Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Leander Independent School District · the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes

Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at (512)463-9704 or [email protected].

Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).

For grades 3-8, the 2011-12 assessment results are based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) results atthe TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes due to the transitionto the new assessment program. The 2010-11 assessment results are based on the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS)results at the Met Standard level.

Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.

* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. See theTexas NCLB Glossary for details.

Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.

Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent ofStudents Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2010-11, 2011-12*

February 1, 2013

For BAGDAD EL (246913109) LEANDER ISD








February 1, 2013


Grade 3 Reading

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

District % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)

Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level

%Not

MeetingStandard(Basic)

%Met

Standard(Proficient)

%Commended(Advanced)

Student Group Year

All Students 2010-11 89 94 89 >99% 11 51 38

2011-12 89 96 92 >99% 11 89 n/a

American Indian/AlaskanNative

2010-11* 88 89 * * * *

2011-12 * * 91 * * * n/a

Asian 2010-11 * 96 95 * * * *

2011-12 * 99 96 * * * n/a

Native Hawaiian/PacificIslander

2010-11* * 91 * * * *

2011-12 * * 90 * * * n/a

African American 2010-11 * 83 83 * * * *

2011-12 * 89 87 >99% * * n/a

Hispanic 2010-11 90 91 87 >99% 10 56 33

2011-12 82 92 90 >99% 18 82 n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 3 Reading

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

White 2010-11 95 96 94 >99% 5 49 46

2011-12 95 97 96 >99% 5 95 n/a

Two or More Races 2010-11 * 93 93 * * * *

2011-12 * 98 95 * * * n/a

Female 2010-11 93 96 91 >99% 7 52 41

2011-12 90 97 93 >99% 10 90 n/a

Male 2010-11 85 93 87 >99% 15 50 35

2011-12 88 95 90 >99% 12 88 n/a

Special Education 2010-11 67 80 82 >99% 33 * *

2011-12 81 90 86 >99% 19 81 n/a

Limited English Proficient 2010-11 89 87 85 >99% 11 54 36

2011-12 90 92 88 >99% 10 90 n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 3 Reading

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

Economically Disadvantaged 2010-11 87 88 85 >99% 13 57 30

2011-12 87 91 89 >99% 13 87 n/a

Migrant 2010-11 * * 80 * * * *

2011-12 * * 84 * * * n/a








February 1, 2013









February 1, 2013


Grade 3 Mathematics

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

All Students 2010-11 72 90 86 99 28 52 20

2011-12 77 90 86 >99% 23 77 n/a


2010-11* * 86 * * * *

2011-12 * * 87 * * * n/a

Asian 2010-11 * 94 96 * * * *

2011-12 * 96 96 * * * n/a


2010-11* 88 88 * * * *

2011-12 * * 87 * * * n/a


2011-12 86 85 76 >99% 14 86 n/a

Hispanic 2010-11 67 82 84 >99% 33 51 15

2011-12 78 81 84 >99% 22 78 n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 3 Mathematics

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

White 2010-11 77 93 92 >99% 23 49 28

2011-12 73 93 92 >99% 27 73 n/a

Two or More Races 2010-11 * 91 90 * * * *

2011-12 * 90 90 * * * n/a

Female 2010-11 67 90 86 98 33 49 19

2011-12 74 89 86 >99% 26 74 n/a

Male 2010-11 76 90 87 >99% 24 54 22

2011-12 79 91 86 >99% 21 79 n/a


2011-12 90 80 77 >99% 10 90 n/a


2011-12 85 81 83 >99% 15 85 n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 3 Mathematics

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

Economically Disadvantaged 2010-11 66 78 82 98 34 50 16

2011-12 73 79 82 >99% 27 73 n/a

Migrant 2010-11 * * 79 * * * *

2011-12 * * 78 * * * n/a








February 1, 2013









February 1, 2013


Grade 4 Reading

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

All Students 2010-11 78 92 85 >99% 22 54 25

2011-12 78 94 87 >99% 22 78 n/a


2010-11* 67 86 * * * *

2011-12 * * 88 * * * n/a

Asian 2010-11 * 97 93 * * * *

2011-12 * 98 94 * * * n/a


2010-11* * 84 * * * *

2011-12 * * 90 * * * n/a


2011-12 * 85 79 * * * n/a

Hispanic 2010-11 77 88 82 >99% 23 57 19

2011-12 69 89 84 >99% 31 69 n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 4 Reading

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

White 2010-11 89 94 93 >99% 11 57 32

2011-12 87 96 94 >99% 13 87 n/a

Two or More Races 2010-11 * 91 90 * * * *

2011-12 * 98 91 * * * n/a

Female 2010-11 82 94 87 >99% 18 59 23

2011-12 84 95 89 >99% 16 84 n/a

Male 2010-11 76 90 84 >99% 24 50 26

2011-12 71 93 85 >99% 29 71 n/a

Special Education 2010-11 38 77 77 >99% 62 31 8

2011-12 71 82 78 >99% 29 71 n/a


2011-12 69 77 79 >99% 31 69 n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 4 Reading

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year


2011-12 72 87 82 >99% 28 72 n/a

Migrant 2010-11 * * 72 * * * *

2011-12 * * 75 * * * n/a








February 1, 2013









February 1, 2013


Grade 4 Mathematics

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

All Students 2010-11 82 92 88 >99% 18 54 27

2011-12 80 93 89 >99% 20 80 n/a


2010-11* 67 89 * * * *

2011-12 * 86 90 * * * n/a

Asian 2010-11 * 97 96 * * * *

2011-12 * 97 97 * * * n/a


2010-11* * 88 * * * *

2011-12 * * 93 * * * n/a


2011-12 * 88 80 * * * n/a

Hispanic 2010-11 83 89 86 >99% 17 56 27

2011-12 71 88 88 >99% 29 71 n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 4 Mathematics

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

White 2010-11 83 93 92 >99% 17 53 30

2011-12 89 94 94 >99% 11 89 n/a

Two or More Races 2010-11 * 92 91 * * * *

2011-12 * 97 92 * * * n/a

Female 2010-11 80 92 88 >99% 20 47 33

2011-12 78 93 89 >99% 22 78 n/a

Male 2010-11 83 92 88 >99% 17 60 22

2011-12 83 92 88 >99% 17 83 n/a

Special Education 2010-11 46 77 79 >99% 54 31 15

2011-12 86 84 80 >99% 14 86 n/a


2011-12 66 80 85 >99% 34 66 n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 4 Mathematics

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year


2011-12 75 85 85 >99% 25 75 n/a

Migrant 2010-11 * * 80 * * * *

2011-12 * * 82 * * * n/a








February 1, 2013









February 1, 2013


Grade 5 Reading

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

All Students 2010-11 91 98 92 >99% 9 66 26

2011-12 82 94 87 97 18 82 n/a


2010-11* * 93 * * * *

2011-12 * 80 87 * * * n/a

Asian 2010-11 * 98 96 * * * *

2011-12 * 98 95 * * * n/a


2010-11* * 94 * * * *

2011-12 * * 88 * * * n/a

African American 2010-11 * 92 90 >99% * * *

2011-12 * 88 82 * * * n/a

Hispanic 2010-11 91 96 90 >99% 9 64 27

2011-12 73 90 84 >99% 27 73 n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 5 Reading

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

White 2010-11 93 98 97 >99% 7 62 31

2011-12 93 96 93 94 7 93 n/a

Two or More Races 2010-11 * * 96 * * * *

2011-12 * 96 92 * * * n/a

Female 2010-11 98 98 93 >99% 2 63 35

2011-12 79 96 89 98 21 79 n/a

Male 2010-11 84 97 91 >99% 16 68 16

2011-12 84 93 86 97 16 84 n/a

Special Education 2010-11 * 88 87 >99% * * *

2011-12 79 83 78 >99% 21 79 n/a


2011-12 70 80 72 >99% 30 70 n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 5 Reading

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year


2011-12 77 87 83 98 23 77 n/a

Migrant 2010-11 * * 82 * * * *

2011-12 * * 76 * * * n/a








February 1, 2013









February 1, 2013


Grade 5 Mathematics

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

All Students 2010-11 87 96 92 >99% 13 59 28

2011-12 73 90 86 99 27 73 n/a


2010-11* * 92 * * * *

2011-12 * 80 85 * * * n/a

Asian 2010-11 * 99 96 * * * *

2011-12 * 98 96 * * * n/a


2010-11* * 91 * * * *

2011-12 * * 88 * * * n/a

African American 2010-11 83 88 86 >99% 17 67 17

2011-12 * 83 78 * * * n/a

Hispanic 2010-11 93 96 91 >99% 7 60 33

2011-12 66 87 84 >99% 34 66 n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 5 Mathematics

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

White 2010-11 76 97 96 >99% 24 52 24

2011-12 79 91 92 97 21 79 n/a

Two or More Races 2010-11 * 99 94 * * * *

2011-12 * 90 90 * * * n/a

Female 2010-11 91 97 92 >99% 9 59 33

2011-12 73 90 87 97 27 73 n/a

Male 2010-11 82 96 92 >99% 18 59 23

2011-12 73 90 86 >99% 27 73 n/a


2011-12 64 81 74 >99% 36 64 n/a


2011-12 63 82 77 >99% 37 63 n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 5 Mathematics

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year


2011-12 69 83 82 >99% 31 69 n/a

Migrant 2010-11 * * 85 * * * *

2011-12 * * 78 * * * n/a








February 1, 2013









February 1, 2013


Grade 5 Science

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

All Students 2010-11 78 92 86 99 22 59 19

2011-12 88 93 87 >99% 12 88 n/a


2010-11* * 86 * * * *

2011-12 * 60 87 * * * n/a

Asian 2010-11 * 94 93 * * * *

2011-12 * 98 97 * * * n/a


2010-11* * 83 * * * *

2011-12 * * 87 * * * n/a

African American 2010-11 * 73 78 >99% * * *

2011-12 * 80 79 * * * n/a

Hispanic 2010-11 76 88 82 >99% 24 58 18

2011-12 82 89 84 >99% 18 82 n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 5 Science

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

White 2010-11 80 95 93 96 20 56 24

2011-12 94 95 94 >99% 6 94 n/a

Two or More Races 2010-11 * 95 91 * * * *

2011-12 * 88 92 * * * n/a

Female 2010-11 77 91 84 98 23 57 20

2011-12 88 92 86 >99% 13 88 n/a

Male 2010-11 79 93 87 >99% 21 62 17

2011-12 88 94 88 >99% 12 88 n/a


2011-12 64 73 69 >99% 36 64 n/a


2011-12 74 78 72 >99% 26 74 n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 5 Science

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

Economically Disadvantaged 2010-11 74 83 80 98 26 57 17

2011-12 82 85 82 >99% 18 82 n/a

Migrant 2010-11 * * 74 * * * *

2011-12 * * 76 * * * n/a








February 1, 2013









February 1, 2013


Grade 6 Mathematics

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

All Students 2011-12 * 93 82 >99% * * n/a


2011-12* * 83 * * * n/a

Asian 2011-12 * * 95 * * * n/a


2011-12* * 85 * * * n/a

African American 2011-12 * 82 72 * * * n/a

Hispanic 2011-12 * 87 79 >99% * * n/a

White 2011-12 * 95 90 >99% * * n/a

Two or More Races 2011-12 * 89 87 * * * n/a

Female 2011-12 * 93 83 >99% * * n/a

Male 2011-12 * 93 82 >99% * * n/a

Special Education 2011-12 * 83 66 * * * n/a

Limited English Proficient 2011-12 * 78 67 * * * n/a

(Continued)








February 1, 2013


Grade 6 Mathematics

Campus % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % ofStudents

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(In Campus)


%Not


%Met



Student Group Year

Economically Disadvantaged 2011-12 * 85 77 >99% * * n/a

Migrant 2011-12 * * 70 * * * n/a

Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].


Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation and AttendanceRate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).



Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 24Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectations asMeasured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*

February 1, 2013








February 1, 2013


Reading/Language Arts

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentMet

Standard(IncludesProficient

Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

80%

'12Target:

87%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

80%

'12Target:

87%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

80%

'12Target:

87%

Campus District State Campus District State

Student Group Year

All Students 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 86 95 88

2011-12 99 99 99 81 95 88

American Indian/Alaskan Native 2010-11 * >99% 99 * 88 88

2011-12 * 98 99 * 93 88

Asian 2010-11 >99% >99% 99 * 97 94

2011-12 * >99% >99% * 98 94

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 2010-11 * >99% 99 * >99% 89

2011-12 * 96 99 * 96 89

African American 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 57 90 83

2011-12 >99% >99% >99% 91 89 83

(Continued)







February 1, 2013



PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

80%

'12Target:

87%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

80%

'12Target:

87%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

80%

'12Target:

87%


Student Group Year

Hispanic 2010-11 >99% >99% 99 86 92 85

2011-12 >99% >99% 99 74 92 85

White 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 92 96 94

2011-12 98 99 99 89 96 94

Two or More Races 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 89 95 92

2011-12 >99% >99% >99% 86 97 93

Female 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 91 96 90

2011-12 99 99 >99% 84 96 90

Male 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 81 93 86

2011-12 99 >99% 99 79 94 86

(Continued)







February 1, 2013



PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

80%

'12Target:

87%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

80%

'12Target:

87%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

80%

'12Target:

87%


Student Group Year

Special Education 2010-11 >99% >99% 99 67 78 67

2011-12 >99% 99 99 69 79 67

Limited English Proficient 2010-11 >99% 99 99 84 85 78

2011-12 >99% >99% 99 75 85 79

Economically Disadvantaged 2010-11 >99% >99% 99 82 89 83

2011-12 99 99 99 76 89 83

Migrant 2010-11 * * 98 * * 76

2011-12 * * 98 * * 76







February 1, 2013








February 1, 2013


Mathematics

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

75%

'12Target:

83%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

75%

'12Target:

83%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

75%

'12Target:

83%


Student Group Year

All Students 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 80 92 84

2011-12 >99% >99% >99% 76 91 83

American Indian/Alaskan Native 2010-11 * >99% >99% * 81 84

2011-12 * >99% >99% * 82 83

Asian 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% * 97 95

2011-12 * >99% >99% * 98 95

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 2010-11 * >99% >99% * 88 86

2011-12 * >99% >99% * 84 87

African American 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 64 83 75

2011-12 >99% >99% >99% 82 84 73

(Continued)







February 1, 2013


Mathematics

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

75%

'12Target:

83%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

75%

'12Target:

83%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

75%

'12Target:

83%


Student Group Year

Hispanic 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 81 88 82

2011-12 >99% >99% >99% 73 87 80

White 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 80 94 91

2011-12 99 >99% >99% 77 92 90

Two or More Races 2010-11 89 >99% >99% >99% 92 89

2011-12 >99% >99% >99% >99% 91 88

Female 2010-11 99 >99% >99% 79 92 85

2011-12 99 >99% >99% 75 91 84

Male 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 80 92 84

2011-12 >99% >99% >99% 76 91 83

(Continued)







February 1, 2013


Mathematics

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentTested

Target:95%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

75%

'12Target:

83%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

75%

'12Target:

83%

PercentMet


Leveland

Above)

'11Target:

75%

'12Target:

83%


Student Group Year

Special Education 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 50 73 63

2011-12 >99% 99 99 71 71 63

Limited English Proficient 2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 79 84 79

2011-12 >99% >99% >99% 72 83 79

Economically Disadvantaged 2010-11 99 >99% >99% 75 84 79

2011-12 >99% >99% >99% 72 84 78

Migrant 2010-11 * * >99% * * 75

2011-12 * * 99 * * 73







February 1, 2013








February 1, 2013


Additional Academic Indicators

Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:75%

'12 Target:75%

Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:75%

'12 Target:75%

Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:75%

'12 Target:75%

Five-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:80%

'12 Target:80%

Five-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:80%

'12 Target:80%

Five-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:80%

'12 Target:80%


Student Group Year

All Students 2010-11 n/a 88.5 84.3 n/a 89.1 85.1

2011-12 n/a 90.5 85.9 n/a 91.9 88.0


2010-11n/a 87.5 84.2 n/a 77.8 83.8

2011-12 n/a * 86.6 n/a 100.0 88.1

Asian 2010-11 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

2011-12 n/a 100.0 95.0 n/a n/a n/a


2010-11n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

2011-12 n/a 80.0 88.0 n/a n/a n/a

African American 2010-11 n/a 83.9 78.8 n/a 87.3 78.8

2011-12 n/a 85.1 80.9 n/a 90.3 82.9

Hispanic 2010-11 n/a 84.6 78.8 n/a 83.4 80.0

2011-12 n/a 85.6 81.8 n/a 89.8 84.0

(Continued)







February 1, 2013



Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:75%

'12 Target:75%

Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:75%

'12 Target:75%

Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:75%

'12 Target:75%

Five-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:80%

'12 Target:80%

Five-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:80%

'12 Target:80%

Five-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:80%

'12 Target:80%


Student Group Year

White 2010-11 n/a 89.6 91.6 n/a 90.7 92.1

2011-12 n/a 92.1 92.0 n/a 92.2 93.6

Two or More Races 2010-11 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

2011-12 n/a 97.1 92.1 n/a n/a n/a

Female 2010-11 n/a 90.6 86.5 n/a 90.2 86.8

2011-12 n/a 92.7 88.2 n/a 93.3 89.5

Male 2010-11 n/a 86.6 82.1 n/a 88.0 83.5

2011-12 n/a 88.5 83.7 n/a 90.6 86.5

Special Education 2010-11 n/a 69.0 74.4 n/a 76.5 78.1

2011-12 n/a 69.4 76.7 n/a 78.7 80.3

Limited EnglishProficient

2010-11n/a 65.2 62.8 n/a 75.7 67.5

2011-12 n/a 71.4 66.8 n/a 75.6 72.0

(Continued)







February 1, 2013



Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:75%

'12 Target:75%

Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:75%

'12 Target:75%

Four-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:75%

'12 Target:75%

Five-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:80%

'12 Target:80%

Five-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:80%

'12 Target:80%

Five-yearGraduation

Rate

'11 Target:80%

'12 Target:80%


Student Group Year

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

2010-11n/a 81.1 81.9 n/a 82.2 83.7

2011-12 n/a 86.8 83.7 n/a 88.3 87.0

Migrant 2010-11 n/a - 75.7 n/a - 76.4

2011-12 n/a * 78.7 n/a - 82.4







February 1, 2013








February 1, 2013



AttendanceRate

Target:90%

AttendanceRate

Target:90%

AttendanceRate

Target:90%

Campus District State

Student Group Year

All Students 2010-11 96.1 n/a 95.5

2011-12 96.1 n/a 95.7

American Indian/Alaskan Native 2010-11 98.0 n/a 95.0

2011-12 97.3 n/a 95.2

Asian 2010-11 * n/a 97.5

2011-12 * n/a 97.7

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 2010-11 * n/a 95.5

2011-12 * n/a 95.9

African American 2010-11 95.4 n/a 95.1

2011-12 96.1 n/a 95.4

Hispanic 2010-11 96.3 n/a 95.3

2011-12 96.8 n/a 95.6

White 2010-11 95.7 n/a 95.6

2011-12 95.3 n/a 95.9

Two or More Races 2010-11 98.9 n/a 95.7

2011-12 95.1 n/a 95.9

(Continued)







February 1, 2013



AttendanceRate

Target:90%

AttendanceRate

Target:90%

AttendanceRate

Target:90%

Campus District State

Student Group Year

Female 2010-11 96.1 n/a 95.5

2011-12 96.1 n/a 95.7

Male 2010-11 96.1 n/a 95.5

2011-12 96.1 n/a 95.7

Special Education 2010-11 95.5 n/a 94.0

2011-12 94.8 n/a 94.3

Limited English Proficient 2010-11 97.0 n/a 96.3

2011-12 97.4 n/a 96.6

Economically Disadvantaged 2010-11 95.9 n/a 95.2

2011-12 96.1 n/a 95.4

Migrant 2010-11 - n/a 93.9

2011-12 - n/a 93.9

Questions regarding Part III of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].

'n/a' indicates the district or school does not receive Title I, Part A funds.


Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 35Part III - Campus Level: Information on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and School Improvement Program(SIP) for Districts and Campuses Receiving Title I, Part A funds

February 1, 2013


Questions regarding Part III of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].

'n/a' indicates the district or school does not receive Title I, Part A funds.


Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 35Part III - Campus Level: Information on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and School Improvement Program(SIP) for Districts and Campuses Receiving Title I, Part A funds

February 1, 2013


Met AYP

SIP(for the

subsequentschoolyear)

Year

2010-11 Meets AYP NONE

2011-12 Missed AYP NONE

Questions regarding Part IV a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Standards & Certification,Fingerprinting. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].

A dash (-) indicates data are not reported; 'n/a' indicates that the data are not available or applicable.

Percentages reported by Teacher Degree may not sum to 100% either due to rounding or because the category 'teachers with no degree'is not reported.

Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).


Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 36Part IV a. - Campus Level: Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers, AsDefined by the State (Teacher Degree)

February 1, 2013


Questions regarding Part IV a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Standards & Certification,Fingerprinting. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].


Percentages reported by Teacher Degree may not sum to 100% either due to rounding or because the category 'teachers with no degree'is not reported.

Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).


Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 36Part IV a. - Campus Level: Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers, AsDefined by the State (Teacher Degree)

February 1, 2013


Bachelors Masters Doctorate

Year

2010-11 80.4 19.6 0.0

2011-12 76.8 23.2 0.0

Questions regarding Part IV b. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Standards & Certification,Fingerprinting. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].


Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).


Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 37Part IV b. - Campus Level: Percent of Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers With Emergency/ProvisionalCredentials

February 1, 2013


Questions regarding Part IV b. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Standards & Certification,Fingerprinting. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].


Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).


Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 37Part IV b. - Campus Level: Percent of Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers With Emergency/ProvisionalCredentials

February 1, 2013


%

Year

2010-11 0.00

2011-12 0.00

Questions regarding Part IV c. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Standards & Certification,Fingerprinting. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].


Percent of Classes are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).


Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 38Part IV c. - Campus Level: Percent of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

February 1, 2013


Questions regarding Part IV c. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Standards & Certification,Fingerprinting. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].


Percent of Classes are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).


Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 38Part IV c. - Campus Level: Percent of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

February 1, 2013


%

Year

2010-11 0.00

2011-12 0.00

Documents

Texas 2012 NCLB Report Card 1 Part I - Leander Independent School District · the TAKS-equivalency standard that was developed using the STAAR Bridge Study, including required changes