200

The Bakhshali Manuscript

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This is actual text book of mathematics teaching in India showing ancient symbols used in about 1000 AD.

Citation preview

Page 1: The Bakhshali Manuscript
Page 2: The Bakhshali Manuscript

THE

BAKHSHALI P 1'

AN ANCIENT TREATISE OF INDIAN Alt I'I'I I N 4F,'

EDITED BY

Svami Satya Prakash Sarasvat Iand

00 Usha,jyotishmati, M. Sc., D. Phil.

Dr. Rataa Kumari Svadhyaya SansthaniALLAHABAD.

Page 3: The Bakhshali Manuscript

PUBLISHE S BY

Dr. Ratn Kumari Svadhyaya SansthanaVijnaua Parishad BuildingsMaharshi Dayanand Marg

Allahabad-211002Phone : 54413

FIRST EDITION

1979

Price Rs. 50/- ( £ 3.5 or $ 7 )

Printed at :-ARVIND PRINTERS

20-1), Bell Road, Allahabad, Phone Not 3711

Page 4: The Bakhshali Manuscript
Page 5: The Bakhshali Manuscript

CDr `-Patna umariBorn 20-3- 19 12 Died 2-12-1964

Page 6: The Bakhshali Manuscript

PREFACE

Dr. Ratna Kumari, M. A., D. Phil. was deeply interested ineducation, higher research and scholarship, and when she died in1964, the Director of the Research Institute of Ancient ScientificStudies, Now Delhi, graciously agreed to publish in her commemo-ration a Series to be known as the "Dr. Raffia Kumari PubllcaNnuSeries", and tinder this arrangement, the five volumes publishedwere: Satapatha Brahmanain. Vol. I, 11 and III (1967, 1969, 19711):ltaudhayana Sulba Sutram (1968) and the Apastanrba Sulba Sutruun(1968). It is to be regretted that in 1971, Pundit Rain SwarnpSharnta, the Director of the Institute died and shortly afterwards,the activities of the Institute came to a close. In 1971, from anendowment created by the relations of late Dr. Ratna Kurnari,Dr. Ratna Kumari Svadhyaya Sansthana, a research orgunicutionfor promotion of higher studies amongst ladies, was ostahll.shed at Allahabad, with Sri Anand Prakash, the younger son of1)r. Ratna Kumari as the first President. Svumi Satya Prukunlt(formerly, Prof. Dr. Satya Prakash) has authorised Dr. RatnaKumari Svadhyaya Sansthana to publish several of his works, plirti.cularly, all of them which were published by the Rcicarch Instituteof Ancient Scientific Studies, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi, andhas assigned the right of publication of these works to the'Sansthana.

We are pleased to offer to the public for the first time, theclassified text of the Bakhshall Manuscript in Devanagari script. Themanuscript was literally dug out of a mound at Bakhshuli on thenorth-west frontier of India in 1881, and Dr. Hoornlc eurefullyexamined the manuscript and published an English translation ol'ttfew of the leaves in 1888. This being the earliest manuscript onIndian Arithmetic, it aroused considerable interest in the West. '11w

Archaeological Survey of India published the manuscript in Paris I,11 and III. as edited by 0. R. Kaye. In 1902, Dr. Hoernle presentedthe manuscript to the Bodleian Library. 1 his distinguished workof Kaye is now not available in market. Dr. Aibhuti BhusunDatta of Calcutta University also made detailed study of thismanuscript,

Page 7: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Vi

Dr. I Jsha Jyotishmati, a distinguished member of the Sans-thana, took onsiderable.pains in editing the text, and we are obligedto Svami Saty,t Prakash Sarasvati for his supervision and criticalintroduction. We r re also obliged to Sri Jagdish 111rasad Misra,B A., LL. B., for his dedicated services to the Sansthana, parti-cularly in the publication programmes.

We regret to announce the premature death of our first Presi-dent Sri Anand Prakash on December 13, 1976. He was a distin-guished graduate of the University of Allahabad, and took hisgraduation in Mechanical Engineering from the University ofGlasgow. and since then he had been working in industry. Tocherish his memory, we have the privilege of dedicating this littlevolume.

The Sansthana Prabha GroverAllahabad M Sc., D. Phil.Ramanavanti DirectorApril 5, 1979.

Page 8: The Bakhshali Manuscript
Page 9: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Anand'PrakaokBorn t-4-1:)38 Died 13-12-1976

Page 10: The Bakhshali Manuscript

To Our PresidentANAND PRAKASH

Who cliedat

au early age of 38.

Page 11: The Bakhshali Manuscript
Page 12: The Bakhshali Manuscript

CONTENTS

N Pltol)UCTION

Chajakputra, the scribe

Ilow the text was found?

The manuscript

The script

The language 7

Ortlor and arrangement of folios 7

Contents of the manuscript 8

(ioncralized arithmetic and algebra 111

't'ext is of Indian form Il

IN the work homogeneous ? 12

The script (details) 12

An indigenous Hindu treatise 13

Various opinions about its age 14

Ilakhshali manuscript older than the presentmanuscript 15

Ilakltshali work, a commentary 1l

Present manuscript-a copy 18

Exposition and method 20

fundamental operations 32

Square root and surds 35

Rule of three 40

Calculation of errors and process of reconciliation 41

Negative sign 45

Least common multiple 47

Arithmetical notation-word numerals SO

Regula falsl 52

Known still earlier in India 54

The rupona method 55

Page 13: The Bakhshali Manuscript

ii

Proofs 59

Solutions 65

Symbols for the unknown 66

Plan of writing equations 70

Certain complex series 71

Systems of linear equations 72

Quadratic indeterminate equations 77

Happy collaboration of the east and the west. 78

Appendix : Weights and measures 81

The arithmetical problems incorporated in theBakhshali Text 85

The Bakhshali Text (Transliterated in DevanagariScript) ... 1-71

Index ... 109

Page 14: The Bakhshali Manuscript

INTRODUCTION

Chajakputra -The Scribe :

While we pay homage to the unknown author of it textcause to be known as the Bakhshali Manuscript, we should expressour gratitude to another person of unknown name who scribed thomanuscript from a text quite lost to us, and not only that, since thI'tscribe was himself a mathematician of no less repute, being knownas it prince amongst calculators, he added illustrations and otienadded something to the i unning commentary of this Text. 1houphwe no independent source to corroborate, it is definite that uText c.isted as early as the second or third century A. I). it' notearlier; this I ext was traditionally used by the lovers of calculations(teachers and taughts) in some parts of the country (specially thenorth-western parts of the Aryavartta), and as it was handed downto us generation after generation, new worked and unworkcd prob-lems were added to the existing material. At the end of the mown.eript (or somewhere on Folio 50, recto) we find a colophon mention-ing that the work was scribed by a certain Brahmana, a prince ofcalculators the son of Chajaka (rq;). Thus we know the sunk ofthe father of the scribe only. I would like to call the scribe of thepresent manuscript himself as Chajaka-Putra (tqq; qa), the son ofC'hajaka. He himself is not an author of the Text; he merely copies itout from some other text already current. Even if the date of copy-ing this text were so late as the tenth or eleventh century and evenit' some illustrations included in the manuscript were not of it veryearly origin, the Bakhshali Text has its great importance, this beingone of the earliest Texts in history available to us on the science ofcalculations.

Blow the Text was Found ?

In 181, a mathematical work written on birchbark was foundat Bakhshali near Mardan on the north-west frontier of India. 1 hismanuscript was supposed to be of great age and its discovery uroun-ed considerable interest. Part of it was cxumincd by Dr. H ocrMe,

Page 15: The Bakhshali Manuscript

i Bakhshali Manuscript

who published a short account of it in 18831, and a fuller accountin 1886x, whic&i together with the translation of a few of the leaveswas republished in 18883. Dr. Hoernle had intended, in due course,to publish a complete edition of the Text, but was unable to do so.The work was later on printed and published in 1927, under the title"The Bakhshali Manuscript", Part I and 11, by the Government ofIndia with photographic fascimiles and transliteration of the Texttogether with a very comprehensive introduction by G. R. Kaye4.This was followed by the publication of the Bakhshali Manuscript,Part 111, in 1933 as the Text Rearranged shortly after Kaye's death.Dr. Bibhutibhushan Datta, a distinguished worker in the field ofIndian mathematics, also published a critical review on the BakhshaliManuscripts.

Bakhshali (or Bakhshalai, as it was written in the official maps)is a village of the Yusufzai subdivision of the district of Peshawarof the North-Western Frontier of India ( now in Pakistan ). It issituated on, or near, the river Mukham, which eventually joins theKabul river near Nowshers, some twenty miles further south. Sixmiles W. N. W. of Bakhshali is Jamalgarhi, twelve miles to the Westof Takht-i-Bhai and twenty miles W. S. W. is Charsada, famous fortheir Indo-Greek art treasures.

Bakhshali is about 150 miles from Kabul, 160 from Srinagar,50 from Peshawar, 350 from Balkh and 70 from Taxila. It is in theTrans-Indus country and in ancient times was within Persianboundaries -in the Arachosian satrapy of the Achaemenid kings.It is within that part of the country to which the name Gandhara

1. Indian Antiquary, XII (1883), pp. 89-90.2. Verhandtungen des VII lnternationalen Orientalisten Congresses, Arische Section,

pp. 127 et. seq.

3. Indian Antiquary, XVII (1888), pp. 38-48, 275-279.

4. The Bakhshali Manuscript--A Study in Medieval Mathematics, Part I and II,Calcutta, 1927. Kaye made two previous communications on the subjectmatter of the Bakhshali work: (i) Notes on Indian Mathematics-ArithmeticalNotation (J. Asiat. Soc. Beng., 111, (1907) and (ii) The Bakhshall Manuscript,ibid. VIII, 1912.

5. Datta : Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society, 1929, XXI, p. 1, entitledthe Bakhshall Manuscript. Also rcforoncos in the History of Hindu Math,.matics, By Datta and A. N. Singh, 1935 and 1962 editions.

Page 16: The Bakhshali Manuscript

I low the'I'ext wit'; found 3

has been given, and was subject to Iliose wc';tern inflpenccu whit ItIIIN e0 bountifully illustrated in the so-cnllcd (7andhara nil.

IThe authentic record of the discuveiy of the ntnnuNcript nl'pr.

gra to be contained in the following letter dated the 5th ofJuly, I1tiil I.from the Assistant Commissioner at Martian.

"In reply to your No. 1306. dated 20111 ultimo, and iln co-ololttree, I have the honour to inform you that the remains of Ihtlpapyrus MS. referred to were brought to me by the lnspcctttr ofpolice. Mien An-Wan-Udin. The finder, a tenant of the latter, Hnidhe had round the manuscript while digging in it ruined stone en-Olasure on one of the mounds near Bakhshali2. These mound,,lie on the west side of the Mardan and I3akhshtlli roads and nroevidaltly the remains of a former village. Close to the same spot theMite round a triangular-shaped 'diva', it soap-stone i'cncil, rued itlarge Iota of baked clay with a perforated bottom. I had it fuilhtymarch made but nothing else was found.

"According to the finder's statement the greater part of IhnManuscript had been destroyed in taking it up from (lie place %%hvivIII lay between stones. The remains when brought to inc weir Ill,vdry tinder, and there may be about fifty pages left sonic of which

-Would be certainly legible to any one who knew the characters, Thelitters on some of the pages are very clear and look like some kiln)of Prakrlla (sTTr ), but it is most difficult to separate the pagesWithout injuring them. I had intended to forward the manuscript tothe Lahore Museum in the hope that it might be sent on thence tofiMe Scholar, but I was unable to have a proper tin box made1'brr it before I left Mardan. I will see to this on my return fromInve. The papyrus will require very tender manipulation. 'I'llefSNlt will be interesting if it enables us to judge the age.of thetutu whore the manuscript was founds."

I. Apparently iha manuscript was found in May 1881.General ('unnigham in a private letter to hr. Hocrnic, dated Sinda, Kilt

June, 1882, nays : "13akhrhali is 4 miles north of Shuhbaxgarhi. II Is it nunnnlwith the village on the top of it The birch-hark manuscript was found la itfield near a well without trace of any building near the spot, which Is autnkluthe ntonnd vlllag.......".

3. kayo hits, however, expressed doubts reltardling the uulhontitily of thinmunlh ntaISOUnt, for, he thinks. It was written app:ucatty from menmoty, it

$ e for the discovery of the rnnnuscript.

Page 17: The Bakhshali Manuscript

4 Bakhshali Manuscript

In the meantime notices of the discovery had found their wayinto the Indian newspapers. Professor Buhler, who had read of thediscovery in the "Bombay Gazette,' communicated the announce-ment to Professor Weber, who brought it to the notice of the FifthInternational Congress of Orientalists then assembled in Berlin. InProfessor Buhler's letter to Prof. Weber it was stated that themanuscript had been found "carefully enclosed in a stone chamber"and it was thought that the newly discovered manuscript mightprove to be "one of the Tripitakas which Kaniska ordered to bedeposited in Stupas".

Kaye, however, says that there is nothing whatever in therecord of the find to justify Buhler's sta'ement, which seems to haveoriginated in a rather strange interpretation of the words "whiledigging in a stone enclosure" that occur in the letter quoted above,and which are themselves of doubtful reliab;lity.

The manuscript was subsequently sc nt to the Lieutenent-Gover-nor of the Punjab, who, on the advice of General Cunningham,directed it to be transmitted to Dr. Hoernle, then head of theCalcutta Nladrasa, for examination and publication. In 1882,Dr. Hoernle gave a short description of the manuscript before theAsiatic Society of Bengal, and this description was published in theIndian Antiquary of 1883. At the Seventh Oriental Conference, held atVienna in 1886, he gave a fuller account which was published in theproceedings of the Conference, and also with some additions, in the

1. This accont appears in the Bombay Gazette of Wednesday, August 13th, 1881and is as follows :

"The remains of a very ancient papyrus manuscript have been found nearBakjtshali, in the Mardan Tahsil, Peshawar District. On the west side of theMardan and Bakhshali road are some mounds, believed to be the remainsof a former village, though nothing is known with any certainty regardingthem, and it was while digging in a ruined stone enclosure on one of thesemounds the discovery was made. A triangular-shaped stone 'Diwa', and asoap-stone pencil and a large lotah of baked clay, with a perforated bottom,were found at the same place. Much of the manuscript was destroyed by theignorant finder in taking it up from the spot where it lay between the stones;and the remains are described as being like dry tinder, in sonic of the pagesHowever, the character, which somewhat resembles 'prakrita'(A(0), i s clear.and it is hoped it may be deciphered when it reach^.s Lahore, whither weunderstand it is shortly to tc sonl".

Page 18: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Manuscript $

hallrrn Anllquary of 1888. In 1902 1)r. Iloernle pichcnlvd IIn'

n Library.

The Manuscript

t

The manuscript consists of some 70 loaves of birchhark, butsome of these are mere scraps. The largest loaf measures about5.75 by 3.5 inches or 14.5 by 8.9 centimetres. The loaves, which arenumbered according to the Bodleian Library arrangement from I III

70, may be classified according to their size and condition asfollows

In fair condition but broken at the edges-sivc, not less flame5 by 3 inches (13 by 8 cros.)

I, 4, 5. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 211, ?2,

23, 24, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 43, 44, 47, 49, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 .

Total 35.

Rather more damaged but otherwise in fair condition not lemvthan 41 by 2 inches (12 by 5 ems.)

2, 25, 26, 42. 45, 46, 48, 50, 51, 52, 55, 56, 57, 58, 64. 69Total 16.

Much damaged

21, 31, 35, 41, 5', 66, 68-Total 7.

Scraps.

27, 28, 29, 33, 35, 38, 39, 40, 54, 68, 70-Total 11.

One folio (19) is entirely blank.

Certain folios consist of two leaves stuck together, namely 7,,11 and 65, and possibly others. It would not be difficult to separatethese double leaves without damaging the manuscript.

The leaves are now mounted between sheets of mica and placed

within an album. The mica sheets arc about 7.4 by 4.6 inches andare fixed together by strips of gummed paper at the edges leaving itulcer area of 61 by 3j inches,

Page 19: The Bakhshali Manuscript

6 Bakhshali Manuscript

Possibly the original strip of birch-bark from which the leaves of Bakhshalimanuscript were taken was roughly ofthe shape of the annexed diagram andwas cut up into the oblongs indicated. IfA, B, C, etc., represent the upper layer,and A', B', C', etc. the lower layer, then,according to the evidence of the leavesthemselves, they were arranged for pur-poses of writing upon in the orderA, A'; B, B'; C, C' ; etc., or A, A'D' ; etc.

A B C

f1 F F

G H I

J L

Nl

P Q P. jRegarding the format of the Bakhshali manuscript (ratio 1.7)

as a criterion of age, Kaye says that he could come to no positiveconclusion from the evidence before him. Dr. Hoernle, however,writes as follows :-

"It is noteworthy that the two oldest (Indian paper) manuscriptknown to us point to their having been made in imitation of such

a birch bark prototype as the Bakhshali manuscript."

Kaye, however, does not accept this argument, for it would bequite as reasonable to cocclude that the Bakhshali format was deter-

mined by the paper manuscript formats, and that it is of later datethan the introduction into India of paper as a writing material; andthis, according to Kaye, would place the Bakhshali manuscript aboutthe twelfth century of our era at the earliest.

The Script

The Bakhshali text is writ',en in the Sarada (V1TT-6,T) script,

which flourished on the north-west borders of India from about theNinth Century until within recent times. Its distribution in space isfairly definitely limited to a comparatively small area lying betweenlongitudes 72 and ;8 east of Greenwich and latitudes 32 and 36north Dr. Vogel distinguishes between Sarada proper, of which thelatest examples are of the early Thirteenth Century, and modernSarada.

The writing of the Bakhshali manuscript is of the earlier periodand is generally very good writing indeed, It was written by at least

Page 20: The Bakhshali Manuscript

-I

a

cl C,4 d A vw .. Qi q, q, c

-ol

ra 1; E` r:

V n ' n ry s..

dJ +7 A d d et Q-

8r a 81 9- a

.1 oll

t

^1 q 'I 7 ') ry

M 0 o 0LN ;I AA

H

s9 m o at m m O bc4 n r t+ N C+ c V

d tJ c+ o C1 0 op

6J o p r. r L i at a

... .4 a.4

L li -1i _L 'L., !11 Lt c .G 11 tl 0-

.. . . .1L' Cr jr cc ,'t7 x 1 x .t r. ?- Y

Page 21: The Bakhshali Manuscript

A page of the Bakhshali Manuscript( 17 verso )

Page 22: The Bakhshali Manuscript

The Script ,)

two scribes. Kaye gives a detailed account of it, anti ham clnortilk t

the writing styles also (a and R as he denotes Style it itdivided into four sub-sections which possibly belong to the woo 1, 401'

four separate scribes, although it is not easy to point out any fluid:mental differences between these styles. Folio 65 possibly exhibit:.the writings of two separate scribes on the two sides, which do notbelong to the same original leaf.

The style Q is distinguished by its boldness by 4 tails" or flonri.shes (including very long virama marks), the methods of writingmediale, ai and o, thj looped six, etc , etc.

A particular section, which Kaye calls as M, has no exampleof ai and contains practically all the examples of "o". Sections 1. (ar)and G (a3) show marked differences in the methods of writinge, while section F is, in this matter, very much like section L. Stie.

tion C (a2) has no example of either the JIHVAMULIYA (Nt.jtq-or UPADHMANIYA, (34szrt'Pr), and so on; but it must he

borne in mind that these statistics are only of value in the mums.

The Language

The language of the text may be described as an irregularSanskrit. Nearly all the words used are Sanskrit, and the rules ofSanskrit grammar and prosody are followed with some laxity, Thepeculiarities of spelling, .sandhi, grammar, etc, that occur in the textare exceedingly common in the inscriptions of the Eleventh andTwelfth Centuries found in the north-west of India. Dr.however, implies that the language is much older. He states thatthe text "is written in the socalled Gatha dialect, or in thty literaryform the North-Western Prakrita which which preceded the employ-ment, in secular composition, of the classical Sanskrit". He alsostates that this dialect "appears to have been in general use, inNorth-Western India, for literary purposes, till about the end of theThird Century A. D".

Order and Arrangement of Folios

The Bodleian Library order of the folios, which was definitelyfixed by circumstances not within the control of the edttorr has

Page 23: The Bakhshali Manuscript

9 Bakhshali Manuscript

necessarily bden followed by Kaye in his edition, in the arrangementof the facsimilqs and the first transliteration of the taxt (Part I andPart II). The whole material was rearranged in the posthumouspublication : The Bakhshali Manuscript, Part Ill.

The leaves were disarranged to some extent before they reachedDr. Hoernle, but unfortunately he did not leave any proper recordof the order in which the leaves reached him.

Dr. Hoernle attempted to arrange the leaves on the basis of thenumbered sutras; but the numbered sutras were two few and too un-evenly distributed to serve this purpose, and in some ways they wereeven misleading. The chief criterion of order is, of course, thenature of the contents of the leaves, but Kaye made an attempt toutilise all available criteria as help towards the solution of the prob-lem of order. Had all the leaves been extant, even if fragments, theproblem could have been completely solved; but some leaves arecompletely missing and many fragments have disappeared altogether,so that the problem could be only partially soluble Sometimes, eventhe knots in the birch-bark were of assistance, and besides thisnatural aid there was the accidental one of the effects of the methodof storage. Possibly for some hundreds of years the bundle ofleaves was subject to a certain amount of pressure, and was exposedparticularly at the edges, to chemical and other disintegratingactions. Some of the leaves stuck together, the edges of all becamefrayed and certain leaves became so frail as to break up into scrapswhen handled. On the principle that contiguous leaves would beaffected approximately to the same extent, we might, if no disintegra-ting effects had taken place since the find, rebuild in layers theoriginal bundle. But we know that further disintegration has takenplace; however, similarity in size and shape and mechanical makingswere of distinct help in rearranging the leaves.

Contents of the Manuscript

The portions of the manuscript that have been preserved arewholly concerned with mathematics. Dr. Hoernle described thework in 1888 in the following words :-

"The beginning and end of the manuscript being lost, both thename of the work and its author are unknown. The subject of the

Page 24: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Contents of the Manuscript 4)

work, however, is arithmetic. It contains it great variety of lunhlems relating to daily life. The following are examples :

(i) in a carriage, instead of 10 horses, their are yoked owdistance traversed by the former v as one hundred; how much willthe other horses be able to accomplish" ?

(ii) The following is more complicated :- 'A certaintravels 5 yojanas on the first day, and 3 more on each succerdinltday ; another who travels 7 yojanas on each day, has it start of Sdays ; in what time will they meet ?'a

(iii) The following is still more complicated :--'Of 3 merehnnln,the first possesses 7 horses, the second 9 ponies, the third 10e.ich of them gives away 3 animals to be equally distributed anionsthemselves. The result is that the value of their respectivetics become equal : how much was the value of each animal ?'s

"The method prescribed in the rules for the solution of theneproblems is extremely mechanical and reduces the labour of thinkingto a minimum".

The following is a summary list of the contents of the work itsfar as its present state allows of such analysis :-

SectionProblems involving systems of linear equations AIndeterminate equations of the second degree A and KArithmetical progressions B and CQuadratic equations OApproximate evaluations of square-roots CComplex series FProblems of the type x (1-al) 0

t. rf rvu r I T zt a rahO i r Mfzqf,; ti I R

I t tl-Folio 8, verso.

2. aTrfa gyasr ;nt d'Tfar r 414;r aW I sifaf' t'Trcq R-7

gswz I *;T q;Tk;r uRat rFetrctt )vrq' I-Folio 6, recto

3...ftl tutor i rri gar: a;' T (VI j#Tzrm...gtkt q gxfgt pit wtnfomt rv# art srrforat ggq; gfq ......"%* a&I Wfffsa dvor. I-Folio

3, verso,

2

Page 25: The Bakhshali Manuscript

'1o Bakhshali Manuscript

The computation of the fineness of gold HProblems oR income and expenditure, and profit

and loss L, D and EMiscellaneous problems MMensuration

Such is a very rough outline of the work as it now stands.Perhaps the most interesting sections are C, A and M; and ofthese C is the most complete and was evidently treated as of cosider-able importance. Section A is also of special interest as it containsexamples which may be described as of the epanthcm type. SectionM is of interest principally on account of the methods of expressingthe numerous measures involved and also because of its literary andsocial references.

Generalized Arithmetic and Algebra

Although the work is arithmetical in form it would be mislead-ing to describe it as a simple arithmetical textbook No algebraicalsymbolism is employeJ, but the solutions are often given in such ageneral form as to imply the complete general solution, i. e., thesolutions, though arithmetical in form, are really generalized arith-metic, or algebra. First of all a particular rule is given, which isintended to apply to the particular set of examples that follows. Theserules are often expressed in language that would be impossible tointerpret without the light thrown upon them by the solutions..Theexamples are themselves sometimes trivial, but the .solutions, oftenexpressed, with what at first glance appears to be meticulous care,often redeem the examples from their apparent triviality. Proofs orverifications are often given with some elaboration and on occasionsare multiplied.

Kaye has said that the work may be divided roughly intoalgebraic, arithmetical and geometrical sections, knowing of coursethat the boundaries of these sections are not clear, but according tohim it would be more correct to classify the problems as (a) aca-demic, (b) commercial, and (c) miscellaneous.

Judging by the manuscript as it now stands, the problems in-volving geometric notions were comparatively very few, and we canonly guess at the meanings of the remaining fragments dealing withthis branch of mathematics.

Page 26: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Generalized Arithmetic and Algebra

One pleasing feature is the small space occupied by om,-,ieroffal problems. There is only one problem on and a tunobtrusive section containing problems on profit and los,,.

Those problems classed as academic are concerned withcular mathematical notions that in early mediaeval times hn,l ittraditional value and interest, such as the ('pantheina, the rr;,;uhivirginum, certain indeterminate equations of the second degree, andcertain sets of linear equations.

The miscellaneous problems include examples where the :iiel'interest is rather in the illustrative material than in thenotions involved; e. g., there are problems concerned with the abdue-tion of Sita by Ravana, the prowess of Haihaya, the constitution ofan army, the Sun's chariot, the daily journey of the planet Satin ii.gifts to Siva, etc. etc.

Such, or similar features, are, however, common to manymediaeval mathematical works. The l3akhshali manucript is, however.almost unique in at least two respects of some mathematical impor-tance: (i) The first of these is the employment of a special sign in tin,form of a cross-exactly like our plus sign but placed after thequantity it effects- to indicate a negative quantity. (ii) The secondspecial characteristic consists of the set of methods for indicatingthe change-ratios of certain measures.

Text is of Indian form

Whether of a purely Indian origin or not, Kayc says that thework is Indian in form. It is written in a sort of Sanskrit andgenerally conforms to the Indian text-book fashion but there arecertain apparent omissions. Perhaps the most noteworthy feat ture ofthe classical Hindu texts is their treatment of indeterminate equa.tions of the first degree, while their greatest achievement is the fullsolution of the so-called Pellian equation. A great part of the texts ofBrahmagupta, Mahavira and I3haskara are devoted to one or both ofthese topics, but there is no evidence of either in what remains of theBakhshali text; and this apparent omission is the more noticeable,inasmuch as there is evidence of considerable skill in the treatmentof systems of linear equations and certain indeterminates of the seconddegree. Another omission to note is of a different character altoge-thor. Every early Hindu work of this kind has a section rclatinlj to

Page 27: The Bakhshali Manuscript

12 Bakhsbali Manuscript

the "shadow of a gnomon", but in our text there is no evidence ofsuch a section.,, We must not, however, as Kaye says, "pay toomuch attention to these apparent omissions. The possibility of entiresections of the manuscript being destroyed is not great, but negativeevidence and a mutilated manuscript do not carry us very far.

Is the Work Homogeneous ?On the first examination of the manuscript it would be noticed

that the writing was not uniform, and that, in particular, certain leavesdifferent'ated themselves from the rest by a bolder and,on the whole,a better style of writing; and Kaye has distinguished this set of leavesas the "M" section. This early differentiation was a most useful onefor it marked not only a difference in style of writing but also one ofmatter. Indeed this "M" section proved to have to many peculi-arities that the idea that it was possibly a separate work could not beignored. But the rest of the manuscript is by no means uniform instyle of writing or anything else, and Kaye is not convinced that the"M" section is the work of a separate author, although, he rathersuspects that it is. It is, however, pretty certain that it was the workof a separate scribe; but, as there are slight indications that theother portions of the manuscript were dictated, this does not affectthe question of authorship conclusively.

The peculiarities of the "M" section, although they may notprove heterogeneity of workmanship, call for some special mentionand are here summarized.

1. The Script :

(a) The writing is bolder and, on the whole, more uniformthan that of the rest of manuscript.

(b) Flourishes or extensions of the bottom endstrokes arecommon. These flourishes occur particularly at the end of ligatures,but also in the cases of the numeral figures "5", "7" and "9". andeven in the case of the stop bars, and occasionally they even occur atthe ends of the frame-works of the "cells" (e. g., see fol. 47, etc.).

(c) The numerical symbols of section "M" have been shownin a table by Kaye [not reproduced here, Table IV (7) line 1], wherethe looped ' 6" should be noted. This is useful Ltzt not an infalli-ble criterion,

Page 28: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Is the Work Homogeneous ? 13

(d) The following table relating to the formation of modinlvowels a, i, and o taken from Part 11.

Medial ai Medial of

ai ui o' o' n'

'M' section 0% 100% 32%, 32%

Whole, manuscript 24%, 76% 75%, 15% 1n';;,

Here the indication appears to be very definite indeed, but itmust be borne in mind that such criteria only apply in tho unnN'i,that the total number of ai examples is only 19, and so on. i

II. It is curious that all the mythological and semi historicalreferences (see Sections 47-48) occur in the "M" section. IIIderdthis section is peculiarly Hindu in contrast with the remainder ofthe manuscript.

III. The mathematical contents of the "M" section may hodescribed as miscellaneous problems, which are generally solved by"rule of three", but a special feature is the occurrence of numerous"measures" and a special method of exhibiting their change-ratio'.But, of course, these points in no way indicate work-rather other-wise for if section "M" were an entirely different work we arightexpect some duplication, and there is none here.

IV. The method of exposition is somewhat dif erent. Theexample is followed by a statement and the answer is then given,generally, without any detailed working, and generally there is no"proof" or verification. There are, however, exceptions.

V. There are differences in language. Certain technical termsthat are extremely common in the rest of the manuscript -do notoccur' e g , pratyaya and yuta.

An Indigenous Hindu Treatise

Dr. Hoernle believes that arithmetic and algebra developedin India entirely on indigenous lines. According to him "in theBakhshali manuscript, there has been preserved to us a fragment ofan early Buddhist or Jain work on arithmetic (perhaps a portion oflarger work on astronomy), which may have been one of the sourccy

(I) The symbols used hero are merely mnemonic,

Page 29: The Bakhshali Manuscript

14 Bakhshali Manuscript

from which the later Indian astronomers took their arithmetical in.formation." Again according to Hoernle, the arithmetic in Indiadeveloped without any Greek influence, "Of the Jains, it is well-known, says Hoernle, "that they possess astronomical books of avery ancient type, showing no tracees of westeren or Greek influence"(Here is a probable reference to the Sur)'aprajnapti,). In India arith-metic and algebra are usually treated as portions of works on astro-nomy. Tn any case, it is impossible that the Jains should not havepossessed their own treatises on arithmetic, when they possessedsuch on astronomy. The early Buddhists too are known to havebeen proficients in mathematics. The prevalence of Buddhism inNorth-Western India, in the early centuries of our era, is a well-known fact."

Kaye, however definitely asserts that there is not the slightestevidence in the manuscript itself of its being connected either, withthe Jains or Buddhists. It is Hindu (Saivite); the author was aBrahmana (fol. 50); to Siva, he attributes the gift of calculation tothe human race (fo1.50); offerings to Siva are mentioned on more thanone occasion (fols. 34. 44); references are made to certain incidentsrecorded and persons named in the Hindu epics (fol. 32 etc.) and thereis not a single reference that could be construed as indicating anyconnection with Buddhism and Jainism.

Various Opinions about its Age.

The original Bakhshali work has been assigned various datesby several scholars. Hoernle says : "I am disposed to believe thatthe composition of the former ( the Bakhshali work) must be referredto the earliest centuries of our era, and that it may date from thethird or fourth century A. D.I. " This estimation about the ageof the original Bakhshali work has been accepted as fair by emirentorientalists like Buhlera and historians of mathematics like Cantoresand Cajori4. Thibaut has followed Hoernle in accepting thedate of the present manuscript to l e lying between 700 and 900A. D.5 But Kaye would refer the work to a period about thetwelfth century. "The script, the language. the contents of thework", says he, "as far as they can give any chronological evidence,

(1) Indian Antiquary, XV11, p. 36. (2) Indian Palaeography, p. 82.(3) M. Cantor, Gcschichle der Math, 1. P. 598.(4) F. Cajori, "history of Mathematics", 2nd ed. Boston, 1922 p. 85.(5) G. Thibaut, Astronoiie, astrolo;ie and inathematlk, p. 71.

Page 30: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Various Opinions about its Ago I'all point to about this period, and there is no cvid nca wbtitlgltririncompatible with it"', Bibhutibhusan Datta agrees with Hogralethat the work was written towards the beginning oil theera, and he has discussed this issue in his paper, "The ficManuscript" published in the Bulletin of the Calcutta Malhenuili'u11Society, 1929, XXI, p. 1. We shall present his arguments hero.

Bakhshali Mathematics Older Than the Present I unuscript

Hoernle thinks that the mathematical treatise contained in IhoBakhshali manuscript is considerably older than the present niamm-cript itself. "Quite distinct from the question of the ago of tin,manuscript", says he, "is that of the work contained in it. 'Photois every reason to believc that the Bakhshali arithmetic is of it vemyearlier date than the manuscript in which it has come down to uH,"a.This conclusion has been disputed and rejected by Kaaye whothinks it to be based on unsatisfactory grounds. Ile then adds, "ill'course it will be impossible to say dctinitely that the manuscript hithe original and only copy of the work but we shall be able Iushow that there is no good reason for estimating the age of the workas different from the age of the manuscript to any considerabledegree..' a Kaye has adversely criticised the linguistic and palaeo-graphic evidence of Hoernle. Datta, however, thinks that Kttyo'sarguments, if proved sound and sufficient, will establish at tile 111olitthat the present manuscript was written about the twelfth century,as is contended by him.`t Hoernle himself considers it to be notmuch older, belonging probably to a period about the ninth centuryof the Christian era.5 Most of the other reasons of Kayo againstHoernlc's vicw, based on certain internal evidence, such as (i) thethe general use of the decimal place value notation, (ii) the occurcncoof the approximate square-root rule and (iii) the employment of theregulafalsi, on imperfect knowledge of the scope and develppmcnt

(1) Bakli. Ms., § 13S.

(2) Indian Antiquary, XVII, p. 36(3) Bakes. Ms. § 122 (4) Bakh. Ms, § 1.45SS) Indian Antiquary, XVII, p. 36.§. In support of this opinion, Kay. states : "There is evidence that Me. Is

not a copy at all. It is not the work of a single scribe : there are cronyreferences to leaves of the manuscript; there is a case of wrongly numlic.ring a Sutra and the mistake is noted in another hand-writing" (p. 74 fn ).The facts noted in the latter part of this statement cannot possibly suppom Iwhat Is stated in the beginning. On the contrary they strongby lend toshow that the present manuscript Is a copy.

Page 31: The Bakhshali Manuscript

16 Bakhshali Manuscript

of Indian mathematics. There is, however, other internal evidence ofunquestionable value to show that the Bakhshali mathematics cannotbelong to so late a period in which Kaye would like to place it.

Bakhshali Work a Commentary

There is another noteworthy fact about the work contained inthe present Bakhshali From the method of its treat-ment, Hoernle thinks it to be a Karana work .1 In the opinion ofDatta, the Bakhshali work is not a treatise on mathematics in its truesense, but a commentary' a running commentary, of course-on suchan earlier work. The manner of its composition and particular'y thevery elaborate, rather over- elaborated details with which the variousworkings of the solution are most carefully recorded, without tryingto avoid even unnecessary repetiti,)ns, strongly tend to such a conclu-sion. Here and there are given explanatory notes of passages,literary synonyms of words and technical terms, some of which will inno way be considered difficult, or which are already well established.For instance, on folio 3 verso the word parasparakrtam ( q-Tx:rtW, )

has been explained by the word gunitam (tata parasparakrtam gunitamU1341gtf?f !I bj f ); again on a subsequent occasion, this latter termhas been interpreted as equivalent to another more difficult and lessknown term abhyasa (tatra guna abhyasam n jq alvgrtt; folio 27,recto ) s. On another occasion we have avrttipravrttigunanam,aTtjft-kofri (folio 12, recto)S. It is stated in several instances that

(1) Indian Antiquary, XII, p. 89.

(2) c c qMzF ic' jkid WI M (folio 3, verso);

fftm (C; I q&,- r: (folio 15, verso)

7qw, vt faf I gerv vt f7t art ul zrw Vr

13 a m# I cq ;1i y...a }z

Y%I araft wrd(folio 27, recto)

(3) T4M,-Mq)j ...6q: C; 9I am. rff - u Tff : V . Ar

(folio 12, recto)

Page 32: The Bakhshali Manuscript

lakhshali Work it ('ontnuntury t?

ksayampastcum, rTdTrf;,f Here is a very typical gas*ap 60-0the works.

11.........lwighnamadi' adidviguna 12 i chayo,iihftnmuttaram ato uttaram i patayitva ekam bhnvati ....."

a (yt;;

The above steyle of composition is verycltar-i-4eri,,dt. :;l a

commentary. And the whole work is written more or Ie4r in lhosame style.

Then are some cross-references in the Bakhshall Kinuetatiptwhich are of immense significance. For instance it has been ub vr'v#dabout the 10th sutra (rule), which refers to a method of mul!!nlir.rrtrrttt,that "this rule is explained on the second page"a A similar rrt rkhas been made about the 14th sutra that it is "written on t14 Yeventtt

page"4 The importance of these two observations in dctcrmiitt31llthe character of the Bakhshali work cannot be overeat imated.1",It will he easily recognized that those observ.ttion cq,ttM01

in any way be due to the author of the original truati4.For evidently those sutras occur at two places in the work. Noauthor is likely to retain consciously such recurrences in his workand pass them merely by giving a cross-reference. So the duplicationcas also the observations, must be attributed to a second person, thecommentator. And they happened in this way : The original lluklt-shali treatise was not a systematic work. It was an ordinary eotnpon-

(1) (I) cu eT T trim =Tfcf

(ii) weirr vg im4 QTf T1r

0") TM rT V# qlTff

-Folio 12, recto

-Folio 10, verso

-Folioj4, recto

(2) firs; rrfa i arrf fd r I met i %r ?t i ark t'T1&ITew %rgfa...... i

(3) t r y q$ fg*qq4 far Tff

(4) ......g#fvr fRfqM-..ffq (fr)'RqM

(5) 4iT w 0w Trrcq rt 1 tEtftY3it cOsfq rf r g fa

-Foll6 50, vcreo

-Folio 1, recto

-Folio 3, rcctor

-Folio 4, verso3

Page 33: The Bakhshali Manuscript

18 Bakhshali Manuscript

diurn of mtth!matical rules and examples in which the rules relatingto the same topic of discussion even, were not always put togetherat the same plane. We notice this irregularity of treatment to acertain extent in the portion of the treatise which has been left tous, It may be pointed out that such irregular treatment is not atall unusual in case of early works and we find another instance o!the kind in the Aryabhatiya of Aryabhata (466 A. D.). The commen-tator very properly attempted to improve upon the order (ratherdisorder) of the author, here and there, as far as posssble, withoutdisturbing it too much, by noticing and commenting upon at thesame time the sutras which are very closely connected. So that he hadsometimes to explain a sutra earlier than its turn according to theplan of the author. Sometimes a commentator is compelled to referto a subsequent sutra before time owing to indiscretion of the author.Therefore, when there comes the proper turn for the explanationof such a sutra, he simply passes it over, very naturally, by givingthe cross-reference to previous pages. Thus there will remain verylittle doubt that the present l3akhshali work is a running commentaryon an earlier work. Further there are found other cross-referenceswhich very strongly suggest that the illustrative examples are alsodue to the original author .1

Present Manuscript-A Copy

Inspite of what is stated on the contrary by Kaye2 there aremany things to make one believe that the present manuscript is notthe original of the Bakhsbali work, but is a copy from anothermanuscript. For it exhibits writings of more than one scribe, possiblyof fives. This can be explained most satisfactorily only on the

(1) For instance, the author may give an illustrative example which mayinvolve a mathematical principle which is yet to be explained. An instanceof the kind is found in the Trisatika of Sridhara where the auteor veryindiscretely gives two examples (Ex.7) in illustration of the Rule 16,whichinvolves mathematical principle explained in the Rules 23 and 24. In thiswork the commentator, who is no other than the author of the treatisehimself gives the cross-references.

(2) Bakh, Ms., p. 74 footnote. "There is evidence that the Ms is not acopy at all. It is not the work of a single scribe : there are cross-references to leaves of the Ms: there is a case of wrongly numberingSutra and the mistake is noted in another hand-writing."

-Kayo(3) Bakh. Ms. p. 11, 97.

Page 34: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Present Manuscript--A Copy 11

assumption that Is a copy. Further on folio 4, v( r c>, is t itvt ;:riobservation as regards a certain sutra (rule) that ` Eh r is a 1_1 tgt:4 c;

in the rule" (.sutra b/:rantineasti).* The style of wriurt ,it t,tir 011twtt!.

vation is same as that of other writings on the leaf. So tiic.r(, INutely no doubt that all the writings on the leaf are dr:r the flairscribe. Moreover, though this observation is pin:; til )ci tevo 1V.lines of writings, it is not an ordinary case of interlining. From tbnapportionment of space in and about the remark, It is apparent tintthe remark was introduced at the time of in tking the copy, but nuton any subsequent occasion. Now that observation cannot be dutyt ) the author of the original treatise. For no author would p,144over a mistake in his work with a mere observation that it is wrongSo it must be from another person, possibly the scribe. There INalso another possibility, and there are reasons to believe it to homore probable, that the scribe found it in the copy which he urged.In any case, it will follow that the present manuscript is it copy. Amore conclusive proof of this is furnished by the colophon that thework is "written (likhitam) by a Brahmana mathematician, son ofChajaka, for the education of the son Vasista."1. 1-lad Chajakn beenthe author of the work, the more appropriate and usual word for thiscolophon to begin with would have been kriam or vlrae!lam("composed ').

The scribe seems to be a careless one. For the manuscriptis full of slips and mistakes. Here are a few of them :-

(1) On folio 4, verso, occurs the passage "sodasamasutram 179.Evidently the figure should be 16.

2. On folio 8, recto, a portion, ' uttarardhcnabhajayct" i..

c l) ...... afara:fkTq; mii gar q' ' 3quhr4 w : fwfta-59a nor ". t r

1'r *;T I a >r i rarr 'rfma ;fsk faaaf 6 i arrt!rrz rr t

#t* 3ar-q twink a twii* furl qq Obi d wezv mum r, I

tr , 04"' "' 11-Folio 50, recto,

(2) gfOr Ja` 4, vcrso

* %awr9wiff

Page 35: The Bakhshali Manuscript

20 Bakhshali Manuscript

deleted'. This was written by mistake for "uttarenabhajet" whichis the relevant portion of the sutra meant for quotation there.The deleted portion can be tracced to a preceeding sutra (folio '1,verso, where we have "uttarardhena bhajitan".

3. On folio 11, verso, 158

1

5

1

64

is twice miswritten for 158. This latter fraction is once again

13

64

wrongly written as "158 to 1 se l". Another mistake on the leaf

64

is "93 to ...masa 9;" what is meant 931.

(4) In the Bakhshali manuscript, the end of a sutra is usuallymarked by a special design. Q) Owing to the carelessness of the scribe,the sign has been put many times at an intermediate place in thesutra. These illustrations are sufficient to show the carelessnessof the scribe.

Exposition and Method

(i) The text consists of rules, sutras, and examples. There isno explanation whatever of the processes by which the rules wereobtained, that is, there is no m.thematical theory at all. Inthis the work follows the usual Indian fashion, as exhibited in allearly texts. But there is a good deal of mathematical theory impliedand the rules and examples are often set-forth in such a way as toconvey the principles followed quite clearly to the student.

(1) (3<iZTt %rrW4(T), this is deleted in the MS; this was written by

mistake for

3rZrbi wF -Folio 7, verso

(2) We have denote.' this design by

Page 36: The Bakhshali Manuscript

exposition and h1cthod

(ii) The rules (sturus) are written in verse, and are ROOM*numbered; and often in the solutions of the f+h+. +:s tF i+the sutras are quoted. When Dr. I-locrnlc tried io rrrr.,rtg tleaves of the manuscript, he took the numbered miras as tltae 4A5i*of his order, but they too few in number to lend 1(, n Hnti'lfactory result. These sutras do not iepresent, as might he scc4

the most valuable part of the text. They are usually of partkuilasapplication rather than general and are often very ohsoitr.Iyexpressed.

(iii) The examplesgiven are generally formally stated In foil,without the use of notation or abbreviation of any kind; and in n tt Acases they are stated in verse. They are introduced by the terra ufa*2

an abbreviation for "an example", After the qucstbpsometimes comes a formal statcnneat with numeric.ll symboll andabbreviations. often arranged in cells. Then comes the hole inttor working (karuna,*3 and here, sometimes, fragments of the ,u;r+S`are quoted. Finally conies demonstration-often mote of the Haremof verification than proof. Generally these demonstrations, h theaid of the answer found to the question, rediscover one of theoriginal elements of the problem; and sometimes several such'demonstrations are attached to an individual pioblcm, buttimes the variation is merely a matter of the form of statement.

The full scheme of exposition is therefore

or rule.

Udaharnam*s or "example"; indicated its abbreviation uda*'t

sometimes the example is called prasnal*v.

1. Folios 46, verso, and 65 recto.

2. Folios, 23, recto 25 verso ; 29, recto, and ,55, verso. Compare

folio 35, recto (a) and verso (b).

3. Folios 32, 36 44, verso and 46, recto. i hcse references must him:escaped the notice of Hoernic who remarks otherwise.

*9 (W); *;(r );

*k (34TQvri ); * (n); (' vq) i

Page 37: The Bakhshali Manuscript

22 Bakhshali Manuscript

Sthapanam or "statement". Sometimes it is also called

nyasa2*1 ol nyasa.stl,apanu3*a.

Karanam*3 or -solution".

Pratyayam*4 or .'verification". (Some time; a solutionis verified in more than one way.

The end of such sutra is marked after last example by the de-vice and the number of the sutra is also given at the end.

The above will explain in general the method of the expositionof the Bakhshali work. But there are also occasional deviationsfrom it. For it is not always that a sutra is illustrated by examplesand an example is followed by its solution. There are at least twosutras in the surviving portion of the Bakhshali work which haveno examples attached to them. They have been passed over ashaving been explained or written on preceeding pages. Two examplesare left without solution with similar remarks. Again solutions ofexamples in the beginning of the work have got no verifications, andso also a few others2 .

The above method of exposition differs considerably from whatis now commonly met with in other Hindu mathematical treatises.

(1) For exawple, on folio 11, verso, there is mention of verification by thefourth method (anvam caturthapratyayam krlyantc)

(2) Vide folios 1-3: also folios 23-25.

(3) BrSpSi. ed. by Sudhakara Dvivedi Benaras, 1912, Solutions of someoC the examples h.sva been included as "authentic in Colebrooke'- Sid-dhanta (H. T. Colebrooke, Algebra with Arithmetic and Mensurationfrom the Sanskrit of Brahmagupta and Bhaskara, London, 1817) trans-lation of the arithmetical and algebraical portion of Brahmagupta's. Butthey are not found in Dvivedi's edition of the work. Dvivedl also pro-cured for himself a transcript of the copy of the commentary by Prthuda-kasvami which was originally secured by Colebrook (vide Dvivedi'sPreface, p. 3). In these circumstances, we accept Dvivedi's version ofBrahmagupta's above mentioned work to be more authentic. So it wiilhave to be said that Brahmagupta did not give any solut on of his exam.pies. See also the Brahrnasphuta-Siddhanta, New Delhi, 1968.

* t (mmr); * i (mrrt itmt); * i (q ur ); * it (sr ) I

Page 38: The Bakhshali Manuscript

xpositlon and Method ?1

Brahmagupta (628 A.D.) gives a very few examplt t a. IQ

illustration of a limited number of his rules, but not heft sclkt1teonp,

This want has been aml.ly made up by his ;nmar,,, comtat trailPrthudakasvatni (860A.D.) who hai supplied sufficient }t fartstrative examples with soluiions uuder each rule.Muhuviru(ed.M:1ll,\ 1) )gives a copious number of examples for each rule". flu calls thetasuddesaka*. But he too does not give solution The first writer Iogive statements (nyasa) as well as answers of his examples called,udaharana is Sridliara (c. 750 A. D.)°. Then comes Bhatihanta.These writers have not recorded working of their solution. And noother Hindu writer is known to have given any verification of thesolution of their examples. We do not find this even in the workso:' the latter commentators.

(iv) The method of grouping sets of figures is of interest, andshows features in common with mediaeval Sanskrit mathematicalmanuscripts, where also it is the practice to place groups of numbersin cells. In the Bakhshali manuscript, however, this fashion is rathermore elaborated than in any Sanskrit manuscript so for examined.T he mathematical possibilities of this scheme do not appear to havebeen realized and the student must always be careful to interpret anygroup of figures from the context, and not from any similarity withother groupings. However, there is a certain amount of consistencyin the arrangements, as the examples exhibited below will show. Thereal purpose of the arrangements appears to prevent confusion bydemarcating the numerical figures from the text itself. The text is

(1) GSS., edited-with English translation by T. Rangacharya Madras 1912.

OUR ;R"#q

(2) Trisatika, edited by Sndhkara Dvivedi, Benaras, 1899.

f?FRRM

(3) Lilavati edited by Sudhakara Dvivedi, Benaras, 1910, BiJaganlta, editedby Sudhakara Dvivcdi and revised by Muralidhara Jha, Bcnaras, 1927.English translation of these works are incorporated in Colebrook's HinduAlgebra,

q1' r rfbrir ffhi 7-f?

wow

Page 39: The Bakhshali Manuscript

24 Bakhshali Manuscript

often written almost independently of the figure groups. and a wordmay be arbitrarily divided by the cell araangement, which may alsocut into several lines of the text not necessarily connected with it. Theeconomic neeessity of utilizing the whole of the writing surface of thebirch-bark availabe seems to have been the determining factor. Thetext itself should be consulted but the following examples may behelpful :

(a) Integral numbers occasionally occur without any marking

off by lines or cells, but often.

(b) each integral number has a cell to itself, e. g.

I11 1421 1391

(c) Sometimes an integer is marked off by two vertical bars :

thus 1 14 1 and invariably a series of integers is thus de.

marcated, e. g.

1 20 1 40 1 60 1 80 1 evam 2001

(d) Fractions and groups of fractions are placed in cells or

groups of cells, e. g.

(i) 1 132 1 (ii) 16055040625 1 (iii) t 1 1 1 111

33 1 13227520000 I 1436 121

(vi) 21 (vii) 720 1221 12

Page 40: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Exposition and Method 2

te) Complete sets of operations are sometimes murky-,:'a similar manner. For example, (d) (iii) meant. ; I(d) (iv) means (1 1-.) (1.1 4) (d) (v) 40 (1-- tl' i)

(t °Y°.J),

( f) Series of operations may he connected together by cellarrangments; for example

2 di°1

2

1 di° I00000 di°1 9472

3 di°

1

2

1 di°1

3

157500 di°947

4 di° I di° 216000 di°1 1 9472 4

which means,

phalam di° 60((X)947

phalam di° 60000947

phalam di° 60000947

2-1 dinaras: : 1 1 days : : 100000 dinaras :60000 days

2 2 947 947

1 1 157600 600003

2 :1 3 days

947 947

14

216000 604147000 'o

(g) The data of the problem and the solution may be indica-ted in one combined statement; e.g.

16

1

41

3

4 a° che° 2187*

1 1

phalam sara 2(2440(1

This is a statement of properties whore the second term means4

Page 41: The Bakhshali Manuscript

16 Bakhshali Manuscript0

1a (1-i-i) (1+1) and the number marked with an asterisk is acharge-ratio.

(h) 10 1 2 1 3 3 112 41 dr° 3001 I 1 1 1 1 1 1

may be roughly expressed by means of x + 2x + 3 x 3x + 12 x 4x= 300.

(v) The use in our text of the sexagesimal notation in the formin which it occurs is of rather special interest, for there is, as far aswe know no other example of the kind in any of the classical Sanskritworks. The Hindus, from Aryabhata onwards, were well aware ofthe advantages of the sexagesimal notation for astronomicalpurposes. but they never used it for an arithmetical purpose.

Apparently there is only one purely arithmetical example ofthe use in the text and this example occurs, in connection with aproblem in arithmetical progression, on folio 6, verso, and 7. recto,where the fraction 178/29 is expressed as 6 +8' + 16" +33"+61v.This sexagesimal fraction is actually written thus-

686016 cha°6033 1i°606 vi°

60se° 6

29

The upper three figures are missing in the manuscript but the resto-ration is certain. Of the abbreviation, 1i° stands for lipta, ft" (Gk.lipte) which in Sanskrit words ordinarily means a minute of arc,or the sixtieth part of a degree; vi° stands for villpta fa' err, ordi-narily a second of arc : while se° stands for sesam, or"remainder".

Page 42: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Exposition and Method

Here one may not agree with Kaye that the purelye teat(and perfectly legitima'e) use of the notation points I.

influence (Kaye thinks that aithough such a use is uii)Mns ;YiA it

Sanskrit works, it was extremely common in nirdiauval Munluuworks).

It will be noticed that the term lipta hero applies to "thirdparts instead of 'first parts', and vilipta to 'fourth parts'. [ lw

abbreviation cha° has not yet been traced to its origin.

(vi) The modern place-value arithmetical notation is employedthroughout the text and Kaye says that there is not the slightestin .lication that to the author, it was a new or strange invention.

(vii) As already indicated algebraic symbols are not generallyemployed, but a symbol for the unknown quantity is. This symbolis the arithmetical symbol for 'nought' or "zero' and on sevciuloccasions it is referred to by the term sunya-sthana (> +ql'r) or'empty place'.

The symbol occurs some twenty times but only in sections It,Co F, G, H, K. Its employment is illustrated in the followingexmple ;-

(a) ( a° 1 I u° 1 I pa° 0 I labdham 10

This is a 'statement' of an arithmetical progression where thefirst term is 1, the common difference is 1, the number of termsunknown, and the 'quotient' is 10 (where lOx=the sum of theseries). Here the symbol simply indicates that the number of 'termspada is unknown, i.e., that the place in the statement is empty.The symbol does not enter into any operation here or elsewhere.The giving it a denominator of unity is curious and really indicatesthat it is an integral number.

(b) a° 5 u° 6 pa° 01 1 I

a° 10 u° 3 pa° 01 1 1

Page 43: The Bakhshali Manuscript

28 Bakhshali Manuscript

Here are two equivalent arithmetical progressions in which thenumber of terms are equal and the sums also are the same in bothcases, but both are unknown.

(c) 01

1 I I 1 bha° se 161 1 1 1 1

3 3 3 3

which-means x=16/(1- 13) (1-,:') (t -;) (1- 1) and since this is adeduction from a problem it is a distinct step towards a properalgebraic symbolism.

(d) 0 2 3 4 drsya 2001 1 1 1 1

which may be represented by x+2xd-3x+4x=2('0 But the methodof solution is by the regulafalsi. Any number is put in the place ofthe 0, and the sum of the series is obta;red. Here the given summultiplied by the assumed value and divided by the (false) sum isthe correct solution...

(e) 0 5 yu mu 0 sa 0 7 mu 01 1 1 I 1 1 7

0which means x+5-s2, x-7= t. Here the symbol 1 stands forthree different unknown quantities. It simply indicates in each casean unknown number.

(viii) Negative Sign : the only distinct mathematical symbolemployed is the sign for the negative quantity, which takes the formof a cross + placed after the number affected. This is peculiar andhas given rise to discussions. In Sanskrit manuscript a dot beforethe quantity affected is the usual method of indicating a negativequantity. In the transliteration of the text the original negativesign (-i-) is, perhaps illogically preserved; but it is a rather specialfeature of the manuscript, easily printed, and leading to no ambi-guity.

On this negative sign Dr. Hoernle writes (1)

(1) Indian 4nNyuary, XVII (1888), p. 34,

Page 44: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Exposition and Method ?1)

"Here, therefore, there appears to he a mark of great antitluityAs to its origin I am unable to suggest any satisfactory"cxplan,owiuI have been informed by Dr. Thibaut of Benares that I)ioplt.ioor.in his Greek arithmetic uses the letter 1s ( short for 41cit»RRreversed (thus T) to indicate the negative quantit t. There is un,lonletedly a slight resemblance between the two signs; but considering thatthe Hindus did not get their elements or the arithmetical Neiviicnfrom the Greeks (a), a native Indian origin of the negative sign t;er"tmore probable. It is not uncommon in Indian arithmetic to indicatea particular factum by the initial syllable of a word of that iinpoitsubjoined to the terms which compose it ..............The only plausiltlosuggestion I can make is, that it is the abbreviation (ka) of the wotdkanita, diminished".

(ix) Abbreviations :-Abbreviations are employed to such anextent as to become, at times embarrassing, and they embrace almostevery type of term. None of these abbreviations is used in an al.get;laic sense, although, at first sight, when we find a°, u", pa" usedconsistently for the elements of an arithmetical' progression, analgebraic symbolism does not seem very far off. But a'), hao.. U0, 1101are the abbreviations of names of animals ya°, go" and sa" of pl.itttH,etc., ect. The names of measures which are numerous, arc nearlyalways abbreviated. Certain common terms of operation are '.lienabbreviated, and of these the following occur most often-

bhai for bhaga2, placed after a term to indicate that it is itdivisor.

se°S for sesam4, a remainder.

mu°5 for mulamc, a root, a quantity that has a root, capital,

pha°7 for phalam", an answer.etc.. etc.

Indeed the writers seem to have used abbreviations wheneverthere was no ambiguity incurred in their own minds. We arc no- tmfortunately placed in this matter and occasionally it has been inii on.sible to rediscover the term implied.

(2) They got a good deal from them, and particularly all their later us.tronomy came from the Greeks.

q 3 a1') tis alrtrq) t3 (qi) Q. (¢qst)

Page 45: The Bakhshali Manuscript

30 Bakhshali Manuscript

A i Illustration

Just to show how the problems me treated in the BakhshaliManuscript, we shall reproduce one it ustration:

(Folio I, verso and 11, rect -)).

The sutra means change b to b+a and quotations from it

a-e given on Folios 1, verso and 2, verso. The example solved on Iverso and 2 recto is son.ewhat as follows :

The combined capitals of five merchants less one-half of thatof the first, one-third that of the second, one-fourth that of the thirdone-fifth that of the fourth, or one-sixth that of the fifth is equal tothe cost of a jewel. Find the cost of jewel. and the capital of eachmerchants

(1)VM;Wa;( 10

q-lI Sri fa w T k II

... wO aff sTht :mrfta er fafaf 1

3111V91 --11 4311t afam ' Wfar MAO fr

era ,r wfar ft 1w 8far it fn irkq

arfdrrir4: T8t4?a9irgt ra***6& Air: T f"sFA..' mm

120 1 90 ( 80 i 75 72 I si b' arTd 1 .0 190 80 175 17260 1 60 160 60

160

" t r w& wra 427 3T O alq 377 qq =TfoT9agrh# W Lama( Ii

sra=rfq utf att 90 1 80 1 75 1 72 WTdq 317 Ar4:

gfai:f a 377 qq sTc r r srgff ti I

r aIJ ;ga 347 fi cl fdar 30 qq377 Qq fhxn aq ww* i

c9nt4 on next page

Page 46: The Bakhshali Manuscript

An 11llustration .11

Verso 1 appears to give part of the solution and proofs of itirquestion on Folio 1, recto. Since.

< Ex-- 4x1 = Ix- gx2 = .x-1X3 = 2x- 1x4

=Ex-axs=C,We have =x$ = 54x4 = $ xa = k>

Whence X = 120+90+80+75+7 a 437 kLLL 60 60

437C43-7--'60

Sq. VM ft ft 94 SIT... tr 357 q q qTd 20 q.trs* 377, qg i* rc tTr waf r I

SM f zr ftzr wv=r(nr 362 qeM qs q 15 qqTi 377, tag ajift:i q4 %TarRr Folio 1 verso.

am *zm 377

amgf q

erq a1 r f

WOW ftk

'i et qr fto mqqlt

120 rd377fgc*V't1 %jgFZT

30807512 1

120 t 377 tf vr'tT908075

70

120908015

72

120908075

12

t# 377 fir t vmRr

0ash377

(Folio 2, recto)

Page 47: The Bakhshali Manuscript

32 Bakhshali Manuscript

1 f k = 60, then C = 377, and xl -120, x2 90y x3 80, x4= 75 and x, =72.

Then follows a proof which may be expressed,

90+80+75+72-317 and 31'+ts10=377;

120+80+75+72=374 and 347+90 =377:

120+90+75+72=375 and 357+0.0=377;.

120+90+80+72=362 and 362+ a -377;

120-90+80+75=365 and 365+7C2--- 377

Again on Folio 11, recto, there appears to be another verifica-

tion of the example which we had on I, recto and verso.

'9°+90+80+75f7?= 377

120+ 9 'D+ 80 {-75+7 '=377

120+90+ +75+72=377

120+90+80+-,,r- +75=377

120+90+80+75+'a2 = 377

and this is the measure of the price of the jewel.

Fundamental Operations

In the classical Sanskrit works there is generally very littleformal information about principles and =methods.Axioms or postulates seldom or ne er occur and strict definition isseldom attempted. Rules are of particular application rather thangeneral - order appears to have been a matter of convenience ratherthan logic; and the fundamental operations receive scanty attention.

(i) Examples of addition (1)

(a) 960 164 yutam jatam 1024

i (b) 10 ( sa rupam 113 I31 3

Page 48: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Fundamental Operations

(c) 12 rupa samyutam 13 I

(d) 840 1 49 1 datva jatam 889.

(e) 924 1 836 1 798 i esham yutim kriyate 2358

(f) 120 1 90 1 80 1 75 1 72 I esham yoga krite jata 437.

(g) 120 evam 37790807512

(h) 110 1 30 1 90 1 ekatram ` 1301I 1

(i) 29 I 3648 7 anena yutam 4858 58

(k) 5 she 1 I

I

10 seI 1 16

(1) 45 sardha traya yutam 522 2

15 I evam 1616

(ii) Examples of subtraction (ii)

(a) 15 19 1 vishesham 14

b) 3 2 vishesham 1(121 I

I

2

(1) (a) 960 and 64 added : 1024 is produced. (b) t$ plus unity(c) 2 and unity added together = 3. (d) 49 having been given to 840,

889 is produced. (e) 924, 836, 798 : the sum of these may bedetermined: they produce 2558. (f) 120, 90, 80, 75, 72 ;the sum of these is made : they produced 437. (g) 120, 90, 80, 75,

12 : thus 377. (h) 10, 30,90 : altogether 130,(i) 291-s. by this (7) increased=36W. . (k) 5110.._ 1016

thus 16. (1) with three and a half added = 52/2.

(ii) (a) 5, 9 : the difference is 4. (b) 2 : the difference is 1/2, (0)5, 3 : subtracted, 2 is produced; (d) 6, 3 : the difference is 3; (0) 42less three is 39; (f) 3, 7 : having subtracted, 4, (g) T , t i t

having subtracted the difference is 91ti

S

Page 49: The Bakhshali Manuscript

34 Bakhshali Manuscript

(c) 15 I 13 I rahitam jatam 121

(d) 6 13 1 shuddhi 13 I

(e) 1 42 1 tryunam 1 39 I

(f) 1 3 1 171 vishodhya 14 1

(g) 1 771 294I

patya shesham 21711 11

I12

(ii) Examples of multiplication :

(a) 1 2 1 dvigunann 1 4 1 , i. e., 2 x 2= 4.

(b) 130 I asta gunam 1240, i.e. 30 x 8 = 240,

(c) I 2 40 I gunita jatam 16, i. e. a x'r° = 16.

I

gunita jata 1277 I i. e. (4+})

anena gunitam jatam

i. e. 6 X (1-1)=44

4(f) 132

I 43

I 5

i.e.IX-x,=s

gunita jatam

(g) 40 phalam 16, i.e. 40(1-s) (1-.1) (1-1)=16

1+31

4+1

5-1-

(h) 1 3 4 abhyasam 12, i.e., 3 x 4- 12.

(i) 18 I atma-gunam 64, i. c. 8 x 8 x 64.

Page 50: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Fundamental Operations 15

(j) I 880 964 gunita jatam 84832084 I 168 I I 14112

i. e.880x 964 _ 848320

84 168= 14112(k) 737 I 178

I 1 Ianena gunitam jatam 65593

58 29 841

737 178 65593i.e.58 x

29=841

(1)

1

108625 pada-ghna 6455040625656001 3227520000 I

108625 multiplied by number of terms 149200,

6455040625

3227520000

(m) 405280 44074 1 samgunya jatam 179945781120387241 77448) I 2999096352

405280 44004 179945781120

i. e., 38724 x 77448 - 2999096352_

(iv) Examples of Division : Fraction quantities are expressedin the usual Indian way with the numerator written above the deno-minator with out any dividing line, and they are usually placed incells. This indic ition of the operation of division often does awaywith the necessity for an explanatory word or phrase.

Examples of division :(a) I 168 I 168

1168 I labdham 42 1 28 j 24

4 6 1 7

I.e.168 =42; 168 - 168

4 628; 7 =24

(b) 14 I vibhaktamI 1

35 gunitam 354 4

i.e. 4 divided = 1, which multplied into 35=

(c) I 10 I 3 I vibhaktvam

i e. 10, 3 having divided -

(d) 1447 I dalita 44729 58

i.e.429 halved = 4587

(e) 1321

vartyam jatam33

1,e.3

redused gives 4,

I

Page 51: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Bakhshali Manuscript

(f) j 798 I projjhya 798I 1463

i e. having described the denominater

(g) 2558 chchheda projjhyam 1095i.e, 2558-1463=1095, where 1463

the fraction.(h) 160 anena drishyam1 1

bhajitam 60

i.e. by this (60) the known quantityof 300 = 5

798becomes 798

1463

is the denominator of

300 I jets j 5

(300) is divided and as

Square-root and Surds

The method of extracting square-roots of non-square numbersexhibited in the text is of special interest. The rule is much mutila-ted but as it is given on three separate occasions the fragments piecedtogether enable us to give the complete sutra 1

"In case of a non-square (number), subtract the nearest squarenumber; divide the remainder by twice (the root of that number).Half the square of that (that is, the fraction just obtained) is dividedby the sum of the root and the fraction2 and substract; (this will bethe approximate value of the root) less the square of the lastterm."2

(1) The rule is not preserved in its entirety at any one place in the mutila-ted manuscript of tha Bakhshali mathematics that has come down tous. But from references and quotations one can restore the rule com-pletely :

21

2021

NO fee Jq;TT 8'tq*qt f": 1. a #f$m: fir lgf $f is mar:

a1 f3 rc wi r 91R.vt f t r:Folio 56, recto

Folio 57 verso.(2) English translation of this rule given by Kaye (Bakh. Ms Sec. .68) is

discarded as being wrong and meaningless. He has admittedly failed to graspthe true significnce of the text. "The rule as it stands," observes Kaye,"is cryptic and hardly translatable." He further thinks that "no rule for'second approximations' is preserved". It is not true, I he method of

(foot-note carried to next page)

Page 52: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Square-root and Surds Ti'

Then follows a note to the effect that "by means of thin t oilan approximation (aT) to the proper root of a mixed quantity jufound.....".

The rule as it stands is cryptic and hardly translatable, bulfortunately there are examples given in some detail, and these trltot Ithat the rule was extended to "second approximations".

The rule means that the first approximation to

Q = V A' +b is A+b/2A or q1 ; but q12- Q a (b/2A)1k

= e1.

No rule for second approximation' is preserved but there areseveral examples; and, of course, no fresh rule is really rcquircil,for er "'q1 - e1 12g1 =

.

4A2+ A

and the second error' may be indicated by,A + 8As-{-4Ab

elk = elz- b ]4/4A i b

z

2q1 2A + 2AI

All the examples preserved belong to section 'C and appear tobe merely subsidiary to the solution of certain quadratic equations

finding the third approximation is indicated in the second line of the verso. lit.deed the only two difficult words in the sutra are samshlista (8f$ isa) and krill.

kshaya (offer) We have interpreted the form as referring to "the Hum

of the root and the fraction," That that is the interpretation aimed bythe author will be corroborated by what is written in the folio 56, recto;while evaluating the surd %/481.

2120 400 9) 1 (faf8 s ;) 20 (wr)21 441 2 21

Compare also folio, verso. Kriti-kshya (f4w) literally means " Iusaof the squares" or less the "square". It means that the square of the upproxl-mate value thus found loss the square of the last term of it will be equal to thogiven quantity. The commentator has attempted an explanation of It on full,57, recto but it is much mutilated. He says: kritiksbayam krltam osamulam (ig;(tt-

tt1R Wff q ), Our explanation seems to be the only rational one possiblle.

Page 53: The Bakhshali Manuscript

38 Bakhshali Manuscript

arising out of, problems in arithmetical progressions. These prob-lems have been fully worked out by Kaye in Sec.68 and below aregiven merely a summary of the square-root evaluations. Thereare no less than six such applications of this rule in the Bakhsbalimanuscript.'

(I) x/41 = 36-{-5 and b1= 6;'2 while e1= 14:51

and qs = 6; 4a

(ii) 105 = -4 106-+_5 and q1=10} ; e1=1 s ;

t 81q2 l04 2X10=10 328; e2=

1

107584

r T8 \\2 x 104

(1)' Folios 57 and 64, verso; 45, recto; 56, recto and 56, verso: 45 and46, recto. Note the expression mulam shlistakaranya ( or"the root by the method of approximation" folio 65, verso).

64 verso, 57, verso, and 57 recto: are all (except the last line) concernedwith one example, the beginning of which is lost. The example is [a = 1, d- It

s = 5; therefore,

1= 41-11 The first approximation to 41 is2 ,,JJ

ql = 65 = 77 and t1 = 2412 .

Therefore.

65sl

L(24 - 1)1

+1] 263

=1 41 65

4 (2'24+ 1)2489. 65 5785 25 1 148 24 = 1152 = 5 1152 = 5 + 8 12) >'

The second approximation is introduced by the square-root rule (as pre-viously on folio 55, recto) and is given by :

5 1 (5 2 5 11858-25 11833qa = 6 82- 2 12) / 6 12 = 1848 = 1848

1 11833 1 1 9985 9985andand to =

2 1848_

= 2 ' 1848 3696,,this is the number of terms when the sum is five)" -Kaye, Bhakh, Ms.Part III, p. 181.'

Page 54: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Square-root and Surds

(iii) -4481= -4212+40 ; qt=2I4II ; el l `401'8 8 42 /

_ 1600

14112 '

20 2

q2 = 2121 - (21) /2 x 2120

9020 ea _ 140 4 I( 2

40 2= 219681 ' 8 - 8 42)

x 21 22)

160,0002,999,096,352

r 19(iv) x/889 = /29a } 48 ; qi29L8

24 = 24\58/

24841

384(v) /336009 = / 5792+768 ; qi = 579

579 '

579515,225,088

q2 777,307,500

e2_ _ 21,743, 271, 9368= 7,250,483,394,675,000,000

384``2384 0579/(v') 339009 = 579 + 579 -

2 579-1-384\

There is not much doubt about the exegesis of the ru'e. It wanneither connected with continued fractions, nor with the so calledPellian equation. Brahmagupta gave the converse of the rule,namely (A+x)2' A2+2Ax from which the square-root rule givenin our text is immediately deducible. In this connection, Kayehas been of opinion that the square-root rule itself was not used bythe Indians and was not even noticed by them until the sixteenthcentury. Indeed the Hindus had a very good practical rule of theirown, which was given by Sridhara (Trishallka, 46) and Bhaskara 11

Page 55: The Bakhshali Manuscript

46 Bakhshali Manuscript

(Liitvati, 138),' namely-"Multiply the quantity whose square-rootcannot be found by any large square number, take the square-rootof the product-leaving out of account the remainder-and divide bythe square-root of the multiplier". For example, 1471- x/41 x 1000000

-1-1000^-6.403+

The above approximate formula is now generally attributed tothe Greek Heron (c. 200 A.D.)', and it is restated by the Arab Al-Hassarar (c. 1175 A.D.) and other mediaeval algebraists2. But itwas known, as has been shown el3ewhere, to the second order ofapproximation, to the ancient Indians several centuries befores.

The values of these surds are summarised below :

Q 91 q2 q (approximately correct).

41 6.41667 6.40313 6.403124

481 21.9524 21.9307 21.9317122

889 29.828 - 29.8161030

33609 579.664 57966615

We have in the 'Sulba sutras (Baudhayana, c 800 B. C.) thevalue of V-27 and the other surds, not only obtained by geometricdevices but also by the process of continued fraction. Kaye isawefully mistaken in asserting that the "Square-root" rule wasnot used by the Hindus and was not even noticed by them untilthe sixteenth century.

Rule of Three

The term trairasika*1 "relating to three quantities" occurs inthe Bakhshali Manuscript about a dozen times-always employed inthe sense of arithmetical proportion. Most often it occurs in the

(1) T. Health, "History of Greek Mathematics", Vol. 11, p. 324Heron's time is uncertain. He may have livcd in the 3rd century. A. D.

(2) D. B. Smith, History of Mathematics" in two volumes, 1972, Vol.11, p. 254.

(3) Bibhutibhusan Datta "Hindu Contribution to Mathematics", Bulletinof the Mathematical Association, University of Allahabad, (1927-28), 269),

Page 56: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Rules of Three 4 1

phrase pratyaya tratrasikena*a or "proof by the rule of three- nullthe proportion is generally set out in the following manner,

Tqrrphafam 18

1

which means

3: 1 4.: : 4 : 18.

The term trairasika is orthodox but the term phalam*n Is

used throughout our text quite appropriately as equivalent to-answer". and is not applied to the second term of proportion asin the Lilavati*4.

There are very many examples of the rule of the three' usedeither as the direct method of solution or as a proof. There arealso some very much damaged examples of what appears to In,problems in so-called compound proportion. There is nothing ofthe nature of a theory of proportion discussed but several cxnmplcnof the following principle occur-

If,

bi b2=...= bn' then lb=B

Calculation of Errors and Process of Reconciliation

The Bakhshali mathematics exhibits an accurate method ofcalculating errors and an interesting process of reconciliation, thelike of which are not met elsewhere. They are necessitated by theapplication of the foregoing approximate square-root formula. Thereare certain examples whose solution leads to the determinationof the number of terms of an arithmetical progression whosenumber of terms is unknown but first term (a), common difference(d), and the sum (s) are known. If the number of terms be t,then according to the Bakhshali work,

so [(t_1).4 + a, 1,

6

Page 57: The Bakhshali Manuscript

42 Bakhshali Manuscript

whence t - - [2a-d]+ [2a- jdn+ 8ds

The negative sign of the radical has been overlroked in the Bakhshaliwork. Putting p - 2a- d and Q = [2a-dj'+8d, we have,

t _ -p+V Qld --

or 2dt 4 P=V Qalso 2s =tad+pt

...(2)

r

Oftentimes in the examples given the value V-Q does not come outin exact terms, so that a method of approximation has to beadopted. Let q1, g2.......... be the successive approximations tothe value of Q and let the values of t obtained from them betl, t .....Neither of these values will evidently give the originalquantity s when substituted in the equation [1] for the purpose ofverification of the results obtained. Suppose the values of scorresponding to the values of t be s1, s; ......

Then,

2 sl = tl 2d + ptl

or 8 dsi +p2 _ (2tid+p)a

8ds-j-p2 - (2td+p)2

Therefore.

now,

8 d(sl-s) _ (2tid + p)2 -- (2 td + p)9

2 td 1 + p = ql

(1) The Krltt-ksaya (FftrWq), probably refers to this second error.

Page 58: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Calculation of Errors and Process of Reconciliation it

Hence, st - s= 91-Q8d

Since a+ Za =91

up to the first approximation,

awe have, q1- Q =

( r 2a)=E1, say

Then ( , will denote the first error. Therefore,

si--s 8d

Similarly, for the second approximation, the error

(rl2a)2Ea. 2(a+ r

2a JCILand ss -s=8d

will be'

We shall now refer to a specific instance, in whichl

a=1, d=1, s=60.

(I) Folio 56,verso and 64, recto. Portions of the detail workings are notpreserved in the existing manuscript. But they can be easily restored.Folio 56, verso and recto as preserved are,I8II 8tt

l 14112

1600 34Z1`Qrc"t4846720

114112 60

.... 21 afr watt2021

VFW firm WTff i r *t fa'ar'. W4 WW OR66: 'ITc Igfi' Wf r Pr: 11

fir W...(carried over to next page)

Page 59: The Bakhshali Manuscript

44 Bakhshali Manuscript

The detailed workings given are

8ds=480, 2a-d=2.1-1=1.480+1=481

40 _ 882+40 922x/481 = 2142 42

=42`

Then, t1= x922 - 1J

_ 880l 42 - 84

He ce,

And

t1(t1+1) 880 _964

=848.320

si ° 2 = 84 X168 14,112 = 60.

ei 1 (40112 16008d - 842/ =14112

ei 848:20 1600 _ 846720s=s1 - 8d= 14112- 14212 14112

=60

Again for the second approximation,

2120 (20/21)2 _ 425,042-400

x/481 = l 21-

211

21 441 21+ir1t'grq " r %T, few ain t 3'qt aiirrau O

... 425042 I 400 itl'q 4246419362 , 193621 19362

(Folio 56, recto and verso)

Folio, 64, recto, is-405280 444004_

387241 387241405280 444004

38724 177448 IWSW 1-i k;q°i

.,, 11799459411202999096352 aT

3;Ef160000-f-

--Folio 64, recto.

Page 60: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Calculation of Errors and Process of Reconeilintion

Hence,

t 1 (424,642 405,280s = '2 19,362 J -" 38,724'

t2(12+1) 405,280 444,004ss = 2 - 38,724 X 71,448

179,945,941,1202,999,096,352

e 404 160,001

gd = s x 214 x (21;, )a =2,999,06,352z

e2 179,945,941,120- 160,000s a - 8d =s = 2,999,096, 352

179,945,781,1202,999,096,352

= 60

Negative Sign

'1"

In the Bakhshali manuscript, a negative quantity is denoted bya cross (-I-) placed after the number affected. Thus, 11 7 i inea lift

11-7. This is very remarkable. For in the manuscripts of Prillut-dakasvami (600 A.D.) and later Indian writers a dot is usually pinealabove the quantity for the same purpose, so that according to them11-7 is denoted by 11 7°. The origin of the use of a cross for thenegative sign has been the subject of much conjecture. Thibaut Iutssuggested its probable connexion with the Diophantine negativesign fi ( reversed 0, abbreviation for Xeo'is, meaning "wanting",'This has been accepted by Kaye2. But in the opinion of Datta sucha conjecture seems to be hardly reliable. For firstly, the Greek signor minus is not ' but an arrow-head (T) and "it is now certain",observes Heath, that the sign has nothing to do with 0." And arrow-head and a cross are too much different to be connected together,or too distinct to be confused for each other. Secondly, the Greeksymbol itself is of doubtful origins. And above all, we are not sureif it is as old as it wili have to be for being the precursor of theBakhshali cross. For there is no manuscript of the Arithmetica of

(1) Indian Antiquary, XVII, p. 34(2) Bakh. Ms. 127, JASB, VIII (1912), p. 357.(3) Heath, Greek Mathematics, Vol. 11, p. 459.

Page 61: The Bakhshali Manuscript

46 Bakhshali Manuscript

Diophantus 'which is older than the Madrid copy of the thirteenthcentury A. D. and again in many cases in this work, the negativequantity is indicated by writing the full Greek word for "wanting"in its different case ending. So we cannot be sure if Diophantus didactually use that symbol for the minus signs. Under such circum-stances it will not be proper to assume the possibility of Greek connec-tion for the negetive symbol of the Bakhshali manuscript, Hoernlethinks it-though he is not quite confident in this respect-to be theabbreviation ka of the word kanita or nit (t or una, an) of theword nyuna, ft q), both of which means "diminished" and both ofwhich abbreviations, in the Brahmi characters, would be denoted bya cross9. Datta thinks that this supposition has got a very notablepoint in its favour. In the Bakhshali manuscript all other arith-metical operations are generally indicated by the abbreviations(initial syllables of the words of that import, though often the wordsare written in full and occasionally nothing is indicated at all).' Soit will be very natural to search for the origin of its negative sign inthat direction. In this way, Hoernle's hypothesis appears to be avery probable one. But its principal drawback is that neither theword kanita (wfr r) nor the word nyuna (t9) is found to have beenused in the Bakhshali work in connection with the subtractive opera-tion. The nearest approach to that sign is that of ksha, FR, abbrevia-ted from kshaya (41zr, "decrease") which has been used several times,indeed more than any other word indicative of subtraction. Thesign for ksha, (a), whether in the Brahmi characters or in the Bakh-shali characters, differs from the simple cross (+) only in having alittle flourish at the lower end of the vertical line. The flourish mighthave besn dropped subsequently for convenient simplification.

(1)' D. E. Smith, History of Mathematics, Vol. 11, p. 396.(2) D. E. Smith, History of Mathematics, Vol. 11, p. 396.(3) Indian Antiquary, XVII, p. 34.(4) It may be noted that abbreviations of all sorts of things, mathematical

as well as non-mathematical, have been freely used in the Bakbshaliwork (vide 62 of Kaye)

al', a° (for asva, a, horse.q, ha° for hasti, Zrmc, elephant)

U;, u° (for ustra, 3, camel)(carried over to next pager

Page 62: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Least Common Multiple 4'1

Least Common Multiple

The plan of reducing fractions to the lowest common denoniiu

ator before adding or subtracting is known correctly to the author of

of the Bakhshali mathematics, We have a few instances of itn ap,

plication in the work. In one instance', it is required to find II

sum of the fractions.

T,1'E,13,I l16

They are first reduced to a common denominator (i fr;nti)

so as to become,

120 90 80 75 7260 ' 60 60 ' b0 ' 60

respectively. Finally, the sum is stated to be437.

go° (for go, rft, cow)

t, di (for dinar, 'Tart, a coin)fi ', li (for lipta, fcTr,, a minute of an arc)fir, vi (for vilipta, frf , a second of an arc)

v(;r, or zero or empty space, a cypher

q, y, pa° (for pads, w , a term)and similarly of plants. In mathematical operations, %ri (bha)

for %rM, a divisor; i)r (she) for *I, a remainder, 1(mu) for IJ 4a root, and T (pha) forefor, an answer.

(1) ant fawrw grain gadwr;r R' 8r a

... a 51 w: q0 f ry 3rrlc r

120 90160

80 7.i 72 qar pj@(tt 3rr' 120 90 1 80 1 15 , 7260160 160160 I

qqf q)-;T fW wrcr 437 arcrr ij 377 qtr Yrfv1' " IFolio I, recto and verso,

Page 63: The Bakhshali Manuscript

48 Bakhshali Manuscript

In a different instance', it became necessary to add up,

1 2 3 *

It is stated that the sum, after having reduced to a common

denominator (q zrcl'), will be 03. On reducing the fractions.

T8, T,IT

to a common denominator, they are stated to be respectively2,

924 836 798

1463 ' 1463 ' 1463'

(i) 11 zr jar eg I

2132143 1 4

5

cq cTic : ti;TT $ l

1631J11 60

:..

Folio 17, recto,

(2) 34 To a WOr N ft fa'9R'd...... qRM 94W, i

for...

7+ 13+12 1212 12

+56

aerr

ararr f v r fat t ffqff r i 'M ...f 4

19 1 7 111 yftff gf -4,d 1 121 4( 6 I tQft12 4 6 19 7 11

... W"M 924 8361 7981463 (14631 1463

924 1 836 798 jrff f c T11c 2558 sAj 1095 qaq

Folio 2, verso.

Page 64: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Least Common Multipie

A fairly difficult case is to simplify2,

" 1 121j

3t8

+ 11+5 5 133'

The result is correctly obtained as1807240

.........armor

tai gI T*ara vft ;r kc

-4T;T aaf?48f fa4 wfor:t r g 1

Tr' T :ram r a aruort ff+4 T T 4 1

q t X R> f;; qf'h

WMfat ITaersT 1E WrM T?SfkMk1Ur

10 2 wrr 13 3 W 13 8 V 1 3 4r 1 l irr 1 S1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1

2 3 3 8 4+2 3 5 2 3

vrr( 2 1 1 l 9rr

11 2 31 sirI 1 360 I M°gi

[4 4 4 2 3

Translation ;--and also twelve and a half in thirty three, and one third days for the

best wine for the consumption of merchants. In the treasure house was storedtwelvc hundred. Say 0 Pandita, how long can this expenditure continue.

The statemcnt means-

daily income = 10, -21s

Daily expenditure= -3T

+13; 11sp 'ff 3a f1

f51+?5+331g 3

1807

240

1807 9 727,The daily loss is, therefore, 240--2-f4-0

and 7270-240 x 360- 78001 is the period)

11

7

Page 65: The Bakhshali Manuscript

50 Bakhshali Manuscript

The fiethod of finding the least common multiple is found inthe Ganitz-Sara-Samgraha of Mahavira (c. 650 A. D.1) and probablyalso in Prithudakasvami's commentary on the Brahma-Sphuta-Sid-dhantas, but not in works of Aryabhata, Brahmagupta and Bhas-kara.

Arithmetical Notation-Word Numerals

The arithmetical notation generally empolyed throughout theBakhshali work is the decimal place-value notation. This fact hasbeen differently utilised by different writers. On the one hand,Hoernle3 and Buhler4, who believe in the antiquityaof the Bakhshalimathematics, consider it as evidence of the earlier date of the dis-covery of that notation by the Indians. On the contrary, Kaye6who believes in the non-Indian origin of the place-value notationand in its late introduction into India, considers its general adoptionin theBakhshali work as proof against the hypothesis of the previouswriters about the early date of this work. It is now definitely knownthat Kaye's notions about the origin of the place-value notation iswrong. It was invented in India about the beginning of the Chris-tian era, probably a few centuries earlier. For this, one may consultthe writings of Dattae. But apart from that controversy it shouldbe noted that the nearly exclusive application of the notation in theBakhshali work is very much noteworthy in asmuch in almost all theavailable Indian mathematical treatises, save and except the Arya-Bhatiya of Aryabhata (499 A. D.), we find copious use of the word-numerals. There is, however, evidence to show that the author ofthe Bakhshali work did know the principle of the word numeralsystem of arithmetical notation. In it we find the use of the word

(1) OSS. Ganita Sara-Samgraha,111, 56.

(2) Colebrooke, Hindu Algebra, p. 281, footnote; p. 289 fn. Also pp. 118-9.(3) Indian Antiquary, XVII, p. 38.

(4) Indian Paleography, p. 82,

(5) Bakh. Ms., Sec. 131.

(6) Datta, "A Note on the Hindu-Arabic Numerals I,( Amer. Math. Month.,Vol. 33, 1926, pp. 220-1), "Early literary evidence on the use of the zeroin India" (ibid., pp, 449-54); :the present mode of expressing numbers"

(Ind. History Quart., Vol. 3, 1927, pp. 530-40 "Al Biruni and the originofthe Arabic Numerals" (Proc. Benares Math. Soc., Vol. 7,1928)

Page 66: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Arithmetical Notation -Word Numerals '%I

Fq,rupa(=1),-m,rasa (= 6,1 andgM,pada (_;)' with numelirnlsignificance. The use of the last word is as old as the Veda N, 'I he

first occurs as early as in the Jyotisa Vedanga" kc. 1200 13.C.) vialsecond in the Chandah-suira of Pingala (before 200 B. C.)4. Again,in speaking of a very large number,

2653296226447064994 ... 83218

the Bakhshali mathematics writese :

Sadvimsasca tripancasa ekonatrimsa eva ca

Dvasa (sti) sadvimsa catuhcatvalimsa saptatI

Catuhsastina (va)... msanamturant

Trirasiti ekavimsa asta....... pakam,

Clearly the principle of the word-numeral system has beenfollowed in this instance. The only departure from its popularfeatures lies in (I) the use of the number names in the place of theword-names and (2) the adoption of the left-to-right system fit the

arrangement of the figures. But, according to Datta°, these features,

(1) faf 3r1 'd'g}a wtWw of i : i

f g- va'W Z T1 Tc Sa: II-Folio 60, verso.

(2) ... %1 c,(arrcr $ k r gf i 135 l4 1 4 1

-Folio 4, recto.(3) Yajus-Jyautisa, 23: Arsa-Jyautisa, 31.(4) Chandah-Sutra, VI, 34: VIII, 2, 3.

(S) 3Zfo molar 1W fagsaI* tf War a igm ...Wsfgr W a1Tfrl'8f it ridsfi ffQ3%fT m49i

q it(2653) 296226447064994 ... (83218)

-Folio 58, recto.(6) Sec Datta's papers in the Aanglya Saliltya Prarika, 13351 D. S. (1925), pp

8.30 on the comprehensive history of the orlein and development of the

Word-numerals,

Page 67: The Bakhshali Manuscript

52 Bakhshali Manuscript

though not common, are not altogether foreign to the system. Onceat least the author has followed the right-to-left sequence. For thecompound word 'Catuh panca' (aT._gs;w) has been used to denoteonce 14 15 j and again 1, 5 14 1. (Folio 27, recto).

Regula falsi

The rule of "false position" or "supposition" is used in two waysin our text' in solving linear equations.

(i) f (x)=p is solved by assuming a value e for x. This givesf(e)=p' and the correct value of x is ep p'.

An example is,

The amount received by the first is not known. The secondreceives twice as much as the first, the third thrice as much as thefirst two and the fourth four times as all the others. Altogether theyreceive 300. How much did the first receive ?

Suppose the first receives one, then second rcceives 2, thethird 9, and the fourth 48 ; or altogether they receive 60. Actuallytherefore, the first received 300/60=5.

(ii` If f (x)=p, reduces to bx+c- p and f (e`=p' reduces to be+c=p', then x=(p=p')/(b+e), which appears to have been consider.ed useful when it was desired to keep b and c unchanged.

For example, if x1+x,=a1, x,+x3-a; x3-+1 =as, we have2x1+(a,-a1) =a3 ; and if in place of x we put e then 2e+(a,-at)=a'3 and the correct value of x1 is (a3-a,')/(2+e).

This rule of 'false position' is interesting as being, in a way, aprecursor of algebraic symbolism. It connotes the idea of an un-

(1) No rule is preserved in the text but Bhaskara ti gives the following (Lila.vatl, 50) :"Any number assumed at pleasure is treated as specific in the particularquestion, being multiplied and divided, raised and diminished by fractions,then the given quantity, being multipled by the assumed number anddivided by the result yields the number sought.

Page 68: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Rcgulu falsi I

known quantity and even of a symbol for that quantity (c. g., w+ inour texts but it does not embrace the notion of such a quantity la'ma'subject to operation or being isolated. As soon as we irnttrnlnralgebraic symbols, the rule, as it were, disappears. Algebraically. tlivrule solves bx =p by x=ep/p'. where p'-be, which shows that thetransformation from bx=p to x=p/b was not conceived.

There is no algebraic symbolism in our text but it may be notedthat Bhaskara gives both the regula falsi and also an early form ofalgebraic symbolism. Neither Aryabbata, Brahmagupta nor Sridlttu'ngives this rule or makes use of the principle. On this, Kaye says thatits occurrence in the Lilavati, therefore seems to indicate that it wattintroduced into northern India after the time of Sridbara (Xltl cent.).Mahavira (IXth cent.), however, uses the method in rather a specialway in connection with a geometrical problem'.

But such a surmise according to Datta is wholly baseless, Woshall sum up here the views advanced by Datta :

The rule of 'false position' has been applied in certain eases inthe Ganita-Sara-Samgraha of Mahavira. For instance, for findingout unknown quantity (avyakta, arzn; ajnata area'), the sum of thevarious fractional parts of which is known, Mahavira says :

"The given sum, when divided by whatever happens to bo altosum arrived at in accordance with the rule (mentioned) before byputting down one in the place of the unknown (element in titocompound fractions), gives rise to the (required) unknown (elements)in (the summing up of) compound fractions'".

We have a few other instances of this kind in the work".Further Mahavira has applied the method of supposition in solvingcertain geometric problems4. Hence Kaye is not truely accurate when

(1) Ganita-Sara-Samgraha., VII. 112.[21 Ganita-Sara-Samgraha 111. 107. Compare the original expression in the work

Vq-,gM;rT etc. with the passage 1grg Mi' '94 WEIT and similar oihrr

passages in the Bakhshali work [folios 25, verso and 26, rccto; compare alsofolios 23, 23]

[31 Ibid III, 122, 182, 135--7[4J Ibid. VII, 112, 221. This should be more accurately culled the geometric

prototype of the regulu finst of algebra.

Page 69: The Bakhshali Manuscript

54 Bakhshali Manuscript

he says : "Mahavira (9th century), however, uses the method inrather a special way in connection with a geometrical problem"'. Infact Mahavira has made more extensive use of the method in connec-tion with certain algebraical as well as geometrical problems. Stillit is quite true that he has not made as general use of the methodas is found in the Bakhshali work, or even in the Lilaval,'. In anycase, Kaye's hypothesis of the foreign import of the rule of falseposition into India after the eleventh century must be abandoned.It should be further noted that Mahavira (c. 850) is a contemporaryof the earliest Arab algebraist to use that rule, namely, Al khowar-rizmi (c. 825). Hence it is quite certain that the Hindus have nottaken the regula jalsi from the Arab scholars, f they have done so atall from a foreign nations.

Known still earlier in India-

It should be observed that the rule of false position was report-ed to by the Arab and Furopean algebraists at the early stage ofdevelopment of their science when there were no symbols. It almostdisappeared from amongst them, as it is bound to do so, with theintroduction of a system of notations'. It will be nothing unreason-able to expect that such had been the case with that rule in Indiatoo, if it was ever followed here. Now it is a well established factthat the Hindus reached Nessel-mann's third and the last stage ofdevelopment of the science of algebra long before all the othernations of the world. They invented a good system of notations

(1) Bakh. Ms., Sec. 72, This statement of Kaye followed by another of the samekind, "it (the regula falsi] occurs in no Indian work until the time ofMahavir a" Sec. 134], v. ill obviously contradict his previous statement, "Itsoccurrence in the Lilavati, therefore, seems to indicate that it was introducedintonorthern in India after the time of Sridhara [11th century]" Sec. 721.

Thus it appear that Kaye is not sure of his own grounds.(2) Certain problems in the Bakhshali work, the Lilavati [pp. 10 et. seq], the

Trishatika [pp. 13 et seq] and GSS [IV, 5-32] which are of the same kindbut differ only in detail, have been solved in the first two works expresslyby the regulafalsi, but not so in the other two works, thought in them theunknown quantity has been tacitly assumed to be one.

(3) It should be noted in this 'connection that while there are ample proofs inthe writings of the early Arab scholars of their heavy indebtedness toIndian Mathematics it is still to be proved that the Indians took anything inreturn from them.

Page 70: The Bakhshali Manuscript

known still earlier in India 5o

by the beginning of the seventh century of the Christiatl era. It lsn'been laid down by Brahmagupta (628 A D ) that a thorough knowledge of algebraic symbols (varna) is an essential qualification for itgood algebraist9. We find mention of a symbol for tl'e unknowneven in the Aryabhatiya of Aryabhata (499 A. D.). So the methodof false position must have disappeared from India before that time.Or it is at least bound to have been regulated to a very inferiorposition from that time. This will account for the absence of tlwmethod from the works of Aryabbata and Brahmagupta as well anfor its limited application in the Ganita-Sara-Samgraha of Mahaviru.There is now left no direct evidence from the Hindu source to showthat that method was followed in India before the fifth century A. 1).Unfortunately no Hindu treatise on arithmetic or on algebra w'he'tcan be definitely referred to that period has survived and come downto this day with the exception of the Bakhshali manuscript. Thorn in,however, external evidence. A mediaeval, Arabic writer of note,possibly Rabbi Ben Ezra (b. 1095) refers the origin of the rule offalse position to India'. And if our hypothesis about the origin ofthe term yavat tavat (zrri

is err r) for the unknown in Hindu algoinabe true, it is in all probability so, then there will remain very little todoubt that the rule was known in India much earlier.

The rupona method

There are several references to the rupona (tatr"*) method, and

the phrases rupona karanena (Ingot ,t i) or pratyaya rupot,u

karanena (g q V*at TTY) occur. In all the cases in arithmetical

progression according to the rule,

s+I (t-1) 2 +a] t0

[I] Smith, D. E, History of Mathematics, Vol. Ii, p. 437.

]2] Brahmagupta says : By the pulverizer, cipher, negative and afrmalivaquantities, elimination of Inc middle term, colours [or symbols andwell understood, a man becomes a teacher among the learned and by tileaffected square' (Cole brook, Hindu Algebra, p. 325).

[1] Smith, D. B., History of Mathematics, 11, p, 437, foolnot u

Page 71: The Bakhshali Manuscript

56 Bakhshali Manuscript

The recurrence of the phrase rupona karanena (q ur w(4 0seems to imply that the rule in question began with the term ruponawhich corresponds to the (t-1) of the formula'. The rule is notpreserved in our text but we find the following in the Ganita-Sara-Samgraha of Mahavira2.

"The number of terms is diminished by one, halved andmultiplied by the increment. This when combined with the firstterm of the series and multiplied by the number of terms becomesthe sum of all".

The rule is exemplified in two ways in our text of which thefollowing are particular cases :

(i) aTr 1 3° 1 q° 19

I 1 I

g wK4q qTI

(Z) T:grq air I qo 1 q O 19 *'q wzi;T n R 191, 1 I 1 1I

Folio 9, recto, verso.aTro 3 I ;To 4 ' qo 3 I g grTsT 21

1I 1

Folio 7, verso.q: ' jqr ag' fgrfq' TT Vqlnlw.T T qrq7 21 fgfW sr fgfr 11 217

Folio 4, versoSTc=TG 1 TTfiZ'rc I 65 I rgq-*q .

fk 65Folio, 5 recto.

(1) Is this a faint echo of Pythogorcan style ? Anatolius writes : The Pythagoreans state that their master, in conncctiun with numbers that form aright-angled triangle, showed how such could be composed by means ofunity'. i. c.,

#I (a2- l))2+a2= [I (a2+1)]2See Tannery : Scientifq,,es, 111, 14.

v4*;ft wrT3t '1 a: sT wrrfq aY f=raT: I

ST'T$q qqrTi'ffffti*fgd q-gfcr ti gTN 11

GSS. 11, 63.

Page 72: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Rupona Method S'l

which means : a-1, d-1, t=19; by the rupona method, tieranswer is s=1 0.

(ii) In section 'C the application of the rupona method kalways worked out step by step. For example, when a - 5, d. :1,

t=178/29; then s=[(t-1)-1-5] t; and the rupona method is appliedas follows' :-

149 149 _ 447 447 447(t-1)= 2 9 ; 3 x 29- 29 29x 58-- ;

447 737 737 178 6559358+5 58 ' 58

x29 841

_ 77 836841

The origin of that name is supposed by Hoernle' and Kaye"to be lying in the fact that "the rule in question began with theterm rupona [ (-qzq -;- ), i.e. one less] which corresponds to tho

(t-1) of the formula". The term rupona literally means, "deduct-ing one". As the rule is not preserved in the available portionof the Bakhshali mathematics, it is not possible to verify this

(1) I 61

860*16a60*33fr60*6 fW60*

We 629

447 ' dqff 447 ': Wid 737 q29 a 58 1 58 I

r 1 ?ff Qv 178 ate jf46 wvt - 65593291 ! 941

fall -M W f4 1 65569 I slit t[841

k;r 1 1 7 ufto 178 q1 9

Otaiw 42*r 28 I fff#aWq ... 7729

(Folio 7, recto.)(2) Indian Antiquary, XVII, p. 47.(3) Bakh. Ms., Sec. 73

$

Page 73: The Bakhshali Manuscript

S$ Bakhshali Manuscript

supposition. Kaye, however, points out that the rule has very nearlythe same beginning in the Ganita-sara-samgrahal of Mahavira :Ruponena gaccho d<<li krtah... (wcrP;r u ? WU:), According toDatta, the above interpretation of the origin of the term ruponakarana, though not impossible, does not appear to be very convinc-ing. The technical terms which are commonly used in the Bakhs-hali mathematics in connection with the arithmetical progression, suchas adi, prabhava, caya, uttarapada dhana, etc., are all the same as inthe other ancient Indian treatises; the name rupana karana is uniquefor it. It is not met with elsewhere. It is further noteworthy thatno other term in the Bakhshali mathematics, or in any other Indianmathematical treatise, is known to have been formed in the sameway, with the opening word rule.

It may be noted here that in the Bakhshali mathematics, theword rupa (r-q) occurs also with different significance than unity.For instance, we finds

"...... (bha) jitam 1

2 !

jatam 12 , labdham sarupa j esa4

rupadhikam 3 esa kala... a° 3 u° 4Fa° 3

phalam ru° 21 1 dvitiyasya trairasikena...

...I1 di°1 7 I

3`

di° pha° ru° 21" II

or ' ...divided becomes 2; 'quotient plus 1 (r upa),' this increasedby 1 bec mes 3; which times... by the ruponakarana, the result isru° 21. Of the second, by the rule of three, the result is ru° 21".

(1) ii, 63.

(2) Folio 7, verso. The problem is

7t- [(t -1)- 2-+3 , t, whence t. 2-(4 3) +1 =3.By the rupona method, ,q = [(3 - l) +3] t - 21 and by the'rule of three' 1:7::3:21.

Page 74: The Bakhshali Manuscript

I'1'ool's Y1

In this passage'. the number 21 has twice been marked =ul ru ,abbreviated from rupa., :Again in a sutra (folio 8, recto) iclutud too

an arithmatical progression, we find the passage i rh4hom +y m'ylnirdiset, (qmq iFq faf ai ), that is, the quotient should be indicated as rupa'. Here again the term rupa seems to have it pnivlYtechnical significance. There are other instance, in which ruptt Is,e'inot mean one, but is used in connexion with an integer'. Similar urn,of the word rupa is found in later Indian mathematical treatise whrleit denotes, besides 1, an integer or the integral part of it mixedfractions. I venture to amend the word rup ma (>ar)i) to ruiuutrt

(Vgor) a Then it will mean 'making rup.' which means 'known 411'absolute number,' 'known quantity as having specific form''. it,rupana-karana (iFgvf zv() will mean the method of making absolutenumber', that is, 'totalization' or 'summation'. This hypothesis willbe strongly supported by the expression 'rupana karancna pltttla,ttrupam lupa 21' (v-qur q;zvt;r tp Vq rq 21, or 'by the method ofmaking rupa the result is rupa 21').

Proofs

To many solutions are attached proofs, which are generallyintroduced by the term sfcgrr-T.'proof' or 'verification'.Th`s is sometimes amplified into pratvava-trairasikena (>ttgrt dCIfbF

(1) Folios 21, recto; 60, recto; etc.

faW1T1"' f aqr I falm gz:~qt ; "

(2)

-Folio 21, recto.

1

faafzarf rq5I 91 rfic =r rri l

101 .

-Folio 60, recto.See Br.Sp. Si, XII, 2; Trisatika, pp. 7 et seq; Lilavatl, pp. 6.7; B(/a.,pp. 2 et seq; (Colebrooke : Hindu Algebra, p. 149).

() Rupona (Vq'Qr = qzggq) may be an archaic form of rupana (Vqur)

(4) See Monier-Williams, Sanskrit English Dictionary, revised byCappaller and Lcumnnn, on rupa. Compare this use of the wordrupa with Its use in algebra in the sense of nhgoluto known number

;,,i v a Ogvation..

Page 75: The Bakhshali Manuscript

60 Bakhshali Manuscript

rd) 'proof by the rule of three', or pralyaya-rupona-karanena

sT:q vc pzor r 'proof by the rupona method'.

Sometimes the 'proof' seems to be merely a matter of rewritinga statement in another form, but generally the answer is utilized andone of the original terms of the problem is rediscovered. Occasion-ally the 'proof' consists of a solution of the original problem inanother way, e. g., by steps; but sometimes it deals with a subsidiaryaspect of the original problem. In certain problems approximationsare employed and then the 'proof' may be described as a process ofi econciliation. These 'reconciliations' entain a comparatively highdegree of mathematical skill. Occasionally several different proofsare attached to a problem. The following are specimens.

(1) Problem t-7=s t+7

Solution t = 2 x 7j(3--a) = 30.

Proof'--3:5 :: 30 : 50, 5:6 :: 30:36 and 50-7=36+7-Folio 46I, recto.

(2) Problem-A gives 21; in 11- days,

B gives 3; in I' days.

C gives 41 in 1; days.

In what time they have given 500 dinaras altogether ?2

(1)"'aTf r r

r fq3 1 5 1 30 1 q o 50 STTT f0ZrfRRM r 17

- - - t$ 43 1 ..................43

1I6I30 36 43Iq wrrwT T

-Folio 61, recto.(2)m +4735C0 I affird rr'ic T Mt *l 500

I 947

(carrkd ovor to aoxt pap)

Page 76: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Proofs (,1

Solution, 500 60.947

OOOdays

t°2 33_

+z+14

And A gives 100,000/947, B gives 157,000/947, C

216,000dinaras.947

Proof. 21 : 1 }y100,000 60,000

947 947

3111

157,00000 600 00- 947

4 : 1 a ;2166000: 60000

9

Folio 22, recto.

(3) Problem. One earns e and spends f daily. How 1onitwill a capital of C last ?

Solution, = t -C(f--e)

Proof. 1 : f :: t : F (the total expenditure).I : e : : t : E (the total earnings) and F-E= C.

(4) Problem, If 7 are bought for 2 and 6 sold for 3, and 11wcapital is 24, what will be the profit ?

Solution. p-c'C 124(x=-1)-18

Proof. 2 : 7 24 84 (the number of articles)and 6 : 3 84 : 42 ( the total proceeds),

and 42-24=18.or ...1 :c::C:n, c:l .:n:C+p

and C+p--C =P,

2 o 1 ifto 100000 41o gff ifto 600001 1 947 9472 2

3 t.^to I Zfto 157000 Efto qMrro 60000

1 1 947 I 947

2 3

4 Rto I 'o 21600000 i ;fto 6000111 1

I

947 ( 947

2 4

Polio 28, recto.

Page 77: The Bakhshali Manuscript

62 Bakhshali Manuscript

(5) Problem. (I-;) (1--1)=x-280

Solution.' 9=200, 400-200- 200

2004_ = 50, 200 - 50 =150

150 = 30, 150--10 = 120

and 400 -120= 280.

-Folio 52, verso.

(6) Problem.

(7)

(l +& (2+ (3+s (4+" (5A- )))))Solution = ; Go .

Proof. (((((io-1) 2-2) 2-3)-4) '-5-1)00.

Problem. Solve x+5 = s2, x-7=12

Solution. x=[ I (L+-7- 2, +7=11

Proof. 11+5=4°; 11-7=2.-Folio 59, recto.

(8) Problem. F= ' 1 + (2) + 41 (3) + ti (4)---1+2+31-4

Solution. F - 163--. 60 163

10 600

Proof. 10: 603::1 16633

600

gfq i1rTF1t m it it Qt .. .(1wr w fa 150 3mTfcT q-- q%r T 3 o I

.. .

1

2

9 280 fM# W14 400 qq q* fr

1 1 I q;9 fqur 2804 51 1 1

2+ 4+

2+gwlm^t rrcT tot $cr...280 atergfa 28 I qfg' 140140

28 1

-Folio 52, verso.

Page 78: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Pr6dili 63

3i 31 610: 60 NO

1 16310: 60 ::3 200

10: 03 4163

61 50

or, since F=If x w w : 2f x w:: w, : w,l

((t_1)(9) Problem. Dt =-d

l Z - -{-a t

Solution. t --?(DI -- a)+

Prcof. By the rupona method, s = C(t -1) 2 +a] t

and Dt = s.

(10) Problem. s =rkt_ i)d +a] t

Solution. 1={,1(2a_d)2.. 8s-(2a-d)}+2d-Folio 65, verso.

Generally the solution is an approximation ti or t2 dependingon the method of evaluation of the surd quantity; and the ruponamethod gives sl or s2, neither of which is the same as the original s.A process of reconciliation is therefore calved for, and this is given by

s-s' = 8d where s' is the approximation to s given by the proof

and e may be termed the square-root error. Problem. a =1, d =1,s=60. First solution, t1={x/(2.1-1)2+480-1}j-2.1

(214240 -1) 880

-Folio 65, verso.

First proof. si = tl (tl+1)+2- 8 0 x 964 Q 848,32084 168 1411

4 0 '0 e 848 320- 1600C ) ande = ,

l =4i sa 14112

-Folio 56, verso.

Page 79: The Bakhshali Manuscript

64 Bakhshall Manuscript

Second Solution, ta.s (424,642-

1 +2= 405,28019362 38724

405.280 444,004 179,945,941,120Second Proof. sa =38724 X

77448=

2,999,096,352

40 a 40Now e. 41) -t-4 (21+ -42 )'

andea _ 160,000=

2,999,096,352

ea 179,945,781.120and s = s2 - d 8 2,989.096,352 = 60

-Folio 64, recto.

(11) The problems in section 'G' are characterised by nume-rous proofs-as many as five separate proofs being attached to oneexample. The following is fairly typical'

Problem. x=500(1-}) (1-;) (1-1)(1-1)

Solution. x=158 's;.

Proof (i). x' (1-a) (1-'s) (1-1) (1-1).1581;.whence x' = 500.

This is written horizontally.

Proof (ii). X, (1-1) (1-1) (1-3) (1-;)=1588;, whencex'=500. This is written vertically.

(1 Wo a9 ffir IM Tr4 wff-4-d

0 158 500 11 Tft wmm Or1 1

1

+5* fo

4 1

1 644+ 500 1 1 1

1+ 1 1-}- i+ 1+I 1+f4 + 4 4 4 4 afkk

ig158cte lWrb 164

-Folio 11, verso.

Page 80: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Solutions 65

Proof (iii), x'= 158;,(1-a, F =

Proof (iv)-By steps,500-i-4=125, 500-125=375;375=4 = 934, 375 - 934 :1 - 2814 i

2814' =4 = 701!`9, 2814 - 701"c = 2 10,210iao =4=5284, 210;4-5284.. 158,11-14.

-Folio 11, verso.

Solutions.

The solutions are sometimes very detailed, proceeding mostcare-fully step by step, so that they become expositions in general termsof the processes involved. Also they often give actual quotationsfrom the rules,-to such an extent sometimes that the original wordingof the rule can be reconstructed. Unfortunately, however, suchhelpful suggestions are more often missing than not : in many easesthe particular portions of the manuscripts are lacking or damagedbeyond repair. In some sections, e. g. section 'M', nothing but thebare answer is generally given, and in others the outline only of theworking is given.

The following examples illustrate these remarks

(i) The problem is DT+Dt = {(t-1)+a} t where a and d it re,respectively the first term and common difference of an arithmeticalprogression, and t the number of terms, to be found. The rule is

t={2(D-a)+d+./t2(D-a)+d)a-} and the ptttticular example gives D = 5, T=6, a =3, d=4., The actual working Ofthe solution, translated as literally as possible, is as follows :

'The daily rate diminished by the first term;* the daily rate isfive yojanas, 5; the first term is 3; their difference is 2: this doubledis 4: *this increased by the common difference is 8; and squat cd is (4which is known as the ksepa quantity.* *Multiplied by eight* ; thefixed term (30) multiplied by eight is 240; and multiplied by the coin-mon difference-multiplied 960. *The quantity known as ksepa isadded*. Now the quantity known as kshepa is 64, which added gives1024. The root of this is 32; the quantity set aside is 8 and thisadded gives 40. *Divided by twice the common difference: *twicethe common difference is 8-divided 5."

The phrases marked off by asterisks are quotations from the sutra orrule.

9

Page 81: The Bakhshali Manuscript

66 Bakhshali Manuscript

The phrases placed between asterisks are quotations from therule. A perfectly literal rcndering would not be very intelligible tothe ordinary reader and one or two gaps have been filled in; but thetranslation is a perfectly fair representation of the original.

(ii) The problem may be represented by x(1- 4) (1-11) (1- a)=x- 24 and the solution is given as follows :-

*Having calculated the loss on unity* the terms become., and these multiplied together give a. This subtracted from

unity gives 6, which, inverted and multiplied' by the given amount24, is r, of 24 = 40.

(iii) Something travels 3 yavas a day. How long will it take togo 5 yojanas ? Here the solution is indicated by the following pro-portion only :

3 ya° :360 years

:: 5 x 4,608,000 : 21,333 years 4 months.

Symbols for the Unknown

In the Bakhshali mathematics the unknown quantity is referredto by the symbol 0, which is called 'sunya,' Tq 'void' or 'empty') 2.Datta thinks that strictly speaking it is not a symbol for the

1. Literally "divided and multiplied" into. This is generally used toindicate division by a fraction.

2 (1) fk i FCZrj ifr t 1T"' r I err aeff4r1 a RmW Ira f

W..J 0 1213 41 jgq 200 I jd pMII I 1 T 1

1 601 80 J 2CO 11

20 13 20 q 111FghlVX j;r v-j 20

The problem of this type :-Folio 22, verso.

"A certain amount was given to the first, twice that to the second,thrice it to the third and four times to the fourth. State the amount given tothe first and the shares of others, if the total amount given was 200."

The shares are represented by 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. (Here zero stands as asymbol for the unknown). Now having added 1 to the unknown (nought), thesum is 1+2+3+4= 10, which shows the proper share of the first is 200/10or 20, and the series is 20+40+60+80° 200..

The proof by the rupona method gives, (Contd. on the next page.

Page 82: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Symbols for the Unknown 67

unknown as has been supposed by Hoernle1 and Kayo'. Forsame symbol has also been used for the zero' (sunya) for the dcchmilarithmetical notation. This is, indeed, its true significance. Its iwoin connexion with an algebraic equation, in a sense other than f4)1-arithmetical notation, is simply to indicate that the quantity whichshould be there is absent or not knowns. Hence its place in iltoequation is left vacant and this is clearly indicated by putting thesign of emptiness there. Or in short, the use of the truely arithme-tical symbol for zero in an algebraic equation is a clear proof of thewant of a symbol for the unknown in the Bakhshali mathematics.Correctness of this interpretation will be borne out by the facts[1] that this symbol does nowhere enter into any operation, its Itought to have done had it been truely a symbol for the unknown,and [2] that often times it is referred to as sunya, sthana or the'empty place', proving thereby that nothing is in that place". This

[ (4-1)22 +20]4=200.2(ii)..9 fkt--

... srqfim 3 fw I

02

19 i9sur fku

... siM !fa chi' 1 12 16 24 I ...121213161111...I

...sift 33 I f r 132 I at?i 141331 1

Folio 23, recto.The example may be represented byx+2T1+3Ta+4Ts =132, whcre Ti, Ts, etc, represent the values

of the first, second, etc. terms. Make x=1, then the terms are 1+2+6+24

= 33, whence x = 133 = 4 and the series becomes, 4+ 8+'4 -1.96=132 (Kaye).

(1) Indian Antiquary. xii, p. 90; xvii, p 30(2) Journ. Asiat. Soc. Beng.. viii (1912), p. 357 ; Bakh. Ms., §9 42, 60.(3) Compare such expression as nrularn na jnayate, itr"T' c* (folio 13.

verso; 15 verso, prathamam na janami) 51 sli1 9 irgrfsf (24, verso),padam na jnayate tr' Wro (54, verso), etc. in each case of whichthe ajnata, arffTU (unknown) element has been indicated in the state-ment by Tzr,

(4) Folio 25, verso ; pnd folio 26, recto,

Page 83: The Bakhshali Manuscript

68 Bakhshall Manuscript

hypothesis will be further supported by the fact that the similar useof the `zero' sign to denMe the unknown element in the statemen IF(nyasa) of problems is found in the crithmelics of Sridharal andBhaskara2. Thus we haven,

afk 20 3 0 r(aw: 7 I Trffrc7RR 245

which is a statement of an arithmetical progression whose firstterm is 20, number of terms is 7, sum is 245 and whose commondifference is not known. Both these writers have well-definednotations for the unknown, and do never use the cipher in this wayin their treatises on algebra. But as the use of algebraic symbols isnot permissible in arithmetic, they make use of the cipher to indicatethat certain clement in a problem is waz;ting. Of course, the cipherhas wider use in the Fakhshali mathematics than in any of theseworks.

The lack of an efficient symbolism is bound to give rise to acertain amount of ambiguity in the representation of an algebraicequation, especially when it contains more than one unknown4. Forinstance, inb

05 Er Zr 0rr 0

7+0

1 It 1

which denotes x 4 5 = s, Jx_ 7 _ t, different unknowns

will have to be assumed at different vacant places. Again in thestatements.

air 5 36 q0 u01 1 1 1

ajr10 33 q0 q 01 1 1 1

which refers to two arithmetical progressions whose firstterms'and common differences are different but known, and whose

(I) Trisatika, pp. 19 et seq.(2) 'Lilavati', r.p. 18 scq. 7 his is not evident from Colebrooke's transla

tion of the works where the cipher has been replaced by the query.(3) Trisatika, p. 29.(4) Nearly similar difficulty and inconvenience %ere experienced by the

Greek algebraists who had only one symbol for the unknown.(5) Folio 59, recto. }foernle and Kaye are not right in thinking that this

statement represents :x-I.5=.s'= and x--7=t2.

,6) Folio 5, recto,

Page 84: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Symbols for the Unknown W4

sums and number of terms arc equal but unknown,0

stands in tlir

place of two different unknowns'. To avoid such ambiguity, in ,,,irinstance which contains as many as five unknowns, the abbrevi-ations of ordinal numbers such as pra, A (abbreviated from pratliantu,

sr" 'first'), dvi ft (from dviliya, fgtq,'second'), ir, q (from trdya,

qtq, 'third'), ca from caturth, :qer4, 'fourth') and pam, d (front

pancama, gsazi, 'fifth') have been used to represent the unknowns;e g.'.

9 A

I

7

l0fZg

I

1011 8:qI

114 Zia 450q;7 8a 114 9sr (Tier)

16117,18119(201which means,

x14-x,= 16, x,+x3= 17, xs+x4=18, X4+X8=19,

X6-+1=20.

The want of a proper symbol for the unknown eventually leadsto the adoption of the method of 'false position' or 'supposition'for solution of algebraic equations. The solution generally beginswith putting 'any desired quantity' (q1%v yadrecha) in the vacantplaces.

(1) It is not easy to say what is intended to be implied by placing theunity below the cipher. It is supposed by some to be an Indicationthat the unknown quantity will be an integer (Kaye, Bakh. Mi.,

t 60). Such a supposition is quite untrue. For in the instance citedwhile dhana is an integer (= 65), pada is a fraction (= 13/3).Strangely this very statement has been quoted by Kaye just after theremark referred to. In certain instances, it is a mixed surd (videfolio 6 and 45, rectos),

(2) Folio 27, verso. In one instance in Dhaskara's Bijaganlia, Initialsyllables of the names of particular things have been used as Symbolsfor the unknowns. (Colebrooke, Hindu Algebra, p. 195; comparealso p. xi. Cf. aTa Jui pi qt TW TU p ' : Blja., p 2,

3) Yadrecha pinyase sunye %ZT f9M1W W'W or yadrccha vinyaseq''qmT fk,q that is 'putting any desired quantity In the

vacant place' (Folios 22, verso, and 23, recto). On another occasionit is said Ka,nika,n sra,ye pinyasta,n, q,7fgq; ;Wfq or 'the desired

quantity is placed in the vacant place (Folio 3, recto and verso). Wehave also such expressions as sunya-sthane rupam dattava, vjw ctitkVq qM or 'putting one in the vacant place' (Folios 25, verso and 26,recto; compare also folio 22, vcrso).

Page 85: The Bakhshali Manuscript

70 Bakhshali Manuscript

Plan of Writing EquationsIn the Bakhshali mathematics two sides of an equation are

written down one after the other in the same line without any signof equality being interposed. Thus the equations,

appear asI

I0 5 rt s; 01m 0 7+ r 01 1''1 1 1 1

The equation,x+2x+3.3x+ 12.4x= 300

is stated asp0 2 1 3 3 12 41 dart 300111 1I1 1I 1 1I 1

Sometimes the unknown quantity is not indicated. Thus theequation

2 3 4is followed in the arithmetical treatise of

Sridhara and Bhaskara. According to the former'

I1 11 it jag22I6 12I

means

x`( 2+ 6 +

122.

Bhaskara does not use the lines8. It will be noticed that inall the aforementioned works the absolute term is called drsya, (TW'.meaning 'visible' which is sometimes abbreviated into dr (1). Adistinction is sometimes made in its connotation in the differentworks. " The problems in connection with which the above equationsarise are of the same kind in all the works. But in the Bakhshaliwork, the term drsya (jar) refers to the 'gives' while in the otherworks it generally refers to the 'remains'e. There is, however, one

Folio 59, recto.Folio 23, verso. See also folios 21, 23, 24, recto, etc.Folio 70, recto and verso (C). See also folio 69, verso.Trisatika, pp. 13 et seqLilavati, pp. 11 et seq.The term drsya occurs also in the (GSS), (IV, 4) in the sense pf"remainder".

Page 86: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Plan of Writing Equations it

instance in the Lilavati in which the connotation of drsya is exactlythe same as in the Bakhshali work', This term is closely related torupa (FT), meaning appearance', which is the same for the absoluteterm in the Indian algebra. We find thus the true significance of theIndian name for the absolute term in an algebraic equation. It

represents the visible or known portion of the equation while itsremaining part is practically unknown or invisible.

The above plan of writing equations differs much from theplan found in ancient Indian algebra in which, (1) two sides tireusually written one below the other without any sign of equalityand (2) the terms of similar denominations are written below oneanother, the terms of absent denominations from either sides beingindicated by putting zero as its co-efficient (Datta).

Certain Complex Series

As already stated, the author of the Bakhshali mathematics iswell acquainted with rule for the summation of series in arithmeti.cal progression. Indeed he gives considerable importance to itstreatment. There are instances of the geometrical progression inthe works. There are further elementary cases of a certain class ofcomplex series. the law of formation of which is quite clear. If al,a a. . ... ... denote the succesive terms of any series, we find series ofthe types,

(1) Lilavati, p. 11.

(2) 1 13 19 127 181 329t 1

1 3r'r' a) r -<Tw t zr)rT 87 qQ PIT iT vi =ii aTmi

242...1

y 1 1 1 3 1 9 1 27 1 81 1 ril 1 121 1 aft;r M 1 2 J

a 1 STasT t 1 2 1 6 1 18 1 54 1 162 1 vmmft2 15 1 48 147 4441I 2 2 2 2

-Folio 51, verso,This appears that it represents a double series :tl + 3t1 + 32t1 + 3313

s+ 34'3 -329

0 + ;t3,+ 4 (11+ta) +4 (t1+ta+t3) +; (tl-4-trl-ta+t.)JlSet t t = 2, then the first series becomes 242 and the second 87, and the

15 48 147 444 329.combined series, 2-I- 2 - 1 2 -I- i-+ -2=

(3) The series of these types occur respectively on folio 22, verso ; 23,

recto ; 23, recto and verso ; 25, verso and 26, recto : 24, verso, and

25, recto ; 51, recto and verso.

Page 87: The Bakhshali Manuscript

71 Bakhshali Manuscript

(1) ai+2.71+3a1 + 4a1.......... +na1,l2) a1+2a1+3a2+4a3+ .....nan-1,(3) a1+2a1+3 (a1+aa)+4 (a1+as-Fa(4) a1+(2a,±b)-f{3a1 f (b+d)}+4a,+ (b+2d)}+......(5) a1+(2a, +b)+{3a,+(b+d)}+

{4v3+(b+2d)}+.........(6) a1+(2a1+b)+{3 (a,+a,)f(b+d)+

{4 (a1+a2+aa)f(b+2d)+...(7) a1+(a1r+dal) +{alra+d (a,+atr)}+.

{atr3+d (a1-l-air-J--air2) )-f--......

Evidently the seric; (4), (5), (6) are obtained respectively fromthe series (1), ('-), (3) with the help of the subsidiary series inarithmetical progression,

b+ (b+d)+(b+2d)+...

Systems of Linear Equations

Examples of the following type occur :x1+xa=a1, x+x3 =a2..........xn+xnl1=an where n isalways odd. We have,an-'a2-a1)+......+ (an_.1-an _2)+2x1 ;

and if we assume x1= pthen, an'=(a2-a1)'l-'...... } (an_1an %)+2p.

Subtracting we get, x1=p+ (an-a'n)l2, which is the solutionemployed in the text.

The following examples occur(1) xt+xa = 13, x3+x3=14, x;,+x1=15.The value of x1 is assumed to be 5, then by 'subtraction order'

x2=8, x3=6 and x3-+1=11. The correct values are therefore,x1=5+(15-11)-, 2=7, x,=6 and x3=8.

(ii) x1+x5= l6, xa+x3=17, x3+x4=18, x4+xa=19,xg+x1= 20.

Here the value of x1 is assumed to be 7 and x'e+x'1=16therefore the correct values are x1= 9, x,=7, x3 =10, x4= 8,x8=111

The following are implied,

1. Since in these two particular examples the values of at as, etc. are in

arithmetical progression a, simpler solution would be x1"i where m is the

mean of the series at, as etc.

Page 88: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Systems of Linear Equations 7:

(ill) x1+xa=9, xa+xs=5, x3+x,=8.(iv) x1+xa= 70, xa +xs = 52, xs+x 1= 66.

(v) x1+x2=1860, xa+xs=1634, xs+x1=1722.

(vi)1 xa+xs+x4+x5=317x, +xs+x4-+5 = 347x1+xa+x4+x5 = 357x1+x2+xs+x4= 365xl+xa+x3+x5 = 362

and the following, which, however, is too mutilated to be sure of

(vii) x1+xa=36, xa+xs=42, x3+x4=48, x4+x5=54, xa+X1=60.

The directions seem to indicate that we should cancel by six.We then get,

a'1=6, a9=7, a'3=8, a'4=9, a'5=10 of which the solution is x'1-4,x'2=2, etc., whence x1=24, xa=12, xs=30, etc.

Further Examples

The next set of examples can be represented in the. form;'x-xr=c-d1x1, Ex-x9=c-dsxa,...I:x-xa=c-daxa.

If we set, a=1-d, these become,

1. This can be arranged in the form y1+ya= 365, ys+ys= 347, Ys+Y4

- 362. y4 +y5 = 317, y5 +y1= 357 Solving this we get x1+xa = 210,xa+x3=170, xs+x4=155, x4+x5=147. x5+x1=192, whichsolved gives x1 =120, xa=go, x3 = 80, x4 = 75, x5 = 72. (See-folio 1)

Also note that most of these six examples can be expressed in the formY,x-x1=a1, Mx-xa=aa... Ex-xn=aa.The examples given in the text pre undoubtedly akin to the'Ephanthema',

usually attributed to Thymaridas, which may be expressed by xo = Ea-Exn-1

where xo+x1=a1, xo+X2=aa...xo-f-xn=an. In Aryabhata's 'Canna

is a similar rule Ex= Edwhere EX-x1=d1r Ex-xa=da ....n-1

Ex- xp = dn, which Cantor ( Vorlcsungen uber der Gesclilcmuc der Matlrc.milk 1. 624) considers to be a modification of the rule given by Thymaridas.See also P. Tannery Memolres Sclenifiques, Tome II, pp. 192-195.10

Page 89: The Bakhshali Manuscript

'f4 Bakhshali Manuscript

x2= ....=`_x-anxn=C, and alxt.=aaxa=....anxn=2,x-c=k.

Therefore : x=l l

1 1\k p k.

U.

^F

as+..

anJ

q

A solution is xi= ri ,x2= q ..xn= 1 and c-p=q'

al ag an

There are four examples illustrating this process which may be

tabulated thus :-

S.No I di da d:, dg ds

_ 7 311i2_4___61 7 8

2 3 4

I P I CI xi Y, X3 X4 x5

437

60 377 111 91 81 71 71

2118 1095 914 836 798

1463161 41 18 14

17 6 3 1

Of these only fragments remain. For example, of the first wehave;

(1) Compare with this the treatment of the epanthetn by Jamblichus(Heath, Greek Mathematics, 1, 93-94

(1) The nearest approach to this that I (Kaye) have came across in anIndian work is given by Mahavira in his GSS, VI. 239-240).Five merchants saw a purse of money. They said one after another,by obtaining _, T, 1 a of the contents of the purse I shall become

three times as rich as all of you.,,Let p be the value of the purse and xis x2 etc., the original capitals:

then 3 (2x-xl)= 6 ±x1,3 P -i-xs,etc.whenceI 6508p11Yx-

1 6 + r 8 - 9 + 10 10080 ' or

_ 6508pZx- 110880'If p=110880, then x1=261.

But al-Karkhi (Xlth cent.) gave (iii, 6) the following :-A certain sum is divided among three people, one-half being given to thefirst, one-third to the second and one-sixth to the third. But then one-half the share of the first, one-third the share of the second and one-sixththat of the third is pooled and shared equally by the three.

(Contd. on next page)

Page 90: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Further Examples 75

1 1 1 1

- 7

1 120 90 80 75 72 4172 T 4 .S -C 60 + 60 + 60 + 6U 60 (dl

90+80+75+72-317, 317+ 120 = 377

120+80+75+72=347, 347+ 30 = 377

120+90+75+72-357, 357+1q = 377

120+90+80+72=362, 362-f 55 = 377

120+90+80-1-75=365, 365+ G = 377

The second of these examples may be expressed in the form

xl+xz-( +.) x3=xa+xs-(,+4) x1=xs+xl-(g+'s) x99 12 4 6x,, =

7 x3 = 6 xs and . xc = 19 + 7 + -11From this !

225581463

'1463The solution given is :Ex= 2558 and c=2558-1463

1091, whence x1= 924, x3= 836, x.,1=798.

Of the third, there is sufficient of the formal question preservedto enable it to be restored.

"One possesses seven horses, another nine mules (?), and athird ten camels. Each gives one of his animals to each of theothers and then their possessions become of equal value".

In. A. D. 1225 this problem became famous as it was one of lbosopropounded to Leonnrdo of Pisa and solved by him.If x1, x2, x1, be the shares and 3c be the amount pooled, then,

x1- X-f e= -x

X2-x9 -f-c_ `x

2, xa

3 3

X3 - 6 +c=6

and j'x-x1=2c, -2x:-2x,-3e,

Fx-5x3 =6c. whence -47 . Make c= 7 and

x1®33,x3=13,x3 01.

Page 91: The Bakhshali Manuscript

76 Bakhshali Manuscript

The fourth example of similar form'.

Mutilated Examples

The following occurs on some very mutik ted scraps that have

been pieced together. it is now impossible to say how it originated

or what its context was.

x (x+y+z)=60

y (x+y+z)=75z (x-}-y+z)=90

We have (x+y ; z )a=225 whence x+y+z=15, and x-4,y=5 and z=6.

Solution in Positive Integers :

There is one nearly complete statement and solution of thefollowing pair of equations :--

x+y+z = 203x+3y+lz=20

of which the only solution in positive integers is x= 2, y= 5, andz- 13.

4

This type of problem was a favourite in Europe and Asia inearly mediaeval times. Later it was known as the 'Regula Virgi-num', 'Regula Potatorum', etc. It was given by Chang-ch' iu-chien(sixth century A. D.)2, by Alcuin the Englishman (eighth century)and.others. About 900 A. D. it was pretty fully treated by AbuKamil al-Misri who gives some six problems, varying from three tofive terms and attempts to find all the positive integral solutionss.

(1) This set of examples is intreduccd by a rule which simply means : changethe fraction A/B into B/ (B.- A). This illustrates the fact that the sutrasor rules often makes no pretencc of indicating in any way the generaltheory : they are merely intcnded to be helpful.

(2) Yoshio Mikami.(3) H. Suter, Das Buch der Selienheil, etc. Bib. Math., (1910-11), pp. 100-

120. Suter's Die Mathematiker and Asironomen der Araber and IhrenWorke, p. 43.

Page 92: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Quadratic Indeterminate Equations 77

In the earlier Indian works problems of this type do not occur,

but exactly the same example is given by both Mahavirat and

Bhaskara 112.

Quadratic Indeterminate Equations.

There are two types of quadratic indeterminates preserved.

First Type : (i) x -}- a = ss, x- b = t 3.

The solution given may be represented by

f( l a+b"l3x-12c

c ),+b

which makes both x+a and x-b perfect squares. In the

actual example preserved a= 5 and b= 7 and the solution is x= 11,

which is the only possible integral (positive) solution obtainable from

the formula. No general rule is preserved but the solution itselfindicates the rule. It proceeds by steps thus :

5+7-12,12-t-2-6, 6-2=4,4-+-2-2,22=4,4+7=ll.

The value of this type of detailed exposition is here selfevi-

dent. It seems to have been almost necessitated by the absence of ti

suitable algebraic symbolisms.

Second Type : (ii) xp-ax-kv-c=0

(1) GSS., vi, 152.(2) Vija-Gan., 158.

(3) This type of equation occurs in many medeiaeval works from the time ofDiophantus onwards (c. g., see Diophantus, ii, 11ff : Brahmagupta, xvili,84: A1-Karkhi, p. 63, etc.) and has here no very special interest beyondthe indication it gives that the Bakhshali text followed the fashion. Dr.Hoernle, however, thought that it indicated a 'peculiar' connexion betweenthe Bakhshali Ms. and Brahmagupta's work : and from this deduced thatour text may have been one of the sources from whence the later astrono-mers took their arithmetical information.' (Indian Antiquary, xvii, 1888,p. 37).

Page 93: The Bakhshali Manuscript

78 Bakhshali Manuscript

The solutions which appear to be followed in the text arex=(ab+c) -;- ,n+b, v=a+m; or y=(?b+c)--m+a,where in is any assumed number. The only example that is preser-

ved' is of which the solutions given are 15 and 4,

and 16 and 5, i, e.,

(3.4-1) - 1+4= 15, 3 }-1 -4; (3.4 -1-1) _ 1+3=16, 4±1= 5.

Happy Collaboration of the East and the West

In chemistry, astronomy, mathematics, medicine and surgery,there was always in our history a happy collaboration in the ad-

vancements, in which all great nations of the East, Middle-East andthe West took part. The Bakhshali manuscript in its original form(agreeing to Dr. Hoernle's suggestion) must have had its authorship

in the early centuries of our era. From generation to generation, itmust have been copied out with alterations and additions. By thistime the western mathematics had incorporated almost all that could

be traceable to Greek sources, and had assumed new forms and

included some new notions also. On the whole the western medi-aeval mathematics tended to become less rigorous and but more

1. Unfortunately the text 'folio 27, recto' is so mutilated that the correctnessof the interpretation h-re t'iren cannot b. guranteed. But the equationwas well known to mediaeval mathematicians and has historical interest.Brahmagupta gave a general solution (-,viii, 61) which, however, he appearsto have th,-,ught unnecessary. Bhaskara also'givec a general solution (BijaGanita, 212.214) together with demonstra'ion in both algebraical andgeometrical forms; but he also on another occasion (ib. 208-209) givesan arbitrary solution, The general solution is also given by Al-Karkhi.Mahavira gives (vi, 284) the equation in a different form, namely

( a+ i > (h-i- -i )=ale -}A which reduces to xr- A X-A

A 0 of which the solution is x= lA r \ ° AaA ),=±

A-}-

am; or y =A

aAb x- A -I- in. If we make m= A -{-1

n x=th b 1 =a A which is the solution given by Mahaviia.e ,

Ay

His examples are : The product of 3 and 5 is 15, and the requiredproduct is 18 or 14. What arc the quantites to be added or subtracted ? i.e.(i) (3+lJx) (5+11v)=15+3,(ii)(3-l/x,) (5-15-1. Hisanswers are (i) 2 and 7, (ii) 6 and 17.

Page 94: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Happy Collaboration of the East and the West. I`

mixed than the mathematics of the classical Greece. Practicalcalculation (logistic) altogether supported the earlier pure arithmetic:mensuration took the place of pure geometry, and algebra slightlydeveloped. Such changes are, indeed, indicated in the laterAlexandrian works, and what we sometimes term degeneration hadalready set in there. The introduction of a place-value arithmeticalnotation made calculation easier and more popular, and more intri-cate arithmetical problems than those exhibited in the Greek Antho.logy, appeared in the later mediaeval text-books. The general bodyof popular mathematical knowledge became more diffused.(Identical problems occur in Chinese, Indian, Arabic and Europeantext-books of a comparatively early period). Indeed the mediaevalmathematical works of Asia and Europe had so much in commonthat at first it seems almost impossible to pick out that which isdefinitely western or eastern in origin. In this connexion it shouldbe remembered that the early astronomers (Aryabhata 11, andVaraha-Mihira, an astronomer of Greek or middle-east origin,settled and naturalized in India,) were among the first to collaboratewith Greeks in mathematical and astronomical learning; that laterthe Arabs, after sampling Indian works, entered into this collabora.tion; and that it was from the Arabs that Europe received once morethe learning it had previously rejected. (Kaye)

We give here a summary chronological table of the period,that may serve to recall the chief mathmatical writers and theirworks :

Before Christ-Rgvedic period Earlier than 4000 B. C.

Taittiriya Samhita 20L0 B. C.Satapatha Brahmana 1000 B.C.Baudhayana Sulba Sutra 500 B. C.Vedanga Jyautisa, Lagadha 500 B. C.

2nd to 3rd Century Bakhshali Manuscript 300 A. D.(original)

5th Century Hypatia d.415 A. D.Proclus 410- 485 A. D.Boethius b.470Aryabhata b.476

Page 95: The Bakhshali Manuscript

80 Bakhshali Manuscript

6th Century Bhaskara I 522

EutociusDamascius 529

SimpliciusDominusChang Ch'-iu Chien 550

Varahamihira 505-587Isidore of Seville 570-636

7th Century Brahmagupta b.598Fall of Alexandria 640/1

Papyrus of AkhminBede b.735.

8th Century Muhammad b. MusaAlcuin b.804Sridhara 750

9th Century Mahavira 850Tabit b. Qorra 835-901

10th CenturyAryabhat II c. 950AvicennaPope Sylvester 11 d. 1003

11th Century Albiruni visited 1017-1030Indiaal-KarkhiPsellusOmar Khayyam b. 1046

12th Gentury Adeland at Cordova 1120

Bhaskara II b. 1114Leonardo b. 1175

For the contents of this chapter the author expresses his in-debtedness to the critical account of the Bakhshali Mathematicsgiven by Kaye in his publications and to the critical paper of Dr.Bibhutibhushan Datta in the Bulletin of the Calcutta MathematicalSociety, 1929.

Page 96: The Bakhshali Manuscript

APPENDIX I

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

The measures exhibited in the manuscript are of rather specialinterest. As a whole they are Indian and the terminology is Sanskrit;but there are some Sanskritized western terms such as lipta, drammadinara, satera employed. Most of the terms are well defined but the,values of some are doubtful. Money measures, however, are, as inmost early Indian works, very ill-defined and hardly show anydifferentiation from measures of weight.

Change ratios : The change ratios are often given with con-siderable care and elaboration, and are expressed in several differentways. The change ratio appears to be considered as a divisor forit is most frequently marked by the term chhedam which indicatesthe operation of division.

Examples are :

chhe° 80 rakti°- su° I. e. 80 raktika =1 suvarnachhe° 24 am°-ha° I. e. 24 angula= l hastachhe° 2 gha°-mu° i. e. 2 ghatika=l muhurtachhe° 4608000 ya°-yo° I. e. 4608000 yava- I yojana

urdha chchhe° 768000 a°-yo°, i.e. 768000 angula=1 yojana, and' isthis particular example the operation of multiplication is to beperformed.

urdha chchhedam 108000 viliptanam rasi, i.e. 108000 vilipta=1 rasiand multiplication is indicated.adha chchhedam 2000 pa°-bha°, i.e. 2000 pals =1 bhara and divisionis indicated.

Another form is illustrated in the following exampler Itolenasti'dhane 12, i.e. I tola - 12 dhana.dhanenasti am° 4, i.e. I dhana=4 andikadinaranasti dhane 12, i.e. I dinara - 12 dhana

II

Page 97: The Bakhshali Manuscript

82 13akhshali Manuscript

Abbreviations :The Bakhshali abbreviation for weights

usually as follows :

Adh, arr= Adhaka, anW

Am, aT - Amsha, aTar

Am, at-Andika, arfsgWr

Am, aT= Angula, aTp

Bha, qr=Bhara, qR

Dha, tTr= Dhanaka, UT;1q;

Dha, q _ Dhanusha, qjq

Di, fk=Dins, f

Di, ift=Dinara, wftffrZ

Dram, x =Drama, tM

Dra, = Drankshana, ttjur

Dro =Drona, f

Mu, IX= Mudrika, lfti

Mu, 11= Muhurta

Pa, qT= Pada, qW

Pa, q = Pala, qff

Pra, sr=Prastha, M

Pra, A- Prasriti, Si fic

Ra, Z- Raktika, zfrtiRa, Tr. Rasi, zTfar

and measures are

Gav, qa= Gavyuti, gnfg

Gha, q=Ghatika, gfkr

Gum, = Gunja,rHa - Hasta,

Ka, q, - Kakini, WTf ?

Ka, ; = Kala, qMT

Kha, q a Khari, Arf t

Kro, = Krosa.- %),q

Ku, = Kudava, lga

Li. fq= Lipta, fjr

Ma, g=Masa, qR{

Ma, q<= Mashaka, tTl@rq;

Sa, q-Satera, c T

Si, fir= Siddhartha, fi`r

Su, ;g = Suvarna,

To, cat=Tola, FiT

Va, a= Varsha, 44

Vi, fa=Vilipta, fa1r

Ya, q=Yava,

Yo, rft=Yojana, xj

Time MeasuresI Varsha=I2 Masa=360 Dina1 Dina - 30 Muhurta = 60 Ghatika

Are Measures1 Rashi =30 Ansha= 1800 Lipta=108,000 ViliptaI Ansha=60Lipta(7.E,rv'i)1 Lipta - 60 Vilipta

Page 98: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Moncy Mcasures

Money Measures

HA

I Suvarnar=11, Dinara=22 Dramkshana=16 Dhanaka-80 Raktika

I Dinara = 2 Dramkshana

I Dramkshana = 6 Dhanaka

I Dhanaka = 5 Raktika

Weight Measures

I Bhara = 2000 Pala

I Pala = 8 Tola

I Tola =2 Dramkshana

1 Dramkshana=6 Dhanaka

I Dhanaka =4 Andika

I Andika =I I Raktika

1 Raktika = 3T Yava

I Yava - 2} Siddhartha

1 Siddhartha - 21 Kala

I Kala - 4 Pada

1 Pada - 4 Mudrika

Length Measures.

I Yojana =2 Gavyuti

1 Gavyuti = 8 Krosha

I Krosha -1000 Dhanusha

1 Dhanusha =4 Hasta

1 Hasta .24 Angula

1 Angula - 6 Yava

Page 99: The Bakhshali Manuscript

13akhshali Manuscript

Capacity Measures

I Khari -- 16 Drona

I Drona 4 AdhakaI Adhaka = 4 PrasthaI Prastha =4 Kudava1 Kudava 2 Prasriti

I Prasriti =2 Pala

Page 100: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Arithmetical ProblemsINCORPORATED IN

The Bakhshali Text

Page 101: The Bakhshali Manuscript

86 Hakhshali Manuscript

A--7

It is possible that 52 recto gives parts of the solutions cf the

example on 51 recto which would make that page the

(of course, doubtful). What is left of the solution means :

X (10+ R-+ 4) -57

or19

A proof by the rule of three

112010 12

1 :120:: 15

1 :120:: 4:30

reverse,

ii. The example, which is continued on 52 verso, may beexpressed by x (1- z) (1 - (I --- ')-x-280, whence x=400. A

proof follows : 400 x n =200 and 400--200=200; 200-50=150;

150-30-120: and 400-120-280

Again, 2+ 4(1- I)+(I ..- 4)(1_2)=2+ R+ -1.

A-9

29 a, b c recto. The problem and its solution here partly

preserved may be represented as

x, +.v2= 13: xa+x.; -14: x,-! x, -15.

If x1=5, then x', =8, x'3=6, and hence r'.,+x, -5-1 6=11. From

this, the correct value would be

x,=5+(15- 11)-2-'whence x%=6 and x3=8.

Page 102: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Problems 117

The phrase "shodhayet kramat" recurs in the next example

and is a quotation from .a lost sutra.

29 d, b, c. verso. The example here given (continued on folio

27 verso) is formulated with exactly the same phraseology as the

previous one. It may be represented by :

xi+x'= 16; x2+x3 =17; x3+x4 =18; x4+xs = 19 and xa A-xl =20.if xl=10, then xa=6; x3= 11; x4=7; xa=12 and x'5-I-x'1-22

Therefore, the correct value of x1=10- (22- 20)+2= 9, andthenx2=7,x8=10,x4=8 and x6=11.

The phrases "icchu' and "shodhayet kramat" are quotationsfrom a lost sutra.

A-10

27 verso gives the answer of the problem given on folio 29verso, namely x1= 9, xa = 7, xs = 10, x1- 8, .rz =1 I and the sums ofthe pairs of 16, 17, 18, 19. 20.

27 recto. Solution of a lost problem which may have boonxy- 3x -4y± 1=0, of which solutions are :

x_3.41 1+4=15;y=3+1=4; x=4+1=5; y =3.i+1+3-16.

The quotations are from a sutra very much like the onethat follows. The phrase "prathak rupam vinikshipya" 'havingadded unity in each case', appears to be a quotation from a lostsutra.

A-11

The example is solved on 1 verso and 2 recto and appears tohave been somewhat as follows :

The combined dapitals of five merchants less one-half of thatof'the fifth is equal to the cost of a jewel. Find that cost ofthe jewel and the capital of each merchant. I .

A 11. 1 verso. This appears to give part of the solution and proofsdr tihb' question on 1 verso.

Page 103: The Bakhshali Manuscript

88 tIakhshali Manuscript

Then follows 'proof' which may be expressed by

90+80+75+72=317 and 317+1,2,°=377

120+80+75+72=347 and 347+90-377.

120+90+75+72=357 and 357+840-377.

120+90+80+72=362 and 362+75 =377.

120{-90+801-75=365 and 365+°9 =317.

Compair with sutra I I on I recto.

A 12

A 12.2 recto This appears to be another 'verification' of theexample on 1 recto et verso; and means :

-80-7-75+72=377.l3°+901

120+ '+80+75+72=377,

120+90+80+ a6 +72- 377.

120+90+80+75-} a = 377.

and this is the measure of the price of the jewel'.

A 13

A 13. Example : One possesses 7 horses (a°=asva), another9 horses (ha°=haya) and a third 10 camels (u°=ushtra). Eachgives one of his animals to both the others and then their possessionsare of equal value. It is required to find the capital of each mer-chant or the price of each animal, if thou art able, solve me thisriddle.

B1 i

B 1.8 verso. i. The sutra is partially reconstructed from thequotations in the solutions below.

ii. The example is : There are ten horses of which five areyoked at a time to the chariot. How many changes should therebe in a journey of one hundred yojanas and how much will eachhorse do ?

The solution is 110F0=10 stages and 10x5-50. Mahaviragives a similar example (vi, 158).

Page 104: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Problems $9

"ravi-ratha-turagas sapta hi chatvaro'sva vahant dhuryuktnliyojana-saptati=gatyah ko vyudhah ko chaturyogah". It is well knowntL at the horses of the Sun's chariot are seven. Four horses are yokedat a time. they have to perform a journey of 70 yojanas. Ilowmany times are they unyoked and how many times yoked ?

B2"For a certain feast one Brahman is invited on the first day,

and on every succeeding day one more Brahman is invited. Foranother feast, 10 Brahmans are invited on every day. In how manydays will their numbers be equal; and how many Brahmans wereInvited ? The use of the term labdham is here rather curious. Thephrases labdhan: dvigunitam kritva, tathadvyunam, uttarain vibhajitua!and rupadhikam are probably quotations from a sutra.

B 2. 9 verso. The example probably meant : A and B startfor a place 70 yojanas distant. A travelled at the rate of 1 yojanaa day and B at the rate of 6. At what point on his return journeydid B meet A ?

Since, 12-706-x , where x is the distance traversed by A,

we have x= 270 x=20 as given in the text, and since A travels6+1at the rate of one yojana a day, this is also the time.

Proof by the 'rule of three'.

1 day : 6 yo° :: 20 days : 120 yon, and 70-20=50 and70+50=120. Also 1 day : 1 yo° :: 20 days : 20 yoe.

B4B 4. i. One goes at the rate of 5 yojanas for 7 days and then

a second starts at the rate of 9 yojanas a day. When will they havetraversed eqnal distances ?

The phrase gatisyaiva vishesam ca is a quotation from sutra 15(folio 3 recto) and purva gala. is a reference to the same rule.

The solution is t=9.5

- 45 days. 'Proof by the rule of three

55 175 35 315_ 1751 :: 5 :. 5 : 4and 1 : 9 :. 4 . 4 -. -4 = 35

Page 105: The Bakhshali Manuscript

90 Bakhshali Manuscript

Qne travels at the rate of 18 yojanas in one day for a period of 8

days. A second goes at the rate of 25 yojanas in one day. Deter-

mine in what time......

D5

D 4 With some uncertainty :

A earns 33 drammas in 2 days, B earns 2p in 3 days. A gives B7

drammas and this makes their possessions equal. How long

had they been earning ?

Since,

days.33

t-7 = 2 '+7. we have t =.14 = 168

=3

15112

3_811

And 3 days : 24. drammas:: iii days :294

drammas and

294 77 140 77 14011 l1 - l1 + 11 days drammas

ii. Another example of the same kind.

D6

D 6. 67 recto. i. The example seems to relate to a game atwhich a certain quantity was staked and eventually all lost. The

statement means,

V .7(5+4. -)))=Is-1-4- (2-f I (3-+(3+12 (4+

E1i

E 1. The problem may have been something like this : The

rates of purchage are one, two, three, four and six articles for one

drama.

The cost of one of each would be 1+1+It+H4==p, thereforethe cost of 12 of each is 27 drammas, and the numbers of articles

are 12, 6, 4, 3 and 2.

Page 106: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Problems 91

E253 recto. The following conjectural restoration of the problem

is offered :

One goes 11 yojana in a day and 'another 6 in 3 days. If thefirst had a start of 9 yojanas, when would the second overtake him ?

53 verso. The following is.merely a guess at the problem :One goes 18 yojanas in 96 days and another 27 yojanas in 108 days.The first starts from A and the second from B and the distance Altis 9 yojanas. When will they meet if they go only for 1"V (or 35ghatikas) of each day ? (60 ghatikas = 24 hours).

E358 verso. There is basis for the following restoration- A man

earns 3 in one day, a young woman I in one day and..... i In oneday. If 20 earn 20 mandas in one, let x, y, z be the numbers ofeach class. Then, x--y±z=20 individuals :

3x+ 3y + Z = 20 mandas

of which the only solution in positive integers is that given in thetext, namely x = 2, y = 5 and z = 13. This problem is known at theHundred liens problem in China, and as the Requla Virginum, etc.in Europe.

F1F 1.22 verso I. This appears to be the beginning of a now

section. This sutra is lost.

The problem was something like this : A certain amount givento the first, twice that to the second, thrice it to the third, and fourtimes to the fourth. State the amount given to the first and theshares of the others, if the total amount given was 200.

The shares are represented by 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 'Having added oneto the nought' the sum is 1+2+3+4= 10. Then the proper shareof the first is 1T °a° = 20. Having added in this value the seriesbecomes 20+40+60+80=200. The proof by the rupona method

gives (4 -1) '0+2014-200.

Page 107: The Bakhshali Manuscript

92 Bakhshali Manuscript

_ For the meathod of solution, the regula falsi, see Part I. Sec.71 and 72, and for the rupona method see Sec.73. The whole section isdealt with in Sec. 87, and the use of the symbol for nought in Sec.60. (Kaye)

ii. The sutra beings. "Put what number you please in theempty place (or for the nought)." This is quoted on folio 23 rectoand so is tada vargarn to karayet, etc.

F2

F 22, 23 recto. The example may be represented by x+2T1+3Ta+4T,=132, where T1, Ta, etc. represent the values of thefirst, second etc. terms. Make x= 1, then the terms are 1+24 6+244= 33 and the proper value of C is 1,31 = 4 and the series becomes4+8+24+96 =132.

All the technical terms here employed Ere of interest : ichchhaan assumed number'; varga a aeries; prakshepa' something thrownin' or an interpolation'; vartya 'cancelled'; drsya the given number'etc.

ii. The term karnika (wrfm) is practically synonymous withichchha or yadrichchha' that you please. For an assumed number,Bhaskara uses ishta much in the same way. A good deal of thesutra is quoted on folio 2, 23 verso.

23 verso. i. The example may be represented by x = 2T1+ 3(T1+Ta) +4 (T1+Ta+T3)= 300. Put x=1, then the series becomes1+2+9+48 = 60 and the proper value of x is v°s" = 5 and we haveT1=5, Ta=10, Ts= 45, T4=240 and total T= 300.

ii. The example is solved on folio 24 recto.

F3e

F 3. 24 recto. The example may be represented by x (1+14)+ 2T1 + 21 x + 37' + 33 x +4T3+4gx=144 : Set x=1 and theseries becomes :

5 15 52 217 289 1

2 + 2 + 2+ 2 2 - = 1442 which is the same as the

given sum and therefore x=1 is correct.

Page 108: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Problems t)3

24 verso. i. The example may be represented by

x (1+1?) + 2T, -14x+3 (T1+T2) + 3x+4 (Ti+Ta T,)+r-x= 222.

Set x=1 and the series becomes 2 + 15 + 2? + 222 1'lu

same quotation shunya sthane.. rupam datva occurs on folio 25 verso,See also at the bottom of folio 26 recto.

F 4.

F 4. 25 recto. The example may be represented by x (1+:I)+2T1-cx-1-3 (Ti+Ta)-3x--4 (Tl-f Ta+T,)-- x=78. Set X-1and the series became $ } i+ a + 43 =1-6 and x= 1.

25 verso. An example, of which only the solution remains.'

ii. The example of which the solution is given on folio 26recto.

F 5.

F5.29 recto. i. This is the solution of the example given titthe bottom of folio 24 verso. Let x=1, then the series become"$+$+3+ q = v and the correct value of x is y =1,

G1.

G 1. 10 verso. i. Gives further proofs of the example on theobverse, namely

1 (1-3) (1-s) (1 - )=32, hence x1=108;

then two proportions in words and figures 287 108 : 32 anda : 33 :: 32:108.

ii. Example-Of iron or ce refined three-tenths is lost. What isthe remainder of twice seventy, tell me, 0' Pandit ? The loss onunity is T& and the remaineder is Ia. The original quantity is 140

and is of 140=98. The loss is therefore, 42 and 98+42=140.Proof. 1 :: 98 : 140

Continued on fol. ii. recto.

iii. The example may be rendered :

Page 109: The Bakhshali Manuscript

94 Bakhshall Manuscript

The third part of the burnt bronze in three instalments (is lost).The amount given was one-hundred and eight. State the remainder,0' Pandit.

The solution according to the rule gives

108 (1- %) (1-1) (1-Wi) = 32. -But proceeding by steps ' 0e = 36 andthe remainder is 72; 11 = 24 and the remainder is 48; 48= 16 and theremainder is 32.

The proof may be represented by

_ 32xi (1-1/3) (1-1/3) (1-1/3)

G. 2

ii. Example-In purchasing one and a half palas the loss is one-third. State what would be the loss on eighteen. Since U1/,3= 9,, theloss on unity, the remainder is g. Now n of 18 = 14 and the lossis 4.

Proof by the rule of three 18 : 4 and 3 : 1g :: 4 : 18

Example-In refining bronze there is a loss of one-fourth.

What would be the loss on 500 suvarnas four times refined?

The solution is lost. It amounted to

500 (1-1) (t-1) (1-1) (1-{) = 158su°64

- 158 su°+1 F; too

(Since 5 tolas =1 Suvarna)

(11 rcrso.) This appears to have contained five proofs of theexample on the obverse, for the present third proof is designated,the fourth'. The proofs are-

i. Missing.

ii. x1(1-;) (1-1) (1-1)=158 su°+11-4 too,

iii.

therefore, xl = 500.

500(1-1) (1-4) (1-1)=x' and x=158 su°+18s too

iv. xl - (158 su°+ 11: to°)/(1-1) (1- 3) (1-1) and x1= 500.

Page 110: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Problems Ts

v. The first basis is540 su° - 125 su° and remainder itt

375 su°. The second loss is 345 su° = 93su°+ 3 to° + 9 masha (sin u

12 mao=1 to°) and remainder is 281; su°. The third loss is 281114-

70.r$,; and the remainder is 21018. The fourth loss is 210,%/4,

521764

and the remainder is 15813

G. 3.

The example may be conjecturally restored : A traveller goeson a journey of 4 gavyutis and takes with him 4 prasthas of wine.After each gavyuti he drinks 1 prastha and then fills up his bottlewith water. How much wine and how much water will there be atthe end of his journey ?

G. 3. (12 verso). The solution of the example on the obverseis now done by steps. The original amount of 4 prasthas is express-ed in kudavas. namely 16.

Kudavas ofwine drunk

Kudavas ofwine left

Kudavas ofwater

Originally 0 16 0

After first gavyuti 4 12 4

After second gavyuti 1 - 3 9 7

After third gavyuti 1=24 6 9;

After fourth gavyuti ; x }= 2r IV 541 10-34

G 3. 12 verso and 13 recto. Kumkum was purchased,for 8,and at each toll office the toll'was paid one-fourth. There were fourtoll-offices, calculate the total toll paid, and the Kumkum left,O' Pandit.

Solution : i. 8 x ; e 6, and 2 is paid as the first toll.

ii. 6 (6 -4) a 43i and the second toll is 18.

iii. 4g (1-1) = a - 38, and the third toll is 1 .

iv. 38 (1- 11-tsi-2g1, and the fourth toll is ai.

Page 111: The Bakhshali Manuscript

96 Bakhshali Manuscript

The total toll paid is :

-2+lW-Ig+2'-s3 (64+48±36+27)- a6 =537.

8-515 =32 - 232'

G4.

G 4. (13 recto). i. Here are four 'proofs' of the example given

on folio 12 verso.

(a) 8(1_1 ) (l-h) (1 )

(c) 8(1 -) (1-;) (1-4) (1-;)=s4

(d) x1=81 /32_ __ whence xt = 8(1-) (1-l) (1-i) (1-a)

ii. There is a quantity of molasses weighing eigut bharakas.What will be left after giving away one-third, one-sixth and one-fifth.

8(I-s) (1-4) (1.r6)= a =3v

iii. Example-By a gain of five-fourth, ten dronas are obtainedLet it be said. 0 best calculators, what will be the gain by threetransactions.

Here the term labha seems to have meaning "capital profit",what is termed the mixed quantity' misraka on folio 62.

(b) xi (1-4) (1-;) (1-4) = 19$3 dro°-19 dro°+2a°+0 pra° -l- 2 ku° whence x1= 10.

The conversion table of capacity measures is given in folio 13 asfollows (marked with asteriks) :

4 adhakas (a°) = 1 drona (dro°)

4 prasthas (pra°) = 1 adhaka

4 kudava (ku°) - 1 prastha.

ii. Example-The capital of a certain banker is sixty, Onehalf of it goes in loss and then he gains by one-third; next he loses

Page 112: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Examples 9'/

one-fourth of it and finally gains one-fifth; so that he has twogains. What is his gain and what is his loss and what-the remain-der and let that be stated.

Solution : 60 (1-;) (1-i) (1+s) (1-1-4)=36.

Proofs : (a) x1=36

(1-3) (1+s) (l+3)whence x1= 60.

(b) 60(l-4.)(l+4) ,l-4.) (1+a)=36.(c) xl (1-fi) (1+a) (l-3) (1+4.)=36.

whence x1= 60.

G-5

G S. ii. Example-A known amount of molasses equal tofour is increased by one-third, one-fourth, one-fifth, one-sixth andthen forty is lost.

No solution is preserved.

G 5. (14 verso). i. Example-An unknown quantity of lapis-lazuli loses one-third, one-fourth, and one-fifth, and the remainderafter the three-fold operation on the original quantity is twentyseven. State what the total was, 0 wise one, and also tell me theloss.

Solution 1-1-73; 27.:-.53-45 and 45-27-18and this is the loss.

The meaning of ambha-loha, lapis-lazuli, was suggested byDr. Hoernle.

ii. Example-Of the loss of iron the third is one-fit th of amasha. The original quantity is not known and neither is theremainder given but only the original remainder which quantitystands as twenty. Tell me what is the unknown, original quantityand what is the remainder.

The interpretation, however, is by no means certain. Thesolution is lost.12

Page 113: The Bakhshali Manuscript

gakhshali Manuscript

G-7

ii. Example-Of a ghataka of honey two-third is given, tothe second two-fifth; to the third two-sevenths; to the fourth two-ninths, till only three palas are left). 0' Pandit, state how muchaltogether was taken away by the tax collector.

H-i

H 1. ii. Rule : Having multiplied the parts of gold with theksaya let this sum be divided by the sum of the parts of gold. Theresult is the average ksaya. This means :

J 3 fig1+f282 + +fngn8i+82+...+8n

where f denotes ksaya and g gold.

iii. Example-f1=1, f= 2, f3=3, f4=4, and gi =1, ga= 2,93 - 3, 94 =4, therefore,

f 1.1+2.2+3.3+44 = 30_3s

1+2+3+4 10-

H2

H2. ii. Example-Gold one, two, three, four; abandoned,the following mashakas one-half, one-third, one-fourth, andone-fifth.

I

F. _ 163 163

1+2+3+4 60+10=

600

Proof by the rule of three g : fg :: gr : grF.

H 3.

H3. ii. Example-Mashakas of one and two, gold of two andfive, mashkas of three and gold unknown. All that is known is thesum of mashakas. six; and the average mashakas four. State themashaka of the unknown gold.

Statement : f, -1, fs- 2,fs a 3; gl o 2, g5 .5, 8a=xi F= 4

Page 114: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Problems 99

4.6-(2.l+5.2) 24-2-10 24-12 12Solution . - 3_____ - 3 -- - _3- 3 = 4

J 1.U

J 1. Example-If a man requires six drammas for his livel-hood for 30 days, for how many dais will 70 men (guards of a fort)live on six drammas ? The details are, however, uncertain.

K 1.

K 1. i. Example-What number with five added is a squareand that same number w'th seven substracted also being a square ?What is that cumber ? is the question.Statement : x+5=s2, x-7=t2

-i-7)Solution : x= C

1

2( (5-

2 -2)1a+7=11.;

by ssteps thus

Having combined the added and subtracted number 5+7=12 :that halved =6; two substracted 4; halved 2; squared 4; then thatsubtractive number (7) is to be added and by the addition of this4+7=11; and this is the required quantity.

Proof : 11+5=42, 11-7=22For such problems, if x+a=sa and x-b=t2, then the solution is,

l la

x=[2\ac -c)] +b.

L 1.

L 1. iii. Example-In two days one earns five; in three dtyshe consumes nine. His store is thirty. In what time will his earn-ings be consumed ?

Solution : t= °30=60 and the amount earned in this time is 2S-11

of 60.150 dinaras.

iii. Example-In three days one Pandit earns a wage of five

and a second wise man earns six (rnsa) in five days. The secondis given by the first seven from his store and I y this giving theirpossessions become equal. Let it be stttited in what time,

Page 115: The Bakhshali Manuscript

100 Bakhshali Manuscript

Solution : t- o"e30.3_65

L 2.

Profit and loss.

The author gives a number of solved examples on problemsconcerning profit and loss. The following rules are given withillustrative examples :

[ Let C be the capital, p the profit, M= C-}- p, N- Cc, thenumber of articles, C the cost rate, and s the sa'e rate, C = alb,where a is the number purchased for b drammas (but money mea-sures are not generally stated), and s=C/d, where C is sold for dmoney. ]

(i) C= p (ii) p=Ccs -Cc-1

S

(iii) C - M= Cc

p;

(iv) C= 1- cS s s

L 2. ii. Example-Two Rajputs are the servants of a king.The wages of one are two and one-sixth a day, of the second oneand one-half. The first gives to the second ten dinaras. Calculateand tell me quickly in what time there will be equality. (IndianAntiquary), 1881, p. 44).

Statement : 'as, , given 10.

Solution : The difference of the daily earnings.

ee-;j=g dinaras.Therefore, a difference of 20 dinaras would be in 30 days.

L 2. 6 verso, i. Proof of example on the obverse-

1 : a :: 30 : 65.1 : it :: 3045 and 65-10=45+10.

ii. The rule rr.eans, C. cp , where C is the capital, p the

sprofit, C is cost rate and s is sale rate.

Page 116: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Problems 101

iii. Example-One buys 7 for 2 and sells 6 for three find I

s his profit. What was his capital 7

Solution : C= 7 186 =24. The proof is given on folio2-t- 3-I

62 recto.L 3.

iii Example-Eight articles are obtained for three and tripare sold for four. The sum of the capital and profit is c me-hundu dand sixty. State, 0' best of calculators, what was the capital andwhat is the profit.

The solution is lost except for the first quotation, but part ofa proof is given on folio 63, recto. The solution was,

C = 160=90. Since C= p - "p --

16 8 6 169 3 / 4-1 9 -1

9

p=; C and C+p=160, and the number of articles boughtwas s of 90 = 240.

L 4.

iii. Example-With five four-squared are obtained by son-cman. For one-six are sold and fifty-six is the loss. Calculatingpurchase and sale let his capiteal be stated.

The solution is C= 5616 = 120 and the number of articles

I 30is s of 120=384.

L 4. recto. i. Proof of example given on folio 62 verso.8:3::240:90 and 6:4::240:160 and 160=90+70.

ii. The rule means C= c , where 1 is the loss sustained,1-

S

i e. having investigated the selling rate multiply with the purchaserate and having subtracted from unity divide and the capital it}Pbtaine4.

Page 117: The Bakhshali Manuscript

102 Bakhshali Manuscript

L 4. 63 verso. Proof of example on the obverse :

s:1::384:120 then with the selling rate 6:1:384:64 and 120 - 64= 56.

ii. Rule-That whieh is the tax on cloth is taken in cloththe tax on a piece of cloth is one-twentieth part.

Some one sells three-hundred. On the pieces being broughtto market, two pieces are taken by way of tax : ten is (?) theselling price. What is the value ?

M L

M I. 20 verso. i. A mere fragment : 12,000 mudrikas...

ii. Example-A snake eighteen hastas long enters its hole atthe rate of one-half plus one-ninth; of that, minus one-twenty firstpart of an angula a day. In what time will it have completelyentered its hole ?

Solution : Since 24 angulas =I hasta, we have s+ V of TI- TIT:ggu :: 18 x 24 : x, whence x =' = 2 years 4 months 10II days.

M 2.

M 3. 38 recto. i. Example-The earning of dinaras is difficultbut consuming them is easy. One gives one-half increased by ratioon one-half (six times) for food for the poor. What is the amountconsumed in 108 days ?

Solution : 1 : 108:1 di°+8dba°-{-lam° i e. 1:(4)°:: 108 : I dio+ 8 dha+1 am° and 4 amsas°=1 dhanaka° and 12dhanaka°=1 dinara°.

ii. Example-(This is not understood, but appears to refer tothe number of hairs on the skin of an animal).

M3M 3. i. A mutilated example about Ravana and Sita. When

Sita had been carried up 30 yojanas into the air she dropped some-thing to earth, which turned over 8 times in lia dhanusha Howwany revolutions did it make before reaching the earth ?

(1 yojana = 8000 dhanusha )

Page 118: The Bakhshali Manuscript

t'roblems 10k

Solution : dha° : 8 revolutions

30 x 8,000 dhanusha :: 210, 181, 181,", revolutions.

ii. Example - A snake which is 100 yojanas, 6 krosas, 3 hast.o.

aid 5 hastas and 5 angulas long sheds its skin at the-rate of 1 anl;n l ,

in 2 days. In what time will it be free. ?

The solution is given (?) on the reverse.

30 verso. i.} 1 an° : 2 d° :: 100 yo°:+6kr°+3 ha°-} 511n"

429,867 years I month and 4 years,

or 1 : 2 :: 77, 376, 077an° : 154752154

360years.

ii. An example about some garment falling to the earth. '1 heelements are uncertain. Compare with - the problem on tlic

obverse (1).M 4.

M 4. 36 recto. i. "This land measurement is completed" mayrefer to the fragmentary example at the bottom of folio 32 vclnlobut it is doubtful.

ii. The example appears to refer to heaps of salt. If oneheap or quantity weighs 1,075 palas bow much will 56 beupnweigh ?

or

1 : 1075 :: 56 : 30 bha° + 200 pn°

1075 x 56 __ 60200bbara=30 bha°-{-200 pa°.

200 2000

iii. One-tenth of a cowry is givea in eighty eight ...of this onetwenilleth and one-hundredth...

36 verso. i. The statement means 3 yo° : 1 day :: 5 ,yo° n21, 333 years 4 months,

or 3yo° : s8a years :: 5 x 4,608,000 yo° : 21.333 years 4 months.

5 x 4, 608,0003X360 ' 3'

ii. A boat goes one-half of a third of a yojana plus one-thirdlcss one quarter, I of 1+,'-J, yojana in one-half of one-third of a

Page 119: The Bakhshali Manuscript

104 Bakhshali Manuscript

day, but then it is driven back by the wind one-half of one-fifth ofa yojana, , of s yo°, in one eight of three days. In what tirre millit travel one hundred and eight yojana.

108I year 3 months 12; days

0of the question and the solution are not clear.

M 5.

M 5. 34 recto. i. The problem is ; Eleven birds feed onprasriti (handful) of corn; how many can feed on 8 Kharis of corn ?It ends '-Say, 0' friend, say what are the Khagas, 0' Sundari.

If this be correct, the same Sundari, "beautiful one" is used inexactly the same way as Lilavati is used by Bhaskara.

The solution is 1 pra° : 11 Kha° :: 8 khai : 63,360 khagaswhich would make 720 prasriti I khari; but there are many elementsof doubt and the application of esha hahu pramanam to this particularproblem is not clear.

ii. By certain persons one kala plus one pada and one yavaare given in gold daily at the shrine of Shulin. What would be theamount of the gift in five years, five months and fifteen days... Idesire to know that.

Solution- I day : 1 yo° + 1 ka° + 1 pa ° :: 5 years, 5 months15 days : x.

or 1 day ; 30 paV ;; 1 965 da 1965 x 30lty ;,

=12 tola°+3 dha°+144 am°.

ao192 x 25

Sec Part 1, Sec. Ill (Kaye for measures of weight)

ii. The problem is about a diamond weighing IIT mashaka, andobtained for 7 55 satera.

The statement means 1i ku°+ ma°, 55 sa°, and indicatesthat 128 ma°= I ku°= I and that 40 si°= I ma°. See part Ill(Kaye).

Page 120: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Problems ION

M 6.

M 6. 37 recto. i. The question may be roughly restored : t lie

Sun (Surya) traverses 500,000,000 yojanas in a day. State withcertainty the amount of the journey of the Sun (Divakara) In it

ghatika.

60 ghatika = l day = 30 muhurta.

The statement means 30 mu° : 500,000,000 yo° : I gha° : 83.333, 333$ yo° and it indicates that 2 ghatika= l muhurta (=>f , of itday). The origin of the length of the daily journey of the Sun, namely500,000,000 yojanas, is not known.

ii. The chariot of the Sun (Bhanu) is surrounded by the groupsof Gods, great snakes, Siddhas and Vidyadharas. In a day andnight, its journey is said to be half a hundred kotis. Tell me, 0 beatof calculators, how much in one muhurta ?

1 day=30 mu°

30 mu° : 500,000,000 :: 2 gha° : 16,666, 6661 yo°.

57 verso. i. The remnant of a problem possibly related to thedaily motion of Jupiter, which according to the Surya Siddhantoamounted to very nearly 5 minutes of arc (lipta).

ii. If Bhanuja (Saturn) moves through a sign in two and ithalf years, state, 0 knower of the truth, what will its motion in ita solar day be equal to (1 sign= 30°=108(00") ? The soluticn is 2byears : 1 sign : : d degree : x

x=1 sign x s8° degrees2J years

= 30 x5 x60 x

36060 x 2 9108.00000=120"

= 2 minutes.

Is

of arc (not 2 seconds as stated in the text, where vilipta appears tohave been written by mistake for lipta) The terms employed areall orthodox except perhaps vasara for solar day, but its special tisois quite intelligible.

14

Page 121: The Bakhshali Manuscript

106 Bakhshali Manuscript

. M 7.

M 7. 47, recto. i. This appears to Partha, the Mahabharatahero who pierced each soldier with 16 (1-q) (1+;) arrows andslew four divisions of the army. How many arrows did he use ?

I si° :: 16 (1-1s) (1+1 :: 4 :x;21,870:2,624,40)

The abbreviation si°=?; a°=anikini. See Part I. See 52Kaye).

There is a very similar example about Partha in the Lilavati(67) which has already been quoted (Part I, 47 recto).

i. Apparently, 3 chamus= l pritana; 3 pritanas= l anikini and10 anikinis= 1 akshauhini. The statement means that a Patticonsists of ratha+ I gaja+5 nara+3 turaga i. e., 1 elephant+5 footsoldiers- 3 horsemen) and that an akshauhini contains 3.710 of eachof these, namely-

1 x 37 chariots= 21,870 chariots (ratha).

10 x 37 elephants- 21,870 elephants (gaja).

5 x lOx37 footmen- 109,350 footmen (nara).

3 x 10 x 37 horsemen= 65,610 horsemen (baya).

Total 218, 700

Albiruni gives the following scheme :-

Each akshauhini has 10 anikini

anikini 3 chamu.

chamu 3 pritana.

pritana 3 vahini.

vahini 3 guna.guna 3 gulma.

gulma 3 senamukha.

senamukha 3 patti.

patti 1 ratha.

Page 122: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Problems 1 07

M 10.

M 10. 55 verso. If tola costs thirty-five drammas (dro), whistwill be the price of one and a half tolas, one and a half mashakas andone and a half andikas and one and a half yavas.

1 tola = 12 mashakas; 1 mashaha = 4 andi =16 yava.

17 to°+1"9 ma°+17 an°+1, ya°=3197 ya°.

Statement - (i) 1 to° : 35 dr° :: 17 to°+17 ma°+17 an°

+17 Ya° : 58192

or761

1:35 :: 31911/192 : 58192

dr°

M 11.

Example-One produces ten and a half in to and one-thirddays. For the sake of religion, he gives thirteen and one-third Inthree and one-eight days; be offers for Vasudeva one-quarter letsthan thirteen in eight and a half days. Desiring reward in a futureworld he gives i.e. 12- to Brabmanas for food, one-third in three andone-fifth days......... (two and a quarter in five days.......(cowd.

on M 12).

M 12.

M 2. 43 recto. and also twelve and a half in thirty-three andone-third days for the best wine for the consumption of merchants.In the treasure house is stored twelve hundred. Say, 0 Pandit, bowlong can this expenditure continue. The statement means=

Daily income= 2'1 = 2 .s

Daily expenditure=13g + $ +3s +! {- 3g

2; 127 1807

+ 5 +334 = 24

Page 123: The Bakhshali Manuscript

108 Bakhshali Manuscript

1807 9 727The daily loss is, therefore, X40 - 2

=240

and

727. 1::1200:x240

where x the period.

120 1x=-1-270X366

years= 727 years.

240

M 14.

50 recto. At the top of this page is the remnant of a problem.too broken up to make out. The rest of the page is devoted to whatappears to be a colophon. This is not all clear but what remainsseems to state that the work was written by a certain Brahman, aprince of calculators, the son of Chhajaka. It also refers to theimportance of the science of calculation which, it is said, we owe to' hivo

Page 124: The Bakhshali Manuscript

The Bakhshali TextTransliterated in Devanagari Script

Page 125: The Bakhshali Manuscript

INDEXThe Bodleian Library Order of the Folks

r = recto, v = verso

Al 40ar, 39ar, 38br, E4 21r, 21v40av, 39av, 38bv E5 22r

A2 39r, 4Cr, 38r, Fl 22v39v, 40v, 38v. F2 23r, 23v

A3 40r, 39r, 38r, F3 24r, 24v40v, 39v, 38v. F4 25r, 25v

A4 54v, 54r F5 26r

A5 35r, 35v F6 26vA6 51 r, 51v, 35v G1 10r, 10vA7 51r, 51v G2 llr, llvA8 52r, 52v G3 12r, 12vA9 29r, 29v G4 13r, 13v

Al0 27v, 29v G5 14r, 14v27r, 29r G6 15v, 15r

All lr, lv G7 16rA12 2r, 2v H1 16v

A13 3v, 3r H2 17r, 17vBI 8r, 8v H3 18r, 18vB2 9r, 9v J1 30r. 30vB3 7v J2 65r

B4 4r, 4v J3 41r, 41vCl 5r, 5v K 59r

C2 6r. 6v L1 60r. 60vC3 7r L2 61r, 61vC4 65v L3 62r, 62vC5 56v, 56r L4 63r, 63vC6 64r M1 20r, 20vCl 57v, 57r M2 33v, 33rC8 45r, 45v M3 32r, 32vC4 46r M4 36r, 36vD1 46v M5 34r, 34v

70 (a, b, c)r M6 37r 37vD2 70 (a,b,c,) v M7 47v, 47rD3 69r 69v M8 48v48rDD4

,68r M9

,49v, 49r

D5 31r M10 55r, 55vD6 67v, 67r M11 44v. 44rD7 28r M12 43r, 43vEl 66r, 66v M13 42r, 42vE2 53r, 53v M14 50v, 50rE3 58r, 58v

Page 126: The Bakhshali Manuscript

(40a recto, 39a recto, 38b recto, 39b recto 40b verso, 39a verve

38b verso)

era a. Tr...9rrT 4-r iaagq-r...' 3 !ra-g4 4 t r urr+r-qa: ajQ-,zrrft...wr ai T fur a r r

q}ar rt fa-ft? s6 i a;Eu FT; writ i

OgVT fiqrq fWq i

900

XR" ra I via...... oo q ...

...mod cTTi` mm I qv qq qr fEr giiu srgt

...8rk T v4 qdOgTr I

ari aF63... r I f f rfw =Iu t r of t u r...ate... WM I ugqz l fm a;ir afz QRri tq$rr1ftwT'i t f4Ft i : 'cc ... c c ar°

q... 9 zxqt I o xrork arr wq, I q;...

A 2.

(39 recto, 40 recto, 38 recto. 39 verso, 40 verso, 38 verso)

...Iff ... srr agv'@rr z Ir zim aa4Tu...%n;ma4zr gya... iilirr f49fqV

asrgarr i acaTr u... ' zt wa'ir I ;rd fa'rlfq j%&;q srarfa ......

...tTq I...... loll qIT >;Ipzr ri Tr ... olkSoiRoolgoo qrt Qa1 R o o wcqq 4- rfsrta... o o ... I R o o

q0 9)e V

to

9 a o

Zo 1

q"+° Re o

Page 127: The Bakhshali Manuscript

(40 recto, 39 recto. 38 recto, 40 verso, 39 verso, 38 verse)

sag wfft Era: tT faf,4waw...

wz" rw f fdfafczr:

V

KM

k

x

k s

x

9k

p sr sr r

f r t i f afar f w or V ft f r o c f v

I q't l

9 ...f rdirt I arc* xt ii q fIt

a o arO era Sri ......x l I9 Iawqfk: p44d f rya sr tTii...9Zo ri 'q aTkrrawm

49 o -19 I VET Z I

9 2yr I IC

q ai4 ... o f o Atkq ift 10 fd 19 ... f

@o

go

Page 128: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( ' )

A4

(54 verso, 54 recto)

...f ap r r a 1algfq "a7f ik * 7;1 ...#ga;( i

gTrzrwfafq ... pft t T1 3rrzrq; DTIT aT: 11

qRuti ii :sir q;i ;T wizr 7aC [ AqT-rfq ErI'r i

;verairq

arar ( ahuf+rfa ... ar zimr:

9 i+ +9 9 9

9 P 9 9

"Fr v=rr ttAftr i as 3a-( =,rf r'..uni vri tc

(b) aa;l (t ... (c) ;3rrcf qcr sruxv r...

A5

(35 recto, 35 verso)

"° aiff R;rZ9rr i r n plT tit a6t:r

9X

ea f i I I f r uffu a9 II

air I I wqrrEi I

Page 129: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( ci )

A 6.

(51 recto, 51 verso, 35 verso)

trfrr f it i aa1 7 9 1 9 1 I I 1 9 fX 9

AI

ggr...ttr %Tr1 r rT 1 : II 19 I

fi9£ I I

Ig r I

I

1I >;a: Mr: U"+Tc

...

ru;T a it fz r;...qT ri fairM"' I

u

I o

Tr 11... I I .. uTzt 9 9 9 i<rQT $T

RftcZT qi: 19 19 1{ w fa MT o I I

8 X

9 9rTo I y ITa-

9 I ,c k... I

---9 g

y I g s o aTMo9

A o

9 9---9q0

Tft. I & X+ I a

A,7

(51 recto, 51 verso)

I 9 R 9

y i 9: 9 9

...,9111 Lrt r ciI...9

I-ac; Iirgr-0 %;g 'd11

11aT WrfW 4 19X1Uvd 0

(ii) 3gTo 11 qf$K zTzn w4 c1gwgmg; %T I

Page 130: The Bakhshali Manuscript

(9 )

Srsrr Srrti Sil A9 Wk 11

0 9 q

I q q

w;cum i avrz...aa'rwT ZrfBr rt u'T cos rrq girr c>Rrr wrW n

mar RvR*,.I %W I I I 14 I I aq I zft'T -m ar*T...rrr I

Sir it Srgr T wri II

RIcIc;1 0 r8TWO c'

A8.

(52 recto., 52 verso.)

(i)... Xo...ON `.I lll W;M :Tff ;F m " Wfff q `0 ... fqeipg rj/l

0 0q cZ 0 q

I9 9 019 q

q agr<o

9I

9kIq I q

j q 1RoI ? I$o

(ii) Taro II uwl FqRo erYbr .,-Fro I

tR 4M a'> rl, wM ...+ I,.t I

Page 131: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( )

arsfl nfi ' as f f It

... ma gm# BTaTrt qTi.... gT1i 1

9Ti' viTfa 9Xo adifq q vrrTr io II

qi o fq4v R r o 11

qs Wfc f r Quo 1 RG 8o o RioVo RC;

ijfb f rTci' 'woo qv %f 9rafa n

A 9.

(29 recto. 29 verso)

m ftr a t4 r " Re4r:fitzr *4 *F;T...a#pr

g4q;fr E...sw a t TT:

9A lit 9K9, 9 9

... a q ad-sm q -.-W. I k I a T stem...

...I 9 19 (9x9 9 4

w#vrfT I1 Vm RmE qw

... -- fir uifr vq;i

Page 132: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( A )

fir zr ut11T a orcQr 96:eve... ...

qJ- g q 'e@rrc? I

Rim asqtfw mm, 4 ft.. ...

91 199 19q I

Jyq

r n r . rat erg WRT ( aarf J c ...qtfqo Wr mqrk t9rqR go......

A 10.

( 27 verso, 29 verso, 27 recto, 29 recto )

......mar i garpwr #t5

$ sio s fire 9 ofao a ao 19 9 103fo}9ofdoC; a° I111°j£sro

off wccuq... J Rl 1191 9S1 jai go...qq t4a wrdc,

r r i 7q;k yr f PArm pq v! -vmdt as vp

V BTmt I I R I r-aI ...... r# qz;q v x I sra fo

w ix 9 I qfap ......aT ...... Pr:%o a l x I qq...

ii rft'**w gar a gamh vcRN R r-......

A 11

(1 recto, I verso )

(;)aura ...' ...... ...QS kII19 I

Page 133: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( 90

(ii) g Vq ? 141--T Ir utt: 11

urvr,gt" q ;r %1TI W I

fq,Tft M'rr fer-ft garb rt k i fkfQ: I I

q1t jal ii fr r tr* faafvr f r 1

!MJT 9 o II

(iii) r 1 ii atBrt f r mar- 1F aftd qvE I

... ,Trot as ACT irkir faf rR I1

(iv) II af4r%II41b fad fw: I

T dm i Owr-frl-m 41'f" Nam, vAq 1

arfd-T1gQI'v'm4 4ITN praII

......fi cffc R w q : t r i v r ffqk .mm

Uol4olgolo$I'43( arwr-www iRoiao1co fro fro co Leo

AoI 13 X1 1!j q ft FW WM it 3o Wft...W qq RkVI M 1

no #4; fowl 11

)4 (Ij q W.-.4o1 So) ' U l9Z att+r 393 R Ilf% I

31919sTemm jsrmmt I

r as 3V19 fir fW nit 3o qW id 31919

qq f Rr a# qq* I I

S;r srm fir To ;r... 3 Xo qm qT ' Z o If@1919gQiW'a'm tT;tIc'II

r f r 3%j Ix ITW

Id 31919 qq Tom 1wi r I

Page 134: The Bakhshali Manuscript

(.) ;K uiwfa u

am srq...c-# Rfie irl 419'3 ti

ark' ffftuzr

am I*qTq fwmk

qd 31919 fgzhqtq waft ii

0 11919 TftzRzr ErI wrfir

# A 1919 qvtq t aric 1

fq f Imq-4 0 g3q=Tfq @t9\9 I

grOn*A......

(ii) bra o 't a q's f4f r faq#...afatW VP[ I

fw ......

3+ @+ xf

9Z 9Z

9 9 t

w# arr......

Page 135: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( IR )

aief fail r fae otf 1 ..f u

9 I 19 9 I r gftaR 19 I u

...wry cl 19£- Aiw' TIT

CQ I ' I ul t grr f k...

stl 9o4% -Our vq '

A 13

(3 verso, 3 recto )

Mo 11 ...f RRtq aT1a: WZraar ;r'1uTr... qq;d a qVv#

gaw# g afW ri lp# ar QrfIIrrt WqnZ Oa avia ffd* f

#$rq: 1

l9 8ro I £o 3+o 9 oj I

Z 19 I qafaty r 'r fw ,c 1 f f qV 1 I l9 aw trmx fofii rrt 1

I

OM UrTMk W*

RlRmilmltmBEm r rr

(i) car ru r wr r M" 7 rrs

I trb to I cBrroI9 9 9

qit sr r c" "r 1$1 : e4 rQar gm 9151 9191 9 9 qq.

go 14 ($

Page 136: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( ¶ )

(ii) fadII r1i T TTfiT.. fir I

araff ErT=i zrraf fm wgfa IIr 7%frla ff T

V IV

(iii) rau a ;rfa ra frtq--a fag # ;rq;rr: M4ar wo %Tlffy car*dg II

(iv) 3ii.To 11 BRSZ i' zT a 0 vra ... ........

B 1.

(8 recto, 8 verso )

Vq faf f II

(ii) 3vTo II 44 wra X wfi r TrQT 1*

pt cad Trf fa IR :Ifi fw R4 rfa phvaq.

cad q W 1 kff q tITRdr4t II

arr 9 309 I

qr 0 I srfao

9,

W n vi I If r rfk...

[3cr rar r w{T3w] 3c"TT;r, ..

71T -

;pz ii qi arNT 'r f l'egzu t WWr;ro ;mw 00 T9a+r rq i9T+tt.

Me I I fmr1 z !RW wfwtvuk 1r r."dfi I 4 u?_imw . fqq5.

w o 9, I c ra

I 9 o ol

, f zr wrait caw pr I y o PTT + o I 9 0 0 13ft Y{m p

W-V 190 I M TfffiT" I y i 74qf +r WT?t n$Wasrmzr: ". No la #goq wr4 - fw rfa a rt1;T'fi asa...

* X o fur ?zr, h - ;Uqm;r?u

Page 137: The Bakhshali Manuscript

B2

(9 recto, 9 verso)

3vr- ri.. PRt f fr i;rli icw .sr " fZimt r r;[ i

trrrr X ;wFaFTrrgq R;fa f.xr x EFa 5r o

aro 9 3o q 4o 0 r'ro'Q' to

9 I 9 I q q

a i i q* f l 'R1 wc.r as W.-7 I I: o l I ,pr I o l q

9

3 r fawrfjagat I I I srka wear wr Atr rFI I cI I aT4 srv TT

Ar rrgwfwfa

f'm- arro ao 4o t4 rlln g',4 9a

ql q q 9

1o I Brio q

q q

zho q 0 I lt

w ma* a 1 9 I fa-qII

j waAa Ifur rr 5rrar9 r i q I

1

%3

fggqt I Zo Iarxr...art wra'*u: aria wraz-

- IrFa WNBT9 i -z Oafawr fr=rriri w i r ii

r r R Krffr a wcqir i 44 F m .1aar a.rf' mw f are

Fa i(szr Er aTd rfa 1 13a arr MIrS rw

gfkol g4tol-jofit, Q,o =r*oZol

: y q 9

Page 138: The Bakhshali Manuscript

ITTTo $ 30 11 qo o f r remit l9

t 9 9I

g, ...3TTf I I 19 I fa ,mar I Y I

mfaau 1 ;ant ( I aim mf I v I wo I ai 1

a<0 30 V qo @ 1R q q# o Z9 II9I 9I 9

. ftfsrRm...I 9 fqo I l9 I 1o q;, *o Q9 119 9 9

y9 Tb1gr WM II

(u) mo 11 aTTfi 3Ttfaa4 f di%r-qwd rrr 1

4' WOW f Rrt Em it qa 's I I

Iar0 309 9

I qo

9 I

fggr9

anfk fmAlsaT,......

B 4.

(4 recto 4 verso)

(;)...ate Qa 1: If'gTfa r ya IcT i 1 t#Ta aQ

R1ta ate""at

I9 RD a?o fag'' nc-rm mglrq $ to 9 fao alo9 9 9 9I 9 9

¶r*a Mm" ;rck 1 I11 ' >< , i Wh* 1 v i f4 (9 ( IRTY

Page 139: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( 9' )

X 4q qr z ...f fag er qa^t -sraf;w as *rqq it8

sr r rfsrak 9 zr) o x ..9 fao 9 V

fao 4 qtq o A Xq;o .. .

mo it armor r Z TWIT i NW zirfit i

cawn ft zr-r i

f 1zr qya f utiar f zrrfa i

akq wI* 8rfT Tr it

q0wtaera' q*f%rfafcaa gasfq u

(iii) a arr fd a a a i faBr 9: I

3cZt I R I fdr 19 ' siTF9 I wm 19 I I R I q9 Z 9 9r si r q T 3 *alafi-

r i 9 ffSfq fqk I ftwq 9,3 wTF=rfn)

(ii) r it a r i u l f r q f a u fazrrf r ;Fqrf r r

r u(iii) mo it Wk fdaaaaa f Lift .<: I

iaqvar*q 3r u

"tq+t fn* I1

Imo R 4 30 3 I qo o I fdo 3rro @ 30 qo 09 9 9 9 9 9

Page 140: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( 9'3 )

c 1.

(5 recto, 5 verso)

3TTo ( 30 Qo o9 9 9

8 1 T; 3 0 qo 091 t t

I aTrthfi*gw I anfa:..

z'zr igf iN c1 j, gf -wTOM,

fT97 I 10 TTY 19 3 Ar wT'..M WT I

Sr'cll9 1 ZQf T q' I C k *q qv*... ai =i' tJt 9 S IIl

(ii) II fir r r rTfk Tf ' f Ot c mw2br

uft frrf rTsc pi 'zr 'q t#NTI 'zlf8r

a a-( gfgrk #tr #ffWt NT

s t'rI rfra SO f txl r i

Is kr 4Lt

........... 3 o ... ffi T ; r g T f k z f t f ztr 0 4>;q

I Izfara i ICI gIa1FTkvrf#`t ...o I ... aTr w ur I cw I gQ 41cr tint ztfbr am

I ..T7 t r f w I 0 1 wzgjt 198o 13a3w rTt I it

gWa IioZVIarZT fem... IGLWtrrdIgol3..a...

C 2.

(6 recto, 6 verso)

(s) src 19 I I I ...k k 11

9 9 9

Page 141: The Bakhshali Manuscript

(it) o n aTrfa a'fifor ;R? *;lm naA I

fka'hrsrfaf i rtriaW R-4 4-A-b 1

3rro stl3o TO C sifa'rfa31fkq "t9 9 9 9 9

f' ;,... of *wq j @ k j I faa

as faa j arF X zf ' ..

(i) arkq r-uo j Sao qvar as EIW' Trfsr mar

ara I r, c; j" c 'rfa qair I W;ruft f& I

(ii)TM 11 aif c fc8 r 8 : aw 44: tm

Of63 efa I lift vrpr M: I

Ot4 fraur farraa f4Trfa=rr

(ii) ao Ra srfafaf ' J 1 T T cVc 8a

... 9 ` WPM Rrfaa:i 1 a......

03.

[7recto]

*m I VV 'fit 19**9 Tom II Xc; sty

raT' I A;[ Ifs artfi I XX41 j4 j j Vsv j

P "car 8%I fl't 1 l l WI*tot9

sr azrfhr r j 9 o

i9 9 y iE

Page 142: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( 94 ) .

I faa4 .. ... qla f aa j r l RC;

WK" n

C 4.

(65 verso)

3170 1130 I I qo

;1 '10

M -(* frfor' i ;4---4a i v c o I -MT TM far-T-

arfz t aTrf i aa'f i s zu i ardt uff t rrafI r

q* %Iffff i 9 r a fafmtx er i xcy i ir fqffc6 walr

Z9 ... q* I c;Z al'!Vo 80

C5.

[56 verso, 56 recto]

Isco I cg fara era 1cecIZo aearfzar g arai aqY 9cG

I 9rP9

qa ;w;awia I I "rr oJ

3r f'sfqarq*q 1ff aguriial 0 as 4frrsa:

dal fir--4 ur > r "

Page 143: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Ro )

R9 RIRTRo Woo ;.rr 9 #Fgglz: Ro

wffa...3ri9r ?1 kff 4 Emf z1T ...R

YZxoVR I Yoo

r6i.

[64 recto]

Vvdocd i...aTq

BoxRc;o YKYoov 8'JjT zrr9r + l

o 13wr ?U1. r"

trial I I ;rqt 3TTo9l3o9lgoc

it v9Iv

V9l3rrfafVI

4(..vc;

C 7.

(57 verso 57 recto)

...mita fr lfo flsa rrF' :4 ...faf4icq I y>;

Page 144: The Bakhshali Manuscript

WW.-ft McfOT...

lp: trtgT1 :Tip f s3 yr wg * ff"or: I

?ra r 3: fa- f - II

arm fps a rf 1?Qrii

9Z gvv

Rk q 19i fa eTzr : qtr Tmt II ff 4 ..gsxG 9rx

9 qtr 9T grfr r Zil M I$4gV a °t ar4q wnk rlC; Ysl

4c; x qz gq I1 aT(4 ST--Aa

fK II RTI zTfwr 1 it KrC! 'I-C 8.

(45 recto, 45 verso)

190RRk lafffaT 3Trfv c. r

'o 14txq°O I I 4 1

Waft gyafaM "'39YT:NRv3x

af81

gRZ,3xR00001 0000

... 01 R qq Q fi i I I

(ii)

13

10 9(ise9 9

9 0000

9 3E1 I tT ?>;IUW

q'ZfUT"'"r T '4Tffgff Wra. 199',a-1 a«r?AIT Tn4...zfbr vo arTB:$139 Z'{O)

Page 145: The Bakhshali Manuscript

It'34

lRX49 X9XX1oooo ZVI99Xc 191919jo19X0o 191919$019X00

Xt96

1VVcJifvgvXot;c;Yc; VXooo

VXOWqvWXgq

C9.

(46 recto. )

1?YAXtioxooo5c ...I ijtl94ojltooVYI 9XXYAt(ooo

brti q 99oGMZ$oZR I I

9'4X

f Q fivMooo I

*terlgra

IlWllit39 3 F grfr ;Wr rr 441,19M rrq"'

klPk$jGX1g%rl9Z%o 00000001 qrr"'19000

J*ooo0o0

D1

[ 46 verso ]

Rt I I...iSr Io wK sip: qra arr w q4%-

am g1rq... .. or r a? arr a i aq* at > at... aq...

arr"a1* aTprora'T rglift"" I *Ift a gfgq4

R ;qT......

Page 146: The Bakhshali Manuscript

[ 70 (a, b, c) recto, 70 (a, b, c), verso]

... ...9 9q3 .....

5( 190

Mro 11 !Rar...... M a 1 g afvrcr ftlAtmivlir

% lfa a:t

......w

V I

D 3

(69 recto, 69 verso )

q ....

Page 147: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( w )

agfk ;rt vt"m oaf acarr'rsr r rr as M t

ft drk q a'1flwr tea: 4mwu .....r

wrzm azrfer ; . Biro io o Rio do S89 t

...trri fr

...

d.. ...uTrf$r:l R RIO

9 c I 9

........R; a 10 x...

1o 11...fafr44, fnur Wa M-;r $ r

n.-.TM-5 11

19119

19lllml9-

I

q*Ql ;o I o o 4 l

rr sra fair 'ar Tq-Cq "'

9 9 9 (lo 9£0... Sao o 140 I l "r

D 4.

(68 .recto.)

...9C; qmI...%W g

,.. wr

-"qv# 94...i ...

.........! ...

Page 148: The Bakhshali Manuscript

D 5.

(31 recto, 31 verso)

() 4ciffr4rr fk* to 9s, ; fk9 9 99

qtm

1-to 9@G f rr A'i1 o

9 99

vo I A CT: r Tar 11 99

art Ifg199 I 99 I I 99

m..... 9%3 umf r ii

(ii) t 18 V fk I Ito 9x tam II9

DIRT f IS~o

...y,rt... R r to 999

to i FTc Tc ' II Itolmm

9

girl r 9 9

Y

Page 149: The Bakhshali Manuscript

(67 verso, 67 recto.)

(i)" a femur i

faa "'srfa$rarW acarft a f: r fk;rqT* era

Ta Vy' era afu f ra Tkm wx.

9 9 9 9 9 9 1 9 9 1 9 9 9

V R VIi o x( y I ...

9 9 9 -a

j?£ 9RIararl 99rc c

19 c 9 I oral' I +

I g l lI

c a I Z 9

9*

srln (3 9+R Z+ I+ Z @+ I -I-9 + -I-9 9 9 9 9 9 c 9 9 9 9

(ii) etb r a $, 11

far WTH A MW

4a qnmr NFOW'r trfar4 fq r

a 9TTdf * c1 kf Eef II

;Prc III f'......

Page 150: The Bakhshali Manuscript

fkgi Sri...9 n %r fzrr...k ii ... " 9 'I

fi ff x

E I.

(66 recto. 66 verso) _

4-4-Irrfr:

le09 Itoq9 I 9 9 9 y I

RM krf$r

9 to q Vo 9Z o I vq 9Z

9 o c !o r-q 9Z9 9 I 9

9 to A ;Fo v to tZ'I 19 9

to 8 o to q#,f.f 9Z9 9 199 lie VZo Z to R # 9

9 9 9

Page 151: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( Ra )

E2.

(53 recto, 53 verso)

... 9 to f$o ...... ......9

9 9

9

wccqq azrf a I P fro uTo Rv fir c tm;9 9

9 9 fqo

R%s tok* Ero fkd

Zo gio ziT

k*srot r

E 3.

(58 recto, 58 verso)

o a 9-ram favaargT-fdt

tir wgwmftw di d r

...arfir arar 3 q9

Page 152: The Bakhshali Manuscript

fqitr.t9

19 Jim Ro9u9

E 4.

(21 recto, 21 verso )

... ...fain......Uq I fdVq 4"fw '

Vo 9 Vo 9

9

9fa, I9fvo

II...... $c'aT:I @ I ISO loo

9 9IX 9

......... aTS tqw

't ..... r'fw%rafaII

9

9

V

6o

Page 153: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( f0 )

......4[ZTchif i xoolC; 90 9

E 5.

(22 recto )

l'ft Trm%-gc ft%oo 11

ara<u wm 4vfw;w i

9

900000 X1'0Oft

ooooOft

ci 33000 IqWfkfoooo

Z9r<ooo00 f4coooo4YU aft

F1.

[22 verso]

(;) . rte' Aaar afa' 1 a 1T atri a as

atar W" 1T 9 g=nTt it em" sit* a<i f. AmnR " q r

I;III III

f 9V ZT

11,10

go 1

9

n i T1 13 1 31g . 4 rc-qr-

Page 154: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( AA

II Zo 1 'Jo r co I c0 1 q4 R 0 it Twt.**

3rro3u'R

Qo Vorr gi6T boo

t 9I 9I

(ii) I" It zr14im fPT r T? aar zpi % vRWq i

i

F 2.

(23 recto; 23 verso )

(i)...;q "...

o cT1Irr

9 91

a 5T fad 9 I air a4 a nrtAr i

9 9 99 9"'...

3 nlei faa ,rl 9 Iao rviIvI

im;t I,aa a:I

qa a+F vm irf ii air

arfa* 1' *m aar a i

Page 155: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( a )o 9 ' 9 o boo'9+ 9 9 19 9 I '1 9 9

r

r gfb& IIIRIAIvgIlT $o

I T ..&07r jt4 7A7 19 11.09I

ow *q garW x I qo I 'x I Rv I - jrr a+r rf r 1

(ii) vro it A"f1'a vwr I

fra gqd l4-t...

F 3.

124 recto, 24 verso)

ffs:wgkmc i tRr . qTt kci vi j X

9 9 1 9 9

rm 1 dot awwa ant jarw t o I tITW W... ...

c r orsl 1 TrrN mwFr1 far I( I Rio xjii I

rr rftq %0 rrqvi%f% wffr f'oa I M4 Te 1'rfZZ

Page 156: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( 4I )

I¢aso R4 atar wraT -

(ii)

... Brat gI`iaett wT fRa stmt ;ttfkm.

I

o

9

' zr"qmT I 9 I 'gfoi r iii WQt Wm, II

Avg

R II

I I st+g vr ; N f d t f f t I fqqTtt 10 * - **'

F 4.

(25 recto, 25 verso )

is3so

wrd... xIf "101...

Iw dr i jwq Ili.0 I

...

I Z I

I¶ Ii I lZ l Z vq l

V.

Page 157: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( R )

ZI I9k 9I

im 3rar l k

... tit sr arrr jth t i fart 14 era

trot aara a era ( y a %ura I

(cZI

I z I4o ISrt j' w vt era

1144 a fafw: 11

(ii) Tao n sraq v4 qvta wr# fw q v" d+T 1

a tf a fki t 1

air TMM &V q-tt mr*,*,

papa a.. -

X ISO is s go ?o Z4t R+I?+It+I ZI

F 5.

(26 recto)

(i) Yr 11 c dr: W TTc x

Page 158: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( ak )

(I Tar itq fait 5rr

't wrd

I I 13rtd 9 I .. fora

it vwl waf r ,

(ii) Nmairt -- uTrrtr II ;Fq I a41 * 1 Mufti '

F 6.

(26 verso )

am dw it I o arfq .c' q;o

am m G I AR -.4 o t{+o

%10 @C; OTo tso

9; gfc'o gio

v am To9frrzr a

wRol S 3Ta...s ar...

Rc;iRo1 9R I...

Page 159: The Bakhshali Manuscript

r )

G 1.

(10 verso, 10 recto)

(i) q# RV

(ii) ta n mar q Leu crr4 ur;ff #gvr;4 a :

sreftr ' i an:... faf i i

(iii) w1o 11 f Tm a faal ua'a -;-Mfa'q'f* iq zggfuz 11

qoc 9 q 9

q 9 q 9

mar vq Lizi qi4 n rr 43 1 Wtr a sra=r --w*

fktzrsurik IRVI Vs -

sr f i

I q 9 grro i {c ?xi r g o q I I a

q 9 q q 9

rrrFa f fm

(i)... o...fafsra

-4m1tI... ..

q

q cTraZ -Liar f U P t o c

1+ G I q q

+ ... igrr a aur6a sarrr Tr cr-

9s

q'io 81 'o AR

Page 160: The Bakhshali Manuscript

3 f`ivrT Tt i I t toS

i frr a f 1 a

q 119 i tiri `

i %3 I"I tvo I a gfara qia i 4GI

to q

Polgl£ I

qol

G 2.

(11 recto, 11 verso )

(ii) To rl...gtfrT WNr T ' %M# M WNfit

8T9r . ...C 1 11

I

q %Tr ci

@ I q

tm I tzT r qZq ;.lvq Xi R wui r-q

No

Page 161: The Bakhshali Manuscript

q q L'rzr "car era qa I rorr rra

1

sr'cirT arrfara n

a err rafa r

arqr;zw qr1' Cdr fw am crNva II

9 9 9G

9

ga fin ftad air a9f%r I f

(iii) w o II as 1T W Dt Brdtr- i f

0

'9+

IV

%T r ko o 11 " RMt 'A+RR

i{oo d 9 9 9

i 9 9 9 9 9

911a Hlo q 81 t

arm W# TM fw4*o 9 9 9 T.

9 t 9 9 tir' !(o o 11

KA*

Page 162: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( as )

aa1t eat 9 X I 4* 4 T mar' o R9o kZ

9 k 9X tiv 9 9 'V

9kca a;arr ii9 I

G3.

(12 recto, 12 verso)

amwo-."W"

*M sg izi grfafifar: as qt : glVt: Wfa : as ezr:

Cdr ( 113 13I

fg afari ' ras hraa1mi ".aa:

I x' arr;ft wjfWi1vr4 au: V I aW '3* aI

Y

qg Ttsa vu rT * i& w , Rw q jo I I

`q

I armor

mart sr r e * V I qd I u j ...

glaar gear vrafm aral a... 9

;.........

air a par 1ar I $o I

9 I +$

Y 1r Y Y

Page 163: The Bakhshali Manuscript

q rF !W1 t ' i c9 Wff WRIT I WsaI PEI 9

(. *o to fto 9X9 9 9 I

(ii) To ii vc'ar T# aT? T r arrai r T ;rr I

'Bruit

C

9 I 9+

wmi Crew 1.40 qrf# S I rf

I I

a r fforc

Y

9

9$ r I g t reaT Oora rrarI

s s I

q t

(i) 3dTo 11 wrax;w-*qw At-;qd:-'r T e I

:T rfa fTU fd zr I

f cl`ca TH H ldnl 11

I

I

v x a a va TfaWr 14k"q ll c c;, I q7 rirzrzt H

Page 164: The Bakhshali Manuscript

,( ?t )

(ii.) pro. gfze#lvifzr 9 M fag gsaarqwa I

wrr sra T I $? g i

Aafa $ 4I fr * f if9 fferazr i

ar r f zf fi ar ft qqfa it ii

G 4.

(13 recto, 13 verso.)

(1) a 9 9 9 9 Mold alrd I C;

+, + + + @Z }

.

x V V V

Y V V V

err It. ay ' ?T crl

Z

Page 165: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( WR)

(ii) II faw r'mp1 "dtw

k ft TfTwtT II -

I Iq cTI

(iii) 3v'1o n -0 ";wa w ft" sTUIf I

fafw t wiw * ff. m1 ww , I

l is X X . X

(i) o ttTo goo 9£

9 aT r o

V* I;To

9 woo8 1i* 3ITo 3To

0

To V* sTftq

%-4 loll 0 qw fto 9e 3TT

,ls) 11 fii IWv3 f i 1ii 1

r T as t rTT u

jjVff % 4"TIrIq1 Ift at mm, I

firfw09* 1Tf$'i4TWqpim II

3go 0jiIj

° 9 9 9 9 q wi"'alas II

19 9 9 9 9

I 'a 0 9 9

+I c I W o u9 99 9

+9 yo

9 9

9 3 X

Page 166: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( v )

3

e a- .- (V o- Or o- o v- at

G5.[14 recto, 14 verso]

4w T r rr W

I i I II

i : w wtv AV#Rv3

v x

7011T II Im raw aa# QTfi I$ I I

X

I ;wf%V

I Z ITmir a'In# TeraI 3v -RT Vow

o

x g

VoI 9 Rv #INoIX 9

w q WTq# Vo %Tv 9 m# qY q4 Vo II9

9+.

9+

Page 167: The Bakhshali Manuscript

(Ii) 3,ro 11 gTf9W TrFr g9z I

" 0 9 meat WCatT w (R*) it air

G 6.

[15 verso, 15 recto]

I9I9I919It3 $ @ 9

RR 11 arr qtfffd 4;r i *q TiSwzar rRf

Z Z f k? 9 c I i; 8r iur

I I I r

f4 *r ii iwTft

fw ' air aft a e i n

o !r t t fro Wo r; f crqw S 1: 11

Page 168: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Wf8w a* wam rT-{ II

TTBTq Smia, w u4T# f r?QfT:

II giT r gfQTa (iX

arr I ; I

R O qg Tr gaff u

t4 is R *- 93mf'aerfair ;qffu II R x

G 7.

[16 recto]

(i)f$w rrt R8 to tol

k3l

wm m-czrq r

9 to IT. PZ

(ii) - To ii =TIfw t-qz ua f -fa- Tar gaftaa

fka'1it ft-w"I-Mrft T&4 t

q;gf f(.aa -gT WM air aMq

a gfug r II

Page 169: The Bakhshali Manuscript

aTRrfft-'Ikft I vMT

H 1.

(16 verso)

0) rrfT eau amf ' * * v-rali

(ii) II iii 4D 9q mar:

fiw r WM f q: I

!iii) 3a To II Q;w-fk-fa-q"%m ;giW? qm* I' i

-f fa- I I

v+ S c IT i 9 -F I -F I -f- I -)-

9 I. I uQ #ir I o I iFawr fa I o *4;r %Ti;t wwz(

H2.

(17 recto., 17 verso)

o 'o 1f I qo $ro *0 9R9' I

I V

(ii) M. II qw-fir-fa- 0 STMT qq si}f tri w'

tmff#ffw mzr

Page 170: The Bakhshali Manuscript

(g13

9 q 9 9

3 Y x

qi 1 1 "U4 9tr "U" Rq W14 W I

cT1c :" Z etcd 19 I «*0 X

4W4T a w qrqw q o 1 ar Trwf 11 Ti q v@ I q q qq; rf('rboa

X11

s ttfsra "' 9° 9 9 jO 1 $9 C° 9

10 %0

I o q $°oto qt4 A TO 4F14

o q Roo

TO%oil 9X°I

fi'irRMTRvftDT "TR I

+ +I 13+ 3

%

+I +I +I +1 +1+I

"4iIt # T" rrt I Zo 1 10 YZ I X I l3 I ° I Z I I¶ Iqtrt # ° 11 fi if FcT Yx 1 d r I IQ; I

YX

asaawa f I w u fro q R*q; qmq; wm;t II9

sregq Ww4m T1 X @ I o 19 YMI ql q 9 I

q :tit sra

Page 171: The Bakhshali Manuscript

H 3.

(18 recto, 18 verso)

(i) (fir) ii agar sir q t r aarfa i

z w ;' 4izr rra =r; r ii

Fit) wao ii T-fk z srrtt 01 a srrrcf iq fvr 1

aria a;fafw ¢ srrckT a fa tmvT i

a rf O-ft a;fa 6zaT >a'zlr 0 i

azraradrFT 4 mw gaori` =rrag1 a : r

amt ii "ai1rta rr93rr a;af fa" fa asrrca wfa aeart i it i

I9i

:fir r i "ire argzrfi gtrzfzr Qr'i'

I9 0. i ffcarr ; ... Beat ara t' 9 @ i i amr-T zrfuaf ......9

.. amfamfazr Vz7

(i) has( ii a4 u aafr ar fog---;w faer

$ w w' zrrmr ,Tfvr i q ffwr

am a;r iq a wq*a q i

zrfRati aft Arr't % zTMTr zrr NF.r u

Page 172: The Bakhshali Manuscript

(V4

)

3ato ii qv-fl-f%-aif#vgT rigr it rfa

-f rt fw: i

r r r ar err i

arAm ff st.......

I

J 1.

(30 recto; 30 verso) .

...... ..... msr"

13, IVR

it c

f$g

%3

U0

lira q ...... f

30

J2.

[65 recto,]

q7c=;wrq...

fR4 rr zr...tqnrt'+ff:...

amMR: -

Page 173: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( xo

afr Ii swat .r q?agtarfizr i rt Tr Ws fir fits &M a MW wafa , ..

wm;E i arrA zrmwft Sww wmm,-q-fd wifgr... Oftw :

aq trcr r f sE

1 9 go ji 0 q I a0 ft o I 30 0 I ...

9

7 9e [ 9

att... fvr fart......

J 3.

(41 recto; 41 verso)

"Op m an ar--cai' rerf ? I " tuft...

q vZ fI

'. air l l3o Y ...9 I 9 9 9

X o 11 pfd q BrcT-q c r ta firfiTfZ tm

aIN 9: wo Rts

ztfar &' VW kt ' ... 34ft r ft Wrto k9

irgrq 91 xi I %*or t% *.*.R

Page 174: The Bakhshali Manuscript

(i) To a 0 zrfir 93a gar zp : frr rrfsrf r qtT XTa c(1

zrWzfa srr:

o V. 10 IXo0

f ar o 3+ iio o I9 9 9 t 9 9

a-k W'1

qi I a' aarI

' I fir

I I W 1 R v 'Itw Ift w4arr to I

+ j arts Vr I 9 9 I q ;rr zrfsr a arm srrar-

a zr ff*

I 99 go $ 10 Y I 99 + vo9 9 9 9 9 9

43:arei 1 X o

q" I rd W w#;*

L 1.

(60 recto, 60 verso)

(ii q F`d I;rrar Pt q9 I *q1

I ..

I

fa'FftttTf t is

ar kq r

it arm aM faWwlr IW # °r:[ I

Page 175: The Bakhshali Manuscript

(ii) 3vTTo a f -f 3Ti 4 fa-f airrmrnt r ; raw fr i 3rr4 9Tarvrzr t

Iftb k v');fl 4 o

Iflo Zfv'r Col

vR 9 1 `ar1LT=fir f " 1 c1 T4 ' I

(I) ...1 9 I t;T' TAP X II

1 ii) I ark vaq 017Tarl r r far*! Nvwim

of ff+ w-mo viii u;T-FFT srfr 11

(iii) a 1 fa-f arr ' tT vrafil-4ii crfQca:

f&q qs:a fva* zfT ;ir ua IV:

sib fir fir flmar l-fxar ITc'rr i+i rv 4MM

v ...fig

L 2.

(61 recto, 61 verso)

i) .. TTWq "$;r of u

:std a?-zrf$r4 fus?r

9

x o a Xo sr4* fwlwr t vFrr i ,

Page 176: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( xQ )

(ii) vzro II vw" gz fa grgTkm OAT 4:

it wm4 tii Q3 wTzfT f c. m fk t9 I

AMIi fgtrft im d rR ;

* r nrr'fi wrriU Tr'ft-car av'fg II

9 X90I 9I

w II "3 xar ft'A--4" I ".c

o gi k I A4f r f ctz T

y , a rar I

x x- ! x x I I rrETTT rrcrr I

(ii) d k I I

fa*f#wro* ri#r0m

aw414 iafi aaau

(iii) 3' To a fgfw X wifr Bc fam"1urrfa f"

mom % mm fiT ;rlas im" 11

ICI lyc; wr9TT

Z : 9

WXRI( Ifar.....

L 3.

( 62 recto, 62 verso)

4141 1TIT I FT S 'T dzTfVrk: T 11

Page 177: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( 'jW )

aft i f i rv r r air X fir I

!19 9I 9 I

(i) a t r f - 4 4 NO i zrf q ? ' f i ffv "r :43zr41frNX f i

19 19 Ic;q I q;q* V R v I cr:m*q 9 G qt mm:

q'Iq`yarvm fair x v

ii Pm# err as Vifi g kwffT;r i

,Fr) 4 Ray ar4T a gO i,

(iii) wo ii fgffcr w19rrfd irficr fa 'Tvrrfr fafwQ'

(') l9 I id Rio fgT4 c I I >Z1 Ii a I 9I I: 9 9II ¢ o g I iii I Qrm *q* 9 I qtr wr9 I I

9

q 44 =4 wdT( $ Y

(ii) a fa' r -4r.* 4a iu 9*Zr f9wm

tam' Tr a' R;*o TTr fg la:

8i FM qQ9 wr9T .,ffm I

3Q6 II fafggir "klsa +TB:q fatzrg, ga

Wrs rar W# qh fir ms

f lAq; a qisq. Isa

I

fag 'V 9

I `'fg 9Tr T 4a %Dft,"

... n. ... ... ..?

Page 178: The Bakhshali Manuscript

l k( )

L 4.

(63 recto, 63 verso)

(i) ... 3

I

RV; q 401 9 19 I P I

t I9 I I 9ol oI9TM>r Ibo

(ii) L $

i faw t 'i i r zTfvr

mar sffwtiwar9 w tt

(iii) 193T9 $

9 faYc#

t a1fafua c r=j 11

tt 9 9

...yTr 19 I

(i) rI9 (9 I GP I

I c I " f tc°

aa,f 9TM I X , qq f ..

t ;qfw V# zri vrafr gq...km tff i

firTfvr o fawrkr Tw fig t4r: 11

I

Page 179: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( x )

3 ro II 'fir f ri ... t rw-NO

gCwmt q r W? qA a qil i

M 1.

(20 recto, 20 verso )

(i) 9 o z9 9

v

;go $o co* Zf i-jo zfffi 4 tFosro 8

9 tizro9 qro@

-ft QTo -To Q'io ETro V tro QTo IX0 9 II

T4im M# u'..-

( i) zoo ii tr q-fid 47r rrf r W;r 8r: i

qm, fwd II

(1) I.0 9R000-

I T-aer wft STrfa,frmrNf

8 'f r ' faMl r Vrf+r"Q;;tf%a

Rfifc qkr. R; R;r w fag' #i 11

Page 180: The Bakhshali Manuscript

t

(x3 )

9 9 9 SG to Zv+ 3iogo I T4 CIoQ=rrov tooR9+I t $ 9 9 901

3 i *a x: f v faar fiz-*"'

o

M 2.

(33 verso, 33 recto )

n gftra't r rori rr rat n

rf Tr r fa-ai r r fa i

r raur r rrfrr r i

as fasaaa n... fto

9 9

frlo c;8ooo9

qqvw fdo

(ii) aaro ii f1' rrz gmrmrfasrr ft gxwr4 a r

amrtaisa %daf rk to V sim4 trim ri

9 1 9 9 9 9 9 I 9O5 I Qiofo 9'Uf9 i 9 9 t 9 9

(ii) pro 11 30 " part aa' rWrfa a r

q;fa ;rr-

9

400 I9 9 1 99 29 9 19 9

4

Page 181: The Bakhshali Manuscript

M 3.

[ 32 recto, 32 verso,

(i) q m fir......ag q;Tq ;T̂ m qqi I Tr...... u eu;m pgwff rT I qT-ftq gvgR

wpk $rg*" aw' qni sr qT# f r4 I to uu gfmm iftzr n

q fer: f maf i& snc ur...

I IN 9 9 T To

9 90+zftwo o

9

0 goon zr?o wo9

q gzro99c I c; 9 ' I I

99

1(ii) wro n mnrqv 'rrfsr ; a w

(i) joo %I o "tiooo 3To-to 9

% 9 I srlpt4 19k4ooo 9RW

9 ao V R4'9%4 We q fito VV00.

,

(ii) v$To II gfcTcT IT U gds 1

fa>Ir T ra "Ic :III RW Tc gar trk a I

4fkv*snt Im 41UPARIl II

pen' 4 flh I

Page 182: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( x )

M 4.

( 36 recto, 36 verso )

(j) err qw faffora U4

...... qq ksr wqrvt try 11

(ii) pro u if ' ZrW oaf a7 we T % i

qat 4q;i zrfsr Tq;g, rffQ1 *m I

r rr9f ifq 4wr zrfvr9frrrfa I

q---q wffmr " q ,-v* *r ;tc fwl

Zr 9 X 019'{ X6 aTQa i o o o* (To '*rro t ToI 9 9I 9I

;wr Oo

go3oo

qQ Vfir RIM srar 9

(iii) Tf 1 aer rl r IT T aett1r I

runt rurfar %Tr r Wff wrrf 5r wf r 1

At ww...

a

(1) =ro Z I q q+ 00 it do ocooo+go to To 'to9 9 I 9 I

(ti) aha,itq fa T Pr EI ;r fa9Trr r t r 9 1

4T aft fw;tfkwWq , Wq irzefr 1

ifr %;r: q--q wFW zila a a... fir faart grlklrawVr

Page 183: The Bakhshali Manuscript

f 9 9 9$ 9 9 9 'n

M S.

(34 recto, 34 verso)

[il V ar qwm vim nfa 4a4a a 11

- Isev WO fw qr a fz it

5ro Wo 99 wr vaco 1 q;r* MoI 9 I ci 9 i

(ii) wfm pt p°lfg we r

wq;gfqk lgF;' F-m

wwr4 .rrt a fk4 q T

r -sw;raW rgf;r--Eprfw r r ii

X I 941*-crr

Wo 9 zharo 191919 9

P I RIR t3

9V.

Page 184: The Bakhshali Manuscript

Specimen of the Baklishali ScriptM 5. (34 verso )

M 5. ( 34 recto )

Page 185: The Bakhshali Manuscript
Page 186: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( 9 )sqa --fag q rs;gm 8citn r

w.0--a ww a Tu TTar w f + r m f r i qswwl1rr s1

T+0 9 do 9ZS* ITo $io 9 TTo 'jo Vo* ffro-wro9 9

M 6.

(37 recto, 37 verso )

go X9

(i) ...#qTgr

fa rurafa4XfTsru

10 Erb-110 !(,oo,ooo,oo qo 9 QioiftoG11MM"I 9 9 9 9II

( i) wit rriftr Ffr+ faw rui $ gfz$au

anal ra1 z a Tf;; Wrm-

.. aa n ` f w r i r

xooooo0oo To I j ''io f o

(i) " VA w ZTfw I

3,v 9oaooo r "f rr $

(ii) 7sqTir taeut of 4* fq ' avor

mmir arETtar f

i ZTo 9 9 ato 9

9 9 9 EoI `

Page 187: The Bakhshali Manuscript

o c Coo fafraraf uf4r i ar ac a fafr-t r

fff Mt R I LT ark qfdir ii

ii) To i i Zrw jkf 7ft mzr: 4To aVT

(i)

M 7.

(47 verso, 47 recto)

Saa of ama ;4r q) i

at...wr acTt1T ? gc1T c frgrcrrzw ii

$r iort a 9fTNr ... f78T w it

IfIIrt9

k it aTo i;o R' °9 9 9

9V

arm t smrafTT

f wxr:

T

m BrtT VVoo

ara1'wIft aer+wrr' mW `aT puVI T: it

aTf ff

Page 188: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( )0 110

qfr 9999991 e

g9TTT rid: TW RcSUorr

9oM1o

(R9c;QOo)

qq 8TP1rrqwt Rgrur9 II

(ii) 3eo 11 )F Tr i Trrr vgzm I

ft I fdo

M 8.

(48 recto, 48 verso)

zoq...IN 9 * %TTo T- tzo*

9 -zr

$"io 9 lk* wro

tma Vao* -(ft-gT...gf

;3rrct qw

eo c; q'u' Zfto BTo 9R* Srro l9 iii' rr cr, To Y*ef oR

(i) q# qToW Rooo RTo I 'To R13o II O S

*oTo Z t c -qr1 iAw Rrffd UTrUT 9Z To a 11

to

o $*IN 14T

9 9V4

Page 189: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( v )(ii) q* ft* r iTt a rvgr affQr

fko RED fro I Q t3 ... c WT 4@ ,.

Rio qo 9 q

R000* Rioado

C*0C 1rro

c to

M9(49 verso, 49 recto)

f 4 rr f4Wf r rff; q;Ufr Ti ;v f a1

9 ctho t 4T -q 8+ ao Rk %oWTo co* zro k 9

fro SRato s* fko Ro* I 10

St*

qro q 9

c1o

tt*

1

I

Tt Srlszt ! Aoacq 3T& Roooquo Y4Zoo

fera I kkS 3c 3I90 'v ft wq...

I oo I

0.. 0. ...

Page 190: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( rk )

(1) $o I uaarfiwoq ao wgt;rrfmgr

gx;rTfer TEo u grilo 110 II

(ii) 3crvr.t II

...IP44 r ka'1 a r... a: 9zaT rT

ararfam fza r zf I qcT r as 7 tra

q 9 I 9 ai q* qZ*

9mv qo gr* ;itFm'a(13'

i

Page 191: The Bakhshali Manuscript

ktofto ;To

9Ik t *

I

q o ao " ro

140 t 9Roo

g*To 9 9* Wo

9it

9

ftro 9 R* VITo9Z

X09 9*WIo

am tie si $r'-'r MMT 0 111941 1

(ii) ale q $o It io q To 9 t* aro 9 9* zo 9 9*zr0 9 9*

9 9 999 9gC; 9Leo 990

ffro q* $'+o q 9* qTo 9 9* ;go 9 9

q V o 9 jZo 9 Ygoo q 041o0

Page 192: The Bakhshali Manuscript

T T t T to 9 f XtI 9

( Q3 )

9

o I qi to k c; k oI J

44RC;

9 9* Iiro9

9 9*09

9 9*Zro9

to 9 kY 9 9 9* 9 9* 9 9* q;cr XG ir. 499 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

M 11.

( 44 verso, 44 recto )

;ft era-wmqt 9x - c qT waTt ii

mrff ;mTfiq f*

3TTo fko9WrTo fro a fko $ To 9 gojR RT0Iq° 9 9

q t 9 9 9 9 9 9 c°

rrrvTr t3 °°1

9

aq xrfar'RR arrqzrf8r

lvvR C;o uaq gram

c9I

RRA I R o 134-OkI. J ' ...9

9

11

Page 193: The Bakhshali Manuscript

l C )

ao f40WO,

3Ta am

(1) .. ... wRZl

9vv

ii rr4 far fasmr f .T 9

gwr if ausr... rra

a f1r a'1fw ri r ar k

rr.t r azlgsrrirrar' r1 f rrf r Wr u

WWQTT *WW rr ?i'faTt r:

it fa * Sri if qrsa wTwr fim aWq

ao

M 12.

RS0

(43 recto, 43 verso)

"M* SmAq *44 l qq M mm azir * f.4 'rfurnmm I i

wraaT2 ut.vrer r aartrari ffqarzr 4 1

gtrr aW q?qffj T.X in 41fq Rfoaq 11

Page 194: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( ctI )

r faarN m Ill m raft FO UM

to - srro @ lrTj, 94 Glrrot $ %Tr,, t t wrro t ( WTo @ 9a9t 9t 9 9 99 t 9t [99 9

Srro 9 wrnt oo

4 9 t 9

R 3

9

A

qj fad R£GZ8c

i r c

44 3c1o faa...... q ii arrq-fq*

aTg;:rr a4ir fq faio 9 tcoq cooR N o /9 3

( 42 verso, 42 recto )

141

M 13.

aTrd ^ a W wrwft

o

9

ITTo "wt %W w' arm Qwq

wit au)asrfw fi;fzrfff 9

19R% I q;o kit qqt...

asJ a rfza q T tq r 19 V I

9

Page 195: The Bakhshali Manuscript

(kso)..q Tr tEr TgfhOff

g"' azrfOw czar w4f fdfiT . I

(ii) vvi ;rmf T I fa$rral fm f; Ak'7 w

f fir I MT4 5rQVrT f4ftT R O 9 9 grW I IfurarI 9 9 I

arar I o 9 I Ro 9 9 I ...aTa # IF9 91

I o i i to fasrrrt fza- wrafa i ara 3gfmrv ;Fu

rTq# NfcT I -

M 14.

( 50 verso., 50 recto. )

(i) w r arlFvr a T x q;fa I

C'w Tft% ww;rT IT *0TIT srf iir p:

loo IJUT

(ii) a r 3;zro a TO F aa>x e'i c X f T

Page 196: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( )

w

quq

i

I

... I,. •.$

Page 197: The Bakhshali Manuscript
Page 198: The Bakhshali Manuscript

INDEX

Abbreviation 29

Addition 32, 33

Age of MS 14

Algebraic characteristics 10

Al Hassarar 40

Al Karkhi 74, 77, 80

Al Khowarizmi 54

Appendix 18

Approximation, first and

second 41-45

Arc measures 26

Arithmetic, generalized 10

Aryabbata and Aryabhatiya 18

Bakbshali 1, 2Bhaskara II of Bijaganita and

unknown 23, 67, 70

Brabmagupta and Brahmasp-

hutasiddhanta, Br. Sp. 22,

23, 80

on square roots 39

and rupona method 55

on equations 70, 77

Buhler 4, 14, 50

Cajori 14

Cantor 14, 73

Capacity measures 84

Chajakaputra, the scribe 1, 19

Chronogical table 79, 80

Colebrooke 50, 69

Commentary nature of ms 1(

Complex series 71

Data and solution In ucllni

24, 25

Datta, B. 2, 15, 16, 40, 45, 50-

51, 53, 58, 66, 71, 80

Denominator, common 47, 411

Dinaras 25, 82

Diophantus 77,

and negative sign 29, 46

on equation 77

Division 35

Drsya, absolute term 70

Equations, linear 72: quadra-tic 77

Error and reconciliation 41, 43

Example, Udaharana 21

False position. see also regula

falsi 15, 52, 53

Folios, arrangement of conte.

nts of MS. 8

Fractions in cells 24, 7

Fundamental operations 32-35

Ganita Sara Samgraha of

Mahavira (GSS) 23, 50,

53,74,77

Heath 40, 45

Heron 40

Hindu treatise, indigenous 13

Page 199: The Bakhshali Manuscript

110

Historical refcrences in MS 13

History of the find of MS. 1. 4

Hoernle 1, 4, 6, 7, 14, 15, 21,

28, 50, 78

Homogeneity of contents 12

Indeterminate quadratic equa-

Von 77

Integral numbers 24

Karanam: solution 22

Kaye 2, 6, 7, 10, 12, 14, 15,

18, 27, 36, 38. 45. 57,

58, 69, 74, %9, 80

Language of MS 7

Least common multiple 47, 49

Length measures 83

Lilavati 23, 40, 59, 71

Linear equations 72-75

Lipta 26, 27, 82

Mahavira (of GSS) 23, 74, 80

Manuscript, MS 2, discovery

3-4, condition 5, leavcs 5,

a commentary 16, cross

references in 17, Sutras

18, a copy from otherMS 18, flourish design at

the end of a Sutra 20,

exposition and method,20, data, figures and

solutions in cells 24.

Minutes and second 26

Money measures 83

Multiplication 34

Mythological references 13

Negative sign 23, 4 i 46

Non-square numbers 36

Notation, place value 27

Numerical symbols 12

Nyasa (statement) 22

Operations, fundamental 32

in groups of cells 25

Place value of notations 15, 27

Positive integer, solution in 76

Pratvayam (verification) 22

Problems, solutions and

proofs 59-65

Problems and treatment 30

Progression, aiithmeticai 26

Proof 32, 59-65

Quadratic equations 77

Regula falsi 15, 52, 53

Regula Vorzinum 76

Rule (Sutra) 18, 21

Rule of three 40, 41

Rupona method 55

Script 6, 12

Solution, see problems andproofs 59-65

Square root 36

Sridhara (of Trisatika) 23,39,59

Sthapanam (Statement) 22

Subtraction 33

Sunyam (zero) 67, 68

Surds 36-40

Sutra (rules) 18, 21

Page 200: The Bakhshali Manuscript

( lit

Symbols 27, 66 (for unkuown)

Tannery 73

1 hibaut 14, 29

Time measure 82

Trairashika 41

Trisatika of Si idhara) 2 39,59

Udaharana (Uda), illustration

21, 23

Uddeshaka, example 23

Unknown or unknown quan-

tities, 27

symbols for 66-69

Verification 32

Vilipta 26, 27

Vowels 13

Weber 4

Weight measures 83

Weights and measures 81-H4

Zero 67, 68