34
The Aggregate Effects of Health Insurance: Evidence from The Introduction of Medicare

The Aggregate Effects of Health Insurance: Evidence from The Introduction of Medicare

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

The Aggregate Effects of Health Insurance: Evidence

from The Introduction of Medicare

Background

US share of health care: 5% (1960), 16% (2004)

US real medical spending : increase 6 times between 1950 and 1990.

Rand experiment findings Total Exp increases about 1.5 times when the

coinsurance rate drops from 95% to 0% The spreading of health insurance can only

explain about one eighth to one tenth of medical spending

Research Question

How important is the role of health insurance in explaining the growth of medical spending?

Explore the impact as a result of Medicare, established in 1965, the single and largest change in health insurance coverage in U. S.

Identification Strategy

Different regions of the country had different rate of private insurance coverage prior to Medicare

Use the regional variations to estimate the spending in the hospital sector

Data

American Hospital Association (AHA) data: 1948-1975

Six hospital outcomes: Total expenditure Payroll expenditure Employment Beds Admission Patient days

Econometric Model

1975

1948

log( ) *1( ) *1( )

( )*1( )

1( ) : county fixed effect

1( ) : year fixed effect

: other controls

( ) : The p

ijt j j t t

t

t z t st ijtt

j

t

st

t z

y county Year

Mcareimpact Year X

county

Year

X

Mcareimpact

ercentage of the elderly without

Blue Cross hospital insurance in 1963

Estimated Results

Estimated Results

Estimated Results

First two years

Since nationwide, Medicare increased the proportion of the elderly with insurance coverage by 75 percentage points.

Admissions: 46 percent (~ [exp(0.504 x 0.75)-1])

Total spending: 28 percent (~ [exp(0.332 x 0.75)-1]).

Robustness Checks

)()(5 1960196519651970

Why Larger Estimates than Rand Experiment?

Rand experiment considers only partial equilibrium

The spreading of health insurance may play a bigger role because market-wide changes in health insurance can fundamentally alter the nature and character of medical practices

Other Specifications (I)

ijtstzt

ztttjjijt

XtMcareimpact

tMcareimpactYearcountyy

)*)1965((

)*()(1*)(1*)log(

2

1

Other Specifications (II): Market Level

mtmtzt

ztttmmmt

XtMcareimpact

tMcareimpactYearmarkety

)*)1965((

)*()(1*)(1*)log(

2

1

mtzt

ztttmmmt

XtMcareimpact

tMcareimpactYearmarketyE

)*)1965((

)*()(1*)(1*))(log(

2

1

The Medicare impact is even larger when measured at the market level than hospital level

Total expenditure: 37 percent (~ [exp(0.083x5x 0.75)-1])

Partial Equilibrium v.s. General Equilibrium

The earlier estimates is about six to seven times larger than RIE would suggest

Fixed Effect Hypothesis

Aggregate changes in health insurance may sufficiently change the nature and the nature and magnitude of the market demand for health care that alter the incentives for hospitals to incur the fixed costs of entering the market or of adopting new practice styles.

Entry and exit Adoption of new technology

Spillover Hypothesis

Change in insurance of one set of patients can have spillover effects on other patients

fdfff