13

 · that it could be a cyanobacterium (Schizophyta). Previously, Rauser-Chernousova (1951, p. 1 7 and pl. 3, figs 1—2) had named this fossil Shamovella, from the Kungurian (uppermost

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1:  · that it could be a cyanobacterium (Schizophyta). Previously, Rauser-Chernousova (1951, p. 1 7 and pl. 3, figs 1—2) had named this fossil Shamovella, from the Kungurian (uppermost
Page 2:  · that it could be a cyanobacterium (Schizophyta). Previously, Rauser-Chernousova (1951, p. 1 7 and pl. 3, figs 1—2) had named this fossil Shamovella, from the Kungurian (uppermost
Page 3:  · that it could be a cyanobacterium (Schizophyta). Previously, Rauser-Chernousova (1951, p. 1 7 and pl. 3, figs 1—2) had named this fossil Shamovella, from the Kungurian (uppermost
Page 4:  · that it could be a cyanobacterium (Schizophyta). Previously, Rauser-Chernousova (1951, p. 1 7 and pl. 3, figs 1—2) had named this fossil Shamovella, from the Kungurian (uppermost
Page 5:  · that it could be a cyanobacterium (Schizophyta). Previously, Rauser-Chernousova (1951, p. 1 7 and pl. 3, figs 1—2) had named this fossil Shamovella, from the Kungurian (uppermost
Page 6:  · that it could be a cyanobacterium (Schizophyta). Previously, Rauser-Chernousova (1951, p. 1 7 and pl. 3, figs 1—2) had named this fossil Shamovella, from the Kungurian (uppermost
Page 7:  · that it could be a cyanobacterium (Schizophyta). Previously, Rauser-Chernousova (1951, p. 1 7 and pl. 3, figs 1—2) had named this fossil Shamovella, from the Kungurian (uppermost
Page 8:  · that it could be a cyanobacterium (Schizophyta). Previously, Rauser-Chernousova (1951, p. 1 7 and pl. 3, figs 1—2) had named this fossil Shamovella, from the Kungurian (uppermost
Page 9:  · that it could be a cyanobacterium (Schizophyta). Previously, Rauser-Chernousova (1951, p. 1 7 and pl. 3, figs 1—2) had named this fossil Shamovella, from the Kungurian (uppermost
Page 10:  · that it could be a cyanobacterium (Schizophyta). Previously, Rauser-Chernousova (1951, p. 1 7 and pl. 3, figs 1—2) had named this fossil Shamovella, from the Kungurian (uppermost
Page 11:  · that it could be a cyanobacterium (Schizophyta). Previously, Rauser-Chernousova (1951, p. 1 7 and pl. 3, figs 1—2) had named this fossil Shamovella, from the Kungurian (uppermost
Page 12:  · that it could be a cyanobacterium (Schizophyta). Previously, Rauser-Chernousova (1951, p. 1 7 and pl. 3, figs 1—2) had named this fossil Shamovella, from the Kungurian (uppermost
Page 13:  · that it could be a cyanobacterium (Schizophyta). Previously, Rauser-Chernousova (1951, p. 1 7 and pl. 3, figs 1—2) had named this fossil Shamovella, from the Kungurian (uppermost