Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
-1-
Thai Oil Public Company LimitedQ1/19 Opportunity Day Presentation21 May 2019
Time : 13.00 - 14.00 hrs.
Venue : Stock Exchange of Thailand, Building B, Room 603
-2--2-
Disclaimer
The information contained in this presentation is intended solely for your
personal reference. Please do not circulate this material. If you are not an
intended recipient, you must not read, disclose, copy, retain, distribute or take
any action in reliance upon it.
Some statements made in this material are forward-looking with relevant
assumptions, which are subject to uncertainties, which may cause the actual
result/performance to be materially deviated from any future
result/performance implied by such forward-looking statements. Please note
that the company and management/staff are not capable to control and
guarantee if these forward-looking statements will be accurately materialized,
they are subject to various risks and uncertainties.
-3--3-
VISIONEmpower Human Life
through Sustainable Energy and Chemicals
MISSION• To enrich stakeholders’ well-being and deliver sustainable returns
built upon innovation, technology and resilient portfolio with top
class management and accountable corporate governance
VALUES
Corporate Vision, Mission and Values
Professionalism
Ownership & Commitment
Social ResponsibilityIntegrityTeamwork & CollaborationInitiative
Vision FocusExcellent Striving
-4--4-
Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance PolicyThe board of directors, management and all staff shall
commit to moral principles, equitable treatment to all
stakeholders and perform their duties for the company’s interest
with dedication, integrity, and transparency.
Anti-Corruption PolicyThe Board, the management, and employees must not
corrupt or accept corruption of all forms in any circumstances,
covering the business of the Company in every country and in
every relevant agency. The Company defines guidelines,
operating measures, and roles and duties of responsible
persons, as well as regularly monitoring and reviewing the
implementation of the anti-corruption policy in compliance with
changes in businesses, rules, regulations, and relevant laws.
Roles and Responsibilities
for Stakeholders
• Truthfully report company’s
situation and future trends to all
stakeholders equally on a timely
manner.
• Shall not exploit the confidential
information for the benefit of
related parties or personal gains.
• Shall not disclose any confidential
information to external parties.
Whistle-Blowing Channels
Should you discover any
ethical wrongdoing that is
not compliance to CG
policies or any activity that
could harm the Company’s
interest, please inform:
Chairman of the Board or
Chairman of the CG Committee or
Chairman of the Audit Committee or
CEO/President or Company Secretary
Thai Oil Public Company Limited
555/1 Energy Complex Building A
11F, Vibhavadi Rangsit Road,
Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900
http://www.thaioilgroup.com
+66-0-2797-2999 ext. 7440-7442
+66-0-2797-2973
-5--5-
Our Achievement in Sustainable Development
6th Consecutive Year as the
Member of DJSI Emerging Marketsand high ranked positions.
-6--6-
Q1/19 KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Q1/19 PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
2H/19 MARKET OUTLOOK
Presentation Agenda
TOP GROUP BUSINESS OVERVIEW
-7--7-
TOP GROUP BUSINESS OVERVIEW
-8--8-
51% 24% 13% 12%RefineryAromaticsLube BaseOthers
Thai Oil Group Business Structure
Net Profit Contribution
(Avg. from 2006 – Q1/19)
IRPC 20.0%
• 5 Oil & Chemical TankersCapacity : 22,800 DWT
• Crude Tankers: 3VLCCsCapacity: 881,050 DWT
• 14 crew & utility boats (120 DWT each)
• 2 Large vessels for crude, feedstock & product storage and transportation services capacity: 200,000 DWT
• Ship management services
9.2 %
Principal power plant of PTTTotal Equity Capacity 1,922 MW of electricity 1,582 tons/hour of steam 2,080 Cu.m./hour of Industrial water 12,000 RT of Chilled water
PTT Group 80.0%
100.0% 100.0% 74.0% 100.0%
Thaioil (TOP)Thai Lube Base
(TLB)Thaioil Power
(TP)
Global Power Synergy Public Company Limited
Thaioil Energy Services(TES)
Thaioil Marine(TM)
Capacity : 275,000 barrels/day Small Power Producer
Program3-on-1 Combined CycleElectricity 118 MWSteam 216 tons/hour
PTT 26.0%
Proceeds the business on various professional of management services
100.0%
Thappline (THAP)
Multi-product PipelineCapacity:26,000 m.lts/y
20.0%
PTTOR 40.4%
Others 50.4%
Lube Base Oil Capacity :Base Oil 267,015 tons/annumBitumen350,000 tons/annumTDAE67,520 tons/annum
Thaioil SolventThrough TOP Solvent (TS)
100.0%
100.0%
Thaioil Ethanol(TET)
Solvent manufacturerCapacity : 141,000tons/annum
Thai Paraxylene(TPX)
100.0%80.5%
Solvent distribute in Thailand
Sak Chaisidhi (SAKC)
Top Solvent Vietnam
Solvent distribute in Vietnam
Sapthip (SAP)
Cassava Based EthanolCapacity : 200,000 lts/day
50.0%
Ubon Bio Ethanol (UBE)
21.3%
Cassava/Molasses Based PlantCapacity : 400,000 lts/day
PTT Energy Solutions(PTTES)
Provides engineering technique consulting services
20.0%
PTT 40.0%PTTGC 20.0%
BCP 21.3%
Others57.4%
Aromatics Capacity:Paraxylene 527,000 tons/annumMixed Xylene52,000 tons/annumBenzene 259,000 tons/annumTotal 838,000 tons/annum
LABIX Company Limited (LABIX)
LAB producer and distributorCapacity: 120 KTA COD: 2016
Mitsui 25.0%75.0% TOP SPP
2 Small Power Producers Total capacity: 239 MWSteam capacity 497 T/HCOD 2016
100.0%
Sells Electricity/Steam to Group
PTT Digital Solutions(PTT Digital)
PTT 22.6%
Thaioil & TP 29.7%
PTTGC 22.7%
Thaioil Treasury Center(TTC)
100.0%
Increases financial efficiency of Thaioil group
Supports execution of social enterprise of PTT group
15.0%PTT Group 85.0%
Sarn Palung Social Enterprise
-9--9-
Q1/19 KEY HIGHLIGHTS
-10--10-
Slightly Soften Aromatics & LAB Margins(GIM contribution 2.0 $/bbl from 2.2 $/bbl in Q4/18)
Implication
Mkt GRM at 3.0 $/bbl(Q4/18 = 3.9 $/bbl)
2.7 $/bbl inventory gain(from stock loss (7.5)$/bbl in Q4/18)
Refinery
Aromatics & LAB
Lube Base Soften Lube Base Contribution(GIM contribution 0.2 $/bbl from 0.4 $/bbl in Q4/18)
Refinery + Aromatics & LAB + Lube Base
$/BBL Q4/18 Q1/19
Market GIM 6.5 5.2
Inventory Gains/ (Loss) (7.4) 2.7
Accounting GIM (0.9) 7.9
Soften refinery margins pressured by weak product spread pressured by weak heating oil demand from mild winter and high gasoline inventory worldwide. However, downside was partially offset by lower crude premium from abundant light crude supply from U.S.
Rising crude price driven by OPEC & Non-OPEC production cut (1.2 MBD), and decreasing Iran’s and Venezuela’s oil export due to U.S. sanctions.
Soften Base Oil spread pressured by additional base oil Gr. 2 & 3 supply mainly from China (1.26 MTA).
Slightly soften aromatics contribution pressured by increasing supplyas Petro Rabigh (1.3 MTA) and Nghi Son (0.7 MTA) run at full capacity and additional supply from China (0.8 MTA). However, ongoing weak feedstock cost (gasoline & naphtha) helped support margins.
2) Based on refinery intake
2)
3)
3) Aromatic contribution including LAB
1)
4) Based on integrated intake
4)
1) Include Margin and Productivity Improvement
Q1/19 Key Market Drivers HighlightsKey Highlights
-11--11-
1,272
4,013 3,835 2,473
(7,211)
381 495
(218)
(37)(166)
(852)
102 334
(544)
1,327
68%
18%
1%11% 2%
Refinery
Aromatic & LAB
Lube Base
Power
Others
Key Achievements Q1/19 TOP Group Net Profit
Maintain high reliable production Unit : million THB (MB) Net Operating ProfitStock gain/(loss) Reversal of Crude NRV /(Crude NRV) & Adjusted to cost
Sustainability& Awards
Q1/19 Q4/18
Refinery 116 % 115 %
Aromatic 92 % 94 %
Base Oil 89 % 86 %
Q4/18 Q1/18
Capture high local & Indochina salesQ1/19 Q4/18
Local 87 % 87 %
Indochina 10 % 8 %
Other exports 3 % 5 %
Operational Excellence
Growth &Profitability
Improvement
Included Stock G/L
(4,812) MB
Q1/19 Key AchievementsKey Highlights
Q1/19
4,408 MB
F/X Risk management gain/(loss)Others i.e. Hedging gain/(loss) & Non-recurring items
Sustainability Member for Oil&Gas Industry for 6th consecutive years of DJSI Emerging Markets
AGM approved Energy Recovery Unit (ERU) Carve out (USD 757 M) to GPSC, with vote 98.6%, to reduce total CAPEX & enhance return after carving out.
Q1/19 FY/18
NACC Integrity Awards 2018, The Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC)
5,608 MB
Management
TOP’s rating is upgraded to BBB+ by S&P after PTT’s SACP is uplifted (May 7).
40%
25%
11%
22%
2%BBB+Stable Outlook
Baa1Stable Outlook
AA- (tha)Stable Outlook
-12--12-
Cost Management
Key Highlights
Q1/19 Margin and Productivity Improvement (VS Corporate Plan)
THB 807 mn THB 2,197 mn
Margin Improvement(Hydrocarbon Management : HMR) and Productivity Improvement
(Non HMR)
Higher domestic and Indochina sales/ better product premium
*
* Compared with Corp. plan
234
573
*7%
Q1/19
Unit: million THB
734
1,463 Q4/18
General & Admin , Procurement & warehouse , Operation & Maintenance , Project & Manpower management
Others
73 MB 161 MB
Crude Enhancement
Energy improvement
Plant optimization
34%
7%
1%
21%
-13--13-
Q1/19 PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
-14--14-
0
200
400
600
800
Mogas Jet/Kero Diesel Total Demand
Q1/18 Q1/19
3.4%
2.2%
1.6%
2.2%
Refining
Refinery: High U-Rate Operation and Robust Domestic & CLMV Sales
97%94%
97%98% 98%
97% 98%
113%108%
115% 115% 116%113%
116%
70%
90%
110%
Q1/18 Q2/18 Q3/18 Q4/18 Q1/19 Q1/18 Q1/19
Industry utilization rate TOP utilization rate
TOP’s Domestic Sale vs Industry***Sales breakdown by customers
*** Source: Department of Energy Business, Ministry of Energy
87% 89% 87% 81% 86% 86%
13% 11% 13% 19% 14% 14%
Q4/18
TOP IndustryThailand
ExportQ1/19 Q4/18 Q1/18
TOP Ind. TOP Ind. TOP Ind.
CLMV 10% 4% 8% 10% 9% 4%
Others 3% 7% 5% 9% 5% 10%
Domestic
Export
50%
7%
1%
34%
8%
Q1/19
Sales
Breakdown
Export**
TOP/ Domestic Refinery Utilization Rate
Unit: % Utilization Rate
Domestic Oil Demand
* exclude Fuel Oil & LPG demand
TOP Industry
Thailand
*
OtherDomesticCustomers
TOP Industry
Thailand
Q1/18** Excludes export sale through PTT
*
Q1/19
Domestic Oil Demand
43%
5%4%1%
38%
9%
Q4/18
Sales
Breakdown
Export**
OtherDomesticCustomers
-15--15-
66 63 63 6874 74 73 72 77 79
6657 59 65 67 71 73
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May
2018 2019
Gross Refinery Margins - GRM
Refining
2018 2019 2018
$/bbl Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2TD* FY18
DUBAI (DB) 63.9 72.1 74.3 67.4 63.5 70.4 69.4
ULG95 - DB 13.7 12.1 11.6 4.7 3.7 8.6 10.5
JET - DB 16.1 15.3 14.5 15.6 13.0 11.9 15.4
GO - DB 14.8 14.6 14.4 14.8 12.8 12.3 14.6
HSFO - DB (4.9) (4.4) (2.5) 1.4 0.6 (2.8) (2.6)
2018 2019
$2.7/bbl Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
Market GRM 5.7 4.0 5.0 3.9 3.0
Stock G/(L) 0.4 5.0 1.2 (7.5) 2.7
Accounting GRM 6.2 9.0 6.2 (3.6) 5.7
Dubai Crude Price & Key Petroleum Product SpreadsRefinery Utilization
Q1/19 Q4/18 Q1/18
116% 115% 113%
Dubai Price
(US$/bbl)
Q1/19 Market GRM
Q1/19 Performance
*Murban OSP over Dubai ($/bbl)
% MB Intake/OSP*
36%/1.8
32%/2.5
39%/3.5
Q1/19: Lower Mkt GRM pressured by Weak Product Spread
+ Rising crude price due to OPEC and Non OPEC production cut
+ Highest refinery run rate at 116%
2018
FY18
4.7
(0.4)
4.3
- Soften gasoline spread due to high inventory worldwide
+ Lower crude premium due to abundant light crude supply from U.S.
- Lower middle distillate margin as low heating oil demand from mild winter
+*As of 10 May 19
-16--16-
Aromatic’s Sales (excluding by product) & Product-To-Feed Margin (P2F)
296 315
300 271 267 267 311
481 559 545 515 524 528 543
454
334 320
246 248 199 145
115 118 130 159
91 73 92 76 38 42 (25)
(59) (80)-100
50
200
350
500
650
2018 2019 2018
$/ton Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2TD* FY18
PX**-ULG95 304 268 451 528 508 290 388
BZ**-ULG95 231 126 126 81 18 (48) 141
2018 2019
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
Aromatic P2F -$/ton 110 87 129 151 143
Aromatic P2F -$/bbl 14.5 11.6 16.9 20.2 18.8
GIM contribution*** 1.7 1.3 2.0 2.2 2.0
Remark: TOL –ULG95 Q1/19 = 41 $/ton, Q4/18 = 73 $/ton, Q1/18 = 57 $/ton
Aromatics Spreads and Margins Aromatics Production
Q1/19 Q4/18 Q1/18
92% 94% 90%
(Unit : KTon)
Q1/19 Market
*** including LAB contribution since 25 Feb 2016** PX price = CFP Taiwan, BZ price = FOB Korea
Q1/19 Performance126 109 131 134 115
6359
57 67 60TL
BZ
PX
(US$/Ton) PX-ULG95
BZ-ULG952018 2019
- Slightly soften PX spread pressured by increasing supply after Petro Rabigh (1.3 MTA) and Nghi Son (0.7 MTA) run at full capacity and new supply from China (0.8 MTA)
- Weak BZ spread due to ample supply in China
Aromatics/LAB
Q1/19: Slightly Soften Aromatics Contribution pressured by Lower PX Spread
+ Weak feedstock cost (gasoline & naphtha) limit downside
2018
FY18
121
15.9
1.8
- Slightly lower utilization rate due to soften product margins
500
245
*As of 10 May 19
-17--17-
TLB’s Sales (excluding byproduct) & Product-To-Feed Margin (P2F)
482 510 545 518469 457 436 425 390
339 364423 384
325280 267 270
(58) (51) (58) (75) (81)(44) (43) (40) (39) (48)
(9) (1)(48) (49) (22) (13) (10)
-200
0
200
400
600
800
Lube Base Oil
2018 2019 2018
$/ton Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2TD* FY18
500SN-HSFO 512 481 417 376 330 270 447
BITUMEN-HSFO (56) (67) (41) (19) (40) (8) (46)
2018 2019
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
P2F -$/ton 105 97 66 73 59
P2F -$/bbl 16.0 14.8 9.9 11.1 9.0
GIM contribution 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.2
Base Oil & Bitumen Spreads & Margins Base oil Production
Q1/19 Q4/18 Q1/18
89% 86% 89%
500SN-HSFO
Bitumen-HSFO
(Unit : KTon)
Q1/19 Performance
Bitumen
Specialty
Base Oil
% Base Oil & Specialty Sales Volume
Q1/19 Market
231
149
440
(US$/Ton)
2018 2019
Q1/19: Soften Contribution as Lower Lube Base Spread
+ Higher utilization rate at 89%
2018
FY18
84
12.8
0.5
− Soften lube spread pressured by new base oil supply group 2,3 from China (1.26 MTA)
61 62 48 60 5939 39 34 38 36
117 11680
104 98
21% 18% 21%
14%13%
14%
Q1/19 Q4/18 Q1/18Base Oil Specialty
*As of 10 May 19
− Soften bitumen spread due to low demand during winter
-18--18-Power
Q1/19 Power Sector Performance…Growing Contribution to the Group
Power Business Sector
Equity holding in
GPSC ****SPP
***TOP shareholding 24.29% (8.91% via TOP and 20.79% via TP)GPSC is an associate company of TOP. Equity method is applied to recognize share of profit. (EBITDA calculation excludes profit sharing from GPSC)
SPP (TP+TOP SPP)Equity income from GPSC
(1) 100% of TP and TOP SPP
Performance Highlight
74% 100%
+ Higher contribution from GPSC’s profit sharing due to consolidating net profit from GLOW (69.11%) since 14 March 2019
368 353 348 299 253
1,387224 255 218 118 229
816
592 608 566417
482
2,183
Q1/18 Q2/18 Q3/18 Q4/18 Q1/19 FY/18
3) consolidated EBITDA of TP and TOP SPP
4) Net profit of 74% TP + 100 % TOP SPP + 24.29% profit sharing from GPSC
Power & Steam Sales
EBITDA & Net Profit
Electricity(1)
(GWh)
Steam(1)
(kton)
1,041 1,084 1,129 1,079 1,043
4,333
Q1/18 Q2/18 Q3/18 Q4/18 Q1/19 FY/18
EBITDA(THB million)
Net Profit(THB million)
3)
4)
13%
622 643 647 632 606
2,544
665 678 683 628 575
2,653
-19--19-
Integrated Margin & Competitive Cash CostFinancial
5.26.7
4.75.7
3.9 3.0
6.87.6
4.3
6.2
(3.6)
5.7
2016 2017 2018 Q1/18 Q4/18 Q1/19
1.4 1.2 1.4 1.11.9
1.2
0.50.4
0.40.3
0.4
0.5
1.91.6
1.81.4
2.3
1.7
2016 2017 2018 Q1/18 Q4/18 Q1/19
Operating Cost Interest Expense
(Unit: US$/bbl)
Group’s Cash Cost
(Unit: US$/bbl)
Market GIM Accounting GIM (Market GIM + Stock G/L)
Market GRM Accounting GRM (Market GRM + Stock G/L)
Gross Integrated Margin
(Unit: US$/bbl)
(excl. one-time non-operating item)
(net)
1.8 1.6 1.9 1.52.4
1.7
0.5 0.5 0.50.4
0.50.6
2.3 2.1 2.41.9
2.9 2.3
2016 2017 2018 Q1/18 Q4/18 Q1/19
Operating Cost Interest Expense
(Unit: US$/bbl)
(excl. one-time non-operating item)
(net)
Higher group cash cost in 2016 mainly from MTA cost in TLB ~198 MB
Gross Refining Margin Refinery’s Cash Cost
5.2 6.7 6.6
7.5 4.6 4.2 5.7 6.1
3.9
(3.5)
3.0
5.7
1.7
1.7 1.6 1.6
1.8 1.8
1.7 1.7
2.2
2.2
2.0
2.0 0.7
0.7 0.8 0.8
0.5 0.5
0.7 0.7
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2 7.5
9.1
7.58.2
6.55.2
9.1 9.9
6.6
8.6
(0.9)
7.9
2016 2017 2018 Q1/18 Q4/18 Q1/19
Refinery Aromatics+LAB Lube Base
Higher refinery cash cost in 2018 mainly from MTA CDU-1 cost ~230 MB
-20--20-Performance Breakdown
Q1/19: Performance Breakdown by Business Unit
(1) U-rate of 5 Oil & Chemical Tankers (total capacity: 22,800 DWT, acquired 1 LPG vessel in Dec 18 which start operate in Jan 19 onwards)(2) U-rate of TET Q1/19 includes SAPTHIP 97% and UBE 97%, Q4/18 includes SAPTHIP 96% and UBE 98%, Q1/18 includes SAPTHIP 87% and UBE 108%(3) Includes 75% of LAB net profit, Q1/19 = (64) MB, Q4/18 = (106) MB, Q1/18 = 115 MB(4) Apply on an equity accounted basis in the consolidated financial statement. (GPSC has been held by TOP 8.9% and TP 20.8%,TP has been held by TOP 74% & TOP SPP has
been held by TOP 100%)
Q1/19 2,968 774 56 44 (2) 16 482 4,408
Q4/18 (6,087) 747 145 (14) (65) 7 417 (4,812)
Q1/18 3,747 751 417 38 17 27 592 5,608
116%
92% 89%
123%
95% 97%115%
94%86%
104%95% 97%
Q1/19
Q4/18
Refinery Aromatic Lube Solvents Marine Ethanol Power
Consolidated Net Profit
Utilization/Production (%) & Net Profit (million THB)
(1) (2)
(3) (4)
(3)
(3)
(4)
(4)
Key Points• Refinery: continued high run rate to
capture strong demand in domestic and Indochina market
• Aromatic/LAB: stable run rate to capture ongoing decent margins
• Lube: declined contribution pressured by new base oil supply from China
• Power: higher contribution mainly from higher GPSC’s profit sharing
• Solvents: higher contribution due to higher sale gross margins following rising crude price
• Marine: improved contribution supported by higher TMS’s utilization and lower operating cost
• Ethanol: higher contribution due to higher sales volume and profit sharing from UBE
-21--21-
(Unit : million THB)
Q1/19 Q4/18 QoQ Q1/18 YoY
Sales Revenue 91,626 100,150 (8,524)(A)
91,536 90
Hedging Gain / (Loss) (166) (852) 686 (B)
102 (268)
EBITDA 6,889 (3,582) 10,471 (C)
7,359 (470)
EBITDA excl. Stock G/(L) & Reversal of
NRV/(NRV) 3,102 4,942 (1,840)
(D) 7,087 (3,985)
Financial Charges (1,215) (1,078) (137)(E)
(750) (465)
FX G/(L) & CCS 652 (233) 885 (F)
1,470 (818)
(Tax Expense)/reversal of income tax (1,000) 1,315 (2,315) (1,209) 209
Net Profit / (Loss) 4,408 (4,812) 9,220 5,608 (1,200)
EPS (THB/Share) 2.16 (2.36) 4.52 2.75 (0.59)
Stock G/(L) & Reversal of NRV 3,787 (8,524) 12,311 272 3,515
Net Profit/ (Loss) excl. Stock G/(L) and
Reversal of NRV/(NRV)621 3,712 (3,091) 5,336 (4,715)
THB/US$ - average 31.79 32.99 (1.20) 31.71 0.08
THB/US$ - ending 31.98 32.61 (0.63) 31.41 0.57
Effective Tax Rate (%) 18% N/A N/A 17% 1%
Financial
Q1/19 TOP Group Consolidated P&L
(A) Decrease overall sales volume and product prices following lower quarterly average crude price
(B) Less commodity hedging loss in Q1/19
(C) Mainly from stock gain 2.7 $/bbl in Q1/19 compared with stock loss (7.5) $/bbl in Q4/18
(D) Mainly due to soften Mkt GIM 5.2 $/bbl in Q1/19 from 6.5 $/bbl in Q4/18
(E) Mainly from new bond 1,000 M$ in Nov’18 to support funding plan for CFP
(F) Mainly from realized gain on AP/AR & unrealized gain on USD debt from THB appreciated
QoQ analysis
(1) Including net F/X risk management (foreign currency assets and liabilities) gain/ (loss) in Q1/19, Q4/18 and Q1/18 334, (544) and 1,347 MB, respectively
(2) In Q1/19, Q4/18 and Q1/18 stock gain/(loss) = 2,473, (7,211) , and 381 MB. And, In Q1/19, the reversal of NRV was recorded at 1,314 MB (consisted of crude NRV 769 MB and product NRV 545 MB), in Q4/18 NRV was recorded at 1,314 MB (consisted of crude NRV 769 MB and product NRV 545 MB), and in Q1/18 NRV was recorded at 110 MB which is wholly crude NRV
(1)
(2)
-22--22-
Q1/19 TOP Group Consolidated Cash FlowFinancial
Q1/19 Q1/18
Operating Cash Flow 3,891 7,636
Net income & non-cash adj. 6,459 7,157
Change in working capital (2,568) 479
Beginning
Cash 34,041
S/T investment 73,221
Investment held as Available for sale
361
107,623
+
+ =
+
Ending
40,218
61,375
380
101,973 6)
Effect of FX changes
(425)
+
Changes
6,602
(11,846) 4)
19 5)
Operating Cash Flow
Financing
(Unit: Million THB)
(Unit: Million THB)
Free Cash Flow 11,769 10,551
Q1/19 Q1/18
Investments 7,878 2,915
ST investments 11,309 4,352
Available for sale - (680)
CAPEX (PP&E) & other (3,431)1)
(968)
Financing (5,186) 7,283
Loans proceeding 2,2532)
10,346
Loans repayment (6,032)3)
(1,685)
Interest (1,404) (1,377)
Dividend (3) -
Investments
6) FCD = 56,708 MB (1,792 MUSD)
1)TOP 2,386 MB, TPX 875MB
2) LABIX 970, SAPTHIP 495, TSTH 590 ,TSV 150, and TMS 5 MB3) TOP 3,000 , TM 75, LABIX 1,200, TLB 540, TSTH 810, TSV 257, SAPTHIP 150 MB
Ending Cash incl. S/T Investment & AFS
Non-cash transaction : 4) Unrealized loss from FCD 488MB5) MTM EBIF 19MB in Q1/19
-23--23-
Cost of Debt
TOP Group (Net***) 2.43%
TOP Group (Gross) 4.83%
Financial
Q1/19 TOP Group Strong Financial Position & Financial Ratios
103,870 105,845
57,481 64,793
107,262 101,593
126,473 130,939
107,060
0
102,026
35,080 39,266
0.0 0.0
31-Dec-18 31-Mar-19
(1) Including current portion of Long-Term Debt
Financial Ratios
Net Debt / adj. EBITDA** Net Debt / Equity
Statements of Financial Position
(Unit: million THB)
Trade Payable/ Others
Interest Bearing Debt
Equities
CurrentAssets
Non-CurrentAssets
Cash & ST investment
31 Dec 18
** Annualized EBITDA (excl stock gain/loss & Reversal of NRV/(NRV))
ROE 8.0 % 7.0 %
ROIC 9.2 % 8.3 %
*
* Based on actual performance in the past 12 months
*
272,231
(1)
BBB+Stable Outlook
Baa1Stable Outlook
AA- (tha)Stable Outlook
0.0 0.0
31-Dec-18 31-Mar-19
2)
(2) Including investment held as available for sale 31 Dec 18 = 361 MB, 31 Mar 19 = 380 MB
Consolidated Long-Term Debt as at 31 Mar 19
Net Debt
433 million THB
(US$ 14 million
equivalence)
*** As of 31 Mar 19 Net Debt 433 MB or 14 M$
102,026 million THB
(US$ 3,190 million
equivalence)
Total IBD
*** ***
(4)
(4) Due to yield enhancement
Interest Rate Portion
Float 11%
Fixed 89%
TOP avg.debt life 14.00 Yrs
Value (Million) Portion
US$ Bond & US$ Loan(3)
USD 1,991 63%
THB Bond THB 20,500 20%
THB Loan THB 16,212 17%(3) Including VND Loan equivalent to USD
268,613
31 Mar 19
As at 29 Mar 19 (31.98 THB/US$)
-24--24-
2H/19 MARKET OUTLOOK
• Crude Oil
• Petroleum Products
• Aromatics
• Base Oil & Bitumen
• Linear Alkyl Benzene (LAB)
CRUDE OIL
-26-Crude Oil
20
40
60
80
100
Jan-17 Apr-17 Jul-17 Oct-17 Jan-18 Apr-18 Jul-18 Oct-18 Jan-19 Apr-19 Jul-19 Oct-19
$/BBL
Dubai Price Movement
Increasing Oil Supply to Balance Iran and Venezuela Output Loss
Key Highlights in 2H-2019*Q2TD’19 (as of 10 May): $70.4/BBL
1st OPEC-led
Supply Cut
Deal Extension
Hurricane
Harvey & Irma
•Concern of Tighten Supply from Iran and Venezuela amid Increasing Non-OPEC Production
• Rising U.S. Production to Impact OPEC Production Decision
1
2
OPEC-led Cut
Deal Started
Supply Outage
in Libya
U.S.-China Trade War Conflict
OPEC-led Cut
Deal Extended until the Dec-18
Keystone &
Forties Pipeline
leakage
U.S. Re-imposed
Sanctions on Iran
Concern Over Supply Loss in Iran
High OPEC
and Non-OPEC output
OPEC & Non-OPEC
Pledged to
Increase Production
Falling Risk Assets
as FED raised rates
OPEC Cut
Steeper than Deal
Supply Loss
from Iran and
Venezuela on
U.S. Sanction
-27-Crude Oil
1 Concern of Tighten Supply from Iran and Venezuela amid Increasing Non-OPEC Production
CCurrent OECD Crude Stock at 5-Year AverageC
OECD Crude Oil Inventory
2200
2400
2600
2800
3000
3200
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2017 2018 2019 Avg 14-18
MBBL
Source : IEA (Apr’19)
OPEC Cut with Steeper Than Deal in 1H-2019
Source : Reuter’s Poll (Apr’19), OPEC (Apr’19) and TOP’s Estimate
MBD
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Jun-17 Dec-17 Jun-18 Dec-18 Jun-19 Dec-19
OPEC-11 Production
*OPEC Target
25.9 MBD
*OPEC-11 excludes Qatar (left OPEC during early Jan’19), Venezuela, Iran, and
Libya from production cut deal
A
OPECDecision in
Meeting 25-26 Jun’19
Growing Oil Supply from Non-OPEC in 2H-19D
Source : IEA (Apr’19)
MBD
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
1Q17 3Q17 1Q18 3Q18 1Q19 3Q19
Non-OPEC Crude Oil Supply2H-19
(+1.4 MBD YoY)
Lower Iran & Venezuela Supply on U.S. SanctionB
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Jun-17 Dec-17 Jun-18 Dec-18 Jun-19 Dec-19
Venezuelan Crude Export Iranian Crude Export
MBD
Iranian & Venezuelan Crude Oil Export
U.S. Sanction on Venezuelan Oil
Source : Reuters (Apr’19)
Venezuela(-1.0 MBD YoY)
Aggressive Political Risk
U.S. Financial Sanction 2H-19 Iran
(-0.5 MBD YoY)
U.S. Waiver Announcement for 8 Countries
U.S. Ending Sanctions Waivers Oct’18
Baseline
for Cut
-28-Crude Oil
2 Rising U.S. Production to Impact OPEC Production Decision
C Rising U.S. Pipeline Outflow Capacity in 2H-2019BSurging U.S. Crude Output on Price RecoveryA
Balancing Market in Q4 in case of OPEC Cut RunD
Source : IEA (Apr’19), OPEC (Apr’19) and TOP’s Estimate
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
Jan-17 Jul-17 Jan-18 Jul-18 Jan-19 Jul-19
Gray Oak Cactus II EPIC pipeline
MBD
Source : Reuters (Apr’19)
U.S. Crude Oil Pipeline Capacity
2H-19 (+0.6 MBD YoY)
Existing Pipeline
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
1Q17 3Q17 1Q18 3Q18 1Q19 3Q19
2H-19 Balance:
Demand: 101.2 MBD (+1.5 MBD YoY)
Supply: 101.4 MBD (+0.0 MBD YoY)
Global Demand/Supply BalanceMBD
Surplus
DeficitCase 2
Case 1
Two Possible Cases on OPEC Production Cut
Source : Reuter’s Poll (Apr’19), OPEC (Apr’19) and TOP’s Estimate
2021222324252627282930
Jun-17 Dec-17 Jun-18 Dec-18 Jun-19 Dec-19
OPEC-11 Production
*OPEC Target
25.9 MBD
Case 1: OPEC Increase
Run to Baseline
Case 2 : OPEC
Increase Run with
Production Cut
Lower Level than
Previous Deal
C
Source : EIA (Apr’19)
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
Jan-17 Jul-17 Jan-18 Jul-18 Jan-19 Jul-19
YoY Growth [RHS] Production (LHS) Forecast
U.S. Crude Oil Production MBDMBD
2H-19 (+1.1 MBD
YoY)
MBD
*OPEC-11 excludes Qatar (left OPEC during early Jan’19), Venezuela, Iran, and
Libya from production cut dealOct’18
Baseline
for Cut
-29-Crude Oil
Jan-15 Jul-15 Jan-16 Jul-16 Jan-17 Jul-17 Jan-18 Jul-18 Jan-19
Note: Update as of 10 May 19
AVG. 2016: 2.65
AVG. 2017: 1.72
Murban OSP Premium over Dubai
1H-19: Steady low OSP on ample supply(-) High US production/export
(-) Steady low Saudi OSP to secure market share(-) New ADNOC competitive grade
(-) Weak light/middle distillate crack(+) OPEC production cuts(+) Venezuela’s crude sanction
Y2019Q1 : 1.77Q2 : 2.10 (Act. Apr)
2H-19: Higher OSP on stronger product
crack, preparing for IMO(+) Stronger middle distillate crack and ahead of
new IMO
(+) End of Iranian waiving sanction (from 2 May)(+) OPEC to control production
(-) More US exports on new pipeline capacity
AVG. 2015: 1.61
AVG. 2018: 3.15
Stronger Murban OSP in 2H-19 (vs 1H-19), Supported by Stronger Light /Middle Distillate Crack before IMO
PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
-31-
Improving Middle Distillate Cracks from Firm Seasonal and Bunker Demand for IMO 2020
7.7
5.0 5.2
6.76.1 6.4 6.4
8.27.2 7.1 7
6.1 6.1
4.2
5.9
3.2 3.7
Q1-16 Q2-16 Q3-16 Q4-16 Y2016 Q1-17 Q2-17 Q3-17 Q4-17 Y2017 Q1-18 Q2-18 Q3-18 Q4-18 Y2018 Q1-19 Q2TD-19*
Key Highlights in 2H-2019
Singapore Cracking GRM ($/BBL)
Gasoline Cracks Supported by Peak Driving Season in Q3, Then Eased by Additional Supply in Q4
1
Improving Refining Margins from Rising Middle Distillate Crack Outweighing Weak Gasoline Market
($/BBL) Q1-18 Q2-18 Q3-18 Q4-18 2018 Q1-19Q2TD-
19*
ULG95-DB
13.6 12.2 11.5 4.9 10.6 3.7 8.6
JET-DB 16.0 15.3 14.5 15.7 15.4 13.0 11.9
GO-DB 14.7 14.6 14.3 15.0 14.7 12.8 12.3
HSFO-DB
(4.9) (4.5) (2.5) 1.3 (2.6) (0.1) (2.8)
2
Refinery
Remarks: *Q2TD-19 as of 10 May 19
Demand Growth Outpacing Supply Addition
3
-32-
Expectation of Higher Chinese Export QuotasD
Declining Stock to 5-year Average LevelA
1
Refinery
Strong U.S. Demand during Summer
Gasoline Cracks Supported by Peak Driving Season in Q3, Then Eased by Additional Supply in Q4
Source : Reuters (May’19)
Additional Supply Pressured the MarketC
Source : FGE Energy (Apr’19)
B
200
220
240
260
280
300
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec5yr-range 2018 2019 avg 14-18
Global Gasoline InventoryMBBL
U.S. Gasoline Demand
Source : EIA STEO (May’19)
MBD 2H-19: 9.3 MBD (+0.1 MBD vs 1H-19)
8.2
8.6
9.0
9.4
9.8
10.2
Jan-18 Apr-18 Jul-18 Oct-18 Jan-19 Apr-19 Jul-19 Oct-19
KBD Chinese Gasoline Export
0
100
200
300
400
500
Jan-18 Jul-18 Jan-19 Jul-19
AVG 2018: 298 KBD
Global Gasoline Supply
Source : Energy Aspects (Apr’19), TOP Estimates
MBD 2H-19 : 25.8 MBD (+0.5 MBD vs 1H-19)
23
24
25
26
27
Jan-18 Apr-18 Jul-18 Oct-18 Jan-19 Apr-19 Jul-19 Oct-19
Hengli (400 KBD)
in Jun LE 1H-19: 284 KBD
LE 2H-19: 333 KBD
Jizan (400 KBD)
in Nov
-33-
Middle Distillate Stock at 5-year Average Level
Firm Seasonal Demand with IMO 2020 SupportiveChance of Colder Winter than Previous YearA
Improving Middle Distillate Cracks from Firm Seasonal and Bunker Demand for IMO 2020
2
Refinery
B
Steady-to-Lower Exports from ChinaC
Global Middle Distillate DemandMBD
Source : FGE Energy (Apr’19), Energy Aspects (Apr’19)
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Jan-18 Apr-18 Jul-18 Oct-18 Jan-19 Apr-19 Jul-19 Oct-19
2H-19: 37.4 MBD (+1.2 MBD vs 1H-19)
Percent of La Niña Development
37%
7%
56%Neutral
La Niña
El Niño
2H’19
20%
0%80%
2H’18
Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric, NOAA (Apr’19)
MMBL
Source : Reuters (May’19)
100
150
200
250
300
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
5yr-range 2018 2019 avg 14-18
Global Middle Distillate Inventory
D
Source : FGE Energy (Apr’19)
KBD Chinese Middle Distillate Export
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Jan-18 Jul-18 Jan-19 Jul-19
AVG 2018: 695 KBD
LE 1H-19: 835 KBD
LE 2H-19: 710 KBD
-34-Refinery
Note: Adjusted capacity based on start-up period (effective additional capacity)
Asia Pacific and Middle East Effective CDU Addition VS Additional Demand
Source : FACTs Semi Annual Reports, Fall 2018, Reuters (Oct’18) and TOP’s estimate
3 Demand Growth Outpacing Supply Addition
3150
517
1386 1431
875
458 562
5
762 775970
721 770632
295595
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
-500
500
1500
2500
3500
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
KBD
AP & ME Demand Growth Middle East China Other AP
Japan India Vietnam Teapot
Thailand Net Addition Operating Rate [RHS]
Refinery Country Start-up CDU (KBD)
Rapid Malaysia Q2’19 Q3’19 300
Hengli China Q3’19 Q2’19 400
Jizan Saudi Arabia Q4’19 400
Rongsheng China Q3’20 400
Operating Rate, %
YoY Y2016(B) Y2017(B) Y2018(B)1Q2019(B)
VS 1Q2018
Y2019FVS 2018
Mogas (A) +9.8% +3.7% +3.3% +3.4%Steady growth due to low oil
price
Jet/Kero +6.8% +4.4% +5.4% +2.2%
Softer growth due to weaker
tourism and limited airport
capacity
Diesel (A) +3.1% +2.9% +1.5% +1.6%Steady growth following
economic expansion
Total +5.4% +3.4% +2.6% +2.2%
GDP +3.2%(C) +4.0%(C) +4.1%(C) +3.4%(D) +3.8%(D)
Domestic
Thailand Oil Demand Growth
Thailand Oil Demand Growth
Remarks: (A) Mogas and Diesel includes Ethanol and Biodiesel, respectively
(B) DOEB
(C) NESDB
(D) BOT’s Estimation (Apr’19)
AROMATICS
-37-
($/TON) Q1-18 Q2-18 Q3-18 Q4-18 2018 Q1-19 Q2TD-19*
PX-
ULG95304 268 447 529 387 508 290
BZ-
ULG95231 126 127 81 141 18 -48
Key Highlights in 2H-2019
Aromatics Market
Weaker PX Market on Concerns of New Capacity in China
Weak BZ Market due to Concerns of New Capacity amid High Stock in China
1
2
332315341280
317 313273258260276 304
268
447
529
387
508
290
Q1
-16
Q2
-16
Q3
-16
Q4
-16
Y2
01
6
Q1
-17
Q2
-17
Q3
-17
Q4
-17
Y2
01
7
Q1
-18
Q2
-18
Q3
-18
Q4
-18
Y2
01
8
Q1
-19
Q2
TD
-19
*
PX CFR Taiwan-ULG95 ($/TON)
156138174185163
343
225195212
245 231
12612781
141
18
-48
Q1
-16
Q2
-16
Q3
-16
Q4
-16
Y2
01
6
Q1
-17
Q2
-17
Q3
-17
Q4
-17
Y2
01
7
Q1
-18
Q2
-18
Q3
-18
Q4
-18
Y2
01
8
Q1
-19
Q2
TD
-19
*
BZ FOB Korea-ULG95 ($/TON)
Pressured PX and BZ Markets due to Concerns of New Capacity in China
Remarks: *Q2TD-19 as of 10 May 2019
Aromatics
-38-
0.9 0.91.5
2.1 1.8
3.6
0
2
4
6
Q1-19 Q2-19 Q3-19 Q4-19 1H-19 2H-19
Effective Cap. from Prev. Yr Heng Li 1 Sinopec Hainan 2
Zhejiang PC 1 Heng Li 2 Sinochem Hongrun
Uncertainty Total
Aromatics
Weaker PX market on Concerns of New Capacity in China
Source: WM Chemicals (Feb’19) and TOP’s Estimate
1
Expect PTA Opt. Rate in 2H-19 to be Higher than 2017-18
Higher Capacity Addition to Pressure in 2H-19A
C D
Lower PX Maintenance in 2H-19 to Pressure MarketB
Lower Opt. Rate from Lower Demand Growth than Cap. Add.
11 12 13 14
2427
10 10 11 11
20 21
05
1015202530
Q1-19 Q2-19 Q3-19 Q4-19 1H-19 2H-19
PX Capacity PX Demand
AP/ME PX Effective Capacity vs DemandMil TON
Cap. Add. : +11.8%
Dem. Growth : +3.7%
D High Supply in 2H-19 to Pressure the Market
Note: the number may not sum to total due to rounding
Fuhaichuang 1
0.8MTA in Jan
AP/ME Effective PX Capacity Addition
Fuhaichuang 2
0.8MTA in Apr
Mil TON
Hainan
0.8MTA
Zhejiang
0.8MTA
Heng Li 1
2.25MTA
Hongrun
0.8MTA
Heng Li 2
2.25MTA
Chinese PTA Operating Rate
50
60
70
80
90
100
Jan-19 Mar-19 May-19 Jul-19 Sep-19 Nov-19
2018 2017 2019
Percentage
069
274
394
280199
14272 107
188119
51
0
200
400
600
Ja
n-1
9
Fe
b-1
9
Ma
r-1
9
Ap
r-1
9
Ma
y-1
9
Ju
n-1
9
Ju
l-1
9
Au
g-1
9
Se
p-1
9
Oct-
19
No
v-1
9
De
c-1
9
Japan China Taiwan South Korea
Malaysia Singapore Thailand Vietnam
India Total 2018
K TONAsian PX Plant Turnaround in 2019
Operating Rate 2019: 83.2%
-39-
0.4 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.81.1
0
1
2
3
Q1-19 Q2-19 Q3-19 Q4-19 1H-19 2H-19
Effective Cap. from Prev. Yr Heng Li 1 Sinopec Hainan 2
Zhejiang PC 1 Heng Li 2 Sinochem Hongrun
Uncertainty Total
Hongrun
0.2MTA
AromaticsWeak BZ Market due to Concerns of New Capacityamid High Stock in China2
SM Capacity Addition to Support BZ Demand in 2H-19
A
C
0.07 0.07 0.09
0.270.14
0.36
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Q1-19 Q2-19 Q3-19 Q4-19 1H-19 2H-19
Effective Capacity from 2018 2019 Effective Capacity
Mil TON
Zhejiang 1.2MTAIn Nov
High BZ Stock in East China to Pressure Import Interest
138
6993
178
231
0
50
100
150
200
250
Ja
n-1
5
Ju
l-15
Ja
n-1
6
Ju
l-16
Ja
n-1
7
Ju
l-17
Ja
n-1
8
Ju
l-18
Ja
n-1
9
BZ Stock in East China 2015 Average 2016 Average
2017 Average 2018 Average 2019 Average
KTONBZ Stock in East China
Higher Capacity Addition in 2H-19
High Supply to Pressure Sentiment in the Market
10 10 11 11
21 22
8 8 9 8
1617
0
5
10
15
20
25
Q1-19 Q2-19 Q3-19 Q4-19 1H-19 2H-19
BZ Capacity BZ Demand
AP/ME BZ Effective Capacity vs DemandMil TON
Cap. Add. : +4.6%
Dem. Growth : +4.9%
Note: the number may not sum to total due to rounding
B
D
Fuhaichuang 1
0.12MTA in Jan
AP/ME Effective BZ Capacity Addition
Fuhaichuang 2
0.12MTA in Apr
Mil TON
Hainan
0.16MTA
Zhejiang
0.65KTA
Heng Li 1
0.65MTA
Heng Li 2
0.65MTA
Source: WM Chemicals (Feb’19), IHS (Feb’19) and TOP’s Estimate
AP/ME SM Capacity Addition
Citic GuoanChemical
200KTAIn Jul
Operating Rate 2019: 81.5%
BASE OIL & BITUMEN
-41-
($/TON) Q1-18 Q2-18 Q3-18 Q4-18 2018 Q1-19Q2TD-
19*
500SN-HSFO
512 482 417 376 447 330 270
Higher Supply on New Supply Addition and Lower Plant Maintenance
Slow Demand during Rainy Season
Base Oil & Bitumen
Key Highlights in 2H-2019
AP Base Oil Effective Capacity Addition
427409443367412 451
556528458498 512482
417376447
330270
Q1
-16
Q2
-16
Q3
-16
Q4
-16
Y2
01
6
Q1
-17
Q2
-17
Q3
-17
Q4
-17
Y2
01
7
Q1
-18
Q2
-18
Q3
-18
Q4
-18
Y2
01
8
Q1
-19
Q2
TD
-19
*
Soft Base Oil Market on High Supply in Asia
1500SN – HSFO ($/TON)
Remarks: *Q2TD-19 as of 10 May 19
1
2
AP Plant Maintenance
0.40.2
0.00.3
0.9
1.4
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
1H-17 2H-17 1H-18 2H-18 1H-19 2H-19
Mil TON Group 3 Group 2 Group 1 Net Capacity
1.2
0.9 0.9
0.60.7
0.3
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.4
1H-17 2H-17 1H-18 2H-18 1H-19 2H-19
Mil TON Group 3 Group 2 Group 1 Net Capacity
2
Source: Argus (May’19)and TOP’s Estimate
-42-Base Oil & Bitumen
($/TON) Q1-18 Q2-18 Q3-18 Q4-18 2018 Q1-19Q2TD-
19*
Bitumen-
HSFO-56 -67 -41 -19 -46 -40 -8
-7
-48 -61
-80 -49
-13 -38 -29
-45 -31
-56 -67 -41
-19 -46 -40
-8
Q1
-16
Q2
-16
Q3
-16
Q4
-16
Y2
01
6
Q1
-17
Q2
-17
Q3
-17
Q4
-17
Y2
01
7
Q1
-18
Q2
-18
Q3
-18
Q4
-18
Y2
01
8
Q1
-19
Q2
TD
-19
*
Bitumen-HSFO ($/TON)
Key Highlights in 2H-2019
Slow demand during 2H-19 1
Slow Demand during Rainy Season in Asia
Improved Bitumen Demand in Thailand from Higher Infrastructure Budget in 2019
1
Soft Bitumen Market on Slow Demand in Asia
Higher Bitumen Demand in 20192
Remarks: *Q2TD-19 as of 10 May 19
2
Source: Petrosil (Apr’19), Bureau of maintenance (Mar’19)
89 88 8274
104
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1H
-17
2H
-17
1H
-18
2H
-18
1H
-19
Bitumen Domestic SalesKton/month
EEC: 5 Highways(35,000 Mil Baht)
Bangyai- Karnchanaburi(55,620 Mil Baht)
0
100
200
300
1H-17 2H-17 1H-18 2H-18 1H-19
Kton/month Import Bitumen Volume
Indonesia India Vietnam
Linear Alkyl Benzene (LAB)
-44-
30
40
50
60
70
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
LAB
Soft Demand in 2H-2019 due to Monsoon Season and Lower AP/ME LAB Plants Maintenance
Key Highlights in 2H-2019
LAB Market
Source: ICIS Publication (2016-2019), India Customs (Jan-19), TOP’s Estimate
LAB Spread* ($/TON)
($/TON) Q1-18 Q2-18 Q3-18 Q4-18 2018 Q1-19Q2TD-
19*
LAB
Spread529 566 562 640 574 615 620
635627619543
606539
603534522550 529566562
640574
615620
Q1
-16
Q2
-16
Q3
-16
Q4
-16
Y2
01
6
Q1
-17
Q2
-17
Q3
-17
Q4
-17
Y2
01
7
Q1
-18
Q2
-18
Q3
-18
Q4
-18
Y2
01
8
Q1
-19
Q2
TD
-19
**
**Q2TD-19 as of 10 May 19
Remarks: *Estimated indicator
Soft Demand in Q3 as Rainy Season Pressure Detergent Demand
Lower AP/ME LAB Plants Maintenance
1
2
2018 India LAB Import VolumeK TON
0
50
100
150
200
250
1H 2018 2H 2018 1H 2019 2H 2019
Saudi Arabia
Egypt
Taiwan
South Korea
Japan
India
China
KTA AP/ME Effective Maintenance/Closure***
***Temporary
CONCLUSION
-46-Conclusion
2H-2019 Market Outlook Conclusion(vs. 1H-2019)
Crude Oil
Refinery
Lube Base
LAB
Aromatics
Improving Refining Margins Supported by Strong Middle Distillate Demand Outpacing Weak Gasoline Market
Increasing Oil Supply to Balance Iran and Venezuela Output Loss
Soft LAB Market Pressured by Monsoon Season and Lower Maintenance Level
Pressured PX and BZ Markets due to Concerns of New Capacity in China
Soft Base Oil Market on High Supply Addition in AsiaSoft Bitumen Market on Slow Demand
-47--47-
Thank You
Any queries, please contact:
at email: [email protected]
Tel: 662-797-2999 / 662-797-2961
Fax: 662-797-2976
-48--48-
APPENDIX
• Strategic Investment Plan
• 2018 Dividend Payment
• Optimized & Flexible Operations…Superior Performance
• CDU Addition VS Additional Demand – AP & ME
• World GRM / Inventories
• Thailand petroleum demand by products
-49--Use only for KM Session- -49-
Strategic Investment Plan Approved by Board of Directors CAPEX Plan (Unit US$ million)
Notes: Excluding approximately 40 M$/year for annual maintenanceUpdated as of April 2019
Project2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Reliability, Efficiency and Flexibility Improvement 46 17 2
Infrastructure Improvement
- Jetty 7&8 / Improvement 78 5 0
- Office Relocation & New Crude Tank 30 16 0
- Site office preparation for fire water & fire water improvement 23 12 0
- New Bangphra Raw Water Line 4 15 8
Other Investments ( i.e. Digital Transformation, Benzene derivatives-LAB license fee ) 28 30 2
Total Ongoing CAPEX 209 95 12
CFP project * 1,280 1,788 875 624 (606)
Total CAPEX (including CFP) 1,489 1,883 887 624 (606)
Planned capital investment
* CAPEX of CFP Project including the disposal of asset to transfer ownership in the Energy Recovery Unit (ERU) which is a part of the CFP Project
CAPEX
-50--50-
7.82
9.198.66
9.40
0.11
5.91
4.39
7.28
6.04
4.57
-2.03
5.97
10.40
12.18
4.97
FY/04 FY/05 FY/06 FY/07 FY/08 FY/09 FY/10 FY/11 FY/12 FY/13 FY/14 FY/15 FY/16 FY/17 FY/18
Annual DPS (Baht/share)
1.80 3.50 3.50 4.50 2.75 2.55 2.00 3.30 2.70 2.30 1.16 2.70 4.50 5.25 2.65
DividendPayout
23% 38% 40% 48% n.a. 43% 45% 45% 45% 50% n.a. 45% 43% 43% 53%
Dividend Yield* 4.0% 5.6% 5.6% 6.2% 5.2% 7.1% 4.0% 4.7% 4.2% 3.6% 2.3% 5.0% 6.7% 6.2% 3.1%
Avg TOP price 44.7 63.0 62.7 72.7 53.3 35.9 49.9 69.8 65.1 64.6 50.4 53.5 66.7 84.2 86.9
Dividend Policy : Not less than 25% of consolidated net profit after deducting reserves, subject to cash flow and investment plan
Unit : THB/Share EPSR
1H dividend
* Based on average TOP share price in each year
2H dividend
Year Dividend
2018 Dividend Payment
R Based on restated financial statement
**
** Dividend payout before restated ; 2004 = 25% , 2006 = 43%, 2013 = 45%
Financial
1.50 1.75 1.75 1.05 0.60 1.30 0.50 0.80 0.56 0.90 1.50 1.50 1.50
2.00 2.75
1.00 1.50 1.40
2.00 2.20 1.50 0.60 1.80
3.00 3.75
1.15 1.80
3.50
** **
-51--51-
Thai Oil is able to diversify its type of crude intake and product outputs to maximize demand and margin
Optimized & Flexible Operations…Superior Performance
27%17%
7%17%
28%29%
28%28%
45% 54%65%
55%
Oman Dubai Murban ArabLight
Short Residue Waxy Gasoline/Distillates
Sources of Crude
• Flexibility in crude intake allows diversification of crude types to source cheaper crude
• Flexibility in product outputs by maximizing middle distillates (jet and diesel) by adjusting production mode to capture domestic demand and price premium
• Maximize Platformate production to capture higher margin on aromatics
• Minimize fuel oil output to avoid lower margin products
Product output
Domestic demand for
petroleum products**
**Source: Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy Thailand
% S = 0.78API = 39.4
% S = 1.43API = 32.0
% S = 2.52API = 31.2
Crude Assays based onTOP configuration*
*** Including Nigeria, Russia and others
% S = 1.97API = 32.8
*Crude yield as per assay in Spiral as of Feb 2016
75%
5%
7%
13%
5%
7%
32%
25%
15%
12%
4%
4%
43%
12%
20%
21%
Middle East
Q1/19
SAUDI ARAMCO
MOPS Jet Kerosene FOB
SG
MOPS Gasoil 0.05% Sulfur
FOB SG
MOPS ULG 95 FOB SG
OthersLPG
PLATFORMATE
GASOLINE
JET
DIESEL
FUEL OIL
Q1/19
***
LONG RESIDUE
MOPS Fuel Oil 180 CST 3.5% Sulfur FOB SG
Reference Price
Crude
Local
Far East
-52--52-
Asia Pacific and Middle East Refinery Addition
Refinery
Sources: FGE Energy Semi Annual Reports, Fall 2018, Reuters (Oct’18) and TOP’s estimate
Note: Adjusted capacity based on start-up period (effective additional capacity)
Start-up period)
CountryNameplate
(KBD)Company
Q1-18 Iran 120Bandar Abbas - PGSOC/1 (Phase 2)
Vietnam 186 Nghi Son
Q3-18 China 100 Petrochina Huabei
Q4-18 India 36 Bharat - Bina
Iran 120Bandar Abbas - PGSOC/1 (Phase 3)
South Korea 82.8 Hyundai Oilbank – Daesan
Q1-19 China 70 CNOOC/Local ZhonghaiDongying
Iraq 66North Refining Company –Baiji
Q2-19 Malaysia 300 Petronas Pengerang (RAPID)
Q4-19 China (Jul’19 > Jun’19) 400 Hengli Petrochemical Dalian
Saudi Arabia 400 Jizan
China 60 Sinochem Quanzhou –Fujian
Iraq 66 North Refining Company –Basra
Kuwait 171 KPC - Mina Al-Ahmadi
Closures
Q2-18 China -75 Local refineries
Q4-19 China -100 Local refineries
Kuwait -112 KPC - Mina Al-Ahmadi
458562
5
762 775970
-1000
0
1000
2000
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
KBD
AP & ME Demand Growth Middle East
China Other AP
Japan India
Vietnam Teapot
Net Addition
(Dec’18 > Dec’19)
(Aug’18 > Oct’18)
(Oct’19 > Nov’19)
(May’19 > Aug’19)
(Dec’18 > Dec’19)
-53--53-
Asian Margin Vs. US-EU margin
World GRM
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
U.S. Crude Refinery Input
5yr-range 20192018 avg 14-18
MBDSource : EIA
8
9
10
11
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
EU 16 Crude Refinery Input
5yr-range 2019
2018 avg 14-18
MBDSource : EurOil
2.2
2.7
3.2
3.7
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
Japan Crude Refinery Input
5yr-range 20192018 avg 14-18
MBDSource : METI
Total Capacity: 3.5 MBD 84.78% 65.71% 90.69%
Total Capacity: 18.6 MBD Total Capacity: 15.8 MBD
-8-6-4-202468
101214
Ja
n-1
6
Ma
y-1
6
Se
p-1
6
Ja
n-1
7
Ma
y-1
7
Se
p-1
7
Ja
n-1
8
Ma
y-1
8
Se
p-1
8
Ja
n-1
9
$/BBL
SINGAPORE GRM
SING CRACK SING HYDRO
-10
0
10
20
30
40
Ja
n-1
6
Ma
y-1
6
Se
p-1
6
Ja
n-1
7
Ma
y-1
7
Se
p-1
7
Ja
n-1
8
Ma
y-1
8
Se
p-1
8
Ja
n-1
9
$/BBL
EU - US Margins
BRENT CRACK BRENT HYDRO WTI CRACK
-54--54-
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
U.S. Crude Stocks (excl. SPR)
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : EIA
Global Crude Oil Inventories
Inventories
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
Crude Oil, Cushing, Oklahoma
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : EIA
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
Japan, Crude Stocks
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : METI
430
440
450
460
470
480
490
500
510
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
EU 16 Crude and Feedstock Stocks
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : EurOil
-55--55-
180
200
220
240
260
280
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
U.S. Gasoline Stocks
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : EIA
Global Gasoline Inventories
Inventories
80
100
120
140
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
EU 16 Gasoline Stocks
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : EurOil
0
10
20
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
Singapore Gasoline Stocks
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : IE Singapore
0
5
10
15
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
Japan, Gasoline Stocks
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : METI
-56--56-
80
100
120
140
160
180
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
U.S. Diesel Stocks
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : EIA
Global Middle Distillate Inventories
Inventories
0
10
20
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
Singapore Middle Distillate Stocks
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : IE Singapore
300
350
400
450
500
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
EU 16 Diesel Stocks
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : EurOil
0
5
10
15
20
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
Japan, Middle Distillate Stocks
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : METI
-57--57-
Global Fuel Oil Inventories
Inventories
20
30
40
50
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
U.S. Residual Fuel Oil Stocks
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : EIA
0
10
20
30
40
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
Singapore Residual Fuel Oil Stocks
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : IE Singapore
0
5
10
15
20
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
Japan, Residual Fuel Oil Stocks
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : METI
50
60
70
80
90
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
EU 16 Residual Fuel Oil Stocks
5yr-range 2019 2018 avg 14-18
MBBLSource : EurOil
-58--58-
China’s Refined Product Exports
China Export
0
100
200
300
400
500
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
China’s Gasoline Exports
2016 2017 2018 2019
KBDSource : China Custom
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
China’s Gasoil Exports
2016 2017 2018 2019
KBDSource : China Custom
0
100
200
300
400
500
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
China’s Jet/Kero Exports
2016 2017 2018 2019
KBDSource : China Custom
-59--59-
LPG Demand by Sector
LPG Demand Highlight
• In 1Q2019, LPG demand expanded 1.8% YoY on the back of 14.2% YoY higher demand from petrochemical sector, as a result of higher substitute feedstock price. However, LPG demand was pressured by 2.9% YoY, 2.1% YoY and 1.6% lower consumption in cooking sector, industrial sector and automobile sector, respectively.
Outlook for 2019
• LPG demand is expected to contract 1.1% YoY as consumption in transport sector is expected to decline at 10.0% YoY due to fuel switching. Despite gasoline price being relatively high, LPG station in Thailand is decreasing hence limiting access to fuelling station for LPG vehicle users. Moreover, the registered number of pure LPG vehicle in Thailand during 2010-2017 fell at a rate of 11.2% per year, which means LPG vehicle has become significantly less popular among automobile users over time.
Thailand LPG Demand
Remark : LPG demand includes Petrochemical consumption
Source: EPPO, DOEB (As of May 2019)
Thailand petroleum demand by products
17.30
18.7918.28
12
14
16
18
20
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2019 2016 2017 2018KT/Day
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov
2018 2019
Cooking Industry Automobile Petrochemical
KT/MTH
Domestic LPG Demand
-60--60-
Domestic Gasoline/Gasohol Demand
Gasoline/Gasohol Demand by Grade
GASOLINE/Gasohol Demand Highlight
• In 1Q2019, Mogas demand rose by 3.4% YoY to an average 31.9 ML/day. Although, the retail price of Mogas is higher, Mogas demand was still supported by consumer preference for using personal cars rather than public transit. Moreover, Mogas demand is also supported by fuel switching from LPG.
• The level of domestic ethanol demand, in 1Q2019, rose significantly by 5.7% YoY from 4.07 mml/day to 4.30 mml/day following the rising of Mogas demand. Additionally, this was also because of higher demand in GSH95, E20, and E85 which increased by 8.1% YoY, 13.6% YoY, and 13.9% YoY, respectively, backed up by increasing in the number of new E20 vehicle, higher E20 gas station, and attractive GSH95-E20 and E20-E85 price gap.
Outlook for 2019
• Mogas consumption is predicted to grow by 3.4% YoY supported by expectation of growing of new passengers cars from return of private consumption. However, the demand growth is limited by higher oil price.
Thailand Gasoline/Gasohol Demand
Thailand petroleum demand by products
31.1932.1732.29
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2019 2016 2017 2018MML/Day
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov
2018 2019
ULG95 GSH 91 (E10)GSH 95 (E10) GSH E20GSH E85
MML/Day
Source: DOEB (As of May 2019)
-61--61-
Domestic Jet Demand
JET-A1 demand and # of flights
JET Demand Highlight
• In 1Q2019, Jet consumption increased moderately by 2.2% YoY tapering off from last year as tourism sector encountered a slowdown in growth following slower global economy. Overall tourist numbers still remained constant at 0.3% YoY while Chinese tourist numbers faced a drop of 2.1% YoY.
Outlook for 2019
• Jet demand growth is expected to grow by 2.5% YoY as a result of tourist number growth, especially from ASEAN. However, the global economic slowdown has turned China’s GDP growth from hot to lukewarm which leads to its citizen being more cautious about their expenses. Such economic activity results in less traveling activity which is damaging to Thailand as one of the main destinations for Chinese to spend their vacation.
Thailand JET Demand
Source: DOEB, AOT, Department of Tourism (As of May 2019)
Thailand petroleum demand by products
12
14
16
18
20
22
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2019 2016 2017 2018MML/Day
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
40,00045,00050,00055,00060,00065,00070,00075,00080,00085,000
Ja
n
Ma
y
Se
p
Ja
n
Ma
y
Se
p
Ja
n
Ma
y
Se
p
Ja
n
Ma
y
Se
p
Ja
n
Ma
y
Se
p
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
# of Flights (LHS) JP 1 Demand (RHS)MML/MTHFlights
-62--62-
Domestic Gasoil and NGV Demand
NGV Demand
Diesel Demand Highlight
• In 1Q2019, Diesel demand rose by 1.6% YoY as a result of the growth of Thai economy, backed up by 9.5% higher commercial car sales and stable agricultural production activity. However, due to the global economic slowdown, manufacturing production turned to contraction at 1.0% YoY.
Outlook for 2019
• Diesel demand is expected to expand by 1.7% YoYsupported by economic activity. Moreover, NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administation) predicts less rainfalls as El Nino is more likely to occur than La Nina.
NGV Demand Highlight
• In 1Q2019, NGV demand fell significantly by 11.9% YoY. The major pressuring factor was the unforgettable hike in retail price. Furthermore, gasoline price dropped significantly in the latter year, making gasoline more popular among consumers.
Thailand Gasoil Demand
Thailand petroleum demand by products
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2019 2016 2017 2018MML/Day
5
6
7
8
9
10
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2019 2016 2017 2018KT/Day
Source: DOEB (As of May 2019)
-63--63-
Domestic Fuel Oil Demand
Thailand Fuel Oil Demand by Sector
Fuel Oil Demand Highlight
• In 1Q2019, Fuel Oil consumption fell by 4.6% YoY, as a result of 78.6% YoY slump in demand for power generation. Moreover, the demand for industrial purpose declined by 13.6% YoY as pollution concern became in the spotlight earlier this year. However, bunker demand remained expandable at 2.6% YoY following import and export activities, although the growth has receded from last year’s outstanding performance due to the lack of special demand from abroad.
Outlook for 2019
• Fuel oil demand is expected to increase by 0.6% YoY, supported by transportation demand from economic activity. However, demand growth will continue to be limited by weak consumption for industrial and electricity purposes.
Thailand Fuel Oil Demand
Source: DOEB (As of May 2019)
Thailand petroleum demand by products
0
2
4
6
8
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2019 2016 2017 2018MML/Day
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov
2017 2018
Transportation Industry Electricity Others
MML/Day
-64--64-
Thank You
Any queries, please contact:
at email: [email protected]
Tel: 662-797-2999 / 662-797-2961
Fax: 662-797-2976