Upload
dotram
View
231
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 1
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch
Preparedby:JohnFraser,Ph.D.,AIA,InstituteforLearningInnovation
JoeE.Heimlich,Ph.D.,TheOhioUniversityExtension&InstituteforLearningInnovationJackieOgden,Ed.D.,Disney’sAnimalKingdom
AllysonAtkins,M.M.S.,Disney’sAnimalKingdom;StacyMcReynolds,SanAntonioZoologicalAssociation;
CarrieChen,AquariumofthePacific,VickiSearles,M.S.,ClevelandMetroParksZoo;
PeggySloan,M.S.NCAquariums;NettePletcher,M.S.,AZAPaulBoyle,Ph.D.,AZA
PublishedFebruary28,2010forreviewandcomment
RecommendedCitation:
Fraser,J.,Heimlich,J.E.,Ogden,J.,Atkins,A.,McReynolds,S.,Chen,C.Searles,V.,Sloan,P.,Pletcher,N.&Boyle,P.(2010).TheAZA’sFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch.SilverSpring,MD:AssociationofZoosandAquariums.ThispublicationwasproducedthroughfundingfromNSFGrant#0205843bymembersoftheAssociationofZoosandAquariumsinassociationwiththeInstituteforLearningInnovationandTheOhioStateUniversityExtension
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 2
WhyaFramework?
TheAssociationofZoosandAquariums’(AZA)ConservationEducationCommittee(CEC)supportstheappropriateuseoflivinganimalsinzoosandaquariumsasanimportantandpowerfuleducationaltooltoadvanceaconservationagenda.Inrecentyears,thesocialsciencestudyofzoos,aquariums,theirvisitors,andtheirrelationshipstotheconservationmovementhasincreasedexponentially.Inlessthanadecade,socialscienceresearchhasgrownfromafewindividualsmainlypursuingbasicquestionsintoafull‐fledgedcommunityseekingthisknowledge.Today,thecommunityhasbenefittedfromstudiesconductedatindividualAZA‐accreditedzoosandaquariums,AZACECsponsorednationalstudies,internationalparallelstudies,andanincreasingnumberofthesesanddissertations.Thesestudiesaddressquestionssuchas:Whatisknown?Wherearethegapsinknowledge?Whatinformationismostusefulforthefield?Andhowcantheinformationgainedgenerateneworconfirmatoryknowledgethatispartofalargerwhole?AnswerstothesequestionshavecreatedasolidbaselineofinformationthatcanbeusedtohelpAZA‐accreditedzoosandaquariumsmeettheirmissions.Therapidgrowthinsocialscienceresearch,however,alsopresentsnewchallengesforresearchers.Whatcurrentresearchwillbemostusefulforthefield?Howcaneachstudygenerateneworconfirmatoryknowledgethatispartofalargerwhole?
Researchonlearninginzoos/aquariums,andevenzoo/aquariumeducationitself,ismaturingandbuilding.Priorto2000,therewaslittlecomprehensiveresearchonexperiencesinzoosandaquariums,andverylittlerelatedtotheconservationgoalsthatAZA‐accreditedinstitutionshopetoachievetoday.Inthelastdecade,sincetheCECfirstsponsoredoneoftwoMulti‐InstitutionalResearchProjects(MIRP)nowcollectivelyknownastheWhyZoosandAquariumsMatterprojects,,socialscienceresearchhasgrownbyordersofmagnitude.CECleadersandscholarsseetheneedforazooandaquariumsocialscienceresearchframeworktohelpthoseintheeducationandconservationcommunicationsfieldunderstandhowtheycancontributetoagreaterbodyofknowledge.ThisreportrepresentstheCEC’sdeterminationtoviewzooandaquariumsocialscienceresearchasacollectiveendeavorthatvaluesandrepresentsamoreholisticviewofhowfree‐choicelearninghappensinandaroundAZA‐accreditedinstitutions.
Todate,morethan30%ofAZA‐accreditedzoosandaquariumsintheU.S.havehadatleastonerepresentativeparticipateinthecontinuingeducationprogrambasedonthefindingsanduseofinstrumentsfromthetwonationalstudiescomprisingWhyZoosandAquariumsMatter(Fraser&Sickler,2008).Zoo/aquariumsocialscienceresearchisnowpublishedinawiderangeofpeer‐reviewedjournalsandincreasinglyappearsinthepopularpress.Audiencesarenowreadytousethefindingspresentedtocreatenewstrategiesbasedonthisscientificallysoundresearch.Aswewritethisintroduction,wecanstatecategoricallythatzoosandaquariumsarewellpreparedtoassertivelyadvancetheirconservationmission,buttodosowillrequirestrategicthinkingindustry‐wide,notjustwithinindividualinstitutions.
ThefollowingframeworkprovidesanopportunityforallAZA‐accreditedinstitutionsandindependentresearcherstobecomeinvolvedinsocialscienceresearchandtoworkcollaborativelyinordertoenhancetheimpactofzoosandaquariumsandtheconservationfieldasawhole.
Thisresearchframeworkalsoprovidesastructureforindividualinstitutionandmulti‐institutionalstudiestobeinterpretedinthelargerpictureofwhatweknowaboutzoosandaquariums,theirvisitors,andtheircommunityrelationships.Theoverarchingquestionspresentedinthefollowingsections
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 3
facilitatethesynthesisofinformationthatisusefulforandaccessibletoresearchers,educators,marketers,administrators,andotherlike‐mindedindividuals.
Withineachquestionthatfollowsaremanyopportunitiesfordescriptive,phenomenological,structural,andpredictiveresearch.TheCECbelievesthatthisframeworkwillhelpindividuals,institutions,andthelargerzooandaquariumcommunitytobetterserveourvisitorsandcommunitiesasawhole.
ConceptualizingtheChallengeAsconservationorganizations,zoosandaquariumsarecommittedtoachievingsocialchange.Theyenvisionaworldwhereallpeopleliveinsustainablebalancewiththebiodiversityonwhichalllifedepends.Toaccomplishthismission,zoosandaquariumsrecognizethattheirconservationbiologyresearchcandescribetheproblemsassociatedwithspeciesloss,habitatloss,anddisruptionofbiologicalsystems.Whileasmallamountofthislosscanbeattributedtonaturalcyclesthatgovernalllife,forthepastcenturyithasbecomeincreasinglyclearthatthemajorityofthislossisdirectlyattributabletohumanaction.
Zoosandaquariumsrecognizethattheymustalsodirectlyfocusonhowtochangepublicknowledge,attitudes,andideallybehaviorinordertocreatethissustainableworld.Theworld‐wideubiquityofzoosandaquariumshasalsocreatedanunprecedentedopportunitytoactlocallyandcoordinatetheseactionsgloballytowardachievingtheirsharedgoal.
Zoosandaquariums,however,donotoperateinasocialvacuum.Themajorityoftheseinstitutionsareprimarilysupportedbylocalgovernmentsandregionalnon‐profitsthatmayormaynotcompletelyagreewiththeseorganizations’specificconservationmission.Theyworkwithinaregionalmatrixofcommunityorganizationsdevotedtoconservationconcernswhichallshareacommongoal,butmaynotagreeonthemeanstothatend.Moreover,theyalsoworkwithinachangingregional,nationalandglobalstoryabouthumanrelationshipstothenaturalworld,whichmeansthattheirsolutionsandstrategiesmaynotalwaysbeapplicabletothelargersociety,eventhoughtheprinciplesfortheirinterventionsmaybethesame.
Thisresearchframeworkestablishestheprinciplesandissuesthathavethemostbenefitforthelargestcommunity.Itprovidesgoverningquestionsthatcanhelpadvanceknowledge,andorganizesthosequestionswithingeneraldisciplinarytraditions.Itrecommendsidealizedconditionsforstudyinordertohelpindividualssituatetheirworkalongsidethatoftheirpeers.Andmoreimportantly,itoutlineswhereeffortmayleadtonewanduniversallyvaluableknowledge.Inthecaseofzoosandaquariums,thefollowingframeworkcanalsohelpadministratorsandthosewhosupportzoosandaquariumstoidentifyandassesstheirownfieldsforactionasconservationistsseekingtohelpshapeamoresustainablesociety.
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 4
TableofContents
THEAZAFRAMEWORKFORZOOANDAQUARIUMSOCIALSCIENCERESEARCH ...................................1ConceptualizingtheChallenge ............................................................................................................. 3
OVERVIEWOFTHEFRAMEWORK ..................................................................................................................... 5WHATWEKNOW.......................................................................................................................................... 7KeyReadings: ....................................................................................................................................... 9
AFRAMEWORKFORSOCIALSCIENCEWORK ................................................................................................... 10Question1:WhatRoledoZoos/AquariumsplayinLifelongLearningExperiences?......................... 10Question2:HowDoZoosandAquariumsComparewithOtherInformalLearningInstitutions? ..... 12Question3:HowDoZoosandAquariumsShapeSocialActionandSocialActivism? ....................... 14Question4:WhatRoledoZoosorAquariumsplayregardingSocialServices? ................................ 16Question5:WhataretheUniqueCharacteristicsofLearninginZoosandAquariums?................... 18Question6:AZooandAquariumEducationProfession? .................................................................. 20Question7:HowdoweAssess,DisseminateandApplyExistingKnowledge?.................................. 21
CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................. 22
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 5
OverviewoftheFrameworkOnthefollowingpages,wehavegroupedcorequestionsunderavarietyofdisciplinaryinquiries,allofwhichcanhelpadvanceknowledgeabouthowzoosandaquariumscanadvancetheirconservationmission.Webeginwithabriefoverviewofquestionsthathavebeenresolvedforthemediumterm,synthesizingtheresultsofafewdecadesofcommittedworkbymoreprofessionalsthancanbecreditedinthesepages.Wethenmoveintoadiscretediscussionofthedisciplinespecificquestionsthathaveemergedfromtheworkofthesescholarsandpractitionersandsuggestidealizedcasesforsuchstudy.
Inthefirstsectionfollowingtheoverview,wesuggestthatrecentresearchhasbeguntoestablishanimportantfocusontherolethezoooraquariumplaysinthecommunity.Heretheresearchisprimarilyfocusedontheperceivedpsychologicalandsociologicalvaluesthatareeitherreinforcedorchallengedbythepresenceoftheinstitutions.Therehasbeenagreatdealofmoraldebateregardingmaintaininglivinganimalsinzoos/aquariums,butonlyrecentlyhasthisissuebeentestedinqualitativeandquantitativestudy.Directlyaddressingthisconcernhelpszoosandaquariumsarticulatemoreclearlyhowtheirmissionispartofthelargergoalssharedbytheircommunities.
Inthesecondsection,werecognizethattheseinstitutionsarepartofalargercommunityofinformallearninginstitutionswithbothsharedandcompetinggoals.Atthiswriting,thereisadearthofknowledgeaboutthenichevalueofzoosandaquariumswithinthislargerlearningcommunity,andwhatmakestheirlivinganimalssovaluableforaccomplishingtheirspecificmission,incontrasttolikemindedinstitutionssuchasnaturecenters,sciencemuseums,orothermuseumsofconscience.Inthissection,thereisacallforaconcertedefforttounderstandzoos’andaquariums’uniquepsychological,sociological,politicalandeducationalfunctionsbyengagingincomparativeresearchwithotherinstitutions.
Inthethirdsectionwedescribekeyquestionssurroundingthesociologicalandanthropologicalcontributionofzoosandaquariumswithintheircommunity.Forthesequestions,theframeworkrecognizesthatzoosandaquariumshavetheabilitytooperateassocialagents,aggregatingconcernsundertheirbanner,andadvocatingonbehalfofaconstituencyintheirlargercommunity.Forthesequestions,legitimacyandauthorityarecentraltounderstandinghoweffectivetheseinstitutionscanbeatpositioningsocialpolicyandadvocatingforchange.
Inthefourthsection,weofferanotheranewdirectionforstudythathasonlybeenanecdotallydescribedinafewveryrecentstudies.Itseemsthatsocialserviceagencieshavediscoveredthepotentialoftheseinstitutionsasimportantpartnersastheycommittosupportingfamiliesatrisk.Theyreportontheseactivities,butthereremainslittleresearchontheeffectivenessorimportanceofthatwork.
Inthefifthsection,wefocusonthedevelopmentofthefieldasaprofession.Werecognizecommunicatingconservationconcernstothepublicisarapidlydevelopingfieldrequiringspecialknowledgeandterminology.Thisquestionshouldbeproactivelyaddressedinordertodirectlyimpactgrowthinthefieldandthecommunitywhowillworkwiththeresultsofthisresearch.
Lastly,theframeworkrecognizesleadersinconservationpsychologyandconservationbiologywhohavedemonstratedthatsynthesizingresearchfromacrosstheirdisciplinaryfieldsintheinterestofadvancingaconservationagendahasbeenimportanttocreatingnewknowledgethatcanleadtosocialchange.
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 6
Webelievethatthisstrategyhasgreatpromiseacrossallthesocialsciences,especiallyifapproachedfromtheperspectiveofzoosandaquariumsassocialchange‐agents.
Theframeworkconcludeswithsomerecommendationsfromtheadvisorycommitteeontheneedforfundingtohelpfleshoutthisresearchframeworkandsomethoughtsonorganizationalstrategiesthatcanhelpaccomplishthatgoalatthegrassrootslevel.Theauthorsareconfidentthatthisinitialframeworkwillbecomealivingdocumentthatwillspawnnewdisciplinarycontributionsandnewtheoriesthatwillexpandknowledgeforthefield.
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 7
WhatweknowTwonationalstudiescomprisedthemulti‐institutionalresearchprojectWhyZoosandAquariumsMatter.Onefocusedonvisitors’motivationtovisitzoosandaquariumsandwhatthosevisitorstookawayfromasinglestudy,andthesecondexploredtheattitudespeoplehaveabout—andthevaluestheybringto—zoosandaquariums.FundedbyNSFandIMLSrespectively,thesestudiesgiveusastrongbaselineforfuturestudybyusingmixedmethodsandengagingmorethan16,000people.Anationalpoll,commissionedbyAZA,laterconductedanationalstudyof2020individuals.CoupledwithmanyindividualzooandaquariumstudiesandevaluationsconductedintheUnitedStatesandinternationally(mostnotablyinEnglandandAustralia)wecanclaimtoknowthefollowingaboutzooandaquariumvisitors:
Dotheylikeus?Yes.Morethan88%viewusfavorably,andlessthan3‐9%viewzoosandaquariumsunfavorably.
Dotheytrustus?Yes.ZoosandaquariumsarefarmorecredibletotheU.S.publicthanareextremists.73%seezoosandaquariumsashighlycredibleversus40%forPETA.85%viewourstaffasexpertsinanimalcare.
Doweknowwhatworks?We’relearning,especiallythroughevaluationstudiesinlotsofdifferentsettings.Weknow,forexample,thatvisitorshavepreferencesastowhatengagesthem:
LeastEngagingExperiences
MostEngagingExperienceFigure1:Typesofzooandaquariumexperiencesthatincreaseaudienceengagement. Dotheylearnanything?Yes.First,theyvalueourroleaseducationalfacilities.Theycomebecause
we’refun,safeplacestobewiththeirfamilies,butvisitorsdefinitelyvaluewhatthey(andtheir)childrenlearnaboutanimalsandnature.Second,theyknowmorethanwethinktheydo.Avisithaslesscognitiveimpactthanwewouldhavethought.Ourvisitorsknowmorethanthegeneralpublicandtheyalreadyknowthebasicconceptswhentheyenter.Further,monthsafteravisit,morethanhalfofvisitors(61%)wereabletotalkaboutwhattheylearnedduringthevisit(whichrelatedto
NoAnimalsVisible
NoInteraclon
Interaclon
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 8
whattheyclaimedtheylearnedimmediatelyafterthevisit).Otherstudieshavefoundsignificantimpactonincreasedunderstandingrelatedtoconservationversusmererecitationoffacts.
Dozoosandaquariumspromoteconnectiontonature?Yes.93%ofthepublicfindzoosandaquariumsa“goodwayforchildrentoconnectwithnature.”Ourvisitorsknowthedifferencebetweenanaturalvs.natureexperienceandtheyvaluethezoo/aquariumforprovidinganexperience,oftenanopportunitytobeoutsidewiththeirfamilies,innature.Further,forsomevisitors,thismaybetheonly“nature”experienceaccessibletosomeurbanresidents.
Doweknowwhatworks?Wehavelearnedtherearesomecomponentswhich,alongwiththesocialexchangewhichisbothamotivationforsomemanyvisitorsandaheldvalueofvisitorsingeneral,cancontributetothepotentialforapeakexperience:
Figure2:Elementsthatcontributetopeakexperiences.
Doweaffectvisitors’attitudestowardwildlife,conservation,andzoos/aquariums?Yes—ingeneral.Mostvisitors(61%)foundthattheirvisitexperiencereinforced/strengthenedvalues/attitudestowardsconservation.Visitspromptedmany(54%)toreconsidertheirroleinconservationaction,andespeciallytoseethemselvesaspartofthesolutiontoenvironmentalissues.Nearlyhalf(46%)offeredunpromptedcommentsrelatedtopersonalactionstheyplannedontakingasaconsequenceofvisitandmonthsaftertheirvisit,and35%reportedthatthevisitreinforced/strengthenedtheirbeliefsaboutconservationandstewardship.
Doweaffectvisitors’behaviors?Sometimes.Behaviorsareverycomplicated,andthereisatremendousarrayofbehaviorsassociatedwithconservationlessonsfromzoos/aquariumsandfromtalkingtotherightpeople.
Doweknowwhatworks?Asinglevisithasimpact,butcumulativeeffectsarepossibleanddesirable:
Figure3:Encounterswithmessagingthatleadtochangeinknowledge,attitude,orbehavior.
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 9
Asaresultofthisearlierdefinitiveresearch,wenolongerneedtoaskthesame,basicquestions.Thisgiveszoosandaquariumsatremendousopportunitytomoveforwardandengageinthenextgenerationofevaluationandresearch,drivenbyaneedtocontinuepushingthefieldforward.
KeyReadings:
AssociationofZoosandAquariums.(2006).ThecollectiveimpactofAmerica’szoosandaquariums.RetrievedOctober12,2006,fromhttp://www.aza.org/AboutAZA/CollectiveImpact1/
Dierking,L.D.,Burtnyk,M.S.,Buchner,K.S.,&Falk,J.H.(2002).Visitorlearninginzoosandaquariums:Aliteraturereview.Annapolis,MD:InstituteforLearningInnovation.
Falk,J.H.,Heimlich,J.E.&Bronnenkant,K.(2008).Theidentity‐relatedmotivationsofadultzooandaquariumvisitors,Curator:TheMuseumJournal.51(1),55‐79.
Falk,J.,Reinhard,E.,Vernon,C.L.,Bronnenkant,K.,Heimlich,J.E.,&Deans,N.L.(2007).Whyzoosandaquariumsmatter:Assessingtheimpactofavisittoazoooraquarium.SilverSpring,MD:AssociationofZoosandAquariums.
Fraser,J.&Sickler,J.,(2008).Whyzoosandaquariumsmatter.Edgewater,MD:InstituteforLearningInnovation.
Mason,P.(2000).Zootourism:Theneedformoreresearch.JournalofSustainableTourism,8(4),333‐339.
Melson,G.F.(2001).Whythewildthingsare.Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 10
AFrameworkforSocialScienceWork
Question1:WhatRoledoZoos/AquariumsplayinLifelongLearningExperiences?TheresearchonvaluescitedinWhyZoosandAquariumsMatterhasoutlinedastrategicframeworkandbaselinedataonvisitors’conservationattitudesandmotivationsforvisitingzoosandaquariums,theperceivedroleofthezoosandaquariumsinAmericansociety,andmethodsforassessingtheinstantaneousexperiencesattheseinstitutions.Educatorshavedevelopedtoolsforassessingfree‐choicelearningoutcomesbasedonindividualexperienceswithprogramsorexhibitsandconservationpsychologistshavedescribedbasicrelationshipsbetweenzoo/aquarium‐goingexperiencesandthedevelopmentofconservationbeliefsandvaluesbyvisitors,staff,andvolunteers.Todate,however,thisresearchhasbeenretrospective,correlative,orpre/postexperience,andhasbeenprimarilyfocusedontheperceivedpsychologicalandsociologicalvaluesthatarereinforcedorchallengedbythepresenceoftheinstitutions.Thetheoriesthathaveemergedare,atbest,tentativebecauseitdoesnotincludealongitudinaldimensionthatreflectshowthechangingfaceofzoosandaquariumscanbemoreproactiveinthefuture.
Newresearchinthisareawillexpandonthisfoundationalresearchbydevelopingrefinedevaluationmetricsthatdescribethelinksbetweenindividualexperiencesandlifelonglearning.Theresearchwillfocusondescribinghowthoseexperiencescanbecausallylinkedtoactionsbeyondthatinstitution.Furtherexaminationofhowvisitorsintegratethezoo/aquariumintheirengagementwithotherculturalinstitutionswillhelpexpandthinkingabouttheplaceofzooandaquariumexperiencesinthelifeoftheindividual.Thisresearchfocuswillpushresearcherstoinvestigatetheperceivedanddesiredroleorrolesthezoooraquariumplaysinpartnerships,events,andthelearninglifeofthecommunity‐at‐large.
Inparticular,weneedtoconsidersocialgroupexperiences—howzoosandaquariumsoperatebeyondtheirpropertylimits—throughexaminationofoutreachprograms,wordofmouth,andcommunityengagementbyzooandaquariumadvocates.Itisalsoimportantthatweunderstandhowtooptimizeparentandvisitorgoalsforcasualvisitswithonsitemessagingandexperiences.
Zoos,AquariumsandOtherCulturalInstitutions:Researchinthisareawillfocusonhowzooandaquariumvisitorsalsoengagewithotherinstitutionsandhowtheyintegratetheseexperiencesintheirlives.Projectsfocusingonadvancingtheorywilladdresshowvaluesaredevelopedacrossinstitutionswithlikemessages,orhowinstitutionswithdissimilarmessagesareintegratedintovaluesdevelopment.Evaluationdevelopmentwillfocusoncreatingsharedinstrumentsthatareabletodeterminethecontributionofzoosandaquariumstothedevelopmentofvaluesacrossinstitutiontypesbybuildingonthesharedgoalsandaffiliationsthatexistamongcultural,scientific,andrecreationalprovidersincommunities.Twoprimaryfociforthesestudieswillbeexpandingknowledgeofhowavarietyofout‐of‐homeexperiencesshapevaluesandbeliefs,andtheroleofsocialnetworksintersectwiththeseexperiences.
InstitutionalRolesintheLivesofFamilies:Significantliteratureonfamilydevelopmentexists,butverylittleaddressesthefamily’sout‐of‐homelearningexperiences.Zoosandaquariumsofferauniquesitetodevelopnewtheoryandresearchstrategiesforlearningabouthowfamiliesdevelopmeaningfromtheirexperiences.Inparticular,socialconversations,andmeaningdevelopedthroughsocialinteractions,remainswithoutsufficientstudytoguidethedevelopmentofmorefocusedparkexperiencesthatbuildontheroleofintergenerationallearninginthelivesofvisitors.
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 11
ZoosandAquariumsasLearningCommunities:Therehasbeenagreatdealoffocusoninstitutionsasplacesthatdeliverlearningtovisitors,butlittleattentiontotheinstitutionsaslearningcommunitiesthemselvesandhowtheirstaffintegrateintootherprofessionalcommunities.Researchinthisfocusareawilladdressthewholeinstitutionasalearningorganization,developingtheoryregardingwherethevaluesofeducationinourinstitutionslie?Whatarethevaluesrelatedtoadultlearningthatmightexpandexistingprogramstonewaudiences,eveninternalorcollegialaudiences?Whatvariousaudiencescouldbereachedandhow?Whatarethemechanismsbywhichvalues,motivations,engagement,andtheconservationmissionmostmakesenseforthosetargetaudiencesandourmembers/visitors?
ZoosandAquariumsintheLifeofaCommunity:Onthecommunitylevel,thereisaneedtodevelopandassessmorefocusedresearchquestionsonhowzoosandaquariumscontributetoacommunity’sculture.Forexample,canweanalyzethelargersocialandrelationalnetworksofindividuals,organizations,beliefs,values,andengagement?Isitpossibletopredictwhomightrespondtodifferentexperiencesandhow?Fociforthisresearchmayinvestigategeographiccommunitiesorculturalcommunitiesrepresentedbyethniccommunitygroups,religiousorganizations,orsocialwelfaregroupssuchastheBoysandGirlsClubsorScouting.Oneaspectofthisareaofresearchfocusesonthecommunityasopposedtotheindividualscale,andexpandstheworkonvalueperceptionstoincludevalue‐addedmeasures.
KeyReadings:Banks,J.A.,Au,K.H.,Ball,A.F.,Bell,P.,Gordon,E.W.,Gutierrez,K.,etal.(2007).Learninginandoutofschoolin
diverseenvironments:Life‐long,life‐wide,life‐deep.Seattle,Washington:CenterforMulticulturalEducation,UniversityofWashington.
Burns,A.L.,Mitchell,G.,&Obradovich,S.(1989).Ofsexrolesandstrollers:Femaleandmaleattentiontotoddlersatthezoo.SexRoles,20(5/6),309‐315.
Fraser,J.,Clayton,S.,Sickler,J.,&Taylor,A.(2009).Belongingatthezoo:Retiredvolunteers,conservationactivism,andcollectiveidentity.AgeingandSociety29(3),351‐368.
Fraser,J.,Condon,K.,&Gruber,S.,(2008).TheTouristValuePropositionofZoosandAquariums,TourismReviewInternational,11(3),279‐293.
Fraser,J.&Sickler,J.,(2008).Whyzoosandaquariumsmatter.Edgewater,MD:InstituteforLearningInnovation.
Holzer,D.,&Scott,D.(1997).Thelong‐lastingeffectsofearlyzoovisits.Curator,TheMuseumJournal,40(4),255‐257.
NationalResearchCouncil.(2009).Learningscienceininformalenvironments:People,places,andpursuits(Vols.CommitteeonLearningScienceinInformalEnvironments.BoardonScienceEducation,CenterforEducation,DivisionofBehavioralandSocialSciencesandEducation.).(P.Bell,B.Lewenstein,A.W.Shouse,&M.A.Feder,Eds.)Washington,D.C.:TheNationalAcademiesPress.
Reade,L.S.,&Waran,N.K.(1996).Themodernzoo:Howdopeopleperceivezooanimals?AppliedAnimalBehaviourScience,47,109‐118.
Reed,E.S.(1996).Thenecessityofexperience.YaleUniversityPress.
Russow,L.(1989).Changingperceptionsofanimals:Aphilosophicalview.InR.J.Hoage(Ed.),PerceptionsofanimalsinAmericanculture,(pp.25‐40).Washington,D.C.:SmithsonianInstitutionPress.
Tomasello,M.,Kruger,A.C.,&Ratner,H.H.(1993)Culturallearning.Behavioralandbrainsciences,16,495‐552.
Tunnicliffe,S.D.(1995).Zootalk:Thecontentofconversationsoffamilyvisitorgroupswhilstlookingatliveanimals.1995AZAAnnualConferenceProceedings,Atlanta,GA.645‐647.
Turley,S.K.(2001).Childrenandthedemandforrecreationalexperiences:Thecaseofzoos.LeisureStudies,20(1),1‐18.
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 12
Question2:HowDoZoosandAquariumsComparewithOtherInformalLearningInstitutions?Inthissection,weaddresstheneedforresearchandevaluationstudiesandtoolsthathelpinstitutionsassesstheirrolesinthelargercommunityofinformallearninginstitutionswithbothsharedandcompetinggoals.Itisimportanttonotethatlittlehasbeendonetodescribethenichevalueofzoosandaquariumswithinthislargerlearningcommunity.Writersonmoralphilosophyandchilddevelopmenthavefocusedonimpliedlearningorformativeexperiencesthatrelatetoencounterswithlivinganimals,butlittlehasbeendonetocomparethislearningtoothertypesofencounters.Furthermore,thesestudieshavetendedtofocusonchildrenandyouthratherthantheentirelife‐coursewherepeoplecontinuetovisitandlearnatzoosandaquariums.
Inasimilarfashion,manyorganizationssharethegoalsofzoosandaquariums,andsomeincreasinglyfocusonbringinglivingbeingsintotheirdisplayswithoutnecessarilymeetingtheaccreditationcriteriaoutlinedforAZAinstitutions.Clearly,therearemanylearninginstitutionsthatbelievethatlivinganimalsareimportanttoaccomplishinglearningwiththeseanimalsbutnotallsharethespecificconservationmissioncentraltoAZAinstitutions(citations!).Therefore,itisimportantforzoosandaquariumstodevelopnewtheoryabouthowtheirapproachtotheuseoflivingcollectionsfulfillstheirspecificmissionincontrasttolike‐mindedinstitutionssuchasnaturecenters,sciencemuseums,orothermuseumsofconscience.
Off‐PropertyandVirtualFree‐choiceLearning:Researchandevaluationstrategiesareonlystartingtoemergeonthewiderangeoffree‐choicelearningconditions,notallofwhichhavephysicalconnectionstolivinganimalsorexhibitions.Off‐siteprograms,onlinelearningenvironments,virtualenvironments,andwebcamremoteobservationsarebutsomeoftheemergingmediacreatingnewinformallearningconditionswhichimpacthowaudiencesexperiencezoosandaquariums.Thereisaneedtoadvancetheoryaroundtheroleoftheseexperiencesinthesuiteofstrategiesemployedbyzoosoraquariums,andhowthevirtualencounterswithlivinganimalsinthewildoratzoosandaquariumsarechangingknowledge,learning,andthevisitorexperiencewhentheyarriveatthephysicalplace.
EnvironmentalLearningExperiences:Increasingly,learningexperiencesinrestorationareas,publicnatureparks,internationalecotourism,andothernature‐basedlearningcentersarechangingvisitors’perceptionsofwhatisauthenticaboutthezooandaquariumexperience.Environmentalimmersion,asasimulationstrategy,cannolongercompetewithrealopportunitiesthatareshapingtheecologicallyfocusedgreeningofurbanareasandnatureopportunities.Itisknownthatzoosandaquariumsarerecognizedasnatureexperiencesbutnotnaturalexperiencesbytheirvisitors.Furtherinquiryintothe“natureofnature”atzoosandaquariumswillbeessentialtohelpingdesignersandprogramdevelopersaddressthepsychologicalshiftsinwhatexperiencesareappropriateatzoosandaquariumsandtherolethatlivingcollectionsatzoosandaquariumswillplayinpeople’slivesastheperceptionofnaturechangesinthe21stcentury.
TheRoleofZoosandAquariumsintheInformalScienceEducationCommunity(ISE):TheISECommunityisrapidlyworkingtoadvancetheorythroughknowledgeexchangenetworks.Zoosandaquariums,however,havenotbeenadequatelydistinguishedfromothertypesofsciencelearningenvironments.ComparativeresearchisnecessarytotrulyunderstandhowlivinganimalsimpactISEoutcomes,whythesevenuesareuniqueintheISEcommunity,andhowconservationeducationissimilartoanddifferentfromeitherscienceorenvironmentaleducation.
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 13
TheArts&Humanities:Recentresearchontheperceivedvalueofzoosandaquariums,andexperimentswithartsandhumanitiesprogrammingatsomeleadinginstitutions,haveradicallyshiftedourunderstandingabouthowvisitorswanttousetheseinstitutions.Moraldecision‐making,perceptionsofselfinsociety,andthemetaphoricfunctionofzoosandaquariumsastheysupportthediscoursearoundurbanconservationquestionsareopenforinvestigation.Itisclearfromcurrentresearchthatvisitorssupportthesetopics,butthereisadearthofempiricalresearchonhowthemanydisciplineswithintheartsandhumanitiesintersectwiththeconversationandsocialmissionsofzoosandaquariumsintheircommunities.Redressingthisdeficitthroughdirectedanthropological,psychological,andsociologicalstudyofhowartsandhumanitiesprogramsfosterconservationvaluesinzoosandaquariumscanhelptoadvancetheoryandguidethedevelopmentofinnovativeprogrammingwhichcanthenbeevaluatedagainstthemissionofzoosandaquariums.
KeyReadings:Burton,C.,&Scott,C.(2003).Museums:Challengesforthe21stcentury.InternationalJournalofArts
Management,5(2),56‐67.
Benbow,S.M.P.(2000).Zoos:Publicplacestoviewprivatelives.JournalofPopularCulture,33(4),13‐23.
Borun,M.,Chambers,M.,Dritsas,J.,&Johnson,J.(1997).Enhancingfamilylearningthroughexhibits.Curator,TheMuseumJournal,40(4),279‐295.
Crane,V.,Nicholson,H.J.,Chen,M.,&Bitgood,S.(1994).Informalsciencelearning:Whattheresearchsaysabouttelevision,sciencemuseumsandcommunity‐basedprojects.Dedham,MA:ResearchCommunications,Ltd.
Falk,J.H.,Heimlich,J.E.,&Foutz,S.(Eds.).(2009).Free‐choicelearningandtheenvironment.Lanham,MD:AltaMiraPress.
Griffin,J.(1994).Learningtolearnininformalsciencesettings.ResearchinScienceEducation,24(1),121‐128.
Leinhardt,G.,Crowley,K.,&Knutson,K.(Eds.).(2002).Learningconversationsinmuseums.Mawah,NJ:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates,Inc.
Moussouri,T.(2002).Researchinglearninginmuseumsandgalleries,1990‐1999:Abibliographicreview.Leicester,UK:ResearchCentreforMuseumsandGalleries,DepartmentofMuseumStudies.
Packer,J.(2006).Learningforfun:Theuniquecontributionofeducationalleisureexperiences.Curator,TheMuseumJournal,49(3),329‐344.
Pekarik,A.,Doering,Z.,&Karns,D.(1999).Exploringsatisfyingexperiencesinmuseums.Curator,TheMuseumJournal,42(2),117‐129.
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 14
Question3:HowDoZoosandAquariumsShapeSocialActionandSocialActivism?Onegoalofconservationeducationisthecreationofenvironmentallyliteratecitizenswhowillmakedecisionsandactinawaythatbenefitsthemselvesandtheenvironment.Toachievethis,advancingcriticalthinkingandpromotingsocialactionbecomecomponentsofsuccessfulconservationeducationefforts.Engagementincommunityimprovement,socialactivism,orsocialactiononbehalfofanimals,wildlife,orconservationarepotentialoutcomesofzooandaquariumeducationprograms,butonlyifthereisadequatetheorytodefinehowtheseactionscanaccomplishtheintendedoutcomes.Evaluationtoolsandstrategiesforassessingsuccess,andadirectedcycleoflearningwithinthecommunitycanhelprefinethesetacticsacrosstheAZAcommunity.Toaccomplishtheseends,therearethreespecificneedsfornewresearchtohelpshapetheseconservationeducationstrategies.
StudiesAssessingtheRoleofScale:Zooandaquariumstudieshavetraditionallyfocusedonanindividualagentwhocanmakechangeintheirpersonalbehaviorfollowingavisit.Itisknownthatpeoplelearnoverrepeatedvisitsandcanattribute,atleastinpart,somechangeintheirbehaviorstotheirexperienceswithlivinganimalsatzoosandaquariums.Intermsofpersonalchangeandindividualaction,however,thediscoursewithinthezooandaquariumeducationcommunityhascontinuedtofocusonthevisitorinisolationratherthanasalearnerwithinasocialworld.Thelackofknowledgeaboutthedifferenceinwhatactionsindividualscantakeorchoosetotakegiventheirsocialcontextappearstolimitcurrenteducationstrategies.Developmentofresearchintohowzooandaquariumeducationprogramsworkwithgroupshasthepotentialtoshiftcurrenteducationstrategiesandtheirevaluationtothelevelofsocialchange.Furtherstudyofhowindividualbehavior‐changeimpactsthepersonchangedonapersonallevelandwithintheirsocialgroupcanalsohelpclarifyeducationoutcomesandanticipatedresults.Lastly,developingknowledgeandcommonevaluationstrategiesforassessinghowindividualconservationactionshelpmoveacommunity,andincombinationwithresultsfromotherAZAinstitutionsthenationaswell,towardlargerconservationgoals,isessentialtoanoverarchingeducationstrategy.
Secondly,therehasbeenlittlestudyoftheroleofgroupscreatedthroughthezoooraquarium’sagency,andhowthosegroupsaccomplishchangeintheircommunity.Furthermore,theinstitutionsthemselvesmayserveassocialagentsinacommunityofculturalinstitutions.Manyzoosoraquariumsfostercommunityinitiativesandhavestaffservingoncommunityboardswhereconservationissuesarecontestedorlaunched.Theseareasofsocialactionarenotstrategicallyrepresentedwithinanysocialactionframework,norhasthesociologicaltheoryofsocialchangebeenadequatelyorganizedinamannerthatcanaidtheseinstitutionstoevaluatetheiropportunitiesforsuccess.Asaneducationalstrategy,itisnecessarytobuildthistheoreticalframework,assesstheknowledgeofhowscaleandperceivedlegitimacyofzoosandaquariumsassocialagentsofchangecanbeusedtoaccomplishtheseoutcomes,andconstructanevaluationprogramtoassessthislearningthroughoutthezooandaquariumcommunity.
Issuesofbehaviors:Whilethetraditionaleducationgoalofzoosandaquariumshasbeentopromotemoreconservationbehavior,thereremainslittletheorydevelopedaroundtheconstraintsthatlimitvariousbehaviorstheypromoted.ResearchinAustraliahasdemonstratedthatdevelopingbehavioralrecommendationsfornon‐nativespecieswasdifficultbecausetherewerefewcausallinksbetweenthestorytellingstrategiesinzoosandaquariumsandwhatvisitorscoulddotoimpactthefuturelivesforspeciesrepresentedthere.Basedonthisresult,thereissubstantialneedforresearchintohowpeopleunderstandthedegreeofproximityofabehaviorinrelationtoaconservationmessage—thatis,thenearnessofthe
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 15
stimuliprovidedinanexhibitorprogramtotheactitself.Thereisalsoaneedtoarticulatethepsychologicalbarrierstobehaviorspromotedbyzoosandaquariums,suchastheabilityandauthoritytoact.Althoughthesebehavior‐changetheorieshavebeenresearchedextensivelyinmediaandconsumerpsychology,thereremainslittleresearchonhowtheseconditionsapplytofree‐choiceenvironmentsandspecificallyinzoosandaquariumswherethebehaviorsaresomewhatabstractbecausethestimulifrequentlyrepresentconservationissuesremotefromthevisitor.Therefore,furtherstudyoftheuniqueissuesofagencyandproximitytotheissueshouldbespecificallyinvestigatedinthesesettings.Tofacilitatethis,itisreasonableforzoosandaquariumstoalsodevelopamoreclearlyarticulatedsetofbehavioralmessagesandinstructionsforat‐homeimplementation,andthendefinethosethatofferthegreatestefficacyforbehaviorchangeorreinforcement.Lastly,concertedfocusoncomparativestudyoftargetedbehavioraloutcomesthatmostresonatewithazoo/aquariumvisitwouldhelpfocuseducationstrategiesandgoalstowardthecapabilitiesoftheseinstitutions.
Issuesofmeasurement:Duringthewritingofthisdocument,wedevelopedsomestandardizedmeasuresforentrymotivations,beliefs,andconservationvalues.However,thesemeasureswerestandardizedforeaseofuseacrosstheUSA,anddonotaddresscontextualchangesthatmayexistwithincommunities,norhowspecificissuesmaybeopportunisticallyusedindifferentregionstohigheradvantage.Thereisanemerginggroupofregionalassociationsofzoosoraquariums,aswellasworldwidegroupsseekingtoachievethesameends.GroupslikeTheOceanProjecthavedoneagreatservicebydemonstratingthatnationalandinternationaldatacanhelpframeandshapemessagesandmeasurementbenchmarksfortheirmembers.TheYearoftheFrogdemonstratedthattherecanbeaworldwidecollaborationonissue‐basedconservationmessaging.Inthistopicarea,however,coherentsub‐groupsofzoosandaquariumscouldadvanceresearchsubstantiallybyfocusingonhowculturalcommunitiessuchasOhio,thezoosandaquariumsofthePacificNorthwest,orothercoherentcommunitiesaddresssocialissuesandchangeregionallyinordertoassesstheireffortsasacollectivegroup.Thiscooperativeresearchstrategywouldgatherresourcesaroundthedevelopmentofevaluationmetricsthatreflectthecommunityandfree‐choicelearningcommunityinaggregateratherthaninstitutionsactinginisolation.
KeyReadings:Cialdini,R.B.2001.Influence:Scienceandpractice(4thed.).Boston:Allyn&Bacon.
Fraser,J.,&Wharton,D.(2007).Thefutureofzoos.Curator,TheMuseumJournal,50(1),41‐54.
Hanna,M.G.&Robinson,B.(1994)Strategiesforcommunityempowerment:Direct‐actionandtransformativeapproachestosocialchangepractice.Lewiston,NY:EdwinMellenPress.
McKenzie‐Mohr,D.,andW.Smith.1999.FosteringSustainableBehavior:AnIntroductiontoCommunity‐basedSocialMarketing.BritishColumbia,Canada:NewSocietyPublishers.
Mezirow,J.(1991)Transformativedimensionsofadultlearning.SanFrancisco:Jossey‐Bass.
Rothman,J,Erlich,J.L.,&Tropman,J.E.(2001)StrategiesofCommunityIntervention:MacroPractice.Independence,KY:WadsworthPublishing.
Smith,L.,Broad,S.,&Weiler,B.(2008).Acloserexaminationoftheimpactofzoovisitsonvisitorbehaviour.JournalofSustainableTourism,16(5).RetrievedOctober18,2008fromhttp://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t794297833.
Swanagan,J.S.(2000).Factorsinfluencingzoovisitors'conservationattitudesandbehaviour.JournalofEnvironmentalEducation,31(4),26‐31.
Tett,L.(2006)Communityeducation,lifelonglearningandsocialinclusion.2ndEdition.PolicyandPracticeinEducation.Edinbourgh,Scotland:DunedinAcademicPress.
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 16
Question4:WhatRoledoZoosorAquariumsplayregardingSocialServices?TherecentlycompletedPerceivedValueofZoosandAquariumsstudyidentifiedanewroleforzoosandaquariumsnottraditionallypartoftheAZAdiscourse,butwhichrepresentsadistinctopportunityandresearchneedforzoosandaquariums.InterviewswithpoliticalleadersandinterceptsurveysatafewzoosandaquariumsuncoveredthatsocialserviceagenciesexpectanduseAZAinstitutionstofurthertheirefforts.Whilesomezoosandaquariumshaveexperimentedwithanimaltherapyoranimalcontactprograms,fewhaveconsideredthesocialvalueorsocialserviceoftheseinstitutionsasenvironmentsthatcanimpactdevelopmentofskillsandrelationshipsaspartofcommunitysocialserviceprograms.Althoughmuchofthismaterialhasbeenanecdotallydescribedinafewveryrecentstudies,itwouldseemthatsocialserviceagencieshavediscoveredtheseinstitutionsasanimportantvenue.Inaddition,somepoliticianswouldliketoseetheseinstitutionscommittosupportingat‐riskfamilies,andreportingontheseactivities,butthereremainslittleresearchontheeffectivenessorimportanceofthatwork.
Perceptionsofrole:Inthefirstinstance,thereisneedforqualitativestudytoassesswhetherthesocialserviceagencies,suchasstateandfederalgovernmenthealth‐care,incomeassistanceandhumanserviceagencies,themselvesbelievethatzoosandaquariumscanofferthemsupport.Atanationallevel,AZAstaffcoulddevelopalistofsocialservicecollaborationscurrentlysupportedbymemberzoosandaquariumsandataskforcecouldidentifyataxonomyofthecurrentlevelsofengagementandpossiblepartnersforexploringhowthesetypesofengagementrelatetothedevelopmentofenhancedmotivations,skillsorknowledgerelatedtoanimals,wildlifeorconservation.Usingthesedata,anewmulti‐institutionalexploratorystudycouldbedevelopedtoexplorehowtherolesandthecommunitiesthemselvesenhanceorlimitthemissionobjectivesoftheseinstitutions.
Potentialaudiences:Fewzoosoraquariumsarefree‐accessatalltimes.Morethan95%ofzoosandaquariumsoperateatleastinpartthroughadmissionfees,butmanyoftheseinstitutionsdoofferfreeorsponsoredaccessaspartoftheircommunityservices.Inafewcases,zoosandaquariumspartnerwithotherculturalinstitutionsandsocialserviceagenciestoprovideaccessforlow‐incomevisitorsorthosereceivingsocialassistance.Clearlytherearequestionsrelatedtotheefficacyandthelonger‐termimpactofprovidingaccess.
Theresearchquestionsinthisareadonotfocusonbuildingminorityorunderservedaudiencesforthesakeofaudience,butratherontheservicesofferedandthecomparativevalueoftheseuniquevenuesforprovidingsuchservices.Professionalandpoliticalaudiencesmightpotentiallysupportzooandaquariumworkwithsocialserviceagencies,orinstitutionsmightuseincreasedengagementwithsocialservicesprofessionalstohelprefineandtargetprogramsthataidtheirlocalcommunitymembersandbuildlong‐termconstituenciesforpositiveexperiencesatzoosandaquariums.
Existingpsychologicaluseandvalence:Again,anecdotally,itisreportedthatsocialserviceagenciesusezoosandaquariumsaspublicvenuestosupportsupervisedparentalvisits,asdestinationsforschoolorothergroupswithlearningdifferencesordevelopmentalchallenges,andaspublicservicesmadeavailabletosupportparentswithchildreninlow‐incomeorat‐riskcommunities.Familyguidesandworkshopshavebeencreatedtohelpthesevisitorsusetheinstitutionforsciencelearning,butthereappearstobeadeficitinunderstandingtheotherpsychologicalandsociologicaldevelopmentalbenefitsthatalsoaccruefromdirectandguided
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 17
engagement.Futureexplorationofthistopiccouldhelpzoosandaquariumsdevelopamorecomprehensivestrategyforcollaborationwiththesocialservicesintheircommunity.
KeyReadings:Devault,M.L.(2000).Producingfamilytime:Practicesofleisureactivitybeyondthehome.QualitativeSociology,
23(4),485‐503.
Fraser,J.&Sickler,J.,(2008).Whyzoosandaquariumsmatter.Edgewater,MD:InstituteforLearningInnovation.
Shaw,S.M.,&Dawson,D.(2001).Purposiveleisure:Examiningparentaldiscoursesonfamilyactivities.LeisureSciences,23(4),217‐231.
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 18
Question5:WhataretheUniqueCharacteristicsofLearninginZoosandAquariums?Conservationeducationthusfarhasfocusedthemissionofzoosandaquariumsonchanginghowpeoplebehave.Currentknowledgetellsusthatlearningmustincorporateknowledge,affect/attitude,andskillinastrategicrelationshipinordertomanifestdesiredbehaviorchanges.Theuniqueaspectsofthezoooraquariumasafree‐choicelearninginstitutionbasedontheirdistinctcollectionsandexperiencesoffersafertilegroundforcontinuedtheoreticalandpracticalexploration.Thefollowingareseveralkeyareasofinquiryforlearninginzoosandaquariums.
Relationshipsbetweenvariouslearningdomains:Nowthatbaselineinformationaboutlearningiswelldefined,itisimportanttofocusthenextstepontrans‐disciplinarystudies.Thatis,toexaminewhereandhowspecificdomainsofknowledgeintersectinazoooraquarium.Questionscanfocusonhowcharacteristicsofalearningdomainrelatetothedevelopmentofintentionality,orthewaysthatlearningoccursasvisitors,repeatvisitors,members,volunteers,staff,andorganizationscometoarriveatnewknowledge.
Thecharacteristicsoflearners/learninginzoosandaquariums:TherecentNRCreportonLearningScienceinInformalEnvironments(Belletal,2009)buildsonrecentresearchintoidentity,temporalidentity,andmotivations.Thisnewstrandofresearch(Strand6)focusesonidentityprocesses,whichinthiscaserefertothedevelopmentofthesenseofselfasastableconstructthatcanpredictbehaviors,beliefs,andattitudestowardotherpeopleandtheenvironment.Identitytheorydoesnothavearobustresearchtraditioninzoosoraquariums.Furtherresearchonthistopicinsituationsoutsidethehomeorschoolisimportanttofurtherunderstandhowidentitycanbeimplicatedinthedesireforself‐directedlearningorfacilitatingthelearningofothers.Inparticular,thereisgreatneedforexperimentalresearchtoidentifystrategies,exhibitconfigurations,andothercontextsthathelpvisitorsperceivethemselvesassuccessfullearners.Aretheredifferentapproachestolearninginzoosandaquariums,preferencesforlearninginthesetypesofenvironments,orcognitiveprocessesinstigatedbyconditionsinzoosandaquariumsthatsetthemapartfromotherlearninginstitutions?
Thesocialnatureofgrouplearning:Secondly,oneofthecorechallengesfacingzoosandaquariumsisthesocialnatureoftheirexperiences.Recentresearchhasdemonstratedthatlearninginzoosoraquariumsissubstantiallyalteredbythecontext,priorities,andvaluesofanindividual’ssocialgroup.Unfortunately,themethodologyforunderstandinglearningingroupsorintergenerationallearninglagsbehindthemethodsforothertypesofassessment.Thereisneedtodevelopmorerobustmethodsforassessinggroupengagementandlearningaswellastheoryandstrategyaroundcomparingsocialorgrouplearningconstructsandprocesses.Furtherexplorationofwhetherthereareuniqueaspects,opportunities,orconditionsthatsupportsocialandgrouplearninginthesesettingsisalsoworthyofpursuit.
Thenatureofscienceinzoosandaquariums:Zoosandaquariumsfocusonconservationactionasthelogicaloutcomeofsciencelearning.ThisfocusiscloselytiedtotheNRCstrandof“reflectonthenatureofscience”(Strand4).Thecharacteristicsofthescientificenterprisebasicallyassumethatscienceisa)subjecttochange(i.e.,tentative),b)empirically‐basedonevidencefromthenaturalworld,c)subjectivelydefined,d)involvesinference,imagination,andcreativitybytheinterpreter,ande)isembeddedintheculture.Zoosandaquariumsofferusefulenvironmentsforinvestigatinghowindividualsintheirgroupsexplorethenaturalbehaviors
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 19
ofanimals,knowledgeaboutspecies,andculturalassumptionsandtheimplicationsofthatexplorationontheoverallculturalunderstandingofthenatureofscience.
Questionsrelatedtospecificcontextandlearning:Philosophically,zoosandaquariumscontinuetodebatewhatislearnedwhenviewingcaptivewildanimals,andhowtheexhibit’ssetting(forexample,immersionversusforced‐flowexhibits)impactslearning.However,thesecontextvariableshavenotbeenadequatelyarticulatedforcomparativeempiricalresearch,relyinginsteadoncasestudydataalone.ThisleavesopenanimportantquestionforfutureresearchersthattheNRCreportalsocalledfor:Doesthecontextofthezoooraquariumalterthewaysinwhichpeoplelearnconceptsanddevelopskills?(TwoindependentstrandsintheNRCreport.)Thisstudyareawouldbestservethecommunityifitfocusedonwhethertherearecontextualbarrierstolearningrelatedtohowanimalsareexhibited,whatcontradictorymessagesvisitorsascertainduringtheirvisitandhowtheydrawmeaningfromthoseconflictingmessages.Thisresearchwouldmovebeyondstudyoftheanimalorinterpretivetexttoexplorewhichspecificdomainsoflearningarebestfacilitatedthroughtheoverallcontext,andhowthecontextitselfservestoteach.
KeyReadings:Acampora,R.(2005).Zoosandeyes:Contestingcaptivityandseekingsuccessorpractices.SocietyandAnimals,
13(1),69‐88.
Balmford,A.,Leader‐Williams,N.,Mace,G.,Manica,A.,Walter,O.,West,C.,andZimmermann,A.(2007).Messagereceived?QuantifyingtheimpactofinformalconservationeducationonadultsvisitingUKzoos.InA.Zimmermann,M.Hatchwell,L.Dickie&C.West(Eds.),CatalystsforConservation:aDirectionforZoosinthe21stCentury(pp.120‐136).Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.
Beardsworth,A.,&Bryman,A.(2001).Thewildanimalinlatemodernity:ThecaseoftheDisneyizationofzoos.TouristStudies,10(1),83‐104.
Broad,S.&Weiler,B.(1998).Captiveanimalsandinterpretation–ataleoftwotigerexhibits.TheJournalofTourismStudies,9(1),14‐27
Bruni,C.,Fraser,J.,&Schultz,P.W.(2008).Thevalueofzooexperiencesforconnectingpeoplewithnature.VisitorStudies,11(2),139‐150.
Clayton,S.,Fraser,J.&Saunders,C.D.(2009).Zooexperiences,conversations,connectionsandconcernforanimals.ZooBiology28(5)377‐397.
Lee,K.(2005).Zoos:Aphilosophicaltour.Basingstoke,UK:PalgraveMacmillan.
Marsick,V.J.,Volpe,M.,&Watkins,K.E.(1999)Theoryandpracticeofinformallearningintheknowledgeera.Advancesindevelopinghumanresources.1(3):80‐95.
Pekarik,A.,Doering,Z.,&Karns,D.(1999).Exploringsatisfyingexperiencesinmuseums.Curator,TheMuseumJournal,42(2),117‐129.
Rabb,G.,&Saunders,C.D.(2005).Thefutureofzoosandaquariums,conservationandcaring.InternationalZooYearbook,39,1‐26.
Schauble,L.,Leinhardt,G.,&Martin,L.(1997).AFrameworkforOrganizingaCumulativeResearchAgendainInformalLearningContexts.JournalofMuseumEducation,22(2&3),3‐8.
Smith,M.C.&Pourch,T.(1998)Adultlearninganddevelopment:Perspectivesfromeducationalpsychology.Mahwah,NJ:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates,Inc.
Tofield,S.,Coll,R.K.,Vyle,B.&Bolstad,R.(2003)Zoosasasourceoffreechoicelearning.ResearchinScience&TechnologicalEducation.21(1),67‐99.
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 20
Question6:AZooandAquariumEducationProfession?Aszooandaquariumeducationmatures,questionsregardingthedevelopmentofthefieldasaprofessionareboundtoemerge.Atpresent,zooandaquariumeducatorsshareagreatdealwiththeircounterpartsinotherenvironmentalandscienceeducationinstitutions,buttheyhavealsorecognizedthatsomeconditionsareuniquetothezoooraquariumsetting,inthesamewaythatanimalbehavioralresearchandanimalhusbandryprofessionalsinzoosandaquariumshaveuniqueknowledgesetsthatdistinguishthemfromtheirpeers.Thisuniqueconditionsuggeststheneedforanewcomparativestudyofzooandaquariumeducationpracticeagainstthecharacteristicsthatdefineaprofession.Thesequestionschallengewhetherthereisadifferencebetweenzoo/aquariumeducationandotherfree‐choicelearningsettings,whatprofessionaldevelopmentisnecessarytotrulyengageinthebusiness,andwhatstandardsofpracticeareuniquetothisfield.
Componentsofaprofession:Toengagewiththesequestions,itisnecessarytobeginanexploratorystudytoarticulatetheuniquecomponentsofthisprofessionandtodistinguishthesecomponentsfromthoseheldbyalliedprofessions.Undertakingthisprofessionalizationstudywouldprovidetheopportunitytodefinewhatchangesarenecessaryforthefieldtobeviewedasaprofessionbythoseoutsidethecommunity,andhowtoengageinthatdiscussioninternally.Lastly,aprofessionisdefinedbyacodeofethicsinpractice,andclarificationoftheseethicsisessentialtotheadvancementofaprofessionaldefinitionofpractice.
Conditionsofaprofession:Asecondtierofresearchintotheprofessionwouldestablishwhetherthereareuniquecharacteristicsofzoo/aquariumeducatorsthatdistinguishthemfromothereducators.Inthiscase,anexplorationoftheuniqueskillsetsneededtobesuccessfulinzoo/aquariumeducationwouldfocusontheeducatorsthemselvesastheresearchpopulation;examinethepedagogicalstancethatleadstosuccess;anddeterminewhetherthefieldistrans‐disciplinary,interdisciplinary,orauniquefielduntoitself.Detailedexaminationofthecareerpathsofzoo/aquariumeducators;theabilitytomoveoutsidetheprofessionafterestablishingexpertisewithinthefield;andtheirprofessionalaspirations,wouldenhancethestudy.
Progressoftheprofession:Lastly,historicalresearchintothezooandaquariumfieldwouldoffervaluableinstructiononhowthefieldhaschangedandwhystandardsthatsupporttheevolutionofaprofessioninzooandaquariumeducationhavedeveloped.Thiscomparativestudywouldexaminetheemergenceofenvironmentaleducationandmuseumeducationasseparatedisciplines,whereandwhythesepedagogiesweredistinct,andhowthetraditionaltrainingofeducatorsinzoosandaquariumshasadaptedwithinthesetwofields.Thisresearchshouldseektoanswerthequestionofhowthepracticeofeducationinzoosandaquariumshaschangedovertimeandtowhatend,whatemergenttrendscharacterizethefieldtoday,andhowexcellenceinpracticeisdefinedandmeasured.
KeyReadings:Evetts,J.(2003).Thesociologicalanalysisofprofessionalism.InternationalSociology,18(2),395‐415.
Friedson,E.(2001).Professionalism:Thethirdlogic.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.
Hargreaves,A.(2000)Fouragesofprofessionalismandprofessionallearning.TeachersandTeaching:TheoryandPractice,6(2):151‐182.
Kultgen,J.H.(1998)Ethicsandprofessionalism.Philadelphia:UniversityofPennsylvaniaPress.
Vollmer,H.M.&Mills,D.M.(1966)Professionalization.Prentice‐Hallseriesonsociology.UpperSaddleRiver,NJ:Prentice‐Hall.
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 21
Question7:HowdoweAssess,DisseminateandApplyExistingKnowledge?Inanyfield,thereisanongoingneedtocontinuallyreviewnewresearchbothwithinandbeyondthefielditself.Thepracticeofsynthesizingandapplyingknowledgeinserviceofthefieldisessentialtoexpandingknowledge.Exploringwhatisknownacrossdisciplineshelpstoidentifyconceptsoropportunitiesthatresideinthatworkthatmaybelessevidenttothoseworkingwithinthefield,helpstochallengeassumptions,andoffersnewperspectivesthatcanenhancepractice.Thisexerciseof“datadiving”isbestcharacterizedunderfourcategoriesofwork.
Breadthofparentdisciplines:Asanappliededucationfield,thereisbasicresearchconductedinseveraldisciplinesthatcaninformthework.Forthisactivity,itisnecessarytothinkbroadlyaboutdisciplinesandreachouttoleadingscholarsinthosefieldstodeterminehowthatmaterialapplies.Inzoosandaquariums,forexample,educatorshaveembracedconservationandenvironmentalpsychology,whereasconsumerpsychologyandtranspersonalpsychologyofferdifferentperspectivesonlearning.Moreimportantly,anthropology,sociologyandpoliticalscienceremainunder‐sourcedbythoseseekingtoadvancenewknowledgeincommunities.Continualattentiontothesub‐disciplineswithinthesocialsciencesandhumanitiescanoffermanynewopportunitiestoexpandthinkingaboutthezooandaquariumexperience.
Deepliteraturesynthesis:Inadditiontothebroadassessmentacrossdisciplines,thereisvalueindelvingdeeplyintowhatisknown,howitisknown,andhowithascometohavemeaningwithinadiscipline.Synthesizingdeeplyisavaluabletoolforunderstandinghowmeaninghasbeenappliedtocurrentlyacceptedwisdom.
Meta‐analysisofstudies:Thereisnolongeradeficitofresearchorevaluationinthezooandaquariumfield.Asshownintheopeningpagesofthisreport,thereareagreatnumberofbothresearchandevaluationstudiesthathavehelpedprovethatzoosandaquariumsachievetheirgoals.Unfortunately,manyofthesestudieshavebeenconductedinisolation.Theliteraturereviewandpost‐hocanalysisofexistingdatasetsaretwoareaswarrantedforfurtherstudygiventhisexplodingtreasuretroveofdata.Forinstance,aresearchermaychoosetolookforanswersacrossexistingstudiesandbringnewresearchtraditionstobearonexistingresults.Forthemajorityofthiswork,secondaryanalysisofreportedfindingshasthepotentialtounlockapplicabletheorythatisconcealedbycasestudiesorlocationspecificanalysis.
Archivaldatadiving:Often,researchandevaluationstudies’datasetscanbeusedtoaskneworadditionalquestions.Delvingintoolddatasetstore‐analyzeortoasknewquestionsusingtheexistingdatacanbeapowerfultool.Thisisparticularlyrelevantwhennewmodelsemergefromcross‐disciplinarystudies.Thisstrategyhasprovenparticularlyusefulinqualitativeresearchwhentranscriptsallowsecondarycodingorexaminationforunderlyingmeaning.Forexample,combiningfivestudiesthatusedtranscriptstoreportexperiencesinzoos/aquariumsmayrevealnewinformationthatwasconcealedinthecontextofanyoneofthestudieswhenconsideredinisolation.
KeyReadings:Brown,J.S.&Duguid,P.(1991).Organizationallearningandcommunities‐of‐practice:Towardaunifiedviewof
working,learning,andinnovation.OrganizationScience,2(1),40‐57.Gupta,B.,Iyer,L.S.,&Aronson,J.E.(2000)Knowledgemanagement:practicesandchallenges.Industrial
Management&DataSystems,100(1),17–21.
TheAZAFrameworkforZooandAquariumSocialScienceResearch 22
ConclusionWhatdoestheCECenvisionasthefutureforresearchinzooandaquariumeducation?Thereisnoonerecommendedapproach,butrather,theCECseesavarietyofstudies—evaluative,applied,andbasic—conductedthroughamixtureoflevels.
Wesee:
Independentstudiesinlocalzoosandaquariums Collaborative,confirmatory,andreplicationstudiesatoneortwosites Smallactiongroupsthatmightbedefinedregionally,byspecies,byprogram,orby
interest Nationallyrepresentativestudies Universityresearchersworkingbeyondtheboundariesofzoosandaquariums
Thisframeworkdoesnotaddressfundingneeds,butdoesrecognizethesubstantiveneedfortheimplementationofanaggressiveresearchagenda.Clearly,evaluativeworkmustbeconductedasapartofallprofessionaleducationactivity.Suchworkcouldbegintocontributetosubquestionsintheaboveframeworkandthusbeincorporatedintonormalroutine.Onthecollaborativeandsmallactiongrouplevel,fundedprojectscan,andshould,usetheframeworktodemonstratehowtheprojectwillprovideinsightintopartofanyoftheframeworkquestions.Forthelargerstudies,externalfunding,oftenfromFederalagenciesorfundingorganizationswhoseektolearnabouthowthenationisdevelopingaconcernfornaturewouldberequired,andsuchstudiesshouldemergeatleastinpartnershipandwiththeknowledgeoftheCECandAZA.
Ultimately,whatwelearnhelpszoosandaquariumsmeettheirconservationmission.Thus,theCECstronglyencouragesthatallresearchbeshared,bothacademicallyandpractically.Itwillultimatelybeimportantthatanyresearchfindingsfittingintotheaboveframeworkshouldbedigestibleandusablebythosedoingeducationinourinstitutions,andthosewhoareresponsibleforthedirectionandmanagementofourinstitutionsandourfuture.