27
The Crucible The Crucible Act III Act III

The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

The CrucibleThe Crucible

Act IIIAct III

Page 2: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

InferenceInference

• What can the audience infer from What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III?III?

• The court presumes that anyone The court presumes that anyone accused of witchcraft is guilty.accused of witchcraft is guilty.

Page 3: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

ImplyImply

• What do Hathorne’s comments to What do Hathorne’s comments to Giles Corey and Francis Nurse imply?Giles Corey and Francis Nurse imply?

• He believes they are challenging his He believes they are challenging his authority.authority.

Page 4: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

IronyIrony

• Francis: We come here three days Francis: We come here three days now and cannot be heard.”now and cannot be heard.”

• Why is this statement ironic?Why is this statement ironic?

• The accusers have no trouble being The accusers have no trouble being heard; only the defenders of the heard; only the defenders of the accused are not listened to.accused are not listened to.

Page 5: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

CharacterizationCharacterization

• Why is Parris so afraid of Mary Why is Parris so afraid of Mary Warren’s confession being heard in Warren’s confession being heard in open court?open court?

• Parris knows that Mary’s testimony Parris knows that Mary’s testimony will show that he has been a party to will show that he has been a party to the fraud all along.the fraud all along.

Page 6: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Legal TermsLegal Terms

• ““deposition” deposition” – The word comes from the French The word comes from the French deposerdeposer, which means “to set down.”, which means “to set down.”

– A witness sets down his testimony in A witness sets down his testimony in writing, to be used when the case comes writing, to be used when the case comes for trial.for trial.

Page 7: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

CharacterizationCharacterization

• Which characters in the play up to Which characters in the play up to this point would you consider this point would you consider villains?villains?– AbigailAbigail– The PutnamsThe Putnams– ParrisParris– The young girlsThe young girls– Judge HathorneJudge Hathorne

Page 8: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Verbal IronyVerbal Irony

• What is ironic about Danforth saying What is ironic about Danforth saying to Hale, “ I judge nothing”?to Hale, “ I judge nothing”?

• Danforth is a judge who makes life Danforth is a judge who makes life and death decisions.and death decisions.

Page 9: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

PlotPlot

• What is Proctor’s main purpose in bringing What is Proctor’s main purpose in bringing May Warren to court?May Warren to court?

• To save his wife from condemnationTo save his wife from condemnation

Page 10: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

PlotPlot

• What document does Proctor present What document does Proctor present to the court?to the court?– The document says that Rebecca, The document says that Rebecca,

Elizabeth, and Martha are all good Elizabeth, and Martha are all good Christian women.Christian women.

– It is signed by 91 people.It is signed by 91 people.

Page 11: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

PlotPlot

• During the presentation of the During the presentation of the evidence, Proctor’s behavior toward evidence, Proctor’s behavior toward Danforth can best be described as Danforth can best be described as respectful.respectful.

Page 12: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Dramatic IronyDramatic Irony

• What is ironic about Parris’s insistence What is ironic about Parris’s insistence that the signers of the deposition be that the signers of the deposition be summoned to the court?summoned to the court?

• By signing the deposition, these By signing the deposition, these people were trying to tell the truth people were trying to tell the truth and help others.and help others.

• Their punishment for this is that they Their punishment for this is that they are now all in danger from the court.are now all in danger from the court.

Page 13: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Dramatic IronyDramatic Irony

• Why is Parris’s reaction to the Why is Parris’s reaction to the deposition ironic?deposition ironic?

• Proctor says that all the signers are Proctor says that all the signers are members of the church.members of the church.

• Parris’s livelihood depends on these Parris’s livelihood depends on these people.people.

• He should treat them well rather than He should treat them well rather than suggesting that their actions are suggesting that their actions are suspicious.suspicious.

Page 14: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Verbal IronyVerbal Irony

• Danforth: But you must understand, sir, that a Danforth: But you must understand, sir, that a person is either with this court or against it, person is either with this court or against it, there be no road between.there be no road between.

• Why is this statement ironic?Why is this statement ironic?

• The court’s job is to be impartial, not to The court’s job is to be impartial, not to assume the guilt of the accused as this court assume the guilt of the accused as this court does.does.

• Those who try to present actual evidence are Those who try to present actual evidence are ignored, but they are the ones trying to work ignored, but they are the ones trying to work by the rules of the court.by the rules of the court.

Page 15: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Verbal IronyVerbal Irony

• Proctor: “Do that which is good and Proctor: “Do that which is good and no harm will come to thee.”no harm will come to thee.”

• In what sense is this quotation from In what sense is this quotation from the Bible ironic?the Bible ironic?

• It is ironic because so far in the play, It is ironic because so far in the play, harm has come to several characters harm has come to several characters who have nothing but good.who have nothing but good.

Page 16: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

CharacterizationCharacterization

• DanforthDanforth– A true PuritanA true Puritan– Believes in the idea of demonic Believes in the idea of demonic

possessionpossession– Takes it for granted no one would lieTakes it for granted no one would lie– Innocent and naïve about human natureInnocent and naïve about human nature– Only wants to protect the reputation of Only wants to protect the reputation of

the courtthe court

Page 17: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Verbal IronyVerbal Irony

• Why is Danforth’s insistence that Why is Danforth’s insistence that lawyers are unnecessary ironic?lawyers are unnecessary ironic?– Since the court is so unwilling to listen Since the court is so unwilling to listen

to defenders of the accused or to accept to defenders of the accused or to accept their evidence, they need the legal their evidence, they need the legal protection that the court insists no protection that the court insists no innocent person needs.innocent person needs.

Page 18: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Dramatic IronyDramatic Irony

• Danforth: …children, the law and Danforth: …children, the law and Bible damn all bearers of false Bible damn all bearers of false witness.witness.

• In what ways is Danforth’s statement In what ways is Danforth’s statement ironic?ironic?

• The play is filled with people who lie The play is filled with people who lie against their neighbors.against their neighbors.

Page 19: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Dramatic IronyDramatic Irony

• Describe the difference between the Describe the difference between the judge’s interrogation of Abigail and judge’s interrogation of Abigail and his interrogation of the defenders.his interrogation of the defenders.

• He takes Abigail’s unsupported word He takes Abigail’s unsupported word as hard evidence, whereas he as hard evidence, whereas he expects the defenders to bring more expects the defenders to bring more proof.proof.

Page 20: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Tragic HeroTragic Hero

• A tragic hero is a significant character who A tragic hero is a significant character who is brought down by a tragic flaw or is brought down by a tragic flaw or weakness in his character. He eventually weakness in his character. He eventually redeems himself but usually dies in the redeems himself but usually dies in the process.process.

• Who is the tragic hero?Who is the tragic hero?• John ProctorJohn Proctor• What is his flaw?What is his flaw?• His failure to truly understand the His failure to truly understand the

repercussions of his adultery.repercussions of his adultery.

Page 21: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

PlotPlot

• What threat does Abigail level at What threat does Abigail level at Judge Danforth?Judge Danforth?

• She implies that she may accuse him She implies that she may accuse him of witchcraft.of witchcraft.

Page 22: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Dramatic IronyDramatic Irony

• When Elizabeth is questioned about When Elizabeth is questioned about John’s affair with Abigail, she lies. What John’s affair with Abigail, she lies. What is ironic about her defense of him?is ironic about her defense of him?

• Elizabeth believes that defending her Elizabeth believes that defending her husband requires her to lie, but the husband requires her to lie, but the audience knows that, in this case, audience knows that, in this case, defending him requires her to tell the defending him requires her to tell the truth.truth.

Page 23: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Situational IronySituational Irony

• Elizabeth is an honest woman who Elizabeth is an honest woman who finds it very difficult to lie. The one finds it very difficult to lie. The one time that the truth is most essential time that the truth is most essential is the time she decides she must lie is the time she decides she must lie to protect someone. Once again in to protect someone. Once again in Salem, lies to the court have hurt the Salem, lies to the court have hurt the innocent and protected the guilty.innocent and protected the guilty.

Page 24: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Dramatic IronyDramatic Irony

• What does the audience know about What does the audience know about the girls that Danforth does not know?the girls that Danforth does not know?

• The audience knows the girls are The audience knows the girls are pretending.pretending.

• Why does Abigail scream at the Why does Abigail scream at the moment that Hale tries to speak?moment that Hale tries to speak?

• She knows that Danforth may listen to She knows that Danforth may listen to Hale, and she needs a distraction.Hale, and she needs a distraction.

Page 25: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

MotiveMotive

• What motivates Hale’s attempt to What motivates Hale’s attempt to intervene on behalf of Proctor?intervene on behalf of Proctor?

• Hale’s commitment to the truth.Hale’s commitment to the truth.

Page 26: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

PlotPlot

• What development causes Mary What development causes Mary Warren to recant her confession and Warren to recant her confession and rejoin Abigail and the other girls?rejoin Abigail and the other girls?

• Abigail’s pretending to be attacked Abigail’s pretending to be attacked by Mary’s spirit.by Mary’s spirit.

Page 27: The Crucible Act III. Inference What can the audience infer from Judge Hathorne’s questioning of Martha Corey at the beginning of Act III? What can the

Dramatic IronyDramatic Irony

• Why is Mary Warren’s accusation of Why is Mary Warren’s accusation of John Proctor ironic?John Proctor ironic?

• Proctor is the only person who tried Proctor is the only person who tried to help her crush the fraud.to help her crush the fraud.