3
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. WEEKEND EDITION JANUARY 17-19, 2014 Organized Crime: An American Tradition The DEA and the Sinaloa Cartel by NICK ALEXANDROV El Universal, the Mexican newspaper, reported on January 6 that Washington and the Sinaloa Cartel have cooperated for years. Sinaloa lawyer Humberto “Loya-Castro stated that [DEA] agents told him that, in exchange for information about rival drug trafficking organizations, the United States government agreed…not to interfere with his drug trafficking activities and those of the Sinaloa Cartel,” published court documents reveal. These disclosures should be considered together with those the intrepid journalist Anabel Hernández published in Los Señores del Narco, translated as Narcoland for last fall’s English-language release. Her main argument, as she explained on Democracy Now! last September, is that in Mexico there isn’t “really a war against the drug cartels. What exists in the government of Felipe Calderón was a war between the cartels, and the government took a side of that war, protecting the Sinaloa Cartel.” President Calderón, during his six-year term ending in 2012, presided over an unprecedented slaughter—perhaps 120,000 Mexicans were murdered while he held office, Le Monde estimated—and the distribution of unprecedented U.S. funding—well over $1 billion by April 2013—“to the Mexican military, police, and judicial systems for training and equipment,” the Center for International Policy’s Laura Carlsen summarized. When his term ended, he fled to an institution certain to ignore the blood on his hands—namely Harvard, where he was a Mason Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government. Past recipients of this honor include Héctor Gramajo Morales, an architect of the genocidal rampage that ripped through Guatemala’s countryside in the 1980s, and a guest speaker at the School of the Americas in December 1991, during its commencement exercises. One wonders whether, to mark the occasion, he imparted his political philosophy: “You needn’t kill everyone to complete the job.” Massacring 30% of the public was more reasonable, he stressed. In her review of Washington’s Mexican policy, Carlsen noted that Thomas Shannon, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, remarked in April 2007 that CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names » The DEA and the Si... http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/01/17/the-dea-and-the-sinaloa-cartel/... 1 of 3 20.01.2014 15:18

The DEA and the Sinaloa Cartel

  • Upload
    thm89

  • View
    4

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

DEA and Mexican cartels

Citation preview

  • This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only.

    WEEKEND EDITION JANUARY 17-19, 2014

    Organized Crime: An American Tradition

    The DEA and the Sinaloa Cartelby NICK ALEXANDROV

    El Universal, the Mexican newspaper, reported on January 6 that Washington and the

    Sinaloa Cartel have cooperated for years. Sinaloa lawyer Humberto Loya-Castro stated

    that [DEA] agents told him that, in exchange for information about rival drug trafficking

    organizations, the United States government agreednot to interfere with his drug

    trafficking activities and those of the Sinaloa Cartel, published court documents reveal.

    These disclosures should be considered together with those the intrepid journalist Anabel

    Hernndez published in Los Seores del Narco, translated as Narcoland for last falls

    English-language release. Her main argument, as she explained on Democracy Now! last

    September, is that in Mexico there isnt really a war against the drug cartels. What exists

    in the government of Felipe Caldern was a war between the cartels, and the government

    took a side of that war, protecting the Sinaloa Cartel.

    President Caldern, during his six-year term ending in 2012, presided over an

    unprecedented slaughterperhaps 120,000 Mexicans were murdered while he held

    office, Le Monde estimatedand the distribution of unprecedented U.S. fundingwell

    over $1 billion by April 2013to the Mexican military, police, and judicial systems for

    training and equipment, the Center for International Policys Laura Carlsen

    summarized. When his term ended, he fled to an institution certain to ignore the blood on

    his handsnamely Harvard, where he was a Mason Fellow at the Kennedy School of

    Government.

    Past recipients of this honor include Hctor Gramajo Morales, an architect of the

    genocidal rampage that ripped through Guatemalas countryside in the 1980s, and a guest

    speaker at the School of the Americas in December 1991, during its commencement

    exercises. One wonders whether, to mark the occasion, he imparted his political

    philosophy: You neednt kill everyone to complete the job. Massacring 30% of the

    public was more reasonable, he stressed.

    In her review of Washingtons Mexican policy, Carlsen noted that Thomas Shannon, U.S.

    Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, remarked in April 2007 that

    CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names The DEA and the Si... http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/01/17/the-dea-and-the-sinaloa-cartel/...

    1 of 3 20.01.2014 15:18

  • U.S. assistance for Mexican security forces was a means of armoring NAFTA, the

    so-called free trade agreement that turned 20 years old as this month began. The

    arrangement, DEA official Phil Jordan explained, was a deal made in narco heaven.

    For Mexican drug cartels, U.S. Army War College professor Paul Rexton Kan writes,

    the provisions of NAFTA came at an opportune time, when U.S. interdiction of

    Colombian cocaine in the Caribbean was increasingly taxing Colombian groups while the

    demand for methamphetamines in the United States skyrocketed, indicated in the

    number of meth-related emergency room visits in the United States, which doubled

    between 1991 and 1994. The result was that Mexican cartels were able to capitalize on

    newly available overland routes to bring cocaine and meth to the U.S. market, and

    commercial-vehicle smuggling shot up 25% in NAFTAs first yearthe biggest jump on

    record, Kan concludes.

    The connections between NAFTA, drug smuggling, and the ruin free tradeslang for

    the U.S. dumping of government-subsidized corn into Mexicobrought to the Mexican

    countryside are rarely examined. Dale Wiehoff, of the Institute for Agriculture and Trade

    Policy, is one of the few writers reflecting upon these interwoven developments, and

    argued last summer that the exploding numbers of unemployed and displaced young

    Mexicans were vulnerable to the drug cartels[.] Displacement is fueled by the conversion

    of subsistence lands to potential profit sources, with poor farming communities shattered

    in the process. In the state of Sinaloa, where the cartel originated, NAFTA spurred these

    processes of territorial transfer, as agribusinesses amassed plots that had once been

    worked collectively.

    Tracy Wilkinson reviewed current conditions there in the Los Angeles Times last autumn.

    On the enormous farms, the planting, weeding, pruning, and picking of the vegetables

    fall to armies of workers from Mexicos poorest states, like Oaxaca, Chiapas, and others

    NAFTA devastated. Carmen Hernandez Ramos is 52 and looks 80, and is just one of the

    many laborers there who feel trapped, Wilkinson explained, and are housed in fenced

    compounds in desolate regions.

    But not everyone suffers. The Guardian reported in July 2012 that HSBC, Europes largest

    bank, had laundered billions of dollars for drug cartels, its subsidiaries permitting

    Mexican drug lords to buy planes with money laundered through Cayman Islands

    accounts. Leopoldo Barroso, a former bank official, voiced worries regarding allegations

    of 60% to 70% of laundered proceeds in Mexico moving through HSBC, supposedly

    tainted by these revelations, as if its money would have been clean otherwise. But the

    differences between legitimate and illegitimate business activity are vague, if even

    meaningful, as Roberto Saviano observes in his foreword to Hernndezs Narcoland: the

    book demonstrates that it is not the mafia that has transformed itself into a modern

    CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names The DEA and the Si... http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/01/17/the-dea-and-the-sinaloa-cartel/...

    2 of 3 20.01.2014 15:18

  • capitalist enterprise, but instead capitalism that has transformed itself into a mafia.

    Others would say this assessment doesnt go far enoughthat organized crime is intrinsic

    to capitalism, a phenomenon that complemented rather than conflicted with the

    maturation of U.S. economic and political power structures, British historian Michael

    Woodiwiss argues, pointing out that the United States can claim no legitimacy in its

    alleged anti-crime initiatives. Pick any episode in the countrys history, whether the

    frequently criminal exploitation of African American and other working peoples, the

    enactment of prohibition laws that fostered corruption and criminal enterprise, or the

    involvement of intelligence agencies in drug trafficking operations, and this fundamental

    point is made. The recent DEA-Sinaloa revelations only drive it home.

    Nick Alexandrov reports on the deteriorating political climate in Honduras in

    the December issue of CounterPunch magazine. He lives in Washington, DC.

    CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names The DEA and the Si... http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/01/17/the-dea-and-the-sinaloa-cartel/...

    3 of 3 20.01.2014 15:18