Technical Library EGG-LOFT-5336. iiiiiiiiiifliiiiiiini

INEEL Technical Library

iiiiiiiiiifliiiiiiini 173185

LOFT MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT FOR DECEMBER 1980

Y Df® mi waiiAjc

>rM t Cfill fc.fiVi

L. P. Leach J PleMcontain Eiport Confr Cemtrofled information

Export Control Review Number ty/£ ^

Date of Review w'ZZjj/

Reviewer Initials.

U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office • Idaho National Engineering Laboratory

EGG-LOFT-5336.

January 1981

LO A N C O P Y

"ETWN OSOMPny TO ^

•»««■ TECHNICAL LIBRARY

R E C E I V E D EGf-G 14'Ho, Inc.

FEB 21 1981 IKEL

JKHN1CAL LiBRARY

j)£t o 2 m

This is an informal report intended for use as a preliminary or working document

Prepared f o r the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Under DOE Contract No. DE-AC07-76ID01570 FIN No. A6048 h

Digitized 07-13-11

Idaho

n E E H G If laho Inc

FORM EG&G 398 / (Rev 1179) c A O

\ A ?) x I N T E R I M REPORT

Accession No.

Report No EGG-L0FT-5336

Contract Program or Project Title:

LOFT

Subject of this Document:

LOFT Monthly Progress Report f o r December 1980 Type of Document:

I n t e r i m Report

Author(s):

L. P. Leach

Date of Document:

January 1981

Responsible NRC Individual and NRC Office or Division:

G. D. McPherson, LOFT

This document was prepared primarily for preliminary or internal use. It has not received full review and approval. Since there may be substantive changes, this document should not be considered final.

EG&G Idaho, Inc. Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415

Prepared for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D.C. Under DOE Contract No . DE-AC07-76ID01570

NRC FIN No. _ A6048

I N T E R I M REPORT

CONTENTS

MANAGER' S MONTHLY SUNMARY 1

ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2

LOFT TECHNICAL SUPPORT DIVISION 2

LOFT FACILITY DIVISION 8

LOFT MEASUREMENTS DIVISION 9

LOFT PROGRAM DIVISION 14

FOREIGN-FUNDED TASK SUMMARIES 15

SUMMARY OF JAPANESE-FUNDED (JAERI) TASKS 15

SUMMARY OF GERMAN-FUNDED (FRG) TASKS 16

SUMMARY OF NETHERLANDS-FUNDED (ECN) TASKS 16

SUMMARY OF FRENCH-FUNDED (CEA) TASKS 17

SUMMARY OF AUSTRIAN-FUNDED (FZS) TASKS 17

SUMMARY OF SWITZERLAND IN-KIND (EIR) SUPPORT 18

FIGURE

1 . LOFT management sunmary schedule 19

TABLES

1. Foreign Funds A v a i l a b i l i t y at End of December 1980

( In Thousands of Dol lars) 87

2. Foreign Funded Task Sunmary at End of December 1980 88

3. LOFT FY-81 Summary Status Report Nuclear Regulatory

Commission ( In Thousands of Dol lars) 90

4. LOFT Funding Sunmary for FY-81 ( In Thousands of Dol lars) 91

5. LOFT FY-81 Sutrmary Budget Status Report of LOFT Foreign Funds ( In Thousands of Dol lars) 92

i i

LOFT MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT FOR DECEMBER 1980

MANAGER'S MONTHLY SUMMARY

On December 10, 1980, LOFT conducted its fifth nuclear test in the L3 Series (small break) as well as the first in the L8 Series (core uncov-ery). The tests, designated L3-6/L8-1, were run in series with each experiment designated to address specific safety questions.

Test L3-6 simulated a four-inch break in a commercial pressurized water reactor. The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the influence of main coolant pump operation on the quantity of fluid which leaves the system and the quantity of fluid in the reactor core region during the experiment. The results of L3-6 are being compared with the results of a previous LOFT test, designated L3-5, which was performed on September 29, 1980.

On December 9 and 10, a special review group committee, commissioned by the NRC, visited LOFT. The purpose of the committee's presence here was to study and evaluate the LOFT project, and then report recommendations to the NRC. The NRC would then use this information to help determine how the resources of the project could best be utilized, and which kind and how many tests should be conducted over how long a time period. Recommendations of this committee are expected to be announced early in February.

The Quick Look Report on experiment L3-6/L8-1, reviewing initial conditions and limited experimental results, was published during the month. More extensive data analysis will continue for the next several months.

The current planned LOFT test schedule and target dates were rescheduled in December which resulted in a major budget revision to the baseline. Successful completion and approval is anticapted by mid-January 1981. Overall current costs are in good agreement with budgets and authorized funding levels.

1

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

LOFT TECHNICAL SUPPORT DIVISION

The experiment safety analysis (ESA) for LOFT Experiment L9-1/L3-3 was initiated. L9-1 is planned to be a loss of feedwater test with the plant being depressurized as the power operated relief valve (PORV) is opened and latched open. The pressurizer will be discharged through the PORV to the suppression tank.

LOFT Experiment L3-6/L8-1 was successfully conducted; this test provided experimental data on the behavior of the reactor system during a small break with primary coolant pumps operating.

The ESA for the conduct of Experiment L3-6/L8-1 was approved by EG&G and DOE. The approved ESA was issued prior to the conduct of the experiment.

The LOFT technical specifications for Experiment L3-6/L8-1 operations (DRR-L-3857) were approved by DOE-ID and issued.

Draft technical specifications were prepared for revising the transient (cycle) requirements for the LOFT primary and secondary systems.

A failure mode effect and consequence analysis (FMECA) was completed and issued for Experiment L3-6/L8-1.

A letter summarizing the significant risks and safety issues for Experiment L3-6/L8-1 was issued.

Waste gas processing radiological calculations which established limits on the current waste gas processing system operation were prepared.

2

9. The Three Mi le Island (TMI) status book was updated, and the new items resu l t ing from recent ly published TMI concerns were incorporated.

10. Checkout, c a l i b r a t i o n , test procedure, and data acquis i t ion of the LOFT traversing in-core probe (TIP) system " i n the water level detect ion mode" during L3-6/L8-1 were completed.

11. TIP probe thermal response during zero power physics operations p r io r to Experiment L3-6/L8-1 was determined.

12. Using the 3-D LOFT PDQ-7 model computer code, the fo l lowing were c a l culated for Experiment L3-6/L8-1:

a Expected power d i s t r i bu t i ons • Expected TIP probe ra t ios • Estimated c r i t i c a l boron concentrat ion.

13. LTR LO-08-80-157, "Descript ion and Reactor Physics Appl icat ion of the

Revised Three-Dimensional PDQ-7 Model of LOFT," was issued.

14. Reactor Cooling Systems personnel were involved with the successful performance of the "pumps on" small break tes t , L3-6. They monitored the performance of the primary coolant pumps (PCP) during the test fo r mechanical degradation. Parameters monitored included PCP motor curren t , PCP RPM, heating temperature, and pump and associated piping v ib ra t i on . The pumps performed without problem, and retest data showed that no degradation was incurred.

An in terest ing side issue was observed during the tes t : pump power and d i f f e r e n t i a l pressure were found to be c losely related to system f l u i d density. This phenomenon may have industry-wide in te res t ; thus, LOFT Plant Services Branch (LPSB) personnel are preparing a paper to present the observations.

15. Experiment L3-6 was completed without major component f a i l u r e and no repair work is required as a resu l t of the tes t .

3

16. TMI/NRC Response Issue "Valve Pos i t ion, Safety-Related Locking Device" research was completed. Data reduction and the LOFT Technical Report (LTR) presenting the resolut ion were put into the f i n a l typing stage. Phase I of th is issue is complete.

17. A Site Work Release (SWR) and drawings for L9-1 dummy spool pieces

were issued.

18. Twelve valve maintenance work packages were issued.

19. A F a c i l i t y Change Form (FCF-8846) was prepared to i n i t i a t e an upgrade of the emergency core cooling (ECC) valve actuator-stem couplings. New valve actuator-stem couplings were ins ta l led on seven ECC valves.

20. Several conceptual designs to enable the LOFT f a c i l i t y to increase use and v e r s a t i l i t y in simulation of large pressurized water reactors (LPWRs) were completed.

21. The task to update the connector stalk assembly to improve grounding and lead termination on the ex is t ing "B" and "C" fuel modules stored at TAN-615 was completed.

22. Basic assembly of the LOFT fue l storage rack was completed. The un i t is pending f i na l checkout using the "A" fuel module prototype.

23. The f i n a l design review for the I r rad iated Fuel Storage F a c i l i t y (IFSF) Pool Cleanup System was held, and the system drawings have been sent to Dra f t ing .

24. The drawings of the control rod storage rack and handling tool have been completed and are now being reviewed.

25. Speci f icat ion ES-60346 for the spent fuel inspection stand was prepared.

4

Project engineers and technical wr i te rs completed two new design desc r i p t i ons : Prel iminary Component Design Descript ion (CDD) 1 .1 .7 .1 , "Spent Resin Transfer System" and Preliminary System Design Descript ion (SDD) 1.4.12, "Reactor Vessel Level Measurement System." Another CDD (CDD 1.1.1.9, "LOFT Reactor Vessel") received DOE-ID approval and was released for pub l ica t ion .

5

LOFT FACILITY DIVISION

The Experiment Operating Procedure (EOP) for Experiment L3-6/L8-1 was completed. Test L3-6 simulated a four- inch break in a commercial pressurized water reactor wi th the coolant pumps inoperat ive.

The post requa l i f i ca t ion test ing required for Experiment L3-6/L8-1 was completed.

Both cold and hot tes t ing of the primary coolant pumps (PCP) were com

pleted.

The inservice inspection ( I SI) and survei l lance test ing that is required pr ior to the next test was begun.

A work window was started in preparation for Experiment L9-1 which is scheduled to be performed on Apr i l 15, 1981.

8

LOFT MEASUREMENTS DIVISION

1 . The examination of the f a i l e d L3-5 PC-2 rake was completed. Results of the examination were documented in a l e t t e r report . Extended operation fo l lowing instrument f a i l u r e resul ted in more extensive damage than had occurred in previous experiments. Five of the six bearing keys were los t . A l l bearings had d is in tegra ted.

2. The f i na l design review on the advanced turbine bearing design was held. C r i t i c a l path items have been iden t i f i ed and special at tent ion and followup w i l l be provided. A l l drawings were released in December.

3. The prel iminary design has been completed for a modi f icat ion to allow rake pinning to obtain addi t ional s t ructura l support. A requirement for interchangeabi l i ty of the rakes between instrument penetrations requires as-bu i l t dimensions at the piping locat ions. The f i n a l design and drawing w i l l be deferred un t i l th is requirement can be met.

4. The drag screen and turbine modules from the L3-4 spool piece assembly are being r e b u i l t fo r Experiment L9-1 appl icat ion. The turbine modules are being changed to the MOD I I bearing design. The drag screen w i l l be rebu i l t using a new screen and springs.

5. Data was recorded during Experiment L3-6/L8-1 from the l i qu id level detector, developed by E lec t r i c Power Research I ns t i t u te (EPRI), and an analysis was i n i t i a t e d . In add i t ion , a draindown ca l ib ra t ion test was completed. Preliminary evaluation of the resu l ts does not indicate any obvious re la t ionship between signal output and l i qu id level or densi ty.

6. The megabytes s tab i l i zed densitometer (MSD) electronics associated with PC-3A and PC-3C were set up and functioned properly fo r Experiment L3-6, g iv ing good density data. This successful appl icat ion of MSD electronics indicates that they could be used to replace ex is t ing densitometer electronics and thereby s i g n i f i c a n t l y reduce the time and costs associated with densitometer data reduct ion.

9

7. Experiment L9-1 instrumentation requirements were defined and work was begun to supply the required power operated r e l i e f valve (PORV) i n s t r u mentation. Preliminary designs of the gamma densitometer spool piece, drag screen turbine spool piece, and PORV spool piece were completed. Preliminary layout of piping conf igurat ion was completed. Conceptual and prel iminary design reviews were conducted, and an integrated planning schedule was completed.

8. Nine embedded thermocouple probes were successful ly fabr ica ted, and acceptance test ing is being conducted. These w i l l be used in the F, bundle, af ter assembly in to the thermocouple assemblies.

9. Kaman Sciences completed fabr ica t ion of a group of eight external fuel

thermocouple assemblies.

10. A test on thermocouple upper l i m i t s was run for LOFT by Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory (HEDL). This was on a z i rca loy-sheathed, BeO insulated, W5/W26 Re elements, 0.028-inch diameter thermocouple. At 1300°C (2370°F), the thermocouple f a i l ed and a sheath- insulat ion reaction occurred. Invest igat ion is cont inuing.

11. Fi f teen stainless s tee l , MgO thermocouples (1-foot length) were completed and stored at Central F a c i l i t i e s in support of the modular drag-disc turbine transducer (MDTT) e f f o r t s .

12. Final design reviews were held on the feedwater f low rate measurement system for L9-1 and for the steam generator primary in le t and out le t temperature measurements.

13. A data acquis i t ion and recording system was assembled and ins ta l led in LOFT to acquire data from an experimental thermal neutron l i qu id level detector during the LOFT L3-6/L8-1 tes ts . This work was a cooperative e f f o r t between LOFT and EPRI to evaluate the performance of an EPRI-developed l i q u i d level device intended for use in commercial power reactors.

10

14. The LOFT Test Support F a c i l i t y (LTSF) test requirements fo r the L9-1 drag-disc turbine transducer (DTT) spool piece and o r i f i c e have been draf ted. A f i n a l test plan w i l l be issued in January.

15. The Data I n t e g r i t y Review Committee (DIRC) a c t i v i t i e s fo r L3-6/L8-1 were completed.

16. Calculat ion of reactor vessel mass was made on a rea l - t ime basis during Experiment L3-6/L8-1. The calcu lat ion provided a bet ter ind icat ion of system inventory than the rea l - t ime level ind icators .

17. The draf t of an LTR, e n t i t l e d "The LOFT Pulsed Neutron A c t i v a t i o n / Transmit Time Flowmeter," has been completed.

18. The MSD system densitometer data were examined and the data processing procedures were speci f ied and developed. Although no d i rec t comparisons ex is t between MSD and PHA (Pulse Height Analysis) , indicat ions are that MSD is providing worthwhile density data.

19. An LTR, en t i t l ed "Density Pro f i l e and Mass Flow Rate Calculat ion Procedures," was completed. This report describes the ca lcu lat ion procedures and computer programs used in ca lcu la t ing two-phase density prof i l e s .

20. A l e t t e r report on the L3-6 neutron f l ux l i q u i d level monitor has been

completed. The conclusion was that the data were useless.

21. The L6-1 , L6-2, and L6-3 Experiment Data Report was completed and issued.

22. The L3-6 breakflow and system void f r ac t i on were calculated and exce l lent agreement was found between the mass flow calculated from the blowdown suppression tank and the drag d isc- turb ine meter combination.

11

23. The L3-6 Liquid D is t r i bu t ion Movie and the L3-5 Data Versus L3-5 Experiment Predict ion Reactor Vessel Level Movie were completed ahead of schedule.

24. The i n i t i a l phase of the c r i t i c a l f low scaling study was completed. Two-sigma data scatter for a l l twelve, 0.110-inch diameter nozzle tests correlated to w i th in +3%.

25. The analog transducer-patch panel por t ion of the Spares Catalog has been completed (data base design plus reports) and data are being entered. This port ion of the Spares Catalog w i l l be published in January.

26. The automated data qua l i f i ca t i on work has shown substantial progress. The batch thermocouple information qua l i t y funct ions (IQFs) ( l i m i t , noise, redundancy) have been programmed and checked out.

27. Instrumented Fuel Branch representatives made presentations to the LOFT Special Review Group Subcommittee on the subjects of "Degraded Cooling and Core Melt Experiments in LOFT" and " A b i l i t y of E lec t r ic Heater Rods to Simulate Nuclear Rod Behavior During LWR LOCAs."

28. LTR LO-14-80-073, "Estimating Steady-State Fuel Pel le t Stored Energy from POST-DNB Cladding Temperature Response for the LOFT L2-2 and L2-3 Tests," was issued by the Fuel Evaluation Section.

29. The Plant Services Div is ion completed improvements ( l i f t i n g f i x t u r e ve r t i ca l alignment and thermocouple grounding) to the Reload Core I instrumented fuel modules.

30. The Plant Services Div is ion completed fabr ica t ion of the f i r s t Reload Core I I control rod assembly.

12

Exxon submitted the f i n a l design package to EG&G for approval for the Power Burst F a c i l i t y (PBF) TC-4 test replacement fuel rods with the special embedded cladding thermocouple.

Colored movies of the LOCE L3-6/L8-1 core axial fuel rod cladding surface thermocouple indicat ions were prepared; the movies v i v i d l y portrayed the precursory core top-down cooling before the a r r i va l of the accumulator cool ing water.

13

LOFT PROGRAM DIVISION

1. The Experiment Subcommittee for Experiment L9-1/L3-3 was set up. The f i r s t meeting w i l l be held in ear ly January. This subcommittee fol lows the preparation for the test at a working l e v e l , in ter fac ing with various support groups and pursuing action items generated at meeting d i s cussions.

2. Twelve RELAP4/M0D7 computer runs designed to iden t i f y the conditions which contr ibute to core flow stagnation in LOFT during a large break blowdown were completed. This e f f o r t was established to iden t i f y the worst case core hydraulic condit ions to apply to prel iminary planning calculat ions fo r Experiment L2-5, cur rent ly scheduled for January 1982.

3. A member of the Analyt ical Model Appl icat ion Section has been appointed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to serve on the PWR-Blowdown Heat Transfer (PWR-BDHT) Review Group.

4. The experimental predict ion document for LOFT Loss-of-Coolant-Accident (LOCA) L3-6/L8-1 was issued.

5. Presentations were made to the LOFT Blue Ribbon Review Committee by two

members of the Analyt ical Model Appl icat ion Section.

6. The quick look report fo r Experiment L3-6/L8-1 was issued on December 22. The reference is : Glenn E. McCreery, Quick Look Report on LOFT Nuclear Experiment L3-6/L8-1, EGG-LOFT-5318, December 1980.

7. A draft of the research information l e t t e r , t i t l e d "LOFT Reactor Safety Program Research Results from Loss-of-Coolant Experiments L3-0, L3-1, L3-2, and L3-7," was completed and transmitted to the NRC.

14

FOREIGN-FUNDED TASK SUMMARIES

Foreign-funded and in-kind LOFT support projects are summarized in th is sect ion.

SUMMARY OF JAPANESE-FUNDED (JAERI) TASKS

1. Task 5F8C2 — Program Development and Analysis

The Related Programs Branch continued task select ion for a two-year master plan f o r use of fo re ign funds. A d ra f t copy of the plan was completed for management review. The Related Programs Branch continued monitoring foreign-funded tasks using JAERI funds.

2. Task 5F8C3 — Component Development

The prel iminary data report fo r the pressure balanced drag turbine transducer (advanced DTT) has not been completed due to p r i o r i t y conf l i c t s with L9-1 planning. The data report is awaiting review pr ior to f i n a l processing and d i s t r i b u t i o n .

3. Task 5F8C4 — Post-CHF Heat Transfer

Comments from the prel iminary design review as well as comments from Ramu Sundaram, who worked on the or ig ina l post-CHF test at Lehigh Univers i ty , have been incorporated into the experiment design s p e c i f i cat ion. Also, a design-requirements document has been completed. The power supply problem at the LOFT Test Support F a c i l i t y has been invest iga ted. A l e t t e r is current ly being wr i t ten describing the f indings and recommendations.

4. Task 5F8C5 — Small Break Instrumentation

A l l charges have been submitted to Accounting Div is ion fo r the LOFT PC-3 gamma densitometer. A l l charge numbers for th is task were closed.

15

SUMMARY OF GERMAN-FUNDED (FRG) TASKS

1. Task 5F7C2 — Program Development and Analysis

Requirements for upgrading the two-phase loop steam supply vessels to 3000 psia have been transmitted to the Applied Mechanics Branch for use in subsequent analysis. Avai lable funding w i l l l i m i t analysis to steady-state thermal and pressure condit ions, and review of the resu l ts w i l l be required pr io r to determining the need for addit ional analysis.

The annual FRG contr ibut ion was received by the NRC, and task proposals have been prepared and submitted for appropriate reviews pr ior to Change Control Board act ion.

2. Task 5F7C3 - - Component Development

Delays in funding for the REBEKA rod-embedded thermocouple i ns ta l l a t i on work at Exxon Nuclear and funding for work on the design of the fuel rods for the Power Burst F a c i l i t y TC-4 test have caused a 6-week delay in del ivery of the REBEKA rod. This w i l l not af fect the 9-rod bundle test schedule since the L9-1 test w i l l be conducted f i r s t at the LOFT Test Support F a c i l i t y . The work at Exxon Nuclear is on a schedule which w i l l complete rod fabr ica t ion by mid-February 1981.

SUMMARY OF NETHERLANDS-FUNDED (ECN) TASKS

1. Task 5FNC2 — Program Development and Analysis

An analysis was completed using a modified Burnell model on a l l twelve avai lable Semiscale, 0.110-in.-diameter test ca l ib ra t ion runs. This analysis showed that 99% of the data f a l l s wi th in +3% of the subcooling cor re la t ion . Based on th is narrow data spread, i t is concluded that the corre la t ion is not pressure-dependent w i th in the stated accuracy l i m i t s . The cor re la t ion was also performed on the four ve r i f i ab le 0.028-inch diameter Semiscale nozzle ca l ib ra t ion runs. The resul tant data spread about the cor re la t ion value was very small (less than 3%).

16

The 0.028- in. nozzle tests did not show an increase in mass f l ux over the 0.110- in. nozzle tes ts . I t is suspected that possible cap i l l a r y type ef fects resu l t in a maximum mass f l ux being achieved somewhere between the two nozzle diameters examined so f a r .

SUMMARY OF FRENCH-FUNDED (CEA) TASKS

1. Task 5FFC2 — Program Development and Analysis

French foreign funds have been received by the USNRC. Planning is complete and proposals have been prepared fo r Change Control Board approval fo r the release and use of these funds. Fund usage has been proposed for Reload Core I I test instrumentation f ab r i ca t i on , LOFT F2 fue l bundle fab r i ca t ion by Exxon Nuclear, CEA foreign fund management, USNRC t rave l , and CEA delegate support.

SUMMARY OF AUSTRIAN-FUNDED (FZS) TASKS

1. Task 5FAC2 — Program Development and Analysis

No s ign i f i can t a c t i v i t y during December.

2. FZS In-Kind Support to LOFT

A report en t i t l ed "Suggestion for a Homogenizer I ns ta l l a t i on in LOFT Small Break Two-Phase Measurement" was completed and sent to EG&G Idaho.

Autoclave test ing of opt ica l materials continued. Of the opt ica l mater ia ls , Spinel is the only one unaffected by the borated water. Some of the DAVCO material cracked, but i t w i l l be fur ther tested to see i f th is e f fec t continues.

The steam-water-mixer is on schedule.

Approval of the Austrian l icensing author i ty (TUV) is pending but no major changes are expected.

17

The draft LOFT Standard Problem Document was completed and mailed to EG&G Idaho.

SUMMARY OF SWITZERLAND IN-KIND (EIR) SUPPORT

1. NEPTUN Reflood Test Program

The review of the Swiss program document was completed. This review was conducted to update the NEPTUN test program to include tests which w i l l be of major importance to the LOFT project. Completion of the Swiss NEPTUN-LOFT program document is in progress.

Assembly of the NEPTUN test f a c i l i t y has continued without any major delays or problems reported. Heater rod fabrication continues with eleven rods completed.

18

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY SCHEDULE

FY 81 FY 82

Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

L3-6 L3-3

L8-1 (O

L6-7

L9-1

Containment vessel leak test

L5-1

L9-2 L8-2

Replace center fuel bundle

L2-5

Replace center fuel bundle

L2-6 L5-2

L6-4

Whole core changeout

Figure 1. LOFT management summary schedule. INEL-A-16 923

LOFT Overall Funding 5xxxxx

20

LOFT Proqrom Cost/Budqet Summery LOFT OVERRLL FUNDING

50000

O O O

C-o o

o

>

£

Totol

40000-

30000 -

20000 -

10000 -

octuoL budget

- , - - i r * l •

1000

-800

-600

-400

-200

Bud

Rc l

Oct 3MB

28S6

Nov 7081

5992

Dec 10568

9193

Jan 13639

Tob 16705

Mar 20706

Rpr 23842

Mau, 26941

Jun 30647

J u l 33392

Ruq Sep 37081142148

MotertoL Bud

Ret

1089

976

2081

1756

3009

2483

3880 4701 5729 6443 7210 8253 89)2 9750 12378

Manpower Bud Ret

615

475

564

537

536

528

517 499 518 524 504 469 506 503 527

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and foreign-funded budgets re f l ec t the LOFT Q81-0 Rev 0/3 baseline approved in December 1980. Refer to the Manager's Monthly Summary for comments.

21

5N--NRC Operating Funding 5F—Foreign Funding

22

in n ^ * 1 o 1 t -

* -i

o a w s»

J .-J J -

4 1 4 9 0 .

3 7 3 4 1 .

3 3 1 9 2 .

2 9 0 4 3 .

2 4 8 9 4 .

2 0 7 4 5 .

1 b 5 9 b .

1 2 4 4 7 .

8 2 9 8 .

4 1 4 9 .

E G I G IDAHO I N C .

LOFT-NRC OPERATING FUNDS

NUM»E« 5 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T - T T

». C' •• —L.-r r

1 2 2 0 .

-

-

1 0 9 8 .

9 7 b .

8 5 4 ,

7 3 2 .

6 1 0 .

4 8 8 .

3 6 6 .

2 4 4 .

1 2 2 .

V _J I

Z o T.

a.

3 o a z <

z UJ -J < > 3

OCT NOV DEC J»N FEB MAR APR H » l

TOTAL PROGRAM JUN J t t «UG SEP

BUDGET

• C T U » L

3 4 1 5

J 7 » l

1 ( 4 2

S O U

' 0 2 7 9

S 4 5 7

1 3 3 1 9 1 f c 2 i 2 2 0 2 3 5 2 3 3 5 8 2 6 4 5 2 3 0 1 4 5 3 2 8 8 3 3fc5fc! 4 1 4 S 2

M A T E R I A L ■UOSET

» C T U » l

9 8 9

8 * 7

1451

lfcfcO

2 0 7 .

2 3 5 5

3 7 3 9 4 4 5 1 , 547fc t . 185

MANPOHER ■UOSET

«CTU»L

t 0 7

4641

5 4 1

5 2 4

5 2 7

5 2 3

i l l 4 5 5 S I * 5 2 2

1 5 4 5 7 9 9 7 8 b 4 3 447fc M M )

5 0 3 4 f c l 5 0 5 5 0 2 5 2 5

0 .

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Refer to the summary cost accounts for specific cost versus budget variance comments.

23

Ul

o </) a i

o D

>

3

EGIG IDAHO INC.

LOFT-FOREIGN FUNDING

NUHBEB 5FOO0OOO0

0. TOTAL

BUOBET

• C T U « L

OCT N O *

PROGRAM 1 3 3

1 0 5

2 3 5

173

DEC

2 0 5

23fc

JAN

3 2 0

FEB

4 4 3

1AR

4 7 1

1

APR

4 B 4

H I T

4 5 2

JUN

5 0 2

J L T

5 0 4

• UB

5 2 0

SEP

tfcfc

MATERIAL BUOBET | 100 | 130

ACTUAL | 7 5 J 4fc

13B

12B

1 4 1 2 4 5 2 5 3 2 5 0 2 * 1 | 2 * *

I 3 * 4 2 7 4 | 4 1 1

l BUDGET

ACTUAL

MANPOWER BUOBET 1 B

ACTUAL J * I B

11

5

5

* 4 3 1 2 1 1 1 | 1 | 3

Refer to the sunmary cost accounts for comments.

24

LOFT 189a Sunmary

5NX--NRC 189a

5FXX--Foreign 189a

25

5 5 7

EG&6 IDAHO INC.

A6308-CRT DISPLAY DESIGN/ANALYSIS

NUHBER BNPOOOOOO

5 0 1 . ^

4 4 5 .

3 8 9 .

3 3 3 .

2 7 7 .

2 2 1 .

1 6 5 .

1 0 9 .

5 3 .

- 3

T - T T

U U - - J I ,

OCT NOV

TOTAL PROGRAM JAN FEB MAR APR HAT JUN AUO SEP

20

1 9 .

16

] . : 10

8

6

4

2 .

0

BUOBET

ACTUAL

4 0

15

B3

5 *

1 3 3

B7

1 7 * 2 2 2 2 8 4 3 3 1 078 4 2 4 4 7 0 5 1 * 5 5 3

M A T E R I A L BUOOET

ACTUAL

8

- 2

17

3

27 1

32 38 4 * 5 3 * 0 *4 75 8 1 8*

MANPOWER BUOBET 7

ACTUAL J 4 <• 7

7

7

7 8 8 7 7 * ' * *

BUDGET

ACTUAL

October manpower was significantly below budget levels; this has now been corrected. Resulting late start on some activities has delayed procurement activities.

26

Ul o

o I

Ul cc

o

=> u

4770.

4293.

3816.

3339.

2862.

2385.

1908.

1431 .

954.

477.

0. TOTAL

EGIG IDAHO INC. NRC 189A A6048 EXPER PROGRAM NUH8JER SN1000000

n

-

-

-

1 1 1 1 1 " I ■ ■ > ■ ■ , ' +

X S

x " *

+ +

y

+ *

* ^ "\ y « - - - ,

L _ _ , . ' I X „» —

_ l >- i i \_ - - c"" j "

„ ' L__,„« = r "r

''yT ^ „ « . - - " ■

' -x*^ - . * - " " X -X*^ - i ^ " * 1̂1 j ~ -^^

A ^ T * ^ — I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

180.

1 6 2 .

1 4 4 . > - I X

126. 2 o Z

108. -or

9 0 . at o a

72. ?

54 . t-

z 3 6 .

OCT NOV 0EC JAN FE1

P R O G R A M

HAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG SEP

BUDGET

ACTUAL 4 8 0

3 0 5

MATERIAL BUDGET

ACTUAL 140

1 0 5

MANPOWER BUOBET

ACTUAL 8 7

5 0

5 8 2

* 5 3

1444 1111

1815 21*3 2*35 24fcb 327* 3*54 3474 4347 4770

3 1 5

2 3 2

7 5

4 5

4 7 9

4 2 *

* 2

55

(.1 7

5 5

7 3 7 4 0 1

5 0 5 4

101 1

4 4

1117

4 4

1 257

4 3

1371

5 0

1518

4 B

1*48

5 3

u 0 .

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Refer to the summary cost accounts for comments.

27

3 6 0 0 .

3 2 4 0 .

2 8 8 0 .

2 5 2 0 .

2 1 6 0 .

1800

1440.

1080

720 .

360 .

EG4G IDAHO INC.

NRC 189A A6063 FUEL NUH8ER 5N2000000

T T -i ~ 80

-J 72.

64

56.

48

F--A-*-

_ _ / - - ; > ' - 1 • i i

1

TOTAL BUDGET

ACTUAL

OCT NOV

PROGRAM 4** 453

754 *43

DEC

1 147 415

JAN

1443

FEB

1715

HAR

2101

APR

2 4 0 *

HAT

2733

JUN

3038

JL*

3211

AUG

3421

SEP

3540

MATERIAL BUDGET

ACTUAL 351 384

581 551

825 *55

1040 1 144 1387 1522 I 170* 1403 201 1 2 1 4 * 22*2

MANPOWER BUOBET 1 27 ACTUAL J 1*

21 15

22 15

IB 2* 34 3* 31 IB 15 12 10

0.

o

40. ar o a.

32. | Z

24

16

8 3 o

BUDGET

ACTUAL

The underruns are caused by delays in hardware item procurements and avai lab i l i ty of key personnel in sunmary cost accounts 5N2D00000 and 5N2F00000. Refer to sunmary cost account cost graphs for detailed explanations and planned corrective actions.

28

4620.

4 158.

3696.

3234.

2772.

2310.

1848.

1386.

924.

462.

EGIG I0AH0 INC.

NRC 189A A6043 EXPER tNSTR

NUMBER 5 N 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

T r - r T r ' -J

J

L -'. r - - > w i

1 7 0 .

1 5 3 .

1 3 6 .

1 1 9 .

1 0 2 .

8 5 .

6 8 .

51 .

3 4 .

1 7 .

z -1 I 1-z o £ — a Ul 3 O a z I »-z UJ _i

> O LU

OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN J L T AUG SEP

PROGRAM BUDGET ACTUAL

373 214

M A T E R I A L BUOBET ACTUAL

85 20

M A N P O W E R BUOBET ACTUAL

72 51

758 *35

1 147 457

1440 184J 2345 2713 3033 3342 3*71 41*2

177 47

2*2 1 14

370 474

74 77

55 **

55 55

**0

55

749

to

822

53

428

44

457 1085

4*12

1 1*1

50 71 80

BUDGET

ACTUAL

The ex is t ing baseline does not re f l ec t the work occurr ing. A new baseline is being implemented and th is w i l l bring the budget and actuals in to much closer agreement. The underspend is due pr imar i l y to 1. Schedule slippage from FY-80 to FY-81 caused work loads in excess of avai lable manpower, 2. Fuel instrumentation was delayed due to higher p r i o r i t y LOFT work at Exxon, 3. L9-1 Instrumentation was delayed due to changes in the test and the piping conf igurat ion.

29

o

o I

l/> or

o o

>

3

8070.

7263.

6456.

5649.

4842.

4035.

3228.

2421 .

1614.

807

0 TOTAL

EGIG IDAHO INC. NRC 189A A6107 PLANT SUPPORT NUHBJER 5N4000000

T -r T r

L-1

I u J L. OCT NOV OEC JAN FEB MAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG SEP PROGRAM

280

252

224.

196.

168 .

140.

112.

84

56.

28

0

BUOBET ACTUAL

*40 543

MATERIAL BUDBCT ACTUAL

124 174

1375 1 140

2032 1715

2*33 31** 38*8 4414

300 328

MANPOWER BUDGET ACTUAL

115 52

1 10 112

420 440

5** *45

104 87

103 47

782 879

4478 5744 *222 *eoi 80*4

488

45 44 45

1237 1323 1403 225*

40 91 85 • 5

BUDGET

ACTUAL

CCF's/CCB's have been submitted reducing the overal l budget by $199K and level the manpower loading. See the indiv idual summary cost accounts for comments.

30

4710.

4239.

3768.

3297.

2826.

2355.

1884.

1413.

942.

471 .

0. TOTAL

EGtG IDAHO INC. NRC 189A A6122 CORE 1 SAFETY SUP NUHiER 5N5000000

i i r -r T 7

1 r u r

..r--u._r;^"L----r

I L. -I 1 1 I OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG SEP

PROGRAM ■UOSET

ACTUAL 3 1 2

3 2 0

M A T E R I A L BUDGET ACTUAL

55

* 7

* 4 *

7 0 3

1018 105*

1395 1*4* 2154 2548

1 4 *

2 0 3

3 1 1

2 7 *

4 1 2

MANPOWER BUOGCT

ACTUAL

47

5 8

4 5

5 1

47

5 *

4 4

5 1 2

4 7

*4 1 7 5 0

2438

8 7 1

334*

1013

5 2 5 4 5 1 49

37*B

1128

55

42*3

1283

4703

1423

5 4 5 8

Refer to the summary cost accounts 5N5N for comments,

31

1/1 Q

01 o I

en o:

o o

3

5140.

4626.

4112.

3598,

3084.

2570.

2056.

1542.

1028.

514.

0. TOTAL

EG1G IDAHO INC. NRC 189A A6110 COMMON SUPPORT NUMBER 5N4000000

i r T r /

\ r \ r s-

..'

\. r - -

4 i

/ - I

OCT NO* OEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG SEP

PROGRAM BUOBET

ACTUAL

2 4 *

2 4 7

MATERIAL

BUOBET

ACTUAL

5 2

3 1

* 0 *

5 3 1

102

7 2

4 4 5 1 2 5 2

• 17 1

1 5 5 4 1 4 * 2 2 2 4 5 2 * 2 4

1 5 *

1 14

2 0 4 2 5 2 3 1 5 3 * 7 4 1 4

3 0 2 4

4 8 2

MANPOWER

BUDGET

ACTUAL

* B

5 4

* 4

5 4

* 7

* 2 *• * 4 ** * 7 » "

3 3 5 0

5 3 5

3 7 8 *

* 2 1

1

5 1 3 7

1 * 7 *

7 2 * 4 71

Refer to summary cost accounts for comments

32

EG1G IDAHO INC. NRC 189A A6054 FACILITY OPERATE NUMBER 5 N 7 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ul Q

c/1 3 O I

l/l or < - J -j o Q

3 r 3 U

7 U 1 U .

8 1 3 6 .

7 2 3 2 .

6 3 2 8 .

5 4 2 4 .

4520

3616 .

2 7 1 2 .

1808.

904 .

n ^

- i ■ 1 1 1 1——i 1 1 1 ;■»

*

.»

-J * 1 r - X ' ' '

y .: - • — r 1 1 1 i — i 1 1 1

OCT NOV OEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN J L T AUG SEP

TOTAL PROGRAM

320

288

256

224

192.

160

128

96.

64 .

32

0.

BUDGET

ACTUAL

* 4 1

5 8 4

1 3 1 7

1 1 4 3

2 0 * 5

2 0 0 *

2 7 4 1 3 4 1 8 4 3 0 8 5 0 4 0

MATERIAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

8 0

1 0 8

1 * 5

1 5 3

2 5 8

2 4 8

3 4 3 4 2 7 5 3 4

MANPOWER ■UOBET ACTUAL

147

128

1 3 8

134

1 4 4

1 5 8

1 4 * 1 3 8 142

* 2 8

1 4 5

5 7 7 3 4 * 5 1 7 3 4 7 8 2 * 2 4 0 3 1

7 1 7 8 2 3 4 0 8 1 0 1 4 1 1 1 3

145 1 4 2 1 5 5 1 4 8 1 5 2

BUDGET

ACTUAL

lo signif icant variance.

33

EGIG IDAHO INC. A610S AUGEM OPER CAPABILITY NUMBER 5HB000000

9 6 0 .

8 6 4

768 .

6 7 2 .

5 7 6 .

4 8 0 .

384 .

288 .

192 .

9 6 .

n

- *

- i 1 1 1 . 1 1 r- ,* 4»

* -4

y * * * *

, ' y

— 1 — _1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OCT NO*

TOTAL PROGRAM

JAN FEB MAR APR

BUOBET

ACTUAL

43

40

MATERIAL

BUOGET

ACTUAL

44

5

141

1 1 *

40

14

MANPOWER

BUOBET

ACTUAL

12

7

1 1 ~

12

2 8 2

143

123

25

1 1

12

344

145

4 1 7

1*7

1 0 10

5 0 8

145

10

5 8 0

2 1 7

10

* 5 2

2 3 8

737

2 * 4

1 0 10

8 0 2

2 8 4

10

8 8 7 4 5 *

3 1 0

1 0

3 3 2

4

3 0

27

2 4 .

21 .

18

1 5 .

1 2 .

9

6 .

3 .

0 .

BUOGET

ACTUAL

Refer to summary cost account 5N8V for comments.

34

o in 3 O X

o

3 x 3

90.

81 .

72.

63.

54.

45.

36.

27.

18.

9.

0. TOTAL

EG1G IDAHO INC. A6351-C0RE MELT MITIG SYS DESIGN KUMBCR 5 N 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

-

:

A

ll If

I I I I

I I I I

if - / / f - - l

1/

~y -

'

/ /

• ^ i — i 1 1 1 A ■ L 1 ,

1

— 1 —

-

-

' ■

.

-

-

OCT NOV

PROGRAM OEC JAN FE1 MAR APR AUG SEP

BUOBET

ACTUAL

25 15

51 4k

*5 1 * 5

81 [

MATERIAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

4

1 10

4

10

t.5 *5 *5 * 5

10 10 10 10

* 5 * 5 * 5 * 5

10 10 10 1 10

MANPOWER BUOBET

ACTUAL

5

3

2

5

0 0 I 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

2 0 .

18.

16. ^ - I z

14. 5 o X

12 . -or

10 . a: o a. X

6 . >-

z Id

4. i > id

0 .

BUDGET

ACTUAL

The first phase of this task has been completed. All future funding and progress has been transferred to the Thermal Fuels Behavior Program through CCB 81-23.

35

20.

18.

16.

14.

12.

10.

8.

6.

4.

2.

0.

EGIG IDAHO INC. A6273 - AUSTRIAN FUNDS NUMBER 5 F A C 0 O 0 0 0

-

-

-

-

-

-

1 — - I r 1 1 1 1 i i

r i

i .

TOTAL BUOBET ACTUAL

OCT NO* PROGRAM

0 0

0 0

DEC

0 0

JAN

0

FEB

0

MAR

1

APR

2

HAT

3

JUN

4

JLT

5

AUG

7

SEP

11

MATERIAL BUDGET ACTUAL

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8

MANPOWER BU08ET ACTUAL

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0 0 0 | 0

1 0 1 0

1 0 1

10.

9.

8.

7 .

6.

5.

4 .

3.

2.

1 .

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Budget graphs at this level contain reserves and contingencies. Refer to lower level graphs (summary cost accounts) for more meaningful budget review.

36

U1 Q Z < in 3 o X

in or

o

>

3 r 3 u

164

EGtG IDAHO INC. A6271 - NETHERLAND FUNDS NUMBER 5FNC00000

147 . -

130 . -

113

9 6 .

79

6 2 .

4 5 .

2 8 .

1 1 .

- 6 .

- r T

I -

I -

I _

I I -I

OCT NOV

TOTAL PROGRAM DEC JAN FEB MAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG SEP

BUOBET

ACTUAL

4

- 2

2 7

* 3 *

35

MATERIAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

1

- 5

15

- 1

MANPOWER BUOGET

(ACTUAL

1

1

2

1

17

2 0

4 0 4 4 51 5 * 5 7 58

1 7

2

1

1

18

1

14 2 0 20

1 1 0

2 0

59

2 0

* 0 158

2 0 1 17

0 0 0 0

10.

9

8

7 .

6

5.

4 .

3

2.

1 .

0

o

or UJ o a z <x r

3 O

BUOGET

ACTUAL

Budget graphs at this level contain reserves and contingencies. Refer to lower level graphs (sunmary cost accounts) for more meaningful budget review.

37

EGIG IDAHO INC

A 6 1 0 4 - GERMAN FUNDS

NUMBER BF7COO00O

i n 3

i n or

o

3 X 3 U

\ -\ \ I I

I . \ \ 1 \

TOTAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

OCT NOV

P R O G R A M

* *

1 *

S

MATERIAL BUOGET

ACTUAL

2

3

2

2

DEC

30

4

2

2

MANPOWER BUOBET

ACTUAL

1

1

2

0

3

0

JAN

4 2

3

3

FEB

1 1 3

71

HAR

1 1 *

75

APR

1 17

HAT

118

7 5 75

0 0 0 0

JUN

118

75

0

J L T

1 1 *

75

0

AUG

1 1 8

75

0

SEP

5 *

14

0

1 0 .

9

9

7 .

6

5 .

4

3

2 .

1 .

0 .

- i i

o r a. UJ i o a z 4

Z

3 O

BUOGET

ACTUAL

Budget graphs at th is level contain reserves and contingencies. Refer to lower level graphs (sunmary cost accounts) fo r more meaningful budget review.

38

VI Q Z < in 3 O I ►-

</> or -J -I o o UJ > 1-

< -1 3 3-

450.

405.

360.

315.

270.

225.

180.

135.

90.

45.

EGtG IDAHO I N C .

A 6 1 1 1 - JAPANESE FUNDS

NUMBER 5FBC00000

TOTAL BUOBET ACTUAL

OCT NOV

PROGRAM 123 101

1 4 * 1*2

oec 223 152

JAN

23B

FEB

26G

HAR

303

APR

308

HAT

314

JUN

322

JLT

327

AUG

335

S E P

441

MATERIAL BUOBET ACTUAL

9* 82

1 1 3 4*

114 105

121 15* 159 1*0 1*3 Ifc* 1*8 172 273

MANPOWER BUOBET ACTUAL

7 5

12 10

4 4

3 3 2 1 1 1 l 1 1 1

z o r

or LU 2 o 0 .

z

z Ul

3 o

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Budget graphs at this level contain reserves and contingencies. Refer to lower level graphs (sunmary cost accounts) for more meaningful budget rev i ew.

39

Summary Cost Accounts 5Nxx —NRC Summary Cost Accounts

5Fxxx—Foreign Summary Cost Accounts

40

EG&G IDAHO INC.

A6308-CRT OISPLAY OESIGN/ANALYSIS

NUMBER 5NPVOOOOO

OCT NOV TOTAL PROGRAM

BUOBET

ACTUAL 40

15

83

5 *

133

87

1 7 * 2 2 2 2 8 4

M A T E R I A L BUOBET

ACTUAL

8

- 2

17

3

27

1

3 2 38 4 *

3 3 1

53

MANPOWER BUOBET

ACTUAL

7

4 * 7

7

7

7 8 B 7

3 7 8

* 0

7

4 2 4

* 4

*

4 7 0

75

7

5 1 * 5 5 3

81 8 *

* *

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Late start on some activities has delayed procurement activities.

41

9 7 0 .

8 7 3 .

7 7 6 .

6 7 9 .

5 8 2 .

485 .

388 .

291 .

194.

9 7 .

0

TOTAL

E61G IDAHO INC.

EXP PROG - PROG PLAN 1 EVAL

NUMBER 5N1800000

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T - 1 1 r— ; ** »»

«/' * B*

S

••* -S

+ f «■

X +

+ -"

_•«• •

•* +

S .

7> _ « . — •"

yy _.,L=rr=-- j -

«">^~ i ^ " B^r T" " E ^ — i 1 _ i i i i i J . 1 OCT NOV OEC JAN FEB MAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG SEP

PROGRAM BUOBET

ACTUAL

107

5 4

2 1 3

132

3 0 4

2 5 4

3 7 * 4 4 4

MATERIAL BUDGET

ACTUAL

3 4

14

1 0 7

8 *

1 3 1 1 5 0

M A N P O W E R

BUOBET

ACTUAL

17

1 0

13

13

10 10

5 3 1

1 7*

10

5 4 0

1 4 4

7

* 5 8

2 2 4

8

744

2 * 7

8

8 0 5

2 4 3

8

8 8 2 4 * 1

3 2 4 3 4 9

8 1 1

1

4 0 .

36

3 2 .

2 8 .

2 4 .

2 0 .

1 6 .

1 2 .

8 .

4 .

>-I

z e X

-nr i i i

T O a z < X

1 -

z u - 1

> 3 13 LU

0.

BUDGET

ACTUAL

This budget does not r e f l ec t the l a tes t LOFT test schedule. New CCB's have been submitted which w i l l better r e f l e c t our current manpower needs.

At our current manpower l e ve l , we w i l l overspend the above budget by about 10%.

Year-to-date actuals through December of 1980 reduced by $13,000 due to premature delet ion of account number 51LPPXX. Has been corrected for January 1981 business.

42

4 0 .

3 6 .

3 2 .

2 8 .

2 4 .

2 0 .

16.

12.

8 .

4 .

0.

TOTAL

EGIG I0AH0 INC.

SWISS REFLOOD

NUMBER 5N1COO0O0

-

■

■

-

-

"

til.

— i 1 1 1 —r- r 1 1 1 T

•** 0

y "

s * —

y * - . - * ' " " " "

*zr # r - . —•*-*

■TT i i * . - - * . - , i L , i 1 1 OCT NOV OEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUB SEP PROGRAM

BUOBET

ACTUAL

2

2

M A T E R I A L BUDGET

ACTUAL

1

2

MANPOWER BUOBET

ACTUAL

0

0

5

4

8

B

10 13 I B 18 2 1

2

2

0

0

3

2

4 * 7 8 5

0

1

0 0 0 0 0

2 4

1 1

0

2 7

12

0

3 0

13

0

33

14

0

No significant variance.

43

1410.

1269.

1 128.

987.

846.

705.

564.

423.

282

141 .

0 TOTAL

EGtG IDAHO INC. EXP PROG - LOFT DATA SYSTEMS NUMBER 5N1C0OO00

" -

-

-

-

1

1 1

• * * ^y

*^y

4-r^^T

i i I I i r — — i 1 i 71

* *

y

y

^ y ' '

y '

* •

y ^ +

— * ■ y

•y > • .;- = *■"- ,

' 1 1 L 1 L I OCT NOV OEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG SEP PROGRAM

BUOBET

ACTUAL

145

1 2 5

MATERIAL BUDGET

ACTUAL

4 1

64

3 0 5

2 3 5

4 1 1

3 5 4

87

1 0 5

125

1 * 0

5 1 5

159

5 4 7 7 4 4

183

MANPOWER ■UOSET

ACTUAL

3 1

17

3 1

1 *

I f c

17

1 4 1 5

2 4 3

B 5 4 4 4 8 1 0 4 7

2 7 9 3 0 4

1 4 1 4 1 *

3 3 5

13

1 142 1 2 7 5

3 * 7

18

41 3

1 8

1 4 0 4

4 * 4

2 0

70.

63.

56.

49,

42.

35

28.

21 .

14 .

7 .

0.

BUDGET

ACTl

The peak testing activity at LOFT during October produced a backlog of effort which will stretch into the coming months.

44

U7 O z < in 3 O X

or

o o

3 X 3 <J

6 4 0 .

5 7 6 .

5 1 2 .

4 4 8 .

3 8 4 .

3 2 0 .

2 5 6 .

1 9 2 .

1 2 8 .

64 .

0 .

TOTAL

EGtG IDAHO I N C .

DATA A N A L Y S I S BR - TEST EVAL

NUMBER 5 N 1 R 0 0 0 0 0

| 1 1 1 r — i 1 i r - 1 — i i ^ . If*

* s

** " S * +

<* S*

* + * *

* s +

. _ _ , ^ •»•» 1 «■*

■ - - - L _ ^ ,

-4y^— m — . a — . i i i i i i i ■ OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR HAT JUN J L T AUG SEP

PROGRAM BUOGET

ACTUAL

1\

38

1 3 5

75

1 4 4

128

2 4 0 2 8 5 3 4 8

MATERIAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

8

3

1 4

10

31

2 3

4 0 49

MANPOWER BUOGET

ACTUAL

15

4

12

8

1 1

4

7 8

to

4

344

6 4

4

4 4 3 4 4 2 5 3 7

7 4 9 0

7 *

48

a

5 4 5

1 10

8

* 3 2

1 1 *

*

40.

36.

32 Z _ i x

28 z o X

24 or

20. 3 o a

16. | x

12. •-z bl

s. i 4 i

111 0.

BUOGET

ACTUAL

Budget reflects improper monthly manpower allocation. Total budgeted manyears reflect proper distribution. Budget realignment is necessary to show proper monthly allocation.

45

1740.

1566.

1392.

1218.

1044 .

870.

696.

522.

348.

174.

0. TOTAL

EGtG IDAHO INC. EXPER EVAL BRANCH - 6420 NUMBER 5N1N00000

T

y

- * = - i i i .

OCT NOV DEC JAN FEI

PROGRAM HAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG SEP

•UOBET ACTUAL

155 81

324 2 0 *

5 18 3*7

*73 825 441 1044 1204 1 350 14*4 1*1* 1740


5 * 2 2

131 80


23 13

14

13

213 155

283 350 415 455

22 15

14 IB l* 14

4 4 * 555 *01

13 14 1*

*58

IS

705

1*

50

45.

40.

35.

30.

25.

20.

15.

10.

5.

0.

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Below budget because of less manpower than projected. Actual costs to date are understated by approximately $25,000. Corrective action has been initiated and will be resolved for February 1981 business.

46

in o Ul 3

U) or

o Q

UJ

>

3 O

6 4 0 .

5 7 6 .

5 1 2 .

4 4 8 .

3 8 4 .

3 2 0 .

2 5 6 .

1 9 2 .

1 2 8 .

6 4 .

0 .

TOTAL

E G t G IDAHO I N C .

FUEL INSTRUMENTATION

NUMBER 5N2A00000 T T I I T^~

y

, - - ' ,'

i

i.jn^m -SL

4'

i i i

i J L_

OCT NOV OEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG

PROGRAM SEP

BUOBET ACTUAL

52 8

1 1 1 20

1 71, 30

221 2*0 313 3*4 478


37 2

81 5

124 17

152 1*7 181 193


4 1

3 1

4 0

5 5 * 8

2*5

4

5 4 8

335

4

*24

340

5

*30 *32

342

1

342

0

2 0 .

1 8 .

1 6 . ^ _i X

1 4 . -o X

1 2 . -or

1 0 . i o a

8- \ X

6. t Z Itl

4. i >

2 i bl

0 .

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Due to changes in test and fuel schedule, much instrument procurement and fabrication activity was delayed longer than originally planned. A new baseline is being implemented which will more closely match present pianning.

47

EGtG IOAHO INC. FUEL - FUEL OSGN t ANALYSIS NUMBER 5 N 2 0 O 0 0 0 0

* : t > * ! U .

2 3 5 8 .

2096

1834 .

1572.

1310 .

1048

786 .

5 2 4 .

2 6 2 .

n

-

•

_ 1 j ^

w*

J . - ' 4»»

<•*

. - ' '

/ ' - ' "

• * * f u

~"! ■•»»•= i

• i i ■ J •

i — i — J

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT

TOTAL PROGRAM AUG SEP

BUOBET

ACTUAL

3 7 0

4 3 4

MATERIAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

3 0 4

3 8 2

* 1 5

8 1 4

4 4 3

5 4 1

8 7 3

8 3 7

* 8 *

M l

1 100

8 7 7

131 1 1 * 1 0 1832 2 0 2 0 21 77

1 0 1 4 1 188 1 3 0 8 1 4 1 7 1 5 4 2

MANPOWER ■UOBET

ACTUAL

14

12

13

10

13

12

7 1 * 2 2 2 2 17 5

2 3 0 3

1 * 4 1

*

2 4 7 1

1 7 7 1

*

2 * 1 7

1 8 8 *

*

50 .

45

4 0 . ^ _i x

35 r

o X

30 . -or

2 5 . al o D,

20 . * x

15. £ Z UJ

10. i > 5 i UJ

0 .

BUDGET

ACTUAL

No signif icant variance,

48

EGtG IDAHO INC. POST TEST EXAM NUMBER 5N2F00000

3 1 5 .

2 8 0 .

2 4 5 .

2 1 0 .

175.

140 .

105.

7 0 .

35 .

n

-

• t

T

I 1 1 l_ - / J * "

y

- 1_

y

- \

'

— i 1 1 1 1 - 1 r-

x -

y

y "

«*»

X ' •

X -

^ -1

OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB HAR APR HA* JUN JLT AUG SEP TOTAL PROGRAM

BUOBET

ACTUAL

4 4

1 2

M A T E R I A L

BUDGET

ACTUAL

4

0

* 4

3 4

49

4 8

10

2

123 143 1 77 2 1 0 2 3 5 2 * 2 2 8 4 3 1 4 3 4 1

U 14 1 7 2 1 2 4 2b 3 0 33 35

M A N P O W E R

BUOBET

ACTUAL

1 0

3 * 3

* 4 5 * 5 4 5 5 4

30.

27. 24. v

_j X 21- z o X 1B. -

or 15. at o 0. 12. \

X 9. *-

6.

3- 3 0.

BUDGET

ACTUAL

The underrun is caused by 1. unanticipated delivery delays of FMIRC load cell data acquisition system hardware 2. nonavailability of key personnel to prepare fuel bundle destructive examination procedures and 3. less than anticipated labor costs incurred in performing the posttest Level I fuel requalifications which was based on incurring fuel damage. A CCB will be prepared to reduce the Level I fuel requalification budget to a level that is consistent with requalification of undamaged fuel.

49

Ul o z « 3 O X 1 -

U1 or < _ i _i o o UJ

> « - 1 3 X 3 o

3 6 8 0 .

3 3 1 2 .

2 9 4 4 .

2 5 7 6 .

2 2 0 8 .

1840 .

1472.

1 104.

736 .

368 .

0 .

TOTAL

EGtG IDAHO INC. EXP INSTR - EXPER MEAS BR 6110 NUMBER 5N1400000

T T * -J

y

- - r - v - ~' J

i i i i

L-.C __!.-.-

■ ■ i i u

130.

117.

104.

91 .

7 8 .

6 5 .

5 2 .

3 9 .

2 6 .

1 3.

>-_ i X

Z o X — or UJ 2 O a z X 1 -

z UJ _J

> 3 o

OCT NOV 0EC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG SEP PROGRAM

BUOBET

ACTUAL

2 7 2

1*0

* 3 4

S04

M A T E R I A L BUOBET

ACTUAL

8 0

1 4

1 * *

81

MANPOWER BUDGET

ACTUAL

4 8

37 *! * 4

4 1 5

770

1 2 0 2 1 4 9 8 1 4 0 * 2 1 9 7 2 4 4 7 2 7 2 4 2 4 2 4 3 3 1 4 3 * 7 5

244

1 1 3

4 2

5 2

3 4 7 4 4 5 * 2 5 70S 7 7 5 374 4 3 8 1 0 1 4

4 4 4 4 4 0 45 4 0 31 3 4 5 5

1 0 8 8

* 2

0.

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Original baseline was underspent due to: 1. a delay in planning for L9-1, which impacted instrumentation activities; 2. moving up of REBEKA and TC-' instrument fabrication, which delayed Fl instrument procurement and fabrication. A new baseline has been implemented, which brings budget into agreement with present plans.

50

EGtG IOAHO INC. DATA ANALYSIS BRANCH - 6130 NUMBER 5 N S R 0 0 0 0 0

T

y

-I 7] 5 0 -4»

4* ^ 4 5 .

4 0 . >-_j I

3 5 . z o X

H 30. -

\ U I 1 1

2 5 .

2 0 .

1 5 .

1 0 .

OCT NOV

TOTAL PROGRAM

JAN FEB HAR APR HAT AUG SEP

BUOBET ACTUAL

101 SB

1*4

135 232 188

289 344


M A N P O BUOBET ACTUAL

* 1

H E R 24 14

11 1*

17

* 23 28

440

35

5 1 * 58b **7 741 843 437

41 47

1 3 14

13 13

12 1 1 15 15 14

54

13

59

1*

*7 73

1* IB

5- g 111

0 .

BUOGET

ACTUAL

Current s ta f f i ng levels are below the al located budget. Steps are being taken to a l l ev ia te the problem.

51

EGtG IDAHO INC. THREE MILE ISLAND SUPPORT NUMBER 5NTHBOO00

BUOBET

ACTUAL

4 0

45

MATERIAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

10

1 *

79

105

1 15

1 15

18

3 0

2 0

35

1 19 1 19

2 0 2 0

1 14 1 19 1 14 1 14

2 0 2 0 20 2 0

MANPOWER BUOGET

ACTUAL

7

7

7

1 0

7

2

1 0 0 0 0 0

1 19 1 1 4

2 0 2 0

0 0

114

2 0

0

o X

or UJ x o a

z UJ

3 O

BUDGET

ACTUAL


52

in o in 3 O X

(A or

o Q UJ >

3 C 3

2139.

1925.

1711.

1497.

1283.

1069.

855.

641

427.

213.

-1

EGtG IDAHO INC. PLANT SUPPORT - PLANT SYS NO 3 NUMBER SN4H00000

T

4* _J

y

i

5 6 . >-_j x z o X

H 42. -or bl

1 X. - - J I

■ r - r T O T A L BUOBET ACTUAL

OCT NO* PROGRAM 123 84

25* 14*

MATERIAL BUOGET ACTUAL

IB 0

3* 17

MANPOWER BUOGET ACTUAL

25 17

24 27

OEC

418 30*

57 25

24 22

JAN

*25

141

28

FEB

784

178

2*

HAR

474

224

25

APR

1 145

2*0

28

HAT

1322

JUN

15*0

JLT

1704

303 380 401

28 28 30

AUG

1870

422

25

SEP

2124

5*2

25

7 0 .

6 3 .

3 5 .

- j 2 8

21

1 4 .

7 .

0 .

o a

3 o U

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Actuals t r a i l the budget due to i n i t i a l f ront-end loading and the fac t that a large port ion of the budget is test support. CCF 3071 is being prepared to respread the budget according to the test schedule published in NCK-274-80.

CCF 3071 is in v e r i f i c a t i o n process, ant ic ipate approval 12-15-80 and pass to CAPS pr ior to December month-end close.

CCF 3071 did not pass to CAPS pr io r to December close and is expected pr ior to January month-end close.

53

1660.

1494.

1328.

1 162.

996.

830.

664.

498.

332.

166.

0. TOTAL

EGtG IDAHO INC. PLANT SUPPORT - PLANT SYS NO 1 NUMBER SNA I 00000

-

-

" 1

1 1

..-r' _

'

— -S_

*

-

'

-1 1 1 1 1 -I 1 1 1 4 /

/ y

+ * '

- - * y '

+ * '

y

*

'^ " " « _ 4 t l - — u . , , J- — L'

_i_ — i i i i 1 1 1 i

100.

9 0 .

8 0 .

70 . z

o X

6 0 . ~ or

5 0 . as o a z 4 0 .

3 0 .

OCT NO* OEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG SEP

PROGRAM •UOBET ACTUAL

211 212

431 384

57* 517

883 774 413 544 1081 1 177 1277 1404 1*53


28 112

112 | 132 1*2 j 143

138 145 18* 145 200 203 230 253 404

MANPOWER ■UOBET ACTUAL

48 2*

24 24

25 24

23 18 1 1* 15 1 15 1 15 1* 1 7 20

20.

'«• 5 0.

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Major contributors to the materiel overrun, are work packages 5N4I06000 and 5N4I04000. CCF 3120 and CCB 81-62, respectively, have been submitted with new logic which brings those budgets in line.

54

1660.

1494

1328.

1 162.

996.

830.

664.

498

332.

166.

EGtG IDAHO INC. PLANT SUPPORT - PLANT SYS NO 2 NUMBER SN4J00000

- r T r — 1 4 0 .

/ /"

/

_ . . r - - r " ' V - . r i

i i j

i /

BUOBET

ACTUAL

55

5 4

1 14

1 1 5

181

188

2 5 5 3 2 7 4 3 7 5 3 * * 5 3 8 4 4 5 * 5 1 0 5 4 1 * 5 7

MATERIAL

BUOBET

ACTUAL

4

7

1 4

17

33

3 7

4 8 5 5 * 4 74

MANPOWER

BUOBET 1 11

ACTUAL | 11

10

11

1 1

10

1 3 14 1 7 18

1 10

1 4

2 5 1

18

2 * 7

1 4

2 8 1

12

8 2 *

1 2

No s ign i f i can t variance.

36.

32

2 8 .

24

2 0 .

1 6 .

1 2 .

8 .

4 .

0 .

BUOGET

ACTUAL

55

1560.

1404 .

1248.

1092.

936.

780.

624.

468.

312.

156.

0. TOTAL

EGtG IDAHO INC. PLANT SUPPORT - PtC REACTOR CONT NUMBER 5N4K00O00

" 1 -| 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T „* ***

y '

<•*

• •

i ■ — i f* — , L__r ----

^L^'V

6 0 .

54 .

4 8 . >-- j X

4 2 . z o X

3 6 . ~ or UJ

H 30 . a: o a.

-I 24. 5 18

OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR HAY JUN JLT AUG SEP PROGRAM

BUOBET ACTUAL

1*4 I 314 84 j 232

4*0 380


48 8

121 **

540 724

142 1*4

842

145

1 M A N P O W E R BUOBET ACTUAL

27 14

20 23

22 25 23

1013 1128

218 23*

20 14

124* 1334

252 2*1

1* 18

14*4 1558

271

It

278

17

1-z UJ

12. i

6. 3 a UJ

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Non-labor costs for material and construction work have not been paid as soon as anticipated.

56

950.

855.

760.

665.

570.

475.

380

285

190.

95.

0. TOTAL

EGtG IDAHO INC. PLANT SUPPORT - PIC H E SUPPORT NUMBER SH4POOOO0

- r T - T

u

OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG

PROGRAM

BUOBET

ACTUAL

• 8

B5

MATERIAL

BUOBET

ACTUAL

1 7

37

182

157

37

* 7

2G2

2 0 4

57

8 4

3 * 1

**

4 3 8 5 2 4

' 7 9 2

* 0 2

1 0 *

* 7 4

1 19

MANPOWER

BUOBET

ACTUAL

2 0

13

15

1 0

17

* 1 * 15 14 1 3 13

75-1

132

814

1 4 3

13 12

8 8 4

1 5 *

1 1

4 4 7

1 * *

1 1

1

5 0

4 5 .

4 0 .

3 5 .

3 0 .

2 5 .

2 0 .

15

10

S

z - j i

> -2" O I

UJ 3 o a z « r

t -z UJ

> 3 a

BUOGET

ACTUAL

Sign i f icant e l ec t r i ca l engineering manpower has been diverted to tes t - re la ted work funded by other LOFT accounts.

Radiation monitoring upgrade tasks are behind schedule; correct ive action ( r e p r i o r i t i z a t i o n and rescheduling) is in progress.

57

1350. I J 3 U . I |

1215. -

EGtG IDAHO INC. CORE t SAFETY SUPT-PROTECT t CON NUMBER 5NSK00000

-r T

1 0 8 0 .

9 4 5 .

8 1 0 .

6 7 5 .

5 4 0 .

405 .

2 7 0 .

135.

'-'ill'

TOTAL BUOBET ACTUAL

OCT NOV PROGRAM

45 8*


30 8

147 155

OEC

304 240

74 34

124 *4

JAN

41 1

1*4

FEB

512

HAR

*45

APR

754

204 257

MANPOWER BUDGET ACTUAL

12 13

12 12

12 12

12 12 12

295

HAT

8*3

341

JUN

494

391

JLT

1047

431

AUG

1233

SEP

1347

484 528

12 12 12 1 3 12 13

3 0 . "3*.

27 .

24

21 .

18

15

12.

9

6

3 .

0

_ i

o X

or UJ as o CL Z « X

3 a

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Manpower budget reflects the actual spending. Through cost effective management of analysis effort, the current computer actual spending rate is lower than the budgeted allocations.

58

1 9 1 0 .

1 7 1 9 .

1 5 2 8 .

1 3 3 7 .

1 1 4 6 .

9 5 5 .

7 6 4 .

5 7 3 .

3 8 2 .

191 .


CORE t SAFETY SUPT-REACTOR SYS

NUMBER 5N5L00000 - r T

x- - - -

y

S-.r u _ _ f - - * - - -

OCT NOV

PROGRAM HAR APR HAT JUN AUG SEP

BUOBET

ACTUAL

140

1 4 3

2 8 *

2 7 5

4 4 *

4 2 4

5 4 1 7 3 5 4 2 5 1081

MATERIAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

27

3 *

5 *

5 3

8 *

8 0

1 14 1 4 1 1 7 7

MANPOWER BUOBET

ACTUAL

2 4

2 3

2 3

23

2 4

2 3

2 4 23 23

2 0 *

2 4

1237 1414 15*0 1745 1401

2 3 5 2 * 7 2 4 0 3 2 1

2 4 23 25 24

3 4 8

2 4

6 0

5 4 .

48

4 2 .

3 6 .

3 0 .

2 4 .

1 8 .

1 2 .

6,

0

BUDGET

ACTUAL


59

EGtG IDAHO INC.

CORE t SAFETY SUPT-FUEL ENG t OP

NUMBER 5 N S N 0 0 0 0 0 T-1460.

1314.

1 168.

1022

876.

730.

584.

438

292

146

OCT NOV TOTAL PROGRAM

" P T T - T - T

FEB HAR APR HAT JUN J L T AUG SEP

BUOBET ACTUAL

77 1 1 1

1*3 274

2*2 342

353 448 588 713 838 483 11 12 1 2 8 * 1455

MATERIAL BUDGET 1 24 ACTUAL j 22

* 2 111

MANPOWER BUDGET

ACTUAL 11 2 2

1 1 1*

101 131

12 21

134

13

1** 207 245 245 355 407

1 3 1 7 IB 15 14 IS

477 54 7

17 21

5 0 .

45

40

3 5 .

30

2 5 .

2 0 .

15.

10.

5 .

0

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Indicated overrun is due to two items: 1. labor overrun resu l t ing from fabr ica t ion of LOFT fuel storage rack and 2. material charges b i l l e d from Hot Shop for October and November support.

CCB's in process to correct current work accomplishments.

60

EGtG IDAHO INC. COMMON SUPP - COCS/TECH SUPT NUMBER 5N*MO0000

U f U .

9 6 3 .

8 5 6 .

7 4 9 .

6 4 2 .

5 3 5 .

4 2 8 .

321 .

2 1 4 .

107.

n

-

. -

■

_ 1 I

1

"-I

•~*JC

1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 " » ,

* y

* y

••* y

, _ _ - / _ _ . , , . . ' ' < L r ? y

y*

OCT NOV OEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG SEP TOTAL PROGRAM

BUDGET

ACTUAL

7*

** 1 5 *

1 4 1

2 4 4

2 2 0

324 4 0 4 5 1 0

MATERIAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

2 0

13

4 1

3 *

* 4

5 0

MANPOWER BUDGET

ACTUAL

17

1 *

1 *

15

17

17

8 5

17

1 0 * 1 3 4

18 17

5 4 * * S 3 7 B *

1 5 *

17

1 79

17

204

17

8 * 8

2 2 5

I B

4 7 *

2 5 3

17

1 0 * 7

2 7 *

18

4 0 .

3 6 .

3 2 .

2 8 .

2 4 .

2 0 .

1 6 .

1?

8 .

4

z -J X

7 O X -or UJ

o 0.

< X

1 -

z UJ - J

> 3 o Ul

0.

BUDGET

ACTUAL


61

1370

EGtG IDAHO INC.

COMMON SUPPORT - QUALITY

NUMBER 5N8I00000 I ' I I I T r

1 2 3 3 . -

1096

959

8 2 2 .

6 8 5 .

548

4 1 1 .

274 .

137.

■ — x. r w

y

' J

BUOBET ACTUAL

102 78


13 0

M A N P O W E R BUOBET ACTUAL

23 14

20* 171

314 270

420 521 *55 7*4 874 100*

24 2

33 10

22 20

23 14

40 48 58 ** 74

23 22 23 23 23

83

23

1 1 10

41

25

1248 1383

101

24

104

24

60 .

54 .

48 .

42 .

36 .

30 .

24 .

18.

12.

6 .

0 .

o X

a. UJ rt o a z

z UJ

3 O

BUDGET

ACTUAL

No significant variance. Subcontract material costs under investigation for resolution.

52

1110 .

EGtG IDAHO INC.

COMMON SUPPORT - PLANS t BUDGETS

NUMBER 5 H 4 T 0 0 0 0 0

0 .

T - ~r

i r _ ^ - l r - - L . _ r

4 0 .

3 6 .

"I 32

2 8 .

2 4 .

20

16.

12.

8 .

OCT NOV

TOTAL PROGRAM JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN AUG SEP

BUOBET ACTUAL

7* 7*

157 154

M A T E R I A L BUOBET ACTUAL

1 7 | 3* 15 j 30

24* 234

5* 4B

32*

74

407

52

512 fcOl **9 75* 884 1015 1 101

11* 137 158 183 207 254 27*


IB IB

17 | IB 17 [ 17

IB 17 IB 18 18 18 14 IS 1«J

No signif icant variance.

4 2 UJ

0

BUDGET

ACTUAL

53

600

EGtG IDAHO INC. COMMON SUPPORT - SAFETY NUMBER 5NH00000

OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG SEP PROGRAM

BUOBET ACTUAL

42 28


1 3

87 *4

137 108

181

2 4

5


10 *

4 7

10

22*

*

285 334 382 441 487

7 8 '0 1 1 12

4 4 4 4 4 10

548

14

10

544

15

10

3 0 .

2 7 .

2 4 . >̂ _J

x 2 1 - z o

X 1 8 . -

or UJ 1 5 . o a

12. I X

9 . K z UJ

6 .

3- 5 u 0 .

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Underrun due to manpower shortage for priority assignment to TMI.

64

1 0 1 0 .


D I V I S I O N CONTROL

NUMBER 5N8800000

9 0 9 . -

8 0 8 . -

7 0 7 . -

6 0 6 . -

5 0 5 . -

4 0 4 . -

3 0 3 . -

2 0 2 . -

101 . -

T T

OCT NOV

TOTAL PROGRAM DCC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN AUG SEP

BUOGET

ACTUAL

0

0

MATERIAL BUDGET

ACTUAL

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 0 0

0

0


0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 0 0 0 0

0

0

0

1 0 0 0

1 0 0 0

0

Management reserve.

1 0 .

9 .

8 . >̂ - I X

■>■ z o X

6. -or

5 . 3 o ft

X 3 . r-

z UJ

2. i

UJ

BUDGET

ACTUAL

65

Ul

o z «c 3 o X 1 -

U1 or « - j _J o o u > •-« _J 3 X

3 4 3 0 .

3 0 8 7 .

2 7 4 4 .

2401

2 0 5 8 .

1715 .

1372 .

1029.

6 8 6 .

3 4 3

EGtG IDAHO INC. LOFT OPERS BRANCH NUMBER 5N7500000

T "I P 1 P

1 L__^«--^

/

1 «

BUOBET

ACTUAL

2 4 1

2 * 5

4 4 4

441 ,

7 8 3

8 3 1

MATERIAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

29

4 1

4 5

1 2 4

1 0 3 4

1 21.

1 2 4 5 1 * 3 3 1 4 1 1 2 1 8 8 2 5 2 1 2 7 8 5 3 1 3 2 3 4 2 4

157 1 4 8

MANPOWER BUOBET

ACTUAL

SO

4 5

4 4

55

5 0 4 7 48

2 3 1 2 * 4 3 0 3 3 3 4 3 7 5

4 4 4 4 4 4 53 5 1

4 0 4

5 2

120.

108.

96

8 4 .

7 2 .

6 0 .

4 8 .

3 6 .

2 4 .

1 2 .

0 .

z _j i

z o 1

-or UJ T a a z 3-

,_ Z

- J

> 3 a

BUDGET

ACTUAL


66

in Q z « to 3 O X 1 -

Ul or < - i j o o

UJ

> « - 1 3 X

1 8 9 0 .

1 7 0 1 .

1 5 1 2 .

1 3 2 3 .

1 1 3 4 .

9 4 5 .

7 5 6 .

5 6 7 .

3 7 8 .

1 8 9 .

EGtG IDAHO INC. LOFT TEST t DATA NUMBER 5N7T00000

BUOBET

ACTUAL

133

8 1

2 7 4

181

4 3 0

3 3 5

5 7 1 7 1 1 8 4 7 1 0 4 5 1 2 0 2 1 3 8 5 1 5 3 0 1 7 2 0 1 8 8 1

MATERIAL

BUOBET

ACTUAL

1 1

4

2 3

11

3 *

2 4

47 59 7 5 87 4 4 114

M A N P O W E R

BUOBET

ACTUAL

3 4

2 4

3 2

27

33

3 4

3 4 3 2 33 3 4 34 33

1 2 *

3 *

1 4 1 154

3 4 35

z o X

or UJ

o a

3 O UJ

BUOGET

ACTUAL

Underrun still caused by manpower expectations not being fulfilled.

67

3 0 8 0 .

2 7 7 2 .

2 4 6 4 .

2 1 5 6 .

1848 .

1540.

1232 .

9 2 4 .

6 1 6 .

3 0 8 .

0 .

TOTAL


LOFT F A C I L I T Y SUPPORT

NUMBER 5N7UOO000

_ _ j , +.'_ , , J 1 J

-I 1 L. OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG SEP

PROGRAM BUOBET

ACTUAL

M A T E R

BUOBET

ACTUAL

2 1 8

2 1 B

AL 3 *

5 5

4 4 8

4 4 3

74

5 4

703

7 0 5

1 1 *

5 1

4 3 3

154

1 1*3

142

MANPOWER BUDGET

ACTUAL

5 1

48

4 7

5 4

5 0

5 *

5 0 47

1 4 * *

2 4 2

4 4

1 715

2 8 2

1 9 * 4

322

221.3

3 7 0

5 0 5 0 4 4

2 4 4 4

4 0 8

5 3

2 8 1 0

4 5 8

3 0 7 1

5 0 0

5 1 5 2

120.

108.

9 6 .

8 4 .

7 2 .

z -1 X i -z o X

-

60.

48.

36.

24 .

'*■ §

0.

BUDGET

ACTUAL


68

660.

EGtG IDAHO INC. OUTSIDE SERVICE SUPPORT NUMBER 5N7Z00000

BUOBET ACTUAL

4*

2 *

55 72

150 135

154 248 312 3*5


4 3

7 4


12 7

1 1 11

12 8

15 15 24

12

13

12 11 1 1

28

12

415

32

12

482

37

12

533 800 8 5 5

41

13

4 *

12

50

12

30.

27.

24. Z -i X

21. z o X

18. -or

15. i o a

'2. I x 9. I-z Ul 3 I UJ

0.

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Underrun is still the result of the October underrun.

69

EGtG IDAHO I N C .

AUGMENTEO OPER C A P A B I L I T Y

NUMBER 5NBVO0000

OCT NOV

PROGRAM BUDGET ACTUAL

83 40

141 1 1*

282 143

344 417 508 580

MATERIAL auooci ACTUAL

44 5

40 14

123 25

145 1*7 145 21 7

*52

238

?37

2*4

902 887 45*

284


12 7

1 1 12

1 1 12

10 10 10 10 10 10 10

310 332

10 4

BUDGET

ACTUAL

B i l l i n g and payment f o r subcontract a c t i v i t i e s has been slower ant ic ipated.

than

70

EGtG IOAHO INC. CORE MELT MITIGATION NUMBER 5N4400000

OCT NOV

PROGRAM JAN FEB HAR APR JUN JLT

BUOBET

ACTUAL

25

1 4

MATERIAL B U O O E T

ACTUAL 4

1

MANPOWER BUDGET

ACTUAL

5

3

51

4 *

8

3

* 5

8 1

1 0

4

4

5

2

5

* 5

10

0

(.5

10

0

* 5 * 5

1 0

0

10

0

* 5

10

0

* 5 * 5

10

0

10

0

* 5

1 0

0

* 5

1 0

0

2 0 .

1 8 .

1 6 .

14 .

1 2 .

1 0 .

8 .

6

4 .

?

- J I

z o X — or 3

a z X l -Z UJ -J

> 3

CT Ul

0.

BUDGET

ACTUAL

The first phase of this task has been completed. All future funding and progress has been transferred to the Thermal Fuels Behavior Program, per CCB 81-23.

71

EGtG IDAHO INC.

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT t ANALYSIS

NUMBER 5FAC20000

AUG SEP

BUOBET

ACTUAL

0

0

MATERIAL BUDGET

ACTUAL

0

0

MANPOWER BUOBET

ACTUAL

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 7 1 1

0 1 2 3 4

0 0 0 0 0

5

0

7

0

8

1

BUDGET

ACTUAL


72

EGtG IDAHO I N C .

PROG DEVELOPMENT t A N A L Y S I S

NUMBER 5 F N C 2 0 0 0 0 6 0 .

5 4 .

4 8 .

4 2 .

3 6 .

3 0 .

2 4 .

1 8 .

1 2 .

6 .

OCT NOV

TOTAL PROGRAM

-

-

-

- r 1

* *

* *

* •

, y / •*■

Is*

~I '

/ / .

/

1 X

.L 1

1

L

-

7 /

/ _ /

MAR APR HAT

BUOGET

ACTUAL

3

4

15

13

25

3 2

28 3 2 3 9 45 45 4fc 47 48 5 4

MATERIAL BUOGET

ACTUAL

0

1

4

4

5

17

5 * -i\

MANPOWER BUDGET

ACTUAL

1

1

2

1

2

1

1 1 l

8 8 8 8 8 I I B

1 0 0 0 0 0

1 0 .

9

0 >̂ -J I

7 z o X

6 -

or 5 z

o a.

*■ I X

3 z 111

2. i >

'• i UJ

0

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Actual costs are shown $10.7K too high because an accrual reversal is shown in the suspense ledger. A cost transfer is in progress to move it to the correct charge number.

73

U1 a

ui 3 X

07

o a

>

3 <J

EGtG IDAHO INC

COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT

NUMBER 5FNC10000 14 .

12.

10.

8.

6. 4.

2.

-0. -2.

-4 .

-(.

1 1 1

P 1 f 1 f L »

i i

i i i

: . - ' • /

i / \ / A / \ / .

— i i —

i — i — i —

— i — — i — '

"

-

-

-

-

OCT NOV OEC JAN FEB HAR APR HAT JUN JLT AUG

TOTAL PROGRAM BUOBET ACTUAL

1 -5


1 -5

12 -5

12 -5

12 3

12 3

12 12

12 12

12 12 12 12

12 12 12 12

12

12

M A N P O W E R BUOBET | 0 ACTUAL j 0

0 0

0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

» - ^

12

0

12

0

1 0 .

9

8 .

7 .

6

5

4 .

o x

a a 2

2 .

x 3 . H

UJ -J

'• 3

BUDGET

ACTUAL

An overrun has occurred of approximately $2K due to construction contractor charges for the two-phase loop platform and s ta i rs at the LOFT Test Support F a c i l i t y . The cost graph shows an underrun because $10.7K in charges fo r the internal cladding thermocouple design by Exxon Nuclear has not yet been charged against th is fore ign fund account. Cost transfers to correct the Exxon Nuclear charges are in progress.

74

EGtG IDAHO INC PROG DEVELOPMENT t ANALYSIS NUMBER 5F7C20000

4 0 .

3 6 .

3 2 .

2 8 .

2 4 .

2 0 .

1 6 .

1 2 .

8 .

4 .

o

*

^

^ 1 —

* /

*

1 I —

>

/ /

/

*

1 1 1 1 -t

y

•

- 1 y v '

i 1— — i — ■ —

/ / / -

/ / 1

J r

i 4 J /

/

.

.

T O T A L BUDGET

ACTUAL

OCT NOV

PROGRAM 4

2

5

2

DEC

1 *

3

JAN

2 0

FEB

23

MAR

2 *

APR

27

HAT

27

M A T E R I A L BUDGET

ACTUAL

0

0

0

0

0

1

1 4 7 7 7

MANPOWER BUOBET

ACTUAL

1

1

1

0

1

0

1 0 0 0 0

JUN

2 7

J L T

27

7

0

7

0

AUG

2 7

7

0

SEf

37

17

0

10. 9. 8 ^

_J I

7- z o X

6 or

5. g o a

" I x

3. i-

z UJ

2. i > UJ

0.

BUDGET

ACTUAL

The actual charges are underrun because of the following reasons. LOFT Related Programs Branch Management charges for German (FRG) Foreign fund administration have not been made because of the delay in the receipt of the German funds. Higher priority work has delayed start on the storage tank analysis task. The LOFT state vector task is being reevaluated.

75

EGtG IDAHO INC COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT

9 0 .

8 1 .

7 2 .

6 3 .

5 4 .

4 5 .

3 6 .

2 7 .

1 8 .

9

0 .

TOTAL

NUMBER 5 F 7 C 3 0 0 0 0

1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 • 1

> 1 • 1

1 1 ' 1

> 1 1 1 > 1

. ' » ' 1

S ' r ' /

' c - — i * i f 1 „S u

— 1 — ■ ' - A —

-

■

-

-

■ ■ OCT MOV DEC JAN FEB HAR APR

PROGRAM JUN JLT AUG SEP

BUOBET

ACTUAL

1

0

4

0

12

3

2 1 87 88 ea 89 89 89 89 8 4

MATERIAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

0

0

0

0

0

0

MANPOWER BUDGET

ACTUAL

0

0

1

0

2

0

0 ** *fc **

2 0 0 0

** *fc

0 0

**

0

** fc*

0 0

Budget is underrun because the steam probe task is being reevaluated and no costs have occurred.

76

90

81 . |-

72. -

63.

54.

45.

36.

27.

18.

9.

EGtG IDAHO INC. PROG DEVELOPMENT t ANALYSIS NUMBER 5FBC20000 T -r T- -r

/ /" / / -\

i y .

J i

/ / -i

„ y

TOTAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

OCT NOV

PROGRAM 4

4

1 1

13

MATERIAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

1

3

2

3

OEC

1 4

27

4

5

J A N

2 4

FEB

2 8

MAR

34

5 7 9

APR

40

HAT

4 5

1 1 13

J U N

5 2

J L T

57

AUG

* 5

15

MANPOWER BUOBET

ACTUAL

1

0

1

1

1

2

1 1 1 I 1 1

18 2 0

1 1

SEP

8 8

3 5

1

Overrun is due to increased management charges to JAERI funds until the German funds became available. Now that German funds will soon be available appropriate adjustments in management charges will be made to compensate for the underrun.

77

EGtG IDAHO I N C .

COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT

NUMBER 5 F 8 C 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 .

9 .

8 .

7 .

4 .

TOTAL BUDGET

ACTUAL

PROGRAM 3

1

3

4

MATERIAL BUDGET

ACTUAL

0

1

0

4

MANPOWER BUOBET

ACTUAL

1

0

0

0

3

4

0

4

0

0

3

0

3 3 3 3

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

3

0

0

3

0

0

3

0

0

3

0

0

z o X

6 . -or

5 . re o o. z « X

3 . H z UJ 2 .

1 . 3 O UJ

0 .

BUDGET

ACTUAL

The overrun is high by $2.2K because the offsett ing accrual reversal is against a different number.

78

1 10.

99.

88.

77.

66.

55.

44.

33.

22.

1 1 .

0.

EGtG IDAHO INC. POST CHF HEAT RRANSFER NUMBER 5F8C40000

— i — i — i — i —

* r

i i

i i

i i

i

.

-

• •

•

i y

4»

i i ■ i — i —

-

-

;

-

TOTAL BUDGET ACTUAL

OCT NOV PROGRAM

11 i

2 2 7

OEC

40 13

JAN

50

FEB

44

MAR

104

APR

104

HAT

104

JUN

105

JLT

105

AUG

10*

SEP

10*


1 0

2 0

5 0

5 34 39 34 40 40 41 41 41


3 0

2 1

3 1

2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 I 0

10.

9.

8.

7.

b.

5.

4 .

3.

2.

1 .

BUDGE

ACTUA

The budget is underrun because work schedules have been changed due to higher priority work. Adjustments to the budget will be made to more accurately reflect the current schedule.

79

t/1

01 3 o I

Ul or

o Q

UJ

>•

3 X 3 U

EGtG IDAHO INC.

SMALL BREAK INSTRUMENTATION •HIM11R 5F8C50000

T T

J. L. T O T A L BUOBET ACTUAL

OCT NOV P R O G R A M

47 4*

144 141

OEC

144 150

JAN

144

FEB

144

MAR

144

APR

144

HAT

144

JUN

144

JLV

144

AUG

144

SEP

144


87 74

•J2 42

42 48

42 92 92 42 42 92 92 92 92


3 4

4 7

0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

20.

18.

16.

14 .

12.

10.

8.

z o X

a: UJ 2 O a z « X

6. t-z

4 .

2 3 0.

BUOGET

ACTUAL

This task has been completed. When all outstanding charges are received against this account, CCB action will be requested to transfer from contingency funds to cover the overrun.

80

LOFT Cost Accounts 5N3Axx —NRC Work Package Accounts

81

440.

396.

352.

308.

264.

220.

176.

132.

88.

44.

0,

EGtG IDAHO INC. EXP MEAS -BRANCH SUPPORT

CR 4N3AB8000 I 1 —1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~T " " J

0

*»* 0

•* 0 0

y 0

0 0

0 A 0 0

s 0

y 0

0 0

0 ^ •* "*

0 _- ^

„--y „ - - ' x — -

y .^^ ■"*m

<• "* .^y^-" " ,'*te^S-~'

TOTAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

OCT NOV

PROGRAM 3 1

1 *

* 4

3 4

OEC

1 0 0

* 3

JAN

133

FEB

1*5

HAR

2 0 4

APR

2 4 4

HAT

2 7 4

JUN

3 2 1

J L T

3 5 4

MATERIAL BUOBET

ACTUAL

14

4

2 4

14

MANPOWER

ACTUAL j 3 4

4 *

3 0

* 1 7 * 5 * 1 1 2 1 2 8 147

3 1

1 * 2

AUG

3 9 *

SEP

4 3 5

182 1 4 8

Less funds are being spent for computer work than originally estimated; this is due to a manpower shortage which existed in the first part of the year and to cost savings implemented by the computer users.

82

Tt EGtG IDAHO INC. EXP MEAS -DAVOS SUPPORT NUMBER 5NSADV000

OCT NOV

T O T A L P R O G R A M

BUOBET

ACTUAL

2 0

1 *

4 0

3 0

M A T E R I A L

BUDGET

ACTUAL

2 j

1

3

2

DEC

* 3

53

5

2

JAN

8 4

7

FEB

105

4

MAR

1 3 2

APR

155

1 1 13

HAT

1 7 7

14

M A N P O W E R

BUDGET

ACTUAL

5

3

4

3

5

5

5 4 4 5 *

JUN

2 0 4

1 *

J L T

2 2 *

I B

AUG

2 5 4

2 0

4 5 s

SEP

2 7 7

2 2

5

2 0 .

1 8 .

1 6 .

1 4 .

1 2 .

1 0 .

>-_ i X 1 -z o X

— or UJ

o 0 .

8.

6. •-4 . 2- 5 0.

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Manpower was assigned to another project, which resulted in slightly less being accomplished than originally planned. Spending is expected to pick up in January and will be within normal variance.

83

i n Q Z •c U) 3 O X

*-

V) ox «c -1 -J o o UJ

» < - 1 3 X

1 1 3 0 .

1 7 3 7 .

1 5 4 4 .

1 3 5 1 .

1 1 5 8 .

9 6 5 .

7 7 2 .

5 7 9 .

3 8 6 .

1 9 3 .

EGtG IDAHO INC. EXP MEAS -MEAS SYST A

t * BN3AMA000

0 .

T

. - - - '

J

L,*̂ —r"! ■ i

T O T A L BUOBET

ACTUAL

OCT NOV

PROGRAM 1 5 1

7 7

3S2

2 4 8

MATERIAL BUOBET 1 43

ACTUAL | 7

4 1

4 7

MANPOWER BUOGET j 28 I 4 1

ACTUAL j IB 1 40

OEC

5 0 7

4 4 4

114

5 1

2 1

3 2

J A N

* 3 *

1 5 5

FEB

7 7 0

HAR

4 4 7

APR

1 144

HAT

1271

JUN

13*7

J L T

1443

AUG

1*8*

SEP

1422

1 8 7 2 4 8 3 3 1 3 5 5 3 7 4 3 8 4 4 2 4 4 5 7

2 2 2 4 21 2 * 22 14 15 3 7 4 4

9 0 .

' - 81 .

72. Z - J x

63. J o X

54 . -or

-i 4 5 . o a

3 6 .

2 7 . t-

z 1 8 .

Ul

0 .

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Delays in planning for the L9-1 test impacted our projects which had been established to support it. Also, some material items are arriving slower than originally expected. A new baseline is being implemented which matches spending and present planning.

84

EGtG IDAHO INC. EXP MEAS -MEAS SYST B NUMBER 5H3AMB000

OCT NOV

TOTAL PROGRAM

DEC JAN

BUOBET ACTUAL

70 51

148 137

245 210


21 2


12 12

42 12

12 17

75 25

13 13

344

124

13

457 5*8 *50 720 832 40* 482 1041

173

13

220

11

253

10

278

4

337

4

3*4

10

343

4

411

4

4 0 .

BUDGET

ACTUAL

Account is underspent in materials. We had delays at Exxon in work supporting instrument design activities, and delays in production of LOFT embedded TC's. Both were caused by REBEKA and PBF-TC-4 work which had higher priority.

85

TABLE 2. FOREIGN FUNDED TASK SUMMARY AT END OF DECEMBER 1980

§

Project Descript ion

JAERI TASKS

5F8C11 5F8C21 5F8C22 5F8C31 5F8C32 5F8C41 5F8C51 5F8C92 5F8C94

Completed Tasks Management and Delegate Support Analysis and Evaluation Instrumentation Hardware Components Post-CHF Heat Transfer PC-3 and Small Break Instrumentation Two-phase Loop Boi ler Bui ld ing

FRG TASKS

5F7C11 5F7C21 5F7C22 5F7C23 5F7C31 5F7C92 5F7C94

Completed Tasks Management and Delegate Support Analysis and Evaluation Task Development Instrumentation Two-phase Loop Boi ler Bui lding

Total Proposal Est. Inc.

Contingency ($K)

820 262

16 154 43

200 692 782

18

2937 249.3 58 10

120 1012

18

Total Spending Auth. by CCB

($K)

820 262

16 154 41

177 660 782 18

2937 249.3

58 10

111 1012

18

Funds Spent to Date (SO

820.0 210.0

10.0 155.4 41.6 76.9

666.4 783.1

0

2852.9 235.9 44.0

3.6 25.2

1013.7 34.8a

Expected Task Completion Date

Done Sept. 81 Sept. 81 Dec. 80 Dec. 80 Sept. 81 Dec. 80 Done Done

Done Sept. 81 Sept. 81 Feb. 81 Sept. 81 Done Done

TABLE 2. (continued)

CO LO

Project Descript ion

ECN TASKS

5FNC11 Completed Tasks 5FNC21 Management and Delegate Support 5FNC22 Analysis and Evaluation 5FNC31 Instrumentation 5FNC32 Hardware Components

FZS TASKS

5FAC11 Completed Tasks 5FAC21 Management and Delegate Support

Total Est

Cont

Proposal . Inc. i ngency ($K)

91 27

234 11 59

123 24

Total Auth

Spen • by ($K)

91 27

219 11 47

123 24

ding CCB

Funds Spent to Date

($K)

91.6 11.7

194.0 0

48.9

123.0 13.5

Expected Task Completion Date

Done Sept. 81 Sept. 81 Dec. 80 Dec. 80

Done Sept. 81

a. Half of these costs will be transferred to JAERI 5F8C94

BUDGET STATUS REPORT

TABLE 3. LOFT FY-81 SUMMARY STATUS REPORT NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

( In Thousands of Dol lars)

WBS#

5N1XX 5N2XX 5N3XX 5N4XX 5N5XX 5N6XX 5N7XX 5N8XX 5NPXX 5N9XX 5NXXX

189 #

A6048 A6053 A6043 A6107 A6122 A6110 A6054 A6108 A6308 A6351

Q81-0-3

4,769 3,590 4,612 8,063 4,703 4,137 9,031 963 553 65

40,494

Approved CCBsa

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

<6>b 0 0 <6>

Current PMB # Q81-0-3

4,769 3,590 4,612 8,063 4,703 4,137 9,031 956 553 65

40,487

Current BAC

4,769 3,590 4,612 8,063 4,703 4,137 9,031 956 553 65

40,487

Supplementary programs 2,836 NRC management reserves 1,000 Total NRC funding (FY-81) 44,323

a. The Change Control Board did not meet in December.

b. Rate change.

TABLE 4. LOFT FUNDING SUMMARY FOR FY-81 (In Thousands of Dollars)

Funds

LOFT Foreign Funds

Total

NRC Operating Funds

E lec t r i c Heat Rod Evaluation LTSF Advanced Instrumentation TC-3 Tests

Total

Total LOFT Funding

Current FIN Plan

651

651

43,856

44,507

#3

Current Budget F i l e

(Q81-0-3)

667a

667

41,487

278 1,694

751 113

44,323

44,990°

a. In process of adjustment.

b. Excludes C.E., GSO, and overhead.

91

•

Documents

Technical Library EGG-LOFT-5336. iiiiiiiiiifliiiiiiini