Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Common Sense of CommunityDick Atkinson
Open access. Some rights reserved.
As the publisher of this work, Demos has an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content electronically without charge.
We want to encourage the circulation of our work as widely as possible without affecting the ownership of the copyright, which remains with the copyright holder.
Users are welcome to download, save, perform or distribute this work electronically or in any other format, including in foreign language translation without written permission subject to the conditions set out in the Demos open access licence which you can read here.
Please read and consider the full licence. The following are some of the conditions imposed by the licence:
• Demos and the author(s) are credited;
• The Demos website address (www.demos.co.uk) is published together with a copy of this policy statement in a prominent position;
• The text is not altered and is used in full (the use of extracts under existing fair usage rights is not affected by this condition);
• The work is not resold;
• A copy of the work or link to its use online is sent to the address below for our archive.
By downloading publications, you are confirming that you have read and accepted the terms of the Demos open access licence.
Copyright Department Demos Elizabeth House 39 York Road London SE1 7NQ United Kingdom
You are welcome to ask for permission to use this work for purposes other than those covered by the Demos open access licence.
Demos gratefully acknowledges the work of Lawrence Lessig and Creative Commons which inspired our approach to copyright. The Demos circulation licence is adapted from the ‘attribution/no derivatives/non-commercial’ version of the Creative Commons licence.
To find out more about Creative Commons licences go to www.creativecommons.org
Acknowledgements
The ideas and suggestions contained in this book have been developed
slowly as a result of practical experience and many conversations over
a thirty year period. As a consequence I am indebted to many people.
Some of these live in Balsall Heath. They include Anita Halliday,Val
Hart, Steve Ball, Ted Wright, Wally Rose, Pat Preistman, Tapshum
Patni, Sheila Dunn, Kay Brazier, Raja Amin and Yoseph Qamar.
Others come from elsewhere in Birmingham, for example, Chris
Wadhams, Ian Cuthbert, Pat Conaty, Ian Morrison, Jim Amos, Pat
Robinson, Tim Brighouse, Chris Jones and John Newing.
Yet others come from across the UK and abroad. They include John
Rennie, Melanie Phillips, Peter Brinson, Anthony Coombs MP, Alan
Howarth MP, Frank Field MP, Rt Hon Paddy Ashdown, Amitai Etzioni
and others too numerous to mention.
These people are responsible for the best of the book’s ideas which
are expressed more coherently as a result of excellent editorial com-
ment by Charles Grant of the Economist. The mistakes and inconsis-
tencies which remain are mine.
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
Introduction 1
The Importance of Self-Reliance 4
The Role of Government in Industrial and Post-Industrial Society 8
Rebuilding From the Bottom Up 13
Rebuilding Neighbourhood and Refocusing Government 31
A New Paradigm 41
The Third Millennium 49
Bibliography 51
Contents
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
The term community is on many lips today. Across Britain people are
worrying as never before about the state of their streets and communi-
ties. There is a feeling that they have been weakened not only by mar-
ket forces and technological change but also by the policies of successive
governments. Many, including politicians of both left and right, are
concerned about the lack of sufficiently robust local institutions close
at hand for most citizens. Many also fear that the corollary of weak
communities is that our belief in common values and our sense of
responsibility for each other has atrophied.
While most citizens see these issues in very practical ways, for exam-
ple in relation to litter-free and safe streets, good schools and a sense of
neighbourhood, their concerns have been matched by the work of a
new school of philosophers and political theorists. For nearly 20 years
the ‘communitarians’ have been developing a body of theory and poli-
cies that show how even in the most economically advanced and atom-
ised societies, communities can be strengthened and citizens encouraged
to take a greater responsibility for their own lives and for the quality of
the society in which they live. On the other side of the Atlantic theoret-
ical arguments which call into question an overly narrow liberalism
have been developed by Michael Sandel, Alastair MacIntyre, Robert
Bellah and Michael Walzer, while the practical political implications
have been developed by Amitai Etzioni, William Galston and Mary-
Ann Glendon. Together these now represent a formidable body of
Demos 1
Introduction
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
analysis and argument, whose implications have yet to be fully appreci-
ated by any of the British political parties.
This book aims to bridge these two strands – the one about every-
day life, and the other about political theory – by suggesting some
practical guidelines for strengthening communities and neighbour-
hoods as we approach the third millennium.
It would be wrong to despair or panic; if we look carefully it is not hard
to see the signs of revitalisation taking place even in the most depressed
cities. And whenever anyone seeks to take a snapshot of voluntary activ-
ity, whether in an inner city housing estate or a Home Counties town (as
in Richard Hoggart’s recent study of Farnham), they uncover a remark-
ably complex, vibrant life of mutual help and civic activity.
This document identifies some of the good practices and urges a
series of proposals which would result in more confident and coherent
communities. It argues in a series of steps, showing how families can
be given a greater degree of security and strength, and suggesting how
the various institutions of school, housing, policing and public spaces
can work in tandem. It shows how, in place of the old model of a local
authority as a monopolist of power, we can build networks and clusters
of institutions – collaborating groups of self-governing institutions –
that can help communities cohere, and give them fresh purpose and
pride. Above all it aims to show the common sense of community and
its practical relevance to solving everyday problems of city life.
Birmingham’s history encapsulates the challenge. In the 1790s,
Matthew Boulton’s Birmingham-based company harnessed and sold
the power of steam to Britain and the world, thus creating the basis for
the industrial revolution. In the 1890s, the rapidly expanding indus-
trial town of Birmingham was granted the status of City by Queen
Victoria, and Joseph Chamberlain encouraged the building of sewers,
schools, colleges and the Town Hall. Today, in the 1990s, this pioneer-
ing era has long gone, and with it many of the old certainties of life,
which gave coherence and purpose to neighbourhoods and communi-
ties. Only relics of the industrial past remain; decayed buildings and
outmoded institutions and attitudes which clutter the environmental
and social landscape.
2 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
Although, as we shall see, many local initiatives are beginning to put
in place the institutions appropriate for a post-industrial city, it has
taken some time for policy-makers to get the problem clearly into focus.
A decade ago, commentators identified the inner areas of the major
cities as the source of the problem. Then, it became clear that the munic-
ipally designed outer ring estate also housed an array of intractable ills.
Today, it is possible to argue that the problem is endemic to urban life,
associated not only with economic decline but also with fear of vio-
lence and the social indifference.
This book seeks to go a step further, setting out the principles and
practices which can serve to solve the problem and give people the
confidence to enter a new millennium with the same energy and com-
mitment which motivated the pioneers of the industrial past.
Demos 3
Introduction
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
Community developmentExactly 20 years ago Erich Schumacher published his classic book,
Small is Beautiful (1974). His central message has not dated:
Attempts to help neighbourhoods, whether in the Third World or
the urban neighbourhoods of the industrialised world will fail, how-
ever well funded, if they do not directly involve those they are designed
to assist. The point is a simple, common sense one. Yet, the recent
history of urban policy in the UK has been based on almost contrary
principles. Much of the structure of the modern state has been shaped
4 Demos
The Importance of Self-Reliance
“The best aid to give is intellectual aid, a gift of usefulknowledge. … Nothing becomes truly ‘one’s own’ except onthe basis of some genuine effort or sacrifice. …Give a man afish, as the saying goes, and you help him a little bit for a veryshort while; teach him the art of fishing, and he can helphimself for all his life. On a higher level: supply him withfishing tackle; this will cost you a good deal of money, andthe result remains doubtful; but even if fruitful, the man’scontinuing livelihood will still be dependent upon you forreplacements. But teach him to make his own fishing tackleand you have helped him to become not only self-supporting, but also self-reliant and independent…”
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
by a steady nationalisation of power. Instead of local or regional health
services we have a national health service. Instead of local agencies
with some discretion over welfare we have national, standardised sys-
tems that find it easier to distribute resources than to provide the
means for self-reliance. And, increasingly, instead of local government
we have agencies working under contract for Whitehall. Meanwhile at
local level, town halls have tended to seek to monopolise their remain-
ing power rather than to share it.
Much the same is true of the multitude of schemes specifically
directed to the cities. Successive waves of urban initiatives, Urban Aid,
Inner City Partnership, City Challenge even Integrated Regional
offices and Single Regeneration Budgets and City Pride, have all made
crucial mistakes. First they have been primarily aimed at inner city
areas. They have not recognised that it is the very nature and organisa-
tion of urban life which has become the problem.
Second, while the aid has helped to finance various new projects,
it has not resulted in mainstream budgets being used in fresh ways.
Third, hardware and buildings have been emphasised at the expense
of the softer foundations of community. Indeed the hardware has
often destroyed the software as when new roads have sliced through
neighbourhoods.
Finally,while schemes have often given lip service to consultation with
local people their views have not been seriously taken into account.
While many useful things have been done ‘for’people, much less has been
done ‘with’ or ‘by’ them. People have rarely been enabled to participate.
These errors would be more understandable if there was evidence
that the principles of self-reliance do not work and if the top-down
approach had visibly solved the problems of cities. But this has not
been the case. Instead it sometimes seems as if initiatives have multi-
plied in inverse proportion to their effectiveness.
Yet in other areas of life, self-reliance has become a basic principle.
Far from being a utopian, ‘soft’ option, it has come to be seen as a far
more effective way of organising people’s energies and their capacity to
act as problem solvers than over-dependence on the wisdom and
knowledge of civil servants and elected officials.
Demos 5
The Importance of Self-Reliance
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
Self-reliance and the modern business organisation
To see this, one need look no further than the modern business. In
recent years much has been made of the importation of business prac-
tices into government and charity. But few policy-makers have quite
grasped just how much the principle of self-reliance has become cen-
tral to modern business, exercised at every level of the modern busi-
ness organisation, not just at its apex. In his important books, The Age
of Unreason and The Empty Raincoat, Charles Handy describes the
industrial business as being shaped like a pyramid, with manual work-
ers at the base of the pyramid, receiving and obeying instructions from
a remote head office at the apex of the pyramid. Once, the educated
elite who staff head office might have been thrusting and entrepre-
neurial in spirit and attitude. Over time, however, they became com-
placent, immune to change, and rule bound. Compared with their
modern equivalents in Japan and America, they became uncompeti-
tive, and faced closure, unless they were prepared to undergo dramatic
change in form, style and attitude.
From being shaped like a pyramid, those organisations which
underwent this change have come to resemble a maypole, with a slim,
charismatic head office. The new senior managers devolve much of
the day to day decision taking process to semi-autonomous units who
thus hold the different ribbons of the maypole. Those who hold these
ribbons have a similar stake and say in the enterprise as those at the
apex. The modern firm which makes this essential but painful change
is characterised by key features:
� It has undone the cumbersome rules and regulations of its
previously large head office. It has written innovation into its
new modus operandi.� It employs fresh, visionary, senior managers and often
deploys these out to a carefully redesigned factory floor in
order to lead small, semi or fully autonomous teams of
enthusiastic staff.� It expects these teams to take the initiative and tell head
office how to resource them rather than awaiting orders.
6 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
� In place of the once dependent, uneducated workforce, it
employs fewer, but educated, skilled, self-motivating people
who work ‘with’ not ‘for’ senior managers. It believes in
‘workers control’, except that the modern ‘worker’ works by
brain as well as by hand and is, in part, a manager.� Because the customer is seen as sovereign, great efforts are
made to achieve a consistently high quality product and
method of production.
The maypole is bound by a common set of values, ideas which moti-
vate all who associate together within the company. And within each
part of the company the aim is to foster self-reliance, autonomy and
responsibility. The distinction between the pyramid and maypole like
organisation is pictured in Fig 1.
Clearly many businesses do not live up to this ideal. Many remain
hierarchical and slow to adapt and most maintain tight central control
over some parameters – particularly finance. But the ideal remains no
less important for that, with obvious implications for other areas of
social life.
Demos 7
The Importance of Self-Reliance
Figure 1
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
At first only private enterprises were forced by competition to move
from model A to B. By contrast public organisations were slow to fol-
low suit, protected by their monopolies and insulated from customer
and community dissatisfaction. They could afford to remain compla-
cent, ineffective and ignore the needs of their dependent customers.
Gradually, however, governments have been forced to realise that they
cannot allow this situation to prevail.
The shift to new forms of government has been taking place across
the world for some time. Many countries in Europe already have complex
arrangements mixing government purchase of services and their provi-
sion by smaller voluntary bodies, often associated with the church.
New Zealand and Australia have also seen radical experiments in gov-
ernment. In ‘Reinventing Government,’ David Osborne and Ted Gaebler
have synthesised some of these experiences. They show how the pyra-
mid-like, collectivist governments of the industrial age came to both steer
and row. That is, they tried to set aims and goals for people and agencies
to follow and to run the agencies to realise their aims. In coming to per-
form both tasks they not only left the productive potential of most people
out of their equation, but also failed to perform either task very well.
To be effective, both Central and Local Government have learned
that they must slough off the agencies and services which they have
attempted to provide for people and instead enable independent
initiative to flourish. Such initiative can take the form of either private
8 Demos
The Role of Governmentin Industrial and Post-Industrial Society
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
enterprise or publicly funded but self-governing agencies, such as exec-
utive agencies, hospitals, housing associations and schools. Delegating
the rowing function to autonomous, non-governmental agencies does
not entail ‘privatisation.’ It merely means giving the initiative and
finances for the provision of government approved services to those
self-governing agencies which have the incentive to deliver a good
product to the specifications which government lays down.
Government may delegate the task of rowing,but it must choose which
services are required and to what quality, and it must then raise taxes to
pay for them. It can’t delegate the task of ‘governance’. This is the special,
irreducible, task of government. It must set the style and shape of its coun-
try or town. Once freed from the task of rowing, a slimmer, higher-
minded government can concentrate on the job which only it can do, that
of reflecting, coordinating and steering the hopes, aspirations and priori-
ties of self-reliant citizens and self-governing private and public agencies.
Charity, responsibility and valueSometimes policies such as these are justified solely in instrumental
terms – as cheaper, more efficient solutions to the delivery of particular
services. But self-reliance is directionless unless provided with a goal to
aim for. On its own, it is a loose cannon able to fire only in random
directions.An overarching set of values is needed which makes sense of
it. Values give it point and purpose. For St Paul, charity was the basic
value from which all human relations were constructed and which suf-
fused and breathed life into home, work, neighbourhood and church.
However, this traditional concept of charity suffered in the wake of
the industrial revolution.Although the 19th century saw a great flower-
ing of charity and self-help organisations in schooling, retailing and
health, the horrors of the dark satanic mill and mine ultimately encour-
aged people to call on the state to take on the main responsibilities
for welfare and care. A more democratic culture came to see charity as
at best inefficient and parochial and, at worst, as demeaning to the
recipient. Local and central government came to influence most areas
of social life until little stood between the individual and the state.
Charity and a sense of responsibility became peripheral concepts.
Demos 9
The Role of Government in Industrial and Post-Industrial Society
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
The unintended destructive potential of this change was not at first
apparent.Yet, gradually, it caused the state to take on from church, fam-
ily and neighbour the responsibility for the care of others and absolved
them from the need to take control of their lives.
Although the vital functions of values and self-reliance have been
diminished in modern neighbourhoods the human impulses to volun-
tary and charitable action have remained strong. Even in a predomi-
nantly secular culture there is still a strong base of moral motivations,
a desire to be connected and contribute that is not captured by much
of the language of modern policy – whether that of ‘consumers’ or of
‘rights’. If it means nothing else, charity today can encompass that
sense of being part of a larger whole, which brings in its wake compas-
sion, responsibility and mutuality, the basic ethical foundations of any
community.
The building blocks of self-reliance
Self-reliance starts at home, and the basic building block of commu-
nity for most people is the family, in all its forms. Every parent wants
the very best for their child, even if they do not know how to go about
helping it to maximise its life chances and even if the home circum-
stances are such that they receive little or no support from relatives or
neighbours. Moreover it is around families that many of the building
blocks of community are formed: networks of child-minders, volun-
tary nurseries and playgroups, and the active engagement of an older
generation in care for the young in such settings as scouts, guides,
supplementary schools, and leisure activities.
The second building block is a sense of place. For many decades this
seemed to be in retreat because of a more mobile, disconnected cul-
ture. But in recent years most evidence suggests that mobility has
been in decline. When people do move it is usually within a two to
three mile radius. Various factors are tending to root people more in a
post-industrial economy. Dual-earner couples (now nearly two-thirds
of all households) find it harder to move, as do those suffering from
negative equity. New technologies make it easier to find a better balance
between work and home. And there is clear evidence of mounting
10 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
concern for the quality of the local environment, focused on every-
thing from high streets to air quality.
There are many institutions that give expression to this sense of
place. Most areas have a residents’ association. They are more success-
ful when they have the muscle to achieve modest improvements, say,
in street lighting or in gaining a pedestrian crossing on a dangerous
road. Some residents’ associations have developed into neighbourhood
watch schemes. There are also few towns which do not have a number
of youth and sports clubs. Like play groups, adventure playgrounds,
urban farms and advice bureaux, these take time, skill and finance.
Most towns can boast of one or two significant voluntary agencies
which give expression to this sense of place. Birmingham has several.
One of the oldest is the Birmingham Settlement which has made a long
term and significant contribution to the social and economic stability
and growth of the Newtown area. The St Peter’s Urban Village building
in Saltley once housed a large teacher training college. It is now crammed
with local enterprises and devolved sections of city departments and is
managed by a local trust which bought the college and runs it as a kind
of mini-town hall for the area – an interesting reversal of the voluntary
sector’s traditional subservience to the local authority.
Another example is St Paul’s Community Project which grew up in
the Balsall Heath area of the city. It runs a charitable secondary school,
nursery centre, farm, enterprise and community center and acts as the
village hall, village green and focal point for the surrounding neigh-
bourhood. It is significant for three reasons:
First, it is the size of many local authority institutions, yet is an inde-
pendent charity which is governed by parents and other residents. The
pride which comes from ownership is tangible.
Second, its school takes rejects from the large local authority
schools. Without St Paul’s they would roam the streets, take no GCSEs
and graduate only with a certificate in failure. At St Paul’s, they not
only take GCSEs but, in 1993, outperformed all but 6 out of the city’s
70 secondary schools in the GCSE league tables.
Third,St Paul’s has only been able to thrive by linking with all the other
agencies, residents’ and religious associations in the neighbourhood.
Demos 11
The Role of Government in Industrial and Post-Industrial Society
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
These links gave rise to a neighbourhood forum which has helped the
whole area to lift itself from the ‘bottom up’ in a dramatic and com-
pelling way. Five neighbouring ‘urban villages’ are doing likewise. As we
shall see their implications for a new social order are significant.
The Settlement, St Peter’s and St Paul’s are Development Trusts.
These Trusts are an interesting new way of helping local people to
gain a greater control over their own lives. A growing number are now
scattered in most urban areas of the country. They are self-governing,
locally managed agencies which normally have charitable and limited
company status. They have a number of basic principles in common:
� They are concerned with the long term regeneration of their
area – with its economy, its environment, its facilities and
services and the ‘spirit’ of its community.� They seek to be financially self-sufficient and independent.� They aim to create assets in the community and make a profit
to be reinvested in the community.� They are community based and accountable.� They are working in partnerships between the community,
voluntary, private and public sectors.
Because they respond to local needs no two development trusts
are alike. And, because they recognise that to regenerate a community
means adopting a comprehensive approach they are involved in a wide
range of activities.
However, even significant ventures like these, let alone the many
smaller voluntary ones, face a huge uphill battle. Most are beset by
constant financial or staffing crises. They rely on small donations, vol-
untary and transient help, have little guaranteed money, no status and
virtually none of the authority which could give them leverage over
decision-makers.
The following argument suggests how these types of organisation,
working in tandem with other public bodies that understand their
needs, could form the basis for stronger, more confident and more self-
reliant communities.
12 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
The familyFor decades sociologists have argued that the unfolding logic of mod-
ern industrial society implies that the traditional family is in terminal
decline and that the role of childrearing will be increasingly under-
taken by the welfare state in an echo of Plato’s Republic. They have a
point. The extended family of industrial society – two parents, grand-
parents, uncles and aunts as well as children – has gradually vanished.
First, advances in medical care, family planning and the emancipation
of women shrank the family to two parents and a small number of
children. More recently, liberal divorce laws and contemporary atti-
tudes have shrunk the two parent family to a single parent for a rapidly
growing minority, a majority in some neighbourhoods.
As people’s rights have grown they have gained access to a far wider
range of choices than in the past. Medicine, the law, the welfare state
have all seen to that. The exercise of these rights has caused the family to
become weaker. As James Q. Wilson has written: “In the 1960s and
1970s… books were written advocating ‘alternative’ families and ‘open’
marriages.A couple could choose to have a trial marriage, a regular mar-
riage but without the obligation of sexual fidelity, or a revocable mar-
riage with an easy exit provided by no-fault divorce. A woman could
choose to have a child out of wedlock and to raise it alone. Marriage was
but one of several ‘options’ by which men and women could manage
their intimate needs, an option that ought to be carefully negotiated in
Demos 13
Rebuilding From theBottom Up
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
order to preserve the rights of each contracting party. The family, in this
view, was no longer the corner stone of human life, it was one of several
‘relationships’ from which individuals could choose so as to maximise
their personal goals.”
The welfare state has supported this shrinking family by ensuring
that it receives the financial help it needs to survive. This generosity is
justified in the language of choice and social justice. But we now know
that this individualistic standpoint is not necessarily beneficial from
the young child’s point of view or from that of the wellbeing of society
as a whole. These needs require parents and others to exercise restraint,
to limit their choices and the range of their goals. There is a need to
balance the pursuit of individual goals within the context of the child’s
need for stability, continuity and the material support which comes
from a wage earner and the role model of two loving adults.
As Sebastian Kraemer of the Tavistock Clinic has pointed out ‘there
is impressive systematic research showing how profoundly the rela-
tionship between infants and their mothers and fathers can influence
the child’s later social and intellectual skills … and we now know that
those who have had good attachments to their parents have a far
greater chance of passing on this good fortune to their children….’ The
child not only needs such support in their pre-school and school years
but also when they become young parents themselves. How can this
support be provided?
To start with, by acknowledging the problem, suggested Professor
Halsey. He ruffled liberal feathers in 1993 by saying that ‘the situation
has arisen in which the father is not so much absent but never arrives.’
Amitai Etzioni, the founder of the American communitarian move-
ment argues in his important books, The Spirit of Community and The
Parenting Deficit, for a number of measures to emphasise the responsi-
bilities of parents, not their rights. He suggests that ‘fathers and moth-
ers concerned with ‘making it’ and consumerism and preoccupied with
personal advancement, who come home too late and too tired to attend
to the needs of their children, can’t discharge their most elementary
duty to their children and their fellow citizens… There are no labour
14 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
saving techniques, and shortcuts in this area produce woefully defi-
cient human beings, to their detriment and ours.’
The problem is particularly acute in Britain. Not only do we have
the highest proportion of households with a lone parent in the EU, we
also have (alongside Ireland) the highest proportion of fathers work-
ing over 50 hours a week, with obvious implications in terms of their
ability to share parenting roles.
Etzioni points out that ‘the weight of sociological and psychological
evidence suggests that on average two-parent families are better able
to discharge their child-rearing duties, if only because there are more
hands – and voices.’ Therefore, a variety of means should be deployed
to support the family. He recommends that ‘divorce should not be
banned or condemned, but … it should be discouraged. Easy divorces
for parents are not in the interests of children, the community, or …
the adults involved.’ He points out that ‘there are … ways to encourage
young people to enter marriage more responsibly, help sustain and
enrich these marriages…’ For example, fast food and a fast lifestyle
may have their attractions, but the family gathering round the meal
table should be advocated. Etzioni talks about economic incentives
which favour marriage. For example, the ‘marriage of those on welfare
should be welcomed rather than penalized … Given the forbearance of
trades unions and employers, it is possible for millions of parents to
work at home. Other arrangements can be made to ensure that care
comes from home and not an institution…’ Such arrangements could
include ‘educational and economic credits for parents’ who are pre-
pared to stay at home during their child’s formative years.
The list of incentives needs to be long and powerful if the trend of
decades is to be halted. However, Etzioni’s main concern is ‘not with
incentives or punishment, but with the need for a change of heart: peo-
ple need to enter marriage more responsibly and be more committed
to making it work… The long term goal must be to bring up children
who are better able to form lasting relationships and participate
actively in the life of their community.’ Only then can we reduce the
false choice between keeping parents together in unhappy marriages
Demos 15
Rebuilding From the Bottom Up
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
and allowing them to break up: both options which guarantee unhap-
piness for the child.
If the family can be strengthened by direct means, what other pub-
lic agencies can be reorganised to support it indirectly?
The school as a hub of community
In the past schools have often acted as crucial hubs of community. In
the future, and in societies that are ever more centred around learning,
this role will become even more important. The Conservative’s reforms
have helped transform the organisation of schools from being pyra-
mid-like to being more maypole-like and self-governing. Other educa-
tional institutions had always been more independent. Universities have
traditionally been self-governing non-government agencies, funded by
the University Grants Committee. More recently polytechnics and col-
leges have also become self-governing (and had their status enhanced).
Few now argue against the decision. However, the debate about
whether schools should also become self-governing still rages.
It is as well to recall that the old Town Hall (LEA) public monopoly
system of providing schools for the community entailed the separation
of ownership, finance and control from practical delivery at the chalk
face. The LEA financed and controlled the system as well as employing
the teachers. Teachers only had influence over day to day delivery in
the classroom. Yet, because they were managing all schools, the LEA
administrator did not know what the budget of any one school was.
Neither did the schools and teachers. They had no chance to target
their resources to meet their particular needs. Worse still, parents had
no say at all – unless they were affluent enough to be able to choose to
opt out of the state system altogether and send their child to a private
school.
In 1988 the government introduced legislation which enabled all
schools to become semi-autonomous. It also gave them the right
to choose full self-governing status (GM). Local management (LM)
entails the delegation of most of the budget and control of schools
from the LEA to the head, teachers and their governing body. At its
inception LM as well as GM was fiercely opposed by Town Halls and
16 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
their LEAs irrespective of which party was in control. This was under-
standable, because the power base and degree of accountability of both
councillors and officers were at stake.
However, many schools have come to appreciate the development.
Partial autonomy began to bring the previously separate functions of
finance, management, control and delivery together under the roof of
each individual school. Pride and standards began to rise so encourag-
ing the LEAs to accept LM while opposing GM.
At first, this was understandable for, in 1988, when legislation first
created LM and GM schools, the distinction between them was clear
and stark. GM schools immediately received 100% of their budgets
direct from Whitehall, while LM ones received only 60–70%, the
remainder being held by the local authority to run their administra-
tion. The subsequent 6 years have seen this wide gap narrow. Now, LM
schools get at least 90% of their budget, while many get over 95%. Soon
it will be hardly possible to distinguish the two forms of school.
Community education
Community education is often seen as being primarily about opening
school buildings in the evenings and weekends for Scout groups, wed-
ding receptions or adult courses. Others say that a school can’t be a
community school unless it has a pre-school worker or home-school
link officer. Both these definitions are useful, but they don’t get to the
heart of the matter. For they see community education as a bolt-on
extra to the real 9 am–4 pm task of education and school life. The wis-
est definition of community education goes much further. It places it
at the very core of the education process, not just for schoolchildren
but for everyone from the 5 year old to the 80 year old who has an
interest in learning. No school can function well, excite teachers and
pupils unless the whole school and its curriculum becomes an exten-
sion of the life of the neighbourhood which itself gains a sense of own-
ership and pride in its school.
For decades community educators have tried to capture what
Henry Morris meant when he said that the best school ‘lies athwart its
Demos 17
Rebuilding From the Bottom Up
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
community’ and provides it with a mirror which reflects its identity
and a dynamo for assisting with its development. There have been
many valiant attempts to achieve this aim and some exceptional
successes. However, most have encountered difficulties because hith-
erto state schools have not belonged to their neighbourhood. They
have been in it but not a part of it.
Independence from the Town Hall transforms this situation. The
old LEA schools were dependent on and accountable to the LEA. It
controlled them via a committee of perhaps 20 councillors who were,
by definition, interested in politics, city wide and national issues. They
did not always recognize the individual educational needs of each par-
ticular school.
The new self-governing state school has at least 15 governors. They
are elected and co-opted from amongst the school’s parents and neigh-
bourhood. In the case of a town where there are, say 100 schools, those
schools will in future be represented by 1,500 local people who each
have the interest of their particular school at heart. This simple fact
should help each school become more accountable to its neighbour-
hood. It should ensure that the neighbourhood controls the school
through these governors and their head.
Although the government did not necessarily intend to create a sit-
uation in which every school could become a community or neigh-
bourhood school it has none the less done so. Not only is the new
situation educationally beneficial because it closes the gap between
home and school and makes each the extension of the other, it is also
potentially much more democratic – 20 councillors versus 1,500 active
citizens is no contest. Further, it helps to take party politics out of the
government of each school and replace it with the real concerns of the
catchment area and its parent customers.
Clusters of neighbourhood schools
Devolving budgets to schools enables them to target resources to the
precise needs of each classroom. The danger of the skilled, teaching
head’s attention being diverted by the new tasks of administration,
18 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
budget control and development, is avoided by the creation of a quite
new post to assist with planning and development.
In the old days, when schools were dependent on the Town Hall for
all their needs, they did not look sideways at each other for practical
support and the development of ideas. Now that they are self-governing,
they can do so. They are beginning to form natural clusters in both
geographically defined areas or neighbourhoods and in terms of their
special interests.
While a large secondary school can afford its own new administra-
tive post, smaller primaries can’t. But they can pool their resources. Ten
schools, say, need only find £2,000 each to produce a cluster facilitator,
or administration officer. In The Mosaic of Learning, David Hargreaves
spells the point out. My own new book, Radical Urban Solutions, makes
similar points. Both show that while individual schools can be driven
by their own development plan they can at the same time form a cluster
development plan and establish fresh forms of support and new
resources. (See Fig 2.)
Demos 19
Rebuilding From the Bottom Up
Figure 2 A cluster development plan
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
Just as the new facilitator post can come from a pooled budget,
so can other posts and initiatives. The point applies to the way exter-
nal contracts for suppliers of oil for heating and food for catering can
be agreed. It can extend to cover cost-effective caretaking, grounds
maintenance, painting and decorating, printing and other facilities.
The cluster of neighbouring schools might also come to share teach-
ers, and the shared facilitator might help them to develop a pool of
supply teachers in areas such as music, games, language and science.
Clusters can also link together on communications networks (as is
already happening with several Education 2000 experiments), linking
these in turn to local business and community organisations.
Teachers can be difficult to recruit. Now that schools are to play a
greater part in the training of teachers they might develop a sophisti-
cated teacher training and probation induction package. This might
include the conversion of a row of derelict houses, with the help of the
local housing association, which can then provide sheltered and sub-
sidised accommodation in the first difficult probationary year. This
could lead to a cluster development and marketing portfolio which
appeals to colleges and universities for their students to come to teach
in the neighbourhood, enjoy their own sheltered accommodation for a
year or make use of their own nursery if they wish to return to the pro-
fession after starting a family.
The shared non-teacher and teacher-support network for clusters of
neighbouring schools might be called a Community Education
Enterprise Centre (CEEC). If the budget for the CEEC was just 2% of
the total budget of each of the 10 schools (9 primary, 1 secondary) this
could equal £12,000 times 9 plus £40,000 � £148,000. This is the equiv-
alent of 10 staff. Given that the non-teacher element of the Centre
would be trading with each school’s maintenance budget, the trading
capacity of this team could be considerable.
A cluster of 10 schools in Oxford are pooling part of their separate
budgets and undertaking various joint initiatives. In Birmingham there
are similar clusters in several neighbourhoods of the city. While none
have moved as far down the road as they could, the journey has begun.
Compass (CfBT), one of the major suppliers of Ofsted inspections, is
20 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
providing two clusters of schools with the finance to employ their own
cluster facilitator over a two year period to pioneer developments.
Soon, most schools may be in one or more clusters and the new facilita-
tor role will be accepted as a matter of essential routine.
The Family Centre
Different schools within clusters and whole clusters will specialise in
different areas. They will become magnets attracting enthusiastic like
minds and interests. But there is the prospect of at least one school in
each cluster becoming a Family Centre.
The pre-school teacher can be the vital link between the floundering
mother and father and others in the community who can help. The
school, cluster of schools and CEEC should build on existing networks of
child minders, playgroups and nurseries. Toy, book and resource libraries
can show the parent how to talk to and care for their child. Other parents
can offer support as well as ideas and suggestions for everything from
healthy diet to the best means of controlling difficult behaviour.
The school, like the doctor’s surgery or health centre, is the obvious
meeting point for young parents – they go there frequently. Indeed,
there is every reason for the surgery and centre to be integrated within
the school to form a Family Centre. The more prepared the young
child becomes in its pre-school years, the more the school can make
rapid progress when the child starts its formal school life. In return, the
more the child is able to progress at school, the more the parent is able
to cope and make progress at home.
So, it is possible to envisage the nursery and primary school as
being not just a ‘provider’ of education to young children but also a
centre for the whole family. Ideally, the nursery and primary school
should combine the functions of education with those of social and
health care, advice and training in parenting and employment skills. It
should help children to learn early about the realities and responsibili-
ties of adult life. The pre-school teacher and colleagues are not so
much acting in loco parentis as in loco grandparentis. In Birmingham
and elsewhere, Chris Dunkley, Peter Simpson, Tim Brighouse, Eric
Demos 21
Rebuilding From the Bottom Up
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
Midwinter, John Rennie and a whole school of community educators
have pioneered such developments. From a rather different back-
ground too, Penelope Leach has also recently made interesting sugges-
tions for family centres.
To facilitate this, each nursery and primary school needs a suite of
rooms in which the roles of priest, teacher, social worker, doctor and
policeman can intertwine. Indeed, the family centre could become a
kind of informal college of life-long learning for the entire area.
Imagine for a moment that the cluster of schools is interlinked via
telecommunications networks to a range of educational programmes
and specialist teaching centres able to complement the teacher in the
classroom; then suppose that the schools are linked via cable to every
home in the neighbourhood and to the local college which has out-
posted adult training centres in each of the schools-as-family centres.
What Harold Wilson achieved with the help of TV in the 1960s in
launching the Open University could be multiplied by the power of the
computer and the cable. Today, it is entirely possible to use a cluster of
schools both on a conventional 9.00–3.30 basis and, more efficiently, to
deploy their resources around the clock in a cradle to grave, open access
college in which the entire neighbourhood is enrolled. Far from being
organised by a remote pyramid on which they were once dependent,
or on an uncoordinated set of competing individual agencies, self-
governing schools are coming to resemble Handy’s maypole. (See Fig 3.)
Every school is a moral community. It teaches ‘personal, social and
moral’ education not just in one or two lessons a week, but through the
way it is organised, conducts and disciplines itself every moment of
each day. The kind of school advocated here necessarily sharpens and
clarifies the ‘informal’ messages it gives to children and adults. It shows
them that their worlds of family and school complement and reinforce
each other.
The self-governing community school and its neighbouring cluster
are ideally suited to perform this function. Just as the role of the
church and extended family have diminished, so the role of the school
must enlarge to fill the gap, becoming the main centre of support for
the family and the neighbourhood.
22 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
House and home
The house in which the young child lives and is nurtured by its parents
is significant, more so even than the school. Yet the government legis-
lation which enabled local council houses to be bought by their ten-
ants was at first opposed by city officers and politicians of all colours.
They wanted to go on controlling and managing them. However, as
with the local management of schools, the move proved to be so pop-
ular that most councils have changed their mind and now approve of
it. Today, it is easy to spot those houses which are privately owned. At
the same time as enabling individual families to own their own houses,
the government also reduced council house building to a minimum. It
increased the amount of money available to housing associations to
build houses in place of councils. It also forced the sale of empty plots
Demos 23
Rebuilding From the Bottom Up
Figure 3
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
of land to both associations and to private builders. This has not only
enabled the use of otherwise derelict plots of land, it has also replaced
a monopoly supplier with a host of independent ones.
The policy is not perfect. Some housing associations have become
so large that they risk becoming over-bureaucratic and insensitive to
local need. But others serve only a limited geographical area and have
developed a range of tenant services and a management style which
fosters good neighbourliness and a sense of belonging. Some make great
efforts to welcome their tenants to the neighbourhoods of the city in
which their houses are located. They provide them with information
and advice about the local services and schools which are available.
They involve them in the process of management and the provision of
security. They even offer a range of adult training courses and jobs
which brighten the street with such things as hanging baskets.
Some would argue that the development of the housing cooperative
movement is of even greater value to local people in encouraging a
shared sense of ownership and involvement. By the same logic, the
idea of the Housing Action Trust, which takes responsibility from the
Town Hall to run an entire estate, then hands it to the tenants, is a rad-
ical and imaginative step. The net outcome is the rapid extension of
home ownership. In place of uniform, drab, remotely managed, state-
provided houses, has arisen a combination of privately-owned houses
and a range of locally managed ones. In turn, of course, this has per-
suaded most Town Halls to become rather more imaginative in the
way they manage those many houses still left under their control.
Place; street and park
After the home, it is the street and local park with which children
identify. If beliefs give a personal identity, place gives a bounded
geographical and physical sense of belonging. In practice, of course,
the identity and belonging can’t be easily separated. In real life, they
blend and each child’s innocent Jerusalem lies within a short radius of
home. However, in practice the street which, a generation ago, could be
played in safely is now dominated by the passing car and a fear of the
24 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
unseen stranger. Too many public spaces are uncared for and the cor-
ner pocket park is a ‘confused’ space. What looked pretty on the archi-
tect’s map belongs to no one and is thus untended, a sight for the
accumulation of rubbish and a hiding place for the petty criminal.
Many parkkeepers, and the other guardians of public space, have also
disappeared. Many parks have lost the sense of confidence and care they
had in the past. The majority have boarded up buildings, endemic van-
dalism and litter. Once, many Town Halls lovingly looked after parks
and open spaces, but now few have either the energy or the resources to
do more than stop them declining further. Regrettably, the implicit mes-
sage given to today’s child is that nobody bothers, and that shared public
spaces cannot compete with the attractions of the video or TV.
Since the modern town is too large to be administered centrally
in every respect it may be that the neighbourhood would be better at
caring for street, park and place if it had a greater degree of ownership
and the tools and resources to act. In some places parks are being
handed over to community trusts, and being given the freedom to
develop in very different ways, linking parks to learning, healthcare or
the arts. These ideas are rich with potential. But they are still strongly
resisted by most local authorities.
Police and the neighbourhood
As society has become more fractured, crime rates have soared, partic-
ularly those for ‘petty crimes’ – vandalism, theft of and from cars, rob-
bery from the person and the house. Crime Concern estimates that
crime now costs £20 billion per year. Although there is now some
evidence that the rise has halted, and may even be in reverse, the debil-
itating fear of crime, the cost of which is incalculable, has risen even
more rapidly than actual crime. It is now no longer felt possible to
allow children to play far from home. The proportion of children who
are allowed to walk to school has fallen from 7 in 10 to 3 in 10 in a
decade. Children and women feel afraid to walk the street in the
evening.Windows and doors have long been bolted. Insurance compa-
nies and investors have virtually deserted some areas.
Demos 25
Rebuilding From the Bottom Up
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
Most crimes are committed by young men. The peak age for offend-
ing is 18, although many start at 10 or even younger. These criminals
have breached the ‘thin blue line.’ In a vain attempt to cope, some police
forces are now agreeing a list of offences to which they will no longer
respond. There is little the police can do when the young criminal is
under the age. Not much more can be achieved when the offender is
just over the age. Months after committing and being apprehended
for the offence, the resultant paper work and court appearance often
leads only to: ‘Don’t do it again.’ Translated in the mind of the young
offenders, this means: ‘Feel free. There is nothing that we can or will do
to stop you.’
Poor schools and houses, uncared for streets and confused open
spaces don’t help. They offer a hiding place and foster low expectations
and a disregard for property and person. As Alice Coleman of Kings
College has shown, a range of simple physical changes to the environ-
ment can have dramatic benefits. She suggests reclaiming ‘confused’
public spaces and giving them to individual families, reducing the
number of shared entries and common walkways. Burglaries in West-
minster have been cut by 55% by adopting such measures. But, the
longer term solution rests not with either architect or police but with
the family and the neighbourhood.
First, only when the infant’s temper tantrum goes unchecked or
receives an erratic, inconsistent, response does the young child learn to
instantly gratify its unchannelled desires regardless of others, assum-
ing that ‘anything goes’. Thus are the seeds sown of a careless disregard
for others. Hard pressed parents now need help to teach character in
the home. As discussed, their efforts need to be reinforced at school
and in the family centre.
Second, neighbours need to acquire the courage of their convic-
tion that it is wrong for children to destroy property, steal, or abuse
adults. The neighbourhood watch schemes have achieved lift-off.
Remarkably, there are now over one million members and 10,000
schemes in the Midlands and over 100,000 schemes in the UK. Those
who emphasised the unqualified rights of the individual were at first
afraid that these might cause some people to ‘pry.’ They hesitated to
26 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
mount the video cameras in shopping centres which identified the
killers of James Bulger because they smacked of ‘big brother.’ They
were nervous at the prospect of ‘vigilantes.’ These hesitations about
rights have begun to evaporate when measured against the responsi-
bilities which parents and neighbours have for children and each
other. They increasingly look after each other’s property and take note
of what their children are doing.
The efforts of the St Paul’s project and others to ‘Build a Better
Village’ of Balsall Health so raised residents’ expectations and confi-
dence that over 500 people decided to stand on their street corners to
eliminate the street prostitution, kerb crawlers and pimps who had
blighted the image of their area and held back progress. In addition to
solving one problem, others were also resolved. The figures for drug
abuse, car theft, burglary and truancy also came down. Residents
began to talk of being able to leave their car and front door unlocked.
Today, they claim with some justification to have one of the most
developed neighbourhood watch schemes in the country. Moving from
the need to eliminate the negative, these residents have begun to
accentuate the positive. They wish to give a face-lift to their local park,
employ a parkkeeper or sports coach, implement a traffic management
scheme to slow speeding traffic and take ownership of and maintain a
range of confused open spaces. The list is endless, as lifted by the expe-
rience of success, large sections of the population have become
engaged in an extensive ‘community service’ programme.
Elsewhere in the country other neighbourhoods and councils are
also trying to rethink local policing. Some are paying for additional
neighbourhood police, as in Sedgefield. Wandsworth has suggested a
special tax to pay for improved local policing under the local authority.
Some 60 Councils are now investigating possibilities like these. How-
ever, like the teacher who views the helpful presence of the parent in
the classroom with anxiety, each of these developments have been met
with suspicion by the professional police, who cling to their monopoly.
But if such schemes can reinvigorate the local community’s sense of
responsibility for order there is surely a case for encouraging the police
to recognise their value and work in partnership with them.
Demos 27
Rebuilding From the Bottom Up
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
Work and the economy
The move from the pyramid to the maypole type of organisation is
transforming a growing number of private sector businesses. While
many still see their role simply in terms of profit maximisation others
are seeking a richer set of connections to their communities. They
recognise that an involved employee is also a keen and productive one,
and that it is important to pay attention to other stakeholders – not
just shareholders, but also suppliers, customers and the surrounding
community. Once, Robert Owen, who built model villages in the early
1800s and the Cadbury family, who built Bournville in the early 1900s,
were exceptions. Today it is not just Business in the Community and
Anita Roddick who flourish, but also Virgin, Shell, Microsoft, Apple
and a growing range of companies whose directors under-stand that
the ethical approach isn’t just socially and environmentally beneficial,
but also good business. Many firms, ranging from TSB and Grand
Metropolitan in the UK to Bosch in Germany and Fiat in Italy have
independent foundations, and here some newcomers, like Nissan in
Sunderland, Toyota in Derbyshire and DUSCOs in Nottingham have
become involved in their local communities to help cultivate a good
local reputation. And firms such as Allied Dunbar, Kingfisher and
Whitbread have extensive employee involvement schemes.
Although there is still much to be done the fading industrial centres
of several cities have been greatly improved by the enlightened combi-
nation of public and private money. Birmingham, Leeds, Sheffield and
other town centres have become models of enterprise and culture
compared to a few years ago. Yet, there remain problems. By contrast
with countries like the USA or Germany we still lack sufficiently
powerful businesses at the city or neighbourhood level. Despite moves
to decentralisation, British industry is one of the most centralised in
the world, as is British banking.
There is also a great danger that progress in city centres is under-
mined by the fading neighbourhoods which surround the centres which
lack education, confidence and which cost so much to police. This was
the experience of Detroit where glittering city centre projects were sur-
rounded by some of the most depressed neighbourhoods in the USA.
28 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
But the biggest problem concerns one of the negative consequences
of dramatic changes in technology and organisation in the private sector
that have left few unskilled manual jobs. In his books, Charles Handy has
argued with great clarity that if we are not vigilant, this world could be
inherited by a new elite, while an increasing number, who have no work,
despair. The social divide could become a chasm. On the other hand, the
very forces that have sharply reduced the number of stable jobs for male
breadwinners are also creating the context for new beginnings.
First, the combination of better teachers and more flexible tech-
nologies should make it much easier to produce well educated, employ-
able, young people, and to top up their skills throughout life, whether
at home or in the workplace or college.
Second, the enterprise culture is giving rise to a range of smaller
businesses, many of them neighbourhood specific. It is also causing
partners to share jobs or undertake part-time ones and to work from
home. Thus mobility is curtailed and neighbourhood strengthened.
Third, imaginative schemes can solve two problems at once. By cre-
ating relatively unskilled jobs for unemployed young and old people it
is possible not only to carry out environmental improvements but also
to repopulate the empty spaces – like parks and railway stations – thus
giving people a greater sense of security and place.
Further, the third sector now includes rather more than the unpaid
volunteer who hands out soup to the homeless. It is being dramatically
increased by the addition of schools, houses and carers in the commu-
nity. Until very recently the third sector held little influence, less
money and few real jobs. Now it is growing so rapidly that few recog-
nise the consequences either for it or for the role of the private and
public sectors which must adjust to take account of it.
Far-reaching schemes are possible. As a result of bold thinking Pat
Conaty and others from the Birmingham Settlement are building on
previous successes with local economic institutions such as credit
unions to develop a Community Bank able to support small businesses
in the community through difficult times.
Ian Morrison, Director of the Council for Voluntary Service in
Birmingham, recently calculated that the third sector budget in that
Demos 29
Rebuilding From the Bottom Up
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
city has a combined annual turnover of £55,000,000, a sizeable busi-
ness and that for every £1 of public money it created £3 from else-
where. It employs thousands of people. But, these calculations did not
include either schools or houses. As it becomes confident in its new
role, the third sector will become a major player alongside the public
and private ones. It could use its new found strength to create a variety
of significant jobs in neighbourhoods and be a major resource for any
national scheme of voluntary service to communities. Indeed, if the
public sector could find as imaginative a way of relating to the third
sector in urban neighbourhoods as it has with the private sector in city
centres, then even more could be achieved today than Robert Owen
and the Cadbury family achieved in the past.
30 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
Refashioning the Urban VillageHow could revitalised communities be given an outward expression?
How can the many urban villages from which each town is built, be
excavated from beneath the accumulated concrete jungle and exert
their identity upon the physical, social and economic geography of
tomorrow? The following suggestions form only a brief introductory
answer which might begin to name and assert the sense of place and
identity of each neighbourhood or urban village.
As the charity Common Ground has shown, urban villages need
boundaries, clear entry and exit points. There is sense in making these
obvious and distinctive, like postal district signs so that residents and
visitors can know when they are being ‘welcomed’ within these bound-
aries or invited to return upon leaving. They also need a central focal
point. It does not matter whether the centre is identified by shops, a
library, a school or community centre as long as it is clear to residents
where this centre is, and as long as it has the right atmosphere, either
because of its architecture or the quality of the services which it offers or
both. Perhaps a distinctive flag, crest or shield might help to give identity
to both the entry gateways and the central features of the village.
At Christmas, Diwali, carnival time or during some other local cele-
bration, both gateways and central features might be enhanced by
festive decorations, perhaps prepared by schools, or religious organisa-
tions, residents’ groups or other voluntary organisations. The content
Demos 31
RebuildingNeighbourhood andRefocusing Government
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
and style of the celebrations will, of course, differ according to the par-
ticular community. But, whatever their content, they are important
occasions and the more people that take part in the planning and exe-
cution of them the better. Such occasions can represent the strength of
the community in a variety of forms including sport, art and business
as well as being purely social or religious events. They can serve to
highlight calendar festivals and mark the natural passing of the sea-
sons which urban life otherwise obscures.
A building which functions as a village hall and meeting place and
the open space which represents the village green or some kind of
arena are important, not only to host celebrations but to serve the needs
of different interest groups. Community notice boards and community
newspapers can advertise events and spread local news and informa-
tion, providing the village with its own voice while also helping to pro-
mote local businesses and schools. A supplement to the newspaper
might form a ‘welcome package’ for those moving into the area and
introduce them to the local amenities and their neighbours.
Buildings and developments which affect the life of the village often
do not take enough account of its particular identity or of the wishes
of residents. It would be profitable to build and develop in ways which
highlight that identity rather than inhibit, depress or destroy it. The
style and proportions of buildings, the materials used and the location
of facilities are all crucial to the creation of harmony in a neighbour-
hood as well as a sense of history, continuity and belonging.
Nothing is ever perfect or complete. Different villages might come to
assert one or other mix of the attributes outlined above, but few will
have the possibility of being purpose designed and built as is the case
with Poundsbury. This village is being constructed on farmland on the
edge of the small town of Dorchester. The idea was conceived by Prince
Charles with the help of the architect Leon Krier. They hope that the
new village will eventually comprise some 2,000 homes housing a pop-
ulation of 8,000.A key feature of Poundsbury is that both detached and
terraced houses, shops and offices and workshops will knit closely
together so that a simple 10 minute walk along its cobbled streets will
enable the resident to reach any part of the village. At the heart of the
32 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
first phase of the building is a square which will be surrounded by
shops and offices. The square will also contain a ‘market hall’, which will
also house a cafe and meeting room. Alongside the hall a familiar, 80
feet tall, church-like tower will be visible from all corners of the village.
The village could become the envy of many city dwellers. Although its
idealised top-down conception may fit uneasily with the real people
who come to live there, it may be easier for existing neighbourhoods to
capture the atmosphere and calm reassurance of village life.
The bottom-up Prince Charles of many an urban village is its
Church, residents group, Housing Association, Development Trust,
school and cluster of schools. These can become its strength and the
engine which drives its development. It is not just the teacher, housing
manager and voluntary sector professional who must be at the service
of their ‘clients and customers’ in this way, but also the doctor, archi-
tect, accountant, indeed every professional whose energy is needed in
the rebuilding of communities. The professional who consults, partic-
ipates and is employed by local people becomes an appreciated part of
the neighbourhood rather than a feared visitor from a different and
more powerful one.
Refashioning democracy
The democratic system is supposed to enable people to freely choose
their representatives and government. Yet, at most elections, the resi-
dent is confronted by 2 or 3 candidates chosen by the big parties and
others who have no hope of election. The active, but diminishing, core
of each party is always re-elected. Often, only the beginners and second
raters are placed in unwinnable contests. If you live in a politically safe
area you have no choice and if you are in an unwinnable area you can
choose only between learners and failures.
Although there are notable exceptions, almost by definition, politi-
cians are principally concerned with gaining and keeping power in
order to implement their policies from the top down. Often, they are
not interested in, or suited to, wielding direct influence within the
neighbourhood or helping it to build itself up from ground level. Even
Demos 33
Rebuilding Neighbourhood and Refocusing Government
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
those who see the point of such action often cannot spare the time to
undertake it. As a result political parties do not do justice to the rich
variety of practical circumstances which define real life and many in
each urban village are in effect disenfranchised. The point can be illus-
trated in Fig 4.
Only the activists within the circles A and B, within the wider com-
munity, C, are represented. The unwritten agenda of the wider com-
munity, D, is unseen by either party. This is perhaps why less than
a third of the electorate vote in local elections. This means that
Councillors directly represent only around 15% of the electorate. The
remaining 85% are effectively disenfranchised. Their experience of
local democracy is like a plausible confidence trick. It offers the illu-
sion, but not the substance of choice and influence.
The more self-reliant people and neighbourhoods become and the
more the pyramids of both private and public institutions have been
transformed into self-governing maypoles, the more voters have become
alienated from politicians. While others have changed, the political
process remains unreformed. Until recently it was unquestioningly
34 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
Figure 4 Political Parties and the community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
supposed that the politically motivated councillor and MP should
attempt to control central bureaucracies in order to supply uniform
services to fractured and dependent neighbourhoods. Suited to the
pyramids of the industrial world, the political party has become
detached from the thrust of a better educated, better informed, more
confident citizen. Neither the representative politician nor the resident
has yet been schooled in the needs of a post-industrial form of partici-
patory democracy. Before the credibility gap between the politician and
the public becomes unbridgeable, it is important to clarify new roles.
The urban village and the active citizen
It is not sufficient to devolve finances and managerial control out to
schools and community agencies. Parts of the political process itself
must also be devolved. The emergent self-governing urban village
needs its own non-party political voice and a degree of control over its
own affairs.
Parish Councils have a legal existence. Those rural villages which
have retained these interesting forms of local democracy elect their
own parish councillors to represent their own very local concerns. The
Parish Council is able to levy a precept on the rate of one or two pence
in the pound, which can give the parish councillors a useful income to
spend as they and their constituents see fit. Most employ their own
professional parish clerk who services and acts for the parish and its
parish councillors.
Many people might respond far more positively to their own urban
neighbourhood council or forum than to their party political coun-
cilor because they would see the immediate and positive results of
their representations. Because most City Council wards encompass at
least three natural neighbourhoods, in place of 1–3 local councillors
who must also relate to the whole city, there might emerge three sets of
say, 15 neighbourhood forum representatives. Such neighbourhood
representatives would tend to be non-party political to ensure that
they represent all local people and keep their purely local focus. They
could either be elected on a street by street basis or be a mixture of
Demos 35
Rebuilding Neighbourhood and Refocusing Government
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
elected representatives and people co-opted from local agencies such
as schools, housing associations and development trusts. The neigh-
bourhood officer could be funded either by a small precept on the rate,
or, as with the school’s cluster officer, by pooling a part of the budget of
the major local self-governing agencies.
Some will wonder where so many active citizens might spring from.
Perhaps most people would rather remain dependent upon the remote
Town Hall than employ their own neighbourhood officer and try to
shape the development of their own area. There are several reasons for
doubting this.
First, any time a franchise has been extended, sceptics argued that ‘it
won’t work’ and that ‘ordinary people can’t cope with the extra respon-
sibility.’ Yet, when finally trusted with that responsibility, most people
invariably rise to the occasion and we are left to wonder: ‘why did we
wait so long before doing this?’
Second, it is relevant to point to the 10,000 strong population of the
urban village of Balsall Heath in which St Paul’s is based. St Paul’s alone
operates with 50 volunteers who staff its various management boards.
Some 6 residents’ groups are attended by some 200 people every
month. The 6 schools’ governing bodies meet termly and have various
working committees. So they increase the number of active citizens by
a factor of 6 times 15. If those who attend their Church, Temple and
Mosque councils or who patrol their street corners are included, the
number of active citizens goes over the 1,000 mark. So to elect say, 20
of these to represent the area doesn’t seem to be expecting too much.
Yet, there is nothing unique about Balsall Heath.
Third, people often do not take a mere ‘talking shop’ seriously. They
want to achieve things and not just enter into idle debate. So, the
importance of the neighbourhood council rests in its ability to employ
an officer, relate to the various local self-governing agencies and make
a serious contribution to the development of the area. One reason why
the people of Balsall Heath leap at the chance to improve their area is
because of their regard for their children’s future.
Fourth and finally, the involvement of so many people can and
should be dignified by the local cluster of schools, their family centre
36 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
and the local college by engaging them in certificated Citizen Aware-
ness courses. Indeed, with the help of cable and home computers, such
a course could bring to life the open access college in which the whole
community is enrolled and make the neighbourhood election an impor-
tant annual occasion. Modern versions of the Greek city state in which
all who wish to participate can do so are no longer so fanciful, particu-
larly when decisions are being made on subjects where first hand
experience is so important.
The social entrepreneur and the new Town Hall
The neighbourhood officer’s role might first be to help people to gain the
confidence to formulate and express shared goals. Second, it could be to
help them to press these goals upon the city authorities and to ensure
that they are acted upon. However, third, and more important, it should
be possible for the forum to achieve many of its aims on its own with lit-
tle more than passing reference to the town centre. With the help of its
schools, their CEEC, housing associations and community development
trusts, the neighbourhood forum would help to stimulate the social,
economic and environmental development of the neighbourhood.
The neighbourhood officer is, in effect, a social entrepreneur. Just as
the private economic sector depends on risk-taking, visionary people
to construct new companies, products, services and wealth, so the
third sector needs social entrepreneurs. The role, once less vital, used
perhaps to be fulfilled by the village priest or the head of the village
school. Today, a new breed of determined professional is needed who
is employed by the active citizens of the neighbourhood forum to bind
together and empower the fractured community.
Although it is novel to the urban scene, the active citizen’s neigh-
bourhood forum, their entrepreneurial officer and those local voluntary
and non-government institutions which relate and are accountable to
them do not comprise an additional layer of government, which
further complicates the organisation of the democratic process. Rather,
they take the place of significant parts of the previously over-intrusive
city machine. As a consequence, the Town Hall can concentrate its
Demos 37
Rebuilding Neighbourhood and Refocusing Government
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
efforts less on trying to run everything and thus failing to do anything
well, but on enabling and resourcing others to achieve excellence.
Because so many of the tasks once undertaken by the Town Hall
can readily and more effectively be discharged within each village it is
necessary to reduce its size and change the way it is organized. Most of
the Town Hall’s departments can be slimmed down or merged in
order to meet new functions.
Old style departments were organized in terms of specialist profes-
sional functions – education, social services, housing etc – as well as in
pyramid-like hierarchies. This suited the needs of city wide planning, but
it was of little benefit to neighbourhoods which recognize different
boundaries and needs. It follows that a fresh, community sensitive, city
department is needed which cuts across the city’s old bureaucratic
specialisms and planning areas. This new department must regard
neighbourhoods as the basic building blocks from which towns are con-
structed. Instead of being organized segmentally and hierarchically this
department would, therefore, subtend an array of sub-departments, one
for each neighbourhood or cluster of neighbourhoods. These neigh-
bourhood sub-departments would marshal and deploy the levers of
local government to the service and enhance the growth points of each
area. Indeed, many towns have developed neighbourhood offices in
recent years, though not always in response to a clear neighbourhood
voice.
Because the aim of this new department is to boost the confidence
of the individual, see to it that others assist the developing child and
take part in the revitalisation of neighbourhoods it could be called
the Neighbourhood Enterprise Department (NED). Once these new
departments are devolved out to area offices in each neighbourhood
they, in effect, become its new mini Town Hall.
The mini Town Hall would be the city’s devolved top-down lever
with which the bottom-up neighbourhood forum would liaise. It
might be based in an extension of one of the village’s schools and
become one of its focal features. These proposals are not fanciful.
Hillingdon and Kent have merged several departments to create a new
community oriented one. Tower Hamlets has devolved most of its
38 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
services. Braintree District council has already implemented many of
Osborne and Gaebler’s suggestions and John Stewart and Michael
Clark at Birmingham University have written extensively about British
examples of good practice. Recently, the DoE has challenged
Manchester, Birmingham and London to become ‘Cities of Pride.’ It
has asked them to define what they might look like in the years after
the new millennium. The winds of change are blowing. As the dust
which it stirs settles, it is possible to see what might replace the old
pyramid like Town Hall. (Fig 5)
City governments are now multi-billion pound, complex, organisa-
tions. They are impossibly larger than the ones with which Joseph
Chamberlain could identify. It is not possible for voluntary councillors to
manage such a modern organisation efficiently. It needs time, devotion,
confidence and an acquired expertise – otherwise the existing depart-
ments of full-time professional officers will follow their own course.
High caliber, part-time or full-time city councillors are needed to steer a
fresh course if these departments are to be refashioned and bent to the
will of the community. It makes sense to pay the chairs of committees
just as MPs are paid. Further, it makes sense to pay the Lord Mayor of
each town. Instead of being largely ceremonial, the role of Lord Mayor
should become more like that of the town’s president. The office
holder should be directly elected not chosen by existing councillors on
a political ticket.
These reforms represent no more of an attack upon local govern-
ment than John Harvey Jones’ attempts to save fading businesses sig-
nify an attack upon them. On the contrary, they could rescue the
political process from decades of inertia and popular resentment and
herald a new era of acceptance, appreciation and vigorous growth.
It is easy for defenders of the status quo to forget that the existing
form of Town Hall and Whitehall democracy has already undergone
many profound changes. Just two centuries ago, Tom Paine and others
fought for the rights of man. In this century women had to chain
themselves to the railings and staff the munitions factories in the first
World War to gain the vote. Full adult suffrage only came after the
second world war.
Demos 39
Rebuilding Neighbourhood and Refocusing Government
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
Democracy has evolved and must continue to keep pace with the
times. Much of what has happened in recent years could be built upon
rather than scrapped in an attempt to return to the past. The array of
quangos and trusts have been rightly criticised as unaccountable to
their local communities. But reconceived to embed them in the area
they serve, with clear lines of accountability and clear rights for local
communities to remove those that don’t perform, new self-governing
agencies have the potential to be much more responsive and entrepre-
neurial than when they were locked into the monopoly of local
government.
40 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
Figure 5
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
Authority and responsibilityAlthough many of the signposts for revitalised communities have now
been identified they remain distinct and separate.What will bind them
together?
The industrial pyramid worked only because those at its apex could
rely on a passive, uninformed and unconfident citizenry. The maypole
will only work if all individuals are prepared to carry responsibility,
undertake duties and fulfil obligations to one another.
There are different forms of authority. Some tear human relations
apart. The best kinds act as the glue which voluntarily bind people
together. The scientific discoveries of the 17th and 18th centuries and
the technology needed to implement them relied on objective,‘rational
legal’ authority and not on subjective, ‘traditional,’ authority. The great
German sociologist Max Weber defined this rational authority as the
lynch pin which held the modern bureaucratic pyramid together.
It laid waste to all previous forms of non-rational, subjective,
authority. He wrote that ‘bureaucracy revolutionises with technical
means … from without. It first changes the material and social orders
and through them the people by changing the conditions of adapta-
tion… It furthers the development of ‘rational matter-of-factness’ and
the personality type of the professional expert.’
Both private enterprise and public monopolies flourished under this
form of authority for most of the 19th and 20th centuries. It kept the
Demos 41
A New Paradigm
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
‘administration of public services untainted by the influence of bribery
and corruption.’ It ‘provided security – from unemployment, during
old age. It provided stability … a basic sense of fairness and equality…
It provided jobs. And it delivered the basic, no frills, one-size-fits-all
services people needed and expected: roads, railways, sewers, schools…’
In the first part of the 20th century, it seemed to both Max Weber and
those who administered it that this system was invulnerable.
However, with the benefit of hindsight we can see that this form of
authority could only prevail as long as the industrialist and planner
who ran the pyramid-like bureaucracies had enough information to
take reasonable decisions which those at the bottom of the pyramid
could not query or improve upon; as long as people worked with their
hands and not their brains; as long as there were mass, undiscriminat-
ing markets; as long as people had similar needs; as long as the rational
Western nations were not rivalled by Japan’ and, even more profoundly,
as long as the subjective part of the human personality could be ignored
without doing so much damage to the quality of life that objection
would result.
In stark contrast, the private and public enterprise of the last decades
of the 20th century are glued together by a different form of authority.
It depends on the subjective vision and charisma of enlightened leaders
who develop tradition to suit new circumstances. It depends on their
vision being shared and voluntarily reinforced by all who work within
the agency and those who relate to it though what is commonly called a
‘mission statement.’ It depends on a set of individual choices which
interlock because they are guided by this subjective mission.
Rational calculation is still employed in private and public agencies.
But it is placed within the context of a shared, common vision and com-
munal care. Business in the Community typifies this attitude. But, it is to
be found even more overtly in the caring organisations which now
thrive within the third sector. Their goals and missions are subjective
and value laden, not rational. They are concerned with process and par-
ticipation, the ownership and pride which comes from shared values.
This subjective, voluntary, form of authority is the life blood of the fam-
ily, neighbourhood and the community of street and place. It provides
42 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
the child with stability and continuity, belief and identity – the spring-
boards from which individuality, choice and reason can leap in later life.
Rights, responsibilities and values
The rational pyramid of the modern state gives people rights – to free
schooling, health care, housing and the vote. It gives no place to the
equally vital qualities of care, responsibility and value. Indeed, it has
denied them. Consequently, the pyramid has been built on unstable
ground. People feel other ties and obligations as strongly as any objec-
tive contract. These ties flow from the love of the mother for the child
and the duty of the father to protect and care for mother and child.
Experience tells that these obligations need to be witnessed by sig-
nificant others, upheld and enshrined by the wider community in cus-
toms and traditions which make it easier for parents to avoid those
distractions which divert the eye from the needs of their child. These
witnesses, customs and traditions have of course become woven into
elaborate rituals which make sense in terms of the cultures and world
religions. They mark the gates which people pass through at times of
birth, youth, maturity and marriage, work and death. They celebrate
the many seasonal and religious events through which life is ordered
and given purpose. It is within this subjective culture that the logic of
duty and obligation resides. This logic gives meaning to the natural
bond between mother and child and generates both the responsibility
to act towards others with charity and love and the confidence to
develop tradition to suit new circumstance. As Dr Nazim proclaimed
in Birmingham’s central mosque: ‘Control of destiny is lost if morality
is shirked,’ sentiments which have been eroded by the West’s search for
an objective and purely material reason.
The pendulum has swung so far from subjective authority and obli-
gation towards reason authority and rights that their interdependence
has been fractured and serious damage has been caused. But it is not
sufficient simply to swing the pendulum back to find a new equilib-
rium. Instead we need to move forward to find a new framework,
which combines the wisdom of maturity with the capacity for change.
Demos 43
A New Paradigm
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
Every new generation rebels against some of what it sees as the con-
servative traditions of its parents, before discovering both how impor-
tant it is not to reject all the wisdom and maturity of the past, and that the
wheel of responsibility has to be reinvented in some form. Today how-
ever, whilst many young people are individualistic and rights conscious
there is also much evidence that they have a powerful sense of responsi-
bility for the environment into which their children will be born which
their industrial forefathers did little to protect. When entered into delib-
erately, responsibilities can be exercised with greater effect than when
they are simply and unthinkingly inherited. The challenge for those who
already appreciate the need for stronger communities is to show how a
greater sense of belonging is relevant and attractive rather than being a
nostalgic return to a past which means little to young people today.
In today’s less deferential society, authority has to be continually
won, justified and remade. It cannot be assumed. If the maypole is to
work, then people will need to appreciate and voluntarily accept their
responsibilities in each of the areas that communities depend on:
� To support families for the sake of the child and the
wellbeing of the next generation, and to take part in common
provision of childcare.� To play an active part in their child’s schooling, not just by
helping with reading at home but by becoming a school
governor and helping with the self-management of the school.� To be a caring neighbour and a Good Samaritan to others in
the neighbourhood, to pay taxes and make charitable
donations to community associations.� To act as juror and take part in the trial of alleged offences, to
become a magistrate, to serve on the neighbourhood forum
or become a councilor and play an active role in the political
process.� To play a part in the care of the street, to assist with the
recovery of a sense of place.� To ‘give as well as to take,’ to ‘plough back as well as to reap,’ to
be a steward of both land and culture.
44 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
� To rediscover and uphold the best of enduring values and
find new ways of celebrating them
The acceptance of responsibility, duty and obligation used to be
symbolically reinforced by maturing young people and adults through
the swearing of oaths – making binding promises of faithfulness, loy-
alty and so on. The point is too easily derided in today’s mass, rational,
society. Few could see the point of making a binding promise to a
remote bureaucracy. They would far rather exploit it and exercise their
rights. However, the significance of making promises or verbal bonds
in the home and neighbourhood where the child is born can be grasped
and honoured. The modern, decentralised, town creates neighbour-
hoods within which such responsibilities can make sense.
Lord Michael Young and Professor Halsey have recently suggested
ways in which parents who do not attend church can affirm their binding
responsibilities to their children before relatives and friends. Schools are
increasingly developing home/school agreements which both parents
and teachers sign. The tenancy agreements between tenant and housing
association or housing department could be similarly dignified. Perhaps
it is time to spell out in a tangible way a variety of socially vital obliga-
tions which have been taken for granted and abused. Similarly, much as a
modern business has a mission statement, each neighbourhood and
town might be asked to develop, enshrine and celebrate these commit-
ments in a way which it feels appropriate to its distinct circumstances.
Partly because of the organisational and theoretical baggage which
the political parties have inherited from their industrial past, they have
found it difficult to address the questions posed by the active citizen’s
sense of responsibility. For answers require an uncluttered fresh atti-
tude and spirit, says Etzioni. Regardless of what the habitually conflict-
ing politicians have argued, the real, common sense, choice is not
between the welfare state and privatization, more or less government.
For we can now recall that: ‘In the past there were other structures in
society which carried part of the social load on their own – communi-
ties, families and individuals. It is time to rediscover them and create a
new welfare system…’
Demos 45
A New Paradigm
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
An Urban Academy
In 1794, Matthew Boulton and his astonishing band of friends walked
to each others houses by the light of the moon and held the discus-
sions which Erasmus Darwin described with such awe. They called
themselves the Lunar Society. Where are today’s equivalent innova-
tors? Where is their modern Lunar Society which is so precisely at the
cutting edge of tomorrow that neither they nor others quite recognize
how far reaching their ideas and action will be? Neither the old or the
once-new red brick universities, nor the seminaries of the great faiths,
let alone the political parties, seem any longer able to read the sign-
posts or to be at the center of intellectual gravity.
It may be that clusters of schools, family centres, neighbourhood or
village forums and new actors like the cluster development officer and
the neighbourhood officer are the harbingers of new thought and
action. Indeed, we noted the possibility of them forming open access
Community Colleges which enrolled entire neighbourhoods. Yet more
is required. For as the public and private sectors change to take the new
third sector into full account and partnership, a series of quite new roles
are implied. These include:
� The responsible, active, citizen. Once subdued, unskilled and
unconfident through dependence upon the logic of the
pyramid, most people are being asked to play a new, active,
independent role.� The responsible professional. Just as the private sector is
adjusting to the demand of the customer, so must the
previously sacrosanct professional expert. The professional
can’t plan, can’t teach, design, heal or police the street without
their ‘customer’ playing an active part in the process. The
professional needs to unlearn old habits and the temptation
to defensively resist the ‘intrusion’ of the customer into
previously sacred areas of expertise.� The social entrepreneur. Just as business does not work
without the visionary, risk taking entrepreneur, so the third
sector will not prosper without a new role being played
46 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
which results in the creation of voluntary associations and
valued, socially responsible jobs.� The socially responsible economic entrepreneur and business
must play their part in conjunction with their new social
counterpart.� The enabling politician and political party. Used to operating
within the pyramid, the new politicians need new skills and
attitudes if they are to work the maypole with skill and
sensitivity and help the State learn to conduct an orchestra of
self-reliant individual players.
These five actors need an Urban Academy to help them to learn and
practice their new skills together. This learning process will need to be
a ‘hands on’ or ‘doing’ one in which the ‘students’ learn through devel-
oping good practice in real life situations. Such Academies need a
physical base, but their most important work would not be between
four walls but rather through bringing together teams of people from
different backgrounds to tackle common problems.
The obvious location for the Academy is in one or more of the
neighbourhood’s community colleges with funding drawn from pub-
lic, private and voluntary agencies which need their personnel to be
at the cutting edge of new ideas and practices. The Open University
was conceived as a new model of teaching for people in work and
later life. The Urban Academy is a rather different model of action
research that links together the experience and reflections of practi-
tioners, observers and analysts in the service not of pure knowledge
but rather of the ends of the community.
Once again, the relevant signposts are in place. Common Purpose
acts as the training catalyst which brings together leading people from
different walks of life and helps them to find common ground. It is
already actively engaged in 23 towns and cities across Britain, and is
now branching out into continental Europe. It is training the ‘movers
and shakers’ who will build the Britain of tomorrow in their region.
The many development trusts, voluntary organisations, the more ener-
getic of the polytechnics-turned-universities, the Foundations, and
Demos 47
A New Paradigm
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
institutions like the Centre for Citizenship Development in Cambridge,
which is a focal point for the new debate about communitarianism, all
have a common potential which could be realized through the joint
development of an academy and in Birmingham a small group of
people from the private, public and third sectors are working towards
this end.
48 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
Two scenarios face the nation as the third millennium approaches. One
is a further weakening of the institutions which mediate between the
individual and society, and further fragmentation and disconnection of
people from each other. In this scenario political parties will probably
continue to be irrelevant to the aspirations of ordinary people or the
needs of the towns and neighbourhoods of post-industrial society in
which they live.
The second scenario is more positive, involving a strengthening of
community in all its forms. The aim of this book has been to set out
some of its elements at the level of the neighbourhood. It starts with
the family and the places where people live and where, despite the con-
fusion and the pace of change, they still find much of their security
and identity. It builds outwards from the family, the home and the
school. Based on clear principles of responsibility and reciprocity, and
an undogmatic openness about which types of institutional organisa-
tion will provide the best solutions, it draws on a wide body of thought
from all shades of opinion from across the world that is grappling with
parallel issues – how to behave and think morally in a post-industrial
world, how to organise, how to link political policy with grassroot con-
cerns about the home and the street.
This book has set out some of the implications of this positive
alternative for communities – how schools, family centres and develop-
ment trusts could work together in a new framework of clearly defined
Demos 49
The Third Millennium
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
neighbourhoods with new forms of participatory democracy. It has
shown how, once released from the task of rowing, government can
concentrate on the essential strategic and visionary task of steering.
Much has to be done at national level to complement the new spirit
of community. New avenues could be opened to enable young people to
serve others and contribute to their community either as part of sec-
ondary schooling or afterwards. Imaginative schemes are being consid-
ered for mobilising people’s moral commitment to help solve problems
in the delivery of healthcare and education. In the USA for example, the
simple example of teaching thousands of people how to do emergency
cardiac treatment in Seattle, and the mobilising of large numbers of col-
lege graduates to help with teaching, have shown the practicality of
well-conceived communitarian ideas.
The prospect of the millennium celebrations offers a great opportu-
nity for giving these neighbourhood level experiments added weight.
So far most of the talk has been about the construction of grand new
buildings, the modern equivalent of the Crystal Palace and the Eiffel
Tower, as well as festivals, fireworks and street parties. But a great
national celebration could also help focus attention on the social inno-
vators. The Millennium Fund could be used, alongside private and
public funds, to give new community organisations, development trusts,
neighbourhood forums and urban academies, the chance to be at the
centre of the planning process in each locality, linking the celebrations
to their own initiatives.
The politicians and parties which can demonstrate that they both
recognise the nature of the problems facing modern urban life and
how to articulate practical solutions will receive widespread acclaim
from all those unsung practitioners who are already hard at work
rebuilding the torn fabric of social life. If they can tap into this energy
of experience, experiment and ideas, and tangibly back the third sector
and the social entrepreneur by providing enabling government, they
would find that they were not just capturing the decade. They would
be setting the agenda for the start of the next millennium. Not just a
once in a lifetime chance, not even one which comes once in a hun-
dred years. This chance is an extra ordinary one. Who will take it?
50 Demos
The Common Sense of Community
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess
Ashdown, Paddy – Beyond Westminster(Simon and Schuster)
Atkinson, Dick – Radical Alternative,Orthodox Consensus (Heinemann)
Atkinson, Dick – Radical UrbanSolutions (Cassell)
Etzioni, Amitai – The Spirit ofCommunity (Crown)
Etzioni, Amitai – The Parenting Deficit(Demos)
Handy, Charles – The Empty Raincoat(Hutchinson)
Handy, Charles – The Age of Unreason(Hutchinson)
Hargreaves, David – The Mosaic ofLearning (Demos)
Hargreaves, David and Hopkins, DavidThe Empowered School (Cassell)
Holmes, Gerard – The Idiot Teacher(Spokesman)
Holman, Bob – A New Deal for SocialWelfare (Lion Publishing)
Osborne and Gaebler – ReinventingGovernment (Addison Wesley andPenguin)
Ree, Harry – Henry Morris: EducatorExtraordinary (Peter Owen)
Schumacher, Erich – Small is Beautiful(Abacus)
Tam, Henry – Public Service (Longmans)Weber, Max – Economy and Society
(Bedminster Press)Wilson, James – The Moral Sense (Free
Press)Willetts, David – Civic Conservatism
(The Social Market Foundation).
Demos 51
Bibliography
This page is covered by the Demos open access licence. Some rights reserved. Full details of licence conditions are available at www.demos.co.uk/openaccess