Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
©2013 MFMER | slide-1
The Core: Testing and Training for the hockey player.
Joe Eischen PT, ATC, SCS, CSCS Mayo Clinic Sports Medicine Center
©2013 MFMER | slide-2
What is the Core?
• Passive subsystem:
• Spinal ligaments.
• Facet articulations.
• Limited load=10 kg.
• Muscular subsystem:
• Local group.
• Global group.
• Guy wires.
• No one important muscle.
• Contribution is dependent upon the magnitude and direction of trunk loading.
• Cholewicki and Van Vliet: No single muscle group contributed more than 30% to lumbar stability no matter what the task.
• Neural subsystem:
• Continuous monitoring from muscle spindles, Golgi tendon organs and spinal ligaments.
• Requirements for stability can change instantaneously.
• Directs tensioning of guy wires.
©2013 MFMER | slide-3
What is the Core? Muscular subsystem
• Local Muscular Stabilizers:
• Primary:
• Transversus abdominis
• Multifidus.
• Secondary:
• Internal oblique.
• Medial fibers of the External oblique.
• Quadratus lumborum.
• Diaphragm.
• Pelvic floor muscles.
• Illiocostalis and longissimus (lumbar portions).
©2013 MFMER | slide-4
What is the Core? Muscular Subsystem
• Global Muscular Stabilizers:
• Rectus abdominus.
• Lateral fibers of the external oblique.
• Psoas major.
• Erector spinae.
• Illiocostalis (thoracic portions).
• Some say we should not divide core muscles into local and global stabilizers. They all work together.
©2013 MFMER | slide-5
How are we put together?
• Mobility stacked upon stability:
• Mobile GH joint.
• Stable scapula.
• Mobile thoracic spine.
• Stable lumbar spine.
• Mobile hips.
• Stable knees.
• Mobile ankles.
• Extensive MSK evaluation:
• Look for limits or stressors above and below the spine.
• What is throwing gas on the fire???
©2013 MFMER | slide-6
How do we test it?
• Sahrmann:
• 5 levels of progression.
©2013 MFMER | slide-7
Testing
• McGill
• Plank testing.
©2013 MFMER | slide-8
Testing: McGill
• Nesser, Lee. The Relationship Between Core Strength and Performance in Division 1 Female Soccer Players. Journal of Exercise Physiology. Vol. 12, No. 2, April 2009.
• 16 female soccer players.
• Tests: • Counter movement vertical jump.
• Shuttle run.
• 40 yard sprint.
• 1RM squat and bench press.
• McGill plank testing.
• No significant correlations were identified between core strength and strength and power.
• Core strength does not contribute significantly to strength and power and should not be the focus of any strength and conditioning program with the intent to improve sports performance.
• Discussion:
• McGill’s tests specifically look at muscle endurance utilizing slow twitch muscle fibers.
• The tests involved 1 repetition explosive drills or exercises utilizing fast twitch muscle fibers.
• Static measurement versus dynamic movement.
• N is very small.
©2013 MFMER | slide-9
Testing:
• Gray Cook:
• FMS (Healthy)/SFMA (Injured):
• 7 tests.
• 0-3 grading system.
• 0=pain with movement pattern.
• 3= perfect movement pattern.
• Mobility and stability issues?
• 46 NFL football players of a single team.
• Score of 14 or less on the FMS was predictive of serious injury during that season.
• Specificity of 0.91
• Sensitivity of 0.54
©2013 MFMER | slide-10
How do we test it?
• Prone instability test:
• Part of clinical prediction rule for lumbar stabilization:
• <40 years old.
• SLR > 91 degrees.
• Aberrant spine movement pattern.
• + prone instability test.
• Bridging with knee extension test:
• Test of proper gluteal activation.
©2013 MFMER | slide-11
Continuum of Training -Injury to performance….
• Train 3 planes of motion: • Sagittal plane flexion and extension.
• Frontal plane.
• Transverse plane.
• Mat-based training.
• Physio ball training.
• Unilateral training.
• Weight bearing training. • Base of support.
• Unilateral drills/exercises.
• Performance. • Development of power and explosiveness while maintaining core control.
©2013 MFMER | slide-12
Core Training and Injury…
• Core endurance is more important in injury prevention and rehab.
• Type 1 muscle fibers which require only low loads to improve performance.
• Performing trunk exercises on a physio ball results in significantly increased activation of the lower abdominal region.
• But, there are studies showing it does not change activation….
• Unilateral use of upper extremities while on a ball or bench results in even greater activation of core musculature.
• However….
• When performing exercises on a ball, force production in the upper and lower extremities is significantly reduced.
©2013 MFMER | slide-13
Common presentation in the hockey player:
• Lower cross syndrome:
• Huge issue with many hockey players:
• Tight hip flexor.
• Weak glutes.
• Tight low back.
• Weak abdominal muscles.
• Remember the paper on the need for hip rotation and rotational sports…..
• Increased thoracic kyphosis (upper cross syndrome):
• Lack of thoracic extension.
• Tight pectorals and Lats.
• May focus stress on lumbar spine.
• Remember our wall Lat test…..
©2013 MFMER | slide-14
Core Training and Performance….
• Can we improve performance by training the Core?
• 24 Elite high school Norwegian handball players.
• 14 performed sling exercise training.
• Similar to TRX training.
• 10 players in control group
• Both groups performed regular handball training x 6 weeks.
• Maximum throwing velocity improved by 5% in the SET group.
©2013 MFMER | slide-15
Core Training and Performance….
• Can we improve it?
• Purpose:
• Is there any difference in hip strength among golfers with different proficiency levels.
• What is the relationship between hip strength and golf handicap.
• What is the relationship between hip strength and self-reported driving distance.
• 82 golfers.
• 10-19 handicap.
• 0-9 handicap.
• Scratch or better.
• Measured isometric hip abduction and adduction in side lying using a hand-held dynamometer.
• Scratch or better group was found to be significantly stronger in left hip strength as well as all hip movements tested.
©2013 MFMER | slide-16
Training the Core:
• Educate the Athlete:
• Understand the task.
• Feel the proper pattern.
• Train the proper pattern.
• Own the proper pattern.
• See it, Feel it, Do it!
©2013 MFMER | slide-17
Training Progression:
©2013 MFMER | slide-18
Bibliography • Willardson. Core Stability Training: Applications to Sport
Conditioning Programs. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2007, 21 (3), 979-985
• Parchmann, McBride. Relationship Between Functional Movement Screen and Athletic Performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Dec 2011. Vol. 25, No. 12
• Kibler, Press, Sciascia. The Role of Core Stability in Athletic Function. Sports Med 2006/ 36 (3):189-198
• Behm, Drinkwater, Willardson, Cowley. Strength and Conditioning Journal. Vol. 33, No. 3, June 2011.
• McGill. Core Training: Evidence Translating to Better Performance and Injury Prevention. Strength and Conditioning Journal. Vol. 32, No.3, June 2010.
• Shinkle, Nesser, Demchak, McMannus. Effect Of Core Strength On The Measure Of Power In The Extremities. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Vol. 26, No. 2, February 2012.
• Faries, Greenwood. Core Training: Stabilizing the Confusion. Strength and Conditioning Journal. Vol. 29, No. 2, April 2007.
• Willardson. Core Stability Training for Healthy Athletes: A Different Paradigm for Fitness Professionals. Strength and Conditioning Journal. Vol. 29, No. 6, Dec 2007.
• Yung-Shen, Myers, McCrory, Laudner, Pasquale, Lephart. The Relationship between Hip Muscle Strength and Golf Performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. Vol. 36(5) Supplement, May 2004.
• Saeterbakken, Tillaar, Seiler. Effect of Core Stability Training on Throwing Velocity in Female Handball Players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Vol. 25, No. 3, March 2011.
• Van Dillen, Bloom, Gombatto, Susco. Hip rotation range of motion in people with and without low back pain who participate in rotation-related sports. Physical Therapy in Sport 9 (2008).
• Lust, Sandrey, Bulger, Wilder. The Effects of 6-Week Training Programs on Throwing Accuracy, Proprioception, and Core Endurance in Baseball. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 2009, 18, 407-426.
• Aroskoski, Valta, Airaksinen, Kankaanpaa. Arch Phys Med Rehabil Vol 82, August 2001.Ekstrom, Donatelli, Carp. Electromyographic Analysis of Core Trunk, Hip, and Thigh Muscles During 9 Rehabilitation Exercises. JOSPT, Vol 37, No. 12 Dec 2007.
• Parenteau-G, Gaudreault, Chambers, Boisvert, Grenier, Gagne, Balg. Functional movment screen test: A reliable screening test for young elite ice hockey players. Physical therapy in Sport. 15 (2014) 169-175.
©2013 MFMER | slide-19
Bibliography • Peate, Bates, Lunda, Francis and Bellamy. Core strength: A
new model for injury prediction and prevention. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 2007, 2:3.
• Kiesel, Plisky, Voight. Can Serious Injury In Professional Football Be Predicted By A Preseason Functional Movement Screen. North American Journal Of Sports Physical Therapy. August 2007, Vol. 2, No. 3.
• Parchmann, McBride. Relationship Between Functional Movement Screen And Athletic Performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Vol. 25, No. 12, Dec 2011.
• Okada, Huxel, Nesser. Relationship Between Core Stability, Functional Movement, and Performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Vol. 25, No. 1, January 2011.
• Stuart McGill. Low Back Disorders: Evidence-Based Prevention and Rehabilitation. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2002.
• Nesser, Lee. The Relationship Between Core Strength and Performance in Division 1 Female Soccer Players. Journal of Exercise Physiology. Vol. 12, No. 2, April 2009.
• Lehman, Gordon, Langley, Pemrose and Tregaskis. Replacing a Swiss ball for an exercise bench causes variable changes in trunk muscle activity during upper limb strength exercises. Dynamic Medicine 2005, 4:6.
• Anderson and Behm. Maintenance of EMG Activity and Loss of Force Output with Instability. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2004, 18 (3). 637-640.
• Mori. Electromyographic activity of selected trunk muscles during stabilization exercises using a gym ball. Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 2004, 44(1): 57-64.
• Cholewicki, Van Vliet. Relative contribution of trunk muscles to the stability of the lumbar spine during isometric exertions. Clinical Biomechanics 17 (2002) 99-105.
• Tarnanen, Ylinen, Kiekkinen, Malkia, Kautiainen, Hakkinen. Effect of Isometric Upper-Extremity Exercises on the Activation of Core Stabilizing Muscles. Arch Pys Med Rehabil Vol 89, March, 2008.
©2013 MFMER | slide-20
Thank you