The Army’s Future Force Capstone Concept 2015-2024 Presented … · 2011. 5. 14. · in Joint Operations The Army’s Future Force Capstone Concept 2015-2024 Presented by BG David

1

The Armyin Joint Operations

The Army’s Future ForceCapstone Concept

2015-2024

Presented by BG David FastabendDeputy Director, TRADOC Futures Center

25 July 2005

Report Documentation Page Form ApprovedOMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering andmaintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, ArlingtonVA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if itdoes not display a currently valid OMB control number.

1. REPORT DATE 25 JUL 2005

2. REPORT TYPE N/A

3. DATES COVERED -

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE The Army’s Future Force Capstone Concept 2015-2024

5a. CONTRACT NUMBER

5b. GRANT NUMBER

5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER

6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER

5e. TASK NUMBER

5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) TRADOC Futures Center Fort Monroe, VA

8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONREPORT NUMBER

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S)

11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S)

12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited

13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The original document contains color images.

14. ABSTRACT

15. SUBJECT TERMS

16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT

SAR

18. NUMBEROF PAGES

21

19a. NAME OFRESPONSIBLE PERSON

a. REPORT unclassified

b. ABSTRACT unclassified

c. THIS PAGE unclassified

Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

IRREGULARCATASTROPHIC

TRADITIONALDISRUPTIVE

The Problem: The Joint Operating Environment

U.S.

Adversaries Seek:Tactical Access DenialOperational ExclusionStrategic Preclusion

World-Wide Areas of Operations

2




U.S.

Pose Complex ThreatsAdapt ContinuouslyDisperse Into Complex Terrain

Tactical Access Denial

HVY

LT

IRRMED

: Seaports: Airfields 3

4




U.S.

Pose Complex ThreatsAdapt ContinuouslyDisperse Into Complex TerrainBlock Points of EntryProtect Key AssetsThreaten Intermediate

Staging Bases

: Seaports: Airfields

Tactical Access DenialOperational Exclusion

HVY

LT

IRRMED

Cruise Missiles

IRBMs

ISB

ISB: Intermediate Staging Base

5

Threaten the Homeland




U.S.


Staging BasesThreaten the HomelandAct Quickly


Tactical Access DenialOperational ExclusionStrategic Preclusion

HVY

LT

IRRMED

Cruise Missiles

IRBMs

ISB

ISB: Intermediate Staging Base

6

Problem: Tactical Access DenialSolution: Tactical Engagement

Direct Engagement

Indirect Fires

Sensor = shooter

Platform vs Platform

7


Direct Engagement

Indirect Fires

Sensor = shooter


Mass

Maneuver

Contact = Meeting Engagement

Survivability = PassiveProtection

8

Direct Engagement

Indirect Fires

Sensor = shooter


Mass

Maneuver


Survivability = PassiveProtectionThe Passive Protection Challenge

Line of Sight Anti-Tank


9

Direct Engagement

Indirect Fires

Sensor = shooter


Mass

Maneuver

Contact = Meeting EngagementR

R

R

R


Survivability = PassiveProtection•SEE FIRST

10

Direct Engagement

Indirect Fires

Sensor = shooter


Mass

Maneuver

Contact = Meeting EngagementR

R

R

R


Survivability = PassiveProtection•SEE FIRST

•UNDERSTAND FIRST

•ACT FIRST

•FINISH DECISIVELY

Direct Engagement

Indirect Fires

Sensor = shooter


Mass

11

Maneuver


Survivability = PassiveProtection

R

R

R

R

•SEE FIRST•UNDERSTAND FIRST

•ACT FIRST

System

Cooperative

EffectsDecisive

Active

• NETWORK ENABLED BATTLE COMMAND


•FINISH DECISIVELY

12

Problem: Operational ExclusionSolution: Operational Maneuver

ISB FSB


FSB: Forward Staging BaseISB: Intermediate Staging Base

13

ISB FSB

INTRATHEATER OPERATIONAL MANEUVER



FSB: Forward Staging BaseISB: Intermediate Staging Base

14

ISB FSB

INTRATHEATER OPERATIONAL MANEUVERDECISIVE MANEUVER


15


ISB FSB

INTRATHEATER OPERATIONAL MANEUVERDECISIVE MANEUVER

CONCURRENT AND SUBSEQUENT STABILITY OPNS

DISTRIBUTED SUPPORT & SUSTAINMENT

Problem: Strategic PreclusionSolution: Strategic Responsiveness



U.S.

80-10080-100

• SHAPING & ENTRY OPERATIONS

HVY

LT

MEDIRR



IRBMs

8-12

20

ISB

Cruise Missiles


ISB: Intermediate Staging Base16

17

Problem: Strategic PreclusionSolution: Strategic Responsiveness



U.S.FSB

ISB

80-10080-100

• SHAPING & ENTRY OPERATIONS

HVY

LT

MEDIRR



Cruise Missiles

IRBMs

8-12

20

• OMSD: OPERATIONAL MANEUVER OVER STRATEGIC DISTANCE

OMSD - AirOMSD - Sea

18

Coalition

XXX

ISR SatelliteCommercialComms Satellite

MilitaryComms Satellite

CAS

SOF

UA

X

SPODTSV

(Sealift) Theater Airlift

Joint Fires

APODSBCT

X

JTF HQ

UEX

DCP1UA

XUA

X

UEX

MCG

JFACC BattleManagement / C3I Army ISRArmy ISR

AircraftAircraft

JointISR

UA

XUSMC

X

Operational Maneuver from Strategic Distances

Network-Enabled Battle Command

Distributed Support and Sustainment

JOpsC Capabilities• Common Understanding• Decision Superiority• Adaptive• Rapid Employment• Continuous Pressure• Disrupt the Adversary• Distributed Deployment -Employment - Sustainment• Interagency & Multinational

SPOD

Decisive Maneuver:Direct Attack of Decisive PointsSimultaneous, Distributed OperationsContinuous Operations; Controlled OPTEMPO

CAS

Joint Fires

Shaping and Entry Operations

Joint ISRJoint ISRUAVUAV

X

FIRESHeavy

BCT UA

X

Concurrent and Subsequent Stability Operations

IntratheaterOperational

Maneuver

JTF Stability

MVREN

XSUSTAIN

MENT

X

KEY IDEAS The Army in Joint Operations

19

Coalition

XXX

ISR SatelliteCommercialComms Satellite

MilitaryComms Satellite

CAS

SOF

UA

X

SPODTSV

(Sealift) Theater Airlift

Joint Fires

APODSBCT

X

JTF HQ

UEX

DCP1UA

XUA

X

UEX

MCG

JFACC BattleManagement / C3I Army ISRArmy ISR

AircraftAircraft

JointISR

UA

XUSMC

X

Operational Maneuver from Strategic Distances

Network-Enabled Battle Command

Distributed Support and Sustainment

JOpsC Capabilities• Common Understanding• Decision Superiority• Adaptive• Rapid Employment• Continuous Pressure• Disrupt the Adversary• Distributed Deployment -Employment - Sustainment• Interagency & Multinational

SPOD

Decisive Maneuver:Direct Attack of Decisive PointsSimultaneous, Distributed OperationsContinuous Operations; Controlled Optempo

CAS

Joint Fires

Shaping and Entry Operations

Joint ISRJoint ISRUAVUAV

X

FIRESHeavy

BCT UA

X

Concurrent and Subsequent Stability Operations

IntratheaterOperational

Maneuver

JTF Stability

MVREN

XSUSTAIN

MENT

X

Joint Sustainment

Joint Fires & Effects

Joint Air and Missile Defense

Joint Force Projection

Joint Battle Command

KEY IDEAS Joint Interdependencies

20

IRREGULAR CATASTROPHIC

TRADITIONAL DISRUPTIVE

Shaping and Entry OperationsOperational Maneuver Over

Strategic DistancesIntratheater Operational

ManeuverDecisive ManeuverConcurrent and Subsequent

Stability OperationsDistributed Support and

SustainmentNetwork Enabled Battle

Command

Soldiers and LeadersThe NetworkAdvanced Strategic

and Operational LiftModular ForcesFuture Combat SystemsLogistics TransformationJoint Transformation

IDEAS and CAPABILITIES

21

The Armyin Joint Operations

The Army’s Future ForceCapstone Concept

2015-2024

Presented by BG David FastabendDeputy Director, TRADOC Futures Center

25 July 2005

Documents

The Army’s Future Force Capstone Concept 2015-2024 Presented … · 2011. 5. 14. · in Joint Operations The Army’s Future Force Capstone Concept 2015-2024 Presented by BG David