Quantifying Agonistic and Affiliative Behavioral Interactions Between Female African Elephants (Loxodonta Africana) in Captivity Conner Bradley, Yoonkeong Chi, Annie Giarla, Maraia Tremarelli, Rhodes College

Introduction

Methods

Results

Fig. 1 Frequency of agonistic behaviors in a pair (the first individual in the pair is the initiator) is higher between Gina-Ty, Gina-Asali; and lower between Asali-Ty, Asali-Gina

Fig. 3 Quantified total number of agonistic and affiliative behaviors exhibited by each elephants. Asali exhibited 0 agonistic and 12 affiliative behaviors. Gina exhibited 52 agonistic behaviors and 12 affiliative. Tyranza exhibited 3 agonistic and 17 affiliative.

Discussion

● There was no significant difference in the frequency of agonistic behavior involving the matriarch (U = 3.00, N1= 4, N2 = 2, p = .639; Figure 1)

● There was no significant difference in the frequency of affiliative behavior involving the matriarch (U = .500, N1= 4, N2 = 2, p = .095; Figure 2)

● The overall difference among the three elephants in the displayed agonistic behavior (x² = 82.07, p = 0.01) was significant.

● The overall difference among the three elephants in the displayed affiliative behaviors (x² = .53, p = 0.77) was not significant

Acknowledgements

Works Cited

• Female african elephants (Loxodonta africana) live in large social groups, where age, size and kinship contribute to social rank². While captive herds are smaller and often comprised of unrelated females, hierarchies (i.e. matriarch system) are common in both captive and wild-life².

• At the Memphis Zoo, Tyranza is the matriarch. The loss of a matriarch may result in a shift in the social dynamic within the group based on how much interaction the matriarch has with each non-matriarch elephant.

• Our study quantified the social interactions, primarily the affiliative and agonistic interactions between the matriarch vs. non-matriarchs, and the non-matriarch vs. non-matriarchs.

• Research Question: How does social hierarchy within the matriarch group affect the frequency of behavior exhibited between the elephant individuals?

H1: Ha - Social rank within matriarch group has an effect on the frequency of exhibited agonistic behavior between the individuals. Prediction 1: The matriarch will exhibit less agonistic behavior toward the non-matriarch individualsPrediction 2: The non-matriarch individuals will exhibit less agonistic behavior towards the matriarchH2: Ha - Social rank within matriarch group has an effect on the frequency of exhibited affiliative behavior between the individualsPrediction 1: The matriarch will exhibit more affiliative behavior toward the non-matriarch individuals Prediction 2: Non-matriarch individual will exhibit more affiliative behavior toward the matriarch, than the other non-matriarch • Our study is important to the Memphis Zoo because it reinforces knowledge about the social

hierarchy within the herd. With a deeper understanding of the herd behavioral dynamics, the Memphis Zoo can make better management decisions in the future.

• Our study can be used as a reference when deciding whether or not it is appropriate to add new elephants in the future.

Setting● Three female African elephants reside in the Memphis Zoo: Tyranza, Gina, and Asali. The

elephants vary in age and size. Tyranza, the largest, is 50 years old, Gina is 32, Asali is 29.

Behavioral Observations ● Data was collected by five research students from September 2014 to March 2015. Individuals

collected three hours of data on average per week, between 10:00 and 4:00.● Behavior and location were recorded using scan-sampling methods.● Scan-sampling was carried out by recording behaviors from an ethogram in two minute

intervals, lasting an hour¹ ● Three specific behaviors were quantified: TTI (touching other individuals), TTT (touching

another trunk), and AG (agonistic behavior) ● TTI and TTT were categorized into the affiliative group and AG was categorized into the

agonistic group ● Affiliative and agonistic behavior were categorized between Matriarch/Non-Matriarch

interactions (M-NM) and Non-Matriarch/Non-Matriarch interactions (NM-NM).

Statistical Analysis: ● A Chi-Square test was performed to test the overall differences among the elephants. ● A non-parametric Mann-Whitney-U test was performed to address the presence of the

matriarch during the exhibition of the affiliative/agonistic behavior

Behavior Definition

Agonistic Social behaviors involve tusking, pushing, aggression, and stealing food. Agonistic behavior also includes a behavior of backing away from an approaching individual.

Affiliative Social behaviors (exhibited when individual wants to reduce the aggression of another individual) are exhibited through [TTT] trunk touching (the other individual), and [TTI] trunk touching another individual (any part of the body).

Table 1. African Elephant ethogram of categorized behaviors ● Both of our hypotheses were not supported because there was no significant difference in the frequency of both affiliative and agonistic behaviors involving the matriarch

● We believe there was no significance in the statistical analysis due to the very large number of total scan sampling size

● The result is still very interesting because while Gina exhibited the most agonistic behavior, she did not display a higher amount of behavior towards one individual over the other.

● It is important to note that the majority of Gina’s agonistic behavior was her stealing their food during feeding time.

● So even though most of Gina’s aggressive behavior was directed towards Tyranza (Fig. 1), it was primarily her stealing Tyranza’s food.

● There was no significance in the the overall affiliative behavior that was exhibited by the elephants, which indicates that all elephants displayed equal amount of affiliative behavior towards each other.

● Future study: it should be noted at all the times when the gates are opened and closed; indicate which individual initiated the behavior (affiliative or agnostic), and quantify how long (according to the 2-minute scan sampling) the behavior was exhibited

● Limitations in research and data include: ○ Not indicating in all our data whether the gates were opened or closed○ Not indicating all the time who initiated the behavior (affiliative or agonistic○ Due to time limit, we could not utilize GIS to quantify spatial distance

between the individuals while the agonistic behavior was exhibited, and we could not quantify time spent on the exhibition of the behaviors

We would like to thank Dr. Sarah Boyle for her support and helping us with the statistical analysis, the Memphis Zoo for allowing us to collect data on the elephants, and the animal keepers of African Veldt for information about the elephants. We would also like to thank Claire Carr, Maddie Carwile, Ethan Jones and Brooke Rose for giving us access to their data.

Asali

©

Gina

¹ Martin, P. & Bateson, P. 2007. Measuring Behavior: An Introductory Guide. 3rd edn. Cambridge: University Press.² Freeman et al. 2010. Using Behavioral Observations and Keeper Questionnaires to Assess Social Relationships Among Captive Female African Elephants. Zoo Biology 29: 140-153.

Tyranza

Conclusion

● Even though the statistical analysis did not show significance in the frequency of behaviors exhibited by each individual, the project is still important to the Memphis Zoo because it shows the quantified exhibited behavior (affiliative and agonistic) between the non-matriarchs and matriarch; as well as non-matriarch and non-matriarch

● All three elephants had around the same number of affiliative actions.This being said the number of affiliative behavior between matriarch and non-matriarchs was greater than the number of affiliative behavior exhibited between non-matriarch and non matriarch.

● Gina displayed the most agonistic behavior, but distributed those behaviors evenly towards the two individuals. Therefore, Memphis Zoo should be aware that though Gina does not particularly target agonistic behavior towards one individual, the fact that she displays the most is an issue faced by the elephant zoo keepers.

Fig. 2: The frequency of affiliative behavior between the pairs (the first within the pair is the initiator) are distributed almost evenly; pair Gina-Asali has the lowest frequency

Phot

o w

as ta

ken

by Y

oonk

eong

Chi

, Rho

des

Col

lege

und

ergr

adua

te.