101
Technology & Progression in IFM The use of technology for environmental monitoring Alastair Leake GWCT Allerton Project

Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Technology & Progression in IFM

The use of technology for environmental monitoring Alastair Leake GWCT Allerton Project

Page 2: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Technology for Wildlife Management “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it”

– Radio tracking (Pheasants and fish) – Satellite/ GPS tracking (Woodcock and

foxes) – Nest sensors – Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)

(Squirrels)

Page 3: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 4: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Breeding season songbird numbers are correlated with wild pheasant numbers the previous autumn.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Bre

edin

g se

ason

son

gbird

co

unt

Autumn pheasant count

Page 5: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Radiotracking is very useful for studying nes4ng ecology

Page 6: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Radiotracking – Habitat use/preference

Page 7: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Study the survival of pheasants (tags have a mortality switch so we can accurately determine when a bird has died)

Page 8: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Cause of death - Fox predation

Page 9: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Cause of death - Disease

Page 10: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Radiotracking is very useful for studying nes4ng ecology

Page 11: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Pheasant nest loca4ons on an arable farm in Norfolk

Page 12: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Woodcock

Page 13: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 14: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

W Satellite-tracked woodcock 2013

www.woodcockwatch.com

Page 15: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Avoidance of sea crossings

Page 16: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Flight stage distances

0

5

10

15

20

25

Perc

enta

ge

Distance flown (km)

Spring migration, between two consecutive Argos transmissions

Page 17: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Cum

ulat

ive

% o

f bird

s de

part

ed 2013

2014

Timing of spring departure

14-Mar 17-Mar 20-Mar 23-Mar 26-Mar 29-Mar 01-Apr 04-Apr 07-Apr 10-Apr 13-Apr

Page 18: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 19: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

-1

1

3

5

7

9

11

13

15

1992 1998 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Terr

itor

ies

Wood

Garden

Spotted flycatcher breeding abundance

Page 20: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 21: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Tagscost£0.40each

Readers/loggerscost£45eachincomponents

Page 22: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 23: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

RFIDreader/loggerscost£45each

Page 24: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 25: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

tota

l hou

rs

10 20 30

untagged tagged Hopper use

TAG

GIN

G

0 10 20 30 40

indi

vidu

als

0 5

10 15

FEB MAR APR MAY JUN

cum

ulat

ive

Squirrels killed alltagged

hoppers first available

WoodB,4.69ha Feb-Jun201638squirrelskilled

=8.5/ha

Page 26: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 27: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Waders are in decline nationally

•  BTO Breeding Bird Survey, UK 1995-2011

•  Lapwing -41% •  Redshank -42% •  Snipe +8%

Page 28: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Lapwing populations

Annual adult survival = 75% First-year survival = 60% For a stable population, each pair needs to fledge on average 0.7 young Decline driven by reduced breeding success

Page 29: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Lapwing productivity, Avon Valley

Page 30: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Effects of lapwing and carrion crow density on nest survival

Page 31: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 32: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 33: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 34: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Clutch predation

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

4/1/2015 0:00 4/6/2015 0:00 4/11/2015 0:00 4/16/2015 0:00 4/21/2015 0:00 4/26/2015 0:00

Nest predated at 22:39

46% daylight, 4% twilight, 50% night

Temperature loggers:

Avon Valley 85% of clutch loss is due to predation (10% flooding, 5% trampling)

Page 35: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Chick monitoring

0.4 g radio-tags with 30 day life

Page 36: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Chick ranges and survival 2015 and 2016

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

2015 2016

Ran

ge a

rea

(ha)

Page 37: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Predator monitoring Camera trapping: 45 cameras set in 179 different locations 1.15 million images in 2015

Page 38: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Chick fates n = 208 dead chicks

Predated 83% Starved 14% Machinery/drowned 3%

0

10

20

30

40

50

Bird Mammal Unknown

% o

f pre

datio

ns

Page 39: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

GWCT breakaway snare

Page 40: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

x

Page 41: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

The AIHTS Agreement on International Humane Trapping Standards (1998)

Ø  TradeagreementbetweenEU,Canada,RussiaandUSA

Ø  TrapstomeetcertainwelfarestandardsØ  80%capturestoshownopoorwelfareindicators

Ø  Speciesincludesstoat(butnotredfoxormink)

Ø  Deadlineis22ndJuly2016

Ø  AbenchmarkfortesXngtraps

Page 42: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 43: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

GWCT breakaway snare

Page 44: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

1996

Page 45: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

GPS tracking of foxes

•  How do foxes use wet grassland habitats? •  Can we disrupt their foraging patterns by habitat manipulation? •  Where should we create better chick-foraging habitats? •  Does electrified fencing to exclude foxes work?

Page 46: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

IniXalcapture…

Page 47: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

AZeraweek…

Page 48: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

AZeramonth…

Page 49: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

01020304050607080

Curlew GoldenPlover Lapwing

Pairswith

chicks(%)

Predatorcontrol Nopredatorcontrol

The Upland Predation Experiment Otterburn (2000 - 2008)

Page 50: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 51: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 52: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 53: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 54: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 55: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

TheGWCTSalmon&TroutResearch

Centre

Page 56: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Assessing Atlan4c salmon popula4ons

Page 57: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

The Main River Fish Counter

Page 58: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

102cm Salmon

Electrodes

Page 59: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Side view camera - Salmon

Page 60: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Counter verifica4on

Page 61: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Passive Integrated Transponder Tagging

Page 62: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

BAFF

Adult Fish Counter and RAPID

Fluvarium and Smolt Counters

FBA River Laboratory

East Stoke infrastructure

Page 63: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Bio Acoustic Fish Fence (BAFF) Deflect smolts from main river

PITdetectorsmeasuredeflecXonefficiency

BAFF

FlowdirecXon

Page 64: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Bio Acoustic Fish Fence (BAFF)

Page 65: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Electric Fishing - Methods • Classical (wading) fishing - Upstream

Page 66: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Electric Fishing - Methods • Boom-Boat

Page 67: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

• Dacewithradiotag

Radiotracking

Page 68: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Manual Tracking

•  FixedStaXons

Page 69: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Using technology for soil/ cover crop recording

Page 70: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Using “Apps” to assess GAI

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

CC1

CC2

CC3

CC4

CC5

AppGAIAverage

hcp://www.agricentre.basf.co.uk/agroportal/uk/en/tools/website_tools/gai_cereals_cat_online/cat_online.html

Page 71: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Green Area Index– 01/12/15 Mix1 Mix2 Mix3 Mix4

Page 72: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

ConvTill NIT

Page 73: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Rainfall simulation

Page 74: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Water infiltration measurements • Double ring

infiltrometer measures speed water moves into soil

• Using double ring prevents side flow

• Calibrated so drop in water levels equates to known amount of water

Page 75: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Resistance to Penetration - Example

• Penetrometer records each reading to a depth of 45cm

• Download the data back in the office

Page 76: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Resistance to Penetration - Example

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

Depth(cm)

Force(kPa)

Farm1

Farm2

Farm3

Moredifficulttopenetrate

Farm1=Difficulttopenetratesoilfrom20cmonwards–impactonrootgrowthFarm2=obviousploughpanat20cmFarm3=limitedsoilstructure

Page 77: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 78: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Mapping trees- Agro-forestry project • Collector app for

ArcGIS • Download base map • Can then add data

points in field • Each dot here

represents a different tree – colour represents a different species

Page 79: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Recording habitat on a Landscape scale • Dedicated dairy supply chain in Cumbria and South West Scotland

•  100 farmers who all supply through First Milk.

Page 80: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

What were the results? •  478,839metresofhedge(473km).

•  390haofwoodland–42haASNW.

•  222,207metresofstonewall.

•  197,068metresofwatercourse.

•  Thereare59pondson41farms.

•  71farmshavelowinputpermanentgrass.

•  Only11farmsareinanagri-environmentscheme.

Page 81: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 82: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 83: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Songbird populations in response to winter feeding

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

Mea

n bi

rds/

mon

th

Feeding

No feeding

Page 84: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Feeder filmed by night vision CCTV

Page 85: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

The proportion of time spent by different wildlife groups foraging at game feeders during separate studies in 2004 and 2008.

2004 2008

Gamebirds

Corvids

Small Birds

Mammals

Pigeons/Dove

Page 86: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Figure1.Gamefeederlocationsandhabitatdetails.

FeedhoppersitehabitatdetailsA Inmatureashdominateddeciduouswoodland.20mfromlargewoodlandride.Largedrumgrainfeederwithin100m.

B Againstthin,1.2mtallhawthornhedgerowwithadjacentmaizebasedcovercrop.Wintercerealsinsurroundingfields.

C Bymoderatelydense,3mtallmixedspecieshedge.Maizebasedcovercropwithin50m.Wintercerealsinsurroundingfields.

D In15yearold,predominantlydeciduousplantation.Hoppersited10mfromwoodedge.Wintercerealsinsurroundingfields.

E Bymoderatelydense,1.4mhawthorndominatedhedge.Adjacentmaizebasedcovercrop(failed).Wintercerealsinsurroundingfields.

F Ingrassfieldmargin,5mfromhedgerow.Beneath2matureoaksgrowingonmargin.Winterrape,andpastureinadjacentfields.

G Against2mtall,thinsectionofreplantedhedgerow.Sparselyvegetatedmargin.Winterrapeandpermanentpastureinadjacentfields.

H Against1.5m,moderatelydensehedgerowborderinga25yearoldstripofmixedwoodland.2yroldKalebasedcovercroponfieldside.Wintercerealinsurroundingfields.

I Againstthin,1.4mtallhedgebygrasstrack.Adjacentmaizebasedcovercrop(failed).<10yearoldNorwaySpruceplantationonoppositesideofhedge.Wintercerealinadjacentfield.Matureashwoodland150maway.

J Below5mtall,predominantlyBlackthornhedge.Severalmaturehedgerowtreesnearby.Deepditchbelowhedge.Adjacentgrasstrackandmaizebasedcovercrop(failed).Wintercerealinsurroundingfields.Matureashwoodland150maway.

Game feeder locations & habitat details

Page 87: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

A B C D E F G H I J

Feeder

The proportion of time spent by the major foraging species at different feeders.

Others Yellowhammer Chaffinch Rook Pheasant Squirrel Mouse Rat

Page 88: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Yellowhammers feeding

Page 89: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 90: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 91: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 92: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 93: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 94: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 95: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 96: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 97: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 98: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 99: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services
Page 100: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

•  28th June 2017 10.30 – 15.30

•  www.gwct.org.uk/allerton25

Page 101: Technology & Progression in IFM - Amazon Web Services

Agricology www.agricology.co.uk