Volume 12Number 6

www.brandeishoot.com Brandeis University’s Community Newspaper • Waltham, Mass. March 6, 2015

Rape Crisis Center opens in Usdan

New York Times columnist Thomas

Friedman ’75 speaks on campus

Influential prof. illuminates life of Albert Luthuli

By Charlotte AaronEditor

By Rachel Bossukstaff

By Jess LindeEditor

See VINSON, page 3

See GREEN, page 8

By Emily BelowichEditor

See FRIEDMAN, page 2

See RCC, page 2

photo by karen caldwell/the hoot

photo by karen caldwell/the hootdr. robert vinson Dr. Vinson gave a lecture on campus titled “Albert Luthuli, Nelson Mandela and the Genealogies of Armed Struggle in Apartheid South Africa.”

opening ceremony Student Rawda Aljawhary speaks with Senior Vice President for Students and Enrollment Andrew Flagel at the Rape Crisis Center opening this week.

Brandeis struggles with sustainability

In the past year, Brandeis University has fallen behind on its commitment to becoming a sustainable campus. In 2012, Brandeis lost a staff member who worked full-time as a sustainabil-ity coordinator. While the po-sition was filled for a time with an interim staff member, after her tenure, Brandeis did not re-hire someone to fill the position. Even more recently, Brandeis’ re-lationship with GreenerU, a com-pany that aids universities in be-coming environmentally friendly, has come into question.

In discussing the history of sustainability efforts at Brandeis, it is important to mention a de-cision made in 2008: At this time, the university adopted sin-gle-stream recycling as the new method of recycling on cam-pus. Single-stream recycling, as opposed to source-segregated recycling, allows students, fac-ulty, administrators, as well as Brandeis guests to put all recy-

clable materials into one contain-er. These materials are then later sorted at Casella Waste Systems, Brandeis’ waste management partner.

Single-stream recycling is a controversial method of recy-cling. There is an increase in residual waste (materials that are unable to be recycled due to contamination in the sorting process). 16.6 percent of sin-gle-stream waste is residual, and when mixed glass is included, this number rises to 27.2 percent, according to a Solid and Hazard-ous Waste Education Center re-port.

Yet while the residual waste does increase, so does par-ticipation in recycling. “Sin-gle-source is an easier and sim-pler ‘one-stop’ process at the source for all users,” wrote Jim Gray, vice president for campus operations, in an email to The Brandeis Hoot about the switch from source-segregated to sin-gle-stream recycling.

many in our community to make this possible.”

McMahon also thanked Ava Bluestein ’15, Victoria Jonas ’15 and Sam Daniels ’16, the B.SASV members who worked closest with the administration over the past year. They are also serving

as the RCC’s first student co-ordinators. There was a palpa-ble feeling of emotion in the air as guests talked and embraced, some crying as they took a tour of the the set of furnished rooms

When Thomas Friedman ’75 was a kid, he wanted nothing more than to be a profession-al golfer. He was the captain of his high school team at St. Louis Park High School in Minneap-olis, and in 1970, he caddied for Puerto Rican professional golfer Chi Chi Rodriguez at the U.S. Open. Rodriguez placed 27th in the tournament, and that was the closest that Friedman would ever get to professional golf. But on Sunday afternoon, a group of approximately 100 students, fac-ulty and board members quickly learned that while being a pro-fessional golfer was Friedman’s dream at the time, shortly there-after, one high school journalism class and a trip to Israel would completely transform his life.

In Levin Ballroom this Sun-day, March 1, the award-winning New York Times foreign affairs columnist spoke about how he formed his passion for journal-ism, followed by a discussion about the current state of Israeli politics, U.S. relations with Isra-el and other controversial issues in the Middle East. Friedman, who has won three Pulitzer Priz-es and has authored six nation-al bestsellers, was interviewed on stage by Chen Arad ’15 and

Rivka Cohen ’17, both of whom ask him not only about his time at Brandeis, but also about his career of international report-ing and his personal views on the state of Israel. The event was organized by Brandeis Visions for Israel in an Evolving World (BVIEW), a group of students committed to “revolutionizing how students discuss Israel on campus,” according to its web-site. BVIEW is a nonpartisan, in-dependent student organization that brings together thought-pro-voking speakers and facilitates student discussions to develop a “forward-looking outlook for Is-rael’s future.”

Friedman grew up in the 1960s in a small suburb right outside Minneapolis. In 10th grade, Friedman signed up to take jour-nalism with Ms. Hattie Steinberg, who he claimed was “legendary” in changing students’ views of the world.

“Her journalism class was the only journalism class that I’ve ever taken,” Friedman said. “Not because I was that good but be-cause she was that good.”

In that same year of 1968, Friedman’s parents took him on a trip to Israel to visit his sis-ter who was studying abroad at the time in Tel Aviv. After being

On Thursday, March 5, the Af-rican and Afro-American Stud-ies Department hosted a lecture by Dr. Robert Vinson titled “Al-bert Luthuli, Nelson Mandela and the Genealogies of Armed Struggle in Apartheid South Af-rica.” A professor in the AAAS Department introduced Vinson and the lecture, which is part of the annual Ruth First Me-

morial Lecture, and the lecture was followed by a short ques-tion-and-answer session.

The lecture was established in 1985 through the generous dona-tion of Rose Schiff, Eileen Schiff Wingard and Zina Schiff Eisen-berg in memory of their daugh-ter and sister Louise Joy Schiff. Since then, every year the Afri-can and Afro-American Stud-ies Department hosts a lecture on black liberation in southern Africa. It is named after Ruth

First, a white South African who dedicated her life to eliminating apartheid in the country. Born to members of the Communist Par-ty, First became a journalist and reported for The Guardian, but because of the radical nature of the paper itself and First’s writ-ings and outspoken nature, she was exiled to Mozambique and eventually assassinated.

First’s husband, Joe Slavo, was

Students, faculty and other members of the community cel-ebrated the official opening of the Brandeis Rape Crisis Cen-ter (RCC) in Usdan on Wednes-day, March 4. The RCC will now serve as a safe space and service for survivors of sexual violence on campus, as well as a hub for programs to combat it. The cen-ter, located next to the Gender and Sexuality Center and the Office of Prevention Services, was first proposed last year by members of Brandeis Stu-dents Against Sexual Violence (B.SASV), as a response to what activists saw as a lack of appro-priate action by the Brandeis ad-ministration.

“Our ultimate goal, of course, is to put ourselves out of busi-ness,” Sexual Assault Services and Prevention Specialist Sheila McMahon told the crowd. “It is a powerful moment to be able to come together with gratitude for the work that’s been done by so

Inside this issue:News: CAST establishes grant for social changeArts, Etc.: ‘House of Cards’ disappoints Opinion: Study abroad housing needs reformFeatures: French club hosts Top ChefEditorial: Student activists bring about RCC

Lottery unfairDCL’s lottery system leaves stu-dents overstressed and rushed to pick housing optionsopinion: Page 12

openMic night poses chaLLenging queriesJaded’s first OpenMic night fea-tures powerful messages on race and identity in Americaarts: Page 16

Page 2Page 6Page 13 Page 10Page 4

2 NEWS The Brandeis Hoot March 6, 2015

The faculty committee of the Cre-ativity, the Arts and Social Transfor-mation (CAST) minor awarded four grants of $2,000 to faculty members exploring the relationship between the arts and social change. The grants seek to promote interdisciplinary discussion, social justice and peace building through creative projects at Brandeis. The grants were awarded to Professors Azlin Perdomo (ROMS), Adrianne Krstansky (THA), Ilana Szobel (NEJS) and Judith Eissenberg (MUS). Dr. Cynthia Cohen, co-chair of the faculty committee, explained that they decided to award grants to projects exemplifying “themes of the minor” after receiving a donation from the Max and Sunny Howard Memorial Foundation. Cohen be-lieves each project “explores a very interesting point of intersection among creativity, the arts and social transformation.” Perdomo will create a website called “My American Girls” highlighting undocumented women, specifically a group of cafeteria work-ers to whom she became close while teaching at Boston College. Perdomo will manipulate photos of her and her daughter to look like dolls, represent-ing the women. Each will have a bi-ography and accessories manifesting their unique identities, parodying the American Girl Doll website.

Of her inspiration Perdomo said, “Being an immigrant myself, I’ve re-alized there are a lot of people who, because their status is not legal in this country, they live in the shadows.” She explains all immigrants grapple with

CAST program grants $2,000 to promote art and social changeBy Hannah Schuster

Editor

Award-winning Times columnist Friedman ’75 speaks about his passion for journalism and Israeli politics

photo from internet source

faculty members receive grants Pictured above are the four faculty members who received $2,000 CAST program grants.

identity, but these women questioned their very right to exist. Her goal is to “be the voice of these women and bring these stories to light.” Perdo-mo asked, “What’s the difference between these women and any other important American citizen like, say, Hillary Clinton.”

“I love the fact that [the grant] deals with social issues and how you can creatively present an issue that is contemporary, that’s pressing, that needs our attention,” said Perdo-mo, who also hopes to use her work in the classroom in discussions on immigration or human rights. She would assign “tasks” to each doll—including a mother’s desire to bring her kids to the U.S.—to help students understand the challenges they face.

Eager to produce her website this summer, Perdomo explained the grant allows her to contract graphic and web designers.

Szobel’s project centers on Tamar Borer, an Israeli dancer who contin-ues to perform though her legs were paralyzed in a car crash.

“She is such an inspiring human being and artist that she made me think about so many issues related to the juxtaposition of disability and political change and dance and the body and gender,” said Szobel who attended Borer’s shows and partici-pated in her workshops in Israel. She will also explore how Borer’s work re-lates to the political climate in Israel, hoping “to see what kind of change we can create.” “I have a lot of faith in art,” said Szobel. She plans to return to Israel in search of more footage of Borer’s dancing, perhaps a video of her first performance post-accident.

With the grant money, Szobel intends to employ Brandeis students to help analyze her research. “The idea is not just to teach [students]…but mainly to get their perspectives,” said Szobel.

Krstansky will develop a syllabus exploring theater and race. Her in-spiration lies with a student who approached her to relay the need for such a class and ask whether she would steward it.“That need and par-ticular question, whether I, a white professor could teach a class on race and theater is the inspiration for my project—to explore the particular ways the theater can open the con-versation around race,” wrote Krstan-sky in an email to The Brandeis Hoot.

For Krstansky, the grant was “the perfect opportunity to understand the community engagement piece of theater making.” This summer, she will work with Cohen to analyze the “Acting Together” anthology from the Ethics Center’s Program in Peace-building and the Arts and Theatre Without Borders of which Cohen is principal investigator. It explores the role of peacebuilding theater in violent areas and will help shape the course. Krstansky explained that her admiration for Cohen’s work encour-aged her to apply for the grant.

She hopes her class will address the complexity of the subject, incor-porating her knowledge as well as students’ cultural understandings of race and will explore this through the art of theater. Eissenberg will analyze birdsongs in correlation with envi-ronmental action. Working with Pro-fessor Dan Perlman (BIOL/ENVS), composer Kurt Rohde, birdsong expert Don Koodsma and Brandeis

students, Eissenberg will compose music using songs from birds on the verge of extinction, thus bringing those species to the forefront of peo-ple’s minds.

“I … have been feeling the need to express my concern with the loss of diversity in the natural world,” said Eissenberg of her project’s or-igins in an email. An NPR segment on the book “The Great Animal Or-chestra” by Bernie Kraus “ignited a spark” within Eissenberg. A scientist recorded birds in a forest, but af-ter some time, returned to the same woods and found evidence of defor-estation in the stifling of birdsongs. Eissenberg will use the grant money to employ composers and musicians, stating the grant is “a strong encour-agement to go ahead.” Through her work, Eissenberg seeks to challenge herself artistically, to connect art and science, and wield the power music to expose what is happening in nature. The professors relate their

honor to have been selected for the CAST award and are excited to work in conduction with the unique pro-gram and have their work recognized as meaningful.

They agree that a community has formed between them, providing support and allowing them to discuss their projects. They have met once al-ready and will meet again this spring.

Of their first meeting, Szobel ex-plained, “The amount of enthusiasm is just overwhelming…It was real-ly great to be exposed to the other projects and to see that such amazing things are happening at Brandeis.”

Krstansky stated the women form “a wonderful group of people who are extremely supportive of each oth-er’s projects.”

She continues to praise the “sup-port and expertise” of Cohen, who the recipients respect and admire, writing “[Cohen] has the ability to ask the most profound questions of the work and is an incredible guide.”

RCC opening a reason to celebrate for Brandeis community

From FRIEDMAN, page 1

“swept off his feet” in Israel, he spent his high school summers there living on a kibbutz. He started out at the University of Minnesota, but was still drawn to Israel, so he spent his sophomore year of college attending the He-brew University of Jerusalem.

Friedman transferred to Brandeis in the fall of 1973, writ-ing a few op-ed pieces for The Justice. In trying to gain a great-er understanding about the Mid-dle East, he travelled back over-seas but this time he landed at the American University in Cairo and subsequently spent time over the next years at St. Antony’s College, University of Oxford.

While walking down the street one day, in 1975, Friedman no-ticed a headline on The Evening Standard that read “Carter to

Jews: If Elected, I Promise to Fire Dr. K.” President Jimmy Carter was running against Gerald Ford for president, and Friedman had a strong opinion about this.

“I thought to myself, ‘Isn’t that interesting? He’s trying to win Jewish votes by promising to fire the first-ever Jewish Sec-retary of State,’” Friedman said. He does not know what inspired him to do so, but he immediate-ly went back to his dorm room and wrote up a column. He gave it to his future wife, also study-ing in London, to bring home on spring break, and it landed in the hands of the editorial page edi-tor of The Des Moines Register. “I had been walking down the street, I had an opinion, I wrote it up, and someone paid me $50,” Friedman said. “And thus a col-umnist was born.”

Friedman transitioned the discussion into speaking about some of his own personal views

on Israel. “I’m a huge believer in the two-state solution,” he said. “And I have believed that ever since I was here [at Brandeis]. There’s no mystery on my views; they’ve actually never changed, and they have never evolved. The only thing that’s changed is the possibility of it.”

He then went on to speak about the meaning of objective reporting, as well as how this plays out in Middle East politics. “When it comes to the Middle East, if you want to be a report-er there, the thing you have to understand is everyone wants to own you,” Friedman said. “Every-one’s a partisan … And it’s not about journalism. It’s about poli-tics, and everyone wants you on their side.”

When asked about his opin-ion on Prime Minister of Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu coming to speak before Congress this Mon-day, March 2, Friedman said it

would “directionally be part of a broader erosion.” He said that this indicates that Israel should become a conservative Repub-lican issue, even though he be-lieves Israel should always be a bipartisan issue.

Friedman briefly spoke about ISIS and other radical Islamist groups. He said that when look-ing at the region of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Jordan, it is a “plu-ralistic region that lacks plural-ism.” From 30,000 feet above, he said what the world is seeing is a region whose pluralistic charac-ter is governed vertically.

“Therefore, that region can only be stable if the constituent communities forge social con-tracts for how to govern them-selves, not vertically but hori-zontally, where they live as equal citizens,” Friedman said.

The discussion ended with questions from the audience, ranging from topics about the

“death” of journalism to advice for Brandeis students. Friedman thinks that journalism will con-tinue to survive as long as the quality of the content can remain the same.

“There’s only one thing in journalism that hasn’t changed, and that’s what makes for a great column,” Friedman said. “Great reporting, great analysis, great interviewing and great writing. I tend to be totally platform-ag-nostic because to me it’s all about journalism.”

Friedman ended the talk with some advice for Brandeis stu-dents. “Whatever it is, you have to be passionate and persuasive about your ideas,” Friedman said. “I’m a little Jewish guy from Minnesota, and I’ve learned that the secret of life is being a good listener. Listening to someone is a sign of respect, and if you truly listen to someone, it is amazing what they will let you see.”

the Center occupies. “[I feel] a mixture of gratitude, relief and frustration [the Center] did not open faster,” Senior Vice Presi-dent for Students and Enrollment Andrew Flagel told The Brandeis Hoot at the event. “I hope that every student always feels that they have a place they can go.”

For students, the opening was

a relief after years of work. “As an activist who has been work-ing on this, it felt like there was a gap for a long time and a lack of a set safe space,” Blustein said. “It’s great to know that even though I’m graduating, this will continue and be a real, function-ing place.”

The Center’s student coordina-tors will also be working on pro-grams with various departments, including a screening co-spon-

sored with Brandeis’ film pro-gram to spread awareness about the Center and its services, ac-cording to Blustein.

The RCC will soon finish hir-ing Brandeis students as peer ad-vocates. These students will help the Center operate its services.

Moving forward, a campuswide task force is currently looking at reports and suggestions by B.SASV and others to implement in the ongoing fight against sex-

ual assault on campus, according to McMahon.

“We have education and train-ing programs, but having a real coordinated and comprehensive program is a goal,” McMahon said.

“Our campus climate [safety] survey is also going out in [the end of March], and that will be hugely helpful.”

McMahon will be one of the primary professional staffers at

the Crisis Center, along with the Psychological Counseling Cen-ter’s Kristin Huang, interim Pre-vention Specialist Rani Neutill and newly-hired Title IX Coordi-nator Rebecca Tiller.

For now, their main concern is to make the existence of the RCC, one of the few independent on-campus centers in the Unit-ed States, known to students and keep working toward putting it-self out of business.

From RCC, page 1

Social justice employers reach out at industry nightBy Emily Smith

Staff

photo from internet source

3 NEWS The Brandeis Hoot March 6, 2015

The Hassenfeld Conference Center was filled with students and industry representatives on Tuesday night, March 3 for the Hiatt Career Center’s Brandeis Industry Night: SoJust. The event, cosponsored by the Heller School, began with a case chal-lenge, which gave students an opportunity to develop solutions and present them to a panel of industry representatives. Repre-sented in the panel were Ben and Jerry’s, Lawrence Public Schools and OXFAM America. Following the case challenge was a brief talk by Hiatt staff about networking, and then open networking in various rooms of the conference center.

The event highlighted careers in social justice, including social services, education, health and human rights and community or-ganizing. Many of the companies and organizations represented at the industry night do work in-

ternationally as well as domesti-cally. Students attended the event from both the undergraduate and graduate levels and with a diverse array of interests. This industry night was originally scheduled for February as part of ’DEIS Impact, but had to be rescheduled due to weather. Despite the reschedul-ing, many employers and students were still able to attend the event.

Students, whom Hiatt staff en-couraged to dress professionally, were allowed to explore the differ-ent rooms of the conference cen-ter, which were divided up based on field. Each room had several tables where representatives wait-ed with pamphlets and business cards. Students networked and listened for information about potential job opportunities. Many of the representatives were also Brandeis alumni.

To prepare students for the night, the Hiatt Career Center posted a spreadsheet with the names of employers and the in-dustries they represent, as well as topics that they might be available

to discuss with interested stu-dents. Links to company websites as well as LinkedIn accounts were provided.

Susan Lit ’86, chief operating officer of the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, was one of many industry representatives that came to the Industry Night. Lit’s background is in business, as she received an M.B.A. from Northeastern’s D’Amore-McKim School of Business. Her unique experience allowed her to advise students with interests related to finance and business in the social justice field.

Lit talked about the importance of Hiatt’s networking events. “I’ve always volunteered to help Hi-

att events ever since I graduated from Brandeis,” Lit said. “I was a student. I had a work-study job at Hiatt and really appreciated what Hiatt provides students and alum-ni. I like to keep up my connec-tions to Brandeis students. I met a number of students who had great questions and aspirations.”

Some of the students attending the event came looking for sum-mer internships and jobs, while others were interested in full-time employment opportunities after graduation. One of these students was David Altman ’15. Altman is studying philosophy and politics and came to the industry night “in search for a job next year … ideally something in government

or law or nonprofit.”Jose Martinez, a first-year grad-

uate student at the Internation-al Business School, attended the event in hopes of finding an in-ternship. Martinez said he wants a job where he can “play off his skills toward economic develop-ment and do research for devel-oping countries, for programs that can help alleviate some pov-erty.”

Also attending the event were industry representatives from City Year Inc., Teach for India, CMI International Group and many others.

To follow up on the event, the Hiatt Career Center sent out emails to participants urging them to contact the industry rep-resentatives they met, take ad-vantage of LinkedIn and social media, and apply for jobs and internships through their B.Hired service. The center will continue to host industry nights, work-shops and coaching sessions to aid students in their search for employment.

one of the co-founders of Um-khonto we Sizwe (MK), which means “Spear the Nation” in En-glish with Nelson Mandela. MK was a wing of the African Nation-al Congress (ANC), which was led by Albert Luthuli. Vinson began his lecture by asking the audience if we had ever heard of Luthuli, to which a few responded affir-matively by raising their hands. Vinson then presented us with a brief overview of what his lecture would consist of: drawing a con-nection between Luthuli and Nel-son Mandela with a focus on the time period before Mandela be-came the renowned activist he is considered today—what Vinson called “Mandela before Mandela.”

First, Vinson spoke about Apartheid, which means “apart-ness” in Afrikaans. He referred to Apartheid as a more “heightened form” of the Jim Crow laws in the post-Civil War South. Vinson went on to say that rather than a form of fascism, some members of the white South African mi-nority believed Apartheid to be the “solution to the problem of racial integration and proximity that would lead to competition and conflict.” This solution was reached through a series of acts passed by the government that gradually stripped the rights of the black majority.

Elaborating on what he men-tioned only briefly at the be-ginning of his speech, Vinson returned to the life of Albert Lu-thuli. His focus, however, was on Luthuli’s pacifism, which was dis-played in the form of ANC non-violent civil-disobedience tactics. Vinson’s intensity increased when he began to speak about one of the government’s responses to these tactics. He describes the 1960 Sharpeville Massacre where many unarmed protesters were

shot and killed, most in the back as they fled the scene, while nu-merous more were injured.

It was after this event, Vinson said, that the ANC began discuss-ing a change in their policy from non-violent to violent. It was also during this time that Mandela gave his first public speech since 1952 and “when Mandela really became Mandela,” as Vinson stat-ed in his lecture. Mandela grew to be the leader of MK, which pro-moted an armed struggle against the current regime, and Luthuli continued to lead the ANC with nonviolence. During this point in the lecture Vinson had on a slide of his PowerPoint the following quote: “No one can blame brave,

just men for seeking justice by the use of violent methods, nor could they be blamed if they tried to create an organized force in order to ultimately establish peace and racial harmony.” Luthuli said this, perfectly encompassing the com-peting ideas Vinson was speaking about.

The last point that Vinson touched upon before he conclud-ed his talk was the connection between Martin Luther King, Jr. and South Africa. King was very interested in and engaged with the issues going on in South Afri-ca and followed them very closely. According to Vinson, King made a connection between what was happening in South Africa and

the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. He said that it was part of the same struggle.

Vinson paraphrases King in his opinion that “there was a global color line and in order to erase that global color line you had to have a global campaign against all forms of injustice, racial and economic.” King, as well as Mandela, used the ideas Luthuli came up with in both of their movements and yet Luthuli is largely forgotten in the public mind today. In his conclud-ing thoughts, Vinson stresses the fact that “Nelson Mandela evolved into a Luthuli-like figure,” and that ideas flow in “two-way traffic” be-tween people. Vinson expressed his gratitude to his audience for

listening before opening up for questions and comments, both of which he received.

Robert Vinson is the Frances L. and Edwin L. Cummings As-sociate Professor of History and Africana Studies at The College of William and Mary in Virginia. He received his Ph.D. in African History from Howard University and is in the process of publish-ing his next book, “Before Man-dela, Like A King: The Prophetic Politics of Chief Albert Luthuli” which is scheduled to be released sometime this year. The topic of his book re-emphasizes Vinson’s great interest and enthusiasm for this subject, which was evident in his lecture.

MANDELA BEFORE MANDELA: Scholar Vinson draws new light on activism in apartheid South Africa.

Lecture remembers activist Luthult

photo by sharon cai/the hoot

From VINSON, page 1

ADVERTISE

Advertising in The Brandeis Hoot helps spread your message to our readers across the Brandeis campus, in the Waltham community and beyond through our website.

All campus organizations receive a 25 percent discount off our regular prices. We also design basic ads for campus organizations free of charge.

To reserve your space in the paper, contact us by phone at (781) 330-0051 or by e-mail at ads@thebrandeishoot.com.

SUBMISSION POLICIES

The Brandeis Hoot welcomes letters to the editor on subjects that are of interest to the community. Preference is given to current or former community members and The Hoot reserves the right to edit or reject submissions. The deadline for submitting letters is Wednesday at noon. Please submit letters to letters@thebrandeishoot.com along with your contact information. Letters should not exceed 500 words. The opinions, columns, cartoons and advertisements printed in The Hoot do not necessarily represent the opinions of the editorial board.

“To acquire wisdom, one must observe.”Editors-in-ChiefDana Trismen

Andrew ElmersSenior Managing Editor

Victoria Aronson

Managing EditorTheresa Gaffney

News EditorsEmily Belowich

Jess Linde

Arts EditorMichelle Kim

Sports EditorSarah Jousset

Opinions EditorKevin Healey

Deputy News EditorsCharlotte AaronHannah Schuster

Deputy Features EditorJacob Edelman

Deputy Hoot Scoops EditorEmily Smith

Senior Copy EditorsMia Edelstein

Julie Landy

Copy EditorAllison Plotnik

Senior Layout EditorSasha Ruiz

Deputy Layout EditorLudi Yang

Graphics EditorLinjie Xu

Website EditorsZak Kolar

Zach Phil Schwartz

Volume 12 • Issue 6the brandeis hoot • brandeis university

415 south street • waltham, maFounded By Leslie Pazan, Igor Pedan and Daniel Silverman

CONNECTphone • (781) 330-0051

e-mail • editor@thebrandeishoot.comonline • thebrandeishoot.com

twitter • twitter.com/thebrandeishootfacebook • facebook.com/thebrandeishoot

MISSIONAs the weekly community student newspaper of Brandeis

University, The Brandeis Hoot aims to provide our readers with a reliable, accurate and unbiased source of news and information. Produced entirely by students, The Hoot serves a readership of 6,000 with in-depth news, relevant commentary, sports and coverage of cultural events. Recognizing that better journalism leads to better policy, The Brandeis Hoot is dedicated to the principles of investigative reporting and news analysis. Our mission is to give every community member a voice.

GIVE A HOOT,JOIN THE HOOT!

Writers, editors, photographers and graphic artists wanted to join The Brandeis Hoot, your weekly community newspaper.

To learn more, send us an e-mail at join@thebrandeishoot.com, or visit our website http://thebrandeishoot.com/join.

This week, Brandeis celebrated the open-ing of its Rape Crisis Center. The RCC aims to act as a safe space where students

feel comfortable reporting and receiving support following sexual assault. A long time in the making, the RCC is absolutely a positive step forward in Brandeis’ handling of sexual violence on campus.

In recent years, Brandeis has rightly been criticized for its poor approach to sexual violence cases. In 2012, The Brandeis Hoot reported on a case in which a Brandeis student alleged she was raped by a Heller School student. In an editorial, The Hoot wrote that the survivor feared for her safety on campus and stated, “Administrators acted in a manner inconsistent with federal law, community stan-dards and social justice.” In 2013, allegations surfaced of an assault at the ZBT fraternity house, which resulted in an expulsion. In Sep-tember 2014, Brandeis came under investiga-

tion for Title IX violation. Throughout these cases, there have been

many calls for action from Brandeis students and faculty. Brandeis Students Against Sexual Violence (B.SASV) released a petition in April 2014 demanding a series of changes to sexual violence policy.

Last September at the “Light of Reason” dedication and at the annual Messiah Sing, students protested about what they felt was an overall lack of action. Last week, The Hoot reported on the final report from the UAC Sub-committee on Sexual Violence which outlined a series of proposals.

The Hoot believes that the opening of the RCC is a concrete step in the right direction for the university and celebrates the hard work of the students who made it happen. It is a tangi-ble resource now available to Brandeis students. We believe the RCC will help students to feel safe on campus, particularly students who need

support in the traumatic aftermath of sexual assault. It demonstrates that Brandeis students, faculty and administration are all committed to fighting sexual violence on campus. From student protests and administrative promises, has come a valuable resource.

The Hoot would also like to congratulate Sheila McMahon and the student activists involved with the Rape Crisis Center. The RCC has been a work in progress for many months, and we are grateful for their hard work and deviation. They have truly worked so hard to create this Center—working to have the plan approved, to hire and train volunteers and to address logistical details such as phone setup.

Brandeis is one of the only schools in the country with a Rape Crisis Center on campus. We hope this development will shed a new-found positive light on the university, but also encourage the university to continue moving forward in the fight against sexual violence.

RCC’s opening positive progressEDITORIALS4 The Brandeis Hoot March 6, 2015

STAFFClayre Benzadon, Ethan Berceli, Rachel Bossuk,

Robin Briendel, Sharon Cai, Karen Caldwell, Shikha Chandarana, Emma Hanselman, Cur-tis Zunyu He, Emma Kahn, Shayna Korol, Joe Lanoie, Nabi Menai, Monique J Menezes, Joon Park, Lisa Petrie, Sabrina Pond, Emily Scharf, Hannah Schuster, Marian Siljeholm, Eliana

Sinoff, Emily Smith, Hannah Stewart, Joe Vigil, Michael Wang, Sophia Warren

UNSOLICITED SUBMISSIONSWe welcome unsolicited submissions from members of the

community sent by e-mail to eic@thebrandeishoot.com. Please limit submissions to 800 words. All submissions are subject to editing.

The Brandeis baseball team started its sea-son over February break in Florida at the Russ-Matt Invitational. The Judges went 2-4 in their six games. Nick Falkson ’18 was a huge player in the Judges games’. In his collegiate debut, Falkson batted .458 with a slugging percentage of .708, while playing all six games at shortstop and committing only one error in 31 chances.

Falkson’s outstanding performance at the in-vitational led to his selection by the University Athletic Association as the Hitter of the Week while also being named to the D3Baseball.com’s Team of the Week. When asked about his achievement in his first week of the season, Falkson replied, “I just want to continue to work hard and help the team succeed in whatever way

possible.”“I love competing for Brandeis and playing

under a coach who knows as much about the game as anybody does. Also, it’s awesome to learn from some of the upperclassmen and use them as mentors,” said Falkson. However, his love of the game is deeply rooted in his child-hood. Falkson said that he started baseball in little league, following in the steps of his brother. “My favorite thing about baseball is just playing the game. My favorite memory would have to be playing shortstop and second base with my older brother a few summers ago. It was a real-ly cool experience playing a season in the same infield as him.”

Falkson, a native of Dedham, MA, is plan-ning to major in marketing and computer science during his time at Brandeis. “I chose

Brandeis because it offers a great balance be-tween challenging academics and a strong baseball program.” Falkson is hoping to help his team succeed in whatever way possible this sea-son, as the team looks toward UAA conference play in Florida this coming week. “Our team puts in a lot of work. We practice every day in preparation for next week’s UAA tournament.”

“He has transitioned from third base, his natural position, to shortstop and has done a nice job. I am very pleased with his progress so far,” Head Coach Richard Varney said about Falkson’s play and growth this season.

Falkson is one of many rookies that will par-ticipate in what looks like a bright future for the Judges. Brandeis baseball will play eight games at the UAA tournament down in Florida next week, starting with a game against Rochester.

Nick Falkson ’18 part of bright future for Brandeis baseball

By Sarah JoussetStaff

CorrectionAn article published in The Brandeis Hoot

on Friday, Feb. 27 about the “What I Be” pho-to project at Brandeis incorrectly stated that the event was sponsored in part by Hillel at

Brandeis with support of the Max and Sunny Howard Memorial Foundation.

The event was sponsored in full by Hillel with support of the Foundation.

We would also like to add that Emily Beker ’15, the campus relations coordinator of the Hil-lel Student Board, co-chaired the event.

ARTS, ETC.March 6, 2015 The Brandeis Hoot 5

Fargana Qasimova to begin residency with Prof. Eissenberg’s MusicUnitesUS

This week, I was fortunate enough to interview Judith Eissenberg (MUS) about her MusicUnitesUS program as well as this Saturday, March 7’s event, which will feature Fargana Qasimova, a resident in MusicUnitesUS.

The Brandeis Hoot: What is the MusicUnitesUS program? What is its aim, and why was it started?

Judith Eissenberg: I founded MUUS in 2003. In the wake of the events of 9/11, I needed to find some way—as a musician—that I could work toward a more peaceful world. I felt that one of the “aftershocks” of 9/11 was to heighten the division between “us” and “them” … and I felt the need to understand “them” from “their” per-spective and also feel more clearly our shared humanity. Music has the potential to meet both of these needs. Understanding the Other requires at some point that we listen to the Oth-er’s perspective, listen deeply. Music is a universal genre that expresses identity, reveals history and expresses cultural, social and personal values. I also have found that at the heart of all music, if you go far enough back, and far enough inward, is the desire to touch the divine, to know beauty and to understand who we are as humans. I know that is a big statement, and of course, but I do believe that all music, in some way, references those things. So the mission statement of MusicU-nitesUS is to further the understand-ing and appreciation of diverse cul-tures through music. We believe that music is a common medium that can help to unite diverse cultures in our own neighborhoods and transcend boundaries in the global community.

How this happens at Brandeis: We invite musicians from around the world to campus for a week. The mu-sicians visit classes from across cam-pus, including anthropology, Inter-national and Global Studies, gender studies, studio art, music and others. In every class, we hear from the mu-

By Michelle KimEditor

sicians, first through the language of music, and then in discussions which are pretty far-ranging. There is an out-reach program to the public schools with a lesson plan that connects the music to the social studies curricu-lum—a sort of mini-version of what happens in the classes at the university level. The week is capped by a Satur-day evening concert. Typically, these sell out—filled with Brandeis students and audience from the greater Boston area. I am particularly interested in fo-cusing on musicians in conflict areas, but that isn’t always the case. Over the years, we’ve had musicians from Cuba, Argentina, Brazil, Peru, Iran, Israel, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Turkey, India, North Africa, Ghana, Mali, Guinea, China, Korea … I’m sure I’ve left some

out … We have a treasured, ongoing relationship with the Aga Khan Music Initiative, who partners with MUUS to bring outstanding musicians from the Middle East, South Asia, Central and West Africa. AKMI is helping us bring Fargana Qasimov and her en-semble to campus this week.

BH: Who is Fargana Qasimova, and what makes her an ideal person for the residency?

JE: Fargana is one of the most high-ly regarded singers in Azerbaijan, singing a repertoire from the Ashiq (folk-troubadour) tradition, and from the Sufi-inspired mugham tradition. She is of the younger generation, and, as a woman, she is forging new territo-ry in what she does and how she does it. She is the daughter and disciple of

Alim Qasimov, a world-renowned vocalist. The New York Times called him one of the five top singers from any genre in the world performing to-day. She learned everything from him, and yet has created her own distinct style. We had both Alim and Fargana back in 2010. They visited 12 classes on campus, and their final concert was sold out. The music was stunning, the conversations deeply compelling. On that visit, Alim did most of the talking. But the few times we heard from Fargana, we knew we wanted to hear more. We wanted to hear her breathtaking artistry and we simply wanted to get to know her better, for all kinds of reasons. I should add, she is accompanied by traditional musi-cians who are virtuosic and deeply

expressive in their own right.BH: What will she do at Brandeis?JE: She will begin the residency in

Chandler Rosenberger’s (IGS/LGLS/SOC) Intro to International and Global Studies class. She and the en-semble will perform music from both her folk and classical repertoire. Each class receives an explanation, given by the residency curator, musicolo-gist Aida Huseynova, who also will translate for Qasimova. Every event will have its own slant; for example, my world music class will be looking at the changing role for Azerbaija-ni women musicians over the years and Fargana’s place in that. We’ll also be exploring the meaning of “hal,” a word that relates to the Sufi influ-ence, a deep connection to the Divine. There is an improv workshop, a visit to a studio art class. Students from the new Creativity, the Arts and Social Transformation class will come to a performance. There was an informal demonstration in the Mandel Atrium at noon on Wednesday. But of course, the final event is the world music con-cert, Saturday night. I should add, I take great pride in our receptions after the concert. We’re planning Persian food for this one, celebrating the Per-sian origins of mugham!

BH: What kind of music will be per-formed at the event this coming Sat-urday? What types of other musicians will be present?

JE: Fargana and the ensemble will perform a bardic repertoire of the ashiq tradition (love songs, heroic songs) and classical, Sufi-inspired mugham. The instruments are: tar (a long-necked lute), kamanche (a spike, bowed fiddle), balaban (a woody, soulful oboe-like instrument) and naghara (a drum). Fargana will some-times play the daf, a hand drum. The concert will be preceded by a talk, giv-en by residency curator, Huseynova, who will give some historical context on Azerbaijan, on the music and on the ever-developing tradition the mu-sicians are bringing. The music that follows will take you on a journey that you will think and feel about for a long time to come. Don’t miss it. Get your tickets now!

photo from internet sourcefargana qasimova Qasimova and an ensemble member perform

From exile to performance, Gayflor inspires hopeBy Victoria Aronson

Editor

Exiled from her home country in the midst of civil war, Fatu Gayflor, renowned vocalist, founder and ar-tistic director of the Liberian Wom-en’s Chorus for Change, spoke to the Brandeis community on Thursday, March 5 to share legacies of loss, vi-olence, resilience and hope. Now set-tled in Philadelphia, Gayflor stated, “Telling my story has helped me to be the strong person I am today.”

Gayflor is one of four acclaimed vocalists comprising the Liberian Women’s Chorus for Change, an ini-tiative of the Philadelphia Folklore Project, which seeks to share experi-ences of domestic violence and post conflict reconciliation through song and performance. Joined by Tori Shapiro-Phim, director of programs for the Philadelphia Folklore Project, Gayflor shared her experiences as a former refugee and survivor of civil war.

In an exclusive interview with The Brandeis Hoot following her perfor-mance, Gayflor revealed her incred-

ible journey through war-torn Liberia to her rise as an acclaimed vocalist inspiring hope in her audiences across the world. Born in the village of Ka-kata, Gayflor quickly rose to fame in her youth and was dubbed “Princess Fatu Gayflor, the golden voice of Li-beria.” Exiled from her home country during the outbreak of civil war in 1989, Gayflor was forced to live as a refugee in neighboring countries for years. She also lost her infant child to the violence of the Liberian civil war. “Whenever I perform for people and share the story of my lost child, I keep on praying and I get that courage. That’s what I have learned,” Gayflor reflected.

While living on the Ivory Coast as a refugee, Gayflor continued to perform and had the good fortune to encoun-ter the renowned AC Milan soccer player George Weah, who was also from Liberia. Traveling with Weah to Milan to perform in the World Food Program Festival, Gayflor recalls her immense gratitude and surprise when he bestowed her and her fellow vocal-ists with instruments and went on to sponsor her first album.

In 1998, Gayflor flew to the United States and began her life in Philadel-phia, where she lived with her close friend Kormassa Bobo, who had grown up in the same village. It was there that Bobo introduced Gayflor to the Philadelphia Folk Club, remark-ing, “This is the birth of your second career.” She still recalls those exact words years later, and Gayflor express-es her immense gratitude to her dear friend.

Accustomed to performing in the ensemble tradition with the Liberian Women’s Chorus for Change, Gayflor nevertheless stepped out of her com-fort zone to share a solo performance with Brandeis students on Thursday. “I’m so proud of myself,” she stated. Remarking on how incredible the students were at engaging in the per-formance, Gayflor reveals that she felt as if she was transported back to Libe-ria, just for a moment. Following the event, students shared hugs and heart-felt expressions of gratitude to Gayflor for her inspiring performance.

When asked what she wishes to impart upon her audiences, Gayflor responded, “I want them to remem-

ber me as a Liberian woman first of all, who came to them and impacted them.” According to Yasmin Yousof ’15, Gayflor did just that. “Innovative pedagogies are rare—but so import-ant! Fatu is taking dance and repur-posing it to bring light to issues within her community. That’s so beautiful. It highlights that dance is more than unrehearsed, seemingly incoherent movements, but rather, something de-liberate and strategic,” Yousof stated.

When asked to describe her ex-periences as an immigrant living in Philadelphia, Gayflor expressed the obstacles she and other Liberians faced. “I met people with my color, and I thought they would be there to give us hope … I thought they would jump to hold us,” she stated. Pointing to the terrible system of slavery which generations had suffered through in the United States, she described the lack of compassion from the racial groups she identified with as “one of my greatest disappointments.” In light of this experience, Gayflor expressed her desire to foster a dialogue between African Americans and African im-migrants.

Gayflor’s passion for performance has passed on to her young eight-year-old daughter, Fayola Karblee. Shapiro-Shim commented, “[Fayola is] so talented, and just as charismatic as Fatu. The audience can’t keep their eyes off her.”

Expressing her sincere gratitude to her colleague Shapiro-Shim, Gayflor stated, “Having her on my side is so beautiful, she makes it so easy for me.” Gayflor also wished to express her sin-cere gratitude to Brandeis faculty and students who warmly welcomed her to perform and share her experiences. “We are hoping this will last forever. You cannot change anything in one day,” Gayflor stated.

photo from internet source

March 6, 2015 The Brandeis Hoot 6

JBS and English department collaborate to create new course

By Emma KahnStaff

The Justice Brandeis Semester program is an academic staple at Brandeis; however, its curriculum is ever-changing to incorporate all ranges of experiential discovery. This year, the English Department has collaborated with JBS programs to offer “Storytelling as Social Practice,” a conglomeration of three courses designed to fuse the social aspects of storytelling with narrative textual analysis. During the nine-week pro-gram, students of all experience levels and fields of study will be able to ac-cumulate the skills necessary to story-telling performances and even reach out to the surrounding community to bring the practice beyond Brandeis.

In our increasingly literate and text-based society, the importance of narrative performance is a topic that the English Department urges stu-dents to explore. This JBS program seeks to engage the humanities in the search for global interactions and so-cial justice, just as the social sciences and other departments have been do-ing by offering opportunities in JBS courses. As highlighted in the course description, students will be able to prepare “for teaching, acting, com-munity outreach, promotion, public speaking, mobilizing social move-

ments or more deeply understanding narrative as a crucial social practice.” By the end of the intensive program, students will have gained vast experi-ence both in- and outside the class-room, as part of the hands-on facet so fundamental to JBS programs. Students will have a repertoire of sto-ries of varying styles and will be able to show off the skills they develop in front of various audiences.

Professor David Sherman (ENG/HSSP) will run the program and teach the three courses that enrolled students will be taking. The English Department has been seeking ways to branch out of the classroom and mobilize the energy of their students, and their first-ever JBS offering can now serve as the vehicle for such aca-demic exploration.

“In the humanities, we’re very good at sitting around with books and talking about how art works or how language works, and it’s not quite as obvious how we do something ex-periential in the community,” said Sherman. “What want to do is do sto-rytelling. The students in JBS will be the storytelling team, or storytelling brigade, so we’ll actually be perform-ing stories in the world. The idea is to really feel the face-to-face, flesh-and-blood experience of how stories cir-culate in communities, and the kinds of relationships that emerge from that storytelling transaction.”

Inspired by ethnographers and the sociological aspects of storytelling, Sherman hopes that students will

understand the fundamental role of narrative in society and culture, and in developing personhood. Although the program intensively studies the role of narrative performance, by no means is the experience limited to English studies. “Any student who wants to more deeply understand the nature of narrative will enroll. That could be somebody from education, who wants to become a storyteller for a classroom, to a fiction writer, to a sociologist looking to understand the dynamics of social relations, to some-one doing business and wants to be an entrepreneur and tell stories to create an enterprise, to future political orga-

nizers who want to talk about social justice campaigns in narrative ways, to anybody else, to anybody who en-joys stories and wants to become a better storyteller,” said Sherman.

There is certainly an emergent na-ture to the storytelling, as students who have never been on stage will be learning to perform for the commu-nity. However, Sherman understands the ongoing process of storytelling and that the program will involve collective learning among all partic-ipants. In fact, the development of the “storytelling brigade” will not end at the conclusion of the nine-week program. Rather, the anticipated out-

come is that students will develop the storytelling brigade into a student-run group, who can recruit all the talented members in the Brandeis community to continue a legacy of narrative tales. “We’ve got a lot of talent here, a lot of creativity and a large horizon when you’re thinking about the area. This is a natural kind of collaboration,” Sher-man said.

The deadline for JBS applications is Monday, March 16 at noon. For any questions regarding the English De-partment session, students can con-tact Sherman at dsherman@brandeis.edu, or more information can be found online.

By Jacob Edelman and Zach Phil Schwartz

Editors

‘House of Cards’ season three fails to live up to hype

Spoiler disclaimer: If you haven’t watched the third season of Netflix’s series “House of Cards” and are plan-ning to, you probably shouldn’t read further.

This review comes from the per-spective of two fans of the show who binge-watched all 13 episodes of the season in a row the same day of release. Food and drink were pre-pared beforehand so there would be no interruption, and once the binge started, there was no stopping until completion.

Although many fans eagerly await-ed Netflix’s release of the critically acclaimed political drama starring Kevin Spacey, “House of Cards,” the new season failed to deliver on many of its expectations. As lofty as the expectations were, the release was nonetheless synonymous with me-diocre. If nothing else, compared to the significantly better previous two seasons, the new release was stale, and the show simply did not fire on all cylinders.

The season opener was a CGI-lad-en, outdoor setting that seemed out-of-step with the start of a new season. Thoroughly unnecessary to start with, it left a bland taste on the palette that remained for much of the rest of the first several unmem-orable episodes. Within the first five minutes of the opening, however, the “wow” moment of the entire season had taken place, leaving nowhere to go but down.

The show was conceived of for the purposes of portraying a political power couple willing to stop at noth-ing on their climb to the top. Season one consists of Frank Underwood’s development into a cold, calculating

psychopath. He takes decisive action and makes it to within one step from the top as he so desires. Season two’s outcome was predictable from the outset, that Frank would only have to take one final step up the ladder to achieve his ends, which turned out to be the hardest step to position for in his political career. Season three was no game of conniving offense, but a display of playing defense on all sides, both from that of his enemies and his rapidly defecting friends, finally culminating in a showdown under his own roof. The plotting had end-ed, and the show lost some of its icy, ruthless charm.

During the first two seasons, Frank frequently turns to the audience and let them know exactly his thought processes, but this became far too in-frequent in the new season. The show gives the audience a similar, yet more defensive Underwood who made the same questionable choices, although this time failing to explain his mind-set to the viewers. This threw off the viewers on more than one occasion and only helped add to the confusion factor involved in the release.

In the beginning of the season, it is revealed that Doug Stamper is still alive, with the natural assumption being that he would rejoin Frank as a trusted advisor, as the show is about Frank. In actuality, howev-er, many of the episodes revolved around Doug’s recovery from the injuries he sustained in the second season’s finale and his twisted quest for revenge against Rachel, which had become an obsession for him. In the Rachel-Doug storyline that had been uninteresting since the first season, this was a slap in the face to viewers who expected a political drama, and instead got an obsessed ex-aide—mind you, a minor character—bent on twisted revenge. The only posi-tive about this totally unrelated and wasteful storyline is that it is predict-ably resolved in the end, giving the

viewers much-needed relief.The Stamper story arc is not the

only conflicting one, however. The U.S.-Russia story arc that occurs mid-season is arguably the best of-fered to the audience, touching on real-world issues and showing rem-nants of writing talent that are visible in only the first two seasons. What did the show do to this arc, howev-er? The show turns in the opposite direction, totally dropping it entirely, instead focusing on the primaries for the 2016 election. Not only would this have been a terrible move in the real world politically, this move was terri-ble for the show. It totally abandoned an interesting story arc and replaced it with filler-quality material that lasts until the end of the season.

Worse yet, the show reused ele-ments that would be best used once not just in the same season but in the span of several episodes. Toward the end of the season, Frank tries unsuccessfully to keep Jackie Sharp, an ally, in line by making it perfectly clear who the boss is, but this tactic backfires, and Sharp defects. Used once, this was a surprising and inter-esting move by the writing staff, but they utilized the betrayal card again on Claire, which also backfires, driv-ing her away. With the Sharp defec-tion fresh on the minds of viewers, this tactic had gone stale. And this was not just an isolated incident. At many times throughout the season, elements like these were reused ar-bitrarily, only strengthening the stale factor and the boredom that followed.

It feels to us as though the third season of “House of Cards” lost what made it so captivating in the first two. Previously, individual episodes oper-ated not only as part of a larger story arc, but also contained their own con-flicts that were entirely and delicious-ly resolved by their ends. This time around, there is a distinct lack of tasty mini-conflict in each episode, and the episodes are structured so that each

contributes to the overall storyline, even at the expense of the show’s ex-pediency. This would have been great if it had been done correctly and with more interesting techniques, but many television shows enter risky waters when they switch from mini-conflicts and overall arc contri-bution to total storyline progression, and most of those do not make it out alive. The third season felt like a slow train ride through endless miles of repetitious, CGI skyline. The over-all progression in this season is best categorized as uninteresting, and the ending is nothing more than a cop-out.

Our final verdict for the third sea-son of “House of Cards” is a profound “We probably would have been bet-ter off not watching this.” We say this with much regret—regret not for the season being as mediocre as it was but with regret that we devoted almost 12 straight hours of our lives to binge-watch it. Unless you are mentally pre-pared to wade through the mediocrity that is the third season, you would probably be better off pretending the third season does not even exist. Wait until the reviews are out on the next season to decide whether or not to proceed with this once-masterpiece of a show.

photo from internet sourcehouse of cards Third season loses elements that made first two seasons so captivating

photo from internet sourcestorytelling as social practice Professor David Sherman (ENG/HSSP) to run new JBS program

March 6, 2015 The Brandeis Hoot ARTS 7

Bricco241 Hanover St., BostonLocated in the North End, this Bostonian favorite is open from 6 a.m. to midnight, which means you can pick

up delicious baked goods at just about any time. First-timers, prepare to pick up the parmesan prosciutto, heat it up at home and eat. Everything is extremely reasonably priced and the staff is nothing but friendly. Only have $1? No worries, you can still buy a buttery croissant.

Thinking Cup85 Newbury St., BostonBustling and kind of pricey, Thinking Cup is not the place to go if you’re looking for a quiet time and cheap cof-

fee. However, customers keep coming here for fast and friendly service, fresh food and hot drinks. The macarons here are ridiculously fresh and have amazing flavors and textures (vanilla and pistachio are always sold out). Come here for a good lunch with chatty friends.

Blunch59 E Springfield St., BostonOne of my new favorite brunch places, Blunch is the reason I don’t wear tight pants to brunch. Located across

from the Boston Medical Center, Blunch is a cozy cafe but is small, so most customers get their stuff to go. Service is very personal and efficient: Go there regularly and the staff will learn your name. If you’re looking for pancakes and eggs, however, Blunch is not the place for you. The menu consists of customizable bagels, sandwiches and pastries. I love the plain bagel with sausage, mozzarella and bacon, as well as the churros.

Hoot Bites: this week’s favorite places to eat in the greater Boston area

By Michelle KimEditor

Surviving Sodexo: Next-level quesadillaBy Charlotte Aaron

Editor

Quesadilla Proteina is a fresh Mex-ican dish for vegetarians who want something more interesting than a salad or veggie burger, but lighter than one of Usdan’s hot meals. It is fresh, simple and contains carbo-hydrates, protein, dairy and vege-tables—all major components of a healthy diet. Although the quesadil-la takes time to make, as the panini press takes a while to melt the cheese, the dish will be well worth the wait.

Ingredients1 round tortilla6 cubes of tofu2 scoops of shredded cheddar

On Friday, Feb. 27, artist Jennie C. Jones came to speak at the Rose Art Museum as part of the “Art | Black-ness | Diaspora Project.” Her paint-ings mostly speak as if they were telling a history through the lens of a photograph, drawing attention to the work narratives of black musicians, with her works containing jazz, pres-ence and absences.

Jones admits that she had mostly struggled to create pieces that spoke about the issue of race, since it takes courage to define a black body and to tell her own story through minimalist

Jennie C. Jones displays work narratives of black musicians

By Clayre BenzadonStaff

works of art. We can see this tension through her work “Crescendo with Ledger Tone.”

The black background contrasts with the glowing reddish-tinted line in the middle, which seems to re-flect a disruption in the piece. This demonstrates the inclusion of space in her pieces. They create moments of silence, as if she were pausing to flip a jazz record before playing it on a record player. The black background gives both a sense of absence but also of presence, highlighting the materi-ality to the composition.

Most of her minimalist works serve to get viewers to interpret the pieces for themselves. Jones says that it’s the materials that are doing the work for her rather than her having to really think about what it is that will be pro-jected onto the print, a sort of spiri-tual process that consumes her with musicality.

The musical aspects of the piece serve to dampen and buffer the paint-ings, because usually paintings, as objects, can be passive-paintings. The installations, the position of the piec-es and the museum space all affect the sound and architecture in the room as well as vice-versa. She speaks of how music creates interplay between a rising and falling of tempo, freezing a moment in time like a “memento mori” painting, and as a way to cre-ate sentences and poetry out of her works.

She considers art as “everything to her” but also “terrifying to her,” which spoke to many of the other artists in the room, as it is one of the biggest struggles they face every day of their lives as they grapple with their iden-tities and fear for taking ownership of a certain style of art, since styles of art are flexible and oftentimes very hard to clearly define.

Another significant point that Jones attempts to reflect through her works is her sense of stretching beyond boundaries and creating a new nar-rative not only in the Rose Art Muse-um, but also throughout every space in which she has the opportunity to express.

The sculptural qualities of her paintings are ultimately based on for-mal decisions focusing on how things relate to each other—through texture, structure and connections of colors. The place of resonance is embodied through the acoustic and sonic verse visually in her pieces. The aggressive nature of her compositions serve to create, more than anything else, a conversation with, as she states, “quo-tation marks around music.”

The color choices are a big part of her work. The union of the warm red and oranges together creates a burst of sound encapsulated in time, like jazz

music culminating before the son-ic and optic qualities come together and work towards creating a density but also brightness, balance, light and sound reverberation.

Overall, Jones is especially inter-ested in the ephemeral, intangible—sounds and color. These techniques create a sort of escape and create an easier way to express the struggles re-flected in the pieces.

What was especially impressive is the way in which Jones was able to capture bebop jazz notations and ge-ometry of music notation through her painting. She played us her sound piece, which one of the participants in the audience thought was a sort of farewell blues composition with Els-worth Kelly influences. The combina-tion of the poetic history, art history and musical history all intertwine to introduce a more complex interpreta-tion of minimalist art.

Make It Work By Katherine Selector

cheese3 diced tomato slicessalsaRecipeFirst, politely ask Marie, a Sodexo

employee who works the sandwich bar, for one tortilla. Take the torti-lla and lay it out on a flat plate. On a separate, small plate, take six cubes of tofu from the salad bar and cut them in half. Carefully place them on one half of the round tortilla. It is easiest to lay the pieces along the diameter and then work your way out toward the perimeter of the tortilla. After all 12 half slices of tofu are placed on the tortilla, take 3 slices of tomato from the salad bar and dice them. While the size of tomato dices can vary, it is suggested that they average about two square centimeters. Scatter the diced tomato on top of and in between the

sliced tofu. Lastly, sprinkle two scoops of shredded cheddar cheese from the salad bar on top of the tofu and toma-toes. If you prefer cheesy quesadillas, one more scoop of cheese can be add-ed, but past that, it will melt out of the quesadilla and onto the paper used in the panini machine. Fold the un-used half of the tortilla over the half with the tofu and tomato to make a sandwich. Take the tortilla over to the sandwich station and place it care-fully on the panini press. Be sure to place parchment paper on both sides of your quesadilla. Do not get impa-tient and press down on the handle of the panini maker. The paper will melt onto the quesadilla. After 10 minutes, remove the quesadilla from the pani-ni press. Walk over to the chips and hummus station and put salsa on top of the hot quesadilla. Enjoy!

‘Focus’ proves an uneven but fun

experienceBy Jess Linde

Editor

Will Smith is one of the most char-ismatic actors in the world, and one of the best movie stars of this genera-tion. So why has he not been around more? We got the very entertaining “Men in Black 3” way back in 2012, but that was his first starring role in four years, after the terrible “Seven Pounds.” After “MIB 3,” he failed to launch his son’s action career with “After Earth,” and mostly vanished from the screen, besides a very fun-ny cameo in “Anchorman 2.” If you couldn’t tell, I am a fan of Smith’s, and was even more confused about his career choices when I saw the trailers for “Focus,” which looked messy and lacking a plot. After seeing the movie, I was thankfully only partially right.

“Focus” is the story of Nicky (Smith), a veteran con-man who finds a protégé in talented pickpocket Jess (Margot Robbie). The two grow very, very close, but after a huge score in New Orleans, Nicky abandons Jess because there’s no room for love in his world. Three years later, Nicky is help-ing corrupt businessman Arriga (Ro-drigo Santoro) sabotage his rivals in a formula one race, when he runs into Jess, apparently in a relationship with Arriga. Nicky now has to deal with his not-so-buried feelings for Jess, and try to pull multiple layers of con art-istry, all while not being caught.

First things first, “Focus” is all over the place. For the majority of the first 45 minutes, it can’t decide what kind of movie it wants to be, insert-ing strange bits of wacky humor in with dramatic music and dialogue. There are a million characters with names and personalities who appear at once, and Nicky randomly switch-

es from lone wolf to group-leading mastermind, apparently able to run a massive criminal operation all in one room in one building without being ever bothered. The big “three years later” title delivers us to the final two acts of the movie, but appears nearly an hour into the movie. Smith is great in his role, but Robbie is decidedly one-note, and the fact that Nicky is a mostly somber character doesn’t help the film when it drags.

But despite all these problems, I ended up having a pretty good time watching “Focus.” It isn’t a particu-larly great movie by any means, and the script could have cut its first act by a solid 20 minutes, but once it gets going, the characters are interesting enough to keep your attention. Like Nicky himself, the plot always has something up its sleeve, and after a while I was just waiting for each twist to one-up the last. Santoro is hilarious and over the top, and Smith delivers the stupidest of one-liners so charm-ingly that I couldn’t help but chuckle. The ending wraps everything up in a really satisfying way, and by the time the film was over I was happy I had seen it. The main problem is that “Fo-cus” takes too long in its setup and never really decides if it wants to be gritty like “The Bank Job” or silly like “Ocean’s 11,” which is frustrating.

Still, the cinematography is great, and director team Glenn Ficarra and John Requa pace the story very well, throwing in some really fun scenes and lines. The supporting cast is also fun, particularly Adrian Martinez and an amazing cameo by B.D. Wong, while the soundtrack fits the film re-ally well. So overall, “Focus” is a big, silly mess that probably could have used one more edit in the screenwrit-ing process, but it is quite a good deal of fun if you need something to do on a rainy afternoon.

Friedman ’75 encourages balance in climate actionNEWS8 The Brandeis Hoot March 6, 2015

By Jess LindeEditor

photo by karen caldwell/the hoot

Come teach your passion this summer.Looking for males and females to join our staff at Tripp Lake camp for Girls in Poland, Maine. Positions run June to August. Apply online at www.tripplakecamp.com

Teach an activity!-Canoe-Gymnastics-English Riding -Softball-Basketball-Hockey-Lacrosse-Art-Theatre-Dance-Pottery

Call us today!1-800-997-4347

Advertisement:

Pulitzer Prize-winning jour-nalist and New York Times col-umnist Thomas Friedman ’75 discussed climate change’s ef-fects on conflicts in the Middle East this Monday, March 2 in the second of two talks given to the Brandeis community. Friedman, an active proponent of clean en-ergy and other environmental ac-tion, sat down with professor Sa-bine Von Mering (GRALL/WGS) to discuss activism and global conflict and to conduct a ques-tion-and-answer session with students.

The event was sponsored by Brandeis Visions for Israel in an Evolving World (BVIEW); Fac-ulty Against the Climate Threat (FACT); the Environmental Stud-ies Program; the Film, Television and Interactive Media Program; the Center for German and Eu-ropean Studies; the Department of Sociology; the Social Justice and Social Policy Program; the Peace, Conflict and Coexistence

Program (PAX); and various stu-dent organizations and clubs.

One of Von Mering’s first ques-tions to Friedman expressed sur-prise at his continued optimism in the face of a consistent stream of bad news about environmen-tal destruction and how he deals with people resistant to the idea of green policy change. “I ask au-diences if they want America to be powerful,” Friedman told the crowd of students, faculty and other guests. “How to be power-ful? Clean, green, efficient ener-gy.” It is essential, Friedman said, for the United States to lead the world in clean energy innova-tion, which he predicts as “the next great global initiative.”

Much of the event was dedicat-ed to a clip featuring Friedman in the Showtime Network’s doc-umentary series “Years of Living Dangerously,” in which he trav-els to Syria and Turkey and ex-amines how a massive drought affected the outbreak of the cur-rent Syrian civil war.

About 15 minutes long, the clip documented Friedman in Turkey and Syria, currently the site of

one of the world’s most violent conflicts. Friedman explained that four years before the Syrian civil war broke out, a drought struck the region, one of the worst in its history. Syrian Pres-ident Bashar al-Assad’s admin-istration refused to properly ad-dress the effects of the drought, resulting in massive crop deaths and famine. “This is a revolu-tion of hungry people,” one rebel leader tells Friedman in the clip.

Friedman spoke of his admi-ration for Syrian environmen-talists fighting the government and groups such as ISIS, in order to protect the fragile ecosystem there. “[The environmentalists] see that [the Levant region] is a single hydraulic system,” Fried-man said. “The war of ideas in the area is really between ISIS, who want to tell people whom to fear, and the environmentalists, who want to help people share and preserve the biosphere.”

Friedman then answered ques-tions from the audience, includ-ing ones submitted on Twit-ter via the #AskTomFriedman hashtag. In relation to questions

about climate denialism and political opposition to change, Friedman advocated tough rhet-oric that promoted American leadership in the field. Friedman also encouraged Brandeis climate activists to focus on finding ways

the university could invest in progressive reforms, instead of devoting energy solely to causes such as divestment from fossil fuels, which administrators and the Board of Trustees may not take to.

News in Photos: Was It Really Suicide? Dark Secrets of Domestic Femicide to Preserve Family Honor

wsrc event An event on Tuesday sponsored by the Women Studies Research Center explained that hundreds of women’s and girls’ lives become victims of honor killings in Middle East, South Asia and elsewhere. The event educated Brandeis community members on the topic, and added that often these vicious killings are recorded as suicides in public records.

Gray additionally noted the significant cost difference, for both Brandeis and the environ-ment, which was considered in the switch. Source-segregated recycling “requires more and dif-ferent containers, much more re-sponsible participation and can use more extensive and separate collection methods, which comes with its own financial and envi-ronmental costs.”

Brandeis, among other schools such as Skidmore and Dart-mouth colleges, did ultimate-ly opt for single-source recy-cling, but there was significant thought and collaboration put into Brandeis’ decision to even-tually make the switch in 2008. Furthermore, in January 2014, Brandeis chose to partner with Casella Waste Systems. As Gray noted, the university works closely with Casella to continue to improve “waste management and recycling programs.”

Despite progress made when Brandeis partnered with Casella during the past academic school year, a decrease in an organized sustainability programming has continued. In September 2012, full-time Sustainability Coordi-nator Janna Cohen-Rosenthal ’03 left her position to pursue a graduate degree. To fill her posi-tion, Brandeis hired Lea Lupkin, a consultant for GreenerU, to serve as the interim sustainabil-ity coordinator. Under Lupkin, Brandeis students filled posi-tions such as communications eco-rep, undergraduate eco-rep and waste reduction and recy-cling eco-rep. Deanna Heller ’15, undergraduate eco-rep in the 2013-14 academic year, was an extremely committed repre-sentative. While Heller, with the help of other eco-reps, promoted the use of reusable mugs at Star-bucks and Einstein’s, helped run Compost Awareness Week and sold Eco Grams for Valentine’s Day, she was also focused on im-

Brandeis to hire new sustainability coordinatorFrom FRIEDMAN, page 1 proving composting on campus.

“One of my biggest initiatives as an eco-rep was trying to imple-ment a better composting sys-tem,” said Heller. When asked about the role of eco-reps in an interview, Heller explained that they served to raise awareness about environmental issues on campus. The role gave students an opportunity to be participants in the Office of Sustainability and help positively contribute to the Brandeis campus. When Lup-kin left Brandeis after two years to attend Yale Graduate School, where she currently studies envi-ronmental management, the role of GreenerU diminished. Eco-reps were “put on hold while the search was underway to hire a permanent sustainability coordi-nator—and now manager,” said Bill Schaller, executive director of integrated media.

In addition to the collapsed eco-reps program, Brandeis did not hire a new sustainability co-ordinator at that time. At the end of last year, Heller was initially asked by the university to sit on a committee to help look for a new coordinator, yet since then, “I have not been contacted about doing anything with [finding a new coordinator],” Heller said. In a recent follow-up email to The Hoot, Gray wrote that Brandeis is in the last steps of the hiring process. Interviews for the posi-tion have been completed, and someone should be hired in the next two weeks. “This commit-ment [to supporting and promot-ing campus sustainability efforts] is most clearly demonstrated with the administration elevating the sustainability position from a coordinator to a manager level,” wrote Schaller. Although prog-ress is being made, “Brandeis is kind of behind the times. Most universities have at least one, if not more, paid, full-time sustain-ability coordinators,” Heller said. Not only do other universities have sustainability coordinators, as Heller said, but they also have

entire offices dedicated to cam-pus sustainability.

Boston University has an Of-fice of Sustainability with a staff of four full-time employees and 11 student interns. Tufts Uni-versity has three full-time em-ployees, student interns and 21 student eco-reps. Bentley Uni-versity, right down the street in Waltham, has two full-time em-ployees and five student interns in their Office of Sustainability.

Although, as Gray said, Brandeis is “in the process of hiring a sustainability manager,” currently, Brandeis has no office, staff or individual solely dedicat-ed to help assure the university is as environmentally friendly and efficient as possible. “With the resignation of my boss and the close of Brandeis’ contract with GreenerU, the eco-reps program has virtually dissolved,” wrote Heller in an email to The Hoot.

Clubs such as Students for En-vironmental Action (SEA) ex-ist on campus and are active advocates for environmentally friendly change on campus, but it is difficult to make this change happen without the existence of a sustainability coordinator. A coordinator “is someone who is hired by the university who is going to be working with stu-dents, with facilities, with any other means that they need to be implementing new initiatives, new policy,” said Heller. As of now, Brandeis has no employee who can help vocalize the con-cerns of students such as Sophie Freije ’17, president of SEA, who is working diligently with her club to “educate students about proper recycling methods” and get the word out about an elec-tronic waste drive that is being organized for the end of the year. According to Gray, “Brandeis is committed to identifying and implementing approaches to less-en our impact on the environ-ment.” Heller added, “It’s not so much that the heart isn’t there. It’s just all the logistics.”

photo by emma hanselman/the hoot

THIS WEEK IN PHOTOS

9 The Brandeis Hoot March 6, 2015

By Emily SmithStaff

Ableism criticized at coffeehouse

Brandeis Buddies and SPECTRUM collaborated to host the powerful “Spread the World to End the Word: I Am Not My Stereotype” coffeehouse at Chum’s Thursday evening, March 5. The event featured performances from a capella groups, slam-poetry and speeches from self-advocates, aiming to end the use of the R-word and promote respect of people with disabilities. The coffeehouse was co-sponsored by the Lurie Institute for Disability Policy and was part of the Special Olympics’ national “Spread the Word to End the Word” cam-paign.

The theme of the event was the ef-fect of stereotypes on the people they described. This motif was common throughout the videos shown during the event, the slam poems performed and the speeches given. In the first video, students were seen holding signs first with the stereotypes they have been associated with, then with the ways that they defy them.

The event began with Dean of Stu-dents Jamele Adams performing his slam poem “Ability.” In his perfor-mance, Adams expressed his feelings about diversity and the need for re-spect for people with different abili-ties. He had the audience repeat after him “The R-word is not our word. We are not your invisible people. Our shadows follow the sun. We are ev-eryone … A spectrum.”

rather be giraffes A student a-capella group perfomes during the coffeehouse. photos by sharon cai/the hoot

HOOT SCOOPS

LIGHTS: Evening snow falls on sculpture

WAS IT SUICIDE?: Women Studies Research Center holds talk on violent assualts on women and girls.

PURIM: Students attend Purim services

photo by emma hanselman/the hoot

photo by marian siljeholm/the hootphoto by marian siljeholm/the hoot

Michael Plansky, founder of the non-profit You’re With Us!, was one of the first to speak at the coffeehouse. Plansky was inspired by his son, who has cerebral palsy, to create a space where people with disabilities can acquire social skills and transition towards adult life by being matched with able-bodied college students. He explained his son’s influence on his life and told the audience the pro-found effect of words. “The word is not going to be the R-word anymore, it’s going to be the I-word. All you’re going to be hearing is ‘inspiration,’” Plansky argued.

One of the slam poets was Rohan Narayanan ’18, who performed two poems. His poem, “Words,” written for the event, discussed his child-hood experiences with stereotypes. He told this story, saying, “Words can be daggers, we only push them into the skin, never understanding when to pull them out or bandage the skin … I wear a sweater of stereotypes put together by the words I got called from fourth grade ’til now.”

Also performing were student a cappella groups Manginah and Rath-er Be Giraffes.

Leah Igdalsky ’14 proposed the idea of hosting a “Spread the Word to End the Word” campaign to Brandeis Buddies and SPECTRUM last year. Together, they hosted Brandeis’ first event last March, and this year they included the Lurie Institute in the process. Igdalsky, who now works for the Lurie Institute, helped make this

years event possible by working to-gether with the Institute and the two Waltham Group programs.

About this year’s event, Igdalsky says, “I’m really excited that this year’s event highlights the individuals behind stereotypes. I think it’s so im-portant to remind people that behind every stereotype or negative language they use is a person just like them.”

“Spread the Word” is a collabo-rative effort of the Special Olympics and Best Buddies International. Since its founding in 2009, the organization has held an annual day of awareness. This day, which is usually held on

the first Wednesday in March, aims to increase consciousness about the harmful effect of the R-word on people with intellectual disabilities. Many celebrities, including Jane Lynch, Paula Dean and Al Roker, have signed the organization’s pledge to stop using the R-word.

Igdalsky hopes that the events will change Brandeis students’ outlooks on people with intellectual disabili-ties. “I want people to see folks with disabilities as people first, not just as their disabilities. There are some easy ways to make this a reality on cam-pus. There are many people with dis-

abilities who work on this campus, in Usdan, Sherman” and doing facilities in Rosenthal. I hope that after par-ticipating in this campaign, students might talk to these workers, say hello and get to know them.”

“I hope that this campaign shows people that using inclusive language is a great first step, but not enough,” Igdalsky argued. “We really want peo-ple to learn from this campaign that people with disabilities are people just like them. Instead of just noticing the differences between yourself and a person with a disability, why not noticing what you have in common?”

SLAM POETRY: A student performs at Chum’s photo by emma hanselman/the hoot

Rosenberger reflects before five-year IGS program reviewBy Jacob Edelman

Editor

FEATURES10 The Brandeis Hoot March 6, 2015

photo by mike lee/the hoot

French business and lifestyle club takes shapeBy Katlyn HuangSpecial to the Hoot

photos courtesy sam bernheim/the hootbrandeis french club

If one were to ask what got Pro-fessor Chandler Rosenberger (IGS/LGLS/SOC) interested in interna-tional frameworks, he would blame a lot of it on Harrison Ford. “Indiana Jones. When I was a kid, watching Harrison Ford running around the world and leading this adventurous life got the 10 year old in me excited. The most interesting thing for me as a student had been comparing differ-ent societies and realizing that not all societies are alike. Plunging in and seeing the world through their eyes is just an amazing experience. It’s al-most like watching the most elaborate 3-D movie you can imagine if you immerse yourself in the mind of an-other society and really understand,” he said.

Rosenberger is the chair of Brandeis’s International and Glob-al Studies Program. This week, the program is undergoing its routine five-year review. Although not a full department, the program offers a major and minor and requires one semester of study abroad. One of the most diverse programs on campus, IGS cross-lists about 180 different classes throughout different Brandeis departments. “Our big challenge now is to make our curriculum as coher-ent as possible … We need to look carefully at how many of these class-es are really comparative in the way we want. Are there classes that don’t meet these criteria, and are there new classes we should be developing?” Rosenberger said.

As an undergraduate at Dartmouth, Rosenberger was the executive editor of the college newspaper, doubling as an on-campus freelance writer for The New York Times. Out of college, he got a job at Massachusetts’s Spring-field Union News. Nine months into his stint on general assignment, he moved to Germany to teach English and learn German. Soon after, he went to Oxford to study philoso-phy. At the height of the collapse of communism in Central and Eastern Europe, he found himself serving

as a representative for a network of philosophers to Czechoslovakia. “I helped the dissidents reorganize ev-erything, political parties, funding for newspapers and rebuilding a civil society,” he said.

He then got a fellowship from the Institute for Current World Affairs, which really kicked off his European travels. “They supported me to trav-el around Central Europe for several years and write about it. I wrote for the Institute and for a lot of magazines as a freelance reporter. I hit about ev-

ery country in Central Europe on that tour, spending a lot of time in Yugo-slavia, Hungary, Romania, Czecho-slovakia, Austria, Northern Italy. It was incredible,” Rosenberger said.

Rosenberger recalls interviewing Radovan Karadžić, the leader of the Bosnian Serbs. Also known as “the Butcher of Bosnia,” Karadžić is cur-rently on trial for genocide and war crimes. “I went to his armed com-pound, went through the metal de-tectors and dealt with his minions and body guards. At the end of the way through was a sad, self-pitying little man sitting at a conference table looking out at a city he was bombing (Sarajevo) and telling me about what a victim he was, and how the whole world was against him. The self-pity was such a key element of the mur-derous tyrant’s makeup. There he was, raining down death upon a city where you could literally see the puffs of ar-tillery, and he was the victim.”

Rosenberger returned to the United States and went to Boston University to work on his Ph.D. with the prom-inent sociologist expert on national-ism Liah Greenfeld. For his Ph.D., he built off his own experiences in Cen-tral Europe and wrote about the cul-tural background of political dissent in Czechoslovakia. He then began work in the BU president’s office for a while, and then started to teach. He wanted the independence to focus on the topics that most interested him, which was not as possible to do as a reporter. “I have a sense of what a war feels like, what a huge protest looks like, what it looks like when a govern-ment falls. I have a personal feel for all that stuff, but you don’t have any time

to think when you’re reporting … There’s a depth of cultural analysis, a sustained interest in a topic that’s very hard to do in journalism as opposed to academia,” he commented.

Then Rosenberger arrived at Brandeis. The IGS program needed full-time faculty, and Rosenberger went for it. “I liked it because it’s mul-tidisciplinary … It seemed like a big intellectual smorgasbord,” he said.

When asked to describe IGS to the non-initiated, Rosenberger stated, “It’s a major where we try to learn lessons about societies by compar-ing them continually … Internation-al relations is a division of political science. It’s a very important part of what IGS does. We add that to other dimensions of society. Societies are cultural, our societies are organized around different ideas of what the good life is, and that’s a cultural phe-nomenon.”

Rosenberger would like to be able to get back to writing soon. He has a book he is finishing, and he also has a sabbatical coming up. “My personal fascination is with Alexis de Tocque-ville and his prophetic ideas about how democracy can become illiberal, how it can slide and how populism can become a platform for dictator-ship. There are similarities between that and popular nationalism. I think that someone like Putin is a figure out of Tocqueville’s nightmares,” he said.

Although not a bullwhip-wielding, Nazi-fighting professor of archeology, Professor Rosenberger certainly has had his share of international adven-ture and worldly academia worthy of his childhood hero.

Wednesday, March 4’s Top Chef event, hosted by the French Business and Lifestyle Club, was the debut event for the newly formed campus group and designed to attract both those who are already interested in French culture and those who are un-familiar with it.

French chef and entrepreneur Etienne Jaulin came to Brandeis to give a cooking demonstration and lesson to 40 lucky students. The first 40 students to respond to the Face-book event with the words “Je sou-haite cuisiner,” meaning “I want to cook” in French, were allowed to attend the event, which was held in Ridgewood A. While many students were interested, they were preclud-ed from attending because the event was conducted entirely in French. “I love cooking, and I love Top Chef, so the [event] title got me, but unfortu-nately, I can’t go because I don’t speak French,” Annie Abrams ’17 said.

Those who could attend appeared to enjoy themselves. “I hope that we will be able to help people better understand the differences between the mindsets of Americans and the French. In order to achieve this, our goal is to have as many French guests as possible,” said Anthony Winszman ’17, founder of the French Business and Lifestyle club. Indeed, by bring-ing Jaulin to Brandeis, it appears that Winszman, along with other mem-bers of the club, are beginning to bridge a cultural gap.

When asked how he got involved

in the club’s formation, Treasurer Sam Bernheim ’18 explained that Winszman was aware of Bernheim’s own involvement in French culture and approached him to be a part of the club’s E-board. “I myself am a French citizen and thought this would be a great way to learn more about the country while also interact-ing with other individuals on campus who want to learn more as well,” Ber-nheim said. “We thought that having a chef come to campus would be a great first activity because it provides an open environment for prospective members to get a feel of what our club is doing and how our events are go-ing to be organized,” Bernheim con-tinued. He went on to explain that the goal of the club is different from the French and Francophone Club, which has more linguistic goals. In-stead, French Business and Lifestyle

aims to better understand business and entrepreneurship in France as a growing phenomenon. Furthermore, Winszman added that he hopes the club will also create a better under-standing among Brandeis students about French lifestyle and work ethic. “It is important to me that we can de-bunk the stigma that the French are neither hard workers nor good entre-preneurs. Most people do not know it, but many companies in the U.S. are French-owned. Sodexo and Dassault system are good examples,” he said.

Despite being a new club, French Business and Lifestyle was able to reach out to a well-known interna-tional chef like Jaulin because of the French Consulate, which has provid-ed the club with contacts and speak-ers. Winszman, who reached out to the French Consulate in Boston earlier this year, has been communi-

cating with the cultural attache, who has also been able to offer assistance to the club.

With their first event deemed a

success, the French Business and Lifestyle Club appears to be well on their way to achieving their goals and attracting campus Francophiles.

March 6, 2015 The Brandeis Hoot FEATURES 11

Library contains many historical treasuresByKatarina Weessies

Special to the Hoot

photo from internet source

SPORTS

By Curtis Zunyu HeStaff

Table tennis players represent Brandeis at national tournament

Last Sunday, March 1, five am-bitious table tennis players from Brandeis represented the Judges and competed with the best region-al teams in the NCTTA Regional Tournament for the second time ever since the club was founded. Although their step toward the Na-tional Tournament was halted by Harvard University and Boston Uni-versity on Sunday as the Brandeis team lost to both by 4-0 and 4-1, the team members won over the Uni-versity of Rochester. The team suc-ceeded partly because of a dynamic duo: Ricardo Aguayo ’17 and Duong Nguyen ’18.

For Aguayo, table tennis has been his absolute favorite sport for a long time. “My parents 100 percent sup-port me on table tennis because they always want to see me winning,” said Aguayo. “To me, table tennis is such a sport that you can play with any-one at any age. It just makes everyone equal.”

Aguayo has also been learning Chinese and is a fan of the Chinese Table Tennis Super League, which is considered the best table tennis league in the world. “I’m looking for-ward to going to China this summer maybe. If I could watch a ping pong game live, it would be a dream come true for me!” said Aguayo.

The cordial love for ping pong

is shared by Nguyen, a first-year at Brandeis from Vietnam. It is only his first year playing collegiate table tennis and he is already ranked the No. 2 player of the whole lower New England Region and top 4 in the Re-gional Tournament. “And now I am a National Individual Tournament player,” said Nguyen, summing up his legendary table tennis experi-ence in the United States. “I started playing ping pong six years ago, and I was told ping pong is not a sport but just a game for fun. Then I realized it actually is a very hard sport to play. You not only need to see the ball, you need to feel it from time to time.”

Nguyen was once the nation-al player for U15 in Vietnam and, with such passion and intensity, his excellence in table tennis keeps on growing in his college life. “It’s great to have him on the team. Last year, no one on the team was as serious as he was. Duong always keeps in mind what the team should do in and out of the practice. And playing with him certainly makes me better too,” said Aguayo in reference to Nguyen.

After leading Brandeis into the Regional Tournament for the second time in history, Aguayo and Nguy-en’s aspirations of success were not fulfilled. This week, they told The Brandeis Hoot, “We were happy but not satisfied. We know we could have beaten all of the teams in New En-gland. Our goal for next year is to be-come the No.1 team in New England and make it to the National Tourna-

ment.”This strong confidence comes from

the amazing potential these players have, which can be seen from the five-player team this season. Three out of five members are still in their first year in Brandeis. “It is only the first year for two of our members to play on the team and one of us just started playing with the team this semester. Everything will be possi-ble next year when all of us become more experienced and skilled,” said Nguyen.

On the other hand, Aguayo has already started planning for the club renovation in the next year. “I’ll try to become the president next year and the first thing I will do is to change our practice location to lower Gos-man maybe. That way, more people can see our practice and more players will come to try out with us. We need players with more diverse styles so that the team can be more prepared for the tournament since play style is a big factor in more competitive games,” said Aguayo.

Tuesday night is the official prac-tice time of the table tennis club for this semester. Every member on the team needs to spend the first half hour practicing drills like keeping the ball on the board for as long as they can. “I know it might be boring, but to get better in any sport, you need to take it seriously and put a lot of effort to improve. We also need to train our physicality a lot, so we usu-ally meet three or more times apart

from the regular practice. Whenever our members have time we can just go and play,” said Nguyen.

Under more strict and serious training with a new coach this sea-son, Brandeis Table Tennis earned a win on the stage of the New England Tournament by winning seven team matches and only losing three in No-vember and February. “If we become the number one team in New En-gland, we would love to operate the Regional Tournament in Brandeis! It’s going to be crazy if that happens,” said Nguyen. “Next season is going to be the beginning of something beau-tiful.”

“I had no idea that Brandeis had a table tennis club when I first got here. Nothing was mentioned in ori-entation or even on the school web-site,” revealed Nguyen. “What’s funny is that it was actually my roommate that told me about this club.” The

club is certainly in need of expanding its popularity, but funding has be-come another severe issue. We only received $4,000 in total this year to build this club and we already spent $3,500 on our coach. We still have to pay for all the travel fees including bus tickets and hotels. There was no money to buy new equipment,” said Aguayo.

Nguyen was even more affected by the underfunding. He said, “I don’t even think I can go to the National Individual Contest because the air-fare is a lot of money…” Without enough economic support, the space for the team’s progress would be harshly limited. Hopefully, this tri-umphant season with such an amaz-ing record can help the table tennis club demonstrate their potential to Brandeis, to ping pong players on campus and to everyone who has the will to compete and to win.

photo from internet source

The impressive contents of the Brandeis library remain unknown to most students. We see the library as a quiet place to work, socialize and oc-casionally pick up a few books for an assignment. We are largely unaware that we have access to fascinating documents such as an original work by Thomas Aquinas, “Buffalo Bill” dime novels from the 1910s and even a Shakespearean First Folio, printed shortly after Shakespeare’s death.

The Brandeis Special Collections Blog describes the collections as “the gems of the Brandeis library. The rare book collection includes incunabu-la; books published in the 16th-18th centuries on such subjects as history, English and American literature, phi-losophy and Judaica; first and limited editions; and fine press publications.” One look through the collections re-veals that it really does contain the “gems” mentioned in the blog. It’s dif-ficult to imagine looking at a physical copy of an original Shakespearean folio or flipping through a playbook over 150 years old.

One reason the Brandeis communi-ty is so unaware of the Archives and Special Collections is obvious: If ev-eryone demanded access to such old and fragile documents, their quality would quickly deteriorate, regard-less of the most careful conservation efforts. It is the responsibility of the school to make sure a careless student doesn’t accidentally crumble a valu-able document. Access to our special collections must be somewhat limited in order to preserve their condition.

Another more unfortunate reason

for the lack of knowledge about the collections is apathy. Colleges and universities can be so oversaturat-ed with academic information that it’s difficult to get students to focus on a single resource. This is a good problem: There is no such thing as too much knowledge or too many re-sources. The world of the modern col-lege student is filled to the brim with information. Sometimes, it is difficult for students to make time for the rare and fragile resources found in the Ar-

chives and Special Collections. But the school’s resources, no matter how impressive, are meaningless if stu-dents aren’t aware of them. The best way to solve the problem of apathy re-garding the collections is to promote its most interesting features, which is what I hope to do with the remainder of this article.

One artifact that encapsulates Brandeis’ history and ideology is a collection of letters by Leo Frank to his wife. Frank was the defendant in

a notorious trial known for its blatant anti-Semitism and controversial rul-ing. He was charged with the murder of a young girl who worked at a pencil factory for which he was the super-intendent. He was convicted based on circumstantial evidence and sen-tenced to death. His trial is now seen as wildly unfair. At the time, protest-ers gathered outside the courthouse chanting “Hang the Jew!” While his death sentence was eventually traded for life in prison and his conviction

revoked after his death, his conviction and eventual murder have become a symbol of the American Jewish com-munity’s struggle. His story even inspired the Tony award-winning musical “Parade.” Brandeis’ collec-tion includes heart-breaking letters between the imprisoned Frank and his wife, legal documents and texts by Governor Slaton regarding the trial.

The Archives and Special Collec-tions Department also has “an excep-tionally rare unpublished handwrit-ten manuscript by Sir Isaac Newton,” which the department’s blog de-scribes as being “composed in a bold and distinctive (often nearly illegible) calligraphic script.” The illegibly writ-ten manuscript is a justification of Queen Elizabeth’s execution of Mary, Queen of Scots. Newton often har-kens to the power of God’s judgment and compares the fatal decisions of royals to those of God. Some schol-ars believe that the manuscript was actually written as a justification of the deposition of royals that Newton saw as unchristian, specifically King James II. This extremely rare text has been the subject of debate and dis-plays an interesting perspective on Newton’s lesser-known opinions on religion and monarchy.

The contents of the Brandeis Ar-chives and Special Collections are impressive, but they remain largely undiscovered by Brandeis students. Their unknown nature is part of what makes them such a great resource. Many of the fascinating documents have yet to be studied extensively, and are completely mysterious to the ac-ademic community as a whole. They wait patiently on the second floor of the Goldfarb Library to be studied by the next intelligent, resourceful Brandeis researcher.

OPINIONSMarch 6, 2015 The Brandeis Hoot 12

DCL should explore changes to housing selection processBy Zach Phil Schwartz

Editor

In last week’s issue of The Brandeis Hoot, we featured an opinion piece that labeled the housing selection process as something out of the Hun-ger Games universe. Half-joking as the sentiment was, we do face a se-lection system that is stressful and dysfunctional—in a sense that there are just so many factors that can go haywire. Before I begin my argument, I would like to make it perfectly clear that I do not want to pin any blame on the Department of Communi-ty Living or any of its staff, as they have been nothing but helpful to my friends and me in the selection pro-cess. I do not seek to lambast DCL here, but rather provide some sugges-tions from students.

First off, the process is messy. The whole concept of being assigned a random lottery number and having that decide where and arguably how a student will live during the next aca-demic year is a huge crapshoot. Some students find themselves extremely satisfied with the results of the lottery, while others find themselves in im-possible situations. To say this is un-fair would be a gross understatement. The problem here is that it is very dif-ficult to ensure fairness while keeping everyone happy. In fact, it’s near im-possible. The situations that the lot-tery creates can also get ugly. In the last week alone, I’ve seen arguments between students on what their num-bers could get. I’ve seen brash self-as-sured students with good numbers boasting just enough to fracture a

The bitter reality of coffeeBy Monique Menezes

Staff

Not everyone likes coffee, but those who do need it more than almost anything else. Those ubiq-uitous coffee lovers haven’t always needed coffee, though. For most people, sometime in high school or even in college, coffee becomes a necessity, a type of chemical dependency similar to, though less serious than, other drug ad-dictions. I don’t really know why this transition happens, but we

friendship. I’ve seen a friend with a good number saving a friend with a horrible number, only to embark on an epic power trip. These examples not only epitomize the failures of the current system but also reinforce the need for reform.

The unfairness of the system isn’t the only component to its overall messy nature. In addition, we have a hectic selection system that allows for the speedy selection of rooms at the

can explore its consequences. Ul-timately, coffee consumption on our campus has become a serious problem.

Like other drugs, the variety of coffee flavors and roasts is as-tounding. If coffee is not part of a daily routine, it can taste a little bitter, but some roasts can help indoctrinate new drinkers. Then, as their tastes develop, they can move on to the harder “drugs” like dark roasts. The choices are truly astounding: there’s Americano, cappuccino, espresso, macchia-to, latte, Frappuccino and that’s

not all. Even a normal cup entails different roasts, light or blonde, medium, dark and extra dark. Coffee is more than a beverage: it is a dessert with all the caramel, whipped cream and chocolate drizzles; it’s no wonder so many people line up for their morning fix. Coffee delights can be down-right delicious! For those of us who find coffee tasty at its most basic form, black, I don’t know what to say; maybe we’ve scalded our adolescent taste buds or the addiction has progressed so far we can’t control it anymore.

Frighteningly, the addiction to coffee can be a serious one. Liking the taste is one thing, but eventu-ally most people start drinking it for other reasons. Oftentimes, people drink it hopes of trying to stay awake.

Soon, functioning without cof-fee will seem like an unfeasible feat. The lack of your daily dose cannot only result in a tiresome and zombie-like state, but it can also lead to headaches, cramps or other seemingly dangerous with-drawal symptoms. That being said, it doesn’t seem logical that

not drinking something that you used to think tasted like mud can actually cause physical anguish, so many people deny the physical dependency. Although we may not think about it, there is a rea-son that coffee is one of our first thoughts in the morning. Our body knows it wants coffee and does not want to struggle against itself to get through the day.

I understand not everyone likes coffee. Nonetheless, the desperate all-nighter has been an experi-

See COFFEE, page 14

photo from internet source

See REFORM, page 15

cost of a calmer, more informed se-lection process. When selection day comes around, students go into panic mode, skipping classes and hastily se-lecting what they believe to be their best option available, only to realize that a slowed down process would’ve yielded safer results. Let me explain further: There are several factors that go into a successful room selection when push comes to shove. A proper-ly numbered roommate group is re-

quired for successful selection. If you have too many potential roommates, you need to devote precious time to drop some while there’s a chance you may not be fast enough to get what you wanted. The fast nature of the selection process forces students to make hasty choices that may not be in their best interest, or may just be care-less. Either way, the automated sys-tem is also inherently flawed.

The real trouble in handling this

situation is of course devising a better, more efficient method of dealing with the housing selection process and the messes involved with it.

In terms of the individual numbers issue, perhaps modifying the random lottery number assignment system so that roommate groups are formed beforehand would be more helpful. Then, DCL will have a rough esti-mate of how many rooms it needs. In

photo by linjie xu / the hoot

Integrate study abroad into general housing with contractsBy Mia Edelstein

Editor

As someone who is studying abroad next spring and therefore guaranteed on-campus housing, I feel guilty complaining about my options since they’re much better than many juniors’ and seniors’. However, I believe my proposal of joint housing for study abroad and non-study abroad students will help out everyone in the sys-tem.

Fall housing for students study-ing abroad in the spring is limited to Ziv suites and Village singles and doubles. It is even more lim-ited by the handful of students go-ing abroad. While you may have a large group of friends, if they’re not studying abroad in the spring, you can’t live with them. Instead, you have to hope that you have a connection for a Ziv with peo-ple you won’t hate living with, a good enough number for a Vil-lage single, or a friend you won’t mind sharing a room with for a semester. It becomes a scramble of trying to find out who’s going abroad, and while Brandeisians like to say that the school is small enough that we pretty much know everyone, it turns out that campus is big enough that we end up in a blind quest, asking every junior we encounter if they are

By Kevin HealeyEditor

See ABROAD, page 15

Student feedback surveys valuable but not always well-intentioned

perchance studying abroad in the spring.

For instance, my friends have a good enough number for a non-study abroad Ziv and all five of the six spots. I would love to be their sixth, and another friend would be interested in replacing me when she returns from study abroad after the fall, but the two of us are resigned to finding other housing, and my friends are left searching for a sixth.

For students studying abroad in the fall, the process is even more stressful. These students are not guaranteed on-campus housing when they return in the spring. The Department of Community Living says that they try to place returning students in Ziv suites vacated by spring study abroad students. Fall study abroad stu-dents who are not lucky enough to be placed in a Ziv get thrown into a room vacated by a senior who graduated in December. That is, if they get housing at all, which DCL makes no promises about. This stress is only compounded by how little information there is on the DCL and study abroad websites that students opting for fall study abroad are left in an abyss.

From returning students, I’ve heard that the only way that they

photo from internet source

photo from internet source

This past week, I got a student survey in my inbox from Sodexo. As someone with quite a few opinions about our dining halls, I was more than excited to get started. Though I’ll admit that by the fifth page of endless bubbles I was getting frustrated, by the time I finished I was positively brim-ming with excitement. I felt that I had been listened to, and that my voice on campus was respected. I knew I had made a difference.

Though the more I reflected on it, the smaller that difference became. All I had done, after all, was fill out a couple of boxes online and written a paragraph about meatloaf quality. I put more work into any class assignment than into this survey, and it was only one of an untold number. It might be true that I had done some amazing thing and helped out our students by finally telling Sodexo what for, but it also seems possible that my survey would fly off into the virtual netherworld to never again see the light of day. Ultimately, there’s no way to know if my feedback will in any way im-pact the actions of a company like Sodexo.

There are ultimately two pos-sible reads into the intentions of an institution when it sends out a survey like Sodexo’s, and they can tell us how the survey will be re-ceived. The first is actually rather positive. It’s entirely possible that Sodexo is sending us a dining sur-vey because they actually want to do better. By this point in the year, I’m certain that the continuous drone of student anger and dis-appointment, whether expressed online, in print or among unhap-py students eating some question-able meatloaf has impacted the managers. No one wants to run a company people don’t like, and

it’s obvious that Sodexo has been attempting to win over students. The change in meal periods this semester has dealt with many stu-dent concerns about scheduling, and made a lot of people more happy. Of course, not all of their efforts have been as far reaching, but even a hot chocolate bar can make any day a little bit nicer.

Looking at them this way, then, the recent survey is simply the latest in a series of attempts by Sodexo to really improve their service.

I would assume that they’ll use this information to target the weak areas of their customer ser-vice and invest in improving. If they do, then my input will have mattered.

However, its also possible that Sodexo has a more cynical rea-son for sending out a survey to its clients. It takes a lot of effort to improve an organization, be it LTS or Sodexo, and it’s often faster to get people to stop complaining than to solve the long-standing issues.

By sending out a survey, I’m sure a lot of students just like me will feel like they’re being heard. They’ll be less likely to be as ac-tive in pressing for change when they feel they’ve been listened to. With groups like the satirical So-dexo Fan Club very active online, they’re obviously under a lot of pressure from above to improve their public image. Getting the public to buy in will certainly help, and a survey is effective. If that’s why Sodexo sent out their survey, its probably even worse than if they did nothing at all. Instead of making our voices heard, they’ll become stifled and ultimately ignored. Beyond that, it just decreases the number of people willing to fill in surveys in the future. If I didn’t feel my views were respected, I would never spend half an hour on a survey, but organizations need that feed-back to improve. Pragmatically,

then, faking interest in a survey is a terrible thing.

The fact that Sodexo is donat-ing money for each survey filled out makes me ultimately question their motives.

No profit-driven corporation donates money without focusing on the PR benefits, and clearly

Sodexo wants to look good. Tying it to the survey makes the entire program appear more like a PR stunt than an actual interest in our beliefs.

Ultimately, Sodexo is only one of an increasing number of cam-pus groups sending out surveys to students. From DCL to LTS,

these types of surveys are becom-ing ubiquitous on our campus. Whether they serve as a mean-ingful way to initiate change, however, is much harder to see. Trying to make change is a good idea, and surveys can help inform those decisions, but they need to be used responsibly.

March 6, 2015 The Brandeis Hoot OPINIONS 13

14 OPINIONS The Brandeis Hoot March 6, 2015

Univ.’s lack of assurance on e-privacy troublingBy Andrew Elmers

Editor

One somewhat interesting news story that has been making the rounds over the past week surrounds the use of emails. Hillary Clinton, in her term as secretary of state, used only her personal email account for work-related issues, instead of a seemingly mandatory government one. This has caused a great deal of concern as people in the government are now unable to access the files and records from when she worked in the State Department.

First of all, it seems a bit ridiculous that Clinton went her entire term using her personal email address (probably monicablows@aol.com as some online sources have suggested) without someone making her set up and actually use the government’s email service. I would imagine after a month or so of not using the gov-ernment email, someone would have approached Clinton and made her use the correct email system, but appar-ently that never happened. Secondly, I am surprised the government is ac-tually concerned about gaining access to these records. It is pretty common knowledge that the government is already reading our emails and can access anyone’s phone or Internet records, or Edward Snowden is in exile for no reason after he disclosed shocking information to the Ameri-can public last year that the govern-ment is spying on all of us. I’m sure they can gain access to Hillary Clin-ton’s personal email account, so they shouldn’t make it seem like they need to gain access to this information, but can’t find it. They can find it.

Of course, the federal government doesn’t want to admit to this practice, lest they lose all credibility and trust with the public, if they haven’t done so already. So they will probably con-tinue this charade of making it seem like they can’t find Clinton’s emails and the national press will help them in doing so.Yet it does bring up an interesting problem, as Hillary Clin-ton was probably somewhat cautious about using the government’s email service compared to using her own, or she was just lazy and didn’t want to learn something new. Assuming Clinton is as smart as she is made out to be, and there is no reason to sus-pect that she’s not, she was probably unwilling to conform to the protocol surrounding emails at the State De-

partment.Here at Brandeis, we are all provid-

ed with an email account. Students, faculty and staff are all on the server, even though, at this point, almost ev-eryone has a personal email account. And the school’s administration prob-ably has some sort of access to these email accounts, should they need it. There are multiple reasons why the school would want to look back into conversations, be it those between two students, two faculty or staff members or between a student and a faculty or staff member.

Not that I always wear a tinfoil hat, but its safe to assume that what we share over our Brandeis email ac-counts is being stored and could pos-sibly be looked into should the need arise. Not just by the government, which is pretty much assumed at this point, but also by the school adminis-tration. Students should be a lot more cautious with what they share over email, if they aren’t already. Not that the government would care so much if you were to send someone a copy of an old test for a class, but when it comes to matters of academic integ-rity, the school administration would very much be interested in looking into that.

However, when the “concerned” listserv was reported on last year, the university seemed to be surprised that these sorts of conversations were go-ing on. President Lawrence has explic-itly stated his displeasure about some of the comments that were made by some people on that listserv, and cer-tainly the resulting publicity was not something the university wanted to be out in the public. These problems probably mean that the school truly had no idea this was occurring, since if they did they most likely would have tried to stop it somehow. Since that didn’t happen, the university might not be actively checking our emails.

Yet we shouldn’t throw caution the wind and just trust the administration wholeheartedly. Instead, we should assume that if the need arises, the school will look into our emails and not show any remorse in doing so. The administration already tries to control so much else of our lives, such as having strict requirements on what club sweatshirts can say and wanting people to register their parties with the school to make sure there isn’t an excess amount of people or loud noise. The government already does it, businesses do it and eventually our

Caffeinated buzz not worth the trouble

that almost all college students deal with. With the desperate all-nighters comes caffeine. Caf-feine comes in other forms like tea, energy drinks and soda, all of which are popular on campus. It may not be apparent to the naked eye, but plenty of students hold tea in their thermoses and to-go cups, not the coffee we assume. So, and some of you may already know this, caffeine may be what we re-ally crave. Coffee-drinkers are not the only ones with grogginess to shake off before morning classes.

Furthermore, I don’t know if anyone else has noticed, but we have quite a few options to get a caffeine fix here on the Brandeis campus. For the through-and-through New Englanders, there’s Dunkin’s. If you want a bagel with your caffeinated beverage, there’s Einstein’s. If you’re planning on settling in for a marathon study session in the library, Starbucks in conveniently close by. There’s

even a Peet’s for those from the West Coast. Those are just the most obvious places to get coffee. In Sherman, Lower Usdan and the C-store, there are also available options for your caffeine needs. Like any drug, there’s always a vendor peddling your next high, but unlike other drugs Brandeis thoroughly supports the coffee trade.

Now, I know most of the afore-

COFFEE, from page 12

mentioned seems obvious. Yet, we do not think about how important to us something like a cup of cof-fee can be. More than for the pur-pose of sustenance, coffee, how many cups we drink and what kind of coffee we drink can be an indicator of our lifestyle.

We all know coffee isn’t a healthy thing to consume, but still, so many of us do, and as college students there’s a good chance that

a lot of us even over-caffeinate. Then there are the stereotypes of what coffee we drink; don’t tell me you’ve never heard of the kind of person who drinks those yummy pumpkin-spiced lattes. So, take a moment and think about it. How do you take your coffee? More importantly, in what form do you like your caffeine?

Coffee is not a requirement in the transition into adulthood. It’s

certainly not a defining attribute for any individual undergoing the transition. It’s just something that’s popular among college stu-dents that for some leads to dan-gerous dependence. I guess the same can be said for all forms of caffeine. Ultimately, though, it’s just not a good thing that we can get it so easily here on campus and continue to feed our coffee addic-tions.

photo from internet source

photo by katherine selector/the hoot

March 6, 2015 The Brandeis Hoot OPINIONS15

Univ. must expand housing to accommodate studentsBy Kevin Healey

Editor

We have a lot of people here at Brandeis. Well, perhaps not compared to Ohio State or Penn State or some other 60,000-student monstrosity. For Brandeis, however, we’ve been steadily growing over the last couple years and that growth is beginning to show. My graduating class—the class of 2018—is the largest we’ve ever had, just like three other classes in the last five years.

Most discussion of the admission rate on campus is negative, but our community does gain benefits from having more students. The more people on campus, the more money comes in tuition. We can hire more and better-known professors, have more events and expand our pro-grams. All of these are benefits to us and our students.

We also get a better campus culture when we get more diverse viewpoints among our student body. The larger our classes, the more of our students win national awards and fellowships and improve the academic prestige of our university.

At the same time, however, we lose out when our classes get larger. Besides the possible decreases in the quality of our applicants, we end up with a crisis of on-campus services. Our dining, financial aid and especial-ly housing systems have the capacity for only a certain number of students, and when our admitted class gets larg-er we have more and more students

Housing needs a redesign

Logical solution available for study abroad housing

competing for the same resources. We might be able to squeeze more people into a dining hall or find more money for aid, but ultimately it’s nigh impos-sible to force that many more people into our residence halls.

As a campus community, we need to seriously invest in improving our res-idence halls for the benefit of our stu-dents. Not only do we face a looming housing crisis when the Castle is in-

evitably closed for students, but even our newer residence halls often need serious repair. Anyone who’s been into the Shapiro basement or anywhere in the Castle knows the state of disrepair some areas of our housing system have fallen into. If we don’t take care of these buildings now, they will be so destroyed by years of neglect that the improvements will be exorbitantly ex-pensive and push the university even

further into a housing disaster, just as the Castle stands poised to do to us next year.

I’m aware that we’d be spending a lot of money if we get serious in tack-ling our housing issues. To an extent, we can help minimize these costs by saving up and performing restoration work in a couple of years. Ultimately, however, we save more money by per-forming maintenance every year in-

stead of skimping to save money and then facing a Castle-like emergency. We are quickly reaching a point where we can no longer wait for our financial situation to fix our housing, but will instead be compelled to act.

If we plan on continuing to increase our class sizes, that won’t be enough for us. We’ll need to construct more housing if we ever plan to keep up with demand.

The problem for us isn’t space—we own ample land around the IBS that could be built on. The problem again is money. If we invest in an expan-sion fund, then over the next couple of years we’ll be able to save up some money to invest, and the selection of a new president ought to bring with it a new pool of donors. It might not be enough in the short term, but we will eventually save up to invest in our housing if we focus our efforts on fundraising.

I’m aware that I’m asking for a lot, but the wellbeing of our students starts and ends in their housing sit-uation. If you have to live in a swell pit with mice and a collapsed roof, no amount of Einstein’s can overcome the sense of anxiety and depression from not having a true home. We have a duty to our students to provide them with a safe, comfortable place to live, especially since other colleges around the nation are capable of doing the same. We shouldn’t be known as a place with terrible housing, or a place where the administration doesn’t care about us. Until we invest more in our students, this housing crisis is only go-ing to continue.

ABROAD, from page 13

REFORM, from page 12

photo from internet source

photo from internet source

got spring housing was by pes-tering DCL incessantly. They and friends in a similar position had to send DCL emails many times before going and while abroad in order to ensure their spot in a Ziv because, as this student informed me, there was no formal process. As mad as DCL makes us, they do work hard and should not have to deal with such badgering.

Instead, students studying abroad in both the fall and spring should be able to live with non-study abroad students in the same on-campus housing unit. This would solve the dilemma of spring study abroad students be-

ing forced to plead their case to other students, friend groups be-ing torn apart for a year, and fall study abroad students being left in limbo.

Residents-to-be of a Ridgewood, Ziv or Grad would make a formal agreement among themselves that when their friend leaves to study abroad for spring semester, their friend returning from study-ing abroad in the fall moves into the vacated room. The two study abroad students would sign a con-tract like responsible adults. Es-sentially, DCL would be allowing a room to be transferred from one leaving study abroad student to another returning one. The issue is solved among the students, so the

work for DCL would be minimal, and fall study abroad students would be able to rest assured that they will have somewhere to live when they return. It makes sense that DCL would appreciate hav-ing the returning students’ hous-ing figured out rather than having to scramble to figure it out in the weeks before those students need housing after winter break.

As far as doubles in the Vil-lage that normally go to juniors studying abroad in the fall, these could be occupied by a non-study abroad student and two friends, one who will be on campus in the fall and one back in the spring. These could even remain rooms given to spring study abroad stu-

dents exclusively, not changing from their current state. Or these rooms could be made available to all juniors and seniors in general.

Admittedly, this would change how many midyears could be ad-mitted and subsequently housed. However, Brandeis needs to cut its enrollment. At the group panel discussion last week, Vice Presi-dent for Campus Operations Jim Gray said that the Castle will re-main open next year but gave a very vague answer about its fu-ture after that. I’m hedging my bets on that some, if not all, of the Castle will be closed by the 2016-2017 school year, as the building undergoes serious reno-vations (or complete demolition).

If that does happen, sophomores, who are guaranteed housing, will have to live in housing tradition-ally reserved for upperclassmen, a move that would displace even more upperclassmen off campus. If Brandeis radically shrinks how many midyears it admits, it would have to house fewer of them, both in their first semester on campus and in later semesters. It’s nothing personal against the midyears, it’s simply that they live in rooms that could be used in this new formu-lation of study abroad housing op-tions.

It’s hard to not get screwed by housing, but if DCL were to con-sider this proposal, they might have some more satisfied students.

preferred contingency roommates and room preferences. The nuances of this would be challenging, but prob-ably could be worked out with more thought than I’m putting into it. In this way, rooms can be distributed without the whole number system with the same principles of random-ness. It may not be game changing in reforming the system, but it will be in cooling the tensions of The Number Games, where to some the odds are never in their favor.

An easier change to this system could be to keep the older personal number assignment system but just expand the housing selection process outward and to times that don’t con-flict with classes. The process could be expanded to have selection occurring all month or so, giving students the

ample time they require to make an educated choice about their rooming situation. In doing so, students won’t have to research beforehand and risk totally abandoning their plans in haste with the fast-paced system we currently operate in. It’d be a long haul to have the month totally devoted to housing selection, but how much dif-ferent would it actually be from how it is now, with the month-long panic that the numbers have forged?

The housing process we find our-selves trudging through this month is by no means the worst thing that could happen to us. It is actually better than it had been in the past, and DCL has done an excellent job in keep-ing the students informed about the process. I believe that with extensive consultation with students, an easier and less stressful method of deriving future housing assignments can be es-tablished.

ARTS, ETC.March 6, 2015 The Brandeis Hoot 16

Jaded coffeehouse questions American identityBy Sabrina Pond

Staff

As the saying goes, there’s no time like the present, but in a present tainted by a series of enlightening events—you only have to hear the names Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown to know what I’m talking about—the time has come for Amer-ica to reflect on her inglorious imper-fections. Brandeis University keyed

into that very necessary conversation on March 4 with Jaded’s first ever OpenMic Night at Chum’s. Jaded, Brandeis’ newest literary journal, presented: America! (cosponsored by Artemis and FMLA) which featured performances by SEAC, BIEI, FMLA and more.

The night was characterized by an epic flow of poetry. The words came pouring out one after the other, an indispensable release for all the per-formers involved. The prose shed light on real issues that can be diffi-

cult, if not impossible to talk about in our everyday lives. Poetry, after all, doesn’t force its audience members to listen and feel; it allows them to de-cide for themselves how they receive the heartfelt words. As I could tell from the audience at Chum’s, keep-ing in mind the onslaught of snap-ping fingers, that message was more than felt; it reverberated and shone through the audience.

Many of the poems dealt with the larger, more pointed question, “What does it mean to be an American? What does it mean to live in Amer-ica?” Numerous voices expounded on their experiences in America as a minority, and the repercussions of straddling two worlds—one in which they cling to their roots, the other in which they are truly assimilated and “Americanized.” Although it may be assumed that America is a melting pot, or better yet, a tossed salad, both analogies don’t describe the struggle that people face in America. The pot is perpetually trying to boil, to liquefy its different parts into a thick sludge. The salad ingredients are being picked out so the heterogeneity is reduced to homogeneity.

Amy Trankiem ’17 performed a very poignant poem in which she ex-pressed her difficulty in dealing with stereotypes as a Chinese-American. Because of her appearance, those around her regarded her as a delicate china doll. The preconceptions peo-ple had about her as a woman and as an Asian person were deprecating and insufferable. Her piece of poetry, which is a very raw reaction to those people’s harsh presumptions, is a rec-ognition of suppressed feelings long felt but never expressed. In response to her involvement in “Jaded pres-ents: America!,” Amy Trankiem said that “Jaded is a great way to have an inside look on the minority experi-ence. Asian women are extremely fe-tishized in Western society, and Jaded is an outlet where I am able to express my refusal to be merely a sex object.” Her strength is incredibly evident as she rejects the stereotypes and defines herself in her own way. Because in the end, how we understand ourselves is more important than how others think of us.

Another very powerful perform-er, Rohan Narayanan ’15, didn’t hold anything back, not one ounce of emotion, not one deeply resonating thought. His performance, which included four poems, incorporat-ed what can only be described as chilling prose—it initiated a kind of goosebump reaction that began in the legs and spread throughout the whole body. His rendition of his po-etry, which was full of emotion, prac-tically seething with frustration, laid

bare the feeling of one who spoke for a people—for Americans overall. His poems focused on the unset-tling realities that is life in America: discrimination, rampant racism and inner hopelessness that nothing, ab-solutely nothing, can be done about it. In Narayanan’s opinion, all of these emotions can be channeled and used to a positive end. “I was honored and excited to be Jaded’s first performer at their first open mic. A lot of my po-etry reflects Jaded’s ideals and ideas regarding identity and experience. My parents were immigrants from India and finding myself growing up in a predominantly Christian sphere in Connecticut was challenging and frustrating, something I did not ful-ly grasp until I left it. Jaded is an ex-

tremely necessary outlet at Brandeis and I’m really thrilled to have been there at the beginning. I can’t wait to watch it grow and watch Brandeis artists, thinkers and students utilize it as a mouthpiece to share their sto-ries.”

America has problems. It’s more than an imperfect place. That red, white and blue flag has been stretched, torn, set aflame, and all the while it still remains in one piece. America, however, isn’t a bro-ken place. As a people, Americans can continue a more than necessary conversation about discrimination and racism. We are a people that are made of multitudes of nationalities, ethnicities and religions, and to-gether we can bridge the divide.

jaded Brandeis new literary journal held OpenMic Night last wednesday

photos by sharon cai/the hoot

photo from internet source