TEAM Grading Rubic Present. Port. and Indiv

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 TEAM Grading Rubic Present. Port. and Indiv.

    1/2

    COMM 161: INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Name:___________________________________________

    Team Business Presentation Project

    E-excellent (5 pts) G-good (4.5 pts) A-average(4 pts) F-fair(3.5 pts) P-poor (3 pts) NP-not prespts)

    COMPETENCIESOrganizationWell-organized point, which aids understanding of presentation.Points clearly support the Central Idea.Transitioned to next speaker.

    Topic AnalysisContent of main point appropriate for audience, purpose & topic.Level of analysis is appropriate to purpose & time limitations.

    Supporting MaterialSufficient external support cited appropriately (>1 type ofsupport).Used credible sources which enhanced the impact of the message.

    LanguageAppropriate for topic, audience & purpose; technical termsexplained. Overall language is clear, creative, and inclusive.

    Physical BehaviorsMeaningful eye contact, appropriate facial expressions,gestures & other movement with no significant distractions.

    Effective use of visuals.

    Vocal Delivery and Pronunciation/GrammarProjects volume so that audience can hear easily.Exhibits variety in rate, pitch, emphasis. Nonfluencies do notdistract.Meets acceptable standards of pronunciation; uses correctgrammar; sounds articulated clearly.

    SCORE

    E G A F PNP

    E G A F PNP

    E G A F PNP

    E G A F PNP

    E G A F PNP

    E G A F PNP

    COMMENTS

    Presentation Score:

    _________(out of 30)

    Peer Evaluation Score:_________(out of 20)

    TOTAL INDIVIDUAL SCORE__________(out of 50)

    COMM 161: INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Name:___________________________________________

    Team Business Presentation Project

    E-excellent (5 pts) G-good (4.5 pts) A-average(4 pts) F-fair(3.5 pts) P-poor (3 pts) NP-not prespts)

    COMPETENCIESOrganizationWell-organized point, which aids understanding of presentation.Points clearly support the Central Idea.Transitioned to next speaker.

    Topic AnalysisContent of main point appropriate for audience, purpose & topic.Level of analysis is appropriate to purpose & time limitations.

    Supporting MaterialSufficient external support cited appropriately (>1 type ofsupport).Used credible sources which enhanced the impact of the message.

    LanguageAppropriate for topic, audience & purpose; technical termsexplained. Overall language is clear, creative, and inclusive

    Physical BehaviorsMeaningful eye contact, appropriate facial expressions,gestures & other movement with no significant distractions.Effective use of visuals.

    Vocal Delivery and Pronunciation/Grammar

    Projects volume so that audience can hear easily.Exhibits variety in rate, pitch, emphasis. Nonfluencies do notdistract.

    SCORE

    E G A F PNP

    E G A F PNP

    E G A F PNP

    E G A F PNP

    E G A F PNP

    COMMENTS

    Presentation Score:_________(out of 30)

    Peer Evaluation Score:_________

    (out of 20)

    TOTAL INDIVIDUAL SCORE

    COMM 161: TEAM BUSINESS PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM Team Name:

    TEAM PRESENTATIONOrganization & Planning

    Introduction was attention-getting & included a credibility statement,central idea, preview of main points, & an introduction of teammembers.

    Developed a clear organization pattern with discernable main points.

    Transitioned between each main point.

    Conclusion summarized main points & included a strong closingstatement.

    Exhibited knowledge & understanding of each others material &demonstrated consistency in terms of presentation style & appearance.

    Visual Support Visuals supported the presentation without becoming the presentation.

    In other words, the visuals were used sparingly and effectively.

    Visuals were well-designed, easy to see, free of errors, and consistent instyle.

    Verbal Support

    Team used sufficient external support incorporating & verbally citing 8credible sources.

    Members correctly cited sources including authors names, affiliations,dates, sources, and/or other relevant material.

    Team used multiple types of supporting material.

    Team provided a professional, comprehensive outline with sources.

    Presentation Delivery Team used extemporaneous delivery, presenting with brief speaking

    notes.

    Delivery seemed polished, practiced, and smooth.

    Presented as a team with equal distribution of effort.

    Physical delivery was not distracting (other team members remainedstationary while others presented, etc.)

    Team conveyed enthusiasm for the topic through vocal variety.

    Managed the question/answer session professionally asked forquestions, provided meaningful answers, managed time by calling q/asession to a close, and ended with a concluding statement.

    Overall Impact/Effectiveness

    Team accomplished the specific purpose of the presentation in that the

    audience came away either knowing more about a topic (informative) orpersuaded to adopt a new policy or product (persuasive).

    Presentation was adapted to the audience and held their interest.

    Project was well developed and fit within the time requirements.

    TEAM PORTFOLIO

    E-excellent (5 pts) G-good (4.5 pts) A-average(4 pts) F-fair(3.5pts)

    P poor (3 pts) NP-not present (0 pts)Agendas & Minutes

    Contained detailed, error-free agendas & minutes in correct format.

    Agendas and Minutes reflect appropriate number of meetings to ensurefinished product.

    Minutes accurately reflected topics on the corresponding agendas. Agendas and minutes demonstrated and documented a clear

    understanding of the steps of the problem-solving process.

    Outline, References, and Visuals

    Full-sentence outline incorporated and labeled required elements(including specific purpose, central idea, transitions, citations,introduction, body, and conclusion) and was in the correct format.

    Main points are parallel and follow an identifiable organization pattern.

    Outline included a complete reference page in correct MLA or APA formatin addition to citing sources within the outline.

    Professional visual aids included in correct format.

    Informational Interview Documentation

    Documented informational interview including specific interviewquestionsExplained findings from interview.

    SCORE

    _________/10

    _________/10

    _________/10

    _________/10

    _________/10

    E G A F P NPE G A F P NP

    E G A F P NPE G A F P NP

    E G A F P NP

    E G A F P NPE G A F P NP

    E G A F P NP

    E G A F P NPE G A F P NP

    COMMENTS

    PresentationScore: _______ x 2

    _100

    Portfolio Score:_

    /50

    TOTAL TEAM SCO

    ___150

  • 8/3/2019 TEAM Grading Rubic Present. Port. and Indiv.

    2/2