Chair: Anthony Adams, Solano TA MTC Staff Liaison: Kenneth Folan; kfolan@bayareametro.gov Vice-Chair: Nancy Adams, Santa Rosa

THE BAY AREA PARTNERSHIP

Partnership Technical Advisory Committee November 20, 2017, 1:30 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.

Bay Area MetroCenter, 1st Floor, Yerba Buena 375 Beale Street, San Francisco 94105

AGENDA

Estimated Time for Agenda Item

1) Introductions (Anthony Adams, Chair) 1:30 p.m.

a) Nomination and election of 2018 PTAC 2nd Vice Chair (Effective January 1, 2018, Nancy Adams (Santa Rosa) will be installed as the PTAC Chair and Chris Andrichak (AC Transit) will be installed as the Vice-Chair. The Committee is seeking a CMA nominations to act as 2018 2nd Vice Chair and 2019 Vice Chair)

2) Partnership Reports:

a) Joint Partnership Working Group (LSRPDWG)* Chair (PDWG): Danielle Schmitz, NVTA (The Joint Partnership Working Group met on November 9, 2017)

b) Partnership Transit Finance Working Group* Chair: Chris Andrichak, AC Transit (The Partnership Transit Finance Working Group met on November 1, 2017)

3) Committee Member Reports

INFORMATION ITEMS / OTHER BUSINESS 1:45 p.m.

4) TIP Update* (Adam Crenshaw; acrenshaw@bayareametro.gov)

(The current TIP can be viewed at: http://mtc.ca.gov/our-work/fund-invest/transportation-improvement-program )

a) 2019 TIP Update b) FMS Update

DISCUSSION ITEMS 2:00 p.m.

5) Legislative Report (Rebecca Long; rlong@mtc.ca.gov)

(The Legislative Update can be found online at: http://mtc.ca.gov/whats-happening/meetings?meeting=Legislation+Committee)

6) STA Policy** (Theresa Romell; tromell@bayareametro.gov)

(Staff will provide an update on the proposed State Transit Assistance Program policy.)

7) SB1 Update: (Staff will provide updates on the various SB1 funding programs.)

a) SB1 Local Streets and Roads* (Theresa Romell; tromell@bayareametro.gov) b) SB1 Competitive Programs* (Kenneth Kao; kkao@bayareametro.gov) c) 2018 RTIP** (Kenneth Kao; kkao@bayareametro.gov)

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 1 of 53

PARTNERSHIP TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PTAC) Meeting Agenda –November 20, 2017 PAGE 2 OF 2

8) OBAG2 County Programs** (Mallory Atkinson; matkinson@bayareametro.gov)

(Staff will provide an update on the OBAG2 County programs.)

9) Lifeline Cycle 5 Update* (Melanie Choy; mchoy@bayareametro.gov /Judis Santos; jsantos@bayareametro.gov)

(Staff will provide an update on the Lifeline Cycle 5 development.)

10) Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Program Guidelines** (Vikrant Sood; vsood@bayareametro.gov) (Staff will present the Draft 2017-2021 Community-Based Transportation Planning Program Guidelines.)

11) Setting Safety Targets for Federal Performance Requirements* (Dave Vautin; dvautin@bayareametro.gov/ Stephanie Mak;

smak@bayareametro.gov) (Staff will report on the 2018 Safety Performance Targets – Recommendation and Options Evaluated.)

12) Recommended Future Agenda Items (All)

13) Public Comment

Remote Access: Join WebEx meeting Meeting number (access code): 923 767 002 Dial in: 1-415-655-0002 US Toll

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 2 of 53

PARTNERSHIP TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PTAC) Meeting Agenda –November 20, 2017 Page 3 of 3

\\mtcfs2.ad.mtc.ca.gov\j_drive\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership TAC\_2017 PTAC\PTAC - Agenda\02_Nov 20 17 PTAC Agenda.docx (5) 11.13.2017

* Agenda Items attached ** Agenda Items with attachments to be distributed at the meeting.

MTC Staff Liaison: Contact Kenneth Folan at 415.778.5204 or kfolan@bayareametro.gov regarding this agenda.

Accessibility and Title VI: MTC provides services/accommodations upon request to persons with disabilities and individuals who are limited-English proficient who wish to address Commission matters. For accommodations or translations assistance, please call 415.778.6757 or 415.778.6769 for TDD/TTY. We require three working days' notice to accommodate your request.

Public Comment: The public is encouraged to comment on agenda items at Committee meetings by completing a request-to-speak card (available from staff) and passing it to the Committee secretary. Public comment may be limited by any of the procedures set forth in Section 3.09 of MTC's Procedures Manual (Resolution No. 1058, Revised) if, in the chair's judgment, it is necessary to maintain the orderly flow of business.

Meeting Conduct: If this meeting is willfully interrupted or disrupted by one or more persons rendering orderly conduct of the meeting unfeasible, the Chair may order the removal of individuals who are willfully disrupting the meeting. Such individuals may be arrested. If order cannot be restored by such removal, the members of the Committee may direct that the meeting room be cleared (except for representatives of the press or other news media not participating in the disturbance), and the session may continue.

Month

Regional Advisory

Working Group

(RAWG)

Yerba Buena,

Room 109

(9:30a - 11:35a)

Partnership

Transit Finance

(TFWG)

Yerba Buena,

Room 109

(10:00a - 12:00p)

Partnership

Local Streets &

Roads

(LSRWG)

Ohlone

Room 109,

(9:30a - 11:30a)

Partnership

Programming &

Delivery

(PDWG)

Ohlone

Room 109,

(9:30a - 11:30a)

Joint

Partnership

(LSRPDWG)

Yerba Buena,

Room 109,

(9:30a - 12:00p)

Partnership

Technical

Advisory

Committee

(PTAC)

Yerba Buena,

Room 109,

(1:30p – 3:30p)

Partnership

Board

Location TBD

Time TBD

January Wed, Jan 4 Thu, Jan 12

February Tue, Feb 7 Wed, Feb 1 Thu, Feb 9 Mon, Feb 13

March Tue, Mar 7 Wed, Mar 1 Mon, Mar 20 Mon, Mar 20 Fri, Mar 3

April Tue, Apr 4 Wed, Apr 5 Thu, Apr 13 Mon, Apr 17 Mon, Apr 17

May Tue, May 2 Wed, May 35/11/2017

Mon, May 22Mon, May 22

June Tue, Jun 6 Wed, Jun 7 Thu, Jun 8 Mon, Jun 19 Mon, Jun 19

July Tue, Jul 11 Wed, Jul 5 Thu, Jul 137/17/2017

Mon, Jul 31Mon, Jul 17

August Wed, Aug 2

September Tue, Sep 5 Wed, Sep 6 Mon, Sep 18 Mon, Sep 18

October Tue, Oct 3 Wed, Oct 4 Thu, Oct 12 Mon, Oct 16 Mon, Oct 16 Mon, Oct 16 Fri, Oct 20

November Tue, Nov 7 Wed, Nov 1 Thu, Nov 9 Mon, Nov 20

December Tue, Dec 5 Wed, Dec 6 Thu, Dec 14 Mon, Dec 18 Mon, Dec 18

J:\COM M ITTE\Partnership\[_M eeting Calendar_WG_PTAC.xlsx]2017

Changes are highlighted.

Please email the appropriate meeting manager if you would like to be added or removed from the distribution list

RAWG Meeting Manager: Martha Silver, msilver@bayareametro.gov

TFWG Meeting Manager: Theresa Hannon, thannon@bayareametro.gov

LSRWG/PDWG/PTAC Meeting Manager: Marcella Aranda, maranda@bayareametro.gov

PARTNERSHIP BOARD: Meeting Manager: Beba Jimenez, bjimenez@bayareametro.gov

(Subject to change. See agendas for final meeting date, time and location)

NO AUGUST PARTNERSHIP MEETINGS

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 3 of 53

PARTNERSHIP TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PTAC) Meeting Agenda –November 20, 2017 PAGE 4 OF 4

Record of Meeting: Committee meetings are recorded. Copies of recordings are available at a nominal charge, or recordings may be listened to at MTC offices by appointment.

Acceso y el Titulo VI: La MTC puede proveer asistencia/facilitar la comunicación a las personas discapacitadas y los individuos con conocimiento limitado del inglés quienes quieran dirigirse a la Comisión. Para solicitar asistencia, por favor llame al número 415.778.6757 o al 415.778.6769 para TDD/TTY. Requerimos que solicite asistencia con tres días hábiles de anticipación para poderle proveer asistencia.

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 4 of 53

JOINT PARTNERSHIP LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS / PROGRAMMING AND DELIVERY WORKING GROUP MEETING

BAY AREA METROCENTER, 1ST FLOOR, OHLONE Thursday, November 9, 2017

9:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.

AGENDA Estimated

Topic Time

1. Introductions (Anthony Adams, STA, LSRWG Chair) 9:30 a.m.

PDWG - Focused Items 9:35 a.m.

1. Discussion Items:

A. OBAG 2 Update (Mallory Atkinson, matkinson@bayareametro.gov) 10 min B. State Programming/ CTC Actions: 15 min

i. Active Transportation Program Update (Kenneth Kao; kkao@bayareametro.gov)ii. STIP Update ((Kenneth Kao; kkao@bayareametro.gov)iii. SB 1 Update (Kenneth Kao; kkao@bayareametro.gov)iv. State Rail Plan Update (Kenneth Kao; kkao@bayareametro.gov)

(The 2018 California State Rail Plan (Rail Plan) will be available for review for 60 days between October11th and December 11th. Please visit www.californiastaterailplan.com to view the Rail Plan and toprovide comments.)

C. Federal Delivery Monitoring Updates (Adam Crenshaw; acrenshaw@bayareametro.gov) 5 min i. FFY2017-18 Annual Obligation Plan Delivery Status**ii. Inactive Obligations Update

(The inactive rate as of October 31, 2017 for California is 3.27%, the target is 2%. Dist 4 hascontributed 91 projects (62 local, 29 State). Sponsors will need to reduce this rate to 2% by the end ofthe quarter. The Inactive Obligations project listing is available online at:http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/InactiveProjects/2017/Webposting_Inactive.xlsx)

D. Other Discussion Items

LSRWG - Focused Items 10:05 a.m.

1. Informational Items: (“Memo Only” unless otherwise noted)

2. Discussion Items:

A. 2017 Work Plan (Theresa Romell, tromell@bayareametro.gov 10 min i. Procurement Process Survey

ii. Pothole Report UpdateB. Draft California Transportation Asset Management Plan Proposed Comments** (Theresa Romell;

tromell@bayareametro.gov) 10 min C. P-TAP Update (Christina Hohorst, chohorst@bayareametro.gov) 5 min

i. P-TAP 19 Call for Projects(The P-TAP 19 Call for Projects is available online at: https://mtc.ca.gov/our-work/fund-invest/investment-strategies-commitments/fix-it-first/local-streets-roads/p-tap/p-tap)

LSRWG Chair: Anthony Adams, STA MTC Staff Liaison: Theresa Romell; Kenneth Kao PDWG Chair: Danielle Schmitz, NVTA Meeting Manager: Marcella Aranda; Megan Magill

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership Joint LSRPDWG\_2017 Joint LSRPDWG\17_LSRPDWG Agendas\06_Nov 09 17 LSRPDWG Agenda.docx (23) 11.16.17

PTAC Agenda Item: 2A

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 5 of 53

JOINT PARTNERSHIP WORKING GROUP (LSRPDWG) Meeting Agenda –November 9, 2017 Page 2 of 3

Joint LSRPDWG Items 10:35 a.m.

1. Review of LSRPDWG Minutes – October 16, 2017*(Anthony Adams, STA, LSRWG Chair) 5 min i. 2018 Joint Partnership Working Group Meeting Calendar

(Survey results reflect that the Partnership members have elected to conduct quarterly Joint Partnership meetings to be held on the 2nd Thursday of each month from 10:00a-12:00p)

2. Informational Items: (“Memo Only” unless otherwise noted)

A. PMP Certification Status* (Current PMP Certification status is available online at: http://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/PMP_Certification_Status_Listing.xlsx )

B. Single Point of Contact Certification Status* (The Current SPOC Certification Checklist is available online at: https://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/SPOC_Certification_Status_Listing.xlsx)

C. Legislative Update (Rebecca Long; rlong@bayareametro.gov) 5 min (Updates on current legislation is available online at: http://mtc.legistar.com/gateway.aspx?M=F&ID=6e7aac1e-3486-4dce-8051-313f66dda3e4.pdf )

D. Federal/State Programming Announcements: i. Office of Local Assistance Training

(http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/training.html) ii. Active Transportation Cycle 4 Guidelines Workshops*

iii. FHWA Extends Comment Period for Greenhouse Gas Measure NPRM* iv. Safe Harbor Rate Test and Evaluation Period Extended

(Notice to Local Agencies and A&E Consulting Firms with Federal Aid Highway Funded Projects, FHWA has informed participating states that the program has been extended again to run through December 31, 2017, (http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/DLA_OB/2013/ob13-07r.pdf)

E. Other Information Items:

3. Discussion Items:

A. TIP Update* (Adam Crenshaw; acrenshaw@bayareametro.gov) 15 min (The current TIP can be found online at: http://mtc.ca.gov/our-work/fund-invest/transportation-improvement-program)

i. 2019 TIP Update ii. FMS Update

B. North Bay Fires 20 min i. Northern County/ Jurisdiction Experience & Response Information Sharing

ii. PRESENTATION: Emergency Response Processes and Resources (John Brewster, Caltrans; jbrewster@dot.ca.gov)

C. PRESENTATION: I-80 Smart Corridor (David Man, Caltrans; david.man@dot.ca.gov) 20 min D. Other Discussion Items (All) 5 min

Recommended Agenda Items for Next Meeting: (All) 5 min

Join WebEx meeting Meeting number (access code): 921 313 683 Join by phone +1-415-655-0002 US Toll

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership Joint LSRPDWG\_2017 Joint LSRPDWG\17_LSRPDWG Agendas\06_Nov 09 17 LSRPDWG Agenda.docx (23) 11.16.17 PTAC 11.20.17 Page 6 of 53

JOINT PARTNERSHIP WORKING GROUP (LSRPDWG) Meeting Agenda –November 9, 2017 Page 3 of 3

* = Attachment in Packet ** = Handouts Available at Meeting

Contact Marcella Aranda at maranda@bayareametro.gov if you have questions regarding this agenda.

Month

Regional Advisory Working Group

(RAWG)Yerba Buena,

Room 109(9:30a - 11:35a)

PartnershipTransit Finance

(TFWG)Yerba Buena,

Room 109(10:00a - 12:00p)

PartnershipLocal Streets &

Roads(LSRWG)Ohlone

Room 109,(9:30a - 11:30a)

PartnershipProgramming &

Delivery(PDWG)Ohlone

Room 109,(9:30a - 11:30a)

Joint Partnership(LSRPDWG)

Yerba Buena,Room 109,

(9:30a - 12:00p)

Partnership TechnicalAdvisory

Committee(PTAC)

Yerba Buena,Room 109,

(1:30p – 3:30p)

Partnership Board

Location TBDTime TBD

January Wed, Jan 4 Thu, Jan 12February Tue, Feb 7 Wed, Feb 1 Thu, Feb 9 Mon, Feb 13March Tue, Mar 7 Wed, Mar 1 Mon, Mar 20 Mon, Mar 20 Fri, Mar 3April Tue, Apr 4 Wed, Apr 5 Thu, Apr 13 Mon, Apr 17 Mon, Apr 17

May Tue, May 2 Wed, May 3 5/11/2017 Mon, May 22 Mon, May 22

June Tue, Jun 6 Wed, Jun 7 Thu, Jun 8 Mon, Jun 19 Mon, Jun 19

July Tue, Jul 11 Wed, Jul 5 Thu, Jul 13 7/17/2017 Mon, Jul 31 Mon, Jul 17

August Wed, Aug 2September Tue, Sep 5 Wed, Sep 6 Mon, Sep 18 Mon, Sep 18October Tue, Oct 3 Wed, Oct 4 Thu, Oct 12 Mon, Oct 16 Mon, Oct 16 Mon, Oct 16 Fri, Oct 20November Tue, Nov 7 Wed, Nov 1 Thu, Nov 9 Mon, Nov 20December Tue, Dec 5 Wed, Dec 6 Thu, Dec 14 Mon, Dec 18 Mon, Dec 18

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\[_Meeting Calendar_WG_PTAC.xlsx]2017

Changes are highlighted.Please email the appropriate meeting manager if you would like to be added or removed from the distribution listRAWG Meeting Manager: Martha Silver, msilver@bayareametro.govTFWG Meeting Manager: Theresa Hannon, thannon@bayareametro.govLSRWG/PDWG/PTAC Meeting Manager: Megan Magill, mmagill@bayareametro.govPARTNERSHIP BOARD: Meeting Manager: Beba Jimenez, bjimenez@bayareametro.gov

Partnership Board, TAC and Working Groups

2017 Tentative Meeting Calendar

March 29, 2017(Subject to change. See agendas for final meeting date, time and location)

NO AUGUST PARTNERSHIP MEETINGS

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership Joint LSRPDWG\_2017 Joint LSRPDWG\17_LSRPDWG Agendas\06_Nov 09 17 LSRPDWG Agenda.docx (23) 11.16.17 PTAC 11.20.17 Page 7 of 53

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2017, 10:00 A.M. – 12:00 P.M. BAY AREA METRO CENTER, YERBA BUENA ROOM, 1ST FLOOR 375 BEALE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Estimated Time

Information Items / Other Items of Business:

1. Introductions 3 min

2. Approval of October 4, 2017 Minutes* 2 min

3. Legislative Update (Rebecca Long, MTC) 5 min

4. FTA Notices (Glen Tepke, MTC) 5 min a. 2016 Data in National Transit Databaseb. Webinar: Impacts on Automated and Connected Vehicle Introduction in Transitc. New Grant Reporting Requirements

5. TIP Update* (Memo Only) 5 min

6. Prop 1B – PTMISEA and Transit Security* (Kenneth Folan, MTC) 5 min

7. Cap & Trade Update* (Craig Bosman, MTC) 5 min

8. State Rail Plan* (Kenneth Kao, MTC) 5 min

9. Transit Sustainability Project/Productivity Improvement Program Integration Update* (Melanie Choy, MTC) 5 min

10. Lifeline Cycle 5 Program Update** (Judis Santos, MTC) 5 min

11. CARB Clean Transportation Funding Update* (Glen Tepke, MTC) 5 min

12. 2017 Draft Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan* (Drennen Shelton, MTC) 5 min

13. Fund Estimate & STA Population-Based Funds Update* ( William Bacon, MTC) 15 min

Discussion Items

14. FY18-FY20 TCP Program Update* (Rob Jaques, MTC) 15 min

15. North Bay Fires Response & Recovery** (North Bay Transit Operators) 30 min

16. Recommended Future Agenda Items (All)

Conference Call-in or Join Online:Dial-in: (415) 655-0002Access code: 922 040 441

Join WebEx meeting

Next Transit Finance Working Group Meeting: Wednesday, December 6, 2017, 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Bay Area Metro Center, Yerba Buena Room, 1st Floor 375 Beale Street, San Francisco, CA 94105

TRANSIT FINANCE WORKING GROUP (TFWG) MEETING AGENDA

Chair: Chris Andrichak, AC Transit MTC Staff Liaison: Glen Tepke, MTC Vice-Chair: Kristina Botsford, Solano County Transit J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership TFWG\_Transit Finance WG\2017\17 - Agendas\11_Nov TFWG Agenda.docx

PTAC Agenda Item 2B

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 8 of 53

TRANSIT FINANCE WORKING GROUP (TFWG) NOVEMBER 1, 2017 MEETING AGENDA PAGE 2

* = Attachment in Packet ** = Handouts Available at Meeting

Contact Glen Tepke of MTC at 415-778-6700 or gtepke@mtc.ca.gov if you have questions about this session.

Month

Regional Advisory Working Group

(RAWG)Yerba Buena,

Room 109(9:30a - 11:35a)

PartnershipTransit Finance

(TFWG)Yerba Buena,

Room 109(10:00a - 12:00p)

PartnershipLocal Streets &

Roads(LSRWG)Ohlone

Room 109,(9:30a - 11:30a)

PartnershipProgramming &

Delivery(PDWG)Ohlone

Room 109,(9:30a - 11:30a)

Joint Partnership(LSRPDWG)

Yerba Buena,Room 109,

(9:30a - 12:00p)

Partnership TechnicalAdvisory

Committee(PTAC)

Yerba Buena,Room 109,

(1:30p – 3:30p)

Partnership Board

Location TBDTime TBD

January Wed, Jan 4 Thu, Jan 12February Tue, Feb 7 Wed, Feb 1 Thu, Feb 9 Mon, Feb 13March Tue, Mar 7 Wed, Mar 1 Mon, Mar 20 Mon, Mar 20 Fri, Mar 3April Tue, Apr 4 Wed, Apr 5 Thu, Apr 13 Mon, Apr 17 Mon, Apr 17

May Tue, May 2 Wed, May 3 5/11/2017Mon, May 22 Mon, May 22

June Tue, Jun 6 Wed, Jun 7 Thu, Jun 8 Mon, Jun 19 Mon, Jun 19July Tue, Jul 11 Wed, Jul 5 Thu, Jul 13 Mon, Jul 17 Mon, Jul 17August Wed, Aug 2September Tue, Sep 5 Wed, Sep 6 Mon, Sep 18 Mon, Sep 18October Tue, Oct 3 Wed, Oct 4 Thu, Oct 12 Mon, Oct 16 Mon, Oct 16November Tue, Nov 7 Wed, Nov 1 Thu, Nov 9 Mon, Nov 20December Tue, Dec 5 Wed, Dec 6 Thu, Dec 14 Mon, Dec 18 Mon, Dec 18

C:\Users\marand\OneDrive for Business\Shared with Everyone\[_Meeting Calendar_WG_PTAC.xlsx]2017

Changes are highlighted.Please email the appropriate meeting manager if you would like to be added or removed from the distribution listRAWG Meeting Manager: Martha Silver, msilver@mtc.ca.govTFWG Meeting Manager: Theresa Hannon, thannon@mtc.ca.govLSRWG/PDWG/PTAC Meeting Manager: Marcella Aranda , marand@mtc.ca.govPARTNERSHIP BOARD: Meeting Manager: Beba Jimenez, bjimenez@mtc.ca.gov

Partnership Board, TAC and Working Groups

2017 Tentative Meeting Calendar

June 28, 2017(Subject to change. See agendas for final meeting date, time and location)

NO AUGUST PARTNERSHIP MEETINGS

J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership TFWG\_Transit Finance WG\2017\17 - Agendas\11_Nov TFWG Agenda.docx (41)

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 9 of 53

PTAC Item 4

DATE: November 20, 2017 TO: Partnership Technical Advisory Committee

FR: Adam Crenshaw

RE: Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Update

TIP Revision 2017-22 – Amendment (Proposed) Amendment 2017-22 makes revisions to 19 projects with a net increase in funding of approximately $66.6 million. Commission approval is expected on November 15, 2017, Caltrans approval is expected in mid-December, 2017, and final federal approval is expected in mid-January, 2018. Among other changes, the revision:

• Adds five exempt and one non-exempt, not regionally significant Surface Transportation Block GrantProgram/Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (STP/CMAQ) funded projects tothe TIP and updates one existing STP/CMAQ funded project to reflect the latest programming decisions;

• Splits out two State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP) funded projects from theSHOPP Mobility grouped listing to the new Alameda County-Traffic Operations Systems/MobilityProgram grouped listing, transfers two project segments and $20 million in CMAQ funds from theFreeway Performance Initiative (FPI) program to the new grouped listing, and adds one new project tothe new grouped listing along with $40.4 million in SHOPP funds;

• Adds one new SHOPP funded grouped listings for the Marin County-Traffic Operations Systems/MobilityProgram with $13 million in SHOPP funds; and

• Archives eight projects as they have been completed.Changes made with this revision do not affect the air quality conformity finding or conflict with the financial constraint requirements.

TIP Revisions 2017-20 and 2017-21 – Administrative Modifications (Pending) Administrative Modifications 2017-20 and 2017-21 are under development.

TIP Revision 2017-19 – Amendment (Approved) Amendment 2017-19 makes revisions to 31 projects with a net increase in funding of approximately $4.4 billion. Commission approval was received on September 27, 2017, Caltrans approval was received on October 9, 2017, and final federal approval was received on October 25, 2017. Among other changes, the revision:

• Amends four new exempt, three new non-exempt, and three new non-exempt-not regionally significantSurface Transportation Block Grant Program/Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality ImprovementProgram (STP/CMAQ) funded projects into the TIP and updates the funding plans of five existingSTP/CMAQ funded projects to reflect changes in the One Bay Area Grant 1 (OBAG1) County Program,the OBAG2 Program, and the Transit Performance Initiative Program;

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 10 of 53

TIP Update LSRPDWG: November 9, 2017 Page 2 of 3

• Amends Bay Area Rapid Transit’s (BART) Transbay Core Capacity Improvements project into the TIP with $931 million in local funds and $2.6 billion in uncommitted funds;

• Updates the funding plan of Caltrain’s Positive Train Control (PTC) System project to reflect the award of approximately $22 million in Federal Railroad Administration PTC Implementation grant funds;

• Updates the funding plans of five State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP) funded grouped listings, the Section 130 – Railroad/Highway Crossing Projects funded grouped listing, and the Highway Maintenance Program funded grouped listing to reflect the latest information from Caltrans, including the addition of $412 million in SHOPP, $3.8 million in Section 130 funds and $15 million in Highway Maintenance funds; and

• Amends one new locally-funded exempt project and one new locally-funded non-exempt project into the TIP.

Changes made with this revision do not affect the air quality conformity finding or conflict with the financial constraint requirements. TIP Revision 2017-18 – Administrative Modification (Proposed) Administrative Modification 2017-18 makes revisions to five projects with a net decrease in funding of $466,894. The revision is expected to be approved into the Federal-Statewide TIP during the week of November 6, 2017. Among other changes, this revision:

• Updates the funding plans of four federal earmark funded projects to reflect the repurposing of earmarked funds; and

• Updates the funding plan and back-up listing of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grouped listing to reflect the latest information from Caltrans, including the addition of $208,500 in HSIP funds.

Changes made with this revision do not affect the air quality conformity finding or conflict with the financial constraint requirements. TIP Revision 2017-17 – Administrative Modification (Approved) Administrative Modification 2017-17 makes revisions to 20 projects with a net decrease in funding of $336,931. The revision was approved into the Federal-Statewide TIP by the deputy executive director on October 12, 2017. Among other changes, this revision:

• Updates the funding plans of 16 Surface Transportation Block Grant Program/ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (STP/CMAQ) funded projects to reflect the latest programming decisions;

• Updates the funding plan and back-up listing of one grouped listing to reflect the latest programming decisions regarding the FTA Section 5310 - Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Transit Program, including the addition of $4.2 million in FTA Section 5310 funds;

• Updates the funding plan of one Federal Transit Administration (FTA) formula funded project to reflect changes in the fiscal year 2016-17 Transit Capital Priorities Program; and

• Updates the funding plan of one State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funded project to reflect the latest programming decisions.

Changes made with this revision do not affect the air quality conformity finding or conflict with the financial constraint requirements. TIP Revision 2017-16 – Amendment (Approved) Amendment 2017-16 makes revisions to 13 projects with a net increase in funding of approximately $20 million. Commission approval was received on July 26, 2017, Caltrans was received on August 9, 2017, and final federal approval was received on September 5, 2017. Among other changes, the revision:

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 11 of 53

TIP Update LSRPDWG: November 9, 2017 Page 3 of 3

• Adds one new exempt project, deletes one existing project and updates the funding plans of seven projects to reflect changes in the FY2016-17 Transit Capital Priorities Program;

• Updates the funding plan of the Fairfield-Suisun Intercity/Local Bus Replacement project to reflect the programming of funds available through the Transit Performance Initiative Incentive and Investment Programs; and

• Archives two projects as they have been completed. Changes made with this revision do not affect the air quality conformity finding or conflict with the financial constraint requirements. TIP Revision 2017-15 – Administrative Modification (Approved) Administrative Modification 2017-15 makes revisions to 16 projects with a net decrease in funding of $12.2 million. The revision was approved into the Federal-Statewide TIP by the deputy executive director on September 20, 2017. Among other changes, this revision:

• Updates the funding plans of six Surface Transportation Block Grant Program/ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (STP/CMAQ) funded projects to reflect the latest programming decisions;

• Updates the funding plan and back-up listing of one grouped listing to reflect the latest information from Caltrans regarding the State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP), including the addition of $4.8 million in SHOPP funds;

• Updates the funding plan of one Federal Transit Administration (FTA) formula funded project to reflect changes in the fiscal year 2016-17 Transit Capital Priorities Program; and

• Splits the El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Modernization project out of BART’s system-wide Station Modernization program along with $21.5 million in Proposition 1B funds.

Changes made with this revision do not affect the air quality conformity finding or conflict with the financial constraint requirements. The 2017 TIP revision schedule (Attachment A) has been posted at the following link: http://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2017_TIP_Revision_Schedule.pdf and project sponsors are requested to submit revision requests before 5:00 PM on the stated deadlines. Information on TIP revisions is also available through the TIPINFO notification system (electronic mails). Anyone may sign up for this service by sending an email address and affiliation to: tipinfo@mtc.ca.gov. FMS is available at the following link: http://fms.mtc.ca.gov/fms/. Projects in all the revisions can be viewed at: http://mtc.ca.gov/our-work/fund-invest/tip/tip-revisions-and-amendments. If you have any questions regarding any TIP project, please contact Adam Crenshaw at (415) 778-6794 or acrenshaw@mtc.ca.gov or Karl Anderson at (415) 778-6645 or kanderson@mtc.ca.gov. The Fund Management System (FMS) system has also been updated to reflect the approvals received. Attachments:

A. 2017 TIP Revision Schedule as of October 25, 2017

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 12 of 53

J:\PROJECT\Funding\TIP\2017 TIP Revisions\2017 TIP Revision Schedule\2017 TIP Revision Schedule 10-25-17.xlsx

REVISION TYPE REVISION NUMBER

REVISION REQUEST

SUBMISSION DEADLINE

MTC APPROVAL* STATE APPROVAL* FEDERAL

APPROVAL* APPROVAL STATUSTIP REVISION

FINAL APPROVAL DATE

2017 TIP Update 17-00 Thu, Apr 14, 2016 Wed, Sep 28, 2016 Wed, Nov 16, 2016 Fri, Dec 16, 2016 Approved Fri, Dec 16, 2016

Amendment 17-03 Tue, Nov 1, 2016 Wed, Dec 21, 2016 Thu, Jan 19, 2017 Wed, Feb 8, 2017 Approved Wed, Feb 8, 2017

Admin Mod 17-01 Wed, Nov 23, 2016 Wed, Dec 21, 2016 N/A N/A Approved Wed, Dec 21, 2016

Admin Mod 17-02 Sun, Jan 1, 2017 Tue, Jan 31, 2017 N/A N/A Approved Tue, Jan 31, 2017

Amendment 17-06 Sun, Jan 1, 2017 Wed, Feb 22, 2017 Fri, Feb 24, 2017 Tue, Mar 14, 2017 Approved Tue, Mar 14, 2017

Admin Mod 17-04 Wed, Feb 1, 2017 Mon, Mar 6, 2017 N/A N/A Approved Mon, Mar 6, 2017

Amendment 17-08 Wed, Feb 1, 2017 Wed, Mar 22, 2017 Wed, Mar 29, 2017 Fri, Apr 14, 2017 Approved Fri, Apr 14, 2017

Admin Mod 17-05 Wed, Mar 1, 2017 Wed, Apr 5, 2017 N/A N/A Approved Wed, Apr 5, 2017

Amendment 17-10 Wed, Mar 1, 2017 Wed, Apr 26, 2017 Thu, May 11, 2017 Thu, Jun 8, 2017 Approved Thu, Jun 8, 2017

Amendment(RTP Reconciliation) 17-14 Fri, Mar 31, 2017 Wed, Jul 26, 2017 Wed, Aug 2, 2017 Wed, Aug 23, 2017 Approved Wed, Aug 23, 2017

Admin Mod 17-07 Sat, Apr 1, 2017 Fri, Apr 28, 2017 N/A N/A Approved Fri, Apr 28, 2017

Admin Mod 17-09 Mon, May 1, 2017 Fri, Jun 9, 2017 N/A N/A Approved Fri, Jun 9, 2017

Amendment 17-13 Mon, May 1, 2017 Wed, Jun 28, 2017 Mon, Jul 17, 2017 Thu, Aug 3, 2017 Approved Thu, Aug 3, 2017

Admin Mod 17-11 Thu, Jun 1, 2017 Thu, Jul 6, 2017 N/A N/A Approved Thu, Jul 6, 2017

Amendment 17-16 Thu, Jun 1, 2017 Wed, Jul 26, 2017 Mon, Aug 7, 2017 Tue, Sep 5, 2017 Approved Tue, Sep 5, 2017

Admin Mod 17-12 Sat, Jul 1, 2017 Wed, Aug 2, 2017 N/A N/A Approved Wed, Aug 2, 2017

Admin Mod 17-15 Tue, Aug 1, 2017 Thu, Aug 31, 2017 N/A N/A Approved Wed, Sep 20, 2017

Amendment 17-19 Tue, Aug 1, 2017 Wed, Sep 27, 2017 Mon, Oct 9, 2017 Wed, Oct 25, 2017 Approved Wed, Oct 25, 2017

Admin Mod 17-17 Fri, Sep 1, 2017 Thu, Oct 12, 2017 N/A N/A Approved Thu, Oct 12, 2017

Admin Mod 17-18 Sun, Oct 1, 2017 Tue, Oct 31, 2017 N/A N/A Pending Pending

Amendment 17-22 Sun, Oct 1, 2017 Wed, Nov 15, 2017 Estimated 4 weeks after MTC Approval

Estimated 4 weeks after State Approval Pending Pending

Admin Mod 17-20 Wed, Nov 1, 2017 Thu, Nov 30, 2017 N/A N/A Pending Pending

Admin Mod 17-21 Fri, Dec 1, 2017 Fri, Dec 29, 2017 N/A N/A Pending Pending

Amendment 17-25 Fri, Dec 1, 2017 Wed, Jan 24, 2018 Estimated 4 weeks after MTC Approval

Estimated 4 weeks after State Approval Pending Pending

Admin Mod 17-23 Mon, Jan 1, 2018 Wed, Jan 31, 2018 N/A N/A Pending Pending

Amendment(Transit Only) 17-27 Mon, Jan 1, 2018 Wed, Feb 28, 2018 Estimated 4 weeks

after MTC ApprovalEstimated 4 weeks after State Approval Pending Pending

Amendment 17-29 Thu, Jan 25, 2018 Wed, Mar 28, 2018 Estimated 4 weeks after MTC Approval

Estimated 4 weeks after State Approval Pending Pending

Admin Mod 17-24 Thu, Feb 1, 2018 Wed, Feb 28, 2018 N/A N/A Pending Pending

Admin Mod 17-26 Thu, Mar 1, 2018 Fri, Mar 30, 2018 N/A N/A Pending Pending

Admin Mod(if needed) 17-30 Tue, May 1, 2018 Wed, May 30, 2018 N/A N/A Pending Pending

Admin Mod(if needed) 17-31 Fri, Jun 1, 2018 Fri, Jun 29, 2018 N/A N/A Pending Pending

Amendment(if needed) 17-33 Fri, Jun 1, 2018 Wed, Jul 25, 2018 Estimated 4 weeks

after MTC ApprovalEstimated 4 weeks after State Approval Pending Pending

Admin Mod(if needed) 17-34 Sat, Sep 1, 2018 Mon, Oct 1, 2018 N/A N/A Pending Pending

Admin Mod 17-28 Close of 2019 TIP Review Period in Mid-March Mon, Apr 30, 2018 N/A N/A Pending Pending

Amendment 17-32 Close of 2019 TIP Review Period in Mid-March Wed, May 23, 2018 Estimated 4 weeks

after MTC ApprovalEstimated 4 weeks after State Approval Pending Pending

N/A - Not Applicable / Not RequiredThe schedule is also available on the MTC's website at: http://mtc.ca.gov/our-work/fund-invest/transportation-improvement-programNote: * MTC has delegated authority to approve TIP administrative modifications, and may approve administrative modifications on, prior to, or after the tentative date listed

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONTRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)

Tentative 2017 TIP REVISION SCHEDULE - Sorted by Revision Request Submission DeadlineOctober 25, 2017

TBD - To Be Determined

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 13 of 53

Joint LSRPDWG Item J3Ai

TO: Joint Partnership Local Streets and Roads / Programming and Delivery Working Group

DATE: November 9, 2017

FR: Adam Crenshaw

RE: Development of the 2019 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

Background

The federally required Transportation Improvement Program or TIP, is a comprehensive listing of all Bay Area surface transportation projects that are to receive federal funding, are subject to a federally required action, or are considered regionally significant for air quality conformity purposes. MTC, as the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area Region, must prepare and adopt the TIP at least once every two years. To align with the State’s effort in developing the 2019 Federal-Statewide TIP (FSTIP) MTC is beginning the process to update the region’s TIP. The 2019 TIP will cover the four-year period of FY 2018-19 through FY 2021-22.

In developing a new TIP, MTC conducts a regional air quality conformity analysis that estimates the emission of specific air quality pollutants from transportation sources and compares those estimates to regional emission budgets. As part of this analysis MTC models regionally significant projects that are not specifically exempted from regional air quality conformity analysis by 40 CFR 93.126 and 40 CFR 93.127 (non-exempt projects). The most common type of non-exempt projects are those that either expand or reduce the capacity of the transit, freight, highway or local road systems. As with the 2017 TIP Update, we will be requesting information on new and revised non-exempt projects beginning in December, 2018.

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) established new requirements for performance management to ensure the most efficient investment of Federal transportation funds. To incorporate the new federal performance requirements into the TIP, MTC is required to show (1) that the TIP “makes progress towards achieving [the region’s] performance targets” and (2) that the TIP includes, “to the maximum extent practicable, a description of the anticipated effect of the TIP towards achieving the performance targets.” Details on how performance management will be incorporated into the 2019 TIP process will be provided in future communications.

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 14 of 53

Development of the 2019 TIP LSRPDWG: November 9, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Impact on the 2017 TIP Because it takes several months to prepare a new TIP, our ability to reflect further changes in the 2017 TIP will be very limited after mid-March, 2018. This is necessary to provide the time needed to ensure that programming data is consistent as we move from the current 2017 TIP to the new 2019 TIP, conduct the required air quality conformity and performance analyses, allow for adequate public participation in the development process, and provide sufficient time for Caltrans, FHWA and FTA review and approval. Due to these limitations, the last scheduled amendment to the 2017 TIP will go to the Commission for review and approval in May, 2018, with final federal approval expected in June, 2018. The next expected amendment will be the first amendment to the 2019 TIP in December, 2018. The last scheduled administrative modification is expected to be approved around the end of April, but others may be processed if needed. Tentative Schedule for Development of the 2019 TIP December, 2017 Release of detailed 2019 TIP Schedule and call for information on non-exempt projects February, 2018

Deadline for submitting revisions for the March amendment, beginning of 2019 TIP review of projects in FMS

March, 2018 Deadline for submitting projects in FMS for the 2019 TIP, deadline for submitting revisions for the May amendment, FMS locked for project changes

May, 2018 Last amendment to the 2017 TIP scheduled to be approved by the Commission June, 2018 Draft 2019 TIP released for public review and comment, FMS un-locked July, 2018

Close of public review and comment period, Last amendment to the 2017 TIP expected to be approved by FTA/FHWA

September, 2018 Final 2019 TIP scheduled to be approved by the Commission November, 2018

Deadline for submitting revisions for the first amendment to the 2019 TIP, 2019 TIP expected to be approved by Caltrans

December, 2018 2019 TIP scheduled to be approved by FTA/FHWA, first amendment to the 2019 TIP expected to be approved by the Commission, first administrative modification scheduled to be approved by MTC

February, 2019 First amendment to the 2019 TIP expected to be approved by FTA/FHWA

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 15 of 53

FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE

Adam Crenshaw, MTCJoint Partnership LSRPDWGNovember 9, 2017

LSRPDWG Item J3A.ii

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 16 of 53

FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE

Project Overview

• About 10 years old

• Not user friendly

• Difficult to maintain and enhance

• Includes unused data fields

Current Version of FMS

• Updated Technology

• Designed with the user in mind

• Better integration with other systems

• Easier to maintain and enhance

• Modular data structures

FMS Version 5

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 17 of 53

FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE

Draft User Interface Design

Search

Smarter Text Search

Streamlined Advanced Search

Tailored Search Screens

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 18 of 53

FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE

Draft User Interface Design

Search Results

Focus on Search Results

Include Project Descriptions

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 19 of 53

FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE

Draft User Interface Design

Project Details

1

2 3

45

6

Project Heading and Navigation Bar

Project Description and Classification Information

Project Version Information and Project Milestones

RTP Information

Air Quality Information

Contacts

Screening Criteria and Documents

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

7

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 20 of 53

FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE

Draft User Interface Design

Project Heading and Navigation Bar

Search Defaults to ‘Active’ Version of Project

Toggle between Other Versions of Project

Display Reason for Revision when Selecting

Versions

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 21 of 53

FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE

Draft User Interface Design

Project Description and Classification Information

Separate Fields for Jurisdiction, Location and

Activities

Multiple Locations or Activities on a Single Project

Limit Legislative Districts Based on Jurisdiction

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 22 of 53

FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE

Draft User Interface Design

Project Version Specific Information and Project Milestones

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 23 of 53

FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE

Draft User Interface Design

RTP Information, Contacts and Air Quality Information

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 24 of 53

FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE

Draft User Interface Design

Project Funding – Table View

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 25 of 53

FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE

Potential Future Enhancements

Project Funding – Tree View

Default View Shows Aggregated

Funding Information

Expandable Tables to Show Details

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 26 of 53

FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE

Potential Future Enhancements

User Dashboard

Recent Searches

Program Updates

Calendar

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 27 of 53

FUND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPDATE

Feedback

Volunteers Needed

Comments and Suggestions on Draft Screen Designs

Workflow Design

User Testing

If interested email Adam Crenshaw at acrenshaw@bayareametro.gov

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 28 of 53

PTAC Item 7a

TO: Partnership Technical Advisory Committee DATE: November 20, 2017

FR: Theresa Romell, Programming & Allocations

RE: Senate Bill 1 Implementation – Local Streets & Roads

The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, commonly referred to as SB1, will more

than double local streets and road funds allocated through the Highway Users Tax Account

(HUTA), allocating funds from new taxes through the new Road Maintenance and

Rehabilitation Account (RMRA). In FY 2017-18, Bay Area jurisdictions are expecting an

approximate $86 million increase in gas tax subvention revenue resulting from SB1. In FY

2018-19, the SB1 increment for Bay Area jurisdictions is expected to be approximately $232

million, effectively doubling the funding that local jurisdictions currently receive from the

HUTA.

The use of RMRA local streets and roads funds is similar to that of HUTA and must be used

for projects “that include, but are not limited to,” the following:

Road maintenance and rehabilitation

Safety projects

Railroad grade separations

Traffic control devices

Complete street components, “including active transportation purposes, pedestrian and

bicycle safety projects, transit facilities, and drainage and storm-water capture projects

in conjunction with any other allowable project.”

In addition, RMRA funds may be used to satisfy a match requirement in order to obtain state or

federal funds for eligible projects.

Prior to receiving RMRA funds in a given fiscal year, a city or county must submit to the

California Transportation Commission (CTC) a council or board approved project list that

includes a description, location, schedule, and useful life for each project that will receive

RMRA funding. These lists were due to the CTC on October 13, 2017. Follow up legislation

amended the Local Street and Road SB1 guidelines to allow a ninety day grace period for local

jurisdictions to submit their project lists. After the grace period, any jurisdictions out of

compliance with reporting requirements will forfeit their RMRA funding for the fiscal year and

the funds will be redistributed by formula across the state.

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 29 of 53

Page 2 of 2

Bay Area Projects

To date, all nine counties and 100 out of the 101 cities in the San Francisco Bay Area region

submitted their RMRA project lists to the CTC as required. 15 submittals from cities were

considered incomplete because they were not contained in a city council resolution. MTC and

Congestion Management Agency staff are following up with the relevant cities to ensure that

100% of Bay Area cities comply with the reporting requirements prior to the end of the ninety day

grace period.

A total of 533 street and road projects of varying mileage and type will be funded in FY 2017-18

with SB1 funding. A sample of individual projects from around the region is listed below.

Berkeley – Reconstruction of segments of Panoramic Way and Prospect Street including

replacement of pavement, storm drains, sidewalks, and installation of curb and gutter and

crosswalks

Concord – Diamond Blvd. Reconstruction from Willow Pass Rd. to Treat Blvd.

Marin County -- Roadway rehabilitation with asphalt resurfacing of nine roadway segments

including improvements to: safety, drainage, bicycle facilities, pedestrian facilities, and transit

facilities, where warranted and/or feasible

City of Napa – Rejuvenation treatment of 14 miles of roadway

San Francisco – Base repair and resurfacing of 1.6 miles of Palou Ave. including installation

of curb ramps and bus pads

City of San Mateo – East Hillsdale Blvd. Rehabilitation from Saratoga to Norfolk

City of Santa Clara – Resurfacing of major segments of De La Cruz Blvd. and Monroe St.

including replacement of failed pavement, curbs, gutter, sidewalks, curb ramps, and median

islands

Vallejo – Citywide curb ramp and ADA improvements; Citywide slurry seal project

Santa Rosa – Reconstruction of Fulton Rd. from Occidental Rd. to W. 3rd St.

More information on SB1 projects – including a map of projects by jurisdiction and

project type – can be found on the State’s SB1 website: www.rebuidlingca.ca.gov.

Resources for SB1 Public Outreach and Implementation

Agencies are encouraged to inform heir residents about benefits associated with the new

transportation funding. The League of California Cities has provided a tool kit for

agencies to use in providing information to the public about SB1. The tool kit includes

talking points, sample op-ed options, logos, and sample tweets and Facebook posts.

In addition, the League’s website contains useful information related to SB1 including

legislative text, summaries, reporting guidelines and templates, funding estimates, and

maintenance of effort information. You can access the League’s SB1 page at:

https://www.cacities.org/Policy-Advocacy/Hot-Issues/Transportation-Funding

For questions related to SB1 Local Street and Road funding, please contact me at

tromell@bayareametro.gov, or (415) 778-6772.

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 30 of 53

PTAC Item 7b

TO: Partnership Technical Advisory Committee DATE: November 20, 2017

FR: Kenneth Kao

RE: Senate Bill 1 (SB1) Competitive Programs

Senate Bill 1 (SB1) provided additional money to existing competitive programs, as well as created new competitive programs. Updates and pending program schedules are provided below.

Local Partnership Program. SB 1 provides $200 million per year to the LPP. CTC approved the LPP Guidelines on October 18, 2017, which evenly divides the LPP into formula and competitive programs. The first program will cover two years of formula funds (FY 17-18 and FY 18-19) and three years of competitive funds (FY 17-18 through FY 19-20). A 1:1 match is required for LPP projects. Only authorities with a voter-approved tax dedicated solely to transportation are eligible to receive formula funds, and those agencies that have imposed fees for transportation are eligible to compete in the competitive program. Of interest, the revised guidelines create an incentive program for new and renewed voter-approved taxes, tolls, and fees (coming from the competitive program), and any cost savings generated within the formula program will be returned to that jurisdiction for reprogramming. The approved guidelines are at: http://www.catc.ca.gov/programs/SB_1/102017_Final_LPP_Guidelines.pdf

Key program dates:

Applications due for the formula program: December 15, 2017

Formula program adoption: January 31, 2018

Applications due for the competitive program: January 30, 2018

Competitive program adoption: May 16, 2018.

Trade Corridor Enhancement Program. SB 1 provides $250 million per year to the TCEP, which will also include federal freight formula funds. CTC approved the TCEP Guidelines on October 18, 2017. The first program will cover three years (FY 17-18 through FY 19-20). The TCEP includes a target for Caltrans (statewide) of $536 million, and a target for the Bay Area/Central Valley of $217 million. A 30% match is required for projects not funded through the Caltrans target. Any public agency is eligible to apply; however, MTC must submit the region’s nominations to CTC to ensure consistency with regional plans. Of interest, the guidelines provide that any cost savings generated within a corridor will be returned to that corridor for reprogramming. The approved guidelines are at: http://www.catc.ca.gov/programs/SB_1/101817_Final_TCEP_Guidelines(2).pdf

Key program dates:

Nominations due to MTC: December 15, 2017

MTC Commission concurrence of nominations: January 24, 2018

Applications due to CTC: January 30, 2018 PTAC 11.20.17 Page 31 of 53

Senate Bill 1 (SB1) Competitive Programs PTAC: November 20, 2017 Page 2

Program adoption: May 16, 2018. Solutions for Congested Corridors. SB 1 provides $300 million per year to the SCC, which aims to fund congestion relief projects included in a multimodal comprehensive corridor plan. The first program will cover four years (FY 17-18 through FY 20-21). According to SB 1, only MTC and Caltrans may apply for SCC; however, the implementing/sponsoring agency may be any public agency. Of interest, the draft guidelines do not require a match, but match or leveraged funds will be an evaluation criteria, and no regional targets are included. The draft guidelines are at: http://www.catc.ca.gov/programs/SB_1/103017_SCC_Draft_Guidelines.pdf Key program dates:

CTC Adopts Guidelines: December 6, 2017

Applications due to CTC: February 16, 2018

Program adoption: May 16, 2018. Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program. SB1 includes funds for the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), aimed at funding projects that will modernize California’s intercity, commuter, and urban rail systems, and bus and ferry transit systems. CalSTA administers TIRCP and released a call for projects on October 13 for a 5-year TIRCP program (FY18-19 through FY22-23). The program blends SB1 funds with Cap and Trade auction proceeds. The total amount available for this 5-year program is anticipated to be $2.4 billion, with an estimated $1.4 billion coming from SB1 revenues and $1 billion from Cap and Trade auctions. Key program dates:

Project applications due to Caltrans: January 12, 2018

Anticipated award announcement: April 30, 2018

Anticipated presentation of project list to CTC: May 2018

Resources:

Program webpage: http://www.dot.ca.gov/drmt/sptircp.html

Call for Projects: http://www.dot.ca.gov/drmt/docs/sptircp/2018call4projects.pdf

Program guidelines: http://www.dot.ca.gov/drmt/docs/sptircp/2018finalgl.pdf Please provide input to Kenneth Kao at kkao@bayareametro.gov / 415-778-6768. J:\COMMITTE\Partnership\Partnership TAC\_2017 PTAC\PTAC - Memos\02_Nov 19 17 PTAC\07_SB 1 Competitive Programs.docx

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 32 of 53

DATE: November 20, 2017 TO: Partnership Technical Advisory Committee

FR: Melanie Choy and Judis Santos, MTC Staff

RE: Lifeline Transportation Program Update

The Lifeline Transportation Program (LTP) funds projects that improve mobility for the region’s low-income communities. MTC oversees the overall program and the CMAs administer it in each county. Historically, LTP has been funded by a mix of federal and state sources. The most recent cycle, LTP Cycle 4, is well underway (the program was approved by MTC in March 2015) and MTC is now planning for LTP Cycle 5.

Update For the LTP Cycle 5, staff is proposing minimal changes to the program guidelines. Overall, the program goals, administration, local match, and performance measures stay the same. LTP Cycle 5 will cover 2 fiscal years, FY 2016-17 and 2017-18. A total of approximately $20 million will be available in this cycle, which is made up of $14 million in State Transit Assistance (STA) funds, and $6.5 million in FTA (Federal Transit Administration) Section 5307 funds.

Proposed Changes to Cycle 5 Guidelines - Participatory Budgeting In response to Commission, public, and advocacy group interests, MTC staff is proposing to pilot a participatory budgeting process. The participatory budgeting process enables residents in Communities of Concern to develop and vote on project priorities working through their CMA’s Community-Based Transportation planning process. Selected projects are then funded as part of an available/dedicated budget. MTC staff is proposing to set aside up to 5% ($1M total from LTP Cycle 5) of existing 5307/STA funds to fund projects identified through this pilot process; the remainder of the LTP funds will be distributed to CMAs through formula. CMAs that volunteer to do a participatory budgeting process receive some of this set aside for projects as a match to their Lifeline formula funding and CBTP planning funding for these pilots. MTC staff is preparing to pursue additional planning funds through the next round of the Caltrans Sustainable Communities competitive grant program expected to be kicked off in January.

PTAC Item 9

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 33 of 53

SB1/STA Proposal Implications for Lifeline MTC staff recently put forth a proposal to update the current STA population-based policy (Resolution No. 3837) with a new OBAG-style county block grant. Under this proposed framework, each county (CMA) would determine how best to invest the funds to support transit services within the county including Lifeline program needs. The proposal does not eliminate the Lifeline Transportation Program but rather gives more flexibility in how much each county wants to invest toward Lifeline services/programs. The use of FTA Section 5307 for the Lifeline Transportation Program will need to be revisited under this proposal.

The LTP Cycle 5 funding from the STA program would be from FY17 and from the “base” funding in FY18 (i.e. not including any SB1 increment) and therefore is expected to proceed regardless of the bigger STA policy discussion. A new STA framework, if enacted, would apply to the SB1 increment in FY18, and to all STA population-based funds starting in FY19.

Anticipated Date

Update and Feedback from the Transit Finance Working Group November 1, 2017

Update and Feedback from the Partnership Technical Advisory Committee November 20, 2017

MTC Programming and Allocations Committee consideration of LTP Cycle 5 guidelines (tentative) December 13, 2017

MTC Commission action on Cycle 5 Program Guidelines (tentative) December 20, 2017

CMA Board-approved Section 5307 (JARC) and STA programs due to MTC from Lifeline Program Administrators (dependent on Commission action)

May 2018

MTC Commission approval of Program of Projects (dependent on Commission action) July 2018

Your comments and feedback are welcomed.

Action

Draft Timeline

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 34 of 53

TO: Partnership Technical Advisory Committee DATE: November 20, 2017

FR: Stephanie Mak, MTC/ABAG

RE: 2018 Safety Performance Targets – Recommendation and Options Evaluated

The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) transformed the policy and programmatic framework for surface transportation investments by establishing new requirements for performance management to ensure the most efficient investment of Federal transportation funds. To implement MAP-21 and the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has established a Transportation Performance Management program to provide a framework to support improved investment decision-making by focusing on national transportation goals, increasing the accountability and transparency of the Federal highway programs, and establishing performance-based planning and programming.

As part of Transportation Performance Management, between April 2016 and January 2017, FHWA finalized all performance management rules to fulfill MAP-21 and FAST Act requirements. The rules established 28 transportation performance measures covering the following federal goal areas: Safety; Infrastructure Condition; System Reliability; Freight Movement and Economic Vitality; Congestion Reduction; and Environmental Sustainability. Under the final rules, State DOTs are required to set performance targets for each measure to comply with the regulations. MPOs have the choice to either support the State targets or set their own, depending on the specific rule. MTC is coordinating with Caltrans on target-setting processes.

While transit asset management targets were set in coordination with Bay Area operators earlier this year, the safety performance measures are the first to be set in coordination with Caltrans. In August 2017, Caltrans set the statewide safety performance targets for the state as a whole. Since MPOs must establish targets within 180 days of the State, MTC is required to set its 2018 targets for safety measures by February 2018, repeating this process on an annual basis going forward.

This memorandum focuses on the target-setting process for the Safety Performance Measures Final Rule. It provides an update on statewide targets set by Caltrans and identifies three potential safety target-setting options. Staff is seeking feedback from partners, stakeholders,

2b

PTAC Item 11

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 35 of 53

2018 Safety Performance Targets - Options PTAC: November 20, 2017 Page 2

and the public on which target-setting approach is most appropriate. MTC intends to adopt safety targets by the end of 2017, in advance of the February 2018 deadline. Safety Performance Measures Final Rule What are the safety performance measures? The final rule established five performance measures to assess safety on all public roads:

1. Number of fatalities 2. Rate of fatalities per 100 million VMT (vehicle miles traveled) 3. Number of serious injuries 4. Rate of serious injuries per 100 million VMT (vehicle miles traveled) 5. Number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries (bicyclists and

pedestrians) The measures are reported using 5-year rolling averages to capture long-term performance trends. The first performance period, calendar year 2018, represents the annual average for 2014 to 2018. What are the safety target requirements? State DOTs must set annual numerical targets each year for each safety measure to comply with the regulation. MPOs have the option of supporting State targets, setting their own region-specific numerical targets, or a combination of both. The measures and targets should inform agency planning and funding decisions to carry out the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). MPOs will report annual targets to Caltrans each year and report progress on these measures in future Regional Transportation Plans (RTPs) and Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs). How are State DOTs and MPOs evaluated on safety targets? State DOTs and MPOs meet or make “significant progress” towards their safety goal if they achieve the target or improve performance in at least four out of five of the safety measures. If a State DOT does not meet or make “significant progress” then it will lose flexibility in spending HSIP funds. FHWA will not evaluate MPOs on their progress towards targets. However, FHWA will review MPO performance as part of the triennial review process. Caltrans Statewide Safety Targets Caltrans used a vision-based approach to set the 2018 statewide safety targets. The methodology the State used was to identify existing trends for measures through 2016, forecast performance for 2017, then estimate annual targets for 2018 using annual vision based goals. Fatalities and the rate of fatalities targets reflect the State’s Towards Zero Deaths (TZD) goal for zero traffic fatalities by 2030. Serious injuries and the rate of serious injuries targets reflect the State Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) vision based concept of 1.5% annual reductions in serious injuries. The non-motorized safety target reflects the vision based goal of 10% annual reductions in non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries. The statewide targets for 2018, all of which reflect five-year rolling average values, are:

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 36 of 53

2018 Safety Performance Targets - Options PTAC: November 20, 2017 Page 3

1. 3,591.8 fatalities 2. 1.029 fatalities per 100 million VMT 3. 12,823.4 serious injuries 4. 3.831 serious injuries per 100 million VMT 5. 4,271.1 non-motorized fatalities + serious injuries

Regional Safety Performance As part of the target setting process, traffic collision data has been analyzed to identify current safety trends in the Bay Area. Economic conditions are strong determinants for road safety performance. One effect of the Great Recession was a decrease in fatalities and serious injuries due to lower rates of driving, whereas the subsequent economic boom can partially explain the rise in fatalities and serious injuries since 2013. However, it is important to recognize that non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries have had an upward trajectory for the past decade-plus. Existing Road Safety Targets and Policies in the Bay Area As part of Plan Bay Area 2040, MTC has adopted a regional Healthy and Safe Communities target, which aims to adverse health impacts by making roads safer, by supporting active transportation, and by improving air quality. Many Bay Area cities and counties have also adopted their own road safety policies and targets. In recent years, Vision Zero and Towards Zero Deaths initiatives have gained momentum around the country. Bay Area jurisdictions that have adopted Vision Zero policies include the cities of San Francisco, San Jose, Fremont, San Mateo, and Oakland. Target-Setting Options To provide MPOs with flexibility, federal rules state that MPOs may: support all the State targets, establish their own specific numeric targets for all the performance measures, or pursue any combination of these actions on a measure-by-measure basis. Targets will be updated annually, meaning that MTC can revisit its target-setting methodology annually, if needed. Staff evaluated three potential options for setting 2018 safety targets, as shown below and recommends Option 1 with monitoring of regional progress toward statewide target. Staff recommends Option 1 as being easiest to explain to the public and decision-makers, while providing strong alignment with the state on safety targets. It also supports the Vision Zero approach adopted by several Bay Area jurisdictions.

Option 1: Support Caltrans statewide targets

MTC supports all five State targets by agreeing to plan and program projects so that they contribute towards the accomplishment of the statewide targets. Strengths: simple; easy to explain; aligns directly with State targets, including Towards Zero Deaths Weaknesses: safety trends will be monitored but no region-specific targets will be identified

Option 2: Set Bay Area targets based on Caltrans methodology

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 37 of 53

2018 Safety Performance Targets - Options PTAC: November 20, 2017 Page 4

MTC establishes numerical targets for the Bay Area mirroring the methodology Caltrans used to set the statewide targets. Strengths: leverages State methodology but quantifies Towards Zero Deaths goal for the region; demonstrates stronger commitment to safety and performance-based planning Weaknesses: unlikely that the region would achieve targets; 2018 targets would remain higher than 2016 baseline due to 5-year rolling average calculation

Option 3: Set more ambitious Bay Area targets based on region-specific methodology

MTC establishes numerical targets for the Bay Area using a different methodology where 2018 targets are set lower than the 2016 baseline – for example, a 5% reduction across all measures from the 2016 baseline. Strengths: most ambitious option; targets identified would improve performance for 2018 Weaknesses: extremely unlikely that the region would achieve ambitious targets; difficult to identify the appropriate percent reduction goal

Under Option 1, MTC does not need to set numerical targets for the Bay Area. The numerical targets for each measure for ■Option 2 and ▲Option 3 are shown alongside historical 5-year rolling averages:

Bay Area Safety Performance and 2018 Target Options*

1. Number of Fatalities

2. Rate of Fatalities Per 100 Million

VMT

3. Number of Serious Injuries

2016 Baseline: 428.8

Option 2: 497

Option 3: 4070

200

400

600

800

2005 2018

Fat

alit

ies

2016 Baseline: 0.689

0.8

0.70.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

2005 2018

Fat

alit

ies

per

10

0 M

VM

T

2016 Baseline: 1871.6

2068

17780

1000

2000

3000

2005 2018

Ser

ious

Inju

ries

2018 Target:

Option 1 NA

Option 2 497.3

Option 3 407.4

2018 Target:

Option 1 NA

Option 2 0.771

Option 3 0.655

2018 Target:

Option 1 NA

Option 2 2067.8

Option 3 1778.0

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 38 of 53

2018 Safety Performance Targets - Options PTAC: November 20, 2017 Page 5

4. Rate of Serious

Injuries per 100 Million

VMT

5. Number of Non-

Motorized Fatalities and

Serious Injuries

Note: Measures and targets reflect 5-year rolling averages Sources: FARS; SWITRS * Safety data will be updated in October 2017 with the final Caltrans dataset to ensure consistency across California; staff is most interested in feedback on the approach rather than the numeric targets.

Next Steps Staff is seeking feedback on staff’s recommendation and the alternative safety target options through mid-November, meeting with stakeholders through several Partnership working groups. Based on feedback received, staff will finalize a preferred alternative and update numeric targets using the final Caltrans dataset. Monitoring data, as well as any adopted targets, will ultimately be reported through the Vital Signs performance monitoring website and will be incorporated into future long-range plans (RTPs/TIPs). Staff will also be seeking input on future target-setting activities related to asset management and system performance in the months ahead.

2016 Baseline: 3.012

3.2

2.90.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

2005 2018Ser

ious

Inju

ries

per

10

0 M

VM

T

2016 Baseline: 749.8

779712

0

250

500

750

1000

2005 2018

No

n-M

oto

rize

d

Fat

alit

ies

+ S

erio

us

Inju

ries

2018 Target:

Option 1 NA

Option 2 3.221

Option 3 2.861

2018 Target:

Option 1 NA

Option 2 779.3

Option 3 712.3

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 39 of 53

Setting Safety Targets for Federal Performance

Requirements

November 20, 2017

Partnership Technical Advisory Committee

Stephanie Mak, MTC/ABAG

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 40 of 53

Background

• MAP-21 and the FAST Act established a performance- and outcome-based transportation program

• The objective is for States to make investments that make progress towards• Safety• Infrastructure condition• Congestion reduction• System reliability• Freight movement and economic vitality• Environmental sustainability• Reduced project delivery delays

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 41 of 53

Safety Performance Management Final Rule

• FHWA issued a final rule under MAP-21 for highway safety planning in April 2016

• The rule established 5 safety performance measures:1. Number of Fatalities

2. Rate of Fatalities per 100 Million VMT

3. Number of Serious Injuries

4. Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 Million VMT

5. Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Non-Motorized Serious Injuries (Bicycles and Pedestrians)

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 42 of 53

Safety Target Setting

State DOTs

• State DOTs must set numerical targets for all five safety measures

• Targets should inform planning and funding decisions to carry out the Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP)

• State DOTs coordinate with MPOs on statewide targets

MPOs

• MPOs can support state targets, set their own region-specific numerical targets, or a combination of both

• Targets should inform planning and funding decision to carry out the Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP)

• MPOs coordinate with State DOTs on target setting process

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 43 of 53

Safety Target Evaluation

State DOTs

• State DOTs report performance data and targets to FHWA

• FHWA determines if State has met or made significant progress towards meeting targets

• If a State does not meet or make significant progress towards meeting the targets for at least 4 out of 5 measures, it will be required to use obligation authority equal to the HSIP apportionment for highway safety projects and submit a HSIP Implementation Plan

MPOs

• MPOs do not report performance data and targets to FHWA

• FHWA does not determine if MPO has met or made significant progress towards meeting targets

• MPOs report targets to State DOT

• MPOs report performance measures and target achievement in future RTP and TIP

• FHWA will evaluate MPO performance as part of ongoing transportation planning process reviews

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 44 of 53

California’s Targets

• State DOTs had to set 2018 targets by August 2017

• Caltrans selected the statewide targets using a vision-based target setting approach• Total fatalities targets are set based on a ‘Towards Zero Deaths’ vision

• Serious injuries targets are set based on the goal of 1.5% annual reduction from the Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP)

• Non-motorized fatalities + serious injuries target is set based on a vision of 10% annual reduction

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 45 of 53

Caltrans Statewide TargetsMethodologyFor 2017, assume• VMT: +2%• Fatalities: +13%• Serious Injuries: +10%• Non-motorized fatalities + serious injuries: 0%

For 2018, aim for

• VMT: +2%• Fatalities: -7.69% (based on zero deaths by year

2030)• Serious injuries: -1.5%• Non-motorized fatalities + serious injuries: -10%For 2018 Target, calculate the 5-YR Rolling Average

2018 Target: 3590.8 Fatalities

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

1994 2002 2010 2018

1. Number of Fatalities

2018 Target: 3.831 Serious Injuries

per 100M VMT0

1

2

3

4

5

1994 2002 2010 2018

4. Rate of Serious Injuries per 100M VMT

2018 Target:4271.1 Non-Motorized

Fatalities + Serious Injuries

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

1994 2002 2010 2018

5. Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

2018 Target: 12,823.4 Serious

Injuries

0

4000

8000

12000

16000

1994 2002 2010 2018

3. Number of Serious Injuries

2018 Target:1.029 Fatalities per

100M VMT0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1994 2002 2010 2018

2. Rate of Fatalities per 100M VMT

Historic Data Historic Data 5-YR Rolling Avg. Forecast/Target Forecast/Target 5-YR Rolling Avg.PTAC 11.20.17 Page 46 of 53

Regional Safety Performance• Although there have been upticks in the last 5

years, road fatalities and serious injuries have decreased over the long-term

• However, non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries have grown since the 2000s

• The 5-year rolling average smooths year-to-year variation and help us gauge long-term trends.

• Economic conditions are strong determinants for these safety measures. More fatalities and serious injuries occur when the economy grows and fewer when it shrinks.

• Overall, the Bay Area and California have similar safety performance trends 0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1994 2000 2006 2012

1. Number of Fatalities

0

1

2

3

4

1994 2000 2006 2012

4. Rate of Serious Injuries per 100M VMT

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1994 2000 2006 2012

5. Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1994 2000 2006 2012

3. Number of Serious Injuries

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1994 2000 2006 2012

2. Rate of Fatalities per 100M VMT

Historic Data Historic Data 5-YR Rolling Avg.PTAC 11.20.17 Page 47 of 53

Three Options for Safety Target-Setting

Recommended

Option Approach

1 Support the State’s statewide targets

2 Set Bay Area targets based on State’s methodology

3 Set Bay Area targets based on own methodology

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 48 of 53

Option 1: Support the State’s statewide targetsMTC will not need to report new performance data or set a region-specific numeric target.Strengths• simple

• easy to explain

• aligns directly with State’s targets, including

Towards Zero DeathsWeaknesses• safety trends will be monitored but no region-

specific targets will be identified0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1994 2000 2006 2012

1. Number of Fatalities

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1994 2000 2006 2012

4. Rate of Serious Injuries per 100M VMT

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1994 2000 2006 2012

5. Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1994 2000 2006 2012

3. Number of Serious Injuries

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1994 2000 2006 2012

2. Rate of Fatalities per 100M VMTRecommended

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 49 of 53

Option 2: Set Bay Area targets

based on State’s methodologyStrengths

• leverages State methodology but quantifies

Towards Zero Deaths goal for the region

• demonstrates stronger commitment to safety and

performance-based planningWeaknesses

• unlikely that the region would achieve targets

• 2018 targets would remain higher than 2016

baseline due to 5-year rolling average calculation

Proposed 2018 Target: 497* Fatalities

0

150

300

450

600

1994 2002 2010 2018

1. Number of Fatalities

Proposed 2018 Target: 3.2* Serious Injuries per

100M VMT

0

1

2

3

4

1994 2002 2010 2018

4. Rate of Serious Injuries per 100M VMT

Proposed 2018 Target: 779* Non-Motorized Fatalities + Serious

Injuries

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1994 2002 2010 2018

5. Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Proposed 2018 Target: 2068* Serious Injuries

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1994 2002 2010 2018

3. Number of Serious Injuries

Proposed 2018 Target:0.8* Fatalities per 100M

VMT

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1994 2002 2010 2018

2. Rate of Fatalities per 100M VMT

Historic Data Historic Data 5-YR Rolling Avg. Forecast/Target Forecast/Target 5-YR Rolling Avg.* Note all data is preliminary; targets will be based on final data provided by Caltrans

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 50 of 53

Option 3: Set Bay Area targetsbased on own methodology –

for example 5% reduction from baseline year acrossall measuresStrengths

• most ambitious option

• targets identified would improve performance for

2018Weaknesses

• extremely unlikely that the region would achieve

ambitious targets

• difficult to identify the appropriate percent

reduction goal

Proposed 2018 Target: 407* Fatalities

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1994 2002 2010 2018

1. Number of Fatalities

Proposed 2018 Target: 2.9* Serious Injuries per

100M VMT

0

1

2

3

4

1994 2002 2010 2018

4. Rate of Serious Injuries per 100M VMT

Proposed 2018 Target: 712* Non-Motorized Fatalities + Serious

Injuries

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1994 2002 2010 2018

5. Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Proposed 2018 Target: 1778* Serious Injuries

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1994 2002 2010 2018

3. Number of Serious Injuries

Proposed 2018 Target:0.7* Fatalities per 100M

VMT

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1994 2002 2010 2018

2. Rate of Fatalities per 100M VMT

Historic Data Historic Data 5-YR Rolling Avg. Forecast/Target Forecast/Target 5-YR Rolling Avg.* Note all data is preliminary; targets will be based on final data provided by Caltrans

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 51 of 53

Option 3: Set Bay Area targetsbased on own methodology –

for example 5% reduction from baseline year acrossall measures

The Bay Area would need to have record-low annual safety performance measures in 2017 and 2018 to achieve the targets

Proposed 2018 Target: 407* Fatalities

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1994 2002 2010 2018

1. Number of Fatalities

Proposed 2018 Target: 2.9* Serious Injuries per

100M VMT

0

1

2

3

4

1994 2002 2010 2018

4. Rate of Serious Injuries per 100M VMT

Proposed 2018 Target: 712* Non-Motorized Fatalities + Serious

Injuries

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1994 2002 2010 2018

5. Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Proposed 2018 Target: 1778* Serious Injuries

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1994 2002 2010 2018

3. Number of Serious Injuries

Proposed 2018 Target:0.7* Fatalities per 100M

VMT

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1994 2002 2010 2018

2. Rate of Fatalities per 100M VMT

Historic Data Historic Data 5-YR Rolling Avg. Forecast/Target Forecast/Target 5-YR Rolling Avg.* Note all data is preliminary; targets will be based on final data provided by Caltrans

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 52 of 53

Next Steps

• Seek feedback on recommended target and alternatives from partners, stakeholders, and public through mid-November• Programing and Delivery Working Group• Local Streets and Roads Working Group• Active Transportation Working Group• CMA Planning Directors

• Finalize preferred alternative based on feedback received

• If needed, update numeric targets using final Caltrans dataset

• Adopt final safety targets by the end of the year

• Report performance measures and targets to Vital Signs website and incorporate targets in future RTPs/TIPs

PTAC 11.20.17 Page 53 of 53