Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION OF VOIP
Presented by Team #3:
Demet Dilekci [email protected]
Conrad Wang [email protected]
Jiang Feng Xu [email protected]
http://www.sfu.ca/~cjw11/427Project.html
ENSC 427 Communication Networks
Spring 2013
Final Project Presentation
Overview
• Motivation
• Background
• Technical details
• Implementation in OPNET• VoIP over LAN (Local Area Network )• VoIP over WAN (Wide Area Network )• VoIP over WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network)• VoIP over WWAN (Wireless Wide Area Network)
• Discussion• Result and Analysis
• Recommendations
Motivations
• To analyze and discuss the parameters that affect the
quality of VoIP
• To simulate scenarios by using OPNET
VoIP Background
• Voice over Internet Protocol
• An Alternative to Public Switched Telephone Network
• Uses Packet Switching instead of Circuit Switching
• Digital Signal instead of Analog Signal
VoIP Advantages / Disadvantages
• Advantages:
• Cost Saving
• Flexible
• Rich Features
• Disadvantages:
• Network quality determines call quality
• Higher call drop rate compared to PSTN
• 911 Emergency call is unable to trace location
Technical Details
• Jitter
• Mean Opinion Score (MOS)
• End-to-end Delay
• Packet Loss
Technical details
• ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) Values [6] [7]:
Average Quality Ideal Quality
Jitter < 60 ms < 20 ms
End-to-end Delay < 150 ms < 50 ms
Packet Loss Rate < 5% < 1%
Quality Scale MOS
Excellent 5
Good 4
Fair 3
Poor 2
Bad 1
Codec (Coder/Decoder)
G. 711
G. 723
G. 729
Implementation in OPNET
• VoIP over LAN (Local Area Network )
• VoIP over WAN (Wide Area Network )
• VoIP over WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network)
• VoIP over WWAN (Wireless Wide Area Network)
OPNET : VoIP over LAN Designs
• Different # of Clients (2, 20 200) & Traffic Load (Light / Heavy) & Codec
OPNET : VoIP over LAN: Results
• Results: Jitter and MOS in office
OPNET : VoIP over LAN: Results
• Results: ETE Delay and Packet Loss in office
OPNET : VoIP over LAN: Discussion
• Discussion
• Increasing number of client & traffic load doesn`t effect the result
• Jitter in good for all codec types
• 711 gives better values (Mos close to good level)
• 729 Mos : fair level. It is below good
• 723 Mos & packet end-end delay: fair level
• 723 send less voice traffic
OPNET: VoIP over WAN Design 1
• # of Clients: 20 & Different Traffic Load (Light / Heavy) & Codec & Links
OPNET: VoIP over WAN Design 2
• # of Clients: 200 & Different Traffic Load (Light / Heavy) & Codec & Links
OPNET : VoIP over WAN: Results
• Results: Jitter and MOS in long distance
OPNET : VoIP over WAN: Results
• Results: ETE Delay and Packet Loss in long distance
OPNET: VoIP over WAN Discussion
• # of client : 20
• Codec 711, links PPP DS0 / DS1:
• PPP DSO values are below acceptable level.
• PPP DS1 is good over all (MOS is between good and fair level)
• Codec (711, 729, 723), link PPP DS1:
• 711: good level (MOS level close the good level)
• 729 and 723 MOS level: fair level
• 723 sent less voice traffic
Implementation in OPNET: WLAN / WWAN
Results – Jitter and MOS in office
Results – ETE Delay and Packet Loss in office
Results – Jitter and MOS in long distance
Results – ETE Delay and Packet Loss long distance
Discussion
• Wireless:
• Base on the results, we noticed that the outputs do not change much even when we set the application traffic from heavy to light.
• Also, when we change the connection link, the outputs do not change significantly.
• Comparing office and long distance communication, we noticed that the Jitter, MOS Value, Delay Variation and ETE Delay only have a slight difference. Thus, change falls into a acceptable range.
Recommendations
• VoIP has many major drawbacks that makes the call
quality not as good as PSTN
• However, it has the most important advantage over PSTN
which is the cost
• Use VoIP to save cost
• Use PSTN for important calls due to its reliability
References
[1] J. Davidson, J. Peters, M. Bhatia, S. Kalidindi and S. Mukherjee, Voice over IP
Fundamentals. Indianapolis: Cisco press, 2007
[2] "Understanding Voice over IP Protocols",
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk701/tech_digests_list.html, 14 Feb 2013
[3] J. Middleton, "Top 11 Technologies of the Decade", IEEE Spectrum, vol 48, issue.1, pp.
34-37, January 2011
[4] J. Soares, S. Neves and C. Rodrigunes, "Past, Present and Future of IP Telephony",
IEEE CTRQ Conference, pp. 19-24, 2008.12
[5] L. Chu, X. Lan, Y. Tan, "The Design and Simulation of Enterprise's VoIP Network",
IEEE ICECE Conference, pp. 2653-2655, 2011
[6] E. Chi-Pong Chan, “Performance Analysis of Voice Communications in a Private
802.11 Network”, Ensc 835: High-Performance Networks, 2003, pp 8
[7] K. Alutaibi, “Performance Analysis of VoIP over WiMAX and Wi-Fi Networks”, Ensc
894: Communications Networks, 2012, pp. 3-4
Questions?