86

Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 2: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

lilinois institute

of Technology

UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Page 3: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

IaT 197jSmith, M. A.

Test of slender wooden1struts for aeroplanes

For Usa In library Only

Page 4: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 5: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 6: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 7: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 8: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 9: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

A TEST or SLENDER WOODEM STRUTS FOR AKEOPLAl^'ES

A THESIS PRESENTED BY

TO THE

PRRSIDEiTT A17D FACULTY

of

ARMOUR INSTITUTE OP TECHNOLOGY

FOR THE DEGRPIE OF

BACHELOR OP SCIEiTCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING

- HATHiNG COJOPLETED THE PRESCRIBED COURSE

IN CIVIL ENGIJiEPiRiNG

ILLW013 INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYPAUL V. GALVkN LBRARY35 WEST 33RD STREET

Page 10: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 11: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

A TEST OF SLENDER WOODEM STRUTS FOR ABEOPLAIJES

.

The recent progress in aviation with so-

called "heavier than air" machines, has attracted

much popular and scientific attention. From the

viewpoint of the engineer the question at once arises,

are these machines correctly and safely designed to re-

sist the strains to which the^ are subjected? Conver-

sations "between engineers and some of the more prominant

of the aviators and areoplane builders disclose the fact

that for the most part aviators are so wrapped up in the

possibilities of human flight that their designs as

far as structural safety goes, have been on the "rule

•o thumb" principle. We do not mean to imply that

"light gas engines" are to be included under "struc-

tures", for some cf the greatest engineers have, and

are now, putting forth their best efforts toward the

design of suitable power plants for air vehicles.

By structures we mean the planes or aerofoils them-

selves, and their oracing and alighting gear.

The first step in attacking the problem was to as-

certain from what little data is available on the sub-

ject, the dimensions of the members used in the framing,

of successful areoplanes.

22131

Page 12: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 13: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

-2-

It was early decided to confine the testa to the

wooden struts used in the alighting gear and what

for lack of a better najae may be called the trusses

between the planes.

These trusses are usually built of piano wire

tension members and wooden spar, (generally spruce

or white pine) compression members

The diagonal members of the "truss" are made

of piano wire. Two wires being placed in each pan-

el so that compression occurs only in the verticals

and upper and lov/er chords, (see figure 3 ) , The

calciilations of the stresses in the members of a

truss of this character is easily accomplished

by well recognized engineering methods, once the

loading on the planes is determined. The loading

caused by the air pressure which furnishes sus-

tension for the machine, owing to the scarcity of

data and formulative conditions of the theory of

aerodynamics is more difficult to fix.

The chief requisites of the elements of an

areoplane truss are lightness and strength. In

the tension members no difficulty is mat in design

Page 14: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 15: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

-3-

to meet these requirements, Taut the compression

members of the truss present a new problem in strength

of materials and engineering practice.

A study of the dimensions of wood struts

in use in machines that have flown, yields some

peciiliar engineering data. In the alighting gear

of the Wright machine there is a strut which has

a slenderness ratio of about 360 while the struts

between the planes show ratios of from 200 to 220.

The straight line formula of Johnson (In which "P" is

the ultimate load, and "A" the area of cross-section,

"S" the ultimate strength in compression, "L" the

length in inches, "r" the least radius of gyration,

and "c" a constant depending on the material and

condition of the ends,) is not designed to apply

for greater ratios than 150, while Bulers formula

for long coliffiins (which should be used according

to the present engineering practice in steel),

gives allowable loads on the struts which are much

lighter than they are known to carry. Hence it

was decided to make a series of tests on spruce

columns, approximating as near as possible the

dimensions of coluir.ns in use.

Page 16: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 17: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

-4-

Sproce was ciiosen because of its lightness and

strength. Specimens "broken weighed 39 lbs. to the

cubic foot. It was also thought advisable to procure

if possible sufficient data by which columns of this

character could be designed.

Therefore thirty odd columns were made to

varying slenderness ratios between 100 and 400.

In order that a curve could be plotted with ultimate

strength as abscissae and slenderness ratios as

ordinates. Four columns (in some case 6 to b) were

made to each dimension, two of which were intended

for use with fixed ends and two with round or pin

ends. Most of the fixed end coliairms and the two

lightest of the pin ends were made from an excellent-

ly seasoned piece of clear straight grained spruce.

In making the pin end columns it was impossible to

seciire as good a piece of spruce so it is possible

tlmt- the values for pin ends are not as high as

can be obtained with columns made of better stock.

Before the columns could be tested it was

necessary to convert a machine originally designed

Page 18: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 19: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

-5-

for tension tests to one which could be used for

the compressions of 6 foot ctlumns. This was done

by making four rods 6 feet long threaded to fit

in the machine and extending the lower draw head

of the machine 6 feet above the base. This change

was made by the writers and is apparent in the

photographs

.

Devices for fixing the ends of the square

end struts were next discussed, it being finally

decided that a two inch oak board he,ving a square

hole to take the column and arrangements of wooden

wedges to hold the column in tightly would be correct.

Both this device and the draw head were found to be

ample for our requirements.

For the free end columns the holes in the

oak boards were plugged with lead castings about

a.n inch thick in which a slight spherical depression

had been formed to center the column and prevent

it springing from the machines when it deflected.

This expedient also fully met our requirements.

The desirability of recording the lateral

deflections of the coliimns under stress was next

discussed, and several schemes were tried out with

Page 20: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 21: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

-6-

more or less success. Because of the difficulty of

making these measurements and their questionable

accuracy they were taken only for perhe-ps half of

the total number of pieces tested.

A scheme was also devised for getting the

total shortening of the column under the load, but

because of slippage of columns in the draw head and

changes in length when the coliimn was becoming

seated the results were unsatisfactory. The total

shortening in the cases observed being but a few

thousandths of an inch, up to the time when

bending occurred, Then the coliimns shortened rapidly

until ruptured. After trying various schemes for

obtaining this shortening (one is shown in the

photograph, a wire plum and a micrometer deflecometer

)

because of the doubtful utility of the data, they

were abandoned.

(Operation of the Tests.)

The fixed struts were all tested first as

follows: 1st, the column »as placed between the

draw heads of the machine, centered, and the ends

wedged in so that they were fixed to take the

Page 22: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 23: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

-7-

"bending strains. The specimen was next carefully

measiired for effective length (i.e. between draw

heads), and dimension of cross-section, loads were

then applied slov/ly until the ultimate load was

reached. In most cases tne draw heads were drawn

together until the coluroi fra-ctured and the nature

of the fracture noted.

The length and cross-sectional dimensions

of the round end columns were taken "before placing

them in the machine. The struts were then centered

on the lead plugs and tested to failure in the same

manner e.s the fixed end struts.

Two attempts were made to obtain the elastic

limit of the spruce used for the specimens but both

attempts were fruitless. The result of these tests,

however, ge.ve two remarkable agreeing values for

the liltimate strength of the wood, namely 7,394

and 7,420 lbs. to the square inch. This value,

7,400 lbs. was used in the calculations of the

allowable loads on the column by the straight line

formula of Ranking.

An attempt was made to obtain the modulus

of elasticity by calculating "backwards", from the

Page 24: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 25: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

-fa-

ultimate loads on the columns obtained experimentally,

in Euler's long column formula, "but the results

gave a different value for each column tested and

were unsatisfactory.

The fracture of the clear grained spruce

exhibited some r8.ther interesting fea,tures, (see

photographsl <^-ff ). The fractures were all caused

by bending out of the specimen. This is shown in

the photographs by well marked tension and com-

pression "sides". In the breaks on the tension side

the fibers are drawn out and pointed, in some cases

slivers of wood extend 10 to 20 inches from the break.

On the compression side the shear planes are apparent,

as is the crushing of the fibers. The fractures

are also interesting in that they show failure by

the columns bending on a diagonal almost invariably.

The free end columns broke in the middle while

all of the fixed end columns exhibited fractures

at both ends where they entered the draw heads,

in addition to the break 4t the middle.

RESULTS.

After the completion of the tests the radii of

gyration and cross-sectional area of each coliunn

was ca-lculated and tables (1) and (2) made.

Page 26: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 27: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

-9-

From this table curves were plotted to show the

relation of the ultimate load and the slenderness *

ratio. Curves were also plotted for similar values

of the slenderness ratio, using Eulers and the

straight line formula to obtain the ultimate loads.

Considerable diff icvilty was met in plotting the

latter ciirves. The writers could find no constant

(c) for the straight line formula which applied to

spruce. Merriman gives 28 as tne value for oak with

flat ends. This trouble was met by using the data

of the larger columns and calculating the constant

by means of the formula. In Euler's formula, the

modiiltfs of elasticity of spruce given in textbooks, i.e.

1,200,000 pounds was used to plot the curve of that

formula.

The curves in our opinion show, that, with

proper constants for Rankin-^s formula and a correct

value pf the modulus of ele.sticity for use with

Euler's equation the formulas can be used with

accuracy for the design of wooden struts. The

curve of Euler's formula indicates "E" to be too

small since the actual values of the loads exceed

those of the formula for similar slenderness ratios.

Page 28: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 29: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

-10-

This may be due in part to the fact that Eiaer's

formula is designed to give the load at which bend-

ing commences, while our values for tne maximum

load were obtained in every case after the strut

had made a pronounced deviation from its axis. It

seems hardly possible for this to entirely account

for the difference so in our opinion the modulus

of elasticity for spruce as given by the 1905 report

of the Railway Superintendent's Association is too

low.

The behavior of the specimens in the machine

would indicate that they may be loaded safely as high

as 3/4 of their calculated strength without at

all affecting or over stressing them and that in

areoplane construction where lightness is an essen-

tial it is not necessary to use a large factor

of safety, ina.smuch as the wood seems to be un-

injured when subjected to loads even up to its

ultimate capacity.

In Pig. ( 6 ) the curves for fixed and round

8nd columns are plotted to tie same scale. It will

be noticed that as the slenderness ratio increases

the two curves becowe nearer together, or it is

perhaps better to say that the fixed end curve

Page 30: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 31: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

-11-

approaches the one for round ends, This gives a

rather interesting graphical exposition of the fact

the.t as tne length or slenderness ratio of the fixed

columns increases the "stiffening effect" of the

ends is diminished and the column behaves more as

one with round ends.

In conclusion the experiments show we think

the following:

Tn?.t Euler's formula can he safely used for

the design of spruce struts of slenderness ratios

exceeding 150 or 175 when proper values of the

modulus of elasticity are used.

That the straight line formulas of Jolanston

or Rankine may be used for ratios less than 150

when proper values of the constant "C" are used

(our experiments indicate "C" to be 45,6 for round

ends and 59,8 for fixed but further experiments

should be ms-de to determine them with greater pre-

cision) •

T;aat good clear spruce may be safely stressed

in columns with a factor of safety of 2 or 1.5

where weight is an essential of the design.

Page 32: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 33: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

-12-

That the modulus of elasticity of spruce is

higJiar than the values now given as correct.

That square columns will fail by bending

on a diagonal and not on an axis perpendicular

to one of the sides. This last conclusion is

perhaps of small avail in the design of wooden

struts but is interesting from a theoretical stand-

point. The moment of inertia and the radius of

gyration are the seune about a diagonal a.nd perpendic-

ular axis. The solution for the failure of the

struts on a diagonal was found in the bending moment

formula, M * -^ where "S" is the stress in the outer-

most fiber "I" tne moment of inertia and "C" the

distance to the outmost fiber. Obviously c is larger

when taken about a diagonal axis, hence the resisting

moment is less and the column taking the line of least

resistence will fail on the diagonal.

It is perhaps well to state in conclusion,

some of the things which future experimenters in

the field will do well to avoid and some of the

things that ought to be done in order to make the

design of areoplane members, founded on accurate

data.

Page 34: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 35: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

-13-

We do not think t>iat it is worth while to

record the shortening of a menber under test, the

diagonal bending, however, should present, at least

interesting phenomena if means can be designed to

accuratel/ observe it. Steps should be taken to

make a series of experiments on spruce, sugar pine,

white pine, and other of the lighter and tougher

woods to determine their moduli of elasticity. In

connection with these experiments it might be well

to test a few columns of greater slendemess ratios

than 150 to check out Euler's formula, with the

moduli of elasticity as determined by experiment.

Experiments might be conducted on the same material

on struts having ratios of slenderness, say from

50 to 150 to obtain tne constants of tne straight

line formula. If time and facilities are at hand,

experiments with "built up" columns of so called

"economic sections" and columns designed with greater

areas at their middles to resist the bending

moments, should produce valuable data.

Bamboo or Calcutta cane both in their natural

forms and built up as is the section of split bamboo

fishing rods should make a good field for tests.

Page 36: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 37: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

-14-

In our work we have t touched on one

feature of a many sided problem. The connections

and details of an areoplane and strengths of different

guying materials, fabrics, etc., the flying and landing,

stresses, impact stresses, design of alighting and

atarting gear, all present fields for interesting

experiments.

The writers would especially like to see

the constants of the straight line formula and the

moduli of elasticity, for light woods determined

accurately.

In conclusion we wish to e:?q)ress oar thanks

for the invaluable siiggestions and advice of Prof.

M, B, Wells and for the toleration and timely hints

of Prof. V/. F. Dietzsch.

Page 38: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 39: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 40: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 41: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

RESULTS of EXPERIMENTSon

COLUMNS^ithROUND ENDS

7/. 7/9 .^94- .i2^.62.

7/.7S .^09 .6f-^.6^

72-00 ^^g^ .83..83

\72.cc\.669

.83..83

,83^.83

72.00 .689 .65^.83

72. CO .SO'f .7/^.f/

72.00 .SO^ ,7/^.7/

7Z.00 .SO^ .7/^.7/

'7 .37^.87

72. OC ,7S7 j87^,S7

72 . OO /. 000 /• 00^ /. 00

;88.9\500.IZ\ZZS

S2 \t03.l\

.ZOS JSO.^B 9/ /80,5

.2as 330.88 7/ /^o.e

'97.80X6/"f-

ConstantforSfrai^At/./nc tormir/Q =^S.6

A/octutus ofE/os//c/ty^t,^Oq,000

/ /y. /

Page 42: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 43: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

RESULT5 of EXPERIMENTS

COLUMNSvviTf^E/XED ENDS

6^.3^5

Page 44: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 45: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

<u

Page 46: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

ri

Page 47: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

I9K

s

Page 48: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 49: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

.. J

Page 50: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 51: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 52: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 53: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

PLATF I,Showing ffii]ure on diflgcnal andposition of neutrsl axie.

Page 54: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 55: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

i

nW'I

Page 56: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 57: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 58: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 59: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

m

PI ATI' II.Frncture of one of the smallerfixe! eni colurns.

Page 60: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 61: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 62: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 63: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

PI ATE III,Showing dlfferenoo In leteral deflec-tion of fixed and round end struts.Fixed end on left.

Page 64: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 65: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 66: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 67: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

PLATE IV.Showing fracture of fixed endstrut in upper drawhead as wellas lower down. This apeclinen wascross-grained.

Page 68: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 69: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 70: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 71: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

PLATE V.Fixed end strut. Shows deflectorcoterand pliiinb bob arranged to get shorten-

ing end lateral aeflection.

Page 72: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 73: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 74: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 75: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

PLATE VIShowe bonding and failure of oro«s«.

grained, rotmd end speolnihn.

Page 76: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 77: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 78: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 79: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes

PLATE VII.Lateral deflection of a largefroe end ooliomn.

Page 80: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 81: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 82: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 83: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 84: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 85: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes
Page 86: Test of slender wooden struts for aeroplanes