15
Testing seasonal Testing seasonal adjustment with adjustment with Demetra+ Demetra+ Zavadskaya Oksana The National Statistical Committee, Republic of Belarus

Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

  • Upload
    kisha

  • View
    65

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+. Zavadskaya Oksana The National Statistical Committee , Republic of Belarus. Check the original time series. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

Testing seasonal Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+adjustment with Demetra+

Zavadskaya Oksana The National Statistical Committee, Republic of Belarus

Page 2: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

October 2011

Check the original time seriesIn this report, was carried the adjustment of volume indices of gross domestic

product (GDP), calculated to the average quarter of 2005 in 2005 prices

Page 3: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

October 2011

Graphs showing the presence of seasonality

In the original time series a seasonal factor is present

Page 4: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

October 2011

The choice of approach and regressors

The approach TRAMO/SEATS was used Pre-defined holidays and national holidays were usedOur own specification was used : - Transformation, Function : AUTO - Calendar effect, Operating days, Type : Calendar, Belarus - Details, Operating days: td2 - The Easter effect, Options: Pretest - Modeling ARIMA, Automatic modeling, Enabled : True

Page 5: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

The applied models

Pre-treatment:

The estimated period: [I-2005 : IV-2010]Logarithmically transformed seriesThe effects of operating days (2 variables)No effects of EasterDeviating values not found

Decomposition: Trending: innovation dispersion = 0,3802 Seasonal: innovation dispersion = 0,0000 Irregular: innovation dispersion = 0,1441

Used model type: ARIMA (0,1,1)(0,1,1)

October 2011

Page 6: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

October 2011

Graph of results

Seasonal component in the irregular component is not lost

Page 7: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

October 2011

Check on a sliding seasonal factor

Graph of the ratio of seasonality and irregularity in III and IV quarters

Page 8: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

The main diagnostic quality

Final diagnosis: in general, the results are good, there are the unstable spectral calendar peaks in the residuals of regarima

Октябрь 2011

Page 9: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

Residual seasonal factor

There are no indications of residual seasonal and calendar effects, in time series adjusted on seasonal fluctuations

Октябрь 2011

Page 10: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

Stability of the model

October 2011

Visual assessment of series allows you to conclude that the model is stable

Page 11: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

Analysis of the residuals

October 2011

Residuals analyzed on randomness, normality and independence

Page 12: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

October 2011

Questions1. What’s the meaning of «Friedman statistic = -12666373951979500,0000»

in nonparametric tests for seasonal fluctuations in the Friedman test (Friedman test)

2. How to interpret the absence of Autoregressive spectral graph in residuals :

Page 13: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

Questions (continuance)

3. The program did not perform an assessment of nonlinearity. Why?

4. How to interpret the straight line on the S-I ratio graph?

Analysis of the residuals

October 2011

Page 14: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

Questions (continuance)

5. How to explain the "zero" in the test for autocorrelation? Should we consider this as a problem?

October 2011

Page 15: Testing seasonal adjustment with Demetra+

October 2011

Problems

1. Lack of Russian interface2. Lack of detailed user's manual of the program in

Russian3. Lack of detailed step by step instructions for

novice on decoding results