22
Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… Oh My! 1

Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers…

Oh My!

1

Page 2: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

By:

Scott Barber Chief Performance Evangelist

SmartBear Software, Inc.

Created for:

Testing, Agile, Value and Testers… Oh My!

Page 3: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

Chief Performance Evangelist Software, Inc. LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/theperfguy/ Blog: scott-barber.blogspot.com Twitter: @sbarber

Co-Founder: Workshop On Performance and Reliability www.performance-workshop.org

Co-Author: Author: Contributing Author:

eMail: [email protected] About me: about.me/scott.barber

Founding Member

Page 4: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

Consistently for 10+ years…

I’ve observed industry doubting: • The “True Value” of Agile • The Benefit vs. Cost of Testing • How Testing “Fits” in Agile • Why Agile (too often) “Fails” • Why Testing/Testers (too often) “Fail”

… go kind of like this: The resulting conversations…

Page 5: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”
Page 6: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

I believe…

These doubts persist because they aren’t the

Page 7: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

I believe…

These doubts are of the *real* problem.

Page 9: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”
Page 10: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”
Page 11: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

All new developments starts with

In “Classical” Engineering Fields

Page 12: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

R & D is all about:

In “Classical” Engineering Fields

Page 13: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

The decision to exit R & D and begin development is based on:

In “Classical” Engineering Fields

Page 14: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

Projects are “released” into “production” by inspectors, a.k.a:

In “Classical” Engineering Fields

Page 17: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

During development checks completed work against specifications.

In Other Words

Page 18: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

Release Candidate validation is done by

In Other Words

Page 19: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile” or “Test” 4. “The Team” is both responsible and legally

accountable for quality/safety 5. “Go Live” decisions are (relatively) easy

What’s my point?

In Classic Engineering:

Page 20: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

Which is why I believe

We would be well served to

• Study “other” fields of Engineering • Consider R & D practices for new software

development • Forget titles. Be responsible and accountable as a

team

Page 21: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

Questions?

Page 22: Testing, Agile, Business Value and Testers… · 1. R & D is very much like Agile 2. R & D doesn’t have the Testing/Tester Challenge 3. No one questions the value of “Agile”

about.me/scott.barber

Chief Performance Evangelist Software, Inc.

E-mail: [email protected]

Blog: scott-barber.blogspot.com

Web Site: SmartBear.com

Twitter: @sbarber

Contact Info