2
MEETING ABSTRACT Open Access The change of gait analysis on applying metatarsal-bar used 3D motion analysis Se won Yoon 1* , Jeong woo Lee 1 , Soo ji Park 2 , Woong sik Park 3 , Moon jeong Kim 4 From 4th Congress of the International Foot and Ankle Biomechanics (i-FAB) Community Busan, Korea. 8-11 April 2014 Introduction Enough dorsiflexion angle of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is needed to ensure thrust and stability [1], and if the range of motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint decreases, normal foot function during gait is under severe restriction [2]. Wearing shoes with high heels during gait makes weight leaning forward and wearing them for long may cause deformation of hallux valgus [3,4]. General therapeutic concepts of foot diseases focus on reducing or eliminating plantar tissue stress. Recently, studies on treat- ment to solve these problems have been conducted, but there have been a few studies on orthotic devices such as metatarsal pad, dome and wedge [5]. Therefore, this study applied bar metatars ophalangeal area of normal persons and examined if any change occurs of spatio-temporal indices and kinematic para- meters by using 3D motion analysis system. Method This study selected 40 female university students in their twenties and conducted the experiment with them before and after applying metatarsal bar. Spatio-temporal indices including stance phase, swing phase, double phase, cadence, stride time, stance phase time, swing phase time, double stance phase time, step length, stride length, velo- city, stride velocity, and swing phase velocity were mea- sured through 3D motion analysis system and kinematic parameters such as pelvic tilt angle, hip joint flexion- extension angle, knee joint flexion-extension angle, foot progression angle, and ankle joint flexion-extension angle were also measured through 3D motion analysis system. After attaching metatarsal bar to the subjects on bare foot, they had enough practice in laboratory to make them accustomed to gait. Before experiment, calibration was conducted, gait space was measured and then sub- sequent experiment was carried out. Marker was at attached to joint and photographing was made at the condition that reflective materials except marker were eliminated within the camera view. Marker was at attached to sacrum (1), anterior superior iliac spine (left, right), greater trochanter (left, right), femur ½ location (left, right), lateral epicondyle of femur (left, right), fibular head (left, right), tibia ½ location (left, right), lateral malleolus (left, right), 5th metatarsal head (left, right), and heel (left, right). Marker should be attached to be seen in a straight line from side to mea- sure the accurate angle and the subjects were made to stand in the middle of gait path and look at the front. The subjects are made to stand at the starting point of the path to measure the dynamic gait and their gaits were measured after comfortable walking by measurers instruction. The subjects wore shorts to prevent the sway of marker during gait and preferred walking velo- city was used as gait velocity. Result As a result of analyzing gait, knee joint angle showed significant difference and remaining variables showed no significant difference. Conclusion This study was showed significantly decreased that change of knee joint angle on applying metatarsal-bar. It was the same change when wearing high heel appears that general knee joint decreased. We think that applying metatarsal- bar wasnt influence on change of knee joint angle. Also gait parameter on applying metatarsal-bar showed no sig- nificantly difference, we suggest that metatarsal-bar is helpful to foot diseases patients. * Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Department of physical therapy, Kwangju womens university, Kwangju, 506-713, Korea Full list of author information is available at the end of the article won Yoon et al. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2014, 7(Suppl 1):A99 http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/7/S1/A99 JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH © 2014 won Yoon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

The change of gait analysis on applying metatarsal-bar used 3D motion analysis

  • Upload
    moon

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

MEETING ABSTRACT Open Access

The change of gait analysis on applyingmetatarsal-bar used 3D motion analysisSe won Yoon1*, Jeong woo Lee1, Soo ji Park2, Woong sik Park3, Moon jeong Kim4

From 4th Congress of the International Foot and Ankle Biomechanics (i-FAB) CommunityBusan, Korea. 8-11 April 2014

IntroductionEnough dorsiflexion angle of the first metatarsophalangealjoint is needed to ensure thrust and stability [1], and if therange of motion of the first metatarsophalangeal jointdecreases, normal foot function during gait is under severerestriction [2]. Wearing shoes with high heels during gaitmakes weight leaning forward and wearing them for longmay cause deformation of hallux valgus [3,4]. Generaltherapeutic concepts of foot diseases focus on reducing oreliminating plantar tissue stress. Recently, studies on treat-ment to solve these problems have been conducted, butthere have been a few studies on orthotic devices such asmetatarsal pad, dome and wedge [5].Therefore, this study applied bar metatars ophalangeal

area of normal persons and examined if any changeoccurs of spatio-temporal indices and kinematic para-meters by using 3D motion analysis system.

MethodThis study selected 40 female university students in theirtwenties and conducted the experiment with them beforeand after applying metatarsal bar. Spatio-temporal indicesincluding stance phase, swing phase, double phase,cadence, stride time, stance phase time, swing phase time,double stance phase time, step length, stride length, velo-city, stride velocity, and swing phase velocity were mea-sured through 3D motion analysis system and kinematicparameters such as pelvic tilt angle, hip joint flexion-extension angle, knee joint flexion-extension angle, footprogression angle, and ankle joint flexion-extension anglewere also measured through 3D motion analysis system.After attaching metatarsal bar to the subjects on bare

foot, they had enough practice in laboratory to make

them accustomed to gait. Before experiment, calibrationwas conducted, gait space was measured and then sub-sequent experiment was carried out.Marker was at attached to joint and photographing

was made at the condition that reflective materialsexcept marker were eliminated within the camera view.Marker was at attached to sacrum (1), anterior superioriliac spine (left, right), greater trochanter (left, right),femur ½ location (left, right), lateral epicondyle of femur(left, right), fibular head (left, right), tibia ½ location(left, right), lateral malleolus (left, right), 5th metatarsalhead (left, right), and heel (left, right). Marker should beattached to be seen in a straight line from side to mea-sure the accurate angle and the subjects were made tostand in the middle of gait path and look at the front.The subjects are made to stand at the starting point of

the path to measure the dynamic gait and their gaitswere measured after comfortable walking by measurer’sinstruction. The subjects wore shorts to prevent thesway of marker during gait and preferred walking velo-city was used as gait velocity.

ResultAs a result of analyzing gait, knee joint angle showedsignificant difference and remaining variables showed nosignificant difference.

ConclusionThis study was showed significantly decreased that changeof knee joint angle on applying metatarsal-bar. It was thesame change when wearing high heel appears that generalknee joint decreased. We think that applying metatarsal-bar wasn’t influence on change of knee joint angle. Alsogait parameter on applying metatarsal-bar showed no sig-nificantly difference, we suggest that metatarsal-bar ishelpful to foot diseases patients.

* Correspondence: [email protected] of physical therapy, Kwangju women’s university, Kwangju,506-713, KoreaFull list of author information is available at the end of the article

won Yoon et al. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2014, 7(Suppl 1):A99http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/7/S1/A99 JOURNAL OF FOOT

AND ANKLE RESEARCH

© 2014 won Yoon et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, andreproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ details1Department of physical therapy, Kwangju women’s university, Kwangju,506-713, Korea. 2Department of physical therapy, Graduate school, Kwangjuwomen’s university, Kwangju, 506-713, Korea. 3Department of occupationaltherapy, Kwangju women’s university, Kwangju, 506-713, Korea. 4Departmentof physical therapy, Shinhwa rehabilitation clinic, Busan, Korea.

Published: 8 April 2014

References1. Hetherington V, Johnson R, Albritton J: Necessary dorsiflextion of the first

metatarsophalangeal joint during gait. The journal of foot surgery 1990,29(3):218.

2. Hopson M, McPoil T, Cornwall M: Motion of the first metatarsophalangealjoint. Reliability and validity of four measurement techniques. Journal ofthe american podiatric medical association 1995, 85(4):198-204.

3. Voloshin A, Wosk J: An in vivo study of low back pain and shockabsorption in the human locomotor system. Journal of biomechanics1982, 15(1):21-27.

4. Nyska M, McCabe C, Linge K, et al: Plantar foot pressures during treadmillwalking with high-heel and low-heel shoes. Foot & ankle international1996, 17(11):662-666.

5. Yoon MC: The effect of metatarsal pad on peak plantar pressures of theforefoot during walking. Kyonggi university 2007, Master’s degree.

doi:10.1186/1757-1146-7-S1-A99Cite this article as: won Yoon et al.: The change of gait analysis onapplying metatarsal-bar used 3D motion analysis. Journal of Foot andAnkle Research 2014 7(Suppl 1):A99.

Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Centraland take full advantage of:

• Convenient online submission

• Thorough peer review

• No space constraints or color figure charges

• Immediate publication on acceptance

• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar

• Research which is freely available for redistribution

Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit

won Yoon et al. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2014, 7(Suppl 1):A99http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/7/S1/A99

Page 2 of 2