Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Texas Children’s Hospital: Pediatric Collaboration to Develop an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Ruston S. Taylor, PharmD
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Texas Children’s Hospital Department of Pharmacy
Page 1
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:17:35 PM
DISCLOSURES
•Grant support from Pfizer for the Sharing Antimicrobial Reports for Pediatric Stewardship (SHARPS) collaborative
•Jason Newland, MD gave permission to utilize selected SHARPS slides
Page 2
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:17:37 PM
Background •33-60% of hospitalized children receive at least one antibiotic during their stay1,2
•Approximately 50% of antibiotic use is inappropriate
•Among 39 free-standing children’s hospitals, 16 had a formal Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) 3
•The most effective methods for stewardship are unknown
1. Gerber J et al., Pediatrics 2010 126:1067 2. Pakyz AL et al. ICHE 2009 30:600-03 3. Newland et al. ICHE 2014 35:265-71
Page 3
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:17:39 PM
Historic ASP Elements Utilized at TCH
•Formulary restrictions existed: -Allowing order by physician specialty:
•Voriconazole (Heme/Onc, BMT, Lung txplant, ID)
•Caspofungin (BMT, ID)
•Meropenem (Pulmonary, ID) [formally peer-reviewed by single ID physician]
-By drug:
•Vancomycin (3-day stop order): Pharmacist reviews at 72-hours, extends therapy if criteria met. [Formally peer-reviewed by single ID physician]
Page 4
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:17:40 PM
Vancomycin Usage Changes
0
2
4
6
8
10
7/12
8/12
9/12
10/1
2
11/1
2
12/1
2
1/13
2/13
3/13
Per
cent
Date
Non-Adherence to Vancomycin Restrictions: 2012 - 2013 Measure
Discontinuation of Peer Review by single ID physician
Page 5
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:17:42 PM
Meropenem Usage Changes
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2/12
3/12
4/12
5/12
6/12
7/12
8/12
9/12
10/1
2
11/1
2
12/1
2
1/13
2/13
3/13
4/13
5/13
6/13
7/13
8/13
Per
cent
Date
Non-Adherence to Meropenem Restrictions: 2012 - 2013 Measure
Discontinuation of Peer Review by single ID physician
Page 6
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:17:44 PM
Multidisciplinary ASP Implementation
Who, What, When, Where, Why of Antimicrobial Usage at TCH
Multidisciplinary Team Formed – November 2013
Understand prescribing
climates between ‘silos’
Understand microbiology
at TCH
Study antimicrobial patterns of
use
Page 7
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:17:46 PM
TCH Barriers •Limited real-time data
•Lack of electronic notification of culture positivity to care team providers
•Lack of alert to care team providers of updated culture information
•Inability to rapidly review existing culture data
•Frequent changes in care team providers
Page 8
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:17:50 PM
Initial SHARPS Hospitals 09/13
Seattle
Salt Lake City
Omaha
Kansas City
Chicago
Cincinnati
Philadelphia
All hospitals provide data to PHIS
Page 9
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:17:53 PM
Objective •Establish an antimicrobial stewardship quality improvement collaborative that would:
-Provide antimicrobial use reports to guide ASP interventions
-Allow for benchmarking among institutions
-Share successful interventions
-All teach, All learn philosophy
Page 10
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:17:54 PM
Methods
•Pediatric Health Information Systems Database
•Free standing children’s hospitals
•Provides billing and administrative data on discharged patients
•Data pulls occur quarterly
•Data quality checks performed
Page 11
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:17:56 PM
Methods •Standard and customized benchmarking reports were provided. Examples include:
-Overall antibiotic days of therapy (DOT)
-Ampicillin use for pneumonia
-Anti-pseudomonal antibiotic use for appendicitis
-Overall carbapenem DOT and in BMT unit
-% oral DOT for highly bioavailable drugs
•Monthly webinars to discuss progress and barriers with interventions
Page 12
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:17:58 PM
Actions by initial hospital cohort Interventions implemented by hospitals:
• Implementation of various forms of rapid diagnostic tests (RDT).
• CAP pathways developed with order sets
• Clinical pathway/guideline for empiric abx use in BMT steering away from carbapenems
• Heme/onc de-escalation process when carbapenems are used
• IV to PO conversion protocol
Page 13
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:17:59 PM
SHARPS member additions: 06/14
Seattle
Salt Lake City
Omaha
Kansas City
Chicago
Cincinnati
Philadelphia
Grand Rapids Boston Houston St. Petersburg San Diego Denver Palo Alto Birmingham Little Rock Miami Indianapolis Portland Stony Brook- LI Corpus Christie All hospitals provide data to PHIS
Page 14
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:18:02 PM
Results: FTEs per hospital
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
5 13 18 20 26 21 19 23 25 15 14 27 9 16 17 28 7 11 2 8 24 1 3 10 12 4 6 22
Pharmacist Physician Data Analyst
FTE
Hospital
Page 15
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:18:04 PM
SHARPS Hospitals as of 02/15
Seattle
Omaha
Salt Lake City
Kansas City
Chicago
Cincinnati
Philadelphia
Connecticut
Minnesota
Los Angeles
Atlanta
Columbus
Memphis
Charleston
Louisville
Boston
Grand Rapids
Fort Worth
Houston
St. Petersburg
San Diego
Denver
Palo Alto
Birmingham
Little Rock
Miami
Indianapolis
Portland
Stony Brook- LI
Corpus Christi
D.C.
St. Louis
All hospitals provide data to PHIS
Page 16
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:18:08 PM
Overall DOT
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
Ove
rall
DO
T
200120
2410
1020
3020
1820
1120
1720
0620
1510
0820
2720
2020
1020
0520
2810
1120
3630
0120
2920
0420
0220
1320
0920
2120
0710
0720
3720
1610
0510
0320
0320
2620
2320
1220
2220
3320
2520
0820
3110
1220
3930
02
PHIS Hospitals
Study Hospitals Other PHIS Hospitals
Page 17
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:18:09 PM ©2013 Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics. All Rights Reserved. 01/13
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Over
all C
arba
pene
m D
OT
20182020
20302007
20162021
10082017
10032005
20363001
20041010
20032025
20102024
20232037
10112011
10052009
20262013
10122008
20282029
20022027
20222015
3002
PHIS Hospitals
Study Hospitals Other PHIS Hospitals
Carbapenem Use
Page 18
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:18:11 PM
SHARPS Conclusions • Benchmarking data reports aid ASPs in
determining areas to target
• Collaborative approach provides expertise and experience for others to learn best practices
• Collaborative approach allows best practices to be implemented that will work for each unique hospital
Page 19
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:18:13 PM
Rapid Diagnostic Test: GeneXpert Our ‘Quick Win’
www.cepheid.com
Page 20
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:18:15 PM
ASP Intervention: GeneXpert Result Notification Pre-intervention (March to June 2014)
n=221 Post-intervention (July to October 2014)
n=236
Gram-stain: GPCs in clusters (n=173) n (%) • MRSA 11 (6.4) • MSSA 20 (11.6) • CoNS 142 (82)
Gram-stain: GPCs in clusters (n=183) n (%) • MRSA 10 (5.5) • MSSA 24 (13.1) • CoNS 149 (81.4)
Time to traditional identification: 1836 + 768 min
Time to molecular identification: 180 + 250
ASP notification (n=102)
MSSA: Time to de-escalate from Vanc 2632 + 1236 min
MSSA: Time to de-escalate from Vanc 115 + 121 min
CoNS [excluded: pts with CL, NICU, immunocompromised]
(n=58) 704 + 581 min
CoNS [excluded: pts with CL, NICU, immunocompromised] (n=68)
241 + 305 min GPC= Gram-positive cocci, MRSA=methicillin-resistant Staph aureus, MSSA=methicillin-sensitive Staph aureus, CoNS=coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, CL=central line
Page 21
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:18:17 PM
TCH Executives Recognize Opportunity •Building needs/requests approved for further investigation:
-Integration of patient parameters within the EHR
-EPIC 2014-Infection Control/ASP module
-Additional analytics: real-time dashboards facilitating:
•ASP activities
•Provider notification when new data exists
•Discrete microbiology data
•Surveillance of antimicrobial usage and microbial resistance
Page 22
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:18:19 PM
Future TCH actions
• Continue to utilize PHIS data to monitor progress longitudinally
• Optimize integration of data elements within the EHR
• Effectively implement/utilize additional RDT
• Utilize the SHARPS collaborative to perform multi-centered studies for stewardship and ID practice
Page 23
xxx00.#####.ppt 4/5/2015 11:18:21 PM
Questions