13
AUTHOR QUERIES Journal id: TFAC_A_236020 Corresponding author: V. DUCRUET Title: Sorption of aroma compounds in PET and PVC during the storage of a strawberry syrup Dear Author Please address all the numbered queries on this page which are clearly identified on the proof for your convenience. Thank you for your cooperation Query number Query PLEASE PROVIDE EDITABLE FORMAT ARTWORK FOR ALL THE FIGURES 1 Please specify affiliation number “5” in author group 2 Please provide figure captions for all the figures 3 Please provide Publisher and town for Brandrup J, Immergut EH, Grulke A. 1989. 4 Please provide citation for Nahon DF, Navarro y Koren PA, Roozen JP, Posthumus MA. 1998. 5 Please provide citation for Van Willige RW, Linssen JPH, Meinders MBJ, Van der Stege H J, Voragen AGJ. 2002b. 6 Please provide Van Willige 2002a in the reference list 7 Please signify ** in table 2

TFAC A 236020 1. - AgroParisTechmodmol.agroparistech.fr/pub/pub_idm3_ducruet_etal.pdf · 2010. 8. 24. · Teisseire. PET1 was manufactured from Ramapet; and PET2 from Shinpet. The

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • AUTHOR QUERIES Journal id: TFAC_A_236020 Corresponding author: V. DUCRUET Title: Sorption of aroma compounds in PET and PVC during the storage of a strawberry syrup Dear Author Please address all the numbered queries on this page which are clearly identified on the proof for your convenience. Thank you for your cooperation

    Query number Query

    PLEASE PROVIDE EDITABLE FORMAT ARTWORK FOR ALL THE FIGURES

    1 Please specify affiliation number “5” in author group 2 Please provide figure captions for all the figures 3 Please provide Publisher and town for Brandrup J, Immergut EH, Grulke

    A. 1989. 4 Please provide citation for Nahon DF, Navarro y Koren PA, Roozen

    JP, Posthumus MA. 1998. 5 Please provide citation for Van Willige RW, Linssen JPH, Meinders

    MBJ, Van der Stege H J, Voragen AGJ. 2002b. 6 Please provide Van Willige 2002a in the reference list 7 Please signify ** in table 2

  • New XML Template (2007) [1.6.2007–5:57pm] [1–12]{TANDF_FPP}Tfac/TFAC_A_236020.3d (TFAC) [First Proof]

    Food Additives and Contaminants, Month? 2007; ??(?): 1–12

    Sorption of aroma compounds in PET and PVC during the storageof a strawberry syrup

    5 V. DUCRUET1, O. VITRAC2, P. SAILLARD3, E. GUICHARD4, A. FEIGENBAUM4,& N. FOURNIER4

    1INRA, Unité Mixte de Recherche SCALE and 2INRA Unité Mixte de Recherche GENIAL, 1 avenue des

    Olympiades, F-91744 Massy CEDEX, France, 3INRA Laboratoire de Nutrition et Sécurité Alimentaire, F-78352

    Jouy en Josas CEDEX, France, 4INRA, Unité Mixte de Recherche FLAVIC, 17 rue Sully, BV 86510, F-21065 Dijon10 CEDEX, France, and 5INRA, Unité Mixte de Recherche FARE, Moulin de la Housse, F-51687 Reims, France

    (Received 11 September 2006; revised 4 March 2007; accepted 23 March 2007)

    AbstractThe sorption of 14 aroma compounds into PET and PVC was monitored during storage of a strawberry syrup for 1 year.Concentrations in the syrup and in the polymer were determined during storage and compared with previously published

    15 results obtained with glass bottles. Apparent partition coefficients between the polymer and the syrup (noted Kapp) wereestimated from experimental kinetics without reaching equilibrium Kapp values and optimally identified from the kineticdata obtained between 30 and 90 days. They exhibited a similar behaviour for both polymers with values were between2� 10�5 and 2� 10�3, 4� 10�5 and 3� 10�2, respectively, for PET and PVC. The variation of Kapp values in PET wasmainly correlated to the polarity of tested compounds as assessed by their log P values. By contrast, the variations in Kapp

    20 values for PVC were mainly related to their chain lengths. Due to slightly higher partition coefficients and diffusioncoefficients in PVC compared with PET, the amount of absorbed aroma was four times higher in PVC than in PET;however, the amount of absorbed aroma compounds was less than 0.1% of the initial amount present into the syrup, exceptfor octyl butanoate. The variation in concentration in the syrup was interpreted as a combination of a degradation processand a transport process into the packaging material. Both effects were particularly noticeable for both PET and unstable

    25 aroma compounds.

    Keywords: Aroma, PET, PVC, packaging, sorption, strawberry, syrup

    Introduction

    The absorption of aroma compounds by plasticmaterials may induce both a weakening of flavour

    30 and changes to the organic profile of packaged foodproducts. This has mainly been reported for aqueousfood, such as fruit juices, or model solutions, wherethe partition coefficient of aromas between food andpackaging strongly favours sorption into the plastic

    35 material (Kwapong and Hotchkiss 1987; Sizer et al.1988). However, there are many discrepancies inreported partition coefficient values (Kutty et al.1994; Hernandez-Munoz et al. 2001; Tehranyand Desobry 2004). The possible reasons

    40 include: (1) sorption kinetic studies performedwithout reaching the thermodynamic equilibrium(Gavara et al. 1996; Lebossé et al. 1997;

    Feigenbaum et al. 1998); and (2) aroma usedbeyond their concentrations limits, which yield to

    45deviations from Henry sorption equilibrium.Besides, partitioning results obtained with modelsolutions are difficult to extrapolate to the behaviourof aroma compounds in real foods, which aregenerally multi-constituent and possibly multi-

    50phase. Recent papers have shown that in complexsolutions simulating food matrices the partitioncoefficients between aroma compounds and poly-mers also depend on the interactions with macro-molecules (lipids, polyoligosides or proteins).

    55In particular, lipids compete with polymers concern-ing the transfer of aroma compounds into polyolefins(Van Willige et al. 2000a, 2000b). Moreover, duringlong periods of storage of up to 1 year, changes in

    Correspondence: V. Ducruet. E-mail: [email protected]

    ISSN 0265–203X print/ISSN 1464–5122 online � 2007 Taylor & FrancisDOI: 10.1080/02652030701361283

    proofreaderText Box1

  • New XML Template (2007) [1.6.2007–5:57pm] [1–12]{TANDF_FPP}Tfac/TFAC_A_236020.3d (TFAC) [First Proof]

    aroma composition were detected in the food matrix60 without any contact with the polymer (Ducruet et al.

    2001; Berlinet et al. 2005). In this case it isimportant to understand how the reactivity of thearoma compound in the matrix can influencethe absorption of the aroma compounds by the

    65 packaging material.Although PET and PVC are known to be good

    barriers to oxygen, in comparison with polyolefins,PET (one of the most common packaging polymers)and PVC (which is not widely used to package

    70 flavoured drinks) have seldom been tested (Ducruetet al. 2001; Van Willige et al. 2002a; Berlinet et al.2005) for their barrier properties to aroma. Theobjective of the present study was to provideadditional results on the sorption of aroma com-

    75 pounds in glassy polymers such as PET and PVCduring long storage periods and to compare thekinetic sorption process with the degradationprocess, which also can reduce the amount ofaroma. To make the results valuable for industry,

    80 the sorption and degradation kinetics were assessedon real food products and real packaging materials.Since the thermodynamic equilibrium cannot beobtained when the rate constants of both processeshave similar orders of magnitude, the apparent

    85 partition coefficients were derived from an approachbased on a new approximated solution proposedby Vitrac and Hayert (2006) to identify transportproperties (including the partition coefficient)from censored kinetics (i.e. without reaching the

    90 thermodynamic equilibrium).

    Materials and methods

    Packaging materials

    All the bottles were supplied from Teisseire S.A.France. Strawberry syrups were packaged in

    95 rigid PVC bottles (PVC1, PVC2: average thick-ness¼ 1 mm) and in amorphous PET bottles (PET1and PET2; average thickness¼0.75 mm). PVC1was made using GFG 52 D resin from Dorlyl; it issuitable for contact with oils and stabilized with

    100 an organotin stabilizer. PVC2 was manufactured byTeisseire. PET1 was manufactured from Ramapet;and PET2 from Shinpet. The surface area/volume(dm2 l�1) ratio was approximately 6. Packagingin glass bottles (GL) was used as a reference to test

    105 the stability of the syrup without the influence ofpolymer contact.

    Strawberry syrup

    Strawberry syrup was obtained by mixing a sucrosesyrup (�Brix: 64.5�1) and fruit juices (strawberry,

    110 elder and lemon juices). Nature-identical flavouring

    substances were also included. The pH of thestrawberry syrup was 2.65� 0.2; its shelf-life was18 months.

    After flash-pasteurization at 105�C for 30 s, syrup115samples were packaged at ambient temperature

    under aseptic conditions. All bottles (PET, PVCand glass) were sealed after filling with aluminiumfoil in order to avoid a cap effect. The packagedsyrups were stored at 20�C.

    120Solvent extraction of the syrup

    A total of 200 ml of syrup, 200 ml of Milli Q waterand 500 ml of tridecane solution (used as an internalstandard, 500 ml l�1) were mixed in a 1-litre flask.Volatile compounds in the strawberry syrup were

    125extracted three times using distilled dichloro-methane, with 80, 30 and 30 ml for 30, 15 and15 min, respectively, at 0�C while stirring. Organicphases were separated from the aqueous phase andpooled. The dichloromethane extracts were dried

    130over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated usinga Kuderna-Danish column. Analysis were done intriplicate.

    Solvent extraction of polymers

    At the end of each period of contact the strawberry135syrup and its packaging were separated. The plastic

    bottle (PET or PVC) was carefully and rapidlyrinsed twice with ultra-pure water, then withethanol, and finally wiped before cutting. Becauseof the heterogeneous thickness of bottles, samples

    140were taken by cutting pieces from three sectionsof a bottle (top, bottom and middle) and thenpooled. Approximately 7 g of each pooled samplewas then plunged immediately into a 100-ml flaskcontaining distilled diethyl ether (95 ml). A total

    145of 2 ml of a solution of ethyl pentanoate in diethylether (100 ml l�1) were added as an internal standard.The flasks were tightly plugged with Teflon capsand extraction was carried out for 2 h at 15�C withmagnetic stirring. Solvent extracts were dried with

    150sodium sulfate and filtered over glass wool. Diethylether extracts were concentrated using a Kuderna-Danish apparatus.

    Two plastic bottles were analysed for eachcontact period. The extraction process was repeated

    155twice for each bottle so as to enable analysis induplicate of the plastic material after each periodof contact.

    Mass spectra

    Identification of the constituents was achieved using160gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

    The GC-MS system consists of a Fisons GC-8000chromatograph and a MD 800 mass spectrometer

    2 V. Ducruet et al.

    proofreaderText Box6

  • New XML Template (2007) [1.6.2007–5:57pm] [1–12]{TANDF_FPP}Tfac/TFAC_A_236020.3d (TFAC) [First Proof]

    (Fisons Instruments, Les Ulis, France). Separationswere performed on a Supelcowax fused silica

    165 capillary column (0.32 mm�30 m; 0.5 mm;Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The linear flowvelocity of helium was 32 cm s�1. The column wasmaintained at 30�C for 10 min and then pro-grammed at 240�C for SPME analysis and 260�C

    170 for solvent extracts at 5�C min�1. The split-splitlessinjector was at 230�C. Solvent extracts were injectedinto the splitless/split system (the split valve wasclosed after 30 s). Electron ionization mass spectrawere recorded under the following conditions:

    175 capillary direct interface, 250�C; ion source,200�C; ionization voltage, 70 eV; mass range,29–300 m/z; electron multiplier voltage, 450 V;scan rate, 3 scans s�1.

    Mass spectral matches were made by comparison180 with NIST and INRAMASS mass spectra libraries.

    Kovat’s Indices of authentic compounds compiledin the INRAMASS library were used to confirmidentification.

    Estimation of apparent partition coefficients

    185 The partition coefficient is defined from the ratioof concentrations of aroma at thermodynamicequilibrium, noted CP jeq and CF jeq, respectively, inthe packaging material (P) and in food (F ):

    K ¼CP jeqCF jeq

    ð1Þ

    190 Note that equation (1) is valid whatever theconsidered equilibrium. Since the equilibrium wasnot reachable due to insufficient contact time (evenafter 1 year) or due to aroma degradation duringstorage, the equilibrium was extrapolated from the

    195 kinetic phase diagram corresponding to the experi-mental sorption kinetic, which was recently pro-posed by Vitrac and Hayert (2006). Only the mainfeatures of KPD relevant for the current applicationare reported here. A kinetic phase diagram, noted

    200 KPD, consists in plotting the sorption mass flux orequivalently the variation of the residual concentra-tion in P with time, ðdCP jt=dtÞ vs. the residualconcentration in P, CP jt. During a sorption experi-ment the expected concentration in P at equilibrium

    205 corresponds in the KPD space ðCP jt,ðdCP=dtÞjCP jt Þto the value ðCP jeq,0Þ. The interesting feature of theKPD space for the interpretation of sorption kineticsgoverned by diffusion in P and diffusion-convectionin F is that after an initial rapid non-linear decay

    210 of ðdCP jt=dtÞ with CP jt, the variation of ðdCP jt=dtÞ isalmost linear with CP jt. As a result, it is possible inthe KPD space to extrapolate linearly the theoreticalequilibrium state. Besides, a possible competitionbetween sorption in P and degradation in F is easily

    215 detected by a change in curvature of the KPD.

    Thus, a change in the decay of the KPD slopeðd=dCP jtÞðdCP=dtÞjCP jt is interpreted as a degradationprocess, which tends to dominate the sorptionprocess.

    220In this work, CP jeq was linearly extrapolated fromthe last experimental point KPD, for whichðd=dCP jtÞðdCP jdtÞjCP jt was monotonous (i.e. increas-ing or constant). The same process was appliedfor the concentration in the liquid. A key step in the

    225KPD approach is calculation of the derivatives of theconcentration with time when the experimentaldata are unevenly sampled and noisy. In this work,we use an efficient non deterministic filteringtechnique based on local polynomial approximants

    230as detailed and discussed by Vitrac and Hayert(2006). By noting with a superscript ‘extrap’ theextrapolated quantities, the apparent partitioncoefficient, Kapp, corresponding to experimentaldata were calculated from:

    Kapp ¼CP jextrapeqCF jextrapeq

    ð2Þ

    235It is emphasized that Kapp may differ from the realK value; however, it is the best estimator accordingto the data available and our knowledge of sorptionmechanisms. Confidence intervals on Kapp were

    240derived by Monte Carlo sampling consisting inadding a white noise similar to the experimentalerror (relative error of 15%) to kinetic data andin repeating the whole analysis. Each confidenceinterval was based on the 2.5th and 97.5th percen-

    245tiles of at least 200 Monte Carlo trials.

    Statistical analysis

    Sorption experiments were analysed using a one-wayANOVA program. When the differences weresignificant (p < 0.05), Duncan’s test was used to

    250check the differences between pairs of groups andwas carried out using XLSTAT-Pro 7.0 software(Addinsoft, Paris, France).

    Results and discussion

    Sorption of the aroma compounds into PET and PVC

    255In order to monitor the sorption of aroma com-pounds, the strawberry syrup and the plastic materialwere extracted and analysed at different time pointsduring the 330-day storage period. In the case ofPVC, the presence in solvent extracts of additives

    260and small oligomers along with absorbed volatilecompounds produced more complex GC profilesthan those seen with PET. Some of these additiveswere tentatively identified in the extracts of the syrup(Table I).

    Sorption of aroma compounds in PET and PVC 3

  • New XML Template (2007) [1.6.2007–5:57pm] [1–12]{TANDF_FPP}Tfac/TFAC_A_236020.3d (TFAC) [First Proof]

    265 These compounds originate from the degradationof additives for example plasticizer, lubricants ormodifiers (Gächter and Muller 1990). Some canmigrate into the syrup such as benzaldehyde,acetophenone and 2-ethylhexanol. By solvent extrac-

    270 tion of the syrup or the packaging, these additiveswere extracted and co-eluted with the aromacompounds by GC. Thus, of the 38 aromacompounds previously identified in the syrup at theinitial time of storage (Ducruet et al. 2001), only

    275 14 compounds can be quantified in both kinds ofpackaging and in the syrup over the 330-day storageperiod (Table II).

    The final concentration of the aroma compoundsinto the syrups stored in both PET and PVC bottles

    280 were compared with their initial concentrations(Figure 1). During shelf life, aroma compoundsdecreased by hydrolysis irrespective of the polymer.The decrease was more for short chain esters, and inparticular for acetic acid esters and ethyl hexanoate

    285 (Figure 1A) compared with more stable compounds(Figure 1B). This reactivity is not related to thecontact with polymer as it was previously found tooccur during the storage of the syrup in a glass bottle(Ducruet et al. 2001).

    290 The greater reactivity was observed for short chainesters (methyl or ethyl esters) and acetic acid estersand can be explained by the low steric hindrancearound their carbonyl group in contrast to linearlonger chain esters (butyl, hexyl or octyl esters) and

    295 specially to branched esters (ethyl 2-methylbutano-ate, ethyl 3-methylbutanoate and 3-methylbutyl3-methylbutanaote). These results demonstratedthe instability of the aroma formulation for longperiods of storage in acidic condition such as it was

    300 also found in the case of citrus flavoured drinks(Sizer et al. 1988; Berlinet et al. 2005).

    The sorption of the aroma compounds fromstrawberry syrup into PET and PVC was monitored

    with time. The sorption of the 14 aroma compounds305over 330 days of storage was compared with their

    initial concentration into the syrup (Table II). Thesorption into both kinds of packaging materials wasfound to be weak. The sorption was generally lowerthan 0.1% in all cases except for octyl butanoate

    310which reached 0.15% in both PET samples, and0.57 or 0.26%, respectively, in PVC1 and in PVC2samples. After 1 year of storage into both samples ofPET and PVC, if we consider the case of the octylbutanoate and hexyl acetate as an example, their

    315concentrations decreased by 30–43 and 67–81%,respectively (Figure 1), although the sorption ofthese compounds into PET and PVC only repre-sented 0.15–0.57 and 0.013–0.023% of the initialamount, respectively (Table I). These glassy materi-

    320als showed their resistance to sorption by aroma andthus the main parameter which had an impact on thearoma formulation was the hydrolytic process intothe syrup.

    Few papers reported quantitative measurement of325the sorption of aroma compounds into PET for real

    foods over a long time storage especially for thickmaterials such as bottles. For soft drinks flavouredwith orange oil and stored in PET during 12 weeks,Nielsen (1994) showed that only 2.1 and 1.4% of

    330the initial concentrations of myrcene and of limo-nene were respectively sorbed by the polymer.Berlinet et al. (2005) compared the initial amountsof these two aroma compounds in orange juice andthe quantities adsorbed in PET after 5 months of

    335storage. They found an adsorption of between 0.2and 0.3% of the initial levels present. These datawere in line with the findings of Van Willige et al.(2003) who stated that only three flavour com-pounds (limonene, �-myrcene and decanal) were

    340absorbed by PET. The percentage absorption ofPET from juice containing limonene, �-myrcene,and decanal reached only 0.1, 0.1 and 2.8%,

    Table I. Extraneous compounds tentatively identified in the syrup or the packaging material extracts during storage.

    PackagingCompounds initially

    present in the polymer Migration into the syrup Origin of compounds*

    PVC 2-Ethylhexanol Yes after 250 days Thermal degradation of plasticizer2-Ethylhexanol acetate No –Benzaldehyde Yes ABS or MBS impact modifierStyrene No –Isooctyl thioglycolate – –Acetophenone Yes Derived from an organotin stabilizer

    PET 2-Ethylhexanol Yes before 225 days Thermal degradation of plasticizerBenzaldehyde Yes –Naphtlalene No –Linear aldehydes No –Acetophenone Yes Possible degradation products of the polyethylene

    waxes used as lubricants in PET

    *Gächter and Muller (1990).

    4 V. Ducruet et al.

  • New XML Template (2007) [1.6.2007–5:57pm] [1–12]{TANDF_FPP}Tfac/TFAC_A_236020.3d (TFAC) [First Proof]

    Tab

    leII

    .A

    mou

    nt

    of

    arom

    aco

    mp

    ou

    nd

    sso

    rbed

    into

    PE

    Tan

    dP

    VC

    afte

    r90

    day

    s**

    and

    330

    day

    sof

    stora

    geat

    20� C

    .

    Vola

    tile

    com

    pou

    nd

    Cod

    eC

    o*

    (mg

    l�1)

    PE

    T1

    (mg

    6d

    m�

    2)

    Per

    cen

    tage

    sorp

    tion

    PE

    T2

    (mg

    6d

    m�

    2)

    Per

    cen

    tage

    sorp

    tion

    PV

    C1

    330

    day

    s(m

    g6

    dm�

    2)

    Per

    cen

    tage

    sorp

    tion

    PV

    C2

    330

    day

    s(m

    g6

    dm�

    2)

    Per

    cen

    tage

    sorp

    tion

    Bu

    tyl

    bu

    tan

    oat

    eB

    B24.6

    3.7

    0.0

    15

    c3.8

    0.0

    15

    c7.8

    0.0

    32

    a4.9

    0.0

    20

    b

    Hex

    ylb

    uta

    noat

    eB

    H9.6

    2.3

    0.0

    24

    c2.6

    0.0

    27

    c11

    0.1

    15

    a5.1

    0.0

    53

    b

    Oct

    ylb

    uta

    noat

    eB

    O8.4

    13.1

    0.1

    56

    c12.8

    0.1

    50

    c47.8

    0.5

    69

    a22.1

    0.2

    63

    b

    Eth

    ylh

    exan

    oat

    eH

    E167.5

    24.5

    **0.0

    15

    c27.8

    **0.0

    17

    b54.3

    0.0

    32

    a29.1

    0.0

    17

    b

    3-M

    eth

    ylb

    uty

    l3-m

    eth

    ylb

    uta

    noat

    e3M

    B3M

    B134.5

    12

    0.0

    09

    c16.8

    0.0

    12

    c146.9

    0.1

    09

    a62.7

    0.0

    47

    b

    Eth

    yl2-m

    eth

    ylb

    uta

    noat

    e2M

    BE

    257.5

    8.8

    0.0

    03

    c8.1

    0.0

    03

    c23.2

    0.0

    09

    a16.4

    0.0

    06

    b

    Eth

    yl3-m

    eth

    ylb

    uta

    noat

    e3M

    BE

    166.8

    7.3

    0.0

    04

    a7.3

    0.0

    04

    a12.4

    0.0

    07

    a8.6

    0.0

    05

    a

    Hex

    ylac

    etat

    eA

    cH152.5

    23**

    0.0

    15

    b25.8

    **0.0

    17

    b34.6

    0.0

    23

    a19.4

    0.0

    13

    c

    3(Z

    )-h

    exen

    ylac

    etat

    eA

    c3H

    142.2

    11.4

    **0.0

    08

    c13**

    0.0

    09

    b21.3

    0.0

    15

    a12.7

    0.0

    09

    b

    Oct

    ylac

    etat

    eA

    cO10.4

    9.1

    **0.0

    87

    a8.5

    **0.0

    82

    a9.2

    0.0

    88

    a4.3

    0.0

    41

    a

    Met

    hyl

    cin

    nam

    ate

    CIM

    E2

    530.5

    149.5

    0.0

    28

    b164.9

    0.0

    31

    b283.5

    0.0

    53

    a149.7

    0.0

    28

    b

    Eth

    ylsa

    licy

    late

    2O

    HB

    zE120.4

    45.5

    0.0

    38

    b40.8

    0.0

    34

    b85.7

    0.0

    71

    a42.9

    0.0

    36

    b

    Eth

    ylb

    enzo

    ate

    BzE

    47.5

    7.2

    0.0

    15

    bc

    6.3

    0.0

    13

    c43

    0.0

    91

    a31.9

    0.0

    67

    ab

    �-D

    ecal

    acto

    ne

    GD

    L339.2

    21

    0.0

    06

    c13.6

    0.0

    05

    c132.3

    0.0

    39

    a43.2

    0.0

    13

    b

    Dat

    aar

    eth

    em

    ean

    sof

    two

    det

    erm

    inat

    ion

    s.*C

    on

    cen

    trat

    ion

    of

    the

    arom

    aco

    mp

    ou

    nd

    sin

    togl

    ass

    bott

    leat

    day

    t0.

    Dif

    fere

    nt

    lett

    ers

    inp

    erce

    nta

    geso

    rpti

    on

    colu

    mn

    sin

    dic

    ate

    sign

    ific

    ant

    dif

    fere

    nce

    sat

    p<

    0.0

    5(D

    un

    can

    )fo

    rea

    char

    om

    aco

    mp

    ou

    nd

    bet

    wee

    np

    acka

    gin

    gm

    ater

    ials

    .

    Sorption of aroma compounds in PET and PVC 5

    proofreaderText Box7

  • New XML Template (2007) [1.6.2007–5:57pm] [1–12]{TANDF_FPP}Tfac/TFAC_A_236020.3d (TFAC) [First Proof]

    respectively, after 1 month of storage. When orangejuice was stored in PET, the sorption of these two

    345 compounds was lower. The constituents of the juice(pulp, pectin), missing in the soft drink, may playa competitive role against the sorption into PET.The difference in the behaviour of the aromacompounds whether they are present in a simple

    350 solution or a more complex food was noticed byLeufvén and Hermansson (1994). The sorption ofaroma compounds into PET was lower when thesecompounds were into a tomato juice in comparisonwith a model solution. These authors suggested

    355 that the aroma compounds probably remain in thetomato juice because they are retained on the naturaljuice constituents instead of being sorbed in thepolymer.

    In the case of strawberry syrup, sucrose may360 reduce the diffusion and convection of flavour

    compounds in the polymer during the early stages

    of storage, as it increases the viscosity of the medium(Van Willige et al. 2000a). Moreover, sucrosemolecules may create local hydrophobic environ-

    365ments in the medium which favours inclusion orinteraction with hydrophobic molecules such asaroma compounds. This may lower the sorptionof aroma compounds because of a competition effectbetween the two hydrophobic phases (polymer and

    370food matrix) (Nawar 1971; Roberts et al. 1996).

    Typical kinetics of sorption into PET and PVC

    for the more stable compounds

    In both PVC and particularly PVC1, the sorptionof most aroma compounds increased with the

    375square-root of time, following a Fickian mode, aswe were able to show for more stable compoundssuch as 3-methylbutyl-3-methylbutanoate. Theirsorption kinetics and their interpretation as kinetic

    Figure 1. 2222.

    6 V. Ducruet et al.

    proofreaderText Box2

  • New XML Template (2007) [1.6.2007–5:57pm] [1–12]{TANDF_FPP}Tfac/TFAC_A_236020.3d (TFAC) [First Proof]

    phase diagrams are shown in Figure 2. Open380 symbols plot experimental values as measured

    (duplicate experiments) whereas filled symbols plotnon-deterministically filtered data as describedby Vitrac and Hayert (2006) (Figures 2A–D). Thecontinuous lines depict a cubic spline model, whose

    385 values and first derivatives fit the filtered ones.Versus the square-root of time, the kinetics showa subsequent delay related to a possible externalmass transfer resistance, a linear segment followedby a part with a decreasing slope. The presence

    390 of a linear segment confirmed that the sorption wascontrolled by the diffusion. The following sharpchange in slope with a possible negative slope is

    related to a dynamic modification of sorptionconditions. This modification was created by the

    395degradation of the aroma compound in the liquidphase, which modified in return the attainableequilibrium state. The expected equilibriumconcentration in the packaging material was conse-quently decreasing.

    400These trends were more discernible in the kineticphase diagram (KPD), which plots the first deriva-tive of the concentration in the packaging materialwith time vs. its primitive (i.e. the concentrationitself) (Figures 2E and F). Filled and open

    405symbols plot respectively the filtered values andthe 95% confidence interval as assessed by

    Figure 2. 2222.

    Sorption of aroma compounds in PET and PVC 7

    proofreaderText Box2

  • New XML Template (2007) [1.6.2007–5:57pm] [1–12]{TANDF_FPP}Tfac/TFAC_A_236020.3d (TFAC) [First Proof]

    Monte Carlo sampling. A non-diffusive behavioursuch as the one related to a reaction in the liquidphase is associated to a change in convexity in the

    410 diagram. Indeed, a convex shape of the KPD or asharp decrease of the absorbed mass flux when theabsorbed amount increase cannot be related any-more to diffusion (for further details, see Vitrac andHayert 2006). This rule could not however be

    415 applied to the earlier stage of desorption kineticssince the mass flux was not estimated with enoughaccuracy. The KPD were used to predict theequilibrium, which would be reached if the sorptionconditions as assessed during the linear part of the

    420 concentration vs. the square root of times wereprolonged, since in the parabolic regime of diffusion,the KPD is linear. The concentrations at equilibriumwere linearly extrapolated from the convex part ofthe KPD to the horizontal line dCP jt=dt ¼ 0. The

    425 linear extrapolation inferred from the confidenceenvelope of the KPD appears as dashed lines.

    Affinity of aroma compounds for PVC and PET

    Apparent partition coefficients Kapp derived from theextrapolation of concentrations expected at equili-

    430 brium in absence of reaction are plotted vs. log P(octanol–water partition coefficient) (Figures 3Aand B) and vs. the molecular weight (Figures 3Cand D) for PET (Figures 3A and C) and for PVS(Figures 3B and D).

    435 It is highlighted that for the set of tested aromacompounds, log P and molecular weight are notindependent quantities. Log(Kapp) appeared almostlinearly correlated to log P values. Whatever thepolymer, sorption was selective and increased with

    440 the chain length of the linear butanoic acid esters(butyl butanoate, hexyl butanoate and octyl butano-ate), a behaviour quite similar to that reported byShimoda et al. (1987) with respect to polyethylene.However the correlation was poorer with the

    445 molecular mass than with the log P, due tobranching into the molecules. Branching or unsa-turation in the backbone of the molecule (for anequal carbon number) caused sorption to decrease,as can be seen for 3-methylbutyl-3-methylbutanoate

    450 by comparison with hexyl butanoate in PET(Figure 3C).

    Quite similar partition coefficients were obtainedfor both PET (PET1 and PET2) and both PVC(PVC1 and PV2). Both PET samples sorbed the

    455 esters to a lesser extent, PVC1 displayed the highestlevel of sorption, three- to tenfold more than bothsamples of PET mainly for octyl butanoate and3-methylbutyl-3-methylbutanoate. Few studies havedealt with the sorption of aroma compounds

    460 into PVC. Koszinowski and Piringer (1987), andDeLassus (1994) showed that diffusion coefficients

    in PVC were several orders of magnitude lower thanin polyethylene and polypropylene. In contrast, theirsolubilities (S) were about one order of magnitude

    465lower in polyolefins. Barrier behaviour evaluated bythe permeability coefficient P(P¼D�S), resultingfrom the kinetic effect (coefficient of diffusion, D),and the thermodynamic effect (S), only gave a smalladvantage for PVC over polyolefins.

    470With PET, the coefficients of diffusion andsolubility of the volatile compounds are lower(Pennarun et al. 2004) than those measured forpolyolefins, so a low interaction can be observedwith this polymer. Figure 3C and D shows that both

    475PET samples were more or less equivalent and wereless sorbent than PVC 2, except for cyclic esters suchas ethyl cinnamate and ethyl salicylate The sorptionof these compounds in PET reached the level ofsorption observed in PVC2. These compounds

    480exhibited a differential affinity for PET, probablybecause of the similarity of their cyclic structure.This affinity could affect the typical flavour of thesyrup related to the ‘wild strawberry note’ which isassociated with ethyl cinnamate, ethyl salicylate

    485and ethyl benzoate.In conclusion, the variation of Kapp values in

    PET was mainly correlated to the polarity of testedcompounds as assessed by their log P values.By contrast, the variations in Kapp values for PVC

    490were mainly related to their chain lengths.

    Kinetics of sorption into PET and PVC for

    the unstable compounds

    The sorption kinetics of some compounds, (ethylbutanoate, hexyl acetate), showed the same typical

    495trends in both types of PET (Figure 4).Sorption increased to a peak at 90 days and

    then declined until 150 days, reaching a state ofequilibrium until 330 days.

    Several hypotheses can be proposed to explain500this behaviour.

    . Durning and Russel (1985) proposed a modelof diffusion with induced crystallization todescribe the sorption kinetics of organicliquids which might trigger PET crystalli-

    505zation. Berlinet et al. (2005) showed that theabsorption of aroma compounds (even at lowlevels) may be responsible for increasing thecrystallinity of PET, over 6 months of storage.This ‘solvent induced crystallization’ which

    510was described in PET in contact with ethylacetate by Hao and Shore (1999), could leadto a structure modification of PET during3 months of storage and then induce therelease of the aroma compounds from the

    515packaging. However this behaviour wouldhave been observed for all the compounds

    8 V. Ducruet et al.

  • New XML Template (2007) [1.6.2007–5:57pm] [1–12]{TANDF_FPP}Tfac/TFAC_A_236020.3d (TFAC) [First Proof]

    specially those which are more sorbed suchas octyl butanaoate, but it is not the case andthis behaviour was only noticed for the more

    520 reactive compounds.. The sorption behaviour into PET of the more

    reactive aroma compounds could be explainedin the following manner: during the first stage

    between zero and 90 days, these compounds525were slowly sorbed by PET, and hydrolysis

    into alcohols and acids started in the syrup.During the second period (90 < t < 150 days),degradation was the leading parameter, whichresulted in desorption of the volatiles from

    530PET, reaching an equilibrium between both

    Figure 3. 2222.

    Sorption of aroma compounds in PET and PVC 9

    proofreaderText Box2

  • New XML Template (2007) [1.6.2007–5:57pm] [1–12]{TANDF_FPP}Tfac/TFAC_A_236020.3d (TFAC) [First Proof]

    phases (syrup and polymer). No alcohol oracid from the corresponding esters was identi-fied in the PET extract. After 150 days, theequilibrium of aroma compounds between

    535 packaging and syrup was reached, takingaccount of degradation into the syrup. Thus,after 90 days, PET could play a positive roleas a reserve for some of these unstablecompounds.

    540 As previously described (Ducruet et al. 2001),esterified aroma compounds were hydrolysed inglass bottles and this was not influenced by polymercontact. The hydrolysis rate of volatile compoundsdisplayed a first order kinetic. Stronger reactivity was

    545 observed for methyl or ethyl esters of acetic acidwhen compared with longer linear chain esters andparticularly branched esters. These compounds wererapidly hydrolysed in the syrup packaged in glassbottles during the first 150 days. Same reactivity was

    550 observed in both kinds of polymers. As oxygentransfer through amorphous PET and rigid PVCwere of the same order of magnitude, 4.4 and3.4� 10�11 cm2 s�1 Pa�1, respectively (Brandrupet al. 1989), the oxidation of these compounds

    555 cannot explain the observed difference between PETand PVC.

    In the case of orange juice in contact with PET,recent results had already shown that, degradationdue to the acid catalysis of aroma compounds

    560(�-pinene, limonene, linalool) is the principalparameter controlling exchanges with the glassymaterial (Berlinet et al. 2005) and therefore thearomatic evolution of orange juice was not controlledby the packaging material but by reactions within

    565the matrix itself. Polyolefins (polyethylene andpolypropylene) in contact with a model mediumcontaining highly reactive compounds such aslimonene or pinene under acidic conditions mayplay a positive role in stabilizing aroma compounds

    570(Lebossé et al. 1997; Feigenbaum et al 1998;Reynier et al. 2004). Because the degradationprocess in the model system is of the same orderof magnitude as diffusion into the polymers, the twophenomena are in competition. In the case of PET,

    575transfer is very slow, and many studies, whichconsidered contact times of insufficient duration,were not able to demonstrate this effect. In the caseof contact between real food products during theirshelf life (up to one year) and unstable aroma

    580compounds such as short chain esters, the degrada-tion of aroma compounds is more rapid thandiffusion into PET. Release is less rapid than withpolyolefins, and some stabilization effects of PET

    Figure 4. 2222.

    10 V. Ducruet et al.

    proofreaderText Box2

  • New XML Template (2007) [1.6.2007–5:57pm] [1–12]{TANDF_FPP}Tfac/TFAC_A_236020.3d (TFAC) [First Proof]

    may be observed after only 150 days of storage, in585 line with the type trend of sorption kinetics.

    In the context of food packaging interactions,the thermodynamic equilibrium of each aromacompound is expressed as the partition coefficient.Because the experimental determination of this

    590 partition coefficient may be prohibitive (Tehranyand Desobry 2004), modelling has been proposed asan alternative (Dekker et al. 2003; Tehrany andDesobry 2005). Models are available for polyolefinsbut extensions to glassy polymers such as PET or

    595 PVC are still pending. The main limitations consistin the availability of reference data, which are notsubjected to bias due to a competition between slowsorption kinetics (longer than 150 days) and a fastdegradation process. The production of apparent

    600 partition coefficient with minimum bias as assessedin this study using a kinetic phase diagram could bean alternative to the lack of published data. From thetechnological point of view, the loss of aroma fora particular food in contact with a glassy material

    605 must be envisaged as a consequence of both thesorption and degradation process. In the presentcase, the degradation of the aroma formulationof the syrup is mainly due to hydrolysis of esters.

    Conclusions

    610 This study showed that the interactions betweenaroma compounds and packaging may result in adynamic and time-dependent change in food qualityduring shelf-life. Two combined mechanisms con-tribute to a loss of aroma during long-term storage:

    615 the degradation process in the food product itselfand the sorption process in the packaging material.Both effects were particularly noticeable for bothPET samples and for unstable aroma compounds.It is emphasized that both processes are antagonist.

    620 Although the sorption rate is low in glassy polymers,the sorption process tends to prevent the aroma fromthe degradation process. By contrast, the degrada-tion modifies the expected thermodynamic equili-brium of sorption of aroma and tends to limit the

    625 sorption of aroma. Both phenomena were simulta-neously studied in this work and a general metho-dology was proposed to extract apparent partitioncoefficients, when the thermodynamic equilibriumcannot be reached due to a coupling with reactions.

    630 This methodology was used to derive the partitioncoefficients of 13 aroma compounds found in realfruit juices and two glassy polymers: PET and PVC.Besides, it was highlighted that the stability of thearoma profile in connection with a packaging

    635 material cannot be addressed with experiments inshort contact times. Additional studies and dataappear desirable to help the food industry predict the

    behaviour of their aroma formulation during long-term storage taking into account both the effects

    640of the food matrix and the packaging.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the Société Teisseire.The authors would like to thank Mr Rouge andMrs Raynal for their efficient partnership during

    645study.

    References

    Berlinet C, Ducruet V, Brillouet JM, Reynes M, Brat P. 2005.Evolution of aroma compounds in orange juice stored in PET.Food Additives and Contaminants 22:185–195.

    650Brandrup J, Immergut EH, Grulke A. 1989. Polymerhandbook, 443.

    Dekker M, Van Willige RWG, Linssen JPH, Voragen AGJ. 2003.Modelling the effect of oil/fat content in food systems onflavour absorption by LLDPE. Food Additives and

    655Contaminants 20:180–185.DeLassus PT. 1994. Sorption and diffusion of flavors in plastic

    packaging. Flavor–food interactions. ACS Symposium Series.Washington, DC: ACS. pp 152–161.

    Ducruet V, Fournier N, Saillard P, Feigenbaum A, Guichard E.6602001. Influence of packaging on the aroma stability of

    strawberry syrup during shelf life. Journal of Agricultural andFood Chemistry 49:2290–2297.

    Durning CJ, Russel WB. 1985. A mathematical model fordiffusion with induced crystallization (2). Polymer 26:131–140.

    665Feigenbaum A, Lebossé R, Ducruet V. 1998. Polypropylene asactive packaging material for aroma sorption from modelorange juice. In: Contis ET, Ho CT, Mussinan CJ, ParlimentTH, Shahidi F, Spanier AM, editors. Food flavors: Formation,analysis, and packaging influences. Developments in Food

    670Science Series. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp 743–751.Gächter R, Muller H. 1990. Plastics additives handbook. 3rd ed.

    Munich: Hanser.Gavara R, Hernandez RJ, Giacin J. 1996. Methods to determine

    partition coefficient of organic compounds in water/polystyrene675systems. Journal of Food Science 61:947–952.

    Hao OY, Shore SH. 1999. Ethyl acetate transport in poly(ethylene terephthalate). Journal of Applied Physics85:1148–1152.

    Hernandez-Munoz P, Catala R, Gavara R. 2001. Food aroma680partition between packaging materials and fatty food simulants.

    Food Additives and Contaminants 18:673–682.Koszinowski J, Piringer O. 1987. Food package compatibility and

    migration. Journal of Plastic Film Sheeting 3:96–111.Kutty V, Braddock RJ, Sadler GD. 1994. Oxidation of

    685D-limonene in presence of low-density polyethylene. Journalof Food Science 59:402–405.

    Kwapong OY, Hotchkiss JH. 1987. Comparative sorption ofaroma compounds by polyethylene and ionomer food-contactplastics. Journal of Food Science 52:761–764.

    690Lebossé R, Ducruet V, Feigenbaum A. 1997. Interactionsbetween reactive aroma compounds from model citrus juicewith polypropylene packaging film. Journal of Agricultural andFood Chemistry 45:2836–2842.

    Leufvén A, Hermansson C. 1994. The sorption of aroma695components from tomato juice by food-contact polymers.

    Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 64:101–105.

    Sorption of aroma compounds in PET and PVC 11

    proofreaderText Box3

  • New XML Template (2007) [1.6.2007–5:57pm] [1–12]{TANDF_FPP}Tfac/TFAC_A_236020.3d (TFAC) [First Proof]

    Nahon DF, Navarro y Koren PA, Roozen JP, Posthumus MA.1998. Flavor release from mixtures of sodium cyclamate,sucrose, and an orange aroma. Journal of Agricultural and

    700 Food Chemistry 46:4963–4968.Nawar WW. 1971. Some variables affecting composition of

    headspace aroma. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry19:1057–1059.

    Nielsen TJ. 1994. Limonene and myrcene sorption into refillable705 polyethylene terephtalate bottles, and washing effects on

    removal of sorbed compounds. Journal of Food Science59:227–230.

    Nielsen TJ. 1994. Limonene and myrcene sorption into refillablepolyethylene terephtalate bottles, and washing effects on

    710 removal of sorbed compounds. Journal of Food Science59:227–230.

    Nielsen TJ, Jägerstad M, Öste RE, Wesslén BO. 1992.Comparative absorption of low molecular aroma compoundsinto commonly used food packaging polymer films. Journal of

    715 Food Science 57:490–492.Pennarun PY, Dole P, Feigenbaum A. 2004. Functional barriers

    in PET recycled bottles. Part I. Determination of diffusioncoefficients in bioriented PET with and without contact withfood simulants. Journal of Applied Polymer Science

    720 92:2845–2858.Reynier A, Dole P, Fricoteaux F, Saillard P, Feigenbaum A.

    2004. Stabilization of aroma compounds through sorption-release by packaging polymers. Journal of Agricultural andFood Chemistry 52:5653–5662.

    725 Roberts DD, Elmore JS, Langley KR, Bakker J. 1996. Effects ofsucrose, guar gum, and carboxymethylcellulose on the releaseof volatile flavor compounds under dynamic conditions.Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 44:1321–1326.

    Shimoda M, Matsui T, Osajima Y. 1987. Effect of number730 carbon atoms of flavor compounds on diffusion, permeation

    and sorption with polyethylene. Nippon shokuhin kogyogakkaiski 34:535–539.

    Sizer CE, Waugh PL, Edstam S, Ackermann P. 1988.Maintaining flavor and nutrient quality of aseptic orange

    735juice. Food Technology 42:152–159.Tehrany EA, Desobry S. 2004. Partition coefficients in food

    packaging systems: A review. Food Additives andContaminants 21:1186–1202.

    Tehrany EA, Desobry S. 2005. Comparison between the different740calculation methods of partition coefficient of aroma com-

    pounds with a difference chemical classes in octano/watersystem. Sciences des Aliments 25:23–36.

    Van Willige RWG, Linssen JPH, Voragen AGJ. 2000a. Influenceof food matrix on absorption of flavour compounds by linear

    745low-density polyethylene: Proteins and carbohydrates. Journalof the Science of Food and Agriculture 80:1779–1789.

    Van Willige RWG, Linssen JPH, Voragen AGJ. 2000b. Influenceof food matrix on absorption of flavour compounds by linearlow-density polyethylene: Oil and real food products. Journal

    750of the Science of Food and Agriculture 80:1790–1797.Van Willige RW, Linssen JPH, Meinders MBJ, Van der Stege HJ,

    Voragen AGJ. 2002b. Influence of flavour absorption onoxygen permeation through LDPE, PP, PC and PET plasticsfood packaging. Food additives and contaminants 19:303–313.

    755Van Willige RWG, Linssen JPH, Legger-Huysman A, VoragenAGJ. 2003. Influence of flavour absorption by food-packagingmaterials (low-density polyethylene, polycarbonate and poly-ethylene terephtalate) on taste perception of a model solutionand orange juice. Food Additives and Contaminants 20:84–91.

    760Vitrac O, Hayert M. 2006. Identification of diffusion transportproperties from desorption/sorption kinetics: An analysis basedon a new approximation of Fick equation during solid–liquidcontact. Industrial Engineering Chemical Research45:7941–7956.

    12 V. Ducruet et al.

    proofreaderText Box4

    proofreaderText Box5