Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
§̈¦5
§̈¦80
§̈¦5
|ÿ99
|ÿ99
§̈¦580
|ÿ152
SR-99 through Sacramento
I-5 thourgh Sacramento
I-80 to the Bay Area
SR-99 at SR-120
SR-99 at SR-132 in Modesto
SR-99 through Fresno and North to county line
SR-99 through Stockton
SR-65 from Bakersfield to Porterville
I-5 through Stockton
SR-120 at Valley Home Road
SR-99 at Gateway Dr in Madera County
SR-152 at SR-165 in Merced County
Fresno
Bakersfield
Merced
Sacramento
Stockton
Visalia
Modesto
Hanford
Sacramento to BakersfieldTraffic, Transit, Circulation & Parking
Technical Evaluation
Figure 8 Goods Movement BottlenecksApril 2003
¯U.S. Departmentof TransportationFederal RailroadAdministration
California High-Speed Train Program EIR/EIS
Legend
Proposed High-Speed Train Stations
Proposed High-Speed Train Alignments
§̈¦5
§̈¦80
§̈¦5
|ÿ99
|ÿ99
§̈¦580
|ÿ152
Downtown
Power Inn
Briggsmore
Airport
Castle AFB
TruxtunGolden State
Downtown
Downtown
Airport
Fresno
Bakersfield
Merced
Sacramento
Stockton
Visalia
Modesto
Hanford
Sacramento to BakersfieldTraffic, Transit, Circulation & Parking
Technical Evaluation
Figure 9 Station Area Level of Service: Existing 2002 vs. No Build 2020April 2003
¯
Station Location V/C LOS V/C LOSSacramento-Downtown 0.61 B 0.86 DSacramento-Power Inn 0.79 C 0.79 CStockton-Downtown 0.46 A 0.61 BModesto-Briggsmore 0.50 A 0.64 BModesto-Downtown 0.48 A 0.65 BMerced-Castle AFB 0.40 A 0.53 AMerced-Airport 0.21 A 0.37 AMerced-Downtown 0.85 D 0.97 EFresno-Downtown 0.35 A 0.54 AHanford-Downtown 0.41 A 0.63 BVisalia 0.38 A 0.64 BBakersfield-Golden State 0.56 A 0.92 EBakersfield-Truxtun 0.40 A 0.67 BBakersfield-Airport 0.58 A 0.84 D
Existing 2002 Baseline 2020
U.S. Departmentof TransportationFederal RailroadAdministration
California High-Speed Train Program EIR/EIS
Legend
Proposed High-Speed Train Stations
Proposed High-Speed Train Alignments
Æm
Æm
Æm
Æm
Æm
Æm
§̈¦5
§̈¦80
§̈¦5
|ÿ99
|ÿ99
§̈¦580
|ÿ152
Fresno
Bakersfield
Merced
Sacramento
Stockton
Visalia
Modesto
Hanford
Sacramento to BakersfieldTraffic, Transit, Circulation & Parking
Technical Evaluation
Figure 10 Airport Area Level Of Service: Existing 2002 vs. No Build 2020April 2003
¯Legend
Æm Study Airports
Proposed High-Speed Train Stations
Proposed High-Speed Train Alignments
2020 BaselineAirport Location V/C LOS V/C LOSSacramento (SMF) 0.66 B 0.88 DModesto (MOD) 0.76 C 0.91 EMerced (MCE) 0.11 A 0.31 AFresno (FYI) 0.17 A 0.37 AVisalia (VIS) 0.36 A 0.62 BBakersfield (BLF) 0.33 A 1.09 F
Existing 2002
U.S. Departmentof TransportationFederal RailroadAdministration
California High-Speed Train Program EIR/EIS
Æm
Æm
Æm
Æm
Æm
Æm
§̈¦5
§̈¦80
§̈¦5
|ÿ99
|ÿ99
§̈¦580
|ÿ152
Fresno
Bakersfield
Merced
Sacramento
Stockton
Visalia
Modesto
Hanford
Sacramento to BakersfieldTraffic, Transit, Circulation & Parking
Technical Evaluation
Figure 11 Airport Area Level Of Service: No Build 2020 vs. Modal AlternativeApril 2003
¯Legend
Æm Study Airports
Proposed High-Speed Train Stations
Proposed High-Speed Train Alignments
2020 Baseline Modal AltAirport Location V/C LOS V/C LOSSacramento (SMF) 0.88 D 0.90 DModesto (MOD) 0.91 E 0.91 EMerced (MCE) 0.31 A 0.31 AFresno (FYI) 0.37 A 0.38 AVisalia (VIS) 0.62 B 0.62 BBakersfield (BLF) 1.09 F 1.09 F
U.S. Departmentof TransportationFederal RailroadAdministration
California High-Speed Train Program EIR/EIS
§̈¦5
§̈¦80
§̈¦5
|ÿ99
|ÿ99
§̈¦580
|ÿ152
Downtown
Power Inn
Briggsmore
Airport
Castle AFB
TruxtunGolden State
Downtown
Downtown
Airport
Fresno
Bakersfield
Merced
Sacramento
Stockton
Visalia
Modesto
Hanford
Sacramento to BakersfieldTraffic, Transit, Circulation & Parking
Technical Evaluation
Figure 12 Station Area Level of Service: No Build 2020 vs. with High-Speed TrainApril 2003
¯
Station Location V/C LOS V/C LOSSacramento-Downtown 0.86 D 0.88 DSacramento-Power Inn 0.79 C 0.85 DStockton-Downtown 0.61 B 0.62 BModesto-Briggsmore 0.64 B 0.65 BModesto-Downtown 0.65 B 0.66 BMerced-Castle AFB 0.53 A 0.53 AMerced-Airport 0.37 A 0.38 AMerced-Downtown 0.97 E 0.97 EFresno-Downtown 0.54 A 0.55 AHanford-Downtown 0.63 B 0.63 BVisalia 0.64 B 0.64 BBakersfield-Golden State 0.92 E 0.93 EBakersfield-Truxtun 0.67 B 0.68 BBakersfield-Airport 0.84 D 0.85 D
Baseline 2020 High Speed Train
California High-Speed Train Program EIR/EIS
U.S. Departmentof TransportationFederal RailroadAdministration
Legend
Proposed High-Speed Train Stations
Proposed High-Speed Train Alignments
Æm
Æm
Æm
Æm
Æm
Æm
§̈¦5
§̈¦80
§̈¦5
|ÿ99
|ÿ99
§̈¦580
|ÿ152
Fresno
Bakersfield
Merced
Sacramento
Stockton
Visalia
Modesto
Hanford
Sacramento to BakersfieldTraffic, Transit, Circulation & Parking
Technical Evaluation
Figure 13 Airport Area Level Of Service: No Build 2020 vs. with High-Speed TrainApril 2003
¯Legend
Æm Study Airports
Proposed High-Speed Train Stations
Proposed High-Speed Train Alignments
2020 Baseline HSTAirport Location V/C LOS V/C LOSSacramento (SMF) 0.88 D 0.63 BModesto (MOD) 0.91 E 0.90 DMerced (MCE) 0.31 A 0.29 AFresno (FYI) 0.37 A 0.33 AVisalia (VIS) 0.62 B 0.62 BBakersfield (BLF) 1.09 F 1.05 F
California High-Speed Train Program EIR/EIS
U.S. Departmentof TransportationFederal RailroadAdministration
![f¶a¤ - ON Semiconductor · Title: 1 âÌnTßO/>î &æm{ì3u6( ] Ýb\ f¶a¤ Author: 1 âÌnTßO/>î &æm{p3 ¨µ 8 À â ¥DTvÈ2 äôR P¢Æò%pÈ> Subject: 1 âÌnTßO/>î &æm{ì3u6(](https://img.pdfslide.us/doc/110x75/5fa845307f573b182762c3c2/fa-on-semiconductor-title-1-oento-m3u6-b-fa.jpg)
