TECHNICAL PROPOSAL PACKET SP-21-0034

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL PACKET

SP-21-0034

Technical Proposal Packet Solicitation No. SP-21-0034

PROPOSAL SIGNATURE PAGE

Type or Print the following information.

PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR’S INFORMATION

Company: Caliper Corporation

Address: 1172 Beacon Street

City: Newton State: MA Zip Code: 02461

Business Designation:

☐ Individual ☐ Sole Proprietorship ☐ Public Service Corp

☐ Partnership ☒ Corporation ☐ Nonprofit

Minority and Women-Owned Designation*:

☒ Not Applicable ☐ American Indian ☐ Service Disabled Veteran

☐ African American ☐ Hispanic American ☐ Women-Owned

☐ Asian American ☐ Pacific Islander American

AR Certification #: ________________ * See Minority and Women-Owned Business Policy

PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR CONTACT INFORMATION Provide contact information to be used for RFP solicitation related matters and Project Lead for Interview.

Contact Person: Stewart Berry Title: VP

Phone: 617 431 4211 Alternate Phone: 617 527 4700

Email: [email protected]

CONFIRMATION OF REDACTED COPY

☒ YES, a redacted copy of submission documents is enclosed.

☐ NO, a redacted copy of submission documents is not enclosed. I understand a full copy of non-redacted submission documents will be released if requested.

Note: If a redacted copy of the submission documents is not provided with Prospective Contractor’s response packet, and neither box is checked, a copy of the non-redacted documents, with the exception of financial data (other than pricing), will be released in response to any request made under the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). See RFP Solicitation for additional information.

ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT CONFIRMATION

By signing and submitting a response to this RFP Solicitation, Prospective Contractor agrees and certifies that they do not employ or contract with illegal immigrants and shall not employ or contract with illegal immigrants during the term of a contract awarded as a result of this RFP.

ISRAEL BOYCOTT RESTRICTION CONFIRMATION

By checking the box below, Prospective Contractor agrees and certifies that they do not boycott Israel and shall not boycott Israel during the term of a contract awarded as a result of this RFP.

☒ Prospective Contractor does not and shall not boycott Israel.

An official authorized to bind the Prospective Contractor to a resultant contract shall sign below.

The signature below signifies agreement that any exception that conflicts with a Requirement of this RFP Solicitation may cause the Prospective Contractor’s proposal to be rejected.

Authorized Signature: Title: VP Use Ink Only.

Printed/Typed Name: STEWART BERRY Date: 11/30/2020


SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST

Per the solicitation, the following items must be submitted with the Prospective Contractor’s proposal:

� Proposal Signature Page

� Proposed Subcontractors Form

� Information for Evaluation

o Experience (2 pages or less)

o Solution (2 pages or less)

o Risk (2 pages or less)

o Value Added (2 pages or less)

� Exceptions Form, if applicable

� Official Solicitation Price Sheet

It is strongly recommended that the following items are also included with the Prospective Contractor’s proposal:

� EO 98-04: Contract and Grant Disclosure Form

� Copy of Prospective Contractor’s Equal Opportunity Policy

� Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT), if applicable

� Signed addenda, if applicable


PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS FORM

• Do not include additional information relating to subcontractors on this form or as an attachment to this form.

o Prospective Contractor shall complete and submit the Proposed Subcontractors Form included in the Technical Proposal Packet.

o Additional subcontractor information may be required or requested in following sections of this RFP Solicitation or in the Information for Evaluation section provided in the Technical Proposal Packet. Do not attach any additional information to the Proposed Subcontractors Form.

o The utilization of any proposed subcontractor is subject to approval by the State agency.

PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR PROPOSES TO USE THE FOLLOWING SUBCONTRACTOR(S)

TO PROVIDE SERVICES.

Type or Print the following information

Subcontractor’s Company Name Street Address City, State, ZIP

NA

☒☒☒☒ PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT PROPOSE TO USE

SUBCONTRACTORS TO PERFORM SERVICES.


INFORMATION FOR EVALUATION – EXPERIENCE Level of Experience:

Significant experience providing a common redistricting platform and data that State GIS Offices can host and operate and that can be shared and used by all redistricting process authorities.

Documented Performance:

The solution first shipped in 1997. Our clients have used the software to create thousands of redistricting plans. Today, 35+ states and many local governments, public interest groups, research facilities, political organizations, and the Department of Justice are using the latest version of the solution for a range of activities including importing and analyzing existing plans, tracking changes in demographics, creating maps with the latest political data, building redistricting plans using estimated data, and preparing staff for the upcoming redistricting cycle. We provide software, data, training, and support services to these clients throughout the redistricting cycle.

Level of Experience: Significant experience providing a redistricting platform that leverages the existing information technology stack already hosted by State GIS Offices and which facilitates interoperability and transparency.

Documented Performance: We currently have 20+ similar multi-environment deployments, at the State level.

Level of Experience: Significant experience providing cloud solutions that deploy a similar stack to that of State GIS Offices so that the redistricting solution can run on a dedicated instance.

Documented Performance: We have provided over 25+ such cloud deployments over the last 2 years, at the local city, school district, and State level, with experience in such deployments since 2009.

Level of Experience:

Significant experience providing a redistricting platform that supports sharing and evaluation of redistricting plans at state and local levels, where adopted plans are shared, used, and published within State GIS Office platforms, and supported in formats that can be published by the State GIS Team in the next redistricting cycle.

Documented Performance: In addition to our online sharing solution, we support over 50 file types and more than 100 GIS and CAD formats (including Esri) ensuring data retention and transferability.

Level of Experience: Significant experience providing a redistricting platform that supports the redistricting of Congressional, House, Senate, Justice of Peace, County Election Commission, city municipal ward, and School Board Zone districts.

Documented Performance: The solution is used by most entities performing redistricting in the USA. The solution has been adopted by 29 States so far for the 2020 redistricting cycle.


Significant experience providing a Redistricting Solution that is self-hosted on a virtual machine(s)/appliance(s) and/or hosted in Amazon Web Services (AWS) Cloud. Or, as a virtual machine(s)/appliance(s) hosted on-premise utilizing typical virtualization technology standards. As well as solutions that are delivered solely as a SaaS, as well as in development, testing, and production environments.


We have 40+ GIS installations in the EC2 environment. We have 40+ GIS installations in virtualized environments such as Citrix XenApp. We have provided over 25+ cloud deployments over the last 2 years, along with development and testing environments.

Level of Experience: Significant experience providing Redistricting Solution training of State GIS Office project teams, end-users, and technology personnel.

Documented Performance: We have conducted over 100 training sessions with State redistricters and GIS offices. With an average rating of Excellent on a scale of Excellent-Average-Poor.

Level of Experience: Significant experience providing a Redistricting Solution for projects of similar scope

Documented Performance: We currently have 20+ similar multi-environment deployments, at the State level.


Level of Experience: Significant experience providing a Redistricting Solution that includes an identity management system, where all servers and data associated reside in the continental United States, with all work on the Solution being performed from within the USA.

Documented Performance: We are one of the few wholly US owned and operated GIS vendors. The solution supports permission-based plan access, while the online solution requires user logins.

Level of Experience: Significant experience providing a Redistricting Solution where we provide all maintenance necessary on the proposed Solution.

Documented Performance: We have directly provided maintenance for the solution for the previous 2 redistricting cycles for most organizations involved in the redistricting process.

Level of Experience: Significant experience providing a Redistricting Solution that adheres to performance standard deliverables and measures/outcomes.


We have responded to and satisfied the requirements of many tens of state level RFPs that required deployment of a redistricting solution. Also, we have adhered to the strict data standards required when processing redistricting data such as population adjustments for prisoner, student, and military populations for 3+ states.


Significant experience providing a Redistricting Solution that reads/imports Census Bureau TIGER/Line files for polygon, line, and point geography layers, and the full PL94-171 data matrix Census File. We then used these to generate the population attribute data necessary to satisfy Department of Justice requirements under the Voting Rights Act of 1965. And matched them to the geography hierarchy used for redistricting state, city, county, house, senate, precinct, place, and school districts, using counties, tracts, and blocks, and supporting this hierarchy in both map and tabular data, using the common geographic area identifiers as the link between the 2. It is easy to manage the population data linked to the polygon layers creating a seamless map with a hierarchy.


We have processed, & integrated the platform with, the PL94-171 and TIGER data for several thousand counties and states over 20 years. Our solution was adopted by the Census Bureau for the national collection of PL94-171 in the 2010 redistricting cycle.

Level of Experience: Significant experience providing Redistricting Solution user and technical support with emergency support.

Documented Performance: Critical and urgent issues are prioritized and resolved as quickly as possible. Typically, critical issues would be addressed within 1 to 2 hours of any request.

Level of Experience: Significant experience providing Redistricting Solution ad hoc reports.

Documented Performance: The solution includes 50+ on-the-fly reports. The reports have been widely used in court and public proceedings, and widely cited in litigation.


Significant experience providing a Redistricting Solution that is functional for 10+ years and that recovers plans for legal or court action, for court proceedings that involved the solution output during the decadal redistricting cycle.


The solution is the gold standard for legal reliability. For example, 2+ Special Masters utilized our solution over the last 10 years. Importing plans from previous redistricting cycles is common.


Significant experience providing a Redistricting Solution in a multi-user environment, deployed on a local area network within a wide area network on a server or accessible through web-based applications or clients that allow access to cloud-based data for 15 remote users. And that can construct and manage multiple redistricting plans of 100+ House and 35+ Senate districts using a seamless statewide map. And that has cartographic map features for printing and publication, being compatible with standard hardware and OS (Dell PCs & MS Windows).


We currently have 20+ similar multi-environment deployments, at the State level.


INFORMATION FOR EVALUATION – SOLUTION Windows Solution

The solution can be installed in any Windows-based environment

or stack whether local, on a server, virtualized, or in an Amazon

EC2 (AWS) instance. The solution is a comprehensive package

for creating, evaluating, and disseminating political redistricting

plans, battle-tested through 2 decades of use. It is easy-to-use

without any GIS experience. It has been tailored to the needs of

political redistricting and its participants and is used by most state

legislatures, redistricting consultants, advocacy groups, both

political parties, and court-appointed expert witnesses. The

solution uses interactive tools for district creation and numerous

measures for plan evaluation. Over 35 reports describing the

districts and their scores come standard with the product. It

interoperates with Microsoft Office and all popular GIS and

database software. The solution includes the latest Census

redistricting geography and Public Law 94-171 (P.L. 94-171) data ready-to-use to begin building plans and can read the

PL94-171 data. Election data can be integrated easily to allow for additional analysis using partisan competitiveness

reports. Redistricting plans can be imported, exported, and shared in numerous formats, with native support for spatial

extract, transform, and load (spatial ETL) operations for Esri formats. The solution also includes a library with APIs to

automate tasks. The solution adheres to all standard Windows conventions, includes context-sensitive help, and comes

with detailed manuals for redistricting and GIS, video tutorials, and an online learning portal. The solution and the online

solution have the capability to use census data and geography, and election data to accurately perform redistricting in

conformity with statutory and constitutional criteria within the timelines specified for each state and jurisdiction.

Online Sharing

The online solution displays interactive maps and reports on the Internet and integrates with the solution for easy plan

sharing, collaboration, and analysis. Multiple users are served in a secure environment that can be accessed using a

desktop, laptop, or tablet via current versions of most browsers. There are different deployment types. For example, you

may have an internal site for Legislators and another public-facing site for constituents. It is highly customizable and can

be implemented as a full featured public plan creation tool, as a simple plan review and commenting tool, or anywhere in

between. Plans submitted by users can be opened and analyzed using the advanced analysis tools in the solution. Plans

created with the online tool remain private in a user’s account until the user submits the plan for review. The plan is then

made available to the system administrator. The user controls what plans are shared publicly and when they are shared.

Online users can run reports on submitted plans and conduct other plan analysis to evaluate fit and fitness.

Capacity to Document and Communicate Redistricting Maps and Changes

The solution tracks the edits made within a plan by optionally recording user notes when a plan is closed. The software

contains a suite of tools that identify geographic and tabular differences between plans, and has identity management.

Capacity for Data Import, Export, and Integration

Census Data

The solution includes an enormous amount of data, including all of the layers from the Census TIGER files from the state

boundary down to Census blocks with all layers in between, such as counties, tracts, block groups, VTDs, state legislative

districts, congressional districts, school districts, water areas, etc. We attach the attributes from the P.L. 94-171

population, race, ethnicity, and voting age data to the geographic layers and include special calculations such as the

Department of Justice definitions of white, black, Asian, etc., along with additional tabulations such as number of persons

reporting that they are of multiple race. The solution also includes a streets file with address information, landmarks, water

features, and ZIP codes. Since we provide all these data layers pre-built, the user can begin using the data with the

solution immediately. The solution creates geographic and tabular hierarchies that satisfy DOJ requirements.

Election Data

The solution contains tools that facilitate the disaggregation of electoral data to Census blocks and its aggregation to

higher levels of geography. The Disaggregation/Aggregation Wizard is a standard tool in the solution. The wizard accepts


a GIS data file or a table and apportions data to standard geographic areas using a single procedure. The wizard can be

used with numerous data sets as often as required by the Legislature.

Delivery of Census Data

We are committed to delivering Census geography with associated Census demographics from P.L. 94-171 within 48

hours of the official delivery of data by the U.S. Census Bureau to official State data designees. We are designated as an

official recipient of P.L. 94-171 data, which permits direct delivery of official data to us for processing and integration with

Census geography. Data will be delivered electronically to the State for direct use within the solution.

Integration with other Systems

The solution outputs to most common Windows file types including Esri Shapefile and geodatabase, Microsoft Word and

Excel and Access and SQL Server, dBase/FoxPro/X-base, HTML, delimited text, Adobe PDF, and many more.

Flexible and Highly Customizable

Both the solution and the online solution are flexible and highly customizable. Many standard reports are included with the

products. These reports can be customized and tailored to meet the needs of the user.

Reports

The solution includes a vast array of reports with percentages for population and ethnicity, 10 scientifically recognized

measures of compactness including the Perimeter measure. Any demographics, including those that are added by the

user such as election or political data, can be included in reports. Several reports include the ability to calculate the

population share of a district for each city and county within the district. The solution includes an integrated tool that

facilitates report customization. Reports can be printed on any local or network printer in both color and black-and-white.

Support Services We provide well-staffed and timely support. The solution is the only software with a highly skilled and dedicated technical

support team who are available to provide real-time assistance. We are available throughout the redistricting process

when you need us. The purchase price of the software includes one year of annual maintenance and startup technical

support. We provide extended technical support by email, telephone, or GoToMeeting. Standard support hours are

Monday through Friday between 8:30 am Eastern time and 6:00 pm Eastern time. Extended 24/7 technical support by

phone or email is available beyond standard support hours at a higher rate. However, based on our experience over the

past decade, we do not believe that this type of support will be necessary. User Manuals provide step-by-step instructions

for all features of the software. There is extensive context-sensitive help. Finally, following the typical 3-day onboarding

training class, the users should be self-sufficient and comfortable with the software. Our employees have extensive

knowledge of software programming, data management and analysis, and issues related to the redistricting process. All

technical inquiries are kept confidential. Any data exchanged for review are used only for purposes of solving technical

problems. Data are not shared outside of the technical inquiry.

Legally Defensible Plans In addition to the broad array of metrics and reports mentioned above, the solution includes unique tools that will be

critical to creating legally defensible plans in the upcoming redistricting cycle. The solution is the only software that is

designed to evaluate travel contiguity, a measure of how possible it is to travel to all parts of a district without ever leaving

it. The solution also includes tools that go beyond trying to evaluate what a “good” redistricting plan is, instead exploring

the range of possible redistricting plans for the given state. This “ensemble” of redistricting plans can serve as a baseline

to measure a proposed or enacted plan against. Ensemble analysis has been applied in this manner to analyze partisan

and racial gerrymandering cases, both by expert witnesses and independent researchers. The technique can also be

useful during the map drawing process, where the ensemble of plans can illuminate possible different decisions that a

map drawer can make.

Demonstrated Reliability The solution has been the leading provider of redistricting software since 1997. Our clients used the software to create

thousands of redistricting plans. Today, over 35 states and numerous local governments, public interest groups, research

facilities, and political organizations, and the Department of Justice are using the latest version of the solution for a wide

range of activities including importing and analyzing existing plans, tracking changes in demographics, creating maps with

the latest political data, building redistricting plans using estimated data, and preparing staff for the upcoming redistricting

cycle. We provide software, data, training, and support services to these clients throughout the redistricting cycle.


INFORMATION FOR EVALUATION – RISK Risk Description: Customer does not understand how to use the redistricting solution.

Solution: A 24-hour self-service online learning portal with searchable questions and answers, videos,

and tutorials.

Documented

Performance:

This risk mitigation has been available for the past 3 years and has decreased support

interactions by over 35%.

Risk Description: Software solution vulnerability.

Solution:

The Windows software solution can be used in your own secured environment. When combined

with adequate backup, there is no risk of data loss. Password protection can be optionally

provided for various installations and as far as we are aware the software offers no backdoors

that would compromise a secure environment. The solution requires an authenticated Windows

domain user and relies on the Windows account security settings and the Windows firewall set

by the domain administrators.

In the online solution, users can access their redistricting plans only via a secure (HTTPS) web

application after they authenticate with username and password. Multi-factor authentication and

token-based authentication via the Auth0 web service can be provided as a customization.

Registered users do not have direct access to any of the data on the server file system, except

via the secure web application.

Documented

Performance: We have zero reports of data breaches because of software flaws or insecurities.

Risk Description: Support – Disaster Recovery

Solution: The solution creates a plan backup each time a plan is closed. Additional backup measures are

supported so that nearly no time at all would be required to recover the data.

Documented

Performance: No reports of catastrophic data loss.

Risk Description: State personnel do not attend training sessions regarding the use of the solution

Solution: We will assign full-time personnel to continually reach out to State personnel regarding training

sessions. We also have an online learning portal to assist personnel.

Documented

Performance:

We have implemented this strategy over the last 2 decades. We have conducted over 100

training sessions with State redistricters and GIS offices. With an average rating of Excellent on

a scale of Excellent-Average-Poor.


INFORMATION FOR EVALUATION – VALUE ADD

Item Claim:

Travel contiguity measure: The solution is the only software that contains tools

designed to evaluate travel contiguity. Contiguity is “usually measured by whether it is

possible to travel to all parts of a district without ever leaving it.”

How will this add value? Assists in creating legally defensible districts.

Documented Performance: “Chapter 4, Redistricting Principles and Criteria.” Redistricting Law 2020, National

Conference of State Legislatures, 2019, p. 77.

Cost Impact (%): NA Schedule Impact (%): NA

Item Claim:

Adaptability: The solution’s extensive GIS capabilities make it well-suited for future

legislative staff applications. Legislative staff in many states use the solution

throughout the decade for mapping and analysis needs that go beyond redistricting.

The software contains tools for unlimited geocoding and analytics without additional

fees, such as spatial analysis, routing, and more, that reveal trends that may help

guide legislative decision-making.

How will this add value? Free offline tools save money over credit and usage-based systems.

Documented Performance: $0 per PDF report vs industry costs of $2 per PDF report. $0 per geocode vs industry

costs of $0.01 per geocode.


Item Claim:

Ensemble analysis: Simulates the range of possible redistricting plans for a state. The

emphasis on diversity over optimization is what distinguishes this technique from

previous applications of math to redistricting. This ensemble of plans can then serve

as a baseline to measure a proposed or enacted plan against. Ensemble analysis has

been applied in this manner to analyze partisan and racial gerrymandering cases, both

by expert witnesses and independent researchers. The technique can also be useful

during the map drawing process, where the ensemble of plans can illuminate possible

different decisions that a map drawer can make.

How will this add value? Assists in creating legally defensible districts.

Documented Performance: Charles, G., DeFord, D., M. Duchin et al. Amicus Brief of Mathematicians, Law

Professors, and Students, Rucho v. Common Cause, Supreme Court, 2019.


Item Claim:

Automated assistant: The solution includes an automated assistant designed to create

balanced, compact districts for part of a redistricting plan or the entire plan. The

assistant can use any layer in the user’s hierarchy. Starting points for each district can

be the geographic center of existing districts, features from any area layer (or a subset

of features), or user-supplied point locations. Districts created with the assistant can

be used as-is or can be refined by the user to achieve an ideal redistricting plan.

How will this add value?

Assists in creating legally defensible districts. Allows rapid creation of compact districts

centered around existing districts, communities of interest, or incumbents’ residential

locations. Decreases training costs, human error/bias, and time spent redistricting.

Documented Performance: NA


Item Claim: High speed performance



The solution and the online solution have been optimized to provide high speed

performance. For over 2 decades the software has been advanced and improved in

response to user input and through significant research and development.

Documented Performance: 5-Star verified reviews on G2.com noting the speed benefits of the solution over

competitor products.


Item Claim:

Built-in and native data and file format translations, interoperability, and

transformations (i.e., spatial extract, transform, load or “spatial ETL”). File format

support, import, and export, is extensive and includes that for Esri Shapefiles,

Personal and File Geodatabases, Feature Classes, ArcSDE File Geodatabases.

How will this add value? No third-party plugins are required to support common data formats.

Documented Performance: $0 cost verses competitor requirements for subscription and/or credit usage.


Item Claim:

The solution requires little infrastructure other than a Windows device. This supports

privacy based on your existing local network security without uploading any data to the

Cloud and can be run completely offline, even without an Internet connection. Little

effort is required to configure the solution. It comes with data that automatically

installs. Detailed installation instructions are provided. Technical support is available

gratis to assist with any installation problems.

How will this add value? Reduces infrastructure, implementation, and security costs.

Documented Performance: Demonstrably lower costs than competitor solutions.


Item Claim:

User interface is designed explicitly for political redistricting based on decades of input

from legislatures, nationwide. It is designed to be easy-to-use without GIS experience,

making it easy to begin creating and editing plans right away.

How will this add value? Reduces training time and costs.

Documented Performance: In upper right of top tier quadrant for GIS Software, with 8.9 out of 10 for “Meets

Requirements”, and 8.0 out of 10 for “Ease of Use”. Source G2.com.


Item Claim: Does not suffer from application stability as a niche redistricting product


The solution is integrated with a widely used GIS platform, which is a full-featured

mapping and GIS software used by tens of thousands of users. Despite the decadal

nature of redistricting, the solution has therefore been stress tested in many different

environments and scenarios and provides a reliable and stable platform.

Documented Performance: A global user-base in the tens of thousands.


Item Claim:

1 instance for 20 viewers of an online redistricting plan sharing app, that includes

custom views of geography, redistricting statistics, reports & other redistricting specific

information that is web enabled

How will this add value? Enables sharing of plans with stakeholders, fostering transparency and dialog

Documented Performance: Successfully deployed in Maryland, NY City, Fairfax County VA, & across California.

Cost Impact (%): 25% Schedule Impact (%): NA


EXCEPTIONS FORM

Prospective Contractor shall document all exceptions related to requirements in the RFP Solicitation and terms in the

“Standard Commodities Contract or the Standard Services Contract” and “Solicitation Terms and Conditions” located on

the OSP website. See Section 1.9 and 1.10 of the RFP Solicitation.

ITEM #

REFERENCE (SECTION,

PAGE, PARAGRAPH)

DESCRIPTION PROPOSED LANGUAGE

1. P.8, 2.11.A. At minimum, this must include 24/7 emergency support.

At minimum, 24/7 emergency support must be provided outside of normal working hours at an hourly billable rate as specified in Table 2 of the Official Solicitation Price Sheet.

2. P.8, 2.11.B. The Prospective Contractor shall provide all the necessary licenses required to support the Solution, including, but not limited to, Server Operating System, Database System, Web Server, and Remote Administration for support and maintenance. The cost for these licenses must be included in Table 2 of the Official Solicitation Price Sheet.

The Prospective Contractor can be requested to provide all the necessary licenses required to support the Solution, if any. These could include, but not limited to, Server Operating System, Database System, Web Server, and Remote Administration for support and maintenance. These costs will be passed onto the State of Arkansas, +10% general administrative expenses. If anything beyond a Windows OS is required to support the Solution, the cost for these licenses must be included in Table 2 of the Official Solicitation Price Sheet.

3. P.8, 2.8.B. The Contractor shall be available to participate in any court proceedings that involve the products of this system and deemed necessary by GIS for the duration of the decade.

The Contractor shall be available at the hourly billable support rate to participate in any court proceedings that involve the products of this system and deemed necessary by GIS for the duration of the decade.

Official Solicitation Price Sheet

RFP# SP-21-0034

Redistricting Software Solution

Table 1

Total

One Time Cost

Table 2--State Hosted

Annual Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Total

Licensing 75,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$

Maintenance** 5,625$ 5,625$ 5,625$ 5,625$ 5,625$ 5,625$ 33,750$

Hosting -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

User & Technical

Support** 5,625$ 5,625$ 5,625$ 5,625$ 5,625$ 5,625$ 5,625$ 39,375$

Total 148,125.00$

**Listed separately but are a single charge per license. Support outside business hours at $400 p/hour.

Table 3

Total

One Time Cost

Table 4

Table 5-Contractor Hosted(optional-not used in low-cost determination)

Annual Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Total

Licensing -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Maintenance -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Hosting -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

User & Technical

Support -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total -$ *Provide the annual cost for licensing, maintenance, and user & technical support.

Prospective Contractor Name: Caliper Corporation

Fields highlighted in yellow shall be used in calculating low price determination. Prospective Contractors shall not alter the Official

Bid Price Sheet.

12,000.00$

*Provide the total, one time cost (including travel expenses) for all implemenation activities necessary to fully implement the

solution. The cost proposed will be an all-inclusive cost in order for the Contractor to successfully complete all implementation

activities in order for the system to Go-Live.

*Provide the annual cost for licensing, maintenance, and user & technical support.

*Provide the total, one time cost for completing all training activities.

Grand Total

160,125.00$

Implementation

-$

Training

Documents

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL PACKET SP-21-0034