto

searchit(ifyoufollowtheNIV),youareinaconditionwhichcanbebest(andcheerfully)describedasHOPELESS.

Thatis“Premillennialism.”APremillennialistiswaitingforJesusChristtocomebackand“settle”God’saccountswithman.

“Nothing on earth is settled right until it is settled with GOD.” As far as God isconcerned—according to what He spoke, wrote, and preserved—right now, His Son is“outofplace”(see1Sam.21:1–4;Matt.12:3–6,5:35,26:64;Rev.19,Psa.72,110;Isa.2,11), His nation is out of place (Jer. 30:11; Rom. 11:7–17; Isa. 62:1–4, 65:9–16), theGentilenationsareoutofplace(Zeph.3:8;Psa.110;Isa.60:12),andHisSon’sBRIDE(2Cor.11:1–3;Rev.19:7;Psa.45:9–15;SongofSol.6:8–10)isoutofplace.

SoallAmillennialistsandPostmillennialistsareasoutofplaceasHitlerataJewishweddingoranArabianterroristataBarMitzvah.

Nothingis“settled.”Itwillbesettled inJoel3:9–17;Matthew25:31–46;andRomans11:25–27,andnot

tillthen.Sounddoctrine?Premillennialism.Falsedoctrine?Anythingelse.

Page 67: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Afterword

Shortly,asonecansee, therewillbeno“after”word.TheBodyofChristwillsoonawaketo“thevoiceofthearchangel”(1Thess.4:16;reestablishingIsrael—Dan.12:1)and“thetrumpofGod”(see1Thess.4:16;1Cor.15:52),which,bytheway,isNOTtheseventh trumpet of Revelation 11:15 (see the Bible Believer’s Commentary on 1Corinthians;chapter15,verse22).

TherewillbenoChristiansleftonthisearthtoaddan“afterword”towhatwehavesaidabouttheapostasy.AlltheapostateChristians,alongwithalltheBiblebelievers,willbegone“inamoment,inthetwinklingofaneye.”

Until“thatblessedhope” (Titus2:13;1John3:1–3), theBiblebelieversshouldbehardatworkwinningsinners toChristandassistingeachother in thework.That is thespiritual content of the New Testament from the practical level. Throughout this heshouldbeconstantlyawareofwhere theresistance torevivalandconversions iscomingfrom,where itstarted,who started it,when theystarted it,andhow theystarted it.Thisbookletillustratesthosemattersperfectly.

The steep descent from Philadelphia to Laodicea (Rev. 3) came about throughChristianColleges,Universities, and Seminaries, as it always has sinceA.D. 325. ThesourcehasalwaysbeenGenesis3:1;ithasneverbeenanydifferentsince4000B.C.Ifyouwant to really read a classic on this operation, obtain the book by Dr.William GradycalledFinalAuthority(1993).

As you have seen from the thirteen cases found in this book—if you took time tochecktheBiblereferences(whichyouprobablydidn’t)—allSatanhadtodowasshaketheconfidence in the Christian leaders (pastors, teachers, evangelists, missionaries,professors,andauthors)intheHolyBibleasTHEfinalauthorityin“ALLmattersoffaithandpractise,”andthe“rot”beganto“setin”(astheLimeyssay).

More than 5,000 preachers (1880–1900) and then more than 10,000 (1901–2007)begantopreachandteach“asoneof thescribes”(Matt.7:29;Mark1:22).Theyhadnoauthorityforwhattheyweresayingatall.ManyofthemusedtheKingJamesBible,andall of them quoted it constantly. But long before they got into “full-time service” theywere denuded (or castrated) spiritually by Westcott, Nida, Hodges, Machen, Wuest,Thayer, Nestle, Aland, Metzger, A. T. Roberson, Spiros Zodhiates, Origen, Barth,Brunner,Tillich,Lewis,Thieme,Warfield,andthe“Scholars’Union.”

Theycouldnotpreachwithpower,nomatterwhattheypreached,becauseasyousee(from studying these thirteen samples of anti-biblical heresy), they could notBELIEVEwhat theywerereadingandpreaching.Theystoodabove itandcritical to itwhile theytriedtoenforceitswordsontheircongregations.Itfailedmiserably.

TheLordGodputallofthemofflikeabadhabit(Ezek.11:5,14:4;Amos4:13).Soforthe“fruit”oftheirlaborsHeallowedthemtoproduce225counterfeitEnglishBibles,whose“fruit”was:1.WorldWarII.2.WorldWarIII.3.Onedivorceoutoftwomarriagesin America. 4. The subjugation of the English Parliament to Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Syria,

Page 68: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

Transjordan, Ethiopia, Egypt, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the “Gaza Strip.” 5. The totalshreddingof theBritishEmpire (Australia,Canada, theUSA,BritishGuiana,Rhodesia,India, Singapore,HongKong, and everywhere in between). 6.An increase in venerealdiseasesTENtimesasfastasthepopulationgrowthanywhere.7.Amajorrevivalofliteralcannibalismandslavedealing not found to that extent from1500 to 1900. 8.The totaldestructionof“qualityeducation”inAmerica.9.TheACLUgivenpowertowipeoutthelast vestiges of the New Testament from every public office, building, monument,decoration,andmeetinginAmerica.10.Americanspendingfiftytimesasmuchmoneyonentertainmentyearlyastheyputintoforeignmissions.11.Araftofhumanistic,pragmatic,multimillion-dollar mega “showcases” for Christians which couldn’t produce ONEconvertper500attendeesinayear.12.AnincreaseincrimethatmadetheUSAthecrimecapitalof theworldwithmore than8,000,000peopleunderarrestoronprobationor inprisonorondeathrow.

“Bytheirfruitsyeshallknowthem.”Source? The same source that Alexis de Tocqueville cited when he talked about

finding the SOURCE for America’s “greatness”—THE LOCAL CHURCHES IN THEUSA(1700–1820).

Samefountforfreshwaterandswampwater(James3:11).Theswampwaterwonout.Thelocalchurchescouldnolonger:1.Produceanyreal

FEARofGod.2.Convincetheirmembers thatunsavedpeoplewouldburnliterally inaburningHellforeternity.3.ProduceChristianstowhomHeavenandNewJerusalemwereasrealasDisneyworld,TheTonightShow,SaturdayNightLive,JurassicPark, theWallStreetJournal, theDiscoveryChannel, the10o’clocknewscast,and theUnitedNationsAssembly.

Alltheycouldproducewerenice,sweet,“sharingandcaring”opportunistswhocouldshowtheirpersonalitiestoeachothersotheywouldallappreciateeachother.Thatiswhattheyaredoing(2007),andthatiswhattheyarepreachingiftheyarerunningover4,000inattendance.Nopreaching like thatof JohnKnox,MartinLuther,BillySunday, J.FrankNorris,BobJonesSr.,GeorgeWhitefield,DwightMoody,orLesterRoloffwilleverbeheard from these“pulpits.”Abetter termfor themwouldbe“announcementbooths”or“rapstations.”

They are through “offending” anyone. Their job is to “get votes” by selling theirpersonalities,andthatiswhattheyhavebeendoing.Youcansee,bythethirteencasesIgaveyou,thatwhenitcomestotheBOOKandtheauthorityoftheBOOK, theyhavenomore use for its text than aRomanCatholicNun or Priest, aBuddhistMonk, aHinduYogi,oraMoslemUlama.Theyalteriteveryplacewhereitoffendsthemordoesn’tmakesense to them. I only gave you 13–16 examples; there are hundreds—literallyHUNDREDS.

Thismeansthatnoneofthemhavebeencalledto“preachtheword”(2Tim.4:2),soGod never honors their preaching becauseHe knows they do not believe it when theyquoteit.

Ifyou study their congregations—ordealpersonallywith their “graduates—yousee

Page 69: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

anamazing thing:70percentof themenareeffeminate (ifnotout-and-outperverts),80percentofthemarriedwomenruntheirfamiliesasanequalauthoritywiththeirhusbands,90percent of themdonot read theBible throughoncea year, 90 percent are from theuppermiddleclass, and90percentof themdonotpersonally lead individual sinners toChristatarateofevenoneeveryfiveyears.Theworkstheysupportneversendeventwopercent of their income overseas to foreign missions. With an annual income of$4,000,000 to $40,000,000 (and sometimes more), you will find the allotment for thesalvation of lost Chinese, Japanese, Germans, Spaniards, Swedes,Mexicans,Moslems,Catholics,Hindus,Africans,andSouthSeaIslanderswillbeLESSthan$50per$500,000andlessthan$10,000per$10,000,000.

“Wherethereisnovision,thepeopleperish”(Prov.29:18).Modern Christian “celebrities” are, for the most part, nice, smooth, dignified,

exuberant,enthusiasticcheerleadersandmotivatorswhoUSEaBooktheydonotbelieveand quote it to put pressure on congregations to do two things:GIVE (Hos. 4:18) andATTEND(Ezek.33:31).

They are, in the words of the commercial fisherman of the First Century (John),“wretched,andmiserable,andpoor,andblind,andnaked”(Rev.3:17).Theyprofesstheoppositeandhavebankaccounts toprove it (Rev.3:17).Their“GAIN” isproofoftheir “GODLINESS,” at least in the eyes of hundreds of thousands of AmericanChristianswhonevernoticedwhattheASV,NASV,NKJV,andNIVdidwiththatverse(1Tim.6:5).

Nowyou knowwhere the devilment comes from.The same source it always camefrom:questioningwhatGodSAID(Gen.3:1).

IfyoufailedtocheckeveryScripturereferencein thisbook,youare ill-equippedtomakeanynegativecommentsaboutit.Youlackthesincerity,thehonesty,andthecouragetofaceTRUTH.

“Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thousayest that Iamaking.To thisendwasIborn,and for thiscausecameI into theworld, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truthhearethmyvoice”(John18:37).

“AndbecauseItellyouthetruth,yebelievemenot”(John8:45).You are a cheerful contributor to the greatest religious apostasy theworld has ever

seen(1880–2000).YourTEACHERS,whoever theywere,were just ascowardly, just asdishonest, and

just as LAZY as their student bodies (Judson, BJU, Howard, BBC, Stetson, Furman,Moody, Fuller, Crown College, Tennessee Temple, Santa Rosa Schools, PCC,Northwestern, Maranatha, Cedarville, and the Seminaries at Fort Worth, Dallas, NewOrleans, Denver, Los Angeles, Chicago, BJU, Liberty University, Kansas City, andLouisville).

“Birdsofafeatherflocktogether.”These“birds”aredefinedinMark4:4,15,whichsee.

Page 70: The Death of Biblical Doctrine - soulwinning.infosoulwinning.info/books/peter_ruckman/the_death_of_biblical_doctrin… · Genesis 1–3 is given as a simple historical narrative that

The “AFTERWORD,” after an operation like that, can be reduced to one word:“ICHABOD”(1Sam.4:21).

OtherworksavailableonKindle

Entirepublicationlistat

www.kjv1611.org