PEMBINAAN CIVIC VIRTUE DI BIDANG SOSIAL MELALUI

PRAKTIK FILANTROPI DAN VOLUNTARISME

(Studi Kasus Gerakan Sosial-Kemanusiaan Let’s ACT Indonesia)

TESIS

Diajukan untuk memenuhi sebagian syarat memperoleh gelar Magister

Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan

Pembimbing:

Prof. Dr. Karim Suryadi, M. Si

Oleh

Aina Nurdiyanti

NIM. 1706654

PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN

SEKOLAH PASCASARJANA

UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA

2019

PEMBINAAN CIVIC VIRTUE DI BIDANG SOSIAL MELALUI

PRAKTIK FILANTROPI DAN VOLUNTARISME

(Studi Kasus Gerakan Sosial-Kemanusiaan Let’s ACT Indonesia)

Oleh

Aina Nurdiyanti

S. Pd Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2016

Sebuah Tesis yang diajukan untuk memenuhi salah satu syarat memperoleh gelar Magister

Pendidikan (M. Pd.) pada Program Studi Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan

©Aina Nurdiyanti 2019

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Juni 2019

Hak Cipta dilindungi undang-undang

Tesis ini tidak boleh diperbanyak seluruhnya atau sebagian,

dengan dicetak ulang, difotokopi, atau dengan cara lainnya tanpa izin dari penulis

PERNYATAAN PENULIS

Dengan ini saya menyatakan bahwa tesis yang berjudul “PEMBINAAN CIVIC

VIRTUE DI BIDANG SOSIAL MELALUI PRAKTIK FILANTROPI DAN

VOLUNTARISME (Studi Kasus Gerakan Sosial-Kemanusiaan Let’s ACT

Indonesia)” ini beserta seluruh isinya adalah benar-benar karya saya sendiri. Saya

tidak melakukan penjiplakan atau pengutipan dengan cara-cara yang tidak sesuai

dengan etika ilmu yang berlaku dalam masyarakat keilmuan. Atas pernyataan ini,

saya siap menanggung resiko/sanksi apabila kemudian hari ditemukan adanya

pelanggaran etika keilmuan atau ada klaim dari pihak lain terhadap keaslian karya

saya ini.

Bandung, Mei 2019

Yang membuat pernyataan,

Aina Nurdiyanti

NIM. 1706654

HALAMAN PENGESAHAN TESIS

AINA NURDIYANTI

NIM. 1706654

PEMBINAAN CIVIC VIRTUE DI BIDANG SOSIAL MELALUI

PRAKTIK FILANTROPI DAN VOLUNTARISME

(Studi Kasus Gerakan Sosial-Kemanusiaan Let’s ACT Indonesia)

Disetujui dan disahkan oleh:

Pembimbing Tesis,

i

ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memeriksa efikasi infrastruktur kewarganegaraan digital

yang dikembangkan oleh lembaga kemanusiaan global Aksi Cepat Tanggap (ACT) dalam

menumbuhkembangkan keadaban warga negara di era digital. Terdapat kesenjangan

antara budaya kewarganegaraan partisipatif dan minimnya keterlibatan publik pada sektor

sosial dan kemanusiaan. Penggunaan internet dan sistem jejaring sosial sebagai gaya

hidup warga negara hari ini, di satu sisi berpotensi menggugah aktivisme, literasi warga

negara, dan menyokong kehidupan berdemokrasi. Namun, di sisi lain, terdapat pula tren

warga digital yang menunjukkan heavy viewers for leisure and pleasure bahkan tendensi

perilaku berdigital yang destruktif. Maka, transformasi media digital sebagai infrastruktur

berwarganegara menjadi satu solusi alternatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan

kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus. Partisipan penelitian meliputi pengurus, pegiat, dan

donatur ACT, serta masyarakat umum terdampak gerakan sosial. Pengumpulan data

dilakukan melalui wawancara, observasi, dan studi dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian

menunjukkan bahwa infrastruktur kewarganegaraan digital ACT berupa filantropi digital

dan voluntarisme ACT telah mampu membina keadaban warga negara pada bidang sosial

di era digital. Capaian tersebut ditandai dengan peningkatan partisipasi publik di bidang

sosial-kemanusiaan melalui pemanfaatan media digital. Pengembangan filantropi dan

voluntarisme digital ACT telah mendorong budaya kewarganegaraan digital yang lebih

partisipatif, terbukanya rute partisipasi lokal-global sebagai dimensi kewarganegaraan

global, dan aktivisme daring yang menumbuhkan spirit pemberdayaan sosial dikalangan

warga digital.

Kata Kunci: keadaban warga negara, filantropi digital, voluntarisme, kewarganegaraan

digital

ii

ABSTRACT

This study aims to examine the efficacy of digital citizenship infrastructure developed by

global humanitarian agency namely Aksi Cepat Tanggap (ACT) in developing civic

virtue in the digital era. There is a gap between the culture of participatory citizenship and

the lack of public involvement in the social and humanitarian sectors. The use of the

internet and social networking systems as citizens' lifestyles today, on the one hand has

the potential to arouse activism, citizen literacy and support democratic life. However, on

the other hand, there are also digital citizen trends that show heavy viewers for leisure

and pleasure even the tendency of destructive digital behavior. Thus, the transformation

of digital media as a citizen infrastructure becomes an alternative solution. This study

used a qualitative approach with case study design. Research participants include

caretakers, activists, and donors of ACT, and also a member of society who affected by

the social movement. Data collection is done through interviews, observation, and

documentation studies. The results showed that ACT's digital citizenship infrastructure in

the form of digital philanthropy and ACT voluntarism had been able to foster civic virtue

in the digital era. This achievement was indicated by an increase in public participation in

the social-humanitarian field through the use of digital media. ACT's digital philanthropy

and voluntarism development has encouraged a more participatory culture of digital

citizenship, local-global participation as a dimension of global citizenship, and online

activism that fosters the spirit of social empowerment among digital citizens.

Keywords: civic virtue, digital philanthropy, voluntarism, digital citizenship

DAFTAR ISI

HALAMAN JUDUL

ABSTRAK ....................................................................................................................... i

KATA PENGANTAR .................................................................................................... iii

DAFTAR ISI ................................................................................................................... iv

DAFTAR BAGAN ........................................................................................................... vii

DAFTAR TABEL ........................................................................................................... viii

DAFTAR GAMBAR ....................................................................................................... ix

BAB I PENDAHULUAN

1.1. Latar Belakang Penelitian ................................................................................... 1

1.2. Identifikasi Masalah dan Rumusan Masalah Penelitian

1.2.1. Identifikasi Masalah ................................................................................ 8

1.2.2. Perumusan Masalah ................................................................................ 8

1.3. Tujuan Penelitian

1.3.1. Tujuan Umum ......................................................................................... 9

1.3.2. Tujuan Khusus ........................................................................................ 9

1.4. Manfaat Penelitian

1.4.1. Manfaat Dari Segi Teoretis ..................................................................... 10

1.4.2. Manfaat Dari Segi Praktis ....................................................................... 10

1.4.3. Manfaat Dari Segi Kebijakan .................................................................. 11

1.4.4. Manfaat Dari Segi Aksi Sosial ................................................................ 11

1.5. Struktur Organisasi Tesis .................................................................................... 11

BAB II KAJIAN PUSTAKA

2.1. Keadaban Kewarganegaran (Civic Virtue) ......................................................... 13

2.2. PKn Sebagai Pembina Keadaban Kewarganegaraan .......................................... 15

2.3. Teori Gerakan Sosial Baru .................................................................................. 17

2.4 Teori Keterlibatan Warga Negara ....................................................................... 20

2.4.1. Keterlibatan Warga Negara dalam Perspektif PKn ................................. 23

2.4.2. Keterlibatan Warga Negara dalam Konteks

Kewarganegaraan Digital ....................................................................... 25

2.4.3. Keterlibatan Warga Negara dalam Konteks

Kewarganegaraan Global ........................................................................ 28

2.5. Tinjauan Tentang Filantropi dan Voluntarisme .................................................. 32

2.6. Penelitian Terdahulu ........................................................................................... 35

BAB III METODE PENELITIAN

3.1. Desain Penelitian ................................................................................................ 42

3.2. Partisipan dan Tempat Penelitian ........................................................................ 44

3.3. Pengumpulan Data .............................................................................................. 45

3.3.1. Observasi................................................................................................. 45

3.3.2. Wawancara .............................................................................................. 46

3.3.3. Studi Dokumentasi .................................................................................. 48

3.4. Analisis Data ....................................................................................................... 48

3.4.1. Reduksi Data ........................................................................................... 49

3.4.2. Penyajian Data/Display Data .................................................................. 49

3.4.3. Penarikan Kesimpulan/Verifikasi ........................................................... 50

3.5. Validitas Data...................................................................................................... 50

BAB IV TEMUAN DAN PEMBAHASAN

4.1. Deskripsi Tempat Penelitian ............................................................................... 51

4.2 Identitas Partisipan Penelitian ............................................................................. 53

4.3 Temuan Penelitian .............................................................................................. 55

4.3.1 Upaya Aksi Cepat Tanggap dalam mengorganisir Gerakan Sosial

Let’s ACT Indonesia ............................................................................... 55

4.3.2 Realitas Praktik Filantropi dan Voluntarisme dalam Gerakan

Sosial Let’s ACT Indonesia .................................................................... 62

4.3.3 Faktor-Faktor Pendorong keterlibatan warga negara dalam

Gerakan Sosial Let’s ACT Indonesia ..................................................... 67

4.3.4 Dampak Gerakan Sosial Let’s ACT Indonesia Bagi Pembinaan

Civic Vitue di Bidang Sosial ................................................................... 73

4.4. Pembahasan........................................................................................................ 78

4.4.1. Pembahasan tentang Upaya Aksi Cepat Tanggap dalam

mengorganisir Gerakan Sosial Let’s ACT Indonesia.............................. 78

4.4.2. Pembahasan tentang Realitas Praktik Filantropi dan Voluntarisme

dalam Gerakan Sosial Let’s ACT Indonesia ........................................... 82

4.4.3. Pembahasan tentang Faktor-Faktor Pendorong keterlibatan warga

negara dalam Gerakan Sosial Let’s ACT Indonesia ............................... 87

4.4.4. Pembahasan tentang Dampak Gerakan Sosial Let’s ACT Indonesia

Bagi Pembinaan Civic Vitue di Bidang Sosial ........................................ 94

BAB V SIMPULAN, IMPLIKASI, DAN REKOMENDASI

5.1. Simpulan ............................................................................................................. 102

5.1.1. Simpulan Umum ..................................................................................... 102

5.1.2. Simpulan Khusus .................................................................................... 103

5.2. Implikasi ............................................................................................................. 105

5.3. Rekomendasi ....................................................................................................... 106

5.3.1. Bagi Community Civic ............................................................................ 106

5.3.2. Bagi Pemerintah ...................................................................................... 107

5.3.3. Bagi Praktisi Pendidikan Kewaganegaraan ............................................ 107

5.3.4. Bagi Peneliti Selanjutnya ........................................................................ 107

DAFTAR PUSTAKA ...................................................................................................... 109

LAMPIRAN

DAFTAR BAGAN

Bagan 2.1 An Integrative Theory of Civic Engagement ................................................. 22

Bagan 2.2. Kerangka Kewarganegaraan Digital .............................................................. 27

Bagan 3.1. Komponen-Komponen Analisis Data ........................................................... 49

Bagan 4.1. Impak gerakan sosial Let’s ACT Indonesia bagi perbaikan sosial ................ 76

Bagan 4.2. Faktor pendorong gerakan sosial Let’s ACT Indonesia ................................ 88

DAFTAR TABEL

Tabel 2.1 Fokus Area Kewarganegaraan Global .............................................................. 31

Tabel 4.1 Dampak Gerakan Sosial Let’s ACT terhadap Civic Virtue di Bidang

Sosial ................................................................................................................ 96

DAFTAR GAMBAR

Gambar 2.1 Capaian Pembelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan................................. 16

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Sumber Buku

Affandi, Idrus. (2009). Bedah Buku Pendidikan Politik dari Robert Brownhill dan

Patricia Smart. Bandung: Kencana Utama

Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. (2012). Pokoknya Kualitatif. Bandung: Pustaka Jaya.

Bahmueller, C. F. (1996). The Future of Democracy and Education for Teaching

In Elementary Social Studies. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

Barber, B. (2003). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics For A New Age.

California press: University of California.

Branson, M. S dan Quingley , C. N. (1998). The Role of Civic Education.

Washington: Centre for Civic Education.

Branson, M. S, dkk. (1999). Belajar “Civic Education” dari Amerika Serikat: Seri

Pendidikan Politik. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Kajian Islam dan Sosial & The

Asia Foundation.

Brodock, K, dkk. (2009) Digital activism survey report 2009. Available at:

http://www.digiactive.org/wpcontent/uploads/Research4_SurveyReport2

009.pdf

Bungin, Burhan. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta : Kencana.

Carabain, Christine, dkk. (2012). Global Citizenship: From Public Support To

Active Participation. Amsterdam: NCDO.

Carpini, M. D., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans Know about Politics and

Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Cresswell, John. W. (2010). Researh Design: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif

dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

_______. (2012). Researh Design: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Mixed

Edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Cogan, J. J & Derricot, R. (1998) Citizenship for The 21th Century, An

International Perspective on Education. London: The Copyright

Licensing Agency.

Cogan, J. J., et al. (2002). Civic Education in The Asia Pacific Region: Case

Studies across Six Societies. New York: Rouledge Falmer.

Dagger, R. (1997). Civic Virtues: Rights, Citizenship, and Republican Liberalism.

New York: Oxford University Press.

Ehrlich, T. (2000). Civic Responsibility And Higher Education. Phoenix, AZ:

Greenwood Publishing Group.

Fernandez, J M. (2009). Asian Transformations in Action: From Charity To

Social Investment and Social Justice (a Study of Philanthropic

Institutions In Indonesia). Bangkok: Abeno Printing Co., Ltd.

Gay, L. R. dkk. (2009). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis

Application (Ninth Edition). New Jersey: Upper Saddle River.

Gerzon, Mark. (2010). Global Citizen: How Our Vision of The World Is Outdated

and What We Can Do About It. London: Ebury Digital.

Gross, R. A. (2003). Giving in America: From charity to philanthropy. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Hadari, Nawawi. (2005). Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gadjah

Mada. University Press.

Hill, K. A., & Hughes, J. E. (1998). Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in The Age of

The Internet. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Hoskins, B., dkk. (2006). Measuring Active Citizenship in Europe. Ispra:

European Commission Institute for the Protection and Security of the

Citizen.

Jacoby, B. (2009). Civic Engagement In Higher Education: Concepts and

Practices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kalidjernih, Freddy. K. (2013). Puspa Ragam Konsep Dan Isu Kewarganegaraan.

Bandung: Widya Aksara Press.

Laclau, Ernest & Chantal Mouffe. (2001). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy:

Toward a Radical Democratic Politics.. London: Verso (New Left).

Locher, David A. (2002).Collective Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Miles, M. & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: UI-Press.

.

Moleong, Lexy. (2007) Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja

Rosdakarya. Offset.

Mulyana, Deddy. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Komunikasi. Bandung: Remaja

Posda Karya.

Pancer, S. M. (2015). The Psychology of Citizenship and Civic Engagement. New

York: Oxford University Press.

Prochaska, F. (2002). School of Citizenship: Charity and Civic Virtue. London:

Civitas: Institute for The Study of Civic Society.

Quingley, C. N., Buchaman, Jr. J., & Bahmueller, C. F. (1991). Civitas: A

Framework for Civic Education. Calabas: Center for Civic Education.

Quingley, C. N., Branson, M. S., Smith, D. E. (ed). (2010). National Standars for

Civics and Government. Calabas: Center for Civic Education.

Ribble, M. (2015). Digital Citizenship in Schools: Nine Elements All Students

Should Know, 3rd ed. Oregon: International Society for Technology in

Education.

Salamon, L. M. (1992). America’s Nonprofit Sector: A Primer. New York:

Foundation Center.

Sapriya, dkk. (2009). Pembelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Bandung:

Laboratorium PKn UPI.

Satori, Djam’an dan Komariah, Aan. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif.

Bandung: Afabeta.

Snow, David A, Soule, Sarah A.; & Kriesi, Hauspeter. (2004). The Blackwell

Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Sobur, Alex (2013). Filsafat Komunikasi: Tradisi dan Metode Fenomenologi.

Bandung: Rosda.

Stillman, David dan Stillman, Jonah. (2018). Generasi Z: Memahami Karakter

Generasi Baru yang Akan Mengubah Dunia Kerja (Indonesian Edition).

Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Sugiyono (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif,

Kualitatifdan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

________. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif

Kualitatif & RND). Bandung : Alfabeta.

Suryadi, Karim. (2017). Menak Senayan. Bandung: PT Pustaka Jaya.

UNESCO. (2015). Global Citizenship Education: Topic and Learning Objectives.

Paris: United Nation Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.

Verba, S., & Nie, H. (1972). Participation In America: Political Democracy And

Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.

Wahab, A. A., & Sapriya. (2011). Teori dan Landasan Pendidikan

Kewarganegaraan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Westholm, A., Montero, J., & Van Deth, J. (2007). Introduction: citizenship,

involvement, and democracy in Europe. In J. Van Deth, J. Montero & A.

Westholm (Eds.),Citizenship and involvement in European democracies:

A comparative analysis. London: Routledge.

Winataputra, U. (2015). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, Refleksi Historis-

Epistemologis dan Rekonstruksi untuk Masa Depan. Tangerang Selatan:

Universitas Terbuka.

Winataputra, U & Budimansyah, D. (2012). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan dalam

Perspektif Internasional (Konteks,Teori dan Profil Pembelajaran).

Bandung: Widya Aksara Press.

Sumber Artikel Jurnal

Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What Do We Mean By "Civic Engagement"?

Journal of Transformative Education. 3 (3). 236-253.

Alber JM, Bernhardt JM, Stellefson M, et al. (2015) Designing and Testing an

Inventory for Measuring Social Media Competency of Certified Health

Education Specialists. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 17(9). 221–

221.

Baek, K. (2018). The Geographic Dimension of Citizenship in Digital Activism:

Analysis of the Relationships Among Local and Global Citizenship, the

Use of Social Networking Sites, and Participation in the Occupy

Movement. American Behavioral Scientist. 62 (8). 1138–1156.

Ball, Stephen J.. (2008). New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance

in Education. Political Studies. 56 (4). 747-765.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Psychological Review. 84 (2). 191–215.

Batson. C.D. (1991) Why Act For the Public Good? For Answers. Personality,

and Interpersonal Correlas of Non Spontaneous Helping Behavior.

Journal For The Theory of Social Behaviour. 39 (3). 34-50.

Bimber, Bruce, dkk. (2014). Digital Media and Political Participation: The

Moderating Role of Political Interest Across Acts and Over Time. Social

Science Computer Review. X (XX). 1-22

Blowfield, M. & Frynas, J.G. (1998). Setting New Agendas Critical Perspectives

on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Developing World.

International Affairs. 81. 499-513.

Boyd, D. E., et al. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Supply

Chains: A Procedural Justice Perspective. Long Range Planning. 40 (3).

341–356.

Buechler, Steven M. (1995). New Social Movement Theories. The Sociological

Quarterly. 36 (3). 441-464.

Caroll, Willian, K dan Robert A Hackett. (2006). Democratic Media Activism

Through The Lens of Social Movement Theory. Media Culture Society.

28 (1). 83–104.

Christopher, G. Reddick & Ponomariov, B. (2012). The Effect of Individuals’

Organization Affiliation on Their Internet Donations. Nonprofit and

Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 42 (6). 1197-1223.

Cox, J., Oh, E.Y., Simmons, B. (2018). Doing Good Online: The Changing

Relationships Between Motivations, Activity, and Retention Among

Online Volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 21 (3).

270-282.

Davies, L. (2006). Global Citizenship: Abstraction or Framework For Action?.

Educational Review. 58 (1). 5-25.

Dewantara, Ramma Wisnu dan Derajad S Widhyharto. (2015). Aktivisme dan

Kesukarelawanan dalam Media Sosial Komunitas Kaum Muda

Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik UGM.19 (1). 40-52. ISSN

1410-4946.

Eckendrode, John. dkk. (2015). Systematic Traditional Review: Volunteer

Motivation. Bronfrnbrenner Center for Translational Research.

Fischer Marilyn. (1995). Philanthropy and Injustice in Mill and Addams.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 24 (4). 281-292.

Foster, Mary K. (2008). Corporate Philanthropy in the Canadian Context: From

Damage Control to Improving Society. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector

Quarterly. 38 (3). 441-466.

Gabriel, S., & Goetschel, L. (2016). Motivation of Philanthropists In

Peacebuilding: Promoting Peace as Personal Satisfaction?. Journal of

Peacebuilding & Development. 11 (2). 51–65.

Gray, F. Elizabeth & Kane Hopkins. (2018). Transported: New Zealand Non-

Profit Organizations, Digital Platforms and The Limitations Of Metaphor.

New Media & Society. 21 (3). 750 –769.

Green, F. Madaleine. (2012). Global Citizen: What Are We Talking About and

Why Does it Matter. Trend And Insight For International Education

Leaders.1-4

Ghosn-Chelala, Maria. (2018). Exploring Sustainable Learning and Practice of

Digital Citizenship: Education And Place-Based Challenges. Education,

Citizenship and Social Justice. 14 (1). 1-17.

Habermas, J. (2015). Democracy in Europe: Why the Development of the EU into

a Transnational Democracy Is Necessary and How It Is Possible.

European Law Journal. 21 (4). 546-557.

Harlow, Summer. (2011). Social Media and Social Movements: Facebook and an

Online Guatemalan Justice Movement that Moved Offline. New Media &

Society. 14 (2). 225 –243.

Hocevar KP, dkk. (2014). Social Media Self-Efficacy and Information Evaluation

Online. Computers in Human Behavior. 39 (2). 254–262.

Helm, Jutta A. (1981). Citizen Initiatives and the Growth of Voluntary Action in

West Germany. Journal of Voluntary Action Research. 10 (2). 49-61.

Hendrastomo, Gendi. (2007). Nasionalisme vs Globalisme: Hilangnya Semangat

Kebangsaan dalam Peradaban Modern. Jurnal Demensia. 1 (1). 1-11.

Henthorn, Thomas C. (2015). Building a Moral Metropolis: Philanthropy and City

Building in Houston, Texas. Journal of Urban History. 44 (3). 402-420.

Hermes, Joke. (2006). Citizenship in the Age of the Internet. European Journal of

Communication. 21 (3). 295–309.

Hoskins, B. L., & Mascherini, M. (2009). Measuring Active Citizenship through

the Development of a Composite Indicator. Social Indicators Research.

90 (3). 459-488.

Hunt, S., Benford, R. (2004). Collective Identity, Solidarity, and Commitment.

Book Review. 433 – 457.

Hussin, Zaiha J dan Mohd Ramlan Mohd Arshad. (2012). Altruism as

Motivational Factors toward Volunteersm among Youth in Petaling Jaya

Selangor. Journal Administrative Science and Policy Studies. 54 (46).

225-243.

Jakimow, Tanya. (2018). Volunteers’ Practices of Care In Community

Development as A Model For Citizenship In Medan, Indonesia. Journal

Citizenship Studies. 22 (2). 34-47.

Jeffrey L. B., & Robert, D. H. (2004). Readers’ Perceptions of Philanthropy and

Nonprofit Management. The American Review of Public Administration.

34 (3). 293-301.

Jones LM & Mitchell KJ. (2016). Defining and Measuring Youth Digital

Citizenship. New Media & Society . 18 (9). 2063–2079.

Kim, E, M., & Yang, S. (2016). Internet Literacy and Digital Natives’ Civic

Engagement: Internet Skill Literacy or Internet Information Literacy?.

Journal of Youth Study. 19 (4). 438-456.

Kohut, A. (2000). Internet Users Are on The Rise, But Public Affairs Interest Isn’t.

Columbia Journalism Review. 38 (5). 68-69.

Kemp, S. (2002). The Hidden Workforce: Volunteering Learning in The

Olympics. Journal of European Industrial Training. 26 (1). 109-116.

Kligler-Vilenchik, Neta. (2017). Alternative Citizenship Models: Contextualizing

New Media and the New “Good Citizen”. New Media & Society. 00 (0).

1-17.

Kou, X., dkk. (2013). The Global Dynamics of Gender and Philanthropy in

Membership Associations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 43

(2).18–38.

Kumar, Rajesh & Devam Thapa. (2014). Social Media as A Catalyst For Civil

Society Movements In India: A Study in Dehradun City. New Media &

Society. 1 –18.

Klandermans, Bert, dkk. (2002). Identity Processes in Collective Action

Participation: Farmers` Identity and Farmers` Protest in the Netherlands

and Spain. Political Psychology. 23 (2). 39-54

Lin, Wan-Ying, dkk. (2010). Becoming Citizens: Youths’ Civic Uses of New

Media in Five Digital Cities in East Asia. Journal of Adolescent

Research. 25 (6). 839 –857.

Marlow, Jay M, dkk. (2016). Digital Belongings: The Intersections of Social

Cohesion, Connectivity and Digital Media. Ethnicities. 00 (0). 1–18.

Munir, Misnal. (1997). Filsafat Voluntarisme. Jurnal Filsafat Ilmu UGM.

McClain, L. C. (2001). The Domain of Civic Virtue in A Good Society: Families,

School, and Sex Equality. Fordham Law Review. 69 (5). 1617-1666.

McDougle, Lindsey, dkk. (2016). Can Philanthropy Be Taught?. Nonprofit and

Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 46 (2). 330-351.

McNair, B. (2016). Book Review: Being Digital Citizens Is (Engin Isin and

Ruppert Evelyn: Being Digital Citizens. London: Rowman & Littlefield,

2015). The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 417–418.

Meijer, May-May. (2006). Book Review: Philantrophy, Patronage and Civic

Society : Experiences from Germany, Great Britain, Aand North America.

Nonprofit and Voluntaryy Sector Quarterly. 35 (1). 147-149.

Molnar, Joseph, J & Sally R. Purohit. (1977). Citizen Participation in Rural

Community Development: Community Group Perspectives. Journal of

Voluntary Action Research. 6 (1-2). 48-58.

Nah, Seungahn & Masahiro Yamamoto. (2018). Rethinking Digital Media and

Citizenship: Conditions, Contexts, and Consequences. American

Behavioral Scientist. 62 (8) 1019 –1021.

Pagden, Anthony. (2003). Human Rights, Natural Rights, and Europe’s Imperial

Legacy. Political Theory. 31 (2). 171-199.

Permana, A & Prawira, R. M. (2016). Kontribusi Aktivitas Voluntaristik Kaum

Muda Terhadap Sosialisasi dan Institusionalisasi Identitas Regional Asia

Tenggara Melalui ASEAN Youth Voluntary Pragram (SYTP) 3013-2016.

Jurnal Studi Pemuda. (5 (2). 467-486.

Pichardo, Nelson A. (1988). Resource Mobilization: An Analysis of

Conflicting Theoretical Variations. The Sociological Quarterly. 29 (1).

97-110.

Pospíšilová, Tereza. (2018). Giving and Refusing: The Contested Reception of

Transnational Philanthropy in the Case of the Prague Central European

University Foundation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 00 (0).

1-17.

Pawluczuk, Alicja, dkk. (2018). Youth Digital Participation: Measuring Social

Impact. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 00 (0). 1-13.

Reckhow, Sarah & Jeffrey W Snyder. (2014). The Expanding Role of

Philanthrophy in Education Politics. Educational Researcher. 43 (4).

186-195.

Ribble, M., & Miller, T. N. (2013). Educational Leadership in an Online World:

Connecting Students To Technology Responsibly, Safely, and Ethically.

Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 17 (1). 137–145.

Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological Contracts and OCB:

The Effect of Unfulfilled Obligations on Civic Virtue Behavior. Journal

of Organizational Behavior. 16(3). 289–298.

Shah, D., dkk. (2002). Nonrecursive Models of Internet Use and Community

Engagement: Questioning Whether Time Spent Online Erodes Social

Capital. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 79(4), 964-

987.

Smith, Raymond D. (2008). The Value of Charity in a World of Profit

Maximization. Journal of Human Values. 14 (1). 49-61.

Sobré-Denton, Miriam. (2015). Virtual Intercultural Bridgework: Social Media,

Virtual Cosmopolitanism, and Activist Community-Building. New Media

& Society. 00 (0). 1 –17.

Son, J., & Wilson, J. (2012). Using Normative Theory to Explain The Effect of

Religion and Education Volunteering. Sociological Perspectives. 55 (4).

473-499.

Sulek, Marty. (2010). On the Modern Meaning of Philanthropy. Nonprofit and

Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 39 (2). 193-212.

Van Sylke, David M. dkk. (2007). Nonprofit Performance, Fund Raising

Efectiveness, and Strategies for Engaging African Americans in

Philanthropy. The American Review of Public Administration. 37 (3).

278-305.

Warf, Barney. (2009). Review: Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and

Participation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 41 (9).

2285-2286.

Walzer, Michael. (1974). Civility and Civic Virtue in Contemporary America.

Social Research of The Johns Hopkins University. 41 (4). 593-611.

Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the

Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? Social

Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment. American

Behavioral Scientist. 45(3). 436-455.

Wilson, J. (2000) . Volunteering. Annual Review Sociology. 27 (1). 215-240.

Wyatt, R. O., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the Spheres: Political And

Personal Conversation in Public And Private Spaces. Journal of

Communication. 50(1). 71-92.

Yang, H. H., et al. (2018). Social Media Competence and Digital Citizenship

Among College Students. The International Journal of Research into

New Media Technologies. X (XX). 1–18.

Yeung, Jerf. W..K. (2018). Are Religious People Really More Helpful? Public

and Private Religiosity and Volunteering Participation. Nonprofit and

Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 00 (0). 1 –23.

Young, Donna. (2014). A 21st-Century Model for Teaching Digital Citizenship.

Educational Horizons. 92 (3). 9-12.

Zuckerman E (2014) New Media, New Civics?. Policy and Internet. 6(2). 151–

168.

Sumber Karya Tulis Ilmiah

Abdillah, F. (2015). Pengembangan Keterlibatan Warga Negara Melalui

Penggalangan Dana Online Untuk Memupuk Tanggung Jawab Sosial

Mahasiswa. Tesis. SPs UPI.

Anggraeni, L. (2016). Transformasi Nilai Kesukarelaan Sebagai Basis Political

Engagement Melalui Service Learning Di Universitas Pendidikan

Indonesia. Disertasi. SPs UPI.

Winataputra, U. S. (2001). Jati Diri Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan sebagai

Pendidikan Demokrasi. (Disertasi). Bandung: Sekolah Pascasarjana

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Winataputra, U. S. (2014). Diskursus Aktual Tentang Paradigma Pendidikan

Kewarganegaraan (PKn) dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2013. Seminar

Nasional AP3KnI Tahun 2014.

Sumber Dokumen Perundang-Undangan

UU RI No. 9 Tahun 1961 Tentang Pengumpulan Uang dan Barang

UU RI No. No 11 Tahun 2008 tentang ITE

UU RI No. 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan UU RI No 11 Tahun 2008 tentang

ITE

Sumber Internet

Antara. (2014). Masalah Sosial Garapan Kementerian Sosial. [online] Diakses

dari http://www.antaranews.com. (3 Desember 2018)

______. (2017). Fenomena Penggalangan Dana Online. [online] Diakses dari

https://www.antaranews.com/berita/627182/cak-budi-dan-fenomena-

penggalangan-donasi-online (28 Mei 2019)

Indiana University. (2018). Global Philanthropy Environment Index. [online].

Diakses dari https://globalindices.iuui.edu/environtment/index.html (3

Desember 2018)

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika RI. (2018). Infografis Penetrasi

Pengguna Internet di Indonesia. [online]. Diakses dari

http://www.kominfo.go.id. (3 Desember 2018).

Tim Kompas. (2016). Korban Konflik Global. [online] Diakses dari

http://nasional.kompas.com. (3 Desember 2018).