69
The ABCDs of Obesity Adipose Based Chronic Disease” Michael A. Bush, M.D. Clinical Chief, Division of Endocrinology Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Clinical Associate Professor, Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA President, CA-AACE

The ABCDs of Obesity - American Association of …syllabus.aace.com/2017/pcp/bakersfield/presentations/4_Bush-NEWEST...The ABCDs of Obesity ... in the placebo 對group without reaching

  • Upload
    buitu

  • View
    215

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

The ABCDs of Obesity “Adipose Based Chronic Disease”

Michael A. Bush, M.D. Clinical Chief, Division of Endocrinology

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Clinical Associate Professor, Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA

President, CA-AACE

The ABCDs of Obesity “Adipose Based Chronic Disease”

Michael A. Bush, M.D. Clinical Chief, Division of Endocrinology

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Clinical Associate Professor, Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA

President, CA-AACE

3

Classification of Weight by BMI

(Must A, et al. JAMA. (1999) 282: 1523-29) (NIH. Obes Res. 1998) (World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation presented at: the World Health Organization; June 3-5, 1997; Geneva, Switzerland. Publication WHO/NUT/NCD/98.1)

with co-morbidities

4

•MULTIPLY WEIGHT IN POUNDS BY 705

•DIVIDE BY HEIGHT IN INCHES

•DIVIDE BY HEIGHT IN INCHES AGAIN

CALCULATING BODY MASS INDEX Wt (kg) / Ht (m)2

5

Do You Know Your Own BMI?

5’4”

Height

Weight (lbs)

5’2”

5’0”

5’10”

5’8”

5’6”

6’0”

6’2”

6’4”

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250

6

OBESITY IN THE UNITED STATES A Growing Epidemic

N/A

<10%

10-15%

>15%

2000 2014

7

Compared with Caucasians, Asians have Higher Levels of Body Fat vs BMI

• SUBJECTS: Hong Kong Chinese, Indonesians (Malays and Chinese), Singaporean (Chinese, Malays and Indians)

• Generally, for the same BMI, Asians’ Body Fat was 3-5% higher compared to Caucasians.

• Results can be partly explained by differences in body build, i.e. trunk-to-leg-length ratio and slenderness. Differences in muscularity may also contribute.

Obesity Reviews (2002), 3: 141-146.

Compared with Caucasians, South Asian Indians have Lower Insulin Sensitivity vs Body Fat

8 Chandalia M, et sl. JCEM (1999). 842329-2335

Asians have Lower Insulin Sensitivity for Any Degree of

Body Fat

9

Abdominal Obesity

10

Measurement of Body Fat Distribution

ASIAN SUBJECTS Women >30

Men >35

11

Normal Type 2 Diabetes

Courtesy of Wilfred Y. Fujimoto, MD.

Visceral Fat Distribution Normal vs Type 2 Diabetes

Obesity is a Chronic and Multifaceted disease

13

McTigue et al. Annals Int Med (2002) 136:857-864

Born in 1964

Born in 1957

The Natural History of the Development of Obesity in a Cohort of Young U.S. Adults between 1981 and 1998

(“National Longitudinal Study of Youth”)

Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity Among US Adults

47

32

15

56

33

23

64

34 31

0

20

40

60

80 Overweight or obese Overweight Obese(BMI ≥25.0) (BMI 25.0-29.9) (BMI ≥30.0)

Increased 100% in 20 years %

NHANES II 1976-1980 (n=11,207)

NHANES † 1999-2000 (n=3601)

NHANES III 1988-1994 (n=14,468)

US Bureau of the Census estimates using the age groups 20-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, and 65-74 years †Flegal KM et al. JAMA. 2002;288:1723-1727.

Obesity Evaluation:

Take Obesity Seriously Take the time and make it a priority

Deal with it as you would other Diseases “Adipose-Based Chronic Disease”

Obesity Meets AMA Criteria for a Disease

16

Impairment of Normal Function

• Physical impairments • Altered physiologic

function (inflammation, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, etc)

• Altered regulation of satiety in the hypothalamus

Characteristic Signs or Symptoms

• Increased body fat mass

• Joint pain • Impaired mobility • Low self-esteem • Sleep apnea • Altered metabolism

Harm or Morbidity

• Cardiovascular disease • Type 2 diabetes • Metabolic syndrome • Cancer • Death

AMA, American Medical Association. Mechanick JI, et al. Endocr Pract. 2012;18:642-648.

Percent of Patients Receiving PCP Advice by Obesity Classification

Simkin-Silverman LR et al. Prev Med 2005;40:71-82.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Percent of Patients Receiving PCP Advice by Obesity Classification This is a study published in 2005 evaluating 18 different primary care physicians and a survey of 225 of their patients. The survey asked the patients if their doctor talked to the patients about being overweight. The number of times that patients were told they were overweight increased with the increased weight of the patient. For example, in class III obesity where a patient is 100 pounds or more overweight, only 84% of patients remembered the doctor saying something to them. In all cases a minority of patients were given advice on what to do about their weight.

The Office Environment An Appropriate Setting for Overweight Patients

EVALUATE BMI and COMPLICATIONS Treatment is “Complications-Centric”

19

Take a Disease-focused Medical, Social, and Emotional History

• MEDICAL CAUSES OF OBESITY — Hypothyroidism, Cushing’s Syndrome, Depression, Medications

• MEDICAL/MECHANICAL/EMOTIONAL COMPLICATIONS OF OBESITY

• SOCIAL AND FAMILIAL FACTORS — Clustering, genetics, availability of resources

• EMOTIONAL FACTORS — Psych history, binge eating, comfort eating, eating disorder

• HISTORY OF OBESITY TREATMENT

Pregnant

Weight Watchers

Exercise Class,

Low Carb Diet

No $ for classes

Set agreed-upon Goals!

DISCUSS LOTS OF OPTIONS FOR WEIGHT CONTROL

21

YOUR DIET

DIETITIAN DIET

DELIVERED DIET

WW/JENNY DIET

VLCD DIET

MEDICATIONS, LONG-TERM: (Brand:) Qsymia, Belviq, Contrave, Saxenda

BARIATRIC SURGERY: Gastric Band, Bypass, Reversals, J-I, Devices

X

23

TREATMENT OF OBESITY Failure of Diet Therapy

My doctor told me I was really in trouble, so I gave up smoking, stopped drinking and started a really good diet ...

… and in 2 weeks I lost 14 days.

24

25

LOW CARB vs. LOW FAT DIETS IN SEVERELY OBESE SUBJECTS (Avg. BMI 42)

Samaha: N Engl J Med (2003), 348: 2074-2081

26

LOW CARB vs. LOW FAT DIET A 1 year Trial with “Minimal Professional Contact”

Foster: N Engl J Med (2003), 348: 2082-2090

27

LOW CARB vs. LOW FAT DIET A 1 year Trial with “Minimal Professional Contact”

Triglycerides HDL Cholesterol

Foster: N Engl J Med (2003), 348: 2082-2090

28

LOW CARB vs. LOW FAT DIET A 1 year Trial with “Minimal Professional Contact”

Foster: N Engl J Med (2003), 348: 2082-2090

LDL Cholesterol Total Cholesterol

29 Dansinger: JAMA, Volume 293(1).January 5, 2005.43–53:

160 participants were randomly assigned to Atkins, Zone, Weight Watchers, or Ornish diet groups.

After 2 months of maximum effort, participants selected their own levels of dietary adherence.

Dietary Treatment of Obesity

Self-rated “Adherance” Level

“approximately 25% of participants in each diet group sustained a mean adherence level of at least 6 of 10”

30 Dansinger: JAMA, Volume 293(1).January 5, 2005.43–53:

Dietary Treatment of Obesity

Conclusion: future research should be directed to understanding which diets work better for which patients.

V(ery) L(ow) C(alorie) D(iets)

31 .

32 Wadden: Ann Int Med (1989) 119:688-693

TREATMENT OF OBESITY Diet with Behavior Modification

33

MEDICATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF OBESITY HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

• 1893-1946 Thyroid Hormone • 1935 Dinitrophenol & Amphetamines • 1950s Norepinephrine analogues (phentermine) • 1973 Serotonin effectors (fenfluramine) • 1980s-90s Dexfenfluramine • 1990s Serotonin/Norepinephrine (sibutramine) • 1990s Lipase inhibitor (orlistat) • 2000 s [Wellbutrin, Topomax, Glucophage,

GLP1 RAs] • 2010s [SGLT2i’s]; Phentermine/Topiramate ER;

Lorcaserin; Bupropion ER/Naltrexone ER; Liraglutide

• Future CCK; B3 Agonists; Gene Therapy; PYY

approved for chronic weight management

Phentermine Use Persists in the Marketplace

34

35

MEDICATIONS FOR OBESITY Orlistat Mechanism of Action

36

ORLISTAT DOSE RESPONSE CURVE (Based on 100 Grams of Dietary Fat)

Data on file. (Ref. 038-007)

% Fecal Fat Excretion

Orlistat Dose (mg) tid 30 120 240 400 60

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

37

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

0 32 48 64 80 104 16 -4

Week

% c

hang

e fro

m in

itial

wei

ght

Placebo/Placebo

120/120

120/60

120/Placebo

Year 2: Eucaloric diet

Year 1: Hypocaloric diet

JAMA, Jan 20, 1999

MEDICATIONS FOR OBESITY Orlistat: Body Weight Change After 2 Years

38

3.9

3.8

3.7

3.6

3.5

3.4

−4 0 24 52 76 104

mmol/L

Week

LDL-cholesterol

p=0.0002

Weight loss

Mildly hypocaloric diet

Eucaloric diet

−4 0 20 40 60 80 104

0

−2

−4

−6

−8

−10

−12

%

Week

Orlistat 120 mg tid Placebo

Lancet (1998) 352:167

MEDICATIONS FOR OBESITY Orlistat: Effect on LDL Cholesterol

Presenter
Presentation Notes
With respect to LDL cholesterol, there were no significant differences between the placebo and orlistat groups at the start of the lead-in period or at randomization. In the placebo group LDL cholesterol gradually returned towards values at the start of lead-in at Years 1 and 2. By contrast, concentrations of LDL fell further during the second year in the Xenical group, and these changes were significantly different from those in the placebo group both at Years 1 and 2. In the comparable US trial, the initial reduction in LDL levels during the placebo lead-in period was similar in the two groups, approx. 8% decrease in total cholesterol. The LDL levels declined further after randomization over Year 1 in the orlistat group but increased in the placebo group without reaching statistically significant difference between treatment groups. After 2 years of treatment with orlistat, LDL cholesterol values were reduced significantly below initial values compared with placebo (p<0.001). The magnitude of the treatment effect over 2 years was roughly 11 mg/dl and 8 mg/dl for total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, respectively

39

40

Oily spotting Flatus with discharge Fecal urgency Fatty/oily stool Oily evacuation Increased defecation Fecal incontinence

Adverse Effect 26.6 23.9 22.1 20.0 11.9 10.8

7.7

Overall Incidence

Percentage of Patients With Adverse Effects

Data on file, Roche Laboratories, Inc.

66.9 70.3 77.8 72.5 73.1 79.6 72.7

One Episode

22.2 18.0 14.5 18.0 17.6 13.0 22.1

Two Episodes

10.9 11.7 7.7 9.5 9.2 7.4 5.1

Three or More

Episodes

MEDICATIONS FOR OBESITY Orlistat: Adverse Effects

NEWER MEDICATIONS FOR WEIGHT LOSS COMBINATION PHENTERMINE/TOPIRAMATE

from the PI …

42

Indicated as an adjunct to a reduced calorie diet and increased physical activity for chronic weight management in adults with an initial body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m or greater or 27 kg/m2 or greater in the presence of at least one weight-related comorbidity such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or dyslipidemia

• If <3% weight loss after 12 weeks on usual dose, either discontinue medication or advance to maximum dose

• If <5% weight loss after 12 weeks on maximum dose, then discontinue the medication (to discontinue take every other day for one week)

Phentermine/Topiramate (Qsymia@) Percent Body Weight Lost

43

Gadde KM, et al. Lancet (2011)16;377(9774):1341-52.

Phentermine/Topiramate (Qsymia@) CONQUER Study: Weight Loss at 1 Year

Lancet (2011). 377: 1341 - 1352

SEQUEL Extension CONQUER Trial

Effect of Phentermine/Topiramate ER on Weight Loss in Obese Adults Over 2 Years

Data are shown with mean (95% CI). Phen/TPM ER, phentermine/topiramate extended release.

Garvey WT, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(2):297-308.

SEQUEL Study (Completer Analysis)

Placebo Phen/TPM ER 7.5/46 Phen/TPM ER 15/92

LS m

ean

wei

ght l

oss

(%)

-2 -4 -6 -8

-10 -12 -14 -16

0 12 20 92

0

Weeks 28 36 44 52 60 68 76 84 100 108 LOCF

Placebo n: 227 227 227 208 197 227 Phen/TPM 7.5/46 n: 153 152 153 137 129 153 Phen/TPM 15/92 n: 295 295 295 268 248 295

45

Effects of Phentermine/Topiramate ER on Glucose, Insulin, and Progression to T2DM

Glucose and Insulin

*P≤0.005 vs placebo. NS, not significant; Phen/TPM ER, phentermine/topiramate extended release; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Garvey WT, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95:297-308.

* *

* *

*

Placebo Phen/TPM ER 7.5/46 mg Phen/TPM ER 15/92 mg

SEQUEL Study Annualized Incidence of T2DM

P=0.008

76%

P=NS

54%

46

Phentermine/Topiramate (Qsymia@) Adverse Effects

• Increase in heart rate or blood pressure • Dry mouth, dysgeusia, constipation • Insomnia, irritability, anxiety • Disturbances in attention, lack of concentration

• CONTRA-INDICATIONS

— Pregnancy — Glaucoma

47

PHENTERMINE/TOPIRAMATE Initiating Treatment

LORCASERIN FOR WEIGHT LOSS

• Lorcaserin (Belviq) is a selective 5-HT2C (Serotonin) Receptor Agonist.

— 5-HT2C receptors are located almost exclusively in the brain in many sites, including the hypothalamus.

• Clinical Use

— Schedule IV Controlled Substance — 10 mg twice daily — Discontinue if 5% weight loss is not achieved within 12

weeks

49

Lorcaserin Adverse Events

Event occurring in ≥5% of patients and more frequently than with placebo, %

Lorcaserin 10 mg BID (N=3195)

Placebo (N=3185)

Headache 16.8 10.1 Upper respiratory tract infection 13.7 12.3

Nasopharyngitis 13.0 12.0

Dizziness 8.5 3.8 Nausea 8.3 5.3 Fatigue 7.2 3.6 Urinary tract infection 6.5 5.4

Diarrhea 6.5 5.6

Back pain 6.3 5.6

Constipation 5.8 3.9 Dry mouth 5.3 2.3

Belviq (lorcaserin HCl) prescribing information. Woodcliff Lake, NJ: Eisai Inc.; 2012.

50

51

Effect of Lorcaserin on Body Weight in Obese Adults Over 2 Years

Smith SR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:245-256.

BLOOM Study

Lorcaserin Treatment in Obese or Overweight Subjects

% Subjects with 5% or 10% Weight Loss

52

Combined Lorcaserin + Phentermine Treatment for Weight Loss

53

NOT FDA APPROVED!

Effect of Lorcaserin on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers

Risk Factors (Mean % Weight Loss)

Lorcaserin 10 mg

(5.8%) P value*

Systolic BP, mmHg -1.4 0.04

Diastolic BP, mmHg -1.1 0.01

Triglycerides, % -6.15 <0.001 Total cholesterol, % -0.90 0.001 LDL-C, % 2.87 0.049 HDL-C, % 0.05 NS hsCRP, mg/L -1.19 <0.001 Fibrinogen, mg/dL -21.5 0.001

*P values represent comparisons to placebo. Intent to treat, last observation carried forward analysis for total study population.

Smith SR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:245-256.

BLOOM Study

54

Effect of Lorcaserin on Progression to T2DM

55

P=0.003

Patie

nts

with

A1C

≥6.

5% (

%)

Proportion of BLOOM and BLOSSOM Patients With Newly Diagnosed Diabetes After 52 Weeks of Treatment

Lorcaserin hydrochloride briefing document for FDA Advisory Committee. Woodcliff Lake, NJ: Eisai Inc.; 2012. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/EndocrinologicandMetabolicDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM303200.pdf.

Bupropion/Naltrexone (Contrave)

• Bupropion: — stimulates POMC neurons —Has been used for “binge” activities, smoking

cessation • Naltrexone:

— Blocks POMC auto-inhibition —Presumably works at the “hedonistic” centers of

the brain Adverse Effects: -- nausea, constipation -- headache, paresthesias -- dry mouth

Bupropion/Naltrexone(Contrave@) Weight Loss Improvement with Behavior Modification

57

Bupropion/Naltrexone(Contrave) 5%, 10%, and 15% Weight Loss

Greenway FL, Fujioka K, Plodkowski RA et al.

Lancet. 2010; 376: 595-605

LOCF

COMPLETERS

Early Weight Loss (week 16) Predicts Weight Loss Success at 1 year

Plodkowski RA, Walsh B, Berhanu, P et al. Presentated at Cleveland Clinic Obesity Summit 10/2/2015.

VICTOZA AND SAXENDA What’s the Difference?

“VICTOZA” • Liraglutide • Indicated for Type 2 DM • Doses range from 0.6 (starter

dose) to 1.2 to 1.8 mg • Pen contains 3 ml, 6 mg/ml • 2 Pens/month for 1.2 daily,

3 Pens/month for 1.8 daily. • Slows stomach emptying,

reduces appetite, improves pancreatic function

• May cause nausea

“SAXENDA” • Liraglutide • Indicated for Obesity • Doses range from 0.6 (starter

dose) to 1.2, 1.8, 2.4, & 3.0 mg • Pen contains 3 ml, 6 mg/ml • 5 Pens/month for 3.0 daily.

• Slows stomach emptying,

reduces appetite • May cause nausea

60

Weight Loss wtith Liraglutide (Saxenda)

Pi-Sunyer X, Astrup A, Fujioka K et al. NEJM.2015; 373(1):11-22.

Weight Loss with Liraglutide (Saxenda) 5% and 10% Weight Loss

Pi-Sunyer X, Astrup A, Fujioka K et al. NEJM.2015; 373(1):11-22.

Liraglutide After Successful Low Calorie Diet

63 The SCALE Maintenance randomized study.

Int J Obesity. 2013 Nov;37(11):1443-51.

-5.8%

-5.4%

-5.6%

MEDICATIONS FOR CHRONIC WEIGHT MANAGEMENT

Composite of Completer Data

Plodkowski RA, McGarvey ME, Nguyen QT et al. Federal Practitioner. In press Jan 2015.

Combined Lifestyle Intervention and Pharmacotherapy

65 Wadden TA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2111-2120.

Wei

ght l

oss

(kg)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16 0 3 6 10 18 40 52

0

Weeks

Drug alone Extensive lifestyle modification alone Drug + brief lifestyle counseling Drug + extensive lifestyle modification

66

Unrealistic Goals: Average Fashion Model vs Average Woman*

BMI = body mass index.

Height

Weight

BMI

5' 4"

142 lb

24.3

Average Woman

*Written communication from TA Wadden, PhD, July 1997.

Average Fashion Model

5' 9"

110 lb

16.3

67

• Each kg of weight loss

— lowers blood pressure by 2.5/1.7 mm Hg

— lowers total cholesterol by 1.93 mg/dl

— lowers LDL cholesterol by 0.77 mg/dl

— lowers triglycerides by 1.33 mg/dl

— increases survival in Type 2 diabetes by 3 - 4 months

Benefits of Modest Weight Loss in Patients With Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia and Diabetes

Schotte et al. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1701-1704. Dattilo et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;56:320-328 Seim et al. Fam Pract Res J. 1992;12:411-419. Lean et al. Diabet Med. 1989;7:228-233 Wing et al. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:1749-1753.

68

GOAL WEIGHT IN THE TREATMENT OF OBESITY

TREATING OBESITY IN YOUR PRACTICE

• With the increase in obesity and co-morbid conditions, obese patients need access to quality care

• Small differences in approach and attitude related to weight and weight loss can have a huge impact

• The treatment of obesity can be easily integrated into any primary care setting.

• Increase your communication with patients who are obese and take aggressive steps to treat this serious disease.