Upload
mikaela-cullis
View
218
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The best environmental choice in seafoodThe best environmental choice in seafoodThe best environmental choice in seafood
DisclaimerIf any interpretive issues arise in relation to the issues covered in these presentations, the text of the English MSC Scheme Documents will prevail in all instances. The MSC is not responsible for any issues arising to any parties as a result of consulting these presentations. If you are unsure of any details on any of the subjects covered, please consult the relevant MSC scheme documents or contact the MSC at [email protected].
MSC Executive October2011
The best environmental choice in seafood
Chain of Custody surveillance audits
September 2011
The best environmental choice in seafood
The best environmental choice in seafood
Learning Objectives• To know how to comply with scheme
requirements• To be able to easily explain to your clients
what they need to do• Understand the procedure for determining
surveillance frequency
The best environmental choice in seafood
Agenda
• Scheme Requirements• What happens at a
surveillance audit?• What your client needs
to know• Surveillance frequency• Exercise
Photo: Tony Rotondas
The best environmental choice in seafood
Surveillance
Scheme requirements •Section 17.8
•Table B4: Risk Analysis to determine appropriate Levels of On-going Surveillance
The best environmental choice in seafood
Surveillance
• 17.8 Surveillance:
1. Scoring table2. Reduced level can happen at
any time between 10 and 18 months
3. Remote reduced for very low risk companies
The best environmental choice in seafood
• Table introduced because:
– Previous verification was in some cases disproportionally heavy in relation to associated risk
– Accounts for seasonal operations– Flexibility to arrange/organise audits– All companies are scored using the same criteria
Surveillance
The best environmental choice in seafood
Surveillance
During a surveillance audit, the CAB:• Checks continued conformity to the CoC
Standard, and• Checks use of MSC ecolabel • Records the list of products actually handled since
the last audit to update the MSC database.
The best environmental choice in seafood
Surveillance
Planned but also irregularly timed – 17.8.3 : CB shall have a documented system in
place for irregularly timed short-notice audits
The best environmental choice in seafood
What the client needs to know
1. Audit Frequency ranges from every 18 months to every 6 months
2. If Major nonconformity is raised, the level of frequency is enhanced
3. Show or explain the risk table
Photo: Blue Lotus
The best environmental choice in seafood
Surveillance Type & Frequency
1. Enhanced: Onsite once each 6 months
2. Standard: Onsite once each 12 months
3. Reduced: Onsite between 10-18 months from the date of certification
4. Remote reduced: Desk audit between 10-18 months from the date of certification
The best environmental choice in seafood
Surveillance
A desktop audit shall involve the same activities as onsite audits. (17.8.2)
The best environmental choice in seafood
Surveillance
17.8 CR :
Table B4: Risk factors are not exhaustive Table B5: Overlapping categories for some scores
The best environmental choice in seafood
Table B4: Factors and scoring to determine surveillance frequency
Risk Factor Score
1. Activity See Table B2 Where more than one activity is undertaken, use the highest score only to add the total score
Trading (buying and selling) ( Activity 1) 4
Transport (Activity 2) 4
Storage ( Activity 3) 4
Wholesale and/or distribution of whole fresh fish in unsealed containers (Activities 4,5) 8
Wholesale and/or distribution of pre-packed products ( Activities 4,5) 4
Harvest (Activity 6) 8
Packing or repacking ( Activity 7) 15
Processing, contract processing ( Activities 8,9)
If there is a risk of handling non-MSC fish due to processing company’s geographic location in relation to non-MSC-certified fisheries of the same species which is considered:
20
high – add: 8
medium – add: 2
low – add: 0
Retailing/food service direct to consumers ( Activities 10,11) 8
2. Handling of Products
Company takes ownership of product and product is processed by one non-certified subcontractor For each additional non-certified subcontractor, add:
8 3
Company takes ownership of product and product is repacked by one non-certified subcontractor For each additional non-certified subcontractor, add:
6 2
Company takes ownership of product and product is stored and/or transported by one non-certified subcontractor For each additional non-certified subcontractor, add:
3 1
Company does not take ownership of the products and/or does not use non-certified subcontractors
1
3. Species Handled
Certified and non-certified same species on site at the same time 8
Certified and non-certified different species on site at the same time 4
Only certified species on site 1
No fish on site 0
4. Other certifications held by company for the last 12 months
None 4
Certified by credible third party CAB to a standard requiring traceability (BRC, IFS, SQF 2000, HACCP, ISO9001 etc.)
1
5. Company’s performance at most recently performed MSC audit
One or more major non-conformity found (or certification suspended in the last twelve months)
Use Enhanced surveillance
Three or more minor non-conformities found 8
One or two minor non-conformities found 4
No major or minor non-conformities found 0
6. Information from other audits and regulatory bodies
Prosecuted for failure to meet regulatory requirements Use Enhanced
The best environmental choice in seafood
Table B5Table B5: Frequency of surveillance audits
Score from Table B4 Surveillance Frequency Activity
50 or more Enhanced Surveillance
On-site once each 6 months
30 to 55 Standard Surveillance
On-site once each 12 months
16 to 35 Reduced Surveillance
On-site once at 10 -18 months from the date of
certification
15 or below Remote Reduced Surveillance
Desktop once at 10 -18 months from the date of
certification
The ranges in Table B5 intentionally overlap. Where this occurs (i.e a score of 30 – 35 or 50 – 55) CAB’s shall make the decision on which surveillance type to use, and shall record their reasons for decision
The best environmental choice in seafood
The best environmental choice in seafood
Summary
• Table B5: Overlapping categories for some scores
• Surveillance audits take place between 6 and 18 months
• A desktop audit involves the same activities as onsite audits.
• Planned but also irregularly timed
The best environmental choice in seafood
Please send comments, queries, suggestions to:Stefano.Minischetti@msc@org
Thank you