Upload
stanley-allison
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Courts and the Constitution
The Silent ProtestTinker v. Des Moines Independent
Community School District
Copyright 2010 The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc.
TM
If you were responsible for selecting all of the judges in Florida what would you look
for?
Knowledge
Skills
Dispositions/QualitiesTM
Calling all judges…….
• How would you write a job description or advertisement to find a good judge?
TM
Judicial Decision-making
• Judges cannot make decisions based on their feelings……
• Decisions must be based on the law.
• Legal reasoning
• Prior cases/ precedent
• Constitution
• Statutes
TM
The first amendment—5 rights• Freedom of Speech• Freedom of Religion • Freedom of the
Press• Freedom of
Assembly• Right to petition the
government
• Note: Only 2 % of Americans could name all five rights in the First Amendment.
TM
First Amendment
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;
or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition
the Government for a redress of grievances.”
TM
Speech
• What is speech?
• Just words……or more?
• Signs, symbols, messages
• on tee-shirts, etc.
TM
Free speech—limits
• Should there be limits on speech ? What are some limits that you can think of?
TM
School Speech vs. Public Speech
• The Court has generally recognized that students do not shed their constitutional rights when they enter school.
• However, the Court has traditionally recognized that the educational mission of the school cannot be disrupted by the exercise of free speech.
• Speech rights at school differ from outside the school environment.
TM
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist.
• In 1965, three public school students protesting the Vietnam War came to class wearing black armbands with a peace symbol. They were silently protesting the Government’s policy in Vietnam.
• The principals of the school district had agreed that all students wearing armbands must remove them or face suspension.
• When they refused to remove the armbands, the students were suspended.
TM
The Silent ProtestWhat did the students do?
What happened to the students?
How does this involve the First Amendment?
Mary Beth Tinker
John Tinker
Christopher Eckhardt
TM
Should the students be allowed to wear the armbands? Were
the students causing a disturbance? Did the
students interfere with the rights of others at school?
TM
What can they do??
• Courts can only make decisions on cases that come before them.
• Courts are often asked to review if a law or action of the government violates their rights.
• Did the schools violate the students’ rights to free speech?
TM
US District Court
Southern District of IowaUS District Court
(How it appears today)
• First step in the federal trial courts:
• Students’ parents filed a legal action.
TM
Precedent
• Burnside v. Byars, 363 F.2d 744 (5th Cir.1966)– African-American students in a segregated high school
wore “freedom buttons” that said “One Man One Vote.”– Students stated that they wore the buttons as a means
to encourage members of the community to exercise their civil rights.
– Fifth Circuit decided that school officials cannot infringe upon the students’ right to free expression where the exercise of such rights in the school does not “materially and substantially interfere with the requirements of appropriate discipline in the operation of the school.”
A prior legal decision that serves as an example or model for the current decision.
TM
Precedent
• West Virginia Bd. of Ed. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)– Students who were members of the Jehovah’s Witness
faith refused to salute the American flag.– Under the State Board of Education Code, the students
were expelled for their failure to salute. School officials threatened to send the students to reformatories for juvenile delinquents.
– The Supreme Court held that this provision of the Code violated the First Amendment because there was no claim that “remaining passive during a flag salute ritual creates a clear and present danger that would justify an effort to muffle expression.”
A prior legal decision that serves as an example or model for the current decision.
TM
Precedent
• Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536 (1965)– Cox was arrested for leading a march that protested
racial segregation in businesses. – Supreme Court held that Cox’s conviction for disturbing
the peace violated the First Amendment where the assembly was peaceful and orderly and the protesters were not hostile or aggressive.
– The Court also held that Cox’s conviction for obstructing a public right of way violated the First Amendment. The Court found that city officials were selectively enforcing the broadly-worded law to only prohibit the expression of ideas with which they disagreed.
A prior legal decision that serves as an example or model for the current decision.
TM
Issues to be Considered
• Was the act disruptive?
• Could the act have resulted in harm to the
other students?
• Is wearing armbands a form of speech that
should be allowed?
TM
Should the students be allowed to wear the armbands? Were
the students causing a disturbance? Did the
students interfere with the rights of others at school?
TM
Question?
• Did the principal’s actions violate the students’ First Amendment freedom of speech protections?
• Yes or No
• Why or why not
TM
Silent ProtestQuestion before the court
(constitutional question):
Does the principals’ rule violate the students’ First Amendment rights to freedom of speech/expression?
TM
Silent ProtestIndividually answer the question –
Yes or No based on
• the facts of the case
• the Constitution
Give 3 reasons in writing.TM
Silent ProtestIf you answer YES…
You are deciding for the students.
If you answer NO…
You are deciding for the school board.
Des Moines School Board
Mary and John Tinker
TM
Silent Protest• Establish groups of 5• Choose a Chief Justice• Chief Justice Maintains Order• Poll the Justices. How did each one
answer the question and why?• Try to come to a unanimous decision.• You have 10 minutes to discuss then
take a final poll
TM
Silent ProtestAfter each Court decides:
• Bring the Chief Justices to the front of the room to report on the decision of each group
• Tally results and announce
TM
US Supreme Court
9 Justices1969
Warren Black Douglas Harlan
Brennan Stewart White Fortas Marshall
TM
US Supreme Court Decision• The wearing of armbands
was "closely akin to 'pure speech'" and protected by the First Amendment. The principal had failed to show that the forbidden conduct would materially and substantially interfere with the work of the school or impinge upon the rights of other students.
• 7 – 2
• In favor of the students (Tinker)
• The Oyez Project, Tinker v. Des Moines Ind. Comm. School Dist. , 393 U.S. 503 (1969) available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1960-
1969/1968/1968_21)
TM