TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT -for- USA DOT …efcog.org/wp-content/uploads/Wgs/Safety Working Group/_Quality...TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT -for- USA DOT 7A TYPE A DRUMS ... A combination

xx.xxx-xxxx

Revision 0a DRAFT

Page 1 of 29 Significant Rewrite, Change Bars Not Used

TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT

-for-

USA DOT 7A TYPE A DRUMS

COMMERCIAL GRADE ITEM PROCUREMENT

Preparer

Print/Sign/Date

Technical Review

Print/Sign/Date

Supplier Evaluation QA Review

Print/Sign/Date

Other

Print/Sign/Date

USA DOT 7A Type A Drums, xx-xxx-xxxx

Commercial Grade Item Procurement Revision 0a

Page 2 of 29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

REVISION LOG ..................................................................................................................3

TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .....................................................................................4

1.0 PURPOSE.....................................................................................................................5

2.0 SCOPE ..........................................................................................................................5

3.0 DISCUSSION........................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.5

4.0 EVALUATION/SELECTION OF SUPPLIER AND PRODUCT ACCEPTANCEError! Bookmark not defined.7

5.0 DRUM ACCEPTANCE ...............................................................................................8

6.0 TABLES - CONTENT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................8

7.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................9



Page 3 of 29

REVISION LOG

Revision Date Description

0 Xx/xx/xxx

x

Initial issue.



Page 4 of 29

TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers

CC Critical Characteristic

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CPSA Compliance & Production Sustainability Acceptance

The criteria associated with a supplier’s program and process controls that ensure

compliant production and acceptable performance are sustainable throughout all

completed units.

DOE U.S. Department of Energy

DOT U.S. Department of Transportation

DRV Document Review and Verification.

HMR Title 49, Subtitle B, Subchapter C - Hazardous Materials Regulations

Lot A quantity of items under any given Purchase Order (PO) being simultaneously

produced.

NCT [DOT] Normal Conditions of Transport

PDAT Packaging Design Authority

RE Responsible Engineer; end-user entity (individual or organization) with drum

design, performance, regulatory compliance, etc. technical review and oversight

responsibilities

REA Responsible Engineer Acceptance

SCI Suspect/Counterfeit Item

SCS Supplier Capability Survey

SIS Supplier Implementation Surveillance



Page 5 of 29

1.0 PURPOSE

1. This report provides detailed requirements and acceptance criteria applicable to the

procurement of radioactive hazardous materials (rad hazmat) qualified USA DOT 7A

Type A drums as commercial grade items. The drums are to be procured for use as

DOT shipping packaging.

2. This report is intended for use in conjunction with other commercial grade item

procurement documents such as specifications, dedication packages, surveillance

plans, commercial grade survey checklists, and receipt inspection criteria plans.

2.0 SCOPE

Primarily, this report is for use with Supplier’s that do not have fully compliant ASME

NQA-1 2008/2009a (NQA-1) Part 1 quality assurance programs implemented for the

production of drums. However, the itemization of technical requirements and associated

procurement/acceptance criteria may also prove useful when using a graded approach to

procure drums from qualified NQA-1 Part 1 Suppliers.

3.0 DISCUSSION

1. Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) qualified, USA DOT 7A Type A drums

(hereafter referred to simply as simply drum(s)) of varying sizes (e.g., 5, 10, 30, 55,

85 and 110 gallon) will be used to contain, store, and transport rad hazmat. Materials

of construction are primarily carbon or stainless sheet steel, fastener hardware,

formed fittings/plugs, cast [closure ring] lugs and gaskets (used to seal lids and bungs

after loading).

2. This document addresses standard “off-the-shelf” single wall, open head, drums with

or without bung fittings, no additional appurtenances (such as valves, lift

attachments, etc.) and no add-on shielding to control radiation dose rates. Contents

will be solids only and suitable for the drum design as determined by the RE. The

7A drums will be procured as qualified for shipment in-commerce or onsite transfer

and with contents as regulated by DOT. Other uses of the drums (i.e., non-DOT

regulated contents) when occurring for onsite transfer under a Transportation Safety

Basis must be uniquely addressed within individual Transportations Safety Basis

documents.

3. Drums are marketed by numerous Suppliers and sold throughout the world to

customers in varying industries. The drums are procured using manufacturer catalog

numbers or generic descriptions such as “DOT 7A Type A meeting 49 CFR 178.350

Requirements”. Production is of a routine, repetitive nature (i.e., processed

continuously by the same personnel, on the same machinery, in the same process

line). Varying design options (such as closure ring type and bung fitting

model/number) are pre-existing and selected “cafeteria style” depending on the

intended use. Unique features that may be requested by an end user are typically of a

superficial of nature (e.g., paint color, interior coating/liner) and should not impact a

drum’s basic design or tested configuration (RE’s responsibility to ensure).

4. The following references (regulatory and DOE directive) are applicable to the

implementation of quality assurance requirements for drum procurements:

49 CFR 173.403 Definitions - Quality

49 CFR 173.474 Quality control for construction of packaging

49 CFR 173.475 Quality control requirements prior to each shipment of Class 7

(radioactive) materials



Page 6 of 29

49 CFR 173.415 Authorized Type A packages

DOE Order 460.1C, Packaging and Transportation Safety, Contractor

Requirements Document

NQA-1 is primarily the Standard implemented by DOE contractors for assuring the

quality of procured drums and is the basis for development of this report. However,

within the drum supply industry sales are to customers with varying expectations

related to Supplier quality program standards and most are not for nuclear materials

application. Past experience with drum procurements has revealed that Suppliers will

likely not have a ASME NQA-1-2008/2009a Part 1** quality program or have one

that is not fully implemented. ** Full Part 1 implementation is under a graded approach that includes de-selection of

requirements/sections/paragraphs deemed not applicable to the procured commodity.

Drum manufacturing includes varying activities through completion such as

establishing a regulatory/customer compliant design, ordering multiple material

types/components, prototype testing, fabrication, production testing, and final

assembly. Therefore, Suppliers must have an established QA program with

implemented controls that sufficiently address these activities and ensures product

acceptability whether at some level of NQA-1 implementation or by use of an

alternate quality Standard (e.g. ISO:9001). Details on areas of QA program controls

that will be required of a Supplier for the production of drums are listed in Tables 1

and 2.

5. Drum Safety Functions

Drums are used as 7A Type A packaging in a radioactive materials processing system

that is bounded by 49 CFR Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) under normal

conditions of transport (NCT). Included are:

Loading of content and closure to prescribed requirements

Interim/short term staging in preparation for transport

Physical preparation for transport (i.e., handling, lifting and loading/securing on a

conveyance)

Communications for transport (marking/labeling, shipping papers, etc.)

Physical transport from point of origin to point of destination

The Safety Functions of 7A Type A packaging within this processing system are the

safe, reliable, and effective positive closure for containment of materials and, when

applicable, shielding protection from radiation dose rates at or below regulated

levels. Typical drum procurements do not require a design with enhanced or unique

shielding to manage and limit the dose rate. Therefore shielding will not be

considered as a drum safety function in this report.

Note: It is the drum end user’s responsibility through content management and

payload positioning and securement to comply with regulatory radiation dose

requirements.

The HMR contains numerous design, construction, and performance requirements

that contribute to drum use safety. For the purposes of commercial item packaging

dedication, identifiable and measurable attributes most important to drum

performance safety will be selected as critical characteristics (CCs) required for

acceptance. Drum CCs required for acceptance are identified in Table 1 and shall



Page 7 of 29

be verified for each delivered lot. Remaining CCs are evaluated for compliance

either during supplier/item suitability assessments, or document reviews. They may

also be required for acceptance with each delivered lot if so determined as required

by the RE. The selection of CCs required for acceptance shall, in part, be influenced

by the Failure Mode description below.

6. Drum Failure Mode

A credible failure mode would be a leaking or unintended opening and exposure to

contents (internal or by spillage) of a drum during NCT (i.e., compromise the

established safety function of protection by positive closure and containment). The

likely failure mechanism for leaking would be at a component to component

mechanical connection such as drum bottom, lid to body interface, or bung fitting.

For unintentional opening and exposure, the likely failure mechanism would be a

loosening or breaking of the drum ring resulting in a partial or complete

seating/removal of the lid.

7. Compliance & Production Sustainability Assessment (CPSA)

CPSA criteria focus on assuring compliant and sustainable Supplier capabilities and

QA program controls. Much of the criteria will be evaluated and validated on the

initial qualification of a supplier and not repeated until performance of periodic

requalification assessments or due to significant changes to customer requirements or

Supplier program controls. Some criteria are more product specific and allow for the

continuing (i.e., with each lot) evaluation/ monitoring of a Supplier’s performance

and quality of product. Reference Table 2 for CPSA criteria.

4.0 EVALUATION/SELECTION OF SUPPLIERS

1. Evaluation/selection of a drum Supplier includes a determination of product

applicability to need as well as suitability for intended use. It will also include

assessing a Supplier’s ability to sustain an acceptable level of product quality.

2. Two criteria from NQA-1 Requirement 7, Section 200 will be used for selection and

evaluation of Suppliers. They are:

Paragraph (b) “qualitative and quantitative evaluation of supplier quality records”

and

Paragraph (c) “direct evaluation of supplier technical and quality capability.”

3. Document Review Verifications (DRV) listed in Table 1and Responsible Engineer

Acceptance (REA) listed in Table 2 align with Paragraph (b).

4. A combination of NQA-1 Part II Subpart 2.14 Acceptance Method 2 (M2),

Commercial Grade Survey and Method 3 (M3), Source Verification from Table 1 and

Supplier Capability Survey (SCS) and Supplier Implementation Surveillance (SIS)

from Table 2 align with Paragraph (c).

5. Use of M2 or M3 for supplier evaluation/selection is in combination with their use

for product acceptance.

6. In conjunction with evaluating Supplier QA program controls, the RE will determine

a Supplier’s 49CFR compliance capabilities for the production of drums. This

evaluation may take the form of Supplier facility visit/assessment, review of

document submittals, review of historical records or any combination thereof.



Page 8 of 29

5.0 DRUM ACCEPTANCE

1. Subpart 2.14 Method 1 (M1) for CCs identified as required for acceptance from

Table 1 shall be implemented for each lot of delivered drums. M1 for other CCs may

be implemented for acceptance as required by the RE.

2. Development of M2 checklists and M3 plans shall include, as a minimum, the CCs

required for acceptance from Table 1 and applicable CPSA determinations from

Table 2 Column C. M2 and M3 criteria for other CCs may be included in checklists

or plans as required by the RE.

3. 7A Type A drums that are also marked as Non-bulk Performance Oriented

Specification Packaging (i.e., UN1A2/X/S) will require verification of correct

markings per 49 CFR 178.3 and 178.503.

6.0 TABLES - CONTENT DESCRIPTION

Table 1

Col A: Technical requirements.

Col B: CC for the corresponding technical requirements.

Col C: Indicates a CC that is mandatory for acceptance with each delivered lot of drums.

Col D: Method(s) used to accept the corresponding CC. The minimum details for

performing the acceptance activity are also included.

Col E: Details of supplier QA program and process implementation controls essential

for the corresponding CCs. These controls are to be assessed when executing

Col. C activities.

Table 2

Col A: Category of required Supplier QA program controls applicable to the production

of drums.

Col B: CPSA criteria for the corresponding QA program controls in Col. A.

Col C: Methods of evaluating and determining acceptance of the CPSA criteria. Details

are provided for supplier survey, surveillance, and document review activities.

Col D: Details of Supplier QA program and process implementation controls essential

for the corresponding CPSA criteria. These controls are to be assessed when

executing Col. C activities.

7.0 REFERENCES

1. ASME NQA-1-2008, Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Facility

Applications/ASME NQA-1a-2009, Addenda to ASME NQA-1-2008

2. Title 49 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter C, Hazardous Materials Regulations

3. DOE Order 460.1 C, Packaging and Transportation Safety

USA DOT 7A Type A Drums, Commercial Grade Item Procurement G-TRT-G-00022

TABLE 1 Revision 2a A.

Technical Requirements

(Design, performance,

testing, fabrication, and

assembly)

B.

Critical Characteristics

(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.

Methods of Acceptance

M1 – Sbprt 2.14 Method 1



DRV – Document Review

Verification

E.

Supplier Document, Receipt, Production

and Product Verification Controls


Design/Technical Requirements Basis

DTR-1:

49 CFR 178.350,

Specification 7A; general

packaging, Type A,

Paragraph (a)

Note: CCs to satisfy these

regulatory requirements

are captured under

multiple 49 CFR rows

below.

See below

See below

DTR-2:

49 CFR 173.412,

Additional Design

Requirements for Type A

packages

(1) Design includes

provisions for

installing a safety seal

such as a TID.

√

DRV Review/evaluation of drum drawing by RE.

Note: See DTR-7(4) for physical verifications.

(1) Development, issuance, and control

of fab/assembly documents.

(2) Materials specified for

use will perform

within prescribed

temperature range -

40oF to 158oF

DRV Review/evaluation of drum drawing by SRS

CTF.

M1 Review/evaluation of material certs during

receipt inspection.



(2) Material receipt verifications.

(3) Request, receipt, review/acceptance

of sub-tier supplier document.

(4) Processing and forwarding of

customer required document

submittals.

(3) Design includes a

containment system

that is securable by a

positive fastening

device


CTF.

Note: See DTR-7(4) for physical verification of

positive fastening device components.








assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




DTR-2 cont. (4) Components/ materials

are suitable for content

radiolytic decomp. and

generation of gas

DRV Review/evaluation of drum drawing by RE

(based on knowledge of end/use and

contents).



Note: Supplier unaware of eventual

contents; responsibility will be to

use of steel types typical for drum

industry.

(5) Design provides for a

containment that

retains contents under

reduction of ambient

pressure to 3.6 psi. √* *If test

perf.


CTF for presence of filter port (i.e., bung

fitting) if required by designA. If not, then

M2 or M3: Additional review /evaluation of

pressurization test by Supplier Test

Engineer and RE.

NoteA: Will also include verification by RE that

nuclear filter was included during design

performance testing or a 49 CFR 173.461

justification exists in lieu of physical testing.



(2) If testing required, development,

issuance, and control of test

procedures/reports.

(3) Use of qualified test personnel.

(4) Execution of test activities.

(6) Evaluation of design

against requirements

in 173.412 concludes

there would be no loss

or dispersal of rad

contents during use

DRV Review/evaluation of drum drawing and any

supplier provided design analysis by RE.

DRV Review/evaluation any test reports/analysis

by Supplier Test Engineer and RE.




of test procedures/reports or test

analysis.

DTR-3

49 CFR 173.410,

General design

requirements

(1) Design provides for

ease of handling and

securement on a

conveyance for

transport

DRV Review/evaluation of drum drawing by RE. (1) Development, issuance, and control







assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




DTR-3 cont. (2) Design provides for an

external surface

relatively free from

protruding features

that is easily

decontaminated.



(3) Design provides for an

outer layer of

packaging that that is

relatively free of

pockets or crevices

that may collect water



(4) Design does not

include the addition of

features that will

reduce the safety of

the package


DRV Review/evaluation of drum testing

report/analysis by Supplier Test Engineer

and RE.





procedures/reports.



(5) Design promotes

retention of contents

and integrity of

components and

fastening devices

during vibrations and

forces experienced

during normal

transport




and RE.





procedures/reports.








assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




DTR-3 cont. (6) Materials of

construction and

components or

structure are

chemically and

physically compatible

with contents

including affects of

packaging and

contents under

irradiation


(based on knowledge of intended

contents/use).





use of materials typical for drum

industry.

DTR-4:

49 CFR 173.24, General

requirements for

packagings and

packages.

(1) Design considers

effectiveness of

package during

transport for variables

such as temperatures,

changes in humidity &

pressure, shocks,

loading and vibration



contents/use).






industry.

(2) Closures are leakproof

and securable against

loosening




and RE.





procedures/reports.








assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




DTR-4 cont. (3) Venting systems are so

designed as to prevent

unintentional release

of content




and RE.





procedures/reports.



DTR-5:

49 CFR 173.24a,

Additional general

requirements for non-

bulk packagings and

packages

(1) Nature and thickness

of designed materials

won’t generate a

sufficient amount of

heat during transport

to dangerously alter

the contents



contents/use).






industry.

(2) Design is capable of

withstanding, without

rupture or leakage, the

vibration test

procedure in 178.608




and RE.





procedures/reports.








assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




DTR-6:

49 CFR 173.504,

Standards for steel drums

(1) Body and heads must

be constructed of sheet

steel, type and

thickness related to

capacity and use.

√



contents/use).



and RE.

M1 Review/evaluation of material certs during

receipt inspection.

M1 Verification of drum material thickness

markings during receipt inspection.





procedures/reports.





(5) Material receipt verifications.

(6) Request, receipt, review/acceptance

of sub-tier supplier document.

(7) Processing and forwarding of

customer required document

submittals.

(2) Body seems are to be

mechanically seemed

or welded.

TBD TBD

(3) Chimes are to be

mechanically seamed

or welded.

TDB TBD






assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




DTR-6 cont. (4) Body of a drum

greater than 16 gallons

may have at least 2

rolling hoops.

Separate rolling hoops

must be fitted tight

against the body

TBD TBD

(5) Closures for openings

in the bodies and heads

of drums and closure

devices are designed

such that they will

remain secure and

leakproof under

normal conditions of

transport.

TBD TBD

(6) Gaskets or other

sealing elements must

be used.

TBD TBD






assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




DTR-6 cont. (7) Body, heads, closures

and fittings must be

compatible with

intended contents or

suitably coated and

protected.

TBD TBD

(8) Maximum capacity of

the drum is 119

gallons

TBD TBD

(9) Maximum net mass of

the drum is 400 kg

(882 lbs.)

TBD TBD

DTR-7:

End-use Specifications

(1) Height and diameter

are as specified for

listed capacity.

TBD TBD

(2) Steel is the type

(carbon or stainless)

specified.

TBD TBD

(3) Body and head

thickness is 16

gage/1.35 (minimum).

TBD TBD






assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




DTR-7 cont. (4) Closure ring is the type

specified (e.g., bolted,

lever lock, etc.).

Bolted rings jam nut

and bolts with TID

hole.

TBD TBD

(5) Closure ring lug welds

are sufficiently sized

and located for applied

loads.

TBD TBD

(6) Lid includes the

specified number of

¾” or 2” bung fittings

required for an order.

Bung fitting is a

manufactured type that

will accommodate

NPSC or NPSM filter

threads.

TBD TBD

(7) Gasket is EPDM type

and securely glued to

lid.

TBD TBD






assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




DTR-7 cont. (8) Exterior coating is tan

in color.

Exterior/interior DFT

is 0.8 mil minimum.

TBD TBD

(9) 7A Type A markings

are applied per 49 CFR

178.350. UN

Markings are applied

per 49 CFR 178.503

for a UN 1A2/X4xx/S

drum. Markings are a

minimum of ½” high

per 49 CFR 172.310.

Sides of drums are

marked with gross

mass.

TBD TBD

(10) Testing was

performed to qualify

drums for the specified

material forms.

TBD TBD






assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




Design/Performance Testing

DPT-1

49 CFR 173.412,

Additional design

requirements for Type A

packages, Paragraph (j)

Evaluation of tests or

alternate methods for

testing demonstrates no

loss or dispersal of the

radioactive contents

TBD TBD

DPT-2

49 CFR 173.461,

Demonstration of

compliance with tests

(1) Compliance with

173.412 design

requirements and

173.465 testing

requirements is by one

or a combination of

the methods prescribed

in 173.461

TBD TBD

(2)Initial conditions for

173.465 - .469 tests

(except for water

immersion)

compliance was based

on the assumption that

package is in

equilibrium at ambient

temp. of 100o F

. TBD TBD






assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




DPT-3

49 CFR 173.462,

Preparation of specimens

for testing

(1) Test specimen is

examined prior to

testing to identify and

record faults or

damage, including:

-Divergence from spec

or drawings

-Defects in

construction

-Corrosion or other

deterioration

-Distortion of features

TBD TBD

(2) Deviations from

design found during

examination corrected

prior to test or taken

into account when

evaluating test results

TBD TBD

(3) Containment system of

the packaging to be

tested is clearly

defined

TBD TBD






assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




DPT-3 cont. (4) External features of

the test specimen are

clearly identified (for

purpose of referencing

during test)

TBD TBD

DPT-4

49 CFR 173.465, Type A

packaging tests

(1) Specimen(s) is

subjected to the water

spray test or

compliance is justified

through 173.461(a)

Other Methods as a

preceding to other

173.465 tests. As a

result of this test, (a)

there is no loss or

dispersal of content

and (b) there is not a

significant increase in

the radiation levels

recorded or calculated

at the external surfaces

for the condition

before the test.

TBD TBD






assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




DPT-4 cont. (2) Specimen(s) is

subjected to the free

drop, stacking, and

penetration test or

compliance is justified

through 173.461(a)

Other Methods and

results in (a) no loss or

dispersal of content

and (b) there is not a

significant increase in

the radiation levels

recorded or calculated

at the external surfaces

for the condition

before the test.

TBD TBD

DPT-5

49 CFR 178.608,

Vibration standard

Specimen(s) are subjected

to the vibration test or

justified as capable of

passing the test.

Acceptance after test is no

rupture, leakage,

deterioration that could

adversely affect

transportation safety.

TBD TBD






assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




Fabrication Activities

FA-1

Material Preparation

Aligns with Design

(1) Materials pulled from

inventory/storage are

correct for the design

and useable (i.e.,

checked for

damage/defects).

TBD TBD

(2) Materials are cut, bent,

formed, and cleaned per

design and procedural

requirements.

TBD TBD

FA-2

Component/Parts

Assembly Aligns with

Design

(1) All parts & components

are configured and

positioned per design

requirements.

TBD TBD

(2) Method and process of

connecting/joining

drum body and heads

are per design.

TBD TBD






assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




FA-2 cont. (3) Lug welding to closure

ring is per design and

associated sub-

supplier weld

procedures.

TBD TBD TBD

(4) When included in

design, bung fitting(s)

are present, sized,

located and press fit in

lid correctly.

TBD TBD TBD

FA-3

Applied Coatings (when

applicable) Align with

Design

(1) Coating system

selected meets SRS

specifications and is

compatible with base

materials.

TBD TBD TBD

(2) Surface preparation is

in accordance with

coatings manufacturer

recommended

practices and/or SRS

specifications.

TBD TBD TBD

(3) Coatings applied in

accordance with

manufacturer

recommended

practices and/or SRS

specs.

TBD TBD TBD






assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




FA-4

Production Testing is in

Accordance with

Established Procedures

(1) All items (or sample if

applicable) are

subjected to tests.

TBD TBD

(2) Item is prepared for

test in accordance with

test procedure.

TBD TBD

(3) Test is performed in

accordance with

prescribed procedure.

TBD TBD

(4) Items successfully

tested or

reworked/retested or

scrapped.

TBD TBD

FA-5

Final Assembly is in

Accordance with Design

and Preparation for

Shipment is per

Procedure/Contract

(1) All fabrication,

assembly, testing, and

in-process inspections

are complete.

TBD TBD






assembly)

B.


(CCs)

C.

CCs

Req’d

for

Accept.

√

D.






Verification

E.




FA-5 cont. (2) Completed item meets

all design and

specification

requirements.

TBD TBD

(3) Required markings

applied.

TBD TBD

(4) Packaging, including

loose material/

components, is

properly prepared and

ready for shipment.

TBD TBD



Requirements Applicable to

Production & Supply

B.

CPSA

C.


D.

Supplier QA Program and Process Implementation

Controls


FA-6

Documents issued for

production

Only approved design,

work control, testing, and

inspection documents are

issued and used during

production.

TBD TBD

FA-7

Material Ordering Aligns

with Design

(1) Materials ordered are

derived from design

documents and are of a

correct type, size, and

part/model number if a

commercial item.

TBD TBD

(2) Materials are acquired

from sub-suppliers

appropriately qualified

for the type and nature

of the product supplied.

TBD TBD

FA-8

49 CFR 173.474, Quality

control for construction

of packaging.

The packaging (container)

meets the quality of design

and construction

requirements of the HMR

TBD TBD




Production & Supply

B.

CPSA

C.


D.


Controls


Documentation

D-1

49 CFR 173.415(a),

Authorized Type A

packages

The following 7A Type A

documents were generated

and are available:

Type A test

documentation

Design drawing

Eng. evaluations/

comparative data

showing design and

materials of

construction comply

with 7A Type A

specification`

TBD TBD

D-2

49 CFR 178.2(c),

Notification

Closure instructions were

generated and are available

for the effective assembly

and closure of the

packaging to prevent

leakage during transport.

TBD TBD

D-3

SRS Specified

Documents in Addition

to 49 CFR Submittals

Documents required were

submitted and provide

evidence of a satisfactory

product.

TBD TBD




Production & Supply

B.

CPSA

C.


D.


Controls


Personnel Qualifications

PQ-1

49 CFR 171.8 Hazmat

Employee (definition);

49 CFR Part 172,

Subpart H – Training

Personnel involved in the

design, manufacturing,

fabrication, inspection,

marking, or testing of a

packaging is properly

trained to requirements in

Subpart H as a Hazmat

Employee

TBD TBD

PQ-2

SRS Specified

Inspection and Test

Personnel Qualification

Requirements

Inspection and Test

personnel meet the

qualification requirements

of ASME NQA-1, Part 1,

Rqmt. 2 para. 302.

TBD TBD

PQ-3

SRS Specified General

Employee Training/

Qualification Reqmnts.

Employees performing

work on SRS designated

items are to be trained and

qualified for their activities

TBD TBD