Upload
girish-ajmera
View
224
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Research study on techniques for Low voltage high output impedance Current Mirror circuit at Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi. Several methods for designing a low voltage high output impedance current Mirror were studied such as Bulk Driven, Self Cascode and Sub threshold MOS architecture. Operation, Pros and Cons of these schemes were studied. Various modifications were suggested to the theoretical explanation of these schemes.
Citation preview
Techniques for Low Voltage High Output
Impedance Current Mirror Girish Kumar Ajmera
CARE, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi,
New Delhi – 110016 India.
Abstract – In this paper various methods for
designing a low voltage high output
impedance current mirror are proposed and
compared. This Paper presents three such
schemes Bulk driven, self cascode, and, sub
threshold [1-2].
Keywords – Cascode, Current mirror, Analog
Integrated Circuits, MOSFET.
I. INTRODUCTION
Current Mirror is an essential part of any CMOS
analog integrated circuit. It is used widely in
analog integrated circuits for biasing, current
amplifications, active loading and level shifting
etc. To supply a regulated current to load which
is the basic requirement of any analog integrated
circuit, there are many ways and current mirror
is one of them. Current Mirror can be defined as
a black box whose output current is linearly
proportional to input current and independent of
output voltage.
As the portability of electronic gadgets is
gaining popularity need of low voltage and low
power devices is increasing [1-3]. In various
applications low voltage signal analysis is
needed such as medical instrumentation. In
conventional 5 V MOSFET circuits the high
gain and high output impedance can be simply
achieved by the cascode structure of MOSFETs
but this cannot be done in low voltage circuits as
cascode structure of MOSFETs increases the
minimum voltage substantially, required for
proper operation of circuit. Another way is to do
cascading but that induces stability issues in the
circuit because at every stage there will be a pole
in the circuit, they may degrade the overall
circuit performance at the high frequency [4].
The one most basic approach to achieve low
voltage design is reduction in threshold voltage
but that will reduce the noise margin and results
in poor SNR [2]. Compactness of analog
integrated circuits has increased substantially in
the last few years but the corresponding scaling
in voltage is still in research. Minimum voltage
needed is limited by the sum of absolute value of
threshold voltages of different MOS in the
circuit. The research in the area of battery less
system can also boost up if the low voltage
analog circuit design is achievable to the level
that voltage level provided by solar cell, RF
power and so forth, is adequate. High impedance
is needed to mitigate the loading effect so that
optimum amplification can be done.
Another way to operate MOSFETs for low
voltage application is to operate the MOSFETs
itself in some other regions instead of strong
inversion region so that the fundamental
limitation on the input voltage is relaxed. For
MOSFETs operating in weak inversion region
the trans-conductance efficiency (gm/ID) is
maximum and the quiescent current magnitude
is much smaller as compared to MOSFETs
operating in strong inversion region [5]. So
operation of MOSFETs weak inversion region is
a potential area to research so that low voltage
circuits can be designed.
The basic desirable properties for a current
mirror circuit are I) As much as possible high
output impedance. II) As much as possible
Output voltage swing, which is limited by the
saturation voltage of the MOSFETs used in
circuit. III) Voltage needed at the input to
operate the current mirror, which is limited by
the voltage required to bias the MOSFETs or to
start the operation of MOSFET.
In this paper the main focus is kept on to design
current mirror circuit which works well at low
voltages and consume low power. Since an ideal
current source has infinite impedance so in the
current mirror it is desired to have as high output
impedance as possible to get the constant current
at the output. When implementing a current
mirror in a design it is desired to have high
output impedance, low operation voltage. Brief
introduction about various low voltage
techniques such as sub threshold, bulk driven,
and, self cascode will be discussed [1-2]. The
main issues using these techniques were that
many popular circuits which are frequently used
in 5V analog integrated circuits have lost their
important properties and performance in low
voltage environment. So designers using these
low voltage techniques have to struggle a lot to
devise the alternative circuit structures. Another
issue in low voltage circuits is the poor dynamic
range as the swing as well as voltage needed for
operation of circuit both decreases substantially
but the noise level is intact. This causes poor
dynamic range. These techniques are still in the
evolution phase and many new improvements
are under research to overcome these limitations.
A simple low voltage and high impedance
current mirror using these schemes will be
discussed. Each one of them have certain
advantages and disadvantages.
II. SIMPLE CURRENT MIRROR
The following diagram shows a simple current
mirror circuit [5].
Figure 1: A simple Current Mirror [5]
The basic current mirror can be implemented
using MOSFETs as shown in the figure 1. Here
the MOSFET 1 is operating in saturation region
so that a constant current flows through it. The
gate to drain connection of M1 ensures that it
always remains in saturation region. The Gates
of both the MOS are connected and drain
voltage of M2 is maintained such that M2 will
also remain in the saturation region so that a
constant current flows through it. As both the
MOS are fabricated in the same process and
their gate to source voltage are same so Iout is a
scaled version of Iref.
( )
( )
( )
( )
If channel length modulation effect is not taken
into account (λ = 0) then from equation (1) and
(2) it can be easily shown that
But this simple current mirror have the
limitations as output impedance is not high, a
basic requirement is for the current source is.
Also, on taking into account the channel length
modulation effect output current may not be
proportional to input current. As the fabrication
process is improving and compactness in circuits
is increasing the trend is towards decreasing the
channel length. But in short channel length
devices the channel Length modulation
parameter becomes more prominent that
decreases the output impedance.
To get over these limitations cascode structure
can be used as shown in figure 2. On using the
cascode structure the output impedance can be
increased from ro (in simple current mirror) to
approximately gmro2. Since in order to ensure
current mirroring function the MOSFETs should
operate in the saturation region, so at the drain
end of M4 the voltage has to be at least equal to
twice of saturation voltage plus threshold
voltage. The additional term of threshold voltage
requires a higher voltage to be present at the
drain terminal of M4. Also, the effect of channel
length modulation is still there which makes the
current mirroring poor as current increases with
VDS.
Figure 2: Cascode Current Mirror [5]
This requirement of additional voltage makes
this conventional current mirror less qualified
for low voltage applications. To get over these
limitations various improvisation has been done
in the cascode current mirror configuration. In
literature various methods have been proposed
to increase the output impedance that leads to
Wilson current mirror, modified Wilson current
mirror, cascode current mirror, regulated
cascode current mirror, folded cascode current
mirror and so on [5]. These all techniques are
effective to increase the output impedance and
do increase the output swing up to some extent
but does not provide any improvement over the
minimum input voltage required to successfully
operate the circuit. In these schemes there is a
tradeoff between operational voltage and output
impedance.
III. BULK DRIVEN MOSFETs
In a standard MOSFET operation the drain
current is controlled by the applied gate voltage,
so they are called gate driven. In this technique
of bulk driven MOSFETs the drain current is
modulated by the bulk voltage instead of gate
voltage. In a standard Gate driven MOS due to
modulation through gate voltage it is necessary
to have the magnitude of input voltage which is
to be applied at gate to be more than the
magnitude of threshold voltage so that inversion
of layer under gate is ensured for flow of charge
carriers through channel. This limitation on
minimum magnitude of input voltage is not
required in bulk driven technique. Hence low
voltage input signal can be used to drive the
circuit. For a typical Bulk driven MOSFET only
0.1 V is sufficient at input and it will provide the
same drain to source voltage as in case of
standard gate driven operation.
Due to fixed gate bias voltage there exist a
constant width channel and the bulk terminal
controls the channel width according to input
voltage, or we can say that it is acting as virtual
gate terminal but there is no limitation of
threshold voltage. For bulk driven operation it is
necessary that MOSFET is fabricated in a
separate well. [6-8].
Figure 3 : Cross section of P-MOS in n-well
Figure 3 shows a cross section of the p type
MOSFET fabricated in n-well. A sufficient
voltage needs to be applied at the gate terminal
to form the channel under gate area. In gate
driven MOS thickness of the channel is
controlled by setting up the appropriate level of
gate voltage. In bulk driven mode of operation
thickness of the channel is controlled by the bulk
potential. On varying the bulk to source
potential the bias voltage between the bulk (n-
type) and source (p-type) varies that modulate
the depletion region width of source-bulk p-n
junction. By modulation of depletion region
width, the channel width can also be modulated.
When bulk is at higher potential then source the
source bulk junction is reverse biased. On
making this potential difference VBS small the
depletion region width starts decreasing that will
decrease the drain current. The bulk to source
junction is kept under weakly forward biased
region very small amount of current flows
through this junction and almost the whole
current flows through channel. Typical current
flow in the bulk source junction is in the range
of pA for |VBS| ≤ 0.3 Volt and it is of no
significance compared to drain current.
Thus, in bulk driven operation MOS is kept in
strong inversion and source bulk junction is
weakly forward biased. Then by varying source
bulk potential drain current is controlled. The
drain current in N type MOSFET is given by
(
) ( )
(
)
VT is the threshold voltage which varies with
source to bulk potential as follows
(√ √ )
Since in bulk driven mode of operation gate to
source voltage is fixed and bulk to source
potential is varied so the equation (4) can be re
written as, it gives the drain current expression
in the saturation mode in bulk driven mode of
operation.
(
) ( √ √ )
From the equation (6) the small signal trans-
conductance is given by
√
Where gm is the small signal trans-conductance
for standard gate driven MOSFET. For the N
type MOSFET source is of n type and bulk is of
p type. In Bulk driven mode of operation the
bulk source junction is kept in weakly forward
bias region so VBS is Positive. This causes the
denominator in the equation (7) to decrease
thereby increasing the trans-conductance (gmb).
Figure 4 Simple Bulk Driven Current Mirror [6]
Figure 8 shows a current mirror circuit using
MOSFETs operated in the bulk driven mode of
operation. The gates of both the MOSFETs are
connected to VDD to ensure the formation of
inversion layer under gate area. Gate to source
voltage for both the MOSFETs is same. Bulk
and drain of M1 are connected so VDS1 and VBS1
are same, this ensures that M1 is always
operated in the linear region. The bulk of both
M1 and M2 are connected together and so the
source, hence, VBS1 and VBS2 are also same. The
drain voltage of M2 is maintained such that it
remains in the saturation region. For M1
operating in the linear region, if channel length
modulation effect is not considered, the Iin
current is given by
(
) (( ) )
From this equation
( )
( )
Gate to source voltage of both M1 and M2 are
same and M2 is operating in saturation region so
current through M2 is given by
(
)(
( )
)
The input impedance of bulk driven MOSFET is
given by [6-8].
√
IV. SELF CASCODE MOSFETs
In a conventional current mirror structure to
maintain both the MOSFETs in saturation region
the output compliance voltage required is given
by
√
So in order to maintain the MOS in saturation
the compliance voltage required has an
additional term Vth, which is a significant term
in magnitude. To increase the output impedance
cascode structures are used, but using a cascode
structure further degrades the compliance
voltage. So in low voltage applications it is
difficult to use conventional cascode structures.
Also as the scaling in MOSFETs is increasing,
the output impedance also decreasing for short
channel MOSFETs. Since short channel
MOSFETs cannot provide high output
impedance, and so cannot provide high gain
structures. Cascode structures are used to
overcome these limitations but they reduce the
available output swing as well as requires more
power.
Figure 5 cascode MOS structure [6]
In a conventional Cascode structure as shown in
figure 5 two MOSFETs are operated in the
saturation region. The fundamental limitation is
to have the magnitude of gate to source voltage
to be more than the magnitude of threshold
voltage. This limitation ensures that MOSFETs
are biased in strong inversion region. If an
another structure is used in which the devices
are operated in weak inversion region then this
fundamental limitation of having magnitude of
gate to source voltage more than magnitude of
threshold voltage can be relaxed as in weak
inversion gate to source voltage is kept lower
than threshold voltage.
In the figure 6 two MOSFETs are connected in
cascode fashion with their gate connected to
same potential. If these two MOSFETs are in
strong inversion region then at a time only one
of the MOS will be in saturation region while
the other one will be in linear region. This does
not provide any advantage in the output
impedance as it remain same as in case of a
single MOSFET. Instead of biasing both the
MOSFET in the strong inversion region if M2 is
biased in weak inversion region, this structure
itself provides high output impedance.
Figure 6 Self Cascode Structure [9]
For MOSFETs biased in weak inversion region
the drain to source voltage required to keep it in
saturation is only larger than Thermal voltage
(VT), which is 26 mV at room temp. This
structure is very much similar to conventional
cascode structure but here M2 does not require
an additional biasing voltage. Gates of M2 and
M1 are connected to one single voltage. The
circuit is self cascode structure when M2 is in
weak inversion region and M1 is in weak or
moderate inversion region.
When both M1 and M2 are biased in saturation
the circuit operates similar to the conventional
Cascode structure and provides a scaling factor
of gmro to output impedance. To ensure that both
the MOSFETs are operating in the saturation
region proper scaling is expected. For M1 it is
biased in the sub threshold region and to keep
M2 in the weak inversion region the gate to
source voltage drop across M2 should be as
small as possible, this is done by enhancing the
aspect ratio of M2 by a factor m. This factor m
is the main design parameter in self cascode
MOSFET structures.
Figure 6 also shows the equivalent N type
MOSFET for self cascode N-type MOSFET
structure. The effective trans-conductance of the
structure is given by
Equivalent MOSFET will work in saturation
region when M1 is operating in linear region and
M2 is operating in the saturation region. Current
through M1 and M2 is given by
(
) ( )
(
) ( )
Since Both MOSFETs are connected in cascode
fashion so I1 and I2 are same. On comparing
equation (15) and (16):
(
)
Where
and
The equation () can be approximated as
(
)
Which is equivalent to a single MOSFET current
equation operating in saturation region. Also,
M1 is always operated in the linear region so the
drain to source voltage drop across M1 is small.
The length of the equivalent MOSFET increases
that gives a long channel MOSFET from the
composite of two short channel MOSFETs and
this equivalent long channel helps in increasing
the output impedance. Thus Self cascode
structures provides high output impedance
without lowering the output voltage swing in
comparison to typical cascode structures. [9-11]
Figure 7 shows a simple current mirror using
self cascode MOSFET which is operable at low
voltage and there is no need of extra burden in
the fabrication. The circuit works in a similar
fashion to simple current mirror as the input
current is replicated as the load current. The pair
M2 and M3 is connected in self cascode fashion
and thus provide high output impedance and
high output swing.
Figure 7: Self Cascode Current Mirror [9]
The gates of M2 and M3 which are connected
together are connected to supply voltage VDD.
The aspect ratio of M2 is similar to M1 whereas
aspect ratio of M3 is m time aspect ratio of M1
and M2. Gate and drain of M1 are connected to
ensure that it is always in saturation mode. As
the gate and drain of M1 are connected so
voltage at the drain of M1 will be Vt1 + Von1 and
the same voltage is applied to gate of M3. In
order to keep the composite self cascode
structure in the saturation region the minimum
voltage required at the drain of M3 will be Vt1 +
Von1 -Vt3. Since aspect ratio of M3 is high
compared to M1 and M2, or in other way
channel length of M3 is smaller than channel
length of M1 and M2. The smaller length of M3
lowers the Von voltage required to keep the
MOSFET in saturation that in turn lowers the
saturation voltage. Thus the available swing at
the output increases. So here we are able to get
better output swing at lower bias voltage without
any compromise over output impedance. Further
improvements over the output impedance can be
made by using the self cascode structure in
improvised current mirror circuits as discussed
in section I. Thus this technique provides
substantial improvements in current mirror to be
used for low voltage and low power
applications.
V.SUB THRESHOLD CIRCUIT
In sub-threshold region which is also known as
weak inversion region the gate to source bias
voltage is below threshold voltage. This region
of operation has become important as the
magnitude if input voltage required to operate
MOS in this region is only few tenths of volt. In
conventional operation Of MOSFET where gate
to source voltage is always kept above threshold
voltage the drain to source current is always a
strong function of gate to source bias voltage.
Similarly in case of sub threshold region of
operation where gate to source voltage is kept
below threshold voltage the drain to source
current varies exponentially with the gate to
source bias voltage. In digital circuit it may be
assumed the no current flows in this region but
in case of analog circuits this region is an
efficient operating region because in this region
also there is a finite current flowing in the
channel even of very small magnitude which is
given by
(
) (
)
(
)
Where parameters K’ (µnCox), W, L, n, K, T, q,
VTN are trans-conductance parameter, channel
width, channel length, sub-threshold factor,
Boltzmann constant, temperature, electronic
charge, and, threshold voltage of NMOSFET
respectively.[2] The trans-conductance
efficiency (gm/ID) is high in this region as
compared to in strong inversion that will help in
power consumption. The saturation voltage in
this region of operation is also low that helps in
providing additional voltage swing at the
output.[2]
A typical current mirror circuit can use this
technique with inclusion of the fact that all the
MOSFETs are operating in the sub threshold
region. This relaxes the limit on input voltage
magnitude as well as on the output swing. The
input compliance in the circuit can be further
improved by using various current mirror circuit
improvisation techniques such as level
Shifter.[6]
There are also limitations on the MOSFETs
operating in the sub threshold region in the sense
that unity current gain cutoff frequency (fT) is
not good. This causes limitation on MOSFETs
to be operated in the high frequency circuits. But
this limitation can be mitigated as with the
current technology standards and fabrication
improvisations modern CMOS devices have
achieved values of fT up to 100 GHz which is a
range suitable enough for most of the
applications.[12]
VI. CONCLUSION
Three promising schemes for low voltage
application were discussed. Each one of them
certain advantages and disadvantages. Due to
Depletion Mode operation in Bulk Driven Mode,
larger range for input voltage is there but that
comes at an additional cost of extra fabrication
processing steps for depletion MOSFET. Sub
threshold Scheme provide better trans-
conductance efficiency which is not available in
bulk driven scheme. Transitional frequency
issues are there in the sub threshold scheme
which is not issue in Self cascode approach.
Depending on the particular type of application
designer may incorporate any scheme or a
combination of these schemes. A typical
approach is followed for low voltage circuit is
that the whole design in decomposed in smaller
sub systems and each sub systems is designed
using any of the low voltage scheme. Various
modifications may be made to the theoretical
explanation of operation of these schemes. As
the low voltage applications are increasing the
designers are also working in towards better
implementation of these schemes in the practical
circuits.
VII. REFERNECES
1. Shouli YAN and Edgar SANCHEZ-
SINENCIO. “Low Voltage Analog Circuit
Design Techniques: A Tutorial”, IEICE
Trans. Analog Integrated Circuits and
Systems, Vol. E00-A, No.2 February 2000.
2. S. S. Rajput and S. S. Jamuar, “Design
Techniques For Low Voltage Analog Circuit
Structures”,NSM-2001/IEEE, Malaysia,
Nov. 2000
3. S.S. Jamuar and S.S. Rajput, “Low-voltage
Current-mode Anlog Circuit structures and
their applications”.
4. E. Sánchez-Sinencio and A. G. Andreou,
Ed. Low-Voltage/Low-Power Integrated
Circuits and Systems, IEEE Press, 1999.
5. Behzad Razavi, Design of Analog CMOS
integrated Circuits: Tata McGraw Hill
Edition, 2002.
6. P. E. Allen, B. J. Blalock, and G, A. Rincon,
"A 1 V CMOS Op Amp Using Bulk-Driven
MOSFETs," Proc. ISSCC, 1995
7. Naresh Lakkamraju, Ashis Kumar Mal. “A
low voltage High output impedance Bulk
Driven Regulated Cascode Current Mirror”,
978-1-4244-8679-3/11/$26.00 ©2011 IEEE
8. Li Yani, Yang Yintang, Zhu Zhangming, ”
A Novel Low-voltage Low-power Bulk
Driven Cascade Current Mirror” , 978-1-
4244-6542-2/$26.00 © 2010 IEEE
9. M.T.Sanz, S.Celma, B.Calvo and D.
Flandre:’ Self-cascode SOI versus graded-
channel SOI MOS transistors’, IEE Proc.-
Circuits Devices Syst., Vol. 153, No. 5,
October 2006
10. Ichiro Fujimori, Sagamihara Japan, “Low
Voltage Self Cascode Current Mirror ” ,
United States Patent No. 5,966,005
11. Bedabrata Pain, Robert C. Schober, and Eric
R. Fossum. “A Self-Cascoding CMOS
Circuit for Low-Power Applications”.
12. Syed Kamrul Islam and Mohammad Rafiqul
Haider.,sensors and Low power Signal
Processing, ISBN-13: 978-0387793917