18
Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

Cost of coexistence in Germany

Maarten Punt,

Technische Universität München

Page 2: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

2

Introduction

• Statement of the EC (2003):

“In principle, farmers should be able to cultivate the types of agricultural crops they choose – be it GM crops, conventional or organic crops”

• In the same document:

“to provide European consumers with a real choice between GM and non-GM food"

Page 3: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

3

Introduction ctd

• In order to prevent outcrossing and adventitious presence -> Coexistence measures

• BUT:– Different Coexistence measures = different costs

– Different Coexistence measures = different effectiveness

• Free choice = C.M. should not tip over the balance!

• Case study in Germany

Page 4: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

4

GM cultivation in Germany

• GM cultivation = outlawed

• GM cultivation 2005-2008: Bt maize

• # farmers involved = ±90

• Area wise <1% of total maize area in Germany

• Obligatory registration @ government

Page 5: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

5

German cultivation in 2008

Standortregister,http://apps2.bvl.bund.de/stareg_visual_web/data.do

Page 6: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

6

Sampling strategy

• Approached former Bt farmers through registration office

• Approached former Bt farmers through Innoplanta (farmers organisation)

• Approached neighbours through Bt farmers

• Face to face interviews

• Total Sample Size: 47 farmers. 27 Bt, 20 non-Bt

Page 7: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

7

Distribution

Not sampled

1-4 farmers

5-9 farmers

10-15 farmers

Page 8: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

8

Our average farmSample Population

(sampled states)

Farm type Mixed (80%)

Farm focus Milk (44%) or cereals (40%)

Farm land 1147 (897) ha 71 ha

Percentage rented 65% 70%

Maize area 218 (209) ha

People employed on farm

22 (21) 3.3

Page 9: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

9

Our average farmer

Job experience 31 (13) years

Age 51 (11) years

Sex Male

Education level University of applied science

Profit/Operating income >€ 60,000 (75%)>€ 100,000 (45%)

Page 10: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

10

Page 11: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

11

Attitudes of farmers

Page 12: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

12

Reasons for non Bt

Page 13: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

13

Coexistence measures: Burden

Page 14: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

14

Measure Time (h/year) Cost (€/ha)

Neighbour informing 6.2 13.0 11.93 32.92

Informing rangers 5.3 13.9 7.58 12.52

Registering 9.5 39.1 4.22 7.91

Liability 6.1 12.9 1.21 1.63

150 meter distance 3.4 5.3 1.47 3.10

300 meter distance 5.0 10.5 5.70 14.98

Goverment permission 5.1 11.7 1.94 3.41

Separate storage seeds 0.7 0.87 1.36 3.10

Separate storage yield 2.6 4.7 3.72 6.90

Cleaning machines 8.0 11.4 20.94 41.20

Volunteer control 2.6 4.7 4.35 9.20

Record keeping 19.0 46.0 6.69 13.87

Waiting/Rotation 1861.8 5551.8 130.9 351.44

Top 4

Page 15: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

15

Measure Time (h/year) Cost (€/ha)

Neighbour informing 6.2 13.0 11.93 32.92

Informing rangers 5.3 13.9 7.58 12.52

Registering 9.5 39.1 4.22 7.91

Liability 6.1 12.9 1.21 1.63

150 meter distance 3.4 5.3 1.47 3.10

300 meter distance 5.0 10.5 5.70 14.98

Goverment permission 5.1 11.7 1.94 3.41

Separate storage seeds 0.7 0.87 1.36 3.10

Separate storage yield 2.6 4.7 3.72 6.90

Cleaning machines 8.0 11.4 20.94 41.20

Volunteer control 2.6 4.7 4.35 9.20

Record keeping 19.0 46.0 6.69 13.87

Waiting/Rotation 1861.8 5551.8 130.9 351.44

Bottom 4

Page 16: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

16

Regression analysis: informing the neighboursModel

Effects 

  Intercept Number of

neighbours

(N)

Farm size (S

in ha)

Interaction

(N*S)

Adjusted R2

T = ß0+ß1*N 128 (53)* 7.5 (2.1)** - - 0.33

T = ß0+ß1*S 199 (92)* - 0.02 (0.05) - -0.03

T = ß0+ß1*N+ ß2*S33 (92) 8.2 (2.2)** 0.06 (0.05) - 0.35

T = ß0+ß1*N+

ß2*S+ ß3*N*S-36 (87) 14 (3.1)*** 0.21 (0.07)** -0.01 (0.005)* 0.48

Page 17: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

17

Correlation analysis

• Analyse correlation of Likert scale with farm characteristics (kendall‘s tau, non parametric)

 Isolation

distance 150 mLiability

Requesting

government

permission

Waiting for two

years

Farm size -0.26 0.07 0.06 -0.39*

% GM maize

planted-0.12 -0.07 0.29 0.14

% area maize 0.20 -0.31 -0.19 0.03

Page 18: Technische Universität München Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München

Technische Universität München

18

Summary

• Small sample, but still sampled roughly 30% of all Bt-farmers in Germany

• Results, so far, seem mostly consistent

• Coexistence measures overall seem not to bother farmers too much

• Farm size is not always an important characteristic