TERRY + HOWELL

EARLY DESIGN GUIDANCE — DR AFTJULY 03, 2014 | DPD #3017451

TERRY + HOWELL

EARLY DESIGN GUIDANCE — DRAFT07.03.2014 | 14-018 | DPD #3017451 | 3

CONTENTS PROJ E C T PRO P OS A L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

S TO N EB R I D G E & W EB ER T H O M P S O N H OS P ITA L IT Y PROJ E C T S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 6

ZO N I N G S U M M A RY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

S IT E I N F O R M AT I O N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

S IT E A N A LYS I S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

CO N T E X T A N A LYS I S - S T R EE T S C A PE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 14

CO N T E X T A N A LYS I S - H OT EL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

CO N T E X T A N A LYS I S - R E S I D EN T I A L / H OT EL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

CO N T E X T A N A LYS I S - R E S I D EN T I A L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

CO N T E X T A N A LYS I S - O FF I C E / C I V I C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

CO N T E X T A N A LYS I S - D EN N Y T R I A N G L E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 - 21

CO N T E X T A N A LYS I S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 - 26

M A S S I N G O P T I O N S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 - 32

RO O F F O R M S T U DY O P T I O N C — PR EFER R ED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

M A S S I N G O P T I O N C — PR EFER R ED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

RO O F F O R M S T U DY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 - 36

FAC A D E S T U D I E S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

P O D I U M S T U D I E S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 - 39

G RO U N D FLO O R PL A N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 0

B U I L D I N G S E C T I O N S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 - 42

D E S I G N I N S P I R AT I O N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

D E S I G N G U I D EL I N E S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 - 49

T ER RY AV E CU R B CU T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 - 5 4

L A N DS C A PE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 - 62

APPENDIXFLO O R PL A N S O P T I O N C — PR EFER R ED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 - 68

B U I L D I N G S E C T I O N O P T I O N C — PR EFER R ED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69


PROJECT PROPOSAL The proposal consists of a new 300 room hotel, associated meeting rooms and dining facilities along with retail at the corner of Howell and Stewart. Structured parking will be provided both below grade and in an elevated podium. Primary vehicular/pedestrian entry will be via a “Porte Cochere” accessed from Terry Ave in order to provide convenient, safe and direct access especially for first time guests. Additional garage access will be from the existing alley.

The site is currently used as a surface parking lot in a relatively low density area “edge neighborhood” a few blocks from the Washington State convention center and I-5. The Aspira apartment tower is adjacent to the site and the Regence Blue Shield building is across the alley. New office building development is proposed across Terry. The new hotel will not only increase density but also provide linkage across Howell to the convention center expansion. The site is also important in helping mark the ending of the Terry Avenue green street as it terminates at the intersection of Howell and Terry.

The new building will respond to the Terry Ave green street setback requirements by stepping the upper tower back from the podium levels. This step back corresponds to the meeting room program for the hotel and will provide an active outdoor terrace space overlooking the green street for hotel guests. The architecture of the corner will be developed as a special signature component to provide a sense of place and signify the hotel’s address. The upper part of the tower will be highly visible from I-5 and will be designed to complement the existing context.

PROJECT VIS ION• EMPHASIZE CORNER — Emphasize the building’s corner at Terry and Howell by making a significant statement. This

corner is highly visible due to the presently underdeveloped adjacent sites, especially toward I-5.

• EXPRESSION OF GREEN STREET AT TERRY TERMINATION — Mark the terminus of the Terry Ave green street in a special and appropriate manner and relate to the design of the convention center expansion and other proposed projects at the northwest side of the “convention center district”

• STREET GRID SHIFT

• VIEW FROM I-5

• ACTIVATE UPPER PODIUM — Activate the upper podium terraces and link the activity/green of the conference room terraces with the green street below. Provide an implied connection to the adjacent convention center expansion. Pay special attention to the design of the podium along Terry Avenue especially considering the parking garage floors.

• MID-BLOCK VEHICULAR ACCESS — Create a welcoming pedestrian/automobile environment at hotel entry and porte cochere/lay-by.

• CONTEXTUAL RESPONSE — Because of the close context of the Aspira and Regence Blue Sheild office building the hotel should have a distinctive response to increase its visibility and differentiate itself.

PROJECT PROPOSAL

PROGRAM:

SITE

180’ X 120’ - 21,600 SF

HOTEL307 ROOMS295,000 SF1600 SF RESTAURANT/BAR220-230 PARKING STALLS


STONEBRIDGE HOSPITALIT YRENAISSANCE HOTEL | PENN STATION NYC

• THIRTY-EIGHT STORY TOWER (240 FT) WITH 340 GUEST ROOMS AND EIGHT TOP-FLOOR SUITES

• UNDER CONSTRUCTION

HILTON GARDEN INN | DENVER DOWNTOWN

• TWELVE STORY TOWER (140 FT) WITH 221 GUEST ROOMS

• 6,800 SF OF FLEXIBLE MEETING SPACE

COURTYARD MANHATTAN | NEW YORK

• TWENTY-SEVEN STORY TOWER (300 FT) WITH 224 GUEST ROOMS

• 6,800 SF OF FLEXIBLE MEETING SPACE


WEBER THOMPSON HOSPITALIT Y

MADISON TOWER | HOTEL 1000 | SEATTLE, WA

• TWENTY-FIVE STORY TOWER (240 FT) WITH 120 HOTEL GUEST SUITES AND 47 CONDOMINIUMS

• 278,975 GSF• 11,013 SF RETAIL INCLUDING HOTEL

ADMINISTRATION

AVA | SEATTLE, WA

• 445 FT MIXED-USE TOWER WITH 39 STORIES LOCATED A BLOCK FROM SEATTLE’S CONVENTION CENTER

• 244 CONDOMINIUM UNITS, AVERAGE 1,080 SF PER UNIT.

• 190 HOTEL SUITES• 622,225 GSF WITH 9,351 SF RETAIL SPACE• REGISTERED TO PURSUE LEED

CERTIFICATION

2ND & VIRGINIA SOUTH | SEATTLE, WA

• MIXED-USE HIGH RISE TOWER IN SEATTLE’S BELLTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD

• INCORPORATES THE LANDMARK TERMINAL SALES BUILDING INTO ITS BASE

• DESIGNED AS A CONDOMINIUM/BOUTIQUE HOTEL WITH RETAIL

• 440 FT WITH 39 STORIES• 190 UNITS• 154 HOTEL KEYS• 559,000 GSF WITH 1,000 GSF RETAIL• TARGETING LEED SILVER CERTIFICATION


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – CURRENT ZONING FOR TERRY & HOWELL

The following is an abbreviated summary and general overview of the existing zoning code bulk allowances. NOTE: See code citations noted below for additional detail and exceptions.

King County Parcel #

Zoning Classication [per map 1A]

Site Area

Street Classication [Map 1B]

Sidewalk widening [Map 1C]

View Corridors [Map 1D ]

Public Benefit Features [Map 1E ]

Pedestrian Street Classication [Map 1F]

Street Level Use Requirements [Map 1G]

Permitted Uses [23.49.042]

Structure Height [23.49.008]

Façade Requirements [23.49.056.]

Setbacks [23.49.056.B]

Façade Modulation [23.49.058.B]

Floor Area Ratio [23.49.011]

Max Allowable Area [site area x FAR]

Upper Level Development Std’s [23.49.058.F]

Common Recreation Area [23.49.010]

TDR [23. 49.014]

Parking Requirements [23. 49.019]

0660001190, 0660001195, and 0660001200

DMC 340/290-400

21,600 SF

Terry Avenue – Green Street | Howell Street – Principal Transit Street

Terry Avenue – Variable | Howell Street –18’ required (when on a one-way

street, only the side with transit stops shall be 18’)

Not applicable

Not applicable

Terry Avenue – Green Street | Howell Street – Class II Pedestrian Street

Terry Avenue – Street Level Use required.

Office, Hotel, Residential, Retail, etc.

340’-0” from average grade (commercial)

Min. 75% of Street level façade shall be transparent. Blank facades

shall not be more than 15’ wide.

2’ setback from Terry Avenue along base, 15’ Green Street setback

above 45’ from Terry Avenue, 2’ Alley Setback below 26’

Max. Façade Length from +86’ to +160’ = 155’ ; from +161’ to +240’ = 125’

Within 15’ of the a Street Property line

Base FAR= 5.0 / Maximum FAR = 10.0

[21,600 X 10.0 = 223,560 SF.]

None Required

None Required

Transfer of Development Rights is allowed per Table 23.49.014A

No parking is required.

ZONING SUMMARY

5th Avenue

6th Avenue

7th Avenue

8th Avenue

9th Avenue

Pine Street

Pike Street

Union Street

University St

Olive W

ay

Stewart

Stre

et

Howell

Stre

etTerry Avenue

Boren Avenue

Minor Avenue

Westlake Ave

4th Avenue

DMC 340/290-400

DMC 340/290-400

DMC 240/290-400

DOC 2 500/300-500

9th Avenue

Leno

ra Str

eet

Virgin

ia Str

eet

Yale Avenue


Site Description: The site is located at the northwest corner of Terry Avenue and Howell Street. The site occupies the southeast portion of the block at the terminus of Terry Avenue. An existing parking lot occupies this site. The site occupies 180’ of street frontage along Terry Avenue and 120’ of street frontage along Howell Street. The site lies at the gridline shift along Howell Street and marks the edge of Terry Avenue as one approaches the future convention center site.

TERRY AVENUE:• One-way northwest bound• Two-lane street with parallel parking to the east and west• Green Street• One existing curb cut along frontage

HOWELL STREET:• One-way northeast bound• Four-lane street with dedicated bike lanes• Direct path from CBD to Captiol Hill• Class two pedestrian street

TERRY AVENUE

HOWELL STREET

SITE INFORMATION


S ITE ANALYSIS MAIN STREET

TRANSIT ROUTE

REGIONAL CONNECTOR

VIEW CORRIDORS

MAJOR BIKE ROUTE

PUBLIC Transit Stop

STREETCAR Stop

SUN ANGLES

GREEN STREETS

DENNY T WO WAY

OLIVE W

AY

ONE WAY

PINE STREET

T WO WAY

PIKE STREET

ONE WAY

BO

RE

N

TW

O W

AY

FA

IRV

IEW

T

WO

WA

Y

TE

RR

Y

ON

E W

AY

STEWA

RT

ON

E WAY

VIR

GIN

IA S

T

ON

E WAY

LENO

RA

ST

ON

E WAY

BLAN

CH

ARD

ST

ON

E WAY

WE

ST

LA

KE

TW

O W

AY

HO

WELL

ON

E WAY

9TH

AV

E

ON

E WAY

8TH

AV

E

ON

E WAY

7TH

AV

E

ON

E WAY

5TH

AV

E

ON

E WAY

6TH

AV

E

ON

E WAY

YALE AVE

ONE W

AY

MIN

OR AVE

ONE W

AY


1

2

CONTEXT ANALYSIS - STREETSCAPE

2

3

6

1112

7

15

8

13

16

14

18 20 21

19

109

54

17

22

1



7

3 4 5

6


12

9 108

11



17

14 1513

16



22

18 19 20

21



11

2

3

2 3OLIVE 8 HOTEL, 2009 • HEIGHT — 455 FT • LEVELS — 39 LEVELS• STRUCTURE — CONCRETE STRUCTURE• CLADDING — CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM• USE — HOTEL | RESIDENTIAL CONDOS | RETAIL

PAN PACIFIC HOTEL, 2009 • HEIGHT — 208 FT• LEVELS — 19 HOTEL LEVELS• STRUCTURE — STEEL | MASONRY• CLADDING — CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM• USE — HOTEL | RESIDENTIAL CONDOS | RETAIL

THE PARAMOUNT HOTEL, 1996 • HEIGHT — 147 FT• LEVELS — 12 LEVELS• STRUCTURE — CONCRETE STRUCTURE• CLADDING — WINDOW WALL SYSTEM• USE — HOTEL | RETAIL

CONTEXT ANALYSIS - HOTEL


CONTEXT ANALYSIS - RESIDENTIAL /HOTEL


CONTEXT ANALYSIS - RESIDENTIAL


CONTEXT ANALYSIS - OFFICE /CIVIC


UPPER VOLUME — CHURCH OF MARY MAGDALENE

CONTEXT ANALYSIS - DENNY TR IANGLE


1800 TERRY RESIDENTIAL POTENTIAL PROJECT - ACTIVE MUP


EXISTING STORAGE FACILITY


54 APPENDIX

ARCHITECTURAL ALTERNATIVE C PREFERRED OPTION: 22-STORY OPTION

1007 STEWART | PROJECT # 3016095 | EARLY DESIGN GUIDANCE | NOV 5, 2013

PROPOSED 1007 STEWART — TRAMMEL CROW 14-STORY OFFICE TOWER

1099 STEWART AVENUE & HOWELL STREET HILL 7 OFFICE & HOTEL(UNDER CONSTRUCTION)

1099 STEWART AVENUE & HOWELL STREET HILL 7 OFFICE & HOTEL (UNDER CONSTRUCTION)

EXISTING WILLIAMS COURT APARTMENTS



SEATTLE VAULT SELF STORAGE

ASPIRA RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTSPROJECT SITE

WILLIAMSBURG COURT APARTMENTS — FUTURE 14-STORY TRAMMEL CROW OFFICE DEVELOPMENT LAVENDER & VINE FLORISTS

CONTEXT ANALYSIS


VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST FROM CAPITOL HILL

CONTEXT ANALYSIS

FUTURE CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSION


VIEW FROM SOUTH FROM CAPITOL HILL

CONTEXT ANALYSIS

FUTURE CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSION


VIEW FROM NORTHEAST FROM CAPITOL HILL

CONTEXT ANALYSIS


VIEW FROM NORTH I-5

CONTEXT ANALYSIS

MASSING OPTIONS


MASSING OPTION A MASSING OPTION B MASSING OPTION C — PREFERRED

MASSING OPTIONS


MASSING OPTION A

VIE W FROM SOUTHE AST


MASSING OPTION A

PROS:• Fewer floors/shorter building• Open garden court along Terry Avenue

OPTION A — EAST COURT SCHEME

CONS:• Additional re-entrant corner, more complex shape• Potential larger shading of adjacent properties• Poor separation from adjacent buildings • More keys with views to building versus surroundings• Does not hold street edge along Terry Avenue

AER IAL V IE W FROM SOUTHE ASTVIE W FROM NORTH


AER IAL V IE W FROM SOUTHE ASTVIE W FROM SOUTHE AST

MASSING OPTION B


MASSING OPTION B

PROS:• Fewest floors/shorter building• Most suites per floor• Able to hold the corner at Howell and Terry

OPTION B — COURTYARD SCHEME

CONS:• Additional re-entrant corner, more complex shape• Potential larger shading of adjacent properties• Poor separation from adjacent buildings



ROOF FORM STUDY OPTION C — PREFERRED


MASSING OPTION C — PREFERRED

PROS:• Able to hold the corner at Howell and Terry• Efficient floor plate locates core in single re-entrant

corner • Good visual separation from Regence Blue Shield

building

OPTION C — L SCHEME

CONS:• L shape is more complex than slab scheme



ROOF FORM STUDY


ROOF FORM STUDY


FACADE STUDIES


PODIUM STUDIES


PODIUM STUDIES

ww

w.w

eberthompson.com

© C

OP

YR

IGH

T WE

BE

R TH

OM

PS

ON

|

TERR

Y AN

D H

OW

ELL

201414-018

LEVEL 1


GROUND FLOOR PL AN


BUILDING SECTION


BUILDING SECTION


ARTICULATED MASSING GROUND LEVEL TRANSPARENCY ELEVATED CITY VIEWS SIMPLE MASSING MOVES

ELEVATED CITY VIEWS ELEVATED CITY VIEWS

DESIGN INSPIR ATION

DESIGN GUIDELINES


| D E S I G N G U I D EL I N E S

TITLE DESCRIPTION RESPONSE A-1 RESPOND TO

THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT

Develop an architectural concept and compose the building’s massing in response to geographic conditions and patterns of urban form found beyond the immediate context of the building site.

Emphasize the building’s corner at Terry and Howell by making a significant statement. This corner is highly visible due to the presently underdeveloped adjacent sites, especially toward I-5. Mark the terminus of the Terry Ave green street in a special and appropriate manner and relate to the design of the convention center expansion and other proposed projects at the northwest side of the “convention center district”

A-2 ENHANCE THE SKYLINE

Design the upper portion of the building to promote visual interest and variety in the downtown skyline.

The new building will respond to the Terry Ave green street setback requirements by stepping the upper tower back from the podium levels. This step back corresponds to the meeting room program for the hotel and will provide an active outdoor terrace space overlooking the green street for hotel guests. The architecture of the corner will be developed as a special signature component to provide a sense of place and signify the hotel’s address. The upper part of the tower will be highly visible from I-5 and will be designed to complement the existing context.

B-1 RESPOND TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Develop an architectural concept and compose the major building elements to reinforce desirable urban features existing in the surrounding neighborhood.

The intersection of Terry and Howell is at a crossroads of future development. Future Convention Center expansion is planned adjacent the property to the south, the existing three-story brick Williamsburg apartment building will soon be replaced by a fourteen story office builiding, as well as HILL 7 — a hotel and office development under construction to the west and a block away. The current environment is inactive with no strong activating and bringing life to Howell Street.

A-2 A-2A-1 A-1


TITLE DESCRIPTION RESPONSE B-3 REINFORCE

THE POSITIVE URBAN FORM & ARCHITECTURAL ATTRIBUTES OF THE IMMEDIATE AREA

Consider the predominant attributes of the immediate neighborhood and reinforce desirable siting patterns, massing arrangements, and streetscape characteristics of nearby development.

B-4 DESIGN A WELL-PROPORTIONED & UNIFIED BUILDING

Compose the massing and organize the publicly accessible interior and exterior spaces to create a well-proportioned building that exhibits a coherent architectural concept. Design the architectural elements and finish details to create a unified building, so that all components appear integral to the whole.

C-1 PROMOTE PEDESTRIAN INTERACTION

Spaces for street level uses should be designed to engage pedestrians with the activities occurring within them. Sidewalk-related spaces should be open to the general public and appear safe and welcoming.

C-2 DESIGN FACADES OF MANY SCALES

Design architectural features, fenestra-tion patterns, and material compositions that refer to the scale of human activities contained within. Building facades should be composed of elements scaled to promote pedestrian comfort, safety, and orientation.

B-3 B-4 C-2C-1

D E S I G N G U I D EL I N E S |


D-3D-3C-3 C-4 C-5

| D E S I G N G U I D EL I N E S

TITLE DESCRIPTION RESPONSE C-3 PROVIDE ACTIVE

– NOT BLANK – FACADES

Buildings should not have large blank walls facing the street, especially near sidewalks.

C-4 REINFORCE BUILDING ENTRIES

To promote pedestrian comfort, safety, and orientation, reinforce the building’s entry.

C-5 ENCOURAGE OVERHEAD WEATHER PROTECTION

Encourage project applicants to provide continuous, well-lit, overhead weather projection to improve pedestrian comfort and safety along major pedestrian routes.

C-6 DEVELOP THE ALLEY FAÇADE

To increase pedestrian safety, comfort, and interest, develop portions of the alley façade in response to the unique conditions of the site or project.

D-3 PROVIDE ELEMENTS THAT DEFINE THE PLACE

Provide special elements on the facades, within public open spaces, or on the sidewalk to create a distinct, attractive, and memorable “sense of place” associated with the building.

D-4 PROVIDE APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE

Design signage appropriate for the scale and character of the project and immediate neighborhood. All signs should be oriented to pedestrians and/or persons in vehicles on streets within the immediate neighborhood.


D-5 D-5&6 E-2 E-2

D E S I G N G U I D EL I N E S |

TITLE DESCRIPTION RESPONSE D-5 PROVIDE ADEQUATE

LIGHTINGTo promote a sense of security for people downtown during nighttime hours, provide appropriate levels of lighting on the build-ing façade, on the underside of overhead weather protection, on and around street furniture, in merchandising display win-dows, and on signage.

D-6 DESIGN FOR PERSONAL SAFETY & SECURITY

Design the building and site to enhance the real and perceived feeling of personal safety and security in the immediate area.

E-2 INTEGRATE PARKING FACILITIES

Minimize the visual impact of parking by integrating parking facilities with surrounding development. Incorporate architectural treatments or suitable landscaping to provide for the safety and comfort of people using the facility as well as those walking by.

TERRY AVENUE CURB CUT


GROUND LEVEL PL AN DIAGR AMSGROUND LEVEL WITH NO CURB-CUT — LAY-BY ON TERRY AVENUE GROUND LEVEL WITH PASS THROUGH AND DROP ZONE

100’-0” LAY-BY PARKING 30’-0”

HOTEL ENTRY

ALLEY ONLY ACCESSED PARKING

80’-0” LANDSCAPE +

PEDESTRIAN GREEN STREET

150’-0” CONTINUOUS LANDSCAPE + PEDESTRIAN GREEN STREET

22’-0” SIDEWALK + GREEN STREET

22’-0” SIDEWALK + GREEN STREET

2’-0” GREEN STREET DEDICATION

2’-0” GREEN STREET DEDICATION

12’-0” EXISTINGSIDEWALK

12’-0” EXISTINGSIDEWALK


LANDSCAPE


PUGET SOUND NOTION BUILING — CORNISH COLLEGE

TERRY GREEN STREET (BETWEEN LENORA AND VIRGINA STREET

2020 TERRY APARTMENTS



47POTENTIAL DEPARTURES

Proposed Terry Ave Green Street Improvements

Street Level Sectionpages 46 & 47


GREEN STREET PLAN AT TERRY AVE

N

54 APPENDIX

ARCHITECTURAL ALTERNATIVE C PREFERRED OPTION: 22-STORY OPTION


1007 STEWART — TRAMMEL CROW 14-STORY OFFICE TOWER 1007 STEWART — TRAMMEL CROW OFFICE DEVELOPMENT GREEN STREET PLAN

1099 STEWART AVENUE & HOWELL STREET HILL 7 OFFICE & HOTEL

1099 STEWART AVENUE & HOWELL STREET HILL 7 OFFICE & HOTEL





PROPOSED NEW STREET TREES WITH PLANTING BED

2" SCARLET OAK

APPENDIX


FLOOR PL ANS OPTION C — PREFERRED

66 66 66 66 66 66

666666666666666666666666666666

xxx 66

xxx 66

xxx 66

6666

6666

6666

66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66

66 66 66 66 66 66

66

66

6666

6666

66

6666xxx

66

xxx

66

6666

www.weberthompson.com© COPYRIGHT WEBER THOMPSON |

TERRY AND HOWELL

2014 14-018

BELOW GRADE PARKING P2

66 66

66666666666666666666

xxx 66

xxx 66

xxx 66

66xx

x 66

xxx 66

6666

6666

6666

66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66

66 66 66 66 66 66

66

66

6666

6666

66

6666xxx

66

xxx

66

6666

6666


TERRY AND HOWELL

2014 14-018

BELOW GRADE PARKING P1 LEVEL

TERRY AVENUE (GREEN STREET) TERRY AVENUE (GREEN STREET)

ALLEY ALLEY

HO

WE

LL S

TR

EE

T (

CLA

SS II

PED

ESTR

IAN

STR

EET)

HO

WE

LL S

TR

EE

T (

CLA

SS II

PED

ESTR

IAN

STR

EET)

BELOW GRADE PARKING LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN BELOW GRADE PARKING LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN




TERRY AND HOWELL

2014 14-018

LEVEL 1

TERRY AVENUE (GREEN STREET)

ALLEY

HO

WE

LL S

TR

EE

T (

CLA

SS II

PED

ESTR

IAN

STR

EET)

GROUND LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN



66 66 66 66

66 66 66 66 66 66

666666666666666666666666

66

6666

66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66

66

66

6666

6666

66

6666xxx

66

xxx

66

6666

66


TERRY AND HOWELL

2014 14-018

ABOVE GRADE PARKING L2


ALLEY

HO

WE

LL S

TR

EE

T (

CLA

SS II

PED

ESTR

IAN

STR

EET)

PODIUM ABOVE GRADE PARKING LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLANwww.weberthompson.com© COPYRIGHT WEBER THOMPSON |

TERRY AND HOWELL

2014 14-018

LEVEL 1A EMPLOYEE/MECHANICAL MEZZANINE


ALLEYH

OW

ELL

ST

RE

ET

(C

LASS

II P

EDES

TRIA

N S

TREE

T)

PODIUM LEVEL 1A FLOOR PLAN



66

6666

6666

66 66


TERRY AND HOWELL

2014 14-018

ABOVE GRADE PARKING L3-A


ALLEY

HO

WE

LL S

TR

EE

T (

CLA

SS II

PED

ESTR

IAN

STR

EET)

PODIUM PARKING LEVEL 3A FLOOR PLAN

666666

6666

6666

xxx

66

xxx

6666 66 66 66 66 66 66

66 66 66 66 66 66

66

66

66 66 66 666666

6666

6666

66

6666

66666666666666666666666666

xxx

66

xxx

66

6666

xxx 66

xxx 66

xxx 66


TERRY AND HOWELL

2014 14-018

ABOVE GRADE PARKING L3


ALLEYH

OW

ELL

ST

RE

ET

(C

LASS

II P

EDES

TRIA

N S

TREE

T)

PODIUM ABOVE GRADE PARKING LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN




TERRY AND HOWELL

2014 14-018

LEVEL 5+ (23 KEYS)


ALLEY

HO

WE

LL S

TR

EE

T (

CLA

SS II

PED

ESTR

IAN

STR

EET)

TYPICAL HOTEL LEVELS 5-17 FLOOR PLANwww.weberthompson.com© COPYRIGHT WEBER THOMPSON |

TERRY AND HOWELL

2014 14-018

LEVEL 4


ALLEYH

OW

ELL

ST

RE

ET

(C

LASS

II P

EDES

TRIA

N S

TREE

T)

LEVEL 4 AMENITY FLOOR PLAN



TERRY AND HOWELL

2014 14-018

BUILDING SECTION

BUILDING SECTION OPTION C — PREFERRED

BUILDING SECTION


Documents

TERRY + HOWELL